National Agricultural Innovation Project
Transcription
National Agricultural Innovation Project
Final Report National Agricultural Innovation Project Indian Council of Agricultural Research Developing Sustainable Farming System Models for Prioritized Micro watershed in Rainfed areas in Jharkhand Birsa Agricultural University Ranchi, Jharkhand Final Report National Agricultural Innovation Project Indian Council of Agricultural Research Developing Sustainable Farming System Models for Prioritized Micro watershed in Rainfed areas in Jharkhand Birsa Agricultural University Ranchi, Jharkhand Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Printed on : 31st March 2014 Component : 3 Citation : Final Report (2007-14) : Developing Sustainable Farming System Models for Prioritized Micro watershed in Rainfed areas in Jharkhand, BAU, Ranchi, NAIP, Component -3 Copyright : Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Disclaimer : The information printed in this report is the input received from consortia partners. Barring the typographical errors, if any, it is subject to correctness and relevance of the information provided by the consortia partners. Published by : Dr. M. P. Pandey, Consortia Leader and Vice Chancellor, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi- 834006 Phone no. 0651-2450500, email: [email protected] Edited by : Dr. A. K. Singh, Professor & CPI, BAU; Dr. A. K. Jaiswal, Principal Scientist, IINRG,(ICAR); Dr. R.S. Pan, Principal Scientist, ICAR RCER Research Centre, Ranchi; Dr. C.V. Singh, Senior Scientist, CRURRS, (ICAR) Hazaribagh and Dr. S. Karmakar, Professor Agronomy, BAU, Ranchi. Compiled/contributed by : Dr. A. K. Singh, Professor & CPI, BAU; Dr. A. K. Jaiswal, Principal Scientist, IINRG, (ICAR); Dr. R.S. Pan, Principal Scientist, ICAR RCER Research Centre, Ranchi and Dr. C.V. Singh, Senior Scientist, CRURRS, (ICAR), Hazaribagh Hindi translation : Dr. A. K. Singh, Professor & CPI, Department of Aquaculture, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi Cover page Photographs : Oyster mushroom production by farm women of village Jiyather, Dumka block, Dist. Dumka & Lalat variety of Paddy at village Gajanda, Jama block, District Dumka. Printed at : Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi IV Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 V Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Preface Agriculture is the main source of livelihood in Dumka and Jamtara districts. Most of the farmers are small and marginal. With limited resources and conventional agriculture of these does not provide food security. The farmers have to migrate as labourers towards the town for livelihood. To develop a suitable farming system model National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP) approved a Sub project “Developing Sustainable Farming System models for Prioritized Micro watersheds in Rainfed areas in Jharkhand” with Birsa Agricultural University as the Lead Centre and ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region Research Centre (Formerly HARP), Plandu, P.O. Rajaulatu, Namkum, Ranchi; Indian Institute of Natural Resin and Gums, Namkum, Ranchi and Central Rainfed Upland Rice Research Station, Hazaribagh as cooperating partners. The project was implemented in two disadvantaged districts namely, Dumka and Jamtara. The total beneficiaries were 2200 in 32 villages; mostly marginal and small farmers of SC/ST category. I am grateful to former National Directors, Dr. Mrityunjay and Dr. Bangali Baboo and present National Director, Dr. D. Rama Rao as well as Dr. A. P. Srivastava, National Coordinator for their monitoring, advice, guidance, support and financial help for the project from 2007-2014. I express my profound and sincere gratitude to Dr. M. P. Pandey, Consortia Leader and Vice- Chancellor; Dr. N. N. Singh, Former Vice-Chancellor; Dr. B. N. Singh, Ex-Director of Research and Dr. D. K. Singh “Dron”, Addl. Director Research, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi for their help, advice and suggestions for successful implementation of the project. I am thankful to Dr. Kirti Singh, CAC Chairman & Former Chairman, ASRB; Dr. B. P. Jain, Ex. Chairman, Horticulture, B.A.U.; Dr. S. Tiwary, Ex. ADR; Chief General Manager NABARD; Director SAMETI, Jharkhand Mr. Sanad Hansda; Secretary, Holicross Society, Hazaribagh; Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, Ranchi and Secretary, PRADAN for their suggestions for improvement during the project implementation. I am thankful to Dr. A. K. Sarkar, Former Dean, Ranchi Agriculture College, BAU who designed the project and Dr. S. K. Pal, Professor, Agronomy and Ex - CPI who gave the project a strong footing and for their support & guidance for the betterment of the project. I am thankful to the officials of ATMA, Dumka and Jamtara, the Project Coordinator, the scientists of KVK of Dumka and Jamtara, Scientists of ZRS, Dumka for their support in implementation of the project. I sincerely thank all the CCPIs, CoPIs, Associated Scientists, Research Associates, Linkmen and Office Assistants of NAIP unit of BAU and staffs of Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, BAU for their hard work and excellent cooperation to make the programme a success. Place:Ranchi (A.K.Singh) CPI Date :31.03.2014 VII Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 CONTENTS Foreword Preface lkjka'k Executive Summary Part-I: General Information of Sub-project Part-II: Technical Details Introduction Objectives of the Sub-project Technical Profile of the Sub-project Achievements and Target objective wise Baseline Analysis Research Achievements Innovations Process/Product/Technology Developed Linkages and Collaborations Status on Environmental and Social Safeguard Aspects Constraints and Remedial Measures Taken Publications Media Products Developed/Disseminated Meetings/Seminars/Trainings/Kisan Mela etc. organized Performance Indicators Employment Generation Assets Generated Steps Undertaken for Post NAIP Sustainability Possible Future Line of Work Personnel Governance, Management, Implementation and Coordination Part-III: Budget and Utilization Part-IV: Declaration Annexure 1: Details of the farming system models Annexure 2: Village activity map of Project before and after NAIP Plate 1 : Gajanda Plate 2 : Palasi Plate 3 : Rupiadih Plate 4 : Madnadih Plate 5 : Majhladih Plate 6 : Andipur Plate 7 : Guhiyajori Plate 8 : Rampur Annexure 3: Midterm evaluation report conducted by Xavier Institute of Social Service(XISS), Ranchi Annexure 4: Farmers’ feedback IX Page No. V VII 1 5 8 10 10 11 12 17 20 38 40 40 40 41 41 42 43 45 46 46 48 48 49 51 53 57 58 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 77 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Lkkjka'k Hkkjrh; Ñf"k vuqla/kku ifj"kn us jk"Vªh; Ñf"k uoksUes"kh ifj;kstuk ß>kj[k.M ds o"kkZfJr fpfUgr lw{e tyNktu {ks= esa fVdkÅ lesfdr Ñf"k iz.kkyh dk fodklÞ uked ,d ifj;kstuk dh LohÑfr nhA bl ifj;kstuk esa fcjlk Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;] jk¡ph eq[; laLFkku vkSj Hkkjrh; Ñf"k vuqla/kku ifj"kn ds rhu laLFkku % iwohZ {ks= ds fy, Hkkjrh; Ñf"k vuqla/kku ifj"kn dk vuqla/kku ifjlj] Hkkjrh; izkÑfrd jky ,oa xksan laLFkku] jk¡ph vkSj dsUnzh; mijkÅ¡ Hkwfe o"kkZfJr pkoy vuqla/kku dsUnz] gtkjhckx us lg;ksxh laLFkku ds :i esa dke fd;kA ;g ifj;kstuk 2007&2014 rd >kj[k.M ds fiNM+s ftys nqedk vkSj tkerkM+k ds pkj iz[k.Mksa esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;kA ;g ifj;kstuk 32 xk¡oksa esa yxHkx 2200 ifjokjksa ds chp dk;kZfUor fd;k x;kA bl ifj;kstuk dk eq[; mís'; fdlkuksa ds ikl miyC/k lalk/kuksa dk mi;ksx dj muds thfodksiktZu esa lq/kkj djuk jgk gSA ifj;kstuk izkjaHk ds iwoZ fd;s x;s losZ{k.k ls Kkr gqvk % p;fur xk¡oksa dh tula[;k esa 60-42% vkfnoklh( 6-21% vuqlwfpr tutkfr( 30-28% fiNM+k oxZ ,oa 3-09% vU; oxZ ds fuoklh FksA ;gk¡ Hkwfeghu 0-97%( e>kSys fdlku 22-64%( NksVs fdlku 7-54%( v)Z e/;e fdlku 7-54% ,oa e/;e fdlku 1-2% FksA ;gk¡ ds yksxksa dk eq[; is'kk Ñf"k rFkk Øe'k% O;olk; FksA 2% ,oa 12.42% Qly l?kurk flQZ 7% flQZ 35% ;gk¡ ds ifjokj dh okf"kZd vkenuh ý- 24]465@& FkhA ;gk¡ thfodksiktZu ds fy, iyk;u 1&6 ekg rd dk FkkA 94-114% ds ikl vkenuh ds vU; lzksr tSls ukSdjh ,oa rd FkhA [ksrh ;ksX; tehu esa flapkbZ dh lqfo/kk FkhA yksxksa ds ikl 6 ekg dk Hkkstu miyC/k FkkA ifj;kstuk {ks= ds fdlkuksa dks Ñf"k esas vkus okyh ijs'kkfu;ksa dk Hkh v/;;u fd;k x;k vkSj blh ds vk/kkj ij ifj;kstuk ds rgr~ dk;ZØe cuk;s x;sA ikuh ,d eq[; leL;k gS gkykafd bl {ks= esa o"kkZ yxHkx 1400 fe-eh-@o"kZ gksrh gSA o"kkZ ty dks lafpr djus dk dk;ZØe fd;k x;kA tylap; dks c<+kus ds fy, 8 u;s rkykc ¼100 x 100 x 10 QhV½ rFkk 18 iqjkus rkykc dk th.kksZ)kj fd;k x;kA blds QyLo:i 85600 eh-3 ty lap; esa c<+ksÙkjh gqbZA ftlls vf/kdrj rkykc okf"kZd gks x;s ,oa 23 gsDVs;j {ks= esa jch Qly dks flapkbZ miyC/k djk;h tk ldhA lHkh izdkj ds tehu esa NksVs xïs ¼10 x 10 x 10 QhV½ cuk;s x;s ftlls izR;sd xïs }kjk 0-02 gsDVs;j esa lfCt;ksa dh [ksrh dks c<+kok fn;k x;kA ,slk ns[kk x;k fd tks xïs fupyh vkSj e/;e tehu esa cuk;s x;s os vf/kd mi;ksxh jgsA Qyksa ds cxhps esa MksHkk ¼3 x 1.5 x 1 eh-½ cuk;k x;k ftlesa IykfLVd fcNk;k x;k gS rFkk Åij ls <Ddu dh O;oLFkk dh x;h rkfd ok"ihdj.k ls Hkh ikuh dks cpk;k tk ldsA ;g MksHkk cxhps esa ikuh tek djus ds fy, dkQh mi;ksxh jghA Qy okys o`{kksa esa ?kM+k }kjk flapkbZ fof/k dks izpkfjr fd;k x;kA bl fof/k ls flapkbZ }kjk ijaijkxr fof/k ls flapkbZ dh 1 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 rqyuk esa ikuh dh yxHkx 50% dh cpr gqbZA unh dq.M ,d uoksUes"kh i)fr dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k tks jch ds Qlyksa esa flapkbZ ds fy, dkQh mi;ksxh fl) gqbZA bl fof/k }kjk fdlku flapkbZ ds ijaijkxr rjhds ls gksus okys [kpZ esa ý- 13]875@rhu o"kZ esa cpr dj ldsA [ksrksa dh e`nk tk¡p dh xbZ rFkk fdlkuksa dks e`nk LokLF; dkMZ miyC/k djk;k x;kA fdlkuksa dks e`nk tk¡p ds vk/kkj ij gh jklk;fud [kkn ds mi;ksx dh lykg nh x;h blls jklk;fud [kkn ds vfoosdiw.kZ iz;ksx dks de fd;k tk ldkA e`nk dh vEyh;rk dks lq/kkjus ds fy, Qly yxkus ds le; D;kfj;ksa esa pwuk@MksyksekbV dk iz;ksx 4 fDoaVy@gsDVs;j dh nj ls dkQh mi;ksxh ik;k x;kA vjgj ,oa ljlksa ds mRiknu ij pwuk@MksyksekbV ds iz;ksx dk vPNk izHkko feykA ifj;kstuk {ks= esa vf/kdka'k mijkÅ¡ tehu ¼<yku 3%½ ijrh jgrh FkhA bu {ks=ksa dh e`nk dk v/;;u fd;k x;k vkSj e`nk LokLF; ,oa esM+ ds vk/kkj ij fdlkuksa dks Qly yxkus dh lykg nh x;hA bu ijrh tehu esa fdlku us MksyksekbV dk mi;ksx dj VekVj dh [ksrh dhA dqy feykdj 40 gsDVs;j ijrh tehu dks lq/kkj dj [ksrh ;ksX; cuk;k x;kA ifj;kstuk {ks= esa fdlku dEiksLV cuk;k djrs FksA mUgsa ,tsVkscSDVj vkSj QkWLQsV ?kqykus okys cSDVhfj;k dk mi;ksx dj vf/kd iks"kdrk okys dEiksLV rFkk dsapqvk [kkn cukus dh fof/k crk;h x;h rFkk bldk izpkj&izlkj fd;k x;k rkfd fdlku }kjk larqfyr [kkn ds iz;ksx dks c<+kok fn;k tk ldsA ifj;kstuk ds xk¡oksa esa vf/kd iks"kdrk okys dEiksLV vkSj dsapqvk [kkn ds fuekZ.k gsrq 78 lajpuk LFkkfir dh x;hA Qlyksa ds mRiknu dks c<+kus ds fy, vf/kd mit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks yk;k x;k ftlls mRiknu 60-115% rd c<+ x;kA fdlkuksa dks cht mRiknu esa izf'k{k.k fn;k x;k vkSj oSKkfudksa dh enn ls fdlkuksa us 4700 fDoaVy cht dk mRiknu fd;kA fdlkuksa }kjk mRikfnr cht yksxksa us vkil esa vnyk&cnyh dh rFkk vius iM+ksfl;ksa dks Hkh cspkA ifj;kstuk {ks= esa cht mRiknu ls cht cnyus dh nj 20% rd c<+ x;hA ifj;kstuk {ks= esa cht ls ikS/kksa dks rS;kj djus ds fy, NksVs IykfLVd ds lqjax ¼ikWyhVusy½ miyC/k djk;s x;s rFkk blds Qk;ns dks fdlkuksa dks crk;k x;kA de Å¡pkbZ okys IykfLVd ds lqjax esa le; ls iwoZ lfCt;ksa dh [ksrh dh rduhd dks iznf'kZr fd;k x;k [kkldj yÙkjnkj lfCt;ksa ds ckjs esa rkfd le; ls iwoZ buds mRiknu ls fdlku dks vPNh vkenuh fey ldsA ijrh tehu ds leqfpr mi;ksx ds fy, blesa vke vkSj ve:n ds cxhps yxk;s x;sA ifj;kstuk {ks= esa csj vkSj iyk'k ds dkQh isM+ miyC/k gSa ftudk fdlku }kjk dksbZ [kkl mi;ksx ugha fd;k tkrk FkkA bu isM+ksa ij Þjaxhuhß vkSj ßdqlqehÞ ykg ds mRiknu dks c<+kok nsdj fdlkuksa us ý- 1500@isM+@Qly dk ykHk dek;kA ;g vfrfjDr vkenuh lq[kkM+ esa fdlkuksa dks lqj{kk iznku djrk gSA ykg dh [ksrh ls vkSlru fdlku dks ý- 6000@ifjokj dh vkenuh feyhA vkfnoklh {ks=ksa esa NksVs ns'kh tkuojksa dk ikyu vke ckr gS ysfdu blls vkenuh dkQh de gksrh gS ifj;kstuk {ks= esa mUur fdLe ds lwdj ¼Vh- x Mh-½] cÙk[k ¼[kkdh dSEicsy½] eqxhZ ¼xzkefiz;k] oujktk ,oa fnO;k;u jsM½] CySd caxky cdjh ,oa chVy cdjk yk;k x;kA ,slk ns[kk x;k fd chVy cdjk ,oa CySd caxky cdfj;ksa ds ladj.k ls mRiUu cPps dh c<+r nj vf/kd gksrh gSA ,d o"kZ esa ladj uLy ds cPps dk otu 18 fdyksxzke gks x;k tcfd lkekU; cPps dk otu 12 fdyksxzke vFkkZr~ 2 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 ,d gh ifjfLFkfr esa cPps ds otu esa 6 fdyksxzke dh c<+ksÙkjh ik;h x;hA chVy cdjk ls ladj.k djkus ij cdfj;ksa esa cPps Hkh vf/kd feyrs gSaA eosf'k;ksa esa e`R;qnj vf/kd Fkh ysfdu [kqjgk&pidk jksx ,oa ih-ih-vkj- rFkk isV ds Ñfeuk'kd nok ds fu;fer iz;ksx ls eosf'k;ksa ds LokLF; esa lq/kkj gqvk rFkk e`R;qnj esa 70% rd dh deh vk;hA ifj;kstuk ds xk¡oksa esa gLrpkfyr pkjk dkVus dh e'khu ,oa ÞVªsfHklß yxk;k x;k rkfd eosf'k;ksa ds j[kj[kko ,oa bykt esa lqfo/kk gks ldsA ifj;kstuk {ks= esa miyC/k rkykcksa vkSj u, cuk;s x;s rkykcksa esa mUur fdLe ds jksgw] dryk] e`xy vkSj dkWeu dkiZ ds cht dk lap; fd;k x;k ftlls fdlkuksa dks 0-12 gsDVs;j rkykc ls ý- 6000@ifjokj@o"kZ dh vfrfjDr vkenuh feyhA Ñf"k esa efgykvksa dk egÙoiw.kZ ;ksxnku gS muds dfBu Je dks de djus vkSj l'kfDrdj.k ds fy, Ñf"k esa dke vkus okys dqN NksVs&NksVs vkStkj tSls gLrpkfyr /kku >kM+us dh e'khu] g¡lqvk] Mp gks] Qhaxj foMj] dksuks ohMj rFkk cht j[kus ds fy, Mªe miyC/k djk;s x;sA efgykvksa ds l'kfDrdj.k ds fy, [kq[kM+h mRiknu ,oa Qly vkSj lfCt;ksa ds ewY;o)Zu esa izf'k{k.k fn;k x;kA yxHkx 189 efgyk;sa lewg cukdj [kq[kM+h dk mRiknu dj jgh gSa vkSj nwljh efgykvksa dks Hkh blds fy, izksRlkfgr dj jgh gSaA [kq[kM+h dk mRiknu 1&2 fdyksxzke izfr cSx feyk ftls efgykvksa us ý- 80&120@fdyksxzke dh nj ls LFkkuh; cktkj esa cspkA ,slk ns[kk x;k fd [kq[kM+h dk mRiknu /kku ds Hkwls dh rqyuk esa xsgw¡ ds Hkwls esa vf/kd ik;k x;kA vkSlru izfr efgyk dks ý- 500&1000@ekg dh vfrfjDr vkenuh izkIr gks jgh FkhA ifj;kstuk {ks= esa pyk;s x;s dk;ZØe ds vk/kkj ij fofHkUu jdck okys fdlkukssa ds Ñf"k ds izk:i fodflr fd;s x,] ftls viukdj fdlku viuh vkenuh dks c<+k ldrs gSaA Hkwfeghu fdlku ds fy, i'kqikyu thfodksiktZu ds fy, vPNk lk/ku gS [kkldj NksVk ifjokj ¼tSlk fd lk/kkj.kr% vkfnoklh ifjokjksa esa gksrk gS½ eos'kh ikyu ls ý- 25]150@o"kZ dh vfrfjDr vkenuh ik ldrk gSA e>kSys vkSj NksVs fdlku /kku vkSj ykg vk/kkfjr lesfdr Ñf"k iz.kkyh ls Øe'k% ý- 34]744@o"kZ vkSj ý- 59]806@o"kZ dh vfrfjDr vkenuh ik ldrs gSaA ifj;kstuk dh lekfIr ij ifj;kstuk }kjk fd;s x;s dk;ksZa ds izHkko dk v/;;u fd;k x;k vkSj ik;k x;k fd ifj;kstuk ds iwoZ fdlku dh vkSlr vkenuh ý- 24]446@ifjokj@o"kZ Fkk tks 6 o"kksZa esa c<+dj ý- 73]684@& gks x;k tcfd xSj ,u-,-vkbZ-ih- xk¡oksa esa ;g vHkh Hkh ý- 23]471@ifjokj@o"kZ gh gSA fdlkuksa dh vkenuh esa gqbZ c<+ksÙkjh dks fdlku cPpksa dh i<+kbZ vkSj ?kj dh t:jr ds lkekuksa dks [kjhnus esa [kpZ dj jgs gSa blls izrhr gks jgk gS fd buds thfodksiktZu esa lq/kkj gqvk vkSj buds jgu&lgu dk Lrj c<+ jgk gSA mijksDr rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ifj;kstuk }kjk fuEufyf[kr ifj.kke feys gSa( fdlkuksa ds thfodksiktZu ds lzksr esa ykg] cdjh ,oa lwdj ikyu ls c<+ksÙkjh gqbZA fdlkuksa ¼efgyk ,oa iqjÿ"k½ dks thfodksiktZu ds vU; mik;ksa ds fy, izf'k{k.k feyk rkfd os nwljs mik;ksa tSls mUur lCth] [kq[kM+h mRiknu ,oa Qyksa rFkk lfCt;ksa esa ewY;o)Zu dks Hkh viuk ldsaA fdlkuksa dks thfodksiktZu ds fy, fofo/khdj.k dh tkudkjh nh x;hA o"kkZty lap;u gsrq cuk;s x;s lajpukvksa ls fdlku [kjhQ ds ckn jch dh Hkh Qly ys ik jgs gaSA blds ifj.kke dkQh vPNs feys gSa ftls vkxs Hkh viukus dh vko';drk gS rkfd nwjxkeh ifj.kke fey ldsA 3 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 /kku ds mRiknu dks ykg ,oa lfCt;ksa dh [ksrh ls c<+kok feyk gSA 88 Lo;a lgk;rk lewg dk xBu fd;k x;k ftlesa ls 72 dk cSad esa [kkrk gS vkSj buds ikl ý- 10]37]000@& miyC/k gS rkfd ifj;kstuk ds ykHkdkjh dk;ZØeksa dks vkxs Hkh pyk;k tk ldsA ifj;kstuk ds iwoZ fdlkuksa ds ikl thfodksiktZu ds lhfer fodYi Fks ysfdu ifj;kstuk ls bu fodYiksa esa o`f) gqbZ gSA fdlkuksa ds ikl miyC/k lalk/ku ,oa ekuo cy ds vk/kkj ij mudh okf"kZd vkenuh ý- 24]446@& ls c<+dj ý- 73]684@ifjokj gks x;k gSA ifj;kstuk ds mijksDr ifj.kkeksa ds vk/kkj ij Hkfo"; ds fy, fuEufyf[kr vuq'kalk dh tkrh gS( thfodksiktZu esa lq/kkj ds fy, lwdj ,oa cdjh ikyu ij fo'ks"k /;ku nsus dh vko';drk gSA fdlkuksa ds fy, vknku dh vkiwfrZ rFkk rduhdh ,oa foi.ku lg;ksx dk leqnk; Lrj ij O;oLFkk djuk t:jh gSA xk¡o esa gh fdlkuksa dks le; ij vknku ,oa rduhd miyC/k gks lds] bldh O;oLFkk vko';d gSA f'kf{kr ukStokuksa dks izf'k{k.k nsdj mUgsa ßlfoZl izksokbMjÞ ds :i esa izksRlkfgr fd;k tkuk pkfg, ftlls eosf'k;ksa esa le; ij Vhdkdj.k bR;kfn gks ldsA bl ifj;kstuk ds }kjk fd;s x;s vPNs dk;ksZa ds izpkj ,oa izlkj ds fy, bls Ñf"k foKku dsUnz ds dk;Zdykiksa esa 'kkfey fd;k tkuk pkfg,A 4 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Executive Summary Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) sponsored livelihood project entitled “Developing Sustainable Farming System Models for Prioritized Micro watersheds in Rainfed areas in Jharkhand” under National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP) with Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi(Jharkhand) as lead centre and three ICAR institutions located in Jharkhand viz. ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region Research Centre, Indian Institute of Natural Resins & Gums, Ranchi and Central Upland Rice Research Station, Hazaribagh as cooperating partners. The project had been implemented from 2007-2014 in four blocks (Prakhand) of two disadvantaged districts of Jharkhand (Dumka and Jamtara). The project had been implemented in 32 villages covering 2,200 households. The main objective of the project was to improve the livelihood of the household by judicious utilization of the resources available. The baseline information of the project area revealed that Population: It comprises 60.42% ST; 6.21% SC; 30.28% OBC and 3.09% General Land holdings: 0.97% Landless; 66.88% Marginal; 22.64% Small; 7.54% Semi medium and 1.2 % Medium The major occupation: Agriculture along with 2% and 12.42% of the farmers had additional sources of income through service and self employment, respectively. Cropping intensity: 94 to 104% Irrigation facilities available: 7% of cultivable area in rabi season Only 35% population had food for six months Average annual income: Rs. 24,465/- Migration for livelihood varied from 1-6 months The constraints for poor livelihood have been studied and interventions have been planned. The major constraint was availability of water for irrigation in the area though rainfall was 1400 mm / annum. Intervention was made to increase the rain water storage through water saving measures. In order to increase the water availability, 8 new ponds (100x100x10 ft) have been developed and 18 existing ponds were excavated. It increased the water storage capacity by 85,600 m3. Most of the ponds were perennial and provided irrigation to 23 ha area during rabi season. Small ditches (164 nos.) were also excavated in medium and low land (10x10x10ft) to provide an additional irrigation to 5 decimal (0.02ha) areas from each ditch for vegetable cultivation in winter and summer seasons. It was noticed that ditches were more useful in the low land than medium and upland ecology. In orchard, the “Dobha” (3x1.5x1m) was made with plastic lining to check the seepage and evaporation losses for irrigation in the orchard. The pitcher irrigation had been introduced for watering the orchard plants resulted in reduction of water requirement up to 50% in comparison to flood irrigation. The “Nadi kund” an innovation was introduced for the purpose of irrigating rabi crop from the river. It reduced the labour cost by Rs. 13,875/3yrs in comparison to the traditional methods. The soil analysis had been made on situation basis. Soil health card had been issued to the farmers to check indiscriminate use of the inorganic fertilizers. In order to correct the soil acidity, lime / dolomite application @ 4 q/ha in furrow had been introduced, which resulted significant positive response in upland and medium land especially in pigeon pea and mustard production. 