2014 Legislative Priorities for America`s Wildlife
Transcription
2014 Legislative Priorities for America`s Wildlife
Upper Mississippi River NWFR, MN | Ted Steinke National Wildlife Refuge Association 2014 Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System About the National Wildlife Refuge Association T he National Wildlife Refuge Association occupies a special niche as the only non-profit organization focused exclusively on promoting the world’s largest wildlife conservation network, the National Wildlife Refuge System. Since 1975, the Refuge Association has worked hand-in-hand with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to protect, conserve and restore the ecological integrity of the 150 million-acre Refuge System. This incredible collection of lands and waters supports 2,170 species of birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians, hosts 46.5 million visitors each year, and generates $2.4 billion of economic return for America. To accomplish our mission and raise the stature of the Refuge System, the Association engages thousands of supporters as diverse as the System itself — they may be members of Refuge Friends groups, private landowners, hunters and anglers, educators and students, or all of the above, hailing from all walks of life, urban, rural, suburban, and even international. In addition, the Refuge Association leads a coalition of 23 diverse organizations called the Cooperative Alliance for Refuge Enhancement (CARE) and our combined 16 million members urge the U.S. Congress to provide robust annual funding for the National Wildlife Refuge System. The National Wildlife Refuge Association is committed to the goals, objectives and strategies articulated by “Conserving the Future,” the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s vision for the future of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The Refuge Association’s role as a non-partisan, incentivebased, and transparent organization that works with diverse constituencies in Washington and across the country positions us well to advance this ambitious agenda. Board of Directors Stuart Watson, Chair Boston, MA Kathy Woodward, Vice-Chair Chatham, NJ William Buchanan, Jr., Treasurer New York, NY Robert M. Morgan, Secretary Lewes, DE Edith T. Eddy, Palo Alto, CA Tom Goettel, S. Thomaston, ME James F. McClelland III, Washington, DC Greg Mensik, Willows, CA Executive Staff Janice Mondavi, St. Helena, CA Michael Mullins, Captiva, FL Donal C. O’Brien, Stamford, CT Simon Perkins, Manchester, VT Tom Prall, Oro Valley, AZ David C. Preschlack, Bristol, CT Larry Ross, Manchester Village, VT Rebecca Rubin, Fredericksburg, VA Lynn Scarlett, Arlington, VA Steve Thompson, Granite Bay, CA Andrew K. Woolford, Stamford, CT David Houghton President Desiree Sorenson-Groves Vice-President of Government Affairs Anne Truslow Vice-President of Conservation Programs Christine McGowan Director of Strategic Communications Camas NWR, ID | Amy Leist 1001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 905, Washington, DC 20036 • 202-417-3803 • www.refugeassociation.org Modoc NWR, CA | Jolly Sienda Merritt Island NWR, FL | Jack Rogers Executive Summary T he National Wildlife Refuge System encompasses 150 million acres of some of the most extraordinary places on the planet. From the rocky headlands of the Maine coast, to powder white beaches of Puerto Rico, to the heartland prairies of the Wichita Mountains, to the tundra of the Arctic, to the turquoise waters of Palmyra Atoll in the Pacific, the Refuge System is the world’s largest and most diverse collection of lands and waters managed for fish, wildlife and their habitats. But the Refuge System is more than a group of places; it is a strategic venture to conserve America’s wildlife heritage for future generations. The American people entrust this important mission, begun 111 years ago by President Theodore Roosevelt, to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This trust must be maintained and the obligations of the responsibility fulfilled. The National Wildlife Refuge Association strongly urges Congress to keep the world’s largest network of wildlife lands and waters healthy and strong. The priority actions outlined in this report are essential to ensuring that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the Service) and its National Wildlife Refuge System have the tools needed to conserve 2,170 species of wildlife for the benefit of all Americans. With 562 national wildlife refuges and 38 wetland management districts around the country, the vitality of the Refuge System directly serves the 46.5 million annual visitors who rely on refuges for recreation, hunting, fishing, bird watching, contemplation and inspiration. But the System is equally important to the surrounding local economies that depend on $2.4 billion in annual economic output the Refuge System provides, and the $33 billion in natural infrastructure to communities, from