Bratislava School of Scenography (14,1 MB, PDF)
Transcription
Bratislava School of Scenography (14,1 MB, PDF)
- - ..- © Ustav umeleckej a divadelnej Bratislava, 1 Jaroslav Hugan, 1. rocnik (1965/66) Priestorova studia, (nit, kov) Rastislav Bohus, 1. rocnik (1968/69) Priestorova studia (papier) J uraj Fabry, 1. rocnik (1976177) Priestorova studia (textil, kov) z instalacie rystavy skolskych prac vroku 1969 (Vystavna sieii na Dostojevskeho rade v Bratislave). Priestorove studie, 1. rocnik Jarmila Opletalovti, 1. rocnik (1968/69) Priestorova studia (papier) Ladislav Lajcha I BRATISLAVSKA SCENOGR AFJC KA S KO L A JlaJJ,HCJJa s Jia i1xa 1 BPATU CJJABCKA5! CL(EH OTPA (f)l1 l.fECKA H lllKOJJA K ed' uvazuje m e o ume lecke j s~o l ~,_o~ravne ne s~ spytuje m e na vysledky, kto re dos•~hh J~J _absolventJ. Rovna ko j e vsak o po dstatnemi otazka !eJ . p red chod cov a p re dpo kladov, je j aktiv•ty v pne behu I I desafroei. k · Vy ucba scenogra fie na Divade lne j fak~ lte ~yso eJ skoly muzickych ume ni v Bra tislave , kt~ra vzrukla ro ku L949 a ko suca st kulturne j revolucJe, nem~hla m at' le psie ho a podne tne jsie ho pre dcho d cu , nez bola Skola ume leckych re m esie l, nasilne uzavret~ roku 1939. Lebo v case, ked' po roku 1933 v Berti n~ p~estal posobit' Bauhaus, patrila k pokrokovym stred~skam_ vyucb y. Mc na pcdag6gov, a ko Josef Vydra, J.:~dov•t Fulla , M ikulas G alanda, J aromfr Fun ke: Frantt~e~, T roste r Julie H oro va ci Este r Sime rova nazn aCUJU, aka bol~ o rie ntacia a d ucho vna n ap ln skoly. ~olo vsak zj ednod usenim, ke by sa vz ni k scenogra_hcke~ sko ly z r . 1949 cha pa l a ko me cha nicke nadv•azame na predoslu. L e b o no va sko la vzni kla uz na novom , , vysokosko lsko m zaklad e, v od l isny~h sp~loce ~skych po dmie nkach s na rocnc jsim posla m m. Su ~u vsak .. , p rvky, kto re d ovo l'uju v icsf iste p arale ly. T •e t? spOJJVa nie su institucio na lne, a le l'udske a osobnostne: • I F ra ntisek Troste r sa po roku 1945 do B ran slavy uz nevra til. A ndre j Baga r, neskorsf re ktor sko ly, ako inte nda nt S love n skc ho na rodne h o d ivad la ho do . Bratislavy vola !, aby sa uja l funkcie sefa scenografie. T roste r, uz pr ivcfmi s pary s reZisers k~m programom J ih'h o F re jku , na miesto seba do B ratJsla~ vyslal La dislava V ycho dila , kto rc ho s pozn a l v pne be hu vojnovych ro kov. . I B ra tislavs ka scenogra ficka skola vzmkJa ak o o dp oved' na na lie havc po treby d ivade lne j ~raxe. K~d' L V ychodil ro ku 1945 prisie l, ocitol sa v d1Va d le sam. K. pnici prizva l m lad e ho sochara D~njela Galik~. Situacia n e bola le psia a ni v osta tnych sl~venskyc~ divadhk h : v Kosiciach bo l Ladislav Sestm~ ~ v Presove M a rti n B r ezina , v Martine Frantisek Kud lac. Nalie havost vyc hovy sccnic kych vytvarnikov sa I ?Y adislav L ajcha I I KorAa Mbl p accy)I(AaeMo XYAO)I(eCTs eHHOH WKOJJe, 3aKOHOMCpH0 CTaBHM s o npoc 0 pe3yJJbTaTaX, KOTOp b.IX AOCTI1TJIH ee BblnYCKHI1KI1. 0 AHa KO, s pasHo i1 Me pe 3a KOHOMe pe H s o n poc o ee OCHOBOOOJIO)I(HI1KaX 11 803M0 )1(H0CTSIX, 0 ee a KTHBHOCTI1 8 Te <te HHe AeCSITHJICTI1H. I KaQ>eApa cu.euorpaQ>11H TeaTp aJJ bHoro Q>a KyJJ bTCTa Bbtcw ci1 WKOJJbl MY3biKaJJ bHOro 11 TeaTpaJtbHOro wcKyccraa B BpaTHCJJas e , KOTOpaSI B03HHKJJa B 1949 TOAy, ue MOrJJa 1-fMeTb JI}"'Wero J.1 6onee OJJOAOTBO pHOr O npeAWeCTs eHHJ.fKa, <le M lilKOJJY XYAO)I(eCTBe HHbiXpe MeCCJJ, HaCHJi bHO 3a Kp~>ny•o n 1939 rony. B TO a pe MH, Ko rna n ocne 1933 TOJ\a 0 6 epJJ HHe KOH' IHJI CBOIO J\e SITCJJbHOCTh B ayxayc, o u a 6 biJJa nporpecCHBHbiM u.e HTpOM o6y•ICH11SJ. l1 Me Ha neAar o ro n - Yro3eQ> Bh1Apa, JIJOA0811T <t>yJw a, MI1Kyna tu r aJJ3HAa, 5lpOMHp <l>yuKe, <l>pa iiTHUICKTpOCT3p , IOmfSI r o poaa, 3cTe p illHMCpOOa - yKa3btOaJOT OpHe HTa tJ.HIO J.1 J\YXOBHbiC l\eJJI1 UJKOJtbL OnHa Ko, 6bi!IO 6bl ynp o llJ.e HHe MV n O~I HM aTb B03HJ.1KHOI3e 11He cu.e uo rpaQ>11'-!eCKOJ.1 WKOJibl B 1949 fOl\Y KaK MCXaBI1'1eCKOC n pOAOJJ)I(eiiHe n pel\biAYllJ.CH wKOJibL H ooaHLUKOna B03HJ1KJla y)I(C n a HOBOH OCJJOBC Ka K BbiCLUee y'le6Ho e 3a BCAeHHe 11 B APYTHX06llJ.eCTBe HHbiX yCJJOBJ.iSIX. 0 AHa KO M0)1(H0 npOBCCTH On peAeJJe HHble nap aJJJJeJJ H. 3TI1 3BCHbSIIIC HOCSIT J.1HCTI1TYU.HOH8Ji bHbiHxapaKTep , a JIH'IHOCTH.biJ.i. I T onbKO no none CJJy'laSI <l> pa uTH ~eK Tpo-.;-r3p noCJJe 1945 rona y)l(e ne ncpHyilcH a BpaT11CJJasy. AIIApeJ:i 6 a r ap, KOTOpbiH CTaJI n03)1(C pCKTOpOM UJKOJJbl KaK ceKpeTapb Cnoaau.Koro Ha U.HOHaJJbHOr TeaTp a ~pHrnaman cro 13 BpaTHCJJaoy, •IT06bl OH. np11HJIJI }.t0JJ)I(II0CTb 3a8CJ(YIOllJ.e ro ClJ.CHOrpa qme H. T pOCT3p 6 biJI y)I(C B TO spe W! TeCBO CBSI3a~ C pe )I(I1CCepCKOH npo r paMMOHJ1p)I(H <l>pe HKI1 J.1 BMCCTO ce6H nOCJl8JI 13 6paTHCJJany JlaA11CJl813a BbiXOAHJia, c KOTOpbiM II03HaKOMHJJCSJ s o 13pe M5r v BOH~I bl. I BpaTwcnancKaHcu.c uorp aQ>H'ICCKrut LUKo na 803J.JHKJia Ka KpcaKU.HSI Na HaCyllJ.Hble nOTpe6HOCTI1 TCaTpaJJ bHOH npa KT11KH. K o rna n. B biXOAJ.iJJ npHe x B 1945 fOAy , OH OKa3aJICSI BTeaTpe OAHH . K cosMeCTHOi1 pa6oTc npHrnacl1n MOJJOAo•·o DIE BRATISLA VAER 'HULE FUR BUHNENBILDNERKUNST Ladislav Lajcha I BRATISLAVA SCHOOL OF SCENOGRAPHY We nn von eine r Kunstschule die Rede ist, so fragt I Whe never we think about a n art school, we are zu Recht nach den Ergebnissen , die ihre always duly interested in the achievments of its lsolve nte n e rzielt ha ben. Ebenso berechtigt ist die grad u ates. H o wever, in this case, the school's history, 1ge nach ihren Vorgange rn und Vora ussetzungen, its preconditions, and activity are equally h ihre r Aktivitat im Ve rla ufeeines Jah rzehnts. significant. D ie Schule fur Buhne nbildne re i an der I The D epartment o f Scenography at the Fa culty o f lmuspie lfakulta t de r Hochschule fiir musisch e Theatre Arts at the College of M usic and Dra m a in nstc in Bratislava, die 1949 e ntstanden ist, konnte B ratisla va, which was founded in 1949, could not have •c bessere Vo rgangerin habeo, die mehr a be tter and mo re stimulating pred ecessor tha n the · l'g ungen ge bote n h a tte , als die Schute ftir School o f Arts a nd C rafts, closed fo rcibly in 1939 . In nsthandwe rke, d ie 1939 gezwunge n wurde, ihre the years fo llowing afte r 1933, when Bauhaus had l ' zu schlie Ben. D e nn zu d e r Zeit, d a nach 1933 das d its activity in B erlin, the School o f Arts and stoppe li llhaus in B e rlin z u wirke n aufhorte, zahlte sie ZU Crafts in Bratislava ranked among the progressive I •• fortschrittliche n Aus bildungsstatten. Die Namen centres of learning. The names of the School's I hier Lchre nde n - wie e twa J osef Vydra, I.:udovit professors: Josef Vydra, I.:udovlt Fulla, Mikula$ I 1111 1, M ikulas G a lla nda, J a ro mir Funke, Frantisek G a landa, J a romfr Funk, Franti~k Troster , Julie I lo'itc r, Julie H o ro va od er E ste r Simerova- d e uten Horova and Este r Simerova give u s a complex picture 111 we lches Oric n tie rung u nd G e ist dieser Schule of bo th its orie nta tio n and ideolog ical te nden cies. It \\ Ill n. Es wurde e ine V e re infachung be de ute n, woUte would be a m atter o f sheer simplification to consider 111 • d ie nachfo lgende Schute fiir Buhnenbildne rei, the ne w School of Scen ography o f 1949 a m echanical II 1949 e ntstand, a ls a utomatische Fo rtfuhrung d es contin u atio n o f th a t from t he pre-wa r years. The new Vo• w fgegangcnen betrachte n. D e nn die neue Schute school o rigina te d a lready on new, university basis in 111 1 ·tnd bereits auf de r neu e n Basis einer H ochschule differe nt sociaJ cond itions, a nd influenced by the 111 1nnerbalb ga nz andere r gesellschaftlicher trends o f the period. Ye t there are some ele m e n ts It d •tgungen und Ziele. D ies sind jedoch E le m en te, e nabling us to find severa l features the two sch ools II c cr la uben , gewisse Pa ra lle le n anzufiihre n . have in commo n tho ugh t hey a re no t o f institutio na l 11 Ill Verbindungen sind nich t insti tutio ne Ue r, bu t human char acter, associated with ma ny great rn m en schlicher und persOnliche r An. personalities. war nur e in Z ufa ll, da B Fra nti~k Troster nach I A s chance wo uld have it Fran tisek Troste r did no t nicht me hr nach Bra tislava zuruckkehrte . re turn to Bra tislava after 1945. Andrej B agar, 11 1, •j Bagar, d e r sp ate re R ektor d e r H ochschu le , director o f the Slo vak Natio na l Theatre and later 1 lr a ls In te ndant des Slo wakische n R ecto r of the College, invite d him to Bra tislava to be 111 , na ltheaters Troster nach Bratislava be rufe n , the head of the D e p artme nt of Scenography. At that el l! Ill d ieser hier d ie Funktion e ines Leite rs d er time, Troste r was too much absorbed and invo lved in llunncngesta ltung wahme hme. Troste r, d er be reits zu director Ji rl Frejka's progra mme a nd sent Lad islav ·lu rnit dc m R egie progra mm Jifi Frejkas verbunden Vychodil, who he had got acquainted with during the \\ 11 c ntsandte Ladislav Vychodil, den er im Laufe der time, to Bratislava instead. wa r 1<1 u gsjahre kenncngele rnt h atte, statt seine rnach ll1 11islava. I The orig inatio n of the Bratislava School of Scenography was actually a r espo nse to the urge nt D ie Bratislavacr Schu te fur Buhnenbildnerei need o f theatrical practice. Whe n V ychodil a rrived in c 111 ta nd aJs R eaktio n a uf die dringliche n B edurfnisse Bratislava in 1945, h e fo und himself alo ne in the de 1 l"hcaterpraxis. A Is Vychodil 1945 nach Bratislava and asked D a nie l G a lik, a young sculptor fo r theatre ku1.1 fiihlte er sich a m Theate r aUe ingelassen . Er lud coopera tion. The situation was far from bette r in other cit n J mgen BiJdha ue r D a nie l Galik ein, hie r ta tig zu theatres in Slovakia. La dislav Sestina was in Kosice, ' 111 A ber auch an d e n iibrigen slo wakischen M a rtin Brezina in P resov, Frantisek Kudlac in Martin. I he tern war die Situa tio n nicht besser: In Kosice war 11 I 11hslav Sestina tatig, in Presov M a rtin Brezina und in Bagar zacaJ vystupnovala , ked' AndreJ· · . uskutocnovaf , svoj program budovania siete profestOnalnych , . divadiel na Slovensku. I V prvych sez6nach vypomahali ces~i vyt~armct. Ich pomoc bola vefmi potre?~a,_p_retoz~ sv?JOU ucasfou nazoacovali orientacm I ~rove~ tejt? • discipliny V ceskom diva~le. ~nze V dtvadlach D~ samom zaciatku existencte preJavovala sa potreba organizacnej prace pri zria~ovani dielni , a zabezpecovaru divadelneJ p~ev~dzk~. Tu _neb_olo mozne vykom1vat pohostinskymt vyst~peru~ffi-1. Vsetko, vratane potreby d'alSieho zvys~varua ~rovne remeselnikov a pracovnikov divadelne_J te_chniky,_ , viedlo k nutnosti co najskor vybudovat scenograhcku v skolu. ' 1 L. Vychodil prisiel do Bratislavy so za~ero~ rozvinut' umelecke ambicie. Pripadla mu vsak uloha byt' aj organizatorom scen_ografie a divadelneho diania najma vsak pedagogom. I Ludovodemokraticke zriadenie po r~ku _1948 venovalo vefku pozornost' kultUrnemu dta?I~, poskytovalo nemale prostriedky na rozvo~ di~adla~ i! 'l vznik divadelne j skoly na urovm umverztty. umozm o , . Do tych cias posobiace dramaticke konzervatonum vychovavalo herecky, tanecny a operny _dorast, , neposkytovalo vsak moznost' rychovy dJvadelnych vytvaroi'kov. Stav slovenskeho diva~la ~~ prelome styridsiatych a patdes~atych roko~ SI'vyztadal CO najcychlejsie obsadit rniesta sceruckych_ . , a kost:Ymorych vytvarnikov. Lebo nove dtvadla (Zvolen, Zilioa, Nitra, Dedinske divadlo, Mad'ar~ke oblastne divadlo v Komarne, Ukra~inske narodne divadlo v Presove) sa zrodili bez pnmer~ne~o materialno-technickeho zazernia, bez dlelm a skladov. , I Ak herecky a herci mohli prist z ochotmckych kruzkov' to iste nebolo moine ocakav~f vo sfere .. scenografie. Bolo priznacne, ze k:Ym sub?ry s~ zaplmli skusenymi ochotruckymi hercami a her~ckamt, , maliari a sochari sporadicky navrhova~t s~en~. T uto cinnost' chapali ako kuri6znu skusenos~, me v~ak ako predmet celozivotneho ~auj~u: Po kra~kom case divadlo opustili - neboh nan pnpravem. IMtin Frantirek Kudlac. DieAusbildungvon uhnenbildnern wurde noch dringender erforderlich, Andrej Bagar seine Plane durchzufiihren begarm, • Netz professioneller Theater in der Slowakei • ,;~,ubauen . Tn den ersten Spielsaisons halfen tschechische lclc nde Kiinstler aus. Ihre Hille war sehr notwendig, 1n sie batten durch ihre Beteiligung Orientierung ' 1d Niveau dieses Faches beim tschechiscben Theater I timmt. Allerdings ergab sich bei den Theatern I 1ch zu Beginn ihres Bestehens die Notwendigkeit ·r organisatorischen Tatigkeit bei der Einrichtung m Werkstatten und der Durchfi.ihrung des I 11terbetriebs. Dieser konnte nicht durch tauftritte aufrechterhalten werden. Alles, 1 •\·hlie.Blich des Bediirfnisses, das Niveau der fiir das II• 1ter Hitigen Handwerker und Technikerweiter 1heben, lief auf dieNotwendigkeit hinaus, so ndl wie moglich eine Biihnenbildoerschule ubauen. 1 Vychodil war mit der Absicht nach Bratislava ~rn men, bier denkiinstlerischen Ehrgeiz zu 1' l rn. Es fiel ibm jedoch die Aufgabe zu, auch 11 misator der Biihnengestaltung und des I h ltcr betriebs zu werden, vor allem sollte er jedoch I I brer in Erscheinung treten. 948 widmete das volksdemokratische System n kulturellen Geschehen greBe Aufmerksamkeit; nep,aroroM. 948 1 I 1 unerhebliche Mittel wurden zur Entwicldung I HapOAHO-JJ,eMOKpaTH'IeCKJIIH CTpOU nocnev rop,a yp,en~n 6onbUJOe sH»MaHHe KynbTypHOJil )!(113HJil, 1 heaters bereitgestellt, und es wurde die npep,oCTaBJlSin 3Ha•mTeJt bHble cpep,cTBa A~SI pa3Bl1TI1SI tH<tll'hung einer Schauspielschule auf TeaTpa, TIOOIL\p~n OCHOBa~me TeaTpaJihH.OI'I WKOJlbl ltttvc rsitatsniveau ermoglicht. Bis dahin hatte das t 1111 tis tatige Theaterkonservatorium Ha yposHe yHHBepCHTeTa. )J.paMaTH•leCKasl KOHCepsaTOpH~, KOTOpaSI AO TeX nop BOCOJiiTbJBaJJa h lllspielerinnen, Tanzerinnen und den Nachwuchs 1111 he Oper ausgebildet. Es hatte jedoch nicht die MOJIOJJ,Oe noKone~me aKTepOB, Tal-U~OBU(JiiKOB " onepHblX nesl\OB, He Aasana so3MO)I(HOCTh o6yt.taTh M· hchkeit geboten, auch Biihnenbildner l11 nzub ilden. Ander Wende zwischen den vierziger xyAO)f(HHKOB-nocTaHOBUJ.~-'~KOB. CocTO~HHe 11 11 • riinfziger J ahren, erforderte der Zustand des cnosal\Koro TeaTpa Ha py6e:>Ke copoKOBbiX" H OSITHAeCSITbiX rOAOB Tpe6osanO BKpaT'laHWI1H cpOK 1. 1\ Jkischen Theaters es, in kiirzester Zeit die SteUen vnn Btihnenbildnern und Kostiimgestaltern zu 3ai:ISITb MeCTa xyJJ,O)KHJiiKOB-OOCTaHOBill,HKOB HxyJJ,O)f(~IJiiKOB nO KOCrlOMaM, nOTOMY <iTO HOBbie l11 • tzen. Denn die neuen Theater (Zvolen, Zilina, TeaTpbi (3soneH, )l(nnl.fHa, HI-'ITpa, ,JJ.epeseHcKJllii Nl t1 1, das Dorftbeater, das Ungarische TeaTp, BeHrepcKHH o6nacn~oi:1 TeaTp Br. KoMapHO, 1(, ~ 1onaltbeater in Komarno und das Ukrainische N111mnaltheater in Presov) waren entstanden, ohne YKpaH.HCKliH Hal\IWHanhHbtWrea;p sr. 11pewos) lll u, cine angemessene materielle und technische HJIIKJIH 6e3 COOTBeTCTByiOtu.e l1 803 MaTepnaJlbHO-TeXHI'l'4eCKOM 6a3bl, 6e3 MaCTepCKHX 1111 ,, zu verfiigen, ohne Theaterwerkstatten und I up rraume. 11 cKnap,os. I f onnten Schauspieler und Schauspielerinnen aus K1t cscn des Laientheaters kommen, so war das im lkrcich der Biihnenbildnerei mit Sicherheit nicbt zu CKYJlbOTOpa )J.aHHena fanHKa.Jil BOCTaJlbHbiX cnonal\KHX TeaTpax nono)Ke~me 6hinO He ny•Jwe: s KowH:l,\aX pa6oTan nap,Hcnaa llle CTMJ-Ja, B Hpe woae MapTHH Bpe3MHa, s Mapnme <I>paHTHWeK Kynna•L HaCTosnenbHM noTpe6HOCTh s nocnHTaHI111 xyJJ,O)KHJiiKOB-llOCTaHOBUJ.JiiKOB ew.e o6oCTpHnaCb, Korna AHApet:f Sarap Ha<tan ocyw.ecTBJlS'ITh cso•o nporpaMMY o6pa3osaHlf~ cent npo<\)eccHOHaJlbHbiX TeaTpos n CnosaKtn1. I B nepBbiX ce3oHax oKa3bmanH noMOH(b qeutCKHe xyJJ,O)f(HHK~-noCTaHOBUJ.JIIKH. J.1x OOMOU(b 6b!Jla O'le Hb l,\eHHOH, noTOMY '4TO CB,OHM y•raCT~eM o603Ha'lanH op«eHTal\»10 H yposeRb 3TOJII Al1Cl(»OJl11Hbi B <te wcKoM TeaTpe. HoB TeaTpax BcaMOM Ha'-tane l.fX cy~ecrsosaHHSI opoSismmacb TIOTpe6HOCTb opraHH3al(H:OHHOi1 pa60Tbl npH C03AaHHJil MaCTepCKHX Ho6ecne'4eHH11 XOAa pa60Tbl BTeaTpe. Ee HeJlb3~ 6biJIO ocymeCTBJI~Tb racTponSIMH. Bee, BKJHO'IaSI noTpe6HOCTb p,anbHeflmero nosbrweH11~ yposH~ peMecneHHHKOB 11 pa60THHKOB TeaTpanMIOK TeXHI.fKH, Tpe6osaJIO C He06XOAHMOCTblO opraHH3al(I1Jil Cl\e HOrpa<\)l.f'lJeCJ<OM UJKOJibl KaK MO)f(HO paHbWe. I n. BbiXOf.\HJI rrpwexan BEpaTHcnasy cu.enhlO ocymeCTBJIITh xyp,o)f(eCTseHHbie 3aMbtcnb.J. 0AHaKo eMY npnmnocb 6btTh TaK)f(e opraHM3aTopoM Cl\eHorpa¢Mn HTeaTpanbHOi1 )f(H3HJil Hnpe)!(p,e scero v (12 (D ) When Andrej Bagar began to implement his programme of building a network of professional theatres throughout Slovakia, the necessity to train scenographers-professionals culminated. I Czech artists helped in the first seasons. Their aid was more than necessary, as they drew on the orientation and standard of scenography in Czech theatres in their work. At the very beginning of the theatres' existence there arose an urgent need of people capable of conducting organizational activities, able to equip workshops, and run theatres. All this could not be substituted by guest performances. All - including the need of more quaJified craftsmen and technicians in theatres, resulted in the necessity of building a school for scenographers as soon as possible. I L. Vychodil arrived in Bratislava to develop his artistic ambitions. However, his flight was somehow curtailed. He had to be alsotheorgaoiserof scenography, theatrical activities, and a teacher in particular. I After 1948 the people's democratic establishment paid great attention to culture, spent large sums of money on the development of theatres, and made possible tne foundation of a theatrica• school of university standard. TiU then it was the Bratislava Dramatic Conservato.ire which trained young actors, dancers, and opera sipgers. However, there was no course for scenographers. At the turn oi the 'forties and the 'fifties Slovak theatres were in bad need of stage and costume artists. Moreover, the new theatres (Zvolen, Zilina, Nitra, the Country Theatre, Hungarian Regional Theatre in Komarno, and the Ukrainian Theatre in Presov) came into being without workshops and stores for scenery. I Actresses and actors could pass from amateur theatres to professional ones, but nothing of that kind could be expected to happen in the sphere of scenography. It was a common practice of the period that experienced amateur actors and actresses joined professional ensembles and painters and sculptors sporadically designed settings. They considered it a curious experience, but by no means the subject of their life-longinterest. Sooner or later they quitted theatres. They were not trained for such kind of work. I L. Vychodil had no intentions to renew the former Gita Pol6nyova, 1. rocnik (1970/71) Zostudi1 protikladov (Noc) Gita Pol6nyova, 1. rocnik (1970/71) Zostudii protikladov (Den) 1 L. Vychodil chcel vyucbu postavit' na vysokoskolsko m zaklade. Tym skor, ze v to m case u~ vysoka divadelna sko la - Divadelna fakuJta YysokeJ skoly miizickych ume n l v Bratislave - bola skutocnosfou . Ne bo lo pochyb, ze scenografia ako odbor na tiito skolu patrL V tom to po ma haJ a j prlklad Divadelncj fak ulty A kademie miizickycb umeni v Pra he, kde katedru scenogra fie viedol Frantisek Trostcr. Pre linanie scenografie s vjucbou reZie , dramaturgic, herectva a teatrol6gie as hudobnou fakultou mo hlo p rospieivsetky m. D o ba, oplyvajuca budovatefsk)fm nadsen lrn s vefkymi perspektivnymi p lanmi, ty mto zamerom zicila. O d roku ~951 - dva roky po vzniku Divade lnej fakulty- Lad1slav Yycho dil s Martinom Brezino m mo hli zacat' svyucbou. 