5 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Most of the upland (slope 3-5%) was never used for crop cultivation in the project area due to poor to very poor soil fertility, water scarcity and lack of awareness. The biggest challenge was to bring the huge upland area under cultivation. The scientists associated with the programme have analysed soil profile and farmers were adviced to grow tomato and other upland crops with the application of lime/dolomite to neutralize soil pH and bunding of land. A good number of farmers started cultivating tomato in such barren land after reclamation. Altogether 40 ha land was reclaimed and brought under cultivation. Compost making by dumping farm wastes in sallow pit was in common practice among the farmers in the project area. The farmers were trained and motivated to enrich compost by adding Azotobacter and PSB (Phosphate Solublising Bacteria) ,switching to vermi compost preparation as well as application of balanced fertilizer to improve soil health and production as well as productivity of crops. Seventy eight units for vermi compost and enriched compost pit had been introduced in the area. To increase the productivity of the crops, the high yielding varieties with appropriate INM practices had been introduced. The introduction of HYVs of main crops had increased the production up to 60-115%. The farmers were trained in seed production skills which helped them to produce 4700q of seeds of different crops. They sold/ exchanged seed produced by them to the neighbouring farmers. The seed production in the area increased the seed replacement rate by 20%. The small Poly house to grow seedlings and low polytunnel concept had been popularized in the area for offseason early production of vegetables, especially the cucurbits, so that farmers could get remunerative price of their produce. Multitier orchard with mango and guava was established in the barren land. There were plenty of Ber and Palas trees in the area which were of no use earlier. The Rangini and Kusumi lac cultivation were introduced in the area which fetched a return of Rs. 1500/tree/season. This gave an additional income and security, especially during drought year. Altogether, 10,100 trees had been inoculated for lac production. Farmers were able to produce brood lac and getting an additional income of Rs. 6000/ family (Rs.1500/tree/yr). In the project area, rearing of small livestock like Goat and Pig as well as Duck and Poultry is an age old common practice. They were rearing locally available animals, whose are not remuneratve. To accelarate income for significant contribution towards livelihood of landless and marginal farmers, improved breeds of Pig (TxD), Duck (Khaki campbell), Poultry(Grampriya, Vanraja & Divyayan red ) with improvement of Black Bengal Goat by Beetal Bucks had been introduced in the area. It had been found that crossbred goat kids (Beetal x Black Bengal) performed better than the local. The crossbred kids attained a weight of 18 kg at one year of age against 12 kg for Black Bengal. So there was an additional gain of 6 kg. The regular vaccination with FMD, PPR and deworming improved the health of animals and reduced the mortality from 70% to 30%. Manual chaff cutter machine and Travis had been introduced in the villages to improve feeding practices and monitoring of health of animals on regular basis. The existing ponds and new ponds were stocked with fish seed of Rohu, Catla, Mrigal and Common carp to promote the fish culture. The fish production had increased from 105 to 650 kg/ha fetching an income of Rs. 6000/Household/Yr from 0.12 ha pond area. Farm women play an important role in agriculture. To reduce their drudgery and for empowerment, some improved farm implements e.g. Mannual Paddy Thresher, Sickel, Dutch hoe, Finger weeder, Cono weeder, Seed bin etc had been introduced . Women were trained in mushroom production and value addition of fruits and vegetables. One hundred eighty nine farm women are engaged in oyster mushroom cultivation in groups. 6 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 The mushroom harvest was 1-2 kg. per bag. The produce was sold at Rs.80-120 per kg in the local market. It had been found that mushroom production was more in wheat straw than that in paddy straw. On an average, each farm women received an additional income of Rs.500-1000/month from mushroom production. On the basis of the interventions, some models had been found suitable for different categories of farmers. For landless (land holding <0.01ha.), the livestock rearing was found very suitable, a nucleus family (common in tribal) can earn practicing the same an additional income of Rs. 25,l50/yr. Similarly, the marginal (land holding 0.01-1.0ha.) and small farmers (land holding 1-2 ha) can adopt rice/lac based farming system and earn an additional income of Rs. 34,744/yr and Rs 59,806/yr, respectively. The self impact study of the project revealed that income had been increased from Rs. 24,446 to Rs.73, 684 in 6 years in NAIP villages whereas it is still stagnated at Rs. 23,471 in Non NAIP village. The farmers are now making more expenditure towards education for their children and purchase of household items from the additional income. Based on the above facts, important outcome of the project are; 1. Increase in availability of improved livelihood options such as lac cultivation and rearing of improved pig and poultry. 2. Capacity building of farmers and farm women to adopt alternate options for livelihood security such as improved horticulture, mushroom production and value addition to vegetables and fruits. 3. Awareness creation among farmer groups on enterprise diversification such as goat rearing, pig rearing and lac cultivation. 4. Renovation of the existing water harvesting structures and creation of new ones helped farmers to grow a second crop after rice. Results have been very encouraging which need further promotion for long term benefits and sustainability. 5. The rice had been substantiated by improved vegetable cultivation and lac rearing. 6. Eighty eight SHGs were formed in the villages. Out of which 72 are having bank accounts with a deposit of Rs.10, 37,000 to continue the activity. 7. Before NAIP the farmers had few livelihood options whereas after NAIP the livelihood options had been increased. The average income of the farmers had been increased from Rs. 24,446 to Rs.73,684/ family/yr depending upon the availability of the manpower and resources. On the basis of outcome of the project the following recommendation has been made for future work; 8. Greater attention should be given for livelihood improvement through pig and goat rearing. 9. Development should be done on cluster basis in order to establish a system for input delivery, technical support and marketing. 10.Timely and effective input delivery system (kinds and technical support) should be made available in the village itself. 11.The educated youth should be trained and encouraged for regular vaccination of the livestock as service provider. 12.For continuation and further expansion of the technologies it should be included in the programme of Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK). 7 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Part-I: General Information of Sub-project 1. Title of the sub-project 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. :Developing Sustainable Farming System Models for Prioritized Micro Watersheds in Rainfed areas in Jharkhand. Sub-project code : 30004 Component: 3 Date of sanction of sub-project :01.09.2007 Date of completion :31.03.2014 Extension if granted, from : 1.10.2012 to 31.03.2014 Total sanctioned amount for the sub-project : Rs. 575.22487 (in lakhs) Total expenditure of the sub-project : Rs. 531.721 (in lakhs) Consortium leader : Dr. M. P. Pandey, Vice Chancellor Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi Phone: 0651-2450500 Email: [email protected] 10.List of consortium partners: Name of CPI/CCPI with Designation CPI Dr. S. K. Pal, Professor CCPI 1 Dr. A. K. Jaiswal Principal Scientist CCPI 3 Dr. R. S. Pan, Principal Scientist CCPI 2 Dr. A. K. Singh Professor Dr. R. K. Singh Principal Scientist Dr. C. V. Singh Senior Scientist Name of Organization Address, Phone & Fax, E-mail Department of Agronomy Ranchi Agriculture College Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi-834006 Email: [email protected] Department of Aquaculture Ranchi Veterinary College Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi-834006 Email: [email protected] ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region Research Centre, Namkum, Ranchi-834010, Phone: 0651-2260141 Email: [email protected] Indian Institute of Natural Resins and Gums, Namkum, Ranchi-834010 Phone: 0651-2261154 Email: [email protected] Central Rainfed Upland Rice Research Station, Hazaribagh Email: [email protected] Central Rainfed Upland Rice Research Station, Hazaribagh Phone: 06546-222263(O) Email: [email protected] Duration (From-To) 01.09.200709.06.2009 437.78268 26.09.200931.03.2014 01.09.200731.03.2014 52.77249 01.09.200731.03.2014 42.09926 01.09.200730.06.2011 01.07.201131.03.2014 CPI-Consortia Principal Investigator; CCPI-Consortia Co-Principal Investigator 8 Budget (Rs. in Lakhs) 42.57044 575.22487 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 11.Statement of budget sanctioned, released and utilized partner-wise (` in Lakhs): CCPI 3 CCPI 2 CCPI 1 CPI CPI/ CCPI Name, Designation & Address) Dr. A.K. Singh, Professor Department of Aquaculture Ranchi Veterinary College Birsa Agricultural University Ranchi-834006 Dr. R.S. Pan, Principal Scientist ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region Research Centre, Namkum, Ranchi-834010 Dr. A.K. Jaiswal, Principal Scientist Indian Institute of Natural Resins and Gums, Namkum, Ranchi-834010 Dr. C.V. Singh, Senior Scientist Central Rainfed Upland Rice Research Station, Hazaribagh Total Fund Released Total Budget Sanctioned (up to Closing Date) (Rs. in lakh) (Rs. in lakh) Fund Utilized (up to Closing Date) (Rs. in lakh) 437.78268 401.69102 401.13617 52.77249 47.87740 43.87562 42.09926 47.86758 47.86758 42.57044 40.00055 38.84163 575.22487 537.43655 531.721 CPI-Consortia Principal Investigator; CCPI-Consortia Co-Principal Investigator 9 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Part-II: Technical Details 1. Introduction Jharkhand is a new State with immense possibilities of development of both the industrial as well as agricultural sectors. Out of 10.13 million working population, 76.9% are engaged in agriculture. In spite of vast working force and richness in natural resources, state is able to produce food grains which met only 50% of its requirement. Agriculture of the state is mainly rainfall dependent and mono crop. Rice is the main crop of the state that too of very low productivity (12.5q/ha) in comparison to national average productivity (20.86q/ha). There is a good average rain fall i.e. 1200 mm but still water is the major constraint in agriculture along with soil erosion. People have to migrate for work as laborers for their livelihood. It has been felt that if rain water (1200 mm /annum) is tapped properly, it may improve the irrigation facilities and make it possible to grow a second crop after kharif. Strengthening and making provisions for the health coverage and technical backup to the allied components will give more employment, income and food for the family which can check the stress migration of the farmers. Keeping the above facts in view, it was planned to evolve an integrated farming system model for the small and marginal farmers present in majority in the state. In this integrated farming system, all the enterprises of the farmers for their livelihood were integrated so that sustainable benefit in the form of production, employment and income generation could be obtained from the available resources to the farmers. The present project was, therefore, initiated to develop the sustainable farming system models for the different categories of the farmers to extrapolate in similar domains. 2. Objectives To develop appropriate land and water use plan in the selected micro-watersheds for conserving natural resources. To improve productivity of crops, promote horticulture, animal husbandry, fisheries and lac cultivation for livelihood security. To promote entrepreneurship for value addition to reduce migration and employment generation at farm level. To develop sustainable farming system models for the micro-watershed and improve market linkages. 10 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 3. Technical Profile of the sub-Project Objectives 1. To develop appropriate land and water use plan in selected micro watersheds for conserving natural resources. 2. To improve productivity of crops, promote horticulture, animal husbandry, fisheries and lac cultivation for livelihood security. 3. To promote entrepreneurship for value addition to reduce migration and employment generation at farm level. 4. To develop a sustainable farming system model for the micro watershed and improve market linkages. Monitoring indicators Base line survey to identify the present 1. Number of groups formed status of farmers, farming system, constraints and formation/reorientation of the farmers group. Identification of the critical erosion prone areas, Livelihood analysis, livestock and suitable crops as per soil and climate suitability and farmer’s preference. 1. Increase in Creation and strengthening of water productivity bodies for storage of runoff water of cereals and through pond, well & ditches. livestock. On farm water management, correction of acidity of soil by use of dolomite/ 2. More area lime. Introduction of INM, IPM and under cropping HYVs of Cereals, Pulses and Oil seeds. 3. Double Introduction of HYV of vegetables, cropping introduction of low polytunnel for off in assured season vegetable production. irrigation area. Introduction of fruit based multitier 4. More income model in upland. Introduction of lac from non-farm cultivation in available Ber and Palas activities. trees. Introduction of improved breed of poultry, pig, goat, duck and fish to increase the livelihood of the farmers. 1. Increase in Diagnostic study of markets, availability of marketable surplus of each commodity crop seed. and identifying alternate market opportunity for each commodity in 2. Value addition project area to fruits and Assessment of new technological vegetable. options regarding post harvest handling at farm level. Development of seed production units. Training on post harvest technology, value addition, processing and preservation of fruits and vegetables. Study of input use and removal in each 1. Development of farming system enterprise, Monitoring and evaluation models of production, processing and value addition under each enterprise in present implemented area. Multilocation testing of technologies and farming system models under similar environments. Work plan 11 Expected output Eighty eight SHGs had been formed. Identification of constraints existing farming system had been studied Increase in productivity of crops, livestock, horticultural crops and fish production from pond. Expected out come Seventy two SHGs are active. The constraints and existing farming system had been studied. Increase in income due to increased production of crops, animal husbandry and nonfarm activities. Development of farming system models. Utilisation of surplus produce through value addition. Better remunerative price of the produce. Reduction in post harvest loss. Better utilization of available resources. Improved livelihood models. Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 4. Achievement and target objective wise Objectives 1. To develop appropriate land and water use plan in selected micro watersheds for conserving natural resources. Activities 1. Baseline survey (PRA) of four micro watersheds Target 2. Identification of farmers’ need & constraints. 3. Reorientation of the existing farmers groups available in agriculture, animal husbandry, horticulture, fisheries and lac cultivation. Formation of new farmers groups (SHGs, WIGs and CIGs) in all four selected micro watersheds. 4. Identification of critical erosion prone areas and assessment of various quality parameters of soil and water in project area. 5. Livelihood analysis of the communities and identification of livestock, suitable crop as per soil and climate suitability and farmers preference. 2. To improve productivity of crops, promote horticulture, animal husbandry, fisheries and lac cultivation for livelihood security. 1. Training and exposure visit of rural youth of four micro watersheds on IFS, agriculture business management, watershed and rain water management. 12 Achievement The baseline survey had been conducted in all the villages covering all the house holds to study the status of farmers and the farming system. The farmers’ need, existing farming systems, and constraints had been studied in the baseline survey and accordingly the intervention had been planned for harvesting of rain water, improvement of breeds of goat, pig etc. and agriculture production. A total 88 SHGs were formed/ strengthened in the villages. Of the total, 72 were linked with Bank and an amount of Rs.10.37 lakh is available in their group for continuation of the programme. The soil quality had been analyzed on situation basis and Soil health cards were provided to the farmers. The fertilizer doses have been recommended as per soil analysis. The soil profile of the barren upland had been studied and accordingly remedial measures had been suggested to the farmers so that these lands could be brought under cultivation. About 40 ha land is brought under cultivation after bunding and reclamation of the soil using lime/dolomite by the farmers. The possible livelihood depending on the available resources with the farmers was analyzed. It was found that the pig farming was profitable where farmers had access to hotel waste. Two-three goats were easily manageable by the landless and small farmers. The backyard poultry upto 10 were easily manageable. A total of 4,790 farmers were trained in different aspects of integrated farming system of agriculture and allied sectors. Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Objectives Activities Target 2. Training and exposure to master trainers for continuing the skill upgradation programme on multitier cropping, rice-fish-duck system, piggery, poultry, fisheries, animal husbandry and lac cultivation. 1200 3. Introduction and improvement of goatry in project area by supplying goats 300 improved goat bred(1 unit =3 goat families + 1 buck) 4. Supply of 2 males and 6 females piglets of improved bred (TxD) pig/ family. 800 piglets to 100 families 5. Introduction & strengthening of poultry activity by introduction of improved poultry breed at the rate of 10 chicks /family. 6. Artificial insemination, vaccinations and livestock health improvement campaign. 12,000 birds to 1200 families 10,000 animals 7. On farm water management technology demonstration in famers field 8. Intercropping in rainfed upland soil 24 9. Demonstration on papaya cultivation 24 10. Technology backup on acid soil reclamation at field level 24 24 13 Achievement Besides farmers, 160 linkmen were also trained to help the farmers in input arrangement and livestock management. They were trained for improved agriculture and allied sector so that they could help the farmers in arrangement of inputs and marketing. A total number of 1400 Black Bengal goats were introduced to 607 farm families. In every village, Beetal Buck was introduced to improve the breed of goats. It had been found that the cross breed goat kid grows at faster rate and there was difference of 6 kg in 12 months age. A unit of 3 goats gave an additional income of Rs. 7280/yr/family. 373 piglets were introduced to 93 households. It was found that the unit of two female and one male pig was most suitable and easy to maintain by the farm family. One unit of Pig provided an additional income of Rs. 13,330/ yr/Household. 6,700 poultry, 1,228 ducks had been introduced to 726 families. It was concluded that a unit of ten birds was most suitable to maintain by a farm women. 12,274 animals were vaccinated for PPR and FMD. The regular vaccination and deworming had decreased the mortality of animals by from 70% to 30% On farm water management was introduced to reduce the water loss. The Pitcher irrigation and plastic lined Dobha had reduced 30% water loss. Intercropping had been popularized in rainfed upland. The Maize+Pigeon Pea and Rice+Pigeon Pea intercropping had been found suitable and the productivity achieved were 14.7q/ha and 13.4 q/ha in terms of maize and rice equivalent yields, respectively. Each farmer received an additional income of Rs. 980 and 694/beneficiary over sole crops of maize and rice, respectively besides no risk of total loss. Papaya cultivation was popularized in the bariland of the household. Almost all the farmers had received the papaya plantation in their bariland who were able to improve the nutritional security and livelihood. The upland and medium land soil acidity was reclaimed by the use of lime/dolomite @4q/ha. The use of dolomite had a positive result on the production of Pigeon Pea. Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Objectives Activities 11. Improved cultivation of Tomato, Brinjal, Cauliflower, Cabbage and other vegetables as per farmers preferences 12. Construction of OFRs in project area Target 24 24 13. Construction of ring well in farmers field 24 14. Formation of ditches on farmers’ fields 240 15. Renovation and desiltation of old ponds of farmers 12 16. Seepage control measures in ponds 12 17. Establishment of rice-fish-duck unit in the project area. 16 18. Production of fish-cum-prawn farming in perennial ponds 10 19. Demonstration and training to the progressive farmers on production of stunted fingerlings in farm ponds 20. Establishment of 10 decimal model for ‘Off season vegetables’ in the project area 10 21. Introduction of one acre model of fruit based multitier model on farmers’ field. 