water supply and water quality to flood control and storm protection. To protect America’s fish and wildlife and the special places they need to thrive, the Refuge Association asks the 113th Congress to take these important actions for FY 2015: Seney NWR, MI | Kenneth Waller ❶ Fully fund the National Wildlife Refuge System at $900 million annually for operations and maintenance, beginning with $476.4 million in FY15; ❷ Appropriate $178.3 million in FY15 from the Land and Water Conservation Fund to acquire conservation easements on working lands and to purchase in-holdings and vital habitat to enhance the ecological integrity of the National Wildlife Refuge System; ❸ Reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act at $75 million and appropriate $35 million in FY15; ❹ Reauthorize the Partners for Fish and Wildlife program and appropriate $75 million in FY15 to assist farmers, ranchers and timber managers with critical wildlife management actions on private lands; ❺ Increase appropriations for essential conservation programs including State Wildlife Grants, the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Fund, the Multinational Species Conservation Fund, Coastal Grants, and the Department of the Interior’s Fire Management Program; ❻ Provide funding for proactive public-private partnerships to secure wide-ranging species at risk from listing under the Endangered Species Act, such as greater sage-grouse and gopher tortoise; ❼ Pass a Transportation Bill that includes $100 million annually to improve refuge road infrastructure for 46.5 million visitors; ❽ Pass the Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Protection Act, landmark legislation that allows the National Wildlife Refuge System to benefit from damage settlements as the National Park Service does; ❾ Reauthorize the Volunteer and Community Partnership Act to allow refuges the continued benefit of a volunteer network that provides 23% of their workforce, thereby leveraging American taxpayer investment; ❿ Retain the current administrative authority for establishing new refuges, which follows a rigorous scientific justification, combined with extensive local input and community support. National Wildlife Refuge Association 3 Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System Hummingbird, Occoquan Bay NWR, VA | Caleb Burgoyne FY 2015 Priorities for Protecting America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System ully fund the annual operations and maintenance accounts for the National ❶ FWildlife Refuge System at $900 million, beginning with $476.4 million in FY 2015 The National Wildlife Refuge System manages 150 million acres on its annual operations and maintenance budget, which presently averages less than $3.15 per acre. The Refuge System cannot fulfill its obligation to the American public, our wildlife, and 46.5 million annual visitors without increases in maintenance and operation funds. National wildlife refuges have a critical conservation mission and their management requires investments in the staff and tools to manage wildlife populations, recover endangered species, control harmful invasive species, adapt management strategies to address changing climate conditions, monitor and measure the effectiveness of this work and report back to Congress. At the same time, the Refuge System provides recreational opportunities for the public, educates the next generation through youth hunting and fishing events, and keeps refuge resources and visitors safe through law enforcement. The investment yields an impressive return, generating approximately 35,000 jobs and $2.4 billion in economic output each year. Every dollar appropriated to the Refuge System returns an average of $4.87 to local economies. And, national wildlife refuges provide the American public with $33 billion dollars worth 4 National Wildlife Refuge Association of clean water and other environmental benefits such as clean air and a cool climate. Refuges also play a critical role in keeping at-risk species such as greater sage-grouse or gopher tortoise from being listed under the Endangered Species Act, preventing the need to regulate private land. In recent years, the Refuge System has undertaken strategic efforts to conserve iconic landscapes through innovative collaborative partnerships in expansive landscapes that range from Kansas, the Dakotas and Montana to Florida’s Northern Everglades and the Gulf Coast. At the same time, the Refuge System is making investments in expanding visitor services and public outreach at our nation’s urban refuges in Minnesota, Colorado, Nevada, California, Maryland, Rhode Island and Pennsylvania. To ensure these benefits are realized, the National Wildlife Refuge Association requests $476.4 million for the National Wildlife Refuge System’s operations and maintenance accounts for FY15. This request is supported by 23 diverse organizations with 16 million members that make up the Cooperative Alliance