April, 2015 - Miller Isar
Transcription
April, 2015 - Miller Isar
NO. 15-04 APRIL 30, 2015 Regulatory Review The Miller Isar, Inc. Regulatory Review is a monthly report designed to provide clients with information regarding regulatory and policy matters that may impact their business operations. The Regulatory Review is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal opinion or counsel. Comments and suggestions are welcome. FEDERAL REGULATORY NEWS COMMISSION SEEKS COMMENT ON 911 CALL FORWARDING FOR NON-SERVICE-INITIALIZED PHONES On April 1, 2015, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding whether the obligation to transmit 911 calls from “non-service-initialized” (NSI) devices to Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) continues to serve an important public safety objective. An NSI device is a mobile device for which there is no valid service contract with any CMRS provider. The Commission explained that a primary rationale for the initial adoption of the Commission’s rule in the late 1990s was to expedite wireless calls to 911 that would otherwise have been delayed due to lengthy call validation processes for unidentified callers that were commonly used at the time. According to the Commission, these call validation methods are no longer in use. Further, the availability of low-cost options for wireless services has increased. These trends suggest that the NSI component of the requirement is no longer necessary to ensure that wireless callers have continued access to emergency services. The Commission proposes to sunset the NSI component of the rule after a six-month transition period that will allow for public outreach and education. Comment is also requested on alternative approaches to addressing the issue of fraudulent calls from NSI devices. Comments are due 30 days following publication in the Federal Register; reply comments are due 60 days following publication. (FCC No. 15-43)( PS Docket No. 08-51) WHEELER SAYS COMCAST ABANDONMENT OF TIME WARNER CABLE MERGER IS IN CONSUMERS’ BEST INTEREST On April 24, 2015, Commission Chairman Wheeler released a statement on Comcast’s announcement that it would abandon the cable company’s $45 billion dollar bid to acquire Time Warner Cable. “Comcast and Time Warner Cable’s decision to end Comcast’s proposed acquisition of Time Warner Cable is in the best interests of consumers,” Wheeler noted. “The proposed transaction would have created a company with the most broadband and video subscribers in the nation alongside the ownership of significant programming interests,” he continued. Wheeler concluded, “I am proud of our close working relationship throughout the review process with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Our collaboration provided both agencies with a deeper understanding of the important issues of innovation and competition that the proposed transaction raised.” NECA AVERAGE SCHEDULE FORMULA REVISIONS APPROVED On April 29, 2015, the The Wireline Competition Bureau issued an Order approving the National Exchange Carriers Association’s (NECA) December 23, 2014 proposed modification of average schedule formulas for interstate settlements, for the period beginning July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. IN THE COURTS COMMISSION OPPOSES SUPREME COURT USF/ICC TRANSFORMATION ORDER REVIEW In late March the Commission filed a Brief with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the Court to deny NARUC, Cellular South, et al. and Allband Petitions for Writs of Certiorari that sought Court review the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s 2014 Opinion denying all petitions for review of the Commission’s 2011 USF/ICC Transformation Order. The Commission argued that Allband’s claims regarding a $250 perline cap on universal service fund (USF) subsidies do not warrant further review because Allband is not, and is not anticipated to be, subject to the $250 cap. The Commission said Cellular South, et al.’s claim that the Commission lacked authority to impose broadband conditions on USF subsidies also does not warrant review because petitioners’ arguments are based on the Commission’s classification of broadband Internet access as an information service rather than as a telecommunications service, and the Commission already reversed that classification. Regarding the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) appeal, the Commission argued that the Tenth Circuit already rejected NARUC’s argument that the Commission lacked authority to establish bill-and-keep as the default method of intercarrier compensation for all telecommunications traffic exchanged with local exchange carriers. USTELECOM FILES SUPPLEMENTAL OPEN INTERNET ORDER REVIEW PETITION – OTHER PETITIONS FILED On April 13, 2015, USTelecom