14 Achievement Improved cultivation of vegetables was popularized covering 713 farmers.Who were able to improve their livelihood and economics status. Eight On farm reservoirs of 100 x 100 x 100′ size were constructed. These OFRs increased the water storage by 26,661m3 for rabi crops. Twenty three ring wells of 4 ft. diameter were excavated for irrigation of Orchard and promotion of vegetable cultivation. One hundred sixty four ditches of 10x10x10′ had been made in different types of land for storage of seepage water. It was found that ditches at low and medium land were more suitable and capable to irrigate about 0.02 ha per ditch under vegetable cultivation. Eighteen old ponds were renovated upto 10 ft. depth to hold more rain water. It increased the water harvest by 59,000m3 in total. It had been observed that there was more loss of water through seepage in upland ponds followed by medium and low lands. The seepage loss ranged from 13.3 to 15.6 mm/day. Application of cattle dung and dolomite was promoted to reduce the seepage loss. Twelve units of rice-fish-duck unit were established in the project area. It increases the fish production, reduces the input cost and making the fish culture more profitable. The programme was dropped due to nonavailability of prawn seed as prawn seed is only available in maritime states. Two units were established for production of stunted fingerlings but it was not sustained due to poaching. 160 Off season vegetable production had been popularized through low polytunnel. 20 Twenty mango and guava based multitier orchards were established but only 14 of these could be maintained successfully. The maximum income of Rs.24,950/- from filler crop (guava) and intercrops (vegetables like potato, tomato, brinjal, radish, okra and chilli) was obtained by the farmer. Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Objectives 3. To promote entrepreneurship for value addition and to reduce migration, employment generation at farm level. Activities 22. Initiation of lac cultivation on existing palas and ber trees. Target 300 23. On farm trials of improved rice cultivation with INM & IPM 320 24. Demonstration of crops at multi- locations for high yielding varieties of pulses and oil seed crops with application of bio fertilizer, sulphur, lime, IPM and INM on soil test basis. 25. Programme on to increase yield expand area under green fodder in project area. 26. Technology of lime application to address acid soil problem along with indigenous technology and intervention (recycling of forest litter and crop residues) to increase organic matter. 27. Technology for by product utilization such as poultry manure, pig manure, crop residues, forest litter & farm yard manure and their recycling to improve the productivity of farming system will be assessed 1. Diagnostic study of markets assessment of marketable surplus of each commodity & identifying alternate market opportunity for each commodity in project area. 2. Assessment of new technological options regarding post harvest handling at farm level. 3. Demonstration of lac processing technology 100 4. Development of seed production units 16 5. Quality protein maize as well as fodder production to supplement the feed requirement of poultry, livestock and pig. 15 Achievement Ten thousand one hundred trees were inoculated for lac production. A quantity of 4.5 q lac was produced improving the economic condition. On farm trials spread over 103 ha were carried out involving 2330 beneficiaries. Multi location demonstrations were conducted for high yielding varieties of pulses and oilseeds using biofertilizer (Azotobacter) and lime. 8 Green fodder production programme was popularized at six places. 75 A total of 76 units had been made for vermicomposting and enriched composting. The vermicompost was mainly used in vegetable production. The use of vermicompost had reduced the use of inorganic fertilizers. Mushroom and lac were sold in the local market. GI sheet storage bin was introduced to reduce the post harvest loss. There was huge demand for brood lac in the area and farmers got good price for the brood lac. Hence, there was no inclination of farmers for the processing of lac. Four thousand seven hundred q seed had been produced from 148 ha land involving 933 farmers. The seeds were sold to the neighbouring farmers or exchanged by the fellow farmers. A total quantity of 1570.2 q (19.2/ha) maize was produced from 81.8 ha land of 1346 beneficiaries. Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Objectives 6. 7. 8. 1. 4. To develop a sustainable farming system 2. model for the micro watershed and improve market linkages. Activities Training on post harvest technology, value addition, processing and preservation of fruit & vegetables. Establishment of pig meat processing unit with slaughter house Establishment of model for small lac processing unit Study of input use and removal in each enterprise. Impact assessment 16 Target 100 Achievement One hundred and twenty farm women were trained on the post harvest technology, value addition to tomato and preservation of surplus vegetables. The idea was dropped due to administrative problem. There was need of administrative approval for establishing a slaughter house. The idea was dropped because farmers were getting good price for brood lac and scrap lac. The input use and output had been studied for animal husbandry and crop production. The midterm impact assessment had been done by Xavier Institute of Social Service (XISS), Ranchi. The report revealed that, the project began with the community mobilization activity. Atleast one SHG was formed in each adopted villages. Women SHGs were also promoted by NAIP. The introduction of lac cultivation gave good profit. Orchards established in project were good and satisfactory. JALKUND, earthen pot irrigation method was found very suitable as it saved water loss. In animal husbandry, Poultry, Pigs, Ducks and Fish culture gave good result and increases the mandays employment of the farmers.The details are enclosed in ANNEXURE-3. Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 5. Baseline Analysis Dumka block of Dumka district falls in Mayurakshi sub catchment. Mayurakshi River has its source in Trikut hill near Deoghar. It flows through Jharkhand then through the district of Birbhum Mursidabad in West Bengal flowing in to the river Hooghly. Mayurakshi is famous for its strong current during a period of seven to eight months in a year. The river dries up for 3-4 months but have strong current during the rainy season. Narayanpur, Jamtara block of Jamtara district falls under Barakar sub catchment. It is the tributary of the Damodar River in eastern India originating near Padma in Hazaribagh district of Jharkhand that flows for 225 km. Baseline survey was conducted by pretested questionnaire taking all the farmers of the village into consideration. The Physiography of the village was made on the village map. The existing livestock and crops were also recorded on the map (Plate 1-8) The baseline survey revealed that the household in the target villages comprised of 60.4% ST; 6.2% SC; 30.3% OBC and 3.0% upper caste. There were in total 2588 households in the 32 villages of four blocks of the two districts. On the basis of land holding, it was found that 0.97% farmers were landless (land holding<0.01 ha); 66.9% marginal (land holding 0.01-1.00 ha); 22.7% are small (land holding between 1.00-2.00 ha); 8.3% semi-medium (land holding 2.00-4.00 ha) and 1.20% farmers were of medium categories (land holding 4.00-10.00 ha). Table : 1 List of villages of the project area District Jamtara Dumka Block Jamtara (Barakar sub catchment) Narayanpur (Barakar sub catchment) Dumka (Mayurakshi sub catchment) Jama (Brahmini sub catchment) Villages Charedih, Dahar Tola, Sawrimundu, Sinju Tola, Rupaidih, Jilimtanr, Nawadih, Karmatar Rai Tola, Mal Tola, MuslimTola, Rampur, Bada Majhladih, Maira Tola Karmatanr, Kodokicha-6, Kodokicha-7, Guhiyajori, ipur, Sagbehri, Jiyathar, Mayurnacha Bhounra, Palasi, Ragat, Karela, Gajha, Lilatari, Muswachak, Pipra, Sarepahari, Meghi Santhali The target population was mainly dependent on agriculture and allied sectors. Of the total population, only 7.0% and 11.7% had additional source of income through service and self employment (business), respectively. Agriculture is mainly rain dependent and annual rainfall is 1376 and 1412 mm in Jamtara and Dumka districts, respectively. The source of irrigation in the villages were ponds, small nalas etc. which were seasonal in nature and hold water for about 6-9 months. 8.73% 3.95% 29.88% Upland 57.25% Low land Bari land Others Out of total geographical area (2332 ha) of the target Fig 1 : Different Categories of land in the project area village, 29.9%, 57.3%, 8.9% and 3.3% were upland, low Fig1: Different categories of land in the project area land, bari land and utilized for other purposes i.e. road, school etc., respectively. Out of 1226.6 ha, 88.5% was cultivable, only 9.8% barren and merely 7.40% land had the irrigation facilities. 17 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Table 2: Land scape farming transect (Jamtara/Dumka) Land Resources Forest Upland (Tanr III, II) Bari land (Tanr I) Medium land (DON III, DON II) Lowland (Don I) Soil Stony Sandy loam Loam Clay loam Clay loam Crops Natural vegetation/ trees Rice, Tomato, Ginger, Termeric, Pigeon pea, Maize, Black gram, Millets, Niger Maize, Tomato, Rice-Wheat Cauliflower, Potato, Rice-FallowBeans, Brinjal, Radish, Tomato Peas, Onion, Fenugreek, Spinach, Pumpkin, Chilies, Ridge gourd, Carrot, Garlic, Corier, Cucumber, Bitter gourd, Bottle- gourd, Okra, Rice seedling Rice Water resource Rainfed Rainfed Irrigated with well Rainfed Trees Timber Fruit and timber Medicinal, species; Mango, fodder species Mahua Permanent seasonal fruits species; Mango, Papaya, Bamboo, Drumstick, Guava, Jackfruit, Banana, Citrus Livestock/ land use Cattle grazing Cattle grazing Cattle, small ruminants, Cattle grazing fowl rearing and grazing Problem Lack of quality Deforestation Lack of irrigation, vegetable seeds, termites fragmented land and technical know how holding, poor fertility, run off & soil erosion, stray cattle grazing and quality seeds Rainfed partial irrigated with well/ pond Lack of irrigation, paucity of quality seeds of HYV, poor fertility in some cases, scattered land. Paucity of HYV seeds, Waterlogging Rice is the main crop in the area and occupies important place in the prevalent cropping pattern i.e. ricefallow. Majority of uplands were left fallow, in pockets where there was irrigation facilities, farmers grow okra, radish, cow pea, bitter gourd, tomato, ridge gourd, drumsticks, kulthi, maize, pigeon pea, egg plant, millets in uplands and bariland. After kharif season, most of the upland remains fallow. The average productivity of the major crops were 9.5q/ha (upland rice), 12.5q/ha (medium land rice), 15.7 q/ ha (low land rice), 16.7q/ha (maize), 17.6 q/ha (wheat) and 159.3 q/ha (potato). Results of the baseline survey revealed the cropping intensity to be very low i.e. 95.7 percent (ranging between 94 -112). The cropping intensity also varied from cluster to cluster. High intensity in Jamtara (102.9) could be attributed to proximity to township and high degree of awareness among the farmers. 18 120 100 120 112.64 95.75 93.88 83.92 92.41 Cropping Intensity % Cropping Intensity % Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 80 60 40 20 0 102.94 100 92.67 100.5 79.82 80 60 40 20 0 Fig 2: Cropping Intensity of different farmers' category Fig 3: Cropping Intensity in cluster The farmers used to keep livestock including buffalo, cow, goat, pig, sheep etc. The average number of livestock per family was calculated to be 2.90. Food 3.56%1.85% 5.89% 6.58% 7.32% Clothes 13.12% Maintenance 7.12% 39.31% 7.34% 7.60% 19.54% 10.44% Agri & Horti 18.49% Household 61.05% Livestock Wages Social Function Health Others Others Fig 4: Expenditure on different components Fig 5: Income from different enterprises The average annual income from agriculture & horticulture per household was Rs. 13,839. Income from subsidiary occupation, wages and employment was Rs. 8560 (Rs. 3352-18,540). The total annual income from all the sources was Rs. 24,465 per household. The average annual expenditure was Rs. 20834/household ranging from Rs. 14,839-43,902. The total employment (man-days) was 207. The engagement in own farm was only 94 man-days. There were migrations of manpower for different duration ranging from one to six months for livelihood as food for whole year was available to only 35% population residing in the adopted villages. The sources of information to farmers regarding inputs and technology were mainly radio sets in most of the villages. The access to micro credit and loan facilities was inadequate among farmers; very few farmers had Kisan Credit Card (KCC) facilities. Most of the farmers were taking credit/loan from the money lenders. Seven SHGs were available in the villages without vocational training programme run by any agency. As stated above, initial productivity of rice and other crops were substantially low. There were various reasons for low productivity of the crops in the project area mentioned below; 1. Poor irrigation facility and low productivity 2. Poor soil fertility status with low water holding capacity. 3. Lack of improved breed, feed and fodder for animal husbandry 4. Lack of quality seed /planting material for crops 5. Low price of the produce 19 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 6. Research achievements Considering the constraints faced in achieving high productivity by the farmers, following interventions were planned. Table 3: Gaps and interventions in farming system in target villages Sl. No. Gaps 1 Poor irrigation facility and low productivity 2 Poor soil fertility status and low water holding capacity. 3 Lack of improved breed, feed and fodder 4 Lack of quality seed/planting material 5 Low price of the produce 6 Women empowerment Interventions Creation of small irrigation facilities, practices recommendation of suitable HYV and INM programmes Application of nutrient as per soil analysis measures taken for amelioration of soil. Introduction of improved breeds of Goat, Pig, Poultry, Duck, fish, feed for animals and fodder production. Production of quality seed in villages. Formation of SHGs and linkage to market. Women economic empowerment and drudgery reduction. 6.1 Natural resource management: Although project area received good quantity of rainfall (1400 mm /annum) by all measures, water was found to be the major constraint due to erratic distribution. Intervention was made to increase the storage of water and water saving measures. To increase the water availability, 8 new ponds (100x100x10 ft) were excavated and 18 existing ponds were renovated to increase the water storage by 85,600m3. Since most of the ponds were perennial, 23 ha area was made irrigable during rabi season that benefitted 110 household. The application of organic manure and lime/dolomite was promoted to reduce the seepage loss (13.3 – 15.6 mm/day). On an average, each new pond provided irrigation to 0.6 ha in rabi crops. Some ponds exhibited good irrigation potential to irrigate 4 ha land after being recharged from ground water (Pond in Andipur, Dumka). Twenty three ring wells of 4ft. diameter were constructed for the irrigation of the vegetable and orchard plants that benefitted 43 households. Small ditches (164 nos.) excavated in medium & low lands (10x10x10ft) provided an additional irrigation to 5 decimal (0.02ha) area from each 20 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 ditch for vegetable cultivation. It has been found that the ditches were more useful in the low land compared to medium and upland. In orchard the “Dobha” (3x1.5x1m) had been made with plastic lining and a cover to check the seepage and evaporation loss respectively and was being used for irrigation in the orchard. The pitcher irrigation was introduced for watering the plants which helped to reduce water requirement by 50% in comparison to flood irrigation. The “Nadi kund” was introduced for irrigating the rabi crop from the river. It has reduced the labour cost by Rs. 14,165/3yrs in comparison to the traditional methods. Soil analysis was done on situation basis, soil health card were issued to the farmers. The fertilizer applied on the basis of soil health card avoiding indiscriminate use of the inorganic fertilizers. To correct the soil acidity, lime/dolomite was introduced in acidic soils. The lime/dolomite application at 4 q/ha in furrows gave good results in upland and medium land. Table 4 : Soil nutrients status in project area: Land situation pH N (kg/ha) P (kg/ha) K (kg/ha) OC (g/kg) Upland 3.85-7.23 168.02-221.18 18.54-32.61 108.52-225.23 2.89-5.31 Medium land 4.09-6.27 194.41-264.99 19.55-31.78 116.12-119.18 2.73-6.07 Low land 3.85-7.23 263.49-313.61 31.55-40.32 128.16-213.53 3.68-6.06 Information obtained from baseline survey suggested that most of the farmers used only farm yard manure (FYM) in the crops. The use of inorganic fertilizer was limited to urea and DAP only. 21 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Table 5: Status of manure and fertilizer used by the farmers of Jamtara and Dumka districts Few farmers Majority of farmers Jamtara Urea and DAP FYM Narayanpur FYM, Urea and DAP FYM Jama Urea, MOP, DAP FYM Dumka Urea, MOP, DAP, Cattle dung FYM Most of the upland (slope 3-5%) was found to be barren in the project area. The soil profile of these lands was studied and farmers had been advised to grow suitable crops practicing bunding and dolomite application. Farmers had taken up tomato cultivation, where there was irrigation. On an average, each village had 50-60 ha barren upland. Altogether, 40 ha land was reclaimed and brought under cultivation. Compost making from the farm wastes was common practice among the farmers of the area. Methodology to prepare enriched compost, adding Azotobacter and PSB vermi composting was provided to farmers and popularized. Seventy eight units for vermi compost were prepared. The enriched compost and vermi compost was mainly used in the vegetable cultivation. Table 6 : Nutritional status of enriched compost Farmers practice Enriched compost Increase in nutrient Additional income in form of nutrient cost by fertilizer Nitrogen 0.32 1.0 0.70 88.2 Phosphorus 0.18 1.01 0.83 214.14 Potash 0.19 1.19 1.0 77.7 Nutrient (%) Total income from 1000 kg enriched compost Rs. 380.04 22 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 6.2 Agriculture The project area was demarcated with varying topography viz., Bari land, upland, medium land, and low land. Before and after inception of NAIP, the land use pattern scenario was as follows; Table 7: Cropping pattern before and after NAIP Season Before NAIP Types of land After NAIP Kharif Rabi Zaid Bariland Maize/ vegetables Leafy Fallow vegetables Upland Maize/Kulthi Fallow Kharif Rabi (where irrigation available) Zaid (with limited irrigation) Maize, Vegetable Vegetable (HYVs) (High Value) Leafy vegetables Fallow Rice, MaizePigeon pea (HYVs) Mustard /Lentil Fallow Medium land Rice Fallow (Traditional) Fallow Rice (HYVs) Wheat /Mustard/ Moong Chick pea Low land Fallow Rice (Hybrid) Wheat /linseed Rice Fallow (Traditional) Vegetables Intensive training was imparted to the farmers regarding rain water harvesting, its management, cultivation of major crops using modern techniques like integrated weed, pest and fertilizer management in uplands and low lands. There was also strong need for creating awareness regarding utilization of the vast areas of upland (mostly acidic in nature) with suitable crops viz. pigeon pea, black gram, kulthi. Introduction of cash crops like groundnut was also successful and became very popular. Introduction of new HYVs of rice (Abhishek, Naveen, Lalat) hybrid rice (PA-6444) proved useful and farmers liked these varieties for high grain yields. Very few farmers in the project area used to grow wheat; introduction of gram was a new item for them. There was also a complete lack of knowledge regarding balanced fertilization. Intensive training and onfarm demonstration with different crops helped farmers to understand the importance of integrated nutrient management. With all these efforts, the present scenario at the end of NAIP has changed. The following crops varieties were demonstrated and found suitable in the region. 