Determination and comparison of uranium and radium isotopes
Transcription
Determination and comparison of uranium and radium isotopes
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 Determination and comparison of uranium and radium isotopes activities and activity ratios in samples from some natural water sources in Morocco O.K. Hakama,c,*, A. Choukria, J.L. Reyssb, M. Lferdec a Laboratoire des Faibles Radioactivite´s et de l’Environnement, Faculte´ des Sciences, De´partement de Physique, Universite´ Ibn Tofail, 14 000, Ke´nitra, Morocco b Laboratoire des Sciences de climat et de l’Environnement, Laboratoire Mixte CNRS-CEA, 91 198, Domaine du CNRS, Avenue de la Terrasse, Gif sur Yvette cedex, France c Laboratoire de Physique Nucle´aire, Faculte´ des Sciences, De´partement de Physique, Universite´ Mohammed V, Avenue Ibn Battouta B.P. 1014, Rabat, Morocco Received 1 October 1999; received in revised form 20 December 2000; accepted 5 January 2001 Abstract Radiochemical results (238U, 226Ra and 228Ra activities; 234U/238U, 228Ra/226Ra and Ra/238U activity ratios) are reported for 42 natural water samples collected from wells, hot mineral springs, rivers, tap water, lakes and irrigation water in 15 Moroccan locations. Results show that 238U activity varies between 4.5 and about 309 mBq l 1 in wells, 0.6 and 8.5 mBq l 1 in hot springs, 9.7 and 28 mBq l 1 in rivers, 2.5 and 16 mBq l 1 in tap waters and between 6 and 24 mBq l 1 in lakes. The 234U/238U activity ratio varies in the range 0.87–3.35 in all analyzed water samples except for hot springs where it reaches values higher than 7. Unlike well water, mineral water samples present low 238U activities and high 234U/238U activity ratios and 226Ra activities. The highest activity of radium in mineral water is 150 times higher than the highest activity of 226Ra found in well water. 226Ra/238U activity ratios are in the ranges 0.07–1.14 in wells, 0.04–0.38 in rivers, 0.04–2.48 in lakes, and 1.79–2115 in springs. The calculated equivalent doses to all the measured activities are inferior to the maximum contaminant levels recommended by the International Commission of Radioprotection and 226 *Correspondence address: Laboratoire des Faibles Radioactivite´s et de l’Environnement, Faculte´ des Sciences, De´partement de Physique, Universite´ Ibn Tofail, 14 000, Ke´nitra, Morocco. Tel.: +212-3-37361621; fax: +212-3-37-372770. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (O.K. Hakam), [email protected] (A. Choukri). 0265-931X/01/$ - see front matter # 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 2 6 5 - 9 3 1 X ( 0 1 ) 0 0 0 1 6 - 9 176 O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 they do not present any risk for public health in Morocco. # 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Environmental pollution and management of water is a national and international priority today. Climatic variations, population growth and industrial development are responsible for the considerable growth in water needs. Therefore, it is necessary to manage and protect the natural surface and underground waters. The presence and behaviour of radioelements in natural waters from different sources have been widely studied throughout the world (Andrews & Kay, 1983; Asikainen, 1981; Asikainen & Kahols, 1979; Cherdyntsev, 1971; Ivanovich & Harmon, 1982; Ivanovich & Harmon, 1992; Mangini, Sonntag, Bertsch, & Muller, 1979; Moore, 1967; Moore & Told, 1993; Hussain & Krishnaswami, 1980; Cowart & Osmond, 1977; Michel & Moore, 1981; Palmer & Edmond, 1993). The behaviour of uranium and thorium decay series nuclides in groundwater is of interest to geochemists, uranium explorations, and health physicists. Studies of 238U series nuclides in groundwater have had a variety of purposes including the calculation of metal scavenging rates (Hussain & Krishnaswami, 1980) developing uranium exploration models (Cherdyntsev, 1971), and the assessment of the effects of phosphate mining on water quality (Kaufman & Bliss, 1977; Strain, Waston, & Fong, 1979). On the other hand, 226Ra has been used as a tracer of large-scale ocean circulation processes and observed increase of 226Ra with depth in the ocean reflects the effects of biological cycling in the ocean surface together with the bottom source function (Ku & Luo, 1994). Other studies concerning radium concentration in riverine (Kraemer & Curwich, 1991; Key, Stallard, Moore, & Sarmiento, 1985) and estuarine environments (Martinez-Aguirre, Garcia-Leon, & Ivanovitch, 1994) allow one to understand the radium redistribution in the environment and the resulting health consequences. High concentrations of natural radioactive elements have been found in some sources of natural water (Asikainen & Kahols, 1979; Cowart & Osmond, 1977; Mangini et al., 1979; Moore, 