and C - Waters
Transcription
and C - Waters
BIOMOLECULE SEPARATIONS BY UPLC-SEC Edouard S. P. Bouvier, Susan Serpa, Nadya Brady, Kevin D. Wyndham, Nicole L. Lawrence, Paula Hong, Uwe D. Neue, Thomas H. Walter Waters Corporation, 5 Technology Drive, Milford, MA 01757 80 H (µm) Figures 1-2. H-u curves for (1) Waters ACQUITY UPLC® BEH200 SEC, 1.7µm, (2) Prototype “D”. Column dimensions were 4.6x150mm. Flow rate range 0.1-0.7 mL/min. Other conditions as described in Methods Section. 40 BEH200 SEC 1.7 µm, 203Å 20 Uracil Ribonuclease A Lysozyme pI N/A 8.7 11 B Ovalbumin 4.6 44000 BSA 5.8 67000 IgG 6.7 150000 17000 Thyroglobulin 4.6 669000 Blue Dextran N/A 2000000 1.7 297 239 139 191 311 86 108 182 135 217 1.6 193 207 1.16 H 2.8 213 225 1.42 BEH200 Biosuite TM 250 1.7 4 203 233 217 218 229 2.00 Ribonuclease A 3.12 Ovalbumin monomer 15.92 Ovalbumin dimer 30.86 A 0.9982 r2 C 5.38 Prototype "A" 2.5 µm, 297Å 6.00 A 1.36 0.9886 4.33 6.99 1.74 0.9741 13.30 11.81 0.9991 11.36 25.43 0.9980 4.23 0.9199 19.19 35.82 0.9949 N.D. 0.9963 N.D. 5.32 3.83 0.9749 13.93 37.45 0.9973 12.09 0.9978 10.08 IgG2 monomer 6.80 6.66 0.9953 14.77 43.19 0.9979 19.65 29.17 0.9998 15.16 47.82 13.40 0.9335 24.18 111.91 N.D. N.D. 0.005 60 BEH200 SEC 40 Ribonuclease A N.D. 8.88 N.D. 0.9991 N.D. N.D. N.D. Ovalbumin dimer 0 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 ui (cm/s) TO DOWNLOAD A COPY OF THIS POSTER, VISIT WWW.WATERS.COM/POSTERS 14 Prototype "D" Prototype "B" 5 15 Time (minutes) 10 20 25 A/dp C/dp2 A/dp C/dp2 A/dp C/dp2 2.082 0.607 1.505 0.842 1.873 0.728 1.893 2.038 0.773 4.619 1.424 3.959 3.087 3.882 7.825 20.571 1.879 6.663 4.319 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. IgG1 monomer 7.177 1.702 4.836 4.515 4.212 1.196 3.589 3.160 IgG2 monomer 4.534 2.960 5.128 5.207 6.848 3.541 5.395 8.780 IgG2 dimer 31.879 5.955 8.396 13.492 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 7 10 Prototype C 300 200 BioSuite 250 - dimer BioSuite 250 - monomer 150 BEH200 - dimer BEH200 - monomer 100 50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Flow rate (mL/min) 3.0 Dextran Blue Prototype D Prototype F Thyroglobulin Prototype G Prototype H IgG 5 10 Prototype I BSA Ovalbumin BioSuite 250 Cytochrome c 3 10 2 10 Uracil 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 J G BEH200 BioSuite 2.0 4 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.08 2 30°C 40°C 1 50°C BEH200 SEC 1.7 µm 4.6x150 mm 3 5 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.0 0.100 0.100 30°C 0.075 0.075 40°C 0.050 0.050 50°C 3.5 3.50 4.0 4.00 4.5 4.50 5.00 5.0 Minutes 5.5 5.50 6.0 6.00 4 2 3 6.5 6.50 7.0 7.00 7.5 BioSuite 250 UHR SEC 4 µm 4.6x300 mm 5 1 0.025 0.025 0.000 0.000 H 5.00 5 6.00 6 7.00 7 8.00 8 9.00 9 10.00 10 Minutes 11.00 11 12.00 12 13.00 13 14.00 14 15 Time (minutes) 1.5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Flow Rate (mL/min) F D C REFERENCES Normalized Retention Volume, V /V R C Pore Volume (cm3/g) Figure 3. Normalized calibration curves for columns packed with materials as described in Table I. Chromatographic conditions as described in Methods Section. Slopes were obtained from the linear region of each curve. Figures 7 & 8. Effect of flow rate on plate height and resolution for separation of monoclonal antibody monomer and dimer. Columns: (1) BEH200 SEC, 1.7µm, 4.6x150, and (2) BioSuite 250 4µm UHR, 4.6x300. Other conditions as described in Methods Section. Figure 4. Plot of normalized slope vs. Specific Pore Volume obtained for each curve shown in Figure 3. Slopes were determined for the linear range of each curve. 