23 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Table 8: Crops varieties grown/demonstrated in different land situations in Jamtara and Dumka Sl. No. 1. Land class Upland 2. Shallow low land Crop grown/demonstrated Rice varieties : Vanadana Anjali Pigeonpea var. : Bahar, UPAS 120 Black gram var. : PU 35 Groundnut var. : AK 12-24 Niger var. : Birsa Niger 1 Sesamum (Til) var. : TKG 55 Mustard : NPJ , PTB Minor millet var. : Birsa Marua 1 Hybrid maize var. : Shaktiman 4 Horsegram var. : Madhu, Birsa Kulthi 1 Rice varieties : Hazaridhan, Abhishek, Pusa Sugha 5 3. Shallow low land Rice variety : Dhanrasi, Hybrid rice 6664 Changes in productivity and income of farmers Rice was the major crop in the project area grown under different land types including upland, medium land and low land. Changes in the productivity due to introduction of high yielding varieties were monitored. New interventions like cultivation of hybrid rice, growing upland rice and maize in association with pigeon pea were made. Impacts of these interventions were studied in terms of productivity and economic changes to beneficiaries’ livelihood. As shown in the Table 9, initial productivity of upland was meager (9.5 q/ha) that doubled up (18.8 q/ha) due to technological convergence such as introduction of high yielding varieties viz., Vanadana, Anjali, Virendra, CR Dhan 40 and with proper nutritional/ pest management. An increase of around 98 percent in productivity resulted in an increase of Rs 9040/ha as monetary benefit of Rs. 589/beneficiary. Changes in the productivity of major crops due to inclusion of high yielding varieties and cultivation practices ranged between 46.2 and 180.9 percent. In medium lands, farmers were encouraged to cultivate high yielding rice varieties like Sahbhagi dhan, Naveen and Lalat. Average productivity of medium land increased from pre-NAIP level of 12.5 q/ha to 25.8 q/ha. An increase of 106.4 percent over initial productivity made a change of Rs 12,928/ha incurring a profit of Rs 860 to each beneficiary. In shallow lowland, introduction of hybrid rice further registered an increase of 32 % over the high yielding paddy varieties (MTU 7029, Abhishek, Hazari dhan etc.). Similarly in upland ecology, intercropping of pigeon pea with upland rice (4:1 row ratio) further increased productivity of upland areas by 78 % over cultivation of high yielding upland rice varieties. Maize is also cultivated in upland and Bari land. Cultivation of high yielding maize varieties using modern techniques of cultivation resulted in an increase of 72.9 % over the farmers’ cultivation. Few farmers grew pigeon pea as mixed crop with maize before the initiation of NAIP project. Intercropping of improved maize varieties with pigeon pea (1:1) was tested as an NAIP intervention that further helped to boost the productivity by 46.4 %. Cultivation of high yielding varieties of wheat, chickpea and mustard using balanced fertilization recorded increases of 62.7, 46.2, 114.9 percent over the farmers cultivation practices, respectively. Changes in income were noted which varied from Rs 9040/ha to 27605/ha due to technological interventions. The minimum and maximum increase in the income of the project beneficiaries were Rs. 589 and Rs 1781, respectively. 24 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Table 9: Changes in the productivity of major crops and income of beneficiaries due to technological convergence after implementation of the Project Crops Change Change in Increase Initial (%) in income due to Area No. of Productivity in income/ Productivity productivity technological (ha) Beneficiaries (q/ha) beneficiary (q/ha) over initial convergence (Rs) productivity (Rs/ha) Rice (Upland) 14.0 215.0 18.8 9.5 97.9 9040 589 Rice (Medium land) 86.0 1292.0 25.8 12.5 106.4 12928 860 Rice (Low land) 92.0 1400.0 33.4 15.7 112.7 17204 1131 Hybrid rice (Low land) 44.0 682.0 44.1 New 180.9 (32.0% 27605 intervention over HYV s) 1781 Pigeon pea pure crop 27.0 490.0 12.56 Rice + PP 11.0 Intercropping (4:1 row ratio) 168.0 Maize (Sole) 45.0 820.0 Maize + PP 66.0 Intercropping (1:1 row ratio) 1210.0 Wheat 123.4 1315.0 28.6 17.6 62.7 12078 1133 Chick pea 29.1 448.0 15.5 10.6 46.2 10145 659 Mustard 34.5 439.0 12.0 5.6 114.9 13285 1044 7.45 68.6 14.8, 6.6 New (REY = 33.5) intervention 28.9 16.7 78.0 (Over rice sole, HYVs) 72.9 18.6 & 7.8 New (MEY=42.3) intervention 14785 815 14963 (Over rice sole, upland crop) 980 (Over rice sole, upland crop) 10831 594 46.4 (Over 12717 (Over maize sole, maize sole, HYVs) HYVs) 694 (Over maize sole, HYVs) *Since hybrid rice was introduced first time, % increase in yield was calculated using initial productivity of lowland rice. MEY denotes Maize Equivalent Yield & REY denotes Rice Equivalent Yield Average Minimum Support Price (Rs/q) used to work out change in the income: Paddy common – Rs 1021, Maize - 949, Pigeon pea - 2886,Wheat - 1098, Mustard - 2079, Chickpea - 2062, Urad - 3077, Lentil - 2134, Finger Millet - 1064 140 40 120 35 100 30 Productivity q/ha Increase in Productivity % In order to make the changes in the productivity of major crops more visible in upland and low lands, data is depicted in the bar diagram shown below (Fig. 6). Significant changes in the initial productivity of paddy, maize, wheat and mustard are easily noticeable in Figure 7. Changes due to new interventions like hybrid rice cultivation in low lands and intercropping of pigeon pea with maize and rice were appreciable as shown in Table 9. 80 60 40 20 0 25 20 Paddy 15 Wheat 10 Maize 5 Mustard 0 Before NAIP NAIP village 2012 Fig 6: Percentage increase in production After NAIP 2013 Non NAIP 2013 Fig 7: Productivity of major crops 25 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Seed production programme Seed production of high yielding varieties of suitable crops (rice, wheat, maize and pigeon pea) for the agroclimatic conditions of Jamtara and Dumka districts of Jharkhand was taken up in adopted villages forming various clusters. Since rice is grown by majority of farmers in the project villages, maximum number of farmers opted for seed production of the same as shown in the Table 10. Technological convergence helped a lot to encourage farmers for the seed production of wheat, a crop grown by limited farmers before NAIP inception. Farmers got benefitted in terms of high productivity of maize over the years consequent upon production of 330 q maize seed in the adopted villages. A substantial quantity (56 q) of pigeon pea seed was also produced by the farmers in Jamtara and Dumka districts. Table 10: Seed production in farmers’ field Crop Paddy Wheat Maize Pigeon pea Total No. of beneficiaries 519 199 150 65 933 Area (ha) 90.9 26.88 20.08 10.6 148.46 Production (q) 3616 722 330 56 4724 Varietal performance In the upland, rice cv Anjali and Vanadana helped to improve productivity of these areas and average productivity of the varieties under rainfed conditions was recorded to be 23.0, 20.8 respectively when averaged over a period of six years (2008-09 to 2013-14). Abhishek gave highest average productivity of 31.9 q/ha in the transplanted conditions. Although hybrid rice was cultivated for one year only (in the last year of the project), cultivar 6444 recorded the highest ever yield (44.0 q/ha) during entire project period by any other lowland rice variety. Various promising wheat cultures were introduced and tested for their suitability in the project villages. Local wheat variety gave an average productivity of 21.7 q/ha whereas appreciable increase in productivity was achieved with HD 2733 and HD 2824 as evident from mean values of 30.0 and 27.2 q/ha, respectively. 26 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 6.3 Horticulture Demonstration of vegetable cultivation: The improved method of vegetable cultivation was demonstrated in the field of 713 farmers. The maximum annual net income of Rs.2544/- was obtained by the marginal farmer through cultivation of summer kharif vegetables in 1.0 decimal (40 m2) area of backyard garden which generated employment of 18 man-days. Off-season cultivation of cucurbits under low poly tunnel: Low poly tunnel cultivation of cucurbits in winter for early summer harvest with better remuneration was demonstrated in 88 farmers’ fields. Farmers earned the maximum net income of Rs.1571/- (Rs.3,92,750/ha) from bottle gourd cultivation in 1.0 decimal (40 m2) area which generated employment of 11 man-days. The crop was sown on 13.12.2012, the first harvest began on 10.3.13 continued till 14.5.2013. Total harvest was 191 kg (estimated 47.75 t/ha) which was sold at the rate of Rs.8-10 per kg. Income generation from Poly house: Four small poly houses were constructed in NAIP area. The farmer earned the maximum income of Rs.43,165/yr raising seedlings of vegetables, papaya and forest plants in portrays/polybags inside naturally ventilated small poly house of 64 m2 area that generated employment of 313 man-days. Each poly house was constructed at a cost of Rs.50, 000/from NAIP fund and farmer could earn total income of Rs.1,01, 895/- from poly house in three years (2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) which was much higher than the cost of construction of the poly house. Demonstration of fruit based multitier cropping system: Twenty mangoes and guava based multitier orchards established, fourteen are being maintained successfully. The maximum income of Rs.24,950/- from filler crop (guava) intercrops (vegetables like potato, tomato, brinjal, radish, okra, chilli) was obtained by the farmer in the 5th year (2013) of fruit based multi-tier cropping system established that generated employment of 181 man-days. gourd, a perennial cucurbit was introduced as a new crop in NAIP area in three farmers’fields. Its cultivation was found to be remunerative. Shri Churamani Prasad Yadav of Jama block of Dumka district harvested 163 kg produce from 2.75 decimal (110 m2) area of pointed gourd planted Pointed 27 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 on 28.02.10 earned Rs.3347/- during harvest period from 7.5.10 to 31.10.10. The estimated yield was 14.81 t/ha. The sale price of pointed gourd was Rs.20-25/- per kg. This income generated an employment of 24 man-days. The farmer had expanded his area of pointed gourd cultivation from 2.75 decimal to 12.5 decimal (500 m2) through propagation of pointed gourd plants by vine cutting. He was also engaged in diffusion of this technology of pointed gourd cultivation to non-traditional non-NAIP villages. He sold 1208 rooted plants of pointed gourd to 7 farmers of 7 villages covering 4 blocks namely Jama, Dumka, Jarmundi and Saraiyahat of Dumka district. After undergoing training on vegetable seed production at ICAR RCER Research Centre, Ranchi, Shri Churamani Prasad Yadav started production of pure seeds of improved varieties of vegetable crops in his own field. He had sold pure seeds of brinjal (560g), bottle gourd (1300g) cucumber (1020g) in local village markets (Haats) to 6 farmers of 3 villages of Jama block of Dumka district. Many farmers from Jamtara and Dumka are coming on their own to ICAR RCER Research Centre, Ranchi for purchase of seed/ planting materials. Table 11: Details of horticulture activity: Household covered Area (ha) Income (Rs./Household/Yr) Improved vegetable cultivation 713 38 2050 Low Polytunnel for cucurbit for early production 88 0.4 1012 Poly house for saving seedling of vegetables & fruits 4 0.004 43,165 Fruit based multitier cropping system in upland (1 acre model) 20 8 14,045 (from filler crop and intercrop) Activity 28 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 6.4 Fisheries There were 168 ponds covering an area of 62 ha. in adopted village. Rain water was harvested in these ponds through runoff diversion and water was used for the life saving irrigation of kharif crops and irrigation for winter/summer crops. Majority of the ponds were seasonal. Out of 168 ponds, 66.3% ponds retain water only for 6 months, 12.8% for 6-9 months and rest (20%) for 9-12 months. Table 12: Water bodies available in the area Cluster No. of ponds Jamtara Narayanpur Jama Dumka 23 85 20 40 168 Total area (ha) 6.31 40.0 6.75 9.0 62.06 Water availability during year Up to 6 months 6-9 months 9-12 months 15 3 5 60 8 16 6 8 4 34 0 9 115 (69%) 19 (11%) 34 (20%) 20% 6 Months 9 Months 11% 69% 12 Months Fig 8: Seasonality of the pond Table 13: Nutrient status of the pond soil & water: Cluster pH Jamtara 4.5-9.5 Narayanpur Dumka Jama Nutrient Status of Soil Physico-chemical & Biological Status of water N (kg/ha) P (kg/ha) K (kg/ha) pH DO Alkalinity Plankton (ppm) (ppm) 250-450 0-10 225-375 6.5-7.5 5-8.0 ppm 115Low to 240ppm moderate Table 14: Fish production & Productivity No. of HH 215 Total Average size Initial Enhanced Cost of Production Total Enhanced no. of of the pond productivity Productivity rearing (kg/unit) income income Rs./ ponds (unit) (kg/ha) (kg/ha) (Rs./unit) (Rs./unit) year/HH 168 0.12 ha 105 650 2200 102 10200 6000 29 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 It was observed that fish productivity was maximum in Dumka followed by Jamtara, Narayanpur and Jama block. The farmers were dependent on the vendor of the neighbouring state for seed and harvesting of the fishes. The farmers were trained and quality fish seed of Catla, Rohu, Mrigal were provided. They were also educated to apply the lime in the pond and trained in the techniques of harvesting of the fishes, so that the dependancy could be reduced. The fish production increased from 105 kg/ha/yr to 650 kg/ha/yr during the last three years. 6.5 Animal Husbandry Livestock is one of the important components of the livelihood of farmers of the project area. They keep large animals for milk and agriculture purposes and small animals for meat and eggs. Analysis of survey results showed that the household to live stock ratio was 2.2-3.84. The maximum number of livestock/ household was maximum in Narayanpur followed by Dumka, Jamtara and Jama. 4.5 Weight(kg) at 12 months 4 No. of live stock 3.5 3 2.5 2 3.84 1.5 1 2.2 2.59 3 0.5 20 15 10 5 0 0 Jama Jamtara Dumka Narayanpur Fig 9: House hold to livestock ratio Cross bred Black Bengal Fig 10: Growth of kid Introduction of Beetal Bucks: The Black Bengal goat was introduced to the landless and marginal farm families on subsidized rates. A total of 1400 goats had been introduced to 607 household. Most of the farmers keep Black Bengal/ Desi goats which was smaller in size and low in meat production. Aimed at genetic improvement (upgradation) of the Desi /Black Bengal goats, one Beetal buck was introduced in each village of project area. It was found that the body weight of the cross bred kid (Beetal x Black Bengal) obtained was higher in comparison to Black Bengal kid (Black Bengal x Black Bengal) goats. The body weight of one year old cross bred was 18-20 kg which was higher than the native Black Bengal goats (10-12 kg). This gave a direct income of 6-8 kg meat in similar condition. It was seen that farmers had additional income of Rs. 7280/yr by maintaining three female Black Bengal goats. 30 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Table 15 : Details of livestock intervention & income Average Cost of No. (unit)/ rearing HH (Rs./unit) Production/ Unit Total income (Rs./unit) Enhanced income Rs./ year/HH 1,420 1200 eggs 5,960 4,540 2-3 7,940* 13 kid 22,500* 7,280 373 4-5 15,341* 28 Piglets 42,000* 13,330 1,228 10-12 1,500 800 eggs 4,000 2,500 No. of HH Total no. Poultry 670 6,700 10 Goatry 607 1,400 Piggry 93 Duckery 119 Livestock *In 2 years, HH=Household The introduction of Beetal Buck had not only improved the goat kids in the NAIP adopted villages but also benefitted the farmers of neighbouring villages as evident from the case study of the farmer earning an additional income of Rs. 1000-1500/month by maintaining the Buck. Introduction of improved breed of pigs: Desi Pig rearing was a common practice among tribal population which generally possessing slow growth rate, small litter size and prone to high incidence of skin diseases. Therefore, the improved breed of TxD had been introduced in the project villages. All together 373 piglets were introduced to 93 households. It was found that there was significant difference in growth of Desi and improved bred of pig. The improved pig attains a higher growth rate (70-80 kg weight in six months age) in comparison to Desi (40-45 kg) larger Litter size (8-10) in comparison to Desi (5-6) pig. The skin disease is also very less in TxD in comparison to Desi. A farmer can earn Rs.13, 330/yr maintaining two sows and one boar. It had been felt that Pig rearing was more profitable when the farmer had easy access to hotel waste or ability to reduce the cost of feeding of pigs. It had been found that a unit of 3 piglets (2 females + one male) could be easily managed by small marginal farmers. The arrangement of hotel waste needed more manpower pig farming could be adopted successfully for this reason by those household who had more family members. Introduction of poultry & duck: It was the most common practice in villages to keep 10-20 poultry in most of the houses but usually they keep the Desi birds whose growth laying performances were very poor. Therefore, the low input improved breed like Divyayan Red, Vanaraja and Gramapriya birds were introduced. These birds have very good scavenging habits and they may be reared for backyard poultry farming. It was found that these improved breed laid 125-150 eggs in one year which was very high as compared to Desi birds (40-50 eggs). The improved bred attained 1500 gm of body weight at 12-14 weeks of age whereas the Desi birds attained 900-1000 g at the same age. The only thing that is lacking in improved breed is broodiness therefore the farmers have to keep the Desi female birds for production of chicks. 31 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 The Khakhi Campbell ducks were introduced among the farmers also contributed higher number of eggs in comparison to Desi chicks. Thus, it improved the family income of the farmers by sale of egg and meat. Altogether 6700 poultry birds were introduced among 670 families. By maintaining 8 hens and 2 cocks, the farmer earned Rs. 4,540/family/yr and by maintaining same no. of ducks the farmer earned Rs. 1,650/family/yr by sale of eggs and meat. Vaccination treatment: Vaccination treatment of animals prior to the project was very meagre. This was a very important component for success of animal husbandry programme. In 1st year of the project, there was outbreak of PPR in goats and FMD in cattle in the villages of the project area. It was felt that vaccination treatment camps should be organised regularly in the villages, after that regular vaccination programme was conducted for all animals in the project villages. Link men and educated youths of the villages were also trained for vaccinating the animals as per need. A total of 11,074 animals had been vaccinated and treated during the project period. The vaccination programme of PPR, FMD and regular deworming had reduced the mortality from 70% to 30%. Introduction of chaff cutter: Hand operated Chaff cutter machine was introduced in all the villages of the project area. The farmers were used to feed their animals without chopping the straw. This caused digestive problems in livestock, by chopping the straw it helped in proper digestion, thereby improving the palatability, health and environment. Introduction of Travis: For treatment, vaccination and handling the animals Travis had been introduced in all the villages of the project area. The introduction of Travis made easy for handling the animals even by the villagers for vaccination and treatment. 6.6 Lac rearing Lac played an important role in livelihood development in the villages. The Palas and Ber trees were found in abundance in the area which are generally cut for using as fuel in the kitchen. Farmers were educated to use these trees for lac cultivation which could fetch extra income from the unused tree. More than 10,100 palas trees were inoculated in all the adopted villages with broodlac by the farmers. An income of around Rs 8.57 lakh had been generated by 148 households in Dumka and Jamtara districts by intervention of lac production. A potential tree of palas has been identified in Bhounra village (Dumka) to be capable of producing three times more yield than normal ones. Three villages of each district have been identified as potential broodlac production hub. These are Bhounra, Kodokicha-7 and Jiyathar in Dumka, Baramajhladih, Dahartola and Karmatanr in Jamtara district. 