1967). Samples of river water in mining areas or near industrial installations could be polluted by toxic chemical or radioactive elements. The natural polluting radioelements could rise from industrial wastes, geological erosion of uranium-bearing rocks or excessive utilization of agricultural fertilizers. Concentration of natural radioelements in water could be related to the physicochemical conditions and to the geological, geographical and socio-economical environment. Uranium and thorium isotopes are generally measured by alpha spectrometry, whereas radium isotopes are measured by gamma spectrometry. In this work, we have applied for the first time in Morocco, a rapid combined technique for measuring uranium and radium isotopes from the same water sample. Some results obtained from natural water samples collected from different sites (mineral springs, rivers, lakes, wells and tap water) will allow us to compare uranium O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 177 and radium concentrations in these sites and help us to orient the next samplings in order to establish a general distribution map of the radioelements in natural waters of Morocco. A comparison between activities of uranium and radium isotopes in natural water samples taken from different localities in Morocco could also help us to know whether radioactivity had a polluting or natural origin. The knowledge of uranium and radium concentrations in drinking water is important because an appreciable fraction of the absorbed uranium and radium is deposited in bone, with the corresponding contribution to the internal dose (UNSCEAR, 1993). 2. Sampling and methods 2.1. Area of investigation The analyzed natural water samples have been collected from 15 wells, eight mineral springs, eight rivers and three lakes. Tap water samples from six distant cities and two irrigation water samples have been analyzed as well. The sampled sites have been chosen at some locations in Morocco (Fig. 1) in order to give significant Fig. 1. Map showing localities of the analyzed natural water samples. 178 O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 preliminary results which could orient next samplings. The region of Fez is characterized by the presence of hot mineral springs. Water of some of these sources is commercialized in bottles (Sidi Harazem) or used as water of bath to heal some skin sicknesses because of its wealth in mineral salts (Aı¨n Allah, My Yacoub). Khouribga region is located in the interior of the country on the largest tray of phosphates in Morocco. It is often affected by dryness, which explains the high number of drilled wells in this region. Sample 10 has been taken from a well located at about 1 km from one of the phosphates extraction site to the east of the city of Khouribga. The Tamraght river, located to the west of the mountainous chain of the High Atlas to the north of the city of Agadir, goes directly from the mountain to the sea. The Sebou river passes beside several factories that probably contribute to the water pollution by industrial wastes. Some tributaries of the Oum Rbiaˆ river cross regions situated on the Khouribga tray of phosphates. The other rivers crossagricultural regions where the use of fertilizers, often rich in uranium, may contribute to a radioactive pollution of these waters. In case of pollution of the analyzed water, the radioactive analysis of these waters will allow us to evaluate the radioactive pollution as a function of the geological context and the socioeconomical environment of the sampled sites. 2.2. Sample preparation Twenty litres of water are collected in a polyethylene tank and immediately acidified slightly to pH 2–3 with concentrated HNO3. After filtration, iron carrier (FeCl3) (60–80 mg) and known 232U–228Th equilibrated spike solution are added. Uranium and thorium are coprecipitated with Fe(OH)3 by addition of NH4OH at pH 8–9 as described by Choukri (1994) and a known quantity of barium in BaCl2 form is then added. Radium isotopes are coprecipitated with BaSO4 formed by addition of sulphuric acid drops in the medium without a significant change in pH. Precipitation of hydroxides is achieved before barium and sulphuric acid addition step to avoid coprecipitation of thorium with BaSO4. The two precipitates are recovered by filtration. Hydroxides containing uranium and thorium are soluble in acid medium, whereas BaSO4 precipitated with radium is not soluble in this medium. The two fractions are separated by filtration or centrifugation. 