- Pacific Disaster Net

Transcription

COASTAL COMPONENT FINAL REPORT
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT PROECT (1)
Infrastructure Asset Management
Program-Phase1
Cr. 3193-0-WSO
World Bank & Government of Samoa
Coastal Component
Terminal Report
Bismarck Crawley
Project Component Manager
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
May 2003
i
May 30, 2003
Tu’u’u Dr. Ieti Taulealo
Chief Executive Officer
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
Government of Samoa
RE: Infrastructure Asset Management Project (1) Coastal Component-Terminal Report
It is with appreciation to submit the enclosed report, which formalizes the official completion of
the IAM-1 Coastal Component for your information.
It has been a challenging and fulfilling experience to work with IDA, the Project Steering
Committee, the communities through the Ministry of Internal Affairs and in particular your
ministry in the implementation of this project.
I congratulate your ministry, IDA, the Project Steering Committee, PMU and the Government
of Samoa for the vision that sets the concept of this project which as evident in its output, will
provide a stepping stone and a strong foundation on all efforts to management coastal
infrastructure assets and the required response and planning requirements to mitigate any
adverse impact on lives of our most vulnerable communities.
I personally would like to thank you for your support and advice, which was the key to the
success and the timely completion of the work.
Please convey my sincere appreciation to your staff who have helped not only as counterparts to
the project but overall, the spirit of workmanship which really makes the project feel at home.
Faafetai,
Tagaloa. Bismarck Crawley
ii
LIST OF ACRONYMS
AIMS
Asset Information Management System
AMS
Apia Management Services Ltd.
AusAID
Australian Agency for International Development
BPIP
Borrower’s Implementation Plan
CEIS
Coastal, Environmental and Institutional Services
CHZ
Coastal Hazard Zone
CIMP
Coastal Infrastructure Management Plan
CIMS
Coastal Infrastructure Management Strategy
COEP
Code of Environmental Practise
CPM
Component Project Manager
DLSE
Department of Lands, Surveys and Environment
EPC
Electric Power Coorporation
FAO
Food Agriculture Organization
GoS
Government of Samoa
IAM-1
Infrastructure Asset Management (project) 1
IAM-2
Infrastructure Asset Management (project) 2
IAMP
Infrastructure Asset Management Program
IAM-PSC
Infrastructure Asset Management Project Steering Committee
IDA
International Development Association
MAFFM
Ministry of Agriculture Forestry Fisheries and Meteorology
MoW
Ministry of Works (previously PWD)
PCM
PMR
Project Management Report
PMU
Project Management Unit
PWD
Public Works Department
RFP
Request for Proposals
SAMS
Samoa Asset Management System
SPREP
South Pacific Regional Environment Programme
SWA
Samoa Water Authority
UNDP
United Nations Development Programme
iii
Executive Summary
1.0
The Coastal Component of IAMP-1 was undertaken to improve coastal
infrastructure management in Samoa. The component was under the supervision of
DLSE and covered the following subcomponents;

Coastal, Environmental and Institutional Services (C1.01 & D4)

Aerial Photography (C2.01)

Geographical Information System (C2.02)
2. 0 Subcomponents
2.1 CEIS
The Samoa CEIS sub-component primarily focused on developing a CIM Strategy and
Plans to improve coastal infrastructure management. The contract was awarded to Beca
International Consultants Ltd in April 2000 and the total scope of the original contract
was completed in March 2002. The contract was extended to August 15th 2002 to
complete an extra 10 CIM Plans.
P
P
The activities involved in this contract were as follows:
1. Coastal Hazard Zone mapping
2. Coastal Infrastructure Management Strategy
3. Coastal Infrastructure Management Plans
4. Coastal/Environmental Advisory Services
5. DLSE Institutional Review
6. Interim Codes of Environmental Practice
7. GIS Specifications
The CHZ Mapping identified and quantified the significant CEHZ and CFHZ from the
sea, as well as CLHZ. The entire coastline of Samoa was mapped. During fieldwork all
accessible parts of Samoa’s coastline were observed, field data gathered, and anecdotal
observations recorded from village interviews. The CHZ Mapping showed that erosion
and flooding from the sea are the most widespread coastal hazards on ‘Upolu, Savai’i
and Manono, and coastal landslip the most widespread on Apolima and the Aleipata
Islands. CEHZs cover an average of 76% of the coastlines of Savai’i, ‘Upolu and
Manono. CLHZs cover an average of 89% of the coastlines of Apolima and Aleipata
Islands, compared to an average of 14% of Savai’i and ‘Upolu. In addition a CHD was
set up for documentation and monitoring.
iv
The CIM Strategy is a national policy document, which outlines visions, goals, policies
and objectives for management of coastal infrastructure. The Strategy has as its central
vision ‘Resilience – Coastal Infrastructure and Communities Resilient to Natural
Hazards’. To be resilient is to be adaptive, responsive and quick to recover so that
communities are environmentally, socially and economically sustainable.
The objectives and policies outlined in the Strategy are separated into six management
themes:
1. National Principles for Management
2. Local Principles for Management
3. Information, Evaluation and Monitoring
4. Education and Awareness
5. Management and Use of Land and Resources
6. Intervention Actions
The CIM Plans provide guidance on the local level implementation of the principles and
directions of the Strategy. The aim of the CIM Plan is to help communities and
government to improve resilience by identifying preferred management actions and
solutions. The pilot economic analysis methodology was also reviewed which forms
part of the planning process for possible options via a cost benefit analysis approach.
Not all the solutions may be actioned immediately but the plan will ensure that issues
and options are identified for the long-term improvement of resilience of both
infrastructure and communities. The component had prepared CIM Plans for 15
Districts selected based on the CSI from the CHD and the CHM. Consultations involve
the pulenuu, 20-30 persons per village and by the time all approximately 300 villages
are complete, about 10,000 citizens (6% of the population) will have been directly
involved. Note that this is about 90% of Resource Managers in the communities.
The CEAS provided guidance and training to staff of DLSE and MoW involved with
coastal works and environmental management on such topics as:

Coastal processes

Evaluation of alternatives

Economic analysis

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

Monitoring and mitigation of effects

Use of current and draft environmental legislation

Implementation of the Interim Codes of Environmental Practice

The CIM Strategy and CIM Plans
The Institutional Review identified that capacity constraints and the distribution of
resources within DLSE are such that the Department has difficulty meeting it’s current
objectives. There are already competing demands at a divisional level and intake of
v
additional activities is proposed. Planning (at departmental and divisional levels),
restructuring and outsourcing of some activities is proposed to refocus DLSE’s
activities and enable objectives to be met. Organisational Templates have been
developed to show a possible staging for restructuring DLSE up to 2003. These
templates are intended as a catalyst for discussion.
The Interim Codes of Environmental Practice (COEPs) focus on road planning, design,
construction and maintenance, and associated coastal protection works. The COEPs are
set out to ensure that minimum environmental standards are met and that appropriate
procedures are undertaken to reduce the environmental impact of various activities
related to road works and services. The COEPs are considered interim, as they need to
be fully reviewed in relation to Samoa’s practices and legislation.
The GIS Specifications outline the findings of a GIS needs analysis and includes a
technical specification, based on the findings of the needs analysis. The technical
specification recommends software and hardware to be procured for DLSE. The report
addresses only Stage 1 of the procurement proposed for DLSE and allows for the
establishment of a LAN based system in DLSE’s Mapping, Surveying and Plan
Draughting and Examination Sections.
2.2 Geographical Information
The contract was awarded to Airesearch Mapping Limited Australia in August 1999 and
the total scope of the original contract was completed in August 2001. The need for
new topographical data to support the management of infrastructure was considered
important.
The main targeted deliverables are as follows;

1:50,000 orthophotos with contours

1:5,000 orthophotos with and without contours

Topographical Maps of Samoa at 1:50,000

GIS Data at 1:20,000 Scale
In addition to hard copy Topographical Maps, electronic copy of Othophotos and GIS
data were generated and received on CD in Mapinfo format. A Desktop computer with
MAP Info software was purchased to access, analyse and print these orthophotos and
GIS layers for the CHM work.
GIS layers provided include; contours, buildings, cultivation, hydrology, land use,
localities, roads, relief, off shore, structure, text and vegetation.
2.3 Information Management System
vi
This component had established GIS Capability and Networking with MoW and DLSE.
The contract was awarded to CSL, Apia, Samoa on May 5th 2002.
P
P
The procurement provided hardware, software, data collection equipment i.e. surveying,
communication equipment, measuring equipment and map production peripherals based
on GIS Needs Assessment done by BECA International for DLSE and OPUS for MoW.
In addition, service was provided including setting up, installation and equipment
configuration and training on the CAD, GIS and Microsoft Products software.
Training was provided for both PWD and DLSE staff. The GIS training was extended
to other agencies to take advantage of the instructor’s presence here. It was an added
indication of agencies moving in to GIS for collection and management of their required
data which is seen sustainable given some compatibility through the common software
that was used in the training which was MAP Info and the networking among operators
who can exchange knowledge and issues to such the tool and its appropriate application
to Samoa.
Having CSL as the winning bidder was the first time a local firm had engaged in
procuring GIS system and software. The delivery of required goods was timely receipt.
DLSE envisage that this involvement of CSL will helped a lot in promoting GIS as a
tool. In addition, CSL should now be part of a wider GIS network where we can receive
updates on the technology and other developments on applications. With a knowledge
of what is now available within the Implementing agencies covered in this procurement,
CSL will have to be prepared to meet maintenance, training and support service for the
system which in turn strengthens their company GIS profile.
3.0 Sub-component Integration
The Coastal component of IAMP-1 contribute to the overall aim of improved coastal
infrastructure management. The CIM Strategy and Plans are the primary means of
coastal infrastructure management and all other components feed into the Strategy and
Plans as follows:

Production of Aerial Photos both in Orthphotos and electronic formats with
contours overlayed provided good comparison with old aerial Photos to identify
the rates of change along the coastline using GIS. In addition, these orthophotos
assisted in the collection of anecdotal data through interviews with communities.

GIS Specification: Conducts and inventory of available GIS capability to ensure
a system to be procured is appropriate to the needs of the agencies as well as
being compatible with existing systems and information available with other
agencies.

Establishment of GIS Capability with DLSE and PWD for the management of
the information for coastal infrastructure management

CHZ Mapping: Utilises orthophotos and combining technical surveying and
anectodal data from community interviews to delineate Samoa’s coastal hazards.
vii

Interim COEPs: Provided guidelines to recognize environmentally sustainable
operating procedures and practice in coastal infrastructure development

CEA Services: An ongoing requirement to enhanced capacity for DLSE, PWD
and private sectors in coastal infrastructure management
DLSE Institutional Review: to sustain and be able to develop and strengthen DLSE’s
capability for coastal management and planning. In addition, to reflect it as an
important activity of the departments mandate.
4.0 Recommendations;
4.1 CEIS

The 21 sites selected by DLSE for monitoring should be followed up and
continually updated.

The CHZ maps should be updated as appropriate. It is recommended that a
decision as to whether to update the CHZ maps be made on the basis of a 5
yearly review of monitoring information. The CHZ maps should be updated
after the occurrence of significant events such as a Class 4 or 5 tropical cyclone,
tsunami, landslide, large earthquakes etc.

More detailed (third order) CHZ mapping should be undertaken for sites where
significant development is proposed.

The numerous implementation methods, other than the CIM Plans, specified in
the CIM Strategy that are required to achieve the policies given in the Strategy,
should also be implemented. CIM Strategy background Report 6 provides a
preliminary guide for implementation of the CIM Strategy, having regard to
priorities, realistic programmes and budgetary constraints.

Develop and investigate the possible solutions identified in the CIM Plans in
more detail. The next step forward should be the development of a CIM
Program based on the outcome of the CIM Plan for the development of
prioritized projects. The projects should identify preparation requirements,
clearance requirements; approximate cost estimates, financing sources,
implementation arrangements and timing. These matters are the responsibility
of the partner departments and corporations identified in the Implementation
Guidelines.

The CIM Plan process identifies issues of concern not directly related to Coastal
Hazards that if acted upon would improve the resilience of these communities.
These issues are noted in the CIM Plans and should be picked up by the relevant
authorities as programming permits. Such issues include the provision of a
sustainable domestic water supply and flooding from inland areas affecting
roads, bridges, houses and other infrastructure.
viii

It is important to recognize that the CIM Plan is one of a number of tools and
Plans that give effect to the CIM Strategy to improve resilience. Consideration
should be given to other plans for land-use management, Integrated Coastal
Zone Management and also the existing plans for fisheries management and
where they fit in the management of assets, resources and activities for the
whole of Samoa.

