Newsletter 939 - Adelaide Institute

ADELAIDE INSTITUTE
PO Box 3300
Adelaide 5067
Australia
Mob: 61+401692057
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org
Online
ISSN 1440-9828
March 2016 No 939
_______________________________________________________________________________________
1
VENICE BIENNALE EXHIBITION
to present architectural evidence from the Holocaust
the blueprints and architectural remains of Auschwitz
became crucial in the defeat of Irving in what remains to
date the most decisive victory against Holocaust denial.
Front Sectional Elevation of The Evidence Room (Siobhan
Allman, Anna Longrigg, Donald McKay, Michael Nugent,
Nicole Ratajczak, Alexandru Vilcu)
In addition to the exhibition at the Canadian pavilion,
another exhibition at this year’s Venice Architecture
Biennale will feature the work of Canadian architectural
researchers. The Evidence Room will be presented at the
15th International Architecture Exhibition – la Biennale di
Venezia, called “Reporting from the Front”, curated by
Alejandro Aravena. The project, by Robert Jan van Pelt,
Anne Bordeleau, Sascha Hastings, and Donald McKay of
Cambridge (Ontario) and Toronto, will be shown in the
Central Pavilion.
Gasdoor Peephole Photograph Detail (photo by unknown
Russian photographer)
University of Waterloo architecture professor Robert Jan
van Pelt served as the expert witness on Auschwitz in the
Irving Trial. His report became one of the sources of
inspiration for a new discipline located at the intersection
of architecture, technology, history, law, and human
rights: architectural forensics.
Interior Perspective of Auschwitz Gas Column in The
Evidence Room (Siobhan Allman, Anna Longrigg, Donald
McKay, Michael Nugent, Nicole Ratajczak, Alexandru
Vilcu)
The Evidence Room Isometric with Ceiling (Siobhan
Allman, Anna Longrigg, Donald McKay, Michael Nugent,
Nicole Ratajczak, Alexandru Vilcu)
In 2000, in a trial held in London, England, the notorious
British Holocaust denier David Irving sued an American
historian and her publisher for libel. At issue: did the
Holocaust really happen, or was the planned and
systematic murder of six million European Jews an
elaborate hoax?
On invitation of Alejandro Aravena, Artistic Director of
the 15th International Architecture Exhibition – la
Biennale di Venezia, van Pelt, his colleagues Bordeleau,
Hastings, and McKay, together with a team of students
from Waterloo, will present a work that summarizes the
forensic analysis of Auschwitz within the larger group
exhibition “Reporting From the Front”.
Waterloo Architecture Student Bradley Paddock Measures
to Cut Mock-up Gas Chamber Door to Size (photo Fred
Hunsberger)
Gas Hatch from Auschwitz Gas Chamber (photo Omer
Arbel)
The battle over the meaning of the architectural evidence
took centre stage. Ultimately, forensic interpretation of
The Evidence Room consists of life-sized replicas and
casts of key pieces of architectural evidence (gas column,
gas door, wall section with gas-tight hatch, blueprints,
architects’ letters, contractors’ bills, photographs etc.)
that proved, beyond reasonable doubt, that Auschwitz
was a purposefully designed factory of death, equipped
2
with large, homicidal
incinerators.
gas
chambers
and
massive
Auschwitz Crematorium Evidence Plans with Waterloo
Architecture Professor and The Evidence Room CoPrincipal Robert Jan van Pelt (photo Fred Hunsberger)
The Evidence Room will be at the 15th International
Architecture Exhibition – la Biennale di Venezia from May
28 to November 27, 2016. A book will accompany the
project.
https://www.canadianarchitect.com/architecture/venice
-biennale-exhibition-to-present-architectural-evidenceof-the-holocaust/1003731075/
Waterloo Architecture Students Alexandru Vilcu, Siobhan
Allman, Anna Longrigg, and Piper Bernbaum Review the
3
Email incites bias reports
Kelsey Neubauer, February 17, 2016
UVM is currently investigating the source of an email
The email was signed by Bradley R. Smith, the founder of
stating that an Auschwitz crematorium was a “hoax.”
the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust.
UVM police and the Office of Equal Employment and
Smith has not responded to the Cynic’s request for
Opportunity received multiple bias reports filed by
comment.
students regarding a Feb. 10 email sent to a number of
It currently appears that the email was sent specifically
students, Vice Provost for Student Affairs Annie Stevens
to Jewish students, according to an email sent Feb. 12 to
said.
the Hillel listserv by Stevens and Vogel.
The email presents various reasons as to why a
Following the initial incident, Vogel sent an email to the
particular crematorium at Auschwitz was created postHillel listserv Feb. 10 to offer support and guidance to
war.