for Refuge Enhancement (CARE), chaired by the Refuge Association. Location | Photo credit Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System the Land and Water Conservation Fund and allocate $178.3 million for the ❷ RU.S.eauthorize Fish and Wildlife Service The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is an essential tool for protecting the integrity of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Allocated from annual proceeds of oil and gas royalties for the purpose of mitigating resource extraction with resource protection, LWCF is the primary source of funding for land and conservation easement acquisition by federal land agencies. Increasingly, LWCF is being used to conserve working lands through the acquisition of conservation easements that secure conservation protection while leaving the land in private ownership and on the tax rolls. Conservation easements are powerful tools that foster public-private partnerships with ranchers and timber owners to conserve wildlife, habitat and a way of life that is uniquely American. Innovative landscape-scale initiatives in New England’s Connecticut River Watershed, the Flint Hills of Kansas, the Everglades Headwaters, Montana’s Crown of the Continent, and the Dakota Grasslands have broad community and state support for the use of conservation easements as a primary conservation tool. These iconic landscapes remain privately managed, generating tax income for local communities, securing our nation’s food and fiber, and balancing resource use and resource protection for wildlife. In many cases, however, land acquisition is required to conserve intact and functional natural habitat. The Refuge System is responsible for safeguarding current and future populations of a range of species, many of which require very specific habitat conditions, such as sea turtle nesting grounds or isolated springs for endemic desert fish. Others require multiple habitat types for their life cycle. By acquiring critical habitat areas, the Refuge System enhances the overall integrity of the system and in some instances links conserved lands to further strengthen our network of habitat to give wildlife space and time to respond to changes, whether from climate or changing land use patterns. The Refuge Association calls on Congress to reauthorize LWCF at $900 million per year, and to provide $178.3 million in FY15 LWCF funding for conservation easements and refuge in-holdings, including the following: Northern Everglades, FL | Carlton Ward National Wildlife Refuge Association 5 Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System • Everglades Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge & Conservation Area (Florida)—$10 million for a combination of conservation easements and fee acquisition. Located between Orlando and Lake Okeechobee, the ranchlands of the Northern Everglades are composed of some of the nation’s largest calf-cow ranch operations, many of which have been in ranch families for four and five generations. These lands are a mosaic of dry and wet prairie and wetlands that hold and filter water in the headwaters of America’s iconic River of Grass, and play an important role in storing water and recharging aquifers for 8 million South Floridians. Conservation easement acquisitions will ensure that large ownerships stay intact and undeveloped, forming a north-south corridor that provides habitat for more than 30 threatened and endangered plants and animals including the Florida grasshopper sparrow, gopher tortoise, and Florida panther. These lands simultaneously buffer the strategically important Avon Park Air Force Range, a key training ground for American fighter pilots. Fee acquisitions to the refuge will provide public access, including hunting and fishing opportunities managed in partnership with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. This project is supported by the Northern Everglades Alliance — a rancher-led organization that represents 980,000 acres of prime ranchlands, and the Sportsmen’s Trust Group; Bear River Watershed • Cache River National Wildlife Refuge (Arkansas)—$5 million to purchase lands from willing sellers. The Cache River basin is an important tributary in the Mississippi River system and provides wintering habitat to hundreds of thousands of migratory waterfowl. The Cache River National Wildlife Refuge was expanded in 2013 with community support and five willing sellers are ready to move forward with sales of priority lands that would connect current refuge holdings, build links with other conserved lands, and offer opportunities to restore bottomland hardwood forest. This habitat has declined by 80% in recent decades and is essential for neotropical migratory songbirds. The project also increases public access for world-class waterfowl hunting and is supported by local communities; • Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge (New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts and Connecticut)—$6.5 million to acquire land and conservation easements in focus areas of the Connecticut River watershed, including a multi-phased effort to acquire conservation easements on more than 13,000 acres in the Vermont and New Hampshire Upper Valley Region that is considered the highest conservation priority by state wildlife action plans. The Mascoma River Headwaters/Bear Hill property provides habitat for black bear, is important to wood duck, black duck and woodcock, and has some of the Flint Hills NWR Connecticut River Watershed Sagebrush Steppe Mojave Desert Blackwater NWR Northern Everglades Lower Mississippi Gulf of Mexico NWRS map underlying NWRA Focus Areas provided by FWS 6 National Wildlife Refuge Association Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System highest densities of Canada warblers in North America. The mosaic of habitats, riparian corridors, and grasslands make this a conservation priority for the Northeast and is supported by the adjacent communities. The project is being leveraged by a private foundation and will expand access around the world famous Appalachian Trail; • Flint Hills Legacy Conservation Area (Kansas)—$3 million to acquire conservation easements to protect the largest and most important remaining tallgrass prairie on the continent. This partnership between ranchers and partners will benefit declining grassland birds, beetles and butterflies and support this important cattle producing region; • Bear River Watershed Conservation Area (Utah, Wyoming and Idaho)—$2 million to purchase conservation easements to protect water quality, water quantity and wildlife habitat on ranchlands in the largest freshwater drainage into the Great Salt Lake. This region is at the heart of two major migratory bird flyways, the Pacific and the Central, and provides habitat for some of the largest breeding populations of cinnamon teal, white faced ibis, and hundreds of thousands of other migratory waterfowl, wading birds and shorebirds. Sagebrush steppe uplands support greater sage-grouse, mule deer, elk and pronghorn, while the Upper Bear River is an important cold water fishery for Bonneville cutthroat trout. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with state and federal agriculture programs, partner agencies, private and nongovernment groups to achieve a matrix of conservation land; • Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge (Maryland)— $1 million to conserve critical marshlands of the Chesapeake Bay that provide important habitat for a diverse range of waterfowl and declining migratory birds. These marshlands and associated uplands are also critical for de-listing the Delmarva fox squirrel. This priority acquisition, in partnership with the Friends of Blackwater, leverages the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Monument and has wide community support; • John H. Chafee National Wildlife Refuge (Rhode Island)—$1 million to conserve and restore highly productive coastal salt marsh habitat that is important to waterfowl and shorebirds and acts as a critical nursery for important commercial fish. It helps protect man-made structures from storm surge and increased coastal flooding due to climate change, and conserves this wild gem from the area’s rapid development. This Refuge, named after one of the Senate’s great conservationists, has broad community support. Above: Western Grebe and chick | David Scholl • Top: Great Blue Heron | Ted Steinke National Wildlife Refuge Association 7 Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System eauthorize the North American ❸ RWetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) at $75 million and allocate $35 million for FY15 The North American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) supports habitat restoration, water quality improvements and carbon sequestration. These projects, developed by landowners and organizations at the community level, benefit continental mallards, northern pintail, other waterfowl, and declining migratory bird species. NAWCA matching grants fuel a public-private partnership between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, landowners and conservation organizations to conserve and/or restore wetlands and associated upland habitats that are vital to the production and survival of waterfowl, shorebirds, waterbirds and songbirds and, in turn, to the millions of Americans who depend on these species for hunting, birding and other outdoor pursuits. eauthorize and fund the Partners ❹ Rfor Fish and Wildlife program at $75 million The Partners for Fish and Wildlife program (Partners Program) is one of our most effective tools for building partnerships between public agencies and private landowners to conserve America’s expansive working landscapes. The Partners Program has led the success of such iconic landscape conservation projects as the Rocky Mountain Front and Blackfoot Challenge in Montana, and the