Document 6589924

Transcription

Document 6589924
Sinfony Indirect Lab Composite
™
Weight
Volume
Average
Particle Size (µ)
Curing
Method
Reinforcement
Fiber
belleGlass HP
KerrLab
74.0–87
56–72.5
0.5
Light
Heat
Pressure
Connect
Sculpture
77.5
68
0.6
Light
Heat
Vacuum
FibreKor
has glass fibers
pre-impregnated
with resin
N/A
Vectris has
pre-impregnated
glass fibers
Product
Filler %
FibreKor
Jeneric/Pentron
60.0
41
Sinfony
50
N/A
0.6
Light
Vacuum
Targis/Vectris
Ivoclar-Williams
78
N/A
0.7
Targis Vectris
Light
Light
Heat Pressure
Vacuum
Sinfony
™
Indirect Lab Composite
Indirect Resin Systems — Reality’s Choices
Reality Publishing Co., Vol. 15, 2001
Testing found Sinfony indirect lab composite to have
very good esthetics and to be easy for the lab to fabricate.
The study results presented here demonstrate
clearly the strength, beauty and versatility
of Sinfony indirect lab composite.
[ before ]
Insertion of Sinfony Indirect Lab Composite
5.0
According to:
4.8
++++ 1/2
300
4.7
The Dental Advisor, Vol. 18, 2001
250
Clinicians were very pleased with the clinical performance
of Sinfony indirect lab composite, rating the “ease of
finishing/ polishing” very high.
200
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.3
TCML
ACTA
µm
Average Rating (1–5 scale)
Abrasion of Indirect Composites
350
4.9
150
100
4.2
50
4.1
4.0
0
Overall
Laboratory
Product
Shade
Match
Vitality
Fit to
Tooth
Margin
Integrity
Ease of
Finishing/
Polishing
1 Year
Sinfony
Overall
Rating
2 Year
5.0
4.5
1-5 Rating Scale
[ after ]
++++ 1/2
3.5
The Dental Advisor, Vol. 19, 2002
Overall, clinicians rated Sinfony indirect lab composite
in the very good to excellent range for two-year recall,
with high marks for “resistance to fracture/chipping”
and “patient satisfaction.”
2.5
2.0
1.5
Shade
Match/
Vitality
Lack of
Marginal
Discoloration
Wear
Resistance
Patient
Satisfaction
3M ESPE Dental Lab Technical Hotline: 1-800-216-9502
3M ESPE Web site: www.3MESPE.com
3M, ESPE, Rocatec and Sinfony are trademarks of 3M or 3M ESPE AG. Artglass
is a trademark of Heraeus Kulzer. belleGlass is a trademark of Kerr Corporation.
Sculpture is a trademark of Jeneric/Pentron. Solidex is a trademark of Shofu.
Targis is a trademark of Ivoclar-Vivadent.
Dental Products
3M Center
Building 275-2SE-03
St. Paul, MN 55144-1000
USA
Dental Products
3M Canada
Post Office Box 5757
London, Ontario N6A 4T1
Canada
1 800 265-1840 ext. 6229
Targis
Bovine Enamel
Both in the mastication simulator machine and in the
three-media-wear machine, Sinfony indirect lab composite
showed significantly less abrasion than belleGlass,
Sculpture, and Targis.
Minimum 10%
Post-Consumer Fiber
Printed in U.S.A.
© 3M 1999–2002
70-2009-2421-8
Impact Strength
10
mJ/mm2
1.0
Resistance to
Fracture/
Chipping
belleGlass
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of
Regensburg, Germany: Abrasion of indirect composite
restorations after artificial abrasion in the mastication
simulation in a three-media-wear machine.
(DGZPW Abstracts #11) 2000.*
Two-Year Recall of Sinfony Lab
Indirect Composite
4.0
3.0
Sculpture
E. Hoffman, M. Rosentritt, M. Behr, G. Handel
8
DIN 53 453, Transverse Impact Test*
6
At 7.5 mJ/mm2, Sinfony indirect lab composite surpasses other
modern materials, such as Solidex, belleGlass, and Targis.