UVM’s Jewish community.
“As pointed out by many revisionists before, the four
The University denounced the original email and said it
holes in the roof of the morgue of Crematorium I at
has no factual validity nor a place in an academic
Auschwitz 1 camp do not ‘fit’ the original configuration of
institution, Stevens said.
the building. In fact, they are centered over the current
“We want to be clear that a communication such as this
post-war modified configuration of the room,” the email
that perpetuates anti-Semitism by falsely proclaiming
stated.
inaccurate historical events has no place at the University
of Vermont,” according to the Feb. 12 statement from
Stevens and Vogel.
Arielle Cheifetz, a first-year member of the Hillel
community at UVM, said though the email was very
unsettling, she is not surprised by anti-Semitic instances
on college campuses.
“[It’s different here compared to other Universities beThe Hillel building on Colchester Avenue is pictured Feb.
cause] 20 percent of the entire [UVM] population is
15. Hillel represents Jewish students on campus. COLE
Jewish,” she said.
WANGSNESS/The Vermont Cynic. Image courtesy of Cole
While in high school, Cheifetz attended workshops
Wangsness.
preparing Jewish students going into college for possible
Students across campus received the email, Hillel
anti-Semitic issues.
Director Matt Vogel said.
She said she feels that issues of anti-Semitism are not
Vogel and Stevens are working alongside UVM Enterprise
addressed enough at UVM.
Technology Services and the Office of Affirmative Action
and Equal Opportunity to determine the source of the
http://www.vtcynic.com/email-incites-bias-report/
email, Stevens said.
The group or individual that sent the email is in no part a
University affiliate, she said.
-----------------------------------------------------------------Architectural Considerations Not Anti-Semitic
Open Letter to The Vermont Cynic
By David Merlin
I am a member of CODOH and am responding to an
students, but rather at anyone with a critical mind. It did
article published in your paper regarding Bradley Smith,
neither claim “that an Auschwitz crematorium was a
the Krema I building at Auschwitz, and accusations of
‘hoax’” nor that “a particular crematorium at Auschwitz
Anti-Semitism.
was created post-war.”
Mr. Smith failed to respond not from indifference to the
I would like to address the statement attributed to
University of Vermont or rudeness but because he died
Stevens and Vogel:
on February 18. His e-mail was not directed at Jewish
4
“We want to be clear that a communication such as this
that perpetuates anti-Semitism by falsely proclaiming
inaccurate historical events has no place at the University
of Vermont.”
To be blunt, Stevens and Vogel seem totally ignorant
about Krema I at Auschwitz, the focus of our
“communication.” That crematorium was allegedly
reconfigured in late summer 1941 as a “gas chamber.”
This happened after the first (alleged) gassing at
Auschwitz in a different building in early September 1941
had turned out to be a disaster. Two weeks later,
after Krema I had been reconfigured, the first gassing in
that building is said to have happened (see the memoirs
of former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss, p. 30; see
also the Jewish Virtual Library with more references).
Interestingly, though, in both cases the victims are said
to have been primarily Soviet PoWs. There was not a
single Jewish victim in the group. Hence, discussing the
origin of this gas chamber isn’t even connected with
Jewish fatalities. How then can such a discussion be antiSemitic?
Stevens and Vogel claim that we “proclaim inaccurate
historical events.” The article we sent around discussed
alterations made to Krema I after the end of the war.
Here is what mainstream scholars say about it:
Back in the early 1990s, Franciszek Piper, at that point
curator of the Auschwitz Museum’s Archives, stated on
camera that what visitors see today is a “reconstruction”
of what the place is said to have looked like when
allegedly used as a homicidal gas chamber.
In a later letter Piper explained that this “reconstruction”
had never been kept a secret to researchers of the topic.
Among other sources, he quoted a work by French
Auschwitz researcher “Jean Claude Pressac ‘Auschwitz:
Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers,’
published by The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, New York
1989,” which had been written during the late 1980s in
close
cooperation
with
the
Auschwitz
Museum. On Krema I Pressac wrote:
“It would appear that the photos of the interior showing
the state of the premises were not taken at the
beginning of 1945, which is a pity because the
restructuring of the building back into a Krematorium
began immediately after the liberation. […] Because of
the lack of original documents and the transformations
that have been made (see the drawing of the present
state of the premises at the end of this chapter), it was
not possible before to materially demonstrate the
existence of a homicidal gas chamber in the former
morgue of Krematorium I.”