filed a Supplemental Petition for Review of the Commission’s March 12, 2015 Open Internet Report and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling and Order with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In its pleading, USTelecom states that its Petition supplements its March 23, 2015 Petition for Review. USTelecom said that the Petition for Review had been filed out of an abundance of caution in the event that the Commission’s Order, or the Declaratory Ruling part of the Order, had been construed to be final on the date it was issued rather than after Federal Register publication. On April 14, 2015 additional petitions for reconsideration of the Commission’s Open Internet Order were filed by the American Cable Association, NCTA, CTIA and AT&T with the D.C. Circuit Court. CenturyLink filed a Petition for Review with the D.C. Circuit on April 17, 2015. See List of petitions for review available to date. On April 23, 2015, USTelecom filed a Statement of Issues to be Raised with the D.C. Circuit Court. USTelecom said the issues include: the Commission’s reclassification of broadband Internet access service as a telecommunications service subject to common carrier regulation under Title II, and the FCC’s assertion of authority over the terms on which broadband Internet access providers interconnect with other IP networks. CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURT DENIES AT&T DISMISSAL MOTION ON FTC MOBILE DATA THROTTLING COMPLAINT On March 31, 1025, U.S. District Court for the Northern California district denied an AT&T motion to dismiss the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Complaint against AT&T for violation of a federal statutory prohibition against unfair or deceptive acts or practices under Section 45(a), title 15, U.S. Code. The Complaint maintains that AT&T violated federal law through adoption of a mobile data throttling program when it had advertised unlimited mobile data plans for smart phone users. AT&T argued it could not be held liable for a violation of Section 45(a) because it is exempted under the statute as a common carrier. The FTC countered that the motion is appropriate because AT&T is challenging only “the scope of the FTC’s statutory authority.” The Court found that “Contrary to what AT&T argues, the common carrier exception applies only where the entity has the status of common carrier and is actually engaging in common carrier activity. When this suit was filed, AT&T’s mobile data service was not regulated as common carrier activity by the Federal Communications Commission.” “Once the Reclassification Order of the Federal Communications Commission (which now treats mobile data serve as common carrier activity) goes into effect that will not deprive the FTC of any jurisdiction over past alleged misconduct as asserted in this pending action,” the Court noted. THREE FCC TRANSPARENCY BILLS INTRODUCED On April 21, 2015, the The House Energy and Commerce Committee issued a Press Release announcing that Communications and Technology Subcommittee members have introduced three draft proposals to improve Commission transparency. The draft bills will be the focus of the Subcommittee’s April 30, 2015 FCC Reauthorization: Improving Commission Transparency hearing. A draft bill by Bob Latta (R-OH) would require the Commission to publish a list of items that are placed on delegated, bureau level authority in lieu of a Commission vote. A draft bill by Adam Kinzinger (RIL) would require the Commission to publish the draft of a rulemaking, order, report or any other action when it is circulated to the Commissioners for a vote, and the draft bill by Renee Ellmers (R-NC) would require the Commission to publish new rules on the same day that they are adopted. Commissioner Pai issued a statement on the bills. 2 IN CONGRESS WHEELER RESPONDS TO CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRIES INTO OPEN INTERNET ORDER On March 25, 2015, Commission Chairman Wheeler, responded to a letter from Representative Rod Blum (R-IA) in which Congressman Blum had expressed concern that the Commission’s Open Internet Order would disproportionately impact small and medium-sized Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and jeopardize their ability to make future network investments. Chairman Wheeler said the Order included a temporary exemption for small providers from the enhanced transparency rule. The Order directed the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau to adopt an order on whether to make the exception for small providers permanent by December 15, 2015, Wheeler said. Chairman Wheeler also responded to letters from Representative Niki Tsongas (D-MA(response), Senator Edward Markey (D-MA), et al. (response), and Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA), et