CEZ Group

Transcription

CEZ Group
Equity story
August 2005
THE LEADER IN POWER
MARKETS OF CENTRAL
AND SOUTHEASTERN
EUROPE
AGENDA
ƒ Summary for investors
ƒ Introduction
ƒ Scope of operations
ƒ Financial performance
ƒ Strategic initiatives of CEZ Group
ƒ Integration and operational excellence
ƒ Plant portfolio renewal
ƒ M&A expansion
1
SUMMARY FOR INVESTORS
ƒ Mission of CEZ is to become the leader in power markets in
the Central and Southeastern Europe
ƒ The largest Czech corporation and the largest corporation among
10 new EU member states
ƒ The best performing European utility stock with growth at >300%
in the last 18 months with wide international shareholders base
ƒ Leading position in all its markets
ƒ Domestic vertical integration – from mining (45% market share)
through generation (74%) to distribution (62%) and supply (58%)
ƒ Operating leading distributors in Bulgaria (42% market share) and
Romania (17%)
2
CEZ GROUP PROVIDES SOME UNIQUE FEATURES FOR EQUITY
INVESTORS
Key factors
Rationale
ƒ Strong financial performance
ƒ EBITDA margin 37% with growth
ƒ Dynamic profit growth expected
ƒ Growing power prices and consumption,
to continue
efficiency improvements and synergies
ƒ Vertically integrated
ƒ Stable performance once prices converge
ƒ Robust balance sheet
ƒ Lowest level of debt among large players
ƒ Management fully focused on financial
and strong free cash flow
ƒ Group restructuring, aggressive
performance targets
performance
ƒ Dividend growth by 50% in 5 years
ƒ 41% pay out ratio in 2004
ƒ Standard corporate governance practices ƒ Under scrutiny of equity brokers,
institutional investors, financial advisors
and rating agencies (S&P, Moody’s)
ƒ Exposure to attractive regions of 1st and
2nd
ƒ Central and Southeastern Europe
EU convergence zone
3
AGENDA
ƒ Summary for investors
ƒ Introduction
ƒ Scope of operations
ƒ Financial performance
ƒ Strategic initiatives of CEZ Group
ƒ Integration and operational excellence
ƒ Plant portfolio renewal
ƒ M&A expansion
4
CEZ GROUP IS AN INTERNATIONAL UTILITY WITH DOMINANT
POSITION IN DOMESTIC MARKET AND GROWING PORTFOLIO
IN THE BALKANS
Target markets
CEZ Group in Romania**
(51% share in EDC Oltenia)
CEZ Group in the Czech Republic*
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Electricity sales (TWh)
67.8
58%
Market share (in CR cons.)
Number of customers (million) 3.44
62%
Market share
Installed capacity (MW)
12,297
Market share
71%
Number of employees
17,855
Sales (EUR million)
3,339
* Czech Republic and Bulgaria in accordance with IFRS, in 2004
** Romanian Accounting Standards, 2003
Note: Exchange rate CZK/EUR = 30
Source: CEZ, Distribution companies, national statistics
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Electricity sales (TWh)
6.8
13%
Market share
Number of customers (million) 1.36
Market share
17%
Installed capacity (MW)
0
Number of employees
3,027
Sales (EUR million)
340*
CEZ Group in Bulgaria*
(67% shares in 3 EDCs )
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
7.7
Electricity sales (TWh)
41%
Market share
1.9
Number of customers (million)
42%
Market share
0
Installed capacity (MW)
4,905
Number of employees
Sales (EUR million)
376
5
CEZ IS A DOMINANT PLAYER IN ALL SEGMENTS OF THE CZECH
ELECTRICITY MARKET
Lignite mining
CEZ
Others
45%
22 million tons
55%
17 million tons
ƒ CEZ has 37% stake
in the largest Czech
mining company
(SD)
ƒ Currently in
exclusive talks with
the government
to acquire its 56%
stake in SD
Source: CEZ, ERU
Generation
74%
62.1 TWh
Transmission
100%
63.4 TWh
Distribution
5 out of 8
distribution
companies:
ZCE, SCE, STE,
VCE, SME
58%
31.7 TWh
62% of customers
38% of customers
26%
22.2 TWh
Supply
42%
22.9 TWh
ƒ The Czech
transmission grid is
owned and
operated by CEPS,
100% owned by
the Czech state
6
CEZ GROUP STEADILY INCREASES PRODUCTION
CEZ Group generation capacity
MW