Interestingly,
this
fact
of
an
undocumented
“reconstruction” was hidden from tourists visiting
Auschwitz until recently. In fact, Auschwitz tour guides,
who learned their tour lecture from the Museum
authorities, told tourists that everything they were seeing
was in its original state (for this see the first part of the
already mentioned video). Only in recent years did this
change when the Museum put up a sign in front
of Krema I saying:
“After the war, the Museum partially reconstructed the
gas chamber and crematorium. The chimney and two
incinerators were rebuilt using original components, as
were several of the openings in the gas chamber
roof.” (see the illustration)
Museum sign in front of Krematorium I at Auschwitz. Photo taken in 2015
5
It is therefore an incontrovertible fact that what we see
today at Auschwitz is not what the Soviets found when
they liberated the camp. It is also uncontested that the
subsequent changes made to the building were
undocumented.
Mainstream historians claim, based on numerous witness
statements, that this building contained a homicidal gas
chamber. The originally claimed death toll was in the
range of hundreds of thousands, but today “not more
than 10,000” are assumed to have been murdered there.
Still, with up to 10,000 victims claimed, this building
would still be the weapon of a gargantuan crime. Yet
instead of investigating this murder weapon with proper
forensic methods right at war’s end, the Soviets and/or
Poles “reconstructed” it the way they felt it conducive to
the credibility of their agenda.
Here is what Wikipedia has to say about that:
“The spoliation of evidence is the intentional, reckless, or
negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or
destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding.
Spoliation has two possible consequences: in jurisdictions
where it is the (intentional) act is criminal by statute, it
may result in fines and incarceration […].
The spoliation inference is a negative evidentiary
inference that a finder of fact can draw from a party’s
destruction of a document or thing that is relevant to an
ongoing or reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal
proceeding: the finder of fact can review all evidence
uncovered in as strong a light as possible against the
spoliator and in favor of the opposing party.”
Hence, the undocumented tampering with evidence
speaks AGAINST the claims made by the spoliator – the
Soviets and Poles – and FOR the victimized party – the
German wartime camp authorities.
Pressac has thoroughly documented most of the incorrect
“reconstructions” perpetrated after the war, some of
which were made by accident (like reopening the wall
leading to the furnace room in the wrong spot and
without any door, or assembling the cremation furnaces
incorrectly), but some have more the smell of a
deliberate deception. This applies to today’s entrance to
the claimed gas chamber sporting a heavy steel door. It
was added only when the place was converted to an airraid shelter for the SS in 1944, as the Auschwitz Museum
itself admits today. They even display a drawing of how
the place looked like when allegedly used as a gas
chamber – with no access door in sight.
Auschwitz Museum sign in front of Krematorium I showing the building’s layout; left: as it existed during
the years 1941-1943 when allegedly used as a gas chamber; right: today’s condition. The long room at
the top right of both layouts is the morgue (“gas chamber”). The entry with steel door visible today –
right-hand layout, in the top-left corner of the morgue – did not exist in the years 1941-1943. Photo
taken in 2015
6
A proper reconstruction would have removed and walled
up this entry. Of course, that would have left the “gas
chamber” without a direct entry for the victims, and
that’s where the story becomes interesting.
Another issue is the question of the four little chimneys
in the roof of the “gas chamber” claimed to have been
used to throw in the lethal Zyklon B. In the abovementioned
interview
Piper
claims
they
were
“reconstructed” in exactly the same spots where they
used to be, because on the ceiling the original “German”
holes filled up with cement could still be recognized. How
can Dr. Piper know this? He was merely a small child at
war’s end (he was born in 1941), and as we have seen,
there is no documentation about how that building
looked after the war.
The article criticized by Stevens and Vogel addresses
exactly that question: How can we know?
I am not sure what Stevens and Vogel claim is the
"correct history" of Krema I, but the history ofKrema I
has already been subject to extensive revision by the
Auschwitz Museum itself. And discussing these revisions
has nothing to do with anyone’s attitude toward Jews.
Stevens and Vogel owe Mr. Smith an apology.
Sincerely yours,
David Merlin
CODOH
PO Box 20774
York PA 17402
[email protected]
________________________
New from Eric Hunt: 3D imagery demonstrates the Auschwitz Hole Hoax
Published by Carolyn on Fri, 2015-08-28 14:36
The Auschwitz Crema 1 Hole Hoax
By Eric Hunt
up. Revisionists deny these holes existed in the first
place.
For decades, tour guides and historians insisted
Crematorium 1 was in its original state. However, a
modern sign acknowledges that Crematorium 1 existed
in several stages throughout the war, and was modified
after the war. This is thanks to Robert Faurisson who
exposed the original plans of the structure.
Figure 1 “Reconstructed” Crematorium 1. The SS Hospital
is located directly behind it.
