Port Sustainability and Energy Security Workshop - CAIT
Transcription
Port Sustainability and Energy Security Workshop - CAIT
A U.S. Department of Transportation University Transportation Center Port Sustainability and Energy Security Workshop Panel III: Port User and Third Part Perspectives March 1, 2013 Panel III: Port User and Third Party Perspectives >> • • • • • Participants Angela Billings-Soini, IKEA North America William Goetz, CSX Transportation Thomas Heimgartner, Best Transportation Douglas P. Morgante, MAERSK Reema Loutan, EPA Region 2 Facilitator Abbas Sarmad - AECOM Topics Corporate strategies, plans to work with ports, road maps to success Panel III: Port User and Third Party Perspectives >> Angela Billings-Soini is Sustainability Manger for IKEA Distribution Services with a responsibility for North America. She is responsible for implementing the IKEA global sustainability direction in North America with all transport service providers and IKEA warehouses. Her area of responsibility includes exploring ways to reduce CO2 from transportation and own buildings as well as environmental and social audits of all North American carriers. Formerly, Ms. Billings-Soini worked for Nokia in the Corporate Social Responsibility department focusing on CSR reporting and communications. Ms BillingsSoini holds a BA in International Relations from the University of the Pacific, a MSc in Environmental Assessment and Evaluation from the London School of Economics and a MSc in Environmental Science from Lund University in Sweden. Panel III: Port User and Third Party Perspectives >> William G. M. Goetz is Resident Vice President with CSX Transportation, a company operating the largest railroad in the Eastern United States. Mr. Goetz represents CSX with the City of New York, State of New Jersey, and City of Philadelphia. Mr Goetz’s 30-year railroad career has included projects resulting in new terminals and infrastructure throughout the Eastern United States, many of which were publicprivate partnerships. Mr. Goetz is a board member of the Schuylkill River Development Corporation in Philadelphia and the Transportation Research Forum’s New York City Chapter. He graduated from the Boston University School of Management and the Wharton Graduate School of the University of Pennsylvania. He and his wife Susan reside in Pennsylvania and New York City. Panel III: Port User and Third Party Perspectives >> Thomas Heimgartner is the President of Best Transportation, which he founded in 1982 modestly as a one-truck operation with Tom himself behind the wheel. Through his insight and leadership, Best Transportation has evolved into a major intermodal carrier now owning over 100 vehicles and servicing the northeast region through The Port of New York and New Jersey Tom has been an advocate for improving the work environment, productivity, and safety of intermodal transportation. As an industry leader, Tom has met with and established relationships with many local, state, federal officials and elected representatives in an ongoing effort to resolve the problems of unsafe, poorly maintained intermodal trailers and containers being driven on our highways. He remains actively engaged in improving highway safety of the Motor Truck Industry and promoting the growth and efficiency of The Port of New York and New Jersey. Tom holds a degree from Rutgers University and has more than 35 years of transportation experience. He is a member of the Board of Directors of The Intermodal Motor Carriers’ Conference of The American Trucking Association and the Association of Bi-State Motor Carriers. Panel III: Port User and Third Party Perspective >> DOUGLAS P. MORGANTE was appointed Director of State Government Relations of MAERSK Inc. in May 2005. As Director, he works closely with business owners and colleagues from A.P. Moller – Maersk and all affiliated companies and departments, as well as with legislators and staff members of state legislatures on a national basis to positively influence Maersk Inc.’s legislative and regulatory interests. Mr. Morgante joined the A.P. Moller-Maersk Group in January 1994. He has served in several management positions for Maersk Line, including route management, and as representative in Ocean Carrier Rate