Local Content Strategy & Implementation in Brazil
Transcription
Local Content Strategy & Implementation in Brazil
Local Content Strategy & Implementation in Brazil Agenda • Brazil Today and Policy Framework • Brazil PSC 1st Bidding • Brazilian Local Content • Success Story − Shipyards − Subsea − Technology Center – Rio de Janeiro • Challenges Brazil Today and Policy Framework Area: 8,502,728 km² Population: 202 million GDP: US$ 1.8 trillion World’s sixth largest economy Over US$ 352 billion in International Reserves • Oil, Natural Gas and Biofuels regulated under the same institutional environment (ANP) • Brazil can double its proven reserves in the near future Government MME (Ministry of Mines and Energy) CNPE • • • • • (National Council for Energy Policy) ANP Certification Companies (National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels) Concessionaires Suppliers IBP => Operator’s forum to discuss industry issues ONIP => suppliers list and suppliers identification ABESPETRO => Supplier’s forum to discuss industry issues Brazil PSC 1st Bidding – Pre-Salt area • Bid year: 2013 • Libra Oilfield – Santos Basin • Bonus paid: US$5 billion; • Exploration phase: LC = 37%. • Development phase: – LC = 55% for the first oil produced until 2021 – LC = 59% thereafter. JV Share (%) Petrobras 30+10 Shell Brasil 20 Total S.A. 20 CNPC International Ltd 10 CNOOC International Ltd 10 Profit oil split (%) Petrobras as the only operator in Brazil PSC agreements - 30% minimum 41,65 Brazilian Local Content • Local Content (LC) is now one of the major challenges of the Brazilian O&G industry • The LC policy evolution has gone through many changes over the years • Percentages of LC work as award criteria (together with signature bonuses and minimum work programs) at the ANP licensing rounds • ANP has a robust process to validate LC evidence • The LC policy encourages main international suppliers to be established in Brazil, providing services and/or manufacturing equipments with Local Content – Ex.: Subsea, Shipyard, Services • Final LC percentages is affected significantly by 2nd and 3rd level suppliers Brazilian Local Content Process - Main players Provides information about the LC part of the purchase or services Responsible for guaranteeing the achievement of the minimum LC (quarterly reported to ANP) Operator Supplier LC certification process started in Round 7 • Defines and monitors LC • Accredits certification companies ANP Certification Company Evaluates and issues LC certificates Brazil Local Content - Minimum Requirements Minimum required by ANP Category ANP DEVELOPMENT Certificate ANP Category DEVELOPMENT LC evidence ANP Category EXPLORATION LC evidence Minimum required by ANP Certificate I- Geology & Geophysics I.1 Acquisition I.2 Processing and Interpretation 5% 40% I - Drilling & Completion II - Production Collection System I.1 Rig Charter II.1 Umbilical 10% I.2 Drilling + Completion II.2 Manifolds 30% I.2.1 Wellhead II.3 Lines Production / Flexible 45% Injection I.2.2 Casing II.4 Production Lines / Injection Rigid 80% I.2.3 Production Column II.5 Flow Ducts 80% I.2.4 Well Equipment II.6 Pumping System 30% I.2.5 Drill Bits 5% II.7 Control System Submarine II.8 Basic Engineering 55% I.3 Others I.3 Auxiliary Systems II - Drilling & Completion I.3.1 Electric System Minimum required by ANP ANP Category 40%DEVELOPMENT 80% III.11.4.1 Pressure Vessels 80% III.11.4.2 Ovens 80% III.11.4.3 Tanks 90% 100% 100% III.11.4.4 Process Towers III.11.4.5 Cooling Towers III.11.4.6 Heat50% Exchangers 50% III.11.4.7 Pumps II.1 Rig Charter 10% I.3.2 Automation System II.9 Detailing Engineering60% 95% III.11.4.8 Steam turb ines 60% II.10 Management, Construction and Assembly 60% II.2 Drilling + Completion 30% I.3.3 Telecommunications System II.11 Other 40% II.2.1 Wellhead 45% I.3.4 Fiscal Measurement System III - Production Unit 60% II.2.2 Casing 80% I.3.5 Field Instrumentation III.1 Basic Engineering 40% II.2.3 Production Column 80% I.4 - Logistics Support II.2.4 Well Equipment 30% I.5 Arvore de Natal 15% III.2 Engineering Detailing 95% III.11.4.13 Filters 85% III.3 Management, Construction and Assembly 60% I.6 Others III.4 Hull II.2.5 Drill Bits 5% II.3 Auxiliary Systems 55% II - Production Collection System III.5 Jacket II.3.1 Electric System 60% II.1 Umbilical III.6 Naval Systems II.3.2 Automation System 60% II.2 Manifolds II.3.3 Telecommunications System II.3.4 Fiscal Measurement