DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
Transcription
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
REVISED AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, March 3, 2015 DUBLIN CIVIC CENTER, 100 Civic Plaza DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL • Agendas and Staff Reports are posted on the City’s Internet Website (www.dublin.ca.gov) • Agendas may be picked up at the City Clerk's Office for no charge, or to request information on being placed on the annual subscription list, please call 833-6650. • A complete packet of information containing Staff Reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review at least 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting or, in the event that it is delivered to City Councilmembers less than 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting, as soon as it is so delivered. The packet is available in the City Clerk’s Office and also at the Dublin Library. REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. 3.1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Certificates of Recognition for City of Dublin 2014 Young Citizen of the Year, Citizen of the Year and Organization of the Year The City Council will present Certificates of Recognition to the City of Dublin 2014 Young Citizen of the Year, Citizen of the Year and Organization of the Year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the Certificates of Recognition. Proclamation for American Red Cross Month, March 2015 The City Council will present a proclamation for American Red Cross Month, March 2015. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the proclamation. Visit Tri-Valley Presentation The Tri-Valley Convention and Visitor’s Bureau, otherwise known as Visit Tri-Valley, will provide a presentation on recent and upcoming regional tourism efforts conducted by the organization. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the presentation. Introduction of Commander Dennis Houghtelling Commander Dennis Houghtelling of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office will be introduced as the new Dublin Police Chief. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Welcome Commander Houghtelling to the City of Dublin. Public Comments 3.2. 3.3. 3.4. 3.5. At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on non-agendized items. Please step to the podium and clearly state your name for the record. COMMENTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with State Law, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The Council may respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the matter. Any member of the public may contact the City Clerk’s Office related to the proper procedure to place an item on a future City Council agenda. The exceptions under which the City Council MAY discuss and/or take action on items not appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3). March 3, 2015 Dublin City Council Revised Agenda Page 1 of 4 4. CONSENT CALENDAR 4.1. Minutes of the February 17, 2015 Regular City Council Meeting and the February 21, 2015 Special City Council Meeting The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of February 17, 2015, and the Special City Council meeting of February 21, 2015. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of February 17, 2015, and the Special City Council meeting of February 21, 2015. Award of Contract for Irrigation System Upgrades – Contract #14-16 Staff is seeking City Council authorization to award Irrigation System Upgrades Contract #14-16. This will provide for upgrades to existing controllers located on street medians east of Dougherty Road so the controllers can communicate with the City’s Central Irrigation System. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Awarding Contract No.14-16 Irrigation System Upgrades to Pom’s Landscaping Incorporated. City Council Disaster Preparedness Training The City Council will consider holding a disaster preparedness training session for City Councilmembers. The purpose of the session is to receive an overview of the City’s disaster response process during an emergency. The City Council will also consider providing Staff with a preferred date to hold the session. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Direct Staff to conduct a disaster preparedness training for City Councilmembers on May 19, 2015 starting at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber. St. Patrick’s Day Celebration The City Council will receive a report on the festivities planned for the 32nd Annual St. Patrick’s Day Celebration on March 14 and 15, 2015. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. Amendment to Legal Services Agreement Meyers Nave, the law firm that has served as Dublin’s City Attorney since its incorporation, has requested that the City Council consider amending its legal services agreement with the City to increase the hourly rates for general legal services, litigation services, and reimbursable third-party services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services and authorize Mayor to execute same. Excellence in Budgeting Award for the City of Dublin’s FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16 Budget and Financial Plan The City of Dublin has received its first Excellence in Budgeting Award, conferred by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, for its FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16 Adopted Budget and Financial Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report and accept the award. 4.2. 4.3. 4.4. 4.5. 4.6. Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the City Council with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the City Council who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor to remove the item. March 3, 2015 Dublin City Council Revised Agenda Page 2 of 4 4.7. Modification of Parking Regulations along Antone Way, Lee Thompson Street, and Shady Creek Road The City Council will consider changes to parking regulations along Antone Way, Lee Thompson Street and Shady Creek Road. Along Antone Way, no-parking regulations are proposed to accommodate roadway striping changes aimed at improving traffic circulation at Green Elementary School entrance. On Lee Thompson Street, a time-limited loading zone is proposed to allow drop-off and pick-up of children for a “Walking School Bus” program at Kolb Elementary School. And, along Shady Creek Road, modifications to parking regulations are proposed to ensure adequate sight visibility for motorists, while providing additional parking in areas of demand. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Lee Thompson Street; adopt the Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Antone Way; and adopt the Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Shady Creek Road. 4.8. Renewal of the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD) In 2005, lodging business owners came together and formed the Tri-Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID). Lodging business owners now wish to renew the TBID, which will continue to provide funding for much needed marketing efforts for the Tri-Valley through Visit TriValley. By adopting this Resolution, the City Council will grant permission to the City of Pleasanton to renew the district as the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Granting Consent to the City of Pleasanton to Renew the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD). 4.9. Caltrans Freeway Ground-Mounted Directional Signs Staff is seeking City Council authorization to execute and submit an Encroachment Permit application to Caltrans to allow for new I-680 and I-580 ground-mounted directional signs to identify the City of Dublin Downtown, and to remove the existing I-580 Civic Center ground-mounted directional sign in accordance with Caltrans standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Filing of an Application for a California Department of Transportation Encroachment Permit Application for New I-680 and I-580 Ground-Mounted Directional Signs to Identify the City of Dublin Downtown, and to Remove the Existing I-580 Civic Center Ground-Mounted Directional Sign, in accordance with Caltrans standards. 4.10. Annual Progress Report on the Status of the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element for Calendar Year 2014 The City Council will review the Annual Progress Report on the Status of the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element for Calendar Year 2014 in accordance with Government Code Section 65400(a)(2). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Annual Progress Report on the Status of the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element Compliance for Calendar Year 2014; and direct Staff to forward the Annual Progress Report to the California State Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community Development. 4.11. Fiscal Year 2014-15 2nd Quarter Financial Review The City Council will receive a financial report on the second quarter for Fiscal Year 2014-15 and consider mid-year amendments to the Fiscal Year 2014-15 Budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report on the mid-year FY 2014-15 financial results and approve the budget change. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION – None. March 3, 2015 Dublin City Council Revised Agenda Page 3 of 4 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS – None. 7. 7.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Marketing and Branding Presentation by North Star Destination Services The City Council will receive a presentation from North Star Destination Strategies about the City’s selected brand concept, “New American Backyard,” and recommendations to implement a marketing and branding plan for the concept. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the City Marketing and Branding Plan presentation by North Star Destination Strategies. 8. 8.1. NEW BUSINESS General Plan and Dublin Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study Initiation Request This item has been moved to the March 17, 2015 City Council meeting. 9. OTHER BUSINESS - Brief INFORMATION ONLY reports from Council and/or Staff, including Committee Reports and Reports by Council related to Meetings Attended at City Expense (AB1234). 10. ADJOURNMENT - In memory of Staff Sgt. Sean Diamond and our fallen troops. This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) If requested, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office (925) 833-6650 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Mission The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life which ensures a safe and secure environment that fosters new opportunities. Vision Dublin is a vibrant city committed to its citizens, natural resources, and cultural heritage. As Dublin grows, it will balance history with progress, to sustain an enlightened, economically balanced and diverse community. Dublin is unified in its belief that an engaged and educated community encourages innovation in all aspects of City life, including programs to strengthen our economic vitality, and support environmental stewardship and sustainability through the preservation of our natural surroundings. Dublin is dedicated to promoting an active and healthy lifestyle through the creation of first-class recreational opportunities, facilities and programs. March 3, 2015 Dublin City Council Revised Agenda Page 4 of 4 CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL File #610-50 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Certificates of Recognition for City of Dublin 2014 Young Citizen of the Year, Citizen of the Year and Organization of the Year Prepared by Taryn Gavagan Bozzo, Executive Aide EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will present Certificates of Recognition to the City of Dublin 2014 Young Citizen of the Year, Citizen of the Year and Organization of the Year. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council present the Certificates of Recognition. Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: In February of each year, the City Council recognizes a Young Citizen, Citizen and Organization of the year who have made a significant contribution toward enhancing the quality of life for residents of Dublin during the past year. The winners in each category were recognized at the City’s Volunteer Recognition Event on February 18, 2015. The City Council will formally recognize Sophia Bafaiz as the 2014 Young Citizen of the Year, Erik Bertelson as the 2014 Citizen of the Year and Easter Seals Kaleidoscope as the 2014 Organization of the Year. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 3.1 CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL File #610-50 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Proclamation for American Red Cross Month, March 2015 Prepared by Taryn Gavagan Bozzo, Executive Aide EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will present a proclamation for American Red Cross Month, March 2015. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council present the proclamation. Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: The City Council will present a proclamation for American Red Cross Month, recognizing those who support the Red Cross in helping people in need down the street, across the country and around the world through time, money and/or blood donation. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 3.2 CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL File #1100-30 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Visit Tri-Valley Presentation Prepared by Erin Steffen, Administrative Analyst II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Tri-Valley Convention and Visitor’s Bureau, otherwise known as Visit Tri-Valley, will provide a presentation on recent and upcoming regional tourism efforts conducted by the organization. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council receive the presentation. Submitted By Economic Development Director/ Public Information Officer Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: The Tri-Valley Convention and Visitor’s Bureau, otherwise known as Visit Tri-Valley, currently coordinates with the Tri-Valley cities of Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton, and San Ramon with the goal of expanding regional tourism in the Tri-Valley. Visit Tri-Valley is present this evening to address the City Council and to present a brief overview on recent services and programs provided to the Dublin community as well as its vision moving forward. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 3.3 CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL File # 700-10 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Introduction of Commander Dennis Houghtelling Prepared by Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Commander Dennis Houghtelling of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office will be introduced as the new Dublin Police Chief. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Welcome Commander Houghtelling to the City of Dublin. Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: Commander Dennis Houghtelling of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office will be introduced as the new Dublin Police Chief. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 3.4 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK File # 610-10 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Minutes of the February 17, 2015 Regular City Council Meeting and the February 21, 2015 Special City Council Meeting Prepared by Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of February 17, 2015, and the Special City Council meeting of February 21, 2015. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of February 17, 2015, and the Special City Council meeting of February 21, 2015. Submitted By City Clerk/Records Manager Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of February 17, 2015, and the Special City Council meeting of February 21, 2015. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Minutes of the February 17, 2015 Regular City Council Meeting 2. Draft Minutes of the February 21, 2015 Special City Council Meeting Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 4.1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REGULAR MEETING –FEBRUARY 17, 2015 A regular meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, February 21, 2015, in the City Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m., by Mayor Haubert. ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmembers Biddle, Gupta, Hart, Wehrenberg, and Mayor Haubert. None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance to the flag was recited by the City Council, Staff and those present. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Presentation of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group “Turning Red Tape into Red Carpet” Award to the City of Dublin 7:02 p.m. 3.1 Steve Wright, Vice President of Silicon Valley Leadership Group, presented the “Turning Red Tape into Red Carpet” award to the City Council. Recognition of Commander Tom McCarthy 7:07 p.m. 3.2 James Meehan, Assistant District Attorney, provided public comment on this item. Mike Grant, Dublin resident, provided public comment on this item. Steve Minniear, Dublin resident, provided public comment on this item. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 34 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2015 1 Dr. Stephen Hanke, Dublin Unified School District Superintendent, provided public comment on this item. The City Council recognized Chief McCarthy for his contribution to the Dublin community. Public Comments 7:28 p.m. 3.3 Michael Beckwith, Dublin resident, provided public comment. CONSENT CALENDAR 7:32 p.m. Items 4.1 through 4.11 Cm. Biddle stated, “I am a member of the Board of Directors of the Dublin Partnerships in Education. One of the items contained on the consent calendar tonight relates to a request for funding from DPIE. Due to my membership on its board, I have a statutory remote interest in the decision, and may not participate in the decision. I hereby recuse myself from all participation in the matter, and ask that my vote not be counted in determining whether DPIE’s request has been approved. In other words, I am recusing myself from item No. 4.10 on the consent calendar. I also ask that the City Clerk include my statement in the minutes of this meeting.” On motion of Vm. Gupta, seconded by Cm. Wehrenberg and by unanimous vote, the City Council took the following actions, with Cm. Biddle having recused himself from voting on Item 4.10: Approved 4.1 the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of February 3, 2015; Adopted 4.2 RESOLUTION NO. 16 - 15 ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS UNDER CONTRACT 12-13/12-14 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX and authorized Staff to accept a maintenance bond in the amount of $1,027.638. Received 4.3 a listing of payments issued from January 1, 2015 – January 31, 2015, totaling $9,149,145.34. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 34 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2015 2 Adopted 4.4 RESOLUTION NO. 17 -15 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR CITYWIDE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-1 RESOLUTION NO. 18 - 15 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-2 (STAGECOACH ROAD AREA) RESOLUTION NO. 19 - 15 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 (VILLAGES AT WILLOW CREEK) RESOLUTION NO. 20 - 15 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) RESOLUTION NO. 21- 15 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA AND TRACTS 7067, 7856, 8024, 8073, 8074) Received 4.5 the City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2014. Approved 4.6 the extension of the State of Emergency for an additional 30 days, as required by Government Code Section 8630(c), which states that the City Council shall review the need for continuing a local emergency at least once every 30 days until the governing body terminates the local emergency, continue the State of Emergency that was declared on March 18, 2014, based on the fact that extreme drought conditions continue to exist within both the State of California and City of Dublin, and the threat to the safety and welfare of Dublin residents remains. Approved 4.7 Mayor Haubert’s recommendation of the appointment of Cm. Hart as the second City Councilmember on the City of Dublin/DUSD Liaison Committee. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 34 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2015 3 Approved 4.8 the addition of the Civic Center Police Wing Renovation Project to the Five Year CIP; approved the Budget Change in the amount of $2.0 million; and, adopted RESOLUTION NO. 22 - 15 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH INDIGO/HAMMOND + PLAYLE ARCHITECTS, LLP FOR THE DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES BUILDING RENOVATION Adopted 4.9 RESOLUTION NO. 23- 15 APPROVING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAM Adopted 4.10 RESOLUTION NO. 24 - 15 APPROVING FUNDING RECOMMENDATION FOR A FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAM CONTRIBUTION TO DUBLIN PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION Adopted 4.11 RESOLUTION NO. 25 - 15 ACCEPTANCE OF WORK CONTRACT NO. 14-09, 2014 ANNUAL SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM AND GI4099 – CIVIC CENTER MODIFICATION DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION approved the budget change; and authorized the City Manager or his designee to approve Change Orders for the project and release retention after 35 days if there are no subcontractor claims. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – None. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 34 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2015 4 UNFINISHED BUSINESS Marketing and Branding Presentation by North Star Destination Strategies 7:34 p.m. 7.1 Assistant City Manager Linda Smith stated the item would be moved to the March 3, 2015 City Council meeting. NEW BUSINESS Cooperative Agreement with the Dublin Unified School District (DUSD) 7:35 p.m. 8.1 Dr. Stephen Hanke provided public comment on this item. On motion of Cm. Biddle, seconded by Cm. Hart and by unanimous vote, the City Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 26 - 15 APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR TECHNOLOGICAL UPGRADES TO THE DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM and approved the budget change. Approval of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Dublin and the Dublin Unified School District (DUSD), and Initiation of General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Study, and Other Required Entitlements, To Allow Use of Approximately 10 Acres of Property Currently Designated as Parks/Public Recreation (Community Park) for Both School and Park Purposes 7:44 p.m. 8.2 Dr. Stephen Hanke, Dublin Unified School District Superintendent, provided public comment on this item. Marlene Masseti, Dublin resident, provided public comment on this item. David Bewley, Dublin resident, provided public comment on this item. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 34 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2015 5 Amy Miller, Dublin Unified School District Board President, provided public comment on this item. By consensus, the City Council agreed to take action on the GPA/SPA portion of the item, as presented, and postponed a decision on the MOU, until the City Council meeting of March 17, 2015; and asked staff to return with number/percentage of residential units not yet covered by development agreements citywide. Appointments to the Standing City Council Federal and Military Communities Committee 9:32 p.m. 8.3 On motion of Cm. Hart, seconded by Vm. Gupta and by unanimous vote, the City Council Approve the Mayor’s appointments of Councilmembers Hart and Wehrenberg to the Standing City Council Federal and Military Communities Committee. General Plan and Dublin Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study Initiation Request 9:32 p.m. 8.4 By consensus, the City Council moved the item to the March 17, 2015 meeting OTHER BUSINESS 9:33 p.m. Brief information only reports were provided by the City Council and Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related meetings attended at City expense (AB1234). ADJOURNMENT 10.1 There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 9:34 p.m. in memory of Staff Sgt. Sean Diamond and our fallen troops. Minutes prepared by Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager. _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ City Clerk DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 34 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2015 6 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN SPECIAL MEETING – February 21, 2015 A special meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Saturday, February 21, 2015, at the Dublin Ranch Golf Course Conference Room. The meeting was called to order at 9:08 a.m., by Mayor Haubert. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmembers Biddle, Gupta, Hart, Wehrenberg and Mayor Haubert The pledge of allegiance to the flag was recited by the City Council, Staff and those present. Retreat, Facilitated By Sherry Lund of Sherry L. Lund Associates The City Council participated in the retreat and discussed vision, protocols and processes for working as a team; long-term financial planning and strategic planning. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 1:20 p.m. Minutes prepared by Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk. _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ City Clerk DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 34 SPECIAL MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2015 1 CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL File #600-35 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Irrigation System Upgrades – Contract #14-16 Prepared by Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is seeking City Council authorization to award Irrigation System Upgrades Contract #14-16. This will provide for upgrades to existing controllers located on street medians east of Dougherty Road so the controllers can communicate with the City’s Central Irrigation System. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The 2014-2019 Capital Improvement Program’s City Irrigation Improvements (Project #ST0715) includes sufficient funding to award the project. Total Available Construction Budget $135,000 Bid Proposal from Pom’s Landscaping Add 10% for Construction Contingency Total Construction Estimate $99,140 $9,914 $109,054 Total Remaining Construction Budget $25,946 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the Resolution Awarding Contract No.14-16 Irrigation System Upgrades to Pom’s Landscaping Incorporated. Submitted By Parks and Community Services Director Page 1 of 2 Reviewed By Assistant City Manager ITEM NO. 4.2 DESCRIPTION: On November 4, 2014 the City Council amended the 2014-2019 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to include a new project called City Irrigation Improvements Project (# ST0715). Funding for this project came from the remaining balance of funds from the now complete Energy Efficiency Upgrade Project (# GI0913). The City Irrigation Improvements project has the following two components: 1) Irrigation System Upgrades - Upgrades existing controllers located on street medians east of Dougherty Road so the controllers can communicate with the City’s Central Irrigation System. 2) Irrigation Optimization - Improves water efficiency and landscape quality through revisions to irrigation programs based on site specific conditions at parks and facilities. In regards to the Irrigation System Upgrades portion of the project, plans and specifications were prepared for Contract #14-16 and bids were solicited in January 2015. After a three-week bid period, bids were opened on Monday, February 9, 2015 with the results shown in Attachment 1. Pom’s Landscaping Incorporated (Pom’s) submitted the lowest apparent bid. Upon review of the bid proposal, it was determined that Pom’s was the lowest responsive and responsible bid. Sufficient funds are available to complete the project for the amount proposed by Pom’s including a 10% contingency. Staff has prepared a Resolution awarding the contract to Pom’s Landscaping Incorporated as shown in Attachment 2. If approved by City Council the schedule for the project is as follows: 1) 2) Award Contract Project Construction March 2015 March 2015 - May 2015 In regards to the Optimization portion of the project, Staff has hired an Irrigation Consulting Firm, Dickson and Associates, to complete the irrigation controller programming revisions at all of the City’s neighborhood parks and facilities. The programming portion of the work will occur this spring with monitoring and refinements to the new programs happening in the summer/fall timeframe. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: Copies of this Staff Report were sent to Pom’s Landscaping Incorporated. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Bid Results 2. Resolution awarding Contract No. 14-16 Irrigation System Upgrades to Pom’s Landscaping Incorporated Page 2 of 2 City of Dublin Irrigation System Upgrades Contract Number 14-16 Bid Results February 9, 2016 Company Name POMS Landscaping Inc Valley Crest Landscape Inc Marina Landscape Inc Sierra Landscape Services Suarez & Munoz Construction Inc Bortolussi & Watkin Inc Bid Amount $99,140 $108,013 $109,825 $118,102 $123,754 $134,930 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN *********** AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 14-16 IRRIGATION SYSTEM UPGRADES TO POM’S LANDSCAPING INCORPORATED WHEREAS, the City of Dublin did, on February 9, 2015, publicly open, examine and declare all sealed bids for doing the work described in the approved Plans and Specifications for Contract No. 14-16, which Plans and Specifications are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work and for all particulars relative to the proceedings under the request for bids; and WHEREAS, said bids were submitted to the City Engineer, who has reviewed the bids to determine the lowest bid which was responsive to the requirements of the bid documents; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby award Contract No. 14-16 to the lowest responsible bidder therefor, to wit, Pom’s Landscaping Incorporated, at a bid of ninety-nine thousand and one hundred and forty dollars even ($99,140) the particulars of which bid are on file in the office of the City Engineer. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL File #520-30 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: City Council Disaster Preparedness Training Prepared by Roger Bradley, Assistant to the City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider holding a disaster preparedness training session for City Councilmembers. The purpose of the session is to receive an overview of the City’s disaster response process during an emergency. The City Council will also consider providing Staff with a preferred date to hold the session. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a disaster preparedness training for City Councilmembers on May 19, 2015 starting at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber Submitted By Assistant to the City Manager Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: Over the past several years, the City Council has held disaster preparedness training sessions to receive an overview of the City’s disaster response process. The City Council last held a disaster training session on July 15, 2013. Generally, the City Council has preferred to hold these training sessions immediately following an election cycle to give an introduction to newly elected and/or appointed City Councilmembers. As the City has just completed an election cycle, which includes a newly appointed City Councilmember, Staff recommends that the City Council attend a disaster preparedness training session. This session would provide the City Council with an overview of the organizational structure utilized by City Staff to manage emergencies, be introduced to the concept of an Page 1 of 2 ITEM NO. 4.3 Emergency Operations Center, and be instructed on how the City would coordinate with multiple agencies to protect and recover the community following a disaster, among other topics. Staff is requesting feedback from the City Council as to a date within May 2015 that would work best with all Councilmember schedules. Overall, it is anticipated that the training will last approximately two hours and be conducted at the Dublin Civic Center. At certain times in the past, the City Council has held disaster preparedness trainings directly before a City Council meeting. If the City Council has interest in following this protocol again, the training would begin at 5:00 p.m. and end before the start of the meeting. The May City Council meetings are scheduled for May 5 and May 19, and Staff would recommend the City Council set aside May 19, 2015 for the training. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK File #950-40 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: St. Patrick’s Day Celebration Prepared by Stephanie Mein, Heritage and Cultural Arts Supervisor EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a report on the festivities planned for the 32nd Annual St. Patrick’s Day Celebration on March 14 and 15, 2015. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the report. Submitted By Parks and Community Services Director Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: The City of Dublin has a weekend of good, green fun planned in celebration of St. Patrick’s Day. Festivities begin on March 13 with dinner and dancing to live music at the annual Green and White Gala hosted by the Dublin Sister City Association. The event will take place at the Shannon Community Center, 11600 Shannon Avenue starting at 6 p.m. On Saturday, March 14, Fire Station #16, located at Donohue Drive and Amador Valley Boulevard will be serving up stacks of hot “green” pancakes served fresh off the griddle at the Annual Firefighter’s Pancake Breakfast. Breakfast will include pancakes, eggs, sausage, juice and coffee and will be served starting at 7:00 a.m. Tickets can be purchased at the door for $5 per person. All proceeds will benefit the Alameda County Fire Fighters Association-Local 55 Charity Fund, which supports local non-profit and community-based organizations. Also on Saturday, March 14, the 32nd Annual St. Patrick’s Day Parade sponsored by the Dublin Lions Club will step-off promptly at 9:30 a.m. onto Dublin Blvd. from Amador Plaza Road. Page 1 of 3 ITEM NO. 4.4 Parade-goers can bring their own blankets or chairs and find perfect viewing along Amador Valley Boulevard or Village Parkway, or, they can take a seat in the parade grandstand located at 7400 Amador Valley Boulevard. The parade will feature over 80 entries highlighted by festive marching bands and floats, Irish bagpipes, equestrian riders and more. The 32nd Annual St. Patrick’s Day Festival takes place on Saturday and Sunday, March 14 and 15, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Dublin Civic Center. Entertainment at this year’s event includes two stages of lively Celtic music featuring the LepreKhanz, Molly’s Revenge and the Black Irish with everything from high-energy Celtic rock to traditional Irish folk music, celtic harp and bagpipes. Live music can also be found in the Irish Tea Cottage and the Library Foyer. A third stage will be devoted completely to Irish dancing featuring the “McGrath Irish Dancers” on Saturday and the “McBride School of Irish Dance” on Sunday. The Arts & Crafts fair will showcase more than 250 talented artisans, along with an “Irish Marketplace,” offering unique Celtic artwork, Irish tartans, beautiful Celtic jewelry, handmade pewter goblets and steins, genuine four-leaf clover trinkets and delectable Irish whiskey cakes and candies. The Celtic Food Court will be serving traditional Irish favorites such as corned beef with cabbage, Irish bangers and mash and, of course, fish and chips. There will also be unique Irish inspired specialties such as corned beef sliders with cheddar and spicy slaw or Irish Egg Rolls with corned beef, cabbage, pepper jack cheese and horseradish sauce. For dessert you’ll find Irish Crème Brulee and green shamrock-shaped funnel cakes. The Irish Tea Cottage has been expanded for this year and will be open from 10:00 am to 5:00 pm on both Saturday and Sunday. This popular attraction features lively music along with steaming cups of authentic Irish Tea served in genuine china cups along with shortbread and scones. New this year, event-goers can get a look at a popular sport on the Emerald Isle . . . the game of Rugby! Local teams from the Tri-Valley will compete with teams from as far away as Sacramento in matches that will be played continuously throughout the day on Saturday beginning at 10:00 am until 5:00 pm on Field #5 at the Dublin Sports Grounds. There will also be a carnival with rides and attractions for all ages. On Sunday, March 15, the 17th Annual Shamrock 5K Fun Run and Walk takes place along Dublin Boulevard near the Civic Center. The race begins at 8:30 a.m. and winds its way through town finishing up at the Main Stage at the festival with live music, awards, food and giveaways for participants. Admission to the festival is free and free parking will be available nearby. Visitors are also encouraged to take BART to either the East or West Dublin BART Stations and connect for free directly to the festival by taking Wheels Bus #10 and collecting the special pass available during the weekend of the event. Also, bicycle riders will be offered free and secure bike parking onsite at the Bike Valet station. All festivities will be held rain or shine (with the exception of rugby on the sports fields). More event information can be found at www.DublinStPats.com Page 2 of 3 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: Residents and businesses have been notified via mail about road closures for both the parade and Fun Run. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 3 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Amendment to Legal Services Agreement Prepared by Christopher L. Foss, City Manager CITY CLERK File # 600-30 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Meyers Nave, the law firm that has served as Dublin’s City Attorney since its incorporation, has requested that the City Council consider amending its legal services agreement with the City to increase the hourly rates for general legal services, litigation services, and reimbursable thirdparty services. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed amendment to the agreement for legal services would increase the hourly rates as follows: General Legal Services Litigation Services Reimbursable Legal Services $225 per hour to $235 per hour $270 per hour to $280 per hour Range $250-$350 per hour to Range $260 - $365 per hour RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services and authorize Mayor to execute same. Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: The City has contracted with Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson (or its predecessors) for legal services since the City’s incorporation in 1982. The current agreement for legal services is dated January 15, 2008 (Attachment 1), and has been amended on July 1, 2008 (Attachment 2), on July 1, 2011 (Attachment 3), on July 1, 2012 (Attachment 4), and on July 1, 2013 (Attachment 5). Page 1 of 2 ITEM NO. 4.5 Meyers Nave has requested that the City Council consider the following changes to the agreement: General Legal Services Litigation Services Reimbursable Legal Services $225 per hour to $235 per hour (increase of 4.4%) $270 per hour to $280 per hour (increase of 3.7%) Range $250-$350 per hour to Range $260 - $365 per hour (increase range from 4.0% - 4.3%) The proposed amendments in the third party reimbursement rate changes the rate structure to be based on attorney experience. This arrangement gives the City ready access to highly skilled and experienced land use attorneys. Attachment 6 is a proposed Fifth Amendment to the Agreement for Legal Services. The only changes from the current agreement are outlined above. The proposed amendment would be effective as of March 1, 2015. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: No public notification required. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Legal Services Agreement dated January 15, 2008 2. First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2008 3. Second Amendment to Legal Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2011 4. Third Amendment to Legal Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2012 5. Fourth Amendment to Legal Services Agreement dated July 1, 2013 6. Proposed Fifth Amendment to Legal Services Agreement, dated March 1, 2015 Page 2 of 2 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES This Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services is made and entered into as of March 1, 2015, by and between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a Municipal Corporation in the State of California, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON, hereinafter referred to as “MNRSW”. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, CITY and MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON are parties to an Agreement for Legal Services, dated and entered into as of January 15, 2008, and amended as of July 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, July 1, 2012 and July 1, 2013; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties hereto to amend the agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that the Agreement for Legal Services is amended as follows: 1. Existing paragraph 4 is deleted and new paragraph 4 is added, to read as follows: “4. Compensation. City shall compensate ATTORNEY, through MNRSW, in the amount of $235 per hour for all services rendered, whether by ATTORNEY or by other attorneys associated with MNRSW, with the following exceptions: (a) litigation, for which ATTORNEY, through MNRSW, shall be compensated in the amount of $280 per hour for all litigation services rendered whether by ATTORNEY or by other attorneys associated with MNRSW; and (b) work for which the City is reimbursed by third parties, for which ATTORNEY, through MNRSW, shall be compensated at the following rates per hour for all services rendered whether by ATTORNEY or other attorneys associated with MNRSW: Senior Principal $365 Principal $320 Senior Associate and Of Counsel $280 Associate $260 MNRSW will also be reimbursed for customary costs and disbursements, including deposition and witness fees, court costs, telephone, photocopying, facsimile charges, computer research on-line fees and messenger services. ATTORNEY, through MNRSW, shall bill CITY at least on a monthly basis and CITY agrees to pay ATTORNEY Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services (Between Dublin and MNRSW) Page 1 of 2 within 30 days of such bill or statement.” IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services the day and year set forth below. CITY OF DUBLIN A Municipal Corporation Dated: By: David Haubert, Mayor Attest: Caroline Soto, City Clerk MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON Dated: By: John D. Bakker 2404533.1 Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services (Between Dublin and MNRSW) Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK File #150-20 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Excellence in Budgeting Award for the City of Dublin’s FY 2014-15 and FY 201516 Budget and Financial Plan Prepared by: Colleen Tribby, Administrative Services Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Dublin has received its first Excellence in Budgeting Award, conferred by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, for its FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16 Adopted Budget and Financial Plan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the report and accept the award. Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: The California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) is a statewide organization serving all California municipal finance professionals, promoting excellence in financial management through innovation, continuing education and the professional development of its members. The City was recently notified that it has been awarded the Excellence in Budgeting Award, conferred by the CSMFO through its Budget Awards Program, for its FY 2014-15 and FY 201516 Adopted Budget and Financial Plan. The Budget Awards Program offers two possible award levels for local agency budgets that meet a set of criteria according to best practices in governmental budgeting. The City of Dublin was awarded the top honor in the program. Page 1 of 2 ITEM NO. 4.6 Last month, the City received a budget award from the Government Finance Officers Association. This second award is further recognition of the City’s commitment to excellence and transparency in financial reporting. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Budget Award Page 2 of 2 _____ Michael Gomez, Chair Professional Standards and Recognition Committee Dedicated Excellence in Municipal Financial Reporting Pamela Arends-King CSMFO President February 8, 2015 For meeting the criteria established to achieve the Operating Budgeting Excellence Award. City of Dublin Presented to the Excellence Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Certificate of Award California Society of Municipal Finance Officers CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL File #570-10 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Modification of Parking Regulations along Antone Way, Lee Thompson Street, and Shady Creek Road Prepared by: Obaid Khan, Transportation and Operations Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider changes to parking regulations along Antone Way, Lee Thompson Street and Shady Creek Road. Along Antone Way, no-parking regulations are proposed to accommodate roadway striping changes aimed at improving traffic circulation at Green Elementary School entrance. On Lee Thompson Street, a time-limited loading zone is proposed to allow drop-off and pick-up of children for a “Walking School Bus” program at Kolb Elementary School. And, along Shady Creek Road, modifications to parking regulations are proposed to ensure adequate sight visibility for motorists, while providing additional parking in areas of demand. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost to implement the no-parking zones along Antone Way, Lee Thompson Street, and Shady Creek Road by modifying curb striping can be accommodated in the Fiscal Year 20142015 Street Maintenance Operating Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolutions: 1. Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Antone Way 2. Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Lee Thompson Street 3. Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Shady Creek Road Submitted By Public Works Director Reviewed By Assistant City Manager Page 1 of 3 ITEM NO. 4.7 DESCRIPTION: Antone Way Parking Regulations Staff met with representatives of the Dublin Unified School District (DUSD) regarding traffic circulation along Antone Way. It was noted that, during pick-up and drop-off hours, eastbound vehicles are queued up to turn left and westbound vehicles are queued up to turn right into a single driveway providing access to Green Elementary School. This line of vehicles often obstructs vehicles proceeding through along Antone Way. Staff is proposing various roadway marking changes to alleviate the existing congestion (Attachment 4). As part of these changes, it is necessary to restrict parking (Red Curb or No-Parking Signs) along a 120’ stretch of roadway on the south side of Antone Way and a 60’ stretch of roadway on the north side of Antone Way. There are no homes fronting Antone Way along the proposed on-street parking restrictions, and therefore, there are no impacts to residential parking in this area. Staff has received support from DUSD for these changes. Lee Thompson Street Parking Regulations Staff met with representatives of DUSD to continue to work to improve traffic circulation near Kolb Elementary School. At the request of DUSD, the City established a passenger loading zone along the west side of Lockhart Street in 2013. Staff is proposing to implement a similar time-limited passenger loading zone (White Curb) along Lee Thompson Street to improve pick-up and drop-off operations at Kolb Elementary School (Attachment 5). DUSD staff and parents are planning to use this location to gather children and then walk to school as a group. This type of pedestrian program is commonly known as a “Walking School Bus.” This location was selected as there is a direct route to Kolb Elementary School along the existing sidewalk or through Passatempo Park without crossing any vehicular roadways. Shady Creek Road Parking Regulations Staff received concerns from residents along Shady Creek Road north of Willow Creek Drive regarding inadequate sight distance at intersections as well as along the curve of the roadway due to parked cars. Staff worked with the residents to create a plan to address these concerns. This plan includes the implementation of new parking tee markings to better organize parking in the area and trimming of vegetation near roadway intersections to provide better sight visibility. Additionally, parking regulations are proposed to be modified (Attachment 6). Implementation of parking restrictions (Red Curb) in order to ensure sight visibility is proposed at following intersections: 1. Intersection of Squirrel Creek Circle and Shady Creek Road 2. Intersection of Willow Creek Drive and Shady Creek Road In order to provide additional parking for residents, removal of parking restrictions is proposed along a 120’ section on the north side of Shady Creek Road west of Quail Creek Circle. This portion of Shady Creek Road has no fronting single family homes. Page 2 of 3 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: A copy of this report was sent to DUSD and the neighborhood representative from the Shady Creek Road area, Alex Persits. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Antone Way 2. Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Lee Thompson Street 3. Resolution Amending the Dublin Traffic Code Approving Parking Regulations along Shady Creek Road 4. Map of Antone Way Parking Regulation Modifications 5. Map of Lee Thompson Street Parking Regulation Modifications 6. Map of Shady Creek Road Parking Regulation Modifications Page 3 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. __– 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********* AMENDING THE DUBLIN TRAFFIC CODE APPROVING PARKING REGULATIONS ON ANTONE WAY WHEREAS, on-street parking is currently unrestricted along both sides of Antone Way; and WHEREAS, there is insufficient roadway width to accommodate parking due to roadway marking improvements; and WHEREAS, it is important to provide an unobstructed path of travel for vehicles; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby adopts the following parking regulation: Section 1: The following language shall be added to Section 6.28.010 (“No Parking Zones: Designated”) of the City of Dublin Traffic Code: Antone Way On the southerly curbline, from a point 165 feet west of the prolongation of the westerly curbline of South Bridgepointe Lane, westerly a distance of 120 feet On the northerly curbline, from a point 40 feet west of the prolongation of the westerly curbline of North Bridgepointe Lane, westerly a distance of 60 feet PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk C:\PROVOX-TEMP\printmap\This item proposes parking regulations along Anton 52_2015_Attachment.1.doc RESOLUTION NO. __– 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********* AMENDING THE DUBLIN TRAFFIC CODE APPROVING PARKING REGULATIONS ON LEE THOMPSON STREET WHEREAS, on-street parking is currently allowed along the east side of Lee Thompson Street; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that additional passenger loading zones would improve the traffic circulation near Kolb Elementary School; and WHEREAS, it is important to provide, in the interest of improved traffic safety and circulation, a dedicated passenger loading zone along Lee Thompson Street during school pickup and drop-off hours; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby adopts the following parking regulation: The following language shall be added to Section 6.40.080 (“Passenger Loading Zones 7:30 AM to 9:00 AM and 1:30 PM to 3:30 PM School Days Only”) of the City of Dublin Traffic Code: Lee Thompson Street On the easterly curbline from a point 330 feet south of the prolongation of the southerly curbline of Palermo Way, southerly a distance of 150 feet. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk C:\PROVOX-TEMP\printmap\This item proposes parking regulations along Anton 52_2015_Attachment.2.doc RESOLUTION NO. __– 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********* AMENDING THE DUBLIN TRAFFIC CODE APPROVING PARKING REGULATIONS ON SHADY CREEK ROAD WHEREAS, on-street parking is currently unrestricted near the intersection of Shady Creek Road and Willow Creek Drive; and WHEREAS, on-street parking is currently unrestricted along the north side of Shady Creek Road west of Squirrel Creek Circle; and WHEREAS, it is important to provide adequate sight visibility at the intersection of Shady Creek Road and Willow Creek Drive; and WHEREAS, it is important to provide adequate sight visibility at the intersection of Shady Creek Road and Squirrel Creek Circle; and WHEREAS, on-street parking is currently restricted along the north side of Shady Creek Road between Squirrel Creek Circle and Quail Creek Circle; and WHEREAS, there is sufficient roadway width and no obstructions to intersection sight visibility to provide parking along a portion of the north side of Shady Creek Road between Squirrel Creek Circle and Quail Creek Circle; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby adopts the following parking regulation: Section 1: The following language shall be deleted from Section 6.28.010 (“No Parking Zones: Designated”) of the City of Dublin Traffic Code: Shady Creek Road On the north side as follows: From the easterly curbline of Crossridge Road, easterly a distance of 50 feet; from the easterly curbline of Squirrel Creek Circle to the westerly curbline of Quail Creek Circle, and from the easterly curbline of Quail Creek Circle, easterly a distance of 75 feet. Section 2: The following language shall be added to Section 6.28.010 (“No Parking Zones: Designated”) of the City of Dublin Traffic Code: Shady Creek Road On the easterly curbline, from the prolongation of the northerly curbline of Willow Creek Drive, northerly a distance of 10 feet On the easterly curbline, from the prolongation of the southerly curbline of Willow Creek Drive, southerly a distance of 15 feet On the northerly curbline, from the prolongation of the westerly curbline of Squirrel Creek Circle, westerly a distance of 20 feet On the northerly curbline, from the prolongation of the easterly curbline of Squirrel Creek Circle, easterly a distance of 40 feet; On the northerly curbline, from the prolongation of the westerly curbline of Quail Creek Circle, westerly a distance of 40 feet; On the north side as follows: From the easterly curbline of Crossridge Road, easterly a distance of 50 feet; from the easterly curbline of Quail Creek Circle, easterly a distance of 75 feet. rd PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3 day of March, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk Antone Way Proposed Parking Regula ons Exis ng Red Curb (30’) TO Remain PROPOSED 60’ NO PARKING ZONE Exis ng Red Curb (20’) to Remain Green hool c S y r a t Elemen Antone Way Stripe New Right Turn Pocket (60’) PROPOSED 120’ NO PARKING ZONE Stripe New Le Turn Pocket (60’) N Lee Thompson Street Proposed Parking Regula ons AY PALERMO W SON STREET LEE THOMP KOLB ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PASSATEMPO PARK 150’ PROPOSED PASSENGER LOADING ZONE (7:30 AM— 9:00AM AND 1:30PM—3:30PM SCHOOL DAYS ONLY (7 SPACES) N Shady Creek Area Proposed Parking Regula ons Willow Creek D rive Quail Squirr el Cre Creek Circle e k C ir c le 10’ PROPOSED NO PARKING Exis ng 80’ of Red Curb to Remain Exis ng 40’ of Red Curb to Remain 15’ PROPOSED NO PARKING ZONE Exis ng 40’ of Red Curb to Remain PROPOSED 20’ NO PARKING ZONE N ad o R k ee r C y Shad MODIFY 120’ OF EXISTING NO PARKING ZONE INTO UNRESTRICTED PARKING Alamo Creek Park CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL File #1100-30 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Renewal of the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD) Prepared by Erin Steffen, Administrative Analyst II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In 2005, lodging business owners came together and formed the Tri-Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID). Lodging business owners now wish to renew the TBID, which will continue to provide funding for much needed marketing efforts for the Tri-Valley through Visit Tri-Valley. By adopting this Resolution, the City Council will grant permission to the City of Pleasanton to renew the district as the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD). FINANCIAL IMPACT: Adopting this resolution will have no immediate fiscal impact. The TVTMD, if renewed, will continue working to bring visitors to the City which may increase transient occupancy and sales tax revenue. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution Granting Consent to the City of Pleasanton to Renew the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD). Submitted By Economic Development Director/ Public Information Officer Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: In 2005, the Dublin City Council granted consent to the City of Pleasanton to form the original Tri-Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID) for the purpose of expanding tourism in the Tri-Valley cities Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton, and San Ramon. The intent of creating the TBID stemmed from the Visit Tri-Valley’s desire to create a revenue source which promotes and supports tourism in the Tri-Valley area by marketing it to potential visitors. In 2010, the TBID was renewed and expanded to include the Town of Danville. Page 1 of 3 ITEM NO. 4.8 The current assessment district, which is $2.00 per occupied room per room night, has been raising approximately $1,520,000 annually from the lodging businesses in the Tri-Valley cities. Participating cities and counties receive a fee equal to 1% of the amount of the assessment collected within their jurisdiction to cover the costs of collection and administration. The TBID is a special benefit assessment district, which may be renewed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994. The 1994 law allows for the formation of multi-jurisdictional improvement districts, with consent of the included jurisdictions being granted to one “lead” jurisdiction. Visit Tri-Valley has been exploring the renewal of the district, as the current five-year district is set to expire soon. After meeting with a subcommittee of staff and hoteliers representing each Tri-Valley city, Visit Tri-Valley has prepared a Management District Plan (Attachment 1) that proposes the following changes for the renewed district: The Tri-Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID) will be renewed as the TriValley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD) to more accurately reflect the purpose of the district. While the current assessment only included those lodging properties with 35 or more rooms, the renewal will include all 36 lodging businesses within the identified geographic areas, regardless of number of rooms. The voting strength for each lodging business is determined by the property’s number of rooms factored by occupancy rate. Hotels will continue to self-assess a $2.00 fee per occupied room per night, with the option to increase the assessment starting in the third year (2018) but not to exceed $3.00 per occupied room per night. This is consistent with other tourism business improvement districts throughout the region and state. The TVTMD will expand to include areas of unincorporated Alameda County and Contra Costa County, including: the communities of Alamo, Blackhawk and Sunol. With the exception of San Ramon, the four other Tri-Valley cities will continue support for the assessment district. The renewal is proposed to begin on July 1, 2015, and last for seven years through June 30, 2022; previous assessment terms have lasted five years. The Pleasanton City Council has requested consent for the City of Pleasanton to act as the lead jurisdiction in renewing the TVTMD. On February 17, the Pleasanton City Council adopted Resolution 15-733 (Attachment 2) requesting consent from the cities of Dublin and Livermore, the town of Danville, and unincorporated areas of Alameda County and Contra Costa County to adopt the renewed TVTMD. Adopting this Resolution (Attachment 3) will give the City of Pleasanton authority to include the City of Dublin in the renewed TVTMD. To renew the TVTMD, the City of Pleasanton will follow the renewal proceedings specified in the 1994 Act, including accepting petitions, adopting a resolution declaring their intention to form the district, holding a public meeting and public hearing to allow for comments, and adopting an ordinance forming the district. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: Extensive public outreach was conducted by Visit Tri-Valley staff and its board, including oneon-one meetings with hoteliers. In the City of Dublin, three of the four of the participating hotels, representing approximately 80% of Dublin’s available hotel occupancy, have signed the petition Page 2 of 3 agreeing to renew the district; this exceeds the minimum required for approval (the fourth hotel did not respond to the request). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Management District Plan dated December 15, 2014 2. City of Pleasanton Resolution 15-733 Requesting Consent of the Cities of Livermore, Dublin and the Town of Danville, and the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa to Renew the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD) 3. Resolution Granting Consent to the City of Pleasanton to Renew the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD) Page 3 of 3 "!"'&'%' " *#%%1(-*#+&*$,#'!#+,*#, %)!&$%( 2 22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222= 2 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222? 2 22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222@ 2 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222A 2 22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222B 2 ''-%*.#%'222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222B 2 ,*&#',#('( )# #' #,222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222C 2 ++++&',22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;: 2 '%,#+' ',*+,2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;; 2 #&'''* (*(%%,#'!++++&',+222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;; 2 ''-%-!,2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;; 2 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;< 2 /'*+3++(#,#('222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;< 2 *(/','%# (*'#-%#(*+,(&)%#'222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;< 2 ''-%)(*,2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;< ;522222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222;= <5 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222<> Prepared by Civitas (800)999-7781 www.civitasadvisors.com December 15, 2014 + Developed by Visit TriValley (VTV), the TriValley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD) is an assessment district proposed to provide specific benefits to payors, by funding marketing and sales promotion efforts for assessed businesses. The TVTMD was formed in 2005 as the Tri-Valley TBID for a five-year term and renewed in 2010 for a five-year term; lodging businesses now wish to renew it for an additional seven years. " The proposed TVTMD includes all lodging businesses located within the boundaries of the town of Danville, the cities of Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton and those portions of the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties shown on the map below, which include the communities of Alamo, Blackhawk, and Sunol, the portion of the counties that lies between the cities of Pleasanton and Livermore, and that portion of Alameda County which lies southeast of Interstate 580 as shown on the map in Section IV. " The TVTMD is designed to provide specific benefits directly to payors by increasing room night sales. Marketing and sales promotions will increase overnight tourism and market payors as tourist, meeting and event venues, thereby increasing room night sales. " The total TVTMD annual budget for the initial year of its seven (7) year operation is anticipated to be approximately $1,822,000. This budget is expected to fluctuate as room sales do. " The annual assessment rate is $2.00 per paid occupied room per night. Based on the benefit received, assessments will not be collected on stays of more than thirty (30) consecutive days, nor on stays by any Federal or State of California officer or employee when on official business who makes a claim that they are exempt, nor on stays by any officer or employee of a foreign government who is exempt by reason of express provision of federal law or international treaty. The annual assessment rate may be subject to an increase each year starting in the third year, the amount of which shall be determined by the VTV Board. The annual assessment rate shall not exceed $3.00 per paid occupied room per night. " Each City and County will be responsible for collecting the assessment on a quarterly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties and interest) from each lodging business located in their respective jurisdictions. Each City and County shall take all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each lodging business. On a quarterly basis, each City and County shall forward the assessment collected to the City of Pleasanton which shall forward the assessments collected to the Owners’ Association. %)!