The CEA Services training notes are quite extensive and distributing additional
copies and updating/maintaining existing copies would represent a significant
time and cost burden on whatever organization ultimately looks after them. It
would be much better to mount these files on an internet web page, so that they
can be downloaded by people who want further information or who need to
update or complete their files. This would allow ready access to the public sector
also. It may also be possible to put other related documents here too, such as
exemplars of consent applications and design reports and the economic analysis
spreadsheet.

As part of the CEA Services, a Network Group was established, comprising
representatives from several government departments and corporations.
Networking amongst this group would allow those people with environmental
responsibilities to maintain contact to share ideas and suggestions. Suggested
actions relating to this group include appointing a person to maintain the email
group, updating email group and sending to all participants and using the email
or users group to update all copies of documents as required.

The CEAS training was well received with participants requesting extra sessions
on the following topics.
The following suggestions are made for future training topics,
1. Economic Analysis (Revision) – as development proceeds, the topic of
economic analysis will require additional revisions sessions at its
application has a direct result on the outcome of the CIM plans.
2. Revetment Design (Revision) – There was a need from MoW to provide
revision sessions on this topic during the last training visit.
3. EIA workshops – Any further training on this topic should ideally be
based on actual EIAs prepared by participants since the last training
sessions.

The immediate priority for Institutional Strengthening is to build capacity in the
area of Divisional Planning. A Consultant should be commissioned to act in a
mentoring/coaching role to assist Assistant Directors in preparing detailed
Divisional Plans.

A longer term, robust framework for DLSE’s operations should then be
developed, to consolidate the capacity gains made by in the short term.
Activities are proposed in the areas of Legislative Review, Human Resource
ix
Management, Accounting and Information Technology, Customer Services,
External Services and Training.

Stage 2 of the COEP development, that is the preparation of a complete set of
codes referenced to legislation, should be undertaken and should include a
legislation review after consultation with stakeholders.

Consideration should be given to developing additional COEPs, relating to
activities other than road planning, design, construction and maintenance. For
example, COEPs relating to construction of hard structural coastal management
options other than seawalls and COEPs relating to sandmining. The preparation
of additional COEPs could be used to enhance coastal infrastructure
management, as identified in the CIM Strategy.

Stage 2 of the GIS procurement should proceed. This stage will establish an
Internet/Intranet system that will allow increased access to GIS information via
a Wide Area Network (WAN) and via the Internet. Stage 2 should include
procurement of hardware and software for other sections in DLSE and training
specific to the software and hardware purchased under this stage.

Arrangement should be made to capture cadastral and land registry data in
electronic format for use in the GIS. Further investigation of these activities,
including outsourcing potential, is recommended.

It is recommended that these topographical maps be updated every 5 years. In
the event of a natural disaster i.e. cyclone reaching cyclonic or hurricane force
winds, a complete aerial survey should be conducted straight after the cyclone
season to map changes that had taken place between pre and post cyclone.

In light of the discrepancies observed between aerial photography and GPS data
collected for the RAMS under MoW, a specific study into the cause should be
conducted. This study is under negotiations and its vital that a solution is
identified for future aerial mapping as well as the use of GPS technology.

The arrangement of selling GIS data should continue in particular for spatial
referenced electronic copies. It should be reminded that, GIS technology is
continue to grow and the system would need to look after itself in light of this
overwhelming growth in Software and hardware development and requirement.
In addition data capture is expensive especially when the department is prepared
to update topographical maps.
x

Information management is critical for sound decision making. The use of GIS
as a tool to catalyze decision formulation is well recognizes. In addition, its
capacity to integrate spatial and non-spatial data should be widely promoted
across all levels of decision making from all stakeholders to communities in
particular areas of common interest.

GIS technology is still in its infant stage thus a need for a well-integrated
approach. GPS work carried out for RAMS discussed some discrepancies
observed between aerial photography and GPS Data. IDA and the PSC had
recognize the need to investigate the issue and efforts are underway for an
independent study. Hoping that the study will assist in documenting a common
platform for GIS and GPS to ensure data exchange and overlaying between
users matches and be able to collectively analyze. In turn, it will assist future
work.

Institutionalizing GIS is vital for the sustainability of the tool and information
needs of the institution. Some training was offered as part of this project but
specific needs and application would require specialize training. These trainings
should be conducted in-country so to maximize participation thus minimize
problems when a few key staff left for greener pastures as GIS operators are
very limited to match its growing demand. GIS should be an integral part of any
organizational structure that required such. Budgets and the required resources
should be allocated. Focus should be on awareness and training to bring
everyone to level with their particular role and need for the GIS.

Now that we have GIS capability in place with MoW and DLSE, efforts should
now be on developing integrated systems. The MoW had put together the
RAMS system with DLSE running the Coastal Hazard Database both as
inventory systems developed by the Project. A wider system that would
encourage a wider participation and use will be the SAMLIS (Samoa Land
Information System). There had been initial discussion on this system and had
been submitted to look at under IAMP-2.

Data exchange, standards, availability and production will always be issues like
in any place. To assist in resolving, a GIS User Group for Samoa should be
setup. The group should have representatives from agencies who have need for
such system with the main objective to monitor GIS activities in Samoa. GIS
activities of each agency can be presented through meetings on a monthly basis
to avoid data duplication leading to reinventing the wheel, which is not cost
effective and time consuming. Opportunities to update on GIS developments
will be critical. During this early stage of GIS development and appreciation, a
few of key players can initiate the user group with the intention of expanding it
to other agencies and institutions when their need is realized and discussed. In
addition, regional organization and institutions like SPREP, FAO, UNDP,
UNESCO, WMO, WHO and USP should participate in the group. There
affiliation and experience with other member countries will help in reviewing
efforts where see appropriate.
xi
Table of Contents
1
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................1
1.1
1.2
2
Overall Project Summary ...................................................................................................................2
2.1
3
Outline of Task ..............................................................................................................31
Summary of Process and Outcomes...........................................................................32
Recommendations for Further Work .........................................................................35
DLSE Institutional Review ...............................................................................................................36
7.1
7.2
7.3
8
Outline of Task ..............................................................................................................25
Coastal/Environmental Advisory Services.....................................................................................31
6.1
6.2
6.3
7
Outline of Task ..............................................................................................................20
Coastal Infrastructure Management Plans .....................................................................................25
5.1
5.2
5.3
6
Outline of Task ................................................................................................................7
Summary of Process and Outcomes.............................................................................8
Coastal Infrastructure Management Strategy ................................................................................20
4.1
4.2
4.3
5
The Project........................................................................................................................2
Coastal Hazard Zone Mapping ..........................................................................................................7
3.1
3.2
3.3
4
Purpose of the Report .....................................................................................................1
Structure of the Report ...................................................................................................1
Outline of Task ..............................................................................................................36
Interim Codes of Environmental Practice ......................................................................................41
xii
8.1
8.2
8.3
9
Outline of Task ..............................................................................................................41
GIS System Specifications ..............................................................................................................43
9.1
9.2
9.3
Outline of Task ..............................................................................................................43
10. Geographical Information…………………………………………………………………………………..46
10.1 Outline of Component..................................................................................................46
10.2 Process and Outcomes………………………………………………………………..46
10.3 Recommendation for future Work…………………………………………………..49
11 Information Management System.......................................................................................................50
11.1 Outline of Component……………………………………………………………….50
11.2 Process and Outcomes……………………………………………………………….50
11.3 Recommendations for Further Work……………………………………………….51
12.0 Integration of Components..............................................................................................................51
12.1
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.5
12.6
Aerial Photography and Topographical Maps .........................................................51
GIS Information.............................................................................................................52
CHZ Mapping ...............................................................................................................52
CEA Services..................................................................................................................53
DLSE Institutional Reeview.........................................................................................54
Interim Codes of Environmental Practice..................................................................53
13 Key Progress Indicators/Financial ..................................................................................................55
12.1 Key Performance Indicators………………………………………………………..55
12.2 Committed Expenditure vs Budget …………………………………………………56
12.3 Payments and Financial Statement…………………………………………………..56
14.0 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………...57
Annexure
1. C2.02 Procurement Matrix……………………………………………………………61
xiii
xiv
1
Introduction
1.1
Purpose of the Report
The CIM Component of the overall IAMP-1 was implemented under 3 main contracts;
C1.01 Coastal Institutional and Environmental Services
C2.01 Aerial Photography
C2.02 Supply of GIS Equipment and Training
The purpose of the Final Report is to provide a summary and outcomes of the Coastal
Component as implemented under the various contracts. The Final Report also
recommends additional work that will further enhance coastal infrastructure
management in Samoa.
While the implementation of the project activities were under the various contract, the
report will try and link the activities in a way that provides a reporting framework not
only to see linkages between activities but will provide an assessment approach for
monitoring and management.
1.2
Structure of the Report
The report combines reports from contractors together with CPM Monthly Reports.
It comprises the following sections:
Section 1: Introduction – outlines the purpose and structure of this report.
Section 2: Overall Project Component Summary – describes the Coastal Component
and the Reporting Framework
Sections 3 to 11 – each section refers to a separate task and gives:
An outline of each task including key activities.
A summary of the process followed and outcomes of the component; and
Recommendations for further work.
Section 12: Integration of Components– discusses how each of the project components
relate to each other, focussing on the relationship to the CIM Strategy and Plans in
particular.
Section 13: Key Progress Indicators /Financial
Section 14.0
Conclusions
1
2
Overall Project Component Summary
2.1
The Project Component
Infrastructure Asset Management Programme
IAMP-1: Meeting Vital Priorities and Strengthening Management.
The IAMP is funded under an International Development Association credit. The
implementing agencies for IAMP-1 are:
Department of Lands, Surveys and Environment (DLSE)
Public Works Department (PWD);
Samoa Airport Authority; and
Ministry of Transport / Public Safety.
The IAMP is being directed by a IAMP-PSC, comprising representatives from
participating departments within Government, and operating under guidelines from the
Government of Samoa and the World Bank. It is being undertaken as a series of
component contracts, managed by PCM’s, with overall project co-ordination by a PMU
(refer Figure 1).
2.1.2
Coastal Infrastructure Management Component is implemented under the
coordination of the Department of Lands, Surveys and Environment. IAMP-1 for this
particular component targeted a collective output for the initiation of environmentally
and socially sustainable management of coastal infrastructure. Overall the component
considers strengthening the management of coastal infrastructures through collection of
relevant biophysical and socio-economic data along the coastal areas from aerial
surveys and anecdotal from interviews with communities and government agencies and
corporations that will be analyzed by tools like GIS and Databases to generate the
CHZM that will quantify and materialize the development of a National Coastal
Infrastructure Management Strategy.
The duration of the work will allow for
developing Coastal Management Plans as the first step in testing the validity of the
strategy at the district and village level. Training for relevant agencies on coastal
processes and works will be carried out through the scope of work. Furthermore, to
ensure the long-term consideration of this issue, an Institutional Review will be carried
out for DLSE to ensure relevant reforms are considered for the inclusion of coastal
2
infrastructure management and decision-making as part of the core activities and the
organizational structure of the department.
2.1.3
Subcomponents
2.1.4
Coastal, Environmental and Institutional Services
The CEIS Subcomponent originally comprised four components of the IAMP:

Task No. C1.01 - Coastal Infrastructure Management (including the CIM
Strategy and Plans);

Task No. C1.02 – Coastal Hazard Zone Mapping;

Task No. C1.03 - Coastal / Environmental Advisory Services; and

Task No. D4.01 - DLSE Institutional Review.
The subcomponent was subsequently amended to include:

Addendum 1: GIS Specifications (part of Task No. C2.02);

Addendum 2: Interim Codes of Environmental Practice (part of Task No.
D1.01);

Addendum 3: Tax Adjustment

Addendum 4: Additional 10 CIM Plans (a continuation of Task No. C1.01).

Addendum 5 : Terms of Reference for Independent GIS Study

Addendum 8 : Review of the Economic Analysis
The Addenda 1 and 2 were completed within the timeframe of the original contract.
These addenda are therefore covered in this report. Addendum 4 continued beyond the
completion of the original contract. Addendum 6 & 7 is for extension of time at no
extra cost involved.
The key goals of the CEIS project, as outlined in Annex 1 of the World Bank Project
Appraisal Document (PAD) are:

Private sector participation in infrastructure provision at least 80% annually.