12,297
Annual production of CEZ Group
TWh
100% of
generation
Completion of Temelín
nuclear power plant
2,000 MW
3%
Hydro (river
accumulation
and pump storage)
1,934
Lignite off basin
and hard coal
(peakload)
2,687
17%
61.4
62.1
50.8
52.2
54.1
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
69
70
71
74
74
38%
Lignite at lignite
Basins (baseload)
3,916
42%
Nuclear (baseload)
Source: CEZ
3,760
Share in power
production in the CR
Percent
7
MAJOR INVESTMENT PROGRAM WAS FOCUSED ON EMISSION
REDUCTION
Generation structure of CEZ Group
TWh
CEZ Group emission change 2003/1993
Percent
60
100%
Hydro power plants
50
80%
40
Nuclear power plants
60%
-50%
-77%
Desulphurized coal power plants
20
10
-92%
-95%
30
1993 level
40%
20%
Coal power plants
2004 level
0%
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
0
CO
Fly
Ash
NOx
SO2
CEZ invested EUR 1.5 billion into desulphurization
of its plants between 1993-99
Source: CEZ
8
CEZ GROUP IS THE LARGEST CZECH COMPANY
BY ANY MEASURE
Top Czech companies in 2004
By assets
Total assets, EUR billion*
CEZ Group
9.4
Český Telecom
4.5
By profitability
Income before income taxes
EUR million*
CEZ Group
598
RWE Transgas
345
327
Škoda Auto
2.4
Mittal Steel
Unipetrol
2.4
Eurotel
275
Lesy ČR
2.2
Český Telecom
264
204
OKD
1.7
T-Mobile
RWE Transgas
1.6
Phillip Morris
174
České dráhy
1.6
Unipetrol
163
Mittal Steel
1.4
Škoda Auto
161
Agrofert
1.2
Siemens Group
141
* Exchange rate CZK/EUR = 30
Source: Czech TOP 100
9
CEZ IS THE BIGGEST COMPANY IN NEW EU MEMBER STATES
Market capitalization of top 15 companies in 10 new EU member states*
EUR billion
11.4
12
10
8.9
8
8.7
7.8
6.9
6.8
5.6
6
4
5.0
4.3
4.2
4.0
2.3
2
1.9
1.6
1.2
(H
U
T
)
O
PS
Ba
A
nk
(P
L)
Po
Ba
ls
ki
nk
(P
PE
L)
K
A
PK
O
(P
N
Ce
L)
O
rl e
sk
y
n
Te
(P
L)
le
co
m
Ba
(C
Ko
nk
Z)
m
B
er
P
H
cn
(P
M
ib
ag
L)
an
ya
k
a
rT
(C
e
Ri
le
Z)
ch
co
te
m
rG
(H
U
ed
)
eo
n
(H
Ba
KG
U)
nk
HM
of
(P
Cy
L)
pr
us
KR
(C
KA
Y)
d.
d.
(S
I)
)
M
O
L
(H
U
Ba
nk
PK
O
TP
CE
Z
(C
Z)
0
CEZ is also third biggest (including financial institutions) in neighboring countries after Bank Austria
Creditanstalt and OMV
* As of August 23, 2005; considering companies included in DJ STOXX EU Enlarged TMI Index
Source: Respective stock exchanges
10
VISION OF THE CEZ GROUP IS TO BE THE LEADER IN POWER
MARKETS IN CENTRAL AND SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
Business
focus
Our vision
The leader
in power
markets in
the Central
and Southeastern Europe
Priority
initiatives
ƒ Integrated utility focused on power generation,
distribution and supply
ƒ Present in related businesses where relevant
(coal mining, heat generation)
ƒ Czech Republic
ƒ maintain strong hedged position
ƒ achieve operational excellence to be replicated
across the group
ƒ renewal of plant portfolio
ƒ Central and South Eastern Europe
ƒ build strong hedged position through
acquisitions
ƒ integrate into the Group
Brand
equity
ƒ Czech champion on the international energy
markets
11
NEW MANAGEMENT TEAM IS DETERMINED TO FULFILL
THE MISSION
Board of CEZ, a. s.
Trade
Finance
Alan Svoboda
Petr Vobořil
Responsibility ƒ Trading
ƒ Sales and
marketing
ƒ Customer services
ƒ Market rules
Credentials
ƒ Partner
in McKinsey
& Company
responsible for
energy sector
ƒ CFO in regional
power distributor
ƒ Treasury
ƒ Accounting
ƒ Planning/
CEO
Martin Roman
ƒ Conventional
ƒ CEO of Škoda
ƒ CEO of Škoda
controlling
positions in CEZ,
including CEO
and CFO
Jiří Borovec
ƒ M&A
ƒ Procurement
ƒ ICT
ƒ Top management
Generation
Operations
Radomír Lašák
ƒ Distribution
generation
ƒ Equity
ƒ Nuclear generation participations
ƒ New projects
ƒ HR
ƒ Integration office
holding in Plzeň
Nuclear division
ƒ CEO of US-owned ƒ CEO ABB Service
Janka Radotin
Czech Republic
ƒ CEO of E-banka
ƒ Board member
of Komerční banka
12
CEZ GROUP ATTRACTED MANY INTERNATIONAL
SHAREHOLDERS
Shareholders of CEZ, a. s.
