City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Centralia, Washington
Transcription
City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Centralia, Washington
City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Centralia, Washington Courtesy City of Centralia Prepared for Centralia Community Development Planning Division and Historic Preservation Commission Prepared by Diana J. Painter, PhD Painter Preservation & Planning and Mimi Sheridan, Sheridan Consulting Group December 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF CENTRALIA Emil Pierson, Director, Community Development Tammy Baraconi, City Planner, Community Development L. G. Nelson, Building Official, City of Centralia Shannon Murphy, City Attorney CENTRALIA HISTORIC COMMISSION Daniel La Plaunt Roy A. Matson Bill Gannon Lucy Page Steve Koreis CONSULTANTS Diana J. Painter, Painter Preservation & Planning Mimi Sheridan, Sheridan Consulting Group This report has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior administered by the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) and the City of Centralia. Regulations of the U.S. Department of Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally Assisted Program on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1840 C Street, NW, Washington D.C. 20240. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN Table of Contents 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………. 5 Project Goals Action Plan Strategy In this Document 2. The Planning Process …………..……………………………….. 7 Survey Results Workshop Results Overview of Training Needs 3. The Legal Framework ……………..………………………….... 12 Federal Legislation and Regulations Washington State Legislation and Regulations 4. Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program ………………… 16 A Brief Overview of Centralia’s History Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 5. The Action Plan …………………………….…………………….. 27 Goals and Strategies 2012 Work Plan 6. Incentives for Historic Preservation .……………………….. 32 Federal Incentives Washington State Incentives Local Incentives 7. References and Resources …………………………………….. 30 Appendix A: Survey Questions Appendix B: Training Power Point #1 – Historic Preservation Regulations Appendix C: Training Power Point #2 – Design Review for Historic Preservaiton Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 4 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN Figures Figure 1 – Street Scene, Centralia, Wn (n.d.), cover photo Figure 2 - The Olympic Club and Hotel Figure 3 - Union Pacific Modern Train, 1934, courtesy City of Centralia Figure 4 – Centralia’s Founder, George Washington Figure 5 - Early Fourth of July celebration, courtesy City of Centralia Figure 6 - The Fox Theater, 1937, courtesy City of Centralia Figure 7 - The HUB City in the 1950s, courtesy of City of Centralia Figure 8 - Streetscape on Tower Avenue, 2011 Figure 9 - Centralia City Hall, 2011 Figure 10 – Centralia’s Preservation Month program, 2011 Figure 11 - Federal Tax Credit guidance, courtesy National Park Service Figure 12 - The Spike Motor Co. (Centralia City Hall) in 1928 Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 5 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN 1. Introduction PROJECT GOALS In February of 2011 the City of Centralia advertised for a consultant to assist them with a “City of Centralia Historic Preservation Facilitation and Work Plan.” The goal of the project was to develop a “Preservation Action Plan,” whose preparation would additionally assist the City in identifying and resolving conflicts within the city over preservation values and strategies. As expressed in the Request for Qualifications and Proposal, the project was to ‘establish a productive working relationship and define communication procedures between city staff and the Historic Preservation Commission’. The result was to be a shared vision and a list of general goals to be achieved in the 2011/2012 time frame, with implementation measures or specified tasks to achieve those goals. The planning process was to include: • Identifying stake holders in the city with an interest in historic preservation, and their respective roles; • Identifying specific goals for the Commission, related tasks, priorities, and dates for completion; • Identifying who would be responsible for achieving goals and completing tasks; • Outlining the planning process for developing the Action Plan; and • Providing training for the Commission and City staff on city and state regulations, the Main Street program, and similar topics. ACTION PLAN STRATEGY The City hired Diana Painter of Painter Preservation & Planning and Mimi Sheridan of the Sheridan Consulting Group in late April, 2011 to assist them in this effort. Painter and Sheridan prepared a “Centralia Action Plan Strategy” in early May designed to achieve the project goals in the appropriate time frames. Also identified were meetings, tasks, respective responsibilities, and project products. This report reflects fulfillment of this planning process, as well as the City’s goals expressed in their Request for Qualifications and Proposal. IN THIS DOCUMENT The components of this Preservation Action Plan include an introduction to the project and the strategies developed to complete it. Chapter 2, “The Planning Process” explains how the Action Plan was developed, as well as suggesting ways to accomplish on-going training. Chapter 3, “The Legal Framework” outlines the major federal and state legislation and regulations that affect historic preservation planning and programs. Local laws and legislation are explained Chapter 4, “Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program.” A brief overview of Centralia’s history and physical development is included in this chapter. The core of this planning document is found in Chapter 5, “The Action Plan.” This chapter contains the goals and objectives developed for this plan. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 1 – Introduction 6 ________________________________________________________________________ It also prioritizes major implementation strategies and recommends a timeline for projects that may be completed in the next twelve months. A discussion of “Incentives for Historic Preservation” at the federal, state and local levels occurs in Chapter 6. This report concludes with a list of references used in preparing this plan, and resources for further reference. Additional materials that were developed for the two Historic Preservation Commission training sessions are located in the Appendices to this document. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 7 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN 2. The Planning Process SURVEY RESULTS Phase I of this project involved identifying and interviewing key players in the historic preservation process in Centralia. The project started with a public meeting with the Historic Preservation Commission on June 13, 2011. The purpose of this meeting was to begin the process of identifying issues and opportunities. Interviews began on this date as well, presenting further opportunities to identify historic preservation challenges and opportunities in the city. Findings from this phase were documented in the Phase I Report, which was submitted to the city on June 28, 2011 and are summarized below. This process and subsequent report was used as a starting point for Phase II, which involved drafting goals and suggestions for short and long-term projects to enhance the City of Centralia’s historic preservation program. While in Centralia on June 13th and 14th, Diana Painter and Mimi Sheridan conducted in-person interviews with Dan Henderson and Edna Fund of the City Council; Bill Gannon, Roy Matson and Steve Koreis of the Historic Preservation Commission; and Tammy Baraconi of the City of Centralia Community Development Department. We also met with Jeff Miller, a local building owner and member of the Centralia Downtown Association,1 with whom we toured the downtown. We also toured the Fox Theater and spoke with building manager Scott White. Follow-up interviews were conducted by telephone with City Attorney Shannon Murphy-Olson and Commission member Lucy Page. Subsequent meetings and follow-up telephone conservations were held with Community Development Department Director Emil Pierson and Building Official LG Nelson. A series of standard questions were posed to the interviewees, followed by a more casual conversation about historic preservation issues in Centralia.2 We discussed present and past successes and current challenges. Our findings are as follows. Players, Roles and Relationships • • • • City Council is the decision-maker for many historic preservation activities. Historic Preservation Commission’s role is primarily advisory. Department of Community Development is staff to the Historic Commission. Centralia Downtown Association, formed in 2007, is non-profit group made up primarily of downtown business and building owners. It is an affiliate of the Washington State Main Street Program. 1 Note that several interviewees were also members or former members of the Centralia Downtown Association. 2 See Appendix B for the list of survey questions. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 2 – The Planning Process 8 ________________________________________________________________________ • • • • Centralia-Chehalis Chamber of Commerce is a joint chamber made up of Chehalis and Centralia. Sub-committee of the Chamber is a newly formed sub-committee that is made up of Centralia representatives. Lewis County Economic Development Council works to assist local businesses and encourage economic growth in the region. Lewis County Historic Society is based in the Lewis County Museum and located in Chehalis. Shared Vision and Goals • • • • • • Vital and historically intact downtown Positive environment for business owners Downtown that is active and attractive for visitors and residents A more effective Historic Preservation Commission Greater knowledge and understanding of historic preservation and its benefits to both individual property owners and the general community Effective management of the City-owned Borst House and Block House. Centralia’s Advantages • • • • • • • • • • Existing downtown National Register District Historic downtown with many intact buildings Residential neighborhood with many intact homes Rich history Good freeway, roadway and rail access Enthusiastic and hard-working building owners Some good renovations completed or underway Engaged business owners Status as a Certified Local Government (CLG) A committed Historic Preservation Commission. Recent Successes • • • • Preservation Month brochure and activities Recent library display on Centralia history by Bill Gannon Non-profit status of Centralia Downtown Association New leadership in city (new City Manager). Past Successes on Which to Draw • • • Rehabilitation of train station and streetscape improvements Approval of 2003 National Register District Rehabilitation and continued popularity of Olympic Hotel Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 2 – The Planning Process 9 ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 2 - The Olympic Club and Hotel • • Development of 2003 Downtown Centralia Revitalization Plan Enactment of RC-3 zoning throughout downtown commercial core. Recent Controversies • • • • • • Lack of rehabilitation of Wilson Hotel City’s need to re-possess the Wilson Hotel Reversion of two downtown buildings (Juggling Java and Rancho Tavern) to previous owners Controversy over CLG grant and whether city should accept it Newspaper coverage of Wilson Hotel problem and related issues (there is disagreement as to whether it has been unfair) Recent downtown renovations that do not meet the Secretary of Interior’s Standards.3 Commission Challenges • • • • The Commission is relatively new; most people have served two or fewer years. Commission term is short (2-3 years) and renewable only once. Staff support has been rotated among city staff persons, resulting in a lack of continuity. The Commission has only five members.4 3 Note that this does not appear to be a controversy. However, these changes render otherwise contributing buildings in the downtown historic district ineligible for Federal Tax Credits, and may become controversial in the future. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 2 – The Planning Process 10 ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 3 - Union Pacific Modern Train, 1934, courtesy City of Centralia • • The Commission feels it has been marginalized or not supported by the city in recent times; its role is unclear. Other priorities compete with historic preservation for scarce funding. WORKSHOP RESULTS The findings from the survey were presented in the Historic Preservation Commission Workshop held in Centralia on July 11, 2011. Also presented at the workshop were draft goals and strategies (tasks) for the Preservation Action Plan. The primary purpose of this workshop was to elaborate on the preliminary goals and strategies by gaining further input from the Historic Preservation Commission. A secondary purpose was to generate a list of ideas for short and longterm activities and programs that the Historic Preservation Commission might undertake to further historic preservation in the city. Lastly, suggestions were taken for potential topics for Commission/staff training sessions, to be held later in the year. OVERVIEW OF TRAINING NEEDS Training needs for City staff and the Historic Preservation Commission were further developed as this project proceeded. A preliminary list of possibilities was presented at the July 11, 2011 meeting for consideration. At that time it was also suggested that City staff and the Historic Preservation Commission develop an on-going training program by bringing in others to speak to the Commission, such as staff of the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation. It was also suggested that the Commission visit other Commissions in the region to observe their processes and exchange information. An overview of training needs is as follows. 4 Five members is only a minimum, per Centralia’s regulations found in Chapter 18.25 of the Centralia Municipal Code. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 2 – The Planning Process 11 ________________________________________________________________________ Basic Legislation and Programs • The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended. o The role of the State Office of Historic Preservation (Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation) o The Certified Local Government (CLG) program and requirements and the responsibilities of a CLG. • The historic registers: criteria, designation process, and meaning. o The National Register of Historic Places o The Washington Heritage Register o Local designation in Centralia and in similar communities in Washington State. • • • The City of Centralia’s preservation ordinance and Rules and Procedures. The economic benefits of historic preservation, and Federal, state and local incentive programs. Design Review Processes and Guidelines • The Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation. o The purpose and scope of the Secretary's of Interior’s Standards o Programs governed by the Secretary of Interior’s Standards o The relationship between the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and local design review standards o Local design review for historic buildings and districts o The application and management process for Certificates of Appropriateness. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 12 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN 3. The Legal Framework A variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations affect or can affect historic preservation planning and activities in Centralia. This section outlines the legal framework for preservation as established by federal and state legislation and regulations. Note that local regulations are discussed in Chapter 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program. Additional information on federal, state and local incentives for historic preservation is discussed in Chapter 5 – Incentives for Historic Preservation. Note that legislation and regulations affecting primarily archaeological resources, tribal practices, and cemetery preservation are not included in this chapter. More information about these can be found at: http://www.dahp.wa.gov/learn-and-research/preservation-laws. FEDERAL LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS National Historic Preservation Act The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) establishes the general policies and procedures by which historic preservation is carried out at the federal, state, and local levels in the United States. It was enacted by Congress in 1966 and has been amended 22 times since then. This act authorizes the Secretary of the Department of the Interior to maintain the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and establishes criteria by which properties are listed on the register. State historic preservation programs are administered under the auspices of this Act, which provides guidelines for conducting statewide historic preservation activities and administering federal grant funds, including those used for Certified Local Government programs, among other responsibilities. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 of the NHPA requires that, before approving any federal undertaking, which includes federally permitted or funded activities, an agency must take into consideration the effects of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register. The head of the Federal agency with responsibility for the undertaking must provide for comment and consultation with the respective State Office of Historic Preservation, any relevant tribal entity, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation when necessary. All relevant consultations and decisions, including any mitigation, are typically documented in a Memorandum of Agreement. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties The Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties are administered under the auspices of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. Often called the Secretary of Interior’s Standards, these provisions provide standards and guidelines that are used by the National Park Service and other federal agencies, state agencies, and many local governments to assess whether changes to historic properties are appropriate and may be approved for various Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 3 – The Legal Framework 13 ________________________________________________________________________ permitting processes. Standards and guidelines are provided for four treatment types: preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction. Compliance with the Standards is required for properties seeking federal tax credits and permits or funding under other federal programs. The Standards are also used as the basis for the city’s own design review process. National Environmental Policy Act The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was adopted in 1969. Under NEPA, federally-funded or permitted projects must analyze and disclose any potential impacts on the environment, including historic and cultural resources. NEPA also requires an assessment of likely impacts from alternative courses of action and includes a mandatory public process. This act typically applies to large-scale activities, such as transportation projects, military projects, airports, and the like. Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation (DOT) Act Section 4(f) and NEPA both require that consideration be given to effects of any federally funded transportation project on historic resources. Section 4(f) is a special provision of the Department of Transportation (DOT) Act of 1966, stipulating that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and other DOT agencies cannot approve the use of land from publicly-owned parks, recreational areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, or public and privately owned historical sites (listed in or eligible for listing in the NRHP) unless the following conditions apply: • • There is no feasible and prudent alternative to use of the land. The action includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the property resulting from use. WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS The Washington State Historic Preservation Program was established in 1975. Provisions of the program are found in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 27.34. The State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 34.21) The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires government decision makers to consider the likely environmental impacts of a proposed action and require measures to mitigate those impacts. A SEPA checklist of potential environmental impacts, which is the mechanism used to preliminarily identify these impacts, requires consideration of impacts on historic and cultural resources, in addition to impacts on noise, air quality, traffic, water, environmental health, and other environmental factors. The City of Centralia addresses SEPA with respect to historic resources through Chapter 16.04 (D) (1) (d) of the Centralia Municipal Code, which includes the statement that, “The city shall use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs and Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 3 – The Legal Framework 14 ________________________________________________________________________ resources to the end that the state and its citizens may preserve important historic, cultural and natural aspects of our national heritage.”5 The Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A) The Washington State Growth Management Act, adopted in 1990, establishes fourteen goals for communities. The primary goal with respect to historic preservation is to, “Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites and structures that have historical, cultural and archaeological significance.” The City of Centralia Comprehensive Plan Historic Preservation Element (2007) includes goals and policies to achieve this end.6 Executive Order 05-05 This order of the Governor, signed in November 2005, requires that state agencies with capital improvement projects and land acquisition projects consult with the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and the Tribes assess their effect on historical and cultural properties. This regulation has limited application in Centralia at this time. Buildings or Structures Having Special Historical or Architectural Significance — Exception (RCW 19.2.120) Washington State provides for exceptions within the State Building Code that recognize the special conditions of historic resources. It states that: (1) Repairs, alterations, and additions necessary for the preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, strengthening, or continued use of a building or structure may be made without conformance to all of the requirements of the codes adopted under RCW 19.27.031, when authorized by the appropriate building official under the rules adopted under subsection (2) of this section, provided: (a) The building or structure: (i) Has been designated by official action of a legislative body as having special historical or architectural significance, or (ii) is an unreinforced masonry building or structure on the state or the national register of historic places, or is potentially eligible for placement on such registers; and (b) The restored building or structure will be less hazardous, based on life and fire risk, than the existing building. 5 6 http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/centralia.html, accessed September 2011. http://www.cityofcentralia.com/files/historicpresweb.pdf, accessed September 2011.. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 3 – The Legal Framework 15 ________________________________________________________________________ (2) The state building code council shall adopt rules, where appropriate, to provide alternative methods to those otherwise required under this chapter for repairs, alterations, and additions necessary for preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, strengthening, or continued use of buildings and structures identified under subsection (1) of this section. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 16 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN 4. Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF CENTRALIA’S HISTORY The following historic context is adapted from the historic context statement for Centralia’s North Edison District Historic Resources Inventory (Painter, 2004) and the historic context prepared for the Centralia Downtown Historic District National Register Nomination (Gray, 2002). Early Settlement Centralia was founded by settler George Washington who arrived with his adoptive parents, a couple named Anna and James Cochran, in Centralia or more accurately, where the Skookumchuck River joins the Chehalis River, in the fall of 1852.7 Because Washington could not file for a donation claim due to his race, his parents filed for the 640-acre claim on which the City of Centralia is located today. The Cochrans deeded the 640-acre Donation Land Claim to Washington for $3,200 once he was legally able to own the land.8 Together Washington and the Cochrans raised cattle and operated an inn and ferry. In 1872 the transcontinental Northern Pacific Railroad crossed the Oregon Territory as workers extended the line to Tacoma. Realizing that the railroad would bring more settlers to the area, Washington "began to dream of planning and building a Figure 4 - Centralia's Founder small town." Washington and his wife Mary Jane platted the four-block area that would become downtown Centralia in 1875. They planned the town to grow around three already-established businesses, including a small store operated by their neighbor Isaac Wingard. They also reserved two lots at Main and Gold Streets for a school and two acres for a cemetery.9 Due in part to Washington’s entrepreneurial efforts and support, Centerville, as Centralia was then known, grew to a population of 50 by 1876. In 1881 Washington filed the plat to his first addition, and in 1883 the town’s name was changed to Centralia. By 1884 it had a population of 200; in 1886 it had grown to 325 persons; and in 1889, the year it was incorporated, its population 7 Washington was the son of a slave and a woman of English descent. Soon after his birth his father was sold and his mother left him with a white couple, who raised him (Oldham, Kit, “George and Mary Jane Washington found [sic] the town of Centerville (now Centralia) on January 8, 1875,” History.Link.org., http://www.washington.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&File_Id=5276, February 23, 2003. 8 As a person of African American descent, Washington was not allowed to own land in Oregon Territory. Once Centralia became a part of the Washington Territory, where this restriction did not apply, he was able to buy the land. 9 Citizens of Centralia, 1995:214. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 17 ________________________________________________________________________ was 700.10 He continued to act as the town’s benefactor throughout his life. Washington died in 1905 at the age of 88. Early Industries and the Railroad Centralia’s early growth and development was due to its fortuitous location and the coming of the railroad. Construction of the transcontinental Northern Pacific line in the Pacific Northwest began in Kalama in 1870 and reached its terminus in Tacoma in 1880. Centralia’s depot – the only one between Kalama and Tacoma – was completed in 1880. Centralia became connected to the rest of the Pacific Northwest once passenger service began between Seattle and Portland in 1884.11 Because of its central location and expanding timber industry, Centralia continued to be well served by the railroads. By 1910 the Great Northern, Northern Pacific, Union Pacific, and others lines all passed through the young city, which was dubbed the “Hub City” and referred to as “the great railroad center of Southwestern Washington.”12 Centralia’s largest industries centered on its timber resources. These included logging, lumber mills, shingle mills, and the manufacture of wood building materials such as windows and doors. By the 1880s it had seven lumber mills and several shingle mills.13 One of the largest timber companies in the region was the Eastern Railway and Lumber Company of Centralia, which was organized in 1903 and maintained operations until 1939, when its mill burned down.14 During its heyday it was one of the largest mill operations in the state.15 When the railway and logging operations of this company and H. H. Martin Lumber Company were combined in 1909, the two plants provided jobs to approximately 1,000 men.16 Another early industry was coal mining. Coal was discovered in the area in 1878 but was not commercially mined until 1906. At the peak of production there were approximately 34 commercial mines operating in the area. By 1920 the coal mining boom was mostly over, due in large part to other competing fields in the Northwest.17 It picked up again during World War II, however, and continues in operation to this day. Farming and ranching, particularly dairy farming, were a strong component of Centralia’s early economy. Crops included wheat, oats, hops, and hay, and potatoes, apples, pears, prunes, cherries, and berries.18 Other local manufacturing encompassed a variety of industries and included the Centralia Furniture Manufacturing Company; the Centralia Brass and Iron Foundry, which served the local mills in addition to manufacturing shelf hardware; and the American Pump Manufacturing Company. High quality bricks were also made in the area. Brickyards included Wheeler & 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Smith, 1942:19. Citizens of Centralia, 1995:86. Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 3. Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 3. Lentz, 1989:17. “Eastern Railway, Lumber Firm Was Once Biggest.” “Eastern Railway, Lumber Firm Was Once Biggest.” Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 4. Centralia Daily Chronicle, January 2, 1890:1. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 18 ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 5 - Early Fourth of July celebration, courtesy City of Centralia Wallace, Aikens & Wingard, the Centralia Alliance Brick & Tile Company, and West Coast Brick & Tile Co., Inc.19 Major Periods of Development The following describes Centralia’s major periods of growth and development, as well as periods of economic stagnation. 1880 – 1910. With its growing logging, farming, and mining industries, Centralia's population expanded rapidly in the 1880s. By 1884, the city boasted a population of 200. In the 1890s it had a thriving downtown, the platting of surrounding residential neighborhoods was active, and it boasted a population of 3,000 people. A newspaper headline from the time announced that 300 new buildings were erected between January 1, 1889 and January 1, 1890. In 1891 the city achieved the milestone of establishing a streetcar line.20 In the last decade of the nineteenth century growth slowed in Centralia, the Pacific Northwest, and throughout the nation as a result of the Panic of 1893, but the local population shrank from 5,000 to 1,200. Town founder George Washington offered food and clothing to help those who stayed survive the depression.21 Once it recovered, its population grew to 1,600 by 1900. During this time major infrastructure improvements enhanced the quality of life in Centralia. In 1902 19 20 21 Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 5. Painter, 2004:8. Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 6. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 19 ________________________________________________________________________ Tower Avenue was graveled, and in 1908 a portion of it and Main Street were paved with brick. In 1907 the city began constructing a sewer system. In 1908 the Pacific Telephone Company planned a new telephone system, and the city’s volunteer fire department was replaced with a paid one.22 An interurban electric railway between Centralia and Chehalis was completed by 1910. In Centralia: The First Century the period was called “the era of development.” The authors claimed that Centralia was the only city between Tacoma and Portland at the time with paved streets and a sewage system, and was the first city in the state to have a paid fire department.23 1910 - 1930. By 1910 the city had reached a population of 7,311, growing to 7,549 by 1920.24 However, this era proved to be tumultuous. In 1919 labor controversies escalated into violence, peaking with the Centralia Massacre on November 11, 1919. In the period leading up to World War I, the entire country, including the Pacific Northwest, experienced considerable labor unrest and occasional violence. One of the most radical labor unions was the Industrial Workers of the World - the I.W.W. or "Wobblies." Founded in 1905, the I.W.W. reached its peak prior to World War I; thereafter its influence faded, except in the lumber camps and among the migrant workers of the Pacific Northwest. In the lumber industry, where working and living conditions were notoriously bad, it was easy for the I.W.W. to gain followers.25 The Centralia Massacre resulted in four deaths and multiple prison sentences, and garnered national attention that contributed to the “Red Scare” of 1919-20.26 Major building projects undertaken in the 1920s including the Elks Lodge (1920); the new City Hall and Masonic Building (1923); the Lewis and Clark Hotel (1927); the Fox Theater and Presbyterian Church (1928); and the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Building (1928-29).27 1930 – 1950. During the Great Depression Centralia’s population again shrank. Contributing to the city’s economic woes at this time was the flood of 1933. Tower Avenue in the Edison District flooded, as did J Street. In 1935 and 1936, there was further flood damage from water traveling down the Mill Race near J Street. Beginning in 1933 a dike was completed using a combination of Works Progress Administration (WPA) and city funds.28 As occurred throughout the country, the federal government stepped in at this time to help with other projects in Centralia as well. Eighty workers in Centralia were employed by the WPA to improve local facilities, including city playgrounds and parks.29 WPA workers were assigned to work on city playgrounds and address river control. They improved the fairgrounds, Borst Park, the city's airfield, the library, and City Park.30 Other major building projects during this era 22 Citizens of Centralia, 1977:40-43. Citizens of Centralia, 1977:42-43. 24 Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 7. 25 Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 8. 26 Burrows, 2003: http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file_id=5605. 27 Gray, 2002. 28 Citizens of Centralia, 1977:45-53. The WPA was a jobs creation program initiated by the federal government during the Depression to build and repair infrastructure, among other purposes. 29 Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 10. 30 Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 10. 23 Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 20 ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 6 - The Fox Theater, 1937, courtesy City of Centralia included the construction of a concrete viaduct over the railroad tracks, a high school gym, extensive street improvements, and the 1937 U.S. Post Office building. Centralia rebounded with the outbreak of World War II, as local industries supplied the troops and the area became a training center. Coal mining and oil exploration were active at this time. Five local coal mines operated year-round during the war and oil companies conducted exploratory work around Centralia, continuing these efforts until 1955. Local manufacturing firms and businesses in the post-war era included I.L. Linscott’s Manufacturing Company, the Southwest Washington Livestock Marketing Association, the Churchill Glove Factory, Plywood Products, and Weyerhaeuser.31 This period of prosperity was interrupted by an earthquake on April 13, 1949, whose epicenter was between Tacoma and Olympia. An estimated forty percent of business buildings and houses in Centralia were damaged in the quake, as well as infrastructure.32 Nonetheless, by 1950 the city’s population had risen to 8,657 residents. In the 1950s the city's major industries continued their historical trajectory, with an emphasis on lumbering, agriculture, and railroading. Within the lumber industry the emphasis had shifted to manufacturing plywood. Centralia Plywood, launched in 1948 as Sylvan Products Inc., was one of Lewis County's leading industries by the 1960s, with more than 200 employees.33 Also during the 1950s, Centralia's Pearl Street underwent several changes. At Pearl and Maple the new Chronicle Building housed a high speed press with additional modern machinery. On North Pearl, a glove factory was constructed, and near it the Centralia Dairy was built. In 1954 Weyerhaeuser moved into its new building in the 500 block of North Pearl.34 31 32 33 34 Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 12. Noson, http://www.pnsn.org/INFO_GENERAL/NQT/where_damage.html, accessed September 2011. Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 11. Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 11. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 21 ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 7 - The HUB City in the 1950s, courtesy of City of Centralia 1950 - 2010. While agriculture and timber remain important to Centralia's economy, over the last fifty years logging in the area has declined. Mill closures and layoffs occurred throughout the county in the 1980s. During this same period, Centralia witnessed the growth of a new industry with the construction of a coal-operated power plant outside the city. In December 1951, the Department of the Interior examined the Hanaford Valley coal fields north of Centralia and found that they contained an estimated 1.75 billion tons of sub-bituminous coal. In 1967, Pacific Power and Light of Portland and Washington Water Power of Spokane, who had acquired the coal fields in 1957, announced plans to build a steam electric plant. Construction began in 1968, and in 1971 the first of the plant's two generators entered service. The second generator was ready in 1972.35 In 2000 the Centralia Power Plant was the county's second largest employer, providing approximately 670 jobs at that time.36 However, because of concerns about air pollution, the state has passed a law ending coal burning by 2025.37 Recreation also received more emphasis during this period, as evidenced in the expansion and development of Borst Park, located west of the downtown. The park's facilities have been expanded by the addition of baseball diamonds, racquetball courts, and an indoor swimming pool. Most recently, the City has partnered with the Lewis County Public Facilities District and the Centralia School District to develop the Lewis County Event Center and Sports Complex, with extensive sports fields and the future Lewis County Event Center.38 35 Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 12. Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 12. 37 .Schmidt, 2011, http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/04/30/, accessed September 2011. 38 “Lewis County Event Center and Sports Complex,” http://www.cityofcentralia.com/Page.asp?NavID=499, accessed September 2011. 36 Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 22 ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 8 - Streetscape on Tower Avenue, 2011 Centralia's downtown underwent changes during this period as well. In the early 1970s, approximately ten-to-twelve historic buildings were demolished to make way for a citywide parking project. Many storefronts were "modernized" with newer materials including permastone, metal, marblecrete and stucco. In the 1990s downtown Centralia's sidewalks and streets underwent renovation, but without impacting any buildings or altering traffic patterns.39 Physical Evolution Tower Avenue has been the main north-south arterial and commercial center in Centralia from the late nineteenth century to the present. Historically it separated the industrial area from the residential area to the west. In the latter part of the nineteenth century it was the commercial street that catered to the mill and railroad workers with saloons and lodgings, as it was close to the Northern Pacific passenger and freight depots. Throughout the first half of the twentieth century the mix of uses was eclectic, with Sanborn Company maps showing a diverse downtown with businesses such as drug stores, mills, grocers, cobblers, bakers, barber shops, hardware stores, and feed stores.40 The residential area that developed at this time was north of the downtown and west of Tower Avenue. The early business and civic leaders built their mansions primarily in the blocks just north of First Street, in a neighborhood called Edison. Its most active period of development took place between 1900 and 1930, which is illustrated in the architectural styles that prevail in the district today. Prior to this time, residences were located, for the most part, in amongst the 39 40 Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 12. Gray, 2002: Section 8, Page 6. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 23 ________________________________________________________________________ commercial and civic buildings within the original town plats, established by the town’s founder George Washington. In the first decade of the 20th century this residential area was about two-thirds built-out, with single family homes on large lots. By the 1920s the neighborhood had nearly achieved the density it would display at mid-twentieth century. By 1950 the neighborhood was fully built out, displaying both the mansions that are the legacy of local business and civic leaders as well as more modest single family homes built by individual home owners and builders. Today the Edison district is largely defined on the eastern boundary, as it was historically, by the commercial north-south Tower Avenue. Centralia’s historic downtown was declared a National Register Historic District in 2003, the same year that a revitalization plan was adopted for the area. The Edison residential neighborhood was surveyed in 2004 and 2007, and may become the subject of a nomination in the future. CENTRALIA’S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM Centralia has several means by which it supports and administers its historic preservation program. These include the following policies, regulations, design guidelines, processes and procedures. Centralia Comprehensive Plan The Centralia Comprehensive Plan, prepared under the auspices of Washington State’s Growth Management Act, complies with that act by ‘identifying and encouraging the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance.’41 The comprehensive plan also references Lewis County Countywide Planning Policies that relate to historic preservation. The Historic Preservation Element provides a comprehensive and solid basis for Centralia’s historic preservation program and is integrated with other aspects of planning in Centralia, such as planning for economic development and affordable housing. The Element contains two primary goals: • To develop a greater understanding of our heritage and our ongoing relationship with our past by preserving historic sites where our legacy will be preserved, interpreted and shared; and • To support the economic health and vitality of Centralia by preserving the historic nature of the City through seeking creative solutions and using existing resources.42 These goals are to be achieved through ten policies that address the value of historic preservation education, neighborhood historic districts, design guidelines, creating partnerships, and on-going identification of historic resources. They also call for: • identifying funding sources for historic preservation, including developing financial partnerships; 41 42 Centralia Comprehensive Plan, 2007:107. Centralia Comprehensive Plan, 2007:110. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 24 ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 9 - Centralia City Hall, 2011 using historic preservation to support affordable housing, business diversification and walkability goals; • using historic preservation to promote tourism; and • seeking compatible uses for historic structures.43 Zoning Ordinance - Chapter 2.58 Historic Preservation The City of Centralia’s regulations governing historic preservation are found in Chapter 2.58 Historic Preservation of the Centralia Municipal Code. Related regulations are also found in Chapter 20.24 C-3 Core Commercial District, which contain the regulations that apply to Centralia’s Downtown Historic District. Chapter 2.58 includes provisions for establishing the Historic Commission and identifies their responsibilities. It also establishes the Centralia Register of Historic Places, including a process for designating properties or districts to the register and criteria for listing on the register. Finally, it provides for the review of changes to properties listed in the local register, including altering, repairing, moving, or demolishing listed properties, and the review process. The Commission is also charged in this ordinance with 43 Centralia Comprehensive Plan, 2007:110. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 25 ________________________________________________________________________ reviewing and monitoring properties for purposes of special property tax valuation. The most recent update of Chapter 2.58 occurred on September 13, 2011.44 Additional relevant provisions are contained in Section 20.24.010 .D of the Municipal Code, which applies to the Core Commercial District, ‘Limits development to those [uses] which preserve or enhance the historic character within the district.’45 Development standards in this section of the code state that, “Architectural and building materials review will be critical in this district to ensure that new or remodeled structures maintain an appearance which is highly compatible with a historic downtown. Frequent store entrances, large window areas, and awnings will be strongly encouraged. Blank facades, large-scale single-use buildings, reflective glass, and other similar features will be strongly discouraged.” Historic Preservation Commission Rules and Procedures Rules and procedures for Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program were approved by the Centralia City Council in two separate actions, on August 28, 2001 and December 10, 2002. Many of these rules and procedures are now incorporated in the Municipal Code. Below is a summary of the bylaws that were approved in 2001/2002. The August 2001 action established Commission bylaws, which covered the followed: • The make-up of the Commission; • Rules and procedures for conducting meetings; • Criteria and procedures for placing properties on the National Register and the Centralia Historic Register; • Special Valuation Review procedures, which includes compliance with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards; and • Rules and procedures for environmental impact review.46 The December 2002 action established rules and procedures for design review and covered the following: • Actions that would reviewed, including the demolition or alteration of a historic resource in Centralia, as well as new construction in historic districts and changes of use that alter the exterior appearance of historic resources. • Application and other procedures for design review; and • Criteria for design review, which reference the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and include provisions identifying character-defining features and placing an emphasis on repair over replacement of important features. 44 “Chapter 2.58, Historic Preservation,” http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/centralia.html, accessed September 2011. 45 “Chapter 20.24, C-3 Core Commercial District,” Centralia Municipal Code, http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/centralia.html, accessed September 2011. 46 City of Centralia, Record of Council Proceedings, August 28, 2001. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 4 – Centralia’s Historic Preservation Program 26 ________________________________________________________________________ The basic provisions outlined above are now included in Chapter 2.58 of the Municipal Code, although many of the specific procedures outlined in the bylaws were not included in the Code. It is recommended here that the section in the 2002 bylaws entitled “Criteria for Design Review,” which includes the principles discussed in The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, be more fully incorporated into Chapter 2.58 of the Municipal Code.47 Centralia Central Business District Design Guidelines The Centralia Central Business District Design Guidelines, a Main Street Association project, were adopted in 1987. The guidelines include drawings and photographs of existing conditions for the building facades in the central business district as of 1987. They also provide “recommended” and “not recommended” design guidelines on how to treat ornamentation and different building materials on existing buildings, and for new infill construction. Information on the components of commercial storefronts and how to treat them, including signage and lighting, are addressed. Finally restoration recommendations are made for each building in the district. These guidelines, although they reflect a point in time, remain very useful and are still referred to today. Another possible project for the Historic Preservation Commission is to update this document. 47 The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/index.htm. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 27 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN 5. The Action Plan GOALS AND STRATEGIES The following goals and strategies were developed over a three month period and in the course of a public meeting, a workshop, and a series of one-on-one interviews with key City staff, the members of the Historic Preservation Commission, and others involved in historic preservation in Centralia. The goals and tasks are oriented toward the Historic Preservation Commission, but may in many cases involve City staff and others as well. The Centralia Historic Preservation Commission considers providing information about historic preservation practices and resources to the City, building and business owners, the real estate community and related professionals, and the general public their primary task. This is reflected in their first goal, to “Increase the level of commissioner and staff knowledge about historic preservation” and also incorporated in Goals 2 and 3. Some goals are readily achievable in the short term – from one-to-six months. Others will require a longer time frame – from 6 to 12 months or more – to achieve. These should be re-visited as conditions and priorities change. Goals 5, 6, 7 and 8 require forging effective partnerships with others. These should also be revisited as the political environment and priorities shift to reflect current conditions. Following the list of goals is a Work Plan for 2012 that prioritizes specific tasks to be accomplished in the coming year. Before the end of the year, a 2013 Work Plan would be developed for future activities. Goal 1: Increase the level of commissioner and staff knowledge about historic preservation. Tasks: • Define and re-define historic preservation training needs for commissioners and staff ongoing basis. • Provide for on-going training by inviting staff from the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and Washington Trust for Historic Preservation and others to speak at Commission meetings on topical issues. • Plan visits to other communities/commissions that are facing similar issues and/or arrange for joint sessions with other agencies when topics of interest are presented. • Seek on-line (such as webinars) and other educational sessions on pertinent topics to share with Commission. • Participate in conferences such as Main Street conferences where possible and share with fellow commissioners. • Invite specific individuals, particularly City staff, and other commissions to participate in relevant training sessions. • Maintain at least one membership in the National Alliance of Preservation Commissions to take advantage of their journal and join their listserv. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 5 – The Action Plan 28 ________________________________________________________________________ Goal 2: Develop the Historic Preservation Commission as a resource for both the city and the community on preservation issues. Tasks: • Develop and distribute a brochure for building owners and prospective building owners on historic preservation benefits and resources, especially tax incentive programs. • Develop and distribute a brochure for the general public on the benefits of historic preservation, especially business development and visitor-oriented benefits. • Ensure that prospective building owners know that their buildings are in a historic district by providing information to real estate and related professionals. • Consider hosting a public open house on preservation in Centralia to publicize the historic preservation program. Goal 3: Increase the visibility and credibility of Centralia's Historic Preservation Program. Tasks: • Develop and install exhibits on buildings and Centralia history in the windows of the Wilson Hotel. • Increase the historic preservation program's • • • • • • • • web presence with a Facebook page and Figure 10 - Centralia's Preservation Month additional information on the city website. program, 2011 Work with the Visiting Nurses' Association by promoting and assisting with a home and gardens tour. Develop partnerships with other groups that promote compatible goals. Re-publish Historic Preservation Month booklet (Walking Tour booklet) and place in area businesses and City Hall. Investigate installing a National Register Historic District sign on the freeway. Develop a permanent exhibit on Centralia’s history that can travel to different venues in the city and beyond. Continue to sponsor exhibits like the recent library exhibit on Centralia’s history. Create a plan to ‘clean up’ the Arboretum and highlight its historic components. Consider nominating the site of the Centralia Massacre, a unique and important historical event, to the historic register and creating an informational brochure or walking tour around this and related sites and events. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 5 – The Action Plan 29 ________________________________________________________________________ Goal 4: Increase the effectiveness of the Historic Preservation Commission. Tasks: • Review and revise municipal code, by-laws and other documents for greater clarity and relevance. • Consider incorporating National Park Service design review principles that are in the bylaws into the Municipal Code. • Clarify and refine the landmark designation criteria, process and procedures. • Revise the application forms and procedures for local historical register nominations and special tax evaluation to clarify the process and information needed from applicants and to be consistent with state and local regulations. • Clarify commission and staff roles that are outlined in the bylaws. • Consider adding additional members to the Commission and expanding the area from which to draw members, if needed. • Consider extending commission term limits. • Review and update the design guidelines as necessary for the commission to work effectively with building owners on rehabilitation. • Explore ways to provide on-going consistency in staff support for the Historic Preservation Commission. • Work with local building owners (commercial and residential) to encourage applications for the local register; explore this opportunity with applicants for façade improvement grants. Goal 5: Better integrate preservation into overall community marketing and economic development activities. Tasks: • Hold a community celebration of the centennial of the railroad depot. • Explore possible promotional tie-ins with the sports complex, Great Wolf Lodge, the Chehalis Steam Train. • Partner with others to develop a program of wayfinding, information kiosks and signage for downtown. • Develop a preservation awards program to recognize individuals and organizations active in local preservation activities and projects. • Conduct walking tours (including some interiors) to highlight rehabilitation that has taken place or is underway. • Develop an historic marker program for notable buildings and sites. • Investigate creating a GPS-based, interactive walking tour of the downtown, possibly in collaboration with the community college. • Investigate creating a walking/biking tour and/or interpretive program for the alleys, possibly in collaboration with the community college. Goal 6: Increase business involvement in preservation. Tasks: • Provide information, activities and incentives to involve more downtown building and business owners in preservation activities. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 5 – The Action Plan 30 ________________________________________________________________________ • • • • • • • Work with building and business owners to encourage participation in historic preservation programs, such as the façade improvement program and the Main Street program’s B&O tax benefits. Work with building owners to update and expand the 1987 document on downtown buildings, increasing its value and usefulness. Work with city and others to attract housing and other second-story uses into downtown. Provide building owners with maintenance guidelines to help preserve both the historic significance and the economic value of their properties. Provide building owners with useful information on energy efficiency for historic buildings. Consider creation of a local historic district within and beyond the Centralia Downtown National Register District, with appropriate design guidelines to ensure compatibility. Look into projects that can be done in cooperation with local business and/or building owners to increase interaction between the historic commission and local business community. Goal 7: Increase neighborhood involvement in preservation. Tasks: • Consider the feasibility of organizing a preservation advocacy group and/or active neighborhood association, such as in the Edison neighborhood, interested in preservation. • Consider the feasibility of nominating the Edison neighborhood as a national or local historic district. • If eligible, consider engaging in public outreach and education to build support for nominating the Edison neighborhood to the national or local register. Goal 8: Better integrate the historic preservation program into city government and activities. Tasks: • Review Historic Preservation element of the Comprehensive Plan and how it is being implemented. • Update the City’s preservation ordinance to reflect the City’s CLG status and integrate Rules and Procedures into the ordinance where appropriate. • Research feasible options for managing the Borst properties. 2012 WORK PLAN High Priority Tasks (January - June 2012) • Revise the Municipal Code as described in Goal 4 and 8 (see also below). • Clarify and update Historic Preservation Commission Rules and Procedures, including the landmark designation criteria. Consider incorporating the National Park Service design review guidance into the Municipal Code. Ensure that forms and instructions for forms are consistent with these changes and with State procedures. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 5 – The Action Plan 31 ________________________________________________________________________ • Develop and distribute a brochure, with particular focus on building owners and prospective building owners, on the benefits of preservation and relevant resources and incentives. • Recruit additional members for the Historic Preservation Commission in order to have additional resources to draw on. • Plan events or activities to observe Preservation Month in May. • Identify additional Commission training needs and arrange for on-going training as described in Goal 1.48 Medium Priority Tasks (July - December 2012) • Develop and install at least one public exhibit on Centralia history; a possibility might be Centralia’s sports history, to coincide with the opening of the Sports Center. • Develop and carry out at least one activity to promote historic preservation in the broader community, such as a walking tour or building tour highlighting local achievements. • Develop a program to recognize the sites of important historic events with plaques. • Work with building and business owners to strengthen historic preservation programs such as the facade improvement program and encourage historic nominations to the local historic register where appropriate. • Develop partnerships with other groups to plan and host a celebration of the train depot centennial in 2012. • Develop a Work Plan for 2013. 48 Commissioners participated in three trainings sessions during the preparation of this plan. These sessions covered design review, special tax valuation procedures and regulatory/process considerations. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 32 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN 6. Incentives for Historic Preservation In addition to legislation, regulations and design guidelines, historic preservation programs are shaped by a variety of incentives at the federal, state and local levels to encourage preservation and benefit owners of historic buildings. The following are brief descriptions of some of these programs, with web links for further research. FEDERAL INCENTIVES Federal Rehabilitation Investment Tax Credit Since the late 1970s the National Park Service has provided financial incentives in the form of a 20% tax credit for the preservation of recognized landmarks. The National Park Service administers this program with the Internal Revenue Service and in partnership with the State Historic Preservation Offices. A 20% tax credit is available for the certified rehabilitation of certified historic structures. In other words, the property must be certified as historic by being listed on the National Register of Historic Places or included as a contributing property within the National Register Historic District. A certified rehabilitation is one in which changes to the property meet the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings.49 The property must also be income producing. An income-producing property would typically be a commercial, industrial, or residential rental building. A 10% tax credit is available for the rehabilitation of non-historic, non-residential buildings built before 1936. The rehabilitation must also be substantial. A “substantial” rehabilitation is one in which the amount spent on qualified project work is equal to or greater than the adjusted basis (value) of the building itself. Technical assistance and application information for this program is available from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). DAHP reviews all applications for the program and forwards them to the National Park Service in Washington, D.C. for final review and acceptance. For more information, see http://www.dahp.wa.gov/tax-credits and http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/tax/index.htm. Historic Preservation Easements A preservation easement is a voluntary legal agreement that protects a significant historic, archaeological, or cultural resource. An easement provides assurance to the owner of a historic or cultural property that the property's intrinsic values will be preserved through subsequent ownership. In addition, the owner may obtain substantial tax benefits. An entire historic 49 More information about the Secretary of Interior’s Standards may be found at http://www.nps.gov/hps/tps/standguide/. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 6 – Incentives for Historic Preservation 33 ________________________________________________________________________ Figure 11 - Federal Tax Credit guidance, courtesy National Park Service structure or just the facade or interior may qualify.50 Owners of National Register-listed properties may qualify for a federal income tax deduction for donating an easement on their property (often a façade easement) to a governmental or non-profit entity. Additional information about organizations that will accept preservation easements may be found through the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation at http://www.dahp.wa.gov/easements. Other Financial Incentives Financial incentives for historic preservation also include grants and special loan programs. Grants are typically available for properties owned by public agencies and non-profit organizations. Private foundations and organizations, such as the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation (see below) and the National Trust for Historic Preservation (http://www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/grants) have been the source of many grants to historic property owners in Washington State. Federal agencies that may provide lowinterest loans or grants for qualifying preservation projects include Community Development Block Grants, USDA Rural Development programs, and the Federal Homes Loan Bank programs. Additional information about grants may be found at: http://www.dahp.wa.gov/grants. Additional information about loans may be found at: http://www.dahp.wa.gov/loans. 50 “Easements,” Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, http://www.dahp.wa.gov/easements, accessed September 2011. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 6 – Incentives for Historic Preservation 34 ________________________________________________________________________ WASHINGTON STATE INCENTIVES Washington State Special Property Tax Valuation (RCW 84.26) The Washington State Legislature established the tax incentive program in 1985 for local governments to encourage preservation by providing special valuation for properties that meet certain historic criteria. The program provides for the revision of the assessed value of a property after expenditures of certain rehabilitation costs for up to ten years. As a result, substantial improvements to a qualified historic property are not reflected in property taxes for the ten year period. For example, if a property owner incurs qualified rehabilitation costs that equal at least 25% of the building’s assessed value within a 24month period prior to application, those qualified costs can be subtracted from the new assessed value of the propertyTo take advantage of the program, local jurisdictions are required to adopt an ordinance allowing property owners to utilize the program, and the improvements must be approved by a local review board, such as the Centralia Historic Preservation Commission. The property owner must also maintain the property in good condition and the property must be visible from a public right-of-way, or be made available for public view once a year. The Washington State Advisory Council has established standards for the rehabilitation and maintenance of historic properties for this purpose. They may be found at: http://www.dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/ACHPrehabStandards.pdf. Capital Projects Fund for Washington’s Heritage This fund specifically supports heritage organizations that undertake capital projects with the goal of interpreting and preserving Washington’s history and heritage, and projects must provide for heritage preservation and/or interpretation to qualify. Non-profit organizations, tribes, and local government agencies may apply. The program is administered through the Washington State Historical Society. Valerie Sivinski Washington Preserves Fund The Valerie Sivinski Washington Preserves Fund is an annual grant program offered by the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation that provides up to $2,000 to organizations involved in historic preservation in Washington State. As noted on the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation website, “The goal of the fund is to provide small yet meaningful amounts of money to help promote historic preservation . . . at the community level.” Eligible projects include the purchase of materials or services for “bricks and mortar” projects that preserve a property, or developing publications or other interpretive materials that promote historic preservation of a specific historic resource. Changes to the property must meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and local design guidelines where applicable. More information may be found at: http://preservewa.org/WashingtonPreserves-Fund.aspx. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 6 – Incentives for Historic Preservation 35 ________________________________________________________________________ Main Street Tax Credits In 2005, Washington State legislation created the "Main Street Tax Credit Incentive Program." Through this program, businesses are eligible to take a Business and Occupation (B&O) tax credit for contributions given to eligible downtown revitalization organizations. Businesses may apply for a credit against the B&O tax and public utility tax equal to 75% of approved contributions to designated revitalization programs, or 50% of approved contributions to the Main Street Trust Fund. The department may not approve credit with respect to a program in a city or town with a population of one hundred ninety thousand persons or more. Additional information is available at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=82.73&full=true. Figure 12 - The Spike Motor Co. (Centralia City Hall) in 1928 LOCAL INCENTIVES Centralia Façade Improvement Program The City’s Façade Improvement Grant program is funded by the Centralia Electric Utility Rural Economic Development Revolving Fund. It allows owners of businesses and/or buildings in the Downtown Centralia Historic District to apply for grants for design services for façade improvements, as well as funding the improvements themselves. Up to $1,250 is available for architectural design costs and up to $10,000 total (design plus renovation costs) is available per storefront, but requires a 50% match. Expenses covered include painting, lighting, signage, and weatherization, including awnings. General design guidelines must be met to successfully Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 6 – Incentives for Historic Preservation 36 ________________________________________________________________________ participate in the program. Additional information is available at: http://www.cityofcentralia.com/files/Facade_Improvement_Program_2011.pdf. Other Relevant Regulations Local Building Code. The City of Centralia has adopted the International Building Code (IBC), 2009 Edition, as their building code. This code contains specific provisions to address historic buildings that acknowledge the nature of historic materials and material assemblies, and allows for waivers of non-mandatory code compliance at the discretion of the local building official. The International Existing Building Code (IEBC) also allows for alternative ways to meet the intent of the code, while preserving original or restored architectural elements and features and encouraging energy conservation, barrier-free access, and a cost-effective approach to preservation. Chapter 18.04 of the Centralia Municipal Code refers to adopts the International Building Codes and Standard Specifications: http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/Centralia/centralia18/centralia1804.html#18.04 The Federal Emergency Management Act. The Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) requires that properties receiving funding to address flood damage be upgraded, which typically requires that building foundations are raised and the first floor high is placed high above grade and the floodplain. However, FEMA offers relief from this provision for properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the State Inventory of Historic Places. See Chapter 16.21 of the Centralia Municipal Code for more information: http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/centralia.html. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 37 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN 7. References and Resources REFERENCES Books and Periodicals Citizens of Centralia, Centralia, The First Century, 1845-1955. Centralia, Washington: Centralia Chamber of Commerce, 1977. “Foreclosure of Wilson Hotel a Prudent City Decision,” The Chronicle, Centralia/Chehalis, Wash.., February 26, 2011:Main 8. Hughes, Lee, Wilson Hotel Still Occupied,” The Chronicle, Centralia/Chehalis, Wash., May 25, 2011:1. _____, “Wilson Hotel Now Back in City Hands,” The Chronicle, Centralia/Chehalis, Wash., May 21, 2011:Main 2. _____, “Wilson Hotel to Be Sold at Auction,” The Chronicle, Centralia/Chehalis, Wash., May 20, 2011:1. Smith, Herndon, Centralia, the First Fifty Years 1845-1900. Rochester, Washington: Gorham Printing, 1995 (1942). Government and Other Documents City of Centralia, Centralia Comprehensive Plan. Centralia: City of Centralia, 2007. City of Centralia, “Centralia Façade Improvement Program, Participant Guidelines and Application Form,” (n.d.) City of Centralia, “Centralia Historic Preservation Commission Rules and Procedures for Centralia Register of Historic Places Designation Review.” December 2002. City of Centralia, “Centralia Historic Preservation Commission Rules and Procedures for Design Review,” December 4, 2002. “City of Centralia Historic Preservation Month Events,” May 2011 (brochure). City of Centralia, “Request for Qualifications and Proposal, City of Centralia Historic Preservation Facilitation and Work Plan,” February 18, 2011. Constantini, Tom and City of Centralia, Centralia Central Business District Design Guidelines. Centralia, WA: Centralia Main Street Association, 1987. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 7 – References and Resources 38 ________________________________________________________________________ Gray, Connie Walker, et. al., Historical Research Associates, Inc., National Register of Historic Places Registration Form – Centralia Downtown Historic District, November 13, 2002. Griffith, Greg, Historic Preservation: A Tool for Managing Growth. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development, 2005 (1994). Lentz, Flo and Janet Blair Porter, Phase II – 1989, Historic Resources Survey & Inventory, City of Centralia, Washington. Prepared for the City of Centralia and State of Washington Department of Community Development, Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, August 1989. Painter, Diana J., Painter, Preservation & Planning, Centralia’s North Edison District Historic Resources Inventory, October 2004. Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, “Special Valuation: A Local Tax Incentive Program,” (form) (n.d.). Websites Burrows, Alyssa, “Four men die in the Centralia Massacre on November 11, 1919,” HistoryLink.org. http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file_id=5605, November 6, 2003, accessed September 2011. Centralia Municipal Code. Seattle, WA: Code Publishing Company, http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/centralia.html, accessed September 2011. “Easements,” Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, http://www.dahp.wa.gov/easements, accessed September 2011. “Historic Downtown,” Centralia, Washington. http://www.cityofcentralia.com/page.asp?navid=231, accessed September 2011. “Historic Preservation,” Centralia, Washington, http://www.cityofcentralia.com/Page.asp?NavID=512, accessed September 2011. Noson, Linda, et. al., “Where has Earthquake Damage Occurred in Washington State?” Washington State Earthquake Hazards", http://www.pnsn.org/INFO_GENERAL/NQT/where_damage.html, accessed September 2011. Oldham, Kit, “George and Mary Jane Washington found [sic] the town of Centerville (now Centralia) on January 8, 1875,” History.Link.org. http://www.washington.