4
2
0
Sinfony
Artglass
Solidex
*These studies were sponsored by 3M ESPE AG.
Targis
belleGlass
Sinfony Indirect Lab Composite
300
Compressive Strength
250
C. Trajtenberg, M. Eldiwany, D. Li, J. M. Powers
200
Houston Biomaterials Research Center, UT-Houston Dental
Branch, Houston, Texas, USA: Properties of Advanced
Laboratory Composites. (IADR Abstracts #413) 1999.*
150
l
l
strength beauty versatility
Toothbrush Abrasion
0
3M ESPE internal test results
-5
A toothbrush abrasion study showed abrasion
resistance of the ultrafine particle composite
of Sinfony indirect lab composite.
-10
µm
MPa
™
-15
100
Demonstrates that Sinfony indirect lab composite has
significant advantages in compressive strength over two
out of three competitive materials.
50
0
Sinfony
Sculpture
Artglass
-20
-25
Targis
Sinfony
Flexural Modulus
10
Visio Gem
Artglass
Shear Bond Strength
30
(after 24 hours water storage or thermocycling–TC)
24 h initial/new Vectris
GPa
6
4
C. Trajtenberg, M. Eldiwany, D. Li, J. M. Powers
25
Houston Biomaterials Research Center, UT-Houston Dental
Branch, Houston, Texas, USA: Properties of Advanced
Laboratory Composites. (IADR Abstracts #413) 1999.*
20
MPa
8
after Thermocycling/new Vectris
24 h initial/aged Vectris
after Thermocycling/aged Vectris
15
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of
Regensburg, Germany: Determination of shear bond
strength of composites on fiber-reinforced FPD material.
(IADR Abstracts #1486) 1998.*
10
2
0
Sinfony
Sculpture
Artglass
Targis
120
Flexural Strength
100
C. Trajtenberg, M. Eldiwany, D. Li, J. M. Powers
5
0
Sinfony
Houston Biomaterials Research Center, UT-Houston Dental
Branch, Houston, Texas, USA: Properties of Advanced
Laboratory Composites. (IADR Abstracts #413) 1999.*
80
MPa
Designed with a lower flexural modulus, Sinfony indirect
lab composite is less brittle than other composites, making
it an ideal material for veneering over flexible understructures such as fiber bridge substrates or telescope crowns.
60
Targis
Artglass
acid etching
air abrading
40
TM
Sinfony indirect lab composite’s flexural strength was
tested and measured to be higher than other popular brands.
TM
30
Sinfony
Sculpture
Artglass
Targis
Solubility
Panavia 21
µg/mm3
Variolink Ultra
Sono Cem
Houston Biomaterials Research Center, UT-Houston Dental
Branch, Houston, Texas, USA: Properties of Advanced
Laboratory Composites. (J. Dent Res, Vol 78 #929) 1999.*
6
4
In a test of solubility, which is associated with water
repellence of the polymer matrix, Sinfony indirect lab
composite is clearly superior.
2
0
Sinfony
Solidex
Targis
belleGlass
(to In-Ceram thermocycling)
H.N. Alkumru, M. Özcan, I. Negriz, D. Gemalmaz,
A. Akkaya
0
C. Trajtenberg, M. Eldiwany, D. Li, J. M. Powers
8
Shear Bond Strength
Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey,
and Medical and Dental School of Köln, Germany: Effect
of Surface Treatment on the Bond Strength of Luting Cement
to In-Ceram. (IADR Abstracts #2238) 1998.*
20
10
10
Repairing of new and aged Vectris material was simulated
via in vitro shear tests. Sinfony indirect lab composite
is suitable for repairing—also on aged samples, whereas
Artglass and Dentacolor showed no adhesion at all.
TM
3M ESPE
Rocatec Jr.
Bonding
System
MPa
0
Dentacolor
50
40
20
T. Frauenholz, M. Rosentritt, M. Behr, R. Lang,
G. Handel
*These studies were sponsored by 3M ESPE AG.
Dyract Cem
Tribochemical coating with Rocatec increased
significantly the bond strength of luting cements
(composite and compomer) to In-Ceram in comparison
to acid etching or air abrading.
