ER/PR-positive, HER2+ breast cancer
Transcription
ER/PR-positive, HER2+ breast cancer
Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer – which target dominates the phenotype 20th Annual NOCR meeting Las Vegas, February 28th 2014 Ruth M. O’Regan, MD Professor and Vice-Chair for Educational Affairs, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Chief of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center for Excellence, Grady Memorial Hospital HER2-positive breast cancers are intrinsically resistant to endocrine therapy • Transfection of ER-positive breast cancer cells with HER2 renders them resistant to tamoxifen • Retrospective analyses of trials in the ERpositive metastatic setting show a worse outcome for cancers that co-express HER2, compared to those that do not • Median progression free survival is less than 6 months for ER+ HER2+ MBC treated with aromatase inhibitors Benz BRCT BRCT 1992, De Laurentiis J Clin Oncol 2005, Kaufman J Clin Oncol 2009, Johnston J Clin Oncol 2009 Progression free survival(months) Outcome for patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer based on HER2 status HER2- LET HER2+/- LET ANAST LET ANAST Kaufman J Clin Oncol 2009, Johnston J Clin Oncol 2009, Bonneterre Cancer 2001, Moridisen J Clin Oncol 2003, Nahta BRCT 2012 HER2 trumps ER when both receptors are expressed….. But is this true for all HR+ HER+ breast cancers? Percent PCR Pathologic complete response is consistently lower in ER+ HER2+ breast cancers compared to ER- HER2+ breast cancers T L T/L T L T/L T L P P -> FEC T/L T L FEC -> P EC -> D T P T/P T/P T/L D Reviewed in Nahta and O’Regan BRCT 2012 PCR is prognostic in ER- cancer but not ER+ cancers that co-express HER2 ER-negative, HER2-positive ER-positive, HER2-positive von Mitchwitz et al SABCS 2011 Other evidence supporting a role for ER in HER2+ cancers • In the adjuvant trastuzumab trials, DFS is longer for ER+ cancers compared to ER- cancers (at least up to 4-5 years) • A subset of patients with ER-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer have prolonged disease control with ERinhibition alone without HER2-inhibition • Patterns of recurrence differ (ER+ more common in bone) Perez J Clin Oncol 2011, Kaufman J Clin Oncol 2009 Why is this important? • We may (and probably are) overtreating a subgroup of ER+, HER2+ breast cancers in the (neo)-adjuvant setting • This subgroup of patients with ER+, HER2+ breast cancers may suffer late recurrences (similar to what we see with luminal A cancers) • Can we identify this subgroup that is driven by ER? Likelihood of PCR is inversely related to level of ER expression for HER2+ breast cancers Percent PCR HER2+/HR- HER2+/ER+ HER2+/ER+++ ER expression Bhargava Mod Path 2011, Nahta BRCT 2012 C40601: HER2+ Subtypes by Hormone Receptor (HR) HR-negative HR-positive Carey et al Proc ASCO 2013 Prognostic ability of 70-gene signature in HER2+, ER+ cancers: untreated patients (n = 89) 21-gene signature not useful as HER2+ cancers have intermediate or high recurrence scores Knauer et al BJC 2010 Bi-directional cross-talk between ER and HER2 • Signaling through EGFR family including HER2 down-regulates ER • Conversely, inhibition of HER2 with trastuzumab or lapatinib increases signaling through ER • ER signaling is increased in HER2-positive cell lines that are resistant to HER2-directed agents • HER2 expression and activity is increased in hormone-resistant cancers, compared to hormone-sensitive cancers Pinzone Mol Cell Biol 2004, Stoia J Endocrinol 2000, Sabnis Cancer Res 2009, Xia PNAS 2006, Valabrega Oncogene 2005 HER2 signaling decreases ER activation and inhibition of HER2 increases ER-regulated gene transcription TRAST HER1/2/3 HER2 HER2 HER1/2/3 xx Membrane FOXO3a Membrane TKI PI3-K Ras PI3-K Ras AKT AKT MEK MEK Erk1/2 Cytoplasm Erk1/2 Cytoplasm FOXO3a Nucleus ER ER ERE x ER-regulated gene transcription FOXO3a Nucleus ERER ER-regulated gene transcription ERE Xia PNAS 2006, Valabrega Oncogene 2005 Clinical relevance of this cross-talk • Inhibition of HER2 without inhibition of ER may increase ER signaling allowing ER to act as an escape mechanism – This could contribute to the lower PCR seen in ER+ HER2+ breast cancers and have potential implications in the metastatic setting – There may be a subset of ER+ HER2+ breast cancers where ER inhibition is critical (more important than chemotherapy) Excellent outcomes for small ER+ HER2+ cancers treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy Tolaney SABCS 2013 Response to pre-operative trastuzumab and lapatinib ± letrozole (12 weeks) pCR + npCR pCR 70 60 * pCR (%) 50 40 30 20 10 0 28 % 21% All ER+ 40% 53 % 56 % 48 % ER - All ER+ ER- * NeoSphere: PCR 6% with dual HER2 inhibition without ER inhibition npCR = < 1cm residual cancer in the breast Rimawi CCR 2013 TEL trial: Pre-operative Trastuzumab, everolimus and letrozole in HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer (PI O’Regan) HER2 + ER+ breast cancer Stratify: ER/PR > 50% ER±PR < 50% Trastuzumab Letrozole (± LHRH agonist) Everolimus 12 weeks* Primary endpoint: PCR *Adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy at physicians discretion Case history • 46-year old with recent diagnosis of stage 1A (T1B (8mm), N0), grade 2, ER 90%, PR 90%, HER2+ (FISH+) cancer status post bilateral mastectomies • Wants to avoid chemotherapy • 70-gene signature: good prognosis • Opts not to receive chemotherapy • Receiving trastuzumab and tamoxifen Conclusions • Although HER2 signaling is associated with intrinsic resistance to endocrine agents, a subset of HER2+, ER+ cancers appear to be driven, at least in part, by ER • Identification of these cancers is crucial: – They may require less aggressive treatment approaches with earlier institution of ER inhibition – May behave like ER+ HER2- cancers with late relapses • Molecular profiling should be looked at in more depth in these cancers