al. (response), all of whom had urged the Commission to reclassify broadband under Title II. Chairman Wheeler said, based on the input of all stakeholders, the FCC adopted the strongest possible open Internet protections in the Order. On April 9, 2015, Chairman Wheeler responded to Senator Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) February 2015 letter. Senator Feinstein had urged the Commission to include provisions in the Open Internet Order to preserve the ability of ISPs to block access to material that endangers public safety, violates intellectual property protections, or threatens national security. Chairman Wheeler said the Open Internet rules were not intended to expand or contract broadband providers' rights or obligations with respect to other laws or safety and security considerations, including the needs of emergency communications and law enforcement, public safety and national security authorities. Further, he noted that the open Internet rules protect only lawful content and are not intended to impede efforts by broadband providers to address unlawful transfers of content or transfers of unlawful content. REPUBLICANS INTRODUCE RESOLUTION TO EXPEDITE INVALIDATION OF OPEN INTERNET RULES Several Republican Congresspersons led by Representative Doug Collins (R-GA) have introduced a “resolution of disapproval that would allow Congress to review new federal regulations including those adopted under the Commission’s Open Internet Order, using an expedited legislative process. The measure is intended to invalidate the Commission’s open Internet rules. Thirteen Republican representatives, including Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Bob Latta of Ohio, co-sponsored Collins' resolution. BILL EXEMPTING BROADBAND PROVIDERS FROM UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND CONTRIBUTIONS INTRODUCED On March 26, 2015, Representative Alexander Mooney (R-WV) introduced H.B. 1712, the Freedom from Internet Tax Act, which proposes an amend the Communications Act of 1934 to exempt broadband Internet access service providers from Federal universal service fund contributions. A broadband Internet access providers is defined as a “person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service (as defined in the rules adopted in the Report and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order that was adopted by the Commission on February 26, 2015(FCC 15–24)” HOUSE REPUBLICANS REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON FCC FIELD OFFICE CLOSURES House Energy and Commerce Committee leaders have requested that the Commission provide additional information on the proposed closure of 16 of the 24 FCC field offices. In a letter to Chairman Wheeler, Committee Chairman Fred Upton (RMI), communications and technology subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden (R-OR), oversight and investigations subcommittee Chairman Tim Murphy (R-PA), and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS) said the Commission has only provided the panel with a two-page memo and a 35-page slide presentation on a consultant's report concerning the proposal to close the field offices. “These cannot be the sole basis upon which you concluded to close the field offices,” the lawmakers said. The legislators state that the proposal raises significant challenges and concerns in the face of Commission statements that it is taking action on 99 percent of interference to public safety communications complaints within one day. The lawmakers have requested all documents, the final report by the outside consultants and other communications related to the field office closure proposal prepared by the FCC's Enforcement Bureau and Office of Managing Director by May 7. 3 STATE REGULATORY NEWS CALIFORNIA – Comcast-Time Warner Cable Merger Would be Rejected Under Alternative Proposed Decision Prior to the withdrawal of the ill-fated Comcast Corp. – Time Warner Cable, Inc. merger, California Public Utilities Commissioner Mike Florio released an alternative proposed decision in which the merger would be denied as being contrary to the public interest. Under the alternative proposed decision, the Commission would have found that the “negative effects of the merger cannot be mitigated effectively.” The proposed alternate decision would have found that the merger would have a negative effect on local telecommunications competition and create barriers to network infrastructure investment, concluding that the merger would create “an effective monopoly on providing broadband services within its local geographic area.” Communications Division's California Broadband Availability Index data reflects that Comcast would have a monopoly on speed tiers of 25 Mbps and above in some 78 percent of California census