1 Divadelmi prax v prvych rokoch urcovala aj charakter skoly. Siicasne vsak sko la vp lyvala aj na prax, n ajma vsak n a postave nie sceno~rafie ak~ discipHny. Kedysi divadelni vytvarnicJ pracova h ako maliari d e kon1cil. Bratislavska scenografick<Bkola vznikla na opacnych, protide ko rater skych principoch ako priestorova discipllna, a koskola nadvazujuca na tendencie priestorovo chap an eho d ivadla v medzivoj novych rokoch. Postupne, ked' scenog ra fovi a zaeali zaujimat eoraz vyznarnnejsie postavenie po pri maliaroch, grafikoch a socharoch, zvysoval sa kredit scenografie a ko o d boru. PoZiadavk a, a by studenti pred zaciatkom studia scenografie najprv a bsolvovali styri semestr e bud' na S lovenskej vysokej skole technicke j (architektiira) a lebo na Yysokej skole vjtvarnych ume nl (mafba), vyvolala rcspekt. v takom pripade vstupovali priamo do treticho rocnlka skoly. Tym sa zabezpecilo, ze stude nti prichadzati odborne priprave ne jsi a fudsky zre lsl. Yyucba scenografie sa mohJa zacat' na vyssej urovni s predpokladom, ie a de pti ziskali zakJadne poznatky na inych skolach . Tym sa scenogr afia aj v ociach verejnosti javila a ko vynimocne narocn y studijny odbor. Pokiaf islo o dliku studia, v to m case sa so scenografiou mo hla me rat' le n me dicina a architektura. I Ecmt aK1"Cp b1 11 a KTpHChi MOrnw npwi1nt H3 ni06 HTCJibCKHX Kpy)!(KOB 8 n po<jJeCCHOHaJibHbiH TeaTp, HCJI b3SI 6bin0 DOJ(06HOTO 0)!(HAaTb BC<jJepe Cl(eHorpa<jJHH. npHMC'iaTCJibHO, qTO 8 TO Bpe~, KOT].(a Tpynnbl COCTaBJUIJIH ODbiTHble ni06HTeJibCK.I1'e aKTe pbl w aKTpHCbl, xyAO)!(HHK.I1' " cKynhnTOpbi TOJihKO HeperynstpHO 3aHHMaJIHCh CU.eHorpa<jJBeH. 3 TO 3aHHTHe p aCCMaTp11BaJIH KaK Kypbe3, HO He KaK npCJ(MeT HHTepeca BCei:f )!(H3HH. n o3TOMY qepe3 RCKOTOpOe apeMSI TC3Tp n OK.I1'J(anl1, OHH He 6blJIH K HeMy rOTOBbl. 1 11. BbiXOJ(HJI He co6~-tpancst nOBTOpHTb 6hJBWYJO lliKOJIY xyJ(O)!(CCTBeHHblX peMeCeJI; o6yqeHHe OH XOTeJI OOJ(Hj!Tb H8 ypoBeHb BbiCWliX yqe6KhiX 3a8eAeHHH TeM 6onee, qTO 8 3TO BpeMS1 cyu~eCTBOB311HC BbJCWCH TCaTpaJi bHOH WKOJihl - TeaTpaitbHbti1 <jJaKyJJ bTCT Bblcw e i1 WKOJibl TeaTpanbHOro " MY3biKMbHoro 11CKYCCTBa a B p aTwCJiaoc - 6biJIO y)!(e <jJaKTOM. H e 6htJio COMHeHHfl, •ITO CUCHOrpa<jJHSI K3K COCUHaJlbHOCTb AOJI)!(Ha 6b1Tb Ha aTOH wKone. B aToMnoMoran " npHMcp TCaTp an bHoro <jJaKyJlbTeTa AKa.QeMHH TeaTpanbHoro " MY3biKaJibHOro wcKycCTsa a Ilp are, rJ(e 3aBCJ(ylOilJ.HM Ka<jJCJWOH CUeHorpa<jJHH 6blJI <l>pa BTHWCK Tpocrap. n a pannc JibHOe npe nOA3B3H:H C[\CHOrpa<jJHH C pC)!(HCCCpCTBOM, JIHTepaTypoif, 3KTepCKHM HCrTOJtHeHHCM, Te31'pOJIOTI1eH 11 conpH'IaCTHOCTb MY3b1KaiibHOro <jJaKyJihTeTa MOT11H 6biTb Ha 00Jib3Y BCCM. B pe~ H306HJIYIOill.ee CTpOHTCJibCKHM3HTY3H33MOM H 60JibiDKMH nepcneKTHBHbiMH nnaHaMH 3TH ~.tenH noorupstno. C 1951 r oAa - naa roAa cnycrst nocne C03J(aHWJ TeaTp anhHOro <jJaKynbTeTa - JlaJ(HCJias BbiXOAHJI "" MapTHH Bpe3HHa Mornw npHCTynHTb K npenoJ(aBaHHIO. 1 TeaTpanMiaSI npaKTHKa a nepBble rOJ(bi npe.Qon peAcnRna 11 xapaKTep wK01lbt. Ho OAHOBpCMe ~IHO WKOIJa OKa3biBaJia BJII1S1HHC Ha npaKTHKY, npc)I{J(C BCCTO Ha MCCTO Cl(CHOrpa<jJI1H K3 AHCUHDJIHHbl. KorAa-To XY!~O)!(HH KH-noCTaHOBlUH pa6oTaJJH KaK }_'ICKOp3TOpb1. 6paTHC113BCK3S1 Cl(CHOrpa<jJH•ICCKa51 WKOJia B03HJ1KJia Ha npOTJ1B0001l0)!(HbiX, aHT11J.(CKOp3TOpCKHXnpHHI.(HO KaK npoCTpaHCTBCIUiaSI J.(HCQHOJIHHa, K3K WK0 118 npOAOJI)!(aiOilJ.aSI TCHAC~I QHH npocrpaHCTBCHHOrO nOHHMa HHS! TeaTpa B nepHOA Me)!(,AY JWYMst MHpOBblMH BOMHaMH. ilOCTenCHHO, KOr}.\8 v trte n. W ahrc nd die Theaterensembles durch hrcne Laicndarsteller erganzt wurden, wares lucichnend, daB die Biihnenbilder bin und wieder 1 Malern und Bildhauern entworfen wurden. Diese kcit wurdc von diesen als interessante Edahrung ehen, nicht jedoch als Gege nstand einer 1~>Iangen Betatigung. Nach kurzer Zeit kehrten m Theater d e n Riickeo , - es fehlte ihnen die tluung. Vychodil h atte oicht die Absicht, eine zweite de dcr Kunsthandwerke, wie sie einst bestandeo I 11ls Leben zu rufe n ; erwollteeineAusbildung I 11.:hschulbasis einrichten. Und dies um so mehr, nals cine Hochschule ftir Schauspielkunst, die 1 1 piclfakultat a n d er Hochschule der musischen to 1n Bratislava, tatsachlich existierte. Esgab I 1 1 Lweifel daran , daB die Billmenbildne rei a1s I n <iicsc Hochschule gehorte. Hierbei erinnerte h• ,Jil an das Beispiel der SchauspieHakultat an der k u mic d cr musischen Kiinste in Prag, an der I 1 111 • ·l k Troste r den Lehrstuhl ftir hlu •tbildncrkunst leitete. Die Yerbindung der ll llaru thildncrei mitdem Unterrichtio I f1 1hrung, Dramaturgic, Schauspielkunstund IIi 1 1 wisscnschaft sowie mit einer Wtsscnschaftlicheo Pakultat sollte allseitig 1od ' t>in. Die damalige Zeit, die gepriigt war von •t •·.terung des Aufbaus und groBen k t1vc n und Planen, begtinstigte solcbe Ziele. m lahre 1951, nurzweiJahrenacbGriindung IUspielfakultat, konnten LadisJav Yycbodil t tin Brezina ihre unterricbtlicbe Tatigkeit hntcn. l11c aterpraxis war in den ersteo Jahren auch 11 C harakter der Hochschule bestimmend. h Cttig wirkte die Schule jedocb aucb auf die 1. 1ruck, insbesondere auf die Stellung der I lin uniklnerei als Fach. Einst batten die fiir das I h 1l 1 l;itigen biJdende n Kiinstler als It 1 ttto nsmaler gearbeitet. Die Bratislavaer Scbule lh I tth tL'nbildnerkunst entstand auf der Basis nt n~esctzter Prinzipien, die das )t lw ttf•urhafte negierten, als eine Disziplin der 1111 • ' taltung, als eine Schule, die an Tendenzen I J tlumverstandnisses beirn Theater der wl h nkriegsjahre ankntipfte. In dem Ma8e, da die ltll1 nLildner ne ben Ma lern, Graphikem und hlh unn e ine immer bedeutendere Stellung Inn hm n, nahm die Glaubwtirdigkeit der llhn nbtldnerei als Pach zu. Die Forderung, daB die Arts and Crafts School. H e wanted a school of university standard which was quite natural, as the Faculty of Theatre Arts at the College of Music and Drama in Bra tislava had already existed. Without any doubt, scenography was fully entitled to occupy an adequate position there. The D epartment of . Scenography, headed by Frantik k Troster at the Faculty of Theatre Arts at the College of Music and Drama in Prague was setting a good example. Coupling scenography with directing, dramaturgy, acting, thea trology, a nd with the subjects lectured at the College of Music must h a ve been bene ficial for all. The period, pregnant with building enthusiasm and great perspective p lans was favourable to such intentions. Since 1951, two years after the Faculty of Theatre Arts had been founded, Ladislav Vychodil and Martin Brezina were able to start teaching. I In the first years theatrical practice determined the characte r of the School. At the same time the School was influenced by practice, particularly the position of scenography as an autonomous discipline. In the olden days artists in theatres were actually scenic painters. The Bratislava School of Scenography, howeve r, originated on the opposite, a ntidecorative principles, as a school linking up to the tendencies of space conception of theatre, having its roots in the inter-war years. Step by step, as sceoographers began to occupy more significant positions besides painters, graphic artists, and sculptors, the credit of scenography as a discipline began to increase. Students of scenography were claime d to attend first four terms either at the Slovak Technical University (architecture) or at the College of Visual Arts (painting) before they started to study scenography proper. This was a great thing which evoked due respect. In such a way they enrolled in the third course actually, much more experienced and mature. Lectures in scenography could start at a much higher level on condition that the students bad already acquired the basic knowledge io other schools. All this caused that scenography began to be considered as an extremely demanding subject by the public. As to the length of the courses, only medicine and architecture could match scenography at that time. I This criterion proved to be a great asset for the creative activities of sceoograpbers after graduation. Even after many years we can make out from the 1 Toto kritcrium prijfmania na ~kolu sa ukazalo ako klad v tvo rbe sccno grafov po absolvovaoi ~koly. Aj po ro koch mozno zo scenograficke ho ruko pisu urCit', ze J a n Ha nak, Vladimir Suchane k ci H e le na B ezakova presli ma liars ko u prfpravou , kym Otto S uja n, Jan Zava rsky ci T omas Berka archHe ktonickou. Roky pred studio m scenografie vo vefke j mie re uro li aj ich vyhra ne nosi po s ko ncenf stud if. . ' 1 Ska la po svoj o m zalozenf zila v llzkom p re p oJe m s divade lnym dia nfm . J estvujuce pomery ne dovorovali ryucbu to ho typu, ak a je p rizn acna pre sko lu dnes. Prva gene racia - Pavol M. G a bo r, O tto Suja n a J a n H a na k - spo lupracovala s L. Vychodilo m priamo v di vade lnc j praxi. L. V ychodiJ bot naplno zapo je ny d o ume lecke j prace v Slo ve nskom na rodno m divadle. Vy ucbu uskutocno val tak, ze zia kov pribral d o vsetkeh o, co ro bil sam. Ate lie ro vy typ vyucby s nasad e nlm v divad e lne j produkcii sa ukazal a ko ryho dnyv to m, ze prechod rnladych absolve ntov do divadie l bo t organ icky. 1 L . Vycho dil s dobro u znalostou deskriptfvne j geome tric ve d c l svo jim zia ko m ukazat', ako mozno vystavat barokovu re liefnu scenu, j e j j ed notlive priestor ovc pla ny a zvladnut pro porcie casti. P oskytol im dobru pro fesio na lnu pripravu, co sa ukazalo v nasledujucich desatrociach , ked' sa z me nila divade lna poctika a o ptika. Prva geoe racia presla prudkymi zvra tmi, kto rc! suviseli s celkovou pre me oo u diva dla. H a nak, G abor a Sujan o bstali v te jto skuske pre me ny a pre sme rovania te ndencif v divadle . , V ychodilo va me t6da vyucby sa ukazala ako plo~na a inspirujuca. Ind ividua lne sled ovala typy m la dych vjtvarnfkov a vychadzala v ustre ty ich ume lecky m a mblciam. 1 Odlisnosti v po rovna nf s dnesno u ryucbo u spocivaju o kre m inc ho a j v tom , ze vted y stude nti UZ pocas studia vo vy~slch rocnikoch zaeali pracov ai v kraj ovych divad lach . Vyn(•til si to akutny nedosta to k scenografov v divadhich. z hfadiska dnesnych p o me rov sa moze te n to postup javit' ako by v rozpore s princlpmi p ed agogiky, a le vte dajsie o ko lnosti divad e lnej pnice ho zd ovo dno va li. xyi(O)I(IDIKH- OOC'f 3110BU(HKH 33HHMaJHl ace 6onee 83)1(1-JOC Mecro HapSIAY CJ(CKOpaTopaMH, r p acpHKaMH " CKJJibnTo paMH, nOBbiWaJICsr Ta K)I(e KpeAHT c l(eHor pacpHH KaK cne l(Ha11bHOC'rH. Tpe6oaaHHe , <JT06bl C'I'YACHTbl p aHbWe , <JeM npuc-rynJ.tTb K J.t3yttCHHIO CL(CHOrpacpHH 3aKOH'tHJIH tteTblpe ceMecrpa u C noaa t(KOM noJmTeXJHI'Ie CKOM HHcrHT)'TC (a pXHTeKrypa) HJTH a Bb1cw ei1 w Kone H306pa3J.tTe11bHbiX HCKYCC'I'B ()I(J.tBOOHCb) Bbl3BaJIO yaa )l(e HHe . B Ta KOM cny•me c-ryAeHTbt 3anHCbiBan uc b npsrMo Ha TpCTHH Kypc. T e M CaMbiM ttTO C'fYI\e iiTbl OKa3bll3aJJHCb 6onee rOTOBbiMH K cne t(HaJibiiOC'I'H H 60JICC 3pe11biMH JTJOAbMH. HpenoJ~aBa HH e cl(e HorpacpHH Morno 6 b1Tb Ra'laTo Ha 6onee BbiCOKOM yp OBHe npH yCJTOBHH, 'ITO C'fYAeHTbl nony•mnH OCIIOBbl 311aHHH B1\pyrHX BY33X. ilOOTOMY H B f11333X06ll(ecrne BIIOC'I'H CL(CHOrpacpHS! nocn pHnHMaJtacb KaK '1pe3Bbl'tai1Ho TPYAHasr: cneqHaJibiiOC'I'b. l.JTO KaCaeTCSI AJIHTCJTbHOC'I'H o6ytte HHSI, 8 TO Bpe MSI MOrJta paBJ.IJITbCSI CCl(e norpacpHe HTOJibKO Mel(HL(HHa H apXHTCKTypa . 1 3 ToT KpHTe pHii 3a<twCJtc uws. o Ka3ancs. nnro co M B BbiOYCKe xyAmi<UHKOB-llOC'faHOB[L(HKOB OOCJTe OKOIIttaHHSilLIKOJlbl . .((a)l(e Cnycrst rOA~l MO)I(HO 00 CL(e Ho rpacj>HttCCKOMY OO•Ie pKy Onpe}.(eJTifTb, qTo 5JH r au aK, Bn aAHMHp Cyxa He K H Ene Ha o e3aKOBa HMe JT nOArOTOilKY R >Kl1BOllHCJ.t, ll TO BpeMSI K3 K0TIO 51u 3aaapCKH HJTHToMa w Be pKa - a apXHTCKType. f OJ!bl ]\0 H3y<te 11HJI CL(eiiOrpacpHH B 60JlbWOHMepe npeAOllpeAeJTHJTJ.f HX OpHe iiT3ll,HIO OOCJTe OKQ J~q3 HJ.UI y <te6bl. / lliKOJT3 llOCJTC CBOCTO OCHOBaHHSI )I(HJTa BTCCHOM KOHTaKTe CTeaTpaJTbiiOH)l(l13Hbl0. T o rA3WHHC YCJTOBHSI He n0 380JlSIJIH npeOOA3BaHHe TaKOr OTHOa , KOTOpblH xapaKTepe u nnR w KOJi bl cero,nHSI. lle paoe OOKOJleHHe - n a oon M. r a6op , OTTO lliysru H51~· r a ..aK - COTPYJIIIH'IaJIO c Jl. BbiXOJ.{HJTOM Hen ocpeHC.."TBe iiHO 8 TeaTpUilbHOW npaKTHKe . n. Bbt xo'~"n 6but normocrblo oKmo <Je H a xyAO>Kecrue HHYIO pa6ory o Cn onal(KOM Ha l(HOH ~IJibHOM Tc aTpe. Ope no}.(asa1me TaK, 'ITO cryJXe HTOll 6KJI10'13JI llO BCC, ttTO J~Cnan CaM. T11n o6y••eut~u o aTeJibec BKJIIOtte Hwe M B TeUTp3JibllYIO npaKTHKY OKa3aJICSI BblrO,I:IHbiM BTOM, 'ITO n e pe xO}\ MOJTO]\biX BblllYCKHHKOB B TC 6 biJI Opr a HH"'IIbiM. I n. BbtXOAHJT c xopOWHM 3HaH!feM hlPI'ICnden vor BeginnihresStudiumsder ·nhildncrei zunacbst vier Semester entweder a n ~ 1 1wakische n Technischen Hochschule (Ar , •tcktur) oder an der Hochschule der bildenden 1111 (Malcrei) zu absolvieren hatten, erregte Rt "I 1 t. In diesem Fall wurde man direkt in den ltrltt J ahrgang d e r Schute aufgenommen. Damit •iihrle istet, daB die Studierenden fachlich .. o rbereitet und menschlich reifer waren. Die lu ng zum Biihnenbildner konnte unter der .ctzung, daB die Studierenden ihre c nntnisse an andere n Schulen erworben .o a uf einem hoheren Niveau ansetzen. Somit • d as Studium der Biibnenbildnerei auch in •en der Offentlichkeit als ein Fach von ' Anspriichen. Was die Lange des Studiums , konnten sich damalsnurdie Medizin und ~ tur mit der Biihnenbildnerei messen. l l1• t•s Au(nahmekriterium erwies sich als Vorteil r til• I •tigkelt der Biihnenbildner nach AbschluB r 1 ' · hula usbildung. Selbst nach Jahren lieB sich 111111 der biihne nbildnerischen Handschrift eines II 111 1k. Vladimir Suchanek, bzw. Helena k1 1s c rkcnnen, daB sie eine Ausbildung a ls llt>SSCO batten, wahrend Otto Sujan, J an md Tomas B erka von der Architektur her 11 I •rc Jahre vor de m Studium der ld nere i bcstimmte n so auch in groBem dt A usrichtung, die ihre Ve rtreternach 1 ~~ des Studiums habe n soUten. ule fiir Biihnenbildnerkunst lebte auch '; riindung in cnge r Verbundenheit mit dem am Theater. Die damalsexistierenden iltn1 o;;c c rlaubten keine A usbildung der Art, wie 1111 r d ie Schute kennze ichnend ist. Die erste 1 1 Pavol Gabor, Otto Sujan und Jan rheitete mit Vychodil unmittelbar in der 'llrnxis zusammen. Vychodil war gaoz in die he Praxis des Slowakischen 11 ,,tcrs e ingebundcn. Seine unterrichtliche nhtc e r so a us, daB er seine Schiiler an a llem i " licl3, waser se lbstmachte.DerTypusvon 111 h lldung mit E insatz bei der lrnd uktion erwies sich dadurch als ·Hdcr Ubcrgang der jungen Absolventen ll.!rn sich in organischer Weise vollzog. <•d il. de r tiber gute Kenntnissein I r Geometric verfiigte, verstand es, seinen u 'cigcn , wie man eine Biihne mit ~ ·lief und ihre einzelnen RaumpUi.ne IUlh styles of individual scenographers what kind of training they had gone through. Without any hesitation we can state that Jan Hanak, Vladimir Suchanek, and Helena Bezakova studied painting, whereas Otto Sujan, Jan Zavarskyand TomasBenka devoted themselves first to architecture. The years before they actually began studying scenography determined the clear-cut character of their works after graduation. I Afte r its foundation the School's activities were closely connected with theatrical practice. In those days the conditions prevented the School from pu rsuing such a way of te aching as today. The first generatio n: Pavol M. Gabor, Otto Sujan, and Jan Hanak cooperated with Vychodil right in the theatre and in practice. Vychodil was fully engaged in his artistic work in the S lovak N a tiona! Theatre. He taught his students by doing everything together with them. Studio type of teaching and direct participation in theatre production proved to be a great plus as the young graduates got from the College to the theatre in a n uninterrupted o rganic process. I L. Vychodil, having a good command of descriptive geometry, was able to show his students how to build a baroque relief setting, its individual space planes and at the same time to cope with the proportions of the parts. He gave them a good professional training, which manifested itself in the following decades, when theatrical poetics and optics changed. The first genera tion went through abrupt changes, connected with the overall theatre transformation. Hanak, Gabor, and Sujan passed this , examination" having been able to cope with aU transformations and changes. Vychodil's teaching me thod proved to be fruitful and inspiring. He pursued the young artists individually and met the demands of their artistic ambitions. I The difference between present day way of teaching and that in the past consists a lso in the fact that in those days a lready the stude nts in higher courses began to work in country theatres. That was caused by the needs of the theatres. From the aspect of today's situation this method may seem to be incompatible with the principles of pedagogy, but the conditions of the period fully justified it. I At the beginning of the School' s existence Vychodil set an example by his artistic work and Marta Rozkopfovo, I . rocnlk (1968/69) A . E. Poe: Cervena s mr( t\ Vladimir Cop, 1. rocnfk ( 1978179) Skica dramatickej postavy na hudobnu temu Vladimir Cop, 1. rocnlk ( 1978179) M aketa dramatickej postavy na hudobn(• tcmu (krajcfrska figurfna, papicr, plcxi) .Strzelecki loubtedly the Bt atislava School of Scenography leu by or I adi~lav Vychodil and Sen ior Lecturer I udmila Purkynova f the most interesting schools I know (England, f ranee, the nion. the U.S.A .