GoalSafetyReport - Zachary Tran Memorial Fund

Transcription

Greater Libertyville Soccer Association
Goal Safety Committee
Report and Recommendations
For Goal Safety
Presented to the
GLSA Board of Directors
March 9, 2004
[Ed. note: At the March 9, 2004 GLSA Board of Directors meeting, the
Board unanimously voted to "Accept and approve" this document, and to
act upon the recommendations outlined herein.]
Contents
About This Report
1
Summary of Recommendations
2
Goal Safety Committee (GSC)
3
Analysis—Standards for Soccer Goal Safety
5
Analysis—Considerations for Soccer Goal Use in Public Venues
8
Analysis—Considerations for Soccer Goal Use in Access-Controlled
Venues
9
Analysis—Existing Conventions for Anchoring Soccer Goals
10
Analysis—Requirements for Soccer Goal Use at Practices
12
Recommendations—Soccer Goal Use (Public Venues)
13
Recommendations—Soccer Goal Use (Access-Controlled Venues)
15
Recommendations—GLSA Policy (Practices)
16
Recommendations—GLSA Policy (Games)
17
Appendix A—GLSA Board of Director's Resolution Creating Goal Safety
Committee
18
Appendix B—Goal Safety Committee Meeting Minutes and Documents
20
Appendix C—Guidelines for Movable Soccer Goal Safety
32
(US Consumer Product Safety Commission)
Appendix D—Soccer Goal-Related Injury Data
40
Appendix E—Commercial Goal Anchoring Systems
41
Appendix F—"A Plea for Zach Tran"
43
Appendix G—Additional Comments and Feedback
45
About This Report
On October 1, 2003 GLSA participant Zachary Tran died from injuries received when a soccer
goal at Century Park in Vernon Hills tipped over and struck him in the head. It was reported that
at the time of the accident, the goal was not secured.
On October 2, 2003, members of the GLSA Board of Directors conducted inspections of all
GLSA practice sites using goals owned and maintained by GLSA. The vast majority of goals at
these sites were secured as directed by the GLSA Director, Fields and Equipment. Board
members immediately remedied those few situations where additional goal counterweights were
necessary. Over the following week, all GLSA goals not in use by school programs were
removed from play; nets were removed, and goals were moved off play areas and secured
(locked) against use.
At the monthly Board of Directors Meeting held on October 7, 2003, the Board unanimously
passed a resolution creating a Goal Safety Committee charged with the development of a
proposal for the proper and safe use of soccer goals within the GLSA program. This proposal
was to include measures GLSA should implement to minimize the potential for goal-related
injuries. The resolution passed by the Board is shown in Appendix A.
This document is the response of the Goal Safety Committee to the request of the Board of
Directors. Committee members in the course of their study and discussions have reviewed a
significant amount of information; this information was gathered from many sources ranging
from publications to personal interviews. While the full breadth of all information does not
appear in this document in its entirety, every effort has been made to provide faithful summaries
of information used in arriving at recommendations.
This report has been developed to support goal safety recommendations made to the GLSA
Board of Directors. The work of the Goal Safety Committee remains focused on the Desired
State articulated in its initial meeting:
Each goal used by GLSA participants* is properly anchored—at all times—in such a way as
to prevent the goal from accidentally being moved or tipped over. Procedures exist and are
followed by all affiliated parties for the safe set-up, maintenance, use, and storage of soccer
goals. If goal equipment does not conform to GLSA standards for safety, goals will not be
used.
* - metal goals used at local parks, schools, the Libertyville Township Soccer Complex, and all away sites
where GLSA-affiliated teams participate in practice, scrimmage, game, or tournament play
The Goal Safety Committee recognizes that another issue related to goal safety is the padding of
goal posts when and where allowed/appropriate. This study does not address this issue; the
Committee supports further investigation, pending availability of resources.
GLSA Report and Recommendations for Goal Safety
1
March 9, 2004
Summary of Recommendations
1. In the short term (i.e., Spring, 2004), no goals are made available for practices in the
parks/schools. Coaches to be supplied with plastic cones (if needed). All goals used at the LTSC
and other venues (i.e., parks and fields for competitive/traveling games) are to be sufficiently
anchored to prevent tipping during normal game use (some sort of anchoring device must be
visibly present and tested).
2. By July 1, 2004 a team of GLSA volunteers complete research and testing of existing goal
anchoring systems, with the intent of making a recommendation to the GLSA Board of Directors
at the July 2004 meeting. This recommendation is to include a specific plan for the types of
goals, signage, and anchoring systems to be deployed in local parks, schools, and game fields for
the Fall, 2004 season. Expectations are that the recommendation is based upon the semipermanent installation of goals at all GLSA-sanctioned locations (semi-permanent defined as tipresistant and non-movable without deliberately dismantling the anchoring system).
3. The GLSA Board of Directors implements a capital improvement fee (per recreational,
competitive, and select player) beginning with registration for Fall, 2004 play. Proceeds from this
fee to be used to offset the costs of procuring approved goals and anchoring systems.
4. The GLSA Director of Field and Equipment directs the inspection of all GLSA-owned goals
currently deployed in parks and school grounds. Goals not meeting or exceeding the
specifications established by the GLSA (see number 2, above) will not be deployed for use.
Within a reasonable amount of time after inspection, goals not meeting or exceeding expectations
will be dismantled and scrapped (parts may be kept for maintenance of usable goals, with the
remainder of pieces recycled as scrap metal).
5. All GLSA-sponsored competitive team coaches and trainers will be equipped with IYSAapproved documentation regarding their right and responsibility to refuse to play a game if field
conditions (including goal equipment) do not meet GLSA standards for safety.
2
March 9, 2004
Goal Safety Committee (GSC)
At the October 2003 GLSA Board Meeting, the Board of Directors unanimously approved a
resolution creating a committee to research goal safety and report recommendations to the Board by
February 2004. During the December 2003 Board Meeting, the reporting deadline was moved to
March 2004 to allow the report to be made at the Annual Meeting. The resolution appears in its
entirety in Appendix A. Meeting minutes and documents appear in Appendix B. Committee members
are:
Mark Zwolski, Chairman
Horst Fatschel
Peter Flaherty
Steve Malecha
Sue Schory
Information was solicited from a variety of organizations and agencies having an interest in the
policies and procedures of GLSA:
High School District 128
Mr. Timothy Albers, Athletic Director, Libertyville High School
Mr. Vincent DeLuca, Varsity Soccer Coach, Vernon Hills High School
Mr. Al Janulis, Athletic Director, Vernon Hills High School
Mr. Scott Shinto, Varsity Soccer Coach, Libertyville High School
Libertyville Parks &
Recreation
Mr. Steven McLevich, Superintendent of Parks
Mr. James Zych, Director of Parks and Recreation
LTSC Board Members
Mr. Edward Joras, Secretary
Mr. Roy Lucke, President
Mr. Michael Stone, Vice-President
Mr. Michael Zovistoski, Treasurer
Illinois Women's Soccer
League
Mr. Charles Dyson, IWSL Registrar, State Soccer Referee Director of
Operations
Illinois Youth Soccer
Association
Mrs. Mary Jane Bender, Executive Director
Mundelein AYSO
Mr. Gary Latkow
School District 70
(Libertyville)
Mr. Phillip DeRuntz, Director of Buildings and Grounds
Dr. Mark Friedman, Superintendent
School District 72 (Rondout)
Mr. Michael Polite, Principal
Dr. Mark Schweitzer, School Board President
3
March 9, 2004
School District 73 (Hawthorn
Option School)
Mr. Brain Rude, Principal
Vernon Hills Park District
Mr. Thomas Ritter, Superintendent of Recreation
Mr. Lawrence DeGraff, Executive Director
Mr. Michael Meline, Park Board Commissioner
Village of Libertyville
Mr. Kevin Bowens, Village Administrator
Young Sportsman Soccer
League
Mr. Robert Berkley, President
Additional resources contacted for documentation and information:
Distributors and
Manufacturers, soccer goal
equipment
American Playground Equipment
Bison, Inc.
Keeper Goals
Kwik Goals
Soccer goal-related injury
information
Bollinger Insurance
U.S. Center for Disease Control
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
Soccer training requirements
Greater Libertyville Soccer Association, professional training staff
Soccer rules (related to soccer
goal safety)
Illinois Women's Soccer League
National Collegiate Athletic Association
National Federation of State High School Associations
United States Soccer Federation
Young Sportsman Soccer League
4
March 9, 2004
Analysis—Standards for Soccer Goal Safety
There is a single universally recognized standard for the safe use of soccer goals for games. Law 1 of
the FIFA Laws of the Game states simply that "Goals must be anchored securely to the ground.
Portable goals may only be used if they satisfy this requirement".
Other agencies have adapted and interpreted the FIFA law as follows:
USSF "Advice to Referees on the Laws of the Game"
1.2 SAFETY
Referees should arrive in plenty of time to inspect the field, goals, flags, and
markings for accuracy and safety. No part of the field surface or the goals and
flagposts may be dangerous to the players. If the field conditions are dangerous or
unsuitable for play, the referee must refuse to officiate the game and, unless there is a
possibility that the problem can be corrected, should leave immediately after
announcing his decision to both sides. Unresolved problems with the field that do not
involve safety should be reported to the competition authority, even if the game is
played.
1.3 GOALS