blocks, with only one competitor in the remaining areas. The alternative proposed decision would have found that the merger would result in a single company capable of serving more than 84 percent of the homes in California. The alternate proposed decision took antitrust and competitive considerations, safety, consumer benefits, and broadband-related issues into consideration among others. On February 13, 2015, a proposed assigned administrative law judge’s decision was released approving the merger with 25 conditions intended to promote broadband deployment, expand Comcast’s Internet Essentials program, provide for broadband service upgrades and customer service improvements. (Applications 14-04-013, 14-06-012) COLORADO – Emergency Service Rulemaking Initiated The Colorado Public Utilities Commission has initiated a rulemaking to review amendments to its basic emergency service rules. The rulemaking follows a grant of a petition filed by several 911 authorities to amend rules relating to the selective 911 database. The Petition requests narrow rule changes to Rules 2136(d) and (e); 2138(b), (c), and (f); 2140; and 2141 of the Rules Regulating Telecommunications Providers, Services, and Products, Code of Colorado Regulations 723-2. According to the Commission, “The 911 Authorities state that the purpose of the proposed rules is to bring the enhanced 911 rules into conformity with existing tariffs and practices, particularly with respect to how governing bodies and public service answering points pay for basic emergency service from a basic emergency service provider, and for purposes of remitting emergency telephone service fees pursuant to § 29-11-100.5, et seq., C.R.S.” (Docket 15M-0122T) DELAWARE– Commission Eliminates Bonding, Certain Reporting Requirements On March 23, 2015 the Delaware Public Service Commission informed telecommunications service providers that they are no longer required to maintain performance bonds, following enactment of House Bill No. 96, which became effective February 11, 2015. Providers were advised that they could cancel their bonds immediately. Providers whose bonds were about to lapse were told that it was unnecessary to inform the Commission if not renewing a bond. The Commission also informed providers that they are no longer required to file annual reports and assessments, and no longer required to submit retail tariffs or tariff amendments. Companies wishing to retain tariffs were asked to inform the Commission if the providers wanted the Commission to retain a link to the provider’s tariff on the Commission’s web site. Switched access tariffs are unaffected and must still be filed. The new law also eliminated the Commission’s jurisdiction over mergers. FLORIDA – New 786 Area Code Slated for Implementation in Keys by June 1 The Florida Public Service Commission has ordered that the new 786 area code be fully implemented in the Keys by June 1, on an overlay basis with the existing 305 are code. Mandatory ten-digit dialing in the 305 area code began April 18. Neustar, Inc., the North American Numbering Plan administrator, had informed the Commission that the 305 area code projected to reach exhaustion in the second quarter of 2015. The Commission noted it had completed initial area code relief work for the Keys in 2000 and that number conservation measures had delayed the need for another area code until 2014. IDAHO – TRS Surcharge Remains Unchanged; Telephone Assistance Surcharge Decreased The Idaho Public Utilities Commission has ordered that the current Telecommunications Relay Service surcharge of $0.02 per month per access line on local service providers and $0.0002 per intrastate MTS/WATS minute are to remain unchanged to meet projected funding levels. Hamilton Telecommunications remains the current default relay services provider. (Case GNR-T-15-02) Separately, the Commission approved a reduction in the Idaho Telecommunications Service Assistance Program (ITSAP) will decrease to $0.01 a month from $0.03 cents a month, to reflect a reduction in recipients. The average 4 number of reported ITSAP recipients per month in 2014 (10,674) decreased by 25% from 2013 (17,626). The reduced surcharge becomes effective on June 1. (Docket GNR-T-15-03). INDIANA – New Area Code Slated for 317 NPA The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has ordered deployment of a new area code in the current 317 area to preclude projected number exhaustion by 2017. The new area code is to be implemented as an overlay, which the Commission found to minimize inconvenience, cost, and burdens on consumers and service providers. A new 463 area code overlay is to go into effect in late spring 2016. An implementation committee is to develop a 13-month implementation plan to be submitted to the Commission and Office of Utility