• and Finland). J find the combinatic)n c)f the ~training with work in the moucrn theatrical workshops of the 1\ .1k National Theatre, perhaps the hest in Europe. to be the ho( I ., mo:>t attraclivc a~sct. That is why the graduates fJ om the II trc wdl trained for the wor k in theatre. All subjects ~tress tlwl 1111 l.tphy is~~ space d iscipline. that is why the training is oricnh.:d in Ill w tV Some schools pay attention first of all to designs, hut th~ 1 Il l l1v.t School of Scenography deals above all wit h the process l1 11 1 la<:c from the completion of the design to its mt~tcrialization in 1 lion with directors and actors. One cannot be taught how to be 111 hut one can be definitely taught theory ;md practice. At this h 1 , Slovak and for cign students have learned all they need for ll k 111 theatres. No one can trajn visionaries like Appia, let us hodils, they arc not only visionaries but practitioners as ,, I V pociatocne j faze L. Vychodil vplyval prik ladom svo je j ume leckc j prace a o sobnosti. Cerpal zo svojich poznatko v z praxe, zo sme ro va nia a urovne ceske ho d ivadla . A k si sam posta vil (tlo hu d osta t s lo vc nsku scenografiu na vysoku urove i'\, nepriamo tym da l cie f aj s ko le, kto ru vted y s Marti no m Brezino m vytvarali . I Syste m vychovy posta vil na principoch rozvija nia ume lecke j vnlmavosti stude n tov, ktorych skola mala vies( k scho pnosti o bjavovat po d statu ume lecke ho zazitku. T e n po to m ma li vediei realizovai vo sfe re scenografie. U ved o mova l si z lozitost vy ucby scenografie, ktoni musela respektova ( je j divade lny ch arakte r ; nesme la zane dba va ( vytvame rycho disko a sucasne bra ( sta le do (tvahy neodde lite fny prvok techniky. Bez ne j by bola neuskutocnite fna. Ve de l, ze bez zvla dnutia archite ktury, ma liarstva a sochar stva ne mozc scenograf uspie t' v divade lnej praci. Ade pt okre m vlastnej tvorive j ume lecke j prace muse l rozvfjat' aj raciona lne prfstupy; pre h lbovai svoje w a lo sti v teore tickych pre dmetoch . Musel sa zozna mit so za kladmi sccnickc ho vytvarnictva, a rchite ktu ry, mo de lo vania, kresle nia, d eskriptlvne j geome tric, kostymu, s d e jina mi ma lia rstva, socharstva a scenografie; s technikou osve tfova nia a s divad elno u techniko u vobec. R ovnako sa muse ! zozna mi( so zakladmi fo togra fi e a fyziky. Ne mo ho l neb yt' vzd e lany v rezijnej tvorbc a v d cjimich dnim y. Musel si sueasne pre h lbo vaf fi lozoficke a j azykove znalosti. Pravdaie, to to bo la le n cas( ry ucby, kto ra pre bie ha la pria mo na skole. Je j neoddelitc fn o u sucastou bola pnizdninova prax v die h1ach a mafo va nie v priro de. I U z z naznaccnch o vypi9Ya, ze mlady scen ograf muscl pre jsf v priebehu studia viacerymi sfe ra mi vyucb y. Zvycajne ai prax mu p o tvrdila, ze tato slrka zabe ru mu nesko r po mo hla pre niknut do p od staty scenografickcj tvo rby. I Ne mozno si o dm yslie ( fakt prostre dia, do kto re ho mladf sccnografovia uz pocas studia prichadzali. V divadhk h sa ich prfchod prijlmal ako vftami p omoc. I L. Vychodil ako ped ag6g vsak stude nto m ll<l'le pTaTCJlbllOH t'COMeTp1111 CyMen CBOI1M CTyAe HT3M OOK333Th, KUK M0 )f(ll0 BbJC"fp011Tb 6apO•IHYIO peJtbe cjnty tO CL~eN y, ee OT}\eJlbHbte npo crpauc rue tlllbte cj>OIIbt 11 coxpa HI1Tb npo nopt,HOliUJtbliOCTh 'tacrc/1 . OH Aan 11M xo po ury to rtpOcpCCCI10 11aJlbiiYI0 nonrOTOBKy, ' ITO npOHBI1Jl0Cb B OOCJ1CJ,Y I0 U~I1 C }leCHTHJieTI1St, KOfA3 113Me HI1Jl3Cb TeaTpaJtbB3St 1103T11 Ka 11 0 rtTI1Ka. ile p BOe 110KOJteHI1C nepCWJlO '1CpC3 pC3KI1e nepCJIOMbl, KOTOpbte 6 b1Jll1 Bbi3B3Hbl 06ll\11M 11:JMClle lll1eM TeaTpa. raHa K, f a6op H lilystH Bbl}le p )f(aJI11 31'0T 3K3UMeH 113Me He li11$1 11 ne pe0p11e 11TaU1111 TCII}leBU11H BTeaTpe. MeTOA npe noAa nattHSt Jl . BhtXOHI1Jia OKaJancSt llJlOAOTBOpllbiM 11 BAOXIIOBJHIIOU\11M. 11~1AI1BI1AyanMIO Y'II1Tblllan TI10bl MOJlOJibiX xynO)f(lii1KOB 11 men lla RC"rpC•ty 11X XYJIO)f(CC"fOeWiblM crpe MJte fi1151M. I 0TJti1'111Stll cpa uue HI111 ccerOHHSIWHHM rtpCrtOAaBaiii1CM KpOMe npo Ye rO B 1'0M, 'ITOTOfA <l c·r·yne u"l'bl y>Kc oo npe MSI Y'IC6bJ ua BbtCWI1X Kypca x H3<13Jll1 pa60T3Tb I) 06nact'HbiX TeaTpax. 3 TO 6b1Jl0 llbl30UIIO IIC6Jt3f011p11HTIIbiM COC"fOSIH 11CMTeaTpOB. TO'IKI1 3pe 1111SI llbi11CUIIII1X YCJlOBI1H 3TOT MCTOA MO>KeT Ka3aThCSI upOTHaope '·la u,I1M np11HUI1TiaM 11e]\31'0r11 KI1, 110 TOI'}\atU1111e 06C"rOHTCJlbC"fB3 TeaTpaiibHOi1 pa60Tbt cro o6ycnoan11san11. I B tra•raJibiiOM ~Ta ue uy3a Jl . SbrX0/\1111 on1151n np11Me po Mcooe/1 xyno)f(ecroe trHo i1 pa60Tbt 11 Jl 11'1110C"fl1 . 0~1 '1Cpnan 113 COOHX3113HI1H 113 n paKTHK11, op11e uTa UHH 11 ypoBHst 'lewcKoroTeaTpa. Ecn11 m r caM cc6c BbtfiBHttyn 3ana••y noAH$1Tb CJlOOat,KytO CI\CHOrpacp11t0 H<l BblCOKI1 HypoBeHb, TCM C3MblM 0 11 KOCBCIIIIO 060:Jlla'll111U,CJib UIKOJlbl, KOTopy to oMccre c MapT11HOM Bpe311HOMTorna co3nanaJtl1 . I Jl. S btXOJli1Jl ut KOJlY nocrpo11n Ha npmtu,)max pa3n11 natu1St xyAO)f(eCTBCIIHOi1 one 'taTJri1TenhHOC"rl1 cry}lCII'fOfl, KOT0pb1X OW\ }\0J1)f(H3 6 hiJI3 Bect·l1 K cnoco6uocr11 xyno)f(ecroe llttoro ne pe >KI1BUNI1st. Ero--ro 11 HOJt)f(llbl 6 htJI1111ClY'II1ThCSI pcaJti130BaTh n cqJe pc ct~c uo rpa<jJI111. Jl. S biXOHI1Jt oco3HanaJt CJ10 )f(IIQCTb 11pe 110}18U<l1111JI ClWHOrpaCp1111, K0T0p3~1 non)f(Ha 6 t.tml y•tHTbiOaTb cc TCaTpa!IblibiH xapaKTe p ; OHa 11e MOfJH\ IIC}lOOqCIII1BaTh 11:J06 p a311TeJlbHbiH nJ13U 11 0}\IIOOpeMCIIIIO llOC"fOSIIIIIO }~0Jl)f(~l 3 6 biJ13 llp1H111MUTb 110 OIIHMaiii1C lle01'}1CJli1MhiH 3JlCMe HT TCX1111K11. Ge3 11eeorra 6 btJta 6bt r;eocyll\CC"rn11MOi1. O H 3113Jt, 'ITO 6C:J OOJ1H}ICII11SI a pX111'eKTyp OH, >K11BOI111Cbl0 c {22) I' ·stalte n kann und wie man die ProportioneD der 'l l·ile in de n Griff bekommt. Er vermittelte ihnen eine l' •te professioneUe Ausbildung, was sich in den It ,lge nden J ahrzehnte n zeigte, als sich die Poetik und 1 >tik d es Theaters wandelten. Die erste Generation . le bte jahe W endungen, die mit dem gesamten mdel des Theaters zusammenbingen. Hanak, • 1bo r und Sujan bestanden diese Priifung des tndels und der Richtungsande rung in den ·atertendenzen . Die Ausbildungsmethode erwies 1 als fruchtbar und inspirationsfordemd. Sie paSte 1 den Typen der jungen Kiinstler individueU an und n ihren kiinstlerische n Ambitionen entgegen. Der U nterschied zur he utigen Ausbildung beruht • darauf, daB die Studierenden damals bereits u end der le tzten Jahre ibres Studiums an den 1 vinztheatem ihre P raxis aufnahmen. Die an d en r Ill atem herrsche nde Notsituation machte dies 1 t torderlich . Unter d em Gesichtspunkt heutiger V l rhiiltnisse mag cs scheine n , daB dieses Verfabren 1r Widerspruch zu den Prinzipien der Padagogik. til md, d och wares durch die damaligen Umstiinde in d Schauspielpraxis begriindet. I In der Anfangsphase beeinfluBte Vychodil die s~ I tie durch das Beispiel seiner kiinstlerischen 1 r~keit und sein e r P erst>nliehkeit. E r schopfte aus Ke nntnissen, die er am tschechischen Theater, lessen Praxis, Zielsetzungen und Niveau, moen h atte. W enn e r sich die Aufgabe gesteUt ' , der slowakischen Biihnenbildnerlrunst zu rn hohen Niveau zu verhelfen, so setzte er indirekt d cr Schule, die e r d a mals gemeinsam mit Martin Lina ins Leben rief, solche Ziele. .r begriindete die Schule auf den Prinzipie n einer a Itung der kiinstlerischen Sensibilitiit der St Jerende n , die durch die Schule zu kiinstlerischer I b nisfahigkeit gefiihrt werden sollten. Diese ,.. ten sie dann im B ere ich der Biihnengestaltung 1t tsieren ko nne n . Vychodil war sich der K· mplizicrtheit de r Ausbildung zum Biihnenbildner ' " "UBt, bei der auch de r Schauspielcharak.ter 11 1ck tiert werden muBte; der bildnerische A 1• gangspunkt sollte nicht ve machlassigt werden, un 1zugle ich muBte die Technik als ein unumgiinglich n -.'Cndiges Element Beachtung finde n . Oboe It tcre war e in Biihnenbild nicht durchfiibrbar. V hodil wuBte, daB der Biihnenbildner ohne I ninanz der Architektur, Malerei und H h auerkunst in der Schauspielpraxis nicht cr 1lgrcich sein kann. Neben der eigenen ) personality. He drew o n his e xperience in pratice, as well as on the tendencies and standard of Czech theatre. Since he himself laid out his objective to make Slovak scenography that of high standard, indirectly he laid o ut the school's aim too, h aving been establishing it together with Martin Brezina in those days. I He based the School on the principle of the development of stude nts' artistic perceptiveness. The School was to guide them to acquire the ability of artistic experience. The students were to further develop and materialize it in the sphere o f scenography. He was fully aware of the complicated character of scenography teaching. H e had to take into account scenography's theatrical ch aracter, not to neglect artistic starting points, a nd at the same time to take permanently into consideration its inseparable, technical e le me nts. Without technology, scenography would be no n existe nt. H e knew that without mastering the skills of architecture, painting, and sculpting, a scenogra pher could never be a success. Besides his or her creative artistic activity, the adept had to develop also rational disciplines, to make his knowledge of theoretical subjects more profound. He b ad to get acqu ainted with the basics of stage art, a rchitecture, sculpting, p ainting, descriptive geometry, costumes, with the history of painting, sculpture, and scenography. At the same time he had to be familiar with the basics of photography and physics. He could n ot be an ignoramus in directing and history of drama. Hand in h and with studying philosophy he had to study languages. Naturally, all th is was only a part of the teaching programme which took place directly in school, n o t speaking of holiday practice in workshops and painting in the open which were a nother inseparable components of the ir training. I It e nsues a lready from the afore mentioned enumeration o f ,mu sts" that as a student, a young scenographe r had to go through several spheres. Many a time did the younggraduaterealizeonlyin practice that it was just this , unnecessarily ample scope of knowled ge" which he lpe d him to understa nd the essence of scenography a nd avoid several pitfalls. I A s a pedagogue L. Vychodil was far from promising his students ideal working conditions. He nesfuboval ide aJne p racovne podmienky. Studentov skor viedol k tomu, a by svoju tvorbu stavali na dovtipe a fantazii, na jednoduchom a ucelnom riesenf, ktore nevychadza zo zlozitej techniky, ale ktore naplni zasadu - jednoduchymi prostriedkami dosiahnut' maximatny ucinok. Viacere divadla na vidie ku v tom case absolvovati pocetne zajazdy a hrali v priestorocb kulturnycb domov, ktorych dispozicie oedovofovali nijake zlo:Zite riesenia. Pruz nost' sce nografa bola prvym predpokladom jeho zivotoosti v procese divadelnej prace. L. Vychodil ako pedagog vycbadzal zo stavu divadiel, suborov i ambiciirezie . Ne vychovaval e xkluzlvnych vytvarnfkov pre e xkluzivne divadla. Nic take v slovenskych pomeroch ani nejestvovalo. Pretrvavajuce pome ry v divadlach a minimalna nadej, ze sa v kratkom case vse tko nahle z meni, nutilo mladych scenografov rozvljat typ scenografie, ktory by staval na inych predpokladoch, ne:Z je divadelna masineria. Po rokoch sa v divadelnej praxi ukazalo, ze toto smerovanie tvorby moze priniest pozoruhodne vysledky. Aktivita Vladimira Suchanka, Jozefa Cillera, Stefana Hudaka a d'aiSich len potvrdila uvedenu orientaciu ako perspektivnu. I Analogicky aj v e ur6pskej scenografii sa zacata presadzovat' akcna scenografia, ktora bola v sulade s intenciami mladych slove nskych divade lnych vytvarnikov, ako aj me t6dami ryucby na bratislavskej scenografickej skole. Naostatok pozitivny ohlas skoly v medzin:hodnych relaciach a prfliv zahranicnycb studentov ukazali opravnenostnastupeneho trendu a je ho produktfvnost'. · I J.:udmila Purkyiiova roku 1955 svojim vstupom na skolu dala nov)' podnet vyucbe divade lneho kostymu. Kym Ladislav Vychodil sa sustredil na scenografiu z hfadiska jej priestorovych moznosti, I.:udmila Purkynova sa upriamila na koscym ako dominujucu sferu svojej divadelnej a pedagogickej aktivity. Ladislav Vychodil v prvom desat'roci skoly vykonal zakladatefsku pracu, urcil trend a pomohol - uz aj za pomoci mladych absolve ntov - scenografiu ako odbor emancipovaf. Aj skola rna zasluhu na tom: H CK}'JJbiiTypow He MO)f(eT 6b1Tb pa6oTa xyAO)f(HHKa-noCTaHOBUJ,wKa ycn ew~10w. CTyAe HT KpoMe caoe li Tnop~IeCKOH xyAO)f(eCTBe HHOii pa60TbJ A01l)f(eH 6bm pa3BH13aTb 11 pa~HOI'laJJ bHble DOAXOAbl 11 yrn y6nSITb CBOH 3HaHHSI BTeopeTI.f'-leCKHX npeAMeTax. OH AOJJ)f(eH 6biJJ n03HaKOMI1TbCSI C OCROBaM.H C~eB.H'JeCKOrO M306pa3HTeJJhHOTO MCK}'CCTBa, apxliTeKrypbi, MOAeJJHpOBaHJUI, ))(ltl300HCH, Ha~lepTaTeJJbHOH re oMeTpH11, KOCTIOMa ; C HCTOpHeH )f(J11300l1CH, CKYJJbDTypbl H CU.e HorpaqmH; CTeXHHKOH OCBe JJJ,e HHSI HCTe aTpaJJbHOM Te XHHKOti soo6JJJ,e. B panHow Mepe OH AOJJ))(e H6blJJ 003Ha KOMHTbCSI C OCHOBaMH cpOTOr pacj>HH Jil cpH3JiiKH. OH He MOr He 6bJTb o6pa3osaHHbiM s pe ))(wccype lt B HCTOpHH ApaMaTypn.m. 0):\HOBpe MeHHO OH ):\OJJ)f(eH 6bJJJ yrny61lSITb CBOH 3HaHMSI 00 cpHJJOCOcpHH n HHOCTpaHHbJM SI3bJKaM. KoHe~JHO, 3TO 61>ma TOnhKO '-laCTb o6y~JeHI1SI , KOTopoe CTYAeHTbi npoXOA111lH npSIMO B By3e. Ero HeOT'beMne MOH COCTaBHOH ttaCTbiO 6bma npaKTI1Ka B MaCTepCKHX H. pHCOBaHHe B HaType no epeMR KaHHKyn. I Y)f(e H3 cKa3aHHoro BbiTe KaeT, ~ITO MonoAoi1 xyAO)f(HHK-nocraHOBJJJ,HK AOJI))(e H6bin npo i1TH a Te':le HHe yqe6ht HeCKOJlbKO ccpep o6ytteHM$1. KaK npaBHJlO, TOJJbKO npaKTJiiKa eMy OOATBepAHJJa, 'ITO 3TOT AHana30H 3HaHHM eMY 003)1{e DOMOr BOHTH n cyi.QHOCTb cu.eHorpacpu~lecKoro Taopqecrsa . I Henb3SI 3a6blBaTr:. o cpe.ue, a KOTopy•o MOJlOAbie xyJJ.O)f(JnJKH-nocraHOBUJ,l1KH y)f(e so epeMR yqe6 1>1 BXOAHJJH. B TeaTpax Hx noSianeHHe socnpHHHManocb KaK )f(eJiaeMaSI OOMOJJJ,b. I JI. BbiXOAHn KaK neAaror OAHaKo He o6e JJJ,an CTyAeHTaM HAe aJJbHblX ycnosm1 TpyJ.\a. CTyAe HTOB CTapaJICSI BeCTJil KTOMY, 'IT06bl CBOe TBOp•IeCTBO CTpOH.Til1 Ha OCTpOyMI1H H cpaHTa3ltJil, Aa DpOCTOM H LJ.eJJCC006pa3HOM pCWeHHJil, KOTOpOe HC HCXOAHT H3 CJJO)f(HOH TeXHlfKH, HO KOTOpoe YAOBneTBOp$1eT npHIU.I,HO - npOCTbiMH cpeACTBaM.H Jl:OCTH':Ib MaKCKMaJJbHOrO B03AeHCTBHSI. MHOrHe TeaTpbl BTO speMR racrpo;mposaJilf n nposHH.U.MM H HrpanH 0 3aJJaX AOMOB KYJJhTypbl, B03MO)f(HOCTH KOTOpblX He 003BOJJJIJJI1 HHKaKJiiX CJIO))(HbiX pe WCHJiiH. OnepaTHBHOCTb XYAO)f(HHKa-nocTaHOBJJJ,JiiKa 6bwa ne pBbiM ycnonHe Me ro )f(Jii3HeHHOC1'H e npou.ecce Te aTpanbHOi1 pa60Thi. JI. BbiXOAHn KaK ne):\aror JiiCXOAHJI H3 COCTOSIHHSI TeaTpOB, Tpynn H CTpeMJlCHHH pe)f(HCCypbi. 0H He BOCOMTh!BaJJ H36paHHbiX (24) •whopferischen Kunstpraxis sollte der Anwarter auch 1 .Ltionale Verfahren entwickeln, er muBteseine I •.mntnisse in den theoretischen Facbem vertiefen. Er 11 lte sich mit den Grundlagen der kiinstlerischen 1 uhnengestaltung, der Architektur, Modellierung, , ~ ichenkunst, der darstellenden Geometrie und der •st iimkunde vertraut machen, ebenso mit der f ·schichte der Malerei, der Bildhauerkunst und 1 11hnenbildnerei, mit Beleuchtungstechnik und , hauspieltecbnik im allgemeinen. Zugleich sollte er c11 • Grundlagen der Fotografie und Physik ~ nnenlernen. Ebenso war eine Ausbildung in giefiihrung und Dramengeschichte unumgiinglich. 1 ctchzeitig sollte er seine philosophischen und 1 rachlichen Kenntnisse vertiefen. Allerclings war • 1 t s our ein Teil seiner Ausbildung, die er unmittelbar der Schute erwarb. Deren unabdingbarer 1. ·sta ndteil waren wahrend der Semesterferien 1 1ktika in Werkstatten und Landschaftsmalerei. I Bereits aus dem bier Angedeuteten ergibt sich, daB 1 1 j uogeBiihnenbildnerim VerlaufeseinesStudiums 111 ·hrere Ausbildungsbereiche durchlaufen muBte. 1\ I ·ist erwies es sich erst in der Praxis, ob diese breite Basis ibm dazu verhalf, in das Wesen der I ~ uhnenbildnerkunst einzudringen. I Ein nicht wegzudenkender Faktor war jedoch das Milie u am Theater, in das die jungen Biihnenbildner I· reits wiihrend ihres Studiums gelangten. Von den hauspielhausem wurde ihr Eintritt als \ llkommene Hille angenomrnen. 1 A ls Lehrer verhie13 L. Vychodil seinen Schiilem ~ ' me idealen Arbeitsbedingungen. Er brachte die "r •tdie renden vielmehr dahin, daB sie in ihrem haffen auf Einfallsreicbtum und Phantasie setzten 1 10 einfache, zweckmaBige LOsungen anstreben , lltcn, die nicht von einer komplizierten Technik •Jsgingen, sondem dem Grundsatzfolgten, mit t 1 nfachen Mitteln eine maximale Wirkung zu •' iclen. 1 Eine Rei he der liindlichen Theater untemahmen , ma ls zahlreicbe Tourneen und spielten in den 'iumen von Kulturhausem, deren Disposition inerlei komplizierten LOsungen erlaubte. Die Beweglichkeit und Anpassungsfahigkeit eines I >jhnenbildners war eine erste Voraussetzungfiirsein 1 Jherleben im ProzeB der Schauspielpraxis. l Vychodil ging als Lehrer vom Zustand der Theater .1 •s, sowie von den Ensembles und dem Ambitionen d ,r Regie. Er zog keine exklusiven Bi.ihnenbildner fi.ir c Jdusive Biihnen heran. So etwas existierte auch ( '5 ) rather made his students base their works on wit and fantasy, on simple and purposeful solutions, not stemming from complicated technology, b ut implementing the principle of achieving the maximal effect by the simplest means. In those days several theatres in the country gave performances in houses of culture, which owing to their limited space and equipment did not allow any complicated settings. Versatility was the first condition of scenographer's , viability" in the process of theatrical practice. L. Vychodil drew on the situation in theatres, ensembles, and the director's ambitions. He did not train exclusive artists for exclusive theatres. Nothing of that kind existed in Slovakia. Permanent unfavourable conditions in theatres and minimum hope for their change to the better in near future, made the young scenographers develop such kind of scenography, which was based on different conditions than the machinery of theatrical production. Years of theatrical practice proved that this tendency brought about considerable achievments. The activities of Vladimir Sue anek, Jozef Ciller, Stefan Hudak, and others proved the presented orientation to be perspective. I Analogically action scenography (scenography participating functionally in dramatic action) began to be acknowledged also on European scale, which was fully in accord with the intentions of the young Slovak theatre artists, as well as with the methods of teaching at the Department of Scenography. Eventually the School's good renown in the world, and lots of students from abroad again prove thanbe laid out trend has been good and effective. I Ludmila Purkynova started lecturing at the School in 1955. She was a stimulating pioneer ofa new costume design conception. While Ladislav Vychodil focused his attention on scenography within the scope of its use in space, Ludmila Purkynova considered costume to be the dominant sphere in her theatrical and pedagogic activities. In the first decades of the School's existence Ladislav Vychodillaid its foundations, determined its trends and succeeded, though already assisted by his young graduates, in gaining autonomous position for scenography. Naturally, the College itself has a lion's share in thrusting scenography's position, training the adepts Juraj Ftibry, I. rocnik (1976/77) G . Gershwin: l'oll'ol Ciwirik, I liiCllik ( 1976/77) I' 1 ov<iCik: Krcma pod , l1•nym stromom Raps6dia v modrom I I (26) 11 7) I I I I I '/• ttum • S:t lzbtug I ·IHstuhl fur Szcnographie an der Hochschulc