The goals must be securely anchored to the ground. For safety reasons, if the goals
are not securely anchored to the ground, the match shall not be played.
NCAA Instructions
Rule 1, Section 9: Goals
The goals shall be anchored, secured, or counterweighted.
Penalty - The game shall not begin and may result in a forfeiture by the home team to
be determined by the governing sports authority.
NFHS/High School Instructions
Rule 1, Section 4: Goals (article 1):
If portable goals are used, they shall be adequately anchored, secured, or
counterweighted to the ground.
Playing Rules 1.4.1 Situation B
While inspecting the field prior to the game, the head referee detects that the portable
goals in use are not anchored to the ground.
Ruling: The game will not start until the goals are properly secured.
YSSL Information
YSSL Game Card, presented to the Referee:
The game should always be played, UNLESS there is a safety issue…Goals not
secured could result in a forfeit and MUST be reported to the league on the "Referee
Game Card Report".
5
March 9, 2004
YSSL Special Procedures - Section IIV (Field)
A) Fields must meet the following. Failure to abide by the following rules will result
in a forfeit: Goals must be anchored and secured for player's safety.
YSSL Pre-game Procedures for Referees
6) Verify that goals are secured into the ground and safe.
IWSL Information
Law 1 states "Goals must be anchored securely to the ground". This means spikes
into the ground or several hundred pounds of sandbags. If the field you are assigned
to for your game does not have securely anchored goals and no remedy is available,
then you are not to start the game. Leave the field and file a report with the league.
It is the opinion of the Goal Safety Committee that the standards for goals used in practice situations
should meet or exceed the standards established for game use.
The only consensus in the public domain regarding specific instructions or guidelines for soccer goal
safety to meet the FIFA requirement is the application of common sense. There are no universally
approved or sanctioned anchoring systems currently on the market. Suggestions or guidelines for
specific goal construction and specific anchoring systems are inconsistent from manufacturer to
manufacturer and from one soccer sponsor/organization to the next.
Specific issues addressed by portable goal manufacturers, portable goal users, school and athletic
organizations, and governmental agencies include:
¾
¾
¾
¾
goal construction
use of counterbalance, counterweight, or anchoring systems
supervision of goal use
storage of equipment when not in use
Portable goals are used by many schools, park districts, soccer clubs, and soccer parks. The most
common reasons offered for use of portable goals (as opposed to permanent goals) are:
¾ flexibility in use
¾ grounds maintenance challenges/requirements
¾ cost of installation
Flexibility is a requirement to allow the user to maximize use of equipment and grounds for multiple
teams and/or sports. In many practice situations, goals are used in parks and on school grounds that
are also needed for other sports activities. Coaches will move goals to accommodate special drills or
practice games, changing the size and shape of the practice field. In some instances, tournament play
requires moving large numbers of goals onto fields or into parks that typically serve multiple
purposes. These goals are used for several days, and then removed from play or returned to other
practice and game fields. Goals are used and stored seasonally, depending on the need for shared
field space with other sports.
Upkeep of the grounds around goal areas remains a challenge for those responsible for field
maintenance. Leaving goals in a stationery position for several weeks will result in killing any grass
6
March 9, 2004
under the side legs and supports of the goal. Play in front of a stationery goal can also damage grass,
leaving bare spots which either become hard ground or turn to mud quickly; both situations increase
the risk of injury to players. Cutting grass around the goals becomes a challenge, as goals are
typically located in field and parks where the primary means of mowing is a large tractor.
Maintenance teams require additional equipment, time, and/or labor to complete their work when
soccer goals are in use. Less-than-careful use of equipment such as lawn mowers or trimmers can
damage the goal or net(s).
Permanent installation includes the one-time cost of digging holes, mixing and pouring concrete, and
setting goal posts in place, plus the ongoing costs of extra grounds maintenance for mowing and field
repairs.
The soccer community—along with the many agencies and organizations involved in making soccer
fields available for play—is familiar with and understands the need for using portable goals.
The main risk of using portable goals is that they are not permanently installed. By their very design
and purpose, portable soccer goals are subject to tipping if enough force is applied at certain parts of
the goal and in a certain direction. Anchoring systems can be removed or deteriorate over time.
Public-access fields are not constantly supervised. Well-intentioned coaches, players, or staff may
not correctly use or re-connect an anchoring system. Even the act of deliberately moving a portable
goal for appropriate reasons can result in injury or death. Short of alert, appropriate, qualified, and
perpetual supervision, the potential for any portable goal to be tipped over remains.
Users can take steps—founded in common sense—that can reduce and even minimize the risk of
injury or death caused by a falling goal. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's
(Guidelines for Movable Soccer Goal Safety, 1995) conclusions and safety tips best summarize these
steps (see Appendix C):
· Securely anchor or counterweight movable soccer goals at ALL times.
· Anchor or chain one goal to another, to itself in a folded down position, or to nearby fence posts,
dugouts, or any other similar sturdy fixture when not in use. If this is not practical, store movable
soccer goals in a place where children cannot have access to them.
· Remove nets when goals are not in use.
· Check for structural integrity and proper connecting hardware before every use. Replace damaged
or missing parts or fasteners immediately.
· NEVER allow anyone to climb on the net or goal framework.
· Ensure safety/warning labels are clearly visible (placed under the crossbar and on the sides of the
down-posts at eye level).
· Fully disassemble goals for seasonal storage.
· Always exercise extreme caution when moving goals and allow adequate manpower to move goals
of varied sizes and weights. Movable soccer goals should only be moved by authorized and trained
personnel.
· Always instruct players on the safe handling of and potential dangers associated with movable
soccer goals.
· Movable soccer goals should only be used on LEVEL (flat) fields.
7
March 9, 2004
Analysis—Considerations for Soccer Goal Use in Public Venues
In addition to common sense guidelines and suggestions for safe use of portable goals, extra care
must be taken with equipment used in public venues. Parks, school grounds, fields, and open spaces
that allow unrestricted and unsupervised access increase the risk for injury caused by improper use of
soccer goal equipment. Equipment used in these potentially unsupervised venues must be measured
against the highest possible standards and considerations for safety.
Care must be demonstrated by all scheduled and casual users of soccer goals in public-access
environments to reduce the risk of injury and to maintain the integrity of equipment and anchoring
systems. A wide range of precautions—from signs and labels to education of users to proper storage
of equipment when not in use—are available for use by sponsors of equipment in such venues.
Individuals—especially children—who have access to soccer goals in public-access areas should be
supervised and/or aware of the risks of improper use of goal equipment. Goals should not be used for
any purpose other than proper use for soccer games or practices. In some public-access venues, goals
can be placed distant from walkways, paths, playgrounds, and other sports fields (such as baseball
diamonds) to minimize traffic and improper use.
Practice schedules may be altered or rotated to reduce the number of goals required to accommodate
the practice needs of an organization. Typically, a goal is used to reserve space within a park or field;
schedules could be established to reserve zones of a park (i.e., NW quadrant, SW quadrant, etc.) as
an alternate. Scheduling by age groups, including limiting use of large portable goals to ageappropriate teams, can also help to control access.
Within the limitations or specifications established by groups and organizations sponsoring the
deployment of portable soccer goals in public places, visible anchoring or counterbalance systems
should be used to allow for immediate (and remote) verification that such systems are in place.
While every possible precaution should be taken to minimize the risk of injury from falling goals, it
is recognized that improper and unsupervised use of goal equipment cannot be prevented or
controlled in public-access environments.
8
March 9, 2004
Analysis—Considerations for Soccer Goal Use in Access-Controlled Venues
Restricting access to soccer fields and equipment in a controlled access venue does not reduce or
eliminate the need for soccer goal safety, regardless of the type of goal and/or anchoring system in
use. Players, coaches, and visitors to such facilities expect equipment used in those facilities to be
properly constructed, inspected, maintained, and secured. While statistics would indicate that fewer
injuries occur in access-controlled venues, goal safety cannot be implied. Goal safety remains the
responsibility of the users even in situations where fields and equipment may be maintained by a
professional staff.
Equipment used inside a fenced and gated park or facility should be installed and maintained as if it
were in an unrestricted access venue. Every effort should to be taken to minimize the risk of injury