Consumer Counselor within 60 days from the date of the order. The Committee is also to develop a customer education plan, focusing on mandatory ten digit dialing. (Case 44513) INDIANA – Internet Tax Prohibition Enacted Governor Mike Pence (R) has signed SB 80, a bill that would prohibit any state government or agency from imposing, assessing, collecting, or attempting to collect a tax on Internet access or the use of Internet access, into law. Under the new law a tax on Internet access, or any use of Internet access, regardless of whether the tax is imposed on a provider of Internet access or a buyer of Internet access and regardless of the technology used to describe the tax is prohibited “Internet access” is defined as a “service that enables users to connect to the Internet to access content, information, or other services offered over the Internet, without regard to whether the service is referred to telecommunications, communications, transmission, or similar services, and without regard to whether a provider of the service is subject to regulation by the Federal Communications Commission as a common carrier under 47 U.S.C. 201 et seq.” The federal Internet Tax Freedom Act prohibits states from taxing Internet access, but the moratorium on Internet taxation is set to expire on Oct. 1, 2015, if not extended. The new state law takes effect July 1, 2015. MARYLAND – Multi-Location 911 Legislation Enacted Maryland Governor Larry Hogan (R) has signed HB 1080/SB 576, bills requiring direct access to 911 from multi-line telephone systems (MLTS) in hotels and businesses, into law. Under the new law, MLTS equipment installations made on or before December 31, 2017 must ensure that the system is “connected to the public switched telephone network in such a way that an individual dialing 911 is connected to the public safety answering point without requiring the individual to dial any other number or set of numbers.” MARYLAND – Streamlined Telecommunications Regulation Bill Passes House The Maryland House of Delegates has passed HB 472, a bill that would streamline the State’s telecommunications regulations and limit Public Service Commission authority. The bill alters the definition of “telephone company,” defined as “a public service company that owns telephone lines to receive, transmit, or communicate local exchange telephone services, exchange access telephone services, or teletype communications; leases, licenses, or sells local exchange telephone services, exchange access telephone services, or teletype communications; or owns telephone lines to receive, transmit, or communicate telephone services to inmate facilities.” The bill would authorize the Public Service Commission to allow a telephone company that has 20,000 or fewer subscribers to provide a regulated service without requiring the company to file a tariff schedule if the Commission finds that it is in the public interest. A telephone company that provides discretionary regulated retail services and/or competitive regulated retail services would not have to file a tariff schedule of its rates and charges for these services with the Commission. Specified merger and acquisition requirements would no longer apply to a merger or transfer of stock or other ownership interest between a telephone company and another entity with a greater than 50% ownership in common with the telephone company. And a telephone company would be exempt from specified requirements related to financial transactions. The bill requires Commission to conduct specified studies and develop a report to the legislature. The bill’s provisions related to tariffs take effect September 1, 2015. The bill’s other provisions take effect July 1, 2015. SB 207, the Senate version of the bill, already passed the Senate. NEW MEXICO – CenturyLink Meets Reduced Regulation Qualifications The New Mexico Public Regulation Commission has voted 4 to 1 to approve a hearing examiner’s February 2015 recommendation that CenturyLink qualifies for reduced regulation under New Mexico law. The hearing examiner found that Century served less than 375.000 access lines, as defined by law, and met the statutory criterion for qualification as a midsized carrier subject to reduced regulation under a 2004 New Mexico law. CenturyLink was found to serve 351,938 access 5 lines as of June 30, 2014, down from the more than 850,000 lines service eight years ago. CenturyLink “will be subject to rules to ensure service quality, consumer protection, and pricing flexibility up to a cap” consistent with the level of regulation currently applicable to Windstream, the second largest local exchange carrier in the State. Several parties, including staff, had urged the Commission to also make a public interest consideration, but the Commission elected to focus solely on