At least 60% of Government of Samoa road and coastal infrastructure
developments satisfy economic, environmental and social appraisal and comply
with priorities of approved sectoral plan.
3

At least 80% of coastal communities protected through CIM Strategy.
4
D5 - SAA
Institutional
Strengthing
B1 - Bridge Works
B1 - Bridge Design and Supervision
B2 - Road Works
B2 - Road Works Design and Supervision
B3 - Road Safety Works
B3 - Road Safety Supervision
PWD Technical Division
D1 - Restructuring of PWD
D1 - Road Feasibility Studies
D1 - PWD IT Equipment
D1 - RAMS Development Services
D2 - AIMS Development Services
D2 - AIMS Equipment
D3 - Traffic Road Safety Services
D3 - Traffic and Safety Equipment
Figure 1 IAMP Implementation Arrangement and the Coastal Component
A1 - Runway,
Taxiway Approach
A2 - Terminal & Tower
A3 - Emergency
Equipment
A4 - Airport Design
& Supervision
SAA Component
Manager
E2.02.01
SAA Manager
PWD Component Manager
E2.03.01
Director of PWD
Leiataua Isikuki Punivalu
E2.01.01 Project Management Unit
Project Office
Project Information Centre
Project Manager
Paul Fritz
Project Accountant
Isadora Beetham
Staff Assistant / Pro
Moira Hastings
IAMP STEERING COMMITTEE
5
Task Manager
Institutional Analysis
Elisaia Talouli
Task Manager GIS
Leo’o Polutea
Task Manager
CZIMS
La’avasa Malua
Component Manager
E2.0401
Bismarck Crawley
Director DSLE
Tu’u’u Dr Ieti Taulealo
Treasury Department
C3 - Coastal Protection Works
C3 - Coastal Design & Supervision
D4 - DSLE Institutional
Development
C2.01 Topographical Maps
C2.02: GIS Equipment and
Training
C1 - Geographic Zone Hazard Map
C1 - Coastal Zone Strategy
An additional goal considered important for the project, but not mentioned specifically
in the PAD, is institutional strengthening of DLSE.
2.1.5 Geographical Information
The contract was awarded to Aireseach Mapping, Australia to conduct the aerial survey
and provide the following deliverables;

The contract was subsequently amended under the following addenda;

Addendum 1:
Map editing travel and allowance

Addendum2:
Aerial Photography Discretionary Runs

Addendum 3::
Demmurage and Crew Expenses

Addendum 4:
Allowance and Map Editing

Addendum 5:
Supply of GIS data at 1:10k
2.1.6 Information Management System
The contract was awarded to CSL on May 5th, 2002. The procurement was to supply
GIS Equipment and Training. It was scheduled as follows;
P
P

Supply of Goods

Provision for Training in CAD and GIS Software

Setting of all equipments and the network for MoW and DLSE
Subsequent Addenda were developed;

Addendum 1: Use of CSL training Facility for the Training on GIS and CAD
software supplied

Addendum 2: Specialize training under the Global Mapping Grant

2.1.7
Addendum 3: Second round of Procurement for DLSE GIS Equipment
Contractors

BECA International Consultants were the main contractor for the C1.01: CEIS.
Dr. Jeremy Gibb, Coastal Management Consultancy Limited, New Zealand was
subcontracted for the CHZ Work. Dr. Tim Omeara, Omeara Consulting Firm,
was subcontracted as the Community Specialist. Lyn Yeoman and Colin Ward
of Yeoman Ward International were sub-consultants to undertake the DLSE
Institutional Review Mr. James Artherton, GIS Consultant, Ms. Theresa Ng
Chung, Community Consultation Facilitator and Mr. Tepa Suaesi, Translator,
are local Consultants that were sub-contracted by BECA.

Aireseach were the main contractors to provide the aerial photography and the
GIS products.

Computer Services Limited, Apia is the main contractor for C2.02: Supply of
GIS Equipment and Training. Hale and Associates, New Zealand were
subcontracted to provide the Training in CAD products while Critchlow
Associates were instructors on the Map Info Training. Training on Microsoft
products were delivered by CSL.
3
Coastal Hazard Zone Mapping
3.1
Outline of Task
The CHZ Mapping component was undertaken in two stages:

Stage I: Covered approximately 25 % of the coastline, with fieldwork
undertaken from May to August 2000. The purpose of Stage I was to test the
methodology proposed for CHZ Mapping.

Stage II: Covered the remaining 75% of the coastline, with fieldwork
undertaken from September to October 2000. The purpose of Stage II was to
complete the CHZ mapping, using the methodology confirmed in Stage I.
Dr Jeremy Gibb (Coastal Management Consultancy Ltd) undertook the CHZ Mapping
fieldwork as a sub-consultant to Beca. DLSE counterparts assisted Dr. Gibb throughout
the fieldwork. James Atherton (sub-consultant to Beca) undertook the GIS work
associated with preparing the CHZ maps.
The deliverables produced under the CHZ Mapping component are listed in Table 1.
The key deliverable, which is summarised in Sections 3.2 and 3.3, is the CHZ Mapping
Final Report.
Table 1 CHZ Mapping Component Deliverables
Deliverable
CHZ Mapping Final Report
CHZ Mapping Stage I Report – Final *
CHZ Mapping Stage II Report – Final *
Coastal Hazards Database – MS Access
Version
Coastal Hazards Database Users Guide
CHZ Maps for all of Samoa
3.2
Date
June 2001
December 2000
April 2001
September 2001
August 2001
Still underway
Summary of Process and Outcomes
Like most island nations in the Southwest Pacific Ocean, Samoa is, and will continue to
be, subject to significant adverse effects from coastal hazards from time to time.
Fieldwork during this study between 22 May and 20 October 2000 identified and
quantified the significant coastal hazards of erosion and flooding from the sea, and
coastal landslip. These hazards occur to a great or lesser degree around the entire
573km-long coastlines of the large islands, Savai’i and 'Upolu, and the small islands of
Manono, Apolima, Nu’utele, Nu’ulua, Namua and Fanuatapu.
Stage I CHZ Mapping fieldwork was completed between 22 May and 9 July 2000 and
Stage II CHZ Mapping between 9 August and 20 October 2000. During fieldwork all
accessible parts of the 573km-long coastlines were observed, field data gathered, and
anecdotal observations recorded from village interviews. At all times the field party
comprised 3 to 5 personnel, 2 from Coastal Management Consultancy Ltd and 1-3
Samoan counterpart staff from DLSE.
The major achievements of the study are summarized in Table 2. Thirteen Samoan
counterparts were involved in gathering data, including 347-recorded interviews at 85%
of the coastal villages of Samoa and measurements at 276 representative Stations. The
entire 573km-long coastlines of the 8 islands of Samoa were mapped and 120 CHZ
maps produced at 1:5000 Scale. For each of the 276 Stations, which provided the
framework for CHZ assessment, a CHDB was produced with CSIs potentially ranging
from Very Low to Very High Sensitivity to physical hazards. An achievement not
recorded in Table 2 was significant capacity building through on-site training of the 13
Samoan Counterpart staff involved.
CSIs were calculated from 8 physical variables at each of the 276 CHDB Stations. In
total, 65% of the Stations were found to have High CSIs, 20% Medium CSIs, 11% Very
High CSIs, and 4% Low CSIs. No Stations recorded Very Low CSIs. The distribution of
CSIs in Samoa is illustrated in Figure 2.
The CHZs adopted for this study included:

Areas Sensitive to Coastal Hazards (ASCH) – refer Figure 3 and Figure 4;

Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone (CEHZ) – refer Figure 5 and Figure 6

Coastal Flood Hazard Zone (CFHZ) – refer Figure 7 and Figure 8

Coastal Landslip Hazard Zone (CLHZ) - refer Figure 9 and Figure 10
The lengths of the coastline and areas of land covered by the 4 types of CHZ (2000
Samoa CHZs) are listed in Table 3.
shows erosion and flooding from the sea are the most widespread coastal hazards
on Upolu, Savai’i and Manono, and coastal landslip the most widespread on Apolima
and the Aleipata Islands. For CEHZs coastal erosion was quantified by comparing the
relative positions of the 1954 and 1999 shorelines on a Geographic Information System
(GIS) and allowance made for erosion from local relative sea-level rise. CEHZs cover
an average of 76% of the coastlines of Savai’i, Upolu and Manono (Table 3). For CLHZs,
coastal landslip was identified in the field and from vertical aerial photographs made
between 1954 and 1999. CLHZs cover an average of 89% of the coastlines of Apolima
and Aleipata Islands compared to an average of 14% of Savai’i and Upolu (Table 3).
Table 3
For CFHZs, flooding from the sea was quantified by measuring storm tide penetration
inland observed by villagers during catastrophic Tropical Cyclones in 29-31 January
1966, 2-5 February 1990 “Ofa” and 6-10 December 1991 “Val”. The effects of tsunami,
sea-level rise and land submergence were also taken into account along with a safety
factor. CFHZs cover an average of 93% of the coastlines of Savai’i, Upolu and Manono
(Table 3). ASCHs were used for areas where there were significant coastal access
limitations and a lack of data typically on Savai’i. ASCHs encompass the range of
potential erosion, flooding and landslip are very much on the side of caution.
The CHZs, CHDB and CSIs assessed in this study have been incorporated
electronically into DLSE’s computer based GIS. The 276 CHDB Stations surveyed in
this study provide the basis for monitoring the effects of coastal hazards from time to
time especially after the occurrence of Class 4-5 tropical cyclones. In April 2002, DLSE
counterparts revisited 21 sites they selected for monitoring. Results had analyzed and
will update the CHZ Database for those particular sites. The 2000 Samoa CHZs should
be consulted for all coastal planning, management and engineering projects and
strategies in Samoa.
Length Of Coast
Mapped (Km)
212
361
573
Field Surveys
(Weeks)
7
8
15
Islands
Mapped
3*
7
8
Shoreline Trend
Maps
65
55
120
161
115
276
CSI Stations
Village
Interviews
213
134
347
Storm Tide
Observations
128
97
225
Counterpart
Input
8
12**
13
Type Of Hazard Zone
A
CEHZ
CFHZ
CLHZ
ASCH
Total island
262.77
perimeter (km)
B
CEHZ
CFHZ
CLHZ
ASCH
Total island area
170,210.48
(ha)
1,221.77 (1.1%)
2,960.64 (2.6%)
449.96 (0.4%)
72.10 (0.1%)
286.99
710.38 (0.4%)
1,655.06 (1%)
191.93 (0.1%)
1,103.53 (0.6%)
112,265.26
10
Upolu
224.13 (78.6%)
235.45 (82.69%)
49.37 (17.3%)
7.08 (2.5%)
8.79
Savai’i
131.12 (49.9%)
126.81 (48.3%)
27.92 (10.6%)
103.07 (39.2%)
285.09
38.42 (13.4%)
39.4 (13.7%)
0
0
98.46
Manono
8.79 (100%)
8.79 (100%)
0
0
4.72
3.19 (3.2%)
3.25 (3.3%)
43.77 (44.5%)
0
144.15
Apolima
0.36 (7.6%)
0.36 (7.6%)
4.36 (92.4%)
0
11.88
7.48 (5.2%)
7.31 (5.1%)
63.18 (43.8%)
0
Aleipata Islands
1.69 (14.2%)
1.8 (15.2%)
10.19 (85.8%)
0
Relative percentages of both coastline length (A) in kilometres (km) and land area (B) in hectares (ha) covered by the 4 different types of CHZ around the 573km-long coastlines of
Samoa, determined by GIS from the 1999 Rectified Orthophotomaps.
Table 3 Relative Percentages of the 4 Different Types of CHZ
Unless otherwise indicated, all values in the Table denote numbers for both Stages I and II.
(*) denotes Savai'i and Upolu mapped in part. (**) denotes input by 7 counterparts in both Stages I and II. (***) denotes 24 maps used for both Stages I and II.
Stage I
Stage II
Totals
CHZ Maps
1:5,000
65
79***
120
Table 2 Summary of Major Outputs Achieved During the CHZ Mapping Programme
11
Figure 2 GIS Map showing the extent, range of Classes and distribution of CSIs around Samoa.
12
Figure 3 GIS map showing the extent and distribution of ASCHs assessed for Samoa in this study.
Figure 4 GIS map showing an example of an ASCH near Lesolo Point, Savai’i.
13
14
Figure 5 GIS map showing the extent and distribution of CEHZs assessed for Samoa in this study.
Figure 6 GIS map showing an example of a CEHZ at Sapapali'i, Savai’i.
15
16
Figure 7 GIS map showing the extent and distribution of CFHZs assessed for Samoa in this study.
Figure 8 GIS map showing an example of a CFHZ for Apia, Upolu.
17
18
Figure 9 GIS map showing the extent and distribution of CLHZs assessed for Samoa in this study
Figure 10 GIS map showing an example of a CLHZ for Apolima
19
3.3
Recommendations for Further Work

The CHZ Mapping Final Report (June 2001) contains several recommendations
for improving the quality of the CHZ mapping and reviewing and refining the
maps from time to time. The key recommendations for further work are:

Monitoring should be undertaken at sites selected from the CSI stations used in
the CHZ mapping exercise. The results of the monitoring would provide
information for use in reviewing the CHZ maps at some stage in the future, or
for undertaking more detailed CHZ mapping at sites of specific interest.