As pointed out by many revisionists before, the four
holes in the roof of the morgue of Crematorium 1 at
Auschwitz 1 camp do not “fit” the original configuration
of the building. In fact, they are centered over the
current post-war modified configuration of the room.
The Auschwitz Museum claims these were the locations
of genuine holes, which were then filled in by the
Germans when they chose to convert the crematorium to
an air raid shelter for the nearby SS hospital.
Under Soviet occupation, the Auschwitz museum kindly
“re-opened” the holes the Germans supposedly covered
Figure 2 Sign acknowledges Crematorium 1 was modified
post-war
On the above sign, which was only added in recent
years, we can see some of the differences between the
building in its original state, at the time of alleged
gassings, and today.
7
Figure 3
The museum sign above admits “After the war, the
Museum partially reconstructed the gas chamber and
crematorium. The chimney and two incinerators were
rebuilt, using original components, as were several of the
openings in the gas chamber roof.”
A 3D representation of the important area of
Crematorium 1 is useful to understand this hole hoax.
For this basic 3D representation, the “roof” has been
lowered so the interior walls can show through. The top
half of the building is devoted to the oven room and
smaller rooms and has not been represented in 3D.
Figure 6 Photograph of hole near original dividing wall
and door
The beam coming from the left was once a wall. This wall
was removed during Soviet occupation.
Crematorium 1 was converted into an air raid shelter for
the SS hospital located across from it. We can see the
many interior walls added, as well as an additional
entrance/exit and air lock on the right. The doorway
between the morgue/alleged gas chamber and the oven
room was walled up.
Figure 7 Air Raid Shelter configuration
Figure 4 Configuration at time of Alleged Mass Gassings
This is part of Crematorium 1 at the time of alleged mass
gassings. The alleged Zyklon B insertion holes are
represented in the roof. The room designated as a
morgue on original German plans is the alleged “gas
chamber”. What was used as a morgue when the morgue
was used as a gas chamber? Who knows…
As we can see, the placement of the holes looks rather
odd and is not centered over the morgue, which is the
long rectangular room the holes should be centered over.
The next image shows the location of an oddly placed
hole, very close to the location of both an original wall
dividing the morgue and wash room and the door to the
oven room.
Figure 8 Current Configuration
According to Carlo Mattogno’s measurements, the holes
in the upper left and lower right are 5.1 meters away
from walls. However, this measurement is senseless as
we’ve seen the hole in the upper left was located next to
a dividing wall and its distance from the opposite wall of
the washing room was irrelevant at the time.
In addition, the other two holes are 7.1 meters away
from walls. One of the walls, a wall of an air lock created
for the entrance for the air raid shelter, didn’t even exist
at the time of alleged gassings! The other wall is the
irrelevant opposite side wall of the washing room.
Figure 5 Hole close to original wall separating morgue
and washing room
8
Figure 9
The placement of the holes in the roof of Auschwitz’s
Crematorium 1 are centered over a building configuration
which only existed after the war.
The Soviets found an air raid shelter for the SS Hospital,
with an operating room and attached washing room with
toilets and sinks. This served no use for propaganda.
They added a chimney on about the same spot it was
located previously. They rebuilt ovens to put in the
adjoining oven room.
They removed all but one of the interior walls dividing up
the air raid shelter, removing one too many – the original
dividing wall between the morgue and washing room
which existed at the time of alleged gassings. The wash
room’s toilets and a sink have been removed.
They left the air lock and second entrance, passing it off
for decades as the “victim’s entrance”. Tourists would
walk past the gallows allegedly used to hang Rudolf
Hoess to enter this entrance, neither of which existed at
the time of mass gassings.
These holes should never have been “re-opened” in the
first place. This is tampering with the scene of a crime –
mass murder!
But the placement of the four holes points to a crude
mistake on the part of the hoaxers, who centered the
supposedly “re-opened” holes not over the morgue, but
the morgue + washing room + second entrance air lock
which didn’t exist at the time of the alleged mass
gassings.~
*
*
*
Eric Hunt’s videos are available at
gaschamberhoax.com andHolocaustDocumentaries.
com
Carlo Mattogno’s study on Auschwitz 1’s Crematorium 1
is available at holocausthandbooks.com
This article is based on a segment of an upcoming video
miniseries to be released at gaschamberhoax.com and
HolocaustDocumentaries.com
Eric Hunt has been banned from Paypal and his website
"HolocaustHoaxMuseum" was removed by godaddy.