32 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Ber and palas trees located on border of rice fields have been utilized successfully for lac production without any adverse effect on paddy. Rangeeni broodlac production was successfully taken from summer crop in Bhounra and Karela village of Dumka district due to suitable climate. Normally summer crop do not survive in many lac growing areas on ber tree. Women folk are actively involved in collection and scraping of lac. During three consecutive years of drought 2009, 2010 and 2013, farmers who have adopted lac cultivation with substantial number of trees earned sufficient income from production of broodlac and did not migrate to other areas for livelihood as lac production have helped and compensate loss due to scanty rains (Example: Sri Vakil Murmu of Dahartola village; Sri Baldev Mari, Sri Nirmal Mari of Baramajhladih village; Sri Baldev Mari, Sri Kaleswar Mari of Karmatanr village in Jamtara district; Sri Sudhir Mari of Bhounra village; Sri Bhado Murmu of Sagbehri village in Dumka district etc.). The technology of lac production radiated from NAIP adopted area to adjoining villages namely; Amra, Muswachak, Lilatari, Sarepahari, Jiyathar and Sagbehri in Dumka district, Kashitanrh, Chalna, Karmatanrh, Nawadih and Jhilimtanrh in Jamtara district. Table 16 : Details of Lac intervention & income No. of trees inoculated No. of lac introduced villages No. of HH involved Production (q) Employment generated (man-days) Income (Rs in lakh) Income/ family/ year (in Rs.) 10,100 17 148 82.78 2300 8.57 5790.00 6.7 Women empowerment and drudgery reduction Farm women play an important role in agriculture. Some improved farm implements were introduced and women were trained in mushroom production, value addition in fruits and vegetables to reduce their drudgery and make empowerment. Altogether, 128 tribal women farmers (out of 247) are now engaged in oyster mushroom cultivation in NAIP villages which indicates an adoption rate of 51.8%. This includes 46 women under 4 SHGs in 3 villages of Jama block and 82 women under 5 SHGs in 2 villages of Dumka block of Dumka district. The harvest is 1-2 kg per bag and the produce is sold @ Rs.80-120 per kg. The farm women have made contributions in the group fund. It had been found that mushroom production is more on wheat straw than that on paddy straw. Twelve women of Gulab Baha SHG of Karela village of Jama block in Dumka district produced the maximum of 678.85 kg oyster mushroom from 446 inoculated bags which was sold @ Rs.120130/kg valuing the produce at Rs.83,146/-. Regular production and consumption of oyster mushroom and green vegetables had impacted positively on health and nutrition of the members of farm families. After gaining expertise confidence in oyster mushroom cultivation, the tribal lady Smt. Lilmuni Soren of Karela village of Jama block of Dumka district became an expert trainer and is now actively engaged in diffusion of oyster mushroom cultivation in non-NAIP villages. So 33 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 far, she has trained 228 farmers (39 male and 189 females) in 12 non-NAIP villages under 3 blocks (Jama, Dumka and Ramgarh) of Dumka district. These 228 farmers have started cultivation of oyster mushroom. Smt. Soren is also earning money through training from sponsors like Department of Soil Conservation, Govt. of Jharkhand, local Grameen Banks, etc. Even after withdrawal of NAIP support, Miss Parvati Baski of Guhiajori village of Dumka block of Dumka district is coming regularly to purchase mushroom spawn from our Research Centre at Ranchi and continuing the mushroom production. The farm women were also trained in preparation of mushroom pickle, tomato sauce, jack fruit pickle and papad making. They are producing pickles and sauce at their homes, selling the products in local village markets and line hotels. The conventional farm implements had been used by the farmers which needs more labour. To reduce the drudgery and improve the efficiency, small tools had been introduced. Out of total farm implements introduced in the village the bullock drawn puddler did not work because it needed more draft power and animal available in the village was of smaller built. Table 17: Farm implements used by the farmers & new tools introduced Agricultural operations Tillage Sowing weeding Plant protection irrigation Harvesting Threshing Tools in use Tools introduced during project period Desi plough plank Desi plough, spade Kudali, Gainta, Khurpi Manual sprayer Diesel pump set Sickle Beating on stone, manual thresher Bullock drawn puddler Improved spade, dutch hoe Improved khurpi, cono weeder, finger weeder Knapsack sprayer Portable diesel pumpset Improved sickle Paddle thresher for paddy , diesel pump operated wheat thresher Winnowing Storage structure Milling Sup Kuchuri (made of straw) Dhekali ricemill GI sheet storage bin - 6.8 Farming system models After introduction of the improved package of practices, the farmer adopted the technologies as per the availability of resources and man power. Table 18 : Productivity (q/ha) of major crops Major crops Before NAIP NAIP village 2012 After NAIP 2013 Non NAIP 2013 Paddy 15.7 33.9 31 17.08 Wheat 17.6 28.6 23 15.7 Maize 16.7 28.8 20 16.71 Mustard 5.6 12 7.9 5.59 34 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 The productivity of the major crops had increased 62% to 116% with an increase in income from Rs.24, 464/ family to Rs.73, 684/family in NAIP villages against the annual income was Rs. 23,471/family in Non-NAIP villages. The major contribution in the income was achieved from the allied activities of agriculture i.e. lac rearing, fish culture, mushroom etc. The increased income of the farmers had been spent towards education of the children and purchase of household items which indicates the improvement of their livelihood status. 7 Agriculture+ Horticulture 13 27 35 Animal husbandry 18 18 20 39 32 30 14 20 6 10 Fig 14: Percentage income in non NAIP village 2013 80000 39 15 7 Before NAIP 0 After NAIP 2013 Animal husbandry Wages Fig 13:Percentage income after NAIP 2013 48 Agriculture+ Horticulture 11 Others Annual Income (in Rs.) Percentage Expenditure Fig 12:Percentage income before NAIP 40 41 48 Wages Others 50 Animal husbandry Wages 61 60 Agriculture+ Horticulture 73684 70000 60000 50000 40000 24464 30000 23471 20000 10000 0 Before NAIP Fig15: Percentage Expenditure in different component After NAIP 2014 Non NAIP 2014 Fig 16: Average Annual Income/Household The livelihood options had increased after NAIP interventions. Table 19: Livelihood options before NAIP & after NAIP Sl. No. Livelihood options before NAIP Livelihood options after NAIP and diversified 1 Conventional Agriculture Improved Agriculture 2 Limited and unorganized Horticulture Horticulture (Poly tunnel, Off season vegetables) 3 Animal Husbandry Organized Animal Husbandry 4 Labour Fisheries 5 Lac rearing 6 Mushroom 7 Orchard 8 Labour 35 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Agricul ture Agricult ure Horticul ture Fisheries Animal husbandry Farmer Horticu lture Farmer Lac Wages Mushro om Wages Livelihood options before NAIP Animal husband ry Livelihood options after NAIP 6.9 Swot Analysis Strength 1. Farmers were practicing different types of enterprises for their livelihood so in case of failure of one enterprise other support the livelihood. 2. Farm women also plays important role in agriculture. Weakness 1. Illiteracy 2. Most of the farmers were resource poor. 3. Poor soil health and irrigation facilities. Opportunities 1. The area had abundant Palas & Ber tree, introduction of lac cultivation had fetched good return. 2. In low land there was water, vegetable cultivation could be promoted in middle land after digging a small pit. 3. There was good local market for the agricultural produce. Threats 1. To sustain the technology there is need of inputs availability. The availability of quality planting material, spawn for mushroom production is difficult. 2. After certain stage when the production increases and will be surplus for local market there will be need of strong market linkage and post harvest processing facilities. 3. Infrastructure would be needed to store more rainwater to increase the irrigation facilities. Table 20: Income and expenditure of different component of farming Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 Particulars No. of animals/unit size Expenditure Rs. Gross return Rs. Net return Rs. Cost : Return ratio Ducks 10 1500 4000 2500 1.6 Poultry 10 1420 5960 4540 4.2 36 Goats 3 9800 26000 16200 2.65 Pigs 3 26896 84000 57104 3.1 Lac rearing Fish culture 10 tree 0.02 ha 1500 2200 15000 10200 13500 6000 10.0 4.6 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 The economics of the different component had been studied and found that backyard poultry rearing has more return (4.2) followed by pig (3.1), Goat (2.6) and duck (1.6). The return in lac rearing is quite high (10.0) followed by fish culture (4.6). There are number of trees in the villages which could be a very potential area for sustainable livelihood. Based on the findings of the different interventions, the successful models had been selected for the different categories of the farmers. The farming system evolved from the project provided additional income to the adopted farmers. Table 21: Recommended livelihood model for landless farmers (land holding < 0.01 ha) Sl. No. 1 Component Poultry (Unit:10 birds) Breed: Vanraja Goat rearing (Unit:3 nos) Breed: Black 2 Bengal x Beetal 3 Pig rearing (2+1) Breed: TxD Total *In 2 years Input cost (Rs./unit) 1,420 Output (Rs./unit) 5,960 Net Return (Rs.) /yr/unit 4,540 7,940* 22,500* 7,280 15,341* 42,000* 13,330 25150 Table 22: Recommended livelihood model for marginal farmers (land holding 0.01-1.0 ha) Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 Component Poultry(Unit:10 birds) Breed: Vanraja Goat rearing (Unit:3 nos) Breed: Black Bengal x Beetal Pig rearing (2+1) Breed: TxD Agriculture Input cost (Rs./unit) Output (Rs./unit) Net Return (Rs.) /yr/unit 1,420 5,960 4,540 7,940* 22,500* 7,280 15,341* 42,000* 13,330 7,282 16,876 9,594 34,744 Total *In 2 years Table 23: Recommended livelihood model for small farmers (land holding 1-2 ha): Rice/Lac based farming system Sl. No. 1 2 Component Poultry (Unit:10 birds) Breed: Vanraja Goat rearing (Unit:3 nos) Breed: Black Bengal, Beetal Agriculture (Kharif & Rabi) Horticulture Lac (10 trees) Fisheries (100 x 100 ft) 3 4 5 6 Total *In 2 years 37 Input cost (Rs./unit) 1,420 Output (Rs./unit) 5,960 Net Return (Rs.) /yr/unit 4,540 7940* 22,500* 7,280 15,089 1,500 2,000 2,200 37,075 4,500 17,000 10,200 21,986 3,000 15,000 8,000 59,806 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Table 24: Income and expenditure of different farming system Sl. No. Category of farmer Farming system Expenditure (Rs.) Gross income (Rs.) Net income (Rs.) Cost: Return ratio 1 Landless Livestock rearing 13060 38210 251503 2.9 2 Marginal 20342 55086 34744 2.7 3 Small Rice/lac based farming system 26179 85985 59806 3.3 7. Innovations Ramakant nadi kund When there is no flowing water in the river during the summer, the farmers dug in the sand and lift water beneath the river bed for irrigation of rabi crops. Each time they have to remove the sand so that the foot valve does not get chocked with sand. This practice is labour intensive and demands that one person is engaged for this work only. As a new intervention, a circular structure of iron with both the end open, some holes in the sides was fabricated. After removing some sand from bottom of the river this structure (Kund) is sunken in the river bed and again the sand from the centre of the structure/kund is removed. By repeating the process the whole Kund was sunken in the sand and only 8-10 inches remaining above the bed. The water starts accumulating in the Kund which was pumped for irrigation. It eliminates the need to remove sand every time from the Nadi Kund thus saves labour cost considerably. This was cost effective (Rs.2,600.00), portable and very much accepted by the farmers. By the use of such Nadi Kund, farmers were able to increase the area of wheat cultivation. This also saves the labour engaged for cleaning the small ditches. It has been worked out that a farmer can save Rs.13,875/- in three years using Nadi Kund. 38 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 The Nadi Kund was circular (112.5 cm in diameter) iron sheet with following specification, Table 25: Specification of Nadi Kund Sl. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Description Alloy metal used for fabrication Thickness of sheet Width of sheet Weight Diameter of kund Depth of kund Number of vertical bars for support Number of horizontal rings for support Number of holes made in the body of kund Diameter of the holes Depth upto which holes were made (from lower side) Methods used for making holes Distance between hole to hole Specification Iron sheet 20 gauge 128.75 cm 24 kg 112.5 cm 128.75 cm 4 4 500 minimum 6 mm 90 cm Welding flames 10 cm (approx) Table 26: Comparative analysis of Ramakant Nadi Kund with conventional system Sl. No. Process 1 Digging of pit for water storage/fixing of kund in river bed. 2 9 10 11 Cost of bamboo basket used to put suction pipe valve during lifting of irrigation water Maintaining of pit during operation of pump for irrigation (man days) to remove sands falling inside the pit Minimum number of days require per irrigation /ha, if pump operates 8 hrs per day Man days required per irrigation/ha Minimum number of irrigation needed for wheat cultivation Total man days for maintaining pits during cultivation of wheat Minimum cost(Rs.) involves in digging and maintaining pit during pump operation @ Rs.100/man day Cost involves in fabricating Ramakant Nadi Kund Life Span Maintenance cost of Ramakant Nadi Kund 12 13 Expenditure in 3 yrs Saving 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pit in the river bed 6 labourers x 5 hrs for one irrigation=3.75 man days Rs. 30 per season Ramakant Nadi Kund 5 labourers x 4 hrs for installation of kund = 2.5 man days Nil 2 person per day Nil 4 4 8 5 2 5 8x5=40 Nil 3.75x5+40x100 = Rs. 5875 Rs.250 Nil One irrigation Rs.2,600 3 years Rs. 500 for 3 year (up keeping paint) Rs. 3,850 Rs. 17,715 - 3,850 = Rs. 13,875 Rs. 17,715 39 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 8. Process/ Product/Technology Developed Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 Process/Product/Technology Developed Nadi Kund Pitcher irrigation in limited water supply Brood lac cultivation Pig rearing based on hotel waste Adoption/Validation/ Responsible Partner Commercialization, etc. Adoption CRURRS Validation ICAR RCER Research Centre Adoption IINRG Adoption BAU 9. Linkages and Collaborations Sub-Project Leader Partners Lac produce (IINRG) Crop seed training programme (CRURRS) Availability of crop seed (BAU) Availability of Mushroom spawn (BAU) Health care of livestock (BAU) Fish seed (BAU) Lift irrigation(at Ragad, Karela, Rampur and Muslim tola) (CRURRS) Linkages developed Forward (marketing of lac produce) backward (accessibility towards broodlac, pesticides and tools) facilities were linked ATMA, Dumka and Jamtara ,Zonal Research Station, Dumka and KVK Jamtara were involved to facilitate the programme Block adminstration of Jamtara, Narayanpur, Jama and Dumka Zonal Research Station, Dumka and KVK, Dumka. Deptt. of Animal Husbandry, Dumka and Jamtara Deptt. of Fisheries, Dumka and Jamtara ATMA and Deptt. of Agriculture, Govt.of Jharkhand 10. Status on Environmental and Social Safeguard Framework Environmental Positive effects Negative effects Social Mitigation measures taken to minimize the negative effects Positive effects Conservation of Palas, Ber Kusum tree in NAIP adopted area. Use of chemical (synthetic) fertilizer) in spraying Initiated to spraying of Involvement of women in different activities of bio pesticides. lac farming. They are enjoying their life with pride. Cropping intensity increased 1. Proper application Income increased 1.Loss of soil of nutrient. nutrient. 2. Recommended 2. Use of dose of fertilizers chemical were applied on the fertilizer. basis of soil test. 3. Use of 3. Application of Pesticide require amount of bio pesticides were encouraged along with IPM 40 Negative Mitigation measures effects taken to minimize the negative effects Nil NA Nil NA Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Environmental Positive effects Irrigation Potential Increased Negative effects Conflict in community ownership. Social Mitigation measures taken to minimize the negative effects Positive effects Measures were taken for encouraging farmers’ community ownership of natural resources like pond and farm reservoirs. Farmers were engaged round the year in their own field. Due to increase in employment and income, the stress migration reduced. Negative Mitigation measures effects taken to minimize the negative effects Nil NA 11. Constraints and Remedial Measures Taken Sl. No. Constraints 1 The area was situated in remote place and far away from Ranchi; hence frequent monitoring becomes very difficult. 2 Frequent leaving of RAs 3 4 Remedial measures Two fields’ offices at Jamtara and Dumka had been established and RAs were posted in the field offices. Linkman had been trained to implement the programme in case of non availability of RAs Language problem in communication to farmers Linkman (Local educated youth) had been engaged from the same area to communicate the messages to the farmers in their language. The farm family size small; hence despite of The farmers were advised to concentrate on few interest in the technology many farm families were technologies as per the manpower resources unable to devote time. Sometimes farmers were available to them. confused what to adopt and what to leave. 12. Publications Sl. No. 1 2 3 Authors, Title of the paper, Name of Journal, Year, Vol. & Page No. R.S. Pan; Low poly tunnel cultivation of bottle gourd in offseason; ICAR Reporter (October-December 2010), p 12. Amresh Thakur, et al. 2010 Impact of ditches for water storage in Rainfed areas of Dumka. A case study accepted in Journal of Research, BAU. Impact of Animal Husbandry components of NAIP in Dumka district, M.V.Sc.Thesis, BAU 41 NAAS Responsible Partner Ratings ICAR RCER Research Centre, Ranchi BAU - BAU Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 13. Media Products Developed/Disseminated 1 /kku dh mUur [ksrh No. of Copies 1000 2 vjgj dh mUur [ksrh 1000 3 edbZ dh mUur [ksrh 1000 4 feêh LokLF; dkMZ 1000 5 fefJr eNyh ikyu 1000 6 e`nk dk uewuk ,d= djus dh fof/k 1000 7 vEyh; Hkwfe esa iSnkokj c<+kus gsrq jklk;fud [kknksa ds lkFk pwus dk iz;ksx djsa 1000 8 dsapqvk [kkn 1000 9 Developing sustainable farming system models for prioritized micro watershed area of Jharkhand (English) >kj[k.M ds o"kkZfJr fpfUgr lw{e tyNktu {ks= esa fVdkÅ lesfdr Ñf"k iz.kkyh dk fodkl 1000 1000 Target villages and neighbouring village BAU 11 i'kq&i{kh Vhdkdj.k dkMZ 1000 BAU 12 cht mRiknu rduhd 1000 13 jekdkUr unhdq.M 1000 14 r`".kk ls r`fIr rd 2012& lhMh 10 Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Each cluster 15 >kj[k.M ds o"kkZfJr fpfUgr lw{e tyNktu {ks= esa fVdkÅ lesfdr Ñf"k iz.kkyh dk fodkl ¼miyfC/k;k¡½ 1000 Dumka and Jamtara BAU 16 nqedk vkSj tkerkM+k ftys esa ykg dh [ksrh cuk vkthfodk dk Jksr 1000 Dumka and Jamtara BAU 17 ekSleh rkykc esa O;kolkf;d eNyh ikyu% ,d lQyrk dh dgkuh 1000 Dumka and Jamtara BAU 18 ohfM;ks fQYe& lhMh 20 ykg ikyu dh lQy dgkuh 21 pkoy xgurk iz.kkyh ;k ,l- vkj- vkbZ- ¼Jh½ fof/k ls /kku dh [ksrh Sl. No. 10 CD, Bulletins, Brochures, etc. 5 42 Distribution Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Target villages and neighbouring village Responsible Partner BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU CRURRS BAU BAU In each cluster IINRG 1000 600 copies IINRG 1000 Target villages and neighbouring village BAU Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 14. Meetings/Seminars/Trainings/Kisan Mela, etc. organized Sl. No. Details of Meetings/Seminars/Trainings etc. Duration (From-To) 1 Agriculture, Fisheries, Animal Husbandry, Soil Science and Ag. Engineering Agriculture and Fisheries Lac culture Fish Harvesting Fish Harvesting Fisheries Fisheries Village level committee and cluster level committee 19.06.08 No. of Personnel Trained 96 Post harvest 20.06.08 16.10.08 16.11.08 17.11.08 16.05.09 17.05.09 21.05.09 22.05.09 07.06.09 08.06.09 05.12.09 21 17 16 19 24 20 22 20 97 94 35 13 14 15 16 17 Health management of livestock SHG empowerment project audit Animal health and vaccination camp Farmers Scientist meet Farmers Scientist meet 16.05.10 23.07.10 12.08.10 28.10.10 28.01.11 57 47 12 206 36 18 19 20 21 Chaff cutter operation and establishment Chaff cutter operation and establishment Lac rearing Lac rearing 17.12.11 18.12.11 31.03.09-02.04.09 31.01.11-03.02.11 63 15 24 13 BAU, ICAR RCER, RANCHI, KVK, ATMA BAU BAU, ATMA BAU All partners BAU, KVK, ATMA, ZRS CRURRS, BAU CRURRS, BAU IINRG, Ranchi IINRG, Ranchi 22 23 24 25 26 27 Lac rearing Lac rearing Animal husbandry Animal husbandry Animal husbandry Soil testing by soil testing kit. 14.03.11-18.03.11 05.03.12-7.03.12 23.03.09-30.03.09 18.05.09-25.05.09 09.03.10-16.03.10 22.06.11-23.06.11 21 30 17 20 18 7 IINRG, Ranchi IINRG, Ranchi BAU BAU BAU BAU 28 Training on value addition to tomato, peas and mushroom Training on rearing of poultry, piggery and goatry 13.02.12-15.02.12 20 03.06.11-05.06.11. 