Comparison of thermal transfer characteristics of wood flooring
Transcription
Comparison of thermal transfer characteristics of wood flooring
Energy and Buildings 70 (2014) 422–426 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy and Buildings journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enbuild Short Communication Comparison of thermal transfer characteristics of wood flooring according to the installation method Jungki Seo a , Yoon Park a,b , Junhyun Kim a , Sughwan Kim a , Sumin Kim a,∗ , Jeong Tai Kim c a b c Building Environment & Materials Lab, School of Architecture, Soongsil University, Seoul 156-743, Republic of Korea Dongwha Nature Flooring Co. Ltd. , Incheon 404-810, Republic of Korea Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 446-701, Republic of Korea a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 13 September 2013 Received in revised form 23 November 2013 Accepted 28 November 2013 Keywords: Wood flooring Thermal transfer characteristics Laminate flooring Engineered flooring Installation method Ondol a b s t r a c t There are two types of installation methods for wood flooring; a floating installation method for laminate flooring, and an adhesive installation method for engineered flooring. Thermal transfer characteristics from the floorings show a significant difference depending on the installation method, so this study focused on the comparative thermal transfer characteristics by preparing mock-up scale. The laminate flooring and the modified engineered flooring of the Korean Standard were used to conduct the tests. The tests were set up in two rooms in an apartment in Seoul, and a water heat source was prepared at 45 ◦ C and 75 ◦ C. As a result, the velocity of thermal transfer of the modified engineered flooring using adhesive was faster than that of the laminate flooring. There was no difference of temperature between both samples at 45 ◦ C of water supply, but a great difference was shown at 75 ◦ C. Moreover, installing the modified PE foam helped the floating installation method to develop a thermal transfer performance comparable to that of the preceding research. © 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. 1. Introduction Recent reports by the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have raised public awareness of energy use and its environmental implications, and have generated a great deal of interest in gaining a better understanding of the characteristics of energy use in buildings, especially their correlations with the prevailing weather conditions. The supreme importance of awareness requires for undivided responses at national, regional and global levels [1–5]. In 2002, buildings worldwide were estimated to account for about 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions [6]. In their work on climate change and comfort standards, Kwok and Rajkovich reported that the building sector accounted for 38.9% of the total primary energy requirements in the United States, of which 34.8% was used for heating, ventilation and air-conditioning [7]. In Korea, 97% of energy resources are imported. The Korean growth rate of greenhouse gas emission per capita was the highest in the world during 1990–2004. Moreover, 83% of the domestic greenhouse gas emissions stemmed from energy use in the year 2004. Korea belongs to the second group of nations that require mandatory reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, starting in 2013. Therefore, Korea is working particularly hard to prepare ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 2 820 0665; fax: +82 2 816 3354. E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Kim). 0378-7788/$ – see front matter © 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.085 for national measures to reduce energy consumption, and limit carbon dioxide emissions in the construction industry, which is responsible for over 40% of all carbon dioxide production. In order to pursue sustainability in the construction industry, the existing development-focused construction activities must be transformed via a new paradigm that focuses on sustainable development, through the adoption of sustainable policies by the government, and the development and dissemination of sustainable construction technologies [8–10]. The radiant floor heating system (Ondol) has conventionally been used in Korea. For floor heating, heat is usually supplied from boilers installed inside each apartment [11]. Hot water from a boiler is piped to a floor coil, which is an X-L pipe underneath the floor surface. The thermal storage mass consists of cement mortar, which replaces the traditional stone slab [12–14]. Residents spend a lot of their time sitting on floors; therefore, the flooring materials used should be thermo-physically comfortable [15,16]. The control of water-based floor heating systems is usually divided into two parts: a central control, which considers the external conditions, and individual room control [17]. Park et al. researched the click profile of laminate flooring, by comparison of click and bonding laminate floorings, especially the base of the click profile shape, bonding strength and international patents. A non-glue locking system has been used since laminate flooring was developed. For environmental reasons, and to save installation time, manufacturers in Europe and the USA have developed a click profile for laminate flooring. In the past, PVC flooring J. Seo et al. / Energy and Buildings 70 (2014) 422–426 423 Fig. 1. Installation method of laminate flooring and engineered flooring. was the main product, but the number of wood floorings in use is increasing as national income rises, and environmental products have attracted attention. However, these current trends have led to an increase in the thickness of flooring materials, PVC to wood flooring, so that heat losses have also increased, because of the low thermal conductivity of wood. With problems, many researches focus on the thermal transfer characteristics of wood flooring, especially on laminate flooring and engineered flooring, which are the most widely used products in the flooring market in Korea. Laminate