2.3. Separation and activity measurement of uranium and thorium isotopes Complete mixing and oxidation are achieved by evaporating the solution to dryness. The dry residue is dissolved in 8 N HCl and the hydroxides are precipitated at pH 8–9 with ammonium hydroxide. In this step, thorium and uranium are precipitated together with iron hydroxides, aluminium and other impurities. After dissolution in 8 N HCl, the sample is filtered and is ready for the ion exchange. A single resin exchange column is used twice: 1. In the first step, uranium and iron are fixed on the resin in an 8 N HCl medium while thorium and other impurities are collected with the effluent. Fe is then O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 179 Fig. 2. Separation scheme for uranium and thorium by ion-exchange resin. eluted with 15 ml of 8 N HNO3. Uranium is eluted with 30 ml of 0.1 N HCl and evaporated to dryness. 2. In the second step, thorium is loaded on the resin bed in 30–40 ml of HNO3 to ensure its fixation solely. Then thorium is eluted with 8 N HCl and evaporated to dryness. The ion-exchange procedure is shown in Fig. 2. It is identical to that used for uranium and thorium separation in carbonate samples with minor modifications (Ku, 1965; Choukri, Reyss, Turpin, & Berrada, 1994). After these anionic exchange steps, thorium is ready for deposition while uranium must be separated from residual iron. Its purification is performed by di-isopropyl ether extraction, followed by evaporation of the aqueous fraction containing uranium. In the last step, uranium and thorium are extracted separately with TTA (1-(2thenoyl)-3,3,3-trifluoroacetone) in toluene in a nitric media at pH 3 and 1, 180 O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 respectively. The two organic phases containing uranium and thorium are evaporated onto aluminium foils and flamed to remove any trace of carbon. The thin sources are, at the end, ready for alpha spectrometry. 2.4. Measurement of radium Radium is extracted from the water samples by precipitation with BaSO4 after removal of uranium and thorium as described above. Schmidt and Reyss (1996) reported that this method is essentially quantitative for radium removal. The (Ba(Ra)SO4) is dried at room temperature. The obtained powder is sealed into a plastic ferrure whose form is compatible with the dimensions of the well-used Germanium detector. The gamma spectrum is measured after 20 days which is necessary to ensure radioactive equilibrium between radium isotopes and their daughters used to determine the activities of the firsts. The efficiency of radium extraction by BaSO4 precipitation is obtained by calculating the weight of recovered BaSO4 to the introduced BaCl2 (corrected by a mass factor of 1.16). Extraction efficiencies are, in most cases, in the range of 75–100%. Radium isotope activities are measured by gamma spectrometry using a 220 cm3 low-background well type gamma ray detector in the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane (LSM-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS/CEA, France). 3. Results and discussion The uranium isotopes (234U, 238U), Ra isotopes (226Ra, 228Ra) activities and the U/238U, 228Ra/226Ra and 226Ra/238U activity ratios for the all samples are given in Table 1. The 238U and 226Ra activities covered wide ranges, from 0.6 mBq l 1 measured in Oulmes mineral water sample to about 310 mBq l 1 in the well water sample located at about 1 km from phosphates extraction site in Khouribga area for 238 U and from 0.46 mBq l 1 in Kenitra tap water sample to 3696 mBq l 1 in the My Yacoub mineral water sample for 226Ra. The 234U/238U, 228Ra/226Ra and 226Ra/238U covered also wide ranges (Table 1). The errors quoted in Table 1 are one sigma uncertainties due to counting statistics. 234 3.1. Wells Among the analyzed well water samples, samples 1 and 5 presented the lowest activity of 238U, samples 4 and 10 presented the highest activities. The mean activity of 238U in wells was about 66 mBq l 1. The 226Ra activity measured for seven well water samples ranged from 1 to 25 mBq l 1 with a mean value of 9.8 mBq l 1. The 226 Ra/238U activity ratio varied between 0.07 and 1.14. Except in samples 1 and 4 where 228Ra/226Ra is >1, the activities of 228Ra originating from 232Th were lower than those of 226Ra originating from 238U. The 228 Ra/226Ra ratio is more variable than 234U/238U because their origins are in Table 1 Activities of uranium and radium radioisotopes (238U, 226Ra,228Ra) and activity ratios (234U/238U, 226Ra/228U, 228Ra/226Ra) in analyzed natural water samples Sample Locality 238 U (mBq l 1) 234 U/238U 226 Ra (mBq l 1) 228 Ra (mBq l 1) 228 Ra/226Ra 226 Ra/238U 6.3 0.5 61 4 45 4 165 27 4.5 0.3 23 2 26 2 64 8 63 5 309 28 64 7 55 5 17 2 57 5 34 3 2.11 0.13 1.01 0.02 0.97 0.03 1.01 0.04 1.98 0.12 1.08 0.05 1.16 0.04 0.80 0.06 0.88 0.04 0.79 0.02 2.64 0.21 2.26 0.11 1.45 0.11 2.83 0.12 2.08 0.12 1.0 0.2 6.3 0.3 5.4 0.4 10.8 0.5 5.1 0.3 25 1 15.1 1.4 } } } } } } } } 1.2 0.3 4.8 0.5 4.9 0.6 17.3 1.3 1.0 0.2 51 0.6 0.4 } } } } } } } } 1.20 0.38 0.76 0.09 0.90 0.13 