Flint Hills in Kansas, and is playing a key role in conserving greater sage-grouse habitat in the intermountain west. Through the program, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provides technical and financial support to private landowners to conserve and restore habitat for fish and wildlife. The program consistently leverages federal dollars for conservation, generating nearly $16 in economic return for every $1 appropriated for programs. The Refuge Meghan Brown 8 National Wildlife Refuge Association Top: Mallards in flight in the South Platte Focus Area in Colorado | Matt Filsinger USFWS Above: Region 6 PFW employees speaking with a cooperator (far left) who voluntarily entered into an agreement with the PFW Program to restore a portion of the Jocko River | Matt Filsinger USFWS Association and landowner-led Partners for Conservation asks Congress to reauthorize the Partners Program, and requests a FY15 appropriation of $75 million. Such a funding level would result in an additional $400 million worth of conservation across the nation. Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System Fire on Merritt Island NWR, FL | USFWS upport FWS programs that significantly leverage federal dollars and protect our ❺ Scommunities and natural resources The National Wildlife Refuge System benefits by working in concert with many other U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initiatives to conserve waterfowl, migratory birds, at-risk species and threatened and endangered species. In recognition of the strategic leverage between refuges and other U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service programs, the Refuge Association urges Congress to support: • Robust Refuge Fire Operations Budget — Fire is one of the Service’s most important tools for managing wildlife habitat; however, due to the catastrophic western wildfires made worse by climate change and fuel loading, funds for refuge fire management have been consistently diverted to fighting wildfires and protecting the forest-urban interface. While these challenges are extremely important, resources are needed to allow refuges to manage dangerous fuel loads in fire-dependent systems — some of which are seeing record droughts. Additionally, refuges must be able to use fire management to improve habitat for many threatened and endangered species such as red-cockaded woodpecker, at-risk species such as gopher tortoise and important game birds such as wild turkey and bobwhite quail. The Refuge Association urges Congress to provide $60 million in dedicated funding to the Refuge System’s fire program through the Department of the Interior’s Hazardous Fuel Reduction program; • Coastal Program—A sister program to Partners for Fish and Wildlife, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Coastal Program provides technical and financial assistance for voluntary efforts to protect and restore high-priority coastal habitats for wildlife. The coastal program is critical to implementing resiliency and adaption strategies in Rhode Island, New York and other Northeast States in the wake of Hurricane Sandy, and equally critical to the recovery of the Gulf of Mexico in the aftermath National Wildlife Refuge Association 9 Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System of the Deepwater Horizon catastrophic oil spill. The coastal program provides nearly $13 in economic return for every $1 in program funds. The Refuge Association asks Congress to fund the Coastal Program at $13 million for FY15; • Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act (NMBCA)— While wildlife species are protected within the boundaries of the National Wildlife Refuge System, NMBCA grants conserve the habitats that neotropical birds use along their migration north and south and in their wintering range throughout the Caribbean, Central, and South America. This Act fortifies investments on national wildlife refuges by conserving “our” birds during critical periods of their lifecycles spent outside of refuges and often outside the United States. The NMBCA funds are critical in safeguarding declining migratory birds such as Cerulean, Canada, Kirtland’s, and Swainson’s warblers, wood thrush and many other declining migratory birds whether here in the U.S. or with our neighbors to the south. The Refuge Association requests that Congress reauthorize the NMBCA and provide $4 million for FY15; • Multinational Species Conservation Funds—Wildlife know no international boundaries, and therefore conservation must happen on a global scale to ensure species survival. Many international wildlife agencies look to the National Wildlife Refuge System as the world leader in wildlife and fish conservation. The Fish and Wildlife Service’s Wildlife Without Borders program and the Multinational Species Conservation Funds together support global partnerships to protect marine Wild Beach Chincoteague NWR, VA | USFWS Emma Kerr 10 National Wildlife