As of December 31, 2004
Institutional Investors
(mostly international)
24.5%
7.9%
National
Property
Fund
67.6%
Source: CEZ
Others
Types of funds investing in CEZ
shares
ƒ Emerging markets
ƒ Hedge
ƒ Utilities
ƒ Growth strategies
Examples of large foreign
investors
ƒ Baring Asset Management
ƒ Merrill Lynch
ƒ US Global Investors
ƒ ABN Amro
ƒ Texas Teacher Retirement System
ƒ Credit Suisse
ƒ Pioneer
ƒ Pictet Asset Management
ƒ Parvest
ƒ Fidelity Management
13
AGENDA
ƒ Summary for investors
ƒ Introduction
ƒ Scope of operations
ƒ Financial performance
ƒ Strategic initiatives of CEZ Group
ƒ Integration and operational excellence
ƒ Plant portfolio renewal
ƒ M&A expansion
14
CEZ IS AMONG TOP 10 EUROPEAN POWER UTILITIES
Top 10 European power utilities
Number of customers in Europe, million
36.2
1 EdF
29.0
2 Enel
26.0
3 E.ON
20.8
4 RWE
5 Endesa
6 Iberdrola
11.3
9.6
7 DEI (PPC)
7.0
8 CEZ Group
6.6
9 Vattenfall
5.8
10 Electrabel
5.6
Source: Annual reports; Forbes; CEZ
ƒ Czech Republic 3.4
ƒ Bulgaria
1.9
ƒ Romania
1.3
15
CEZ GROUP IS ONE OF THE MOST PROFITABLE UTILITIES
IN EUROPE AND WILL REMAIN SO
EBITDA margin, 2004
Percent
Electrabel
RWE
E.ON
EdF
Endesa
CEZ Group has advantageous low cost
generation portfolio
17.8
ƒ Lignite
ƒ Long term fuel contract till 2050 for >90%
19.9
of consumption
ƒ Prices capped at predefined fraction of mix
of electricity price and annual inflation
change
ƒ Volume secured for both current and
new/refurbished plants
21.4
25.8
27.0
Vattenfall
27.7
Iberdrola
27.7
PPC
29.6
ENEL
30.2
CEZ Group
ƒ Nuclear
ƒ Operations approved till 2027 (Dukovany)
37.5
Source: Annual reports; CEZ, Bloomberg
and 2042 (Temelin)
ƒ Further extension technically feasible and
likely to be granted
ƒ Increased capacity of Dukovany (~5% or
80 MW) and Temelin (~5% or 100 MW)
after turbine rotor upgrade
16
CEZ STOCK HAS SIGNIFICANTLY OUT-PERFORMED THE CZECH
MARKET AS WELL AS EUROPEAN UTILITY
Prices of shares and share indexes*
Percent
Current price
CZK 587**
600%
CEZ
500%
400%
300%
Price on Jan 1, 2003
CZK 92
PX50
200%
BBG EUR
Utilities Index
100%
0%
2003
2004
2005
CEZ shares are among the most liquid
on the Prague Stock Exchange
CEZ shares are part of
the following main indices
Average daily volume in Q2 2005
ƒ CZK 1.1 billion
ƒ 2.6 million pieces
ƒ 0.4% of total shares
ƒ 1.4% of the free float
ƒ PX50, PX D – Prague Stock
Exchange
ƒ CTX – Wiener Borse
ƒ CETOP 20 – Budapest Exchange
ƒ STOXX EU Enlarged – Dow Jones
* Indexed to Jan 1, 2002
** As of August 26, 2005
Source: PSE, CEZ, Bloomberg
17
ANALYSTS MAINTAIN POSITIVE VIEW ON CEZ GROUP
PERFORMANCE
Target share price
CZK
Current share
price CZK 587*
610
520
460
Recommendation
625
618
Erste
Bank
Deutsche Wood
Bank
& Comp.
639
569
KB
UBS
ING
7.6.05
12.7.05
3.8.05
8.8.05
10.08.05
16.08.05
Hold
Buy
Buy
Hold
Buy
Hold
562
Raiffeisen
Bank
561
CAIB
Patria
22.08.05
23.08.05
24.08.05
Hold
Hold
Buy
* August 26, 2005
Source: Analyst reports
18
CEZ GENERATION FLEET IS THE MAIN VALUE DRIVER
OF THE WHOLE GROUP
Contribution of various segments to consolidated
EBITDA (2004)
CZK billion
1%
27%
72%
0.5
100%
10.0
37.5
27.0
Generation
and trading
Source: CEZ
EBITDA Growth drivers
ƒGeneration and trading
ƒ Regional price convergence
to German levels
ƒ CO2 optimization
ƒ Increased capacity of nuclear
plants
ƒ Higher utilization of plants
(demand driven)
ƒ Higher efficiency of new and
retrofitted lignite plants
ƒ Additional capacities
(acquisitions, new projects)
ƒ Supply and distribution
ƒ Improvement in sales margin
ƒ Implementation of cost cuttings
Supply and
distribution
Other
Total
through Vision 2008
ƒ Adjustments in regulation
of distribution business
ƒ Inclusion of Bulgarian and
Romanian distributors
19
CEZ GROUP MAINTAINS HIGH DYNAMICS IN PROFIT GROWTH
IN LINE WITH ANALYSTS EXPECTATIONS
2006 key growth drivers
ƒ ~ 15% price increase
ƒ Savings resulting from group
consolidation
ƒ Compensation of unbundling costs
EBIT of CEZ Group
EUR million
891-1,482
735-909
566-663
Key growth drivers beyond
2006
ƒ Regional price convergence
ƒ Increased nuclear capacity
ƒ Regional demand growth
ƒ RAB revaluation
433
~833
639
2003
954-1,410
787-1,106
Annual increase
of 48%
2002
923-1,425
832-1,295
Expected annual
increase of 31%
374
CEZ
Analysts’ expectations
(as of August 24, 2005)
2004
2005E
Source: Analyst reports updated in 2005
2006E
2007E
2008E
2009E
2010E
20
CEZ DIVIDEND POLICY TARGETS 50% DIVIDEND INCREASE BY
2008 (COMPARED TO 2003)
Net income and dividends (IFRS,
consolidated)
CZK bn
Dividend payout ratio
Percent
14
RWE
14
37%
12
12
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
Total dividend payment
CZK / Share
10
2004 2005e 2006e 2007e
Net Income
Dividend per share
Fortum
41%
E.ON
41%
CEZ
41%
PPC
57%
Inberdrola
57%
EnBW
57%
ƒ CEZ pay-out ratio is in the range of its peers
