of Shire Capel
Transcription
of Shire Capel
Shire of Capel MINUTES ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING Wednesday, 22 July 2009 SHIRE OF CAPEL TABLE OF CONTENTS ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING – 22.07.09 RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE .......................... 3 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME............................................................................................. 3 APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE ................................................................. 5 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST..................................................................................... 5 NOTICE OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS .............................. 6 OC0709 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES – 08.07.09 ..................................................... 6 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY PERSON PRESIDING WITHOUT DISCUSSION ........................... 6 PETITIONS/DEPUTATIONS/PRESENTATIONS ......................................................... 6 MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN QUESTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN ..................................... 6 ................................. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES REPORTS .......................................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION ........................................................................... 7 OC0710 (13.1.1) Contaminated Site, Capel Basketball/Tennis Courts Goodwood Road ......... 7 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORTS ................................................ 10 BUILDING SERVICES SECTION .............................................................................. 10 PLANNING SERVICES SECTION................................................................................. 10 OC0711 OC0712 (14.2.1) Planning Consent Application Lot 1 Maidment Pde, Dalyellup (C5.2.D.8) .. 10 (14.2.2) Extractive Industry – Lot 2 Calinup Road, Gelorup (C.5.2.N.76).............. 24 (14.2.3) Home Occupation – Lot 5 (No 5) Brockman Street, Capel (C5.2.C.131) ... 25 TECHNICAL SERVICES REPORTS ............................................................................... 31 TECHNICAL SERVICES SECTION ............................................................................ 31 CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORTS ................................................. 31 GOVERNANCE ........................................................................................................... 31 OC0713 (16.1.1) Trading Hours Amendment Bill ........................................................... 31 COMMUNITY SERVICES SECTION .......................................................................... 34 FINANCE AND RATING SECTION............................................................................... 34 OC0715 OC0723 (16.3.1) Adoption of 2009/10 Budget and Differential Rates ............................... 34 (16.3.2) Accounts Due and Submitted for Authorisation ..................................... 44 OC0724 (16.3.3) Accounts Paid During the Month of June 2009 ...................................... 47 COMMUNITY RANGER SERVICES ........................................................................... 55 NEW BUSINESS OF AN URGENT NATURE PUBLIC QUESTION TIME ............................................................... 55 ....................................................................................... 55 MOTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE (ABSOLUTE MAJORITY BY COUNCIL) ...................... 55 NOTICES OF MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE NEXT ORDINARY MEETING OF THE COUNCIL .............................................................................................. ............ 55 ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION BEHIND CLOSED DOORS .......................................... 55 MEETING CLOSURE ................................................................................................... 55 SHIRE OF CAPEL MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON WEDNESDAY, 22 JULY 2009 COMMENCING AT 4.39PM. PRESENT: President Deputy President Councillors Chief Executive Officer Director Corporate & Community Services Director Planning & Development Services Manager Health Services A/Director Technical Services Senior Planning Officer – Strategic Minute Secretary MT Scott KV Caratti S Akl BW Bell JA Fuller Hill K Gibson NR Jones S Manley GJ Norton JA Scott MM Smith PF Sheedy AJ Ross C Burwood CR Dent S Faber G Bishop AD Evans GALLERY: 23 members of public RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE Nil PUBLIC QUESTION TIME Celestin Hutchinson – 2/19 Diamond Street, Dalyellup: As this is a major and contentious issue for this Shire – In the process of making a decision on the extension of the permit for the dump site, is Council going to do a legitimate and independent survey – that is: a referendum of the Dalyellup Community to get clear about how many people oppose the extension? If so, and Council finds the majority of residents oppose it, will Council vote in accordance with the community’s wishes and close the site? The Chief Executive Officer, Mr Sheedy, responded: No, the Shire is not going to hold a referendum as we have satisfied all requirements. David Yeoman – 7 Edwinstone Close, Dalyellup: Are the councillors aware of the Inorganic Chemical Production Wastes classification K178 and the content held within it as we believe that this site falls within this classification and if it does, are you aware of the dioxins mentioned? Senior Planning Officer – Strategic, Mr Bishop, responded: If community members are concerned about the contents of the waste they should take the opportunity to comment on the environmental licence that is administered by the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC). The Shire understands that the application for a new licence will be advertised by the DEC for comment in Monday’s West Australian, if not next Monday, then the one after. Charles Newell – 12 Daablone Vista, Dalyellup: Has there been any testing for radiation in local area of the disposal site for contamination ie 1-2 km from site and if not, why not? If so, (what were) the results? I believe they do (testing) in Capel. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 4 Mr Bishop responded: No. Mr A Ross left the Chambers at 4.42pm and returned at 4.43pm. Cherie Russell – 6 Zedor Way, Dalyellup: Have Dalyellup residents received information from an independent body that guarantees the site poses absolutely no health risk? Mr Bishop responded: The activity operates under an approval from the Minister for the Environment after assessment by the EPA and also is subject to licence under Part 5 of the Environmental Protection Act. If community members are concerned about the contents of the waste they should take the opportunity to comment on the environmental licence that is administered by the Department of Environment and Conservation. Denis Newell – 12 Wornt Road, Dalyellup: Would all Councillors who know the chemical composition of what Cristal Global is dumping at Dalyellup please raise their hand? The Chairman ruled this question inappropriate. Mr Newell: Would the Councillors who live in Dalyellup please raise their hand? Is the report on the titanium dioxide waste totally independent and totally without Cristal Global input including funding? Mr Bishop responded: The Chairman of the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) provided a letter earlier this year that the EPA was satisfied subject to compliance with the conditions of Ministerial Statement 332 that there would not be any additional environmental impact and that there would be no further environmental assessment required. It would be satisfactory for the activity to be continued under the present Part 5 licence process. Rajeev Sud – 23 Macedon Road, Dalyellup: The Shire policy regarding the extension of the waste site beyond 2010 is an area of concern: (1) If 300 petitioned to have the site closed and 3 petitioned to keep it open, an overwhelming majority want it closed even though 4,500 abstained. (2) Was the initial application for the waste site too large and the government misled to the number of years it would take to fill up? (3) Millennium claims that the exposure level is equal to 1 x-ray for 8 hours of play at an average of 2 hours a week, it will account to 13 x-rays a year which is excessive. (4) Why was the item not advertised in the yearly picnics – where more people would have time to react? Mr Bishop responded: The application did not require advertising at all but the Council decided to advertise it anyway. Council used the local newsletters in accordance with previous survey feedback from the communities within the Shire. The company has advised that the volume of waste relative to the volume of product has been reduced over the time of the operation and therefore the available volume of the site has not been used up as quickly as expected. The activity is monitored to the requirements of the Radiological Council of WA. Suzanne Bairstow – 21 Hutt Drive, Dalyellup: Has the Council considered the consequences of a massive dune blow-out, such as the one near the surf life saving club, should it happen in the area north of Hutt Drive, where the proposed sporting complex is to be held – a great possibility considering the number of kids who would be inclined to take a short cut to the beach? Please comment on the health, environmental and upkeep expenses involved. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 5 Mr Bishop responded: There will be no provision for public access to the beach in front of the site. The dune system is in excess of 25m in height and does not lend itself to public access in any event. The surf life saving club is located in an area of pre-existing dune blow-out and it is likely that additional foreshore stabilisation and management will be required at that site as population pressure increases. Celestin Hutchinson: How much money is the Shire of Capel going to receive by granting permission for the extension of this permit, to Millennium Chemicals (Global) either in the form of a playing field, or in other monetary payments? Mr Sheedy responded: $950,000 is the sum that has been offered by the applicant. $150,000 will be used to carry out a study on the sporting facilities and the rest would be used for facilities in Dalyellup. Celestin Hutchinson: Please comment on why Council seems to be pushing to have a toxic waste dump in its largest residential community in the Shire of Capel. Mr Bishop responded: It is a matter of opinion as to whether the site is a “toxic waste dump”. Contaminants are not necessarily toxic unless there is an exposure path that would cause a toxic level to occur. If community members are concerned about the contents of the waste they should take the opportunity to comment on the environmental licence that is administered by the Department of Environment and Conservation. Celestin Hutchinson: Is the Council representing the community? Mr Sheedy responded: We have advertised for the 35 day period as part of this process and Council will consider the interest of the whole community. Leteisha Jewell: 43 Gelorup Rise, Gelorup: Does anyone know what effect this will have on the next generation? Mr Bishop responded: No. Genevieve Daley – 43 Gelorup Rise, Gelorup: Do you have any evidence that the kangaroos living on the dump are healthy and fertile? Would you like to live on a toxic waste dump? Mr Bishop responded: No. Leteisha Jewell: So does that mean that you don’t know if this will create new cancers/diseases? APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE Nil DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Mr Sheedy declared an impartiality interest in Item 14.2.1 Planning Consent Application Lot 1 Maidment Parade, Dalyellup. The nature of the interest is that he is a resident of Dalyellup. Cr N Jones declared a proximity interest in Item 16.3.1 Adoption of 2009/10 Budget and Differential Rates. The nature of the interest is that he owns property adjoining proposed roadworks included in the Budget. Cr K Gibson declared an impartiality interest in Item 16.3.1 Adoption of 2009/10 Budget and Differential Rates. The nature of the interest is that he is a partner in a solar panel supply and installation company and he has provided quotes to a supplier who is quoting for a job for the Shire. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 6 Cr G Norton declared a proximity interest in Item 16.3.1 Adoption of 2009/10 Budget and Differential Rates. The nature of the interest is that he owns property adjoining proposed roadworks included in the Budget. Cr J Scott declared a proximity interest in Item 16.3.1 Adoption of 2009/10 Budget and Differential Rates. The nature of the interest is that she owns property adjoining proposed roadworks included in the Budget. Cr M Smith declared an impartiality interest in Item 14.2.1 Planning Consent Application Lot 1 Maidment Parade, Dalyellup. The nature of the interest is that she is a member of CoastSwap and Cristal Global donated $5,000 for CoastSwap to purchase a car. NOTICE OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS Nil OC0709 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES – 08.07.09 Moved Cr Smith, Seconded Cr J Scott That the minutes of the Council Meeting held on 8 July 2009, as printed, be confirmed. Carried 11/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority ANNOUNCEMENTS BY PERSON PRESIDING WITHOUT DISCUSSION The Chairman announced that Item 14.2.2 Extractive Industry – Lot 2 Calinup Road, Gelorup, has been withdrawn from the Agenda at the request of the Applicants. PETITIONS/DEPUTATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Nil MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN Nil QUESTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN Nil ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES REPORTS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION OC0710 (13.1.1) Contaminated Site, Capel Basketball/Tennis Courts Goodwood Road REPORTING OFFICER Colin Dent - Manager Health Services 14.07.09 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Nil OWNER/APPLICANT Shire of Capel MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION Closure of the Capel basketball/tennis courts at the Capel Recreation Ground, Goodwood Road, Capel to allow for the rehabilitation of the area by removing the contaminated fill. ATTACHMENTS Provided under separate cover: 1. Executive Summary Radiological Assessment (Phase 1), Coffey Environments, 16 March 2009 2. Executive Summary Radiological Assessment (Phase 2), Coffey Environments, 29 June 2009 APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION Nil BACKGROUND Council’s Sports and Recreation Plan identified the need to redevelop the Capel Recreation Ground. This redevelopment includes installing improved floodlighting, replacing the sports pavilion and installing new hardcourts closer to the building. The project to replace the Capel Sports pavilion commenced in 2008/09 but was delayed due to the need to undertake a radiological survey of the site. This survey is required as the banks of the hardcourts would be disrupted by the building construction process and the source of fill for this area was mineral sands tailings. At its meeting on 11 February 2009 Council approved unbudgeted expenditure to conduct this survey (minute reference OC0203). Coffey Environments were engaged to carry out this radiological survey in March 2009. As a result of receiving the results of the radiological survey the Shire is looking to firstly, close the courts to the public and secondly, remove the contaminated material from the basketball/tennis courts at the Capel oval. This will be done in conjunction with Iluka Resources. The Radiological Council of Western Australia carried out a radiation survey of the Capel townsite in late 1981 and early 1982. The survey found that a range of buildings and localities within the townsite exceeded the background radiation levels set for human habitation. Between 1982 and 1988 the majority of the sites in the townsite were rehabilitated by Westralian Sands (a predecessor of Iluka Resources). Capel Recreation Ground was one of the sites identified in the survey which found that both the oval and the basketball/tennis courts had a higher than background radiation reading. The oval was one of the last sites to be cleaned up in 1988. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 8 During the rehabilitation process at the recreation ground it was noted that whilst there were elevated radiation readings at the basketball courts the readings were on the banks of the courts and were therefore not considered to be a threat to public health. The basketball/tennis courts have been registered as a contaminated site with the Contaminated Site Section of the Department of Environment and Conservation as required under the provisions of the Contaminated Sites Act and Regulations. Council, as owner of the site, is responsible for the remediation of the site. Council has a total of seven sites registered under the Act. STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Contaminated Sites Act 2006 and Regulations The radiological parameters for human exposure to radiation are set by the Radiological Council through the Radiation Safety Act 1975 and the Radiation Safety (General) Regulations 1983. The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Agency, National Directory for Radiation Protection set the national standards. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Nil FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Before the site can be rehabilitated the infrastructure on the site has to be removed, this includes light poles, backboards and two buildings. The lights can be reused on the new multi use courts. A budget allowance of $40,000 has been set aside for works associated with the remediation of the site. This budget excludes removal of fill which will be funded by Iluka Resources. STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS The rehabilitation of the Capel basketball courts meets the requirements of Core Business Area 3, Health and Environment, and Core Business Area 4, Community Services by encouraging a high level of environmental health and provides services to the community that assist in achieving that level. Also to maximise the social, recreational, cultural and economic opportunities for our communities. CONSULTATION Nil COMMENT The results as presented by the Coffey reports indicate that in a realistic worst case assessment the maximum annual dose a member of the public could receive is an exposure of twice the current dose limitation. The realistic worst case assessment assumed an occupancy time of 1 hour per day for 365 days per year in a small area of the courts. The report states that there are areas of the courts that exceed the legal health requirements and goes on to outline several ways in which the levels can be lowered. As the results are known Council now has a duty of care to prevent the public’s exposure to harm and should apply risk management principles and use the “precautionary principle” (a responsibility to intervene and protect the public from exposure to harm, essentially Council have to anticipate harm before it occurs). The most effective method of achieving this is for Council to close the basketball courts to the public and remove the infrastructure; this will assist in preventing people from entering and using the site. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 9 There are several steps that must be taken before the area can be rehabilitated. Council staff have commenced discussions with both the Contaminated Sites Section of the Department of Environment and Conservation and the Radiological Section of the Department of Health regarding the approval to remediate the site. The closure of the courts will not lead to any major disruption to the use of the oval as the oval lies outside the affected area. The basketball club and the tennis club have both ceased using these courts for competition. It should be stressed the radiation at the courts is not considered a serious threat to health as the normal level of usage by any individuals has been lower than the realistic worst case assessment outlined in the Coffey report. With the proposal to reconfigure the courts, and knowing the site contains contaminated fill, Council exercised due diligence by having the site surveyed prior to any construction work commencing. Now the area has been fully surveyed there are certain protocols Council should implement before removing the contaminated material. These are: 1. close the site to public access; 2. inform neighbouring land owners and occupiers of the reasons for the closure and that rehabilitation work will be undertaken; and 3. inform the community and casual users of the facilities of the reasons for the closure and the rehabilitation works to be undertaken. OC0710 STAFF RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL DECISION Moved Cr J Scott, Seconded Cr Fuller Hill That Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to: 1. Close the Capel basketball/tennis courts at the Capel Recreation Ground situated at 17 Goodwood Road, Capel to the public as soon as the area can be secured with fencing; 2. Remove all infrastructure from the site; 3. Inform landowners on Goodwood Road between Berkshire Street and Upson Road that rehabilitation works will commence later this year; 4. Advise the community and casual users of the closure of the courts; and 5. Liaise with Iluka Resources regarding the removal and disposal of the contaminated material. Carried 10/1 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 10 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORTS BUILDING SERVICES SECTION Nil PLANNING SERVICES SECTION Mr Sheedy declared an impartiality interest in Item 14.2.1 Planning Consent Application Lot 1 Maidment Parade, Dalyellup. The nature of the interest is that he is a resident of Dalyellup. Cr M Smith declared an impartiality interest in Item 14.2.1 Planning Consent Application Lot 1 Maidment Parade, Dalyellup. The nature of the interest is that she is a member of CoastSwap and Cristal Global donated $5,000 for CoastSwap to purchase a car. OC0711 (14.2.1) Planning Consent Application Lot 1 Maidment Parade, Dalyellup (C5.2.D.8) REPORTING OFFICER G E Bishop - Senior Planning Officer - Strategic 15.07.09 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Nil OWNER/APPLICANT Cristal Global/Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Pty Ltd MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION An application for Planning Consent to extend the current approval to conduct the land use of disposing of waste from the Millennium Inorganic Chemicals titanium dioxide refining operations for a three year period beyond March 2010. ATTACHMENTS The following attachments are contained in the separate attachments booklet: • • • • • • • • • • • • Location Plan Development Plan Schedule of Submissions EPA Bulletin 706 of October 1993 (includes EPA letter dated 19 December 1988, EPA Bulletin 589 of October 1991 and Ministerial Statement 213 of 23 January 1992) Ministerial Statement 332 of 8 December 1993 Letter from the Chairman of the EPA dated 24 February 2009 Current Licence No 6130/11 under Part V of the Environmental Protection Act Letter from Regional Leader, Department of Environment and Conservation dated 18 June 2009 Letter from the Radiological Council of WA dated 9 July 2009 Chapple Report of April 2002 Report Titled “RADON” of 30 July 2002 South West Environment Centre Report of 5 November 2002 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 11 APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION Background Millennium Inorganic Chemicals (MIC) is a Cristal Global company that produces titanium dioxide pigment (TiO2) for the use in the manufacture of paint, paper, plastic, cosmetics and many other products. MIC has two manufacturing facilities in the south west region near Bunbury. They are the Kemerton chloride plant and the Australind finishing plant. Combined, the two plants produce around 100,000 tonnes of finished pigment each year. MIC also operates a treated solid residue disposal facility at Dalyellup, 8km south of Bunbury. Treated residue from MIC’s process is transported to Dalyellup in a slurry form which consists of 12-15% solid material. The dried residue is an inert, insoluble, non-toxic, clay-like material. MIC continuously monitors the site as required under a licence issued by the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC). 20 years of operation and monitoring at the site reveal no adverse impacts on the surrounding environment or risk to human health. Application for 3 Year Extension Under the Ministerial Statement 332 condition M6:2 Site Management, the finished level of the disposal ponds is to be 24m Australian Height Datum (AHD). Due to improvements in processes and increased efficiency, the 24m level will not be reached by March 2010. It is now anticipated that the 24m level will be reached by 2013. Thus, MIC is proposing a 3 year extension. As approved by the Ministerial condition, the extent of disposal will not go above the height of 24m AHD. This level is shown in the attached development plan. In the development plan, the height limit of disposal is marked with a red line at the 24m AHD level. The development plan shows a mounded area to the north-east of the lot. This is the stockpiled sand which has been kept to backfill the disposal ponds. The ground level in this area will be re-contoured to a level of 26m, which will continue across the site. The 26m level will satisfy the minimum coverage requirement of 2m of fill on top of the ponds. The proposed extension of time will ensure that the resource is fully utilised, which is in line with national and state sustainable environmental objectives. In the case of the sporting field option, the 3 year extension will also result in a uniform level across the site thereby maximising the potential sporting field area. MIC Community Consultation MIC has always been proactive in engaging the Dalyellup community in decision making processes. MIC believes that a consultative, informative approach allows the community to become involved in projects from an early stage, alleviating any fears and preventing the spread of incorrect information. This approach has proven effective in communicating the proposed extension to Dalyellup residents. MIC held two community information meetings before the application was lodged with Capel Shire. The purpose of these meetings was to provide information to the community, and to gauge the community’s view on the extension by giving them the opportunity to provide input and feedback. At the community meetings, MIC gave a historical perspective of the site’s operations, and provided a vision as to the possible end uses of the site. Originally, the site was expected to be rehabilitated into a natural dune system. However, information presented to MIC by the Shire revealed that there was a need for more ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 12 sporting facilities in Dalyellup. Upon investigation, it was revealed that sporting fields may be a compatible end use for the site. Transport Management MIC and the transport contractor, BIS Industrial Logistics, have agreed to a voluntary code of conduct for the operating of the trucks in Dalyellup. The details of this are: • • • Trucks will only operate between 6am and 11pm each day. Trucks will not travel faster than 40km/h whilst in the Dalyellup estate. The use of engine brakes will be limited to emergencies only. They will not be used in normal movements. This measure is to reduce noise impacting on surrounding residents. Brambles are committed to these measures and regularly communicate and enforce them with drivers. Any new driver is made aware of these rules before commencement of duty. There is also a large sign erected at the exit of the landfill facility reminding drivers of these measures. MIC recognises that active management of the transport arrangements is vital in maintaining a good community relationship, especially as more houses are built along the truck route. In the Dalyellup locality the trucks turn off Bussell Highway at Harewoods Road and then into Maidment Parade until they reach the site access road adjacent to the “Green Patch”. Handling Community Complaints MIC has a detailed complaint handling procedure which is applied to the Dalyellup operations, entitled Environmental Occurrence and Complaints Reporting. This procedure details: • • • • The course of action from the time a complaint is received Who is responsible for different actions throughout the process The Investigation procedure Reporting procedures The instruction defines a “verified community complaint” as: “…any notification by a member of the public or a government authority that an emission, odour, noise or discharge is causing public concern. The complaint shall be considered verified if the shift supervisor determines that the Company Operations are the cause of complaint.” Once a community complaint is received, it is recorded in the electronic environmental occurrence report register. This register triggers an investigation stage, and all managers are alerted as well as other relevant parties. Once the investigation is complete, findings and outcomes are communicated back to the original complainant. MIC believes that the complaints system is thorough and adequate for handling any possible complaints which may arise through the Dalyellup operations. Since 2002, there have been 2 community complaints received. The first complaint in 2002 involved a report of tankers exceeding the designated speed limit. Although this report was unverified, MIC spoke to the transport company and reminded them of “the importance of maintaining a healthy relationship with the local community” (environmental occurrence report reference number JPIN-5EQ8SU). The transport company took action in speaking with their drivers, reinforcing the 40km/h speed limit. The complainant was contacted and informed of the outcomes. It was reported the complainant was happy with the outcome. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 13 The second complaint was received in 2007 and was a noise complaint which involved the use of engine brakes on Harewoods Road. MIC spoke with the transport company, who committed to reducing the use of engine brakes whenever possible. This was communicated back to the complainant, who noted that, since reporting the incident, the use of engine brakes had noticeably reduced. As well as handling complaints, MIC believes in actively managing community interests. As such, MIC has encouraged community enquiries, and issues a community fact sheet regarding the Dalyellup operations as needed. Future Rehabilitation Costs The original requirement under the operating licence was to return the site to natural dune vegetation. The main rehabilitation costs are associated with covering the site with 2m of sand and ongoing monitoring. These costs are independent of the final rehabilitation option chosen, and are expected to be in the order of $2,000,000. BACKGROUND Minute No OC0107 of 2001 refers. Council resolved to grant Planning Consent to waste disposal by Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Pty Ltd (MIC) subject to a Deed of Covenant being entered into. Consistent with the term referred to in the Deed, the Planning Consent specifies that the period of approval was until 2 March 2010. MIC and their predecessor, SCM, have been using the disposal site at Dalyellup since 1989. The site is now owned by Landcorp and is leased to MIC for a period that practically mirrors the term of the Shire agreement. The original consent of the Shire to the disposal by SCM of waste material was for a 5 year term. A second agreement was negotiated in 1994 for an eight year term which was due to expire on 1 March 2002. However, prior to that expiry date a new agreement extended the term to 2 March 2010 was negotiated in 2000. At that time a Planning Consent was required as Town Planning Scheme No 7 which had been gazetted in 1998 identified the land use “Waste Disposal” as an ‘AA’ use and therefore one requiring a specific planning approval from Council. Minute OC1211 of 2008 refers. Council endorsed the proposed extension of the dumping of waste material at the Dalyellup disposal site by Cristal Global for a further three year period from 3 March 2010, subject to them obtaining a planning approval from Council and all other necessary State government agency approvals subject to a number of conditions relating to the contribution of a total of $950,000 for capital projects in Dalyellup. The contribution includes an allowance of up to $150,000 to cover consultant costs as part of the program to gain approval for the use of the site to be used as sporting fields. STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Town Planning Scheme No 7 The site is identified as lot 1, comprising of 21.7066ha and is situated in the sand dunes west of Maidment Parade and south of the Water Corporation waste water plant. The subject land was zoned Rural under Town Planning Scheme No 7 until the Greater Bunbury Region Scheme was gazetted after which the Town Planning Scheme No 7 was automatically amended pursuant to 126(1) of the Planning and Development Act 2005 to include the land in a Reserve for Regional Open Space. The waste site is therefore a Non-Conforming Use under Town Planning Scheme No 7. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 14 Town Planning Scheme No 7 provides that a non-conforming use of land that was legally operating prior to a change of zoning that made it non-conforming can continue as of right unless it ceases. Clause 4.2 provides for the right to apply for an extension of a non-conforming use although that would normally be in relation to extending the area or size of the use. In this case there is no extension of the area or permitted size of the use but given the time limit of the current Planning Consent the application has to be treated as an extension. Greater Bunbury Region Scheme Apart from the requirement to obtain a Planning Consent from Council MIC will be required to obtain an approval from the Western Australian Planning Commission pursuant to the requirements of the Greater Bunbury Region Scheme (GBRS). Due to the set up of the GBRS an applicant is required to lodge such an application with the Shire but the Shire has no authority to determine the application and is required to forward it to the WAPC within 7 days of receiving it. Council is required to make a recommendation on the application to the WAPC within 42 days. For the purpose of making a recommendation Council’s decision on the application for Planning Consent under Town Planning Scheme No 7 will provide the basis of a recommendation to the Commission. Environmental Approval In addition to any planning approvals that MIC are required to obtain it must meet the requirement of the Environmental Protection Act, the Radiation Safety Act and Radiation Safety (General) Regulations. In that regard the operation has been the subject of assessments by the EPA and is approved by Ministerial Statements under Part IV of the EP Act. It is also the subject of a licence under Part V of the EP Act. The previous EPA assessments set out in its first letter dated 19 December 1988 and subsequent Bulletins 589 of October 1991 and 706 of October 1993 along with Ministerial Statements 213 of January 1992 and 332 of December 1993 are included in the attachments booklet for this agenda. The assessments published in the Bulletins and Ministerial Statements conclude that the operation is environmentally acceptable subject to conditions. The Chairman of the EPA has also advised in a letter to MIC dated 24 February 2009 (letter included in the attachments booklet) that subject to compliance with Ministerial Statements 221 and 332 and most particularly that the capacity of the site is not exceeded (as limited by the 24m AHD contour level), the environmental impact of the operation will not increase. That letter also states that the continued operation at the site can be managed under a Part V licence. The Department of Environmental and Conservation administers the process for the issuing of a licence under Part V of the Environmental Protection Act. A copy of the current licence is included as an attachment to this report. Part V of the Act sets out a formal process for applications for licences to be assessed, including provision for 21 day public comment period prior to a determination and appeals against conditions if a licence is issued. A new licence for a period beyond the current expiry date of 18 January 2010 will be required for MIC to continue and they have recently commenced the process for that application. Advice was requested from DEC about risk from the waste and the monitoring program. A letter from the Regional Leader SW of the Department of Environment and Conservation dated 18 June 2009 (copy included in the attachments booklet for this agenda) confirms that leaching from the site has not exceeded acceptable environmental and health standards in the groundwater beneath the residue disposal site since its inception. The letter also confirms that through a requirement to use a NATA accredited laboratory to analyse samples, and it being an offence to breach any condition of a licence or to provide incorrect or misleading information, the ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 15 Department is provided with appropriate confidence, integrity and independence in monitoring results and reports. The DEC letter notes that matters of toxic risk are referred to the Department of Health (DH). Discussions with an officer of the Toxicology Branch of the Environmental Health Directorate of DH suggests that they have not received or asked for information that would enable a formal toxicological assessment of the operation as the principle focus has been on radiation which has been addressed by the Radiation Branch. The understanding that the waste is well contained and that water leaching is monitored has lead to a conclusion that the factors that could result in exposure to contaminants at toxic levels will be avoided. However the discussions with DEC and DH officers have confirmed that if during the DEC assessment of any future licence renewal members of the community raise concerns about toxicity they can be specifically investigated by them. Radiological Council of WA The Radiation Branch of the Environmental Health Directorate of the DH reports to the Radiological Council of Western Australian which is responsible for ensuring public safety in relation to radiation. It requires anyone handling material that contains radioactive elements to comply with the Radiation Safety Act and Radiation Safety (General) Regulations. MIC has an approval from the Council which is subject to a regime of monitoring and reporting to verify the safety of the operation. The Council has advised MIC that it has no objection to the continued use of the site in principal and will consider the proposal further with particular reference to proposed radiation monitoring plans. Notwithstanding that any Radiological Council approval stands separately from that of the Shire Council’s Planning Consent advice was requested regarding the level of radiation and monitoring. A letter from the Secretary of the Radiological Council dated 9 July 2009 confirms that the emissions from the site after rehabilitation do not exceed normal background levels on the Swan Coastal Plain (copy included in the attachments booklet for this agenda). It also confirms that no adverse monitoring results have been reported. Reports of monitoring are submitted annually by the company for review by officers of the Radiological Council and they have also conducted site visits to verify results. Contaminated Site The site was registered in May 2007 as a Contaminated Site, as required under the Contaminated Sites Act 2003. The Contaminated Sites Branch of DEC must complete a classification process of the registered site. The registration and classification process gives notice of a contaminated material to any future owners or users of the site so that it is not disturbed. The DEC data base cross references registered sites to Works Licences so there is also a record of contaminants through licensing and monitoring processes. It also has the effect of identifying the source of contamination and therefore who is responsible for causing it. The liability for contamination will rest with MIC beyond any cessation of dumping and therefore it has a clear incentive to ensure that the operation of the site is managed to avoid both short and long term adverse effects. Approval will need to be obtained from the Contaminated Sites Branch of DEC and the Radiological Council for the option of using the rehabilitated site for playing fields. If approval cannot be obtained the rehabilitation of the site will consist of a dune vegetation system. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 16 Transport Approval The operation of the trucks which deliver the waste to the site is subject to permit control under the Road Traffic Act. A heavy haulage route is approved by Main Roads WA by which the trucking company is permitted to operate truck trailer tanker combinations to the site. As stated in the Applicant’s Submission the trucking company limits the truck speed to 40km/h where it passes through the residential area. This approach both reduces the risk of vehicle conflict and reduces damage to road pavements during turning movements. Conclusion In conclusion it should be noted that regardless of any Planning Consent that might be granted MIC can not operate without all the relevant approvals. That situation serves to clarify what authority is responsible for what aspect of the activity and highlights why it is not necessary for Council to attempt to duplicate an environmental assessment process. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Nil FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Some critical comment in submissions has focused on MIC having paid the Shire funds while it continues to dispose of its waste at the site. Funds have been paid in the past and will be paid in the future for the purpose of providing community facilities at Dalyellup. From the time of the original approval the company constructed public roads (Harewoods Rd and Minninup Road which is now named Maidment Parade, a new culvert over Five Mile Brook Division Drain and a public access, car park and toilet block at Dalyellup Beach. A contribution was also made to the Gelorup Community Centre. Subsequently funds were paid and to date most of that remains in a reserve account for the future use. The fact that MIC is prepared to make a further contribution of $950,000 to the provision of capital works for community facilities is a demonstration of its willingness to create a public benefit from the operation it conducts consistent with the practice of other large industrial and mining companies in the South West. There was no community at Dalyellup when the operation commenced in 1989 but the company accepted that the Shire was best placed to ultimately adjudicate on which community projects should receive funding as the need arises so the stage contributions committed to in a Deed of Covenant are held in a reserve account for future projects. However that cannot influence this decision before Council and does stand apart from any Planning Consent that the Council may grant. It should be noted that the Deed of Covenant negotiated in 2000 in which MIC undertakes to pay moneys to the Shire specifically acknowledges that the deed is not be taken as any consent required by the Town Planning Scheme. A valid financial implication that is relevant to the application is that which potentially flows from the possible end land use of the site for playing fields. The EPA has stated in its past assessment (reported in Bulletin 589) that rehabilitation for recreational use would be one of the few acceptable end land uses for the site given its proximity to the sewerage treatment plant. Nevertheless a study of the site to identify any limitations to its use for playing fields will be required. In that regard MIC has identified that up to $150,000 could be needed to fund an environmental assessment to confirm or otherwise the suitability of the site for playing fields after disposal is completed. The company has agreed to meet that cost as part of its further commitment to capital works in Dalyellup but it would be appropriate to identify that as a condition of any Planning Consent. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 17 STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Greater Bunbury Region Scheme The Region Scheme reserves the subject land as Regional Open Space (ROS). It is separated from the ROS which will be managed as the Ocean to Preston River Regional Park by the reserve for Public Purposes which covers the sewerage treatment plant. The land was also included in the ROS due to it being encumbered by the odour buffer of the Water Corporation sewerage treatment plant and the chlorine storage buffer for the scheme water treatment facility. The GBRS effectively uses the ROS designation as a method of protecting the buffer of those strategic State owned assets. Nevertheless a future use of the land for recreation would be consistent with ROS designation provided that the risk of occasional odours is acknowledged. Shire of Capel Land Use Strategy The Land Use Strategy includes the area within Planning Unit BU6. The objective for the Unit is to provide for urban expansion whilst conserving significant areas of natural environmental value. As the subject land is within the odour buffer of the sewerage treatment plant it cannot be available for residential development and its prior disturbance makes its use for playing fields development a practical consideration. Future Playing Fields Shire of Capel Strategic Plan Core Business Area1 – Infrastructure, Action 4.6 states “Provide, improve, maintain sporting fields and reserves for the enjoyment of the community”. The provision of suitable options for the provision of playing fields for the future needs of the community of Dalyellup has been an ongoing problem due primarily to the reduction in areas that can be used for that purpose. This has come about through demands to conserve areas of remnant vegetation on the recreation reserve which was the former Gelorup tip reserve off Harewoods Road held by the Shire. This has lead to a majority of the land being reserved for conservation under the GBRS. Also areas given up for Public Open Space by subdividers are being used to satisfy State and Federal Government requirements for habitat protection. The disposal site provides an option for future playing fields if it is levelled and rehabilitated to accommodate turf surfaces and a relevant geotechnical and environmental assessment is completed to confirm its suitability for the purpose. CONSULTATION Town Planning Scheme No 7 does not require that an application such as that before Council must be advertised for public comment as the application is for an extension (of time) of a non-conforming use. However given the past public interest in the matter it was decided to advertise the application for comment and in accordance with Council’s recent practice a notice was placed in the community newsletters circulating in the district of the Shire. In the case of Gelorup and Dalyellup the newsletter is delivered to all households. The notice was also placed on the Shire website along with an electronic copy of the application. Relevant Government Departments were also provided with a copy of the application and invited to comment. Submissions received are summarised in a Schedule included as an attachment to this report. The advertisement period ran for 35 days although many of the pro-forma submissions were received after the nominated closing date of 7 May 2009. The issue also received local television, radio and newspaper exposure during the advertisement period. A Schedule of Submissions is included as an attachment to this report. Submissions have been summarised and responses from the applicants have been provided and ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 18 are identified in italics. Staff comments in normal type and recommendations are shown in bold type. The names of persons making the submissions have been omitted based on advice from the Local Government Department. The submissions in the form of a pro-forma letter were facilitated by one of the submitters. It should be noted that when presented to the community for their use the pro-forma letter was attached to a sheet titled “Dalyellup – The Uncomfortable Truth” which on careful analysis can be seen to selectively present information, opinion and some incorrect statements that does not present the “truth” about the activity. It is likely that this has contributed to the level and style of responses from residents. One submission attached a photocopy of a petition organised by the submitter with the heading “As a community member I wish to inform Capel Shire Council that I support the closure of the Millennium Inorganic Chemicals waste site in Dalyellup and I do not wish the council to extend the period of approval to dispose of Titanium Dioxide residue there.” It contains the names of 302 persons some of whom do not reside in Dalyellup coming from localities of Mandurah, Eaton, Bunbury, Stratham, Gelorup and Busselton. Some of the persons including the author submitted individual or pro-forma submissions. The petition adds no factual evidence to support the contention that the application should not be approved. COMMENT Scope of Council’s Decision Council does have a responsibility to receive and determine land use applications. Where applicants exercise their right to make an application Council is required to consider the applications to the best of its ability on the facts and merits of the case. Applications cannot be summarily dismissed because some members of the public have strong opinions that generate objections. In making this land use planning decision Council should have regard to the matters such as the potential affect on adjoining land uses, the affect of road transport, the affect on the local environment and in the case of a short term land use what will be the end or long term land use opportunities. It should confine itself to relevant considerations to avoid making a decision which is open to review and therefore being overturned. Relevant considerations will include the facts that can be gleaned from the application, public submissions, and the decisions of government agencies responsible for administering relevant legislation. In exercising its responsibility as a planning authority Council has a quasi-judicial role in which it is obliged to consider the facts and the merits of the case. In regard to public submissions it should have due regard to the factual substance of submissions both for and against and not be influenced by the weight of numbers or unsubstantiated opinions. Applying procedural discipline when making a land use planning decision, by focusing on the relevant facts, is an important facet of such decisions. Any tendencies to do otherwise will leave Council’s decision open to review both on matters of fact and law. Environmental and Health Risks As noted in the Statutory Environment section of this report the issues relating to environmental and health risks are dealt with by State authorities and relevant conditional approvals are issued and monitored by them. Nevertheless some comments need to be made in response to the submissions which have raised concerns about these matters. While State authorities do address issues of environmental impact and health risk