The CHZ maps should be updated as appropriate. It is recommended that a
decision as to whether to update the CHZ maps be made on the basis of a 5
yearly review of monitoring information. The CHZ maps should be updated
after the occurrence of significant events such as a Class 4 or 5 tropical cyclone,
tsunami, landslide, large earthquakes etc.

More detailed (third order) CHZ mapping should be undertaken for sites where
significant development is proposed.
4
Coastal Infrastructure Management
Strategy
4.1
Outline of Task
There were three distinct phases in the preparation of the CIM Strategy, as illustrated in
Figure 11:

Discussion Document preparation and consultation

CIM Strategy Consultation Draft preparation and consultation

CIM Strategy finalisation and Cabinet submission
20
CIM STRATEGY DISCUSSION DOCUMENT
Jul / Aug ‘00
Aug / Sept ‘00
CONSULTATION
Sept / Oct ‘00
CIM STRATEGY CONSULTATION DRAFT
November ‘00
CONSULTATION
Dec ‘00 / Jan ‘01
FINAL CIM STRATEGY
24 January ‘01
CABINET SUBMISSION
12 February ‘01
CABINET APPROVAL
Figure 11 CIM Strategy Process
The deliverables produced under the CIM Strategy task are listed in Table 4.
Table 4 CIM Strategy Component Deliverables
Deliverable
Date
CIM Strategy Discussion Document
August 2000
CIM Strategy (English and Samoan January 2001
versions available)
CIM Strategy Background Reports:
Existing Information and Environment September 2001
Review
Consultation
January 2001
Review of Project Components
September 2001
CIM Strategy: Principles and Assessment
September 2001
21
Deliverable
Date
CIM Strategy Evaluation Model
October 2001
Preliminary Implementation Plan and January 2001
Programme for the Strategy
CIM Plan Method and Pilot Study Review
March 2002
The CIM Strategy was adopted by Cabinet in February 2001 and was officially
launched on Climate Change Awareness Day, in July 2001.
4.2
The CIM Strategy is a national policy document, which outlines visions, goals, policies
and objectives for management of coastal infrastructure. The philosophy of the CIM
Strategy has been to prepare a simple and concise national policy document that sets the
scene for the management of infrastructure in Samoa’s coastal environment.
The Strategy has ‘Resilience’ as its central vision (refer Figure 12).
Figure 12 Central Vision of the CIM Strategy
The concept of resilience was considered an appropriate one for the Strategy for the
following reasons:

To be resilient is to be able to respond to, recover or quickly repair from damage
or hardship. In this regard, the concept of resilience recognises external physical
and natural pressures. It is important to recognise that coastal processes are a
22
natural and will occur independently of human actions. The concept of resilience
establishes a management approach that is directed at how people respond to
these coastal processes.

The concept of resilience recognises the importance of human behaviour and
management. The philosophy behind this approach is that communities need to
be responsible for their own actions and how these actions increase/decrease
hazard risk.

The concept of resilience recognises that hazards can not be eliminated.
Alternative vision concepts were discussed in the development of the strategy
(e.g. hazard resistance). The concept of resilience was preferred as it
acknowledges that, particularly in the Samoan context there is always hazard
risk. This recognises that, in a number of cases, management approaches will be
focused to risk minimisation and preparedness rather than avoidance or
elimination. The concept also avoids any suggestion of bias towards a particular
management approach, such as reliance on physical protection works.

The concept of resilience promotes the retention of natural systems, recognising
the implicit resilience in such systems (e.g. that hazard risk is associated with
human activities and property).
It is also noted that the concept of ‘resilience’ is increasingly used in reference to the
management and planning for both hazards and natural disasters.
The objectives and policies outlined in the Strategy are separated into six management
themes, each with a separate goal, as outlined in Figure 13.
In developing the CIM Strategy, both the Study Team and Government (in particular
DLSE) indicated the importance of emphasis on local community responsibility through
partnership with Government for the management of infrastructure and hazard risks.
The Strategy is aimed at emphasising the importance of this aspect for coastal
infrastructure management.
Consultation has been undertaken at two key stages of the CIM Strategy process: the
Discussion Document and the CIM Strategy: Consultation Draft (see Figure 11). The
consultation process for the CIM Strategy was undertaken at three broad levels:

Government consultation (this includes ‘internal consultation’ with DLSE, other
members of the Infrastructure Asset Management Project Steering Committee
and other relevant Government Departments);

‘Urban Consultation’, including consultation with government departments and
agencies, NGO’s and private sector businesses and business representatives; and

‘District Consultation’, including consultation with Pulenu’u and other village
members in selected, representative Districts.
23
Further detail on the consultation on the draft CIM Strategy is given in CIM Strategy
Background Report 2 – Consultation.
National Principles for
Management
Local Principles for
Management
Information, Evaluation
and Monitoring
Education and
Awareness
Management and Use of
Land and Resources
Intervention Actions

Figure 13 Goals for the CIM Strategy Management Themes
24
4.3
The CIM Strategy identifies implementation methods that are specific actions required
to achieve the policies given in the Strategy. The CIM Plans are the primary
implementation method and Plans should be prepared for all Districts in Samoa. In
addition, the numerous other actions specified in the Strategy should be undertaken to
ensure it’s successful implementation.
CIM Strategy Background Report 6 – Preliminary Implementation Plan and
Programme for the Strategy provides a preliminary guide for implementation of the
CIM Strategy having regard to priorities, realistic programmes and budgetary
constraints. The report has been prepared based on the study team’s understanding from
consultation feedback of the key issues and priorities emerging for the CIM Strategy
and assumes that a pragmatic approach to implementation will be necessary given
resource limitations.
5
Coastal Infrastructure Management
Plans
5.1
Outline of Task
The original contract for this work includes preparation of CIM Plans in 5 Districts.
Another 10 districts were added on the list and were completed in August 15, 2002.

Aiga i le Tai (including Satuimalufilufi)
Vaisigano East
Palauli East (including Tafua)
Falealili
Vaimauga East
Anoama’a West
Falelatai
Safata
Lefaga and Falese’ela
Salega
Gagaifomauga
Aana alofi
Faasaleleaga No.1
GagaemAuga
Vaa o Fonoti
The CIM Plan for Aiga i le Tai as the first CIM Plan was used to develop the
methodology and involved considerable discussions with the IAMP Steering Committee
to confirm the methodology and outcomes. Subsequent Plans followed the agreed
methodology, although some refinements were made. A review of the CIM Plan pilot
25
study and methodology is given in CIM Strategy Background Report 7 – CIM Plan
Method and Pilot Study Review.
Each CIM Plan comprises two volumes:

Plan Development (English only); and
Implementation Guidelines (English and Samoan versions).
Each CIM Plan was prepared in conjunction with the respective District Committees
and National Infrastructure Providers.
5.2 Summary of Process and Outcomes
Following from the Strategy, the CIM Plans provide guidance on the local level
implementation of the principles and directions of the Strategy. The aim of the CIM
Plan is to help communities and government to improve resilience by identifying
actions and solutions. Not all the solutions may be actioned immediately but the plan
will ensure that issues and options are identified for the long-term improvement in
resilience of both infrastructure and communities.
The aim of each CIM Plan is to:
1. Improve the community’s awareness of coastal hazard risks;
2. Enable the community and infrastructure providers to reduce coastal hazard
risks in villages;
3. Enable the community and infrastructure providers to better adapt, respond and
recover from cyclones.
The process of preparing a CIM Plan is outlined in detail in the CIM Plan Handbook
(refer Figure 14). The Handbook includes instructions, forms, worked examples and
handouts for use in consultation. It is a ‘living’ document to be changed and added to as
the CIM Plans progress. The purpose of the Handbook is to provide training notes for
counterparts and team members from the outset of the process and to give consistency
in the preparation of the CIM Plans as team members change over time.
Consultations involve the pulenu’u, 20-30 persons per village and by the time all
approximately 300 villages are complete, about 10,000 citizens (6% of the population)
will have been directly involved. Note that this is about 90% of Resource Managers in
the communities.
26
Step 1: Preparation
Getting Ready
Step 2: Briefing and Assessment
What’s the Problem?
Step 3: Evaluation of Options
What can we do about it?
Step 4: Drafting the CIM Plan
Let’s try this… or this… or this
Step 5: Follow up
How’s it going?
Step 6: Finalise the Plan
This is it!
Step 7 Delivery
Telling those who need to know
Figure 14 Contents of the CIM Plan Handbook
In summary, the Plan development process involves (refer also Figure 15):

Information is gathered from the Coastal Hazard Zone Maps, the Coastal Hazard
Database, walking through and driving through the communities that make up
the area of the Plan, consultation and education meetings held in the local
communities, discussions with National infrastructure providers responsible for
the provision and maintenance of national services and networks and other
public and private stakeholders such as Government departments, donor
agencies and significant resource users in the district such as resort hotels;

Consultation is undertaken during the collection of information for the Coastal
Hazard Zone Maps, during the preparation of the Strategy and with each village
during the preparation of the Plan;

A District CIM Plan Committee is formed consisting of representatives from
each village;
27
NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
ASSESSMENT
VILLAGE / DISTRICT BRIEFING
& ASSESSMENT
OPTION EVALUATION & PLAN
DRAFTING
NIP WORKING GROUP MEETING 1:
Identify Infrastructure and Issues
VILLAGE EDUCATION
WORKSHOPS
VILLAGE WALK THROUGHS
ASSESS INFRASTRUCTURE
RESILIENCE
DISTRICT COMMITTEE MEETING 1:
Possible Solutions and Impacts
DRAFT CIM PLAN
DISTRIBUTE DRAFT CIM PLAN
Distribute Draft CIM Plan
NIP WORKING GROUP MEETING 2:
FOLLOW UP
Receive Comments
Receive Comments
FINALISE PLAN
DISTRIBUTE FINAL CIM PLAN
Distribute Final CIM Plan & Sign Off
Figure 15 CIM Plan Process

The draft Plan is prepared and returned to each of the District CIM Plan
Committee representatives for discussion and comment in the village. At the
same time the draft Plan is delivered to other stakeholders for their comment and
discussion.

The Plan is finalised following the receipt of comments from all of the villages
and other stakeholders.
28
In preparing the CIM Plans, an assessment is made of the physical, social and economic
aspects of the solutions proposed. The assessment is undertaken in conjunction with
District CIM Plan Committee. The CIM Plan Team provides technical support and
facilitates the assessment. The CIM Plan Team also undertakes a preliminary economic
analysis of structural solutions such as seawalls or managed retreat involving road
relocation.
The Economic Analysis methodology is a key deliverable of the CIM Plan component,
outlined in the Guidelines for Economic Analysis. The Economic Analysis applies costs
and benefits over a 20 year timeframe and assesses the proposed solutions against the
benefits and costs of continuing to do what is currently being done in terms of on-going
maintenance and investment (i.e. the ‘Do Minimum’ option).
The CIM Plan consists of two parts each serving a separate and distinct purpose.

Plan Development, which describes the process undertaken in preparing the
CIM Plan in conjunction with representatives of the Communities involved and
the Government and other stakeholders with interests in the Plan area.

Implementation Guidelines, which describes the Plans and Actions
recommended as outcomes of the process, together with the partner (e.g.
Government department, village) responsible for implementing these outcomes.
The participants of the CIM Plan preparation process are acknowledged in the
Implementation Guidelines.
Plan Development includes the following:

A description of the plan development process and of the physical, social and
economic settings for the Plan area.

A description of the existing situation and the issues affecting networks and
services at the District level. A description is also given of the solutions
proposed for the district, including the reasons for those solutions, the expected
outcomes and monitoring measures. Other solutions considered but not
proposed are discussed.