Conferences and Discussion Agreements. Prior to his current position, he was responsible for Regulatory Affairs. Mr. Morgante currently chairs the Legislative Committee for the Ocean Carriers Equipment Management Association (OCEMA). Education: - Rutgers College, NJ, B.A. Political Science, 1988. - Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government - Infrastructure in a Market Economy Panel III: Port User and Third Party Perspective >> Reema Loutan has worked in the Mobile Source Section of EPA Region 2 for 10 years. Reema's program responsibilities include ports, the SmartWay program, fuels, inspection and maintenance, and grants. Reema has a Masters in Chemical Engineering from Manhattan College, and Bachelor degrees in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering from NYU and Stevens Institute of Technology. Towards More Sustainable Transportation Angela Billings-Soini IKEA Distribution Services, North America 2013 03 01 2013-03-01 At IKEA we are good in using Unit loads - Transport T t starts t t att the th drawing d i table! t bl ! Products developed to… …fit flat packages that are… …optimized for pallets that are… …optimized for containers that can… …be unloaded directly to point of sales. SCOPE We secure movementt off products W d t & materials between IKEA associated locations including customers customers’ homes OUR SCOPE in figures • 1 1.3 3 million shipments per year, year >99% FL • 30 Million net m3 • 9 500 different articles, produced at 1000 suppliers • Transit through 26 DCs and 27 CPs • Making their way to >300 stores • Approx. Approx 20 000 units on the road/sea everyday • In addition, deliveries of materials and deliveries directly to 5 million customers’ homes • Approx. 13 000 movements every day • All this in cooperation with 400 carriers. carriers CO2 emissions reduction target C Compared d to t the th FY11 emissions i i Actions in reducing CO2 Equipment utilization – – – Inter modal set-ups – 25 000 000+ units i last l year Direct deliveries – New handling material Filling rate Optimal equipment >50% shorter distances Regional sourcing Carrier fuel reduction Truck age HM NOW – Phase out of wooden pallets • • IKEA has decidedout to phase wooden pallets Phase of out wooden pallets Lower costs & more sustainable: – – – – • No return flows of empty wooden pallets More efficient use of wood as raw material in recyclable paper pallets Lower total cost Less emissions HM NOW is an enabler for higher equipment © Inter IKEA Systems B.V. 2011 – A combination of lower handling material and higher transport equipment enables a reduction of number of transports. Filling rate activities 27 Consolidation points Transit set ups in DCs Co-loads & Milk Runs Load optimization tools at suppliers Combine heavy & light goods while fulfilling g availability y demands Combination of activities g gives result C40HC + + + Utilization of the extra space is key Green Freight g Initiatives Thank you! y © Inter IKEA Systems B.V. 2011 Railroads At Sustainable Ports 1 March 1, 2013 Freight Rail’s Long-Term Fundamentals: Best in 50 Years. Eisenhower Era 21st Century Rail Significance Virtually Unlimited Supply of Cheap Petroleum Erratic Commodity Prices; Long-Term Supply Questions Compared to Long-Haul Trucking, Rail Uses 1/4 Fuel Environmental Insignificance Environmental Awareness Freight Rail: Part of the Solution Not Part of the Problem Rapid Growth of Limited Access Highway System Rising Highway Repair Cost; Extensive New Untolled Route Mileage Unlikely Re-think Asphalt-Only Strategies. Reconsider Rail and Water Solutions Sprawl Urban Rebirth Revival where Rail Infrastructure is Strong Railroad Management Mindsets Shaped by WWII Railroad Industry Pragmatism Customer-Driven Business Strategy 4 Liberty Corridor Freightway Bergen Tunnel Waldo Tunnel Waldo Tunnel Was Improved by Daylighting Its South End Bergen Tunnel: 4200 feet of Very Hard Rock Bergen Tunnel: Well Built…150 years ago Construction Completed Under Budget in One Construction Season NW Ohio Terminal Improves the Flow of Freight. Before NWOH Interchange with western rails After NWOH Chicago Bypass for Western interchange Opening of Northwest Ohio Terminal is a Major Milestone. • • • • • • • • • • Opened February 22, 2011 