Refuge Association Seal Pup at Back Bay NWR, VA | USFWS turtles, tigers and rhinos, great apes and elephants and other iconic species. Particularly in light of the poaching crisis that is decimating many important wildlife species, the Refuge Association joins many conservation partners in asking Congress to appropriate $9.1 million for the Funds in FY15; • State Wildlife Grants —The Fish and Wildlife Service works with states to keep common species common and restore declining species before they warrant listing under the Endangered Species Act. The Refuge Association asks Congress to fund the State Wildlife Grants Program at $58.7 million for FY15 to fulfill the shared federal-state responsibility for keeping our nation’s wildlife from becoming endangered. Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System Refuge road on “Ding” Darling NWR, FL | Steve Hildebrand ass a Transportation Bill with ❼ Pdedicated funding for Refuge System roads and transportation infrastructure Sage Grouse | USFWS species before they are ❻ Restoring listed under the Endangered Species Act Providing incentives for conservation on private lands holds great potential for the protection and recovery of at-risk species. A public-private partnership operating in and around the Hart Mountain and Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge Complex in Nevada and Oregon could play a pivotal role in protecting greater sage-grouse habitat and keeping the species from being federally listed under the Endangered Species Act. Habitat protection in Texas and Kansas could keep lesser prairie chicken from being listed, and habitat protection in the Southeast could prevent gopher tortoise from being listed. The Refuge Association urges Congress to fund $30 million to advance public-private partnerships for restoration and conservation easements on strategic private lands from willing landowners. To accommodate 46.5 million annual refuge visitors and their recreational needs, the Refuge System must maintain and improve roads, trails and other transportation infrastructure on its network of lands. Refuges provide nearly $5 in economic output for every dollar invested by Congress, creating an impressive $2.4 billion return for taxpayers, and a competitive return on investment as compared with the private sector. To nurture this growing economic powerhouse that currently supports 37,000 local jobs in the recreation and outdoor industry, funding is needed to repair and build better roads that provide safer access to these federal lands. Transportation enhancement projects can also significantly reduce vehicular collisions with wildlife with appropriate crossings and signage. The Refuge Association calls on Congress to pass a national transportation bill that provides $100 million annually specifically for roads, trails, and alternative modes of transportation on our nation’s refuges. National Wildlife Refuge Association 11 Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System ass the Fish and Wildlife Service ❽ PResource Protection Act. Since 1996, the National Park Service has had the authority to seek and retain compensation from responsible parties who injure park resources, whether through vandalism, encroachment, or chemical spills. The Refuge System has no such authority; fines levied for most types of damage to refuge resources currently go to the General Treasury and can only be made available to the Service to repair or replace those resources with further congressional action. The Refuge Association urges Congress to pass the Fish and Wildlife Resource Protection Act—budget-neutral legislation that grants the Service the same common-sense authority to that was given to the National Park Service more than 15 years ago. Oil arrives on Bon Secour NWR, AL | USFWS eauthorize the Volunteer and ❾ RCommunity Partnership Act In 2013, more than 38,000 volunteers donated more than 1.4 million hours, a 22% boost to the National Wildlife Refuge System workforce. This vital contribution was the equivalent of an additional 702 full-time equivalent employees and valued at $31 million. The Volunteer and Community Partnership Act encourages the use of volunteers to assist the Refuge System in tasks ranging from removing invasive species to delivering recreation opportunities to the public. The Act also facilitates partnerships between the Refuge System and non-federal entities to promote conservation and awareness. The Refuge Association asks the Senate to reauthorize this valuable legislation, which has already passed in the House of Representatives. Above: Volunteer teaches Naturalists in training at Tualatin NWR, OR | USFWS. Below: Oregon coast | Dan Magneson 12 National Wildlife Refuge Association Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System Bitter Lake NWR, NM | Gordon Warrick ❿ Retain refuge establishment authority Bighorn Sheep at National Elk Refuge, WY | Anthony Lasuzzo National wildlife refuges are