fu1 Mus1k unci nd Kun ..t, B1 at1slava spiclt cine hen m ragcnde Rolle 111 d 1 ungclcrcuropai-;chcn Szcnographen. WH..:dcrholt n Male hahcn wirdic Aushildungsst·1th.: hc..,ucht on dcrcn I 1folg ubc1 zcugt. scenografii razila cestu, pripravovala ade ptov, spolupracovala na vystavach. Prichodom I:udmily Purkynovej doslo k vyvazenemu usilu o kostym, ktory si vtedy nevyhnutne i iadal zvysenie profesionalnych kriteril. Preto aj doslo k samostatnej vyucbe koscymu ako scenograficke j discipli'ny. I Vstup Otta Sujana do pcdagogickeho procesu znamenal zasa doraz na uiSiu spatosf scenografie s reziou a dra maturgiou, co svedcf 0 dynamickom vyvine skoly a 0 jej prepojc ni s potrebami sueasnej ctivadelnej praxc. V pedagogicko m procese Ladislav Vychodil, I.:udmila Purkynova a Otto Sujan sa delili a delia o cfalsie profil ovanie katedry. Ak naprfklad na zaciatku bolo prfznacnc, ze sa scenografii venovaU adepti ako discipline zamerancj na priestor, prfchodom I.:udmily Purkynovej sa zd6raznil ryznam kostymu. Helena Bezakova sa sfce v kosickej etape kratko po absolvovanf venovala tvorbe sceny i kostymu, no ncskor sa sustredila vylucne na kostymovu tvo rbu. Pcdagogicke usilie I:udmily Purkynovej sa ukazalo neskorv praxi inych: Bezakova i Pol6nyova prejavili svoj vefmi osobity scenograficky rukopis ako vylucne kostymove vytvarnfcky. I Patri k prfznacnym crtam bratislavskej scenografickcj sko ly, ze neviedla a nevedie stude ntov k sabl6ne, ale k respektovaniu svetonazorovych umelcckych poziadaviek. Nie su nijake vynimky, ie naprfklad graficka a lebo maliarska skola pod urcujuci m vplyvom pedag6gov poznacf ziakov na dlhe roky, kym sa im podarf vymaru( sa spod tohto vplyvu a najsf svoj vlastny ryraz. Ladislav Vychodil, L.udmila Purkynova a cfalsf pedag6govia nikdy svoj rukopis nevnucovali ziakom. Nekorigovali ich podia seba, a le usilovali sa ich vi est tak, a by sami z vnutornych podnetov a zdrojov rastli a rozvijaUsa do svojbytnej osobnostnej polohy. Pre absolventov je typicke, ze chapu scenografiu nie ako dekorativnu disciplinu, ale ako priestorov(• tvorbu v spatosti s dramou a divadelnym priestorom. Poueenfv historickych styloch, v materia loch, v utvaranf priestoru, v tende nciach divadelnej rezie nevedu deliacu hranicu xyJ~O)t{HJ.1KO B HJist J.1 36pa111-lbiXTea-rpos . Hwiero OOA06 Ho ro o CJiooauK J.1X YCJIOBJ.1RX To r.o.a R He 6biJIO. CyLL{CCTUytOUJ.J.1CycJtOBJ.151 n TeaTpax u MMHf!MaJibHast li a.IJ.C)t(J~a, 'iTO 8 6JIJ.1)1{3HUJCe opeMA oce HeO)t{J.1.0.aHHO J.1 3MCHJ.1TCSI, 3aCT30JlSIJl J.1 MOJlO]\biX XYAO)t{IIJ.1K08-nOCTallo owJ.1KOn pa3oJ.1BaTb TJ.1n CL{CIIOrpa<j:>HJ.1, KOTOp biH CTOJ.1 T Ha .O.pyrHX 11pCAOOCbiJlK3X, 'iCMTeaTpanbHOe 060pyA08aHHe. C nyCTSI rOJ\bl a TCaTpanbuol1 npaKTJ.1 Ke oKa3anocb, 'iTO TaKaS! OpJ.1CIITaL{J.1R TBOp'ieCTBa M0)1(CT npJ.1HeCTJ.1 3aMe'I3TCJlbllbiC pe3ynbTaTbl. AKTI18HOCTb BnaJIHMJ.1pa CyxaHKa , Mo:1e<j:>a QHJ!nepa, lliTe<j:>aHa f yAaKa "1\pyr"x TOnbKO noATBep}\J.1Jia 0603Ha•tC~IIIYIO OpJ.1CII1'3L{J.110 KaKnepcneKTJ.18HyW. I AuanorH'iCCKJ.1 TaK)t{e n eoponei1cKol1 CL{CHOrpa<j:>HH u a~I3Jl 3 yTUCp)t{}\3TbCSI onepaTJ.18H3SI C~CH Orpa<j:>J.1SI , KOTOpaSI COOTBeTCTilOBana CTpCMJICIIJ.1SIM MOJIOAbiX CJlOB<lL{KI'IX TeaTpanbHbiX XYJ1.0)t(HI1KOB, TaK)t{C KaK J.1 MeTO]l.aM 06y•tCHI1Sl 8 6paTJ.1 CJl30CKOHCL{CIIOrpa<j:>w•ICCKOHUJKOJIC. DOJl0)1(J.1TCJlbllbiC 0T3bl0bl 0 WKOJIC 8 MC)t(Jl.Yii<lpO[tiiOMMaCUITa6e 11 )t{CJlatme HHOCTpaunbJX C'T"yne u•ron y•• HTbCSI o EpaTJ.1cnane noKaJanJ.1 npa8J.1JlbHOCTb Ha•taToro nyTJ.1 "ero npOAYKTl18110CTb. I ny,~MH na n ypKHHCBa 8 1955 ro]l.yCBOJ.1M noCTynncHJ.1CM8 ny3 n KalfeCTae ne]l.arora Aana H08bll1 J.1 MnynbC Kn pe OO}~aB3 HJ.1 lOTeaTpaJibROrO KOCTlOMa. ECJIJ.1 na,~H cnao BbiXOJl.HJl cocpe.o.OTO•IJ.1Jl cooe LliiJ.1MaHJ.1C ua cucuorpa<j:>J.1JOc TO'iKH 3pe mrn ee npOCTp3HCTBCHIIbiX803M0)t{HOCTCH, JlyJIMl.fJla 0 ypKHIIC8a OpJ.1CHTJ.1pOnanaCb Ha KOCTIOM K3KHa rnasHyto c<j:>epy cooel1 TCaTpan bHOI1 J.1 ne]l.arorJ.1 <1CCKOHaKTJ.1 8110CTJ.1 . n a]l.J.1 Cnas BbiXO]l.J.1 Jl B nepaoe ).(CCSITHJICTHC ayJa C]lenaJI pa6oTy OCH080 00Jl0)t{HJ.1Ka, 0603H3'1HJI Op!ieHT3L{J.1lO H OOMOr - y)I(C UMCCTC CMOJIO]\biMJ.1 BbinyCKHHK3MJ.1 - Cl\CHOrpaCj)J.110 KaKCO CI~J.1aJlbHOCTb 3M a ~I CHOJ.1pOU aTb. Y ny3a TO)t{e COOJ.1 3acnyrl1 B3TOM - OH no Moran cu,cuorpacp"" npo6J.1133Tb AOpory, roTOOJ.1Jl BbmycK~mKOo, COTPYAHH'laJI Ha BhtCTanKax. C npJ.1XOAOMllyHMJ.1Jlbl DypKl1Henol1 6bm Bhl38aH ypaBHO BC UIC ~IIIbl H J.111TCpCC TaK)t{C KKOCTIOMY, KOTOpblH BTO BpCMSI CHCJ.1 36C)t{HOCTbiO HY)t(Jl.aJICSI B OOilblUICHJ.1J.1 npO<j:>CCCHOHaJibHblXKpJ.1TCpHe B. D03TOMY KOCTIOMJ.1pOBaiiJ.1C Ha•tanocb npeno]l.anaTb (28) •ntcr slowakischen Verhaltnissen nicht. Die weiterhin ncstehenden Verbaltnisse an den Theatem tWd die "'Tinge Hoffnung, daB sich binnen kurzem plotzlich lies andern wtirde, zwang ctie jungen Biihnenbildner, men Typus der Biihnengestaltung zu eotwickeln, der 1f anderen Voraussetzungen basierte, als es die heatermaschinerie war. Nach Jahren eJWies es sich doch in der Biihnenpraxis, daB ctiese Ausrichtung ·s Schaffens bemerkenswerte Ergebnisse zeitigen -.nn. Die Tatigkeit Vladimir Suchans, Jozef Cillers, 1cfan Hudaks und anderer erbrachte eine cstatigung dafiir, daB die genannte Orientierung 1kunftsweisend war. Analog hierzu begann sich auch in der uropaischen Biihnenbildoerkunst ein durchdie ktion gepragtes Biihnenbild durchzusetzen, wie es l'o Intentionen der jungen slowakiscben heatcrschaffenden und cbenso den usbildungsmethoden an der Bratislavaer Schule fiir iihncnbildnerei entsprach. Schlie6lich zeigten das •ositive Echo, das die Schule international fand, und ' r Z ustrom auslanctischer Studenten, daB der bier ·rtrctene Trend berechtigt und produktiv war. Im Jahre 1955 verlieh Ludmila Purkyilova mit der tfnahme ihrer Lehrtatigkeit an der Schule der usbildung in Kostiimgestaltung neue Impulse. ihrend Ladislav Vychodil sicb unter dem Aspekt r mmlicher Moglichkeiten auf dasBiibnenbild k >nzcntrierte, wandte sich Ludmila Purkyiiova dem } )Stiim als dem dominierenden Bereich ihrer · heater- und Lehrtatigkeit zu. Lactislav Vychodil I tte im ersten J ahrzehnt des Bestebens der Schule < ' Basisarbeit geleistet, er hatte ihren Trend stimmt und der Biihnenbildnerkunst- auch unter uthilfe dcr jungen Absolventen - dazu verholfen, l(. h als Fach zu cmanzipieren. Auch die Schute nuchte sich darum verdient, sie bahnte der 'tldhauerkunst den Weg, bereitetedieStudierenden or und arbeitete an Ausstellungen mit. Mit dem \ uftreten Ludmila Purkyi'iovas kam es zu einem usgcwogeneren Bestreben urn das Theaterkostiim, hs damals eine Erhohung der professionellen riterien erforderte. Daher kames auch zu einer •genstandigen Ausbildung in Kostiimkunde a1s c1lfach der Biihnenbildnerei. Das Auftreten Otto Su jans innerhalb des usbildungsprozesses bedeutete hingegen, daB der kzcnt auf eine engere Verbindung der tihnenbildnerei mit Regiefiihrung und Dramaturgic and cooperating in exhibitions. Ludmila Purkynova's advent brought about an effort to pay proportional attention to costume, which in those days inevitably claimed higher professional standard. That is why costume design became a subject lectured within the scope of scenography. I Otto Sujan, as a lecturer, stressed closer bonds among scenography, direction, and dramaturgy, which was an evidence of the school's dynamic development and its direct contact with the needs of the theatre of the day. As professors Lactislav Vychodil, Ludmila Purkynova, and Otto Sujan have been striving and strive for greater differentiation within the framework of the department. At the beginning it was a typical feature that the students devoted themselves to scenography as to a subject dealing with space. After the arrival of Ludmila Purkyiiova costume's significance was stressed. Helena Bezakova devoted herself for a short time she spent in Kosice, to both scenography and costume design, but later focused her attention entirely on costume design. Ludmila Purkynova's pedagogic activity brought its fruit later in the work of other artists. Both Bezakova and Pol6nyova proved to be genuine scenographers exclusively in the sphere of costume design. I The Bratislava Schoo) of Scenography has another typical feature. Each student can fully develop his abilities without having to follow models or submit to dull routine. It is no exception to the rule, that those who had studied graphic art, or painting before embarking on scenography, remain for a long time under the influence of their first professors. Lactislav Vychodil, Ludmila Purkynova and other lecturers have never urged their styles upon the students, nor have ever been trying to make them accept them. On the contrary, they have always been doing their best to get the students to grow and develop, to draw on their own sources and stimuli, and in such a way to become autonomous artists with their own genuine conceptions. Moreover, it has become a common practice that the school's graduates conceive scenography not as a mere decorative ctiscipline but as a creative activity existing in direct contact with drama and theatrical space. Well aware of historical styles and materials, of aU the principles of creating space within the scope of direction, they do not find medzi rytvarnym vyrazom a ostatnymi zlozkami divadelnej strukt(try. Pochopili, ze scenografia moze napJnO zit len VO vzajomnom podmieneni, Vprepojeni javiskovcho dicta s ideovo-umeleckymi ciefmi. I Najma generacia sesfdesiatych rokov podala dokazy, ze ju skola dobre pripravila pre rozvijajuci sa divadelny proccs nielen v nasom, ale aj v eur6pskom divadle. Pre skolu bolo osozne, ze Ladislav Vychodi l coraz viae pracoval aj v zahranicnych divadlach. Prinasal podncty z inych divadelnych kultur, skolu prepajal s celym procesom pokrokoveho eur6pskeho divadla. Skola sa otvarala norym podneto m. A stavala sa pri(ailivou pre zahranicnych studentov, ktori prichadzali bucf na kratsie pobyty, a lebo absolvovali celcstudium. I Od cias, ked na Vysokej skole muzickych umeni v Bratislave vzni kla Katcdra sccnografie sa vefa zme nilo: skola sidli v niekdajsom objekte Acade mic Istropolitany, ped agogicky zbor sa rozsiril, co malo vplyv na smcrovanic vyucby a jej metodiku, vybudovali sa modcrne dielne Slovenske ho narodncho d ivadla v Bratislave, ktore sh:izia mladym vytvarnikom pocas studii, rozvilo sa aj divadelne umenic. I Nezmenilo sa to zakladne: skola sa uzko prepaja s praxou; odpoveda najej potreby zmenami a doplnujucimi kratkodobymi i dlhodobymi kurzami pre postgradualne vzdelanie odbornikov z praxe; udriuje kontakty s ostatnymi divadelnymi sccnografickymi skolami v zahranici, vedic studentov k vedomiu suvislosti a podmienenosti scenografie s d ivadlom v cclcj jcho zlozitosti v priestore, pohybe a case. I Ten to trend poskytuje zaruky, ze absolventi budu schopni niclcn osvedcit svoj talent v divadl<kh, ale v praxi aj prcsadzovat do buducnosti zacielene umelcckc programy. KaK CaMOCTOSITCJibllbiM npenMeT cue~t orpa¢11'-ICCKOM AHClV'IfiJIHHbl. I BKmO•ICIIHC OTTO lU yS~Ha 8 neAarorw4CCKHi1' npouecc o3uayano aK t~eHTHpooa HHe 6onee TecHoM' CBSI3Hcucu orpa¢t~ w c pe:>Kt~ccypoi:i " mtTepaTypKbiM OT]\eJtOM, YTO C8H]\eTCJJbCTByCT 0 J.(HHaMHYCCKOM pa3BHTHH UJKOJibl " ee CBSI3H c HY:>KAaMH COBpCMCHHOM TeaTpanbHOM npaKTHKH . B neAaront'4CCKOM npoueccc JlaAHCJtao BbiXOAHJJ, llyAMwna ITypKt~u eoa "OTTo lllysiH pa3ACJJSIJJHCb 11 pa3nenHIOTCH 8 AaJJbiiCMIUCM npo¢HnHpooaHHH Ka¢eAph1. EcnH 8 HaYane, uanpHMCp, 6b1Jl0 xapaKTCpHOTO, YTO CTYACHTbl JalntMaJJHCb CI.(CHOrpacp»ei:i KaK A HCl~HllJI HHOH , OpHeiiTHp08311HOM Ha npocrpaHCTBO, npHXOAJlyAMHJtbl ITypKHHeooi:i aKuet~Tpwpoaan 3Ha••cuwe KOCTtOMa. Ene~ta Be3aKooa XOTSI H3aHHMaJJaCb IICJ.(JIHTCJibiiOC BpeMSJ nocne OKO~I'I aiiHf! Oy3a 0 KoUJWI.(aX CI.(CHOH HKOCTIOMOM, ll03)1(e rTOJIHOCTbtO COCpC]'I01'0'1HJI3 CBOC 8HI1M3ti.He Ha KOCTIOMC. n ena rOrl1<1eCKHC CTapaHHSI JlyAMHJlbl HypKHI·Ie80H J.\aJJI1 o cc6e 3HaTb no3)1(C o npaKTltKe JWYrHx : BcJaKona 11 ITOJtOHHOt3a npOHBHJtH caoi:i O'ICHb COOC06p3311blM Cl.(CIIOrpacpHYCCKHH 110'-ICpK .HCKJH0'4HTCJtbHOKaK XYAO)I(HHI.(bl no KOCTIOMaM. I XapaKTCp~roi:i •repTOH 6paTwcrraocKoi1 CI.(CHOrpacpH'4CCKOH WKOJl bl SIBJISICTCSI TO, 'ITO OH8 1-lHKOrAa IIC oena H IIC BeACT CTYACHTOB KTpa<fJapeTy. He 6btaac-r HCKJIIO'ICiiHCM, •1-ro HanpwMep WKona rpaQJHKH HJJH )I(HBOOHCH OOA CHJlbHbiMBJIJ{}{HHeM OCJ~arorOB Ht1Jl0)1(HT CBOIO 11C'4 aTb Ha CTYJlCHTOBHa AOJlrHC rOAbl, noKa HMyAac-rcS~ ocao60AHTbCSI OT 3TOrO BJIHSIIIHSI 11 113HTH CBOC HHAHBHAYaJibHOe Bbtpa)I(CtiHC. JlaJ\HCJJaB BbtXOAHJJ , JlyAMMna n ypKHIICBa Hl\pyrHC llCAarorH HHKOrf\a CTyAeHTaM HC H aoS~3b iBaJJI1 C80H no•tepK. 011w He KOppCKTHp013<lJIH HX 110 COOHM npCACT38JICHHSJM, HO CTapaJJHCb HX OCCTH T8K, 'IT06bl C8MH113 8HyTpCHHHX no6y)I{J\CHHH H HCTOYHHKOB pOCJJH H pa3BI183JIHCb BOpHrl4 113JibiiYIOJIHYIIOCTb. J];m1Bblt1YCKIH1K08 xapaKTCpiiO, ' ITO n O HWM~UOT Cl~CHOrpacpH10 HCKaK f\CK0p3'1'11B IIYIOAHCI~11tlJ1HHY, a K<lK 11pOCTp311CTOCIIIIOC '1'130p•ICCTI30 8 C6Sl311 CApaMOH HTCaTpaJibll biM 11pOc-rpaHCTOOM. 06pa30BlHIHbiC B HC'I'OpH<lCCKHX CTHJISIX, ll MaTCpH3JitlX, BC03J\8HI1H npOCTOpa, 13 TCH,UCIII.(HSIX TCaTpaJlbHOH pC)I(HCCypbl 01111 HC BHJ\SIT pa3f\CJlSI IOtl.(ytO rp81111QYMC:>KAY XYAO)I(CCTOCHHbiMBblpa)i(eiiHCM 11 ocranbHbJM..11 (30) J' ·legt wurde, was von der dynamischen E ntwicklung ·r Schule und ihrer Verbundenheit mit den I ·diirfnissen der zeitgenossischen Scbauspielpraxis ugt. Ladislav Vychodil, Ludmil a Purkynova und Ito Sujan gestalteten gemeinsam den usbildungsprozeB und streben auch beute noch eine \ itere Profilierung ihres Lehrfaches an. Wares rspielsweise am Anfang bezeichnend, daB sich die ' udierenden der Biihnenbildnerkunst als einer 1 tmtich orientierten Disziplin widmeten, so wurde, • t Ludmila Purkyi'iova ihre Lehrtatigkeit aufnahm, Bedeutung des Kostiims betont. Zwar hatte sich lena Bezakova wahrend ihrer Kosicer Zeit kurz h AbschluB ihres Studiums mit dem Biihnenbild 1 uder Kostiimgestaltung befaBt, doch konzentrierte sich spiiter nur auf die Kostiimbildnerei. Die 'lagogischen Bestrebungen Ludmila Purkynovas 11cn spiiter in der praktischen Tatigkeit anderer in .cheinung: Helena Bezakova und Pol6nyova lu tchtcn ihre ganz spczielle biih nenbildnerische I r ndschrift ausschlieBlich als Kostiimgestalterinnen 'I ' n Ausdruck. I / u den charakteristischen Ziigen der Bratislavaer S •ulc fiir Biihnenbildnerkunst gehortees, daB die S dicrcnden nicht schablonenhaft ausgebildet " den, und dies ist auch heute noch so. Wenn 11 piclsweise cine Scbule der Graphik oder Malerei cl ~chiiler durch den bestimmenden EinfluB ihrer trcnden auf lange Jahre hin pragt, so gelang es mer 111 • ahmlos jedem, sich diesem EinfluB zu entziehen un ·inc eigene Ausdrucksform zu finden. I adislav Vychodil, Ludmila Purkyi'iova und die 1111 ren Lehrenden haben ihren Schiilern niemals Ih I Iandschrift aufgezwungen. Sie korrigierten sie nl 1 nach ihren eigenen MaBstiiben, sondem waren h rcbt, daB diese selbst a us inneren Anregungen 111 Quellen heranwuchsen und eigenstandige Jll -;onliche Positionen entfalteten. Fiir die A 1 .olventen ist es typisch, daB sie die ll '•nenbildnerkunst nicht als dekorative Disziplin 111 r.1sscn, sondern als Raumgestaltung in enger V hindung mit dem Biihnenwerk und dem I ,ttcrraum. Die Kenntnis der historischen Stilarten, ,t. Wissen tiber Raumgestaltung, Tendenzen der H efiihrung fiihrt nicht zu einerTrennungslinie .,, ·hen dem bildnerischen Ausdruck und den bl •en Bestandteilen der Schauspielstruktur. Die AI 'lventen dieser Schule haben verstanden, daB die lh 1enbiJdnerei nur in der gegenseitigen < (3 ) a dividing line between artistic expression and other components of theatrical structure. They have understood that scenography can flourish only in close contact with theatre and in their mutual influencing. I The generation of the 'sixties, in particular, gave evidence of having been well trained by the School for the process of development which took place not only in Czechoslovakia but in European theatre as well. It was a great advantage for the school thatLadislav Vychodil worked for several theatres abroad. He brought back stimuli from other theatres and cultures and joined the School to the overall process of progressive theatre development in Europe. The School absorbed the new stimuli. It has become attractive also for students from abroad who come either for shorter study stays or attend all the courses and graduate in Bratislava. I A lot has been changed since the Department of Scenography was founded at the CoUegeofMusicand Drama in Bratislava. The Department resides in the former building of Academia Istropolitana. The number of professors and lecturers increased, which considerably influenced the trends in teaching and methodology. Modern workshops of the Slovak National Theatre were built, being available to the students, and theatre arts have made a great step forward , too. I However, the School's principal conception has not been changed. It has been closely connected with practice, responds to its needs by changes and complementary short or long post graduate courses for artists and experts engaged in theatres. The School is in contact with other schools of scenography abroad. It leads its students to be aware of the continuous character of theatre's historical development and to take into account all connections and conditions of scenography and its position in theatre in full complexity of s pace, move ment, and time. I This trend is a guarantee that the graduates will be able not only to assert themselves as good professionals, but implement progressive artistic programmes as well. Priesto rova studia (plcxisklo) ' 13C'I'SJMI1 TCaTpaJJbiiOH CTpyKTypbt. 0HH OOHSJJlH., 'ITO CQeHorpacp11Sl MO>KeT >K11'l'b OOJlHOKpOBIIOH >K113Hbl0 TOJibKO BO ll3ai1MHOH 06ycnOBJ1CHHOCTI1, B3ai1MOCBSJ311 11 B3311MOBJ11151HI111. I flpc>K.ne accro noKoneu11e w eCTHACCSJTbiX roAOB npe.f.{"bSJ811Jl0 }!OKa3a·reJibC'I'Ba TOrQ, 'ITO WKOJla ero xopowo no.nrOTOBI1JJa .QJ151 pa3BHBaiow,erocSJ TeaTpaJJbHOI"' npOQecca He TOJlbKO BH3WCM, HO 11 B C8p00CHCKOM TC3TpC. J].JJSJlly3a 6biJ10 OOJ1e3Hb1M, •ITO na.n11cnaa BbiXOAHJJ nee 'iaw,e pa6oTan TaK>Ke a 3apy6C>KIIbtX TCaTpax. OH CBSJ3MBan CI{CHOrpacp11•1CCKYIO IJIKOJl YC QeJlbiM npOQCCCOM ncpenonoro eoponei1cKor o TeaTpa, o6oraw,aSJ ee HMllYJJbCaMI1 113 .npyr11x TCaTpanbnbiX KYJlbTyp. lliKOJH\ C'I'3JH\ OTKpbiTOH HOBOMy. l1 OHa C'I'3HOBHJ1aCh npHnneKaTCJI biiOi1 JVISt HHOCTpaHHbtX CTYACHTOB, KOTOpbre 11p11C3>K3JII1 11<1 KOpOTKHe C'I'3>K11p08K11 111111 npOL111111 BCCb Kypc Y'IC6bl. I C Tcx nop, KnK o BblcweJ:iwKOJte-rea-rpaJJbHoro 11 MY3bJKaJJbiiOf"O 11CKycCTaa B EpaTwCJJa8e B03HHKJJa Kacpe}\pa CQe110rpacp1111, 3{1eCb MIIOroe 113MCHI1J10Cb: :mau11e oy3tl113X0.1.{11TCH 0 6bJOWCM 06"bCKTe AKaJWMHH H CTpOIIOJlHTaHbJ, ne].