due to accident or improper use of equipment. All users require ongoing education and reminders
about the need for goal safety, especially in environments where safety could be assumed.
Referees have access to information on field and equipment safety, and are instructed on the
remedies available when conditions or equipment pose a risk to players, coaches, and fans. Game and
park/facility officials have opportunity to inspect goal equipment on a regular basis, and should do so
armed with a checklist of what to look for and how to report or remedy unsafe conditions.
9
March 9, 2004
Analysis—Existing Conventions for Anchoring Soccer Goals
Analysis included two categories of anchoring systems: permanent or semi-permanent. Permanent
anchoring systems refer to fixed, in-ground methods or materials (such as concrete) used to secure a
goal with the intent of the goal not being moved to other locations. This type of anchoring system
requires a goal to be fixed in one location in the field or park and would be similar to that used with
playground equipment and/or baseball backstops. Alternatively, soccer goals could be physically
attached to permanent footings in the ground. This alternate (permanent) method would allow the
goals to be removed, but still fixes the goal location on the field. A removed goal would leave
behind a structure in the ground. Semi-permanent anchoring refers to methods for securing or
anchoring a goal that allows the goal to be moved and set-up at a different location during and/or
between seasons without requiring additional long-term in-ground structures. A discussion on the
associated benefits and risks of permanent and semi-permanent anchoring systems is provided in the
“Analysis - Standards for Soccer Goal Safety” section of this report.
Our initial evaluation of anchoring systems focused primarily on commercially available semipermanent anchoring methods and portable goal design. Additional discussions regarding the
design/fabrication of a locked anchoring device were also held. The initial thought was to develop a
anchoring device that would restrict the movement of goals to authorized and trained personnel only.
These locking devices could be attached to either permanent or semi-permanent in-ground fixtures
and, providing the in-ground fixtures were at or below ground level, grounds maintenance activities
could be performed without having to remove or unlock the anchoring system. However, the
analysis regarding time saved in trimming around anchored goals did not offset the time (and
potential damage to goals) associated with moving the goals. As a result, no novel or unique
anchoring system, that did not incorporate elements of a currently available permanent or semipermanent anchoring systems, were proposed or identified.
Portable soccer goals appear to be simple structures; however, both the design and construction of
the equipment play a role in overall product safety. For example, counterbalancing design strategies
are employed in goal design to offset the forces working to tip the goal forward. These strategies
include the lengthening the overall depth of the goal to effectively place more weight further from
the goal's front posts, selecting lightweight materials for the goal’s front posts and crossbar and/or
heavy rear ground bar and framework. Even with improved goal designs, these counterbalanced
portable soccer goals still need to be secured.
The US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recommendations on securing portable
soccer goals include:
- secure the goal to the ground (preferably at the rear of the goal), and
- making sure the anchors are flush with the ground and clearly visible.
There are several different ways to secure a portable soccer goal. These systems can be broken down
into three basic classifications, include staking devices (auger, ground anchors and J-hook),
counterweights (sandbags or anchor weights) or sleeve anchors. The number and type of anchors to
be used will depend on a number of factors, such as soil type, soil moisture content, and total goal
weight. See Appendix C—Guidelines for Movable Soccer Goal Safety for additional information.
10
March 9, 2004
The following charts list some of the perceived advantages and disadvantages of each of these
anchoring systems.
Anchor Type
Style
Advantages
Disadvantages
Permanent
Not Applicable
·
Cannot be tipped without
disconnecting goal or a
catastrophic system
failure
·
Fixes location in the park
or field results in
increased wear of grass in
goal area and is not
flexible for other
configurations (sports or
field)
Semi-permanent
Staking Device
·
Secures goal to the
ground
Goals cannot be moved
without effort
Reduced risk of injury
caused by goal tipping
over.
·
Requires the physical
installation and removal
of the anchor, increasing
time for set-up and takedown.
Cannot be easily seen
from a distance.
Anchors are not
permanent or fail-safe
Depending on type of
anchor used, potential for
increased risk of injury
(tripping, exposure of
metal surfaces)
Variety of goals currently
in use would require
multiple anchoring
solutions
·
·
·
·
·
·
Semi-permanent
Counterbalance
·
·
·
Semi-permanent
Sleeve Anchor
·
Visible anchor that
allows for inspection
from a distance
Most flexibility as far as
moving and changing
field configurations
Easiest anchoring method
for set-up and take down.
·
Allows some shifting of
goal (within limits of the
tethers)
·
11
·
·
Sandbags are not
physically attached to
goal and easily removed.
Sandbags deteriorate over
time
Allows unauthorized
movement of goals
Requires burying an
anchor in the ground,
minimizing flexibility of
goal configuration
March 9, 2004
Analysis—Requirements for Soccer Goal Use at Practices
The professional coaching staff of the Greater Libertyville Soccer Association (Travel and
Recreational programs) provided the following guidelines:
Age
Recreational
Competitive
Tots - K
·
No goals necessary
Grades 1 - 3
(U7 - U9)
·
Very minimal goal use, ·
age should be
·
concentrated on skill
use
Activities should be
focused on individual
ball control,
participation and fun
·
Grades 4 - 6 ·
(U10 - U12) ·
·
Grades 7+
(U13 and
older)
·
·
Minimal goal use
Skill learning ages
Small sided games
with a number of
touches for all should
be the focus
·
·
Increased goal use, but
recreational league
coaches should still be
working to keep all
players participating,
getting touches and
having fun
·
·
·
Select
Not applicable
·
Not applicable
Same as Recreational
May need goals a bit
more at U9 age level
for finishing and
goalkeeping sessions
·
Not applicable
Same as Recreational
May use the goals one
of every two training
session as we take the
training theme to a
large goal setting
Also for use with
specific finishing
sessions, as goal
scoring becomes more
important and difficult
as the players get older
·
Same as Competitive
Increased goal use as
·
finishing and
defending become very
important
Specific finishing and
goalkeeping session
Same as Competitive
Recommended use of goals for practices (as outlined above), particularly for players at the younger
ages or involved in recreational play, is significantly less than volunteer coaches for those age/skill
groups might feel is necessary. Coaching education and training sessions should consistently stress
the practice principles noted in the chart (above). Coaches need to understand that cones and/or
corner flags can be used instead of full-sized goals for many activities where goals have been
traditionally used.
It is the opinion of the GLSA professional coaching/training staff that intermediate-sized goals are
adequate for use in recreational team practices (all age groups) requiring use of goals.
12
March 9, 2004
Recommendations—Soccer Goal Use (Public Venues)
All practical precautions should be taken to minimize the risk of injury from falling soccer goals,
especially in public-access areas such as parks, school grounds, and athletic play fields. The GLSA
Goal Safety Committee recommends the adoption of and adherence to a strict policy for use of goals
in such public venues, which should include:
· Limiting the use of goals to a reasonable minimum number of public-access venues needed to
provide for practices (for use as outlined by the GLSA professional coaching staff)
· Limiting the use of equipment to those goals which meet or exceed GLSA-defined standards for
construction
· Providing for the appropriate and visible anchoring and/or counter weighting of every goal
deployed by GLSA.
· Applying and maintaining multiple-language (at a minimum, English and Spanish) warning labels
(as recommended by the US Consumer Products Safety Commission) on all goals deployed for use
by GLSA. Labels to address the risk for injury or death caused by improper use of the equipment.
· Providing ongoing education and training regarding the safe use (and when appropriate - moving)
of soccer goals for
¾ Coaches (professional and volunteer)
¾ Trainers
¾ Players
¾ Parents
¾ Neighbors (of parks and schools where goals are deployed)
¾ Maintenance staffs
¾ Schools
¾ Local police and fire departments
· Limiting or restricting use of goals by GLSA participants in practice sessions via scheduling
activities and processes.
· Timely and effective removal/storage of goals during off-seasons.
· Development of a comprehensive inspection, maintenance, and storage program/policy for use
during set-up, takedown, and in-season use activities.
· Development of a process or policy for use of GLSA goal equipment by non-GLSA affiliates, such
as local schools and other organizations providing soccer training or play (i.e., non-GLSA summer
camps, summer school).
· Development of a process for notifying the Director, Fields and Equipment of any concerns or
safety issues regarding goals deployed by GLSA. To include annual publication of process to all
users, sponsoring or partner agencies, staffs, and public safety departments.
· Review of the necessity for use of nets on goal structures deployed for recreational practices.
· Development and publication of a process for notifying the appropriate staffs and responsible
parties of any concerns or safety issues regarding goals deployed by organizations other than