A description of the existing situation and issues affecting each village. A
description is also given of the solutions proposed and other solutions
considered in consultation with the village.
The Implementation Guidelines describe the solutions proposed that will increase the
resilience of the villages in the Plan area and the ways these solutions can be
implemented. The solutions are presented for each of the infrastructure items that have
29
moderate to low resilience. Where one solution will provide benefits to other items of
infrastructure these “Other Benefits” are also noted.
Implementation is considered to be the joint responsibility of both the villages and the
government in partnership. The government is responsible for the provision of national
and district “Public”, infrastructure, while villages are responsible for local and
community infrastructure. The responsibility for implementing the proposed actions is
also defined. Solutions for both District infrastructure and Village infrastructure, and
the responsibility of both partners, should be considered together as they combine to
provide for the integrated management of all coastal infrastructures.
The solutions for village infrastructure will usually be the responsibility of the Village
and Families in the village to implement. Advice and resources may be available from
government to assist the village in implementing these solutions. In most situations
these solutions will also provide benefits to both village and district infrastructure and
should be considered an integral part of managing coastal infrastructure at both levels.
5.3
Arising from the CIM Plan component, there are four recommendations for further
work that would improve the long-term resilience of Samoan communities:

Complete CIM Plans for all Districts of Samoa. While it is clear from the work
completed to date that some Districts are more sensitive to Coastal Hazards than
others it is important to develop the Partnership between Government and the
Villages that is engendered through consultation.

Develop and investigate the possible solutions identified in the CIM Plans in
more detail. For each District a specific schedule and list of projects for
managing infrastructure assets should be developed, which identifies preparation
requirements, clearance requirements, approximate cost estimates, financing
sources, implementation arrangements and timing. These matters are the
responsibility of the partner departments and corporations identified in the
Implementation Guidelines.

The consultation also identifies other issues of concern not directly related to
Coastal Hazards that if acted upon would improve the resilience of these
communities. These issues are noted in the CIM Plans and may be picked up by
the relevant authorities as programming permits. Such issues include the
provision of a sustainable domestic water supply and flooding from inland areas
affecting roads, bridges, houses and other infrastructure.

It is important to recognise that the CIM Plan is one of a number of tools and
Plans that give effect to the CIM Strategy to improve resilience. Consideration
should be given to other plans for land-use management, Integrated Coastal
Zone Management and also the existing plans for fisheries management and
30
where they fit in the management of assets, resources and activities for the
whole of Samoa.
6
Coastal/Environmental Advisory
Services
6.1
Outline of Task
The CEA Services component comprised six visits, as outlined in Table 5. Paul WellsGreen and Richard Frankland, both of Beca, lead the training sessions. Other members
of the consultant’s team made presentations also. Following each visit, a Visit
Completion Report was prepared, containing details of the training presented,
attendance, responses to sessions and suggestions for improvement of future training.
The deliverables produced under the CEA Services component are listed in Table 6.
Table 5 CEA Services Visits
Visit No. Description
Dates
Trainer
1
Coastal Processes and Coastal 26 June to 14 July Paul
Management Options
2000
Green
Wells-
2
Design Processes
3
Environmental
Impact 13 November to 1 Paul
Assessment and Interim Codes of December 2000
Green
Environmental Practice
Wells-
4
Implementing the Interim COEPs
13 August to 24 Paul
August 2001
Green
Wells-
5
Coastal
Infrastructure 17 September to 28 Paul
Management and Environmental September 2001
Green
Management. (Also review of
previous topics)
Wells-
6
Economic Analysis
28 August to 15 Richard
September 2000
Frankland
25 February to 8 Richard
March 2002
Frankland
31
Table 6 CEA Services Component Deliverables
Deliverable
Date
CEA Services Training Notes
June 2000 to November 2001
Visit Completion Report 1
August 2000
October 2000
December 2000
October 2001
March 2002
March 2002
CEA Services Background Report
March 2002
6.2
A training needs analysis workshop was undertaken in May 2000, as part of the CEIS
project inception, to identify training topics that should be covered as part of the CEA
Services training programme. The potential training topics identified were:

Formation of a technical information database

Coastal process monitoring methods

Coastal dynamics

Causes of erosion

The legislative framework for coastal works

Explanation of the CIM Strategy and CIM plan processes

Selection of appropriate solutions for coastal works

Preparation of environmental impact assessments and documents

A formal EIA process (in practice, rather than in law)

Evaluation of EIA submissions

Design guidelines, criteria, methods
32

Net present value (economic analysis)
The training needs analysis also reviewed what training methods had been successful in
the past. The above information was used to plan a course of training visits, as
summarized in Table 5. The training sessions addressed all of the issues raised during
the Training Needs Analysis and utilized all preferred training approaches at various
times.
The training visits were focused on day-to-day work, as it relates to the coastal
environment and environmental management in general. Teaching methods were varied
and included seminars, tutorials, workshops, group and individual presentations. There
was an emphasis on interactive methods that involve participants in the exercise, rather
than on lecture deliveries. Wherever possible, training was related to the actual work of
the participants.
For each training visit a comprehensive set of training notes were prepared and
presented to participants. The contents of the Training Notes are given in Table 7. The
training notes included details of each presentation, sets of references notes and design
examples, guidelines and checklists for particular types of work advocated by the CEA
Services, such as EIA preparation.
Table 7 Training Folder Contents
CEA Visit
Number
1
Contents
Pages
COASTAL AND PROCESS MANAGEMENT
~100pp
Geomorphology
Coral reefs
Sediment Transport
Wind
Waves
Currents
Sea Level Change
Runoff and Groundwater
Vegetation
COASTAL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Non-structural options
Soft Structural Options
Hard Structural Options
2
DESIGN PROCESS
94pp
Data Collection
Concept Design
Preliminary Design
Detail Design
Design Documentation
Geographical Information Systems
Economic Analysis
3
EIA AND CODES
110pp
EIA Preparation
EIA Evaluation
EIA Practice in Samoa
Codes of Environmental Practice
Environmental Impact Identification
Workshop
33
CEA Visit
Number
Contents
Pages
4
CODES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE
Mitigation, Monitoring and PEAR Workshop
20pp
Review of COEPs and requirements for
parties involved in development and
construction in the coastal zone
(Power point presentation and workshops)
5
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
FRAMEWORK
27pp
Draft CIM Strategy Workshop
Documents for CEIS Project
Coastal Hazard Zone Maps
The Vision (CIMS)
CIM Strategy evaluation model
Where the strategy fits
6
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
90pp
Introduction
Concepts and Methods
Annex 1 – Input data for Economic Analysis
Annex 2 – EA for Construction Projects
Guide to the Excel Worksheet
Training Notes
Attendance at the training sessions was good. The group of people attending the training
sessions was drawn from the design and construction industry and from public servants
involved in the regulation and protection of the environment in Samoa. This included
staff from MoW, Treasury, DLSE, EPC, SWA, MAFFM, SPA, Samoa Tel, consultants,
contractors and other government corporations.
The objective of the CEA Services work was to develop skills in the attendees that will
help them in their investigation, design, assessment, evaluation, construction and
maintenance of coastal resources and assets. Participants were asked to complete and
return evaluation forms during each training visit. Based on the responses received from
these evaluations, the ongoing interest in the training sessions and by the overall
increase in environmental awareness, we consider the capabilities of the participants
have increased over the course of the CEA Services component. This increase is also
reflected in the number and quality of applications for consent and EIAs prepared over
the past year.
Many of the aspects of the CEA Services component have been be put into action by
DLSE and PWD staff however many of those who began the training have now left and
have been replaced by others.
In a wider sense the project as a whole has had major influence on the way that village
and district communities view environmental issues, through the extensive consultation
programme carried out for the preparation of the CIM Plans. The contribution of this
process to the consciousness-raising in respect of environmental issues is very
significant. The CEA Services training benefited from this consultation process, as
34
training participants were learning in a situation where environmental issues had new
and important prominence. This provided more incentive to learn.
6.3
The training notes are quite extensive and distributing additional copies and
updating/maintaining existing copies would represent a significant time and cost burden
on whatever organization ultimately looks after them. It would be much better to mount
these files on an internet web page, so that they can be downloaded by people who want
further information or who need to update or complete their files. This would allow
ready access to the public sector also. It may also be possible to put other related
documents here too, such as exemplars of consent applications and design reports and
the economic analysis spreadsheet.
As part of the CEA Services, a Network Group was established, comprising
representatives from several government departments and corporations. Networking
amongst this group would allow those people with environmental responsibilities to
maintain contact to share ideas and suggestions. Suggested actions are as follows

Appoint a person to maintain the email group.

Update email group and send to all participants still around.

Use the email or users group to update all copies of documents as required.
It has been our experience on many training visits that despite attempts to co-ordinate,
other events have often prevented participants from attending. Most often though other
training has been under way and it is clear that major efforts are being made to provide
useful training for participants, from a wide variety of sources. This can lead to a
“training overload” phenomenon, where participants go from one training session to the
next and not surprisingly end up not much better off.
It would be an advantage to identify all the potential upcoming training programmes
(DLSE and PWD have a training co-ordinator who could do this) and try to minimise
clashes. Additionally, as all learners need to try out their new found knowledge for it to
be properly absorbed, the quantity of training provided should be very carefully
weighed against the quality and the time required applying the knowledge gained.
Without the opportunity to apply new knowledge, it is quickly forgotten and has to be
re-learnt at a future date.
From comments made during the recent training visits, the following suggestions are
made for future training topics,

Economic Analysis (Revision) – we suspect that the topic of economic analysis
will require additional revisions sessions at its application has a direct result on
the outcome of the CIM plans.

Revetment Design (Revision) – We were asked to provide revision sessions on
this topic during the last training visit.
35

EIA workshops – Any further training on this topic should ideally be based on
actual EIAs prepared by participants since the last training sessions.
It was agreed that these topics are suitable for revision and review in future to ensure
they accurately applied.
7
DLSE Institutional Review
7.1
Outline of Task
Lyn Yeoman and Colin Ward of Yeoman Ward International undertook the DLSE
Institutional Review from 26 June to 28 July 2000. The Institutional Review took into
account the impacts of the other components of the CEIS project and other members of
the consultant’s team made contributions to the Institutional Review.
The resulting report (refer Table 8) was finalised in June 2001, after being submitted in
draft in September 2000.
Table 8 DLSE Institutional Review Component Deliverables
7.2
Deliverable
Date
DLSE Institutional Review Phase 1 Report
June 2001
The Institutional Review involved extensive consultation within DLSE and across other
key stakeholder organisations, particularly MoW, Treasury, PSC and MAFFM.
The purpose of the review was to identify

Institutional issues which, when addressed, will contribute to the further
development of DLSE.

Institutional issues which need to be addressed to enable the sustainability and
success of the Coastal Environmental and Institutional Services components of
the IAMP.
The review process was also designed to be a training experience also, with the
interview process including a description of the review framework, purpose and
methodology. Also, a formal workshop was held to explain how public sector
organisations work, develop and change, and why. The combination of consultation and
training enabled staff to be included in the evaluation process rather than the target of
36
evaluation, which was intended to reduce anxiety as to what impact the review may
have.
Prior to the Institutional Review, DLSE had undertaken several initiatives in relation to
Institutional Strengthening. The resulting DLSE Corporate Plan 2000-2002 and
Institutional Policy (February 2000) were submitted to and approved by Cabinet during
2000. The Institutional Review component commenced with a review of these
documents and the legislative framework that provides DLSE’s mandate. Several
recommendations arose from this review, including:

Existing legislation should be reviewed to provide a clearer mandate for DLSE,
through removing internal inconsistencies, repealing irrelevant provisions and
consolidating legislation into several key Acts.

A sustainable development and management framework (i.e. identification of
links between legislation, policies, strategies, plans, best practice guidelines etc)
should be developed to provide a more effective operating environment for
DLSE.

DLSE’s organisational structure should be further refined to better support key
functions.

The ‘Vision’ and ‘Mission’ statements should be refined to better demonstrate
DLSE’s focus. They should also be more visible within the Department, so they
act as a guide for internal practices.

Divisional Business Plans should be prepared to provide more detail in relation
to the concepts presented in the ‘Management Plan’ section of the Corporate
Plan. The Divisional Business Plans should establish priorities and target dates
for the completion of tasks.

Management of outsourced functions should be strengthened, through
developing policies on tendering, quality control and revenue management.