1.59 0.14 0.20 0.04 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.03 } } } } } } } } 0.16 0.03 0.104 0.008 0.12 0.01 0.07 0.01 1.14 0.10 1.11 0.10 0.58 0.07 } } } } } } } } Mineral springs 16 Sidi Harazema (s) 17 Sidi Harazemb (s) 18 Sidi Harazem (c) 19 Aı¨n Allaha (s) 20 Aı¨n Allahb (s) 21 My Yacoub (s) 22 Oulmes (c) 23 Sidi Ali (c) Fez Fez Fez Fez Fez Fez Oulmes Oulmes 6.1 0.7 5.2 0.6 5.2 0.5 5.4 0.6 8.5 1.1 6.5 0.8 0.6 0.1 5.1 0.8 6.45 0.53 7.39 0.62 6.94 0.56 4.76 0.32 3.13 0.26 1.84 0.25 4.13 0.74 0.97 0.15 51.9 1.3 60.4 1.6 89.1 1.2 30.0 0.6 26.8 0.6 3696 12 1248 3 9.1 0.6 9.1 1.1 11.4 1.4 16.2 1.1 3.1 0.1 2.4 0.4 620 10 67 2 3.3 0.6 0.18 0.02 0.19 0.02 0.18 0.01 0.100 0.004 0.09 0.01 0.168 0.003 0.053 0.001 0.36 0.01 8.58 1.04 11.59 1.39 17.17 1.73 5.56 0.61 3.15 0.39 573 66 2115 321 1.79 0.29 Rivers 24 Tamraght 25 Sebou 26 Fouarat Agadir Kenitra Kenitra 12.66 0.07 13.3 1.7 11.5 0.7 2.14 0.07 1.38 0.12 1.07 0.05 0.8 0.1 2.3 0.1 1.12 0.14 1.6 0.3 2.9 0.2 0.78 0.05 1.95 0.44 1.25 0.05 0.70 0.09 0.07 0.01 0.17 0.02 0.10 0.01 181 Beni Mellal F.B. Salah F.B. Salah Settat Khouribga Khouribga Khouribga Khouribga Khouribga Khouribga Erfoud Rissani Tiflet Tiflet Errachidia O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 Wells 1 Beni Mellal 2 Ouled Reguia 3 Beni Amir 4 Settat 5 Beni Yakhlef 6 Ourghida 7 Lahmina 8 ouled essassi 9 ouled Azouz 10 1 km from phos. Extrac. site 11 Erfoud 12 Rissani 13 Jorf Melha 14 Tiflet 15 Zrigate 182 Table 1 (continued) 238 234 Oum Rabiaˆ Oum Rabiaˆ Nfifikh Bouregreg Tiflet Settat Kasbat Tadla Casablanca Sale Tiflet 9.7 0.8 14.1 1.5 28 3 24.2 2.3 27.2 2.3 1.55 0.09 1.54 0.16 1.84 0.09 1.28 0.10 2.49 0.15 1.71 0.07 5.3 0.3 1.2 0.1 } } 1.71 0.15 2.7 0.4 1.7 0.2 } } 1.00 0.09 0.51 0.08 1.37 0.21 } } 0.18 0.02 0.38 0.05 0.044 0.005 } } water Kenitra Khouribga Errachidia Beni Mellal Kasbat Tadla F.B. Salah Kenitra khouribga Errachidia Beni Mellal Kasbat Tadla F.B. Salah 2.5 0.3 15.7 1.4 10.2 1.4 8.3 1.2 7.2 0.6 13 1 1.14 0.21 1.38 0.07 3.35 0.41 1.54 0.24 2.08 0.12 1.91 0.08 0.46 0.06 35 2 } 2.1 0.3 41 2 46 1 0.77 0.04 7.7 1.4 5 0.4 5.4 2.2 12 1 1.67 0.23 0.22 0.04 0.13 0.05 0.27 0.02 0.18 0.03 2.20 0.22 5.61 0.49 3.54 0.28 Lakes 38 Fouarat 39 Boughaba 40 Beni Yakhlef Kenitra Mehdia Khouribga 6.00 0.05 23.7 6.5 9.3 1.1 0.87 0.09 1.11 0.17 1.16 0.10 0.81 0.05 0.92 0.08 23 3 0.61 0.01 0.70 0.01 11 3 0.75 0.05 0.76 0.07 0.48 0.14 0.140 0.009 0.04 0.01 2.48 0.43 Irrigation water 41 Rguea irrigation water 42 Hassan Dakhil Barrage F.B. Salah Errachidia 13.6 1.4 14.8 1.7 2.52 0.34 1.94 0.19 2.5 0.1 } 1.9 0.2 } 0.75 0.09 } 0.19 0.02 } 27 28 29 30 31 Tap 32 33 34 35 36 37 a b First sampling. Second sampling. (c): Commercialized mineral water. (s): Water from spring U (mBq l 1) U/238U 226 Ra (mBq l 1) 228 Ra (mBq l 1) 228 Ra/226Ra 226 Ra/238U O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 Locality Sample O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 183 different decay series, in which the parent 232Th and 238U have quite dissimilar chemical behaviours in aquifers. The radioactive disequilibrium between the two uranium isotopes, 238U and its daughter 234U in natural waters is well known (Cherdyntsev, 1971; Asikainen, 1981; Dickson & Davidson, 1985; Cuttell, Lloyd, & Ivanovich, 1986; Andrews & Kay, 1983; Chalov, Tuzova, & Musin, 1964; Osmond, Cowart, & Ivanovitch, 1983; Plater, Ivanovitch, & Dugdale, 1992). In the dissolved phase, the 234U activity is generally in excess compared to that of 238U resulting in a 234U/238U activity ratio >1. The genesis of this excess is attributed to processes like preferential leaching of 234U (Rhosolt, Shields, & Garner, 1963; Hussain & Krishnaswami, 1980), in situ decay of alpha recoiled 234Th (Kigoshi, 1971) or leaching through alpha-recoil tracks (Fleischer & Raabe, 1978; Fleischer, 1980). The 234U/238U activity ratio varied between 0.79 for the sample presenting the elevated 238U activity and 2.83. Hussain and Krishnaswami (1980), and Cowart and Osmond (1974) have observed a reverse correlation between 234U/238U activity ratio and 238U concentration in well water samples from regions near Ahmedabad and in aquifers from Southern Texas. They have attributed this finding to changes in the oxidizing/reducing conditions of the aquifer environment, with high 238U and low 234U/238U in the oxidizing zones and low 238U and high 234U/238U in the reducing zones. Our results showed four activity ratio values of 234U/238U 51, four others slightly >1 and seven ratios 52. Only the lowest value of 234U/238U was correlated with the highest value of 238U activity that is related to 238U concentration, whereas the other points did not show any evident correlation between the two measured parameters. 