75 Home Science, BAU BAU 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 29 Kharif crop 43 Organizer BAU BAU, ATMA, KVK BAU, ATMA, KVK BAU, ATMA, KVK Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Sl. No. Details of Meetings/Seminars/Trainings etc. Duration (From-To) 30 31 32 District level workshop at Jamtara District level workshop at Dumka Lac production by Scientific method (field training) Training on “Value addition, processing and preservation of fruits and vegetables” Training on “Value addition, processing and preservation of fruits and vegetables” Training on “Value addition, processing and preservation of fruits and vegetables” Agrotech 2010 Kisan mela Kisan mela Management practices for Kharif and Rabi crops District level workshop at Dumka District level workshop at Jamtara Training of livestock management at Dumka 20.01.12 21.01.12 10.10.11-15.10.11 No. of Personnel Trained 400 380 90 10.03.11-11.03.11 25 14.03.11-15.03.11 24 24.03.12-26.03.12 20 ICAR RCER RC, Ranchi ICAR RCER RC, Ranchi KVK, Dumka 06.03.08-08.03.10 02.03.12-04.03.12 26.02.09-28.02.09 27.03.12-28.03.12 200 250 85 50 BAU BAU BAU CRURRS 24.09.13 04.10.13 15.03.12 350 150 78 BAU BAU BAU 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Organizer BAU BAU IINRG 43 Training of livestock management at Jamtara 26.03.12 85 BAU 44 Training of livestock management at Dumka 22.12.13 80 BAU 45 Training of livestock management at Jamtara 23.12.13 78 BAU 46 State level workshop on popularization of the NAIP technologies 04.01.14 98 BAU 44 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 15. Performance Indicators Sl. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. Number of new technologies developed/introduced in the project area Number of improved technologies introduced in project areas Number of improved technologies adopted in these areas Number of farmers involved in consortia activities 5. Increase in agriculture services processing enterprises in project area 6. Increase in income of participating household (Rs/Annum) 7. Number of farmer groups involved in consortia activities 8. Incremental employment generated (person days/year/HH) 9. No. of farmers/area in addition to project beneficiary farmers adopting introduced technologies 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Indicator Total No. Number of patent/intellectual property protection applications filed based on NAIP research Number of patents/intellectual property protections granted/published based on NAIP research Number of scientists trained overseas in the frontier areas of science Number of scientists trained overseas in consortium-based subject areas No. of scientists participated in conference/seminar etc. abroad Success stories Amount of sustainability fund corpus created (` Lakh) Number of novel tools/protocols/methodologies developed Publications Articles in NAAS rated journals Articles in other journals Book(s) Book chapter(s) Thesis Popular article(s) (English) Newspaper article(s) Seminar/Symposium/Conference/Workshop Proceedings Technical bulletin(s) Manual(s) CDs/Videos Popular article(s) in other language Folder/Leaflet/Handout Report(s) Success stories 45 7 7 5 2100 Baseline 0 Baseline 24,544 Final 5 Final 73,684 86 Baseline 207 Farmers (No.) 300 Final 317 Area (ha) 89 0 0 0 0 0 12 10.57 7 0 1 0 0 1 1 15 1 10 0 3 0 8 4 12 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 16. Employment Generation (man-days/year) Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 Type of Employment Generation Employment Generation Responsible Partner More work in own farm, opportunities in Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Lac rearing Horticulture and Mushroom Crop seed production 12,2500 BAU 2,150 4,594 21,410 IINRG ICAR RCER RC, Ranchi CRURRS 17. Assets Generated i. Equipment Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Name of the Equipment with Manufacturers Name, Model Sr. No. Bench Balance Avery/H311AL112A Spectroquant Photometer Nova 60 Orient Pulverizer Mixing machine Sewing Machine Water Purification system, Model Millipore Hot water both Reico—equipment Instrument Pvt.Ltd, Kolkata Ion meter, Model S 50 K brand Mahler S/No 123009561 Anomad Electronic Balance PC based split beam scanning UV VIS spectrophotometer model UV-2300 Mobile feed block machine Scorpio LCD AC Still Camera Printer Weighing machine UPS Lac processing unit Digital camera Computer Computer Digital camera Poly house Digital camera PC with printer, scanner, UPS and other accessories Poly house Drip irrigation system Year of Purchase 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 Quantity (Nos.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 2009 1 2009 1 2009 1 2009 1 2010 2009 2010 2010 2008 2009 2009 2010 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 2008 1 2009 2010 1 1 46 Total cost (Rs in lakh) 0.276 2.60190 0.970000 0.66400 0.63700 5.24475 0.06750 1.98000 0.21700 1.63350 4.84700 7.42095 1.09 0.31750 0.26657 0.0900 0.9460 0.3500 2.00000 0.14990 0.55580 0.70000 0.15000 2.00000 0.15000 0.69238 0.2000 0.99864 Responsible Partner BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU IINRG BAU ICAR RCER RC, Ranchi Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 ii. Works Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 Particulars of the Work, Name Address of Agency Awarded the Work Pond-26 (8 new, 18 renovation) Ditches Vermicompost pit and enriched compost pit Ring well 1. M/S Shakti Construction, Dumka 2. M/S Gauri Shanker, Jamtara 3. M/S Sanjay Kumar, Jamtara 4. M/S Rafique Ansari, Jamtara 5. M/S Farooq Ansari, Jamtara M/S Shyam Ventilator, Dumka Road, Jamtara Year of Work Done 2009-10 Quantity Total Cost (Nos.) (Rs.) 26 2009-10 2009-10 164 73 2009-10 23 53,81927 Responsible Partner BAU iii. Livestock Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Details of Livestock (Breed etc.) Duck Goat Pig Poultry Duck Goat Pig Poultry Duck Goat Pig Poultry Goat Duck Pig Poultry Goat (F) Goat(M) Year of Procurement/ Production 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 47 Nos. Total Cost (Rs.) 350 284 125 31500 314340 186125 200 72 33 1000 400 459 3 2000 128 960 45 100 236 13 20000 146398 51711 100000 43000 963805 4995 200000 291769 120835 89800 10000 541769 93176 Responsible Partner BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU BAU Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 18. Steps Undertaken for Post NAIP Sustainability Total 88 SHG had been formed in the villages, out of which 72 have bank account and Rs. 10.37 lakh as sustainable fund. One person in each village had been trained as service provider to help the farmers in input arrangements and livestock management. The farmers have been linked up with BAU/ICAR RCER RC, Ranchi for assured supply of mushroom spawn. The farmers had been trained to contact call centre /SMS for technical support. The farmers had been trained in water saving devices e.g. pitcher irrigation, ditches, mulching. The rice had been substantiated by horticulture & lac cultivation. The farmers had been linked with BAU for bio fertilizer. The farmers had been linked with ATMA, NHM, Deptt. of fisheries for seed. There was a clear cut difference in the income of farmers of NAIP & Non-NAIP Villages. There was fan-out impact of the interventions in the adjoining areas of NAIP villages due to farmer to farmer interaction. 19. Possible Future Line of Work 1. Greater attention should be given for livelihood improvement through pig and goat rearing. 2. Livestock development programme should be ethnic and location specific. Any livestock development programme should aim to build on existing skill resources be incremental giving sufficient scope for motivation and awareness building skill development to understand the actual objectives of the initiatives. 3. Development should be done on cluster basis in order to establish a system for input delivery, technical support and marketing. 4. The Goat production has given good results for the farmers who take care for timely medication, vaccination and proper feed. Farmers reported goat mortality due to fever, diarrhoea, cough and cold. The major cause of mortality was PPR, due to improper health care and lack of vaccination. Vaccination programme should be taken up on regular basis. 5. Duck has been found hardy in comparison to chicken and gave good results. The mortality was low and farmers could fetch good profit because duck eggs fetched higher sale price than chicken eggs. Duck farming should be promoted for higher income. 6. Timely and effective input delivery system (kinds and technical support) should be made available in the village itself. 7. The educated youth should be trained and encouraged for regular vaccination of the livestock as service provider. 8. Post harvest processing facilities need to be developed both for vegetable, fruits and animal products. 9. Establishment of village level efficient marketing system. 10. For continuation and further expansion of the technologies it should be included in the programme of Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK). 48 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 20. Personnel Name and Designation Research Management (CL) Dr. N. N. Singh,Vice-Chancellor, BAU, Ranchi Dr. M.P. Pandey, Vice-Chancellor, BAU, Ranchi Scientific (CPI, CCPI, others) CPI- Dr. S.K. Pal, Professor Agronomy, BAU, Ranchi CPI- Dr. A.K. Singh, Professor, Aquaculture, BAU, Ranchi Dr. A.K. Sarkar, Dean, RAC, BAU, Ranchi CCPI- Dr. R.S. Pan, Principal Scientist, ICAR RCER RC, Ranchi CCPI- Dr. A.K. Jaiswal, Principal Scientist, IINRG, Ranchi CCPI- Dr. R.K. Singh, Principal Scientist, CRURRS, Hazaribagh CCPI- Dr. C.V.Singh, Senior Scientist, CRURRS, Hazaribagh Dr. S.K. Singh, Co-PI, Animal Husbandry, BAU, Ranchi Dr. A.K. Singh, Co-PI, Professor, Aquaculture, BAU, Ranchi Dr. Shushil Prasad, Co-PI, Prof. Animal Husbandry, BAU, Ranchi Dr. P.B. Saha, Co-PI, Sr. Scientist, ZRS, Dumka Er. D.K. Rusia, Co-PI, Agril. Engineering, BAU, Ranchi Dr. Arvind Kumar, Co-PI, Soil Science, BAU, Ranchi Dr. S. Karmakar, Assoc. Scientist, Sr. Scientist, Agronomy, BAU, Ranchi Dr. Praveen Kumar, Assoc. Scientist, Asstt. Professor, RVC, Ranchi Dr. Sanjeev Kumar, Co-PI, PC, KVK, Jamtara Dr. Sanjay Kumar, Assoc. Scientist, SMS, Animal Husbandry, KVK, Dumka Contractual Smt. Padmaja Gupta, Research Associate (BAU) Sri Hemant Kumar, Research Associate (BAU) Er. Amresh Kr. Thakur, Research Associate (BAU) Dr. Dushyant Kr. Raghav, Research Associate (BAU) Dr. Raghuveer Ranjan, Research Associate (BAU) Dr. Sunil Kumar, Research Associate (BAU) Sri Madhav Kumar, Research Associate, (IINRG) 49 From – To (DD/MM/YYYY) 01.09.2007-30-08-2011 07.09-2011-31.03.2014 01.09.2007-09.06.2009 26.09.2009-31.03.2014 01.09.2007-06.09.2011 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 01.09.2007-30.06.2011 01.07.2011-31.03.2014 01.09.2007-10.08.2011 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 17.08.2011-31.03.2014 26.09.2009-31.03.2014 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 07.10.2010-31.03.2014 20.09.2012-31.03.2014 20.09.2012-31.03.2014 18.09.2009-31.03.2012 20.05.2008-31.03.2012 27.01.2011-19.09.2011 22.01.2011-14.09.2011 08.07.2010-29.09.2011 04.02.2008-15.01.2010 17.05.2010-31.03.2014 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Name and Designation Dr. Abdul Karim, Research Associate (BAU, ICAR RCER RC, Ranchi) Mr. Narendra Kumar, Research Associate (CRURRS) Dr. Shiv Mangal Yadav, Research Associate (CRURRS) Mr. Piyush Shrivastava, Research Associate (BAU) Mr. Upendra Ram, Research Associate (BAU) Mr. Ajit Kumar, Research Associate (BAU) Mr. Arvind Kumar, Research Associate (BAU) Mr. Sushil Kumar, Research Associate (BAU) Mr. Dhirendra Yadav, Research Associate (IINRG) Ms. Shewta Mishra, Office Assistant (BAU) Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, RA (Horticulture) Mr. Pawan Kumar, RA (Horticulture) Mr. Manohar Panjikar, RA (Horticulture) Mr. Sunil Kumar, RA (Horticulture) Mr. Abdul Karim, RA (Horticulture) Mr. Rajendra Kumar, RA (Agronomy) Mr. Kapil Kumar Saini, RA (Horticulture) Dr. Birendra Kisore, RA (Animal Husbandry) Dr. Dhamendra Kumar Dubey, RA (Agronomy) Mr. Vidyapati Vidyakar, RA (Agronomy) Dr. Madhav Roy, RA (IINRG) Mr. Rameshwar Das, Office Assistant (BAU) 50 From – To (DD/MM/YYYY) 07.06.2010-31.03.2014 08.01.2008-13.09.2010 13.01.2011-31.03.2012 01.02.2008-10.12.2010 04.02.2008-03.02.2010 04.02.2008-13.02.2010 04.02.2008-07.05.2008 04.02.2008-13.06.2009 17.04.2008-02.03.2010 18.09.2009-31.03.2012 31.01.2008-12.08.2008 22.10.2008-11.09.2009 27.11.2009-31.03.2010 31.07.2010-31.05.2011 01.10.2011-31.03.2014 07.09.2013-31.03.2014 11.01.2013-31.03.2014 07.09.2013-31.03.2014 11.09.2013-15.02.2014 28.01.2013-31.03.2014 09.11.2012-31.01.2014 10.09.2013-31.03.2014 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 21. Governance, Management, Implementation Coordination A. Composition of the various committees (CIC, CAC, CMU etc.) Sl. No. 1. Committee Chairman Name (From-To) CAC Dr. Kirti Singh, Ex-Chairman ASRB 26.09.200931.03.2014 2. CIC Dr. N.N. Singh, Vice-Chancellor, BAU, Ranchi 01.09.2007 -30-08-2011 Dr. M.P. Pandey, Vice-Chancellor, BAU, Ranchi 07.09.201131.03.2014 3. CMU Dr. N.N. Singh, Vice-Chancellor, BAU, Ranchi 01.09.2007 -30.08.2011 Dr. M.P. Pandey, Vice-Chancellor, BAU, Ranchi 07.09.201131.03.2014 Members (From-To) 1. Dr. N.N. Singh ,Vice-Chancellor, BAU, 01.09.2007-03.08.2011 2. Dr. M.P. Pandey,Vice-Chancellor, BAU,07.9.2011-31.03.14 3. Dr. A.P. Srivastava, National Coordinator, NAIP, Krishi Anushan Bhawan, Pusa,New Delhi-12. 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 4. Chief General Manager, NABARD, Ranchi. 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 5. Director, Sameti, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 6. Dr. S. Tiwari, Ex-Director of Research, BAU. 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 7. Dr. B.P. Jain, Ex-Chairman, Horticulture, BAU. 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 8. Secretary, Badlao Foundation, Jamtara. 01.09.2007-31.03.2012 9. Secretary, Agarian Assistance Association, Dumka. 01.09.2007-31.03.2012 10.Mr. Sanat Hansda, Progressive farmer, Dumka. 01.9.2007-31.03.2014 11.Holi Cross Society, Hazaribagh 01.9.2007-31.03.2014 12.Ram Krishna Mission ,Ranchi 01.9.2007-31.03.2014 13.Dr. S.K. Pal 01.09.2007-09.06.2009 14.Dr. A.K. Singh 26.09.2009-31.03.2014 1. Dr. S.K. Pal, 01.09.2007 - 09.06.2009 2. Dr. A.K. Singh, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 3. Dr. A.K. Sarkar, 01.09.2007 -06.09.2011 4. Dr. R.S. Pan, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 5. Dr. A.K. Jaiswal, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 6. Dr. R.K. Singh, 01.09.07- 30.06.2011 7. Dr. C.V. Singh 01.07.2011-31.03.2014 8. Dr. S.K. Singh, 01.09.2007-10.08.2011 9. Dr. Shushil Prasad, 17.08.2011-31.03.2014 10.Dr. P.B. Saha, 26.09.09-31.03.2014 11.Er. D.K. Rusia, 01.9.2007-31.03.2014 12.Dr. Arvind Kumar, 01.9.2007-31.03.2014 1. Dr. S.K. Pal, 01.09.2007- 09.06.2009 2. Dr. A.K. Singh, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 3. Dr. A.K. Sarkar, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 4. Dr. R.S. Pan, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 5. Dr. A.K. Jaiswal, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 6. Dr. R.K. Singh, 01.09.2007- 30.06.2011 7. Dr. C.V. Singh, 01.07.2011-31.03.2014 8. Dr. S.K. Singh, 01.09.2007-10.08.2011 9. Dr. Shushil Prasad, 17.08.2011-31.03.2014 10.Dr. P.B. Saha, 26.09.2009-31.03.2014 11.Er. D.K. Rusia, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 12.Dr. Arvind Kumar, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 13.Dr. R.P. Singh, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 14.Comptroller, BAU, 01.09.2007-31.03.2014 51 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 B. List of Meetings organized (CIC, CAC, CMU etc.) Sl. No. 1. Details of the meeting CIC 2. CAC Date 05.07.2008 17.10.2008 13.12.2008 17.04.2009 06.07.2009 15.10.2009 09.11.2009 20.10.2010 19.07.2010 05.07.2008 25.05.2011 25.08.2011 01.02.2012 06.09.2013 07.08.2008 08.06.2009 16.11.2009 10.03.2010 29.10.2010 24.10.2011 01.04.2013 03.01.2014 Place & Address (Where meeting was organized) Board room, BAU, Ranchi Board room, BAU, Ranchi Board room, BAU, Ranchi Board room, BAU, Ranchi Board room, BAU, Ranchi Board room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Conference Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, RAC, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Meeting Hall of ZRS, Dumka Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi Board Room, BAU, Ranchi 52 53 15.5531 5.52216 -0.84223 -1.20591 1 1 0 0 0 0.71435 -1 1.71435 1.26701 0.88597 1 1 0 0 0 0.35083 0 0.35083 3.28815 3.2581 -0.03005 1.1763 -35 -0.62206 1.123 -5.33699 0 -2.77398 0 -59.29032 0 0 0 0 -24.77589 0 0 0 0 87.64675 0 71.01566 0 12.85577 2.52249 1.25283 2013-14 1.123 24.36884 1.68677 4.77524 1 1 0 0 0 5.25 2 3.25 50.4065 186.23765 18.09949 72.08201 49.37353 2.81255 15.25 59.37 27.64166 33.75 0 0 2012-13 Grand Total (A+B+C+D) 0.73292 9.0688 -5.45453 80.5 1 30 2 47.5 5.25 2 3.25 0.41015 1.04288 2011-12 20.12 10.93863 2 3.5 2010-11 Funds released 90.688 19.02712 70.25 14.938 2 3.5 2009-10 401.69102 0.86528 7.62225 8.4165 61.50204 6.1 0 4.37794 51.0241 14.85333 3 11.85333 298.65327 216.2437 64.86456 6.56792 10.97709 Total release 0 0.96416 2008-09 1.85999 3.2106 2009-10 VI Year : 1.123, 0.41015 1.81963 2010-11 Expenditure 1.00064 2.34805 2011-12 3.33935 0 3.33935 4.0542 1.9044 2.1498 0 2.2317 2.11375 0.57149 0.99912 2.61439 0.96742 0 0.35172 9.9008 2.68054 0 2.68054 1.0453 0.40951 0.9 0.61384 5.56728 0.69328 0 0 4.874 0.5393 0 0.5393 3.94487 0 0 0 0 0 2.1877 0 2.1877 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.9895 93.54541 103.8075 64.78946 55.51086 24.86225 44.62933 0 5.57951 67.8716 72.68447 49.98897 48.79044 18.72968 44.62933 6.49032 21.28916 26.65932 11.21994 0 0 1.34098 0.82041 2.46469 2.92652 2.77011 -0.0483 -0.91047 3.44018 -4.84609 0 -8.31807 2.05224 1.0956 0.95664 401.1343 0 0 6.91352 0.55672 0.86528 7.62225 1.50298 71.22602 -9.72398 2.65982 4.84609 4.37794 59.34217 12.80109 1.9044 10.89669 310.19367 -11.5404 229.59544 -13.35174 62.09445 6.61622 11.88756 Total Balance 2013-14 expenditure 54.2989 35.53756 28.76499 17.16992 33.65861 5.14934 16.94371 22.47432 0 0 0 7.49918 6.11264 54.05282 0.22075 0.5186 2012-13 VII Year : 24.36884 0.62654 12.85462 13.31498 12.22163 16.67676 0.66 0.1 2007-08 V Year : 49.37353, 0.86528 1.915 37.3 1 5 3 28.3 0 0 0 11.915 10.425 0.49 0.5 0.5 2008-09 III Year : 18.09949, IV Year : 72.08201, : Rs 457.41544 lakh : September 2007 : September 2007 to 31st March 2014 Bank interest (2013-14) 457.41544 12.71959 D. Institutional Charges Bank interest 20.58685 94.05739 4.84609 (9) Work / New / Renovation Sub- Total of C (7-10) 5.16194 (8) Furniture (10)Others/ Books 63.46251 15.99098 4.0364 (7) Equipment C. Non - Recurring Sub- Total of B (5-6) (6) Consultancy (c) Training for farmers (5) Training 11.95458 334.64748 Sub- Total of A (1-4) B. HRD Component 80.97553 234.59778 (4) Operational Cost 6.92855 (3) Contractual Staff 12.14562 (2) Workshop Total allocation 2007-08 : 401.1343 lakh (1 ) TA A. Recurring Contingencies Sanctioned Heads Expenditure Head-wise : Total expenditure Sanctioned Date of Commencement of Sub-project Duration Funds Received in each year(Rs. In lakh) I Year : 50.4065, II Year : 186.23765, Total amount received : 401.69102 lakh Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi (Period from 2007 to2014) STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE Part-III - Budget & Utilization Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 54 50000 20000 70000 - 285000 50000 20000 355000 610000 12750 (D)Institutional Charges* Grand Total (A+B+C+D) 52.77249 622750 @2231380 101780 50000 - 2.71725 - - 2008-09 93158 247050 1680000 2020208 50000 Total Allocation 2007-08 25000 35000 195000 255000 - Item (A) A. Recurring contingencies 1 TA 298676 2 Workshops -0.0 3 Contractual Services 1348639 4 Operational Costs 2455856 Sub-total of A (1-4) 41.03171 (B) HRD Component 5 Training 3.27336 Consultancy Training 6 organized for farmer Sub-total of B (5-6) 3.27336 (C.) Non-recurring 7 Equipment 3.84102 8 Furniture 91688 9 Works 10 Others (Books) 99227 Sub-total C (7-10) 5750170 Total (A+B+C) - No. @ Actual released - - - 100000 - *100000 - 2009-10 2011-12 802411 3928 20000 20000 - 50000 - 127364 26620 20000 20000 - 25000 (-) 25000 100000 73741 352000 342000 430000 (-) 359997 872000 55744 50000 50000 2010-11 Fund Released 212083 (-) 898 (-) 8312 (-)9210 (-)12356 (-)200 25000 - 11731 50749 146369 208849 25000 2012-13 4787740 382948 - 19800 691752 153232 - 84238 49163 - - 18158 26450 185108 229716 - 2007-08 - - 100000 - 100000 1664 316024 254264 2013-14 Total released 1009788 94675 200000 42525 19831 262525 - - - 50000 29942 177440 363651 2008-09 1409550 99800 99864 20000 119836 - - - 27336 52306 171338 938934 2009-10 555975 - 19972 - - - 50000 21435 213803 251069 2010-11 Expenditure Sanctioned : Rs 52.77249 lakh Date of Commencement of Sub-project : September 2007 Duration : September 2007 to 31st March 2014 Funds Received in each year (Rs in lakh) I Year : 6.22750, II Year : 22.31380, III Year : 1.00, IV year : 8.02411, V Year : 1.27364, VI Year : 2.12083, Total amount received : 47.87740 lakh Total expenditure : 43.87562 lakh Expenditure Head-wise : * 100000 received under Equipment for PI NAIP BAU construction of drip irrigation ** Misc. receipt Rs. 417/- 200 credited by bank. 401740 - 19668 - - - 50000 26837 219608 85539 2011-12 227752 10800 19756 - - - - 1664 86024 129264 2012-13 399809 19000 - - - - 1171 303600 76038 2013-14 VII Year : 6.91752 4387562 - Total Expenditure ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region Research Centre, Namkum, Ranchi (Period from 2007 to 