The Corporate Plan and Institutional Policy should be integrated to provide
improved efficiency, transparency, budget control and staff management.
The consultation undertaken during the review reinforced the above recommendations
and highlighted further institutional issues that would need to be addressed to further
development of DLSE and enable the sustainability of the CEIS project. DLSE was
found to be subject to a series of constraints on capacity, including:

Understaffing of established positions by 33%

Scarcity of skilled resources

Inability to compete with the private sector for skilled resources
37

Need to prioritise resource allocation and establish basis for performance
management

Lack of long term skill / career planning

Scattered office locations

Lack of funding for staff training

Lack of empowering legislation
These constraints impact on the ability for the Department to undertake existing
functions. In addition, a functional analysis indicated that, only 13% of staff resources
are devoted to policy development, resource management, programme planning and
implementation and organisation support (refer Figure 16), which are considered the
main areas of DLSE’s operations.
The functional analysis and capacity constraints suggest that DLSE will find it difficult
to achieve the objectives of the current Corporate Plan. DLSE is subject to a series of
competing demands and this is evidenced by the ‘reworking’ of the ‘Management Plan’
section of the Corporate Plan, as undertaken during the Institutional Review. Identifying
the Division most suited by function to complete the ‘Activities’ from the ‘Management
Plan’ clearly demonstrated the competing demands experienced by Divisions within
DLSE.
38
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS DLSE
Policy
Support
1
4%
6
18%
Planning
2
5%
Regulator
3
4%
4 Informatio
23%
Services
5
46%
Figure 16 Results of Functional Analysis
In addition to the activities identified in the Corporate Plan, there are other activities
that DLSE must consider in setting priorities. In particular, over the next 1-2 years
DLSE will be required to absorb activities from PSC Institutional Strengthening Project
and the CEIS project, and develop information technology and data management
functions. The Institutional Review suggests that DLSE also assumes responsibility for
Disaster Management functions and those functions currently located within
Meteorology Division, MAFFM.
Restructuring and refocusing of resources will be required to achieve the objectives of
the current Corporate Plan and to allow the proposed intake of new functions.
Outsourcing has been identified as a mechanism for refocusing DLSE’s resources and
increasing capacity. DLSE have already outsourced some functions and have identified
further potential candidates in the Corporate Plan. The Institutional Review identified
further candidates. DLSE has also already established an external services function to
manage outsourced activities
The intake of new activities and outsourcing of current activities must be carefully
managed and planned. Organisation templates to 2003 were prepared showing a
possible staging of intake and outsource functions (the final organisation template for
2002/2003 is given in Figure 17). These templates identify potential functional
structures over the next three years, based on private sector capacity, likely timing of
exit and entry of functions and skill availability. They are intended to provide a catalyst
for DLSE to begin to consider functional analysis and the streamlining of DLSE around
its core functions.
39
Department of Environment Functional Organisation Template 2002/2003
Directorate
Corporate Services
Environmental
Information Services
Environmental
Support Services
Environmental
Planning
Land
Management
Disaster
Management Unit
Accounts
Draughting &
Examination
National Parks
Policy &
Planning
Land Policy
Risk
Management
Extenal
Services
Valuation
Resource
Conservation
Planning
Land Leases
Hazard
Management
Administration
& Secretarial
Survey
Capacity Building
& Community
Consultation
CIMS
Land Registry
Disaster Response
and Recovery
Human Resources
& Training
Mapping
Donor Funded
Projects
COEP
Legal
Weather
Forecasting
CEAS
EIA Audit
Professional
Standards
Geological
Surveys
CIMP
Customer Services
Information
Technology
CHZ
Mapping
CHZ Database
Management
Geophysical
Surveys
Hydrology
Figure 17 Organisational Template 2002/2003 (Bold Line = Outsource Candidates; Dotted Line = Intake
Functions)
7.3
Annex 1 of the DLSE Institutional Review Phase 1 report contains a recommended
Terms of Reference for further Institutional Strengthening Technical Assistance. The
Terms of Reference are separated into Immediate Priorities and Longer Term
Requirements.
The Immediate Priorities are intended to quickly build capacity in the areas of
divisional planning. This will require a Consultant to act in a mentoring/coaching role
to assist Assistant Directors in preparing detailed Divisional Plans.
The Longer Term Requirements are intended to consolidate the capacity gains made by
developing a longer term, robust framework for DLSE’s operations. Activities are
proposed in the following areas:

Legislative Review;
Human Resource Management;
Accounting and Information Technology;
Customer Services;
External Services; and
Training.
40
8
Interim Codes of Environmental
Practice
8.1
Outline of Task
Codes of Environmental Practice for Samoa are to be developed in two stages:
Stage 1
Interim codes to guide the implementation of works under IAMP during
the latter half of the year 2000.
Stage 2
A complete set of codes referenced to legislation to be prepared after a
legislation review and after consultation with stakeholders.
Stage 1 was undertaken as part of the CEIS project and the outcome, the Interim
COEPs, focuses on road planning, design, construction and maintenance, and associated
coastal protection works.
Table 9 Interim Codes of Environmental Practice Component Deliverables
8.2
Deliverable
Date
Interim Codes of Environmental Practice
November 2000
The Interim Codes of Environmental Practice (COEPs) have been prepared for use
during the planning, design, construction, and operation as well as maintenance of all
roads and coastal works in Samoa. The overall objectives of this component are:

To initiate sound environmental management practice and procedures for public
works in Samoa, with particular emphasis on the application of COEPs for road
works and services

To develop user friendly COEPs which can be readily applied and understood
by all affected interest groups; and

To support the goals of the IAMP which is funded by the International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)
The COEPs are set out to ensure that minimum environmental standards are met and
that appropriate procedures are undertaken to reduce the environmental impact of
various activities related to road works and services. Each of the phases of a roading
41
project, i.e. planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance are
interrelated and have differing potential to effect (either adversely or beneficially) the
environment.
The overall objective of the COEPs is to provide a pollution minimisation approach to
general road works and services, establish guidelines for the mitigation of adverse
environmental effects, and wherever possible indicate opportunities for environmental
enhancement for, the planning, design, construction and operation and maintenance of
roading projects.
It is intended that the development, approval, and subsequent adoption of the COEPs in
conjunction with the identification of project specific issues and the preparation of
management and mitigation plans for those issues will allow a reduction in the
dependence on the conventional environmental impact assessment (EIA) system.
COEPs are identified within the framework of environmental assessment outlined in
Samoa’s Draft EIA Regulations 1998.
The codes included in the Interim COEPs are:
COEP 1
COEP 2
COEP 3
COEP 4
COEP 5
COEP 6
COEP 7
COEP 8
COEP 9
COEP 10
COEP 11
COEP 12
Administrative Procedures
Planning, Design & Construction
Consultation
Land Acquisition & Compensation
Construction Camps
Erosion Control
Slope Stability
Quarry Development & Operation
River Gravel Extraction
Coastal Protection
Drainage
Traffic Control During Construction
All COEPs should be read in conjunction with COEP 1, which sets out the overall
administrative mechanisms and objectives for this group of COEPs. Some COEPs will
be relevant to all aspects of road works and services, while others are only relevant to
one or two stages of an overall project.
8.3
Stage 2 of the COEP development, that is the preparation of a complete set of codes
referenced to legislation, should be undertaken and should include a legislation review
and after consultation with stakeholders.
42
Consideration should be given to developing addition COEPs, relating to activities
other than road planning, design, construction and maintenance. For example, COEPs
relating to construction of hard structural coastal management options other than
seawalls and COEPs relating to sandmining. The preparation of additional COEPs could
be used to enhance coastal infrastructure management, as identified in the CIM
Strategy.
9
GIS Specifications
9.1 Outline of Task
Preparation of the GIS Specifications involved a needs analysis to determine the GIS
requirements of DLSE and PWD. The needs analysis was undertaken in September
2000. The resulting report (refer Table 10) was finalised in April 2001, after being
submitted in draft in October 2000. Dave Annan of Beca undertook the needs analysis
and report preparation.
Table 10 GIS Specifications Component Deliverables
Deliverable
GIS Specifications Report
Date
April 2001
9.2 Summary and Outcomes
The purpose of GIS Specifications component was to prepare a technical specification
for the GIS System to be procured under IAMP component C2.02. This component
covers the:
Supply and implementation of a geographic information system (GIS) computerised
database and software, for the storage, retrieval and management of land related data
and information, to be administered by DLSE and made available for access by public
and private users.
The report outlines the findings of a GIS Needs Analysis and includes a technical
specification, based on the findings of the needs analysis. The technical specification
recommends software and hardware to be procured for DLSE.
Several issues identified during the needs analysis influenced the outcomes of the
report, namely:

Progress of the DLSE Institutional Review

Capture of the Cadastral and Land Registry information

PWD Road Asset Management Requirements
43

Access to information by other Sections within DLSE, Government
Departments, Outside Interested Parties

Relocation of Offices of DLSE
Discussions focused on these issues and the relationship between the IT components of
the IAMP (i.e. components C2.02, D1 and D2) resulted in the following directions for
the report:

The equipment for PWD is now to be purchased under components D1 and D2.
Therefore, while the requirements for PWD are discussed in the GIS
Specifications report, no technical specification is included.

A staged approach was agreed upon for the procurement of hardware, software,
and services for DLSE.

The first stage of the procurement is to focus on DLSE’s Mapping, Plan
Draughting and Examination and Surveying sections. Therefore, other sections
of DLSE are not been included in the technical specifications.
Stage 1 of the procurement will establish a LAN based system in DLSE’s Mapping,
Surveying and Plan Draughting and Examination Sections. It will comprise:

Procurement of stand alone hardware and software for basic GIS requirements in
Mapping, Plan Draughting and Examination and Survey sections.

Installation of a Local Area Network (LAN) to connect between the devices
within the above mentioned sections as well as between the sections.

Training to be specific to this software and hardware only.
This stage will allow basic access to the data and functionality of the GIS software to
manipulate the data while other aspects of the project progress. During this time a better
understanding of the requirements of different Sections and Departments in terms of
GIS will be developed. This will allow a more comprehensive and detailed specification
to be provided for the procurements of goods and services under Stage 2.
9.3 Recommendation for Further Work
Stage 2 of the GIS procurement should proceed. This stage will establish an
Internet/Intranet system and will comprise:

Increased access to the GIS via a Wide Area Network (WAN) and via the
Internet.
Procurement of hardware and software for other sections in DLSE.
44

Capture of cadastral and land registry data, including training.

Training to be specific to this software and hardware purchased under this stage
only.
The actual timeframe for the commencement of Stage 2 is dependant upon the
completed relocation of DLSE (expected to occur early 2002), fibre optic lines installed
along Beach Road (expected to occur by March 2001) Phase II of the Institutional
Review (expected to be completed by the end of 2001), and the development of the
Government WAN by Treasury.
DLSE have noted that this report and the associated specifications should allow the
Mapping, Plan Draughting and Examination and Surveying sections to collect, analyse,
manipulate and present data. The GIS System Architecture presented in the report
allows all of these functions, with the exception of the electronic capture of cadastral
information and the capture of survey data. Further investigation of these activities,
including outsourcing potential, is recommended.
10.1 Outline of Task
The last aerial photographs taken, was before the visit by cyclones Ofa and Val in 1991
and 1992, which left the Government with a total cost of about ST 600 Million.
The overall aim of this work can be collective discussed as follows;

To update topographical maps so to map out new data

Provide the required information in a GIS format that can be analyzed in
parallel with existing data to reveal and identified changes in particular to
support hazard Mapping for the CIM Strategy development

To update existing GIS layers and further support SAMS under MoW.
The following deliverables were received;