GLSA (i.e., away game sites for competitive teams).
· Deployment (by GLSA) of IYSA-approved documentation regarding a coach's (and/or referee's)
right and responsibility to refuse to play a game if goal and/or field safety is compromised. Our
recommendation is that GLSA (in collaboration with the IYSA) provide a laminated card to be
kept with each team's player cards. GLSA should also provide IYSA-approved forms to record and
13
March 9, 2004
register appropriate information in the event that a game is postponed, cancelled, or forfeited due
to unsafe goal equipment or field conditions.
· Publication of this document—along with IYSA, league, and GLSA policies and procedures—to
partner agencies, organizations, and associations.
14
March 9, 2004
Recommendations—Soccer Goal Use (Access-Controlled Venues)
All practical precautions should be taken to minimize the risk of injury from falling soccer goals. The
GLSA Goal Safety Committee recommends the adoption of and adherence to a strict policy
regarding the GLSA-participant use of goals in controlled-access venues, which should include:
· Limiting the use of equipment to those goals which meet or exceed GLSA-defined standards for
construction
· Providing for the appropriate and visible anchoring and/or counter weighting of every goal
deployed.
· Applying and maintaining multiple-language (at a minimum, English and Spanish) warning labels
(as recommended by the US Consumer Products Safety Commission) on all goals. Labels to
address the risk for injury or death caused by improper use of the equipment.
· Effective storage of equipment not deployed on fields for regular play and/or practice sessions.
· Adherence to a comprehensive inspection and maintenance program.
· Development and distribution of education materials regarding the safety systems in use at the
facility; to be made available to all users, including
¾ Coaches (professional and volunteer)
¾ Trainers
¾ Referees
¾ Players
¾ Visitors
¾ Field Marshals
¾ Public Safety officials
· Development and publication of a process for notifying the appropriate staffs and responsible
parties of any concerns or safety issues regarding goals deployed.
· Deployment (by GLSA) of IYSA-approved documentation regarding a coach's (and/or referee's)
right and responsibility to refuse to play a game if goal and/or field safety is compromised. Our
recommendation is that GLSA (in collaboration with the IYSA) provide a laminated card to be
kept with each team's player cards. GLSA should also provide IYSA-approved forms to record and
register appropriate information in the event that a game is postponed, cancelled, or forfeited due
to unsafe goal equipment or field conditions.
15
March 9, 2004
Recommendations—GLSA Policy (Practices)
1. All goals used for practices by any GLSA-affiliated team/player shall conform to all GLSA
specifications for goal construction, signage, and anchoring systems (scheduled to be determined
by July 1, 2004 and approved by the Board of Directors at the July 13, 2004 Board Meeting).
2. Only goals meeting GLSA specification will be deployed in parks or on school grounds where
GLSA reserves practice times on behalf of GLSA teams/coaches.
3. All coaches receive documentation and personal instruction on the age-appropriate use of goals
for practice sessions.
4. All coaches and parents receive documentation and personal instruction on goal safety, including
specific instruction that goals are not to be moved except by GLSA and/or venue-authorized
staff.
16
March 9, 2004
Recommendations—GLSA Policy (Games)
1. All goals used for games by any GLSA-affiliated team/player shall conform to all GLSA
specifications for goal construction and anchoring systems (scheduled to be determined by July
1, 2004 and approved by the Board of Directors at the July 13, 2004 Board Meeting).
2. Only goals meeting GLSA specification will be deployed in parks, school grounds, or venues
where GLSA schedules games on behalf of GLSA teams/coaches.
3. All coaches receive documentation and personal instruction on goal inspection and goal safety.
4. All traveling team coaches are supplied with IYSA-approved documentation regarding FIFA
rules on goal conditions and game field safety, and are instructed to refuse to play a game on a
field where goals do not meet approved specifications/conditions. See "Recommendations—Goal
Use (Public Venues)" and "Recommendations—Goal Use (Access-Controlled Venues)", above.
5. All GLSA-sponsored referees are:
¾ trained on how to inspect a field and equipment prior to each game/set of games
¾ provided with a checklist to use while inspecting fields and equipment
¾ provided with forms and a process for reporting needed repairs
6. GLSA maintains an Incident Log to capture and monitor information on goal- or field safetyrelated injuries sustained by players at games involving GLSA-participants. Summary and
Analysis reports are shared with game field sponsors and/or partners on a regular basis.
17
March 9, 2004
Appendix A—GLSA Board of Director's Resolution Creating
Goal Safety Committee
Whereas, a tragic accident occurred on October 4, 2003, involving one of our soccer players and a
soccer goal prior to a practice in Vernon Hills, IL,
Be it resolved that:
A committee be formed to review GLSA’s procedures related to the use of soccer goals and to
recommend to the Board of Directors of GLSA any changes to those procedures and practices
The scope of the committee is to include the procedures for the use of soccer goals at practice and
games (home and away).
The committee will consist of Mark Zwolski as Chair, Horst Fatschel, Peter Flaherty, Steve Malecha,
Sue Schory, and others as appointed by the President.
The committee should include representatives (or at least some level of consultation or participation)
from groups at which GLSA teams do or could practice, including but not limited to Libertyville
Parks Department, Vernon Hills Park District, Mundelein Park District, Gurnee Park District, School
Districts 70 (Libertyville), 73 (Vernon Hills), 68 (Oak Grove), 72, (Rondout), 75 (Mundelein), 128
(Libertyville/Vernon Hills HS), and 120 Mundelein HS).
The committee should include representatives (or at least some level of consultation or participation)
from groups which provide or sanction fields where GLSA teams play their games, including but not
limited to Libertyville Township Soccer Complex (LTSC), Illinois Youth Soccer Association
(IYSA), Young Sportsmen Soccer League (YSSL), and Illinois Women’s Soccer League (IWSL).
The committee is encouraged to seek information from other government, industry, consumer and
other groups concerned with safety, as it deems practical and appropriate.
The committee's report is to include recommendations on:
1. Soccer goal equipment – which equipment is most suitable, are there alternatives?
2. How to secure soccer goals (in a practical manner) to minimize risk.
3. Changes to GLSA procedures and recommendations to soccer organizations in general.
The committee is authorized to spend up to $2,500 for postage, photocopying, materials, etc. The
committee may request additional funds from the Board for a specific purpose.
The committee is encouraged to make its recommendation to the Board by the February Board
Meeting in order for the Board to have the opportunity to implement the recommendations prior to
the spring 2004 season.
18
March 9, 2004
Until the Board has the opportunity to review the committee’s recommendations, the Director of
Scheduling and the Director of Fields and Equipment are directed to work with organizations that
host our recreation league practices to recommend that the goals now in place be removed or secured
(typically chained face to face) as soon as possible as a temporary safety measure.
That a letter be sent to all recreation league coaches outlining the above steps and asking them to
organize their remaining fall practices with out the use of goals.
Note: at the December meeting of the Board of Director's, the Board agreed to move the report date
to March, 2004 (and to include a presentation of the report at the GLSA Annual Meeting).
19
March 9, 2004
Appendix B—Goal Safety Committee Meeting Minutes and
Documents
Meeting Minutes - October 21, 2003
GLSA Goal Safety Committee Meeting Minutes (October 21, 2003)
In attendance: Horst Fatschel, Peter Flaherty, Steve Malecha, Sue Schory, and Mark Zwolski
Team reviewed/discussed draft of Guiding Principles presented by Mark. Added 2 statements:
10. Meetings will be conducted in 90 minutes or less (added by consensus)
11. Business at meetings will be conducted using one - and only one - conversation at time
(added by chairman's prerogative).
A revised copy of the Guiding Principles is included. (see attachment "GSC Guiding
Principles.doc")
By consensus, the team agreed that the primary focus of work would be goal safety related to the
tipping of goals. If, in the course of research or discovery, additional safety recommendations are
formed, the team reserves the right to present these recommendations to the GLSA Board of
Directors and other interested parties. (see attachment "GSC Problem Statement.doc" for additional
information on committee focus.)
A high level review of research work completed to date was shared:
Peter reviewed his focus on anchoring devices; no consistent or definitive solutions to date.
An ongoing issue - determining the amount of weight/counterbalance required to guarantee
no tipping. Hinsdale club/park district uses 3-foot long rebar stakes. Another club in the
Western suburbs uses standard stakes placed every 10 feet along the sides and back of the
goal and sandbags.
Sue shared information regarding recommendations and guidelines. One document published
by the CDC has been in circulation since 1995. No definitive or officially recognized
standards are available at this time. The costs for securing systems can run as high as $300
per goal; there is no official measurement of how successful such securing systems are/have
been.
After a discussion regarding the type of information to be researched, the following assignments
were made:
Develop a synopsis of the available guidelines for goal anchoring (Schory)
20
March 9, 2004
Investigate the tolerance of District 70 maintenance crews for "extra" work/time caused by
goal anchoring systems (Malecha)
Determine coaching requirements for goal use at practices (Zwolski)
Collect information on the types of anchoring systems available and the effectiveness of
these systems; gather specifications (Flaherty)
Obtain name of GLSA attorney for review of options, recommendations (ask Craig for
reference)
Information to be shared via email when possible, preferable ahead of meeting dates. Mark to
distribute committee roster with preferred email addresses and phone numbers for CSG
business.
Next Meeting: Tuesday, November 18; 7:30 PM at GLSA office
21
March 9, 2004
Documents - GSC Meeting of 10/21/2003
GSC Problem Statement.doc
CURRENT STATE
Soccer goals used by GLSA participants are not always properly secured against tipping over.
DESIRED STATE
Each goal used by GLSA participants* is properly anchored—at all times—in such a way as to
prevent the goal from accidentally being moved or tipped over. Procedures exist and are followed by
all affiliated parties for the safe set-up, maintenance, use, and storage of soccer goals. If the safety of
GLSA participants cannot be guaranteed, goals will not be used.
* - metal goals used at local parks, schools, the Libertyville Township Soccer Complex, and all away sites where
GLSA-affiliated teams participate in practice, scrimmage, game, or tournament play
22
March 9, 2004
GSC Guiding Principles.doc
Guiding Principles - Goal Safety Committee
1. We report to the GLSA Board of Directors; any recommendations, etc., must be approved by the
Board before action is taken. We will present a report to the Board no later than the February,
2004 meeting.
2. Need to decide scope of work (i.e., just goals tipping over, or goals tipping over and collisions
with goals, etc.) and stay focused specifically on that scope.
3. Decisions/recommendations are the responsibility of the core team (committee); additional
resources will be brought in to the process to provide information/perspective only.
4. Communication between committee members is key - information shared with one team member
should be shared with all. Pre- and post-meeting communications to be handled via email when
possible.
5. Additional resources to be brought into the process only with the consent of the core team (i.e.,
no committee member to invite a subject matter expert into the process).
6. Working towards consensus will be our primary operating method. Majority rules in the event
that a vote is required to arrive at a team decision; dissenting perspectives will be reported to the
Board as part of any presentation/recommendation.
7. Silence/absence equivalent to agreement.
8. Meetings to be held monthly (at a minimum).
9. Assigned work will be completed on time.
10. Meetings will be conducted in 90 minutes or less time.
11. Business at meetings will be conducted using one - and only one - conversation at a time.
23
March 9, 2004
GLSA Goal Safety Committee Meeting - November 18, 2003
Meeting was not held due to numerous scheduling conflicts, including parent-teacher conferences.
The committee continued to research and share data.
Via email, Steve Malecha reported
Yesterday, I had the opportunity to speak with Steve McLevich atLibertyville Parks and Recreation
regarding our question on the acceptable impact of goal anchoring systems and mowing the parks.
In an earlier voice mail, I had indicated to him that GLSA had formed a committee to evaluate goal
safety and at this time we were in an initial evaluation stage of any and all options. As part of this
evaluation, we wanted to gain a better understanding of the Parks and Recreations' position on
anchoring the goals, especially as it relates to and impacts cutting the grass. Steve had spoken with
the head of their grass cutting crew and had the following comments:
1) Steve indicated that each week the mowing crews start at the South end of town and work their
way North. The crews do not move goal if they are "sand bagged". But rather, they trim around the
goals with a weed whacker. However, if the goals are not sandbagged, the crews will slide the goals
and mow underneath.
2) For the crews trimming around the goals, the nets represent the biggest hassle, as the crew needs
to hold up the nets while trimming. I would imagine that the trimming is also hard on the nets.
3) Since the mowing crews do not move the "anchored" (i.e. sandbagged) goals, Libertyville Parks
and Rec. does not have any issue with our use of any type of anchoring system that we deem
necessary and appropriate. This would include more permanent anchoring systems. Steve's only
concern with any permanent anchoring systems is the wear and tear that would take place in the goal
mouth area.
Steve and I also had some discussions, similar to those at our GSC meeting, on potential solutions
and associated issues. The discussions were very positive and showed Libertyville Parks and
Recreation interest in safety and willingness to work with us as needed. I told Steve that we would
keep him posted on our progress. My next step is to call the school districts and have some of the
same dialog.
Next meeting was scheduled for January 20, 2004
GLSA Goal Safety Committee Meeting - January 20, 2004
Meeting was rescheduled to February 3, 2004
24
March 9, 2004
GLSA Goal Safety Committee Meeting Minutes (February 3, 2004)
Present: Horst Fatschel, Steve Malecha, Mark Zwolski
Based on research and findings to date, Steve recommended changing the last sentence of our
Desired State (GSC Problem Statement.doc) to read "If goal equipment does not conform to GLSA
standards for safety, goals will not be used". Change was approved.
It was suggested that we create a timeline for review, comment, and revision of the draft GSC report,
leading up to the March 9, 2004 Board meeting. The timeline is as follows:
·
·
·
·
Saturday, Feb. 7 - all data and content information to M. Zwolski
Thursday, Feb. 12 - distribute draft copy of report for review and comment
Friday, Feb. 27 - comments due
Tuesday, March 2 - next (and last) GSC Committee meeting to review comments and revise report
as appropriate
· Friday, March 5 - distribute report (electronically) to GLSA Board Members as a pre-read to 3/9
meeting
· Tuesday, March 9 - present report to GLSA Board and membership
· Tuesday, March 9 - present motion(s) to Board for approval of next steps/tactics
Final data/content requirements were reviewed, with the following assignments made:
·
·
·
·
·
·
Injury statistics (Sue)
Distribution contacts for review (all)
Info re: force required to tip goals (Peter)
Field safety info sent to referees (Horst)
Anything re: new goal construction anchoring system from N. Carolina (Sue)
Listing of anchoring/counterweight devices (Steve)
The current draft of the document was reviewed, with a number of suggested edits. All will be
incorporated by end-of-day, February 5.
Next meeting scheduled for March 2, 2004.
25
March 9, 2004
GLSA Goal Safety Committee Meeting Minutes (March 2, 2004)
Present: Horst Fatschel, Sue Schory, Mark Zwolski
The Committee reviewed the responses received in reply to the draft of the GSC report that was
emailed the week of February 9th. Responses were received from 7 individuals representing 7
different organizations (the draft report had been sent to 23 individuals representing 12
organizations). Several of the responses received were prepared on behalf of all the individuals at
that organization.
The following responses were received and reviewed.
Flo Dyson (President, Illinois Women's Soccer League); email received 2/16/04:
Mark,
Thank you for your request. I have requested Charlie Dyson, IWSL Registrat and State
Soccer Referee Director of Operations to review your draft report and respond to you. His
comments will reflect the opinions of the IWSL.
Thank you again,
Flo Dyson
President
Illinois Women's Soccer League
Gary Latkow (Mundelein AYSO member, LTSC Board Member); email received 2/16/04:
Mark,
I will send this to our Mundelein AYSO (rec league) and MSTA (travel league).
Mary Jane Bender (Executive Director, Illinois Youth Soccer Association); email received
2/16/04:
I will forward your email to our insurance provider for response. Our insurance company and
goal manufacturers will be presenting information regarding goal safety at our Soccer Expo.
Charlie Dyson (Registrar, Illinois Women's Soccer League); email received 2/16/04;
Mark,
Thank you for allowing me to review the work your group has done. I cannot think of any
sources you have not covered.
I will suggest a couple of activities that may help prevent accidents.
26
March 9, 2004
1. Regardless of the rules we put in place so far as grass mowing etc., changes in personnel
results in lost knowledge and continuity. You should consider having someone from your
club inspect the goals regularly to see that they haven't been moved or left unanchored by
maintenance people, coaches (yours or others), neighbors or people stealing the anchors and
sandbags. I inspected the goals at a club on a Friday and found them to be well anchored.
On Tuesday of the following I returned in response to a complaint be a team scheduled to
play an away game there and found the anchors were missing. I found them under a tree
where the mowing people had put them while mowing and failed to replace them. A crew of
volunteers to check the goals regularly in their own neighborhood will avoid a lot of
problems.
2. Have a rule that parents shall not leave their children for practice until the head coach or
his/her appointed assistant is present. Players arriving early left alone or in the care of other
parents who don't know the dangers or who may not be as attentive as needed may climb on
the goals or try to lift them causing tip-overs.
The safest goal configuration and plans still need constant supervision.
Let me know if Flo and I can help.
Charlie Dyson, Registrar, IWSL
Roy Lucke (President - Libertyville Township Soccer Complex, and Member - GLSA Board of
Directors); email received 2/17/04:
Mark,