{aront<teCKHi1 KOJIJICKTI18 paCIJ 111p11Jl CSJ, 'ITO HMeJJO 8Jll151HI1C Ha HanpaOJleHHe npenO.QaBaJiH5111 ero MeTO.QWKy, 6bfJ1J1 OOC'I'pOCilbl C08pCMCHIIbJe MaCTepCKHe CJ10B3QKOrQ ~JaQHOHaJlb HOf"O TeaTpa 8 6pnTHCJ1aae, K01'0pble cny>KaT MOJJOI\biM XYI\O>KHHKaM ao npeMH y..e6ht, pa30I1Jl 0Cb TaK)I(e TCaTpaJJbHOe 11CKyCCTBO. I He 113MCII11Jl OCb ocnoonoe: CQenorpacj>I1'1CCK351 WKOJla TCCIIO CBH3nHa C npaKTKKOH; OTBe'laeT Ha ee rt0Tpe61IOC'I'I1 113MeHeH1151MH 11 }\OOOJlHHTCJlbllbiMH KpnTKOCp0'1Hbi M11 11 AOJlf"OCpO'IIIbi MH KypcaM.H ]\JlSl ll08bi WCtii1H KU3J1Hcp11KCIQI111 CfH!QHaJIHCI"OB 113 npnKTHKH ; 110}{1\ep>KHOaeT KOHT3KTbl COCTaJlbHbiMH TeaTpaJJbllbiMH CQeHorpacj>H'IeCKMMH WKOJ13MH 3apy6e>KOM; 8CJICT C'I'Y/-'CHTOB K OC03~1aHJUO npeCMC'I'llCHHOC'I'I1 C11CT0p11'1CCKI1M pa3BI1T11CM TeaTpa 11 K OC03Halll110 CI3SI3eHI1 o6yCJJOBJ1CHHOCTI1 CQCHOr"p3cp1111 CTCaTpOM 80 BCeH ero CJ10>KHOCTI1 8 llpOC'I"paHCl'lle, }\BH>KCI-11111 11 flO BpCMCHW. I 3To nanpaOJICIII1e W:leT rapatiTHIO, 'ITO 8binYCKHI1K11 6yAyT B COCTOSIHI111 ne TOJlbKO np11MCIII1Tb OpOcpCCCHOHaJlbHO CBOI1 3HaHJ1SJ Ha rrpaKTHKC, 11011 B npaKTHKY 6y.QyT B 6y.QyUJ,CM BBOAJ1Th QencuanpaoJtCIIIIble xyAO>Kec-raeHHbi C nporpaMMbl. (32) l k dingtheit, durch Z usammenwirken und llccinflussung, voll existieren kann. I rnsbesondere erbr achte die Gen eration der ~l'thziger Jahre den Beweis, daB die Schule sie fiir den F ntwicklungsprozeB der Scbauspielkunst nicht nur in dt.•r Sl owakei, sondern aucb innerhalb Europas gut vt bcreitet hatte. Fur die Schule wares von N utzen daf\ Ladislav Vychodil immer haufiger auch an ' l llt'l~i ndischen Bi.ihnen tatig war. Er bracbte J\ nrcgungen aus anderen TheaterkuJturen mit und ' Illite ei ne Verbindung der Sch ute zum <ksamtprozeB des fortschrittlichen europaischen !'heaters her . Die Schule o ffnete sich neuen A nrcgungen. Und sie wurde fUr auslandische 'lh tdcnten attrakti v, die entweder fiir ei nige Zei t hicrhcr kamen oder ihr gesamtes Studium hier uhsolvierten. I Scit der Zeit, da der Lehrstuhl fUr l llihnenbil dnerei an der Hochschule der musischen Kilnstc i n Bratislava entstanden i st, hat sich vieles I-Ll'otndert : Damals war die Schule im Gebaude der ••lwmaligen Academia I stropolitana untergebr acht; dlt (Jruppe der Lehrenden wurde gr oBer, was sich auf dk A usrichtung der Ausbildung und deren Methodik uu ~wi rkte; die m odernen Werkstatten des ~ l nwa kischcn N ational theaters wurden eingericbtet, •he den jungcn Bi.ihnenbil dnern wahrend ihrer \l ll(hcnzeit zur Verfugung stehen, und die \ r h.lllspielkunst erfuhr cine Entwicklung. Das G rundlegende blieb unvedindert: Die Schul e i ~l l ng mit der Praxis verbunden; sie reagiert auf deren lkdu rfnissc durch Veranderungen, und indem si e u ~atzlich Kurz- und L angzeitkurse zur postgradualen hu tbi ldung der in der Praxis tatigen Fachvertreter l'llll tchtct. Sic unte.rhalt Kon takte mit auslandischen •,c•hulcn fi.ir Bi.ihnenbildnerei , vennittelt den 'olmlicrcnden das B ewuBtsein einer Kontinuitat der hiNiorischen Entwickl ung des Theaters und das Wlsscn um die B edingtheit der Bi.ihnengestaltung und 1111 1."11 Z usammenhang mit dem Theater in sei ner llt'llltmtcn KomplexiHit von Raum, Bewegung und I' I' l l I >icsc A usr ichtung bietet die Gewahr, daB die \ hsnlvcnten nicht nur die Fahigkei t besitzen werden, h h In dcr Praxis professionell durchzusetzen, ••11dcrn auch zukun ftweisende ki.instlerische l 'lll!''·•mm e in die Praxis umzusetzen. ( II ) Rastislav Bohus 2. rocnfk ( 1969) ~tudia kosrymu v m ak ete Peter Canecky, 2. rocnfk ( 1979/80) Studia sucasneho odevu Olio KA/ILER p, .tsident dcr Scktion DDR dcr OlSTA I .., schu.::n mir c;;chon nnmcr cincr dcr wichtig~tcn Bcstandteile de Au .. bilclung von Blihncn und Kostumhiklncrn Ill scm. vom crsten Tag des St udium an eng mit <.l\!r Pra '"'des 1 heaters vcrbundcn lU sl.':in damll cin crfoh?,rcichet lJbcr gang zur sclhsHtndigcn kirnstlcrische n At bcit gelingt Dic'\e J ordcrung fand ich bci cincm Bcsuch de Kun ..thochschulc in Bt atJslav,t auf gcradc7u idc,tlt We is~,; vcrwirklicht Mich bccimh ucktc dr~,.: Vi I fait (k-s Studrcnprogr,mun": D i Stud nten khnm:n ilu I Ill\\ ur f im Kont.tkt mit Regio.;scurcn un Dr m·1tur ·n rul d t r •cnl:n Studrohuhn um!-!Cl.lcn unci d i 1 1, rt thrcr Au t·tttun tn d 1 Studrnms/cnreJungcn rprohen 1 I Ja..,s th I nt\\Jrf rrb tt d 1 Stud ·nt n nh.:ht nurnufgros I nk v1 d s s I 1 E i1 dur"' 1ch urn dcr junge1 u1 I m t tn port hi [) kor~ time I 1 t '-"" I II I n mod ·rnl:n grosse (34 ttcn habcn drc Studenten die Moglichkeit, ~rch mil hen und konstruktiv~;n Aufgahen ihrcs spittcrcn Bcrufcs 7U machcn und mit Materia len zu cxpcrimcnticJCn. Die me am 1.. ntstchungspro1ess von Aufflihrungen des ,..,chen Nationalthcaft.•p; vcJ mittclt das Den ken in 11 gischcn Zusa mmcnhimgcn. die Siehl des TIH.:atc 1 s als kunstwcrk. sor Vychodii. zuglcich Ausstat1ungschcf des SND und l citc.:r nbildklao;s~.:: g.lr<mliert \.!inc lebcndigc Wl:ch clwrrkun, von rn I St udrum chu ch scim: Pcrsonhchkl:Jt' d :ts grit auch fur 1 r tu k nova, die I ·11 nn lcr Kostiim.tbtcilung Die m.rlen Kont tided 1 Schul~.:: und d1c Prager Qu tdn nn.tk t. Bildun ,.., 11 bm~se zu verm1ttdn d1 · k n Stull ntcn 1 1 n. d n ctg n n St.mdpunkt in Kun'\t und Bcr uf u !veta Tomanova, 2. rocnik (1984/85) Studie odevu zostvorca a kruhu \ . ·- H'het Ratkaiova, 1979/80) I l' nrona: Z iska 1dlplomo va praca, I •Ilona J6zsef szinhaz 1 o'l ~kc met, R. A. Beke, ~ '' 1yrn z inscenacie, ~ otlli / z tcchnickeho 1, • IO~Ilfk ( I• I tl u) I I/) J. B. Molie re: Mizantrop. R. P. Mikulik, S. + K.: l.Jelfnek, P: 12.4. 1970, koscyrn z inscemicie v Divadc lnorn studiu VSMU (mafba na za rnate) I '. I J0 : '"" Miroslav Matejka, Peter Caneckj, 2. rocru1c (1974175) 2. rOCnlk (1979/ 80) StUdia doboveho Studiaodevu kruhovej kon§trukcie divadelneho kostymu Hlny umelec I adis/m• ( /u((hk. .ttedJ a sccnogr.tfit.: VSMlJ sa moze cdkom bez Zdbt an pochvaht dkami vojcj pracl:. Nacelcsprofesorom l. Y)chodilom uz 1 c gencnkic .,vychodili'' chodnicky k uspechom dzinarodnych n.:I.Jciach. Ako kolega hcrcc marn wpttcl'nu rddost', lwei ma prcdsa len trochu t 1<tpt. lC n ic.: srnc lld .tkC j \IWVIll. Jr pko Sfl mi [JrJZJUtVa. ZC SCCI10grafia ll<lnl par t) ~.,;h kroCikov utickla dnp1 cdu a tn) sa budcme m11sicr' pori.tdn~..: dmut. dby smc moh li za-;a slavit spolocnc uspc~.:hy. Smc ".l tvtc;IJ n n.t druhom a .tk <;.t 'zajomnc ncinspiruJemt: podkop 1vmnc na~c \ nc diclo. CuntntcnLJ\ ncjsic zijc JaVisko hwu hcrcov tym via~: 1dol\ .u a. luno~.,;nujc divakov nit:itok. 011va dwmm, kon,uum , 1 hl: 1 Cc\ lebo mu thl' a sancu me iha pr c..: hru ale pr c t H)rbu, pre 07\ tnutic tvorivostt. M) shm ze pra\ c k tonmto nazot u rncru JC. l flCd, provoku JC 'brat J<;)avska skol.t Sl.:t: 110!!f3fl '. ( 19) lana Fifikovti, 3. roeru1c (1978179) Konstrukcie architektonickych detailov Frantisek Lipuik, 4. rocnik (1984/85) J. Hayden: Svet na mesiad Frantisek Liptak, 4. rocnik (1984/85) J. Hayden: Svet na mesiaci (maketa kostymu 2/3vefkosf figuriny, technicky textil) ' 0 I . 0 I :";9:-\;J , ol 1/;:,. : •• 0 ' Peter Canecky, 3. rocnfk (1980/81) Cvicenie z technickeho kreslenia , .. 1':!... ~ !II I : 0 ' Milan Ferencik, 1. rocnik (1973/74) Cvicenie z deskriptivnej geometrie oJ j j ·' (40) ( II ) Narodny u melec, p rofesor LADISLAV VYC HO DIL I Studium scenografie v CSSR bolo zaclenene ako odborna specia lizacia na A MU v Prahe a na VS MU v Bratislave. Scenickf vytvarnfci studuju na tychto skobich spolu s rezisermi, he rcami, teatro l6gmi, d irigcntm i a spcvakmi. Vyuka vychad za z nahfadu, ze scenografia je dramaticko-priestorova disciplina a nie disciplfna dekora tivneho maliarstva. I Skola ma od zaciatku samostatne D ivadelne st udio VSM U a rocne predvedie za ueasti verejnosti 4-7 inscemicii. I Stru ktu ra aj osnovy sko ly scenografie sa, pochopite fne, menili a vyvijali. Spociatku sa odbor ko ncipoval ako specia lizova ne stud ium a kazd y stude nt pred p rfcho do m na skolu muse! skonCit' dva roky studia na inej vysokej sko le (a rchitekturu a lebo malia rstvo). Ve l'a sa diskutovalo o to m, ci sa divade lna kostymo va tvo rba ma studovai samosta tne , a le bo spo locne so scenickym vytvarnictvom. Specia tizo vane studium kostymu sa cxpe rime ntalne o tvorilo ako vyuka spo lu so scenickym vjtvarnictvo m . I Ko ncepciu vyueovacie ho procesu predklad am v jej ,bistorickej" podobe z rok u 1965. I Z3kladna struktura studia scenickeho rytvamictva a d ivade\ne ho kosty mu Hlavna ulo ha rychovy: 1. Viest' adeptov k tomu, aby boli scho pnf ume lecke ho zazitku. 2. Poskytn ut im ta ke vedomosti, aby boli scbo pni tieto zazitky realizovat' vo svojej d iscipline. Tato dvoj p61ovost' mala byt' urcujuca pre vsetky p redmety. R ozde le nie predmetov: svojej pnk i v urcitej rov novahe vsetky disci pliny rytva rne ho umenia (architektu ru, socharstvo a maliarstvo). Ak cha pemc pr:ku divadelne ho vytvam fka kom plexne (scena, kostym a maska), nemozeme prist' k ine mu zaveru. I Pri rychove scenickych vytvarnfkov treba brat' do uvahy, ie pracuju na kolektfvnom diele, kde musia by( teoreticky jasne vzajomne vzrahy jednotlirych zloiiek a ich do pa d na celkove vyznenie d iela. Po p ri hlavnom predm ete maju dolezitu ulo h u teoreticke pre d mety, ktore by sa ma li v tom to smere skonkretizovai. I Plan vychadza zo skutocnosti, ze PrvY rok je pripravny, v dru hom roku sa studium deli na scenicke a televfzne rytvarnictvo a kost}imove rytvarnfctvo . I. rocnik, II. rocnfk, III. rocnfk,IV. rocnik,V. rocnik Pripravka. Scenicke a te lcvizne rytva rnictvo. Kosrymove vytvarnictvo. Statna 1. previer. 2. previer. zaverecna talcntu. talentu. skUska ---------------------------------- 1. SCENICKE VYT VAR Nicrvo I V p riebehu celc ho studia zastupuje priesto rovu disciplinu. Je hlavny m nosite To m ulo hyupevnovat' a rozvijat' scho pnost' u meleckeho zazitku stude ntov. Na tejto ulo he sa podieTaju aj vsetky ostatne predme ty. Prv:Y rok je p ri pravny. Od druM ho rocnika sa predme t deli na: a) ate lierovu pnku; b) pracu pre Divad e lne stud io VSMU a ine divadla. Tato praca je viazana na dra ma turgicke plli ny, preto nie je obsia hnuta v tom to programe. 1. semester V yrvarne discipHny Priesto rove Plosne Te6ria Technicke d isci pliny Tech n. realizacia Techn. javiskova Te6ria Divade lne discipHny I U k lady rezijnej tvo rby Z3klad y he reckej tvorby Te6ria d ra my Architektu ra Socharstvo M aliarstvo ·-..... cd cd ..... 01) 0 c:: ~ 0 C/) Vychova vychadza zo zasady, ze sceno graf spaja VO a) Vyzdoba javiska D ivade lnehostudia VSMU; b) kra tkodo be trojtyzdnove ulo hy, studje mate ria lo v a struktur v pioche a priestore, mate ria l ale bo struktura ako nastroj svetla. 2. sem ester a) trojtyzdnove kratkod obe priestorove ulohy, studia kocky, pre la movanie plochy, studia ho rizontu ; b) divad elny re lie f. Semester je zako nceny klauzuro u, ktora nadviizuje na d ane uloh y. Priesto rna danu litera rnu temu. 3. semester a) scena a koscymy (realizuje sa v p redmete zaklad y kost:Ymu) p re a nticku d ra mu. Navrh, maketa; (42) h) p raca pre Divadelne studio VSMU a lebo te leviziu . I AI> lSI A\ VYC 1101>11 4. semester n) seen a a kostymy pre stredoveku hru ; h ) praca pre studio a lebo televiziu. 5 semester n) shakespcarovskadrama; h ) pnka p re studio a lebo televiziu. fl semester u) Goldoni - Mo lie re - Com media dell'arte; h ) praca p re studio, televiziu a lebo ine divadlo. semester u) klasicka o pera; h ) praca pre studio, televfziu a lebo ine divadlo. S semester 11) domaca klasika; h ) pnica pre studio, televiziu a lebo ine divadlo. c) semester u) balct ; h) drama 19. storocia; c) pnica pre studio, te leviziu a le bo ine divadJo . I 0. semester u) drama 20. storocia - do maca ale bo zabranicmi; h ) praca p re studio, televfziu a lebo ine divadlo. 2 Z AKLA D Y A R CHITEKTURY 1 Predmet by ma l nadvazovai na historicky pre hfad interieru (hmotna kultu ra). PribliZii zasady tvorby moderne ho interieru (bytovej jedno tky) so zvlastny m n cte fo m na prevedenie a fun kciu. 1 MODELOV ANIE V prvo m roeni ku tre ba studentov oaucit zaklady rcprodukcneho socharstva. Namo de lovaf a odlia! d o for my a sadry styri archite kto nicke cla nky (gotika, rcncsancia, baro k, klasicizmus). Pripravii fonny pre pr:izd ninovu prax. v d ruho m rocnlku.sa studium zameriava na modelovanie hlavy, mo delovaoie figury a priest orove §tudie. I 4. KR ESLENI E A MALOY A NIE I Popri hlavnom predmete te nto pre dmet je druhy m hlavnym nosite fo m te nde ncie rozvijai v studentoch schopnosf umelecke ho zazitku. Poslucbac musi mat pre dpoklady: o) pre na maTovanie navrhu, h) p re namaTovanie kostymu, masky a c) diele nsku ma1bu. Ko nkretne: zatisie, nabytok, inte rie r, omame ntalna nrchitektfua, krajina, po rtret, fig6ra, diapozitivy. (43) In thl!( zcdwslmak Socmh'>t Republic I)c p.utmc nts uf See no •rnphy \\ er c C<>t.lblishcd ell the College of M li'>IC .111d Dr.mM in Prague .md at the College of Musrc.tnd Dram,\ 111 Br&~tblma. Sccnogrnphers study togcthcr With drrcctors. actors. thc,llrologuc<>. conductors. ami'Srngc n; at these college-;. rhc tc.lching progr.unmc is based on the premise th.tt sccnogmphy rs a drscrplinc of space char.lctcr md not that of dccorati\c p.untmg. I rom the very hcganning the School has it'> .mtonnmous 1 hc.1tric tl Studio .11 the College of Mus1c ::met I)r.una and has to present + 7 swgings to puhhc .tnnuall) I he SciH1111's st ructurc. as ""ell.ts rts tl:achrng pr ogr nmmc 11.1\ c been naturall) changing and dc\l!lopmg. IJornthc very beginnrng this SJK'l ralit:tl ion '"as t:om:civcd as a sp~.·cific. spccia I cour sc, and tach stwknt he lor c- having he en enrolled. had to attend courses 111 architl'durt.• or painting for t\\ o yc.1n;. I od.ty.• til 1he L'ourses as well ns art is tic 1r.1ining .trc conccntr.tlcd nt 1he ( Plkgc of r-.tusac and Dr .un.t B.tsrc structure of courses rn sccnogmphy ami the.\tr il,;,ll costume. J>rincrp.1l ohJCCtrvcs· I To guide thc adepts to.\cquare the abrlit} to ha\c .1rttstic ex per renee. In pro\ldc them with such 1scopcnfknowlcdgc th.1t they could he: .tblc tu m&~tcnahzt: the afore rncntron~..:d expencnccs in therr spcci,tlrzatrons. fhc tr.unm • r based on thc pr indplc th.tt a c no r.tphcr cmploy-; m hrs work c~ll pr.ICIIC~..:s of vasu.ll ,nts proporiiOII til) \\hen tr.\ining sccnn •r.tphcrs nne mu'>t h.tvt rn mind th.uthcy \\(Ilk rn tc tms "h rc tho.: rcl.ttiom.olrndrvidu.tl turnponcnts .llld the 11 rmpact on 1hell\ era II dtar.tctcr uf st.l mgs llltl'-l he d~:.trly distingurshcd thcnrctu;,tlly lh•o;rdc-., rh ·rr m·trn subject lho..:v havL' top:\\ g1cal tll..:ntH)II tn othct 1hcatr ical subjco..:h, whrch arc to he on~: r ted to th o;cnpc ot prohlern•iO[ thc;il ... pcu.thz.ttrun. I he pl. n ts I :1o;cd on the l.ro..:t th.tl the frr-;t year rs of p puttnr ch,tr.t(tcr whrl •nthc..,•condonc the 1 ur "r mury mto the fnlh wrn • ..,pccwhzatton-;. u n •r phy p10p~.:r ,md costume dcsi~n In 11 ohtudt !I em gr.tph)' represent It m.un td 1.. r tu.,tn·n •the nand Techniky: kresba tusom, lavirovana technika, akvarel, tempera, gvas. 5. ZAKLADY KOSTYMU (prescenickych vytvamfkov) I V prvom rocniku prebrat' zaklady kostymovej tvorby. Od 3. semestra sa zamerat na prakticku tvorbu v spolupraci s hlavnym predmetom. 6. DESKRIPTivNA GEOMETRIA I Uloha: Objasnit zakonitosti priestoru a ich zobrazovanie. Zakladne ulohy v premietani na dve priemetne, vzajo mna poloha dvoch rovin, priamky a roviny. Priemety jednoduchych geometrickych telies. Kuzelosecky. Axonometria, stredove premietanie, perspektiva, relief. Plochy pouzivane v scenografickej praxi: rotacne plochy, priamkove zborene plochy, skrutkove plochy atd'. Paralelne osvetlenie ploch. 7. DEJINY HMOTNEJ KULTURY I Pod at uceleny obraz o zivotnom style v jednotlivycb historickych epochach (byvanie, sposob spolocenskeho a rodinneho zivota). Doraz na tie obdobia, ktore sa najcastejsie vyskytuju v divadelnej literatUre. Predm'isky su chronologicke, sprevadzane obrazovou ilustraciou. Studenti by mali skicovat predmcty a interiery ako zdroj informacii pre vlastnu pracu. 8. DE JINY MALIARSTV A A SOCHA RSTV A I Strucny vyklad vyvinu so zretefom na vseobecne dejiny a vyvoj vedeckeho poznania, ktore sa odzrkadfovali v slohoch vytvarneho umenia. 9. DE JINY SCENOGRAFIE I Strucny vyklad vyvinu scenografie s dorazom na vyvoj divadelneho priestoru a divadelnej tecbniky (t'aZisko- 20. storocie). 10. TEORIA SCENOGRAFIE I Zakladne pojmy, kateg6rie a ryvoj v jednotlivych historickych etapach - so zretefo m na scenografiu 20. storocia. 11. D E JINY KOSTYMU I Ukazat', ako hospodarske, politicke a vyrobne ~me ny posobili na vyvin kostymu. Venovafsa doplnkom a skladbe koscymu a jeho estetickej, socialnej a psychologickej funkcii. Ku sk(•ske predpisat' seriu kresieb ako studium faktografie pre vlastnu pn'icu. 12. DE JINY ARCHITEKTURY I Typol6gia architektury. Osobitny zretel' venovaf divadelnej architektfue a interieru, ktory dominuje v divadelnej a televiznej tvorbe. 13. TECHNICKE KRESLENIE I Predmet, ktory studentov pripravf pre technicke riesenie realizacie scenickej vypravy. Nauka o vlastnostiach a spracovani zakladnych materialov (spajanie, konstrukcne clanky, zakladne matetialy: drevo, zelezo, textil a umele hmoty), organizacia vyroby, harmonogramy, jednotlive fazy (naznaky, technicka skUska). L4. VYBRATE STATE Z FYZIKY I lnformacia o hlavnych oblastiach, s ktorymi sa stretava seen icky vytvarnik. Statika, optika, zakladne pojmy o elektrine, zvuku a farbe. 15. JA VISKOV A TECHNIKA I Obsahuje: a) javiskovu techniku, b) osvetfovaciu techniku. I Hlavny doraz klasf na tvorivy prlstup k technike. Treba vytvorif system, ako ukazat studentom moznosti divadelnej techniky v umeleckej praxi. Napojenie na h lavny predmet. I Pri osvetfovacej technike predovsetk:Ym dosiahnut', a by kazdy student vcdcl prakticky osvetfoval' (fotografie, pokusne javisko). Prakticky vypracovat' niektore efekty. Scitanie a odcitanie farieb. 16 . FOTOGRAFIA I Zaklady fotografie. 17. DE JINY DIVADLA I Zakladn e historicke epochy s dorazom na divadlo 20. storocia. Prednasky usmernif na scenicke vytvamictvo. Ako jednotlive epochy suviseli s filozofiou, vedou a v'Jvojom vytvarneho umenia a ostatnymi umeniami. 18. REZIJNA TVORBA I K hre urcenej pre hlavny predmet demonstrovat (44) develop the students· ability to havt.l artistic experience. Other subJects share in this task, too. 1 The first year is of preparatory character. From I he secono year the subject divides into stuoio work, and the work for Theatrical Studio of the College of Music and Drama and other theatres or television. 