2014) STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE - - - - - - - 400178 - 417** = 400595 Balance Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Item 55 13.40311 4 Operational costs - Consumables 1.39585 42.57044 Grand Total (A+B+C+D) 41.17459 D Institutional Charges* Total(A+B+C) 2.94313 0.00000 1.09961 9 Works (new/renovation) 10 Others (Journals/Books, Animal etc) Sub-total of C (7-10) 0.00000 0.99612 3.17750 0.07750 3.10000 1.5500 0.20000 0.5000 0.84740 0.85000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.55000 0.95000 0.35000 0.0000 0.25000 8 Furniture 2.88763 0.0 2.88763 Fund Released 7.38485 0.20000 0.20000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.48763 0.00000 0.48763 6.69722 3.50756 2.18979 0.00000 0.99987 8.47726 7.22720 0.36780 -0.15765 8.10946 0.70000 0.20000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 6.90946 3.60853 2.30593 0.00000 0.99500 7.39916 0.29280 7.10636 0.30000 0.30000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 6.30636 2.29262 3.01600 0.00000 0.99774 0.45000 0.00000 0.45000 2.54607 0.99440 0.59100 0.00000 0.96067 0.00000 5.80462 0.26990 5.53472 3.17888 0.18968 2.98920 0.20000 -0.00687 0.20000 -0.00039 0.00000 0.00000 -0.00388 0.00000 -0.00260 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 4.83472 1.05000 2.78827 0.00000 0.99645 0.00000 5.75587 2.94313 1.09961 0.00000 0.99612 0.84740 2.72859 0.00000 2.72859 1.28003 4.73593 40.00055 0.24000 4.49593 38.72052 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.29096 0.00000 0.29096 4.20497 33.04880 0.48141 12.88452 3.16742 14.40841 0.00000 0.55614 released Total Expenditure VI Year : 3.17888, VII Year : 4.73593 2.63819 0.00000 2.63819 1.53305 0.20000 0.00000 0.48565 0.84740 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.10514 0.75853 0.09993 0.00000 0.24668 8.24532 0.10000 8.14532 0.71047 0.20000 0.00000 0.51047 0.00000 0.48763 0.00000 0.48763 6.94722 3.75756 2.18979 0.00000 0.99987 7.79555 0.32819 7.46736 0.20000 0.20000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 6.76736 3.54262 2.22700 0.00000 0.99774 7.14217 0.27916 6.86301 0.20000 0.20000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 6.16301 2.37829 2.78827 0.00000 0.99645 5.90339 0.14100 5.76239 0.29961 0.29961 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 4.96278 0.96611 3.03600 0.00000 0.96067 1.94593 0.15000 1.79593 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.29096 0.00000 0.29096 1.50497 0.48141 0.46742 0.00000 0.55614 5.17108 0.27484 4.89624 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.23900 0.00000 0.23900 4.65724 0.67115 3.08422 0.00000 0.90187 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 V Year : 5.80462, 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 7 Equipment C Non-recurring Sub-total of B (5-6) 6 Consultancy 5 Training B HRD Component 35.34383 15.74099 3 Contractual Services (RAs / SRFs) Sub–total of A (1-4) 0.00000 6.19973 allocation 2 Workshops 1 TA A A. Recurring contingencies No. Total Total expenditure : 38.84163 lakh Expenditure Head-wise : IV Year : 7.39916, : September 2007 to 31st March 2014 Duration Funds Received in each year (Rs. in lakh) I Year : 3.1775, II Year : 8.47726, Total amount received : 40.00055 lakh III Year : 7.22720, : Rs 42.57044 lakh : September 2007 Sanctioned Date of Commencement of Sub-project Central Rainfed Upland Rice Research Station, Hazaribagh (Period from 2007 to 2014) STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE 38.84163 1.27319 37.56844 2.94313 1.09961 0.00000 0.99612 0.84740 2.51759 0.00000 2.51759 32.10772 12.55567 13.89263 0.00000 5.65942 nditure Total Expe- 1.15892 0.00684 1.15208 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.21100 0.00000 0.21100 0.94108 0.32885 0.51578 0.00000 0.09645 Balance Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 A. Recurring Contingencies (1 ) TA (2)Workshop (3) Contractual Staff (4) Operational Cost Sub- Total of A (1-4) B. HRD Component (5)Training (a) International Training (b) National Training (c) Training organized for farmers (6)Consultancy Sub- Total of B (5-6) C. Non - Recurring (7)Equipment (8)Furniture (9) Work / New / Renovation (10) Others/ Books Sub- Total of C (7-10) D. Institutional Charges Grand Total (A+B+C+D) Refunded to ICAR Total (A+B+C+D) + Refund Sanctioned Heads Expenditure Head-wise: Total expenditure 56 2.85000 8.00000 0.50000 0.50000 0.00000 0.00000 0.20000 0.20000 3.55000 8.70000 0.07125 0.45530 5.04625 18.76130 10.8500 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 12.8500 1.5194 47.6214 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000 0.0000 2.0000 1.00000 0.00000 2.55600 5.55000 9.10600 2008-09 0.25000 0.00000 0.35000 0.82500 1.42500 2007-08 4.5000 0.0000 12.6520 14.1000 31.2520 Funds allocated : 33.46816 lakh 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.0000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 2009-10 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -0.20000 -0.20000 -0.76165 3.86789 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.50000 0.00000 0.50000 0.26766 0.00000 3.42000 0.64188 4.32954 2010-11 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.20000 0.20000 0.27350 5.69085 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.28525 0.00000 0.28525 0.46210 0.00000 3.42000 1.05000 4.93210 2011-12 Funds released 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.85062 0.00000 0.85062 0.31784 0.00000 3.25809 4.49019 8.06612 2013-14 10.83831 0.92702 0.00000 0.00000 11.76533 0.45680 47.86758 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 2.13587 0.00000 2.13587 2.14842 0.00000 14.80409 16.55707 33.50958 Total released V Year : 5.69085, -1.08622 1.07453 -0.07298 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -0.40000 0.00000 -1.55920 1.07453 0.27660 0.14180 4.36822 10.13307 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -0.14918 0.00000 1.80000 4.00000 5.65082 2012-13 IV Year : 3.86789, : September 2007 to 31st March 2014 Duration Funds Received in each year(Rs. In lakh) I Year : 5.04625, II Year : 18.76130, Total amount received : 47.86758 lakh III Year : 0.0, : Rs. 47.6214 lakh : September 2007 Sanctioned Date of Commencement of Sub-project 0.14990 0.41327 0.00000 0.00000 0.56317 0.00000 0.83819 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.27502 0.27502 2007-08 2.01388 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 2.01388 0.01430 7.46278 0.47595 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.47595 0.25699 0.00000 1.86235 2.83931 4.95865 2008-09 0.00000 0.51375 0.00000 0.00000 0.51375 0.00000 6.64727 7.6000 14.24727 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.20935 0.00000 0.20935 0.32067 0.00000 2.29500 3.30850 5.92417 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 4.67754 0.0000 4.67754 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.09995 0.00000 0.09995 0.40210 0.00000 2.50374 1.67175 4.57759 2010-11 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 5.06598 1.0745 6.14051 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.35062 0.00000 0.35062 0.35082 0.00000 3.40700 0.95754 4.71536 2011-12 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 4.20879 0.0000 4.20879 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.06784 0.00000 1.13600 3.00495 4.20879 2012-13 VII Year : 10.13307 Expenditure incurred 2009-10 VI Year : 4.36822, Indian Institute of Natural Resins and Gums, Namkum, Ranchi (Period from 2007 to2014) STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 4.56761 5.72489 10.2925 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.61060 0.00000 0.61060 0.11505 0.00000 2.75360 1.08836 3.95701 2013-14 2.16378 0.92702 0.00000 0.00000 3.09080 0.01430 33.46816 14.39942 47.86758 0.47595 0.00000 0.00000 1.27052 0.00000 1.74647 1.51347 0.00000 13.95769 13.14543 28.61659 2007-14 Total Expend Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Part-iv : declaration 57 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 ANNEXURE-1 Economics of Goat Rearing Sl. No. Item Quantity I. Non Recurring expenditure a. Cost of female goat (10 kg) 3 goats b. Buck provided on community basis c. Housing as per existing renovation d. Total II. Recurring expenditure 1st & 2nd year a. 100gm concentrate/kid/day up to 180 days (9 kids) 62kg/ b. 100 gm concentrate/day 365 days (Female) 73 kg c. Medicine + Vaccination d. Total Total expenditure of 1st & 2nd year (Recurring) III Income: 1st year a. Sell of goats after 10 months 9 IV. Income: 2nd year a. Sell of kids after 10 months 7 (2 female goat will be kept for breeding purpose) b. Sell of old female goats 2 c. Total V. Net Income(IV –II) in two years Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) 1500/goat 4500.00 500.00 4500.00 20/kg 20/kg 3240.00 1460.00 200.00 4900.00 9800.00 1500/- 13500.00 1500/- 10500.0 1000/- 2000.00 26000.00 16200.00 Economics of Backyard Poultry Rearing (ten birds unit) (Breed: Grampriya) Sl. No. Item Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) I Male: a. Cost of birds (8 weeks) 2 100/bird 200.00 b. Rearing cost of birds from 9 wks to 12 wks (Backyard farming) 10/bird 20.00 c. Total 220.00 II Output profit: a. Sale of male birds 72 wks , 1.2 kg body wt 2 150/kg 360.00 b. Income 140.00 III Female a. Cost of birds (8wks) 8 100/bird 800.00 b. Cost of rearing from 9 to 72 wks (Backyard farming) 50/bird 400.00 c. Total 1200.00 IV Output profit: a. Sale of eggs 150 eggs/bird upto 72 wks of age 1200 eggs 4/egg 4800.00 b. Sale of culled bird 2 kg bwt 8 100/bird 800.00 c. Total 5600.00 V Net Profit (IV -III ) 4400.00 VI Net Income (II+V)/year 4540.00 Economics of Backyard Poultry Rearing (ten birds unit) (Breed: Vanraja) Sl. No. I a. b. c. Item Male: Cost of birds (8 weeks) Rearing cost of birds from 9 wks to 12 wks (Backyard farming) Total 58 Quantity 2 Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) 100/bird 10/bird 200.00 20.00 220.00 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Sl. No. II a. b. III a. b. c. IV a. b. c. V VI Item Output profit: Sale of male birds 72 weeks, 2-2.5 kg bwt. Income Female Cost of birds (8wks) Cost of rearing from 9 to 72 wks Total Output profit: Sale of eggs 100 eggs/bird upto 72 wks of age Sale of culled bird 2.5 kg bwt Total Net Profit (IV -III ) Net Income (II+V)/year Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) 2 150/kg 600.00 380.00 8 100/bird 50/bird 800.00 400.00 1200.00 800 eggs 8 4/egg 100/kg 3200.00 2000.00 5200.00 4000.00 4380.00 Economics of Pig Rearing (2 females+1 male) (Breed: T x D) Sl. No. I. a. b. c. II. a. b. a. b. c. d. III. a. IV. a. b. c. d. e. V. a. VI. a. Item Non Recurring expenditure Cost of 2 females + 1 male Renovation of existing house Total Recurring expenditure Cost of kitchen waste (1050kg/pig/yr) Medicine & Vaccination Quantity 1st year 2nd year Cost of kitchen waste (3285kg/pig for 3 pigs) Medicine Cost of Medicine & Vaccination of piglets Total Profit 2 months piglets (10kg/piglets) Net income 3rd year Cost of kitchen waste for parents (3285 kg/pig/yr) Cost of medicine for adult pigs Cost of feed in two years kitchen waste (12 kg/piglet) 28 piglets Cost of medicine & Vaccination Total Profit 2 months piglets (10kg/piglets) From 3 years onwards upto 5 years Net Income 59 Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) 3 1500 4500.00 2000.00 6500.00 3150 kg 3 pigs 1/ kg 100/pig 3150.00 300.00 9855 kg 28 piglets 1/ kg 100/pig 50/piglet 9855.00 300.00 1400.00 15005.00 28 piglets 1500/piglet 3 pigs 3 pigs 336 kg 1/kg 100/pig 1/kg 9855.00 300.00 336.00 28 piglets 50/piglet 1400.00 11891.00 28 piglets 1500/piglet 42000.00 42000.00 26995.00 (in 2 yrs) 13498.00/yr 30109.00 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Annual net income (Marginal Farmers) Land holding size 0.5 ha (0.25 ha upland, 0.15 ha medium land, 0.10 ha low land) Situation A: land use pattern of 0.5 ha Crop Kharif: Maize + Pigeon Pea intercropping Rice(HYV) Rabi : Gram (Rainfed) (Medium land) Total Area (ha) A 0.25 Cost of Production (Rs) D 3500.00 Net income (Rs) E 5800.00 0.25 B 4.5q (M) 1.75q (PP) 8.5q Gross Return (Rs) C 4050+5250 = 9300.00 8500.00 3000.00 5500.00 0.125 1.75 q 4025.00 1375.00 2650.00 Production (q) 13950.00 Situation B: land use pattern of 0.5 ha Area Crop Yield (q) (ha) Maize 0.125 2.0 Pigeon pea 0.125 0.9 Rice (Med & low) 0.25 4.0 Total Gross Return (Rs) 1800.00 2700.00 4000.00 Cost of Cultivation (Rs) 1050.00 750.00 2100.00 Net Income (Rs) 750.00 1950.00 1900.00 4600.00 Annual net income (Small farmers) Land holding size : 1.0 ha (0. 5 ha Upland,0.3 ha Medium land and 0.2 ha Low land) Situation A: land use pattern of 1.0 ha Crop Kharif: Maize Maize + pigeon pea intercropping Rice (HYV) Hybrid Rabi: Mustard (irrigated) Gram (irrigated) Total Area (ha) A 0.25 0.25 Production (q) 0.3 0.2 B 7.5 4.5 (M) 1.75 (PP) 10.5 11.0 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.5 Gross Return (Rs) C 6750.00 9300.00 Cost of production (Rs) D 3500.00 3500.00 Net income (Rs) E=(C-D) 3250.00 5800.00 10,500.00 11,000.00 3600.00 3200.00 6900.00 7800.00 2520.00 3450.00 1000.00 1100.00 1520.00 2350.00 27620.00 Situation B: land use pattern of 1.0 ha Crop Kharif: Maize Pigeon pea Rice (Med & low) Rabi: Mustard (irrigated) Total Area (ha) Yield (q) Gross Return Cost of (Rs) Cultivation (Rs) 0.2 0.2 0.5 3.4 1.5 8.0 3060.00 4500.00 8000.00 1700.00 1200.00 4200.00 1360.00 3300.00 2000.00 0.1 0.56 1180.00 600.00 580.00 7240.00 60 Net Income (Rs) Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 ANNEXURE-2 Plate - 1 Village Activity Map of the Project before and after NAIP Village : Gajanda, Block : Jama, District : Dumka (Mayurakhi Sub catchment) 61 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Plate - 2 Village : Palasi, Block : Jama, District : Dumka (Brahmani Sub catchment) 62 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Plate - 3 Village : Rupaidih, Block : Jamtara, District : Jamtara (Barakar sub catchment) LEGEND Upland Medium Land Low Land Houses River Road Ditch Well Pond road Before NAIP Drainage P Pig (P=10 pigs) G Goat (G= 50 Goats) F Poultry (F=100 Poutry) D Duck (D=20 Ducks) W Wheat (W=0.4 ha) M Mustard (M=0.2 ha) Gr Gram (Gr=0.2 ha) After NAIP 63 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Plate - 4 Village : Madnadih, Block : Narayanpur, District : Jamtara (Barakar Sub catchment) LEGEND Upland Medium Land Low Land Houses River Road Ditch Before NAIP Well Pond road Drainage G F Goat (G= 50 Goats) D W M Duck (D=20 Ducks) V Vegetable (V= 0.03 ha) Poultry (F=100 Poutry) Wheat (W=0.4 ha) Mustard (M= 0.2 ha) After NAIP 64 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Plate - 5 Village : Manjhladih, Block : Narayanpur, District : Jamtara (Barakar Sub catchment) LEGEND Upland Medium Land Low Land Houses Road Before NAIP Ditch Well Pond road Drainage P Pig (P=10 pigs) G Goat (G= 50 Goats) F Poultry (F=100 Poutry) D Duck (D=20 Ducks) W Wheat (W=0.4 ha) M Mustard (M=0.2 ha) V Vegetable (V= 0.03 ha) After NAIP 65 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Plate - 6 Village: Andipur, Block:Dumka, District:Dumka Village : Andipur, Block : Dumka, District : Dumka (Mayurakshi (Mayurakshisub Subcatchment) catchment) Before NAIP After NAIP 66 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Plate - 7 Village : Guhiyajori, Block : Dumka, District : Dumka (Mayurakshi Sub catchment) Before NAIP After NAIP 67 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Plate - 8 Village : Rampur, Block : Narayanpur, District : Jamtara (Barakar Sub catchment) 68 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 ANNEXURE-3 Impact Assessment Conducted by Xavier Institute of Social Service, Ranchi, February 2011 Executive Summary 1. The Present Study At the request of Birsa Agricultural University, Xavier Institute of Social Service (XISS) has undertaken the present comprehensive study entitled “National Agricultural Innovation Project on Developing Sustainable Farming System Models for Prioritized Micro watersheds in Rainfed Areas in Jharkhand in Dumka and Jamtara District”. The Birsa Agricultural University has been working on the National Agricultural Innovation Project on Developing Sustainable Farming System Model. Mid-term evalution was conducted by Xavier Institute of Social Service, Ranchi in order to assess the work perform by BAU and its consortia partners in providing the output and its outcome and the impact on the number of targeted people and further to provide with suggestion so as to bridge the gap. 2. Disclaimer Although this report was prepared under the funding of BAU, but BAU bears no responsibility for, nor is in anyway committed to, the views and recommendations expressed herein. 3. Area Covered Survey was conducted in two districts namely Dumka and Jamtara. Two Blocks were selected in each district where the project has been implemented. In Dumka district five villages each where selected from two blocks viz. Dumka and Jama. In Jamtara, six villages were selected from Jamtara block and five villages from Narayanpur block. 4. Scope of Work The study has broadly analyzed the following aspects of the project: (i) Review and analyze the performance of various activities including training of the scheme vis-à-vis its objectives. (ii) Review and identify the constraints/gaps in impending project implementation and attainment of the stated goals and providing recommendations/suggestions for overcoming these constraints. (iii)Review and analyze the status of Self Help Groups and suggest strategies to ensure the sustainability. Further more the study keeping in mind above mentioned study objectives assessed the project performance on the following areas: a) To assess the change in knowledge, attitude, skills and aptitude labels of smalls and marginal forms in relation to objectives and output envisaged under this scheme. b) To assess the social impact of the project in terms of social mobilization, solidarity, mutual health, group activity as economy benefit. c) To assess the incensement of employment days, income enhancement and production enhancement. d) To assess pre and post project group in various livelihood sector. e) To assess the SHGs activities and its sustainability. f) To extent to which the trained farmers have been actually benefited & the kind of impact the scheme activities\intervention had on the lives of farmers. g) To assess the farmer’s satisfaction about the watershed in rain fed farming areas. 69 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 5. Methodology A. Methods: Survey has employed multi pronged methods to collect and collate various streams of data. In the nutshell these were as follows: I. Projects beneficiaries/household profile through structured questionnaires– The detailed socioeconomic features households and livelihood based skill of members of household of selected villages was collected. II. Social Inventory and village profile– for our evaluation process, enlistment of the existing village resources and people dependency on these resources was done. III.Assessment of Self Help Groups through Focus Groups Discussion was carried out IV.Analysis – Quantitative data was analyzed with the help of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Quantitative was collected content wise. B. Sample Size: This study was taken up or the selected beneficiaries from all villages under the National Agricultural Innovation Project on “Developing Sustainable Farming System Models for Prioritized Micro Watersheds in Rainfed Areas in Jharkhand”. Details of the sample size are as follows; a. All 5 villages each from Dumka and Jama block from Dumka districts which were under the NAIP were studied to cover all the implemented project components. 51 households were selected randomly and studied through a structured questionnaire. Besides household survey, 20 Focused Group Discussions were also conducted in these villages. b. In Jamtara district all 6 villages from Jamtara block under NAIP and all 5 villages under NAIP from Narayanpur block were selected to cover all the implemented project components. 36 households Jamtara block and 33 households from Narayanpur blocks were randomly chosen for the study. 22 FGDs were conducted in these villages, 11 for women and 11 for men’s group. 6. Findings A. Community mobilization through SHGs The project began with the community mobilization activity. Community mobilization was done by forming Self Help Groups in each selected village which were later on adopted by the project. In this chapter, we have analyzed functioning of SHGs and their relevance in the project implementation process. 1. At least one SHG was formed in each adopted villages.Women SHGs were also promoted by NAIP. 2. Age of SHGs: Nearly 69% SHGs were 1 year old followed by 11% SHGs of 3 years old, 9% SHG of 4 years old. Remaining 19% SHGs were 5 and above years old. 3. Composition of SHGs: Nearly 60% members were ST followed by OBC 34%. Very few SC and general caste household took the SHG membership. 4. Membership size and attendance in the SHGs: On and average SHGs had 15 members and 65% of them regularly attend the SHG meetings. Average attendance of members in SHG meetings was higher in Dumka district compared to Jamtara district. 