ƒ If no suitable and rightly priced acquisitions
possible distribution to shareholders will increase
Source: CEZ, Bloomberg, respective annual reports
21
CEZ GROUP HAS VERY STRONG FREE CASH-FLOW THAT CAN
BE USED TO FINANCE INTERNATIONAL GROWTH
Free cash flow of CEZ Group (cumulative)
EUR million
3,000
2,375
1,750
1,125
500
2005E
Source: CEZ
2006E
2007E
2008E
CEZ Group can finance
foreign acquisitions
in the next 3-5 years from
free cash flow up to EUR
3,000 million without
impacting
ƒ Dividend payments
ƒ Budgeted CAPEX
ƒ Level of debt
2009E
22
CEZ GROUP GENERATES LARGE OPERATING CASH-FLOW
IN EXCESS OF INVESTMENT NEEDS
CZK billion
50
50
40
40
Generation CAPEX
2005
ƒ CZK 3.3 bn – nuclear power plants
ƒ CZK 0.9 bn – coal power plants
ƒ CZK 2.3 bn – other
Distribution CAPEX
30
30
20
20
2005
ƒ CZK 5.3 bn – domestic distribution
companies
ƒ CZK 2.0 bn – Romanian and
Bulgarian distribution
Other
10
10
0
0
2005
ƒ CZK 2.4 bn – nuclear fuel and
provisions
ƒ CZK 1.2 bn – capitalized interest
Net cash provided by
operating activities
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: CEZ
23
CEZ FINANCES ARE UNDER CLOSE SCRUTINY OF RATING
AGENCIES AND BOND INVESTORS
Credit rating of CEZ and Czech Republic
CEZ bonds
Year
BBB+
CEZ
Standard
& Poor’s
Czech
Republic
A-
CEZ
A3
Moody’s
Czech
Republic
ƒ CEZ has high credit rating just
below the country risk
ƒ CEZ has been first rated company
in former Eastern Europe
Source: CEZ, rating agencies
A1
Amount
Million
Currency
Placement
Repayment
Matured
2,100
1993
1994
4,000
150
1995
4,000
3,000
1996
3,000
1999
3,000
CZK
CZK
USD
CZK
CZK
CZK
CZK
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Prague
Prague
Luxembourg
Prague
Prague
Prague
Prague
1996
1999
1999
2000
1999
2003
2004
Outstanding
200
1997
4,500
1999
2,500
200
2003
3,000
400
2004
USD
CZK
CZK
EUR
CZK
EUR
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
USA
Prague
Prague
Luxembourg
Prague
Luxembourg
2007
2009
2014
2006
2008
2011
ƒ CEZ has been first and
one of the largest
corporate bond issuers
in former Eastern Europe
24
CEZ GROUP IS THE LEAST INDEBTED UTILITY IN EUROPE WITH
STRONG ADDITIONAL BORROWING CAPACITY
Additional borrowing capacity equals EUR 2 billion
ƒ May be used on top of the free cash flow to finance acquisitions if large, interesting
and properly priced acquisition targets appear
Long-term debt/Total assets
Percent
CEZ Group
EnBW
E.ON
Debt/ EBITDA
Multiple
15
CEZ Group
20
E.ON
23
Endesa
1.0
1.6
1.9
Vattenfall
27
Vattenfall
2.1
RWE
28
Iberdrola
2.1
38
Endesa
42
Iberdrola
Industry
average 28%
Source: CEZ, Bloomberg, respective annual reports
EnBW
2.7
2.9
RWE
Industry
average 2.0%
25
CASH FLOW GENERATED BY CEZ IN 2005-09 EQUALS ALMOST
85% OF ITS CURRENT MARKET CAPITALIZATION
Cash flow generation 2005-09
EUR billion
11.4
9.6
ƒ Market cap almost
85%
3.5
55%
2.3
3.0
Cumulative
FCF
0.8
Cumulative
dividend
payments
Source: CEZ
Additional
borrowing
capacity
Cumulative
CAPEX for
long term
assets
maintenance
Total
available
cash
covered by cash
in next 5 years
ƒ If no value increasing
acquisition
opportunities
secured distribution
to shareholders will
increase
Market
capitalization
26
AGENDA
ƒ Summary for investors
ƒ Introduction
ƒ Scope of operations
ƒ Financial performance
ƒ Strategic initiatives of CEZ Group
ƒ Integration and operational excellence
ƒ Plant portfolio renewal
ƒ M&A expansion
27
CEZ GROUP HAS LAUNCHED FOUR KEY STRATEGIC
INITIATIVES
Vision and corporate targets
Integration
and
operational
excellence
Plant
portfolio
renewal
M&A
expansion
(2004-08)
(2007-20)
(2004-10)
Performance-oriented culture
28
PERFORMANCE ORIENTED CULTURE IS A PRECONDITION
FOR ALL OTHER INITIATIVES
Implementation
program
ƒ Top and middle
management
meetings/
workshops
ƒ Employee
meetings
ƒ Corporate
magazine and
intranet
ƒ New hires
ƒ Job rotations
ƒ Performance
reviews
7 principles of CEZ performance-oriented culture
1. Value creation is the top priority
2. Enforcing individual responsibility for reaching
ambitious goals/results
3. Building ties and share values within the Group
4. Development of human potential
5. Creation of international organization
6. Acceptance of continuous change
7. Enforcing integrity
29
AGENDA
ƒ Summary for investors
ƒ Introduction
ƒ Scope of operations
ƒ Financial performance
ƒ Strategic initiatives of CEZ Group
ƒ Integration and operational excellence
ƒ Plant portfolio renewal
ƒ M&A expansion
30
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES TARGET VALUE ENHANCEMENT
Integration and
operational
excellence
EBITDA
growth
drivers
Capital
requirements
Source: CEZ
ƒ Margin
improvements
ƒ Costs savings/
synergies
ƒ Regulated
revenues
increase
ƒ None
Plant portfolio
renewal
M&A expansion
ƒ Maintain/increase ƒ Acquire assets
installed capacity