3.2. Mineral springs Unlike well waters, the 238U activity in hot springs water, seems to show a decreasing trend with increasing 226Ra activity and 234U/238U activity ratio (mean values have been considered to establish this trend). Except the commercialized Oulmes water sample that is poor in uranium and rich in radium, 238U activity ranged from 5 to 9 mBq l 1 with a mean activity value of 6 mBq l 1 that is clearly lower than that of well water value. The 226Ra activity ranged from 9 to 3696 mBq l 1 with a mean value higher than 650 mBq l 1. A comparison of the uranium and radium activities in mineral water show that large amounts of 226Ra do not necessarily indicate a high concentration of 238U in the surrounding rocks. Often such an anomaly is caused by radium that has migrated from other areas and been deposited randomly in the fissures of the bedrock. The measured 226Ra/238U ratio ranged from 1.8 to 2115. The 234U/238U activity ratio in mineral waters was obviously higher than in waters from the other sources. The reverse trend in 238U activity vs. 234U/238U activity ratio suggests that the elevated temperatures and strong reducing conditions in depth in geothermal systems cause an acceleration of isotopic exchange processes (Cowart & Osmond, 1974; Kronfeld & Adams, 1974). In geothermal sources where the temperature and the concentration of chlorine are very elevated and the reducing potential is very weak, the 226Ra/238U ratios are 184 O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 often very large. Zukin, Harmond, Ku, and Elders (1987), and Herczeg, Simpson, and Anderson (1988) have established in samples of geothermal origin, ratios in order of 103–104. Indeed, in a reducing medium where uranium is much less mobile than radium, the disappearance of sulphates allow more concentration of radium in solution (Beaucaire & Toulhoat, 1987). 3.3. Rivers In river water, 238U and 226Ra activities did not cover wide ranges, they varied from 9.7 to 28 mBq l 1 for 238U and from 0.8 to 5.3 mBq l 1 for 226Ra. In case of wells, variation ratios were about 69 times for 238U and about 25 times for 226Ra. In case of mineral waters, except Oulmes water sample , it was about 4 times for 238U and higher than 130 times for 226Ra. This suggests that there is no large variation in environmental conditions of investigated rivers. The activity average was 17.6 mBq l 1 for 238U and 2.1 mBq l 1 for 226Ra. They presented, respectively, about 3.3 and 3 10 3 times of the activity averages in mineral waters and about 0.27 and 0.21 times in well waters. The 226Ra/238U was very low in analyzed river waters and covered a range from 0.04 to 0.38 without any evident correlation between uranium and radium activity variations. In surface, radium concentrations are generally lower than uranium concentrations. They are controlled by different mechanisms in the environment, and several types of chemical reactions may take place in the riverine environment. Redox reactions strongly affect the chemistry of uranium which can pass from solution into reducing river bottom sediments (Lewis, 1976). Radium concentrations in natural waters are limited either by adsorption or/ and by solid solution formation. Riese (1982) found that adsorption of Radium is inhibited by low pH and by high concentrations of calcium because of H+ and Ca++ compete with Ra for adsorption sites. There are many chemical and physical circumstances in which Radium is adsorbed on or desorbed from associated sediments. Previous works showed an extremely large range of variation in uranium and radium contents of river water. For example, the 238U activity varied from 0.2 mBq l 1 for the Amazon to 82 mBq l 1 for the Ganges and the 226Ra activity ranged from 0.8 mBq l 1 in the St Lawrance river to 33.4 mBq l 1 in the Ganges river (Scott, 1982). 238U activities higher than 17,000 mBq l 1 were found in the surface water of Lodeve basin located on the uranium-bearing area in France (El bouch, 1996). The uranium activities can also be affected by salinity and seasonal variations. Indeed results reported in Ivanovich and Harmon (1992) show seasonal variations in 238 U activity of a factor of 2–3 without obviously changing 234U/238U ratio. The variation represents a random sampling of what is probably a fluctuation influenced by rainfall, run-off, and soil-leaching phenomena. These results show also a variation of 238U activity from 10 mBq l 1 for salinity of 0% to 46 mBq l 1 for salinity of 37.2%. Our samples have been sampled in the same season of spring. The 234U/238U activity ratios ranged from 1.07 to 2.49. The analyses of Amazon and Mississippi river waters by Moore (1967) used as typical values in subsequent works by other authors gave values of 234U/238U between 1.22 and 2.03. 