I can tell that much thought and deliberation went into the goal anchoring resolutions drafted
by your committee. I have used the Word "edit" feature to note a couple of minor typos and
enter a couple of concerns on some content. As you are aware, starting this spring, all LTSC
fields will have a double anchor system with sandbags supplemented by a state and cable
system. We are also in progress with a plan to eventually replace all goals with more tipresistant models.
My greatest area of concern is wording where game fields are referred to. These imply that
GLSA teams will not play on fields that do not meet GLSA goal anchoring system standards.
GLSA does not control its game fields - either at the complex or for away competitive games.
I think that game field wording should be limited to specifying that game fields must meet
USSF and CPS standards.
Please let me know if there is anything that LTSC or I personally can do to assist the
committees work.
Roy
[Ed. Note - 4 changes were suggested in the edited Word document returned by Roy:
27
March 9, 2004
From page 1 of the draft (About This Report)
This document is the response of the Goal Safety Committee to the request of the Board of
Directors. Committee members in the course of their study and discussions have reviewed
a significant amount of information; this information was gathered from many sources
ranging from publications to personal interviews. While the full breadth of all information
does not appear in this document in it's its entirety, every effort has been made to provide
faithful summaries of information used in arriving at a recommendation.
From page 2 of the draft (Summary of Recommendations)
By July 1, 2004 a team of GLSA volunteers will complete research and testing of existing
goal anchoring systems, with the intent of making a recommendation to the GLSA Board
of Directors at the July 2004 meeting. This recommendation is to include a specific plan
for the types of goals, signage, and anchoring systems to be deployed in local parks,
schools, and game fields for the Fall, 2004 season. Expectations are that the
recommendation is based upon the semi-permanent installation of goals at all GLSAsanctioned locations (semi-permanent defined as tip-proof resistant (we cannot go to
absolutes) and non-movable without deliberately dismantling the anchoring system).
From page 15 of the draft (Recommendations—GLSA Policy [Practices])
All coaches receive documentation and personal instruction on goal safety, including
specific instruction that goals are not to be moved except by GLSA and/or venueauthorized staff.
Phil DeRuntz (Director, Facilities and Transportation, Libertyville School District #70); email
of 2/17/04:
Hi Mark,
I reviewed the Report and the Guidelines and feel that they are very
thorough in their research and findings. I completely support the
GLSA's efforts to implement a more comprehensive Goal Safety Plan.
Thanks,
Phil DeRuntz
Director of Facilities and Transportation
Libertyville School District #70
28
March 9, 2004
James Zych (Director, Parks and Recreation, Libertyville Park District); email of 2/17/04:
Mark,
Lets get together soon in reference to Soccer and what we can do to help each other out.
James Zych
Roy Lucke (President - Libertyville Township Soccer Complex, and Member - GLSA Board of
Directors); email received 2/19/04:
Mark,
I had one additional thought about the current GLSA practice goals. Your draft recommends
scrapping them. Perhaps they could find a place on the complex - permanently anchored (at
least in terms of stakes and cables) on the periphery of the new practice area. If the coaching
staff thinks they could be of use in those areas we can take care of bolting them down. If
they are on the edge of the actual practice area, grass wear may not be a problem - it is up to
the committee and GLSA staff.
Another area that the committee might consider is goal padding. With the micro goals
sandbagged, they offer some "give" if someone runs into them. With more permanent
anchoring, that might not be the case. Padding is made for the face of these goals. The
national high schools association just made padded goal faces legal for high school play.
Roy
Larry DeGraaf (Executive Director - Vernon Hills Park District); email received 2/26/04:
Hi Mark!
Your email of February 16 to Tom Ritter, asked for comments on the Soccer Safety
Committee Report Draft from the Park District by February 27, 2004. The Park District's
Safety Committee, as well as the District's legal resources have reviewed and discussed your
report draft.
We would like to compliment your committee on the thoroughness of its report. While
recognizing that there is no perfect solution to goal anchoring, you did look at and analyze
the issue from every conceivable viewpoint. We believe you have exhausted the subject
matter. There is nothing in the document that conflicts with the goals and mission of the
Vernon Hills Park District, including the soon to be consummated relationship between the
Park District and GLSA at the VH Athletic Complex soccer facilities. Within the next month
or so, the District's Soccer Safety Committee will be putting together it's soccer safety
statement before the VH Board of Park Commissioners. The work your committee has done
in putting together this report will assist us in that effort. Thank you.
Larry A. DeGraaf, CPRP, Executive Director
Vernon Hills Park District
29
March 9, 2004
Bob Berkley (President, Young Sportsman Soccer League); email received 2/26/04:
I have read through your attached report and have read all reports from the U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission.
I did not find a decision as to what exactly was going to be done to anchor GLSA goals, other
than repeating the options noted throughout all the publications.
Although all the additional precautions, procedures, policies, and printed materials will help,
nothing will stop abused goals from coming down unless they are anchored in such a way to
prevent it.
The YSSL has formulated the "Zach Tran Goal Safety Policy" starting this spring season. It
is consistent with the existing rules and policies of the league except that unanchored goals
will not be ignored. Simply stated, games will not be played where goals are not anchored
and secure. Games will be forfeited and fines issued where goal safety has not been
followed.
Finalization of the policy remains unresolved for the sake of 2 or 3 issues. Will sand bags be
accepted when outside goals could be anchored in the ground. What number of sand bags
will constitute an acceptable level of counter weight safety. Portable goals that are designed
with counter weight rear ground bars, pose difficulty in administering the new policy.
We have to be able to direct our referees on the application of the new policy. We do not and
cannot expect our referees to become engineers to administer this safety rule. We must
provide them with direction that will be simplistic in nature and apply common sense as a
guiding rule. We can't ask referees to endanger themselves by pulling goals down on
themselves to see if a goal is adequately counter weighted.
Every publication that deals with anchoring goals refers to sand bags as a "could be
acceptable" alternative for goals on artificial turf or hard surfaces where all other acceptable
anchoring devices cannot be used.
All the issues that deal with the necessary portability of goals being a convenience, cost,
time, and mobility are real and legitimate concerns. It is my hope that when we must
determine the trade off of these opposing interests that we do not sacrifice the ultimate
interest, the kids safety.
I hope I have given you a response that is useful and applicable to your study.
Soccer is Splendor in the Grass,
Bob
30
March 9, 2004
Pat Pullen (President, Pullen Insurance Services, Inc.); email received 2/27/04:
Mark,
Mary Jane [President, IYSA] has forwarded the above referenced document. Your report is
well done and addresses the critical issues of goal post safety.
Goal Safety must be directed and reinforced at the coach level. We can set policies, provide
periodic inspection of all facilities but the "first line" of defense rests with the coach in
assuring that portable goal posts are securely anchored and that proper supervision is
provided at play fields.
Pat Pullen
President
Pullen Insurance Services, Inc.
Gary Latkow (Mundelein AYSO member, LTSC Board Member); email received 2/16/04:
To:
MSTA and AYSO boards:
FYI...
Sorry for the delay. I have been quite busy with work these past weeks. Please review the
information and feel free to comment directly to Mark Zwolski.
James Zych (Director, Parks and Recreation, Libertyville Park District); email of 2/17/04:
After a detail review of your plans, I see no changes, you covered everything. Good job. let
me know if there is anything else I can help with. let me know when you guys want to get
together to talk about improving are relationship with GLSA.
thanks
james.
The Committee members agreed on a list of edits to be made based on the input received, and agreed
that all edits would be made prior to distributing the report to the Board of Directors and the GLSA
membership.
31
March 9, 2004
Appendix C—Guidelines for Movable Soccer Goal Safety (US
Consumer Product Safety Commission)
The text of this document (January, 1995) is included on the following pages. Figures have been
removed to accommodate inclusion in this Word document.
32
March 9, 2004
January 1995
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
Washington, D.C. 20207
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Soccer Goal Injuries
3. Rules of Soccer
4. Design/Construction Guidelines
5. Anchoring/Securing/Counterweighting Guidelines
6. Goal Storage Guidelines
7. Conclusions
APPENDICES
Appendix A - List of Soccer Organizations
Appendix B - For Further Information
Appendix C - Warning Labels
33
March 9, 2004
1. Introduction
This handbook presents guidelines for the installation, use and storage of full-size or nearly fullsize movable soccer goals. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) believes
these guidelines can help prevent deaths and serious injuries resulting from soccer goal tipover.