However he can recieve donations at Google Wallet
under the name "[email protected]" and
also bitcoin. Please contribute if you can.
http://carolynyeager.net/new-eric-hunt-3d-imagerydemonstrates-auschwitz-hole-hoax
_________________________________________________
Trump to Israeli paper: I’m your biggest friend
Candidate pledges to make efforts toward IsraeliPalestinian peace if elected; says he likes idea of
moving embassy to Jerusalem
By Times of Israel staff and Agencies February 26, 2016, 10:34 am
The interview was only published in a Hebrew
translation, thus no direct quotes in English were
available.
Trump told the paper, which is strongly supportive of
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that he
wanted to work to achieve Israeli-Palestinian peace.
Though he didn’t know if this was possible, he said he
would make efforts to resolve the conflict if elected.
He also blasted the Iran nuclear deal, as he has in the
past, calling it the worst possible accord for Israel.
Asked for his position on moving the American Embassy
from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — as was promised in the
past by many presidential candidates — Trump said he
liked the idea.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks
Last Wednesday, Trump vowed to give Mideast peace
during a campaign rally in Sioux Center, Iowa, on January
“one hell of a shot” and called it “probably the toughest
23, 2016. (AP/Evan Vucci)
agreement of any kind to make.”
Republican front-runner Donald Trump called himself
During a town hall event hosted by MSNBC in Charleston,
Israel’s biggest friend this week, saying his ties to the
South Carolina, Trump tried to show neutrality.
Jewish state are stronger than those of any other
“You know, I don’t want to get into it, because… if I win,
presidential candidate.
I don’t want to be in a position where I’m saying to you
Speaking to the Sheldon Adelson-controlled Israel Hayom
and the other side now says, ‘We don’t want Trump
newspaper, Trump cited his daughter’s marriage to Jared
involved,’” he said.
Kushner, who is Jewish. And he added that he, himself,
had participated in various pro-Israel rallies.
9
“Let me be sort of a neutral guy,” he continued. “A lot of
people have gone down in flames trying to make that
deal. So I don’t want to say whose fault is it. I don’t
think it helps.”
The Grand Old Party is under intense pressure to derail
the Trump train.
By turns boastful, mocking or menacing, Trump has hit
on a style that has seduced a growing and increasingly
diverse share of Republican voters — to the dismay of his
rivals, who have struggled to find an effective angle of
attack against the 69-year-old real estate mogul.
White House hopefuls Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio
unleashed a barrage of attacks against Trump during
Thursday’s raucous Republican debate as they sought to
halt the billionaire front-runner’s seemingly relentless
march to the party’s nomination.
The three candidates exchanged some of the mostheated and acerbic remarks of the entire 2016 primary
cycle. They often talked over one another as they battled
for supremacy in the final on-stage showdown before the
“Super Tuesday” series of statewide votes on March 1.
Cruz and Rubio mounted a furious assault against Trump,
blasting the front-runner for hiring foreigners and
challenging his commitment to conservative principles,
but Trump largely stood his ground and swatted away
the attacks.
Knowing that they need to change the campaign trail
narrative quickly — or risk Trump coasting to the
Republican nomination — the two freshman senators
launched broadsides against the brash billionaire, who
lashed out at his challengers in what quickly devolved
into a shouting match.
The tone reflected the fierce battle under way ahead of
“Super Tuesday” next week, when 12 states — including
Cruz’s huge state of Texas — go to the polls in perhaps
the most consequential voting day of the 2016 primary
campaign.
Should Trump win most of the states, it could be lights
out for his rivals, who also include two lesser candidates
in retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson and Ohio Governor
John Kasich.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-to-israeli-paperim-your-biggest-friend/
________________________________________________
Dr Tom Sunic:
Wo bleibt Prinz Eugen?
Der Multikultiwahnsinn und das Ende Europas
Alles dreht sich um die richtige oder falsche
Kennzeichnung politischer Begriffe. Wir alle hier nennen
uns freiheitsliebende Menschen, die heute sehr besorgt
sind über die Zukunft der europäischen Identität. Unsere
selbsternannten „antifaschistischen“ Gegner hingegen
nennen uns Fremdenfeinde, Rassisten oder Nazis.
Unserer eigenen Erfahrung nach – und meiner Erfahrung
nach, die ich im ehemaligen Multkulti-Jugoslawien und in
Multkulti-Amerika gesammelt habe, sowie aufgrund der
Forschung vieler Soziologen, haben Multikulti-Staaten
keine lange Lebensdauer. Früher oder später zerfallen sie
alle in einem Bürgerkrieg. Ich kann hier wieder auf den
ehemaligen
zusammengeschusterten
jugoslawischen
Staat
verweisen,
der
trotz
aller
akademischer
Schönrederei unter der Vielfalt der Interessen seiner
verschiedenen Völker zusammenbrechen musste.