the statutory threshold. Commissioner Valerie Espinoza, who cast the dissenting vote, expressed concerns over insufficient consumer protections resulting from reduced regulation. A proceeding is to be initiated to implement the decision. (Case 1400068-UT) NORTH DAKOTA – Application Fee Bill Signed Into Law Governor Jack Dalrymple (R) has signed SB 2123, a bill authorizing the Public Service Commission to impose an application fee to process applications submitted by certain utilities, including telephone companies, for certificates of public convenience and operating authority, into law. Fees of up to $10,000 will be assessed on new applications. The fee will be deposited into a special fund and held to cover the cost of processing an application. WASHINGTON – Amended Telecommunications Regulations Adopted On March 30, 2015, the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission adopted amendments to existing telecommunications rules intended to streamline state regulation of providers and reduce reporting and tariffing requirements for certain carriers to reflect an increasingly competitive market place. The Commission amended rules in several areas including registration and competitive company classifications; the Washington Telephone Assistance Program and universal service; and the transfer of property. Under the amended rules “competitively classified” carriers are no longer required to file tariffs, although the Commission adopted detariffing following changes in state law enacted in 2006. The amended also rules reduce certain service quality reporting requirements and eliminate certain reporting requirements, as well as the filing of annual certification and other reports with the Commission. (Docket UT-140680) WEST VIRGINIA – VoIP Deregulation Bill Enacted SB 576, a bill that prohibiting the Public Service Commission from asserting jurisdiction over Internet Protocol enabled or voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) has been enacted by Governor Earl Ray Tomblin (D). Under the new law, an “Internet protocol-enabled service” is defined as “any service, capability, functionality or application provided using internet protocol, or any successor protocol, that enables an end user to send or receive a communication in internet protocol format, or any successor format, regardless of whether the communication is voice, data or video.” VoIP is defined as a service that “enables real-time two-way voice communications that originate or terminate from the user's location using internet protocol or a successor protocol; and uses a broadband connection from the user's location.” The new law also prohibits the Commission from regulation of transactions involving telephone company entities under common ownership. COMPLIANCE REPORTING MAY The following report listing has been compiled from past reporting requirements and is provided exclusively for informational purposes. Reporting requirements are subject to change and should be verified by filers. 6 FEDERAL REPORTS DUE IN MAY FCC Form 499-Q Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet and de minimis notification due May 1. ALL REPORTS DUE IN MAY Due May May Jurisdiction Alaska Alaska Report Access Minutes Report Carrier and Area Specific Bulk Billed Report May Missouri Relay Missouri Statement May Rhode Island Telecommunication Education Access Fund May Rhode Island Telecommunications Relay Service Report May 1 California Affiliate Transaction Report May 1 Federal 499Q de minimis determination notice (ad hoc as may apply) May 1 Federal FCC Form 499-Q Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (Quarterly) May 1 Federal Geographic Rate Averaging and Rate Integration Certification May 1 Idaho ID Universal Service Fund Form May 1 Indiana Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Telecommunications Public Utility Fee Report May 1 Kansas Interexchange Carrier/Competitive Local Exchange Carrier/And Operator Service Providers Annual Report to the Kansas Corporation Commission May 1 Minnesota Alternative Operator Service Annual Report May 1 Minnesota Telecommunications Carrier Annual Report May 1 North Dakota North Dakota Telecommunications Gross Receipt Tax May 1 Ohio Competitive Telecommunications Service Providers Annual Report May 1 Oklahoma Annual Report of Competitive Telecommunications Carriers May 1 Oklahoma Local Service Provider Annual Report May 1 Washington Telecommunications Companies Annual Report May 10 Alaska Alaska Telecommunications Relay Services Fund - Remittance of Surcharges Collected May 10 Arkansas State of Arkansas Universal Service Fund Due Jurisdiction May 10 California May 10 May 10 May 10 May 10 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 May 15 Report Combined California PUC Telephone Surcharge Transmittal California