Pending Decisions 13 February 2015

PENDING DECISIONS LIST
WEEK 7 2015
13 February 2015 TO 20 February 2015
BEDFONT, FELTHAM & HANWORTH AREA
Minor & Householder Applications to be recommended for REFUSAL
Item
1
Proposal
No. of
submissions:
1
Outcome
Address
86 Cranleigh Road, Feltham, London TW13
4QB
Ward
Ref. No.
Feltham
00317/86/P1
Case officer details
[email protected]
Retrospective application for the erection of a canopy to cover decking area.
Summary of likely reasons for refusal
- The canopy is attached to an existing single storey rear extension and has a depth of 4.8metres. It is considered that scale of the
development is not subservient to the main property and appears visually obtrusive when viewed from the rear garden, contrary
to UDP policy ENV-B.1.1.
- It is considered that structure adversely impacts the amenity of neighbouring occupiers.
Major Applications
Item
1
Summary
Address
Hanworth Library, 2-12 Hampton Road West,
Feltham, TW13 6AW
Ward
Ref. No.
Hanworth
00550/N/P2
Case officer details
[email protected]
Demolition and erection of part three, four and five storey building to provide 35 self contained residential units with associated
parking and amenity facilities.
Recommendation: Refuse
Summary of likely reasons for refusal:
- The scale and massing of the proposal does not relate well to the scale, height and massing of the adjacent townscape and does
not respect the proportions of neighbouring buildings.
- The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the street scene.
- Unacceptable parking and servicing arrangements harmful to the free flow and safety of vehicular and pedestrian traffic on the
adjoining highways.
- Unacceptable cycling provision.
Outcome
Breaches of Planning Control where Enforcement is to be undertaken
Item
1
Breach
Outcome
Address
11 Myrtle Avenue, TW14 9QU
Unauthorised single storey rear extension
Ward
Ref. No.
Bedfont
568854
Case officer details
[email protected]
PENDING DECISIONS LIST
WEEK 7 2015
13 February 2015 TO 20 February 2015
CENTRAL HOUNSLOW AREA
Minor & Householder Applications to be recommended for REFUSAL
Item
1
Proposal
No. of
submissions:
0
Address
Land rear of 226 - 228 Bath Road, Hounslow,
TW4 7DE
Ward
Ref. No.
Hounslow West
00083/CV/P4
Case officer details
[email protected]
Variation of condition 2 to allow for reduced site area and repositioning of building pursuant to planning permission granted under
appeal ref APP/F5540/A/13/2208000 dated 01/05/2014 for proposed erection of pair of semi-detached dwelling houses with access
off dawn close on vacant site at rear.
Summary of likely reasons for refusal
- The access gates would open onto the highway, harmful to the free flow and safety of traffic and pedestrians on the adjoining
highway.
- Substandard amenity space resulting in inadequate standard of accommodation for future occupiers.
Outcome
Item
2
Proposal
No. of
submissions:
1
Outcome
Address
Land rear of 45 Bell Road, Hounslow, TW3
3NX
Ward
Ref. No.
Hounslow Heath
00108/R/O45/P6
Case officer details
[email protected]
Erection of a two storey detached building comprising of two self contained flats.
Summary of likely reasons for refusal
- Insufficient amenity space would be provided in order to serve the two flats in conflict with Council Policy, therefore offering
substandard living conditions for future occupiers.
- The close proximity of the development to the flats above 45 Bell Road would harm existing residents’ outlook.
- The bulk, scale and position of the proposal within a constrained site would harm the appearance of the area.
Item
3
Proposal
No. of
submissions:
0
Address
79 Cecil Road, Hounslow, TW3 1NX
Ward
Ref. No.
Hounslow Central
00223/79/P3
Case officer details
[email protected]
Erection of a single storey rear infill extension, a side first floor extension and a rear roof extension
Summary of likely reasons for refusal
- The proposed rear dormer due to its excessive scale would appear as a large box and dominate the original roof. This is in
conflict with the Residential Extension Guidelines.
- The rear infill extension would be constructed close to the boundary of an attached neighbour. This coupled with the excessive
depth of the proposal would unacceptably block light to and harm outlook from the property.
Outcome
Breaches of Planning Control where Enforcement is to be undertaken
Item
1
Breach
Outcome
Address
16 Laburnum Grove, TW3 3LU
Ward
Ref. No.