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&File_Id=5276, February 23, 2003. “Lewis County Event Center and Sports Complex,” Centralia, Washington. http://www.cityofcentralia.com/Page.asp?NavID=499, accessed September 2011. Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 7 – References and Resources 39 ________________________________________________________________________ Schmidt, Katie, "TransAlta: Gregoire signs bill to halt coal burning by 2025," http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/04/30/accessed September 2011. RESOURCES Publications Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation: A Tool for Managing Growth, http://www.dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/Historic%20Preservation%20Guidebook%20 Final.pdf Sustaining Communities Through Historic Preservation, http://www.dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/PreservationPlan09.pdf WAC 254-20-100, Washington state advisory council's standards for the rehabilitation and maintenance of historic properties http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=254-20-100 Washington State Standards for Cultural Reporting, http://www.dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/External%20FINAL.pdf US Department of the Interior, National Park Service Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning, http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb24/ Introduction to Federal Tax Credits for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, Main Street Commercial Buildings, http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/tax/downlaod/intro_main_streets.pdf National Register Bulletin 15: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/ National Register Bulletin 16A: How to Complete the National Register Registration Form, http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb16a/ Planning Successful Rehabilitation Projects, Guidance on Interpreting and Applying the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/tax/guidance.htm Preservation Briefs 14 – New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings: Preservation Concerns, http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/briefs/brief14.htm The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/index.htm Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group City of Centralia Preservation Action Plan Ch 7 – References and Resources 40 ________________________________________________________________________ The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings, http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/standguide/index.htm The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation & Illustrated Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/sustainability-guidelines.pdf Technical Preservation Services, Preservation Briefs, 1-44, http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs.htm Preservation Tech Notes, http://www.nps.gov/tps/education/free-pubs.htm Websites Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Information on the legislative basis for historic preservation in the United States, http://www.achp.gov/nhpp.html National Alliance of Historic Commissions, http://www.uga.edu/napc/. Publications and Resources, http://www.uga.edu/napc/programs/napc/publications.htm National Park Service, http://www.nps.gov/history/. Historic Preservation Tax Credits, http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/tax/ National Trust for Historic Preservation, http://www.preservationnation.org/. Main Street Program, http://www.preservationnation.org/main-street/ Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, http://www.dahp.wa.gov/. Certified Local Government Program, http://www.dahp.wa.gov/programs/certified-localgovernment-program Technical Preservation Guidance, http://www.dahp.wa.gov/experience-history/preservehistory Washington Trust for Historic Preservation, http://www.wa-trust.org/. Main Street program, http://preservewa.org/Main-Street.aspx Painter Preservation & Planning/the Sheridan Consulting Group 41 CITY OF CENTRALIA PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN Appendices 42 Appendix A – Survey Questions 43 SURVEY QUESTIONS Name __________________________________________ Role ___________________________________________ CITY OF CENTRALIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM Commissioners 1. How long have you been involved with Centralia's Historic Preservation Program? How did you first get involved? 2. Why did you want to be on the commission? Did you have anything in particular you wanted to do? How well have you been able to achieve that? 3. How have you participated, other than attending meetings? 5. Do you think the historic preservation program is considered important by Centralia residents generally? Why do they value it (or not)? Do you think it is considered important by city officials? Why do they value it (or not)? 6. How effective do you think the commission has been since you've been on it? What changes could make it more effective? City officials 1. Generally, what do think is the value of the historic preservation program to Centralia? Do you think it is considered important by Centralia residents generally? Why do they value it (or not)? 2. Do you think there are the threats to historic resources in Centralia? If so, what are these threats? 3. How do you see historic preservation fitting with overall city goals? 4. How could the historic preservation program be more effective? 5. How could the commission serve citizens better? Should its role be re-defined in any way? 44 Other people 1. Have you had any involvement with Centralia's Historic Preservation Program? What kind of involvement? 2. Generally, what do think is the value of the historic preservation program to Centralia? Do you think it is considered important by Centralia residents generally? Why do they value it (or not)? 3. Do you think there are the threats to historic resources in Centralia? If so, what are these threats? 4. How could the historic preservation program be more effective? 45 Appendix B – Training Power Point #1 – Historic Preservation Regulations 46 Historic Preservation Regulations Centralia Historic Preservation Commission Diana Painter & Mimi Sheridan November 14, 2011 Legal Basis for Preservation Before the Progressive Era, government was intended to keep bad things from happening. Over time, making good things happen became a goal as well. 1909 - Zoning (land use) 1916 – Regulation of height and bulk 1926 – Zoning upheld in Euclid v. Ambler 1954 - Berman v. Parker (removal of blight) 1976 – Penn Central v. New York - Historic preservation is a valid government goal - Limits a private use for a public good - Not a taking under the 5th Amendment if a reasonable return is allowed 47 Historic Preservation in Washington 1966 NHPA - National Register program - State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO) - Certified Local Governments (CLG) - Historic resource inventories 1967-71 - Washington State Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation established - CLGs established - historic resource surveys throughout the state (now 67 CLGs plus tribes) Certified Local Governments Benefits Eligible for state grants DAHP training & technical assistance More local control over preservation Increased visibility for preservation Eligible for special tax valuation Responsibilities (NHPA) Enforce state or local preservation laws Retain a qualified commission Maintain an inventory of historic resources Engage the public Review local NRHP & WHR nominations Review & monitor special tax projects 48 National Register of Historic Places Listing is honorary except for federal actions. Buildings can be altered or demolished. Anyone can nominate, but listing must have owner consent. Nominations are reviewed by state preservation office & local preservation commission. Reviewed & approved by State Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, then forwarded to Keeper of the National Register for final approval. National Register Criteria Must be at least 50 years old (in most cases), retain its original character and integrity and be significant with respect to at least one of four criteria: A. Associated with an important event or series of events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of American history; B. Associated with an important individual who was significant in our past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of an architectural type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic value; or D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. 49 Centralia Landmark Designation Exterior changes or demolition must be approved by the HPC. Anyone can nominate but owner consent is required for listing. HPC recommendations must be approved by City Council. Decisions can be appealed. Tied to WHR criteria and application process, but are outdated. Centralia Designation Criteria • Has integrity; • Is at least 50 years old, or of exceptional importance; • Meets at least one of the following criteria: 1. Associated with important events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, American history; 2. Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction; 3. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art; 4. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history; 5. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state or local history; 50 Centralia Designation Criteria, con’ con’t. 6. 7. Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information; Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with an historic person or event; 8. Is a birthplace or grave of an historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure significantly associated with that person; 9. Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, distinctive design features, or from association with historic events or cultural patterns; 10. Is a reconstructed building which has been executed in an historically accurate manner on the original site; 11. Is a creative and unique example of folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical categories. Washington Heritage Register (WHR) Listing is honorary except for state or federal actions. Buildings can be altered or demolished. Anyone can nominate, but listing must have owner consent. Nominations are reviewed by state preservation office & local preservation commission. Reviewed & approved by State Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. 51 WHR Designation Criteria Has good to moderate integrity; • Is at least 50 years old, or of exceptional importance; • Meets at least one of these criteria: • 1. Belongs to the early settlement, commercial development or original native occupation of a community or region. 2. Is directly connected to a movement, organization, institution, religion or club which served as a focal point for a community or region. 3. Is directly connected to specific activities or events which had a lasting impact on the community or region. 4. Is associated with legends, spiritual or religious life ways which are uniquely related to a piece of land. WHR Designation Criteria, con’ con’t 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Displays strong patterns of land use or alterations of the environment which occurred during the historic period. Is directly associated with an individual who made an outstanding contribution to the development of a community or a group of people. Has strong artistic, architectural or engineering qualities, or displays unusual materials or craftwork that reflect an historic era. Was designed or built by an influential architect, or reflects the work of an important artisan. Archaeological investigation of the property has or will increase our understanding of past cultures or life ways. 52 Due Process Because of the power of landmark designation, due process is vital to a successful landmarks program. Decisions must be made at a public hearing with adequate public notice. The owner must have the opportunity to comment. There must be a clear record of decision stating why the property meets or does not meet the criteria or the design review standards. There must be an appeal process (such as for economic hardship or to provide a reasonable rate of return). Historic Districts National Historic Districts: Cannot be designated if a majority of owners object. Do not regulate changes to buildings or demolitions (except for Federal actions). Contributing buildings are eligible for Federal tax credits. Local Districts: Alterations or new construction require review, using Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and specific district guidelines. 