System II.3.5 Field Instrumentation Minimum required by ANP 85% 85% 85% 80% 70% 90% III.11.4.9 Screw Compressors 70% III.11.4.10 Reciprocating Compressors 70% III.11.4.11 Diesel Engines (up to 600 HP) 90% 50%up to 24 " III.11.4.12 valves III.11.4.14 Burners 80% Protection III.11.4.15 Cathodic 90% 85% 80% 90% III.11.4.16 Electric System 60% 40% 80% III.7 Simple Anchoring Systems II.3 Lines Production / Flexible Injection III.8 Multiple Anchoring 80% Systems 30% III.11.4.18 Telecommunication System 40% 60% II.4 Production Lines / Injection Rigid 100% Modules III.9 Installation and Integration 40% II.5 Flow Ducts 95% III.11.4.20 Field Instrumentation III.10 Pre-instalção and Hook-up 85% and Assembly 100% of Anchor Lines III.11.5 Construction II.4 Others II.7 Control System Submarine 40% III.11 Process Plants, Moving 50% and Injection 50% III.11.4.17 Automation System 70% III.11.4.19 Fiscal Measurement System Total Investments Development 50% III - Logistics Support 15% II.8 Basic Engineering III.11.1 Basic Engineering50% Total Exploration Expenditure 37% II.9 Detailing Engineering 95% III.11.2 Detailed Engineering 95% II.10 Management, Construction and Assembly 60% III.11.3 Service Management 90% II.11 Other 75% III.11.4 Materials 60% 60% 40% 95% 55% Success Story • Shipyard: local EPC suppliers invested in capacity expansion. 20% per year increase vs. last decade • Subsea: major suppliers invested in manufacturing capacity in Brazil to meet increasing demand • Technology: new research and development centers funded by the Concessionaires Shipyards • Local EPCs - investing in capacity expansion − 82k direct workforce; − 324 constructions on going (vessels, rigs and PU)* • Last decade – increase ≈ 20% per year since 2004 • Local content Requirements − Attract foreign companies to establish locally − Hull conversion/construction: internationally (Round 1-6) or domestically (Round 7-12) • Main bottleneck: dry docks – only 3 in Brasil • Challenges − Overdependence on Petrobras − Low productivity − International competitiveness Shipyards: Direct workforce progress* Total * Source: 2014 - Sinaval 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 14k 20k 78k 29k 33k 41k 56k 59k 62k 82k Shipyards – cont’d Brazilian shipyard • 1980s: industry was extinguished • 2005+: the booming offshore segment + LC requirements => multiple shipyards built • Fully booked until 2016/17 with the current backlog • About half of existing demand can be met locally. Shipyards backlog (CGT) Techint 4% 1 module and topside integration FPSO P-76 6 drillships EBR 4% 1 module and topside integration FPSO P-74 Inhaúma 2% 4 FPSO conversion hulls (P-74 – P-77) Enseada 4% Mauá 5% EAS 20% 8 Panamax 4 Product tankers 10 Suezmax, 8 Aframax 7 drillships 2 modules and topside integration FPSO P-67 and P-70 OSX 8% 2 modules and topside integration FPSO P-75 and P-77 Brasfels 15% 3 modules and topside integration FPSO Cidade de Itaguaí FPSO P-66 FPSO P-69 QGI 8% 6 semisub rigs 2 modules and topside integration FPSO Cidade de Maricá and Saquarema Brasa 8% 3 drillships Note: CGT = Compensated gross tonnage. Source: IHS Energy Jurong 12% ERG 10% 7 FPSO newbuild hulls (P-67 – P-73) 7 drillships 2 modules and topside integration FPSO P-68 FPSO P-71 © 2015 IHS Subsea Brazil current capacity—Christmas tree • Subsea equipment and services GE 7% − Global industry leaders invest in local manufacturing, bases and R&D • Foreign companies plan to expand in Brazil, seeking to win a share of this growing market Aker 21% One Subsea 37% • New plants are being built • Umbilicals remain a constraint FMC 35% Source: IHS Energy © 2014 IHS Technology Centers – Rio de Janeiro • Operators of large fields must invest in 1% of gross income in research and development • Main International companies are establishing new R&D centers in Brazil - Rio de Janeiro − Total investment >US$ 270 million during 2010–2013 − Increase LC and technology transfer − New technologies: waiver mechanism Source: Parque Tecnológico UFRJ Challenges • Drilling rigs and services • International competitiveness • 2nd and 3rd level suppliers • Frequency of licensing rounds • Shipyard bottleneck More than USD100 millions in fines have been issued so far More to come Move form penalty-based to incentive-based system Flavia Craveiro BP Brazil Local Content Lead Brazilian Oil, Gas and Biofuel Institute (IBP) Local Content Committee Coordinator [email protected]