flooring is installed by a floating installation method, with polyethylene (PE) vinyl and polyethylene (PE) foam to make the floor even. Due to the installation method, a click profile type, there is no possibility of emitting pollutant caused by resin, so that this flooring can offer a comfortable indoor air quality. However, heat losses can occur between the connection gaps; besides, PE foams have many pores to block the upward heat flow, and that is also one of the reasons to cause heat loss. In the case of engineered flooring, resins are used to fix the flooring on the finishing mortar, so this floor system can have high thermal conductivity, because of its adhesive type. However, the thermal conductivity of this flooring is lower than that of laminate flooring [18]. Thermal conductivity and thermal transfer characteristics of a variety of wood floorings were considered above. In this study, the thermal transfer characteristics of laminate flooring and modified engineered flooring in the actual living space was compared. The thermal transfer characteristics of the modified underlay foam with the laminate flooring were also determined. 2. Experimental 2.1. Materials In this research, adhesive installation method and floating installation method were installed to determine thermal transfer characteristics of those. First type, the floating method, was constructed with this layer; PE vinyl, modified underlay-foam, and laminate flooring. The modified underlay-foam has a punched hole, which results in improvement of heat transfer rate from a heat source. Second type, adhesive installation method, used a water-borne epoxy adhesive to install modified engineered flooring. The modified engineered flooring is a flooring to have melamine film on the surface to increase the surface strength of it. Fig. 1 presents the two installation methods. Each of flooring has a dimension with 7.5 mm × 75 mm × 900 mm of the laminate flooring and 7.5 mm × 190 mm × 1200 mm of modified engineered flooring, which meet Korean standard. 2.2. Methods 2.2.1. Test in actual living place This test was performed in two rooms of the same size, located in Seoul, Republic of Korea. Room 2 and Room 3 were the test objects in Fig. 2. To minimize outside influences, every side of the rooms was constructed to be airtight. The laminate flooring was constructed by a floating installation method on the PE vinyl and the Fig. 2. Test plan. modified underlay foam, and the engineered flooring was installed by an adhesive installation method, after spreading adhesive on the mortar floor, and then allowing time to cure the adhesive. The supplying heat temperature of water was 45 ◦ C, and the temperature variation was measured two times with a time schedule, of heating for 4 h and turning off the heating for 4 h. Fig. 3 shows the measuring temperature points. The temperature on the flooring was monitored at five points, and one point for the indoor temperature 1 m above the flooring. Test was carried out with a six times cycling. Three times tests of the six cycling were measured in the condition that the modified engineered flooring, as an adhesive type, was installed in Room 2, and the laminate flooring, as an assembly type, was done in Room 3, and the other three times tests were vice versa to minimized the test error. Table 1 presents a summary of the experiment. 2.2.2. Mock-up test Equal tests were carried out by thermal environment performance evaluation module in Korea Conformity Laboratories (KCL), to take accurate measurements, and to confirm any errors caused by ambient conditions and the location of rooms in the preceding tests in an actual living place. The same specification samples were used, and two modules made with standard flooring structure were installed. The thermal sensors were set at three points on the surface of the finishing mortar, three points on the surface of the flooring, and one point in the air. The condition of the test room was constantly kept at 20 ◦ C temperature and 50% relative humidity. The module size was 2 m × 2 m × 1.2 m. In addition, the 424 J. Seo et al. / Energy and Buildings 70 (2014) 422–426 Fig. 3. Measuring temperature in actual living space (a) laminate flooring and (b) engineered flooring. Table 1 Summary of the experiment. Installation method Floating installation Adhesive installation Flooring type Subsidiary materials Installation size Sampling point Sampling intervals Laminate flooring Modified PE-foam, PE-vinyl 3000 mm × 2700 mm Surface 5 point, indoor 5 point 10 min Modified engineered flooring Water-borne epoxy adhesive 3000 mm × 2700 mm Surface 5 point, indoor 5 point 10 min 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Test in actual living place Test results are presented in Fig. 6. The variations of the surface temperature of the flooring and the indoor temperature during heating time were similar, but this result indicated that the thermal transfer performance of the laminate flooring with modified underlay foam was significantly improved, comparing to the existing PE-foam [18]. Similar test results were measured by the six times cycling. The room where the modified engineered flooring was constructed had a 0.2 ◦ C higher room-temperature, and the surface of the flooring kept a slightly higher temperature. Therefore, there was no remarkable difference in thermal transfer performance between the laminate flooring and engineered flooring. Fig. 4. Thermal transfer characteristics test in mock-up lab. supplying heating source temperatures of water were 45 ◦ C, which is the temperature of a district heating type, and 75 ◦ C, which is that of an individual heating type. The time schedule was planned with heating for 4 h, and turning off the heating for 4 h, giving 8 h of test time. Figs. 4 and 5 show the test room, and a structure diagram of the module system. Fig. 5. Structure diagram of module system. 