Wireless LAN Experiments
Transcription
Wireless LAN Experiments
Wireless LAN Experiments Computer Network Experiments NBL Assisting Session for CIS, NCTU Lecturer: Elia Chen 陳世揚, Project Manager Network Benchmarking Laboratory Outline n About Wireless LAN q q n Recent Features of WLAN q q q n n Introduction to Wireless LAN Variant Wireless LAN Technologies b/g-Mixed Mode Compatibility Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) Support Proprietary Throughput Improvement The Experiment Approach Test Utility Adopted q q q Introduction to NetIQ Chariot Add Pair and Select the Script Run and Get the Throughput Network Benchmarking Laboratory 2 Outline (cont.) n Experiments in Brief q q q q q n Test Coverage for Students in NBL Parameters Configuration (constant conditions) Functionality Tests Interoperability Tests Performance Test Test Methodology Design Copyright © 2004 ITRI-NCTU NBL, All rights reserved The author, Elia Chen, has unconditionally permitted Prof. Yingdar Lin and his teaching assistant to properly modify these slides to be used in the courses of future semesters. Network Benchmarking Laboratory 3 About Wireless LAN Introduction to the WLAN n One MAC supporting multiple PHYs q q n PHY: FH, DS, IR, CCK, PBCC, and OFDM (more in the future!) MAC: CSMA/CA (collision avoidance) with optional “Point Coordination” Two configurations q “Independent” IBSS (Ad Hoc) and “Infrastructure” BSS From: © IEEE, “Tutorial of Draft Standard 802.11/D3.0” Network Benchmarking Laboratory 4 About Wireless LAN Variant WLAN Technologies q Features of 802.11b, 802.11g, and 802.11a technologies From: © Broadcom, “The New Mainstream Wireless LAN Standard” Network Benchmarking Laboratory 5 Recent Features of WLAN b/g-Mixed Mode Compatibility q 802.11g AP, Mixed Client q 802.11b AP, 802.11g Client From: © Broadcom, “The New Mainstream Wireless LAN Standard” Network Benchmarking Laboratory 6 Recent Features of WLAN Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) Support RADIUS Supplicant WEP (x) 802.1X over TKIP RADIUS Agent EAP-TLS RADIUS Server From: © Wi-Fi Alliance, “Overview of Wi-Fi Protected Access” Network Benchmarking Laboratory 7 Recent Features of WLAN Proprietary Throughput Improvement Atheros Super A/G 108 Mbps (60Mbps in Real) TI Turbo Mode (G+) 90 Mbps (35 Mbps in Real) Broadcom 125 High Speed Mode Boost of 35% (30~35 Mbps in Real) Agere’s new chipset 150 Mbps? From: © Atheros Communications, “802.11 Wireless LAN Performance” & Wi-Fi Planet News, “Wi-Fi Marketing's Favorite Numbers“ Network Benchmarking Laboratory 8 The Experiment Approach A Testing Equals An Experiment? n You can find some examples of network product testing q q n An experiment is q n "a scientific test which is done in order to discover what happens to something in particular conditions.“ by Collins COBUILD Dictionary While correctly designed, it ALWAYS consists of q q n Tests done and published in some famous Magazines? Wi-Fi Interoperability Test in the Agilent Lab? exactly ONE control factor related to your hypothesis other constant conditions specified as complete as possible 大膽假設 小心求證 Network Benchmarking Laboratory 9 Test Utility Adopted Introduction to NetIQ Chariot n There is an end-to-end solution Chariot, which tests q q n NetIQ Chariot q q n Wireless LAN (Chariot is convenient, and especially, specified by Wi-Fi) Any other network device operates with TCP/IP “evaluates the performance of networked applications on devices” “is used to optimize your network and predict the impact of changes” 工欲善其事 必先利其器 Access Point Station From: © NetIQ,, “User Guide of Chariot” Network Benchmarking Laboratory 10 Test Utility Adopted Add Pair and Select the Script Network Benchmarking Laboratory 11 Test Utility Adopted Run and Get the Throughput Network Benchmarking Laboratory 12 Experiments in Brief Test Coverage for Students in NBL n 6 tests designed for students in NBL (at MIRC 604) q Tests cover Functionality, Interoperability, and Performance Code Test Name Subject Time FT-1 Functionality Test 1 Basic Settings 60 min FT-2 Functionality Test 2 Security Modes FT-2x The Extension of Functionality Test 2 n IT-1 Interoperability Test 1 - Wi-Fi Style (see later) IT-2 Interoperability Test 2 b/g Mixed Mode PT-1 Performance Test 1 Throughput vs. Chipset 60 min 30 min Used Platform (Operating System) q q Station (Client): Windows XP Professional with WPA Support Server: Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition running CA, IAS, IIS Network Benchmarking Laboratory 13 Experiments in Brief Parameters Configuration (constant conditions) q Settings for AP under test (APUT) and STA under test (STAUT) APUT Settings IP Address 192.168.3.11 /24 Operation Mode Infrastructure Wireless Mode 802.11b/g Auto SSID ‘NBL’ Channel 11 Wireless Security Disable [Other Settings] [Default] STAUT Settings IP Address 192.168.3.21 /24 Link and Signal Monitor Enable Power Save Disable [Other Settings] [Same as APUT or Default] Network Benchmarking Laboratory 14 Experiments in Brief Functionality Test 1 (FT-1) n n Hypothesis: Functions of wireless mode and channel are correct Utility: Ping; Chariot with ‘InquiryL’ script for 30 sec q Control Factor for both APUT and STAUT 1 Wireless Mode {802.11b/g Auto, 802.11g Turbo, 802.11b Only} 2 Channel q {1, 6, 11} Observations if… 1 Associations occur 2 Good or Excellent status by Link and Signal Monitor indicated 3 Replies of ping from STAUT to Server received 4 ‘InquiryL’ completes without any error Network Benchmarking Laboratory 15 Experiments in Brief Functionality Test 2 (FT-2) n n Hypothesis: Functions of security mode are correct Utility: Ping; Chariot with ‘InquiryL’ script for 30 sec q Control Factor for both APUT and STAUT Security Level 1 WEP Key 0x9876543210 2 WPA PSK PassPhrase Random ASCII of Length = {15, 31} 3 WPA EAP-TLS q - Observations if… 1 Associations occur 2 Good or Excellent status by Link and Signal Monitor indicated 3 Replies of ping from STAUT to Server received 4 ‘InquiryL’ completes without any error Network Benchmarking Laboratory 16 Experiments in Brief The Extension of Functionality Test 2 (FT-2x) n n Hypothesis: Functions of security mode are correct Utility: Ping; Chariot with ‘InquiryL’ script for 30 sec q q q This test uses a different version of driver for STAUT The control factor and observations are the same as FT-2 Please be careful that if any thing occurs unexpectedly, do not modify the configurations of Windows XP before noticing Elia (me). Network Benchmarking Laboratory 17 Experiments in Brief Interoperability Test 1 - Wi-Fi Style (IT-1) q Data Transfer # means using 1: ‘FileSndL’ Downsteam, 2: ‘FileSndL’ Upstream, and 3: ‘InquiryL’ Downstream respectively Network Benchmarking Laboratory 18 Experiments in Brief Interoperability Test 2 (IT-2) n n Hypothesis: BSS in mixed mode will operates correct, but the throughput in mixed mode will lower than in pure mode Utility: Ping; Chariot with ‘InquiryL’ and ‘FileSndL’, both for 30 sec q Control Factor in the BSS Another Involved STA {802.11b device, 802.11g device, not exists} q Observations 1 Associations occur 2 Good or Excellent status by Link and Signal Monitor indicated 3 Replies of ping from STAUT to Server received 4 ‘InquiryL’ completes without any error 5 Average Throughput of ‘FileSndL’ Network Benchmarking Laboratory 19 Experiments in Brief Performance Test 1 (PT-1) n n Hypothesis: The throughput of different chipset may differ obviously Utility: Ping; Chariot with ‘high_performance_throughput’ for 60 sec q q Actually this test is a performance benchmarking Control Factor AP-STA Pair of Different Chipset {Broadcom BCM94306,TI TNETW1130} with best transmission rate settings q Observations 1 Associations occur 2 Replies of ping from STAUT to Server received 3 Average Throughput of ‘high_performance_throughput’ Network Benchmarking Laboratory 20 Test Methodology Design Especially for Graduate Students n The left period of 30 minutes is for you to discuss with Elia q q n A good methodology which possibly q q q n Define a new test methodology If you can, perform the new test in NBL follows the experiment principle (scientific view) reflects the issues in WLAN technology and industry (technical view) expends properly low cost (operational view) 最後, 請大家別全都選了 WLAN 實驗, 還可考慮 q q Network Security Routing and Bridging Network Benchmarking Laboratory 21