created through a combination of science-based planning and an extensive stakeholder engagement process that seeks local support, input and opinion on new refuge proposals, according to guidance by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Refuge proposals and expansions that have demonstrated local support have been successful, while those that did not seek or gain community input have been shelved, regardless of their conservation merit. The Service has a proven track record of engaging local stakeholders in this process, which enjoys the support of 40,000 Friends, landowners and conservation organizations. Excellent examples of successful projects that built strong local support include the Bear River Watershed Conservation Area, the Blackfoot Challenge, the Dakota Grasslands Conservation Area, the Rocky Mountain Front and the Everglades Headwaters. Recent congressional proposals would move the refuge creation process to Washington, D.C. and thus introduce national politics into what has been a locally-led, community-based process. The Refuge Association is strongly opposed to such a move, and urges Congress to reject any effort to move refuge strategic growth to Washington, D.C. and away from local communities. National Wildlife Refuge Association 13 Legislative Priorities for America’s Wildlife and the National Wildlife Refuge System Conclusion The National Wildlife Refuge System is an efficient investment for Congress and the American people. The National Refuge Association’s FY15 Legislative Priorities represent the essential needs for upholding the federal obligation to conserve fish and wildlife and the habitats they need. These funding requests and actions will provide real and meaningful conservation results that will be enjoyed by not only the 46.5 million Americans who visit the Refuge System annually, but also the millions of Americans who benefit from the $33 billion worth of clean water, clean air, cool climate, and thriving wildlife that refuges provide, not to mention the $2.4 billion in direct economic return in the communities that border refuges. These legislative priorities are necessary to keep our waterfowl and other migratory bird populations strong and restore wildlife species that are endangered or headed in that direction. Virtually all Americans, whether they are landowners, ranchers, timber managers, students, birders, backpackers, hunters, anglers, kayakers or families looking to reconnect nature, will benefit from these actions by Congress. A relatively small investment will produce exponential returns. Please join the National Wildlife Refuge Association, our members, our 204 affiliated Refuge Friends groups around the country and a diverse and large group of partners to support the necessary funds and policies to uphold the promise made to the American people to protect and enhance our world-class network of lands for wildlife. For questions or inquiries, please contact Desiree Sorenson-Groves Vice President for Government Relations at 202-290-5593 or [email protected]. Bear Lake NWR, ID | Amy Leist 14 National Wildlife Refuge Association National Wildlife Refuge Association Affiliate Organizations NWRA’s Friends Affiliate program is a network of over 200 Friends groups aligned around the concept that just as refuges are linked ecologically, they are linked by mission and purpose. These groups recognize that it’s crucial to speak with a unified voice about the needs of our refuges and related conservation programs. Alaska Geographic Amigos de la Sevilleta Arthur R. Marshall Foundation Audubon Refuge Partners, Inc. Back Bay Restoration Foundation Big Oaks Conservation Society Booth Society Cabeza Prieta Natural History Association Central Basin Audubon, ARK Chincoteague Natural History Association Citizen’s Committee to Complete the Refuge Coastal Wildlife Refuge Society Columbia Gorge Refuge Stewards “Ding” Darling Wildlife Society Evergreen Lakes Society Friends and Volunteers of Refuges Florida Keys Friends in Support of the Hatchery Friends of Alaska NWRs Friends of Anahuac Refuge Friends of Aransas and Matagorda Island NWR Friends of Assabet River NWR Friends of Back Bay Friends of Balcones Canyonlands NWR Friends of Bayou Teche Refuge Friends of Big Lake Friends of Bitter Lake NWR, Inc Friends of Black Bayou, Inc. Friends of Blackwater NWR Friends of Bombay Hook, Inc Friends of Bon Secour NWR Friends of Bosque del Apache NWR Friends of Boyer Chute and DeSoto NWRs Friends of Brazoria Wildlife Refuges Friends of Buenos Aires NWR Friends of Caddo Lake NWR Friends of Cahaba River NWR Friends of California Condors—Wild & Free Friends of Camas NWR Friends of Cape May NWR Friends of Carson Fish Hatchery Friends of Cherry Valley Friends of Clarks River NWR Friends of Crab Orchard Refuge Friends of Crane Meadows NWR Friends of Dahomey NWR Friends of Deer Flat NWR Friends of Dungeness NWR Friends of Eastern Neck, Inc Friends of Erie NWR Friends of Felsenthal, Inc