in accordance with their statutory authority and legislated processes the Shire is obliged to defer to them. This is evidenced by the fact that any land use planning approval that it grants does not override the requirement to hold approvals under other legislation. So long as the MIC holds other relevant approvals purported issues of concern regarding them should not be ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 19 used to influence the land use planning approval. It is important for Council to consider those matters for which it has clear responsibility in making its land use planning decision. Environmental matters are relevant considerations in land use planning but where a responsible authority makes a decision dealing with such issues; particularly where they are of a specialist/technical nature Council should leave those matters to those authorities. It would be unsafe to make a land use planning decision based on the concerns of residents about environmental and health issues when the other authorities charged with the responsibility to address those matters have made specific decisions about those issues. The relevant facts in relation to these matters are that the responsible authorities have determined that the activity can occur safely subject to monitoring and reporting to their satisfaction. It should also be understood that those decision making bodies receive and assess applications to them in accordance with a legislated framework which provides a level of procedural fairness to applicants which can’t be overridden. Some submissions have sought to degrade the value of the reporting to State authorities because it is done by consultants engaged by the company. Apart from ignoring that these consultants are specialists with NATA (National Association of Testing Authorities) certification it ignores the commercial incentive of the company to be informed as early as possible of any adverse environmental impacts from its activity so that it can correct them and avoid creating a liability. Through the operation of the Contaminated Sites Act the liability will be attached to the company even after the operation finishes. Also the Ministerial Statement 332 requires that the operation be conducted so as “to protect the environment from unacceptable environmental impacts.” That condition gives broad scope for the company to be prosecuted for a breach of approval and it is in its best interest to know whether it is creating a legal and therefore financial liability of itself. In the document referred to as the Chapple Report (copy included in the attachments booklet for this agenda) the author gave no justification for the claim that all residents of Dalyellup should be given independent information on the nature of the waste so that they are able to make an informed decision. He made no comment as to the scope of what the independent advice should cover. The report by Chapple itself confirmed that on the rehabilitated portion of the site radiation readings were the same as background levels for the Swan Coastal Plain. The EPA, DEC and Radiological Council of WA had approved the activity and were satisfied that the site did not pose a public health or environmental risk. Further, no residential properties were exposed to the waste or included land affected by the waste so the claim that residents should be informed is impossible to respond to and is susceptible to the criticism that it is so vague as to be irresponsible. It is also ill-conceived in so far as it seems to be directed to the Shire (that is the way it has been used in references by persons in submissions) when the specific approvals which have authorised the activity in respect to environmental management and public health risk come from State agencies responsible for those issues. Robin Chapple was a member of the Legislative Council of State Parliament at the time and would have known or should have known the proper approach to pursue at State level any claims about risk that could be sustained. End Land Use In considering the extension of the non-conforming use of waste disposal it is appropriate to consider the effect on long term land use options for the site. It has long been held that the only viable uses for the land are to return it to a coastal dune land form and vegetation system, use it for recreation or a combination of the two. The potential long term end land use of part of the site as playing fields is consistent with the reservation of the land as Regional Open Space. The EPA advised in Bulletin 589 that recreation would be one of the only acceptable outcomes given the location of the land within the odour buffer of the south Bunbury waste water (sewerage) treatment plant. The conclusion that the site would be suitable for such a use after ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 20 rehabilitation is also consistent with the predicted outcome that covering the residue with 2m of sand will reduce the emission of radiation to background levels consistent with the rest of the Swan Coastal Plain. However the suitability of the completed site for sporting playing fields will need to be confirmed in the light of current legislative requirements under the Contaminated Sites Act. A total volume of 755,000 m3 (final settled volume after drying) of residue will have been deposited at the site by March 2010 and will remain regardless of whether or not an extension of time is granted. The disposal of residue until 2013 will not exceed the volume of residue recommended by the EPA assessment in Bulletin 706 and approved by Ministerial Statement 332 as it will not exceed the 24m AHD level specified. The company estimates that the additional final settled volume that could be deposited over the extended period is 135,000 m3 which represents 15% of the total potential volume of the site. The filling of the site with waste to the previously approved contour and then the subsequent levelling of it with cover fill will create a level area of 10-12 ha that could potentially be used for playing fields subject to relevant approvals. The balance of the 21 ha site can be maintained as coastal dune landscape and vegetation. Objections to the end land use of playing fields which have come from residents of Hutt Drive and others concerned about traffic pressure can be partly addressed by not providing anything other than pedestrian/cycleway access from Hutt Drive and maintaining a reasonable setback of the existing dune vegetation restoration adjacent to Hutt Drive. Other concerns about the possible traffic impacts from a sporting field complex may arise from a lack of awareness that the road network in Dalyellup has been designed to cater for a larger community (16-17,000 people) than currently exists. The level of traffic movements that could be generated by the playing fields is not large relative to the capacity of the road network. The playing fields would have to be developed in stages with the growth of the community and according to the rate revenue base that will be required to support long term maintenance so any traffic increase will be gradual and manageable. The intersection of the site access road on Maidment Parade may need specific design assessment and upgrading but that does not mean the traffic impacts on Maidment Parade will be significant relative to other traffic that could be moving through the area when Dalyellup is fully developed. Norton Promenade and Maidment Parade are classed as Neighbourhood Connector Roads within the district road hierarchy. They have good connectivity to the rest of Dalyellup where the majority of the trips to the playing fields would be generated and have the capacity to provide adequate road access without loss of amenity to residents. Land Use Conflicts The site is within the odour buffer of the waste water treatment plant which is expected to remain for the foreseeable future and the water table movement is known to move towards the ocean. Those are some of the fundamental reasons why the site was selected originally. There is no land use conflict arising from the site itself which is confirmed by the EPA assessments, Ministerial Statements and DEC licences and the ability for the site to be rehabilitated to a land form of coastal dunes or recreation subject to further approval. Whilst the site is being used it is secured by a perimeter fence and security patrols are conducted to verify the integrity of it. The company has undertaken to continue with those arrangements and that should be recorded in any approval if granted. The only external impact that can be seen to potentially affect the community is the delivery of the waste using truck/trailer combinations through the road network that is used by a growing number of local residents. The truck movements are strictly controlled and the trucking company adheres to a speed limit of 40 km/h which gives increased margin to avoid conflict. The applicants have advised that the trucking company uses the latest technology to increase public safety such as driver fatigue ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 21 monitoring. There are approximately 7 deliveries per day between the hours of 6.00am and 11.00pm. When compared to the frequency of other potential truck movements from sand carting and subdivision and housing construction that occur in the locality this is not a significant number. However the truck movements have been a concern raised by some residents and from their viewpoint the additional time of three years will add to the problem. There will also be additional residents moving into the area over the proposed extended period which could lead to further awareness of the trucks. MIC has responded to complaints in the past and has offered to work with the community to continue to try to improve the situation. The portion of the disposal area closest to housing has been capped since 2003 and has been rehabilitated. Once rehabilitated it does not emit radiation above background levels for the Swan Coastal Plain. The waste that is located in that portion of the site will remain and the minimum coverage of 2m of sand will not be disturbed by the development of playing fields if they are approved and proceeded with so the extension of time to fill the balance of the site will not create a land use conflict. Site Stability Relative to Sea Level Rise The base of the waste in the pits is approximately 7m above current sea level and the western face of the pits vary from 135m to 160m from the western edge of the frontal dune ocean high water mark. It is set back further from the ocean high water mark than housing to the south. In March this year a group of scientists in Europe presented findings which suggested a sea level rise of 1m by 2100 which is higher than the fourth IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) finding which predicts up to 0.8m of rise. It should be understood that estimates for sea level rise are calculated with computer modelling that has to use a range of assumptions and it is expected that the severity of the rise will vary from region to region around the world. The effects of storm events will vary with regions and also the threat of erosion will vary with the geomorphology of localities among other things. Even if the more severe predicted sea level rise of 1m by 2100 is applied to the WAPC SPP 2.6 State Coastal Planning Policy guidelines which includes allowing for sea level rise the existing setback in front of the waste site is sufficient for the waste not to be exposed. In any event the proposal to use the capacity of the site by filling to the 24m AHD level will not increase the risk of exposure due to sea level rise. Conclusion The relevant facts and merits of the case with respect to land use planning that are applicable to this application are not complex and should not be clouded by unsubstantiated comments and speculation. The application is only to extend the time over which the operation can occur in accordance with existing environmental approval from the Minister for the Environment and will be subject to a further licence under Part V of the EP Act and approval from the Radiological Council through which the operation will continue to be monitored. 755,000m3 of waste will have been deposited at the site by the end of the current Planning Consent and a further 135,00m3 which represents 15% of the potential total will be deposited if approval is granted to March 2013. If the community has concerns over the environmental and health affects of the operation now or with any extended time period they should direct those concerns to the relevant authorities through the EP Act Part V licensing process. The available facts confirm that the effect of this short term land use on the potential long term use of the land and adjacent land uses in the locality will not cause a conflict. Subject to further environmental approval it will provide a good option for future sporting playing field development. Truck movements are carefully managed by the truck contractors and the effect on the local road network and residents do ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 22 not currently appear to be so adverse as to warrant not approving the application. Ongoing community consultation about truck movements can provide an opportunity to resolve further concerns if they arise and if necessary advice can be given to Main Roads WA regarding the ongoing designation of Harewoods Road and Maidment Parade as a heavy haulage route. The Chairman advised that in paragraph 1(d) of the Staff Recommendation, the condition referred to in Line 4 should read (c), not (b). Cr M Smith left the Chambers at 5.46pm and returned at 5.48pm. Mr Dent left the Chambers at 5.50pm and returned at 5.51pm. Mr Ross left the Chambers at 6.00pm at returned at 6.01pm. OC0711 STAFF RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL DECISION Moved Cr Caratti, Seconded Cr Bell That Council resolves to: 1 Grant Planning Consent to the extension of the non-conforming use of disposing of waste residue to lot 1 Maidment Parade, Dalyellup from the Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Pty Ltd titanium dioxide refining operations at Kemerton and Australind for a three year period beyond March 2010 subject to: (a) The disposal activity ceasing on 4 March 2013. (b) The maintenance of the existing fencing of the disposal site and the ongoing use of a security monitoring service to check the site integrity on a regular basis. (c) Prior to cessation of disposal Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Pty Ltd shall make all necessary applications and make all reasonable efforts at its cost to secure relevant Government agency approvals to confirm that upon cessation of disposal and appropriate rehabilitation that the disposal area of lot 1 can be used for the development of sporting playing fields and associated infrastructure in accordance with concept plans to be provided by Council. (d) Immediately upon cessation of disposal, and having regard to weather conditions, the site being rehabilitated to the satisfaction of Council so as to facilitate the development of sporting playing fields if relevant approvals referred to in condition (c) have been obtained. The portion of lot 1 not to be developed with sporting playing fields shall be rehabilitated to a coastal dune landscape and vegetation system and maintained for a two year period to the satisfaction of Council. (e) In the event that approvals to the development of sporting playing fields cannot be obtained the whole of lot 1 shall be rehabilitated to a coastal dune landscape and vegetation system, including a system of pedestrian/cycle paths, and be maintained for a two year period to the satisfaction of Council. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 (f) 23 Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Pty Ltd shall conduct community consultation to the satisfaction of Council every 6 months, commencing 4 March 2010, during the life of the operation to invite comment on the truck movements associated with the disposal operation and to identify opportunities to respond to community concerns if they arise. Council will reserve the right to advise Main Roads WA that the heavy haulage route approval through the Dalyellup locality should be modified in the event of truck movements associated with the disposal operation proving to be the cause of unreasonable impacts on the residents of the locality. 2 Note that in the event of sporting playing fields being developed on lot 1 vehicle access will be based on entering from Maidment Parade and that pedestrian/cycleway access will be provided from Hutt Drive. The existing rehabilitated land form and vegetation will be retained along the Hutt Drive frontage within a setback of 60m from the southern boundary of lot 1. 3 Adopt the recommendations in respect to submissions set out in the Schedule of Submissions to this report as included in the attachments booklet to the agenda. 4 Advise the Western Australian Planning Commission that in response to any application pursuant to the Greater Bunbury Region Scheme required from Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Pty Ltd to continue to conduct the disposal of its residue on lot 1 for 3 years beyond the current approval Council recommends that approval can be granted consistent with its Planning Consent. Carried 7/4 Councillors Fuller Hill and Akl requested it be recorded that they voted against the motion. VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority Correction as per Council resolution OC0801 12/08/09 The members of the gallery left the Chambers at 6.19pm and did not return. Councillors Fuller Hill and Akl left the Chambers at 6.19pm and did not return asked to be excused from the meeting and left the Chambers at 6.19pm and did not return. Mr Bishop left the Chambers at 6.20pm and did not return. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 24 (14.2.2) Extractive Industry – Lot 2 Calinup Road, Gelorup (C.5.2.N.76) NOTE: The President advised the meeting that the applicant’s Environmental Consultant has requested that this item be withdrawn to allow for additional information to be provided, and discussion with Shire staff. This request was agreed to by Council. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 OC0712 (14.2.3) Home Occupation – Lot 5 (C5.2.C.131) 25 (No 5) Brockman Street, Capel REPORTING OFFICER C Burwood – Director Planning & Development Services 14.07.09 G Panorios – Planning Officer 09.07.09 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Nil OWNER/APPLICANT A N Cahill/A N Cahill MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION Planning Consent sought to conduct a Home Occupation as a Florist operating from a shed at the rear of the existing house. ATTACHMENT Attachment 1 - Location Plan APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION Letter of 5 May 2009 The owner/applicant has owned and operated Capel Blue in the Capel town for 5 years and now would like to down size and operate the business from home due to family commitments. The owner/applicant would rather operate from home rather than close the business down completely after spending so much time and energy building up the business. The owner/applicant wishes to do flower arrangements by phone order and deliver them, having very limited clientele come to the house for appointments for bridal and function quotes therefore reducing traffic flow on Brockman Street. Operating hours to be from 9am to 4pm Monday to Friday. Letter of 30 June 2009 The owner/applicant has advised that there will be no sale of retail giftware from home and will be doing floristry only on a very small scale. There will be no advertising out the front of the house. The owner/applicant has also submitted a plan indicating a 54m2 shed from which the business will be conducted and stated that the area to be used will consist of a bench and a refrigerator which will occupy half of this shed (27m2). Verbal Advice from Applicant Flowers will be delivered by courier to the owner’s residence 2 to 3 times per week and the owner will deliver flowers to clients as required. • After discussion with staff the owner/applicant has advised that it is not necessary to have any clients come to the residence and the area of floor space usage can be reduced to 20m2. • The applicant has been trying to sell the business and this is the owner’s preferred outcome but has been unsuccessful in these endeavours. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 26 • Due to family pressures and needs it is important that the owner discontinue the existing business and as it has not been possible to sell the business the next option is to continue it in a smaller, less demanding scale from home. BACKGROUND January 1989 – Building license issued for the construction of a shed. The owner/applicant is currently operating a florist and gift shop business from Lot 13 (No. 34) Forrest Road, Capel in the Town Centre Zone (approx. 96m2). This business is currently for sale. Prior to this the owner/applicant occupied premises at Lot 4 (No. 28) Forrest Road again in the Town Centre Zone (32m2). STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Under the Shire of Capel Town Planning Scheme No 7 Lot 5 is zoned Residential R10/R15 and has an area of 1514m2. A ‘Home Occupation’ under the Town Planning Scheme No 7 is an ‘AA’ land use in a Residential zone. An ‘AA’ use is a use that is not permitted unless the Council has granted Planning Consent and may involve public advertising. The following clauses of the scheme apply to this development: 1.6 – Scheme Objectives 1.6.1 - To direct and control the development of the Scheme area in such a way as shall promote and safeguard the health, safety, economic and general welfare of its inhabitants and shall conserve the natural values of the District. 1.6.4 - To provide standards to secure and maintain the orderly and properly planned development of land within the Scheme area. Clause 7.5.1 of the Scheme states, in part, that a person may with the consent of the Council conduct a Home Occupation provided it complies with the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Does not affect the amenity of the neighbourhood; Does not entail employment of any person not being a family member; Does not occupy an area greater than 20m2; Does not require the provision of a greater service main other than that which exists; Does not in the opinion of the Council, by reason of its nature or scale, constitute a use that would more appropriately be located in another zone other than a Residential zone; Will not generate a volume of traffic that will prejudice the amenity of the area. Clause 7.5.2 sets out general conditions that may be imposed on an approval that includes, in part: (a) (b) (c) (d) The approval shall be personal to the applicant and shall not be transferred to or assigned to any other person; The approval shall not run with the land in respect of which it was granted; The person to whom approval is granted by the Council to carry on a home occupation shall not carry on that home occupation at any premises other than the land in respect of which the Council’s approval is granted; A time limit of 12 months after which a further approval is required; and ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 (e) 27 If in the opinion of the Council the Home Occupation is causing a nuisance or annoyance to owners or occupiers of the land in the neighbourhood, the Council may withdraw the approval granted. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Policy 15.4 – Home Occupations The Policy reiterates the Town Planning Scheme provisions referred to under the Statutory Environment section of this report. It also states that Council will give regard to the hours of operation of the activity, level of attendance of customers at the premises, that no retailing will be permitted and that the application will be advertised for 21 days to adjoining land owners. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Nil STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Shire of Capel Strategic Plan 2003 - 2007 Core Business Area 2: Land Use In part, the Shire of Capel’s objectives are to: • • Ensure that development of the district is sustainable; and Facilitate economic land use opportunities. Capel Townsite Strategy - 2009 The Capel Townsite Strategy was adopted by Council in July 2009. The following parts of the Strategy apply to this application: 6.2 VISION “To promote and facilitate the growth of the Capel townsite as a sustainable and vibrant village that is a significant settlement and economic centre within the Shire of Capel”. 6.3 AIMS & OBJECTIVES The aims and objectives of the Capel Townsite Strategy are in part to3 Promote the growth of the town in a manner that is sustainable and retains the existing natural and built form character. 5 Provide for a variety of development to meet the needs of the community with regard to housing, employment and services, and to facilitate the provision of a wide range of social and cultural facilities and services. 13 Promote sustainable development that integrates consideration of economic, environmental and social goals. 6.4 STRATEGIES & ACTIONS 6.5.2 Economy and Employment ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 28 Strategy To increase the level of employment self-sufficiency within the Capel townsite by providing appropriately zoned land for a variety of land uses and businesses and to maximise the location of the town as a service centre/transport hub between the major urban areas of Busselton and Bunbury. Actions (i) Provide for expansion of the retail/commercial component of the Capel town centre through relevant structure planning and zoning changes with this to be focussed towards areas of greater visitor interest ……….. (ii) Provide for employment generating home-based business through provisions for Home Offices, Home Occupations and more intense Home Businesses. CONSULTATION Seven adjoining neighbours were consulted. No comments were received. The Manager Health Services has not identified any adverse health issues which may arise with the proposed use. COMMENT The nature of this application is unusual in that the normal logical sequence of events is for a “Home Occupation” to commence at a residential premise and with growth and improved viability to then relocate to a ‘Town Centre’ zoned premises. In this instance the situation is quite the reverse in that the owner/applicant advised that whilst it is considered to be a viable business that has operated in Town Centre for five (5) years, due to difficulties in selling the business and demands of family life, the only option for the owner/applicant is to down size business and operate from home. has the the the Home Occupation Provisions The proposal has been assessed and advertised as a proposed Home Occupation in accordance with the requirements of the Town Planning Scheme, Policy 15.4 Home Occupations and normal procedural requirements which included writing to surrounding owners. Given the applicant has advised staff that no clients will attend the premises, that the floor space of the activity will be limited to 20m2 and no objections were received from adjoining neighbours, the application is significantly in compliance of Scheme and Policy requirements with the exception that Council needs to consider Clause 7.5.1 (e) of the Scheme which states: “A person may with the consent of Council conduct a Home Occupation provided it does not in the opinion of the Council, by reason of its nature or scale, constitute a use that would more appropriately be located in another zone, other than a Residential Zone”. In respect to the above provision the owner/applicant’s existing business clearly needs to be in the Town Centre zone given it has the following elements: • Retailing of giftwear and flowers; • A floorspace of 96m2; and • Walk off the street clientele. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 29 The proposed Home Occupation is distinctly different in terms of nature and scale of activity as it is intended to involve: • Phone ordering of flowers and delivery to customers; • A floorspace of 20m2; and • No customer attendance at premises. It would appear that the proposed Home Occupation in a Residential area would in terms of nature and scale be acceptable however prior to reaching final determination the Council needs to also consider and accept that such an approval would not be contrary to the intent of its Strategic Plan and Capel Townsite Strategy. Strategic Provisions The Strategic Plan provides that the Shire of Capel’s objectives include ensuring that development of the district is sustainable and to ‘facilitate economic land use opportunities’. In the context of the proposal this maybe interpreted to mean that it should support, promote and approve appropriate land uses both commercial and home occupations in its district. Similarly the Capel Townsite Strategy has the Vision to promote and facilitate the growth of the Capel Townsite as a sustainable settlement and economic centre. The Vision is to be achieved by a range of objectives including promoting the growth of the town in a sustainable manner and providing for development to meet the needs of the community with services. In the context of this proposal it maybe interpreted that to agree to a business activity being relocated to a residential area is not promoting the growth of the towns retail centre, although this needs to also be viewed giving regard to the downsizing of the business in this instance. In respect to meeting the needs of the community it is apparent that there is a possibility that the existing business may close and that approval of the ‘Home Occupation’ is a means of continuing this service for the community. Apart from the more general Vision and Objectives of the Capel Townsite Strategy it has a more specific Strategy requirement which states that it is Council’s intent to undertake actions to: 1. Increase the level of employment self sufficiency with the townsite by providing for the appropriately zoned land; and 2. Providing for employment generating home based business. In specific consideration of the Strategic Planning references it is apparent that Council has two options that it can consider in determining the application: 1. To refuse the proposal as it is considered that by allowing the business to relocate from the Town Centre zone to a Residential Zone is in conflict with the general Vision and Objectives to promote the growth of Capel Townsite as a sustainable economic centre; or 2. To approve of the proposal as it is considered to be consistent with the general Vision and Objectives as the continuation of the business even at a smaller scale does continue to provide economic and employment benefits to the town. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 30 Conclusion On balance, given the proposal meets the ‘Home Occupation’ provisions, that it is proposed to scale down the activity from its present form, that it can be seen to be consistent with the specific ‘Economy and Employment Strategies/Actions’ of the Capel Townsite Strategy and importantly it will continue to provide a service to the community, the application may be approved. Any approval granted will however need to be conditioned to ensure the nature of the activity is clearly a low key activity suited to a residential environment. OC0712 STAFF RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL DECISION Moved Cr Caratti, Seconded Cr Gibson That Council resolves to grant Planning Consent pursuant to Clause 8.3.3 of Town Planning Scheme No 7 to the proposed Home Occupation- Florist from the existing shed at lot 5 Brockman Street, Capel subject to compliance with the following conditions: • • • • • • • • • • • • The approval being valid for a period of 12 months after which a further approval is required; The approval is personal to the owner/applicant Alicia Nardia Cahill and shall not be transferred to or assigned to any other person; No person other than the applicant being employed in the activity; The approval does not run with the land in respect of which it was granted; The owner/applicant shall not carry on the home occupation at any premises other than in the approved premises at Lot 5; The owner/applicant to partition off an area no greater than 20m2 within the existing shed to use for the home occupation activity to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Development Services; No retailing is permitted from the premises at Lot 5; No advertising of the business activity is permitted at the frontage of Lot 5; No clients being encouraged, invited or permitted to visit the premises; Flower delivery vehicles parking and unloading within the confines of Lot 5; The hours of business being restricted to 0900 to 1600 hours Monday to Friday; and Council reserves the right to withdraw this approval if the Home Occupation causes a nuisance or annoyance to owners or occupiers of land in the neighbourhood. Carried 9/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 31 TECHNICAL SERVICES REPORTS TECHNICAL SERVICES SECTION Nil CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORTS GOVERNANCE OC0713 (16.1.1) Trading Hours Amendment Bill REPORTING OFFICER PF Sheedy – Chief Executive Officer 13.07.09 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Nil OWNER/APPLICANT Mick Murray MLA, Member for Collie-Preston MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION Council is requested to indicate to the Member for Collie-Preston its views on the proposed Trading Hours Amendment Bill allowing for extended retail trading. ATTACHMENTS Nil APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION The Government is about to introduce a Bill that will allow retail shops to stay open until 9pm, Monday to Friday and Sunday Trading. The Bill has no provisions for alleviating the impact of extended trading hours on small business and regional traders. Following the mid year break, Parliament sits in early August and this Bill will be one of the first Bills to be debated. As your elected Member of Parliament, I am canvassing your opinion on this issue. BACKGROUND Under the existing Retail Trading legislation there are various trading hours permitted depending on the category of shops as detailed below. General Retail Shops These are allowed to trade at any time during the standard hours which are: 8.00am-6.00pm Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday & Friday 8.00am-9.00pm Thursday 8.00pm-5.00pm Saturday These shops cannot open on Sundays and public holidays. Tourism Precincts – Perth & Fremantle Same hours as General Retail shops plus 11.00am-5.00pm Sunday ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 32 Filling Stations These are completely deregulated in all areas. Motor Vehicle Shops (car yards) 