Cost: $175 million Construction Time: 18 months 500 acres 200 employees at opening 24,000 feet of working track 100,000 feet of block swapping track Parking for 280 units Five cranes spanning eight tracks Will process 30 trains daily when fully network integrated • CSX’s largest Intermodal terminal Northwest Ohio Terminal Anchors National Gateway and Other CSX Intermodal Corridors GenSet Locomotives • Replaces locomotive’s large diesel engine with two or three smaller engines, each with its own generator • Locomotive only powers on engines sufficient for its pulling load • Best suited for yard switching applications • Cuts fuel consumption 25% • Cuts CO2 emissions 25% • Cuts NOx emissions 80% • $1.5 million to retrofit an existing locomotive Thank You BEST TRANSPORTATION Tom Heimgartner President Best Transportation LLC. Port Newark, NJ Rutgers Port Sustainability and Energy Security Workshop Friday, March 1, 2012 CHASSIS TIRES BIAS ON OPEN WHEEL = HIGH ROLLING RESISTANCE VS RADIAL ON HUB PILOTED WHEEL = LOW ROLLING RESISTANCE Maersk Line: Environmental and Operations Perspectives Port Sustainability & Energy Security Workshop Rutgers University -- 3/1/2013 Doug Morgante – Director, State Government Affairs Lee Kindberg - Director, Environment & Sustainability Agenda • Challenges we faced due to Hurricane Sandy • Operational challenges • What we are doing about climate change • Emissions reduction on our cargo vessels 1 Hurricane Sandy – aftermath • Ports were closed over a week • Vessels had few alternatives – Halifax? • Maersk Line had 2785 containers in Norfolk and 680 in Philadelphia that needed to get to Port Elizabeth. • Some containers were cleared and picked up by customers. The rest moved in bond to Newark. • It took 26 days to clear the backlog. • Cost est. $2.5M to Maersk Line and our customers, truck, rail, extra bunker). Possible Future Solutions: 1. Jones Act waiver in an emergency: The Jones Act requires that all goods transported by water between U.S. ports be carried in U.S.-flag ships, built in the US, owned by US citizens, and crewed by US citizens/permanent residents. For the future a one-time waiver would allow faster recovery with Lower cost and environmental impact. 2. Review changes to the Stafford Act (Relief and Emergency Assistance 2 The Bayonne Bridge is an operational limitation for vessel operations. • A solution is in place, the bridge will be raised. • We already have problems getting under the bridge today. • This is due to the vessel’s high air draft -- transit of the bridge is sometimes not possible to meet the scheduled arrival. • Less water draft = higher air draft. Full vessel = lower air draft. • With 50+ feet of water depth and a raised bridge, we should not experience delays. Possible outcomes due to delays in project completion: Local cargo Discretionary cargo Panama Canal Expansion More cargo volume? Economies of scale: larger vessel mean more cost efficient moves per container – less emissions – increased volumes good for the economy. 3 Vessels are increasingly fuel efficient. This reduces fuel use, CO2 and other air emissions. Maersk Line CO2 Reductions 80 75 70 CO2 Emissions g/TEU*Km 65 Met 2020 goal for CO2 reduction 8 years early! 60 Previous 2020 Target reduction from 2007 baseline 55 50 45 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Revised 2020 Target reduction from 2007 Baseline 2007-2011 data was verified by: CO2 and other emissions were reduced 25% per TEU km from 2007 to 2012. CO2 reduction goal has now been raised to 40% for 2020 Reductions were achieved through a combination of vessel size, technologies, route planning and operational changes. 