45
Samoa Database Structure:
Layer Listing:
Layer
U
U
U
Feature
Types
U
Description
U
U
Building
Point Features
/ Poly
Features
All building features
Contour
Point Features
/ Line Features
Contour and spot heights
Cultivation
Poly Features
Agricultural Land Use
Hydro
Point Features
/ Line Features
/ Poly
Features
All land based Hydrographic features
Landuse
Poly Features
Urban or Infrastructure Land Use
Localities
Point Features
All named features
Offshore
Point Features
/ Line Features
/ Poly
Features
Offshore and CoastLine Features features
Relief
Poly Features
Relief Area Features (Lava Flows)
Road
Point Features
/ Line Features
Roads and Associated transport features
Structure
Point Features
/ Line Features
Structural and infrastructure features
Text
Annotation
Cartographic Text
Vegetation
Point Features
/ Line Features
/ Poly
Features
Non cultivated Vegetation
Layer: Building
Items
Feat_Code, Feat_Name, Name, Use
Point Features
building
Poly Features
building_ply
Layer: Contour
Fields
Feat_Code, Feat_Name, Name, Elevation
Point Features
height, trig
46
Line Features
contour
Layer: Cultivation
Fields
Poly Features
orchard, plantation, cultivation
Layer: Hydro
Fields
Feat_Code, Feat_Name, Name
Point Features
spring, waterfall
Line Features
drain, river
Poly Features
lake, reservr, river_poly
Layer: Landuse
Fields
Poly Features
cemetery, golf_crs, landfill, racetrk, urban , sprtfld
Layer: Localities
Fields
Feat_Code, Feat_Name, Name, Descript
Poly Features
named_feat
Layer: Offshore
Fields
Point Features
Line Features
reef
Poly Features
Island, ocean, rock
Layer: Relief
Fields
Feat_Code, Feat_Name, Name
Point Features
cave
Line Features
cliff
Poly Features
lava_flow
Layer: Road
Fields
Feat_Code, Feat_Name, Name, Use, Lanes, Material ,Class
Point Features
ford
47
Line Features
bridge, ferry, road, track
Layer: Structure
Fields
Point Features
grave, tank, tower
Line Features
breakwtr, embankment, fence, wharf, wharf_edge
Poly Features
airport
Layer: Text
Fields
Annotation
All annotation text
Layer: Vegetation
Fields
Feat_Code, Feat_Name, Name, Type
Point Features
tree
Line Features
shelt_blt
Poly Features
forest, mangrove
During the process of finalizing the topographical maps and the GIS products, Mr. Leoo
Polutea, Chief Mapping Officer of DLSE was attached to Aireseach. A staff of
Airesearch went around the island with DLSE counterpart staff from the Mapping
Section to do the field checks. In addition, DLSE conducted checks on all products and
a report was sent back to Airesaerch to correct discrepancies discovered. The
discrepancies were mainly on contours which were found inconsistent.
OPUS , who were contracted to develop the SAMS identified some discrepancies when
GPS data were mapped on the aerial photos. On average there was a 13 meters shift in
the north direction and a 3-4 meter shift in the East West Direction. This finding was
received critical and an independent study to resolve the issue is under preparation.
The sale of GIS data and Topographical maps was an issue constantly raised as the data,
in particular, was argued to be freely exchanged. DLSE discussed the importance of
copyright to control data reproduction. The department also recognized the cost
involved in capturing new data and the overall management and sustainability of the
system in light of technology growth. To formalize the sale of data, DLSE had
developed an agreement to provide a licensee in the use of data. Costings were also
developed and was submitted to Cabinet for endorsement and approval. Since the sales
48
of the data in 2000, the system had collected about ST 170,000. This revenue will go
back to treasury as an indicator of the system potential to sustain and to some extent
reimburse the cots spend on the whole exercise.
Presently, the computers now available and received from C2.02 had enable DLSE to
provide this service.
10.3 Recommendation for Further work

The continual interest in using the aerial photograph, the proposed GPS study is
critical and should be done soon.

The growth in development and the potential threats to possible cyclones would
require good planning and commitment to update these topographical data. An
update time of min 5 years is requested.
11.1 Outline of Task
Having used GIS to support the CHZ and the need to manage all spatial and non spatial
data collected in this component for the management of coastal infrastructure, this
procurement establishes full GIS capability with DLSE and MoW. The task, apart from
supplying GIS Equipments, provided training on software procured. The software are
Civil CAD and Auto CAD for road design and survey work which can feed in to the
GIS. Map Info, the preferred GIS platform is compatible to CAD packages thus
enhance transfer of data between these software
The training aspects were schedule as follows;
Table 11: Training Schedule
MAPINFO (total 18 people)
Course 1 - Monday 10th, Tuesday 11th & Wed 12th June
premises
6 x people
Course 2 - Thursday 13th Friday 14th & Monday 17th June
Premises
6 x people
Course 3 - Tuesday 18th, Wednesday 19th, Thursday 20th June
Premises
6 x people
U
U
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
CIVILCAD (total 5 people)
U
P
P
P
U
49
P
P
P
P
CSL
CSL
CSL
Course 1 - Monday 24th, Tues 25th, Wed 26th June
premises
5 x people
CSL
AUTOCAD (total 10 people)
Course 1 - Mon 1st July, Tues 2nd July, Wed 3rd July
premises
10 x people
CSL
P
U
P
P
P
P
P
U
P
P
P
P
P
P
MS OFFICE (total 20 people)
Local classes with CSL - Trainer to liase with both depts. 8th - 18th July CSL
premises
20 x people
U
U
P
P
P
P
The relocation of accommodation for DLSE and the reform of MoW caused a delay in
the networking activity of the task.
To ensure that information is available in such a format that can be collectively
analysed and managed, GIS capability and database systems were setup with PWD
through the newly established Asset Management System and DLSE.
11.3 Recommendation for future Work
The equipment procured under IAM-1 should initialize data capture that will serve
the setup of Samoa Land Information System (SAMLIS) in IAM-2
More specialize training is required for staff especially for DLSE who will be
managing the SAMLIS. AusAID and NZODA can approached under their training
grant to provide this support.
Cadastral System and a reliable Land Registration System are key attributes of the
SAMLIS
12.
Integration of Tasks
All of the project components contribute to an overall aim of improved coastal
infrastructure management. The CIM Strategy and Plans are the primary means of
coastal infrastructure management and, as illustrated in Figure 18, all other components
feed into the Strategy and Plans.
The relationship of each component to the CIM Strategy and Plans is summarised in the
following sections. Also discussed is the relationship with other components, where
applicable.
50
1 2 . 1 A e r i a l P h o t o g r a p h y a n d To p o g r a p h i c a l M a p s
Overall, appropriate planning and sustainable decision making is based on good, updated
information. The information collected through the aerial survey was the basis for the
success of the CIM strategy and plan development.
12.2 GIS Information
This component involves developing specifications for the procurement of GIS
equipment and software for DLSE. It is the first step in establishing and Land
Information Management System (LIMS) in the Department. The CHZ maps will
become one component of the LIMS, as will the topographical information developed.
Once the system is established, information from other sources can be incorporated.
In this component, GIS was used to manage, analyze and compare data from aerial
photography both current and past to identified changes that had occurred. Rates of
change were being determined to give a forecast of what to expect depending on the
planning horizon.
CHZ maps were a combination of anecdotal interviews and GIS analysis.
12.3 CHZ Mapping
The CHZ maps define the type and extent of coastal hazards to be considered in setting
the objectives and policies of the CIM Strategy, in particular those relating to
‘Information, Evaluation and Monitoring’ and ‘Education and Awareness’. Hazard
definition also goes some way towards defining design parameters for the construction
of intervention actions.
At both the national and district level, the CHZ maps will be a critical tool in
implementing the CIM Strategy. They can be used to identify infrastructure and it’s
susceptibility to hazards, and thus to determine a communities resilience. The use of the
CHZ maps in the CIM Plan process will raise community awareness of coastal hazards.
The CHZ Mapping involved extensive fieldwork and consultation. The consultation
raised the profile of the CEIS project overall and therefore facilitated the consultation
for the CIM Strategy that followed.
51
Interim
COEPs
Environmentally sustainable
operating procedures and practice in
coastal infrastructure development
Improved analysis, management and
publishing of data relating to coastal
infrastructure management
G IS
Spe
cs
Define Samoa’s coastal
hazards and make the
information widely available
Ma
CHZ
g
ppin
CE
A
l
na
ti o
i tu w
st vie
In Re
Enhanced capacity for DLSE, PWD
and private sectors in coastal
infrastructure management
Se
rv
ice
s
CIM Strategy
and Plans
Develop and strengthen
DLSE’s capability for coastal
management and planning
Figure 18 Integration of Project Components
12. 4 CEA Services
Transfer of knowledge and enhancement of environmental awareness are principal
purposes of the CEIS project. There are elements of training in all activities of the
project, but these purposes are achieved primarily through the formal training that
occurs under the CEA Services.
The CEA Services will strengthen government’s capability for coastal management and
planning by training DLSE and PWD staff involved with coastal works and
environmental management. This will strengthen government’s capability for
implementing the CIM Strategy and preparing CIM Plans.
Private sector is also targeted in this component, enhancing the capacity of
infrastructure providers and developers to implement the Strategy through planning and
preparing for hazard resilience.
The CEA Services is related to other components of the project also. Elements of the
CHZ mapping component were presented early in the training programme. The Interim
COEPs have been the subject of several sessions with both government staff and private
sector representatives.
52
12.5 DLSE Institutional Review
Endorsement of the CIM Strategy by Cabinet will see coastal infrastructure
management becoming an increasingly important function of DLSE. The DLSE
Institutional Review will, in part, identify means by which the department’s capability
for coastal management and planning can be strengthened. The Institutional Review
will also be an opportunity for DLSE to adjust its corporate plan and structure to
incorporate the new activities identified in the Strategy.
Specific issues that will be considered by the Institutional Review that directly relate to
the CIM Strategy include:

Identifying the functions and roles of the department, and therefore the
department’s role in promoting, regulating, monitoring and enforcing the CIM
Strategy.

Identifying the functions of divisions within DLSE, with the functions of the
Division of Environment and Conservation (DEC) and the possibility of this
division of DLSE becoming a separate department, and the role of the proposed
Environment Board being particularly important.

