ECON337901: Problem Set 7
Transcription
ECON337901: Problem Set 7
Problem Set 7 ECON337901 - Financial Economics Boston College, Department of Economics Peter Ireland Spring 2015 Due Tuesday, April 21 1. Re-Deriving the CAPM, Part I Consider an economy with a risk-free asset with return rf and two risky assets, one with random return r˜1 with expected value E(˜ r1 ) and standard deviation σ1 and the second with random return r˜2 with expected value E(˜ r2 ) and standard deviation σ2 . Assume for simplicity that the returns on the two risky assets are uncorrelated, so that a portfolio with share w1 allocated to risky asset 1, share w2 allocated to risky asset 2, and the remaining share 1 − w1 − w2 allocated to the risk-free asset has return with expected value µP = (1 − w1 − w2 )rf + w1 E(˜ r1 ) + w2 E(˜ r2 ) and variance σP2 = w12 σ12 + w22 σ22 . Suppose that all investors in this economy have identical levels of wealth and identical preferences over the mean and variance of the returns on their portfolios described by the utility function A 2 σP2 , U (µP , σP ) = µP − 2 where a higher value of A again corresponds to a higher level of economy-wide risk aversion. By substituting the expressions for µP and σP2 into the utility function, the problem solved by the “representative investor” can be described as one of choosing w1 and w2 to maximize A (w12 σ12 + w22 σ22 ). (1 − w1 − w2 )rf + w1 E(˜ r1 ) + w2 E(˜ r2 ) − 2 What are the first-order conditions for the investor’s optimal choices w1∗ and w2∗ ? 2. Re-Deriving the CAPM, Part II In the same economy described in question 1, above, suppose that there are equal shares of asset 1 and asset 2 in total, so that the random return on the market portfolio is 1 1 r˜1 + r˜2 . r˜M = 2 2 Thus, the expected return on the market portfolio equals 1 1 E(˜ rM ) = E(˜ r1 ) + E(˜ r2 ) 2 2 1 and, again using the fact that the two asset returns are uncorrelated, the variance of the return on the market portfolio equals 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 σM = (σ12 + σ22 ). σ1 + σ2 = 2 2 4 Although the two individual asset returns are uncorrelated with each other, both are correlated with market return, since σ1M = E{[˜ r − E(˜ r1 )][˜ rM − E(˜ r )]} 1 M 1 1 = E [˜ r1 − E(˜ r1 )] [˜ r1 − E(˜ r1 )] + [˜ r2 − E(˜ r2 )] 2 2 1 1 2 = E{[˜ r1 − E(˜ r1 )] } + E{[˜ r1 − E(˜ r1 )][˜ r2 − E(˜ r2 )]} 2 2 1 σ12 = 2 measures the covariance between the return on asset 1 and the return on the market portfolio and, similarly, 1 σ22 σ2M = 2 measures the covariance between the return on asset 2 and the return on the market portfolio. These results imply that the betas on assets 1 and 2 are β1 = 1 2 σ σ1M 2 1 = 1 2 2 σM (σ1 + σ22 ) 4 β2 = 1 2 σ σ2M 2 2 . = 1 2 2 σM (σ1 + σ22 ) 4 and Since, by assumption, all investors in this economy are identical, it must be true that in equilibrium the first-order conditions for w1 and w2 that you derived for the individual investor when answering question 1 must be satisfied with w1∗ = 1/2 and w2∗ = 1/2. That is, investors as a group must hold the two risky assets in the same proportion in which those assets are supplied. Can you use those first-order conditions, with w1∗ = 1/2 and w2∗ = 1/2 imposed, together with the expressions for E(˜ rM ), β1 , and β2 shown above to re-derive the CAPM relations E(˜ rj ) − rf = βj [E(˜ rM ) − rf ] for each risky asset j = 1 and j = 2? 2 3. CAPM Betas and Expected Returns Here are some stocks with high and low betas: High Beta Stocks Company Beta Caterpillar General Electric General Motors US Steel 1.25 1.15 1.20 1.60 Low Beta Stocks Company Beta AT&T Coca-Cola General Mills Pfizer 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.80 Suppose that the risk-free rate is rf = 0.02 (2 percent) and that the expected return on the market portfolio is E(˜ rM ) = 0.08 (8 percent), then use the CAPM to calculate the expected returns on each of these eight stocks. 3