4 Innovation is essential for sustainability Propeller, hull & trim optimization Waste heat recovery system Slow steaming and super-slow steaming Other Initiatives SOx scrubber studies Alternative fuel tests Antifouling hull paint New propulsion technologies QUEST: Low energy chilled containers ISO 14001 certified Crew awareness and engagement Modified bulbous bow Maintenance of hull and propeller Micro bubbles Voyage Efficiency System (VES) Trim optimization 5 Ballast water optimization and treatment systems Vessel environmental improvements take time and partnerships. New vessels Existing fleet • Optimize vessels for intended services • Identify or develop technologies • Potential energy efficiency improvements 20-50% • Partner with technology, software and engine suppliers • Work with shipyards, equipment and fuel suppliers • Identify the right mix for each vessel • Work with Charter vessel owners • Long-term view plus short-term impact Personnel •Vessel crews •Shore side teams •Structures, metrics, idea sharing 6 Improvements go beyond the vessels • Reefers – a new, innovative control system reduces energy consumption by 50% (some by 63%). • Dry Containers - flooring is now recycled plastic, bamboo or FSC certified timber. • Slow or “steady” steaming – voyage efficiency systems improve on-time delivery at the same time they are minimizing fuel usage. • Testing alternative fuels and propulsion. • Using our vessels to assist ocean scientists. 7 Study Period On-time % Ranking Among Top 20 3Q11 83 1 2Q11 76 1 1Q11 66 3 4Q10 70 1 3Q10 79 1 2Q10 77 1 1Q10 69 1 4Q09 63 1 3Q09 71 2 2Q09 79 1 1Q09 78 1 4Q08 77 1 3Q08 68 1 2Q08 76 1 1Q08 63 3 Maersk Line Terminal Efficiency Project: Port Captains at larger ports work with terminals to reduce port stays through process improvements Example: performance (hours) A Previous port to Pilot 1 Arrival at sea 25,3 0,1 3,5 1,0 Buoy/pilot station Pilot time 2 Arrival 3(first line to first move) -26% 18,8 0,0 3,0 0,2 16,5 12,2 4 Operations Departure (last move to last line) 5 6 B 8 Pilot time Pilot to next port More timely and accurate planning Vessels on time 1,1 3,2 0,4 2,9 2012 Actual Best observed /Target Optimized port stay and Reduced emissions Thank you 9 Mode selection is a major factor in supply chain environmental impact. Ocean shipping has the lowest environmental impact for long distance transportation… Then rail… Then truck… And air has the highest impact. Graphic provided by Edgar Blanco, MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics 10 Reducing Drayage Emissions U.S. EPA SmartWay Transport Partnership Program Port Sustainability and Energy Security Workshop Rutgers University 03/01/2013 Reema Loutan Mobile Source Section US EPA Region 2 1 Moving Goods the SmartWay • Goals: – Improve the environmental and energy efficiency of goods movement – Promote investment in clean, efficient technology and operational strategies – Enable and complement EPA regulation • Outcomes: – Achieved climate and air quality benefits - national and place-based – Contributed to economic growth and energy independence – Drove innovation and investments in clean truck, trailer & tire technologies – Leveraged existing market forces through collaboration and brand value 2 Businesses use SmartWay to Demonstrate Commitments to Sustainability 3 A Few of SmartWay’s 3000+ Partners 4 Addressing Drayage Emissions • Dray Trucks: Unique, Challenging – – – – Very old trucks Low income owner-operators Limited benefits from fuel-saving equipment PM, ozone and toxics are the major priority, not GHG • Created SmartWay Drayage criterias that balance: – Financial consideration – Available emission reduction technologies – Superior environmental performance 5 SmartWay Drayage Program • SmartWay shipper and logistics Partners assess the emissions performance of their carriers, including drayage carriers • Drayage carriers commit to track and report their emissions on an annual basis with SmartWay tools • With access to environmental performance data – Carriers can cut costs, benchmark internally and against competition, and attract customers looking for greener choices – Shippers can identify greener choices to reduce carbon footprint and improve supply chain efficiency through carrier/mode selection – Information supports competition & demand for top performers 6 EPA Commitments • SmartWay commits to support our drayage partners by: – SmartWay provides a network of proven technologies and driving techniques that reduce emissions and fuel consumption – EPA assists SmartWay drayage carrier Partners in developing and meeting goals – Drayage carriers gain access to SmartWay Partner Account Managers who serve as important sources of personalized insight into how you can improve performance • For details on the SmartWay Drayage Program, visit: – www.epa.gov/smartway/partnership/drayage.htm