Identifying the scope of legislation review required to provide a framework
supportive of coastal infrastructure management and other functions of DLSE.
The legislative review would also allow the development of statutes to promote
environmental impact assessment.
The outcomes of the DLSE Institutional Review will be a legislative framework that
supports coastal infrastructure management, giving a legal mandate to the preparation of
the CIM Strategy and CIM Plans. The Institutional Review will also be a mechanism to
identify and mobilise resources for coastal infrastructure management.
12.6 Interim Codes of Environmental Practice
The Interim COEPs are a means of ensuring that the principles of environmental impact
assessment are applied to projects – one of the objectives of the CIM Strategy. They
will promote environmentally sustainable operating procedures and practices in both the
public and private sector.
53
13.0
Progress Indicators and
Performance Measures
13.1
Key Performance Indicators
Table 12: KPI
Activity
CHZ Survey
Topographical maps
published
Indicator
Target
Actual
50% complete
Jun-00
Aug-00
100%
complete
Jun-01
Dec-00
Coastal maps
available
Jun-00
Oct-00
Jun-01
Dec-00
National maps
published
Jun-02
Dec-00
Prepared
Jun-00
Oct-00
Cabinet
endorsed
Dec-00
Jan-01
Awareness A –
5%, B & C –
0%
Jun-00
April-01
GIS Service
established
CIM Strategy
CIM Plans
Awareness A –
40%, B – 5%,
C – 0%
Jun-01
July -01
Jun-02
August-01
September
01
Awareness A –
70%, B – 40%,
C - 5%
COEP
Implemented
Jul-99
Monitoring sites
Baseline – 1
Sep-99
Current – 277
54
Nov-00
13.2 Committed Expenditure vs Budget
Part Component
C.
Expenditure
WST million
Payments v. Physical
Current
Progress
Estimate
Coastal Infrastructure and 4.9
Management
94%
100%
Refer to Figure 19 & Figure 20 for more information.
13.3
Payment and Financial Statements
(i)
C1.01 Coastal Environmental and Institutional Services
Contract Awarded:
903,730.00 USD
U
Addendum1: COEP
USD
4,640.00
Addendum2: GIS Specifications
USD
5,747.00
Addendum 3: Taxation
USD
304,462.15
Addendum 4: 10 CIM Plans
USD
518,678.53
Addendum 5: Extension of completion date for original contract
0
Addendum 6: Extension of completion date for addendum 4
0
Addendum 7: Preparation ToR for GPS Study
USD
2,245.61
Total Variation:
USD
833527.68
Total Contract:
USD
1,737,257.68
(ii)
C2.01: Aerial Survey and Topographical Maps
55
Contract Awarded
AUD
Addendum 1:
AUD
Addendum 2:
AUD $97,130.00
Addendum 3:
AUD $42,400.00
Addendum 4:
AUD $1,245.75
Addendum 5:
AUD $ 12,360.00
Total:
(iii)
AUD
$299,610.00
$5,494.00
$458,239.75
C2.02: Supply of GIS equipment and Training
Original Contract Awarded:
USD 312,643.00
Variation
Addendum 1: Use of CSL premises for Training USD 1,500.00
Addendum 2:Travel and Training
USD 18,019.74
Addendum 3: Second Round of Procurement
USD 43,152.88
New Contract Amount
USD
375,315.62
80%Delivery of Goods
USD
250,114.4
Use of CSL premises
USD
1,500.00
Training (10%)
USD
33,216.27
Addendum 1
USD
1,500.00
Addendum 2
USD
18,019.74
Payment
14.0
Conclusions
The subcomponent of this project component all contribute towards enhanced coastal
infrastructure management for Samoa. They are all inter-related and in particular, all
components contribute to the Coastal Infrastructure Management (CIM) Strategy and
Plans, which are considered the key components of the project.
56
As a result of the Coastal Project Component, there is a proven need to manage Samoa’s
coastal resources and infrastructure development. The Coastal Hazard Zone Mapping
indicates that all of the coastline of Samoa is subject to coastal hazards to some extent.
The coastal environment and development is particularly susceptible to coastal hazards
during major events, such as tropical cyclones.
The CIM Strategy and associated Plans provide the means of managing Samoa’s coastal
resources and development. The overall intention is to improve the resilience of
Samoa’s coastal communities to coastal hazards. Better investment of Samoa’s limited
resources for coastal infrastructure management and development will also result.
Both Government and villages need to be empowered to achieve the vision of
resilience. Government will require additional resources, training and possibly
restructuring to take on the new functions associated with coastal infrastructure
management. Initial training had been provided by this component. The institutional
review of DLSE had reflected on these issues.
Village level involvement is a key to the success of the CIM Strategy and Plans and the
role of Government in raising public awareness and providing technical advice is
therefore important. These activities are vital to ensuring that villages can participate in
the decision making process and DLSE will draw on the training provided through to
fulfill this role.
Provision of information is also an important means of empowering villages to
participate in coastal infrastructure management. It is also important in encouraging the
participation of other stakeholders, such as the private sector and government
corporations. The establishment of a GIS within DLSE will facilitate the dissemination
of information to any interested party. Information management is also necessary for the
monitoring of activities and associated impacts.
Development of the CIM Plans has highlighted that land use practices can have
considerable impact on the coastal environment. The need for ‘best practice’ guidelines
such as those contained within the Interim Codes of Environmental Practice (COEPs)
will become increasingly important in Samoa over the coming years, as development
increases.
While the coastal project component has advanced coastal infrastructure management in
Samoa, there remains further work that could further the achievements in this direction.
This work should be considered for inclusion in the IAMP-2, or as candidates for
funding by other donor agencies.
57
Payments to be paid
P
P
Figure 19: Payments made as per May 31st , 2003.
Expenditure paid to date
98%
2%
DLSE Component C2.01
Airesearch Mapping Pty Ltd in AUD
58
Payments to be paid
100%
0%
C1.01&D4.01-Coastal Environment & Institutional
Services-BECA International Consultants in USD
Payments to be paid
100%
0%
C2.02 DLSE GIS Equipment
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
FY 98-99
Qtr 1
Qtr 3
Fiscal Year 1999 -2000
Qtr 2
Qtr 4
Qtr 1
Qtr 3
PAD Forecast
59
Qtr 4
Current Forecast
Fiscal Year 2000-2001
Qtr 2
Qtr 1
PAD Budget Forecast
WST4,858
Qtr 3
Actual Expenditure
Qtr 2
Qtr 4
Qtr 1
Cumulative Actual Expenditure todate
WST6,271
Current Budget
Estimated at
WST6,662
Figure 20: DLSE Component C1, C2, D4 & Supplementary Studies
as at 30 September 2002 in WST ('000)
Qtr 3
Qtr 2
Qtr 4
Ending Period for Payments
for DLSE Components
31 December 2002
PWD-9
LSE-Appendix 1
LSE-Appendix 1
LSE-Appendix 1
igital Camera
OFTWARE
IS Desktop Software
eskop GIS Viewing Software
esktop Embedded GIS Object
U
PWD-9
3 Color Laser Printer
U
PWD-13
PWD-13
PWD-13
PWD-14
LSE-Appendix 1
LSE-Appendix 1
PWD-7
PWD-8
PWD-4
LSE-Appendix 1
LSE-Appendix 1
PWD-6
TS Note 3.
LSE-Appendix 1
LSE-Appendix 1
PWD-6
PWD-6
Specification
Reference
(page nos.)
tem
ARDWARE
erver
erver
igh-end PC
tandard PC
tandard PC
AN for Mapping, Survey, Plan Draughting
AN for PWD Savalalo
AN for PWD Savaii
AN for PWD Vaitele
0 Plotter ( With RIP Feature)
0 Plotter
0 Plotter
odems
0 Digitiser
0 Laminator
1 Plain Paper Copier
3 Flatbed Scanner
16-Sep-01
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.6
2.7
3.2.4
3.2.5
3.4.4(
I)
3.4.4(i
i)
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
2.3
2.1
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.1.1
2.4
2.5
3.2.3
Para.
Ref
No.
LSE/PWD Procurement Matrix
ex 1
5
4
4
2
1
1
1
6
9
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
2
1
1
1
Total
Quantity DLSE
1
1
60
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
DLSE
DLSE
Mapping PD & E
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
DLSE
PWD
Surveyin
Operati PWD
g
PWD ons
Savaii
1
1
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
PWD
PWD
PWD
Technic
PWD
Enginee Corporate PWD
al
PWD Saval
ring
Service
Buildings Assets Viatele alo
PWD-7
PWD-7
PWD-7
PWD-7
PWD
PWD
PWD-9
otal Survey Station (EDM or equivalent)
ata Recorder (for EDM, or equivalent)
utomatic Levels, normal
utomatic Levels, infrared
-meter staves
easuring wheels
PS Locators
UPPLIES
lotter Ink Cartridge - Black
U
PWD-7
U
PWD-9
nti-virus software
UPPORT AND MAINTENANCE
ervice Level Agreement (LSE)
ervice Level Agreement(PWD)
RAINING
nsite formal on the job training for all SW
AD Software Training
eneral Computing Training
EASURING EQUIPMENT
dometers, Electronic (Terratrip or
quivalent)
TS
TS
TS
PWD-9
PWD-9
PWD-9
PWD-9
PWD-9
roject Management
ivil CAD - Upgrade Full Lock
ivil CAD - Upgrade Survey to Full Lock
ivil CAD - Full Road Design Package
AD Package
U
PWD-9
ffice Software Suite
U
LSE-Appendix 1
esktop Diagramatic Drawing Interface
omponents
3.4.4(i
ii)
3.3.2(
I)
3.3.2(i
i)
3.3.2(i
i)
3.3.2(i
ii)
3.3.2(i
ii)
2.3
2.3
2.3 all
1.4
3.4.5(
I)
3.4.5(i
i)
3.2.1
3.2.1
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.4.5(i
ii)
3
1
2
5
3
1
2
17
1
1
3
25
3
2
1
1
3
20
1
1
3
61
2
2
2
1
1
2
5
3
1
2
25
14
17
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
3
chnical References
ote:
U
lotter Ink Cartridge - Color
aser Cartridge Toner Cartridge
aminating sheet
atteries for Digital Camera
atteries for Total Survey Station
0 Paper Roll
ewritable blank CD
PARES
ard Disk Drive
lain Paper Copier Drum
odem
62
Second
Procurement
for DLSE
1
Item
C2.02 Addendum 3
2
Description
DELL PE1500SC Server
(I) Pentium III Processor 1.2GHz
(ii) 512KB Cache
(iii) RAM 512MB 133MHz
(iv) 3 @ 40GB SCSI HDD
(v) 17" Monitor MPRII
(vi) RAID 5
(vii) 10/100Mbit full duplex NIC
(viii) CDRW
1 **NO OS
Option: Operating System for DELL
1500SC Server
Win2000 Server - 5 Client (Factory
Installed) on Dell Server plus
additional 10 Windows CAL License
pack
3
4
Country
of
origin
Quantity
Malaysia
1
USA
1
Firewall GNAT GB-1000;
· 10/100 ethernet interfaces (2, UTP)
· VPN (Virtual Private Network) feature
· RS-232 serials port (2)
· Console interface
2 · 32,000 user license
nz
High-end PC DELL Optiplex GX260
PC
(i) Processor Pentium4 1.6GHz
(ii) 512KB Cache
(iii) 512MB RAM
(iv) Harddrive 20GB HDD
(v) 21" Monitor
(vi) 32MB Video
(vii) 10/100NIC
(viii) CDRW
3 (ix) 1.44Mb 3.5" floppy drive
Malaysia
Standard PC - DELL Optiplex GX260
(i) Processor Pentium4 1.6GHz
(ii) 256KB Cache
(iii) 256MB RAM
(iv) 20GB HDD
(v) Monitor 17"
(vi) 16MB RAM ATI Rage Graphics
card
(vii) 10/100Mbit full duplex NIC
(viii) 48x CDROM
4 (ix) 1.44Mb Floppy, Keybd & Mouse. Malaysia
63
1
2
3
Digitising Tablet - Summagrid V SG53648-AP16-A
Printing Area - A0 36"x48"
PC - Windows'2000 Compatible
16 button cursor
<0.5" proximity
RS232 Serial interface
100 lines/mm resolution
Manual tilt/lift stand
Panamax 240v surge protector
5 Price includes ins
A0 Plan Copier - KIP1030
c/w stand
AO size Max. 2m Length
Image Shift Adjustment
Clear Copies from a Variety of
Originals.
Quality Copying with a 9 Step Density
Adjustment.
Media - paper, heat stable tracing
6 paper and heat stable film with ease.
OFFICEJET PRINTER: HP
OFFICEJET D145
Printer Specifications: Black print
speed upto 19ppm, Color print speed
upto 16ppm, Black quality
1200x600dpi, Color print quality
2400x1200dpi, 32MB Memory, USB ,
Camera Card Reader, Automatic
Duplex printing
Fax Specifications: Color faxing,
300x300dpi resolution, 3 seconds per
page transmission speed, 100 pages
fax memory, 130 numbers speed
dialing
Copy Specifications: Black copy
speed upto 18 cpm, Color copy speed
upto 16cpm, color resolution black text
upto 1200x600dpi, copy resolution,
copier reduction/enlargement 25 to
400%
Scan Specifications: resolution upto
9600dpi, color processing upto 48-bit,
256 levels of grayscale
Software included HP Director, HP
Scan to Web software, HP Creative
Photo Project,
Comes with 1 year warranty on parts
only, Installation Included, Delivery will
7 be 7 working days from order
INTERNAL CD-WRITER - SONY
24X10X40X CDRW
Kit includes drive, software,
connection cable, mounting screw,
CDRW Media Manual, Software suite
bundled includes B's Recorder Gold &
Clip, Photobase & VideoImpression,
Intelligent buffering with in-built smart
monitoring and auto speed
adjustment, Includes Retrospect
software to enable backups of files,
8 Compatible with Win98, 2K, ME, XP,
64
nz
1
NZ
1
NZ
1
NZ
1
1year warranty on parts only, Delivery
will be available in 7 working days
from date of order
COMPAQ EVO N1000C MODEL:
P4 1.8GHz, 512KB cache, 512MB
DDR SDRAM, 40GBHDD, AT Mobility
RADEON 7500 AGP graphic
Accellerator 32MB Video RAM, 15.1"
XGA TFT Display, 16bit sound blaster,
56Kmodem, 10/100NIC, DVD/CDRW
Combo Drive, 1.44MB 3.5"Floppy Disk
Drive, Touchpad, Battery, Adapter,
Carry case, Pre-Installed Softwares
9 Windows 2000Pro, Office XPPro
COMPAQ EVO N1000C MODEL:
P4 1.7GHz, 512KB cache, 256 MB
DDR SDRAM, 40GBHDD, AT Mobility
RADEON 7500 AGP graphic
Accellerator 32MB Video RAM, 15.1"
XGA TFT Display, 16bit sound blaster,
56Kmodem, 10/100NIC, DVD/CDRW
Combo Drive, 1.44MB 3.5"Floppy Disk
Drive, Touchpad, Battery, Adapter,
Carry case, Pre-Installed Softwares
10 Windows 2000Pro, Office XPPro
Autocad 2002"LT Upgrade to Full
Version, +Autodesk Map 5, + land
Desktop 3, + Cadastral Survey Option,
+ VIP 12 Month upgrade and extra
11 releases (Network Version)
128MB RAM upgrade kit for DELL
12 GX150
13 HP Deskjet 1220C
65
NZ
1
NZ
NZ
1
Malaysia
6
NZ
1