1. D Held, G Reinhold and P Kilz, “U-GPC? Making GPC/SEC Faster,” The Column (April 6, 2010) 10-14. In general, a decrease in retention was observed to follow the Hofmeister series, with the notable exception of sodium chloride. In this case, retention was greater than with other analytes. In addition, peaks were significantly broader. Sodium Sulfate 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.04 Sodium Phosphate 100mM 0.02 0.00 0.04 Sodium Acetate 0.02 0.00 0.04 Sodium Chloride 0.02 0.00 0.04 Sodium Perchlorate 0.02 0.00 2 3 4 5 Time (minutes) 6 7 8 0.04 Ammonium Chloride 0.02 0.00 0.04 Potassium Chloride 0.02 0.00 0.04 Sodium Chloride 0.02 0.00 2 3 4 5 Time (Minutes) 6 7 8 Figures 10 & 11. Effect of salt type on retention of analytes. Mobile phase consisted of 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 with 200 mM of given salt. In the case of phosphate, salt concentration was 100 mM. Analytes same as in Figure 9. Other chromatographic conditions as described in Methods Section. 250 0 I 30 Figures 5 & 6. Effect of flow rate on the separation of a monoclonal antibody monomer and dimer. Top: Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH200 SEC, 1.7µm, 4.6x150mm. Bottom: Waters Biosuite 4µm, 4.6x300mm. Prototype "A" C/dp2 16 0.4 mL/min 2.5 4 10 12 BioSuite 250 UHR SEC 4 µm 4.6x300mm 0 Retention times for proteins were determined for columns packed with Materials A-I, which varied in total pore volume from 0.68-1.63 cm3/g, as shown in Table II. A plot of retention volume vs. log MW was plotted for each of the materials (Figure 3). The slope of the each of the curves (in the representative linear region) was determined for each column; Figure 4 shows a plot of the pore volume vs. the slope. As can be seen, a good correlation is obtained between these two factors. 6 10 10 0.00 EFFECT OF PORE VOLUME ON SELECTIVITY 1.27 Chromatographic Conditions (unless otherwise noted): ® • Instrument: ACQUITY UPLC System with UV detection @ 280 nm • Temperature: 30˚C • Mobile phase: 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 • Flow rate: 0.3 mL/min • Injection type: Full loop, 2 µL • Column dimensions: 4.6x150 mm, except for the Waters BioSuiteTM 250 4µm UHR column, which was 4.6x300 mm. 8 Time (minutes) 0.1 mL/min 0.9982 24.67 0.9982 A/dp Ovalbumin monomer 10.611 20 1.30 METHODS 6 0.2 mL/min r2 1.63 1.52 4 21.99 0.9960 N.D. 10.77 N.D. 5.73 10.91 IgG1 monomer 0.9937 9.85 N.D. C 2 Table IV. A/dp and C/dp obtained from Figures 1 & 2. 0.73 G 201 1.80 r2 C 0.1 mL/min 0.8 mL/min 0.72 1.12 2.0 1.60 (2) Prototype “D” dp=2.60µm, MPD=191Å 0.69 112 209 1.40 Prototype "B" 2.6 µm, 239Å 80 0.69 348 259 1.20 IgG2 dimer 0.68 1.6 2.4 1.00 100 Mean Pore Specific Surface Total Pore Dia (Å) Area (m2/g) Vol. (cm3/g) F J 6.8, 7.2 2.6 E 112 Myoglobin 1.8 D I 14400 2.6 C MW 13700 2.5 0.80 A 0.2 mL/min 0.00 Resolution Analyte A 0.60 120 Table II. Properties of chromatographic materials used in this study. dp (µm) 0.40 r2 C Normalized Slope from Calibration Curve, β Δ(log MW)/Δ(VR/Vc) Table I. Test probes used for characterization of SEC columns. Stationary phase particles were synthesized with different total pore volume, mean pore size, surface area, and mean particle size. All materials were diol-bonded to provide a stable chemical surface that exhibited low protein binding. Material 0.20 ui (cm/s) H (µm) The general resolution equation in chromatography is typically defined as Rs≡ΔVR/4σv, where ΔVR is the difference in retention volume between two peaks, and σv is the mean standard deviation of the two peaks in volume units. In SEC, the numerator is representative of the selectivity, while the denominator is a function of the chromatographic efficiency. For a given packing material, a calibration curve can be generated that correlates the retention volume to the molecular weight. A linear relation is obtained for a portion of the curve. We can use the experimentally-determined slope of the curve to quantitate the selectivity of a given chromatographic material. As will be shown, the slope of the calibration curve is directly related to the pore volume of the stationary phase. The chromatographic efficiency is a function of the particle size and packing efficiency. MATERIALS PROPERTIES 0.00 Molecular Weight (Da) FACTORS AFFECTING RESOLUTION IN SEC A 0 Prototype "D" 2.6 µm, 191Å 0.4 mL/min 0 Table III. A- and