Das heutige Migrationschaos trägt einen verlogenen
Namen, nämlich „Flüchtlingskrise“. Von den tausenden
und abertausenden Migranten, die nach Österreich
hineinströmen, sind die meisten keine Flüchtlinge. Sie
sind „Flüchtlinge“, nur insofern als sie von den
Etablierten in den österreichische Medien schon im
voraus
als
„Flüchtlinge“
bezeichnet
wurden.
Merkwürdigerweise stellen alle diese Migranten ihren
Asylantrag nicht in der Türkei oder einem anderen Staat
entlang der Balkanroute. Sie wollen alle unbedingt in die
BRD. Sie bilden sich ein, Österreich, Deutschland und
Schweden seien Schlaraffenländer, wo man gut leben
und sich eine schöne Frau aussuchen kann. Aber – nein!
Diese Migranten sind gar nicht schuld an ihren falschen
Vorstellungen; es sind unsere Politiker mit ihren falschen
Versprechungen,
die
wiederum
bei
den
10
Einwanderern diese
falschen
Wunschvorstellungen
hervorrufen.
Die Multikultiutopie unserer Politiker trägt einen anderen
falschen
Namen,
nämlich
das
Unwort
„Willkommenskultur“, obwohl der richtige Name auf gut
Deutsch „Kultur der Selbstabschaffung“, „Schuldkultur“
oder „Selbsthasskultur“ heißen sollte. Was heute mit dem
Wort „Willkommenskultur“ bezeichnet wird, hat gar
nichts zu tun mit der althergebrachten europäischen
Willkommenskultur. Die heutige Willkommenskultur ist
bloß ein liberalistischer Ersatz für das gescheiterte
kommunistische Projekt. Was einst die Kommunisten in
Osteuropa mit ihrer Gewaltherrschaft nicht erzwingen
konnten,
will
das
heutige
System
mit
seiner
Ersatzideologie des Multikulturalismus erreichen. Der
Kommunismus ging in Osteuropa zugrunde, weil er der
Liberalismus seine materialistischen Heilsversprechungen
besser umsetzen konnte. Das System glaubt, dass alle
europäischen Völker in einem Multikulti-Superstaat von
nichteuropäischen Zuwanderern ersetzt werden können
und wie Ersatzteile ständig reproduziert werden können.
Fragen wir unsere Politiker und Befürworter des
Multikulturalismus, ob sie in Multikulti-Bezirken wie
Wien-Favoriten oder in Neukölln in der BRD leben
möchten! Sie werden „Nein!“ sagen. Sie predigen gerne
von der Multkulti-Gesellschaft, so lange sie selbst von
den Einwanderern fern bleiben und in ihren golden
Ghettos in Sicherheit leben. Wenn sich eines Tages die
Etablierten und ihre Gutmenschen doch entschuldige ich
mich gerne bei Ihnen. Ich habe in den Multkulti-Bezirken
in den USA sehr lang lange gelebt und habe dort sehr gut
den Wortsinn der Doppelverriegelung an meiner
Wohnungstür und Schusswaffen gelernt.
Historisch und philosophisch gesehen ist der heutige
Multikulti-Wahn,
bzw.
die
Willkommenskultur
in
Österreich, Deutschland und der EU, eine Abart der
Ideologie der Hypermoral nach Arnold Gehlen. Es kann
auch wissenschaftlich bewiesen werden, dass, je mehr
die Bevölkerung eines Staates ethnisch und kulturell
homogen ist, wie zum Beispiel in Japan, je mehr ein
Staat von ethnisch und kulturell verwandten Bürgern
bewohnt wird, desto größer ist die Überlebensdauer
dieses Staates – und auch die Solidarität. Bei den
nichteuropäischen Völkern in Afrika und Asien zum
Beispiel ist es nicht vorstellbar, andere Völker
massenweise ins eigene Land zu importieren. Nur bei den
lebensmüden europäischen Völkern kann man diese
selbstmörderischen Willkommenszüge beobachten, nicht
jedoch bei den nichteuropäischen reichen Staaten wie
Saudi Arabien. Dieser pathologische Hypermoralismus
und
Altruismus
führt
Europa
letztendlich
in
den Selbstmord. Wenn ein Volk, wie die Deutschen,
lebensmüde geworden ist, bedeutet das nicht das Ende
der Politik; es bedeutet nur das Ende des schwachen
Volkes.