185 O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 The 228Ra/226Ra ratios are higher in rivers than in springs and wells, they ranged from 0.51 to about 1.95. The 228Ra, daughter of 232Th is found in natural waters in excess of equilibrium with its parent because of its ability to diffuse out of sediment into the overlying water. The 228Ra/226Ra activity ratio changes by dilution and radioactive decay after the water is isolated from sedimentary input. It decreases with increasing distance from sediments and with depth within thermocline (Yamada & Nazaki, 1986; Reid, Moore, & Sackett, 1979; Moore & Told, 1993; Schmidt & Reyss, 1996). 3.4. Lakes, tap water, and irrigation water Results given by tap water samples taken from six different Moroccan cities did not present any anomalous value in uranium and radium activities, nor in 234U/238U, 228 Ra/226Ra and 226Ra/238U activity ratios. Radioactivity in tap water depends on its source that could be rivers, dams, wells or springs. The results obtained for only three samples did not allow us to discuss the trend of radioactive repartition of uranium and radium isotopes in lake water. The two investigated irrigation water samples both originated from dams located on rivers gave activities and activity ratios comparable to those found in river water. The minimum, mean and maximum of 238U, 226Ra and 228Ra activities and 234 U/238U, 228Ra/226Ra and 226Ra/238U activity ratios in investigated water sources are shown in Table 2. The data are similar to those published for other regions of the world. More discussions have taken place in recent years about what constitutes a generally Table 2 Minimum, mean and maximum of 238U, 226Ra and 228Ra activities and of 234U/238U, 226Ra/238U and 228 Ra/226Ra activity ratios in principal investigated sources of natural water in Morocco Activiy (mBq l 1) Minimum 238 Wells Springs Rivers Cold Springs Lakes U Ra 228 Ra 238 U 226 Ra 228 Ra 238 U 226 Ra 228 Ra 238 U 226 Ra 228 Ra 238 U 226 Ra 228 Ra 226 4.5 1 0.6 0.6 9.1 2.4 9.7 0.8 0.8 2.5 2.5 0.7 6 0.8 0.6 Mean 66 9.8 5 5.3 651 91.5 17.6 2.1 1.9 4.8 7.3 2.2 13 8.2 4.1 Activity ratio Maximum 309 25 17.3 8.5 3696 620 27.8 5.3 2.9 8.3 10.5 3.3 24 23 11 234 238 U/ U Ra/238U 228 Ra/226Ra 234 U/238U 226 Ra/238U 228 Ra/226Ra 234 U/238U 226 Ra/238U 228 Ra/226Ra 234 U/238U 226 Ra/238U 228 Ra/226Ra 234 U/238U 226 Ra/238U 228 Ra/226Ra 226 Minimum Mean Maximum 0.79 0.07 0.04 0.97 1.8 0.05 1.07 0.04 0.51 2.53 0.86 0.27 0.87 0.04 0.48 1.54 0.47 0.70 4.45 342 0.13 1.66 0.16 1.13 4.85 3.00 0.30 1.05 0.89 0.66 2.83 1.14 1.59 7.39 2115 0.19 2.49 0.38 1.95 8.30 4.79 0.31 1.16 2.48 0.76 186 O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 acceptable level of individual risk in the world. A consensus exists for substances to which large number of people are exposed involuntarily via media such as food and water. The Annual Limits of Incorporation (LAI) by ingestion recommended par the International Commission of Radioprotection (CIPR) are 5 104 Bq/y for 238U, 4 104 Bq/y for 234U, 7 103 Bq/y for 226Ra and 9 103 Bq/y for 228Ra. Assuming an individual annual consummation of 900 l of water (about 2.5 l per day), the equivalent doses to the maximal activities measured in all samples are 278 Bq/y for 238 U, 220 Bq/y for 234U, 3326 Bq/y for 226Ra and 558 Bq/y for 228Ra. These doses present, respectively, LAI percentages of 0.56, 0.55, 48 and 6.2%. This calculation shows, that all measured activities are inferior to the maximum contaminant levels recommended by the International Commission of Radioprotection and they do not present any risk for public health in Morocco. 4. Conclusions Radiochemical analyses of 42 natural water samples taken from different origins (wells, springs, rivers, lakes and tap water) show, for each source, comparable results (238U, 226Ra and 228Ra activities; 234U/238U, 228Ra/226Ra and 226Ra/238U activity ratios) to those reported in previous works for different regions in the world. The main conclusions include the following points: (1) The 238U activities are higher in wells than in the others sources, and unlike well waters, the 238U activity in the mineral hot water seems to show a decreasing trend with increasing 226Ra activity and 234U/238U activity ratio. A comparison of the 238U and 226Ra activities in mineral waters show that large amounts of 226 Ra do not necessarily indicate a high concentration of uranium in the surrounding rocks, but is caused by migration of radium from other areas that has been deposited randomly in the fissures of the bedrock. (2) The reverse trend in 238U activities vs. 234U/238U activity suggests that the elevated temperatures and strong reducing conditions at depth in geothermal systems cause an acceleration of isotopic exchange processes. (3) In river water, 238U and 226Ra activities varied in narrow ranges. This suggests that there is no large variation in environmental conditions