19. HERECKA A POHYBOV A vYCHOVA 1 The first tasks are focused on the study of materials I H ospitacie na tejto tvorbe. and structures in space, on an area, and on the investigation of illumination effects. The practical task 20. DIE LENSKA PRAX oeals with the stage decoration on special occasions. I Zabezpecit prakticky styk s profesionrunym I During the next term the students work on the divadlom a divadelnymi dieh1ami. Prax trva kaidy rok tasks connected with solving the space - on studies of 14 dni pred zapocatlm skolskeho roku: cube, cylinder, overlapping spaces, open work areas. a) prax na javisku, The task culminates by the elaboration of horizon. b) stolarska, zamocnicka, kasirnicka diem a, a concrete historical building using the system of c) maliarska dieliia, theatrical relief. d) konstrukcne oddelenie, 1 From the third term on, the students make ::.tage ~) vlasenkarska a krajcirska dielna. and costume design (dummies, designs) in their studio work, in such a way that they deal with all important 21 . MAI.:OV ANIE V PRIRODE phenomena of dramatic works and theatre in I Sucastou prazdninovej praxe je kreslenie historical order of succession (antique drama, a mafovanie v etnograficky a historicky zaujimarych comedy, medieval plays, Shakespeare, baroque krajoch a mestach v CSSR. Tato prax trva tiez 14 dni drama, opera, commcdia dcll'arte, local dassicworks, v priebehu prazdnin. ba llet, the 19th century drama, the 20th century drama). Each term closes up with a work. maoe 1 Diplomova praca sa sklada z prakticke j autonomously by the students, on the basis of the a teoretickej casti. Prakticka cast'diplomovej prace je in[ormation they gained in their term works. samostatml. praca na scenickej a kostymovej vyprave I The work for the Theatrical Studio of the College v profesionalnom divadle. of Music and Drama is connected with dramaturgic plans of the theatre, and the students materialize their designs in the artistic decoration workshops of the Zasluzila umelkyna, profesorka Slovak National Theatre. I:UDMILA PURKYNOVA I Diploma work and the final state examinations. 1 Vyucba je obsahovo koncipovana v nadvaznosti na · I Diploma work consists of a practical part - the work on a setting and costume design in a professional lcoreticke i odborne predmety ucebneho phinu theatre, and of a theoretical one, consisting of (I zohfadnuje v sirokom zabere kriteria umelecke a written evaluation of the given problem, either from i ideove. Vytvar a pre disciplinu divadelneho kostymu the sphere of scenography or history. The studies close vzdelanostn e zazemie s estetickym, faktografickym up by state examinations and defence of the diploma H filozofickym zazemim. work. 1 Divadelny kostym tlmoci ryznam dramatickebo 1 fhc number of students at the Department is cliela v priamom a bezprostrednom kontakte - herec determined by the needs of practice, that is why the adivak. specializations can be studied in cl!rtain intervals only. I Predmet zdruzuje specifika kostymovej tvorby pre Cinohru a hudobno-dramaticke divadJo . LUDMILAPURKYNOVA I Cinohem e inscenacie sucasnej dramatiky nie su pn1ezitostou pre atraktlvnu rytvarnu pracu. Ale pre 1 Theatrical costume represents the meaning of rytvamika su zakladoym prostriedkom a kl'ucom pre a dramatic work in direct contact bel ween actor and pochopenie dramatickych vztahov, napati aich audience. The subject differentiates bewecn the umeleckych vyjadrenL Nedoslednym respektovanim specific features of costumes for drama and music " ncdostatocnym vyjadrenim sucasnych zivotnych takladne postupy rezijnej tvorby so zvlastnym a etefom na rytvarnu zlozku. Vovyssich rocnlkoch v predstihu pripravovat rezijne rozbory hier, urcene pre studium v hlavnom predmete. (45) K abinet kostymovcj tvorby U mclecko-dc ko racnc dielnc Slovenskeho mirodneho d ivadla, maliarcn v ' dio Dtvadelne stu V~ M U (47) tendencii sa narusa najvnutornejsie a najucinnejsie prepojenie medzi divakom a hercom. I Vytvarna praca v hudobno-dramatickom divadle spociva na odlisnych principoch a vyjadrujesa inymi prostriedkami. Tuto tvorbu vyrazne ovplyvnuje e motivnost hudby a abstrahujuci komponent plastiky pohybu herca. Zakladna logika dramatickych vzt'ahov a charakteristika postav je podobna ako v cinohernej dramatike, ale rytvame prostriedky sa nepomerne ryraznejsie uplatnuju a dostavaju ioy dramaticky a charakterotvornyryraz. Dramaticke napatie a ucinok sa vyMiraju realnymi i fiktivnymi materiaJmi a kostymy spolu s interpretom ozivaju v pohybe, vo svojich tvarovych obmenach, v priestore a svetle, vyvljaju sa amenia v spojenf s hudbou. I Dolezitym faktorom je vzt'ah scenickeho kostymu k historickemu odevu. Odev, ako jedna zo sucasti kulturnych dejin fudstva, podlieha rovnakym principom a zakonitostiam doby ako architekrura a vyrvarne umenie. To sa tyka hist6rie prave tak ako sucasnostL I Z nalost' historickcho odevu umoznuje poznaf a najst' tie prvky, ktore svojlm vyznamom spajaju nasu dobu s minulymi epochami a ktore pomahaju vyjadrit mystienku podriadenu sueasnej umeleckej zlikooitosti arytmu. I Vymedzenic svojbytnosti divadelneho kost:Ymu a civilneho odevu urcuje jednoznacne bistoricka i sueasna faktografia . I Otazka realizacie kostymovej rypravy uzko suvisl s tvorbou. Je umeleckou sueas(ou konecneho artefaktu - kosrymovej rypravy na javisku - v hereckej akcii, dramatickej gradacii a integracii vsetkych komponenlov, urcujucich konecoy rysledok ioscenacie. I Ako pedag6g kost:Ymovej tvorby mam snahu v priebehu studia poskytnut a vytvorit atmosferu tvoriveho naplitia, kulturu pracovneho prostredia a naucif remeslo - mct6du tvorivej, realizacnej a organizacnej prace. I Na nasej skolc spojenie ryucby s praxou je zakladnou koncepciou pedagogickej prace. Vyucba prebieha v uzkej spolupnki a nadvliznosti na predmet scenicke vytvarnictvo. I V roku 1968, ked' sa zriadilo specializovane st(tdium divadelneho kostymu, koncipovato sa podia spolocneho ueebneho planu, v ktorom boli specializovane tieto predmety: koscymove rytvarnfctvo, realizacna technika, dielenska a javiskova prax, technol6gia materialov, strihova technol6gia a ryvoj historickeho odevu. I Styri samostatnc uvodnc temy studia kostymovej tvorby mozu byt' rozdelene do niekofkych semestrov. 1. Dramaticko- vytvarny vyraz I Kontrasty (napriklad v spolocenskom diani, emotivnom prejave a vneme, v prirode, priroda kontra technika a pod.). Praca je zaloiena na studiu kontrastov dramatickeho napatia, ich splyoutia a vyjadrenia jednotnym vyrvarnym nazorom. Pracuje sa klasickymi i netradicnymi rytvarnymi technikami a praca sa koncf trojrozmernou maketou. 2. Literarna a hudobna terna (folk/6ma u!ma) I Vychadza zo skusenosti a prace na prvej ulohe. Moze cerpat' z historickych pramenov a vofne ich stvamit'. Vyjadrit v dvojrozmernom aj trojrozmernom navrhu . Realizovat'jednu postavu 1:1. 3. Charakterorvomy kostym I Antiiluzlvna faktografia. 1 Studium sucasnej typo16gie clove ka, sucasneho odievania a rozdietov odevu: socialne, etnicke, spoloccnske, psychologicke a pod. djferencie. I Studie vyrazu tv:he - masky. I Ulohu d'alej aplikovat na pnku so sueasnym aj historickym odevom pri tvorbe kostymorych ryprav. 4. Emotivny vyraz kostymu - forba a pohyb 1 Studie historickeho divadetneho kost:Ymu a jeho vztah k dobovemu civilnemu odevu. 1 Rekonstrukcia doboveho divadelneho kost:Ymu 1:1. I Navrby kostymov pre balet. I Praca s draperiou a farbou, ich pouzitie vpohybe. 1 Otoha sleduje doriesenie kostymovej vypravy ako celku a jej vzfah k scene. Zdruzuje dramaticku gradaciu kostymov a vzajomne vzfahy medzi postavami zo stranky farebnej a tvarovej kompozicie. I Vyucba kostymovej tvorby musivsebezhrnut vsetky tieto momenty, musi viesf studenta od najjednoduchsich postupov k najzlozitejsfm, a to v suvise s priestorom, do ktoreho kostym vstupuje a s ktorym vytvara vizualnu a vyznamovu jednotu. Zasluzily umelec, docent OTIOSUJAN I V umeni ziadne trvale a konecne riesenie neexistuje. Absolvent skoly musi by{ preto schopny (48) dlhodobo sa rozvljat v praxi. So zretefom na rychly wtvoj divadla a insccnacnych postupov je pt avdepodobnc, ze sa po vstupe do praxe stretne 'l llplnc inou situaciou, nez v akej pracuje does v skole. M o ho pripravit docs na buducu zmenenu situaciu 111~ . aby maximalne uspel? Aj ked' sme, samozrejme, ~odl<lpni vyabstrahovat z dlhodobeho trendu ryvoja ld o tcndencic, tieto poznatky nestacia nato, aby sa d.tlt absolutnc konkretizova(v uccbnych planoch. I !\/ova kvalita vznika v umcni ten v kontexte il nadv~iznosti na sucasne progreslvne tendencie, ich dllhtm rozvijanim a lebo ich negaciou. Zlikladnou podmienkou adaptabilnosti a tvorivosti absolventa v huducnosti je tcda jeho htboka, intimna a tvoriva .putost' s tym, co je v divadlc najprogresivnejsie dills. 1 Nnjprogresfvncjsic tendencie vedu k timovej p1 11d. Zakladnou mct6dou prace v time je ko munik~kia, dial6g medzi jednotlirymi zlozkami IVortveho stabu. Vcdoce postavenie v time si tut:ltovava reziser. Nic je to vsak uz nadumelec II .,au tor" insccnacie z cias avantgardy. Zastoj lt•dnotlivych zlozick je relatfvne vyvazeny, umerny ich 111 lnosu k formovaniu ideovo-umeleckej koncepcie lnsc.:cmicie, ktora je je j organizujucim prindpom. Vyraznym znakom sucasnych inscenacnych pt incipov su vzajomnc presahy v kompetenciach ••llmnostiach jednotlirych zloziek. Vo vrcboloych lll\(.'~ll aciach su tendencie k synteze take silne, ze je lllCkl!dy nemozne identifikovat' podieJ jednottirych , k nov tvorivcho timu na rysledku - inscenacii. I hurakteristicke je cfalej usilie 0 interpretaciu die la. Nulichava potreba spotocenskej vypovede a hlboka opt>loeeoska angazovanosf tvorcov vedu cas to k 111 amatizaciam aktualnych tern alebo rozsiahlych llh:rarnych diet. Mladc slovenske profesionalne divadlo <llll;olvovalo ten to vyvoj v skratke. u nas premenu od pnpisneho realizmu cez reminiscencie na avantgardu II) podnes zazila jedna generacia divadelnikov. Skola 11l mi. V relatfvne knitkej hist6rii katedry sa preto IICt<hame s vyraznymi zmenami v koncepcii ryucby. 1'1v(i gencracia absolventov bola vychovavaoa 1 lntcnciach iluzivneho realizmu. Sesfdesiate roky ,unmcnaju odklon od tychto tendencii. 0 spravnosti 1tcdajsieho smerovania skoly svedcia umelecke ~~~nbnosti, ktore v tom to obdobl skolu absolvovali. Vyvoj sa nezastavil, denne sme koofrootovanl lh)V(}U situaciou. Ukladnou motivaciou pre upravy ~lllKcpcie hlavneho predmetu a metod.iky II 'I) pedagogickej prace je usilie o maximalnu aktualnosf vyucby. Cie fom je pripravit studenta po technickej stninke tak, a by bol schopny pohotovo riesit' proble my a formulovat' postoje; rozvljaf je ho tvorive scbopnosti, teda vychovavat' umelecku osobnost' s vlastnym umeleckym mizorom a pevnym ideov)im zazemim. Predpokladom pedagogickej prace je 6zka spatosf s umeleckou praxou a pokrokovymi tendenciami do macej a svetovej divadelnej k ultury. I V hlavnom prcdmete, v sulade s trend om vyvoja, akcentujeme d ramaturgicke a rezijne aspekty tvorby, schopnost' studenta koncepcne myslief. Predmet integruje vyucbu pocas cele ho studia. Ostatne maju cha rakter pomocnych prcdmetov a vytvaraju podmie nky pre pnicu v hlavnom predmete. I Vychadzame z nasledujucej premisy: scenografia sa koncepcne podie fa na vytvarani javiskoveho diela. G raficka dokumcntacia sceny, tak a ko aj dramaturgicka priprava predstavenia a praca rezisera s hercom su podmienujucimi, a le pomocnymi stupnami, ktore maj(l komunikatlvny charakter. Artefaktom je predstavcnie. I Pre rozvinutie talcntu stude nta v tychto intenciach vytvarame predpoklady v me todike vyucby: 1. Impulzom pre pracu v hlavnom pred me te je rozbor textu a vypracovanie vytvarno-rezijnej koncepcie. (Spoluucast' dramaturga a rezisera.) 2. Pracovny proces pocas celcho semestra sa bliZi pnici v tvorivom time. 3. Zaldadnou met6dou prace je budovanie priestoru na principe skicovania mizansccn. I Hierarchiu uloh podriad'ujemezasade: od jednoduchSieho k zlozitejsiemu. Prvy semester - transpozicia pocitu z basne a lebo piesne do divadelne ho priestoru. V d'aiSich prechadzame v atelie rovej tvorbecelymi dejinami svetovej dnimy. V klauzurnych pnkach zadavame spravidla realizaciu tej istej hry a lebo nametu v inom zanri. I Pri koncipovani predme tu vychadzame zo zasady, ze scenograf musi vo svojej pnici spoj it' tie to kompone nty: 1. Ako zakladny predpoklad vsetky discipliny vytvarneho ume nia. 2. Schopnost' umeleckcho zazitku z literarnej alebo hudobnej predlohy divadelncho diela a jeho interpretacie vo vytvarno-rczijnej koncepcii pripravovaneho predstavenia. 3. Schopnost' transponovai prijaru koncepciu do divadelneho priestoru. 4. Schopnost' realizovai prijatu koncepciu. JARMlLA C IHANKOVA-SEMIANOVA I I Pre dme t ma liarstva a grafiky pa tri k pomocnym predmeto m vyuky scenickeho a kostymoveho vytvarnlctva na VSMU. Uz pri tale ntovych skuskach sa kladie vefky doraz na schopnosi v mafbe a kresbe. I Studium predmetu sa realizuje v deviatich semestroch - tyzdenne tri hodiny mafby a hod ina grafiky. D e lenic jc iba nimcove, vyuka sa zvacsa prelina podfa ulo h. SkoHsa vytvame videnie, citenie a prejav. Studuje sa tvar a priestor, te6riasvetla a farby, farebnej harmo nic, kontrastu a kompozicie ! tvoria sa k6pie diel starych majstrov, anatomicke studie, zatisia, krajina, architektfua, portret, draperi oblecena postava, akt. Posluchaci sa nimcovo oboznamuju s grafickymi technikarni a zakladmi uzitej grafiky (plagat, graficka uprava, pismo). 1 Pri tejto vyuke je dolezita prazdninova prax v prlrode. T rva dva tyzdne. Zucastnuju sa jej studenti spolu s pe dag6gom maliarstva a grafiky a pedag6gom dejln ume nia. Pri vybere lokaHt sa uprednostnuju historicky a etnograficky zaujimave miesta. I Ako pedag6g pristupujem ku kaidemu studentovl individualne. R espektuje m je ho osobitosti v nadani ana nich staviam dane ulohy. I D overa v studentove schopnosti, zadavanie ulo h s presne vymedzenymi technickgmi moznosiami, no aJ; uloh s maximalnou m ierou s lobody vyjadrenia- tos4 met6dy vychovy buduceho scenografa. STANISLAVA VANICKOVA I Predmet kostymova realizacia ucl studentov systematicky pracovaf od mivrhu az po fimilny vyrobok - divadclny kostym . Z plosnej kresby vytvorif trojrozmcrnyobjekt v textile. I Uvodom do problematiky je navrh odevu s mini malnym remeselnym zasaho m zo stvo rca, kruh a lebo ich kombinaciou (zmnozene kruhy, stvorce, kombimkia stvorca a kruhu). Stude nt pracuje s cistymi, vefkymi tvarmi, skicuje v polovicnej mierko a vybrany variant realizuje v mierke 1: 1 v textile. Ten to vytvarny mate ria l sa musl vytvarne spracovat (farbou, strukturou, ornamentom, patinou) podfa typu odevu. 1 v d'alslch piatich semcstroch sa posluchac postupne oboznamuje s historick.Ymi odevmi (so strihmi, autcntickymi casfami a ich doplnkami). (5 Praca pozostava: I . z koplrovania dochovanych strihov 1:1; 2. tato k6pia sa realiz ujc v potrebnej vefkosti; 1 realizuje sa v pomocnom materiali; 4. realizuje sa v textile, vytvarnym dotvorenlm 1mituje au tent icky historicky odev. Kazda praca sa realizuje na postavu, nie na figurinu. th 1 new quality in arts can generate only in context with present day progressive It n kncics by <.lc.!velup111g or negating them. To t•ducate a personality, an artist with his own views and .,n 1<.1 ideological background, capable of further dt vdopmcnt is the final objective of the School's 11 •ning. I In the main subject, in accord with the trend or d ' dopment, the aspects of dramaturgy and direction 11 ... tressed together with the student's ability to think 11 conceptional w<1y. Scenographic work is the main ,u p.:ct integrating all courses. Other subjects creatt· til ·unditions for the work 111 the principal one. I I he conception of the subject is based on the p• mciple, that scenography must combine the lollt1wing components proportionally: I \II the disciplines of visual arts (architecture, Jl• 1111ing, and sculpture) .Is bas1c preconditions. 1 f hc student himself must be able to experience 11 tlstil·ally a literary or music work of theatrical • h 11.1cter and to build its conception from the aspect uf '''ual arts and dirl'Ction. The work's 1111 •rrctarion. I k must be able to transpose this artistic C:\i rience in accord with the accepted conception ' l theatllcal space. Materialization of an artefact. I I he College gives the fo llowing conditions in h': ' hing methodology to enable the student to '"' d op his talent: I. nalysis of text and elaboration of conception lllllll the aspect of arts and direction is the impulse for lh l \\ mk in the main subject. (Cooperation of 1 d r 1111aturge and a director.) ' Working process situates work in creative teams 1111 1ughout th~.; term. ( fhe student must defend his "" k in a dispute with the dramaturgc and the ll11 ~.: tnr.) 1111 I continuity ( ~I) 3. Space building on the principle of mise-en scenes outlir11ng is the basic method of work. STANlSl AVA VANI('KOVA I Jn the subject of costume matcrialitation the students arc t.tught how to materialize a design in three dimensional textile object. The work begin"> with artistic formation of clothes from squares and circles. The students gmdually get tasks demanding greater skills copying the styles of historical costumes on the basis of preserved authentic material, so that they could learn the constructional and shape regulations of clothing in individual peliods. The tasks arc carried out1n auxilliary material and by artistic completion the students imitate historical costumes. They work with living models not with dummies. J/\RM IJ .A CII lANKOVA-SEMIANOVA I Painting and graphic art arc subjects which arc to guide the -.tudents and teach them to be able to materialize promptly their ideas of settings and costumes in designs. Already at the entry talent exnrninations great attention is paid to the investigation of the student's nrtistic talent. The '>UbJcct trains artistic seeing, feeling, and expression. Individual tasks arc aimed at developing the ability to cope with shape, space, light, and colour and that to imitate historical paintings. The subject deals with graphic ar ttcchniques and pr 111ciplcs of applied graphic art. lloliday practice aimed at studying histm ical m chitccturc, pmnting in the open. and getting familiar with objects of historical and ethnographic significance represent part of the traming. NetA~r~•IYt>J ~ 'N.C.Vr;li - I"StJb?/l'll/'N//JS/1VI?.N/r fJP "J~l. Pt1)"llk~yl./lt ~i>U:STW~ LCt&'f-2 /'ll'M n...,.,, .. """"-.~_, Gita Polonyova, I. rocnfk (J 970171) Sofokles: Antigona Jaroslav Valek, 3. roenik (1980/8 1) Sofokles: Filoktetes dagogicko-vychovncj cinnosti na katcdre. ktoni sa o~icr:• progrcsivnc myslicnkO\·C zazemic. 