Hounslow Heath
TBA
Construction of an outbuilding for use as a separate self contained residential unit
Case officer details
[email protected]
PENDING DECISIONS LIST
WEEK 7 2015
13 February 2015 TO 20 February 2015
CHISWICK AREA
Minor & Householder Applications to be recommended for REFUSAL
Item
1
Proposal
No. of
submissions:
1
Outcome
Address
46 Elliott Road, W4 1PE
Ward
Turnham Green
Ref. No.
00395/46/P4
Case officer details
[email protected]
Erection of rear extensions to the main roof and rear element of roof with two roof windows to the front elevation
Summary of likely reasons for refusal
- Mansard style is not in-keeping with the character and appearance of the area.
- Harm to neighbours living conditions – loss of daylight, outlook and sense of overbearing.
- Bulky and dominant addition to the property.
Minor & Householder Applications to be recommended for Approval with objections
Item
1
Proposal
No. of
submissions:
2
Outcome
Address
263 Chiswick High Road, W4 4PU
Ward
Ref. No.
Turnham Green
00248/263/p5
Case officer details
[email protected]
Retrospective application for the siting of 2 external fridge and freezer refrigeration units within an acoustic enclosure to the rear flat
roof area of the Subway retail store
Summary of objections
- No consent originally sought
- Loss of natural wildlife
- Harm to setting of a listed building
- Cumulative impact of number of units to the roof
- Equipment is audible from nearby residential properties
Summary of reasons for approval
- The proposal will reduce noise emitting from existing fans in accordance with council policy on noise
- No harm to character or appearance of the conservation area.
PENDING DECISIONS LIST
WEEK 7 2015
13 February 2015 TO 20 February 2015
HESTON & CRANFORD AREA
Minor & Householder Applications to be recommended for REFUSAL
Item
1
Proposal
No. of
submissions:
0
Address
19 Broad Walk, Hounslow, TW5 9AA
Ward
Ref. No.
Heston Central
00162/19/P4
Case officer details
[email protected]
Erection of a rear roof extension incorporating an increase in the overall height of the roof of the existing side extension, juliet balcony
and two front roof windows to the house
Summary of likely reasons for refusal
- The rear roof extension would not be sufficiently set in from the shared side boundary and its insensitive design would appear
overly dominant to the main roof in conflict with the Residential Extension Guidelines.
- The increased ridge height would be highly visible and is considered harmful to the street scene.
Outcome
Breaches of Planning Control where Enforcement is to be undertaken
Item
1
Breach
Outcome
Address
172 Heston Road, TW5 0QU
Ward
Ref. No.
Heston East
375139
Case officer details
[email protected]
Unauthorised internally illuminated advertisement and projecting sign within a conservation area
Item
2
Breach
Address
41 Great South West Road, Hounslow, TW4
7NH
Ward
Ref. No.
Cranford
OUTB/2012/00099
Case officer details
[email protected]
Construction of unauthorised outbuilding and unauthorised use of outbuilding as residential
Outcome
Item
3
Breach
Address
39 Brabazon Road, TW5 9LL
Ward
Ref. No.
Heston West
567378
Case officer details
[email protected]
Use of an outbuilding as a separate self contained residential unit
Outcome
Item
4
Breach
Outcome
Address
29 Burnham Gardens, TW4 6LS
Ward
Cranford
Use of an outbuilding as a separate self contained residential unit
Ref. No.
OUTR/2007/00247
Case officer details
[email protected]
PENDING DECISIONS LIST
WEEK 7 2015
13 February 2015 TO 20 February 2015
ISLEWORTH & BRENTFORD AREA
Minor & Householder Applications to be recommended for REFUSAL
Item
1
Proposal
No. of
submissions:
1
Address
60-62 Enfield Road, Brentford, TW8 9PB
Ward
Ref. No.
Brentford
00409/60-62/P1
Case officer details
[email protected]
Erection of a single storey rear extension to both dwellings.
Summary of likely reasons for refusal
- 62 Enfield Road does not intend to build the proposed single storey rear wraparound extension.
- The excessive depth and height on the boundary, contrary to the Residential Extension Guidelines, would therefore harm
neighbours’ living conditions.
Outcome
Breaches of Planning Control where Enforcement is to be undertaken
Item
1
Breach
Address
Bridge House, Commerce Road, Brentford,
TW8 8LE
Ward
Ref. No.
Syon
GEN/2013/00497
Case officer details
[email protected]
Unauthorised erection of a fence around the front of the premises
Outcome
Item
2
Breach
Outcome
Address
72 London Road, Brentford, TW8 8JL
Ward
Ref. No.
Syon
BWR/2014/00310
Case officer details
[email protected]
Unauthorised erection of a rear extension, front porch, front boundary wall with associated pillars and side boundary wall