Publication of the handbook is intended to promote greater safety awareness among those who
purchase, install, use, and maintain movable soccer goals.
These guidelines are intended for use by parks and recreation personnel, school officials, sports
equipment purchasers, parents, coaches, and any other members of the general public concerned
with soccer goal safety.
These guidelines are intended to address the risk of movable soccer goal tipover. They are not a
CPSC standard, nor are they mandatory requirements. Therefore, the Commission does not
endorse them as the sole method to minimize injuries associated with soccer goals.
2. Soccer Goal Injuries and Deaths
According to the 1994 National Soccer Participation Survey (Soccer Industry Council of
America), over 16 million persons in the United States play soccer at least once a year. Seventyfour percent (over 12 million) of these persons are under the age of 18. Soccer ranks fourth in
participation for those under 18, following basketball, volleyball, and softball and well ahead of
baseball, which has an annual participation of 9.7 million.
There are approximately 225,000 to 500,000 soccer goals in the United States. Many of these
soccer goals are unsafe because they are unstable and are either unanchored or not properly
anchored or counter-balanced. These movable soccer goals pose an unnecessary risk of tipover to
children who climb on goals (or nets) or hang from the crossbar.
The CPSC knows of four deaths in 1990 alone and at least 21 deaths during the past 16 years
(1979-1994) associated with movable soccer goals. In addition, an estimated 120 injuries
involving falling goals were treated each year in U.S. hospital emergency rooms during the
period 1989 through 1993. Many of the serious incidents occurred when the soccer goals tipped
over onto the victim. Almost all of the goals involved in these tipovers appeared to be “homemade” by high school shop classes, custodial members, or local welders, not professionally
manufactured. These “home-made” goals are often very heavy and unstable.
The majority of movable soccer goals are constructed of metal, typically weighing 150-500
pounds. The serious injuries and deaths are a result of blunt force trauma to the head, neck, chest,
and limbs of the victims. In most cases this occurred when the goal tipped or was accidentally
tipped onto the victim. In one case an 8-year-old child was fatally injured when the movable
soccer goal he was climbing tipped over and struck him on the head. In another case, a 20-yearold male died from a massive head trauma when he pulled a goal down on himself while
attempting to do chin-ups. In a third case, while attempting to tighten a net to its goal post, the
34
March 9, 2004
victim’s father lifted the back base of the goal causing it to tip over striking his 3-year-old child
on the head, causing a fatal injury.
High winds can also cause movable soccer goals to fall over. For example, a 9-year-old was
fatally injured when a goal was tipped over by a gust of wind. In another incident, a 19-year-old
goalie suffered stress fractures to both legs when the soccer goal was blown on top of her.
3. Rules of Soccer
From the Federation of International De Football Associations’ (FIFA) Laws of the Game, Guide
for Referees, July 1993:
“Goal-posts and cross-bars must be made of wood, metal, or other approved material as
decided from time to time by the International Football Association Board. They maybe
square, rectangular, round, half round, or elliptical in shape.”
“Goal-posts and cross-bars made of other materials and in other shapes are not permitted.
The goal-posts must be white in color.”
“The width and depth of the cross-bar shall not exceed 5 inches (12 cm).”
From the National Federation of State High School Associations’ (NFSHSA) 1994-95 National
Federation Edition-Soccer Rules Book:
“They shall consist of 2 upright (posts) 4 inches but not more than 5 inches (0.10m by
0.12m). The tops of the posts shall be joined by a 4 inches but not more than 5 inches
(0.10m by 0.12m) horizontal crossbar...”
From the National Collegiate Athletic Associations’ (NCAA) Rules for Soccer:
“...and shall consist of two wooden or metal posts, . . . the width or diameter of the goalposts and crossbar shall not be less than 4 inches (10.16 cm) nor more than 5 inches (12.7
cm).”
35
March 9, 2004
4. Design/Construction Guidelines
While a movable soccer goal appears to be a simple structure, a correctly designed goal is
carefully constructed with counterbalancing measures incorporated into the product. The
common dimensions of a full-size goal are approximately 7.3 m (24 ft.) in width by 2.4 m (8 ft.)
in height and 1.8 m (6 ft.) in depth. The stability of a soccer goal depends on several factors.
One effective design alternative uses a counterbalancing strategy by lengthening the overall
depth of the goal to effectively place more weight further from the goal's front posts (more
weight at the back of the goal). A second design selects lightweight materials for the goal’s front
posts and crossbar and provides much heavier materials for the rear ground bar and frame
members. This tends to counterbalance the forces working to tip the goal forward. Another
design uses a heavy rear framework and folds flat when not in use, making the goal much less
likely to tip over. Finally, after these various designs are considered, it is imperative that ALL
movable soccer goals be anchored firmly in place at all times (see section 5).
5. Anchoring/Securing/Counterweighting Guidelines
A properly anchored/counterweighted movable soccer goal is much less likely to tip over.
Remember to secure the goal to the ground (preferably at the rear of the goal), making sure the
anchors are flush with the ground and clearly visible. It is IMPERATIVE that ALL movable
soccer goals are always anchored properly. There are several different ways to secure your
soccer goal. The number and type of anchors to be used will depend on a number of factors, such
as soil type, soil moisture content, and total goal weight.
Anchor Types
Auger style
This style anchor is “helical” shaped and is screwed into the ground. A flange is positioned over
the ground shoes (bar) and rear ground shoe (bar) to secure them to the ground. A minimum of
two auger-style anchors (one on each side of the goal) are recommended. More may be required,
depending on the manufacturer’s specifications, the weight of the goal, and soil conditions.
●
Semipermanent
This anchor type is usually comprised of two or more functional components. The main support
requires a permanently secured base that is buried underground. One type of semipermanent
anchor connects the underground base to the soccer goal by means of 2 tethers. Another design
utilizes a buried anchor tube with a threaded opening at ground level. The goal is positioned over
the buried tube and the bolt is passed through the goal ground shoes (bar) and rear ground shoe
(bar) and screwed into the threaded hole of the buried tube.
●
Peg or Stake style (varying lengths) Anchor
Typically two to four pegs or stakes are used per goal (more for heavier goals). The normal
length of a peg or stake is approximately 10 inches (250mm). Care should be taken when
installing pegs or stakes. Pegs or stakes should be driven into the ground with a sledgehammer as
●
36
March 9, 2004
far as possible and at an angle if possible, through available holes in the ground shoes (bar) and
rear ground shoe (bar) to secure them to the ground. If the peg or stake is not flush with the
ground, it should be clearly visible to persons playing near the soccer goal. Stakes with larger
diameters or textured surfaces have greater holding capacity.
J-Hook Shaped Stake style
This style is used when holes are not pre-drilled into the ground shoes (bars) or rear ground
shoe(bar) of the goal. Similar to the peg or stake style, this anchor is hammered, at an angle if
possible, directly into the earth. The curved (top) position of this anchor fits over the goal
member to secure it to the ground. Typically, two to four stakes of this type are recommended
(per goal), depending on stake structure, manufacturers specifications, weight of goal, and soil
conditions. Stakes with larger diameters or textured surfaces have greater holding capacity.
●
Sandbags/Counterweights
Sandbags or other counterweights could be an effective alternative on hard surfaces, such as
artificial turf, where the surface can not be penetrated by a conventional anchor (i. e., an indoor
practice facility). The number of bags or weights needed will vary and must be adequate for the
size and total weight of the goal being supported.
●
Net Pegs
These tapered, metal stakes should be used to secure only the NET to the ground (Figure 3.6).
Net pegs should NOT be used to anchor the movable soccer goal. Net pegs should never be
used to anchor a soccer goal.
●
6. Guidelines for Goal Storage or Securing When Goal is Not in Use
The majority of the incidents investigated by CPSC did not occur during a soccer match. Most of
the incidents occurred when the goals were unattended. Therefore, it is imperative that all goals
are stored properly when not being used. When goals are not being used always:
a) Remove the net,
b) Take appropriate steps to secure goals such as:
1) Place the goal frames face to face and secure them at each goalpost with a lock and
chain
2) Lock and chain to a suitable fixed structure such as a permanent fence
3) Lock unused goals in a secure storage room after each use,
4) If applicable, fully disassemble the goals for seasonal storage, or
5) If applicable, fold the face of the goal down and lock it to its base.
37
March 9, 2004
7. Conclusions/Safety Tips
· Securely anchor or counterweight movable soccer goals at ALL times.
· Anchor or chain one goal to another, to itself in a folded down position, or to nearby fence posts,
dugouts, or any other similar sturdy fixture when not in use. If this is not practical, store movable
soccer goals in a place where children cannot have access to them.
· Remove nets when goals are not in use.
· Check for structural integrity and proper connecting hardware before every use. Replace damaged