0 prcvcrcnc lllCtodtckcAf~OS!UJ}Y ' . ) n:1rocnosf umclcckej divadelnej praxc. Vo vycho\ c ncmozc chybat r cdov~ctkym poznanic, jasnc formulovany filozoficky n:lzor, 1 lldcckc osobnostne vyznanic a ovlatlanic. nickl'dy aj n.:mesclnych tdlicich technik. Profcsorovi Latlislavovi Yychodilovi a jcho danym spolupracovnikom sa podarilo uchopit vychovny pt oces ,omplcxnom vidcni a v ncust<ilomnacluidzani novych foricm . prostricdkov.l en takym sp6sohom sa im darf o.bjavovat~schopnc~stJ >sluchacov a formova( ich do o:sobnostncho prcJavu. V sucasnost 1 sa >ZClllC pochvaJi( V nasom divadeJnictve viaccrymi individualita~li , ore vysli z tejto katedry a ktore si razia smclu .t 'yraznu cestu melen lomacom ccskoslovenskom, ale aj zahranicnom umem. (52) ( 'i3) Prof. Ph Dr. Jan Boor I 0 slovcnskcj sccnografii sa dnes pisu Milan Ferencik 3. rocnfk (1975176) Navrhna univcrzatnu sccnu pre Sha kc spearove hry knihy, venuje sa jej patricne miesto v kritikach noryeh inscenacil (to nebyvalo!), diskutujc sao nej na konferenciach a symp6ziach, jej vysledky sa hojne zverejnuju na vystavach doma i v zahranici, z ktorych si prinasa ccny a vyznamcnania, ma woje me no a vaznost' vo svetc ... To vsctko je radostnc, ale je za cym vcfa pnke i zapasov. Levi podiel na tychto snahach i uspechoch mala na zaCiatku a rna i nadalcj Katedra scenickcho vytvamictva a kostymu na Divadelnej fakulte VSMU, ktora od zalozcnia skoly u robila obrovsky kus prace na vyvinc slovenskej scenografic, vychovala takmervsetkych dnes profilujucich slovenskych scenografov, ba i mnohych zahranicnych. Zasluhu na tom maju vsctci jej pedag6govia na celc s mirodnym umelcom prof. Vychodilom, kton!ho vcfke umenie i medzim1rodne rcnomc je jcj najvacsfm kapitalom. Mozno pre to s d6vcrou hfadief aj do buducnosti a vyslovit pcvne presvcdcenic, 7e tato katcdra bude i nadalcj jednou z najplatnejsich na Divadclnej fakulte VSMU a ze zostanc zarukou bohateho pokroku nasej scenografic i divadelncho umcnia vobec. F. Schille r: M . Stua rtova . R : M.Kakos, S: M . Hafsahlovd, K : C. Juriko vci, P: 5. 12 .• L977 Divadelne studio VSMU Peter Canecky, 3. rocnfk(l 980/8 L) W. S hakespeare: Romeo a Julia (54) (55) l / ¥: (if. / ·"~' ~ !, f I ~ § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • A I' f(}()tsrEU WI I I ~/1/'e.SSM- • \ '\ • c \ \ .,..:j\...=--· Vladimir Cap, 3. rocnik (1980/81) W. Shakespeare: Vesele panie z Windsoru • ·- ··- > Ntlrodny ume/ec. pro/ Jozef Budsky I Ncnazdavam sa, ze mozno pridaf cstc daco ncvyslovcnc ku konstatovaniu, ze odbor scenografic na VSMU v Bratislavc v jcho pouccnosti, rozhl'adcnosti a konccpcii stlidia, jcho cicl'och a preukaznnych vysledkoch bol vzdy na urovni vcl'kcho umcniil at vorby jcho zakladatcl'a a hlavneho pedag6ga na tcjto skolc - mirodncho umcka prol'csora Ladislava Vychodila. I Formuhicic ako Lake ncm6zu nic viae ako pribliznc vystihnti( tcmu Povazujcm prcto za potrebnc len zaznctmcnat', zc Ladislav Y)chodil ako lllllL' kc I\\)[ ca-Sl'l' ll< )!!1 a r (I pcdag<')g prcdhdwl S\ () j cas \'tom, zc urncnie divadclncj sccnografic a jeho pcdagogiku ncchc.ipal ako spricvodnu alebo dokonca ilustrativnu zlozku javiskovcho dicla. a le ako jcho zakladny komponcnt. ako javiskovo-dramaticky priestot a k c i c chivno prc<ltym, nez (56) s sfonnuloval pre takto chiipanu a citenu scenografiu adekv{itny az. I DokJadom taktoch<l.pancj scenografic su studijnc plany tohto n horu spolu s pcdagogickou praxou vnitanc skutocnosti. zc sa odbo1 :-. nografic - spolu s odhormi rczie a hcrcctvn - nacluidzal pod s ,focnou strcchou Divadclnc j fakulty a zc sa posluch<ici sccnografic. I fCJl1 UZ SpOllllflUllYCh oclhorOV, ZUCaStJlOVali 0(.) SpOJOCil~j (')f'CdJl(lSk(' ' ·minarnch, navysc s posluchacmi divadelnej vcdy. Ak hovorfmc. sa javiskovc diclo uskutoci'tujc v pricstore a case. ' .u.lrujcmc lym s(tcasnc zakladne dimenzic bytia. Priest or rovnako ,1 , myslcnic a hcrcc su v ustavicnom pohybe.lcho ako v zivotc. ani \ tviskovom umcnl ncjcstvujc nijak::l stalos( pnivc tak, ako nejcstvujc 11 1ka konccnost. zc (57) Peter(;anecky, 3. rocnik (1980/81) W. Shakespeare: Romeo a Julia Pavol Cisarik, 4. rocnik (1980/81) J.B. Moliere: Tartuffe Jaroslav Valek, 3. rocnik (1980/81) W. Shakespeare: Romeo a Julia Prof. lng. arch. Du.~an Kuzma I Katedra scenografic a kostymoveho vytvarnfctva VSMU v Bratislave vyznamnym sposobom zaplnila medzeru vo vychove mladych scenografov, kostymovych vytvarnfkov v nasom umeleckom skolstve. lste kontakty s touto katedrou umoznili mi zoznamit' sa s jej pracou i sledovat jej vysledky. I Chcel by som vyzdvihnllf jeden z kladov umeleckej pedagogiky, spocivajuci v tom, ze nevychadza z dekorativistickych aspektov, ale ze sa usilujeo priestorovu scenografiu. Ten to pohl'ad suvisi s mojim (58) ( ~9) a . . ,# <'.,., .. Rastislnv Bohus, 4. rocnfk (1971172) J . Offenbach: H offmanove rozpn\vky ;!/!;· A. S. Puskin: Tri male tragedic. R : B. Uhfor, J. Praimary, S + K: J. Zavarsky, P:9.3.1973 Divadelnestudio V SMU tvorivym odhnrom, no domnicvam sa. :I.e uvcdcny umcle<.·ky postup otvara inspiru juci priest or. ktoreho p6dorys d;lva rdiscrovi viaccr tvorivc moznostJ I 6alcj by som chcel zdot aznti skutocno:,t. zc na prad prcvaznc 1 viicsiny absolvcntov vidno snahu vych,H.lzaf vo svoj~j horh z obsahovcho naboja insccnovancho diclaa ncubcrc~fsacesto u apri6t nych postul<l.tov ci tcndcncif. Poznatkm jc zaistc viae, ale tict dva v tom to rozsahu povazu jcm za podstatnc, ktorc hod no rozvfja( •II f1 / Al)y o~ • :tiA v lmd(tcnosh (60) (6 1) f/"f'ftlt.' 4 $ 1,\f'f'_.(', A-'\ 'f•II'V)" 11'111~1'. Vladimir Cap, 4. rocnlk (1981/82) R. Wagner: Tristan a Izolda JosefJelinek, 4.rocnik (197 1/72) J. Offenbach : Hoffmanove rozpravky .. c ... ( ' ~ , - ? .·....... ....••• •• u .. .. - "' '~ .. r ~ "" ,. ......... ,~ . ~ -· ..~ '. ,. .... (63) i:i! ' '/ -~ (62) ..... ... ~-- .~',. ....... ' •.. ·" .. \. "-. }\~. ~ \ ' ..... .. l ~: .... ...• Tomas Berka I Patrim dnes uz k strednej generacii absolventov Vychodilovej skoly. Pred dvadsiatimi rokmi tato skola v intenciach eur6pskeho i mimoeur6pskeho scenografickeho skolstva hrala nesporny prim; a mena Vychodil, Purkyiiova, Bezakova lakali ku studiu posluchacov z roznych kutov sveta. Pretoze na nej studoval maly pocet domacich studentov, bola to vlastne medzinarodna skola. Myslim, ze k tomu nedoslo len vdaka umeleckym 6spechom a medailam, ktore tito pedag6govia ziskali na svetov)fch scenografickych a kostymovych prehliadkach. Vychodilova skola lakala domacich i zahranicnycb posluchacov najma nekonvencnosfou pedagogickych metod, moznosfou studentov ciastocne participovai na koncepcii v)fuky hlavnych predmetov, nevsednou toleranciou umeleckej osobnosti profesora Vychodila ku studentskej nezrelosti a v neposlednom rade jeho osobnyro, takmer rodinnym vzfahom ku kazdemu ziakovi. Pre mila, -ktdry som prisiel k prof. Vychodilovi zo studia architektury, ten to krok znamenal 6nik z prostredia neuprosnej exaktnosti do ,,rise divov". Bolo to paf rokov novych, necakanych tern, zaujimavycb a blavne nenalinajkovanych umeleckych programov, stretnuti s mnozstvom zaujimavych fudi. I Mimoriadne priazniva pedagogicka konstelacia na prelome sesfdesiatych a sedemdesiatych rokov nam umoznila pravideln9 styk s takymi osobnosfami ako bol Budsky, Zachar, Zaborsky, Huba, Karvas, Kosler, Kriska ... Navyse Vychodilova skola mala v tych rokoch v)fsostne atelierovy charakter. V atelieri sme travili vsetok vofny cas. Vsetko sme tvorili i vyrabali v skole. V atelieri sapo veeeroch debatovalo s ostatnymi kolegami zo skoly i mimo nej. Umoziioval to neobmedzeny prevadzkovy cas vdaka dislokacti atelierov v budove byvalej fary na Panenskej ulici - teda mimo areal skoly. To vsetko uz patri minulosti - vacsina pedag6gov i podoba atelierov. I Dnes chodim opaf do tejto skoly - pre zmenu ako asistent prof. Vychodila a doc·. Sujana. Ale to je UZ ina skola- nova, umiestnena v starodavnej Academii Istropolitane, skola dostojna co do minulosti a vedm, ze i do buducnosti. Je na nas mladsich, a by sme o dobry kredit Vychodilovej skoly vo svete neprisli. (64) lozef Ciller ' Scenograf dneska potrebuje vzdelanie divadelne a architektonicke. Potrebuje znalosti technicke, technologicke. Musf vediet o vsetkom nieco a 0 niecom vsetko. Droveii skoly je dana trojuholnfkom, ktocy ohranicuju: koncepcia, , radlcia a pedagogicky zbor. Je nasfm specifikom, ze scenografia sa studuje na Divadelnej •akulte. Tu som poznal divadlo, svojich zivotnych spolupracovnikov, ~ ktorymi spolupracujem dodnes a dostal som rozsiahlu profesionalnu orientaciu. 1 Tu som po prv)f raz vide! v skolskom divadelnom studiu vo svctlc 1 flektorov realizovane to, co som vymyslel. I Tu som zacal byt spolutvorcom tradicie tejto skoly. Tesfm sa, ked' mozem k rctazi tradicic prilozif ohnivko 6spechu. I Vsetci nasi pedag6govia boli aktivnymi pioniermi a spolutvorcami slovenskeho divadla, preto aj nasa priprava a vclenenie sa do profesionalneho divadclneho zivota prebiehalo organicky. Mona Hafsahlowi I V rokoch 1973 - 1978 studovala som scenicke v)ftvarnfctvo pod vcdenlm profesora Ladislava Vychodila, ktory rna naucil divadelne mysliet. Nevyzadoval len remeselnu zdatnosf. Naucil rna chapat ~cenografiu ako zlozku celkovej strukttiry divadla. Inspiroval nas "- netradicnemu vyuzitiu materialu, svetla, farieb a priestoru. Odvtedy jl pre mila jasne, ze seen a rna byf funkcna, rna odkryvat nove vyznamy a myslienkovo podnecovaf ostatnych spolupracovnikov. I Profesorka Ludmila Purkyiiova rna v priebehu studia podporovala v hfadani mojho vlastneho vyrazu vo sfere modemeho kostymoveho vytvarnictva. Vzdy mala na mysli vytvarnu a myslienkovu jednotu predstavenia a najma vystihnutie charakterov jednotliv)fch postav. (65) Gila Polonyova, 4. rocnfk ( I 973/74) Mtlan Ferencik, •1. rocnik ( L976/77) B. Brecht: Zobracka opera A Visncvskij: Optimisticka tragedia (67) ...• ..... ... . • Mona Hafsnhlovd, 4. rocnik (1976/77) 13 . Brecht: Muzako muz Miroslav Matejka, 4. rocnlk(1976/77) B. Brecht: Muiako muz (68) (69) . I I •• • • fl~ Gita Polonyovti, 4. roenik (J 973174) M . Gorkij: D eti. R: B. Uhltir, S: J. Zavarsky, I. Witkiewitcz: Vodna sticpka K: N. Simunovti, P: 23. 2. 1974 Divadelnc studio VSMU Nod'a Simunova, 5. rocnfk (1975176) b. von Horvath: Kazimir a Karolina Maria Zubajova, 4. rocnlk (1975176) K. Cape k: Biela nemoc (70) (71 ) Vladimir Suchanek I Bot som jednym z tych, co ukoncili studium scenografie, ked sa tento odbor na skole len zacfnal formovaf. Najzaujimavejsie boli pre nas prve stretnutia - prve inscenacne postupy, ktore sme ako studenti navrhovali a realizovali v Divadelnom srudiu VSMU v Redute. Bolo ch neurekom. Pri prvych dotykoch s divadlom nas profesor Vychodil viedot a ukazoval nam, ako preCftat divadelnu hru, ako hfadat' nezvycajne i priznacne crty atmosfery diela a ako treba pristupif k zaktadnemu podorysnemu cleneniu priestoru, k farebnosti, k osvetleniu a k charakteru koscymov. Nemozem nespomenut vynikajuce pedagogicke a umelecke osobnosti, ktore boti pevnymi piliermi vtedajsej skoty a umelecky-mi vzormi pre studentov, ktore nam vedeti dat prve a myslim aj tie najspravnejsie impulzy pre Javiskovu a divadelno-priestorovu tvorbu. Bolito Ladistav Vychodil, JozefBudsky, Karol L. Zachar, Ludmila Purkynova. I Co mi data skola? Uviedla rna do staleho a neopakovatefneho rytmu hl"adania toho umeleckeho a divadelneho smeru, v ktorom kracam a z ktorcho by som sa nerad odchylil. Gi1n Polonyovti: 4. rocnfk (1973/74) I. Witkiewic-J:: Vodmislie p ka ltin Zavarsky Skola narodneho umelca profesora Ladistava Vychodila bola predovsetkym skolou myslenia o divadle. Myslenia pomocou "ytvamych prostriedkov. Neprijfmal efektne, no togicky a dramaticky nezdovodnene riesenia. Nutil mysliet a uvaiovaf o dramatickom texte, priniest novy postreh a novy pohfad. Bolo zrejme, ze vyiadoval, aby sme kvalitu myslenia overovali praxou a praxou korigovali myslenie. Skola umoznovata tuto 'zajomnu vazbu. Spojila priestordivadtas priestorom atelieru prostrednictvom Divadelneho studia VSMU v Redute. Tak sme zacali pravidetne timovo spolupracovat' skolegami-postuchacmi rezie, dramaturgie a divadelnej vedy. Bol to nemaly pocet premier. Vtedy vyucovali na skole spolu s nasim profesorom divadelne osobnosti, ktore spolurealizovali vefku etapu ceskoslovenskeho divadla sestdesiatych rokov. Vyueovanie praxou a moznost konfrontovat svoje predstavy o divadle s osobnym prikladom tychto tvorcov - to je lm pulz, ktory nas vsetkych urcil a nasmeroval. (11) J . Pauer: Taravy Stimak. R. M. Fische r, S. + K.: H. Beztikowi, P: 11. 4. 1961 .5tefan Hudak, 5. rocn fk (1976/66) P. Kyrmezer: Komedia o Tobiasovi (navrh sceny u kostymov a ukazky z realizacie v Divadle pantomfmy v Bratisl~ve) DivadeJne studio VSMU (74) (75) - 1 -- V. K. Kli.cpera: Hadrian z Rimanoviec. R : J. Bindzar, S: J. Zavarsky, K : M . Rozkopfowi, P: 15. 4 . 1972 Oivade lne stUdio VSMU Rastislav BohuJ, V. K. Klicpera: Divotvom y klobuk. R : M . Peterich,S: M. Zubajo va, K: G. Krajcovii!ova, P:22.3. 1975 Divadelne studio VSMU 4. rocnik ( 197 .1/72) J . G. Tajovsky: Statky-z miitky lo cfJclmck Ked sr z. od!.tupu casu ~pommam na stuclcnt~kc roky na Vysok.ct skolc muzicb,ch umcnr. ccnlm si najma dvc skutocnosti: rnoje zaujatic sccnogr afiou sa mohlo rozvinuf vdaka systcmatickl::J vyukc a domysclncj koor dmacir pr aktickych a tcor etrckych prcdmctov od vcdcmm sku!.Cil)ch pcdagogov; mal som mo7nost rc.tlrzovat 'ic:tcerc skol:;kt: kost)movc i sccmckt ypravy' diclnach Slovcnskcho narodnchn dl\ aclla a takto sc~ oznamit s prcvadzkou a tcchnologi,mti. Ohidve tlcto skutocnosu som occnrl po vstupc do anga:lman. lrskanc vcdomostJ <1 skuo;,enosti "iOill prehlboval v prrcbchu SVOJCI tr nastrocnej pr axe\ chv.tdlach. vo frl me aj v tclevr;.-ii. (76) (77) Neznamy autor: Chytractva majstra Pathclina. R : M. Gogt'ifova, S + K: J. Jelfnek, P: 6. 5. 1972, Divadelne studio vSMU Jtin 1/muik I Malsom st'astic, po studiu figun\lnl.!j mal'by na Vysokcj skole vytvarnych umcni v Bratislavc dostal som sana vynikajticu skolu sct.:nografie prof. Ladislava Vychodila. Strctnutic s tymto vz<icnym clovckom, pedag6gom a umelcom popri zfskanych skt'iscnostim:h maliarskych z prcdoslcho studia dalo mi pretlovsctkym pricstorov~ vidcnic, dtvaddnu oricntaciu a zo7namcnic sa s pntcou scenografa na Javisku. Prof. Vychodtl v prnktickych cviccniach m\s vicdol do sccnickcho n<lvrhu a tcchnickej dokumcntacic co rcaliz<kiu vo vyrobc a/ po stavacic a svctclne skusky. Na skolc som sa naueil pre divadlo priznacnc j kolcktivnt.:j prcici. Rad by som podakoval prof. Vychodilovt a ostatnym pcdag<)gom za to, som moho I takto pripravcnyvstupif do praxc. zc uz ze (78) (79) Juraj Fabry, 3. rocnfk (1978/79) A. Jirase k: Lampas, maketa VVSOKA ~KO LA MUZICKYCH U MENi lliVADE LNA FAKULTA Jtdtskova 3 HI 3 0 1 Bratislava Ceskoslovensko KATEDRA SCENlCKEHO A KOSTYMOvEHO VYTVARNICTVA Zakladatef katedry: m'irodny umelec prof. Ladislav Vychodil, vcduca katedry: zasluzila umelkyi\a, prof. Ludmila Purkyt1ova, tajomnicka katedry: odb. as . .EugeniaSikorova. INTERNY PEDAGOGlC:KY ZBOR narodny umelec, prof. Ladislav Vychodil, zash1iila umelkyi\a, prof. Ludmila Purkynova, zash1:Wy urnelec, doc. OttoSujan, odb. as. Jarmila Cihankova-Semianova, odb. as. Eugenia Sikorova. I Katedra zabezpecuje vychovnovzdelavad proces v spolupnici s odbornikrni z praxe, ktori posobia ako extern I pedag6govia. (Ich mena uvadzame za predmetmi, ktore vyucujtL) I Studium je patrocne a podmienkou prijatia na skolu je ukoncenie strednej skoly S maturitou a llSpesne vykonanie tale ntovej skusky. Posluchaci na skole studuju predmety spoloen<!ho zakladu spolu s posluchacmi tychto odborov: herectvo, divadelna a opema rezia, balct, divadelna a filmova veda, dokumentarna tvorba, filrnova a televizna dramaturgia a scenaristika, televizna rezia a produkcia. Na katedre scenickeho vytvarnictva sa vyucuju tieto predmety: scenograficka tvorba a) scenicka tvorba (L. Vychodil, 0. Sujan, T. Berka), b) kostymova tvorba (L. Purkyi1ova), c) rciijna a herecka tvorba (0. Sulaj, J. Blaiek, J. Holicka), d) scenicka realizacia (0. Sujan), e) kost)lmova realizacia (S. Vanickova, K. Trizuljakova-Bohmova, G. Duchonova), f) televizna scenicka tvorba (0. Sujan), g) scerucka techruka (V. Hazucha), h) scenicke svetlo (V. H azucha); zaklady vjtvarnej a arch.itektonickej tvorby a) maJiarstvo (J . CiMnkova), b) grafika (J. Ciluinkova), c) sochiirstvo (J. Me b1l), d) architektura (J. Jakubik, R. Janak); riadenie a organizticia divadla (J. Krisfak) ; dejiny a teoria vjtvarnej kultury a divadla a) dejiny a te6ria scenografie (0. Sujan), b) dejiny a te6ria vytvameho umerua (E. Sikorova), c) hmotna kultura (S. Kovacevicova,L. Purkynova, E. Sikorova), d) dejiny divadla (S. Simkova, G. Leinerovicova, E. Stric), e) te6ria divadla, opery a baletu (G. Leinerovicova, J . Blazek, E. Stric, J . Holicka); zdklacly p~ychologie(J. Vopalensky), vybrane state z ekonornicko-prdvnych predpisov v divadltich (J. Krisiak), odevnti technologia (G. Duchonova), zaklady fotografie(J. KriZik), deskriptfvna geometria (J. Frecerova), kurzstrihovej technologie(I:... Juriova), prax v scenickej a kostjrnovej vjrobe (v UD D SND ) p ra.x mal'ovania v prfrocle(.J. Cihiinkova, E. Sikorova). Sludium v tret:om rocniku sa speciabzuje na: a) scenicke vytvarnictvo, b) kostymove vytvamictvo (od r. 1968), c) scenicka realizacia (od r . .1981), d) koscymova realizacia (od r. 1983). 