with competitive
plants
abroad with
performance
upside
ƒ Return to exceed minimum hurdle rate
(WACC + country/project specific
premiums)
31
MARKET FACTORS DRIVE CEZ’S ATTENTION TO DOMESTIC
MARKET
Key drivers
Development of CEZ Group sales
TWh
Domestic sales
Exports
growing demand across all
customer groups
ƒ Exports influenced by high
50.8
49.8
ƒ Domestic sales driven by
cross-border transmission
costs
37.2
ƒ Since CO2 trading mechanism
16.0
19.2
16.9
introduction (2005) exports
hedged by alternative sale
of CO2 allowances
ƒ Exports to grow starting 2007
2002
2003
2004
following expected power
plants shut downs in
the region and growing
consumption
* Excluding Bulgarian an Romanian distribution companies
Source: CEZ
32
CEZ GROUP IS SECOND LARGEST EXPORTER OF POWER
IN EUROPE, PROVIDING POWER TO CENTRAL EUROPEAN
COUNTRIES
Net exports in 2004
TWh
France
64.5
ČR
Poland
3%
15.7*
Poland
10.3
Germany
8.1
Slovakia
Structure of CEZ exports in 2004
1.9
Germany
60%
Austria
7%
Slovakia
30%
Diversification of target export
markets from initial focus on Germany
* CEZ Group exported 16.7 TWh
Source: CEZ, UCTE
33
WHOLESALE PRICES OFFERED BY CEZ ARE THE LOWEST
IN THE REGION
Wholesale power price*
2005, baseload, EUR/MWh
+72%
Export markets
30.2
+10%
+15%
Import markets
+18%
+18%
+22%
Existing pricing
ƒ Has been a result of influence of higher
German prices and potential cheaper
imports from Poland and Slovakia
ƒ Will be changed with full implementation
of CO2 European Trading Scheme
supporting price convergence
Poland
Germany
Slovakia
ČR
Slovakia Poland Germany Austria Hungary
Italy
Austria
Hungary
* Comparing 2005 forward price as of September 2004
Source: CEZ, Eurostat
34
GAP BETWEEN ELECTRICITY PRICES IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
AND ABROAD REMAINS WIDE
Wholesale electricity prices (baseload)
2000 index
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
2000
Source:CEZ, EEX
+24.0% EEX Forward 2006
43.7 EUR/MWh
+15.1%
Czech Republic 2006
35.1 EUR/MWh
+11.4%
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
35
DOMESTIC AND EXPORT PRICES ARE CONVERGING
TO INTERNATIONAL LEVELS
German wholesale price
43
Domestic annual
baseload
wholesale prices
EUR/MWh*
35
Export prices
EUR/MWh
Transmission capacity fee
35
24.5
24.8
27.1
30.2
2002
2003
2004
2005
1.5%
9.1%
11.3%
15.1%
34.5
43.0
Price change
Percent
29.9
24.7
21.7
2.7
2.6
19.1
22.0
25.7
28.0
2002
2003
2004
2005
15.2%
17.0%
8.8%
Price change
Percent
2006 forward
prices
?
6.5
4.2
Net export prices
?
2006 forward
prices
?
* Exchange rate CZK/EUR = 30
Source: CEZ, Eurostat
36
CO2 EMISSION PERMITS HELP CEZ TO HEDGE ITS EXPORTS
Electricity price***
Emission permit’s price
EUR/MWh
Export
margin
Emission
permit’s
price**
Minimum
margin
Electricity
EUR/MWh
CO2
EUR/t
48
35
46
30
44
42
25
40
Cross
border
capacity fee
Variable
costs *
38
20
36
Total
variable
costs
15
34
32
10
30
28
Jan
5
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
* Coal-fired power plants
** Generation of 1 MWh of electricity in coal-fired power plant induces production of 1.04 metric tons of carbon dioxide
*** 2006 baseload future traded at EEX
Source: CEZ, EEX
37
ALLOCATION OF 36.9 TONS OF CO2 EMISSION PERMITS PER
YEAR FOR 2005–07 ALLOWS CEZ TO INCREASE GENERATION
IN LIGNITE-FIRED POWER PLANTS BY 5.3%
Market value of additional
allowances EUR 41 million/year
40.8
37.3
35.1
Carbon dioxide
emissions in
2001 (million
metric tons)
Carbon dioxide
emissions in
2004 (million
metric tons)
Source:CEZ, EEX
+5.3%
36.9
33.7
Allocation
of carbon dioxide
emission permits
(million metric
tons)
Electricity
generation
in lignite-fired
power plants
in 2004 (TWh)
35.5
Generation
of lignite-fired
PPs covered by
Current
allocations
(TWh)
Current ultimate
Capacity
of lignite-fired
PPs (TWh)
38
GOING FORWARD, CEZ GROUP WILL BENEFIT FROM FAST
GROWING DEMAND AND FORCED SHUT DOWN OF OLD
PLANTS
Power consumption in the Czech Republic
TWh
Estimated capacity reduction in Central Europe by 2010
Installed capacity, MW
66
64
62
H1 2005
+2.2%
60
2. 0
%
+2.9%
58
56
+2.9%
Slovakia
NPP phase out – Bohunice A1
environmental impact
Poland
environmental impact
Hungary
economic ageing
environmental impact
Czech
Republic
CEZ, IPPs
1,540
1,000-2,000
+2.0%
-0.2%
54
~500
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
E
20
06
E
20
07
E
20
08
E
20
09
E
20
10
E
52
Centrel
220
218
230
234
240
400
248
ƒ Increased shortage of power in the region
ƒ Lower pressure on export profiles to Germany/Austria
ƒ Price convergence to one level across Central Europe
Source: Europrog, ERÚ, CEZ
39
ADDITIONAL 8.7 TWh CAN BE GENERATED BY INCREASING
UTILIZATION OF NUCLEAR AND COAL PLANTS
Current utilization
Auxiliary services
Reserve for higher utilization
Time utilization of generation capacity
Percent of hours p.a.