of investigated rivers. (4) The uranium and radium isotope activities measured in analyzed natural water samples are comparable to those reported in previous works throughout the word, and do not show any significant radioactive pollution. (5) The calculation of equivalent doses to the maximal activities for each isotope show that all the measured activities are inferior to the maximum contaminant levels recommended by the International Commission of Radioprotection and they do not present any risk for public health in Morocco. We cannot generalize the obtained results for all natural water in Morocco because of the limited analyzed sample numbers. They gave a general idea of O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 187 uranium and radium radioisotopes activity repartition in some sources of natural water which could be used to orient the next samplings in order to establish a global distribution map of radioelements in natural waters of Morocco. Acknowledgements Alpha spectrometry analysis benefited from the assistance of the Laboratoire des Sciences de Climat et de l’Environnement, Laboratoire Mixte CNRS/CEA, Gif Sur Yvette, France. Gamma spectrometry analysis were realized in the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane (LSM-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS/ CEA, France). We thank E. Jahjouh, S. Semghouli, H. Kafsaoui and F. Boujghal for their help during the field campaigns. We are grateful to R. Messoussi for his language assistance. References Andrews, J. N., & Kay, R. L. F. (1983). The U content and 234U/238U activity ratio of dissolved uranium in groundwater from some triassic sandstones in England. Isotope Geoscience, 1, 101–117. Asikainen, A. (1981). State of disequilibrium between 238U, 234U, 226Ra and 222Rn in groundwater from bedrock. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 45, 201–206. Asikainen, M., & Kahols, H. (1979). Anomalously High concentrations of uranium, radium and radon in water from drilled wells in the Helsinki region. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 43, 1681–1686. Beaucaire, C., & Toulhoat, P. (1987). Redox chemistry of uranium and iron, radium geochemistry, and uranium isotopes in the groundwaters of the Lode`vre basin, Massif Central, France. Applied Geochemistry, 2, 426–471. Chalov, P. I., Tuzova, T. V., & Musin, Y. A. (1964). The 234U/238U ratio in natural water and its use in nuclear geochronology. Geochemistry International, 3, 402–408. Cherdyntsev, V. V. (1971). Uranium-234. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem. Choukri, A. (1994). Application des me´thodes de datation par les se´ries de l’uranium a` l’identification des hauts niveaux marins sur la coˆte e´gyptienne de la Mer Rouge au moyen de coraux, radioles d’oursin et coquilles, et sur la coˆte atlantique du Haut Atlas au Maroc, au moyen de coquiles. The`se de doctorat essciences, Universite´ Mohammed V, Rabat, Maroc. Choukri, A., Reyss, J.-L., Turpin, L., & Berrada, M. (1994). Radiochemical separation of U and Th isotopes in phosphate rich samples for age determination. Radiochemica Acta, 65, 137–139. Cowart, J. B., & Osmond, J. K. (1974). U-234 and U-238 in the Carizzo sandstone aquifer of South Texas. Proceedings in isotope techniques in groundwater hydrology II, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 131–149. Cowart, J. B., & Osmond, J. K. (1977). Uranium isotopes in ground water: Their use in prospecting for sandstone-type uranium deposits. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 8, 365–379. Cuttell, J. C., Lloyd, J. W., & Ivanovich, M. (1986). A study of uranium and thorium series isotopes in chalk groundwater of lincolinshire. Journal of Hydrology, 86, 343–365. Dickson, B. L., & Davidson, M. R. (1985). Interpretation of 234U/238U activity ratios in groundwaters. Isotope Geoscience, 58, 83–88. El bouch, M. (1996). Etude physico-chimique des e´le´ments traces (stables et radioactifs) dans les eaux naturelles. Application aux eaux du bassin de Lodeve. The`se de doctorat, Universite´ Montpellier II, France. Fleischer, R. L. (1980). Isotope disequilibrium of uranium, alpha-recoil damage and preferential solutions effects. Science, 207, 979–981. 188 O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 Fleischer, R. L., & Raabe, O. G. (1978). Recoiling alpha-emetting nuclei. Mechanisms for uranium series disequilibrium. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 42, 973–978. Herczeg, A. L., Simpson, H. J., & Anderson, R. F. (1988). Uranium and radium mobility in groundwaters and brines within the Delaware Basin, Southeastern New Mexico. Chemical Geology, 72, 181– 196. Hussain, N., & Krishnaswami, S. (1980). U-238 series radioactive disequilibrium in groundwaters: Implications to the origin of excess U-238 and fate of reactive pollutants. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 44, 1287–1291. Ivanovich, M., & Harmon, R. S. (1982). Uranium series disequilibrium: Applications to problems in earth sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ivanovich, M., & Harmon, R. S. (1992). Uranium series disequilibrium: Applications to earth, marine and environmental sciences. Oxford: Cladendon Press. Kaufman, R. F., & Bliss, J. D. (1977). Effects of phosphate mineralization and phosphate industry on 226Ra in ground water of central Florida. U.S. EPA, of Rad. Program, Las Vegas, Nev., Rept. EPA/520-66-77010. Key, R. M., Stallard, R. F., Moore, W. S., & Sarmiento, J. L. (1985). Distribution and flux of Ra-226 and Ra-228 in the Amazon River Estuary. Journal of Geophysical Resarch, 30(C4), 6995–7004. Kigoshi, K. (1971). Alpha-recoil thorium-234. Dissolution into water and the uranium-234/uranium-238 disequilibrium in nature. Science, 173, 47–48. Kraemer, T. F., & Curwich, P. B. (1991). Radium isotopes in the lower Mississippi river. Journal of Geophysical Resarch, 96, 2797–2803. Kronfeld, J., & Adams, J. A. S. (1974). Hydrologic investigations of the groundwaters of Central Texas using 234U/238U disequilibrium. Journal of Hydrology, 22, 77–88. Ku, T. L. (1965). An evaluation of the 230Th/234U method as a tool for dating sediments. Journal of Physical Research, 70, 3457–3474. Ku, T. L., & Luo, S. (1994). New appraisal of Radium-226 as a large-scale oceanic mixing tracer. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 10255–10262. Lewis, D. M. (1976). The geochemistry of manganese, iron, uranium, Pb-210 and major ions in the susquehanna River. Ph D. thesis, Yale University. Mangini, A., Sonntag, C., Bertsch, G., & Muller, E. (1979). Evidence for a higher natural uranium content in world rivers. Nature, 278, 337–339. Martinez-Aguirre, A., Garcia-Leon, M., & Ivanovitch, M. (1994). The distribution of U, Th and 226Ra derived from the phosphate fertilizer. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 22, 155–165. Michel, J., & Moore, W. S. (1981). Ra-228 and Ra-226 content of groundwater in fall line acquifers. Health Physics, 38, 663–671. Moore, W. S. (1967). Amazon and Mississippi river concentrations of uranium, thorium and radium isotopes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2, 231–234. Moore, W. S., & Told, J. F. (1993). Radium isotopes in the Orinoco estuary and eastern Caribbean sea. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98(C2), 2233–2244. Osmond, J. K., Cowart, J. R., & Ivanovitch, M. (1983). Uranium isotope disequilibrium in groundwater as an indicator of anomalies. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 34, 283–308. Palmer, M. R., & Edmond, J. M. (1993). Uranium in river water. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57, 4947–4955. Plater, A. J., Ivanovitch, M., & Dugdale, R. E. (1992). Uranium series disequilibrium in river sediments and waters: The significance of anomalous activity ratios. Applied Geochemistry, 7, 100–110. Reid, D. F., Moore, W. S., & Sackett, W. S. (1979). Temporal variation of 228Ra in the near-surface gulf of Mexico.. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,, 43, 227–236. Rhosolt, J. N., Shields, W. R., & Garner, E. L. (1963). Isotopic fractionation of uranium in sandstone. Science, 139, 224–226. Riese, A. C. (1982). Adsorption of radium and thorium onto quartz and kaolinite: A comparison of solution/ surface equilibria models. Ph. D. dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden. Schmidt, S., & Reyss, J.-L. (1996). Radium as internal tracer of Mediterranean Outflow Water. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(C2), 3589–3596. O.K. Hakam et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 57 (2001) 175–189 189 Scott, M. R. (1982). The chemistry of U- and Th-series nuclides in rivers. In M. Ivanovich, & R.S. Harmon (Eds.), Uranium-series disequilibrium: application to earth, marine, and environmental sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Strain, C. D., Waston, J. E., & Fong, S. W. (1979). Evaluation of 226Ra and 222Rn concentration in ground and surface water near a phosphate mining and marine facturing facility. Health Physics, 37, 779–783. UNSCEAR (1993). Sources, effects and risks of ionising radiation. Report to the General Assembly, United Nations, New York. Yamada, M., & Nozaki, Y. (1986). Radium isotopes in coastal and open ocean surface waters of the Western North Pacific.. Marine Chemistry, 19, 379–389. Zukin, J. G., Harmond, D. E., Ku, T. L., & Elders, W. A. (1987). Uranium-thorium series isotopes in brines and reservoir rocks from two deep well holes in the salton Sea geothermal field, southeastern California. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 51, 1719–1731.