or missing parts or fasteners immediately.
· NEVER allow anyone to climb on the net or goal framework.
· Ensure safety/warning labels (see Appendix C) are clearly visible (placed under the crossbar and
on the sides of the down-posts at eye level).
· Fully disassemble goals for seasonal storage.
· Always exercise extreme caution when moving goals and allow adequate manpower to move goals
of varied sizes and weights. Movable soccer goals should only be moved by authorized and trained
personnel.
· Always instruct players on the safe handling of and potential dangers associated with movable
soccer goals.
· Movable soccer goals should only be used on LEVEL (flat) fields.
38
March 9, 2004
Appendix A. List of Soccer Organizations
Federation of International De Football Association
Hitzigweg 11,8030
Zurich, Switzerland
Telephone 41-1-384-9595
National Federation of State High School Associations
11724 NW Plaza Circle
Box 20626
Kansas City, Missouri 64195-0626
Telephone (816) 464-5400
National Collegiate Athletic Association
6201 College Blvd
Overland Park, Kansas 66211-2422
Telephone (91 3) 339-1906
APPENDIX B. For Further Information
For further information on soccer goal anchors and/or to obtain FREE soccer goal warning
labels (see Appendix C), safety alerts/bulletins and additional copies of this document, please
contact:
The Coalition to Promote Soccer Goal Safety
c/o Soccer Industry Council of America
200 Castlewood Dr.
North Plain Beach, FL 33408
or call any of these Coalition members:
800-527-7510
800-334-4625
800-243-0533
800-531-4252
or write: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
Washington, D.C. 20207
To report a dangerous product or a product-related injury, call CPSC’S toll-free hotline at (800)
638-2772 or CPSC’S teletypewriter at (800) 638-8270. Consumers can get recall information via
Internet gopher services at cpsc.gov or report product hazards to [email protected].
This document is in the public domain. It may bc reproduced in part or in whole by an individual or organization without permission.
If it is reproduced, however, the Commission would appreciate knowing how it is used. Write the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Office of Information and Public Affairs, Washington, D.C. 20207.”
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is an independent regulatory agency charged with reducing unreasonable
risks of injury associated with consumer products.
Appendix C. Warning Labels
(samples removed)
39
March 9, 2004
Appendix D—Soccer Goal-Related Injury Data
Fatalities from soccer-related injuries are associated almost exclusively with traumatic contact with
goalposts. On average, victims are between 8 and 10 years of age.
The number of goal related injuries reported to National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System between 1998-present. Municipal parks are the most common
location of serious or fatal soccer goal injury, followed by school district
properties. 1
416
Ed. Note: While we do not have statistics on goal deployment, we suspect that the
vast majority of soccer goals in use in the United States are located in municipal
parks or on school grounds.
The number of Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) soccer goal in-depth
investigations of fatalities or serious (life threatening or life altering) injuries from
1979-2003. Fewest goal post injuries/death occurred on designated soccer fields,
most of which were in access controlled venues. 2
76
The number of documented fatal injuries in the United States from 1979-2003.2
The most common cause of fatality is massive head trauma. Head trauma
accounted for 22 out of 29 fatal occurrences. The remainder of fatalities were
attributed to internal injuries. 3
29
The number of claims that have been filed with Bollinger Insurance (the largest
sports insurer in the nation) in the past 3 years related to soccer goal injuries.
These range from simple fractures to catastrophic and fatal injuries.4
30
1
- Soccer Goal Injuries 1998-present: National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) National Injury Information Clearinghouse.
2
- Soccer Goal In-Depth Investigations, CPSC 1979-2003
3
- CDC MMWR Weekly Report, Epidemiological Notes and Reports Injuries Associated with Soccer Goal
Posts—United States, 1979-1993. 3/1994, reprinted 10/2001
4
- Bollinger Insurance Annual Publication, Insurance 101: Spectator & Player Safety Guidelines.
40
March 9, 2004
Appendix E—Commercial Goal Anchoring Systems
The diagrams and pictures of the commercial goal anchors are from the following web sites:
- www.epicsoccer.com
- www.jaypro.com
- www.sladekcorp.com
The inclusion of these pictures are for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended as a
recommendation or an endorsement from GLSA for these products or companies
Staking anchors
Augers
Ground Anchors
41
J- Hooks
March 9, 2004
Counterweights
Sandbags
Anchor Weights
Sleeve Anchor
42
March 9, 2004
Appendix F—"A Plea for Zach Tran"
A Plea for Zach Tran
By Bob Berkley, President YSSL
A response to the death of 6-year-old Zach Tran of Vernon Hills who was killed by a soccer goal October
2, 2003.
The reality impact of this horrific incident will not hurt hard enough, deep enough, or long
enough to outweigh the tragedy of its existence. We as human beings become too
complacent with the habit of good fortune and the rhythmic reality of unrealized danger.
I was coaching U10 boys when the first scare of “goal danger” ran through our soccer
community. The stories were read and passed on to everyone that our goals posed a true
danger to our youth players and tie-downs, anchors, and labels warning of such danger
were mandated. The YSSL, and I am sure every other league and soccer organization,
adopted rules that were supposed to prevent this very occurrence.
The diligence of this single most dangerous responsibility is too often left to someone else. I
know referees are often more concerned that the nets are properly attached and secure to
contain the ball during a shot on a goal, then if the goal posts are anchored. The coaches
figure the responsibility for such a mundane measure as anchoring the goals is the grounds
maintenance crew. And the grounds people figure they anchored it when they were put in, if
anyone moves the goal they will assuredly anchor them again.
I suggest that for this tragedy to have any lasting affect everyone adopt an attitude that
everyone, “not someone,” is responsible to assure that goals are anchored. Everyday in
every way the goals should be examined by players, parents, coaches, referees,
maintenance people and their supervisors. Prior to the start of every practice, during the
practice, before a game, and too if you drive by the field and see some kids in a pick-up
game, goals should be checked to assure they are secure.
Any goal that is not secured should be dropped to the ground and dismantled if you cannot
anchor it. Parks, school grounds, forest preserves, anywhere soccer goals are present
should post an emergency phone number on the goal posts where someone, 24 hours a
day, can be called to come out and anchor goals. The IYSA and all its affiliates should
mandate this notification process immediately.
It might also be just as prudent to facilitate the distribution of “Anchor Kits” to all coaches
who are members of the IYSA and it’s affiliated organizations. Maybe the notification policy
or the Anchor Kits should bare this young boy's name so that his loss will not be in vain.
43
March 9, 2004
One last point! As dangerous as these goal posts are, and the obvious need to secure them
is apparent, it must be noted that in the normal course of play these things do not just fall
down. They are not “monkey bars” or part of any climbing apparatus in the playground. No
one should ever ignore or indirectly allow the misuse of this dangerous piece of equipment.
This is not just a coach’s responsibility. All those present at an organized function need to
monitor children’s activities. Just as important is the activities of unmonitored kids at play.
Do not ignore kids at play misusing our dangerous piece of equipment, the “GOAL POSTS.”
Source: http://yssl.org/newsletter/a_plea_for_zach_tran.htm
44
March 9, 2004
Appendix G—Additional Comments and Feedback
This Appendix includes comments and feedback received from GLSA members and partners after
March 1, 2004. Comments received before March 1st are detailed in Appendix B—see "GLSA Goal
Safety Committee Meeting Minutes (March 2, 2004)."
Dr. Mark Schweitzer (School Board President, Illinois School District 72); email received
3/9/04:
Mike and Mark,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. After reviewing the report, I found it to be thorough
and covered the critical points. The recommendations are reasonable and in the spirit of
keeping the safety of our kids as a priority. In my opinion, we could implement the proposal
in Rondout with little or no impact to our programs - Mike would be the official word on that
issue. From past experience as a coach and ref - this issue has never come up on our field
because 1) I always inspect the goals prior to practices or games and 2) I educate my kids on
the hazards of the goals. In principle, I agree that goals aren't necessary for rec level teams
through 7th grade, but they are one of the tools that is important to use to help the kids target
their shots on goal (getting more loft on their shots) without wasting a lot of time chasing
balls/giving the kids fewer touches of the ball.
The document is comprehensive, thorough and proposes a reasonable solution.
Mark Schweitzer
45
March 9, 2004

GoalSafetyReport - Zachary Tran Memorial Fund

Transcription

Similar documents

Get Your Kicks this Fall with LWYSA!

Kustom - Brsoccer.org

Spring 2016 flier

Cold Stone Creamery is teaming up with AYSO Region 154 and VIP

Yardley Makefield Soccer Day

HERE - SW Sting Soccer Club

April 2013 Newsletter - Granada Hills North Neighborhood Council

HERE - SW Sting Soccer Club

the hall of fame and museum - Ontario Soccer Association

RadioNotas.com | SuperGolTM | KWKW 1330AM ESPN Deportes