&$%( ' " The renewed TVTMD will have a seven (7)-year life. The TVTMD assessment will be implemented beginning July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2022. Once per year, beginning on the anniversary of district renewal, there is a 30-day period in which owners paying more than fifty percent (50%) of the assessment may protest and initiate a Pleasanton City Council hearing on district termination. " The Tri-Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (also known as Visit TriValley) will serve as the TVTMD’s Owners’ Association. The Owners’ Association is charged with managing funds and implementing programs in accordance with this Plan, and must provide annual reports to the Pleasanton City Council. %)!&$%( ( + There are several reasons why now is the right time to renew a TMD in TriValley; the most compelling reasons are as follows: 1. The Need to Increase Occupancy The renewal of the TVTMD is a proactive effort to secure funding for tourism marketing. The funding will ensure that adequate financing exists for the investment required to increase occupancy in the lodging industry and be competitive in the tourism market. The investment will cover an expanded marketing and promotional budget needed to reach this market segment. 2. An Opportunity for Increasing City Tax Revenues As occupancy rates increase, so too will the cities’ TOT revenue. With stable public/private funding for tourism marketing efforts, annual occupancy rates should increase as new marketing and sales promotion programs are implemented. Greater occupancy will also produce an increase in sales tax revenues from tourist spending. This represents a substantial return to the cities. The renewal of the TVTMD in partnership with the VTV creates a stable funding source tied directly to tourism promotion. 3. Stable Funding for Tourism Promotion The TVTMD will provide a stable source of funding for consistent tourism promotion efforts. The TVTMD will provide funding for tourism promotion free of the political and economic circumstances that can reduce or eliminate government funding for tourism promotion. %)!&$%( ) + TMDs are an evolution of the traditional Business Improvement District. The first TMD was formed in West Hollywood, California in 1989. Since then, more than eighty California destinations have followed suit. In recent years, other states have begun adopting the California model – Washington, Montana, and Texas have adopted TMD laws. Several other states are in the process of adopting their own legislation. And, some cities, like Portland, Oregon, have utilized their charter powers to create TMDs without a state law. California’s TMDs collectively raise more than $150 million for local destination marketing. With competitors raising their budgets, and increasing rivalry for visitor dollars, it is important that the TriValley lodging businesses invest in stable, lodging-specific marketing programs. TMDs utilize the efficiencies of private sector operation in the market-based promotion of tourism districts. TMDs allow lodging business owners to organize their efforts to increase room night sales. Lodging business owners within the TMD pay an assessment and those funds are used to provide services that increase room night sales. In California, TMDs are formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994. This law allows for the creation of a benefit assessment district to raise funds within a specific geographic area. The key difference between TMDs and other benefit assessment districts is that funds raised are returned to the private non-profit corporation governing the district. There are many benefits to TMDs: • • • • • • Funds must be spent on services and improvements that provide a specific benefit only to those who pay; Funds cannot be diverted to general government programs; They are customized to fit the needs of payors in each destination; They allow for a wide range of services; They are designed, created and governed by those who will pay the assessment; and They provide a stable, long-term funding source for tourism promotion. %)!&$%( * + The TVTMD will include all lodging businesses, existing and in the future, available for public occupancy within the boundaries of the town of Danville, the cities of Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton and those portions of the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties which include the communities of Alamo, Blackhawk, and Sunol, the portion of the counties that lies between the cities of Pleasanton and Livermore, and that portion of Alameda County which lies southeast of Interstate 580 as shown on the map below. The boundary, as shown in the map below, currently includes 36 lodging businesses. A complete listing of lodging businesses within the proposed TVTMD can be found in Appendix 2. %)!&$%( + + + ""( %) " Assessment funds will be spent to provide specific benefits conferred, or privileges granted directly to, the payors that are not provided to those not charged, and which do not exceed the reasonable cost to the City of conferring the benefits or granting the privileges. The privileges and services provided with the TVTMD funds are sales, marketing, advertising, and promotional programs available only to assessed businesses. Administration costs that support the provision of the services are also allowed. A service plan budget has been developed to deliver services that benefit businesses throughout the District. A detailed annual budget will be developed and approved by the Owners’ Association. The table below illustrates the initial annual budget allocations. Category Percent of Budget Dollar Amount Marketing Sales Administration City Collection Costs Contingency/Renewal Total Annual Budget 50% 25% 18% 2% 5% 100% $911,000 $455,500 $327,960 $36,440 $91,100 $1,822,000 Although actual revenues will fluctuate due to market conditions, the proportional allocations of the budget shall remain the same. However, the VTV board shall have the authority to adjust budget allocations between the categories by no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the total budget per year. For instance, the sales item could be reduced by 15% of the total budget (from a 25% allocation to a 10% allocation) and the marketing item could be increased by 15% of the total budget (from a 50% allocation to a 65% allocation); no other changes could be made because this is a 15% adjustment. A description of the proposed improvements and activities for the initial year of operation is below. The same activities are proposed for subsequent years. In the event of a legal challenge against the TVTMD, any and all assessment funds may be used for the costs of defending the TVTMD. The marketing program will be designed to raise awareness of assessed lodging businesses as overnight venues, using both digital and traditional channels. Marketing programs may include: • Generating media coverage for assessed businesses by hosting journalists, pitching media stories, and writing press releases • Partnerships with national and international travel organizations to benefit assessed businesses • Participating in press trips with partners, including Visit California and SF Travel, to increase coverage of assessed businesses as overnight venues • Developing and expanding social media promotions for assessed businesses, including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Pinterest • Creating cooperative marketing opportunities for assessed lodging businesses %)!&$%( , • • • Advertising to drive room night sales at assessed businesses, including print, billboard, television and Internet Digital media campaigns to drive room night sales at assessed businesses Producing written and online collateral to promote assessed businesses to visitors The sales program will focus on activities that drive weekend traffic, including efforts that draw group business. The sales programs may include: • Sport and similar competition attraction to generate room night sales at assessed businesses • Bridal and wedding event attraction to generate room night sales at assessed businesses • Regional, national, and international tourism development to generate room night sales at assessed businesses • Sales missions and trade shows to attract overnight visitors • Host familiarization tours for potential clients of assessed businesses The administrative and operations portion of the budget shall be utilized for administrative staffing costs, office costs, rent, and other general administrative costs such as insurance, legal, and accounting fees. The cities of Danville, Dublin, and Livermoreand the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa shall each be paid a fee equal to 1% of the amount of assessment collected within their jurisdiction to cover their costs of collection and administration. The City of Pleasanton shall be paid a fee equal to 1% of the amount of assessment collected in within its jurisdiction, plus 1% of the total assessment collected from all jurisdictions, to cover its costs of collection and administration. # A prudent portion of the budget will be set aside in a contingency fund, to be used for unforeseeable costs in carrying out the sales and marketing programs. The reserved amount each year shall be up to five percent (5%) of the annual budget, at the discretion of the Board. If near the expiration of the district there are contingency funds remaining, and business owners wish to renew the district, the remaining contingency funds may be used for renewal costs. Unless they are needed for programs, at the discretion of the Board, contingency funds will be banked until such time as the total fund reaches an amount equal to six months of operating expenses, which amount will be determined by the VTV Board. After that balance has been achieved, contingency funds may be reallocated to sales and marketing programming. + '%!"'#"#$"' State law requires that assessment funds be expended on specific benefits conferred directly to the payors that are not provided to those not charged, and which do not exceed the reasonable cost to the City of conferring the benefits. The services in this Management District Plan are designed to provide targeted benefits directly to assessed lodging businesses. These services are tailored not to serve the general public, but rather to serve the specific lodging businesses within the District, e.g., the proposed activities are specifically targeted to increase room night sales for assessed lodging businesses within the boundaries of the District, and are narrowly tailored. TVTMD funds will be used exclusively to provide the specific benefit of increased room night sales directly to the %)!&$%( - assessees. For example, non-assessed businesses will not receive room night sales leads from the TVTMD programs. The activities paid for from assessment revenues are business services constituting and providing specific benefits to the assessed businesses. Further, the assessment may be utilized to provide specific government services directly to the payors that are not provided to those not charged, and which do not exceed the reasonable costs to the City of providing the services. The legislature has recognized that marketing and promotions services like those to be provided by the TVTMD are, in the context of assessment districts, government services. Further, the amount of the assessment is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the proposed activities, and the manner in which the costs are allocated to a business owner bear a fair share or reasonable relationship to the businesses’ benefits received from the proposed activities. District services will be implemented carefully to ensure they do not exceed the reasonable cost of such services. Funds will be managed by the Owners’ Association, and reports submitted on an annual basis to the City. Only assessed businesses will receive room night sales leads generated from district-funded activities, receive room night sales from advertising campaigns, and directly receive the specific benefit of room night sales from other district-funded services. Non-assessed businesses will not directly receive these, nor any other, district-funded services and benefits. The legislature has recognized that tourism district assessments are not taxes “merely because they might generate indirect, secondary benefits for nonpayers, provided that those indirect, secondary benefits occur incidentally and without cost to the payors of the assessment.” + &&&&!"' The annual assessment rate is $2.00 per paid occupied room per night. Based on the benefit received, assessments will not be collected on stays of more than thirty (30) consecutive days, nor on stays by any Federal or State of California officer or employee when on official business who makes a claim that they are exempt, nor on stays by any officer or employee of a foreign government who is exempt by reason of express provision of federal law or international treaty. The annual assessment rate may be subject to an increase each year starting in the third year, the amount of which shall be determined by the VTV Board. The annual assessment rate shall not exceed $3.00 per paid occupied room per night. For instance, the rate could be increased $0.10 (to $2.10) in year three, $0.80 (to $2.90) in year four, and $0.10 (to $3.00) in year five; thereafter it could not be increased further. Any increase in the assessment rate must be approved by the Visit TriValley Board of Directors, including a majority of the hotels then on the Board, and included in the annual report. The amount of assessment, if passed on to each transient, shall be disclosed in advance and separately stated from the amount of rent charged and any other applicable taxes, and each transient shall receive a receipt for payment from the business. The assessment shall be disclosed as the “TVTMD Assessment.” The assessment shall not be considered revenue for any purposes, including calculation of transient occupancy taxes. Bonds may not be issued. %)!&$%( %$ + " '& " "'%&' 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Any business which fails to pay any assessment within the time required shall pay a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount of the assessment in addition to the amount of the assessment. Any business which fails to remit any delinquent assessment on or before a period of 30 days following the date on which the assessment first became delinquent shall pay a second delinquency penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount of the assessment in addition to the amount of the assessment and the ten percent (10%) penalty first imposed. If it is determined that the nonpayment of any assessment is due to fraud, a penalty of twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the assessment shall be added thereto in addition to the penalties stated above. In addition to the penalties imposed, any business which fails to remit any assessment shall pay interest at the rate of one-half of on percent (0.5%) per month or fraction thereof on the amount of the assessment, exclusive of penalties, from the date on which the assessment first became delinquent until paid. Every penalty imposed and such interest as accrues shall become a part of the assessment required to be paid. + !"""%#%# '"&&&&!"'& The TVTMD assessment will be implemented beginning July 1, 2015 and will continue for seven (7) years through June 30, 2022. Each City and County will be responsible for collecting the assessment on a quarterly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties and interest) from each lodging business located in the boundaries of the TVTMD. Each City and County shall take all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each lodging business. On a quarterly basis, each City and County shall forward the assessment collected to the City of Pleasanton. The City of Pleasanton shall forward the assessments collected to the Owners’ Association. + ""( (' The total seven year improvement and service plan budget is projected at approximately $1,822,000 annually, or $12,754,000 through 2022. This amount may fluctuate as sales and revenue increase at assessed businesses, or if the assessment rate is increased. %)!&$%( %% + + *"%&,&&#'#" The Pleasanton City Council, through adoption of this Management District Plan, has the right, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36651, to identify the body that shall implement the proposed program, which shall be the Owners’ Association of the TVTMD as defined in Streets and Highways Code §36614.5. The City Council has determined that the Tri-Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (also known as Visit TriValley) will serve as the Owner’s Association for the TVTMD. More than one-half of the members of the Visit TriValley Board of Directors shall be representatives of assessed lodging businesses. + %#*"'" #%"( #%&'#!$ " An Owners' Association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials for any purpose. The Owners’ Association is, however, subject to government regulations relating to transparency, namely the Ralph M. Brown Act and the California Public Records Act. These regulations are designed to promote public accountability. The Owners’ Association is considered a legislative body under the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code §54950 et seq.). Thus, meetings of the VTV board and certain committees must be held in compliance with the public notice and other requirements of the Brown Act. The Owner’s Association is also subject to the record keeping and disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. Accordingly, the Owner’s Association shall publicly report any action taken and the vote or abstention on that action of each member present for the action. + ""( $#%' VTV shall present an annual report at the end of each year of operation to the Pleasanton City Council pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36650 (see Appendix 1). The annual report will include: • • • • • • Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the tourism improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of businesses within the district. The improvements and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements and the activities for that fiscal year. The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each business owner to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her business for that fiscal year. The amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year. The amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied. %)!&$%( %& .- Property And Business Improvement District Law of 1994 Cal Sts & Hy Code § 36600 (2013) *** This document is current through the 2014 Supplement *** (All 2013 legislation) ß 36600. Citation of part This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994." ß 36601. Legislative findings and declarations The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: (a) Businesses located and operating within the business districts of this state's communities are economically disadvantaged, are underutilized, and are unable to attract customers due to inadequate facilities, services, and activities in the business districts. (b) It is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of the business districts of its cities in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and prevent the erosion of the business districts. (c) It is of particular local benefit to allow cities to fund business related improvements, maintenance, and activities through the levy of assessments upon the businesses or real property that benefits from those improvements. (d) Assessments levied for the purpose of providing improvements and promoting activities that benefit real property or businesses are not taxes for the general benefit of a city, but are assessments for the improvements and activities which confer special benefits upon the real property or businesses for which the improvements and activities are provided. ß 36602. Purpose of part The purpose of this part is to supplement previously enacted provisions of law that authorize cities to levy assessments within a business improvement area. This part does not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes. ß 36603. Preemption of authority or charter city to adopt ordinances levying assessments Nothing in this part is intended to preempt the authority of a charter city to adopt ordinances providing for a different method of levying assessments for similar or additional purposes from those set forth in this part. A property and business improvement district created pursuant to this part is expressly exempt from the provisions of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 (Division 4 (commencing with Section 2800)). ß 36603.5. Part prevails over conflicting provisions Any provision in this part that conflicts with any other provision of law shall prevail over the other provision of law. %)!&$%( %' ß 36604. Severability This part is intended to be construed liberally and, if any provision is held invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Assessments levied under this part are not special taxes. ß 36605. [Section repealed 2001.] ß 36606. "Assessment" "Assessment" means a levy for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, installing, or maintaining improvements and promoting activities which will benefit the properties or businesses located within a property and business improvement district. ß 36607. "Business" "Business" means all types of businesses and includes financial institutions and professions. ß 36608. "City" "City" means a city, county, city and county, or an agency or entity created pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, the public member agencies of which includes only cities, counties, or a city and county, or the State of California. ß 36609. "City council" "City council" means the city council of a city or the board of supervisors of a county, or the agency, commission, or board created pursuant to a joint powers agreement and which is a city within the meaning of this part. ß 36610. 'Improvement" "Improvement" means the acquisition, construction, installation, or maintenance of any tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or more including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Parking facilities. (b) Benches, booths, kiosks, display cases, pedestrian shelters and signs. (c) Trash receptacles and public restrooms. (d) Lighting and heating facilities. (e) Decorations. (f) Parks. (g) Fountains. (h) Planting areas. (i) Closing, opening, widening, or narrowing of existing streets. (j) Facilities or equipment, or both, to enhance security of persons and property within the area. (k) Ramps, sidewalks, plazas, and pedestrian malls. (l) Rehabilitation or removal of existing structures. %)!&$%( %( ß 36611. "Property and business improvement district"; "District" "Property and business improvement district," or "district," means a property and business improvement district established pursuant to this part. ß 36612. "Property" "Property" means real property situated within a district. ß 36613. "Activities" "Activities" means, but is not limited to, all of the following: (a) Promotion of public events which benefit businesses or real property in the district. (b) Furnishing of music in any public place within the district. (c) Promotion of tourism within the district. (d) Marketing and economic development, including retail retention and recruitment. (e) Providing security, sanitation, graffiti removal, street and sidewalk cleaning, and other municipal services supplemental to those normally provided by the municipality. (f) Activities which benefit businesses and real property located in the district. ß 36614. "Management district plan"; "Plan" "Management district plan" or "plan" means a proposal as defined in Section 36622. ß 36614.5. "Owners' association" "Owners' association" means a private nonprofit entity that is under contract with a city to administer or implement activities and improvements specified in the management district plan. An owners' association may be an existing nonprofit entity or a newly formed nonprofit entity. An owners' association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials for any purpose. Notwithstanding this section, an owners' association shall comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code), at all times when matters within the subject matter of the district are heard, discussed, or deliberated, and with the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code), for all documents relating to activities of the district. ß 36615. "Property owner"; "Business owner"; "Owner" "Property owner" means any person shown as the owner of land on the last equalized assessment roll or otherwise known to be the owner of land by the city council. "Business owner" means any person recognized by the city as the owner of the business. "Owner" means either a business owner or a property owner. The city council has no obligation to obtain other information as to the ownership of land or businesses, and its determination of ownership shall be final and conclusive for the purposes of this part. Wherever this part requires the signature of the property owner, the signature of the authorized agent of the property owner shall be sufficient. Wherever this part requires the signature of the business owner, the signature of the authorized agent of the business owner shall be sufficient. %)!&$%( %) ß 36616. "Tenant" "Tenant" means an occupant pursuant to a lease of commercial space or a dwelling unit, other than an owner. ß 36617. Alternate method of financing certain improvements and activities; Effect on other provisions This part provides an alternative method of financing certain improvements and activities. The provisions of this part shall not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes. Every improvement area established pursuant to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500) of this division) is valid and effective and is unaffected by this part. ß 36620. Establishment of property and business improvement district A property and business improvement district may be established as provided in this chapter. ß 36620.5. Requirement of consent of city council A county may not form a district within the territorial jurisdiction of a city without the consent of the city council of that city. A city may not form a district within the unincorporated territory of a county without the consent of the board of supervisors of that county. A city may not form a district within the territorial jurisdiction of another city without the consent of the city council of the other city. ß 36621. Initiation of proceedings; Petition of property or business owners in proposed district (a) Upon the submission of a written petition, signed by the property or business owners in the proposed district who will pay more than 50 percent of the assessments proposed to be levied, the city council may initiate proceedings to form a district by the adoption of a resolution expressing its intention to form a district. The amount of assessment attributable to property or a business owned by the same property or business owner that is in excess of 40 percent of the amount of all assessments proposed to be levied, shall not be included in determining whether the petition is signed by property or business owners who will pay more than 50 percent of the total amount of assessments proposed to be levied. (b) The petition of property or business owners required under subdivision (a) shall include a summary of the management district plan. That summary shall include all of the following: (1) A map showing the boundaries of the district. (2) Information specifying where the complete management district plan can be obtained. (3) Information specifying that the complete management district plan shall be furnished upon request. (c) The resolution of intention described in subdivision (a) shall contain all of the following: (1) A brief description of the proposed activities and improvements, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on property or businesses within the district, a statement as to whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district. The descriptions and statements do not need to be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements and activities and the location and extent of the proposed district. (2) A time and place for a public hearing on the establishment of the property and business improvement district and the levy of assessments, which shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 36623. ß 36622. Contents of management district plan The management district plan shall contain all of the following: (a) If the assessment will be levied on property, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of %)!&$%( %* property and, if businesses are to be assessed, each business within the district. If the assessment will be levied on businesses, a map that identifies the district boundaries in sufficient detail to allow a business owner to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries. If the assessment will be levied on property and businesses, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of property and to allow a business owner to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries. (b) The name of the proposed district. (c) A description of the boundaries of the district, including the boundaries of benefit zones, proposed for establishment or extension in a manner sufficient to identify the affected lands and businesses included. The boundaries of a proposed property assessment district shall not overlap with the boundaries of another existing property assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a district created pursuant to this part to overlap with other assessment districts established pursuant to other provisions of law, including, but not limited to, the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500)). This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to overlap with another business assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to overlap with a property assessment district created pursuant to this part. (d) The improvements and activities proposed for each year of operation of the district and the maximum cost thereof. If the improvements and activities proposed for each year of operation are the same, a description of the first year's proposed improvements and activities and a statement that the same improvements and activities are proposed for subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision. (e) The total annual amount proposed to be expended for improvements, maintenance and operations, and debt service in each year of operation of the district. If the assessment is levied on businesses, this amount may be estimated based upon the assessment rate. If the total annual amount proposed to be expended in each year of operation of the district is not significantly different, the amount proposed to be expended in the initial year and a statement that a similar amount applies to subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision. (f) The proposed source or sources of financing, including the proposed method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each property or business owner to calculate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her property or business. The plan also shall state whether bonds will be issued to finance improvements. (g) The time and manner of collecting the assessments. (h) The specific number of years in which assessments will be levied. In a new district, the maximum number of years shall be five. Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years. Notwithstanding these limitations, a district created pursuant to this part to finance capital improvements with bonds may levy assessments until the maximum maturity of the bonds. The management district plan may set forth specific increases in assessments for each year of operation of the district. (i) The proposed time for implementation and completion of the management district plan. (j) Any proposed rules and regulations to be applicable to the district. (k) A list of the properties or businesses to be assessed, including the assessor's parcel numbers for properties to be assessed, and a statement of the method or methods by which the expenses of a district will be imposed upon benefited real property or businesses, in proportion to the benefit received by the property or business, to defray the cost thereof, including operation and maintenance. (l) Any other item or matter required to be incorporated therein by the city council. ß 36623. Procedure to levy assessment (a) If a city council proposes to levy a new or increased property assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure shall comply with Section 53753 of the Government Code. (b) If a city council proposes to levy a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure shall comply with Section 54954.6 of the Government Code, except that notice shall be mailed to the owners of the businesses proposed to be assessed. A protest may be made orally or in writing by any interested %)!&$%( %+ person. Every written protest shall be filed with the clerk at or before the time fixed for the public hearing. The city council may waive any irregularity in the form or content of any written protest. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing. Each written protest shall contain a description of the business in which the person subscribing the protest is interested sufficient to identify the business and, if a person subscribing is not shown on the official records of the city as the owner of the business, the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person subscribing is the owner of the business or the authorized representative. A written protest that does not comply with this section shall not be counted in determining a majority protest. If written protests are received from the owners or authorized representatives of businesses in the proposed district that will pay 50 percent or more of the assessments proposed to be levied and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than 50 percent, no further proceedings to levy the proposed assessment against such businesses, as contained in the resolution of intention, shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the city council. (c) If a city council proposes to conduct a single proceeding to levy both a new or increased property assessment and a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure for the property assessment shall comply with subdivision (a), and the notice and protest and hearing procedure for the business assessment shall comply with subdivision (b). If a majority protest is received from either the property or business owners, that respective portion of the assessment shall not be levied. The remaining portion of the assessment may be levied unless the improvement or other special benefit was proposed to be funded by assessing both property and business owners. ß 36624. Changes to proposed assessments At the conclusion of the public hearing to establish the district, the city council may adopt, revise, change, reduce, or modify the proposed assessment or the type or types of improvements and activities to be funded with the revenues from the assessments. Proposed assessments may only be revised by reducing any or all of them. At the public hearing, the city council may only make changes in, to, or from the boundaries of the proposed property and business improvement district that will exclude territory that will not benefit from the proposed improvements or activities. Any modifications, revisions, reductions, or changes to the proposed assessment district shall be reflected in the notice and map recorded pursuant to Section 36627. ß 36625. Resolution of formation (a) If the city council, following the public hearing, decides to establish the proposed property and business improvement district, the city council shall adopt a resolution of formation that shall contain all of the following: (1) A brief description of the proposed activities and improvements, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on property, businesses, or both within the district, a statement about whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district. The descriptions and statements do not need to be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements and activities and the location and extent of the proposed district. (2) The number, date of adoption, and title of the resolution of intention. (3) The time and place where the public hearing was held concerning the establishment of the district. (4) A determination regarding any protests received. The city shall not establish the district or levy assessments if a majority protest was received. (5) A statement that the properties, businesses, or properties and businesses in the district established by the resolution shall be subject to any amendments to this part. (6) A statement that the improvements and activities to be provided in the district will be funded by the levy of the assessments. The revenue from the levy of assessments within a district shall not be used to provide improvements or activities outside the district or for any purpose other than the purposes specified in the resolution of intention, as modified by the city council at the hearing concerning establishment of the district. (7) A finding that the property or businesses within the area of the property and business improvement district will be benefited by the improvements and activities funded by the assessments proposed to be levied. %)!&$%( %, (b) The adoption of the resolution of formation and, if required, recordation of the notice and map pursuant to Section 36627 shall constitute the levy of an assessment in each of the fiscal years referred to in the management district plan. ß 36626. Resolution establishing district If the city council, following the public hearing, desires to establish the proposed property and business improvement district, and the city council has not made changes pursuant to Section 36624, or has made changes that do not substantially change the proposed assessment, the city council shall adopt a resolution establishing the district. The resolution shall contain all of the information specified in paragraphs (1) to (8), inclusive, of subdivision (b) of Section 36625, but need not contain information about the preliminary resolution if none has been adopted. ß 36626.5. [Section repealed 1999.] ß 36626.6. [Section repealed 1999.] ß 36626.7. [Section repealed 1999.] ß 36627. Notice and assessment diagram Following adoption of the resolution establishing district assessments on properties pursuant to Section 36625 or Section 36626, the clerk of the city shall record a notice and an assessment diagram pursuant to Section 3114. No other provision of Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100) applies to an assessment district created pursuant to this part. ß 36628. Establishment of separate benefit zones within district; Categories of businesses The city council may establish one or more separate benefit zones within the district based upon the degree of benefit derived from the improvements or activities to be provided within the benefit zone and may impose a different assessment within each benefit zone. If the assessment is to be levied on businesses, the city council may also define categories of businesses based upon the degree of benefit that each will derive from the improvements or activities to be provided within the district and may impose a different assessment or rate of assessment on each category of business, or on each category of business within each zone. ß 36628.5. Assessments on businesses or property owners The city council may levy assessments on businesses or on property owners, or a combination of the two, pursuant to this part. The city council shall structure the assessments in whatever manner it determines corresponds with the distribution of benefits from the proposed improvements and activities. ß 36629. Provisions and procedures applicable to benefit zones and business categories All provisions of this part applicable to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of a property and business improvement district apply to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of benefit zones or categories of business. The city council shall, to establish, modify, or disestablish a benefit zone or category of business, follow the procedure to establish, modify, or disestablish a property and business improvement district. ß 36630. Expiration of district; Creation of new district %)!&$%( %- If a property and business improvement district expires due to the time limit set pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 36622, a new management district plan may be created and a new district established pursuant to this part. ß 36631. Time and manner of collection of assessments; Delinquent payments The collection of the assessments levied pursuant to this part shall be made at the time and in the manner set forth by the city council in the resolution levying the assessment. Assessments levied on real property may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as for the ad valorem property tax, and may provide for the same lien priority and penalties for delinquent payment. All delinquent payments for assessments levied pursuant to this part shall be charged interest and penalties. ß 36632. Assessments to be based on estimated benefit; Classification of real property and businesses; Exclusion of residential and agricultural property (a) The assessments levied on real property pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the real property within the property and business improvement district. The city council may classify properties for purposes of determining the benefit to property of the improvements and activities provided pursuant to this part. (b) Assessments levied on businesses pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the businesses within the property and business improvement district. The city council may classify businesses for purposes of determining the benefit to the businesses of the improvements and activities provided pursuant to this part. (c) Properties zoned solely for residential use, or that are zoned for agricultural use, are conclusively presumed not to benefit from the improvements and service funded through these assessments, and shall not be subject to any assessment pursuant to this part. ß 36633. Time for contesting validity of assessment The validity of an assessment levied under this part shall not be contested in any action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding is commenced within 30 days after the resolution levying the assessment is adopted pursuant to Section 36626. Any appeal from a final judgment in an action or proceeding shall be perfected within 30 days after the entry of judgment. ß 36634. Service contracts authorized to establish levels of city services The city council may execute baseline service contracts that would establish levels of city services that would continue after a property and business improvement district has been formed. ß 36635. Request to modify management district plan The owners' association may, at any time, request that the city council modify the management district plan. Any modification of the management district plan shall be made pursuant to this chapter. ß 36636. Modification of plan by resolution after public hearing; Adoption of resolution of intention; Modification of improvements and activities by adoption of resolution after public hearing (a) Upon the written request of the owners' association, the city council may modify the management district plan after conducting one public hearing on the proposed modifications. The city council may modify the improvements and activities to be funded with the revenue derived from the levy of the assessments by adopting a resolution determining to make the modifications after holding a public hearing on the proposed modifications. If the modification includes the levy of a new or increased assessment, the city council shall comply with Section 36623. Notice of all other public meetings and public hearings pursuant to this section shall comply with both of the following: %)!&$%( &$ (1) The resolution of intention shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city once at least seven days before the public meeting. (2) A complete copy of the resolution of intention shall be mailed by first class mail, at least 10 days before the public meeting, to each business owner or property owner affected by the proposed modification. (b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention which states the proposed modification prior to the public hearing required by this section. The public hearing shall be held not more than 90 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention. ß 36637. Reflection of modification in notices recorded and maps Any subsequent modification of the resolution shall be reflected in subsequent notices and maps recorded pursuant to Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100), in a manner consistent with the provisions of Section 36627. ß 36640. Bonds authorized; Procedure; Restriction on reduction or termination of assessments (a) The city council may, by resolution, determine and declare that bonds shall be issued to finance the estimated cost of some or all of the proposed improvements described in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, if the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to that section provides for the issuance of bonds, under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10 (commencing with Section 8500)) or in conjunction with Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 (Article 4 (commencing with Section 6584) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code). Either act, as the case may be, shall govern the proceedings relating to the issuance of bonds, although proceedings under the Bond Act of 1915 may be modified by the city council as necessary to accommodate assessments levied upon business pursuant to this part. (b) The resolution adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall generally describe the proposed improvements specified in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, set forth the estimated cost of those improvements, specify the number of annual installments and the fiscal years during which they are to be collected. The amount of debt service to retire the bonds shall not exceed the amount of revenue estimated to be raised from assessments over 30 years. (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, assessments levied to pay the principal and interest on any bond issued pursuant to this section shall not be reduced or terminated if doing so would interfere with the timely retirement of the debt. ß 36641. [Section repealed 2001.] ß 36642. [Section repealed 2001.] ß 36643. [Section repealed 2001.] ß 36650. Report by owners' association; Approval or modification by city council (a) The owners' association shall cause to be prepared a report for each fiscal year, except the first year, for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvements and activities described in the report. The owners' association's first report shall be due after the first year of operation of the district. The report may propose changes, including, but not limited to, the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or any benefit zones within the district, the basis and method of levying the assessments, and any changes in the classification of property, including any categories of business, if a classification is used. (b) The report shall be filed with the clerk and shall refer to the property and business improvement district by name, specify the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with respect to that fiscal year, shall contain all of the following information: (1) Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of property or businesses within the district. %)!&$%( &% (2) The improvements and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. (3) An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements and the activities for that fiscal year. (4) The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each real property or business owner, as appropriate, to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her property or business for that fiscal year. (5) The amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year. (6) The amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied pursuant to this part. (c) The city council may approve the report as filed by the owners' association or may modify any particular contained in the report and approve it as modified. Any modification shall be made pursuant to Sections 36635 and 36636. The city council shall not approve a change in the basis and method of levying assessments that would impair an authorized or executed contract to be paid from the revenues derived from the levy of assessments, including any commitment to pay principal and interest on any bonds issued on behalf of the district. ß 36651. Designation of owners' association to provide improvements and activities The management district plan may, but is not required to, state that an owners' association will provide the improvements or activities described in the management district plan. If the management district plan designates an owners' association, the city shall contract with the designated nonprofit corporation to provide services. ß 36660. Renewal of district; Transfer or refund of remaining revenues; District term limit (a) Any district previously established whose term has expired, may be renewed by following the procedures for establishment as provided in this chapter. (b) Upon renewal, any remaining revenues derived from the levy of assessments, or any revenues derived from the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, shall be transferred to the renewed district. If the renewed district includes additional parcels or businesses not included in the prior district, the remaining revenues shall be spent to benefit only the parcels or businesses in the prior district. If the renewed district does not include parcels or businesses included in the prior district, the remaining revenues attributable to these parcels shall be refunded to the owners of these parcels or businesses. (c) Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years, or, if the district is authorized to issue bonds, until the maximum maturity of those bonds. There is no requirement that the boundaries, assessments, improvements, or activities of a renewed district be the same as the original or prior district. ß 36670. Circumstances permitting disestablishment of district; Procedure (a) Any district established or extended pursuant to the provisions of this part, where there is no indebtedness, outstanding and unpaid, incurred to accomplish any of the purposes of the district, may be disestablished by resolution by the city council in either of the following circumstances: (1) If the city council finds there has been misappropriation of funds, malfeasance, or a violation of law in connection with the management of the district, it shall notice a hearing on disestablishment. (2) During the operation of the district, there shall be a 30-day period each year in which assessees may request disestablishment of the district. The first such period shall begin one year after the date of establishment of the district and shall continue for 30 days. The next such 30-day period shall begin two years after the date of the establishment of the district. Each successive year of operation of the district shall have such a 30-day period. Upon the written petition of the owners or authorized representatives of real property or the owners or authorized representatives of businesses in the area who pay 50 percent or more of the assessments levied, the city council shall pass a resolution of intention to disestablish the district. The city council shall notice a hearing on disestablishment. (b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention to disestablish the district prior to the public hearing %)!&$%( && required by this section. The resolution shall state the reason for the disestablishment, shall state the time and place of the public hearing, and shall contain a proposal to dispose of any assets acquired with the revenues of the assessments levied within the property and business improvement district. The notice of the hearing on disestablishment required by this section shall be given by mail to the property owner of each parcel or to the owner of each business subject to assessment in the district, as appropriate. The city shall conduct the public hearing not less than 30 days after mailing the notice to the property or business owners. The public hearing shall be held not more than 60 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention. ß 36671. Refund of remaining revenues upon disestablishment or expiration without renewal of district; Calculation of refund; Use of outstanding revenue collected after disestablishment of district (a) Upon the disestablishment or expiration without renewal of a district, any remaining revenues, after all outstanding debts are paid, derived from the levy of assessments, or derived from the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, or from bond reserve or construction funds, shall be refunded to the owners of the property or businesses then located and operating within the district in which assessments were levied by applying the same method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the fiscal year in which the district is disestablished or expires. All outstanding assessment revenue collected after disestablishment shall be spent on improvements and activities specified in the management district plan. (b) If the disestablishment occurs before an assessment is levied for the fiscal year, the method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the immediate prior fiscal year shall be used to calculate the amount of any refund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istrict Boundaries The boundaries of the district shall be those of the cities of Pleasanton, Livermore, Dublin, and the Town of Danville, and those portions of unincorporated Alameda and Contra Costa Counties show on the map, which include the communities of Alamo, Blackhawk, and Sunol, the portion of the counties that lies between the cities of Pleasanton and Livermore, and that portion of Alameda County which lies southeast of Interstate 580. 3 RESOLUTION NO. XX- 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********* GRANTING CONSENT TO THE CITY OF PLEASANTON TO RENEW THE TRI-VALLEY TOURISM MARKETING DISTRICT (TVTMD) WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton is beginning the process to renew the Tri-Valley Tourism Marketing District (TVTMD) pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Streets and Highways Code Section 26600 et seq., to promote tourism and the lodging businesses in Tri-Valley; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pleasanton has requested consent to renew the TVTMD in the City of Dublin with adoption of Pleasanton City Council Resolution No. 15733, dated February 17, 2015. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Dublin, that: 1. The above recitals are true and correct. 2. The City Council consents to the City of Pleasanton renewing the TVTMD, which district shall include the City of Dublin. 3. The City Clerk of the City Council is hereby directed to transmit a copy of this Resolution to the Clerk of the City of Pleasanton City Council. 4. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ___________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Clerk STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK File #800-30 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Caltrans Freeway Ground-Mounted Directional Signs Prepared by Hazel L. Wetherford, Senior Economic Development Analyst and Obaid Khan, Transportation & Operations Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is seeking City Council authorization to execute and submit an Encroachment Permit application to Caltrans to allow for new I-680 and I-580 ground-mounted directional signs to identify the City of Dublin Downtown, and to remove the existing I-580 Civic Center groundmounted directional sign in accordance with Caltrans standards. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost to the City is estimated at $4,000 which is included in the FY 2014/15 Economic Development budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Filing of an Application for a California Department of Transportation Encroachment Permit Application for New I-680 and I-580 Ground-Mounted Directional Signs to Identify the City of Dublin Downtown, and to Remove the Existing I-580 Civic Center Ground-Mounted Directional Sign, in accordance with Caltrans standards. Reviewed By Economic Development Director Reviewed By Public Works Director Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: City staff has been working with Caltrans to explore possibilities for new freeway signage on I680 and I-580 to provide better identification of Downtown Dublin. Staff is currently working with Caltrans on freeway roadside ground-mounted signs to meet their statewide sign standards while maximizing the permissible size of the signs. The proposed Page 1 of 2 ITEM NO. 4.9 signs would be approximately 4’-5’ feet in height and 6’-7’ feet in width along the freeway and prior to exits; however, the exact dimensions will be determined by Caltrans. Both directional signs will read “Downtown Dublin” (Attachment 2). Along eastbound I-580, staff is proposing to install a new “Downtown Dublin” directional sign prior to the San Ramon Rd. / Foothill Rd. exit as the main exit to direct motorists into the Downtown area. On westbound I-580, an existing Dublin Civic Center sign exists prior to the Hopyard Rd. / Dougherty Rd. exit which will be removed in order to comply with Caltrans standards of allowing signs to identify only one destination. Along southbound I-680, staff is proposing to install a new “Downtown Dublin” directional sign prior to the Dublin/Oakland exit as the main exit to direct motorists into the Downtown area. Final location and number of permitted signs will be determined by Caltrans staff after the encroachment permit is submitted. A map is included (Attachment 3) that identifies the proposed locations of the signs. The addition of these new “Downtown Dublin” directional signs should help direct and focus driver attention to destinations in Dublin. A resolution by the City Council supporting the installation of signs on interstates to guide motorists to the City’s Downtown including the legend “Downtown Dublin” are part of the required Caltrans Encroachment Permit process. The cost to the City to fabricate and install the two signs is estimated at $4,000. Staff presented the proposed signage to the Standing Economic Development Committee on May 12, 2014 and February 23, 2015, and they were supportive of the placement of the signs and requested that Staff move forward with Caltrans and prepare a report for the full City Council. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Resolution Authorizing the Filing of an Application for a California Department of Transportation Encroachment Permit Application for New I-680 and I-580 Ground-Mounted Directional Signs to Identify the City of Dublin Downtown, and to Remove the Existing I-580 Civic Center Ground-Mounted Directional Sign, in accordance with Caltrans standards. 2. Sign Design Proposal 3. Sign Location Map Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. XX-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********* AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR NEW I-680 AND I580 GROUND-MOUNTED DIRECTIONAL SIGNS TO IDENTIFY THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOWNTOWN, AND TO REMOVE THE EXISTING I-580 CIVIC CENTER GROUNDMOUNTED DIRECTIONAL SIGN WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) follows California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD-CA); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin in accordance with the MUTCD-CA desires the placement of new ground-mounted directional signs along I-580 and I-680 in both directions, to provide better visibility and guide motorists to the Downtown area; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin designates San Ramon / Foothill Road exit on eastbound I-580 and Dublin Boulevard Exit on southbound I-680 as the main exits to direct motorists to Downtown area; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approves the legends for the directional signs on I-580 and I-680 to read “Downtown Dublin” for the City of Dublin downtown area; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approves the removal of the existing westbound I-580 “Dublin Civic Center” sign in order to comply with Caltrans standards of allowing signs to identify only one destination. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute and submit an Encroachment Permit application to Caltrans to allow for the installation of new I-580 and I-680 ground-mounted directional signs identifying “Downtown Dublin” and remove the existing “Dublin Civic Center” sign. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ/ͲϱϴϬ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ/ͲϲϴϬ ΕϮϱϬϬ͛ǁĞƐƚŽĨ^ĂŶZĂŵŽŶZĚͬ&ŽŽƚŚŝůůZĚĞdžŝƚ ΕϱϬϬϬ͛ŶŽƌƚŚŽĨƵďůŝŶͬKĂŬůĂŶĚĞdžŝƚ džŝƐƟŶŐ^ŝŐŶ;ŶŽŶĞͿ džŝƐƟŶŐ^ŝŐŶ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ^ŝŐŶĂŐĞ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů^ŝŐŶĂŐĞ ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶƵďůŝŶ Eydy/d WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ&ƌĞĞǁĂLJ^ŝŐŶ>ŽĐĂƟŽŶDĂƉ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͞ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶƵďůŝŶ͟ƐŝŐŶ ϱϬϬϬ͛ĨƌŽŵƵďůŝŶͬKĂŬůĂŶĚĞdžŝƚ ZĞŵŽǀĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ͞ƵďůŝŶŝǀŝĐĞŶƚĞƌ͟ƐŝŐŶ ϮϬϬϬ͛ĨƌŽŵ,ŽƉLJĂƌĚͬŽƵŐŚĞƌƚLJĞdžŝƚ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͞ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶƵďůŝŶ͟ƐŝŐŶ ϮϱϬϬ͛ĨƌŽŵ^ĂŶZĂŵŽŶͬ&ŽŽƚŚŝůůZĚĞdžŝƚ E STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK File #420-10/430-10 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Annual Progress Report on the Status of the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element for Calendar Year 2014 Prepared by Marnie R. Delgado, Senior Planner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will review the Annual Progress Report on the Status of the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element for Calendar Year 2014 in accordance with Government Code Section 65400(a)(2). FINANCIAL IMPACT: No financial impact. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Annual Progress Report on the Status of the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element Compliance for Calendar Year 2014; and direct Staff to forward the Annual Progress Report to the California State Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community Development. Submitted By Community Development Director Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: Local governments are required by Government Code Section 65400(a)(2) to provide an annual report to their legislative body, the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), that includes the status of the General Plan and the progress made in implementing the General Plan as well as meeting its share of regional housing needs. The Annual Progress Report on the status of the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element Compliance for Calendar Year 2014 has been prepared in accordance with the Government Code and is included as Attachment 1 to this Staff Report. The Dublin General Plan groups the Page 1 of 3 ITEM NO. 4.10 seven (7) State-mandated Elements and the five (5) optional Elements into the following five Sections: 1) Land Use and Circulation Section: Land Use Element (State-mandated) Parks and Open Space Element (State-mandated) Schools, Public Lands, and Utilities Element (Optional) Circulation and Scenic Highways Element (State-mandated) 2) Housing Section: Housing Element (State-mandated) 3) Environmental Resources Management Section: Conservation Element (State-mandated) Seismic Safety and Safety Element (State-mandated) Noise Element (State-mandated) Water Resources Element (Optional) Energy Conservation Element (Optional) 4) Community Design and Sustainability Section: Community Design and Sustainability Element (Optional) 5) Economic Development Section: Economic Development Element (Optional) The Annual Progress Report is divided into Sections according to the Elements of the General Plan. For each Element, a description of actions taken to further the policies of that Element is included. Throughout 2014, the City of Dublin continued to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan as well as work towards meeting the City’s share of the regional housing need. The Land Use Element was amended four times during the calendar year. The first amendment was for two development projects, Dublin Ranch Subarea 3 (437 single-family units) and The Groves Lot 3 (122 townhomes). The second amendment adopted the Dublin Open Space Initiative. The third amendment to the Land Use Element included the Heritage Park development project (54 single-family units) and increasing the development potential in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area by 1,200 residential units. The fourth amendment included two development projects, Dublin Transit Center Site A-1 (52 townhomes) and Tassajara Highlands (48 single-family units) as well as new policies related to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Livermore Municipal Airport. Additional details on these amendments can be found in Attachment 1. Amendments to other Elements of the General Plan during Calendar Year 2014 included amending the Parks and Open Space Element, the Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, and the Community Design and Sustainability Element, all in conjunction with the Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Amendments to the Seismic Safety and Safety Element and the Noise Element were also adopted in conjunction with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Livermore Municipal Airport. The Housing Element was updated for the 2015Page 2 of 3 2023 planning period in accordance with State-law. The City also adopted a new Energy Conservation Element. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY STATUS REPORT: The Planning Division is currently processing five (5) potential General Plan Amendments which includes the City-initiated Amendment associated with a Jordan Ranch school site. The General Plan Amendment Status Report is included as Attachment 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) basic data collection strictly for information gathering purposes which does not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource is Categorically Exempt under Section 15306, Class 6 (Information Collection). NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: The Annual Progress Report on the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element is a progress report to the State on the status of implementing the General Plan and Housing Element. The Progress Report is not subject to a public hearing; therefore, a public notice is not required. Public outreach is also not required as the progress report does not change any of the guiding policies or programs in the General Plan. A copy of this Staff Report has been posted to the City’s website and following the City Council’s acceptance of the Annual Progress Report, Staff will also post the Report to the City’s website. ATTACHMENT: 1. Annual Progress Report, Dublin General Plan and Housing Element, Calendar Year 2014 2. General Plan Amendment Study Status Report Page 3 of 3 Annual Progress Report on the Dublin General Plan and Housing Element Reporting Period: Calendar Year 2014 INTRODUCTION Government Code Section 65400(a)(2) requires planning agencies to provide an annual report to their legislative body, the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on the status of their General Plan and their progress in its implementation. The report must detail the progress in meeting the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need and address efforts by the local agency towards removing governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. The City of Dublin’s Annual Report was presented to the City Council on March 3, 2015. The purpose for the Annual Progress Report is to: assess how the General Plan is being implemented in accordance with adopted goals, policies and implementation measures; identify any necessary adjustments or modifications to the General Plan as a means to improve local implementation; provide a clear correlation between land use decisions that have been made during the 12-month reporting period and the goals, policies and implementation measures contained in the General Plan; and, provide information regarding local agency progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs. The Dublin General Plan was adopted on February 11, 1985, three years following the City’s incorporation in 1982. The General Plan contains the seven State-required elements which are Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise and Safety. The State allows the combining of elements or the addition of new elements as long as the required seven elements are present in some fashion. The Dublin General Plan contains the following twelve (12) Elements: Land Use Element Parks and Open Space Element Schools, Public Lands, and Utilities Element Circulation and Scenic Highways Element Housing Element Conservation Element Seismic Safety and Safety Element Noise Element Community Design & Sustainability Element Economic Development Element Water Resources Element Energy Conservation Element Local governments are required to keep their General Plans current and internally consistent. There is no specific requirement that a local government update its General Plan on any particular timeline, with the exception of the Housing Element, which is required to be updated as prescribed by State Law. The Dublin Housing Element was last updated and certified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development on January 21, 2015 for the 20152023 planning period. The City of Dublin continues to actively implement the policies of the General Plan including the goals, policies and programs of the Housing Element. The following represents the progress the City has made towards implementing the General Plan and Housing Element during the Calendar Year 2014 reporting period. The information to follow is organized to correspond with the elements of the Dublin General Plan. 2 of 26 LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENTS State Law limits the number of times the Land Use Element can be amended to a maximum of four per calendar year. The Land Use Element of the Dublin General Plan was amended four (4) times during Calendar Year 2014 as follows: Land Use Amendment No. 1: On February 18, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 19-14 approving amendments to the Land Use Element for the Dublin Ranch Subarea 3 and The Groves Lot 3 residential projects. Dublin Ranch Subarea 3: The Subarea 3 amendment reallocated existing Medium-High Density and Medium Density Residential land uses; reduced and changed an Open Space designation to Rural-Residential/Agricultural; and, increased the Stream Corridor designation, on approximately 64 acres within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. The project proposes up to 437 single family residential units. The Groves Lot 3: The Lot 3 amendment changed an existing High Density Residential land use to Medium-High Density Residential on approximately 6.6 acres of land in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. The project proposes up to 122 townhomes. Land Use Amendment No. 2: On June, 3, 2014, the City Council adopted the Dublin Open Space Initiative. The Initiative protects the open spaces and agriculture of the Western Extended Planning Area (outside of the existing Urban Limit Line) and establishes a new Urban Limit Line along the eastern City limits to protect the open spaces and agriculture of the Doolan and Collier Canyons area. Land Use Amendment No. 3: On July 15, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 129-14 approving amendments to the Land Use Element for the Heritage Park residential project and for the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan. Heritage Park: The Heritage Park amendment changed an existing Retail/Office land use to Medium Density Residential on approximately 5.94 acres of land in the Dublin Village Historic Area Specific Plan area. The project proposes up to 54 small lot single family residential units and a 14,000 square foot office building on a total of 6.6 acres. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP): The DDSP amendment increased the number of residential units by 1,200; reduced the non-residential square footage by 773,000 square feet; created minimum density thresholds for the TransitOriented and Retail Districts within the Specific Plan area; and, restricts development west of San Ramon Road within the Retail District. The Specific Plan area is approximately 284 acres. Land Use Amendment No. 4: On September 16, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 159-14 approving amendments to the Land Use Element for the Dublin 3 of 26 Transit Center Site A-1 and Tassajara Highlands residential projects and for the update to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Dublin Transit Center Site A-1: The Site A-1 amendment changed the existing High Density Residential land use to Medium-High Density Residential on approximately 2.86 acres of land in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. The project proposes up to 52 townhomes. Tassajara Highlands: The Tassajara Highlands amendment changed the existing land use designations of Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial to a combination of Medium Density Residential and Open Space on approximately 11.11 acres of land within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. The project proposes up to 48 single family detached residential units. Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP): The ALUCP amendment incorporated policies to establish consistency between the Dublin General Plan and the land use compatibility plan for the Livermore Municipal Airport. The Dublin General Plan Land Use Map (Figure 1-1) was also amended to include the Airport Influence Area, Airport Protection Area and Safety Zone 6. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT Residential Land Use During the Calendar Year 2014, the following residential projects were either under review, approved and/or under construction in furtherance of the guiding policies of the Land Use Element for residential land use: x Fallon Village: The Fallon Village project includes the future development of up to 3,108 residential units at various densities; up to 2.5 million square feet of commercial, office, light industrial and mixed use development; two elementary school sites; parks; utility extensions; and, open space. The project area includes 1,134 acres of land within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area and consists of various parcels with different ownership interests. Positano: A Vesting Tentative Map (Braddock & Logan) was approved in 2005 to subdivide 488 acres into 1,043 low density single family residential units within a portion of Fallon Village now known as Positano. A Site Development Review for the first 247 lots (Salerno and Cantara neighborhoods) was approved in 2007 and construction of the homes is complete. The following additional neighborhoods have been approved within Positano: Cortona: D.R. Horton received Site Development Review approval from the Planning Commission on August 4, 2010 for 68 single family detached homes. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. Biella: Braddock and Logan received Site Development Review approval from the Planning Commission on October 12, 2010 for 101 single family detached homes. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. 4 of 26 Calabria: K. Hovnanian Homes received Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission on October 11, 2011 for 88 single family homes on 5,000 square foot lots. Construction was nearing completion in December 2014. Cortona II: D.R. Horton received Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission on October 11, 2011 for 70 single family homes on 6,000 square foot lots. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. Calarosa: Braddock and Logan received Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission on November 8, 2011 for 71 single family detached homes on 4,000 square foot lots. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. Livorno: K. Hovnanian Homes received Site Development Review approval from the Planning Commission on September 14, 2012 for 69 single family detached homes. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. Fallon Ridge (formerly Calarosa II): Braddock and Logan received Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission on December 11, 2012 for 98 single family detached homes on 4,000 square foot lots. The project has been sold to KB Home and is currently under construction. Veneto: D.R. Horton received Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission on January 22, 2013 for 134 single family homes. Construction is currently underway. The Heights at Positano: KB Homes received Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission on May 28, 2013 for 84 single family homes. Construction is currently underway. Jordan Ranch: Jordan Ranch, also a portion of Fallon Village, was approved by the City Council on June 22, 2010 and amended on June 19, 2012. The project will provide up to 963 residential units and up to 5,000 square feet of retail commercial uses. Residential product types include single family detached; cluster homes; small lot alley homes; townhomes; and, mixed use. Winwood: Brookfield Homes received Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2011 for 81 single family homes with a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet. The project was nearing completion in December 2014. Mariposa: Brookfield Homes received Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2011 for 85 single family homes with a minimum lot size of 5,200 square feet. The project completed construction in February 2014. 5 of 26 Altmore (Neighborhood 2): Toll Brothers is developing 107 single family homes with a minimum lot size of 3,600 square feet. The project is currently under construction. Capri (Neighborhood 3): Brookfield Homes is developing 94 single family homes with a minimum lot size of 2,900 square feet. The project is currently under construction. Trio (Neighborhood 4): Brookfield Homes is developing 126 townhomes on approximately 7 acres. The project is currently under construction. Kingswood (Neighborhood 6): Landsea is developing 109 town homes on approximately 6 acres. The project is currently under construction. x Dublin Ranch Area F West and East (‘Sorrento’): The Dublin Ranch Area F West and East will provide up to 999 medium density residential units with a variety of housing types within 11 distinct neighborhoods. Area F West (Neighborhoods 1-5): The Dublin Ranch Area F West project completed construction in 2013. There are a total of 5 neighborhoods comprised of 418 single family attached units and detached units. The project also includes a neighborhood square and private recreation complex both of which are constructed and available for use. Milano (Neighborhood 1): 75 single family detached cluster units by Toll Brothers. Construction of the units was completed in 2012. Trevi (Neighborhood 2): 117 condominium units, both flats and townhome style around a motor court, by Toll Brothers. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. Firenze (Neighborhood 3): 66 condominium units, both flats and multi-story townhouses, by Toll Brothers. Construction of the units was completed in 2012. Siena (Neighborhood 4): 64 condominium units, both flats and townhouse style, by Toll Brothers. Construction of the units was completed in 2012. Amalfi (Neighborhood 5): 96 condominium units in a multi-story podium structure by Toll Brothers. Construction of the units was completed in 2012. Area F East (Neighborhoods 6-11): The Dublin Ranch Area F East project is currently under construction. There are a total of 6 neighborhoods comprised of 581 single family detached units with small yards. The project also includes a 5 acre neighborhood park, private recreation complex and 10 acre elementary school site. Piazza (Neighborhood 6): 102 single family detached condominiums by Standard Pacific. Construction of the units was completed in August 2014. 6 of 26 (Neighborhood 7): 95 single family detached condos. The project was nearing completion in December 2014. Arrivare North & South (Neighborhood 8): 138 single family detached condominiums by D.R. Horton. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. Ravello (Neighborhood 9): 68 single family attached townhouses by Shea Homes. The project was nearing completion in December 2014. La Solara (Neighborhood 10): 112 single family detached homes by Taylor Morrison. Construction of the units was completed in August 2014. Castello (Neighborhood 11): 66 single family detached homes by Standard Pacific. Construction of the units was completed in May 2014. x Schaefer Ranch: The project includes 406 single-family detached residential units in five distinct neighborhoods. As part of the project, Dublin Boulevard was extended, new trails were constructed and a new East Bay Regional Park District staging area including a parking lot, trailer parking area, restroom, maintenance building and associated landscaping was constructed. The Summit @ Schaefer Ranch: In 2012, 66 lots in Neighborhood C were sold by Discovery Builders to Standard Pacific. Construction of the units was completed in April 2014. Schaefer Ranch South (Orchid @ Schaefer Ranch): In December 2008, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment for Schaefer Ranch South to replace 12 estate lots and a 5.69-acre commercial site in the original Schaefer Ranch project with up to 140 single-family detached homes. On June 12, 2012 Discovery Builders obtained a Site Development Review approval by the Planning Commission for the project now known as Orchid @ Schaefer Ranch. The project is currently under construction. x Arroyo Vista/Emerald Vista: In September 2009, the Dublin City Council approved a General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Rezone with a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, Tentative Map, Site Development Review and associated environmental review for a new mixed income project at Arroyo Vista. The project included demolishing 150 existing affordable housing units (which took place in 2011) and the construction of 378 new, market rate and affordable, housing units. KB Home: KB Home obtained building permits in October 2011 to construct 198 units (128 for sale townhomes and 70 single family homes). Construction of the units was completed in March 2014. Eden Housing: Eden Housing obtained building permits in May 2011 to construct 180 units including the Wexford Way Family Apartments (130 affordable family apartment units) and the Carlow Court Senior Housing (50 affordable senior apartment units. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. 7 of 26 x Chateau @ Fallon Crossing: In June 2006, the City Council adopted an Ordinance to pre-zone the Mission Peak/Fallon Crossing (Standard Pacific Homes) project. The project was annexed to the City in September 2006 and includes 106 single family residential units (8 duets and 98 single-family homes) on 67 acres of land. The project was approved by the City Council in December 2007. On November 8, 2011 the Planning Commission approved a revised Site Development Review for the 98 single family homes. The project was nearing completion in December 2014. x Moller Ranch/Casamira Valley: On December 18, 2012, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Planned Development rezone with a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan for the 226.3 acre Moller Ranch project. The project will provide 370 single family detached homes on 80 acres; 137 acres have been designated Rural Residential/Agricultural. The next step in the development process is for the Applicant to submit a Site Development Review application for the architecture of the homes. Construction is scheduled to commence on back bone infrastructure and the culvert under Tassajara Road in Spring of 2015. x Dublin Transit Center: The Dublin Transit Center project includes up to 1,800 highdensity residential units adjacent to the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station. The following projects have been constructed and are currently occupied: Camellia Place (EAH, Inc.): 112 affordable apartment units Avalon @ Dublin Station (Avalon Bay Communities): 305 apartment units with 10% moderate income units Élan @ Dublin Station (D.R. Horton): 257 condominium units with 10% moderate income units The following projects have been approved and are under construction: Avalon II @ Dublin Station (Avalon Bay Communities): On May 17, 2011 the City Council approved a Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Tract Map for Dublin Transit Center Site C. The project includes 505 apartment units with 10% moderate income units. The project is currently under construction with completion estimated in Fall 2016. Esprit @ Dublin Station (D.R. Horton): In October 2010 the City Council approved a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment, Stage 2 Development Plan, and an Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1. The Planned Development Rezone allowed the development of either a 105-unit condominium project with 15,000 square feet of ground floor retail (previously approved in 2006) or a 105-unit townhome project. In 2013 the developer, D.R. Horton, elected to proceed with the 105-unit townhome project. The project is currently under construction with completion estimated in Spring 2015. The following project has been approved: 8 of 26 Site A-1 (Pulte Homes): On September 16, 2014, the City Council approved a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Tract Map for Site A-1 at the Dublin Transit Center. The 2.86 acre site is proposed for development of 52 three-story townhomes. x Dublin Ranch West: The Dublin Ranch West (commonly referred to as Wallis) project includes the development of a variety of housing types and residential densities including low, medium and medium-high on 189 acres of land. A 1.9 acre Semi-Public site is also encompassed in the overall project site. The project has been approved and will provide 806 housing units. Development will occur on approximately 85.6 acres of the site, with the remaining site area devoted to permanent open space. There are 8 individual residential neighborhoods; 6 for single-family detached living and 2 for townhomes. Additionally, there will be a 7.9-acre City park and a private community recreation center. The historic Antone School is proposed to be relocated and enhanced near the entrance to the developed portion of the property. Phase 1 construction of the vehicular and pedestrian bridges that cross Tassajara Creek has been completed. In 2011, portions of the backbone infrastructure were constructed. Grading is currently underway with backbone infrastructure scheduled to be installed beginning in the Spring of 2015. Residential development is scheduled to begin construction in the Spring of 2016. x Tralee Village: The Tralee Village project is a mixed-use project containing medium-high density residential and retail/commercial uses. The project includes 130 apartment units which completed construction in 2012 and 35,000 square feet of ground floor commercial uses which are substantially occupied with a variety of commercial uses including a financial institution, restaurants, and personal service uses. The project also includes 103 for-sale townhomes which were in a state of partial construction in 2012. On March 13, 2012 the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review for the remaining 53 townhouse units. Construction of the units was completed in September 2014. x Silvera Ranch: The Silvera Ranch project (formerly by Pinn Brothers Fine Homes) is under construction and includes 254 residential units on 105 acres of land. The four phase development contains a mix of housing types, including single-family estate-size units, smaller lot single-family cluster homes and multi-family condominiums. Phases 1 and 2 consisting of 108 single family cluster homes have been completed and are occupied. Phase 3 consisting of 102 multi-family condominiums is partially built and occupied; portions of Phase 3 remain unconstructed. In 2013, the project was purchased by Nuvera Homes and the remaining 53 units are currently under construction. Phase 4 (Belle Monte) consisting of 44 single family detached homes was approved by the Planning Commission on February 7, 2011; construction was completed by KB Home in 2012. In 2012, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, and Planned Development rezone including a Stage 1 9 of 26 and 2 Development Plan to change the land use designation of a .95 acre site within Phase 4 from Rural Residential/Agricultural to Low Density Residential for the construction of 4 single family homes. Construction of the units was completed in 2013. x AMB/Prologis: A Development Agreement that vested the 2004 project approvals expired in 2014. Throughout the last year, the site was being actively marketed and a development partner is being sought to facilitate development of the site. x Camp Parks Real Property Exchange (Dublin Crossing): In November 2013, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Rezoning, Development Agreement, and certified an Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Crossing project. The project entitlements allow for the future development of up to 1,995 residential units, up to 200,000 square feet of commercial uses, an elementary school site, 35 areas of public parks, and associated infrastructure to serve the community. Construction on the first phase of the development is expected to start in 2015. x Dublin Ranch North: In December 2009, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Map and associated environmental review to change the land use designation of the site from Low Density Residential and Rural Residential /Agricultural to Estate Residential and Open Space. A hearing was held before the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) in March 2010 and the project site was annexed into the City of Dublin. A grading permit was issued for the project in July 2012. The next step in the development process is for the Applicant to submit a Site Development Review application for the architecture of the four custom homes. x Crown Chevy Redevelopment Site: In March 2013, the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review application to construct 314 high-density residential units and 17,000 square feet of commercial uses on 4.74 acres and 72 high-density residential units on an adjacent 1.37 acre parcel. In 2014, the site was acquired by a different developer, who is proceeding with plans to construct the approved project. It is expected that building permits will be issued for both projects in 2015. x 8010 Holanda Lane: In August 2013 the Community Development Director approved a new two-story Single Family Dwelling at 8010 Holanda Lane near Dublin Elementary School. The original home was completely destroyed by fire several years ago, and the new property owner completed construction of the approved 2,815 square foot home in May 2014. x Dublin Ranch Subarea 3 (Lennar Homes): On June 3, 2014, the City Council approved a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, a Site Development Review, a Vesting Tentative Tract Map and a Development Agreement for the development of 447 residential units on 64 acres of land bounded by Central Parkway to the North, Dublin Boulevard to the South, Fallon Road to the East and Lockhart Street to the West. Approximately 51 acres of the site will be developed under two General Plan land use designations: Medium Density Residential and Medium-High Density Residential. The project proposes 330 medium density single family detached units (under the Medium Density designation) and 107 townhouse units 10 of 26 (under the Medium-High Density designation) for a total fop 447 units. The project also includes a 2.0 acre Neighborhood Park and a 2.0 acre enhanced stream corridor. The site is currently being graded and backbone infrastructure is being installed. Residential construction is scheduled to start in the northeast corner of the property in Spring 2016. x Dublin Ranch Lot 3 (formerly Fairway Ranch/The Groves) (Lennar Homes): On March 4, 2014, the City Council approved a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, a Site Development Review and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map for a 6.36 acre site for the development of 122 unit townhouse units. x Terrace Ridge (Nielsen Property) (William Lyon Homes): On June 10, 2014, the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review permit for the development of 36 single family homes on a ten acre site. The Planned Development Zoning and environmental document were approved in 2010. Grading on the site has begun and homes should be under construction before Summer 2015. x Tassajara Highlands (Fredrich/Vargas) (Tim Lewis Communities): On August 19, 2014, the City Council approved a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, a Site Development Review and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map for a 12.93 acre site. The project includes the development of 48 Single Family detached residences and 3.06 acres of Open Space. The project is expected to begin grading and construction of infrastructure in the Spring of 2015. x Heritage Park (Challenge Dairy) (Pulte Homes): On July 15, 2014, the City Council approved a General Plan and Dublin Village Historic Area Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the redevelopment of an existing commercial office complex with 54 single Family detached units and a 14,000 square foot office building. Demolition and grading have begun and models homes are scheduled to open in the Fall of 2015. Commercial and Industrial Land Use During the Calendar Year 2014 reporting period, the following commercial and industrial projects were either under review, approved and/or under construction in furtherance of the guiding policies of the Land Use Element for Commercial and Industrial land use: x Fallon Gateway: Fallon Gateway is a 34 acre commercial shopping center located at the southwest corner of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area. The project was approved in June 2009 and includes 379,000 square feet of retail commercial development. Subsequently in May 2010, the Community Development Director approved minor revisions to the Site Development Review permit. There are 5 major tenant stores and 13 smaller commercial buildings which are planned to be constructed in four phases. The first three phases of development include approximately 311,000 square feet, 4 major tenants and 6 smaller shop buildings. On-site amenities include outdoor seating areas, pedestrian paseos and unique paving, landscaping and lighting elements. 