Sinfony Indirect Lab Composite
300
Compressive Strength
250
C. Trajtenberg, M. Eldiwany, D. Li, J. M. Powers
200
Houston Biomaterials Research Center, UT-Houston Dental
Branch, Houston, Texas, USA: Properties of Advanced
Laboratory Composites. (IADR Abstracts #413) 1999.*
150
l
l
strength beauty versatility
Toothbrush Abrasion
0
3M ESPE internal test results
-5
A toothbrush abrasion study showed abrasion
resistance of the ultrafine particle composite
of Sinfony indirect lab composite.
-10
µm
MPa
™
-15
100
Demonstrates that Sinfony indirect lab composite has
significant advantages in compressive strength over two
out of three competitive materials.
50
0
Sinfony
Sculpture
Artglass
-20
-25
Targis
Sinfony
Flexural Modulus
10
Visio Gem
Artglass
Shear Bond Strength
30
(after 24 hours water storage or thermocycling–TC)
24 h initial/new Vectris
GPa
6
4
C. Trajtenberg, M. Eldiwany, D. Li, J. M. Powers
25
Houston Biomaterials Research Center, UT-Houston Dental
Branch, Houston, Texas, USA: Properties of Advanced
Laboratory Composites. (IADR Abstracts #413) 1999.*
20
MPa
8
after Thermocycling/new Vectris
24 h initial/aged Vectris
after Thermocycling/aged Vectris
15
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of
Regensburg, Germany: Determination of shear bond
strength of composites on fiber-reinforced FPD material.
(IADR Abstracts #1486) 1998.*
10
2
0
Sinfony
Sculpture
Artglass
Targis
120
Flexural Strength
100
C. Trajtenberg, M. Eldiwany, D. Li, J. M. Powers
5
0
Sinfony
Houston Biomaterials Research Center, UT-Houston Dental
Branch, Houston, Texas, USA: Properties of Advanced
Laboratory Composites. (IADR Abstracts #413) 1999.*
80
MPa
Designed with a lower flexural modulus, Sinfony indirect
lab composite is less brittle than other composites, making
it an ideal material for veneering over flexible understructures such as fiber bridge substrates or telescope crowns.
60
Targis
Artglass
acid etching
air abrading
40
TM
Sinfony indirect lab composite’s flexural strength was
tested and measured to be higher than other popular brands.
TM
30
Sinfony
Sculpture
Artglass
Targis
Solubility
Panavia 21
µg/mm3
Variolink Ultra
Sono Cem
Houston Biomaterials Research Center, UT-Houston Dental
Branch, Houston, Texas, USA: Properties of Advanced
Laboratory Composites. (J. Dent Res, Vol 78 #929) 1999.*
6
4
In a test of solubility, which is associated with water
repellence of the polymer matrix, Sinfony indirect lab
composite is clearly superior.
2
0
Sinfony
Solidex
Targis
belleGlass
(to In-Ceram thermocycling)
H.N. Alkumru, M. Özcan, I. Negriz, D. Gemalmaz,
A. Akkaya
0
C. Trajtenberg, M. Eldiwany, D. Li, J. M. Powers
8
Shear Bond Strength
Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey,
and Medical and Dental School of Köln, Germany: Effect
of Surface Treatment on the Bond Strength of Luting Cement
to In-Ceram. (IADR Abstracts #2238) 1998.*
20
10
10
Repairing of new and aged Vectris material was simulated
via in vitro shear tests. Sinfony indirect lab composite
is suitable for repairing—also on aged samples, whereas
Artglass and Dentacolor showed no adhesion at all.
TM
3M ESPE
Rocatec Jr.
Bonding
System
MPa
0
Dentacolor
50
40
20
T. Frauenholz, M. Rosentritt, M. Behr, R. Lang,
G. Handel
*These studies were sponsored by 3M ESPE AG.
Dyract Cem
Tribochemical coating with Rocatec increased
significantly the bond strength of luting cements
(composite and compomer) to In-Ceram in comparison
to acid etching or air abrading.