5. Type of agencies assisting the SHGs: It was found that nearly 174% SHGs were assisted by NGOs and 83% were assisted by the Government Department. 6. Frequency of SHGs’ meetings: In Jamtara SHG meetings are held once in a month. In Jama block SHG meetings are held fortnightly. However, in Dumka block nearly 55% SHGs had weekly meetings, 36% had monthly meetings and remaining 9% had fortnightly meetings. 7. Status of framing of rules by SHG: 51% SHGs had framed there own rule according to their wisdom and 49% were guided by the assisting agencies in framing their rules. 8. Status of rule abidance by SHG members: It was found that nearly 43% SHGs members abide by the rules and in 9% SHGs members do not abide by the rules. However, in nearly 49% SHGs member’s responses were conspicuous by their silence. 70 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 9. Maintenance of registers/records by the SHGs office bearers: It was found attendance registered were maintained properly in all SHGs but savings registered are maintained in 97.1% SHGs and individual pass book in 60% SHGs. Very few SHGs maintained loan register (8.6%), ledger book (5.7%) and cash register (11.4%). These are a grey area of SHGs functioning which needs to be improved and regularized. 10.Topics or issues discussed in the SHGs meetings: The topics or the issues discussed among the 35 SHG weekly meetings indicates that 22.9% (8) had no discussions at all, 20.0% (7) SHGs discussed about agriculture and horticulture, 14.3% (5) SHGs discussed about agriculture and animal husbandry, 8.6% (3) SHGs discussed about agriculture, 5.7% (2) SHGs discussed about collection of money followed by 2.9% (1) SHGs discussed about agriculture, animal husbandry, anti-alcohol, education, health, horticulture, goatry, furthermore duckery, plantation, veterinary, cash collection, handloom making, self-employment and poultry respectively. 11.Decision making mechanism in the SHG meetings: The way of decision making on any issues in the SHG meetings was found that 40% (14) SHGs were based on decision as per the suggestion of experts, followed by 34.3% (12) SHGs by decision of the majority, 20% (7) SHGs by the decision of the office bearers, and lastly 5.7% (2) SHGs by the decision of the majority and as per the suggestion of the experts respectively. 12.Information sharing process among SHG members regarding collection of cash and other transactions: No uniform information sharing process was observed among studied SHGs. Only around 17% SHGs showed the pass book and cash book to the members and 14% SHGs show the actual cash to the members. Very few (less than 3%) SHGs shared register and other documents with the members. This showed a gross transparency in the SHGs which may paralyze the SHGs in the long run. 13.Bank accounts: Out of 35 SHGs, 31 SHGs have bank account, one has applied for and three SHGs have no bank accounts. 14.Handling of SHG savings: In 48.6% SHGs savings are handled by the treasurer, followed by 25% each SHGs where savings are handled by the president or secretary. In Dumka district, in majority of SHGs savings are handled by either president or secretary but in Jamtara district in 2/3 SHGs savings are managed by the treasurer. 15.Total number of members enrolled and members save regularly in SHGs: Out of 524 enrolled members, 506(93.7%) members save regularly with SHGs. While all members of Dumka district save regularly, only 95.1% members from Jamtara block save money regularly. 16.Interval of savings of SHGs’ members: Members make small regular savings contributions overtime until there is enough capital in the group to begin lending to the needy members. However, these regular intervals differs across SHGs. Out of the 35 SHGs under study, members made regular contributions at a monthly interval, while in three of them it was on a weekly basis, and in one it was done at a fortnightly interval. 17.Regular savings amount of SHGs members: Amongst the 35 studied SHGs, it was seen that in 15 of them members made regular savings of Rs. 20, Rs. 10 in 7 SHGs, Rs. 30 in 5 SHGs, Rs. 50 in 3 SHGs etc. We can see from the table below that, whereas in Dumka no SHG members deposit more than Rs. 20, in Narayanpur there are two SHGs in which the members deposit Rs. 50 regularly. 18.Total savings as on the date of survey: Out of the total 35 SHGs, only one is having a total savings exceeding Rs. 10000, 6 have a total savings in the range of 7500 to 10000, eight have in between 50007500, and ten each are having total savings in the range of 2500-5000 and 1000-2500 respectively. 19.Total credit given, credit recovered and interest earned by SHGs as on the date of survey: Out of four block cluster, SHGs from Jama and Jamtara block cluster have not done any credit disbursement, SHGs of Dumka block disbursed Rs. 75,300/- as credit, whereas recovered only 71 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Rs. 51,500 with an interest amount of Rs. 1505/- only. Similarly, SHGs of Narayanpur block Rs. 25,000/- as credit, whereas recovered only Rs. 20,000/- with an interest amount of Rs. 960/- only. Recovery rate was found to be in Dumka block than Narayanpur block. 20.Saved money invested by members of SHGs in non-farming activities: The SHGs have also invested some of their savings in non farming activities. However this exercise was limited to the SHGs in Dumka alone. Here too such investments were limited only to these SHGs. One SHG each invested Rs. 250, 2000, 300 for such activities. 21.Purpose of loan received from Bank/Govt./other organization: Three (3) SHGs from Dumka block received loan from bank for goatry and poultry and one (1) SHG from Narayanpur received loan for household consumption purpose. 22.Amount refunded against loan to bank: In Dumka block, one SHG each refunded Rs. 20,000/-, Rs. 21,500/- and Rs. 25,000/- respectively to the bank. SHG from Narayanpur block has refunded only Rs. 2000/-. 23.Outstanding amount with the bank: In Dumka block among three SHG who took bank loan, one has loan outstanding Rs. 3,500/-, another Rs. 5,000/-, and third one has no loan outstanding. SHG from Narayanpur block has Rs. 23,000/- loan standing. 24.Working pattern of women SHGs: Women SHGs has observed to work on ad hoc basis without strategic decisions. This has been the weakness of women SHGs in all block. Nearly 51% women SHG have not made any norms and rules for SHG functioning. 25.Consultation process in women SHGs: Nearly 45% women SHGs did not consult the members for taking any decisions and in another 43% SHGs members were only informed about the decisions but were not consulted ever. In barely 11% women SHGs, members were consulted before taking a decision. 26.Functions of women SHGs: women SHGs helped, in the implementation of NAIP activities and scheme, fund management and resolving conflicts, observing social religious functions and festivals and raising voices for developmental activities. By and large women SHGs did not play active role in above mentioned activities except helping in NAIP schemes. B. Benefits flow to beneficiaries Key findings of benefit flow towards beneficiaries can be summed up as follows: Socio-economic profile of respondents 1. Out of 120 respondents sampled from among beneficiary households showed that only 38% (45 respondents) were from BPL households. 2. 87% respondents were males and 13% were female. 3. 78% (94) belonged to joint families. 4. 71% (85) respondents were Scheduled Tribes. 5. 59% (71) respondents were the follower of Sarna religion. 6. 68% of the respondents were head of the household and the rest 33% were family members. 7. 75% (90) respondents had marginal land holdings i.e. <1 acre. 8. 57% (68) respondents were cultivators followed by 28.3% (34) cultivator cum casual laborers. Among remaining 15% respondents, on and average less than 5% respondents were engaged in other type’s occupations. 9. Number of earning members per respondents varied from 1 to 10.35% (42) and 30.8% (37) respondent’s households had only one and two earning members respectively. 10.The dependents members per respondent’s household varied from 1 to 19. Average number of dependent members per household was 5.83≈6. 72 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 Assistance given by NAIP 11.Average assistance given in the form of seeds to the beneficiary respondents’ varied from 9.309 kg for wheat to 0.250 kg for soybean. Seed assistance was given for paddy, wheat, maize, pigeon pea, mustard, gram, soybean and peas. 12.The beneficiaries were even given vegetable seeds viz. cow pea, bean, bitter gourd, brinjal, cabbage, chilli, cucumber, ginger, lady’s finger, parwal (pointed gourd), pumpkin, radish, broad bean (sem) and tomato. The average value of assistance varied from Rs. 366.67 for parwal to Rs. 12 for chilli. 13.Under the horticulture scheme saplings of fruit trees given from banana, guava, litchi, mango, papaya. The average assistance received by the beneficiary varied from 32.71 units of guava to 3 units for litchi. The average value of the respective assistance is Rs. 222.86 for guava and Rs. 36 for litchi. 14.Under NAIP, fertilizer assistance was given in the form of DAP, Urea, Compost, Murate of Potash, and Calcium. The average amount of assistance varied from 56.75 kg to 18.63 kg. The average value of the assistance varied from Rs. 330 to Rs. 142.96. 15.NAIP assistance also included Brood lac, ducklings, chicks, fingerlings, improved compost pit, green house. The average value of assistance provided was Rs. 373.75 for lac, Rs. 450.69 for goats, Rs. 983.3 for pigs, Rs. 1065.42 for ducklings, Rs. 814.55 for chicks, Rs. 210.43 for fingerlings, Rs. 4,908.95 for improved compost pit and Rs. 15,000 for green house. 16.The group sets were given to 17 individuals and 4 farmer’s groups. Value of assistance was Rs. 19000 per Pump-set. Economic gains through the utilization of assistance 17.Utilization of NAIP has accrued following average monetary gain Rs. 944.23 from wheat Rs. 666.67 from gram, Rs. 440.20 from maize, 144.80 from mustard, Rs. 457.00 from mustard+maize, Rs. 1046.30 from paddy, Rs. 1600.00 from paddy+maize, Rs. 4850 from wheat+gram and Rs. 1200 from wheat+mustard combination. Therefore it was found that crop mix has yield more monetary gain than mono crop. 18.We find that average economic gain in terms of by- product of cereal after project assistance was varied from 10.32q from paddy to 0.23q from gram. Highest by 10.32q in paddy and lowest by 0.23 in gram. The value of by- products varied from Rs. 300 from wheat to 52.50 from mustard. 19.The average employment opportunities in main days before project assistance varied from 60 days in paddy to 14.94 days in pigeon pea. This has been enhanced after NAIP assistance due to growth in agriculture and now it varies from 65 days in paddy to 20.33 days for pulses. 20.In the case of the average economic gains in terms of production of vegetables varied from 340q for brinjal, cow pea to 0.03q for sem. Highest market value obtained was Rs. 2600 from lady’s finger and lowest was obtained Rs. 40 from bean. 21.The highest average employment opportunities at pre project period were 27.5 days and the same has increased to 40 days after NAIP project implementation. Similarly, lowest average employment opportunities at pre project period were 9 days which has increased to 9.56 days after NAIP implementation. 7. Observation and Recommendations a. Monsoon in 2009 was untimely and insufficient. Distribution of wheat and vegetable seeds during 2009 rabi season was a great help for farmers in the area to fight food shortages in the village. b. Pump set distribution in village It was seen that for one or two tolas one diesel pump set was provided for irrigation on turn by turn basis. 73 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 • One pump can hardly irrigate 8 to 10 farmers in one season, • Maintenance was not done properly, • Honestly circulations among the farmer were not done, • It was generally circulated among the friends or relative of one or two tolas, • Once it was damaged no one came forward to repair it. If somehow any farmer repaired it, he refused to give it to other for irrigations, • In majority cases, pump set were captured by one who repaired it, • People’s contribution system was a big failure because the supervision and follow up from the side of project holder was in sufficient. c. Lac cultivation: Introduction of lac cultivation gave good profit to the farmers who adopted it. Very few farmers took up lac cultivation as seed were not available sufficiently. Only 1 or 2 farmers were trained for lac cultivation from each tola. Farmer who did not undergo training also did lac cultivation and earned profit. There is lot of demand among the farmers for lac seed. d. Goat distribution: • She goats were distributed in each tola. It has given good result for those farmers who took care (timely medicine and proper food). • 40% farmers complained that goats died due to fever, diarrhea and cough and cold. Medical help was not provided in time by the project staff. Initially medical support was good but after 6 months slowly the help slowed down. • Death rate of He Goat was high in all the villages about 50% of the He Goat died due to lack of proper food and medical care. Housing arrangements were also not proper or as per the guide line of the project experts. • In spite of high death rate of the He Goat indigenous variety goats had produced good variety of off- springs. Farmers were very much satisfied about it. e.Orchard: • Orchards were good and satisfactory in almost all the villages we visited. Death rates were minimum 15 to 20%. JALKUND method of preserving water for irrigation proved to be very affective. Irrigation with the help of earthen pot/pitch was found very much suitable as it saved water loss. Fencing was somehow OK (bamboo fencing) and the farmers worked hard and maintained it to their best. • Theft of the plants were reported almost everywhere. • Theft of pots were reported • Theft of plastic of JALKUND was reported. • Ring wells constructed in the orchard for irrigation (4 ft diameter.) were not fully successful. As all these ring wells in upland (Tanr) did not fetch sufficient water. f. Green House at Rai Toli: • In charge was Mr. Bhim Rai. • He worked hard and his efforts are helping the other farmers in villages. • This green house has produced Papaya, Karaila, chilly, Eucalyptus, Sagwan, Gamhar etc. and has been sold in the village and nearby village market. Mr. Bhim reported that last year he had sold saplings worth Rs. 2000/-. 74 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 • Mr. Bhim told us that coco-feed and organic manure were not supplied by in the project in time. If the things are available the green house activities would increase. He further informed that cocofeed are not available in the open market. g. Seed: • Wheat and paddy seeds provided by the project were very good and its yield was more than expectations. • Seeds of Arhar supplied were of long duration so its yield was not good. Farmers reported that in their area short duration arhar is suitable. • Maize: The growth of the plant was very good, the farmers expected a bumper crop, but about 3540% farmers reported that it did not fruit at all. • Karaila: Germination was poor 40%. • Bhindi: Germination was poor 50%. • Seeds of Gram, Kohra, Brinjal, Tomato, Seem, Pumpkin, Marua, Kulthi, Parwal, Jhinga, Chily were very good and gave good yield. • Farmers reported that small amount of seeds were provided from the project. Seed supply needs to be adequate and to be increase appropriately. h. Birds, Pigs, Fish • Red chicks RK Mission variety were given. • Gave good result as long as feed was provided by the project. • After the feed finished the birds stopped laying eggs and even died. • Farmers reported that birds died due to Ranikhet (Tunki) disease, but the survey team felt that the major reason of death was poor nutrition. • About 15-20% farmers (rich) took care properly and production was satisfactory. i. Pig rearing: • Death rate 25-30%. • As long as project provided feed animals growth was satisfactory and death rate was nil. • As soon as the feed supply stopped animals started dying. • Farmers complained that medical assistance was not provided. j. Fish: Fish production was satisfactory. • No complain. • All fish were harvested after winter. • New ponds gave less production. • Old ponds gave better production. k.Duck: • Good result • Death rate was negligible. • Other problem: Theft, attack by dog (It occured in the evening when ducks returns from pond or water place.) • Egg layers were found to be more profitable for the beneficiaries. 75 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 l. Vermi compost: • Pits made but earthworms were not supplied (Training organized for farmers). m. Improved manure pits: • 25-30% farmer were trained and managed the pit better than others. • Farmers to farmer dissemination were largely absent. • More than (50% pits) farmer did not cover the pit with roof. n. Pond (Large): • Ponds were dug: But in most of the cases the selection of site was not proper. • Ponds in tanr- 50%. • Ponds in don- 50%. • Ponds dug in the Don (Low land) had water even during summer. • Ponds dug in tanr dried up during winter (December). o. Individual Orchard: • Mango and Guava saplings were mostly distributed. • Saplings provided to the individual did not show expected result. Most of them neglected it. Hardly 10-20% survival was seen in the village. p.Mushroom: • The survey team visited 3 mushroom centers during the survey. Production of two centers was satisfactory. The third center complained about irregular spawn availability. • Spawn supply need to be regularized. q. Dobha (Small Pond) Construction: • Dobha/ditch/dari construction with the help of machine was very much accepted in the village as it was dug in only two days. With the help of each dobha 10 farmers cultivated wheat and vegetable in Rahi village. • Dobha dug in low land were turned out be more useful throughout the year. • Dobha dug in Chowra land or upland dried up after winter. r. Ring well: • Ring well- 4 ft diameter for orchard was not successful as it was dug in tanr (upland). s.OVERALL • There was lack of trained field staff. • The field staff moved in cycle and could not cover the villages which were situated far off. Transport facilities for staff needs to be improved. • Visits of officer/ experts need to be increased and to be made more frequently. • Management information system at Head Quarter in Ranchi, as well as in district and villages need to strengthened. This needs to up graded thoroughly. 76 Final Report (NAIP) BAU 2014 ANNEXURE-4 Farmers’ feedback 1- ,u-,-vkbZ-ih- esjs xk¡o esa ojnku cudj vk;k ftlesa oSKkfud rjhds ls [ksrh djus dk izf'k{k.k fn;k x;k lkFk gh Vhx Mh- uLy ds lwdj fn;s x;sA tgk¡ ns'kh lwdj dk otu lky Hkj esa 30&35 fdyksxkz e gksrk Fkk] Vh- x Mh- uLy dk lwdj 85&90 fdyksxkz e rd gks tkrk gS ftlls vPNk equkQk fey jgk gSA ckcwtu lksjsu] xzke% dksnks[khpk] nqedk 2- igys dsoy [ksrh esa gkFk c¡Vkrh Fkh ysfdu ,u-,-vkbZ-ih- ifj;kstuk ls tqM+us ds ckn e'k:e mRiknu] ykg mRiknu 'kq: fd;k vkSj /kku ds mRiknu esa Hkh o`f) gqbZA ckgkequh gk¡lnk] xzke% lkxcsgjh] nqedk 3- xk¡o esa ifj;kstuk 'kq: gksus ds ckn cgqr dqN lh[kus dks feyk ftlesa e'k:e mRiknu esa izf'k{k.k eq[; gSA efgyk Lo;a lgk;rk lewg ls tqM+dj e'k:e mRiknu 'kq: fd;k ftlls vPNh vkenuh gks jgh gSA iSlk efgyk lewg ds cpr [kkrk esa tek dj jgs gSaA eq[kh gsEcze] xzke% ft;kFkj] nqedk 4- eSa ,u-,-vkbZ-ih- ifj;kstuk ls cgqr ykHkkfUor gqvk gw¡A muds }kjk crk;s x;s fof/k ls [ksrh dj jgk gw¡A ykHk Hkh fey jgk gSA esjk fopkj gS fd le;≤ ij bl rjg dk dk;ZØe vkrk jgsA eksrhyky ckLdh] xzke% xqfg;ktksjh] nqedk 5- ifj;kstuk us eq>s lwdj ikyu ds fy, izfs jr fd;k ftls eSa vkt Hkh dj jgk gwA¡ esjh lykuk vkenuh dkQh vPNh gS vkSj cPps Hkh vc vPNs Ldwy esa i<+ jgs gSAa vc etnwjh ds fy, ckgj Hkh ugha tkuk iM+rk gSA eksgu eksgyh] xzke% vUnhiqj] nqedk 6- iwoZ esa [ksrh iqjkuh jhfr ls djrk Fkk] ?kj dk cht gh cksrk Fkk ftlls mRiknu de gksrk Fkk tks lky Hkj Hkh ugha pyrk FkkA ,u-,-vkbZ-ih- ls tqM+us ds ckn [ksrh ds u, rjhds viuk;k] mUur cht feyk ftlls iSnkokj vPNh gqbZA vc lky Hkj dk vukt fey tkrk gSA f'kys'k ckLdh] xzke% xqfg;ktksjh] nqedk 7- Jh fof/k ls [ksrh fd;k ftlls mRiknu esa Ms<+ xq.kk o`f) gqbAZ vkt lkyksa Hkj [kkus ds fy, vukt gks tkrk gSA Lkkjtsu ckLdh] xzke% xqfg;ktksjh] nqedk 8- geyksxksa dks ifj;kstuk dh rjQ ls tks cdjh feyh mldk otu ns'kh cdjh ds eqdkcys vf/kd gS ,oa mlls izkIr cPpksa dh c<+r Hkh de le; esa vPNh gSA larks"k fdLdw] xzke% dksnks[khpk] nqedk 9- ,u-,-vkbZ-ih- ifj;kstuk }kjk rkykc fuekZ.k ls eNyh ikyu ds lkFk&lkFk T;knk tehu esa [ksrh dj ik jgs gSaA ikWyhVusy ls ekSle iwoZ lCth fey tkrh gS ftlls vPNk equkQk fey tkrk gSA x.ks'k ejkaMh] eqfLye Vksyk] tkerkM+k 10-Jh fof/k }kjk /kku dh [ksrh ds rjhds crk;s x;s rFkk Ñf"k ;a=ksa esa iEilsV] fQaxj ohMj] dqnky vkfn ds feyus ls dkQh lqfo/kk feyh ftlls vPNk ykHk feykA gj izlkn eqewZ] cM+k ea>ykMhg] tkerkM+k Ranchi, Jharkhand 1427/06/2014 l www.kailashpaper.org Birsa Agricultural University