11 of 26 Phase 1 of the project has been completed. The center’s anchor tenant, Target, opened in October 2011. On September 27, 2011 the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review for BJ’s Brew house, an 8,736 square foot restaurant and brew house. Construction is complete and BJ’s is open for business. In September 2012, a Site Development Review was approved by the Community Development Director for Dick’s Sporting Goods, a 55,000 square foot sporting goods store. Construction is complete and Dick’s is open for business. On August 13, 2013 the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for a 6,504 square foot building (Shops 7) which will also include drive-thru. Construction completed in 2014. On August 13, 2013 the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for a new service station, 2,520 square foot minimart and 1,050 square foot carwash. The new Chevron station is currently under construction with an estimated completion date of early 2015. On July 22, 2014 the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to amend the Planned Development Zoning Stage 2 Development Plan to modify the site plan for Phase 4 and, a Site Development Review Permit to allow the construction of Pads 2 and 3 and Shops 1-4 totaling 42,160 square feet of development on approximately 4.22 acres and a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map to create 11 parcels at the Fallon Gateway retail center. The project is currently in Building Plan Check review. x Dublin Buick/GMC: In April 2012, the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review for façade modifications to the Buick/GMC showroom building to enhance the appearance of the dealership. The project was completed in April 2014. In November 2013, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for the construction and operation of a carwash. The project was completed in July 2014. x Dublin Toyota: In March 2014 the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review for modifications to enhance the appearance of the existing Dublin Toyota sales and service buildings, and to improve the operations of the service department. The first phase of the project, an illuminated entry portal feature, is presently under construction. x Dublin Preschool: In October 2012, the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for the construction of a new 3,284 square foot day care center for up to 60 children within the Village Parkway District of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area. The project is currently under construction. x Amador Crossings: In November 2012, the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review for the construction of a 4,500 square foot commercial pad building within a portion of the Amador Crossings shopping center within the Retail District of the 12 of 26 Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area. Construction of the project began in September 2013 and was completed in January 2014. x Fountainhead Montessori: In December 2012, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow the expansion of Fountainhead Montessori School for the operation of a Day Care Center and Community Facility (Elementary School) with up to 381 children and a Site Development Review Permit for façade modifications to three existing office buildings and associated site improvements. The project will be constructed in phases. The Applicant has begun the first phase of construction which includes interior building improvements and an outdoor play area/garden. x Lazy Dog Restaurant and Café: In January 2014, the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review for a new 7,755 square foot restaurant with a 1,159 square foot outdoor dining patio at Hacienda Crossings. The project is located on the former Macaroni Grill site which was demolished as part of the project. Construction of the project was completed in October 2014. x Persimmon Place (The Village at Dublin): In December 2013, the City Council approved a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Planned Development Rezoning, and certified a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for The Village at Dublin retail center. The project also received Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Map approval for the construction of a 154,000 square foot commercial shopping center. Construction on the project began in Spring 2014 and is expected to be open to the public in Summer 2015. x Dublin Valero Service Station: In April 2013, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for a 1,545 square foot expansion of the existing mini-mart and the construction of a new carwash. The project is currently in building plan check review. x Car West Auto Body: In April 2013, the Planning Commission approved a Minor Use Permit and Site Development Review for a new auto body repair business, façade modifications and site improvements at 6080 Dublin Boulevard, the site of the former Kassabian Motors vintage auto dealership. Construction of the project was completed in August 2014 and the auto body repair business immediately began operations. x Rahma Mediterranean Market & Cuisine: In November 2013, the Community Development Director approved a Site Development Review for an extensive remodel of the building at 7111 Village Parkway, the former Hunan House restaurant. The remodeled building will be a 4,762 square foot restaurant and market occupied by Rahma Mediterranean Market & Cuisine, which will relocate from its existing space in the Dublin Crossroads shopping center. The project is currently in building plan check review. x Challenge Dairy Headquarters: On July 15, 2014, the City Council approved a General Plan and Dublin Village Historic Area Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 and 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the construction of a 14,000 square foot commercial office building which will be the future corporate home for Challenge Dairy. The site is currently being graded and construction scheduled to commence in the Spring of 2015. Upon completion of construction of the 13 of 26 commercial office building, Challenge Dairy will move from their current location into the new building and the existing office building will be demolished to allow for the construction of 54 single family residences being developed by Pulte Homes (see “Heritage Park” project above). PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Parks and Open Space Element was amended once during Calendar Year 2014 in conjunction with Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The amendment included revising Figure 3-1 (Parks and Open Space) to reflect existing and proposed bike lanes and trails consistent with the Master Plan. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT x Emerald Glen Park Recreation and Aquatic Complex: The City continued the planning and design for the Emerald Glen Park Recreation and Aquatic Complex, a 51,000 square foot facility including one indoor and two outdoor swimming pools, a waterslide tower, a gymnasium, fitness center, game room/teen center, group exercise/dance studio, special events room, locker rooms, and administrative offices. The design and construction documents have been completed for Phase 1 of the project which includes a 31,000 square feet of indoor space, all of the aquatics amenities, a fitness center and the locker rooms and administrative spaces. x Fallon Sports Park, Phase II Design: The design and construction documents for Phase II of the park were completed in late 2014.. Amenities will include a lighted 90-foot baseball diamond; two lighted synthetic turf soccer fields; adventure playground; group picnic area; four lighted bocce ball courts; restroom and concession building and related parking and pedestrian circulation improvements. x Positano Hills Neighborhood Park: Enhancement of the 4.6-acre Positano Hills Park playground was completed in November 2014 and includes an expanded play area and additional landscaping. Construction of Positano Hills Park was completed in 2012 and enhancements began in 2013. The park is located in the Positano development in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. x Passatempo Park, Sorrento East: Construction was completed for this neighborhood park, which includes 5.1-acres in the Sorrento East development in the Eastern Extended Planning Area. Construction of the park began in 2013 and features include an interactive sundial and small vineyard. x Shannon Park Water Play Area: Construction was completed for the Shannon Park Water Play Area renovation project in June 2014. The site features a new “splash pad” with interactive water elements. Construction began in late 2013 and completed in time for a summer opening. 14 of 26 x Parks and Recreation Master Plan: Update activities for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan continued in 2014 and is scheduled to be completed during fiscal year 20142015. x Dublin Crossing Park: The Dublin Crossing Park Master Plan project was initiated in 2014 and includes the planning process for a 30-acre community park that will be centrally located in Dublin on a portion of the former Camp Parks Army Base property. x Jordan Ranch Neighborhood Park: The conceptual design documents for this 4.4-acre park were approved and the construction documents were initiated. The park amenities will include a shaded playground area, picnic areas and an open space meadow. SCHOOLS, PUBLIC LANDS AND UTILITIES ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Schools, Public Lands, and Utilities Element was amended once during Calendar Year 2014 in conjunction with Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The amendment included revising Figure 4-1 (Schools and Public Lands) to reflect existing and proposed bike lanes and trails consistent with the Master Plan. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE SCHOOLS, PUBLIC LANDS AND UTILITIES ELEMENT Schools x In 2014, the City continued to work with developers and property owners to ensure that adequate sites are reserved to meet the Dublin Unified School District’s projected demand for future school uses. As part of the Fallon Village project (as described in the Land Use section above) two elementary school sites have been reserved for future development by the Dublin Unified School District. As part of the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan Area, one school site has been reserved for future development by the Dublin Unified School District. x In 2014, the City continued to collect school fees upon issuance of building permits for development projects in accordance with State law. Public Lands x Alameda County Courthouse: In November 2004, Alameda County received City approval to construct a 210,000 square-foot East County Hall of Justice (County Courthouse) complex on a 22-acre portion of the Santa Rita Property near the intersection of Gleason Drive and Hacienda Drive. In December 2009 and again in Janaury 2014, Alameda County was granted an amendment to the original approval for a slightly smaller building (196,000 square feet). The East County Hall of Justice will house 13 courtrooms and associated governmental facilities. Grading on the site began in September 2014 and construction is expected take two years. 15 of 26 x Camp Parks Reserve Forces Training Area/Dublin Crossing Specific Plan Area: 189 acres of land (comprised of three parcels) designated as Public Lands on the Camp Parks Reserve Forces Training Area were changed to a new Dublin Crossing land use district for the future development of up to 1,995 residential units, up to 200,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 900-student elementary school, and 35 acres of public parks. The site no longer has a “Public Lands” land use designation. x Federal and Military Communities Committee: On September 3, 2013, City Council established the Federal and Military Communities Committee (FMCC) on which two council members serve and which is staffed by the Public Works Department. The FMCC provides information and updates on programs and services related to federal agencies and military installations operating in Dublin. Utilities x In 2014, the City continued to work closely with project applicants and service utilities to ensure that there is adequate capacity to serve all new and existing areas of Dublin. CIRCULATION AND SCENIC HIGHWAYS ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Circulation and Scenic Highways Element was amended once during Calendar Year 2014 in conjunction with the Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The amendment included policy revisions as well as updates to various Figures within the Element. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE CIRCULATION AND SCENIC HIGHWAYS ELEMENT x Right-of-Way Maintenance: The City provides for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and traffic signals throughout the City. The City also completes annual ADA curb ramp, sidewalk repair, street overlay, and slurry seal projects. x Traffic Impact Fees: The City continues to collect traffic impact fees for new development projects to ensure that new facilities are built to accommodate the additional vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian trips that result from the projects. x Dougherty Road Improvements: The City plans to widen Dougherty Road to six lanes with bicycle lanes and a reconstructed bicycle/pedestrian path from Sierra Lane to the northern City limit. Final design and right-of-way acquisition is proceeding. x Bikeways Master Plan Update and Pedestrian Plan: The 2007 Bikeways Master Plan was updated and was adopted by the City Council on October 7, 2014. The updated Master Plan achieves consistency with recently updated regional transportation plans and conforms to current design standards and state guidelines. As part of the updated Master Plan, a Pedestrian Plan was also adopted which set a pedestrian policy framework and implementation strategy with emphasis on the Downtown Dublin Specific 16 of 26 Plan area. The updated Master Plan and Pedestrian Plan were combined together to form a multi-modal plan/policy document. x Truck Route Map: On February 18, 2014, the City Council approved the City’s first Truck Route Map. The Truck Route Map is maintained by the Public Works Director in consultation with the Chief of Police. x Dublin Boulevard Improvements: The City plans to widen Dublin Boulevard to six lanes with bicycle lanes between Sierra Court and Dublin Court. The project will also include undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. Final design and right-of-way acquisition is proceeding. x Street Functional Classification Update: On April 15, 2014, the City Council approved an update to the City’s Street Functional Classification System. This update was critical for the City in maintaining its eligibility for various Federal and State funding sources. The final approval of the Street Functional Classifications was granted by the Federal Highway Administration in August 2014. HOUSING ELEMENT The Housing Element was amended on November 18, 2014, in accordance with State Law, for the 2015-2023 planning period. PROGRESS TOWARD MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT Pursuant to Government Code Section 65400, the City Council is required to prepare an annual report on the status and progress in implementing the City’s Housing Element using forms and definitions adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development. These forms and definitions were adopted on March 27, 2010 and are required to be used for the Annual Progress Report. The completed forms for Calendar Year 2014 are attached as Exhibit A to this report. CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Conservation Element was not amended during Calendar Year 2014. PROGRESS TOWARD MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE CONSERVATION ELEMENT x Dublin Village Historic Area Specific Plan: The City continues to work on preserving Dublin’s historic resources through the implementation of the Dublin Village Historic Area Specific Plan. On July 14, 2014, the City Council approved a development project that will replace an existing, non-historic commercial office complex with 54 single family detached residential units and a 14,000 square foot office building which will be occupied by Challenge Dairy for their corporate offices. The project includes, historic architecture; the 17 of 26 relocation of a historic plaque; a monetary contribution to enhance the existing historic park and museums; and, an enhanced streetscape landscaping along Donlon Way. x The City continues to review each new development project that is proposed near a natural resource such as a stream corridor with the intent of protecting the resource. Conditions of approval include measures to ensure adequate setbacks, minimal impacts to water quality, passive recreational opportunities, and the maintenance of natural systems to the extent possible. x The City continues to work with developers to ensure that open space corridors established in new neighborhoods are maintained and managed appropriately, and open space areas are contiguous with other such lands. SEISMIC SAFETY AND SAFETY ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Seismic Safety and Safety Element was amended once during Calendar Year 2014 in conjunction with update to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The amendment incorporated policies to establish consistency between the Dublin General Plan and the land use compatibility plan for the Livermore Municipal Airport. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE SEISMIC SAFETY AND SAFETY ELEMENT x All new construction and certain building renovations are reviewed for compliance with the California Building Code for seismic safety. x All new development projects are required to submit a Geotechnical Analysis to assess site conditions. x The City continues to implement the Wildfire Management Plan for all properties identified within a fire buffer zone. x The City continues to participate in the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) flood insurance program. NOISE ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Noise Element was amended once during Calendar Year 2014 in conjunction with update to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The amendment incorporated policies to establish consistency between the Dublin General Plan and the land use compatibility plan for the Livermore Municipal Airport. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE NOISE ELEMENT 18 of 26 x Due to the nature of the Guiding and Implementing Policies of the Noise Element, efforts to implement this Element of the General Plan are on-going in nature. Projects are reviewed on a case-by-case basis for adverse noise impacts to the environment and sensitive receptors. In addition, a Noise Mitigation fee is charged to developers in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area to assist in funding the construction of improvements to mitigate noise impacts. COMMUNITY DESIGN & SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Community Design & Sustainability Element was amended once during Calendar Year 2014 in conjunction with the Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The amendments were minor and included updating all references to the former “Bikeways Master Plan” with the new “Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan” as well as updating the description of the Master Plan. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE COMMUNITY DESIGN & SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT x The Community Design & Sustainability Element was adopted in September 2008. The Community Design Element establishes principles, policies and implementation measures that are designed to enhance the livability of Dublin and encourage a high level of quality design while encouraging well designed sustainability measures. The purpose of the Element is to enhance the physical form of the community by establishing policies that will guide future development. The Community Design Element applies to developments throughout the City. The efforts to implement this Element of the General Plan are on-going in nature. Projects are reviewed on a case-by-case basis for conformance with this Element. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Economic Development Element is a newer Element that was adopted in April 2013. This Element guides the City’s efforts to foster business expansion and job growth and provide the City with a framework for economic development programs and activities. The overarching objective of the Economic Development Element is to enhance the competitiveness of the City of Dublin and maintain a strong and diverse economic base. The Element includes specific goals, policies and implementation measures to promote economic vibrancy, improve conditions for small businesses, encourage development of the strategic employment-supporting sites, and achieve the Downtown vision. The Economic Development Element was not amended during Calendar Year 2014. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT x Maintain an Economic Development Function: The City continues to maintain an Economic Development Office to implement the economic development goals of the City. The services include, business attraction activities; access to labor force data; business 19 of 26 recruitment; business retention and expansion assistance; and, site selection assistance. The goal of these efforts is to market the City's many economic advantages in order to enhance the competitiveness of our local economy and to maintain a strong and diverse revenue and job base in the Tri-Valley. The Economic Development Office also supports the following efforts: In partnership with the Dublin Chamber of Commerce and the Alameda County Small Business Development Center (ACSBDC), the Economic Development Office provides a variety of interactive business seminars to support business owners. During Calendar Year 2014, seven seminars were held on the following topics: Affordable Health Care Act & Other Insurance Questions (January 2014; Meet the Lenders Event (February 2014); The Use of Constant Contact (March 2014); Using Census Data (May 2014); Meet the Business Resources (May 2014); Nuts & Bolts of Establishing Your Online Presence (June 2014); Search Engine Optimization/Discover Dublin for the Holidays (September 2014). New in 2014, the City in partnership with the ACSBDC and i-GATE offered Startup Dublin: A Bootcamp for Technology Entrepreneurs to help meet the needs of new and existing local entrepreneurs looking to establish new startup companies. Organizes roundtable discussions annually with residential and commercial brokers, developers and the auto dealerships. Advances the Business Recognition Program by recognizing the achievement of significant milestone anniversaries by local businesses that have been in Dublin for 10 years or longer; businesses that have been operating for 20 years or more are recognized at City Council meetings in the spring and fall each year. Added key Dublin opportunity sites to a new web-based site selection and promotion application called “OppSites.” This effort promotes commercial development sites with a global audience. Persimmon Place Sewer Assistance: In April 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of sewer capacity credits to Regency Centers in order to assist with the attraction and development of a new 152,000 square foot shopping center that will be home to Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack, Home Goods and many other retailers. Three Sheets Craft Beer Taproom, Patxi’s Pizza, and Great Harvest Bread Company Sewer Assistance: In June 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of sewer capacity credits to assist with the attraction of these establishments to Dublin. Urban Plates Sewer Assistance: In September 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of sewer capacity credits to Urban Plates in order to assist with their attraction to Dublin. Pacific Catch and Chaat Café Sewer Assistance: In September 2016, the City Council approved the allocation of sewer capacity credits to assist with the attraction of these establishments to Dublin. 20 of 26 x Maintain a Comprehensive Marketing and Branding Plan: During Calendar Year 2014, the City entered into a Consulting Services Agreement with North Star Destination Strategies to develop a comprehensive marketing and branding strategy. The branding effort develops a cohesive message to promote opportunities in Dublin. Implementation of the plan will begin in FY14-15 and will promote Dublin as a destination for visitors, families, businesses, and events. x Focus Business Visitation Program on High-Growth Companies: The Economic Development Office continues to advance the objectives of the Business Visitation Program through monthly meetings with high growth companies throughout the City. The Business Visitation Program was established to assist businesses with retention and expansion needs and bring awareness to the resources available to support their business. x Participate in Regional Economic Development Efforts: During Calendar Year 2014, the Economic Development Office continued to partner with regional organizations such as the East Bay Economic Development Alliance, the East Bay Leadership Council, Innovation Tri-Valley and i-Gate. Some of the meetings and events that were held during the calendar year include: Through participation in i-Gate, attended the monthly Mayoral Advisory Committee meeting. Partnered with i-Gate to create Startup Dublin. Also worked to locate an i-GATE business in commercial space in Dublin. Partnered with the Tri-Valley One-Stop Career Center and entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for an additional three-year term. Attended the annual Visit Tri-Valley meeting. Participated in the One Bay Area Regional Initiative’s Bay Area Prosperity Plan: Economic Development Strategy. x Maintain Small-Business Friendly Development Services: The City of Dublin continues to encourage the development of small businesses through the following: Providing information on business incentive programs, financing and support services on its webpage. Providing tools for small businesses including, Getting Started, Financial Tools, Personnel Tools, and Sales/Marketing Tools on its webpage. Providing key development contacts to small businesses and coordinating a small business referral program with the Community Development Department in order to identify new businesses that may need additional assistance in getting established or existing businesses that would like to remodel or expand. 21 of 26 Adopted the Small Business Assistance Program to help fund ADA, Title 24, and trash enclosure improvements and other legal obligations imposed on small business. x Partner with the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority: The City continues to meet with the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority (ACSPA) to discuss partnership efforts on how to market their development sites. x Support Downtown Business Attraction and Development Efforts: During Calendar Year 2014, the City held numerous property owner roundtables and summits to gather information on property owner interest in developing or improving their properties; educate property owners on the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan; discuss streetscape improvement projects such as Golden Gate Drive; and, discuss current and future development projects in the downtown. In addition, the following development activities occurred downtown during the reporting period: Crown Chevy Redevelopment Site: In March 2013, the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review application to construct 314 high-density residential units and 17,000 square feet of commercial uses on 4.74 acres and 72 high-density residential units on an adjacent 1.37 acre parcel which has been dedicated to Eden Housing for an affordable housing project for Veterans. In 2014, the 4.74 acre site was acquired by a different developer, who is proceeding with plans to construct the approved project. It is expected that building permits will be issued for both projects in 2015. 7123 Amador Plaza Road: Under the Small Business Assistance Program a grant was awarded to Karpenko Family Partners for the construction of a new trash enclosure to assist with the attraction of a new bakery at their retail shopping center on Amador Plaza Road. 7046 Village Parkway: Under the Small Business Assistance Program, a grant was awarded to Pastime Brew LLC (dba Three Sheets Craft Beer Taproom) to assist with accessibility improvements at their retail space on Village Parkway. Tous les Jours Sewer Assistance: In March 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of sewer capacity credits to Tous les Jours to assist with their attraction to Dublin and to also densify the existing Amador Plaza Center retail shopping center. Village Parkway Pilot Parking Program: In December 2014, the City Council extended for five years an Ordinance that temporarily eliminates the parking standards in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Village Parkway District in order to incentivize more commercial businesses in the downtown by having greater flexibility in regulatory standards. x Achieve the Downtown Vision: During Calendar Year 2014, the City continued to advance the Downtown Vision to improve the quality of place and quality of life in Dublin. The City continues to be active in Downtown development in the following ways: 22 of 26 Providing a consolidated toolkit to business owners and developers to promote economic development. The toolkit includes, the Sales Tax Reimbursement Program; Fee Deferral Program; Sewer Capacity Assistance Program; Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program; Small Business Assistance Program; and, PACE Financing for Energy Upgrades. Following legislation for economic development tools and incentives that will be replacing the dissolution of redevelopment, specifically AB 2292, AB 229, SB 628 and SB 614 as it relates to Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts. WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Water Resources Element is a newer Element that was adopted in June 2013. The primary purpose of the Water Resources Element and the reason for including this optional Element in the Dublin General Plan is to ensure that the City’s water resources are sustained and protected, and to consolidate information and polices related to the conservation and management of water resources, riparian corridors, and watershed lands. The Water Resources Element also defines the storm water facilities needed to serve Dublin at build out of the General Plan. The Water Resources Element was not amended during Calendar Year 2014. PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT x City Staff engaged in continued collaboration with DSRSD and Zone 7 to ensure that existing and new development is served with adequate water resources. x Staff conducted a multi-jurisdictional workshop “Water Conservation by Design” to educate local agency staff on incorporating water conservation techniques into site design planning. x Staff completed the construction of several new public facilities, including the Public Safety Complex, Corporation Yard, and additional park facilities, implementing several of the policies in Section 12.3.4 of the Water Resources Element. ENERGY CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS The Energy Conservation Element is a new Element that was adopted in July 2014. The primary purpose of the Energy Conservation Element and the reason for including this optional Element in the Dublin General Plan is to ensure that the City is taking an active role in encouraging and promoting energy conservation at every level, and to consolidate information and policies related to energy supply, current conservation programs, and opportunities for future improvements. 