8.00am-6.00pm Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday 8.00am-9.00pm Wednesday 8.00am-1.00pm Saturday. Small Retail Shops These are shops owned by up to six people who operate no more than three retail outlets in which up to 13 people work at any one time. Shops in this category are able to operate 24 hours a day, every day of the year. Special Retail Shops These are shops considered necessary for emergency, convenience or recreation goods and include newsagencies, pharmacies, nurseries, hardware and home improvements, video shops etc. Shops in this category may trade between 6.00am and 11.30pm seven days a week. Non metropolitan trading hours Local government authorities outside the Perth metropolitan area can apply to extend the trading hours for General Retail Shops in their district beyond those specified in the Act. STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT The Retail Trading Hours Act 1987 POLICY IMPLICATIONS Nil FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Nil STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Shire of Capel Strategic Plan 2003-2007, Core Business Area 4 ‘Community Services’, Strategy 5 ‘Support the process to encourage economic activity’ is relevant to this item. CONSULTATION Nil COMMENT The are currently no shops that come under the definition of ‘General Retail Shops’ operating within the Shire of Capel and therefore all shops operating in the Shire have the ability to trade seven days a week over extended hours. However in time there will be a District Centre at Dalyellup which would be affected by this proposal and Councillors may wish to consider that issue now whilst the opportunity is there. Should The Trading Hours Amendment Bill be passed it is assumed that the non metropolitan local governments would have no say in retail trading hours or at the ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 33 minimum may be able to apply for extended trading hours on Sunday beyond the 11.00am commencement. In general, the debate around the benefits or negatives of extended trading hours makes it difficult to obtain clear factual data with large business indicating it should happen because it is what the community/shoppers want, whilst small retailers are arguing that it will destroy their business and result in longer hours and higher costs if they are forced to open for additional hours. For the sake of generating points for discussion and debate it does appear that to open Monday to Friday during the week until 9.00pm, especially during winter in the country does appear to be excessive and a reduction in the closing time could be warranted. There is also strong argument both ways about the benefits of trading on Sundays both on its impact on small business and family life. The following staff recommendation has been generated purely to generate debate on the appropriate operating hours. OC0713 STAFF RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL MOTION Moved Cr J Scott, Seconded Cr Caratti That Council advise Mick Murray MLA, Member for Collie-Preston that it supports The Trading Hours Amendment Bill subject to the hours that retail shops are allowed to remain open on Monday to Friday being extended to 7.00pm and not 9.00pm. Lost 5/4 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority Cr Smith left the Chambers at 6.29pm and returned to Chambers at 6.31pm. OC0714 COUNCIL DECISION Moved Cr Gibson, Seconded Cr Bell That Council advise Mick Murray MLA, Member for Collie-Preston that it supports the retention of the existing Retail Trading legislation. Carried 5/4 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority REASON: Council was concerned about the effect of extended trading hours on smaller retail businesses within the Shire. Mr Dent left the Chambers at 6.31pm. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 COMMUNITY SERVICES SECTION 34 Nil FINANCE AND RATING SECTION Councillors N Jones, G Norton and J Scott declared a proximity interest in Item 16.3.1 Adoption of 2009/10 Budget and Differential Rates. The nature of the interest is that they own property adjoining proposed roadworks included in the Budget. Cr K Gibson declared an impartiality interest in Item 16.3.1 Adoption of 2009/10 Budget and Differential Rates. The nature of the interest is that he is a partner in a solar panel supply and installation company and he has provided quotes to a supplier who is quoting for a job for the Shire. The Chairman advised that the Minister for Local Government has given approval for Councillors Norton and J Scott to attend and vote on this item but has not given approval for Cr Jones to attend and vote on this item. Cr Jones left the Chambers at 6.32pm. Mr Ross advised that the Director General, under delegated authority from the Minister for Local Government, has given approval for the Shire to impose differential rates for the 2009/10 financial year. OC0715 (16.3.1) Adoption of 2009/10 Budget and Differential Rates REPORTING OFFICER A Ross – Director Corporate & Community Services 14.07.09 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST OWNER/APPLICANT Shire of Capel MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION Council to consider adopting the 2009/10 Budget and also approve: • • • • • • differential, minimum and specified area rates; rate payment discount, instalment interest rate and fee, penalty interest rate and early payment incentive prizes; rubbish collection and disposal fees and charges; the waiving of charges and granting of concessions; the Schedule of Fees and Charges; and the materiality percentage for monthly financial reporting of variances. ATTACHMENTS Shire of Capel Budget for the year ending 30 June 2010 (separate booklet) APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION Nil BACKGROUND Council on 24 June 2009 considered and endorsed the draft Budget for 2009/10 that was presented (refer Council resolution OC0612). At its meeting on 10 June 2009 Council approved the advertising of differential rates for 2009/10 (refer Council resolution OC0607). ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 35 STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Local Government Act 1995: • • • • • • • • • • • Section 6.2 requires a local government to prepare an annual budget by 31 August (absolute majority required). Section 6.32 states that a local government in order to make up the budget deficiency is to impose a general rate on rateable land that may be imposed uniformly or differentially. Section 6.33(1) provides that a local government may impose differential general rates according to a number of characteristics. Section 6.33(3) states that a local government cannot, without the approval of the Minister, impose a differential general rate that is more than twice the lowest differential general rate imposed. Section 6.34 states that a local government cannot without the approval of the Minister raise an amount of general rates that exceeds 110% of the budget deficiency or is less than 90% of the budget deficiency. Section 6.35 states a local government may impose a minimum rate that is greater than the general rate that would be applied for the land and outlines the requirements for this minimum rate. Section 6.36 requires that a local government before imposing any differential general rates provides at least 21 days local public notice of its intention to do so. Section 6.37 allows a local government to impose a specified area rate for the purpose of meeting a specific work, service or facility. Sections 6.45 to 6.47 allow a local government to levy fees and interest, grant a discount for early payment and to waive or grant other concessions in relation to a rate or service charge. Section 6.51 allows a local government to charge interest on a rate or service charge that remains unpaid after it is due and payable. Section 6.16 allows a local government to impose and recover a fee or charge for any goods or services it provides or proposes to provide. Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 states that each financial year a local government is to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with AAS5, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Policy 11.8, Preparation of Budget, outlines the steps and timetable leading to the adoption of the Budget. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Budget outlines planned expenditure and revenue and determines the financial parameters for the Shire to operate within for the 2009/10 financial year. The proposed budget for the year is balanced with all revenue to be received during the year and the estimated brought forward surplus being expended on meeting operating expenditure demands, the capital works programme and transfers to reserves for future year’s expenditure. STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS The draft Shire of Capel Strategic Plan 2009-2020 includes the objective of providing efficient and effective financial management to ensure the long term financial viability of the organisation within the economic experience key focus area. The development of an annual budget and the levying of rates are required to achieve this objective. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 36 CONSULTATION The proposed differential rates were advertised for public comment in advertisements placed in the Bunbury Herald on Tuesday 16 June 2009, the Bunbury Mail on Wednesday 17 June 2009 and the South Western Times on Thursday 18 June 2009. Ratepayers and electors were invited to provide submissions to be received by 4.00pm on Thursday 9 July 2009. No submissions were received. COMMENT Following changes processed to the draft Budget provided to Council at its meeting on 24 June 2009, the Rate Setting Statement has been amended to show a balanced result. The budgeted result for 2009/10 assumes that a surplus of $78,530 will be recorded for 2008/09 and is similar to the surplus forecast in the draft Budget. As the annual financial statements have not been completed this forecasted result is subject to change. Changes to the Draft Budget Following the Council meeting on 24 June 2009 the following major changes have been processed to the Budget document: • • • • • • The WA Local Government Grants Commission (WALGGC) recently advised the notional grants for 2009/10. The general purpose grant may total $796,630 and is an increase of 2.64% compared to last year. The road grant may be $433,537 and is an increase of 4.83% compared to last year. The total of these grants was higher than the amounts included in the draft budget by $4,735 as it was assumed for the draft Budget that these grants would both increase by 3%. The WALGGC also advised that 25% of the total grant allocation for 2009/10 would be paid in advance and this would be received in 2008/09. $311,955 was received on 26 June 2009. It was stated the early receipt of this grant is effectively income for 2008/09 and would need to be carried forward to 2009/10. Given the funds were received only 2 working days before the end of the financial year and there was therefore very limited opportunity to spend these funds, it has been decided to accrue the grant to 2009/10 rather than distort the budget surplus for 2008/09. The re-running of rates models after the new unimproved values were loaded resulted in 99 additional properties being included and therefore additional property rates of $80,872. Rates in the dollar for rural properties have been decreased from 0.2497 cents to 0.2170 cents to compensate for the impact of an average 15.1% increase in property values. The amount of the Country Local Government Fund grant to be received through the Royalties for Regions program was increased by $6,566 to $756,566. This amount represents 65% of the amount received in 2008/09 and $600,000 has been allocated to the road works programme and the balance to the replacement of the pedestrian footbridge over the Capel River. Unfortunately, after the Budget had been finalised, the Department advised the actual grant to be received would be $746,120 or 64.1% of the 2008/09 allocation. This shortfall in funding will require that the value of the pedestrian footbridge project be adjusted. The budgeted interest rate for new loans to be drawn down in 2009/10 was increased to 7% and resulted in additional expenditure of $3,658. Capital works projects carried over to 2009/10 included $15,250 for the pontoon at Peppermint Grove Beach, $35,000 for the final payments for the recreation ovals floodlighting project and $20,000 to construct a carpark and fencing at Mallokup Bridge. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 • • • • • • • • 37 Budgets for insurance were increased to a total of $142,137 and is an increase of over $30,000 on the draft budget. The significant increase is due to property insurance premiums increasing by 15% and the declared value of property insured increasing by $8 million. An allocation of $5,000 was included for contract staff to provide customer services relief during periods of extended leave for staff. The Director Corporate & Community Services’ decision to forgo the 2009/10 salary increase in return for a changed pattern of working hours offset this increase. Some amendments to operating budgets were processed including the inclusion of $8,500 for linemarking carried over from 2008/09 and the annual contribution to the Bunbury Wellington Economic Alliance (BWEA) was increased by $1,000 to $11,000. Grant expenditure and funding for the heritage project for Mallokup bridge was reduced by $8,000 as work to this value was completed in 2008/09. The discounts and rebates that may be received for the photovoltaics project have been reduced by $4,000 following the federal government’s recent budget decision to reduce solar funding. A budget of $10,000 has been included for the possible lease of office accommodation in Capel to accommodate staff. A budget of $40,000 has been included for remediation works at the Capel Recreation Ground hardcourts. These remediation works involve removing contaminated fill from the site and expenditure will be incurred on activities such as removing the light poles, providing temporary fencing to secure the site, removing the basketball equipment, etc. Within the Governance area a budget of $8,000 has been included for the data input and analysis of the customer survey that was completed in 2008/09 and a budget of $2,000 has been included to kiln dry the Tuart timber that is being stored for possible future use as Council Chambers furniture. Rates, Discounts, Penalties and Instalments As previously advised to Council it was intended the rates in the dollar for properties rated on the basis of their unimproved values would be adjusted to compensate for the increased value of these properties at 1 July 2009. Values for unimproved value properties had increased by on average 15.1% compared to the values applied at 1 July 2008. To ensure rural property owners were not penalised with a rate increase greater than the 8% intended, rates in the dollar for the rural category were reduced to a level that resulted in the same amount of rates being raised that was calculated prior to the updated property values being loaded. The process for determining this adjustment was to prepare a rates model using the rates in the dollar previously agreed by Council against the new valuations provided by the Valuer General’s Office. For the rural category this resulted in a rate yield of $1,155,643 from a valuation base that had increased to $414,698,213 from $360,314,464. Rate models were then rerun with a lower rate in the dollar in order to achieve a rate yield result similar to that proposed in the draft budget. For zone group 11, rural properties, the rate was reduced from 0.2497 cents to 0.2170 cents and resulted in a rate yield of $1,037,461 (previously $1,037,379). This represents a 13% decrease in the rate in the dollar. Therefore if a property valuation has increase by 21% the increase in the property rates will be 8%. However, as some property valuations have increased by greater than this amount rate increases will also be greater. This situation cannot be resolved as the intent is to increase the overall rate yield by 8% and whilst this has been achieved there will be anomalies at an individual property level. For zone group 10, land use commercial, the rate of 0.6559 cents has not been changed and has resulted in a rate yield of $47,435 (previously $38,751). For the 13 assessments in this category this represents a rate ranging from $1,226 to $7,260 with the average rate being $3,648 and this rating quantum does not seem inappropriate for the type of businesses being operated. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 38 Section 6.36 (5) (b) of the Local Government Act states that where a local government proposes to modify the proposed rates or minimum payments after considering any submissions it is not required to give local public notice of that change. Regulation 23 (b) of the Local Government Financial Management Regulations states that if a differential rate or minimum payment differs from the proposed rate that was advertised, details of the advertised rate and the reasons for the variation must be disclosed in the Annual Budget. A notation satisfying these compliance requirements has been included in Note 8 to the Financial Statements of the Budget. A letter was sent on 18 June 2009 to the Director General of the Department for Local Government and Regional Development requesting approval to implement a differential rate that is more than twice the lowest differential rate. This approval is required in accordance with Section 6.33 (3) of the Local Government Act 1995. A response advising that the Director General, under delegated authority from the Minister for Local Government and Regional Development, approves the differential rates in accordance with section 6.33 of the Local Government Act 1995, is expected prior to the meeting. Overall, the objective for property rates was to increase the yield from rates by 8% in addition to the growth in the number of properties. An increase of 8% is necessary to fund increases in the cost of the goods and services used by the Shire as well as fund the delivery of services to meet the needs of a rapidly growing area. This rate increase has resulted in a balanced budget for the year. Revenue from property rates including interim rates of $90,000 has increased to $5,567,492. Compared to the actual rates income for last year of $4,884,307 this represents an increase of 14%. A large part of this increase is attributable to the 8% increase in rates in the dollar with the 13% increase in minimum rates and the year on year growth rate in properties of 3.3% also being contributing factors. The discount for payment of rates by the due date, penalty interest rate for rates not paid by the due date and rate payment instalment options are the same as last year. These details are: • • • 5% discount on rates paid in full by the due date 11% penalty interest to be charged on rates outstanding after the due date and for which the instalment option has not been taken up. Rates can be paid in four instalments two months apart, provided there are no outstanding rates from the previous year. An instalment charge of $10.00 is applicable to the second, third and fourth instalment as is instalment interest of 5.5%. Rates incentive prizes for rates paid in full and received by Council by 4.30pm on the due date are offered to ratepayers. Three prizes of Bendigo Bank savings accounts of $500.00, $300.00 and $200.00 are offered and are again provided by the Donnybrook Capel Districts Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank. Rubbish and Service Charges Rubbish and recycling collection charges are to increase by $4.00 due to an increase in the contractor’s cost for supplying these services. For ratepayers provided these services and who are not resident in Capel, Boyanup, Dalyellup, Peppermint Grove Beach, Gelorup and special rural areas the charge will now be $150.00 per property. Ratepayers in Capel, Boyanup, Dalyellup and Peppermint Grove Beach will be charged $175.00 per property for rubbish and recycling collection services that will also include two green waste collections and one hard waste collection during the year. Ratepayers in Gelorup and special rural areas will be charged $160.00 per ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 39 property for rubbish and recycling services that will include one hard waste collection during the year. The refuse site levy will increase to $85.00 per property. This levy is used to meet the cost of transporting and disposing waste at a contracted landfill facility as well as providing for waste management infrastructure works. Rate Concessions Council has a number of properties where it needs to grant a rate concession or waive the rates each year, when adopting its Budget. Details are as follows: • Sussex Location 1328, Capel Tutunup Road – GL Roberts. This property is held in one title but is divided by the Ludlow River, hence the property is partly located in both the Capel and Busselton Shires. As a result the section located in the Shire of Capel attracts the minimum rate for rural land each year and is more than Mr Roberts would be levied if it was based on the rate in the dollar. Since 1997 Council has agreed to grant Mr Roberts a concession each year. • A rate concession to all ratepayers in Dalyellup is requested in order to cap the specified area rate for Dalyellup Parks & Gardens Maintenance at $125.00. The amount of this specified area rate is the same amount that was levied last year. The impact of this concession is that all developed properties will be rated the $125.00 maximum rate and almost all the vacant land will also be charged this maximum. Only 29 properties are expected to be charged less than the maximum and would be charged amounts ranging from $84.00 to $108.00. • The amount budgeted to be raised from the specified area rate, including interim rates is $333,948. This is more than half of the total expenditure budget for maintenance of gardens and public open space in Dalyellup of $545,811. The excess income obtained of $61,042 will be transferred to the Dalyellup Parks & Gardens Specified Area Rate reserve. This reserve is expected to have a balance of over $500,000 at the end of the year and is a useful insurance against increases in maintenance costs or unexpected costs being incurred. Fees and Charges Amendments have been made to the Schedule of Fees and Charges that was presented to Council at its meeting on 27 May 2009 (refer minute OC0530) include: • • • The Emergency Services Levy has been increased to $43.00 per property from $40.00 following advice received from FESA. The schedule of town planning fees prescribed by the Planning and Development Regulations 2009 have been increased in accordance with the advice contained in Planning Bulletin 93/2009. These fees are effective from 1 July 2009. The Builders Registration Board Levy has been increased by $1.00 to $40.00 pursuant to section 4B(1) of the Builders Registration Act 1939. This fee is effective from 1 July 2009. Summary The Budget document as presented to Council is complete in its format. However, as the information relating to the 2008/09 financial year is still being compiled and is subject to end of financial year audit scrutiny, the brought forward position for 2009/10 is likely to change. All of the explanatory text associated with the Budget has been prepared and is included with the document provided with this item and Councillors are asked to refer to this text for additional commentary on the budget. Once adopted by Council this document will be the final Budget and will be provided to the Department of Local Government by the end of August as is required by the Local Government Act. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 40 To complete the budget process for 2009/10 there are a number of formal decisions required and these are outlined in the staff recommendations. Materiality Limit Local Government Financial Management Regulation 34 (5) requires that each financial year a local government adopts a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with AAS5, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. AAS5 is the abbreviation for Australian Accounting Standard number 5, Materiality. AAS5 states that “information is material if its omission, misstatement or nondisclosure has the potential to adversely affect decisions about the allocation of scarce resources made by users of the financial report or the discharge of accountability by the management or governing body of the entity”. AAS5 also states that “quantitative thresholds used as guidance for determining the materiality of an amount of an item must, of necessity, be drawn at arbitrary levels. Materiality is a matter of professional judgement influenced by characteristics of the entity and the perceptions as to who are, or are likely to be, the users of the financial reports, and their information needs.” AAS5 provides some guidance as to what may be regarded as a material amount when dealing with the balance sheet, operating statement and statement of cash flows when it states an amount which is equal to or greater than 10 per cent of the base amount may be considered to be material while an amount less than or equal to 5 per cent may not be material, unless in both cases there is a convincing argument to the contrary. On the basis of this guidance and having regard to the fact that the users of this financial information are management and Council requiring assistance with making management decisions, then 10% would be a reasonable lower limit for highlighting material variances. However, this limit could be adjusted in the future if necessary and the use of this limit also does not preclude reporting lesser variances if it is considered their disclosure would be of benefit to the user of the financial report. Council last approved the materiality limit of 10% at their meeting on 23 July 2008 (Minute reference OC0726) as part of the annual budget approval process. As legislation requires this approval be provided every year, it is recommended it continue to be considered as part of the annual budget approval process. Mr Dent returned to Chambers at 6.37pm. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 41 EN BLOC RESOLUTION Moved Cr Caratti, Seconded Cr Gibson that Council adopts en bloc the Staff Recommendations 1-8 as follows: OC0715 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1/COUNCIL DECISION That Council adopt the following differential, minimum and specified area rates for the year ending 30 June 2010: Rate in $ Differential Rating : - Residential (zone groups 1 – 4 GRV) - Commercial (zone groups 5 – 6 GRV) - Land Use Commercial (zone group 10 – UV) - Rural (zone group 11 – UV) - Special Rural (zone group 12 – GRV) Specified Area Rating: - Dalyellup Parks, Reserves Maintenance (GRV) Purpose: Parks and Reserves Maintenance 6.5931 6.5931 0.6559 0.2170 6.5931 Minimum cents cents cents cents cents $700.00 $700.00 $750.00 $750.00 $700.00 4.2462 cents (to a maximum of $125 per assessment) Nil Carried with an Absolute majority 8/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Absolute majority OC0716 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 2/COUNCIL DECISION That Council grant a rate concession for 2009/10, under Section 6.47 of the Local Government Act 1995, to limit the specified area rate for Dalyellup Parks and Reserves Maintenance to a maximum amount of $125.00 for all ratepayers in zone groups 3 and 4 (Dalyellup) who are levied the specified area rate for the maintenance of parks and reserves. Carried with an Absolute majority 8/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Absolute majority OC0717 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 3/COUNCIL DECISION That Council grant a rate concession for 2009/10, under Section 6.47 of the Local Government Act 1995, to GL Roberts for Sussex Location 1328 Capel Tutunup Road (A94), by levying a rate on the property calculated at the adopted rate in the dollar for rural land (Rate zone 11) disregarding the application of the minimum rate (a concession of $361.57). Carried with an Absolute majority 8/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Absolute majority ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 42 OC0718 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 4/COUNCIL DECISION That Council: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. In accordance with Section 6.46 of the Local Government Act 1995, offer a five (5) percent discount on current rates paid in full by the first due date of the rate notice. In accordance with Section 6.45 (1) (b) of the Local Government Act 1995, offer the following options for the payment of rates: Option 1 – payment in full by a single instalment Option 2 – payment in four equal instalments at intervals of two calendar months In accordance with Section 6.45 (3) of the Local Government Act 1995, impose an interest rate on instalment of 5.5% for the second, third and fourth instalments. In accordance with Section 6.45 (3) of the Local Government Act 1995, impose an administration fee of $10.00 to the second, third and fourth instalments. In accordance with Section 6.51 of the Local Government Act 1995, impose a late payment penalty interest rate of 11% on rates that have not been paid by the due date and where instalment option 2 has not been taken up. Incentive prizes be offered for rates paid in full and received by 4.30pm on the due date shown on the rates notice. Carried with an Absolute majority 8/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Absolute majority OC0719 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 5/COUNCIL DECISION That Council, in accordance with the Health Act, impose the following charges for 2009/10: 1. 2. 3. Weekly rubbish removal, first bin Weekly rubbish removal, second and subsequent bins Greenwaste and Hardwaste Collection Service fee for Boyanup, Capel, Dalyellup and Peppermint Grove Beach 4. Hardwaste Collection Service fee for Gelorup and Special Rural areas 5. Fortnightly rubbish removal 6. Refuse Site Charge (for commercial, residential, rural and special rural properties that have a house/premises and industrial properties that have a rubbish collection) $ 150.00 pa $ 116.00 pa $ 25.00 pa $ 10.00 pa $ 107.00 pa $ 85.00 pa Carried with an Absolute majority 8/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Absolute majority ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 43 OC0720 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 6/COUNCIL DECISION That Council, in accordance with Section 6.16 of the Local Government Act 1995, adopt the Schedule of Fees and Charges as presented in the Budget for the year ending 30 June 2010. Carried with an Absolute majority 8/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Absolute majority OC0721 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 7/COUNCIL DECISION That Council, in accordance with Section 6.2 of the Local Government Act 1995, adopt the Annual Budget for the year ending 30 June 2010. Carried with an Absolute majority 8/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Absolute majority OC0722 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 8/COUNCIL DECISION That Council, in accordance with Local Government Financial Management Regulation 34(5), adopt a percentage of plus or minus 10% to be used for the reporting of variances of actual expenditure and revenue to budgeted expenditure and revenue in the monthly report of financial activity for 2009/10. Carried 8/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority Cr Jones returned to Chambers at 6.39pm. ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 44 OC0723 (16.3.2) Accounts Due and Submitted for Authorisation REPORTING OFFICER AJ Munday - Creditors Officer 10.07.09 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Nil OWNER/APPLICANT Nil MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION Adoption of accounts to be paid. ATTACHMENTS Nil APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION Nil BACKGROUND Accounts for payment are required to be submitted each month for authorisation. STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (Reg 13(2)). POLICY IMPLICATIONS Nil FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Payment from Council’s Municipal Fund. STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Nil CONSULTATION Nil COMMENT Accounts due and submitted for authorisation are as follows: Chq/EFT EFT4716 EFT4717 Name A & L Printers Amity Signs EFT4718 John Anderson Electrician EFT4719 EFT4720 EFT4721 Arrow Bronze Alphawest Services Pty Ltd Bunbury Retravision EFT4722 EFT4723 EFT4724 Bunbury Machinery Bunbury Mower Service Bell Fire Equipment Company Busselton Toyota Benson's Chainsaw Centre Bunnings Building Supplies Pty Ltd EFT4725 EFT4726 EFT4727 Description Business Cards Various Signs and Guide Posts Repairs to Dalyellup Community Centre Bronze Plaque Rees Block IT Hours Fridge, Oven & Dishwasher for New HACC Office Pressure Cleaner Tank Repairs to Chainsaw Back End Service Boyanup 3.4 & Stirling 2.4 Service Chain Bar General Tools Amount 116.00 11825.33 137.50 311.08 3941.30 4374.95 3830.00 422.10 2799.50 369.00 76.40 148.75 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 EFT4728 EFT4729 EFT4730 Boyanup Auto Repairs Boyanup Botanical BCE Surveying Pty Ltd EFT4731 Corporate Express Bunbury Capel Hardware & Farm Supplies Coastal Hire EFT4732 EFT4733 EFT4734 EFT4735 EFT4736 EFT4737 EFT4738 EFT4739 EFT4740 EFT4741 EFT4742 EFT4743 EFT4744 EFT4745 EFT4746 EFT4747 EFT4748 EFT4749 EFT4750 EFT4751 EFT4752 EFT4753 Carbone Bros Pty Ltd Community Arts Network WA Ltd Des Air Farmco Boyanup Fennessy's Harradine & Associates Bunbury Hyundai Imagetec Living Springs Landgate Nightguard Security Service Pty Ltd Pioneer Road Services Pty Ltd Prestige Products Reface Industries Records Maintenance & Storage Southern Lock & Safe Technology One 43063 Tracplus Pty Ltd Visimax Veolia Environmental Services Yakka Pty Ltd Environmental Health Australia Australian Taxation Office Judith Murray Cultural Heritage & History State Library of Western Australia Lexden Park 43064 Main Roads Department 43065 Mining & Pastoral Communication Services Monica Neville D Palmer (WA) Pty Ltd Sean McArthur EFT4754 43059 43060 43061 43062 43066 43067 43068 45 Fit Isolator Switch Seedlings Volume Assessment Mulch Transfer Station Stationery Star Pickets for Bush Fire Awareness Signs Hire of WC for Transfer Station Gravel Attendance by L Jackes Art in Public Places Annual Air Conditioner Maintenance Tap Replace Tail Light CP81 Sterilisation Subsidy Service Printer Ink Water Bottles Shire Office Valuations Security Patrols at Dalyellup 303.98 14.50 1149.50 3065.99 249.45 168.14 8351.70 80.00 1311.20 38.50 258.80 700.00 861.25 160.60 148.50 10633.78 615.19 500L Emulsion 495.00 Cleaning Products Library Rack & Sleeves Delivery & Storage of Archive Boxes 6 Padlocks Annual Support & Maintenance Puncture Repair Safety Equipment Clean Pits at Dalyellup 589.33 93.30 210.82 Staff Uniforms Membership Fees Fringe Benefits Tax Research Mallokup Bridge Lost Damaged Books Repair Tank at Fishermans Road Standpipe Refurb Works Cable Mine Road Bridge Radio Fitted to Patching Truck Research Mallokup Bridge 200 Galvanised Steel Posts Repairs to Concrete Setting at Earle Scott Reserve 921.09 5936.28 39.00 1452.00 3766.95 503.36 295.00 63.76 8150.00 95.15 412.50 52800.00 1156.54 1680.00 1377.20 170.00 136670.27 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 46 CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER This schedule of accounts to be passed for payment, covering vouchers as detailed above which was submitted to each member of Council on 22 July 2009, have been checked and are fully supported by vouchers and invoices which are submitted herewith and which have been duly certified as to the receipt of goods and services and as to prices, computations, and costings and the amounts shown are due for payment. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OC0723 STAFF RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL DECISION Moved Cr Caratti, Seconded Cr Gibson That the Schedule of Accounts covering vouchers EFT4716 to EFT4754 and 43059 to 43068 a total of $136670.27, be authorised for payment. Carried 9/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 47 OC0724 (16.3.3) Accounts Paid During the Month of June 2009 REPORTING OFFICER AJ Munday - Creditors Officer 10.07.09 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Nil OWNER/APPLICANT Nil MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION Authorisation of accounts paid during the month. ATTACHMENTS Nil APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION Nil BACKGROUND Accounts paid are required to be submitted each month. STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (Reg 13(1)) requires that where the Chief Executive Officer has delegated power to make payments from the Municipal or Trust funds a list of accounts paid is to be prepared each month. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Nil FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Payment from Council’s Municipal Fund. STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Nil CONSULTATION Nil COMMENT Payments made during the month of June 2009 are as follows: Chq/EFT 13 Name Shire of Capel 14 Building & Construction Ind Training Fund Builders Registration Board of WA Dale Alcock Homes 15 16 EFT4438 EFT4439 EFT4440 Apex Club Of Capel Inc Boyanup Hall Advisory Committee Bunbury Retravision Description Payment of BRB Commission May 09 BCITF Levy Payment May 09 May 09 BRB Levy Payment Refund BCITF Levy Cancelled B/L 9757 Minor Community Grant Minor Community Grants Microwave Oven Dalyellup Community Centre Amount 694.10 19220.43 2177.50 358.02 1774.64 222.50 500.00 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 EFT4441 48 Courier Fees Health EFT4442 Courier Australia International Dale Alcock Homes EFT4443 D & W Pollard EFT4444 Filtrex EFT4445 Land Insights EFT4446 EFT4447 EFT4448 Margie's Alfresco Overacre Contract Mowing And Landscaping Constructions Plunkett Homes Temporary Refuse Site Attendant Cancellation of Septic Licence 30% Payment Peppi Beach Management Plan Catering for Health Meeting Mowing of POS at Gelorup Community Centre EFT4449 EFT4450 D & H Payne J & K Papas Retainers EFT4451 Southern Irrigation & Pumping Pty Ltd South West Tree Safe Scott Park Homes EFT4452 EFT4453 Kerb Deposit Refunds Kerb Deposit Refund Bulldozing Refuse Site Concrete Works at Gelorup Skatepark Reticulation Parts 73.24 2500.00 850.30 104.00 5425.20 45.00 275.00 500.00 19413.90 3850.00 62.38 Remove Trees Boyanup Kerb Deposit Refunds 1705.00 1000.00 SOS Office Equipment South West Mapping Services Tangent Nominees Pty Ltd Meterbilling Boyanup Townsite Strategy Mapping Kerb Deposit Refund 962.75 3192.85 Flexi Call Manager Disposal of Domestic Refuse 5637.50 12608.42 EFT4460 Total Telephone Transpacific Waste Management Ultimate Paint & Panel 1144.55 EFT4461 Ventura Homes Remove and Refit New Step to HACC Bus Kerb Deposit Refunds EFT4462 WA Country Builders Kerb Deposit Refunds 1000.00 EFT4463 EFT4464 Westnet Pty Ltd Westnet Pty Ltd EFT4467 ARRB Transport Research Ltd Apex Club of Capel Inc Bunbury Cleaning Service Boyanup Lions Club Capel ADSL & Static IP Dallyellup Library ADSL & Static IP Registration for Training S Faber & P Ettridge Community Grant Apex Cleaning Public Amenities Hall Bond Refund Lions Club of Boyanup Service 60CP EFT4454 EFT4455 EFT4456 EFT4457 EFT4458 EFT4468 EFT4469 EFT4470 EFT4471 EFT4472 EFT4473 EFT4474 EFT4475 EFT4476 EFT4477 Autogroup (Bunbury Mitsubishi) B & B Street Sweeping BGC Construction Courier Australia International Cleanaway Custom Service Leasing Ltd Paul Sheedy Clear Pipes Thomas Street Kerb Deposit Refund Courier Fees Library Waste Cartage BFB & HACC Fuel Staff Reimbursement 1500.00 2500.00 509.75 74.94 2535.00 1000.00 4010.18 150.00 942.20 899.25 500.00 47.58 30244.06 2403.69 1557.79 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 49 EFT4478 EFT4479 CJD Equipment Pty Ltd Dale Alcock Homes Replace Pinion Seal Kerb Deposit Refund 1228.98 2007.53 EFT4480 EFT4481 Andrew Dykstra Delron Cleaning 2034.00 3341.55 EFT4482 EFT4483 EFT4484 EFT4485 EFT4486 EFT4487 Express Print Golden West Plumbing & Drainage Fesa Go West Tours Gresleyabas Jamic Engineering EFT4488 Kelyn Training Services TP Assessment Services Cleaning Dalyellup Community Centre 4700 Newsletters Repairs Toilet Capel Community Centre ESL Quarter 4 50NF Heritage Park Trip Building Design Gelorup Skatepark Enhancements Traffic Mgt & Controller Course EFT4489 Landscape Development EFT4490 Leeuwin Transport EFT4491 EFT4492 Linda's Lawnmowing Capel Blue EFT4493 Lampo EFT4494 EFT4495 Ocean Forest Lutheran College Inc Plunkett Homes EFT4496 EFT4497 Planscape Michelle Plume EFT4498 EFT4499 EFT4500 J & K Papas Retainers Professional Training Solutions Scott Park Homes EFT4501 EFT4502 SOS Office Equipment SW Precision Print EFT4503 EFT4504 Monthly Landscaping Maintenance for Dalyellup Freight for Filing Cabinet Delivery Mowing Flower Arrangements May 2009 Repairs to Senior Citizens Building Reimbursement of Electricity Fees Dalyellup Kerb Deposit Refund TP Assessment Services Staff Reimbursement Accommodation M Plume & S Hall Retaining Wall Management Essentials Training Kerb Deposit Refund 4870.80 1058.20 24552.00 1111.00 44886.66 26950.00 1365.00 49628.39 13.94 70.00 90.00 698.50 2202.28 500.00 2211.00 376.40 12000.00 203.50 500.00 2508.83 1599.00 Shaddicks Lawyers Tangent Nominees Pty Ltd Meterbilling Envelopes & Reply Paid Envelopes Legal Fees Kerb Deposit Refund EFT4505 EFT4506 EFT4507 Totally Sound Ventura Homes WA Country Builders Training Audio Visual Kerb Deposit Refunds Kerb Deposit Refund 473.00 2500.00 500.00 EFT4508 - EFT4567 EFT4568 SAI Global Limited EFT4569 EFT4570 Ascent Engineering Bell Fire Equipment Company Capel Hardware & Farm Supplies See Council Agenda 24 June 2009 Download Internet Standards Relief Engineer Fees Service Fire Extinguishers EFT4571 General Hardware 440.00 500.00 202.69 6963.00 2363.53 534.40 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 EFT4572 EFT4573 EFT4574 EFT4575 EFT4576 EFT4577 EFT4578 EFT4579 EFT4580 EFT4581 EFT4582 EFT4583 EFT4584 EFT4585 EFT4586 EFT4587 EFT4588 EFT4589 EFT4590 EFT4591 EFT4592 EFT4593 EFT4594 EFT4595 EFT4596 EFT4597 EFT4598 EFT4599 EFT4601 EFT4602 EFT4603 EFT4604 EFT4605 EFT4606 EFT4607 EFT4608 EFT4609 Courier Australia International Coffey Environments CJD Equipment Pty Ltd Lisa Dent Farmco Boyanup Golden West Plumbing & Drainage Fennessy's Golden West Pest & Weed Control Houghton Decor D & V Kitchen Western Australian Local Government Association Linda's Lawnmowing Capel Lions Club Marks Window Cleaning & Maintenance Neat N Trim Uniforms Pty Ltd Slee Anderson & Pidgeon Donna Sims Total Telephone Busselton Tree Lopping Services Vogue Furniture Veolia Environmental Services Westrac Equipment Child Support Agency Evans Family Superannuation Fund Ausquip Industries Bunbury Mower Service Bunbury Plumbing Services BGC Construction 50 Courier Fees Health Radiation Survey Capel Loader Service Reimburse IR Conference Registration Hardware Items Repair Leak at West Rd 12.90 8946.16 2228.44 2084.50 25.51 1805.21 Service Spray Depot For Spiders 466.00 220.00 Notice Boards Rates Refund 391.60 21.27 Advertising Lawnmowing Boyanup Museum & HACC Minor Community Grant Window Cleaning for Community Centres Staff Uniforms Easement Documents Reimburse Study Fees Service Call & New Card for Phone Tree Pruning in Capel and Boyanup Office Chair Vacuum Stormwater Drains Outer Air Con Filter Payroll Deductions Superannuation Contributions Sign Holder & Tray Dividers Parts HACC Drinking Water at Elgin Hall Kerb Deposit Refund 1802.27 140.00 779.97 1010.00 77.00 695.91 500.00 1081.50 11770.00 375.00 9353.22 304.17 568.61 351.64 3519.00 28.00 411.00 500.00 Capel Hardware & Farm Supplies Courier Australia International Cleanaway Dale Alcock Homes Fan Heater 15.95 Courier Fees 14.62 Burial of Waste Collection Kerb Deposit Refund 9236.46 3000.00 Dick Smith Electronics Andrew Dykstra DSIISR National Measurement Institute Eaton Hardware Echelon Australia Pty Ltd Telephone Cable TP Assessment Services Water Testing 20.87 3051.00 1675.74 HACC General Hardware Home Care and Personal Care Manuals 1688.51 693.00 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 EFT4610 EFT4611 EFT4612 EFT4613 EFT4614 EFT4615 EFT4616 EFT4617 EFT4618 Golden West Plumbing & Drainage Insight CCS Pty Ltd Jamic Engineering Malatesta Road Paving & Hot Mix Metal Artwork Creations Neat N Trim Uniforms A J Nicholls EFT4621 EFT4622 EFT4623 EFT4624 EFT4625 Planscape Perth Management Services Southern Irrigation & Pumping Pty Ltd South West Women's Health & Information Centre Inc Toms Garden Machinery Totally Workwear T & P Design Village Carpet Care Ventura Homes EFT4626 EFT4619 EFT4620 51 Repairs to Dalyellup Community Centre Call Centre Charges Notice Boards Reseal Boyanup West Rd Name Badge Staff Uniforms Water Dispenser For HACC Office TP Assessment Services Rent for Dalyellup Library 275.00 282.26 220.00 35180.21 13.20 1059.00 295.00 1700.00 2201.61 Repairs to Standpipe 115.50 Catering for Harmony Day 110.00 HACC General Parts Staff Uniforms Design and Specifications Carpet Cleaning Kerb Deposit Refunds 36.00 204.55 1373.63 1480.00 1000.00 WA Country Builders Kerb Deposit Refunds 1000.00 EFT4627 EFT4628 West Oz Linemarking C Wilson Fisher 1254.00 450.00 EFT4629 EFT4630 EFT4631 EFT4632 42919 Alleasing Pty Ltd Alleasing Pty Ltd Caltex Australia Caltex Australia Boyanup General Store 42920 42921 M & E Bielby Capel Tavern 42922 42923 Capel Newsagency Content Living Install Hydrant Markers Reimburse Accommodation Expenses for WARA Conference Lease of Lanier Lease of Lanier Diesel Fuel Cards Catering DAIP Regional Meeting Crossover Contribution Refreshments Australia Day Awards Milk & Stationery Kerb Deposit Refunds 42924 42925 B Chapman Churches of Christ 42926 42927 42928 42929 42930 42931 42932 Australian Taxation Office Robert Gardner Department Of Health of WA J Jenkins & D White David Milkins S McDonald Princi Constructions Crossover Contribution Hall Refund Churches of Christ Balance of 08/09 FBT Crossover Contribution Lead Auditor Training C Webster Crossover Contribution Hall Bond Refund Crossover Contribution Kerb Deposit Refund 42933 42934 42935 42936 T Sebbes & R Potts Synergy Transport Payment Centre K J Vivian Crossover Contribution Electricity Vehicle Registrations Kerb Deposit Refund 792.30 329.23 16729.37 1908.83 94.55 300.00 301.50 213.35 1500.00 300.00 150.00 15167.59 300.00 2210.00 300.00 150.00 300.00 500.00 300.00 11229.85 771.60 300.00 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 52 42937 42938 Water Corporation BNH Tarratt & DP Olsen Water Usage Rates Refund 42939 42940 Postage for Month Interim Audit at Capel Shire 42945 42946 42947 Australia Post AMD Chartered Accountants Capel Butchers DALJRB Holdings Fourbirds Pty Ltd Bradley & Alison McCracken Norman Fullwood Page Panel & Paint Repairs Peter Read 42948 42949 42950 42951 Synergy Telstra Corporation Ltd Transport Payment Centre -42959 42960 42961 42941 42942 42943 42944 85.45 852.30 2157.44 3300.00 Catering for Depot Crossover Contribution Crossover Contribution Kerb Deposit Refund 90.60 300.00 300.00 500.00 Hall Bond Refund Repairs to Slasher Kerb Deposit Refund 150.00 120.00 500.00 2182.40 2193.86 24.05 Johnny Botha Bennybrook Pty Ltd Electricity Rent & Calls Registration See Council Agenda 24 June 2009 Refund of Hall Bond Rates Refund 42962 Content Living Kerb Deposit Refund 1000.00 42963 42964 42965 Relief Building Surveyor Minor Community Grant Advertising 42966 Peter Davis Dalyellup Beach Playgroup Department of Premier & Cabinet Ms J Davies 42967 42968 42969 Jamie Dunn Australian Taxation Office Mr G Gishubl & M Bruce Reimburse Police Clearance BAS Statement Rates Refund 42970 Lost and Damaged Books 42971 State Library Of Western Australia Frances Matthews 42972 42973 42974 42975 Nicole Hobbsturner Nick Marinelli Officeworks Bunbury Pacific Magazines 42976 Commissioner of State Revenue Transport Payment Centre J Vanderloop Wt & Tm Wilkinson Justine Wright Western Power Corporation Australian Services Union The Australian Workers Union Shire of Capel Shire of Donnybrook/Balingup HIF Health Insurance Fund 42977 42978 42979 42980 42981 42982 42983 42984 42985 42986 Rates Refund Reimburse for Accommodation and Meals Crossover Contribution Reimburse for Training Stationery for HACC Better Homes and Gardens Subscription Duty Payable on Drainage Agreement Registration Refund of Hall Bond Crossover Contribution Refund of Hall Bond CT Metering Capel Lot 199 1000.00 156.93 200.00 575.00 444.72 50.00 51.00 22580.00 136.62 49.50 222.08 300.00 93.66 279.91 113.95 123.50 48.60 100.00 300.00 100.00 1389.52 Payroll Deductions Payroll Deductions 35.80 324.00 Payroll Deductions Payroll Deductions 1856.54 150.00 Payroll Deductions 95.90 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 53 42987 42988 42989 LGRECU Shire of Murray WALGS Plan 42990 42991 42995 42996 42997 Adams & Co Freight Australind Cleaning Service Big W City of Bunbury Bunbury Honda Bunbury Kia Capel Tavern Shire of Capel Content Living 42998 Shire of Dardanup 42999 43000 D Dench Gemill Homes Group Annual Contribution to Bunbury Wellington Group of Councils Minor Community Grant Kerb Deposit Refund 43001 R & L Keen Kerb Deposit Refund 500.00 43002 43003 43004 43005 Ms D Mader Nancy De Baughy 3 Australia Cheyne Reid Refund of Hall Bond Refund of Hall Bond Fire Service Call Outs Kerb Deposit Refund 100.00 150.00 253.20 500.00 43006 43007 Synergy Shawmac 43008 43009 Telstra Corporation Ltd Mr K Todd & Ms H Monley Electricity Traffic Study at Bussell Hwy, Gelorup HACC Rent and Calls Rates Refund 42992 42993 42994 Payroll Deductions Payroll Deductions Superannuation Contributions Steel Posts Delivered Window Cleaning at HACC Office Books & DVD’s Removal of Grafitti Service Bus Hire HACC Refreshments Kerb Deposit Refund 131.20 60.00 54148.67 126.50 71.50 797.21 771.37 427.27 1080.00 185.00 1000.00 550.00 1295.45 500.00 3537.44 4950.00 739.44 205.15 622531.79 24.06.09 10.06.09 Shire of Capel Payroll Payments Shire of Capel Payroll Payments $107,458.02 $110,133.98 $217,592.00 26.06.09 12.06.09 10.06.09 30.06.09 Transfer Transfer Transfer Transfer to Municipal Account to Municipal Account to Municipal Account from Municipal Account $200,000.00 $250,000.00 $200,000.00 $820,000.00 $1,470,000.000 ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 54 CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER This schedule of accounts to be passed for payment, covering vouchers as detailed above which was submitted to each member of Council on 22 July 2009, have been checked and are fully supported by vouchers and invoices which are submitted herewith and which have been duly certified as to the receipt of goods and services and as to prices, computations, and costings and the amounts shown are due for payment. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OC0724 STAFF RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL DECISION Moved Cr Gibson, Seconded Cr Caratti That: 1 The Schedule of Accounts covering vouchers 13 to 16, EFT4438 to EFT4507, EFT4568 to EFT4632, 42919 to 42950 and 42960 to 43009 totalling $622531.79 paid during the month of June 2009 be received; 2 Payroll payments for the month of June 2009, totalling $217592.00 be received; and 3 Transfers to and from investments as listed, be received. Carried 9/0 VOTING REQUIREMENTS Simple majority ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – 22.07.09 COMMUNITY RANGER SERVICES Nil NEW BUSINESS OF AN URGENT NATURE Nil PUBLIC QUESTION TIME Nil MOTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE (ABSOLUTE MAJORITY BY COUNCIL) Nil NOTICES OF MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE NEXT ORDINARY MEETING OF THE COUNCIL Nil ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION BEHIND CLOSED DOORS Nil MEETING CLOSURE The meeting closed at 6.42pm. These minutes were confirmed at an Ordinary Council meeting on 12 August 2009. Signed Presiding Person at the meeting at which time the minutes were confirmed. Date 55