C- terms obtained from Figures 1 & 2. Note large A-terms, which may be a result from partial resolution of multiple components in the peak. 60 0.7 mL/min where ΔH˚ and ΔS˚ are the respective standard enthalpies and entropies, R is the molar gas constant, T is the absolute temperature and φ is the phase ratio of the column. In adsorption chromatography, the entropy term can usually be neglected, as it is negligible relative to the enthalpy term. However, in SEC mode, the opposite is true. Thus in an entropicallydriven separation such as SEC, retention should be primarily independent of temperature. However, chromatographic materials may have ionic or other functional groups on the surface that may induce binding. Ideally, the stationary phase and the chromatographic conditions are optimized to prevent adsorption interactions. Examining retention at different temperatures will provide information as to whether adsorption is occurring. Other factors which may contribute to temperature-induced changes in retention, such as changes in conformation or changes in the hydration layer, should also be considered. The chromatograms below show the effect of temperature on the retention of a Protein Test Mix. The top chromatogram was obtained using a BEH-based ACQUITY BEH200 SEC column, while the bottom chromatogram was from a silica-based BioSuite 250 column. Significantly greater retention change is observed for proteins in the latter case. This is attributed to the greater acidity of silanols at the stationary phase surface, which can interact with and adsorb proteins. Note in both cases, uracil retention is affected by temperature. We believe that this is due to H-bond interactions. Further work is being done to better understand this behavior. Absobance @ 280 nm (AU) 100 This presentation will discuss the benefits in speed and resolution that can be obtained with UPLC-SEC for biomolecule separations. The effect of particle size, pore volume and pore size distribution on chromatographic resolution will be evaluated, as well as the effect of temperature on SEC performance. Examples will be given of size-based separations, including separations of monoclonal antibody monomers from aggregates. (1) ACQUITY BEH200 SEC dp=1.7µm, MPD=211Å IgG2 dimer IgG2 IgG1 dimer IgG1 Ovalbumin Ribonuclease A Uracil ln k = ΔH˚/RT - ΔS˚/R + ln (φ) The effect of different salt additives to the mobile phase was explored. Both retention and peak shape were found to be influenced by salt type. Chromatograms are shown below, following the sequence of the Hofmeister Series for anions and cations: SO42- > PO42- > OAc- > Cl- > ClO4NH4+ > K+ >Na+ Absorbance @ 280 nm (AU) 120 AU @ 280 nm Another important attribute of SEC packing materials is that they interact minimally with the analytes. For traditional silicabased SEC materials, a high ionic strength mobile phase is typically employed to mitigate silanol interactions that may result in adsorption. The reduced silanol acidity on BEH particles compared to traditional silica results in decreased secondary interactions for charged analytes. The impact of temperature on a chromatographic separation is determined thermodynamically by the expression: BEH200 SEC 1.7 µm 4.6x150mm 0.01 Plate height (µm) SEC separations typically require long analysis times. This is primarily because the slow diffusion of large molecular weight analytes within the porous media requires operation at low linear velocities to achieve optimum resolution. Mass transfer can be enhanced greatly by using smaller chromatographic particles, resulting in benefits in speed and resolution. We have recently expanded the scope of the ethylene-bridged hybrid (BEH) technology by re-engineering our particle-making process to create porous particles with almost a two-fold increase in pore volume compared with the original BEH particle. This newly designed chromatographic media (patent pending) has been shown to maintain the mechanical strength