Lignite
(at mine)
69
Lignite
(other)
3
50
29
Source: CEZ
11
6
20
3
77
Nuclear
Hard coal
Overhauls, outages
23
12
16
13
12
70%
100%
16
90%
100%
Higher sales
opportunity due to
ƒ Improved utilization
of mainly lignite
plants – potential
of additional 8.7 TWh
sales (14% of CEZ
generation volume)
ƒ Additionally nuclear
capacity could be
extended by ~5%
representing ~1.2
TWh
40
CEZ GROUP INCREASED SALES MARGIN WHILE MAINTAINING
MARKET SHARE
Domestic wholesale baseload
CZK/MWh
+ 15.1%
1,041
+ 11.4%
906
813
Distribution regions of CEZ Group
Děčín
2004
2005
2006
Market share in power retail
Percent of MWh
Hradec Králové
Praha
Ostrava
58%
58%
?
Plzeň
Target:
maintain
Brno
České Budějovice
2004
2005
2006
Average net supply margin
Percent
6%
?
2%
2004
Source: CEZ, ERU
Target:
maintain
2005
2006
41
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IS FAIR
AND TRANSPARENT
<2002
2002-04
2005-09
Prepare team
1st regulatory period
2nd regulatory period
ƒ Czech energy regulator
ƒ Introduction of RPI-X
established
ƒ Introduction of TPA to grids
ƒ Separate reporting for retail and
distribution
ƒ Regulated tariff split into
transmission, distribution,
systems services and power
price
regulation
ƒ Starting values
of regulation parameters
defined
ƒ Full pass-through
of the wholesale price
*PV = OC*(PPI - X) + D*PPI + RAB*WACC
PV
OC
PPI
X
D
RAB
WACC
distribution revenue cap
operating costs
producer price index
efficiency factor (2.085)
depreciation
operating assets (regulatory assets base)
weighted average capital costs (8.114% in 2nd reg. period)
Source: CEZ, ERU
ƒ Regulation parameters
reassessed for distribution*
(WACC, RAB, allowed
costs, …) - Average revenue
cap of CEZ Group
distribution up by ~20%
ƒ Main new factors
ƒ Coverage of unbundling
costs EUR 10-20 million
agreed
ƒ Revaluation of asset base
up potentially by ~90%
42
WITHIN PROJECT VISION 2008 CEZ GROUP WILL REORGANIZE
ITSELF INTO A TRANSPARENT HOLDING STRUCTURE …
CEZ
ƒ Generation
ƒ Wholesale trading
ƒ Sales
Distribution company 5
Distribution company 4
Project
Vision 2008
CEZ Group
ƒ Generation
ƒ Wholesale trading
CEZ Prodej
ƒ Sales
CEZ Distribuce
ƒ Distribution
Distribution company 3
Distribution company 2
Distribution company 1
ƒ Wholesale trading/
sourcing
ƒ Sales
ƒ Distribution
ƒ Support functions
Source: CEZ
Main objectives
ƒ Restructure CEZ Group into
integrated, functionally driven
organization
ƒ Implement all synergies
and operational improvements
ƒ Meet all requirements
of unbundling
ƒ Improve margins, minimize risks
ƒ Develop “Business excellence”
to be replicated in foreign
subsidiaries
Support functions
ƒ IT/Telco
ƒ Procurement and
logistics
ƒ Metering
ƒ …
43
… AND ACHIEVE ALMOST EUR 100m IN ANNUAL SAVINGS
Gross costs saving* in 2004-08
EUR million
258
95
76
Total annual costs
savings related to
Vision 2008 project are
to reach CZK 2.9 bn by
2008, i.e., ~10% 2004
operating costs in supply
and distribution segment
(excluding purchased
electricity)
Key contributions
61
Processes unification
830
Best practice
-2
∆ 2004
∆ 2005
∆ 2006
∆ 2007
∆ 2008 Cumulative
Headcount reduction
Centralized procurement
* Costs savings compared to 2003
Source: CEZ
44
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WILL DECLINE BY 1,800 BY 2008
TOTAL COSTS SAVINGS WILL REACH CZK 2.9 BN
Number of employees in CEZ Group CR
Thousands
-10%
20
18,100
18
- 300
- 200
- 400
- 600
16
- 200
16,300
14
12
10
2003
Source: CEZ
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2008
45
AGENDA
ƒ Summary for investors
ƒ Introduction
ƒ Scope of operations
ƒ Financial performance
ƒ Strategic initiatives of CEZ Group
ƒ Integration and operational excellence
ƒ Plant portfolio renewal
ƒ M&A expansion
46
LARGE PORTION OF CEZ POWER PLANTS WILL BE AT THE END
OF THEIR LIFETIME
Age structure of CEZ thermal blocks MW
3,000
ƒ Portion of CEZ thermal
capacity approaches end
of its life time in 2010-20
2,800
ƒ Also desulphurization
equipment to reach end
of its lifetime in 2015 -2020
2,500
2,000
1,550
1,512
ƒ Additionally, the emission
limits on SOx, NOx will get
much stricter starting 2016
1,500
1,000
655
500
0
10-15
Source: CEZ
25-30
30-35
35-40
Age
Years
ƒ As a result thermal
capacities must be renewed
by new plants additions of
refurbishment of existing
equipment