3.2. Mock-up test 3.2.1. Thermal transfer performance at 45 ◦ C of heating supply source Figs. 7 and 8 show the test conducted in the mock-up lab in KCL. At 45 ◦ C, which is the supply temperature of a district heating type, the surface temperature of the finishing mortar increased quickly, which led the surface temperature of the engineered flooring to quickly increase. This is because the thermal conductivity of the resin used to install engineered flooring is far higher than that of the components of the laminate flooring, and the resins were thinly and thoroughly spread on the finishing mortar. The engineered flooring exhibited better thermal transfer performance than that of the laminate flooring, technically showing about 2 ◦ C difference of temperature, particularly at the beginning time. Furthermore, the air temperature of the engineered flooring is higher than that of the laminate flooring, but not as much as the surface temperature, because the thermal sensor for air temperature was not influenced by radiant heating energy, but only air temperature. It takes a long time for air to heat up, because of the high specific heat of air, which means that there is no significant temperature variation at the low temperature of the heat source. However, after heating off, the temperature of the engineered flooring dropped sharply; on the other hand, that of the laminate flooring decreased gradually, due to the heat storage capacity of the underlay foam under the flooring. J. Seo et al. / Energy and Buildings 70 (2014) 422–426 Fig. 6. Thermal transfer performances in actual living place. Fig. 7. Thermal transfer performance at 45 ◦ C of heating supply source by water. Fig. 8. Thermal transfer performance at 75 ◦ C of heating supply source by water. 425 426 J. Seo et al. / Energy and Buildings 70 (2014) 422–426 3.2.2. Thermal transfer performance at 75 ◦ C of heating supply source At 75 ◦ C, which is the temperature of an individual heating type, similar temperature variations and heat storage capacity were presented. However, as the heating supply source temperature increased, temperature changes were distinguishably observed, and the surface temperature of finishing mortar of the engineered flooring remained 0.5–2 ◦ C higher than that of the laminate flooring for a heating period, but the laminate flooring could not reach the peak temperature for 4 h. The results indicate that differences in the thermal conductivity of the resin for the engineered flooring, and the PE-foam for the laminate flooring, brought out the difference of thermal transfer performance. 4. Conclusions This research determined the thermal transfer characteristic according to the flooring installation methods and materials, by tests in the actual living place, and in a mock-up module lab. The test results show that the thermal transfer performance of the modified underlay foam for the laminate floor showed better thermal transfer characteristics than the existing PE-foam. Moreover, when both of the floorings were installed in an actual living place, no considerable difference of thermal transfer performance was found between the laminate flooring and modified engineered flooring. However, thermal transfer characteristic of the modified engineered floor was slightly higher than the laminate floor as the preceding research [18]. Lastly, when the temperature of the heating supply source increased, temperature variations were clearly observed, which made the air temperature remain high. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (No. 2008-0061908). References [1] N. Urushizaki, M. Mizuno, Y. Shimoda, The study on life-cycle waste and CO2 emission from countermeasure of long-life building, Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ) 563 (2003) 93–100. [2] A. Forsberg, F. von Malmborg, Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment, Building and Environment 39 (2004) 223–228. [3] T. Frank, Climate change impacts on building heating and cooling energy demand in Switzerland, Energy and Buildings 37 (2005) 1175–1185. [4] IPCC, Climate Change 2001. Synthesis Report, Third Assessment Report Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, 2002. [5] IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. [6] G. Levemore, A review of the IPCC assessment report four, part – 1: the IPCC process and greenhouse gas emission trends from buildings worldwide, Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 29 (2008) 349–361. [7] A.G. Kwok, N.B. Rajkovich, Addressing climate change in comfort standards, Building and Environment 45 (2010) 18–22. [8] S. Tae, S. Shin, Current work and future trends for sustainable buildings in South Korea, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (2009) 1910–1921. [9] W.S. Chung, S. Tohno, S.Y. Shim, An estimation of energy and GHG emission intensity caused by energy consumption in Korea: an energy IO approach, Applied Energy 86 (2009) 1902–1914. [10] L. Pérez-Lombard, J. Ortiz, C. Pout, 2008 A review on buildings energy consumption information, Energy and Buildings 40 (3) (2008) 394–398. [11] H. Seo, J. Sung, S.D. Oh, H.S. Oh, H.Y. Kwak, Economic optimization of a cogeneration system for apartment houses in Korea, Energy and Buildings 40 (6) (2008) 961–967. [12] B.I. Park, H.T. Seok, K.W. Kim, The historical changes of ONDOL, Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea 24 (1995) 613–627. [13] S. Gook-Sup, Buttock responses to contact with finishing materials over the ONDOL floor heating system in Korea, Energy and Buildings 37 (2005) 65–75. [14] M.S. Yeo, I.H. Yang, K.W. Kim, Historical changes and recent energy saving potential of residential heating in Korea, Energy and Buildings 35 (7) (2003) 714–727. [15] S.S. Kim, D.H. Kang, D.H. Choi, M.S. Yeo, K.W. Kim, Comparison of strategies to improve indoor air quality at the pre-occupancy stage in new apartment buildings, Building and Environment 43 (3) (2008) 320–328. [16] J.Y. An, S. Kim, H.J. Kim, J. Seo, Emission behavior of formaldehyde and TVOC from engineered flooring in under heating and air circulation systems, Building and Environment 45 (8) (2010) 1826–1833. [17] B.W. Olesen, Control of floor heating and cooling systems, in: Seventh World Congress Clima 2000, Napoli, Italy, 2001. [18] J. Seo, J. Jeon, J. Lee, S. Kim, Thermal performance analysis according to wood flooring structure for energy conservation in radiant floor heating systems, Energy and Buildings 43 (8) (2011) 2039–2042.