Warum ist dieser Hyper-Altruismus, bzw. diese
Selbstabschaffungs-Willkommenskultur heute besonders
in Deutschland und in Österreich derart ausgeprägt und
weniger inmitten anderer europäischen Staaten? Der
Grund dafür ist nicht schwer zu erraten. Jegliche Kritik
am Multikulturalismus kann einem Politiker oder einem
Akademiker in Österreich oder BRD das Stigma des
„Faschismus“ einbringen. Und das bedeutet quasi den
Tod im öffentlichen Leben. Herr Faymann und Frau
Merkel, aus Furcht vor der Nazikeule müssen sich jetzt
mit dem massenhaften Import
von Zuwanderern
gegenüber jeglichen Nazivorwürfen versichern. Die
Ideologie des Multikulturalismus ist heute eine Art
Negativlegitimation
ganz
Europas
geworden
insbesondere
inmitten
der
deutschen
und
österreichischen politischen Klasse. Dementsprechend
wird jede Debatte, die sich kritisch mit dem
Multikulturalismus
befasst,
mit
dem
Schlagwort
„Fremdenfeindlichkeit“
etikettiert.
Dieses
Unwort
„Fremdenfeindlichkeit“ dient heute der politischen Klasse
in
Europa
als
Alibi
zum
Fortbestehen
ihres
immerwährenden politischen Status quo.
Im Gegensatz dazu werden Multikulti-Kritiker von den
Medien zu absoluten Bösewichten und sogar zu
Kriminellen erklärt. Damit wollen die Multikulturalisten
jede Fehlentwicklung in ihrem eigenen System
rechtfertigen und ihr eigenes System als das geringere
Übel darstellen. Dessen sind sich auch die Politiker in
Österreich und der BRD bewusst und deswegen müssen
sie sich in den Augen der Weltöffentlichkeit päpstlicher
als der Papst zeigen, bzw. müssen sie die massive
Migrantenflut nach Deutschland und Österreich weiterhin
befürworten.
In
diesem
Sinne
sind
sie
dazu
gezwungen die Einwanderer besser zu behandeln als
diese das überhaupt von ihnen erwarten würden. Es ist
naiv zu glauben, dass die heutigen Befürworter der
Willkommenskultur in Österreich mit Argumenten
widerlegt
werden
können.
Das
deutsche
Wort
„Gutmensch“ schildert am besten diese selbstzensierende
und hypermoralistische Multikulti-Spezies. Sollte jemand
heute
in
Österreich
zufällig
wagen,
seine
wissenschaftlichen Quellen gegen den Multikulti-Mythos
zu
nennen,
gerät
er
prompt
ins
Visier
der
Gesinnungswächter. Die etablierten Parteien und ihre
Medien können ihre Macht nur durch die Dämonisierung
der Andersdenkenden beibehalten, wie zum Beispiel im
ehemaligen kommunistischen Jugoslawien, wo jeder
Dissident automatisch als Faschist oder Krimineller
etikettiert wurde. Die Politiker in Österreich, aber auch
anderswo
in
Europa,
sind
in
politischen
Selbsttäuschungen verstrickt, die sich einerseits mit der
Idealisierung
der
außereuropäischen
Leute
und
anderseits mit der Abwertung der Einheimischen
befassen.
Die sogenannte Willkommenskultur ist jedoch langfristig
nicht haltbar. Sie führt nicht zum gegenseitigen
Völkerverständnis, sondern verursacht bzw. vertieft nur
den gegenseitigen Hass zwischen Völkern. Das haben wir
unzählige Male in allen Multikulti-Gesellschaften gesehen.
Zum Beispiel asiatische Amerikaner in den USA mögen
nicht die Afro-Amerikaner und die Afro- Amerikaner sind
gar nicht beliebt bei den hispanischen Latinos in Amerika.
Die Krawalle zwischen Mitglieder der verschiedenen
Völker inmitten heutiger Zuwanderer werden gar nicht in
unserer Öffentlichkeit debattiert. Auch wenn die „bösen
Deutschen“ und alle „bösen Nazis“ und alle „Faschsiten“
verschwinden
würden,
wird
es
keinesfalls
den
gegenseitigen Hass und Krieg inmitten verschiedener
nichteuropäischen Gruppen und Völker verhindern.
Rassismus und Fremdfeindlichkeit sind kein Privilegium
der Österreicher oder der Deutschen oder anderer
europäischen Völker.
Die heutige verlogene Willkommenskultur verlangt von
uns deswegen, unseren politischen Feind zu erkennen.