47
CEZ INTENDS TO BUILD ITS FUTURE PLANT FLEET AROUND
NEW GENERATION OF LIGNITE PLANTS
Coal
Nuclear
Gas
ƒ Low emissions
Renewables
Environmental
impact
ƒ Acceptable emissions ƒ No emissions
if well designed/
ƒ Nuclear risk
Competitive
advantages
ƒ Low cost of domestic ƒ Politically acceptable ƒ Flexibility, relatively
Risks/
constraints
ƒ Lignite availability
ƒ High up front
investment
ƒ CO2 regulation/price
ƒ High/volatile gas
ƒ Cornerstone
ƒ Potentially source
ƒ Complementary role
of flexible power
(e.g., combined
combustion of coal
and biomass)
managed
lignite
of the future CEZ
plant fleet
Source: CEZ
ƒ Limited/no emissions
ƒ No resources
depletion
in Czech Republic
ƒ Complement to
lignite for baseload
generation
ƒ Public support
low investment cost
price
ƒ Subsidy scheme not
clear yet
48
CEZ HAS FINALIZED PLANS FOR LIGNITE PLANTS RENEWAL AND
NOW DEVELOPS STRATEGY IN OTHER FUELS
Capacity
MW
Best case*
7,000
Retrofits
Conservative
Existing plants
6,000
ƒ In the Best case CEZ
5,000
would maintain existing
capacity till c. 2035
ƒ Otherwise c. 30%
reduction after 2015
4,000
3,000
2,000
New plants
Retrofits
Existing plants
1,000
0
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
2055
* The best case scenario (additional 2x 660 MW in new units) would require removal of existing administrative
geographical mining limits
Source: CEZ
49
LIGNITE PLANTS PORTFOLIO RENEWAL RELATED CAPEX TO REACH
CZK 100 BN AND BRING 14-25% EFFICIENCY UPLIFT
Expected CAPEX – conservative scenario
CZK million
14,000
2008-15: Main Assets
Renewal Period
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
Projects overview
ƒ Highly profitable
ƒ Secured fuel – low risk
Retrofits
ƒ Gross efficiency improvement
from 36% to 41%
ƒ Less CO2 production
ƒ Tušimice II 4 x 200 MW
ƒ Prunéřov II 4 x 200 MW
ƒ Počerady 3 x 200 MW
4,000
New units
ƒ Gross efficiency 45%
2,000
ƒ Less CO2 production
0
ƒ Počerady 1 x 660 MW
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021
ƒ Ledvice 1 x 660 MW
Source: CEZ
50
AGENDA
ƒ Summary for investors
ƒ Introduction
ƒ Scope of operations
ƒ Financial performance
ƒ Strategic initiatives of CEZ Group
ƒ Integration and operational excellence
ƒ Plant portfolio renewal
ƒ M&A expansion
51
CEZ GROUP WANTS TO GROW BOTH IN GENERATION AND
DISTRIBUTION/SUPPLY
Ambition for distribution/supply growth
Millions of customers
Ambition for target generation growth
MW of installed capacity
~20,000
~10.0
12,297
6.6
Bulgaria
1.9
Hydro
1,934
Romania
1.3
Coal
6,603
Czech
Republic
3.4
Nuclear
3,760
6th European
player
CEZ
Group
Current
ranking
Source: CEZ, Annual reports
8th
CEZ
Group
8-9th European
player
10th
52
CEZ GROUP IS BEST POSITIONED TO SUCCEED IN THE REGION
OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
ƒ Intimate knowledge of the region
ƒ Very well accepted, successful but “local” investor due to close
cultural/historical ties
ƒ First-hand experience with transformation of power markets
ƒ Natural hedge to current position of CEZ Group providing
significant synergies/risk mitigation
ƒ Significant portion of the assets still in state hands, many
privatization processes initiated
ƒ Limited interest of other players in target region of CEZ Group
ƒ Higher financial leverage of other players
Source: CEZ
53
EVEN THOUGH CEZ GROUP HAS AMBITIOUS EXPANSION
PLANS, WE ARE VERY PRUDENT IN OUR M&A DECISIONS
Key criteria for M&A decisions
M&A process
ƒ Target attractive on standalone
ƒAlways along a global advisor
basis (market position, asset
quality)
ƒ Synergies with CEZ Group
(welcomed but not taken into
valuation)
ƒ Return above cost of capital
(without future synergies)
ƒ Credit rating targeting
ƒ Positive contribution to CEZ
with target country ties
ƒValuation prepared by advisor
cross-checked to internal
valuation
ƒMultiple scenarios
ƒTransaction team includes
implementation team
ƒValuation model becomes budget
for the implementation team
Group value
Source: CEZ
54
THERE IS LARGE NUMBER OF POTENTIAL TARGETS IN THE
REGION OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
Target markets
Main acquisitions opportunities
2005-06
ƒ Bulgaria: generation – TPPs Varna,
Ruse
ƒ Romania: distributors Muntenia
Sud, generation – TPP Turceni,
Rovinari, Craiova
ƒ Poland: generation – PAK, Dolna