Friends of Forsythe NWR Friends of Gavins Point NFH Friends of Great Falls Discovery Center Friends of Great Swamp NWR Friends of Hagerman NWR Friends of Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge Friends of Haystack Rock Friends of Heinz Refuge at Tinicum (FOHR Tinicum) Friends of Humboldt Bay NWR Friends of Iroquois NWR Friends of Kenai NWR Friends of Kootenai NWR Friends of Laguna Atascosa NWR Friends of Lake Woodruff NWR Friends of Las Vegas NWR Friends of Louisiana Wildlife Refuges, Inc. Friends of Mackay Island NWR Friends of Maga Ta-Hohpi Friends of Maine Seabird Islands Friends of Mid-Columbia River Wildlife Refuges Friends of Midway Atoll NWR Friends of Missisquoi NWR Friends of Monomoy Friends of Moosehorn NWR Friends of Neal Smith NWR Friends of Necedah NWR Friends of Nisqually NWR Friends of Norwalk Islands, Inc. Friends of Noxubee Refuge Friends of Nulhegan Friends of NWRs of Rhode Island Friends of Ohio River Islands NWR, Inc. Friends of Outer Island Friends of Parker River NWR Friends of Patoka River NWR Friends of Patuxent Friends of Pee Dee NWR Friends of Plum and Pilot Islands Friends of Pocosin Lakes NWR Friends of Pondicherry Friends of Pool 10 Friends of Pool 9-Upper Miss Refuge Friends of Potomac River Refuges Friends of Prime Hook NWR, Inc. Friends of Quivira NWR Friends of Rachel Carson NWR Friends of Refuge Headwaters Friends of Rice Lake Refuge Friends of Ridgefield NWR Friends of San Diego Wildlife Refuges Friends of Seal Beach NWR Friends of Sherburne NWR Friends of Shiawassee NWR Friends of Silvio Conte Friends of Southwest Louisiana NWRs & Wetlands Friends of Squaw Creek NWR Friends of St Catherine Creek Refuge Friends of Stillwater NWR Friends of Sullys Hill Friends of Sunkhaze Meadows Friends of Supawna Meadows NWR Friends of Tamarac NWR Friends of Tennessee NWR Friends of the 500th Friends of the Antioch Dunes, Inc. Friends of the Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee Refuge Friends of the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Friends of the Cache River Watershed Friends of the Carr Refuge Friends of the Crystal River NWRC Friends of the Deep Fork NWR Friends of the Desert National Wildlife Refuge Comples Friends of the Detroit Lakes WMD Friends of the Florida Panther NWR Friends of the Front Range Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center Friends of the Hakalau Forest NWR Friends of the Horicon NWR Friends of the Little Pend Oreille Friends of the Migratory Bird/Duck Stamp Friends of the Minnesota Valley Friends of the Modoc NWR Friends of the Montezuma Wetlands Complex Friends of the Morris Wetlands Management District Friends of the National Conservation Traning Center Friends of the Oxbow NWR Friends of the Reach Friends of the Red River NWR Friends of the San Luis Valley NWR Friends of the San Pablo Bay NWR Friends of the Santee NWR Friends of the Savannah Coastal Wildlife Refuges, Inc Friends of the St. Croix Wetland Management District Friends of the Suwannee and Cedar Keys NWR Friends of the Swan Lake NWR Friends of the Tampa Bay NWR Friends of the Tualatin River NWR Friends of the Upper Mississippi Fishery Services Friends of Trempealeau NWR Friends of Trinity River NWR Friends of Turnbull NWR Friends of Union Slough NWR Friends of Unity Wetlands Friends of Wallkill River NWR Friends of Wertheim NWR Friends of West Tennessee Refuge Friends of White River NWR Friends of the Wichitas Friends of Willamette Valley NWRC Friends of Willapa NWR Friends of Windom Wetland Management District Great Dismal Swamp Coalition Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes Center International Wildlife Refuge Alliance Kilauea Point Natural History Association Lostwood Birding and Nature Association Malheur Wildlife Associates Merritt Island Wildlife Association Mingo Swamp Friends Mississippi River Wild Muscatatuck Wildlife Society Nevada Wilderness Project Okefenokee Wildlife League Ottawa NWR Association Pelican Island Preservation Society Portneuf Valley Audubon Society Prairie Pothole Partners PRBO Conservation Science Rappahannock Wildlife Refuge Friends, Inc. Red Wolf Coalition Refuge Friends Inc Salmon River Watershed Partnership San Francisco Bay Wildlife Society Sandhills Prairie Refuge Association Seney Natural History Association SEWEE Association (Southeastern Wildlife & Environmental Education) Shoreline Education for Awareness (SEA) Southeast Wildlife Conservation Group Southwest Wetlands Interpretative Association Spring Wings St. Marks Refuge Association Stone Lakes NWR Association Supporters of St. Vincent NWR, Inc. The Great Lakes Experience Theodore Roosevelt Society, Inc. Ticatove-Grupo de Conservation de Vieques Tishomingo Refuge Ecology & Education Society (T.R.E.E.S) Valley Nature Center Wheeler Wildlife Refuge Association Holla Bend NWR, AR | Mark T. Carr 1001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 905, Washington, DC 20036 202-417-3803 www.refugeassociation.org