Sinfony Indirect Lab Composite
™
Weight
Volume
Average
Particle Size (µ)
Curing
Method
Reinforcement
Fiber
belleGlass HP
KerrLab
74.0–87
56–72.5
0.5
Light
Heat
Pressure
Connect
Sculpture
77.5
68
0.6
Light
Heat
Vacuum
FibreKor
has glass fibers
pre-impregnated
with resin
N/A
Vectris has
pre-impregnated
glass fibers
Product
Filler %
FibreKor
Jeneric/Pentron
60.0
41
Sinfony
50
N/A
0.6
Light
Vacuum
Targis/Vectris
Ivoclar-Williams
78
N/A
0.7
Targis Vectris
Light
Light
Heat Pressure
Vacuum
Sinfony
™
Indirect Lab Composite
Indirect Resin Systems — Reality’s Choices
Reality Publishing Co., Vol. 15, 2001
Testing found Sinfony indirect lab composite to have
very good esthetics and to be easy for the lab to fabricate.
The study results presented here demonstrate
clearly the strength, beauty and versatility
of Sinfony indirect lab composite.
[ before ]
Insertion of Sinfony Indirect Lab Composite
5.0
According to:
4.8
++++ 1/2
300
4.7
The Dental Advisor, Vol. 18, 2001
250
Clinicians were very pleased with the clinical performance
of Sinfony indirect lab composite, rating the “ease of
finishing/ polishing” very high.
200
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.3
TCML
ACTA
µm
Average Rating (1–5 scale)
Abrasion of Indirect Composites
350
4.9
150
100
4.2
50
4.1
4.0
0
Overall
Laboratory
Product
Shade
Match
Vitality
Fit to
Tooth
Margin
Integrity
Ease of
Finishing/
Polishing
1 Year
Sinfony
Overall
Rating
2 Year
5.0
4.5
1-5 Rating Scale
[ after ]
++++ 1/2
3.5
The Dental Advisor, Vol. 19, 2002
Overall, clinicians rated Sinfony indirect lab composite
in the very good to excellent range for two-year recall,
with high marks for “resistance to fracture/chipping”
and “patient satisfaction.”
2.5
2.0
1.5
Shade
Match/
Vitality
Lack of
Marginal
Discoloration
Wear
Resistance
Patient
Satisfaction
3M ESPE Dental Lab Technical Hotline: 1-800-216-9502
3M ESPE Web site: www.3MESPE.com
3M, ESPE, Rocatec and Sinfony are trademarks of 3M or 3M ESPE AG. Artglass
is a trademark of Heraeus Kulzer. belleGlass is a trademark of Kerr Corporation.
Sculpture is a trademark of Jeneric/Pentron. Solidex is a trademark of Shofu.
Targis is a trademark of Ivoclar-Vivadent.
Dental Products
3M Center
Building 275-2SE-03
St. Paul, MN 55144-1000
USA
Dental Products
3M Canada
Post Office Box 5757
London, Ontario N6A 4T1
Canada
1 800 265-1840 ext. 6229
Targis
Bovine Enamel
Both in the mastication simulator machine and in the
three-media-wear machine, Sinfony indirect lab composite
showed significantly less abrasion than belleGlass,
Sculpture, and Targis.
Minimum 10%
Post-Consumer Fiber
Printed in U.S.A.
© 3M 1999–2002
70-2009-2421-8
Impact Strength
10
mJ/mm2
1.0
Resistance to
Fracture/
Chipping
belleGlass
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of
Regensburg, Germany: Abrasion of indirect composite
restorations after artificial abrasion in the mastication
simulation in a three-media-wear machine.
(DGZPW Abstracts #11) 2000.*
Two-Year Recall of Sinfony Lab
Indirect Composite
4.0
3.0
Sculpture
E. Hoffman, M. Rosentritt, M. Behr, G. Handel
8
DIN 53 453, Transverse Impact Test*
6
At 7.5 mJ/mm2, Sinfony indirect lab composite surpasses other
modern materials, such as Solidex, belleGlass, and Targis.
4
2
0
Sinfony
Artglass
Solidex
*These studies were sponsored by 3M ESPE AG.
Targis
belleGlass