1 Studenti svoje m1vrhy realizuju v skolskom divadelnom studiu, kde je rocne 5-6 premier (Cinohra, opera a balet). I V poslednych piatich rokoch katedra reagovala na potre by umcleckej praxe orientaciou vychovy s merom k realizacnym disciplinam. V roku l 981 otvorila specializaciu scenicka realizacia a v roku 1983 kostymova realizacia. Pre skvalitoenie umeleckorealizacnej zlozky v slovensrych divadlach zriadila v rokoch 1983 - 1985 dvojrocny kurz umeleckeho maskerstva, v roku1985 zapocala vyuku v studiu popri zamestnani v specializacii kostymova realizacia a dvojrocne studium vybranych predmetov pre studentov Slovenskej vysokej s koly technickej, buducich pracovnikov v oblasti vystavby a vybavenia kultumych stavieb. V spolupr:ki s Doskofovacim ustavom Mioisterstva kultliry SSR pripravila vzdelavacie cykly pre pracovnikov technickych prevadzok divadiel. I Poeas trvania katedry tu vystudovali viaceri zahra nicni studenti. Formou riadneho studia (v jazyku slovenskom) alebostaze (v jazyku nemeckom) v rozsahu 1 - 4 semestre. Zahranicni studenti sa mozu na obidve formy studia prihh\sit prostrednictvom svojich uradov preskolstvo. Podmienkou stlidia je uspesne zlozena talentova skuska. (80) COLLEGE OF MUSIC AND DRAMA, FACULTY OF THEATRE ARTS, Jiras kova 3, 813 01 Bratislava, Czechoslovakia. DEPARTMENT OF SCENOGRAPHY AND COSTUME DESIGN Founder of the De partment: People's Artist, Professor Ladislav Vychodil, Head of the De part ment: Senior Lecturer, Merited Artist Ludmila Purkyi\ova, D e partment's Secretary: Assistent Lecturer Eugenia Sikorova. INTERNAL PEDAGOGIC STAFF Professor Ladislav Vychodil, People's Artist Professor Ludmila Purkyi\ova, Merited Artist Doce nt OttoSujan, Me rited Artist Assistant Lecturer Jarmila Cihankova-Semianova Assistant Lecturer Eugenia Sikorova. I The Department cooperates also with experts working in other places of work, who teach at the department as external lecturers. Their names are presented together with the subjects they teach. I Studying scenography takes five years. Successful passing the leaving examinations from a secondary school and passing the entry talent examinations entitle a student to study at the College. The students of scenography study together with those studying acting, theatrical and opera directing, ballet, theatre and film science, documentary works, film and te levisio n dramaturgy and screen play writing, television direction and production, and attend lectures in common basic subjects. The following subjects are taught at the Department of Scenography and Costume Design: Scenography a) scenography (L. Vychodil, 0. Sujan, T. Berka), b) costume design (L. Purkyi1ova), c) direction and acting (0. Sulaj, J. Bla:lek, J. Holicka), d) setting materialization (0. Sujan), e) costume mate rialization (S. Vanickova, K. Trizuljakova-Bobmova, G. Duchonova), f) television scenography ( 0. Sujan ), g) stage technology (V. Hazucha), h) stage illumination (V. H azucha); basics of arts and architecture a) painting (J . Cihankova), b) graphic art (J. Ohankova), c) sculpture (J. Metis), d) architecture (J. Jakubik, R. Janak); management and organization oftheatre (J . Krisfak) ; history and theory of artistic culture and theatre a) history and theory of scenography (0. Sujan), b) history and theory of arts (E. Sikorova), (81) c) material cultme (S. Kovacevieova, L. Purkyi\ova, E. Sikorova), d) history of theatre (S. Simkova, G. Leinerovieova, E. Stric), e) theory of theatre, opera, and ballet (G. Leinerovicova, J. B laiek, E. Stric,J. Holicka); basics ofpsychology (J. Vopalensky), selected paragraphs from economic-legal regulations for theatres (J. Kristak), clothing technology (G. Duchonova), basicsofphotography(J. KriZik), descriptivegeomeuy(J. Frecerova), cow :re in style technology (I:... J uriova), p ractice in setting ami costume production (in the Workshops of the Slovak National Theatre in Bratislava and STYL Prague), practice in painting in the open (J. Cihankova, E. Sikorov:i). In the third year s tudents can specialize in : a) scenography b) costume design (since 1968) c) setting materialization (since 1981) d) costume materialization (since 1983). I The students materialize their designs in the School's Theatrical Studio, as there are 5- 6 premieres annually {plays, operas, ballets). I In the last five years the D epartment responded to the claims of artistic practice and oriented the educational process to materialization disciplines. rn 1981 specialization in setting materialization was opened and in 1983 that in costume materialization. To improve the artistic-materializational component in Slovak theatres the De partment opened a two year course in artistic maski.ng in 1983- 1985 and i.o 1985 started extramural courses in costume materiaJization and two year courses of selected sub_jects for the students of the Slovak Technical University, who would work in the sphere of building and furnishing cultural facilities. In cooperation with the Institute of Complementary Courses of the Ministry of Culture the De partment prepared educational cycles for those engaged in tech nical operation of theatres. I Duri ng the De partment's existence several students from abroad graduated from the College, either as internal students (in Slovak language) or by form of study stays (in German language) taking from 1-4 terms. Foreign students can apply for both forms of studying via their representative schools authorities. Successfully passed talent entry examinatio ns are the only condition. Maria Zubajova, 3. roenik (1974175) Studie aktu, kresba tuSom AleS Votava, 3.roCnik (1983/84) Studie prirodnych motivov z prlizdninovej praxe (82) (83) JanLaluha, 3. rocnik (1983/84) Fragment barokovej architektury, mafba temperou Jaroslav Valek, 4. rocnlk (1981182) Zatisie, mafba temperou (84) (85) PEDAGOGOVlA, KTORf POSOBILI NA KATEDRE SCENOGRAFIE OD VZNTKU SKOLY Hlavneodbom.epredmety: Antalova, Elvira Berka, Tomas Beuikova, Helena Brezina, Martin Cemieky, Ladislav Cihankova, Jarmila Ciel, Igor Duehonova, Gabriela Gabor, PavoiMaria Hazueha, Vladimir Hupka, Ladislav Katusa, Oto Kovacova, Judita Korkos, Ludwik Kudlac, Frantisek Laluha, M.ilan Lchotsky, Eugen Lugs, Teodor Melis, J uraj Milly, Dezider Pasteka, M.ilan Peehr, Cestmir Pietor, Milos Purkynova, Ludmila Romberg, M.ichal Suchanek, Vladimir Sujan, Otto Sulaj, Ondrej Valocky, D usan Vanickova, Stanislava Vyehodil, Ladislav Zavarsky, Jan (maliarstvo) (seen. tv., seen. real.) (kostym. tvorba) (seen. tvorba) ( maliarstvo) (maHarstvo, grafika) (rez. tvorba) {kostym. real.) (seen. tvorba) (javiskova techn. a sveLlo) (televizna seen. tvorba) (rez. tvorba) (kostym. tvorba) (soeharstvo) (maliarstvo) (maliarstvo) (maliarstvo) (soeharst vo) ( socha rstvo) (maliarstvo) ( maliarstvo) (seen. vytv., grafika) (rez. tvorba) (kostym. tv., maliaJ·stvo) (kostym. tvorba) (seen. tv., maliarstvo) (seen. tv., seen. real.) (rez. tvorba, te6ria div.) (maliarstvo) {kostym. tv., kostym. real.) (seen. tvorba, seen. real.) (seen. tv., seen. real.) 1960/61 1983/84 - dodoes 1972/73, s prestavkami dodoes 1951/52-1955/56 1956/57 1971/72- dodoes 1972173, 1973/74 1985/86 - dodoes 1961 /62, 1972/ 73,1973/74 1952/53- dodnes 1971/72,1981/82,1983/84 1974175, 1975/76 1972/73 1969/70, 1971/72 1972173 1963/ 64-1966/67 1955/56, 1958/59 1971/72 1973/74, s prestavkami dodoes 1952/53 1962/63 1962/63 1971/72, 1977/78 1955/56 - dodnes 1977178 1973/74, 1974/75 1966/67, 1968/ 69 - dodoes 1979/80- dodoes 1957/58 1963/64, 1969170 - dodnes 1951/ 52- dodnes 1978179, s prestavkami dodoes Prehlbujuce odbome predmety: Absolon, I.:.udovit Beizetzer, Ladislav Bohle, Ursula Bohmova-T rizuljakova, Katarina F recerova, Jelen a Hellmieh, Julius Huntier, Jozef Jakubik, Juraj Janak, Rastislav Juriova, I.:.udmila Kristofovic, Mario Krizik, Jan Piffl, Alfred {uiklady fotografie) (zaklady architektury) ( umeleeke vlasenkarstvo) (kostym. real.) ( deskript. geometria) ( umeleeke rnaskerstvo) (uiklady architektury) (zaklady arehitektury) (zaklady arehitektury) (strihove konstrukeie) (zaklady (yziky) (zak1ady fotografie) (zaklady arehitektury) 1978/79 1978/79 1983/84, 1984/85 1986/87 1969170 - dodoes 1983/84, ] 984/85 1978/79 1980/81,1983/84,1984/85 1977178 1984/85 - dodoes 1977/78, 1978/79 198 J /82, s prestavkami dodoes 1970171 , 1971/72 Predmety teoretickeho ztik/adu ( okrem pedag6gov inyeh katedier VSMU) Ba1·tko, Emil ( dejiny tanca) Benes, Juraj (dejinyopery) D obesovii-Luxova, Viera (dejiny vytv. umenia) Holicka, Jan ( dejiny ope1y) . {dejiny vytvar. umenia) Janci, Zdenek Kahoun, Karol (dejinyvytvar. umenia) Kara, Lubor (estetika, dejiny vytvar. umenia) Kovacevicova, Sona (hmot. kultura) Kounl, Miroslav (te6ria scenografie) Kristak, Jan (org. a riadenie divadla)" Mudroehova, Natalia ( dejiny vytvar. umenia) Pastorova, Aliea {dejinytanea) Peterajova, I.:.udmila (dejinyvytvar. umenia) Pi.ffl, Alfred (hmot. kult(rra) Porubjak, Martin (te6ria divadla) Purkynova, Ludmila {dejiny vytvar. um., hmot. kult.) Samko, Jozef (dejiny opery) Simun, Ladislav (anat6mia pre vytv.) Sujan, Otto (te6ria scenografie) Zelenka, Vladimir (riadenie diel. vyroby) Odborru! praxe: Bocekova, Zuzana C6ka, Ladislav Duehonova, Gabriela Granec, Fridrich Hojova, Eva Kozfk, Jan Linhardtova, Maria Michalek, Stefan Novak, Jan Nemeth, Stefan Neklapil, Milan Ondrus, L:ubomir Seliga, Dusan Sulka, Stefan Sehmiedova, Boiena Zelenka, Vladimir (88) (89) 1983/84 1978/79, 1984/85 1966/67 1985/86 1971 /72, 1972173 1956/57,1957/58, 1973/74, 1975/76 1971/72 1953/54, s prestavkami dodnes 1963/64- 1966/67 1985/86 1965/66, 1967/ 68,197 1/72 1977/78, 1978/ 79, 1982/83 1961162- 1963/64 1970171, 1971 /72 1976177-1978179 1955/56 - dodoes "1974/75 1983/84, 1984/ 85 1966/67, 1967/68 - dodnes 1983/ 84 Fabry, Juraj Fifikova, Jana Chmelova, Zuzana Konarzewski, Jakub Canccky, Peter Valek, Jaroslav Pietor, Milos mi. Cap, Vladimir Szapuova-Balazova, Maria ZOZNAM STUDENTOV Prfpravne rocniky na VS vu alebo s VST: Sujan, Otto Gabor, Pavol Maria Hanak, Jan Majda, Oldfich Baranek, Alojz Bonta, Stefan Bezakova, Helena Fedorjak, Frantisek Perger, Frantisek Suchanek, Vladimir Beniela, Milan Hudak, Stefan Chladna, Anastazia Luzinsky, Tibor · Sustrova, Teodora zahorova, Eva Ciller, Jozef Erdely, Gabriel Hugai\, Jaroslav (1951 - 1955) (1951 - 1955) (1951 - 1955) (1951-1953) (1953-1957) (1956- 1959) (1959- 1962) (1959-1960) (1959-1962) (1959-1962) (1962- 1963) (1962- 1966) (1962-1963) (1962-1966) (1962-1963) (1962 - 1963) (1964 - 1968) (1965 - 1969) (1965- 1970) vytvamik, Nova scena, Bratislava, docent VSMU vytv., SND, Bratislava vytv., Stat. divadlo, Kosice UDD, SND vytv. v slob. povolanf vytv., DJZ, Presov vytv., SND, Bratislava S1:tcasni posluchaa (realizacne smery): vytv., DAB, Nitra vytv., SND, Bratislava Laluha,Jan Liptak, Frantisek Mojzis, L.ubomir Votava, Ales Belohradska-Pavelkova, I.:.ubica Nagyova, AIZbeta Tomanova, I veta Hojova,Eva vytv., ST, Kosice vyty., ST, Bratislava vytv., DSNP, Martin vytv., ST, Bratislava vytv., ST, Bratislava Gasparovicova, Eva Ivicicova, I veta Jurikovicova, He lena Lukacova, Jana Pavliskova, Gabriela Revay, Emil Si makova, Karol a (1968-1974) (1968- 1974) (1968-1973) (1968- 1974) (1968- 1972) (1968-1971) (1969-1974) (1970- 1975) (1970- 1972) (1971- 1977) (1971 - 1976) (1971 - 1976) (1972 - 1978) (1973-1974) (1973-1978) (1973- 1978) (1973 - 1978) (1 973 - 1978) (1972- 1978) (1973- 1977) (1973-1976) (1974- 1979) (1974-1976) (1975 - 1980) (1975 - 1980) (1977- 1980) (1 976-1982) vytv., Nova scena, Bratislava vytv ., DJGT, Zvolen, slob. povolanie vytv., DPB, Ostrava vytv., DPDM, Trnava vytv., Nova seen a, Bratislava vytv., SD, Kosice, slob. povolanie vytv., DP, GottwaJdov, ND, Praha vytv., DSNP, Martin, ST, Bratislava (1981 (1981 (1981 (1981(1983(1983(1983{1983 - (1985 (1985 (1985 (1985 (1985(1985(1985 - Mimoriadne SPZ: vytv., SD, Kosice designatthka, SND, Bratislava vytv., Nova scena, Bratislava vytv., ST, Kosice Palatinusova, Beata Simkova, Anna Bulkova, Emilia vytv., DAB, Nitra vytv., ST, Bratislava, slob. povolanie vytv., ST, Bratislava vytv., DJZ, Presov, ved. kostym. vyroby SND vytv. v slobodnom povolanf Mimoriadne studium posluchacov S VST: Buraj, Pavol Moravcik, Peter Sujan, Juraj vytv. vHanoi, VDR vytv. v Hociminovom meste, VDR vytv. v slob. povolanf, Mt:R vytv., Katona J6zsef szinhaz Kecskemet, MI.:R vytv., ST, Bratislava vytv., DJGT, Banska Bystrica (90) (91) vytv., DSNP, Martin, slob. povolanie vytv., DJGT, Zvolen vytv. vo Varsave, PI.:R vytv., DJGT, Zvolen vytv., DSNP, Martin vytv., Nova scena, Bratislava vytv., DJZ, Presov slob. povolanie, m6dna tvorba Zahranicni studenti na katedre Studium popri zamestnani: Studium VSMU: Berka, Tomas Bohu~. Rastislav Roszkopfova, Marta Zavarsky, Jan Kovacova, Judita Opletalova, Jarmila Jelinek Jozef Pol6nyova, Margita Ofonda,Jan Hanakova, Danica Krajcovicova, Gabriela Simunova, Nada Zubajova, Maria Kroslakova, Ivica Ferencfk, Milan Gfondova, Mana Jurikova, t:ubica Matejka, Miroslav Hafsahlova, Mona Kaanova, Soiia Chochlfkova, Eva Doan Thi Tinhova DoDoanChau J6jart, ZoHan Ratkai, Er.l~'>ebet Varossova, t:udmila Cisarik, Pavol (1976- 1981) 0976- 1981) (1976- 1977) (1976-1981) (l 978- 1983) (1978- 1983) (1978- 1983) {1978-1984) (1978-1984) (1985(1985 (1985- (1985(1985(1985- Zahranicni riadni posluchaCi: Mona HafsahJova (N6rsko) Do Doan Chau (Vietnam) Doan Tinhova (Vietnam) Erzsebet Ratkaiova (Madarsko) Zoltan J6jart (Madarsko) Sttii.e: Majja Pekkanenova Peiia del Sol Claudio Godo Barreto Cardidad Cordova-Cobelova Hortensia De Las Nieves Laferte Valdesova LUsi Tandefeltova Kaije Salaspurova Chjara Mangiarottiova Linda Salvova Jyrky Samppa Tapio Lahdenpera Riina Ahoneuova Vienna Rotkova Verstraaten, Jan Sari Maria Salmela Ranum Torkil Figueroa Alboaaroa Humberto Kristin Neremova Leila Oksanenova Liz Hellstromova 1972- 78 1974- 76 1974-79 1975-80 1975 - 81 (Finsko) (Kuba) (Kuba) 1970-72 1972-73 1972- 73 (Kuba) 1972 - 73 (Kuba) (Finsko) (Finsko) (Taliansko) (USA) 1972-73 1973-74 1973 - 74 1973-74 1973 - 74 (Finsko) (Finsko) (Finsko) (Belgicko) (Finsko) (N6rsko) 1974-75 1975 - 76 1976 1977- 78 1978 1979- 80 (Mexiko) (N6rsko) (Finsko) (Svedsko) 1980198219831983 - 81 83 84 84 INA PEDAGOGJCKA CINNOST KATE DRY VYZNAMNE CENY A VYZNAMENANIA ABSOL VENTOV SKOLY vYSTAVY KATEDRY SCENOGRAFIE YSMU I Na zaklade poziadaviek umeleckej praxe katedra usporiadala ku rz umeleckeho maskerstva, ktoryodborne pedagogicky zabezpecila za pomoci Hochschule fiir bildende Kiinste v Dnizcfanoch. Pedag6govia oddelenia Umeleckeho maske rstva doc. Julius Hellmich a Ursula Bohle prednasali hlavne predmety - umclecke maskerstvo a umelecke vlasenkarstvo. Kurz bol dvojrocny a uskutocnil sa vskolskom rok'U 1983/1984 a 1984/1985. 1965 - Zlata medaila prezidenta Brazflskej republiky za najlepsiu mlrodnu expoziciu kolektivnej vystave Ladislava Vychodila a jeho skoly na 8. bienale rytvarneho umcnia v Sao Paolo . 1967 - Strieborna medaila za scenografiu Vladimirovi Suchankovi na PQ. - Strieborna medaila za scenografiu P. M. Gaborovi na PQ. 1970 - Za vy nikajucu pracu, vyznamenanie udelene P.M. Gaborovi. 1971 - Zlata mcdaila z.a kostym Helene Bezakovej na PQ. - Striebormi medaila Stefanovi Hudakovi za scenografiu na PQ. 1973 - Zlata medaila za kolekciu kostymov H elene Bezakovej na 12. bienale v)itvarncho umcnia v Sao Paolo. - Cena ministra kultury ZSSR Stefanovi Buntovi za vypravu k inscenacu HrnCiarsky bal v Kyjeve. 1975 - Z.lata n~edai.la Jozefovi Cillerovi za scenografi u na PQ. 1977 - Cena belgickeho ministra kultury Jozefovi Cillerovi na festivale v Gente. 1979 - Zlata medaila za scenografiu Jozefovi Cillcrovi na PQ. - Z lata medaila za kostym Margite Pol6nyovej na PQ. - Strieborna medaila za scenografiu Vladimfrovi Suchankovi na PQ. 1981 - Zlata medaila kolektlvu kostymov)ich rytvarnikov na 6. trienale scenickeho a kostymoveho vytvarnfctva v Novom Sade (Hanakova, Bezakova, Jelinek, Pol6nyova, Simunova). - Z lata medaila za scenografiu Jozefovi CiUerovi na 6. triemlle scenickeho a koscymoveho vytvamictva v Novom Sade. 1983 - Z lata medaila za scenografiu Jozefovi.Cillerovi na . PQ. - Strieborna medaila za scenog1·afiu To masovi Berkovi na PQ. - Zasluzily umelec Otto Sujan. - Z lata medaila za kostym Jozefovi Je linkovi na PQ. 1984 - Z lata medaiJa Marte Roszkopfovej na 7. trienale scenickeho a kostymoveho vytvarnictva v Novom Sade. 1986 - Zaslu.zilyumelecJozef Ciller. 1965 - L. Vychodil a jeho skola - bienale Sao Paolo (zlata medaila za naj1cpsiu narodn6 expoziciu) - L. Vychodil a jeho skola - vystava v Havanc a Budapesti (kulturne stredisko) 1966 - L. Vychodil a jcho skola - vystava v Ka hire a Alexandrii, Parfzi (Divadlo mlrodov) a vTouluso 1967 - L. Vychodil a jeho skola- vystava na univcnit::ich v Cbicagu, Pittsburgu a Mexico City 1967 - Yystava studentov a absolventov YSMU - Vieden (informacny Ictal<) - Leningrad, lnstitut divadla (informacny lctak) pociatky druzobnych stykov medz.i skolami 1969 - Yystava scenografickeho skolstva - Bratislava (Vystavna sien, Dostojevskcho rad), spoluvystavujuce skoly - Akademia muzickych ume ni .Praha, U nivcrzitn v Pittsburgu a Flnska skola - rystava bola venovana 20. vyrociu zalozenia YSMU (informacny katal6g 0 kaidej skole) 1971 - II. praiske quadriem'ile - vydany rcprczentacny katal6g 1972 - Ceskoslovensky divadelny kostym - Praha, Nova sin- ucast' na vystaveDivadelneho ustavu Praha (informacny katal6g) 1974 - Vystava prac studentov scenografie - Bratislava, Galeria mladych, Mostova utica (katal6g z prfJezitosti 25. vyrocia YSMU) 1976 - lll. praiske quadrienale - expozicia scenografickych skoJ - Vystavna siil ULUY, Narodni tl'ida (informacny letak v jazykovych mutaciach) 1979 - IV. praiske quadrienale - expozfcia scenografickJch skol - Park kulrury a oddychu JF (in(ormacny plagat v jazykovych mutaciach) 1982 - lV. medzinarodny festival vysokych skol divadelnych - Bratislava, Reduta (bulletin festivalu) 1983 - Y. praiske quadriemlle - expozicia scenografickych skol - Park kultury a oddychu J F, Praha - Dni divadelne j techniky skandinavskych krajin - usporiadalo narodne stredisko OISTAT v Stockho lme, vystava VSMU 1985 - Vefka Morava - ucasf na vystave, Dom kulttiry, Bratislava 1986 - l. medzimirodny festival vysokJch skol divade.lnych - Ales (Francu7.sko), vystava pradtudentov YSMU Absolventi kurzu ume/eckeho maskerstva: Bicanova, Renata- SND, Bratislava - cinohra Blizniak, Ondrej - DSNP, Martin Cs6kova, Ed ita - MOD, scena TaHa v Kosiciach Doktorova, Marta- Statny film, Koliba Revay, E mil - DAB, Nitra Rybnickova, Bozena- SND, Bratislava - UDD SND Visibeli-Berkova, Monika- DJZ, Pre5ov SEMINARE A SYMP6ZIA USPORlADANE VSMU 1977 - seminar o vychove scenografov spojeny s kurzom technol6gii vytvarneho dotv<;>renia divadelneho kostymu, ktory viedli odbornici z berlinskej Statnej opery (150 ueastnfkov z 15 statov); filmov:Y zaznam, vystava, zbornik vybranych prispevkov. 1981 - seminar venovany rezijnym aspektom vo vychove scenografov, vystavky zucastnenych skol, diapozitivy (30 ucastnikov z 9 statov), zbornJk vybranych prispevkov. 1984 - seminar venovany v)ichove vytvamikov realizacneho smeru (30 ucastnikovz8 statov), vystavky ztleastnenych skol, videozaznamy z vychovno-vzdehivacieho procesu, diapozitivy, zbornfk vybranych prispevkov. 1985 - seminar o vychovescenografov na VSMU a v Salzburgu (50 ueastnfkov z radov pedag6gov a posluchacov oboch skol). Spoluucasi VSMU pri usporiadani strctnutl zastupcov scenografickych skol na DAMU v Prahe pri prllezitosti PQ vrokoch l976, 1979a 1983. ( 92) (93) Katedra zabezpeciJa mensie kolekcie VSMU na vystavach pri prflezitosti Dnf divadelnej techniky, ktore usporiadalo narodne stredisko OISTAT, SVTS a SND v Ustrednych divadelnych dieli\ach SND v rokoch 1977,1981 a 1984. DAB DAMU DJGT DJZ DPB DPDM DSNP MOD OlSTAT - PQ SND ST SVST SVTS SD UDDSN D VSMU - Divadlo Andrej a Bagara Di.vadelni Akademie muzickych umeni Divadlo Jozefa Gregora Tajovskeho Divadlo Jonasa Z3borskeho Divadlo Petra Bezruca Divadlo pre deti a mladez Divadlo Slovenskeho narodneho povstania Macfarske oblastne divadlo Medzih3rodml o rganizacia scenografov, divadelnych technikov a architektov Praiske quadrienale Slovenske narodne divadlo Slovenska televizia Slovenska vysoka skola technicka Slovenska vedecko-technickaspolocnos( Statne divadlo Umelecko-dekoracne dielne Slovenskeho narodneho divadla Vysoka skola muzickych umeni Udajc platne k junu 1986 Vyslo vo vydavaterstve Tat ran v Bratislavc 1987 ako 4422. publikacia a ucelovy naklad pre Ustav umeleckej kritiky a divadclnej dokumentacie v Bratislave. Pripravila Katcdra sccnickeho a kostymoveho vytva rnlctva VSMU pod vedenim prof. Ludmily Purkynovej. Pozml mkovy apa rat vypracovala odb. as. Eugenia Sikorova. Prve vydanie. 96 stra n. O balka a graficka uprava Karol Rosmany. Vytvarm1 redakto rka Eva Jakabovicova. T echnicka rcdaktorka Z latica Magalova. Zodpovcdn y redaktorVIastimjJ Zabloudil. Vytlacili Tlaciarne SNP, n. p., Martin. Naklad 2000 vy tlackov. A H 10,30. VH 10,64. VHS 4,56. VHI 6,08. TS 09.20 1866/I-82 06 1 - 1 00 - 87 BSS