letter - Juvenile Justice Coalition

Transcription

letter - Juvenile Justice Coalition
March 16, 2015
We are writing regarding the Department of Youth Services (DYS) Fiscal Year 2016-2017 (FY16-17) budget and
calling for the reductions proposed in the Governor’s budget to be reinvested in youth, families, and communities
who are at-risk of or involved in Ohio’s juvenile justice system.
Over the past decade, DYS’s facility population has declined from over 2000 youth in the late 1990s to less than
500 youth in 2013. This decrease has resulted in significant cost-savings to the state as the number of DYS
facilities have decreased 10 to three. Much of these reductions can be attributed to DYS programs to create or
strengthen cost-efficient and effective community alternatives to correctional facilities under the Targeted
RECLAIM and the Behavioral Health and Juvenile Justice initiative (BHJJ). These decreases are likely to
continue under the recently implemented Competitive RECLAIM, which is a $2.2 million competitive grant
program for counties to further invest in evidence-based programs.
We applaud DYS’s leadership on these programs and the agency’s willingness to embrace research-supported
change. However, these changes also have involved significant work and investments by local courts and
communities to retain youth safely in their home county and implement these research-based interventions. These
achievements have been the result of collective efforts at the state and local level and strong state-local
partnerships to improve outcomes for youth.
We believe that the majority of these cost-savings realized through our collective work with DYS should be
reinvested back into community programs that serve Ohio’s youth, whether in DYS or other agencies, to ensure
positive outcomes for young people. While DYS’s investments in local communities have made important
progress, there are still significant unmet needs for youth across the state, including access to physical and
behavioral health services in schools and communities or programs that support families, such as research-based
wraparound services like Multi-Systemic Therapy. In addition, delivery of services and programming for youth
varies from county to county and funding could be used to continue to expand or establish outcome-focused
prevention or diversion programs, as well as creating more community-based alternatives to locked facilities.
Reinvesting these cost-savings also benefits all Ohioans as more youth can be given a chance at lifelong success
and put on a path to becoming positive, productive members of our communities.
The youth served in the juvenile justice system – and for some youth eventually in DYS facilities – are some of
Ohio’s most vulnerable, complex, and at-risk youth. For example, many youth in the juvenile justice system are
or have been involved with the child welfare system or face behavioral health challenges. In Ohio, 46% of youth
in DYS facilities are on the mental health caseload and 85% of youth on this caseload also have a co-occurring
substance abuse issue. Additionally, Black and Latino youth are disproportionately represented in Ohio’s juvenile
justice system; nearly 2/3 of DYS facilities’ population are youth of color. Ohio must stop seeing youth in the
juvenile justice system as youth with needs that must be addressed in that system; instead, we must work
collaboratively and purposefully across agencies to identify and address these challenges early.
We respectfully request that you consider reinvesting a significant portion – if not all – of the $32 million in
savings realized by DYS cost-saving efforts, particularly closing DYS facilities, back into effective, cost efficient
local programs in DYS or other agencies that work with youth who are at risk of involvement or involved in the
juvenile justice system. This reinvestment will allow us to continue to build on our collective efforts to strengthen
youth and the communities in which they live, creating a better future for all Ohioans. We are available to meet
and discuss reinvestment and effective programs that work for Ohio’s youth.
Sincerely,
ACLU of Ohio
Alicia Monaco, Assessment and Outpatient Mental Health Therapist
Children's Defense Fund-Ohio
Children's Law Center, Inc.
Dawna-Cricket-Martita Meehan, Ph.D., Director, Center for School-Based Mental Health Programs
Family and Youth Law Center at Capital University Law School
Franklin County Juvenile Court
Human Service Chamber of Franklin County
Justice for Children Project, Moritz College of Law
Juvenile Justice Coalition
Karen Miner-Romanoff, Ph.D., J.D., Dean, College of Health and Public Administration and Program Chair,
Criminal Justice Administration at Franklin University
League of Women Voters of Ohio
Lighthouse Youth Services
National Alliance on Mental Illness of Ohio
National Association of Social Workers - Ohio Chapter
National Youth Advocate Program
Ohio Association of Child Caring Agencies
Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Ohio Justice and Policy Center
Ohio PTA
Ohio Student Association
Professor Mary Thomas, Department of Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies, The Ohio State University
Racial Justice NOW!
SkoolAid
The Ohio Council of Behavioral Health & Family Services Providers
Voices for Ohio's Children