requirements necessary of a 1.7 micron particle for UPLC applications. The effect of flow rate on the resolution of a monoclonal antibody 0.03 monomer and dimer was compared for an ACQUITY BEH200 SEC 1.7 µm, 4.6x150mm and a BioSuite 250 UHR 4µm, 4.6x300mm column. Despite the shorter column length of the former column, we0.02 found comparable resolution for the two columns when operated at identical flow rates. The smaller particles in the BEH200 provided for even shorter run times by enabling operation at faster flow rates, while still achieving the requisite resolution. AU @AU 280 nm The introduction of sub 2 micron particles and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography instrumentation has led to significant improvements in chromatographic efficiency and throughput compared to traditional HPLC separations for reversed-phase chromatography. However, to-date, similar benefits have not been demonstrated for other modes of chromatography, such as size-exclusion chromatography. A recent publication by Held et al (1) states that such benefits cannot be achieved with columns packed with sub-two micron particles for SEC. We evaluated the effect of flow rate on the chromatographic separation of various proteins on columns packed with particles of a range of pore sizes and particle sizes. Retention time and peak width data were first corrected for system effects. Plots of plate height vs. interstitial linear velocity (measured at 50% peak height) are shown in Figures 1 & 2 below. Results show significantly improved performance for the column with 1.7 µm particles compared to 2.6 µm particles. For proteins, the flow rates used were significantly higher than the diffusion-limited region, so data were fit to the linear equation, H=A + C•u. Theory predicts that the A- and C- terms are proportional to 1/dp and 1/dp2, respectively. The experimental data fits well to this expectation. We also found that pore size has limited impact on chromatographic performance as a function of flow rate. INFLUENCE OF SALTS INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE AU Size exclusion chromatography is one of the primary analytical techniques used today to provide a rapid and simple means to assess protein aggregation. Aggregate impurities are carefully monitored throughout development of a protein therapeutic because of their correlation to inducing immunogenicity. MAb MONOMER/AGGREGATE SEPARATION AU @ 280 nm EFFECT OF PARTICLE SIZE AND PORE DIAMETER ON EFFICIENCY AU @ 280 nm INTRODUCTION Figure 9. Effect of temperature on the separation of (1) Thyroglobulin, (2) IgG1, (3) BSA, (4) Myoglobin, (5) Uracil. Top: Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH200 SEC, 1.7 µm, 4.6x150 mm. Bottom: Waters BioSuite 4 µm, 4.6x300 mm. CONCLUSION We have evaluated columns packed with stationary phases containing a range of mean pore sizes, particle sizes and pore volumes. We have found particle size has a direct impact on chromatographic performance, and correlates well with chromatographic theory. We have also found that the total pore volume correlates well with the slope of the calibration curve. By reducing particle size, SEC throughput can be increased significantly. In the case of monoclonal monomer/aggregate separations, analysis time can be decreased dramatically compared to traditional SEC packing materials. Operating temperature was found to have minimal impact on chromatographic retention times for proteins tested on the BEH200 SEC column. On the other hand, retention times were affected by temperature for the BioSuite 250 UHR column, which is silica-based. We attribute this to interactions with exposed silanols on the silica surface. Uracil retention is affected by temperature for both columns, which we attribute to hydrogen bonding effects. SEC separations using various buffer types were explored. Salt type was found to affect both retention times and chromatographic efficiency. ©2010 Waters Corporation