53 Conservation Districts For buffer zones or areas without the integrity or support for an historic district Tailored to community needs Community must decide what it wants to preserve (e.g. setbacks, landscaping, massing, materials, etc.), then determine the best method Not tied to Secretary's Standards Can be administered through zoning or design review. Federal Legislation National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Covers projects funded by, carried out by, or permitted by the Federal government. Looks at both the natural and the built environment. Requires that potential impacts be identified; does not prohibit the impacts. Product is an Environmental Assessment (EA) or EIS. State Environmental Policy Act is similar 54 Section 106 of the NHPA Covers Federal undertakings (anything funded, permitted or undertaken by Federal government: - transportation (USDOT) - water-related projects (COE) - flood control projects - FEMA assistance - weatherization - housing financing - cell towers (FCC) - surplus property & base closures - numerous other examples Section 106 Process Requires consultation with SHPO, tribes, local groups Identify resources eligible for NR Identify potential impacts: - permanent (demolitions, etc.) - construction (vibration, economic) Determine mitigation - documentation - move building, etc. - reduce construction impacts Memorandum of Agreement among Federal, state and local agencies involved to assure compliance 55 Federal – Other Section 4(f)of the National Transportation Act • Covers impacts to historic resources & public parks, recreation & wildlife areas from federally-funded transportation projects. • A much stronger standard: - A project can impact a resource only if there is “no prudent or feasible alternative” and there is - “all possible planning to minimize harm.” 56 Appendix C – Training Power Point #2 Design Review for Historic Preservation 57 Design Review for Historic Preservation Centralia Historic Preservation Commission Diana Painter & Mimi Sheridan October 24, 2011 Why conduct design review? Mandated in the C-3 Core Commercial District to ensure compatibility with the historic downtown. “Architectural and building materials review will be critical in this district to ensure that new or remodeled structures maintain an appearance which is highly compatible with a historic downtown. Frequent store entrances, large window areas, and awnings will be strongly encouraged. Blank facades, large-scale single-use buildings, reflective glass, and other similar features will be strongly discouraged.” (20.24.040 (C)) “Designs for this area should focus on the “historic character” relating to the heritage of the early residents of the community.” (20.24.110 (C)) 58 Why conduct design review? Mandated in the C-3 Core Commercial District to ensure a positive pedestrian environment with traditional storefront elements. Differentiated base Weather protection No blank facades Glass at the ground level Entrances Pedestrian amenities Why conduct design review? Mandated in Centralia’s historic preservation ordinance (Chapter 2.58 of the Zoning Code) “Review proposals to construct, change, alter, modify, remodel, move, demolish, and significantly affect properties or districts on the register as provided in CMC 2.58.050 and adopt standards in its rules to be used to guide this review and the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness.” (2.58.030 (D) (4)). “Provide for the review either by the commission or its staff of all applications for approvals, permits, environmental assessments or impact statements, and other similar documents pertaining to identified historic resources or adjacent properties.” (2.58.030 (D) (5)). 59 Why conduct design review? Mandated in Centralia’s historic preservation ordinance (Chapter 2.58 of the Zoning Code) “No person shall change the use, construct any new building or structure, or reconstruct, alter, restore, remodel, repair, move, or demolish any existing property on the register or within an historic district on the register without review by the commission and without receipt of a certificate of appropriateness as a result of the review. The review shall apply to all features of the property, interior and exterior, that contribute to its designation and are listed on the nomination form. . . Information required by the commission to review the proposed changes are established in rules.” (2.58.050 (A)) Why conduct design review? Allows property owners to qualify for Façade Improvement funds. Special guidelines cover: Awnings Signs Paint Color Windows 60 Why conduct design review? Allows property owners to qualify for Special Valuation tax relief for properties listed on the National or local register. “Serve as the local review board for the purpose of approving applications for special property tax valuation per Chapter 84.26 RCW and Chapter 221, Laws of 1986, and entering into an agreement with the property owner for the duration of the special valuation during which time the review board monitors the property for continued qualification for the special valuation per requirements of Chapter 84.26 RCW and Chapter 221, Laws of 1986.” (2.58.030 (D) (15)). Why conduct design review? Allows property owners to qualify for Special Valuation tax relief for properties listed on the National or local register. Properties must not be altered in a way which adversely affects those elements which contribute to its designation. (2.58.070 (C)) Owners must comply with rehabilitation plans and minimum standards of maintenance. (2.58.070 (C) (2)) Owners must apply to the commission for approval or denial of any demolition or alteration. (2.58.070 (C) (4)) 61 Why conduct design review? Allows property owners to qualify for Federal tax credits for properties listed on the National Register. Federal tax credits are available for properties that are individually listed on the National Register or are contributing properties to a National Register district. A 20% tax credit is available for the rehabilitation of historic structures and a 10% tax credit is available for the rehabilitation of nonhistoric, non-residential buildings built before 1936. The rehabilitation must be substantial, and the building must be income-producing, such as a commercial, industrial, agricultural, or rental residential building. Which standards apply? Centralia Façade Improvement Program General Program Guidelines apply to facade improvement projects. Centralia Historic Preservation Commission Rules and Procedures for Design Review apply to historic review projects in Centralia. Washington State Advisory Council’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Maintenance of Historic Properties apply to Special Valuation projects. The Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation apply to Special Valuation and Federal Tax Credit projects. 62 Which standards apply? All review guidelines and incentive programs require compliance with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Centralia standards Centralia’s Criteria for Design Review include the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Centralia’s Central Business District Design Guidelines refer to many of the guidelines promoted in the Secretary of the Interior’s standards and guidelines. 63 Washington standards The Washington State Advisory Council's standards for the rehabilitation are the same as the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The Advisory Council’s standards for maintenance are as follows. Washington standards Maintenance 1. Buildings and structures shall not be allowed to deteriorate beyond the point where routine maintenance and repair will return them to good condition. 2. Buildings shall be kept in a safe and habitable condition at all times. Structural defects and hazards shall be corrected. Any condition which constitutes a fire hazard shall be eliminated. 3. Buildings shall be protected against ongoing water damage due to defective roofing, flashing, glazing, caulking, or other causes. Moisture condensation resulting from inadequate heat or ventilation shall be eliminated if present at levels sufficient to promote rot or decay of building materials. 4. Deteriorated exterior architectural features and any broken or missing doors and windows shall be repaired or replaced. 5. Painted exterior surfaces shall be maintained and repainted as necessary to prevent a deteriorated appearance or damage to the substrate. Exterior masonry surfaces shall be tuck pointed where required to maintain the mortar in good condition. Finished tuck pointing shall match the original mortar joint in hardness and appearance. 64 The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Four treatment types Preservation focuses on the maintenance and repair of existing historic materials and retention of a property's form as it has evolved over time. Rehabilitation acknowledges the need to alter or add to a historic property to meet continuing or changing uses while retaining the property's historic character. Restoration depicts a property at a particular period of time in its history, while removing evidence of other periods. Reconstruction re-creates vanished or non-surviving portions of a property for interpretive purposes. The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Principles “Some exterior and interior alterations to historic building are generally needed to assure its continued use, but it is most important that such alterations do not radically change, obscure, or destroy character-defining spaces, materials, features, or finishes.” 65 What are the character-defining features? The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Principles Identify, retain and preserve the architectural materials and features that are important to defining the historical character of a building or district. Protect and maintain the materials and features in the rehabilitation process. Repair character-defining materials and features that have deteriorated whenever possible. Repairing can include limited replacement in kind--or with compatible substitute material--of extensively deteriorated or missing parts or features. Substitute materials may be acceptable if they have the same visual appearance as the remaining parts of the feature or finish. Replacing an entire character-defining feature with new material is recommended only when it is too deteriorated or damaged to repair. Missing features. When an entire interior or exterior feature is missing, it should not be replaced unless its physical appearance can be verified by research. 66 The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 1 A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 2 The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 67 The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 3 Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 4 Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. 68 The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 69 The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 7 Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 8 Archaeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 70 The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. The Secretary of the Interior’ Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation 10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. 71 Altered exterior What aspects have been affected? Renovation Which features needed reconstruction? Has the integrity been affected? New storefront Are the new features historically compatible? Do they create pedestrian interest? Do they protect the historic character of the District? Useful references The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings http://www.nps.gov/hps/tps/standguide/ Planning Successful Rehabilitation Projects, Guidance on interpreting and applying the Secretary of the Interior's Standards http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/tax/guidance.htm Introduction to Federal Tax Credits for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, Main Street Commercial Buildings http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/tax/download/intro_main_street.pdf Preservation Briefs 14 – New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings: Preservation Concerns http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/briefs/brief14.htm The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation & Illustrated Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/download/guidelines-sustainability.pdf WAC 254-20-100, Washington state advisory council's standards for the rehabilitation and maintenance of historic properties http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=254-20100