Odra, Kozienice, distribution
ƒ Montenegro: generation + mining –
TPP Pljevlja, coal mine company
Pljevlja
ƒ Macedonia: generation +
distribution – electricity power
complex ESM
Additional opportunities expected
within next 2-3 years – e.g., remaining
distributors in Romania, energy sector
in Serbia and former Yugoslavia,
additional assets in Poland
Source: CEZ
Central
Europe
Southeast
Europe
55
CEZ PARTICIPATES IN ALL PENDING PRIVATIZATIONS
IN THE TARGET REGION
Varna
Ruse
Muntenia Sud
ƒ Installed capacity (MW)
1,260
ƒ Sales (2004, GWh thousands) 2,463
ƒ Sales (2004, EUR million)
69.9
ƒ Installed capacity (MW)
400
ƒ Sales (2004, GWh thousands) 421
ƒ Sales (2004, EUR million)
23.9
ƒ Number of customers (million)
ƒ Sales (2004, TWh)
ƒ Sales (2004, EUR million)
1.1
4.3
286
ƒ Process started in July
ƒ Expected finish by end of 2005
ƒ Bids submitted (CEZ’s bid 2nd highest), deal still open
ƒ UES RAO submitted highest bids for both, however, competition
authority ruled Varna and Ruse can not be controlled by one entity
Dolna Odra (up to 85%)
ƒ Installed capacity (MW)
ƒ Sales (2004, TWh)
ƒ Sales (2004, EUR million)
Pljevlja (generation assets + 30%
share in coal mine)
Kozienice (50%+)
1,950
5.6
290
ƒ Installed capacity (MW)
ƒ Sales (2004, TWh)
ƒ Sales (2004, EUR million)
2,820
11.8
414
ƒ Pre-final bids (end of August) to be
ƒ Pre-final bids (end of August) to be
handed over to new post-election
government for finalization
handed over to new post-election
government for finalization
Source: Annual reports, privatization announcements
ƒ Installed capacity (MW)
210
ƒ Sales (2004, GWh, estimate) 1,000
ƒ Final bids expected at the end
of September 2005
56
THE ACQUISITION OF EDC OLTENIA IS ALMOST COMPLETE
AND INTEGRATION HAS STARTED
Acquisition of distribution in Romania
51% share in EDC Oltenia*, adjacent to
the Bulgarian EDCs
Status
ƒ CEZ Group selected as a tender
winner
ƒ SPA signed; settlement
expected in 9/2005
ƒ Strong CEZ management team
on the ground combining
internal professionals with
managers from outside the
Group and Romanian experts
ƒ The team currently in the role
of observer, consulted on key
issues by local management
* 25% share purchase, remainder equity contribution
Source: CEZ
57
THE INTEGRATION OF THE BULGARIAN EDCs IS PROGRESSING
FASTER THAN EXPECTED
Acquisition of distribution in Bulgaria
67% in three EDC
Source: CEZ
Status
ƒ Control gained faster than expected thanks to tight
project management
ƒ Corporate governance changes to secure control
over all three EDCs
ƒ Team of 3 observers quickly extended to
international team of 20 professionals covering all
important business areas
ƒ Immediate initiation of key projects to improve
financials and increase comfort with the acquisition’s
performance
ƒ 6 projects targeting quick improvements in key
business areas such as regulatory management,
purchasing, planning and standardization
of investment and sales to eligible customers
ƒ 4 support projects deal with finance, corporate
governance, organization and communication
ƒ CEZ is now well positioned to proceed with
management process redesign, unbundling and
eventually consolidation of the three EDCs to benefit
from best practices implementation
58
FAST INTEGRATION IN BULGARIA BRINGS EARLY RESULTS
ƒ Unified organizational structure across all three EDCs implemented
ƒ All three EDCs adopted international accounting standards
ƒ Energy losses were reduced by ~10% in all three EDCs during the first half
of 2005
ƒ Coordination of selected activities among EDCs already delivered first cost
savings
ƒ CEZ is the only of all distribution companies that obtained trading license in line
with legal deadlines
ƒ Tariff application requesting a price increase was submitted to the regulator,
however, post-election uncertainty in Bulgaria can delay the regulator’s decision
Selected financials – IFRS
EUR million
Name
EDC Stolichno
EDC Sofia Oblast
EDC Pleven
Total
H1 2005
H1 2005
H1 2005
H1 2005
H1 2004
H1 2004
H1 2004
H1 2004
Sales
95.4
86.0
52.4
50.2
52.3
49.9
200.2
186.0
EBITDA
15.0
11.4
8.4
6.7
6.1
5.4
29.5
23.5
EBIT
9.3
5.2
5.3
4.4
2.2
2.1
16.9
11.7
Net Profit
7.6
4.0
4.0
3.5
1.8
1.6
13.4
9.1
Note: The figures above do not contain some intra group accrual items
Source: EDCs, CEZ
59