23 of 26 PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES OF THE ENERGY CONSERVATION ELEMENT x The Building Division ensures the continued implementation of Chapter 7.94 of the Municipal Code (Dublin Green Building Code) and the 2013 California Green Building Standards Code, also known as the “Cal Green” Code, which was adopted by the City and became effective January 1, 2014. During Calendar Year 2014, the Building Division issued 222 residential and 2 commercial photovoltaic permits; and, 17 residential and 5 commercial electrical vehicle chargers. x Environmental Services Staff play an active role in educating residents and businesses about the various programs, tools, and incentives of the agencies and organizations whose main function is to encourage and enable energy conservation, including the PG&E, California Youth Energy Services (CYES), and StopWaste. The City of Dublin partnered with Rising Sun Energy Center to promote energy conservation and sustainable living via a youth employment program, known as California Youth Energy Services (CYES). The CYES program is a youth and young adult summer employment and training program open to those who are 15– 22 years old. The CYES program trains and employs local youth to provide resource conservation audits and retrofits to local residences in the form of a Green House Call. A Green House Call includes a walkthrough energy assessment of the house with the client looking for energy and water savings opportunities. Residents who sign up for a Green House Call receive free energy and water conservation saving measures including efficient-flow faucet, aerators and showerheads, and screw-in compact fluorescent lamps. o In 2014, 224 Dublin area households received a Green House Call. The following equipment was installed within Dublin homes at no cost to the homeowner: x 3,453 compact fluorescent light bulbs 173 LED light bulbs 37 LED night lights 39 CFL torchiere lamps 39 efficient-flow showerheads & aerators 94 power strips 95 retractable clotheslines 49 feet of water heater pipe insulation In May 2011, with the help of Chevron Energy Solutions (Chevron ES), the City conducted an energy audit of all City facilities. From that audit, several recommendations were made for projects that would incorporate energy conservation measures as well as renewable energy options. The following projects have been completed: Photovoltaic Electricity: Seven PV electricity-producing (solar) installations have been constructed as part of the Energy Action Plan at the following locations: Civic 24 of 26 Center; library; Shannon Community Center; senior center; and, all three fire stations. These installations will generate more than 700 kW of solar energy at all sites combined. Additionally, a display monitor at the library with a link to the City website allows for public viewing of real-time tracking of production, savings, and environmental benefits. The solar arrays are a combination of solar shade structures at the Civic Center, library, Shannon Community Center, Fire Station 17, and Fire Station 18, with roof-mounted solar installations at the remaining facilities. Most importantly, the solar arrays will help power the diverse city operations. In addition to the solar arrays, the City will be upgrading its heating and cooling systems at the Civic Center and the library with more efficient technology. Lighting and Irrigation Changes: Over 3,100 fixtures have been retrofitted. The high-pressure sodium cobra head lamps have been exchanged for energy-efficient LED streetlights. This project has benefited both the City’s public safety responders as well as the public with improved lighting quality. The decorative fixtures along the Village Parkway corridor, in the Dublin Ranch area, and Transit Center were not switched to LED. The decorative streetlights will be looked at in a future time when decorative light technology advances. Interior lighting retrofits have also occurred as part of the project. Encompassing all fire stations, Civic Center, the library, the senior center, and Shannon Community Center, these retrofits have had an immediate effect in reducing electrical consumption of the City's facilities. Existing fixtures at all these locations have been retrofitted with more energy-efficient bulbs and ballasts. Motion sensors have been added, and more efficient lighting technologies will be incorporated as appropriate. The City is in the process of upgrading the watering systems within all of its parks with a centralized irrigation system that will ensure that water is delivered to these locations only when needed, cutting the cost of maintaining the landscaping within City parks. Additionally, City facilities have been retrofitted with low-flow toilets and sinks. x Dublin Green Shamrock Business Program: The goal of the Dublin Green Shamrock Business Program is to educate businesses on sustainable practices and connect them with potential savings. Energy Conservation is part of the multi-faceted program. The program began in October 2014 and by the end of the year, 11 businesses were enrolled in the program. x Home Energy Analyzer: 90 residents participated in a Home Energy Challenge during the 4th quarter of 2013. In 2014, an additional 45 residents signed up and were given access to detailed energy reports that educated them on their energy usage. Residents were given access to energy assistance and were made aware of energy rebates that would be beneficial for them. x BayRen Multifamily Program: As part of a BayRen Multifamily program that started in November 2013 and continued through 2014, the City promoted a multifamily outreach campaign that included energy efficient rebates to help pay for enhancements to aging or 25 of 26 inefficient energy systems. In addition, all Dublin multifamily complexes were notified of a free 4 day Green Property Management training opportunity for multifamily property staff, including property managers, superintendents, maintenance staff and service providers. The trainings took place in February 2014. x City completed the construction of several new public facilities, including the Public Safety Complex, Corporation Yard, and additional park facilities, implementing several of the policies in Section 13.3.3 of the Energy Conservation Element. 26 of 26 AnnualProgressReport HousingElementImplementation (CCRTitle25§6202) Jurisdiction ReportingPeriod CityofDublin 1/1/2014Ͳ12/31/2014 TableA AnnualBuildingActivityReportSummaryͲNewConstruction VeryLow,Low,andMixedIncomeMultiͲFamilyProjects HousingwithFinancialAssistance Housingw/outFinancial and/orDeedRestrictions AssistanceorDeedRestrictions HousingDevelopmentInformation 1 ProjectIdentifier(maybe APN,projectnameor address) 2 UnitCategory 4 3 Tenure R=Rent O=Own 5 LowIncome Moderate Income Ͳ Ͳ 25 227 252 (9)TotalofModerateandAboveModeratefromTableA3 (10)TotalbyincomeTableA/A3 Ͳ (11)TotalExtremelyLowIncomeUnits* Ͳ 25 AvalonII (TransitCenterSiteC) *Note:Thesefieldsarevoluntary. 5+ R 6 Assistance Programs forEach Development 7 8 Notebelowthenumberofunits determinedtobeaffordable DeedRestricted withoutfinancialordeed TotalUnitsPer Est.#of Units restrictionsandattachan Project InfillUnits* Above explantionhowthejurisdiction Moderate SeeInstructions SeeInstructions determinedtheunitswere Income affordable.Refertoinstructions. AffordibilitybyHouseholdIncome VeryLow Income 5a 1,093 1,068 Inc TableA2 AnnualBuildingActivityReportSummaryͲUnitsRehabilitated,PreservedandAcquiredpursuanttoGCSec.65583.1(c)(1) Pleasenote:Unitsmayonlybecreditedtothetablebelowwhenajurisdictionhasincludedaprogram initshousingelementtorehabilitate,preserveoracquireunitstoaccommodateaportionofitsRHNA whichmeetthespecificcriteriaasoutlinedinGCSec.65583.1(c)(1) ActivityType (1)RehabilitationActivity (2)PreservationofUnitsAtͲRisk (3)AcquisitionofUnits (4)TotalUnitsbyIncome *Note:Thisfieldisvoluntary. AffordabilitybyHouseholdIncome ExtremelyͲLow VeryLow Low Total Income* Income Income Units 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Description: Thedescriptionshouldadequatelydocumenthoweachunitcomplieswith subsection(c)(7)ofGovernmentCodeSection65583.1. TableA3 AnnualbuildingActivityReportSummaryforAboveModerateIncomeUnits (notincludingthosereportedonTableA) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Single Family 2Ͳ4 Units 5+ Units 2nd Unit Mobile Homes Total Units Numberof InfillUnits* No.ofUnitsPermittedfor ModerateIncome Ͳ No.ofUnitsPermittedfor AboveModerateIncome AvalonBayII (DTCSiteC) TassajaraPointe/Villas (SilveraRanchPhase3) Piazza (SorrentoNeighborhood6) Sorrento (Neighborhood7) Ravello (SorrentoNeighborhood9) Tralee (Townhomes) Chateau (FallonCrossing) VeronoEstates (Positano,NeighborhoodCͲ3) Calabria (Positano,NeighborhoodDͲ2) FallonRidge (Positano,NeighborhoodDͲ4) Veneto (Positano,NeighborhoodEͲ1) TheHeights (Positano,NeighborhoodEͲ2) Orchid (SchaeferRanch) Winwood (JordanRanch,Neighborhood1) Altmore (JordanRanch,Neighborhood2) Trio (JordanRanch,Neighborhood4) Kingswood (JordanRanch,Neighborhood6) Esprit (DTCSiteEͲ1) TOTAL *Note:Thisfieldisvoluntary. Ͳ 25 Ͳ Ͳ 25 227 227 50 50 5 5 71 71 45 45 12 12 43 43 17 17 3 3 46 46 70 70 74 74 43 43 63 63 38 38 518 126 126 33 33 102 102 261 314 Ͳ Ͳ 1,093 Ͳ TableB RegionalHousingNeedsAllocationProgress PermittedUnitsIssuedbyAffordability EnterCalendarYearstartingwiththefirstyear oftheRHNAperiod. IncomeLevel RHNAby Income 2007 Year1 2008 Year2 2009 Year3 2010 Year4 2011 Year5 2012 Year6 DeedRestricted Ͳ 1 Ͳ 21 167 Ͳ 1,092 NonͲdeedRestricted Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ DeedRestricted Ͳ 4 3 9 39 31 661 Low NonͲdeedRestricted Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ DeedRestricted Ͳ 1 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 40 653 Moderate NonͲdeedRestricted Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Above n/a 924 118 137 135 325 594 1,017 Moderate TotalRHNAissuedbyCOG 3,330 TotalUnits 118 143 138 355 800 1,088 RemainingNeedforRHNAPeriod *Note:UnitsservingExtremelyLowIncomehouseholdsshouldbeincludedintheVeryLowIncomepermittedunittotals. VeryLow* Total TotalUnits Remaining toDate RHNAby (allyears) Income Level 2013 Year7 2014 Year8 Ͳ Ͳ 14 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 25 Ͳ 189 Ͳ 100 Ͳ 66 Ͳ 659 1,068 4,053 (3,129) 673 1,093 4,408 903 561 587 (1,078) TableC ProgramImplementationStatus ProgramDescription (ByHousingElementProgramNames) NameofProgram Program1:HousingRehabilitation Assistance Program2:HousingChoiceVoucher RentalAssistance Program3:CodeEnforcement HousingProgramsProgressReportͲGovernmentCodeSection65583 Describeprogressofallprogramsincludinglocaleffortstoremovegovernmentalconstraintstothemaintenance,improvementanddevelopmentofhousingasidentifiedinthehousing element. Timeframein Objective StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement ContinuetosupporttheAlamedaCounty 2007Ͳ2014 TheAlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgencyadministersaMinorandMajorHomeImprovementProgramforthe CommunityDevelopmentAgencyto CityofDublin.Duringthe2014calendaryear,theAgencyadministered$4,001.15ofCommunityDevelopmentBlockGrant (CDBG)fundstoDublinresidents.WithCDBGfunds,therewere2minorhomerepairprojectscompletedand1accesibilty implementtheMinorandMajor grantissued. ImprovementPrograms. Facilitate25minorhomerepairs,10paint grants,10majorhomeimprovements duringtheplanningperiod. 2007Ͳ2014 Continuetosupporttheassistanceof150 verylowandextremelylowincome householdseachyearthroughoutthe planningperiod. 2007Ͳ2014 EmeraldVista,formerlyknownasArroyoVista,isnowandhaslongbeensupportedbytheHousingChoiceVoucher Program.EmeraldVistawasredevelopedtoinclude378units,194ofwhichareaffordable(180rentalunitsand14forͲsale units).Inaddition,theHousingChoiceVoucherprogramprovidesassistancetoresidentsinthefollowingprojects:Camellia Place,OakGrovesatDublinRanch,ParkSierraApartments,PineandCedarGrovesatDublinRanch,andWicklowSquare. Continuetoreferinterestedhouseholds andhomeownerstotheHousing AuthorityoftheCountyofAlameda. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCityofDublincontinuestoreferinterestedhouseholdsandhomeownersinterestedintheHousingChoiceVoucher programtotheAlamedaCountyHousingAuthority.Inaddition,informationondevelopmentswithintheCitythataccept Section8vouchersisprovidedintheTriͲValleyAreaAffordableRentalHousingDirectory,whichisavailableontheCity's websiteandattheCity'spubliccounter. Continuetoenforcelocalordinances relatingtopropertymaintenanceand substandardhousingbothproactivelyand onacomplaintbasis. 2007Ͳ2014 TherearetwoareasofCodeEnforcement:PlanningCodeEnforcementandBuildingCodeEnforcement.PlanningCode EnforcementenforcesviolationsoftheDublinMunicipalCodePropertyMaintenanceandGraffitiOrdinancesaswellasthe ZoningOrdinance.Commonpropertymaintenanceviolationsincludeweeds,inoperablevehicles,junk&debris, overgrown/deadvegetation,andgraffiti.Propertymaintenanceviolationsareenforcedproactivelyandonacomplaint basis.BuildingCodeEnforcementactivelypatrolsCitystreetsenforcingBuildingCodeViolations,suchascontractorsor homeownersworkingwithoutrequiredbuildingpermits.Inaddition,BuildingCodeEnforcementrespondstoanonymous callers,concernedcitizensandothercontractorsreportinganyactivityconnectedtoillegalconstruction.Enforcement officersspendtimeeducatingthepublicontheimportanceofobtainingrequiredbuildingpermits. NameofProgram Objective Conductapproximately1,700residential inspectionsduringtheplanningperiod. Program4:Condominium ConversionOrdinance Timeframein StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement 2007Ͳ2014 Thefollowingresidentialinspectionswereconducted(thesenumbersarebasedonthenumberofnewopencode enforcementcases). PerformannualreviewofCityOrdinances. Annual 2008:TheCityreviewedtheDublinMunicipalCode(DMC)andupdatedthefollowingOrdinances: 1)DMC5.70WeedsandRefuse(Ord.29Ͳ08) 2)DMC5.72RodentsandFlyControl(Ord.30Ͳ08) 3)DMC5.64PropertyMaintenance(Ord.31Ͳ08) 4)DMC5.68Graffiti(Ord.32Ͳ08) Alsoin2008,thefollowingnewOrdinancewasaddedtotheDublinMunicipalCodetoaddressresidentialforeclosures: 1)DMC5.66MaintenanceofForeclosedResidentialProperties(Ord.44Ͳ08) 2009:TheCityupdatedthefollowingOrdinance: 1)DMC5.64StateofPartialConstruction(Ord.02Ͳ09) 2010:TherewerenoupdatestotheDublinMunicipalCodeinCalendarYear2010. 2011:TheCityewedtheDublinMunicipalCodeandupdatedthefollowingOrdinance: 1)Chapter5.56SmokingPollutionControl(Ord.10Ͳ11) 2012:TherewerenoupdatesinCalendarYear2012. 2013:TheCityreviewedtheDublinMunicipalCodeandupdatedthefollowingOrdinances: 1)Chapter5.08(FireCode) 2)Chapter7.32(BuildingCode) 3)Chapter7.34(ResidentialCode) 4)Chapter7.36(ElectricalCode) 5)Chapter7.40(PlumbingCode) 6)Chapter7.44(MechanicalCode) 7)Chapter7.94(GreenBuildingCode) 2014:TherewerenoupdatesinCalendarYear2014. Monitorconversionactivitiesannually. Annual In2005,aCondominiumConversionOrdinancewasadoptedbytheCityCounciltopreservetheexistingrentalhousing stock.TheCitycontinuestomonitorconversionactivitiesannually.Therewerenocondouminiumconversionsduring CalendarYears2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013or2014. NameofProgram Program5:MixedUseDevelopment Timeframein StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement Facilitatetheconstructionof100highͲ 2007Ͳ2014 InNovember2007,WindstarCommunitieswasapprovedtoconstruct309highdensityresidentialunitslocatedadjacentto densityresidentialunitswithinmixedͲuse theWestDublinBayAreaRapidTransit(BART)Station.TheprojectwassubsequentlypurchasedbyEssexandbuilding permitswereissuedinAugust2011.Theprojectwascompletedin2013.Futurephasesoftheprojectincludethe developmentswithintheplanningperiod. constructionofa150Ͳroomhoteland7,500squarefeetofretailcommercialuses. Objective InAugust2008,amixedͲuseprojectconsistingof305highdensityresidentialunitsandapproximately15,000squarefeetof groundfloorcommercialcompletedconstructionattheDublinTransitCenter.Theproject,Avalon@DublinStation,isan apartmentcommunitywith10%oftheunitssetasideformoderateincomehouseholds. InMarch2011,AvalonBayCommunitieswasapprovedtoconstruct505highdensityresidentialapartmentunitsatthe DublinTransitCenter.10%oftheunitswillbesetasideformoderateincomehouseholds.Theprojectiscurrentlyunder construction. TheTraleeprojectwasapprovedin2004andbuildingpermitswereissuedin2007.Duetotheeconomicdownturn,the projectwasleftinstateofpartialconstructionuntilitwaspurchasedin2011bySignatureProperties.Theprojectconsists of130apartmentunitsover34,950squarefeetofgroundfoorcommericaland103townhomes.ConstructionofthemixedͲ usebuildingwascompletedin2012.Constructionofthetownhomesisnearingcompletion. InMarch2013,thePlanningCommissionapprovedtheKingsmillproject,a314unithighdensityprojectwith17,000square feetofcommercialspace.Thenextstepintheprocessisforthedevelopertosubmitforbuildingpermits. Program6:AffordableHousing Developers Negotiatespecificincentivespackagefor eachproject. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCityworkedwithEdenHousing,KBHomes,andtheformerDublinHousingAuthoritytofaciliatatethecompletionofthe EmeraldVistaproject(formerlyknownasArroyoVista).Thispublic/privatepartnershipinvolvedvariousagreements betweentheentitiesincludingvouchers,landandotherincentives.TheCityprovidedfinancingandexpeditedthe processingoftheentitlementstothegreatestextentpossible. Inaddition,theCitycoordinatedwithEdenHousingonplansforthedevelopmentofanaffordablehousingprojecttoserve veterans.TheCityworkedcloselywithEdenHousingtoprocurelandfortheprojectand,inNovember2014,theCityCouncil agreedtoprovide$6.4millioninfinancialassistance. Program7:DensityBonuses Provideapplication/technicalassistance asneeded.Timingofapplicationsor technicalassistancewilldependon applicationdeadlinesforfundingsources. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCityworkedwithEdenHousing,KBHomesandtheDublinHousingAuthorityonthedevelopmentoftheArroyoVista mixedͲincomedevelopmentproject.TheCityprovidedapplication/technicalassistanceasneededbythedeveloperinorder tosecurefinancingandothersourcesoffundingtosupportthedevelopmentoftheproject. Provideassistancetoaffordablehousing developerswithintheplanningperiodto facilitatetheconstructionof100 affordablehousingunitswithinthe planningperiod(5extremelylow,20very low,35lowand40moderateincome units). 2007Ͳ2014 Asnotedabove,theCityworkedwithEdenHousing,KBHomesandtheDublinHousingAuthorityontheArroyoVista Project.TheprojectwasapprovedbytheDublinCityCouncilinSeptember2009andincludesthedemolitionof150existing affordablehousingunitsandtheconstructionof378newhousingunits(bothattachedanddetached)includingmarketrate, affordableseniorhousing,affordablefamilyhousing,achildcarecenterandcommunitybuilding.Theprojectincludes approximately191affordableunitsinvariousincomecategories. Facilitatetheconstructionof50 affordableunitsduringtheplanning period(10verylow,20low,and20 moderateincomeunits). 2007Ͳ2014 OnApril20,2007,theCityofDublinadoptedaDensityBonusOrdinancewhichgrantsadensitybonusandcertainother concessionsorincentivestoadeveloperwhenthedeveloperagreestoconstructtherequisitepercentageofaffordable housingunits.TheCityofDublincontinuestoencouragedeveloperstoprovideaffordablehousingbyawardingqualifying developmentswithadditionalmarketrateunits.TheCitydidnotreceiveanyrequestsforadensitybonusduringCalendar Years2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013or2014. NameofProgram Program8:InclusionaryZoning Program9:CommercialLinkageFee Objective Facilitatetheconstructionof1,000 affordablehousingunitseitherthrough directconstructionorthroughthe InclusionaryHousingInͲLieuFundwithin theplanningperiod.Specificconstruction targetsinclude300verylow,200lowand 500moderateincomeunits. Timeframein StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement 2007Ͳ2014 Duringtheplanningperiod,thehasCityissued357permitsforconstructionofaffordablehousingunits. Workwiththestakeholders,reviewand considermodificationoftheInclusionary ZoningRegulationstoenhancefeasibility asneededwithintwoyearsofthe adoptionoftheHousingElement. 3/2/2012 InDecember2008,theCityCouncilapprovedanamendmenttotheInclusionaryZoningOrdinancetoeliminatethe requirementtoconstructownerͲoccupiedverylowincomeunits.ThismodificationwasinresponsetofeedbacktheCitywas receivingfromthedevelopmentcommunityonthefeasibilityofconstructingowneroccupiedverylowincomeunits.During CalendarYear2009,theCitywasintheprocessofupdatingtheHousingElement.TheupdatedHousingElementwas adoptedonMarch2,2010.InApril2013,theCitymetwithstakeholderstoreviewtheInclusionaryZoningRegulations. Facilitatetheconstructionof14 affordablehousingunitswithinthe planningperiod(14veryͲlowincome units). 2007Ͳ2014 CommercialLinkageFeesarecollectedfromdevelopersuponissuanceofbuildingpermitsforcommercialdevelopmentand areplacedintheCity’sHousingInͲLieuFundalongwithotherinͲlieufeescollectedfromdevelopersforresidential development.Thefollowingamountshavebeencollectedduringtheplanningperiod: Assist12moderateincomehouseholds withfirstͲtimehomebuyerloans. 2007Ͳ2014 Providefundingtowardshomeownership trainingandforeclosureprevention services,rentalassistanceprogramsand theAlamedaCountyHomeless ManagementInformationSystem. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCityprovidedfinancialsupporttotheTriͲValleyHousingOpportunityCenter(TVHOC).TVHOCoffershomebuyer education,foreclosurepreventionservices,andpreͲandpostpurchasecounselingtoclients.Inaddition,theCitycontinues tosupporttheAlamedaCountyHomelessManagementInformationSystemthroughtheHousingInͲLieuFund.TheAlameda CountyHomelessManagementInformationSystem(HMIS)ismanagedbyEveryOneHome,acommunitybasedorganization formedin2007underthefiscalsponsorshipoftheTidesCenter.EveryOneHomemanagestheCounty’sinͲhouseHMISin thecollectionandreportingofthehomelesscountandotherdatacollection. NameofProgram Program10:HousingType andSizeVariations Objective Requirethatdevelopersprovidea diversityofhousingtypeandsizeona caseͲbyͲcasebasistomeettheCity’s housingneedsthroughouttheplanning period. Timeframein StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement 2007Ͳ2014 InJanuary2007,thePlanningCommissionapprovedtheWallisRanchproject,a935unitresidentialdevelopment.The projecthas6distinctneighborhoodsofvaryingdensitiesincludinglow,mediumandmediumͲhigh.Residentialunitsinclude, singlefamilydetachedwithagrannyflatoption(Neighborhood1);5Ͳunitdetachedclusterhomesaroundamotorcourt (Neighborhood2);rowhousesandcondominiums(Neighborhood3);multiͲfamilystackedflats(Neighborhood4);single familydetachedwithalleygaragesandagrannyflatoption(Neighborhood5);and,multiͲfamilystackedflatsandwalkup townhomes(Neighborhood6). InApril2007,theCityCouncilapprovedtheSycamoreGroveproject,a304unithighdensityresidentialcondominium projectwith22live/workunits.Thelive/workunitshavebeendesignedas3Ͳstorytownhomes;278unitsarecondominium flats;andtheremaining4unitsarealso3Ͳstorytownhomes(butnotlive/workunits). InSeptember2007,thePlanningCommissionapprovedPhaseIofthePositanoproject,a247unitsinglefamilydetached residentialdevelopmentintwodistinctneighborhoods,SolernoandCantara.Solernoprovides175unitsand4different floorplans;Canteraprovides72unitsand5differentfloorplans.Additionalneighborhodshavesincebeenapprovedat Positano:Cortona(August2010)forthedevelopmentof68singlefamilydetachedhomeswith4differentfloorplans; Livorno(September2010)forthedevelopmentof69singlefamilydetachedhomeswith3differentfloorplans;Biella (October2010)forthedevelopmentof101singlefamilydetachedhomeswith4differentfloorplans;Calabria(October 2011)forthedevelopmentof88singlefamilydetachedhomeswith3differentfloorplans;CortonaII(October2011)forthe developmentof70singlefamilydetachedhomeson6,000squarefootlotswith5differentfloorplans;Calarosa(November 2011)forthedevelopmentof71singlefamilydetachedhomeson4,000squarefootlotswith3differentfloorplans; Fiorano II(February2012)forthedevelopmentof5singlefamilydetachedhomes(previouslywithinSalernoII)withtwodifferent floorplans;CalarosaII(December2012)forthedevelopmentof98singlefamilydetachedhomeswith3differentfloor plans;Veneto(January2013)forthedevelopmentof134singlefamilydetachedhomeswith4differentfloorplans;Verona Estates(February2013)forthedevelopmentof30singlefamilydetachedhomeswith7differentfloorplans;and,The Heights(May2013)forthedevelopmentof84singlefamilydetachedhomeswith4differentfloorplans.ThePositano projectwillalsoprovidesecondunitssomeofwhichwillbedeedrestrictedforlowerincomepersons. NameofProgram Objective Timeframein HousingElement StatusofProgramImplementation InNovember2007,thePlanningCommissionapprovedtheFallonCrossingproject,a106unitsinglefamilyresidential developmentincluding8duets,and3privatemotorcourts.ThefirstneighborhoodatFallonCrossing,Chateau,willprovide 98homeswith3differentfloorplans. InDecember2008,theCityCouncilapprovedaGeneralPlanAmendmentforSchaeferRanchSouthtoconvert12estate residentiallotstoupto104singlefamilydetachedhomes. InSeptember2009,theCityCouncilapprovedtheEmeraldVistaproject(formerlyArroyoVista)fortheconstructionof378 residentialunits.Theprojectwillincludebothdetachedandattachedhousing,marketͲrateandaffordableforͲsaleunits, andaffordableseniorrentalandfamilyrentalhousing. InJune2010,theCityCouncilapproved781residentialunitsatJordanRanch:235singlefamilydetachedunits,111cluster homes,94smalllotalleyhomes,218townhomesand105mixeduseunits.InDecember2011,thePlanningCommission approvedthefirsttwoneighborhoodsinJordanRanch:Winwoodwillprovide81singlefamilyhomeswithaminimumlot sizeof4,000squarefeetand3differentfloorplans;Mariposa willprovide85singlefamilyhomeswithaminimumlotsizeof 5,200squarefeetand3differentfloorplans.Additionalneighborhoodsunderconstructionin2014include:Altmore,107 singlefamilyhomeswithaminimumlotsizeof3,600squarefeetand4floorplans;Capri,94singlefamilyhomeswitha minimumlotsizeof2,900squarefeetand4floorplans;Trio,126townhomesonapproximately7acreswith4floorplans; and,Kingswood,109townhomesonapproximately6acres. Phase3ofSilveraRanch,TheVillas/TassajaraPointewillprovideupto102townhomeswithupto5floorplans. Phase4ofSilveraRanch,BelleMontewillprovide48singlefamilyhomeswithupto4floorplans. InMay2010,theCityCouncilapprovedaPlannedDevelopmentrezonefortheSorrentoEastproject.Theprojectincludes 581unitsin6differentneighborhoodscomprisedofsinglefamilydetachedandattachedhomes. InApril2011,theCityCouncilapprovedaPlannedDevelopmentrezonefortheAvalonIIprojectattheDublinTransit Center.Theprojectincludes505highdensityapartmentunitsadjacenttotheeastDublin/PleasantonBARTStation. InSeptember2010,theCityCouncilapprovedaPlannedDevelopmentrezonefortheEspritprojectattheDublinTransit Center.Theprojectincludes105townhomeunitsadjacenttotheeastDublin/PleasantonBARTStation. InMarch2013,thePlanningCommissionapprovedaSiteDevleopmentReviewfortheKingsmillproject.Theprojectis locatedwithintheDowntownDublinSpecificPlanareaandincludesa314unithighdensitymixeduseapartmentproject with17,000squarefeetofgroundfloorcommercialanda72unithighdensityapartmentprojectwhichwillprovide affordablehousingtoveterans. NameofProgram Program11:FirstͲTime HomebuyerPrograms Program12:SecondDwellingUnits Program13:HomelessAssistance Objective Assist75incomeͲqualifiedfirsttime homebuyersduringtheplanningperiod. Strivetoprovideassistanceto approximately15abovemoderate income,50moderateincome,and10low incomehouseholds. Timeframein StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement 2007Ͳ2014 Duringthe2014calendaryear,theCitywasissuedoneFirstTimeHomebuyerLoanProgramloantoamoderateͲincome householdintheamountof$36,888. DistributeFTHLPapplicationpacketsat theCivicCenter,Citywebsite,and locationsthatprovidehousingservices. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCityprovidesinformationregardingfirsttimehomebuyerassistanceprogramsonitswebsiteandatthepubliccounter. Thewebsiteisroutinelyupdatedtoprovidecurrentinformationregardinghousingopportunitiesandfinancialasssitance programsinDublinandthroughouttheregion.Inaddition,informationregardintheCity'sprogramsisdistributedviatheTriͲ ValleyHousingOpportunityCenter. Marketthisprogramthroughan informationalbrochure.Thebrochurewill beavailableontheCitywebsiteandat theCivicCenter,library,seniorcenterand otherpubliclocations. 2007Ͳ2014 InSeptember2009,theCityupdateditsSecondUnitbrochure.Thebrochureexplainsthepurposeandintentofasecond unitaswellasthepermittingproceduresanddevelopmentstandards.Thebrochureismadeavailabletothepubliconthe City’swebsiteandatthepubliccounter.TheCityofDublinalsopublishesaquarterlyHousingNewsletterwhichisprovided totheCityCouncil,postedontheCity’swebsiteandmadeavailabletothepublicattheCivicCenter,libraryandsenior center.Articles,includinginformationaboutSecondDwellingunits,areroutinelyincludedintheNewsletter. Facilitatetheconstructionof15second dwellingunitswithintheplanningperiod. 2007Ͳ2014 Positano'sFallonVillagedevelopmentintroducedseconddwellingunitsasanadditionalhousingopportunity.Asecond dwellingunit(alsocommonlyreferredtoasan"inͲlaworgrannyunit")isaselfͲcontainedresidentialdwellinglocatedonthe samelotasanexistingprimaryresidentialdwelling.WithinPositano,thereareseveralneighborhoodsthatincludesecond dwellingunits.Inaddition,theSchaeferRanchincorporated17secondarydwellingunits.Alsoin2012,thefirstpermitswere issuedforStandardPacific'sfirstduetconceptintheCityofDublinintheChateauatFallonCrossingsproject.Theproject contains106unitsofwhich8arethreeandfourbedroomduets.Thehomesarelocatedoncornerlotsandhaveseparate entriesandgarages.Therearefivehomesformoderateincomefamiliesandthreehomesforlowincomefamilies. Continuetofundemergencyshelter programsintheTriͲValleyareatohouse residentsinneedofemergencyshelter. 2007Ͳ2014 OnNovember1,2009,theTriͲValleyHousingResourceCenter(HRC)waslaunchedtoprovidehomelesspreventionand rapidreͲhousingservices.TheHRCisacollaborationofstaffmembersfromAlamedaCountyHousing&Community Development;staffmembersfromthecitiesofDublin,LivermoreandPleasanton;and,stafffromTriͲValleycommunity basedorganizations.OperationsoftheHRCarecarriedoutasfollows: Continuetoparticipateinregional collaborationstoaddresshomelessness. •OveralladministrationoftheprogramisprovidedbytheCityofLivermore’sHorizonsProgram. •Homelessnesspreventionservices(e.g.,emergencyshelter,casemanagement,referral,etc.)arecoordinatedbyECHO Housing. •RapidreͲhousingservicesareprovidedbyAbodeServices(formerlyTriͲCityHomelessCoalition). FundsforDublinresidentsforthisprogramwereexhaustedin2010,therefore,nonewDublinresidentsreceivedassistance duringthesubsequentreportingperiods;however,theCityofDublincontinuestosupporttheTriͲValleyHaven'sDomestic ViolenceShelterandHomelessShelterthroughCommunitySupportGrantfunds. NameofProgram Program14:TriͲValleyAffordable HousingCommittee Objective Participateinatleastoneaffordable housingfairannuallythroughoutthe planningperiod. Timeframein StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement 2007Ͳ2014 InMarch2011,theCityparticipatedintheBetterHomes&GardensTriͲValleyRealty’sHousingAssistanceForumwhich highlightedvariousaffordablehousingprogramsthroughouttheTriͲValley.Inaddition,inJune2011,theCity,inconjunction withTriͲValleyAffordableHousingCommittee(TVAHC),coordinatedandhostedaSymposium–“IstheRealEstateMarket MeetingtheNeedsforFirstTimeHomebuyers?”–Realestateandmortgageprofessionalsgatheredtodiscussthis interestingtopic. Inaddition,CityrepresentativeattendedquarterlyTVHACmeetingsandparticipatedinannualaffordablehousingtours. Program15:ResidentialSites Inventory Program16:ArroyoVistaSite Program17:DublinTransitCenter Annuallyevaluatethelandavailabilityto meettheremainingRHNA.Ensure adequatecapacityexiststoaccommodate theremainingRHNAof1,730units(879 verylow,519low,and332moderate incomeunits). Annual TheCitywillannuallyevaluatelandavailabilitytomeetitsremainingRHNA.TableCͲ35inAppendixCoftheupdated HousingElementdemonstratesthattheCityhasadequatevacantsitesavailabletoaccommodatetheremainingRHNAof 1,730units. Proposemodificationstobeimplemented asneededaspartoftheCity'songoing planningeffortsoratthetime developmentproposalsaresubmittedto theCity. 2007Ͳ2014 TableCͲ35inAppendixCoftheupdateHousingElementdemonstratesthattheCityhasadequatevacantsitesavailableto accommodatetheremainingRHNAof1,730units.TheCitywillcontinuetomonitorprojectstoensurethatdevelopment proposalsareconsistentwiththeupdatedHousingElement. Strivetoachieve180affordablehousing unitsonthesite,including20extremely low,40verylow,50lowand70moderate incomeunits. 2007Ͳ2014 TheDublinCityCouncilapprovedaGeneralPlanAmendment,PlannedDevelopmentRezonewithaStage1andStage2 DevelopmentPlan,TentativeMap,SiteDevelopmentReviewandassociatedenvironmentalreviewfortheEmeraldVista (formerlyArroyoVista)projectinSeptember2009.Theprojectincludedthedemolitionof150existingaffordablehousing unitsandtheconstructionof378newhousingunits(bothattachedanddetached).Thecompletedprojectfeaturesmarket ratetownhomes,affordableseniorhousing,affordablefamilyhousing,achildcarecenterandcommunitybuilding.The projectoffers194deedrestrictedaffordableunitstohouseholdsatawiderangeofincomelevels. Ensurecompliancewithallapplicable relocation,displacementandreplacement housingrequirements. 2007Ͳ2014 TheDublinHousingAuthorityadoptedaRelocationPlanforArroyoVistatenantsandrelocationswerecompletedinJuly 2010.ThePlanestablishedrelocationbenefitsthatmetorexceededtherequirementsofapplicablelaw.Theseincluded counselingandadvisoryservices,helpwithpackingfordisabledandseniorresidentsifrequested,securitydeposits,credit checkfees,comparablereplacementhousingintheformofaSection8voucheror,ifineligible,areplacementhousing payment,anda150Ͳdaynoticetomove(uponnotice).TheRelocationPlandemonstratedthattherewereadequate availablehousingresourcesforthedisplacedhouseholdsandthattheDublinHousingAuthorityprovidedadvisory assistanceandrelocationbenefitsnecessarytoensurethatallhouseholdswereadequatelyhousedintheeventof displacement.TheRelocationPlanalsodemonstratedthattheimpactsofdisplacementweremitigatedbytheprovisionof relocationbenefits.Asthenewprojectprogressed,formertenantsweresentnoticestokeepthemabreastofthestatusof theproject.Formertenantsweregiveninformationregardingthepurchaseofahomeorfuturerentalopportunities.The projectwascompletedin2013. Facilitatethereview,approvaland/or constructionof900housingunitsduring theplanningperiod. 2007Ͳ2014 In2008,constructionwascompletedontwohousingdevelopmentsattheDublinTransitCenterͲÉlan@DublinStationand EclipseatDublinStation(formerlyAvalon@DublinStation).Elanis257ͲunitcondominiumcomplexandEclipseisa305Ͳunit apartmentcommunity.BothdevelopmentsofferunitsrestrictedforaffordabilitytomoderateͲincomehouseholds.InMarch 2011,AvalonBayCommunitieswasapprovedtoconstruct505highdensityresidentialapartmentunits,255ofwhichwere completedin2013.Theremainingunitsareunderconstructionasofthiswriting.TenpercentofAvalonunitsare/willset asideforoccupancybymoderateͲincomehouseholds.In2013,Esprit@DublinStationbeganconstructionof105 townhomeunits.Duringtheplanningperiod,817unitswereonstructedandanadditional355unitsarecurrentlyunder constructionattheDublinTransitCenter. NameofProgram Program18:FeeDeferrment orAmortization Timeframein StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement Assist100unitsthroughthedefermentor 2007Ͳ2014 TheCitycurrentlyparticipatesintheStatewideCommunityInfrastructureProgram(SCIP).In2010,theCityexpandedtheir amortizationoffees,subjecttofunding participationtoincludemultiͲfamilyandmixeduseresidentialprojects. availability(15extremelylow,25very low,35lowand25moderateincome units). Objective Program19:UniversalDesign Ordinance Produceabrochureonuniversaldesign, resourcesfordesignapproachesand compliancewithCityrequirementsin 2009.Brochureandotherrelated informationwillbepostedattheCity websiteanddistributedatpublic counters. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCitydevelopedabrochureontheUniversalDesignOrdinanceafteritsadoptioninDecember2007.Thebrochurewas updatedinSeptember2009toincludemorecurrentinformationonusefulwebsitesrelatingtoUniversalDesign.The brochureandotherrelatedinformationregardingtheOrdinancehasbeenpostedtotheCity’swebsiteandisalsoavailable atthepubliccounter.In2010,therewasanupdatetotheOrdinancetomeetthecurrentbuildingcode.Thisupdatetook effectJanuary1,2011.InNovember2012,thebrochurewasreviewedandminorupdatesweremade. Program20:Reasonable Accomodation ReviseZoningOrdinancetoamend definitionof“family”andtopreparea formalreasonableaccommodation procedurewithinoneyearofthe adoptionoftheHousingElement. 