Wichtig
ist:
Nicht
die
vorderasiatischen
oder
afrikanischen Einwanderer tragen Schuld an dem
Niedergang Europas, sondern die Systempolitiker und
11
ihre kapitalistische „Superklasse“. Um unsere deutsche
und unsere österreichische bzw. die gesamte europäische
Identität wiederherzustellen, müssen wir zunächst den
schrankenlosen globalen Kapitalismus in dieser Form
demontieren und andere Werte an die oberste Stelle
setzen. Multikulturalismus ist ein Mythos, der an das
grenzenlose Wirtschaftswachstum und dementsprechend
auf den grenzenlosen Zustrom von Migranten anknüpft.
Nichteuropäische Einwanderer wissen derzeit genau, dass
sie im selbsthassenden Europa sorglos leben können.
Gefühle des Selbsthasses gibt es gar nicht bei den
Politikern in ihren Heimatländern. Das Finanzkapital der
Oligarchen in Europa, gepaart mit Schuldgefühlen der
Europäer auf der einen Seite – und linke MultkultiPrediger auf der anderen Seite, sorgen für weitere
Zuwanderung der Abermillionen von nichteuropäischen
Einwanderern. Wenn die Europäer wieder ihre eigene
Identität aufbauen wollen, sollten sie zuerst den
entfesselten
Kapitalismus
abschaffen.
Die
Auslandsimmigration
würde dann
sofort
gestoppt
werden. Einwanderer hätten dann keinen Grund mehr, in
unseren Ländern zu leben und sich falsche Hoffnungen zu
machen.
Wir werden bald sehen, wie sich die Geschichte weiter
entwickelt. Im Rückblick stellt sich auch die Frage: Wozu
hat Prinz Eugen seine langen Kriege gegen die türkischen
Eroberer geführt? Zum Glück bleibt die Geschichte immer
offen und es liegt nur an uns unsere Geschichte aufs
Neue zu gestalten. Nicht die Jahre, sondern die Tage der
Entscheidung liegen vor uns. Wir alle wissen die größte
politische Weisheit aller Zeiten nur zu gut: Wer sich zum
Schaf macht, den fressen bald die Wölfe. Also meine
Damen und Herren, seien wir keine Schafe. Der Kampf
geht weiter.
Ich danke für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit.
http://www.identitaere-generation.info/sunic-wo-bleibtprinz-eugen/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF6YrLgs36A
_________________________________________________
Prinz Eugen der edle Ritter
Er tät sie recht instruieren,
Wie man sollt’ die Truppen führen
Und den Feind recht greifen an.
Bei der Parol’ tät er befehlen,
Daß man sollt’ die Zwölfe zählen,
Bei der Uhr um Mitternacht.
Da sollt’ all’s zu Pferd aufsitzen,
Mit dem Feinde zu scharmützen,
Was zum Streit nur hätte Kraft.
Alles saß auch gleich zu Pferde,
Jeder griff nach seinem Schwerte,
Ganz still rückt’ man aus der Schanz’.
Die Musketier’ wie auch die Reiter
Täten alle tapfer streiten:
’s war fürwahr ein schöner Tanz!
Prinz Eugenius der edle Ritter,
wollt dem Kaiser wied’rum kriegen
Stadt und Festung Belgerad!
Er ließ schlagen eine Brukken,
daß man kunt hinüberrucken
mit der Armee vor die Stadt.
Als die Brucken nun war geschlagen,
daß man kunnt mit Stuck und Wagen
Frei passir’n den Donaufluß,
Bei Semlin schlug man das Lager,
Alle Türken zu verjagen,
Ihn’n zum Spott und zum Verdruß.
Am einundzwanzigsten August soeben
Kam ein Spion bei Sturm und Regen,
Schwur’s dem Prinzen und zeigt’s ihm an,
Daß die Türken futragieren,
So viel, als man kunnt’ verspüren,
An die dreimalhunderttausend Mann.
Als Prinz Eugenius dies vernommen,
Ließ er gleich zusammenkommen
Sein’ Gen’ral und Feldmarschall.
Ihr Konstabler auf der Schanzen,
Spielet auf zu diesem Tanzen
Mit Kartaunen groß und klein;
Mit den großen, mit den kleinen
Auf die Türken auf die Heiden,
Daß sie laufen all’ davon!
Prinz Eugenius auf der Rechten
Tät als wie ein Löwe fechten,
Als Gen’ral und Feldmarschall.
Prinz Ludewig ritt auf und nieder,
Halt’t euch brav, ihr deutschen Brüder,
Greift den Feind nur herzhaft an!
Prinz Ludewig, der mußt’ aufgeben
Seinen Geist und junges Leben,
Ward getroffen von dem Blei.
Prinz Eugen war sehr betrübet,
Weil er ihn so sehr geliebet,
Ließ ihn bring’n nach Peterwardein.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZgP7J
QaqMs
____________________________________________________________
12