Employee Compensation, Dues, and Subscriptions Georgia Local Service Indicators Data Requests New York Service Quality Performance Oregon Oregon Universal Service Contribution Worksheet Alabama Revised Survey of Competitive Local Exchange Carriers Florida Florida Telecommunications Relay, Inc. (FTRI) Monthly Surcharge Collection Report Georgia Georgia Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Monthly Surcharge Collection Report Kansas Kansas Universal Service Fund 2004/2005 Wireless and Wireline Carrier Remittance Worksheet Kentucky Commonwealth of Kentucky Telecommunications Relay Service Fund Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf Distribution Fund Kentucky Commonwealth of Kentucky Universal Service Fund Maine Maine Telecommunications Education Access Fund Maine Maine Universal Service Fund Missouri Quarterly Quality of Service Report Nebraska Nebraska USF & E911 Remittance Worksheet Nevada Annual Report North North Carolina Access Line Report Carolina - Rule 17-2(K) North Public Utility Regulatory Fee Carolina Report North Questions for Competing Carriers Carolina Report Oklahoma State of Oklahoma Universal Service Fund Carrier Remittance Worksheet Oklahoma Utility Assessment Fee Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Universal Service Fund, FY2004 Carrier Remittance Monthly Worksheet 7 Due Jurisdiction May 15 Puerto Rico May 15 Rhode Island May 15 South Carolina May 15 Texas May 15 Utah May 15 Vermont May 15 Virginia May 20 Alaska May 20 Arizona May 20 Colorado May 20 Idaho Report Puerto Rico Universal Service Fund July 2004 - December 2004 Carrier Remittance Worksheet E911 The Public Service Commission of South Carolina SC Dual Party Relay System Invoice CTP (Certified Telecommunications Provider) Quarterly Reporting pursuant to HB 1777 Hearing and/or Speech Impaired Relay Report Vermont Universal Service Fund Carrier Remittance Worksheet Telecommunications Relay Service Monthly Report State of Alaska Universal Service Fund Monthly Carrier Remittance Worksheet Arizona Universal Service Fund Carrier Remittance Worksheet CO Telecommunications Relay Service Surcharge Idaho Telecommunications Service Assistance Plan (ITSAP) May 20 New York Simplified Telecommunications Annual Report May 20 New Hampshire Telecommunications Relay Service Remittance Due Jurisdiction May 20 Utah May 20 Washington May 21 New York May 21 New York May 21 Oregon May 22 Arkansas May 25 Minnesota May 25 Texas May 30 Mississippi May 30 Nebraska May 30 Tennessee May 30 Vermont May 30 Vermont May 30 Virginia May 30 Wyoming May 31 Federal Report Utah Universal Service Fund Surcharge Remittal Statement Telecommunications Relay Service, Washington Telecommunications Assistance Program, and E911 TAF Adjustment Input Form Targeted Accessibility Fund Monthly Online Reporting Form Residential Services Protection Fund Surcharge Remittance Form Arkansas Intrastate Carrier Common Line Pool Report Minnesota Annual 911/TAM/TAP Fees Report Form Texas Universal Service Fund Worksheet Mississippi Dual Party Fund Statement of Revenues State of Nebraska Dual Party Relay Surcharge Form Wireline Activity Tennesse-CCN Authority Monthly Disconnect Report Vermont Service Quality Performance Index Report Service Quality Report Telecommunication Companies Revenue & Assessment Report (Wyoming Universal Service Fund) FCC Form 395 - Common Carrier Annual Employment Report and Discrimination Complaint Report May 20 Pennsylvania Remittance Form for Monthly Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Surcharge Collections MILLER ISAR, INC. NEWS Access billing disputes continue to plague competitive local exchange carriers. Miller Isar, Inc. has been active in supporting dispute resolutions in April through review of incumbent and client access tariffs, interconnection agreements, and regulatory decisions. The firm has also initiated client plans for compliance with the July 1, 2015 switched exchange access end office rate element reductions ordered under the 2011 FCC USF/ICC Transformation Order and begun providing courtesy compliance notifications in anticipation of the large number of compliance filings to be made in May and early June. MILLER ISAR, INC. DAILY NEWS Miller Isar, Inc. offers a daily news service on regulatory and industry issues and separately, on VoIP developments. For subscription information, contact Andrew Isar at 253.851.6700 or [email protected] . MILLER ISAR, INC. ONLINE Miller Isar, Inc.’s web site has been redesigned and is available to provide clients and the public with access to important regulatory information. Please visit us at www.millerisar.com. 8 For additional information, please contact Andrew Isar at aisar@ millerisar.com, or 253.851.6700. The following articles are reprinted with the expressed consent of the author and CCMI. The author and CCMI have authorized reprinting of these and future articles by Mr. Regitsky as a regular Regulatory Review feature. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND EXEMPTION FOR BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS PROVIDERS WILL NOT LAST LONG By Andrew Regitsky, Apr 3, 2015 9:43:29 AM In its recently released Open Internet Order, the FCC congratulated itself on forbearing from the telecommunications requirement that broadband Internet access services immediately begin contributing to the universal service Connect America Fund. This self-congratulation has become a habit. Read more » COMBINATION ILEC/CLEC COMPANY STRESSES NEED FOR COST-EFFECTIVE, IP-BASED WHOLESALE SERVICES By Andrew Regitsky, Apr 10, 2015 9:30:00 AM There is an important battle currently being waged between ILECs and CLECs regarding the continuing need for ILECs to provide cost-effective wholesale services to replace special access during the transition from the copper circuit switched network to one based on fiber and Internet protocol. The FCC finally waded into this battle in November, when it released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in Docket 14-174, tentatively concluding that to receive authority to discontinue, reduce, or impair a legacy copper service that is used as a wholesale input by CLECs, an ILEC must commit to providing CLECs equivalent wholesale access on equivalent rates, terms, and conditions. For more details on this NPRM, please see our December 5, 2014 blog. Read more » A POSSIBLE WAY OUT OF THE NET NEUTRALITY CHAOS By Andrew Regitsky, Apr 17, 2015 9:52:56 AM Watching unfold after the FCC’s March 12, 2015 Order is like watching the plucky heroine enter the deserted house in a horror movie. We know nothing good is going to happen. Unlike our heroine, however, who can usually make quick work of the demons hiding inside the house, the net neutrality dispute is only the beginning of a horror movie that will continue for years. Here are the latest developments: Read more » THE EVER-EXPANDING UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND By Andrew Regitsky, Apr 24, 2015 9:16:00 AM, While the industry waits to see if the Federal-State Joint Board will recommend that broadband Internet access service providers must contribute to the Universal Service Fund (it will), and whether that recommendation is accepted by the FCC (it will be), it appears that the Commission is in search of even more ways to increase the flow of universal service dollars. Its latest effort is a back door attempt through the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) to require VoIP providers to contribute to the Fund based on their revenues from ancillary services such as call forwarding and call waiting. Read more » LIGHT READING FROM CORPORATE COUNSEL DAILY UPDATE LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF COMPLIANCE, SAYS LAWYER A little oversight never hurt anyone, he says. And it's actually led to a better job for him and his colleagues. READ MORE » UNLOCKING THE VALUE OF AN INFORMATION GOVERNANCE STRATEGY A clear understanding of the underlying value of all of your electronically stored assets will allow you to reduce information-related... READ MORE » NO DOJ RULES FOR ADA-COMPLIANT WEBSITES? DO IT ANYWAY Right now is the perfect time to make websites and mobile applications accessible, regardless of when the U.S. Department... READ MORE » WHEN EX-EMPLOYEES LEAVE WITH SOCIAL MEDIA PASSWORDS An Illinois company sued a former employee for misappropriation of trade secrets when he refused to hand over its LinkedIn... READ MORE » BROWSE, CLICK, SIGN, ENFORCE Signing, dating and keeping a record of a paper contract are standard practices that do not easily translate to online... READ MORE » 9 THE $11M LESSON IN TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION COMPLIANCE Want to let your customers know with a phone call or text that the items they need are ready for pickup? Think twice.. . READ MORE » MICROSOFT: UNMASKING EMAILS RISKS 'OUTRAGE' OVERSEAS Internet users are secondarily liable third parties for negligence when they fail to incorporate reasonable security... READ MORE » EMPLOYEE WELLNESS PROGRAMS: FINALLY, SOME GUIDANCE The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is giving companies some direction for implementing wellness programs... READ MORE » CAN EMPLOYEES SECRETLY RECORD WORKPLACE CONVERSATIONS? It's likely that almost every employee in your company has a smartphone that can be used as a clandestine recording... READ MORE » THE ETHICS AND COMPLIANCE RISK ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST The term "risk assessment" is thrown around early and often in ethics and compliance circles, but it often is hard to... READ MORE » 10