3/2/2011 ZoningOrdinanceAmendmentswereadoptedbytheCityCouncilinApril2011. Program21:EmergencyShelters RevisetheZoningOrdinancewithinone yearoftheadoptionoftheHousing ElementtoaccommodateEmergency SheltersconsistentwithSB2. 3/2/2011 ZoningOrdinanceAmendmentswereadoptedbytheCityCouncilinApril2011. Program22:TransitionalHousing Facilitatethedevelopmentoftransitional housingforpersonswithdisabilitiesand extremelylowincomehouseholdsusing inͲlieufees. 3/2/2011 ZoningOrdinanceAmendmentswereadoptedbytheCityCouncilinApril2011. Facilitatethedevelopmentoftransitional housingforpersonswithdisabilitiesand extremelylowincomehouseholdsusing inͲlieufees. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCitywillfacilitatethedevelopmentoftransitionalhousingforpersonswithdisabilitiesandextremelylowincome householdsusinginͲlieufees. RevisetheZoningOrdinanceto accommodatesupportivehousing consistentwithSB2withinoneyearof theadoptionoftheHousingElement. 3/2/2011 ZoningOrdinanceAmendmentswereadoptedbytheCityCouncilinApril2011. Facilitatethedevelopmentofsupportive housingforpersonswithdisabilitiesand extremelylowincomehouseholdsusing inͲlieufees. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCitywillfacilitatethedevelopmentofsupportivehousingforpersonswithdisabilitiesandextremelylowincome householdsusinginͲlieufees. RevisetheZoningOrdinancewithinone yearoftheadoptionoftheHousing ElementtoaccommodateSingleRoom OccupancyUnitsconsistentwithAB2634. 3/2/2011 ZoningOrdinanceAmendmentswereadoptedbytheCityCouncilinApril2011. EncouragetheinclusionofSRO/efficiency unitsinlargeͲscaledevelopmentstooffer arangeofhousingchoices. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCitywillencouragetheinclusionofSRO/efficiencyunitsinlargeͲscaledevelopmentstoofferarangeofhousingchoices. Program23:SupportiveHousing Program24:SingleRoom OccupancyUnits NameofProgram Program25:EqualHousing Opportunity Timeframein StatusofProgramImplementation HousingElement Providereferralstoappropriateagencies 2007Ͳ2014 TheCityofDublinwebsiteprovidesalinkforfairhousingissueswhichdirectsinterestedreaderstotheEdenCouncilfor forservices. HopeandOpportunity(ECHO)HousingandtotheStateofCaliforniaConsumerAffairsOfficebooklet“CaliforniaTenants: GuidetoResidentialTenantsandLandlord'sRightsandResponsibilities.”Inaddition,theCitycontributesCommunity SupportGrantfundingtoECHOhousing. Objective Distributefairhousinginformationto publiclocationsthroughouttheCity. 2007Ͳ2014 Fairhousinginformation,intheformofbrochuresandpamphlets,hasbeenmadeavailableattheCity’spubliccounteras wellaslinksontheCity'swebsitetoappropriateagencies.Inaddition,theCityhostsaboothattheCity’sannualSt. Patrick’sDayFestivalwhereEdenCouncilforHopeandOpportunity(ECHO)Housingdistributesinformationtothepublic abouttheservicestheyofferincludingtenant/landlordmediation. PostinformationontheCitywebsite. 2007Ͳ2014 FairhousinginformationismadeavailabletothepublicontheCity’swebsiteandattheCivicCenterpubliccounter. ThroughAlamedaCounty,theCitycontractswithECHOHousingtomediatefairhousingissuesforDublinresidents. Distributeinformationtorealestate agents,rentalpropertyowners/managers, andfinancialinstitutionsinDublin. 2007Ͳ2014 Realestateagents,rentalpropertyowners/managersandfinancialinstitutionsaredirectedtotheCity’swebsite,partner organizations,oraremailedinformation(asappropriate).Throughouttheyear,HousingStaffmeetswithdevelopers,real estateagents,andlandlordstodiscusstheCity'shousingprograms,whichmayincludeinformationonthe211CountyͲwide socialserviceshotlineandECHOHousing'sservices. ParticipateinAlamedaCounty’s ImpedimentstoFairHousingStudy throughtheCDBGprogram. 2007Ͳ2014 In2011,theCityofDublin,incollaborationwithLivermoreandPleasanton,participatedintheHumanServicesNeeds AssessmentStudy,whichidentifiedsocialserviceandhousinggapsintheTriͲValley.Dublinparticipatedinmeetings, outreach,datacollection,andinformationgatheringthroughoutthecourseofthestudy.Thefinaldraftwascompletedin January2012andthedocumentisavailableontheCity’swebsite. Inaddition,in2014,theCityofDublinparticipatedinAlamedaCounty'sAnalysisofImpedimentstoFairHousing.Citystaff hasattendedmeetings,providedinformation,andparticipatedinpublicoutreach.ThedraftAnalysiswaspostedtothe City'swebsiteforpublicreviewandcommentasofthiswriting. Program26:GreenBuilding Guidelines Program27:EnergyConservation Developgreenbuildingguidelinesor ordinancewithinoneyearofcertification oftheHousingElement. 5/12/2011 TheCityofDublinadoptedaGreenBuildingOrdinanceinApril2009.TheOrdinanceappliestoallresidentialprojectsover 20units.InNovember2010,theCityadoptedanewGreenBuildingCode.TheOrdinancewentintoeffectJanuary1,2012. Createbrochurestodescribetheprogram requirementsandmethodsofcompliance withinsixmonthsoftheadoptionofthe guidelines/ordinance. 11/12/2012 AbrochurewasdevelopedinApril2009atthetimetheGreenBuildingOrdinancewasadopted.Thebrochurewasrevisedin September2009toincludevariousexamplesofGreenBuilding. ImplementapplicableWaste ManagementandBuildingCode regulations,provideGreenBuilding trainingtoCitystaff,anddistribute energyconservationinformationtothe public. 2007Ͳ2014 TheCityrequiresalldevelopmentstosubmitaWasteManagementPlantomeettheCity’sConstructionandDebris OrdinancewhichwasadoptedinJanuary2008.TheOrdinancerequiresthediversionofatleast50%ofconstructionwaste awayfromlandfills.Inaddition,theCityCounciladoptedGreenBuildingGuidelinesforCivicBuildingstopromoteenergy efficiency.TheCitycontinuestoimplementtheGuidelinesonaprojectspecificbasis.Informationalbrochuresand pamphletsareavailableontheCity’swebsiteandatthepubliccounter. TheCityalsoofferssubsidizedpermitfeesontheinstallationofsolarroofpanelsforavarietyofprojectsthroughoutthe CityofDublin. TheCity’sEnvironmentalSpecialistandEnvironmentalTechnicianhavealsobeenGreenBuildingCertifiedbytheBuildIt Greenorganization. Active General Plan Amendment Study - Status Report Updated through February 18, 2015 Project Name Project Description Interim DUSD Est. Council Study CC Consult Hearing Date Date Date 1. 9/17/13 2. 9/25/13 & 4/21/15 7/15/14 12/2/13 1 Green @ Park Place 2 Jordan Ranch School Site* GPA/SPA to change Parks/Public Recreation land use designation to allow use of site for both school and park purposes. City Council initiated GPA/SPA Study. MP 2/17/15 n/a 3 Kaiser Dublin GPA/SPA, PD Rezone, Site Development Review, Map, EIR and Development Agreement for a medical campus with up to 950,000 of medical related uses and up to 250,000 of commercial uses. Contract with CEQA consultant initiated. Project description complete. CEQA scoping meeting held on 1/22/15. CEQA Initial Study and related technical analysis are underway. KB 10/7/14 Staff to identify key issues and bring them forward as identified during study process. TBD n/a Winter 2015/2016 4 Promenade GPA, SPA, PD Rezone to convert mixed use site to residential. Preliminary conversations with the applicant. City Council directed that Commercial Development Task Force shall be the community outreach component of Council direction. Applicant working to further define the project. MP 10/15/13 1. Land use & density; 2. Circulation & connectivity; 3. Timing of com. dev; 4. Project interface w/ surroundings; 5. Review retail supply/ demand study; 6. Fiscal impacts; 7. DUSD impacts; 8. Retail stdy & prioritize sites; 9. Community outreach. TBD TBD TBD 5 Schaefer Ranch Unit 3 GPA, PD Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Map to change land use from Open Space and Estate Residential to Single Family Residential. DUSD did not raise concerns about the project. Applicant working to address existing access easements that run through project site to benefit of adjacent property owners. Preparing CEQA Addendum and final project details Public Hearings. MP *City initiated amendment. GPA/SPA, PD Rezone, Site Development Review, Map, SEIR and Development Agreement for development of approximately 40,000 s.f. of retail and 372 attached residential units. Council Plnr Initiation Interim Study Items Date 9/17/13: CC Study Session to review Fiscal Analysis. 7/15/14: KB 2/5/13 1. Fiscal analysis; 2. CC Study Session to review project design. 8/26/14: PC DUSD impacts. recommended project approval. 9/16/14: Applicant pulled item from CC agenda. 11/4/15: CC took public testimony and continued item to 2/3/15. 2/3/15: CC granted applicant request to continue item to 4/21/15. Status 2/7/12 1. DUSD impacts. n/a n/a Ongoing Summer 2015 9/25/13 & Winter 2015 12/2/13 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK File #330-50 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2014-15 2nd Quarter Financial Review Prepared by Prepared by Colleen Tribby, Administrative Services Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a financial report on the second quarter for Fiscal Year 2014-15 and consider mid-year amendments to the Fiscal Year 2014-15 Budget. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Approval of the FY 2014-15 budget change will result in a net increase of $1,952,835 to the General Fund revenue budget and a decrease of $25,779 to the General Fund expenditure budget. Total General Fund reserves are projected at $70,471,828 as of June 30, 2015, with $15,287,140 in the unassigned (available) reserve. This report also contains a number of budget changes in other funds requiring City Council approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the report on the mid-year FY 2014-15 financial results and approve the budget change. Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: This focus of this report is the projected FY 2014-15 fund balance in the General Fund, updated with information collected through the second quarter, ending December 31, 2014. The numbers include budget amendments already approved by the City Council since July 1, carry-over budgets from FY 2013-14, new amendments needing approval, and updated revenue and expenditure projections. Page 1 of 4 ITEM NO. 4.11 FY 2014-15 Projections General Fund revenues are projected to come in $1,952,835 higher than the amended budget, due primarily to an increase in building permit revenue. Expenditures are in line with the budget except for the elimination of a large carryover budget for Police dispatch services that will not be used this fiscal year, and increased contract service costs related to development services. Revenue projections also include the second payment of $750,000 from Discovery Builders for the Cemetery Expansion project, which has been added to the Committed Reserve for that purpose. In addition, Staff recommends $1,500,000 of the anticipated surplus in the Assigned Reserve for contribution to Internal Service Funds in order to address necessary technology upgrades identified in the Information Technology Master Plan, which is currently underway. Examples of upgrades include the relocation and update to the City’s Data Center, a provision for a computer training space, and the eventual replacement of the City’s financial software package, which will be needed in the next six years. The draft Master Plan, as well as final reserve designations for the fiscal year, will be brought for City Council approval before June 30, 2015. The following is a summary of changes to revenues and expenditures. Revenues: $1,952,835 higher than budget Other Taxes: $90,000 higher than budget The increase is due to a higher level of Property Transfer Tax than anticipated, due to both an increase in assessed value of selling properties, and an increase to the number of sales expected to occur in FY 2014-15. Building Permits: $1,294,688 higher than budget Other Taxes (CalGreen Building Permit Surcharge): $65,887 higher than budget Charges for Services (Fire Inspection Services): $152,260 higher than budget Community Benefit Payment: $350,000 higher than budget The increase in these development-related revenues is related to the acceleration of development activity that occurred in the latter half of FY 2013-14 and has continued into FY 2014-15. The large increase in Building Permit revenue will change the flow of these funds throughout the five-year forecast, where the accelerated development may mean slowed activity sooner than previously anticipated. Expenditures: $25,779 lower than budget Contracted Services: $401,150 higher than budget The increase is due primarily to building, safety, and engineering contract service costs, and is offset by additional development-related revenues. There is also an increase to the City’s contract for Animal Control Shelter Services. Carryovers from Prior Year: $426,929 lower than budget The remaining budget for Police Dispatch services in the prior year had been carried over into FY 2014-15 to cover possible true-up costs that are sometimes incurred after the year is finished. The first billings in FY 2014-15 did not contain a true-up, therefore this budget amount will not be used. Page 2 of 4 Fiscal Impact, Projected FY 2014-15 The projected net impact of revenues, expenditures, and transfers out results in a draw on reserves of $9,101,059 (see Table 1) in FY 2014-15. The cash flow reserve is projected at $15,287,140 representing 2.9 months of the FY 2015-16 operating budget. Attachment 2 presents the details of all projected changes to reserves during FY 2014-15. Table 1: General Fund Reserves 13-14 Actual Reserve Balances Non-Spendable Restricted Committed Assigned Unassigned / Unreal Gains Unassigned / Cash Flow TOTAL RESERVES 2,270,022 500,000 34,124,272 29,259,338 99,765 13,319,490 79,572,887 Change 14-15 Projected 1,622,168 500,000 24,773,468 28,189,287 99,765 15,287,140 70,471,828 (9,101,059) Long Term Projections Though the gains in the major revenue categories discussed above are anticipated to result in a surplus budget in this fiscal year, it is important to note that the long term projections show deficit spending within five to six years. Property Tax and Sales Tax revenues, which provide the primary funding for ongoing City operations, are not projected to keep pace with increases in ongoing expenditures. Building Permit revenues and other development-related revenues are expected to decline as projects are completed and the City nears build out. Staff will provide the City Council with a detailed long-term budget analysis, as well as the tenyear forecast model, at the City Council meeting of March 7, 2015. Items Needing City Council Approval (BUDGET CHANGE ATTACHED): 1. Budget adjustments, General Fund a. Property Transfer Tax: increase $90,000 b. Building Permits: increase $1,294,688 c. CalGreen Building Permit Surcharge: increase $65,887 d. Fire – Alarm Revenue: increase $13,000 e. Fire – Sprinkler/Underground Revenue: increase $128,000 f. Fire – Fixed Systems Revenue: increase $2,340 g. Fire – Plan Check Revenue: increase $14,500 h. Fire – Miscellaneous Revenue – decrease $5,580 i. Community Benefit Payment Revenue: $350,000 higher than budget j. Contract Services: increase $401,150 k. Police dispatch carryover: decrease $426,929 2. Budget adjustments, Non-General Fund: Page 3 of 4 a. Appropriate $30,000 in the ACTC Sales Tax Bike & Pedestrian Fund for a shared-use path condition assessment. b. Appropriate $27,320 in the Measure D Fund for a storm drain base map update, software and connection fees related to the Chargepoint maintenance program, and water bottle re-fill station for special events. c. Include revenues of $616,500 in the Public Art Fund, $1,200,000 in the Affordable Housing Fund, and $1,735,419 in the Impact Fees Funds resulting from developer contributions. d. Appropriate $5,000 in the Fire Impact Fee Fund for the interest payment on the General Fund loan. e. Appropriate $145,000 in the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Fund for reimbursement of the Tassajara Interchange construction costs, based on a share of the fees collected. f. Appropriate $46,270 in the ISF Police Vehicle Fund for the replacement of a fully depreciated vehicle. g. Appropriate $100,000 in the ISF Building Fund for replacement of HVAC unit #8 at the Civic Center. 3. Budget adjustments, Capital Improvement Program: a. Appropriate $89,401 in Downtown Traffic Impact Fee mitigation funds to the St. Patrick Way Project (#st0494). b. Eliminate $1,089,771 in budget from the St Patrick Way Project (#st0494), to remove the appropriation for the portion of the project that was completed by the developer. c. Reduce $4,507 in funding from Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee mitigation funds, replace with $4,507 in funding from the Traffic Impact Fee Category 2 Fund for the Dublin Blvd Improvements Project (#st1012). NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. General Fund Summary and Reserves 2. Budget Change Page 4 of 4 GENERAL FUND RESERVES: FY 2014-15 2nd QUARTER FINANCIAL REVIEW Projected 2013-14 TOTAL CHANGE TO RESERVES $2,255,754 Reserve Balances Non-Spendable $2,270,022 Prepaid Expenses Cemetery Endowment Advance to Fire Impact Fee Advance to PERS Side Fund Restricted Heritage Park Maintenance Committed Economic Stability Downtown Public Impr Open Space Funding Affordable Housing Emerald Glen Aquatic Complex Emergency Communications Fire Svcs OPEB Innovations & New Opport Maintenance Facility Cemetery Expansion Fallon Sports Park Civic Ctr Expansion Public Safety Complex Jt City / School Projects Non-Streets CIP Commitments Shannon Center Parking Lot Advance to Public Facility Fee One-Time Initiative Assigned Accrued Leave Operating Carryovers CIP Carryovers Civic Ctr Renovation-Police Contribution to ISF Catastophic Loss Service Continuity Pension & OPEB Fiscally Responsible Adj Unassigned Unassigned-Unrealized Gains Unassigned (Available) TOTAL RESERVES INCREASE $0 $0 ($647,854) ($647,854) $1,622,168 (250,000) (397,854) (250,000) (397,854) 27,080 60,000 651,907 883,181 $0 500,000 $34,124,272 6,000,000 1,000,000 45,975 1,000,000 3,000,000 741,000 8,196,000 1,372,785 1,133,601 2,391,538 259,076 235,873 3,132,016 775,000 3,500,000 1,341,408 $29,259,338 Projected 2014-15 (9,101,059) 27,080 60,000 901,907 1,281,035 $500,000 total change during year DECREASE $0 - $7,382,766 ($16,733,570) (450,042) (45,975) (102,350) 397,854 2,887,600 2,000,000 97,312 (8,196,000) (1,133,601) (816,960) (155,457) (97,312) (235,873) 2,000,000 (5,500,000) $1,507,000 ($2,577,051) 979,248 1,486,299 1,083,752 2,000,000 500,000 10,608,186 2,410,000 9,866,853 325,000 1,500,000 $13,419,255 $19,958,475 7,000 (1,493,299) (1,083,752) ($17,990,825) $500,000 500,000 ($9,350,804) $24,773,468 (450,042) (45,975) (102,350) (7,798,146) (1,133,601) 2,070,640 2,000,000 (155,457) (235,873) (3,500,000) - 6,000,000 549,958 0 1,000,000 2,897,650 741,000 397,854 1,372,785 4,462,178 2,000,000 103,619 0 3,132,016 775,000 1,341,408 ($1,070,051) $28,189,287 (1,486,299) (1,083,752) 1,500,000 - 979,248 2,000,000 2,000,000 10,608,186 2,410,000 9,866,853 325,000 $1,967,650 $15,386,906 99,765 13,319,490 2.9 months 99,765 15,287,140 79,572,887 ($9,101,059) 70,471,828 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ATTACHMENT 1 FY 2014-15 2nd QUARTER FINANCIAL REVIEW 13-14 Actual Revenues Property Taxes 25,286,308 Sales Tax 17,833,314 Other Taxes 5,427,627 Building Permits 5,046,928 Other Licenses & Permits 927,056 Fines & Penalties 111,714 Interest 787,515 Rentals & Leases 708,090 Intergovernmental 191,574 Charges for Services 9,197,812 Other Revenue 286,683 Community Benefit Payment 2,108,858 Subtotal Revenues 67,913,478 Carryover Prior Year Operating Revenues Total Revenues 67,913,478 Expenditures Salaries & Wages 9,443,209 Benefits 4,530,270 Services & Supplies 2,133,125 Internal Service Fund Charges 1,721,525 Utilities 1,784,982 Contracted Services 35,099,787 Capital Outlay 212,240 Contigency & Contributions Subtotal Expenditures Carryover Prior Year Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures 54,925,137 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT 12,988,341 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) CIP / One-Time Expenditures Maintenance Yard * (4,894,349) Public Safety Complex * (3,186,592) Parkland Acquisition * (1,954,025) Emerald Glen Aquatics Complex * Civic Center Modifications * (132,498) Joint City/School Projects * (364,127) Cemetary Expansion * Fire Services OPEB * Amador Plaza Rd Bicycle & Ped Impr * San Ramon Rd Landscape Tree Planting (777) Sidewalk Safety (21,574) Electronic Agenda (64,945) Energy Upgrade (102) Network Syst Upgrade (12,539) Tennis Court Resurfacing GIS ADA Transition Storm Drain Condition (100,476) Storm Drain Trash Capture (583) TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES USE OF COMMITTED RESERVES (for projects noted by *) AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO SHIFT AMONG RESERVES NET IMPACT ON RESERVES TOTAL RESERVES (10,732,587) 14-15 Adopted 25,898,281 17,686,696 4,813,800 3,171,473 717,559 138,260 368,581 1,016,037 193,620 7,115,752 388,654 2,426,174 63,934,887 14-15 Projected Change from Amended Budget 29,290,511 18,667,216 4,657,800 3,171,473 717,559 138,260 368,581 1,016,037 193,620 6,890,752 392,654 2,426,174 67,930,636 1,493,299 69,423,935 29,290,511 18,667,216 4,747,800 4,466,161 783,446 138,260 368,581 1,016,037 193,620 7,043,012 392,654 2,776,174 69,883,471 1,493,299 71,376,770 59,197,782 9,724,952 4,892,712 2,462,206 1,778,101 2,035,482 36,995,273 511,710 821,346 59,221,782 1,480,923 60,702,705 9,724,952 4,892,712 2,462,206 1,778,101 2,035,482 37,396,423 511,710 821,346 59,622,932 1,053,994 60,676,927 4,737,105 8,721,230 10,699,844 (1,133,601) (97,312) - (147,524) (244,005) (5,593) (313,793) (153,350) (87,656) (43,577) (207,010) (178,436) (1,133,601) (97,312) (5,602,350) (155,457) (235,873) (816,960) (8,196,000) (450,042) (239,065) (147,524) (244,005) (5,593) (313,793) (153,350) (87,656) (43,577) (207,010) (178,436) (18,307,604) (18,307,604) - 16,687,595 16,687,595 7,101,222 (11,079,673) 9,079,835 (9,101,059) 63,934,887 9,708,952 4,892,712 2,453,706 1,778,101 2,035,482 36,897,837 511,710 919,282 (816,960) (239,065) (86,972) (10,000) (19,000) (21,177) (160,042) (1,353,216) 10,415,745 816,960 12,671,500 2,255,754 4,200,849 3,383,889 79,572,887 14-15 Amended (5,602,350) (155,457) (235,873) (816,960) (8,196,000) (450,042) (239,065) 70,471,828 90,000 1,294,688 65,887 152,260 350,000 1,952,835 1,952,835 401,150 401,150 (426,929) (25,779) 1,978,614 - CITY OF DUBLIN FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 BUDGET CHANGE FORM Budget Change Reference #: City Council's Approval Required From Un-Appropriated Reserves X Budget Transfer Between Funds From Designated Reserves Other INCREASE BUDGET AMOUNT Budget Change Description Account Amount Animal Control Shelter Services due to allocated budget is higher than estimated. EXP: General Fund - Animal Control - Contract Svcs Animal Shelter Building Permits and Fees - higher than projected development activities. REV: General Fund - Building Safety - Revenues Building & Safety contract service - higher than projected development activities. Engineering private development inspection services higher than anticipated plan checking services. Property Transfer Tax - higher than anticipated property transfers and property value. 1001.2701.64014 1001.8102.44231 (Building Permits) $1,294,688 1001.8102.44233 (Cal Green Permit Fees Surcharge) $65,887 EXP: General Fund - Building Safety - Building Permits - Contract Services 1001.8102.64001 $200,000 EXP: General Fund - Engineering - Inspection Private Development 1001.8301.64093 $178,253 REV: General Revenue - Property Transfer Tax 1001.0000.42201 Community Benefit Payment $22,897 $90,000 REV: General Revenue - Community Benefit Payment 1005.0000.49151 $350,000 REV: General Fund - Fire Prevention - Revenues Fire Prevention Revenues - higher than projected development activities. 1001.2402.48301 (Fire Alarm) 1001.2402.48302 (Sprinkler/Underground) 1001.2402.48303 (Fixed System) Class I Shared-Use Path Condition Assessment $13,000 $128,000 $2,340 1001.2402.48305 (Fire Plan Check) $14,500 EXP: ACTC Sales Tax Bike & Ped Fund - Engineering - Contract Services General 2205.8301.64001 $30,000 Storm Drain Base Map Update - to analyze and plan for the EXP: Measure D Fund - Envir. Services - Contract Services General implementation of long-term Dublin Trash Reduction Plan. 2302.5201.64001 $15,000 Chargepoint 3 year hardware maintenance program & Software maintenance and connection/reporting fees. EXP: Measure D Fund - Envir. Services - Contract Services General 2302.5201.64001 $8,320 c:\PROVOX-TEMP\printmap\FY 2014-15 Mid-Year Review 54_2015 - 1_Attachment.2.xlsx FY 2014-15 Mid-Year Review 54_2015 - 1_Attachment.2.xlsx FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 BUDGET CHANGE FORM Budget Change Reference #: City Council's Approval Required Water Bottle Re-fill Station for special events. EXP: Measure D Fund - Envir. Services - Operating Supplies 2302.5201.61104 $4,000 REV: Public Art Fund - Developer Contribution Public Art Contribution 2801.0000.49161 $585,000 2801.0000.49163 $31,500 REV: Affordable Housing Fund - Developer Contribution Affordable Housing Fund 2901.0000.49161 $1,145,000 2901.0000.49163 $55,000 REV: Impact Fees - Developer Contribution 4101.0000.49161 (PFF - Community Parkland) $461,232 4101.0000.49163 (PFF - Community Parkland) $54,797 Impact Fees - higher than projected development activities. 4201.0000.49161 (Fire Impact Fee) $80,000 4201.0000.49163 (Fire Impact Fee) $11,390 4301.0000.49161 (TIF - Cat 1) $1,000,000 4302.0000.49161 (TIF - Cat 1) $100,000 4304.0000.49163 (Downtown TIF) Fire Impact Fee - Interest payment to General fund Loan. $28,000 EXP: Fire Impact Fee - Non Dept - Interest Payment 4201.1901.85101 Traffic Impact Fee - Cat 1 - higher than projected TIF1 revenues. Reimbursement of Tassajara Interchange construction costs advanced by the County and the Lin Family. Pro-rata share of 8% of TIF1 fees collected. $5,000 EXP: Traffic Impact Fee Cat 1 - No Dept - Impact Fee Obligation 4301.1901.86101 $145,000 Replacement of Police vehicle D8 - purchased in 2009 & fully depreciated. EXP: ISF Police Vehicle Fund - Non Dept - Equipment ISF Replacement of HVAC #8. EXP: ISF Building Fund - Non Dept - Equipment ISF 6101.1901.72102 6201.1901.72102 $46,270 $100,000 DECREASE BUDGET AMOUNT Reduce Police dispatch carry over from FY 13-14, FY 13-14 dispatch true-up cost is lower than budget. General Fund - Police Dispatch - Contract Services Dispatch 1001.2106.64035 ($426,928) Reduce Fire Prevention misc. revenues. REV: General Fund - Fire Prevention - Misc Fire Services 1001.2402.48309 ($5,580) c:\PROVOX-TEMP\printmap\FY 2014-15 Mid-Year Review 54_2015 - 1_Attachment.2.xlsx FY 2014-15 Mid-Year Review 54_2015 - 1_Attachment.2.xlsx FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 BUDGET CHANGE FORM Budget Change Reference #: City Council's Approval Required CIP BUDGET CHANGE Traffic Impact Fee Mitigation Fund - Street CIP - St. Patrick Way Increase Budget - Allocate remaining Mitigation Funds to the St. Patrick Way CIP project (st0494). st0494.9100.9101 (Salary/Benefit) $24,401 st0494.9200.9207 (Contract Svcs - General) $65,000 3600.9601.49999 (Transfers In) 4309.9601.89101 (Transfers Out) $89,401 $89,401 Traffic Impact Fee Downtown TIF - Street CIP - St. Patrick Way Decrease Budget - Improvement for St. Patrick Way CIP (st0494) to be constructed by developer, not the City. Change Funding Source - not net impact to project cost. Mitigation Fund balance for Dublin Blvd Improvements Sierra Ct to Dublin Ct (st1012) is less than budgeted. st0494.9400.9401 (Improvement - Not Bldg) ($1,089,771) 3600.9601.49999 (Transfers In) ($1,089,771) 4304.9601.89101 (Transfers Out) ($1,089,771) Traffic Impact Fee Category 2/Mitigation Fund - Street CIP - Dublin Blvd Improvements - Sierra Ct to Dublin Ct 4309.9601.89101 (Transfers Out) ($4,507) 4302.9601.89101 (Transfers Out) $4,507 REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE As Presented at the City Council Meeting 3/3/2015 **********Finance Use Only********** Posted By: Date: c:\PROVOX-TEMP\printmap\FY 2014-15 Mid-Year Review 54_2015 - 1_Attachment.2.xlsx FY 2014-15 Mid-Year Review 54_2015 - 1_Attachment.2.xlsx STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK File #1100-70 DATE: March 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Marketing and Branding Presentation by North Star Destination Services Prepared by Erin Steffen, Administrative Analyst II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a presentation from North Star Destination Strategies about the City’s selected brand concept, “New American Backyard,” and recommendations to implement a marketing and branding plan for the concept. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Adopted Budget includes sufficient funding to begin implementation of the City’s marketing and branding plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the City Marketing and Branding Plan presentation by North Star Destination Strategies. Reviewed By Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: The City Council’s Strategic Initiatives in Fiscal Year 2013-2014 included creation of a comprehensive City marketing and branding plan. On September 3. 2013, the City Council selected North Star Destination Strategies (North Star) to conduct the first phase of the project. The City Council also approved creation of an Ad-Hoc Marketing and Branding Committee, consisting of Former Mayor Tim Sbranti and Vice Mayor Abe Gupta, to work Staff and North Star on the development of the branding effort. Development of the plan included: More than 20 pieces of separate research about Dublin, including but not limited to stakeholder interviews, focus groups, external opinions about Dublin, and data-driven psychographics about Dublin’s residents; Page 1 of 2 ITEM NO. 7.1 Creation of a citizen’s advisory group to help review concepts and ideas prior to presenting to the City Council; Development of a Dublin brand, including written concepts, looks and logos which convey Dublin’s attributes; and Implementation guidelines to launch an identity and awareness campaign for businesses and residents, along with two specific economic development-related marketing projects for the Downtown and the Eastern Dublin Transit Center area. On October 21, 2014, the City Council selected “The New American Backyard” concept as the final creative direction for the City’s marketing and branding efforts. On November 18, 2014, City Council selected a modified shamrock logo to replace the City’s existing logo. North Star Destination Strategies has prepared a final presentation for City Council that reviews development of the “New American Backyard” brand concept, outlines possible actions to implement the plan, and offers several applications for the brand concept. This information is has also been provided to the City in the brand implementation guidelines submitted by North Star. During the remainder of Fiscal Year 2014-2015, City staff will begin implementation of the brand concept. Many of the efforts, such as a branded City PowerPoint template and stationary, will be initiated during spring 2015. Other branding efforts scheduled to begin during Fiscal Year 20142015 include an updated business e-newsletter and the introduction of branded materials at the City’s Farmers’ Market. A comprehensive update to the City website will take several months to complete and will require photography and content development. Staff believes that the newly branded website and mobile application, including new Economic Development content and expanded visitor content, will be initiated in summer 2015. Staff will explore additional methods, such as video content and graphic design services, to help tell the Dublin story to a broader audience. The Fiscal Year 2014-2015 budget includes funding to begin implementation of the brand concept. Many efforts to integrate the brand, such as City email signature changes, will be accomplished at no increased cost. Additionally, changes to existing promotional materials, such as the City letterhead, will occur as materials are re-ordered. During Fiscal Year 2015-2016, the City anticipates more thorough implementation. Both the City Recreation Guide and Annual Update (formerly the City Report) will incorporate the brand, and elements will be integrated into events such as the St. Patrick’s Day Festival and Splatter as well as into existing City buildings. Once the City website and other print materials, such as the Economic Development folder and inserts, are completed, then other branded business and visitor attraction efforts, such as an advertising plan, will be implemented. Sufficient funds have been included in the Approved Fiscal Year 2014-2015 & 2015-2016 Budget to continue implementation of the “New American Backyard” brand concept; details on schedule of initiation branding efforts will be provided in the Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Budget Update. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 of 2 None.