see full letter here
Transcription
see full letter here
MANOTICK MESSENGER THURSDAY, July 23, 2015 Page 7 The MessengerOPINION Letters to the Editor Fraser Institute again pushing its pro-austerity, small-government agenda The Editor, Nice to see that the Manotick Messenger has once again handed over their editorial column to that notorious gang of fiction writers, the Fraser Institute, to push their pro-austerity, small-government agenda. [“Ontario’s economic crisis wasn’t caused by a lack of revenue” Thursday July 16, 2015.] For those with the stomach to plow through this load of neo-con codswallop, there was nothing new to be found as it was simply yet another rehash of the same right-wing talking points we hear from these guys every time someone is foolish enough to provide them with a forum. To sum it up, basically they always tell us how the federal Conservatives were innocent victims of the 2008-2009 recession, whereas the Ontario Liberals are entirely responsible for their current economic woes. I’m not a fan of either government, but I would respectfully submit that if a worldwide recession occurred in 2008-2009, common sense would suggest both governments would have been victims of it. Our friends at the Fraser Institute really lost touch with reality when they got onto the topic of former TD Bank CEO Ed Clark, who has apparently signed on to assist the Ontario Government with their budgetary issues. In a desperate attempt to discredit Clark, we’re told that “back in 2010, Clark favoured hiking the GST to combat the federal deficit. His recommendation demonstrated a surprising lack of understanding about the real source of the federal deficit.” What a ridiculous statement! Stephen Harper inherited a government that was running a surplus of $13.8 billion, yet managed to push the country into deficit before the 2008-2009 recession by making the second GST cut. If cutting the GST caused the country to go into deficit, wouldn’t common sense suggest that hiking the GST would take the country back into surplus? How does that recommendation demonstrate a “lack of understanding about the real source of the federal deficit?” I’m not entirely sure if our friends over at the Fraser Institute have ever actually received any formal training in economics, because what they come up with seems to suggest that they have precious little understanding of modern economic theory. First of all, in order to have economic growth, some sector has to incur debt--that is a given. Combine that with the fact that by definition, the sum of all the deficits and surpluses across all three sectors of the economy, the government sector, the private sector and the foreign financial sector, has to be zero. In practice, what that means is that when the government goes into deficit, the private sector goes into surplus by an equivalent amount, and vice versa. No federal government can ever eliminate debt, they can really only ever shift it over to the private sector in the form of household debt. How does that help the average Canadian, who ultimately carries the debt either way? It’s interesting that the Fraser Institute is still pushing for government budgetary balance, when it’s so clear that they are riding a bandwagon that went by years ago. Japan, for example, has a debtto-GDP ratio of almost 250% and has had interest rates of less than 1% for 21 years now. They don’t have runaway inflation and the Japanese Yen remains one of the world’s reserve currencies, like the US dollar and the Euro. The Japanese experience has shown the world that sovereign countries with their own currency and their own central bank (i.e. not any countries in the Eurozone) can never face any real constraint to stimulate jobs through deficit spending except an ideological one. Of course, the facts generally conflict with the Fraser Institute narrative, so they tend to avoid them. Andy Braid Ed. Note – Andy, we hadn’t heard from you in a couple of weeks so we figured a Fraser Institute editorial would get you going again. Active attention must be paid to dangerous stretch of River Road The Editor, Like Ms. Spragg’s letter to you last week, I am concerned that another death is imminent on River Road unless active attention is paid to this safety concern by the councillors which were voted to be our voice. To the office of Councillor Darouze, I have specifically addressed the condition and speed infractions on the stretch of River Road which is from the intersection of Nixon and River Road to where River Road meets Highway 416. I have also addressed to his office, the heavy truck traffic and the speed of these trucks beyond 80 km, which further adds to the road’s deterioration and hardly is a welcome to safely leading potential visitors to the city of Ottawa if they have left Highway 416 to take “the scenic route”. The safety of drivers, cyclists and residents is perilous because many areas, namely this section of River Road requires better road maintenance (note…it is not been repaved in the 25 years I have lived on it!) and a review of speed zones. I too have been told by Councillor Darouze’s office that there is a 3 5 year plan… I have not been told the name of the plan nor any details of how public input is included in this planning. Any resident in this “rural” part of the City of Ottawa will attest to the increased usage, of this section of River Road, by motorcyclists who seem to think this stretch of country road is a trial test strip for Shannonville Track motorcycling racing. (All of River Road is avoided by cyclists throughout Ottawa, as it is considered as a highway of death; I note that the tragedy of the Cycle Ride last Sept. in which a cyclist lost her life, has certainly left many questions in my mind about how our city planners are planning and manag- ing roads in the interest of public safety). More specifically, River Road from its intersection at Nixon Road is supposed to be considered the scenic route to lead tourists from Highway 416. Yet, you will not see any leashed dogs and their owners casually strolling this section of River Road without fearing both lives. You will seldom see a walker and runners need to rethink routes. Country living at its finest! I hope to read more concerns in this community paper so as to bring a stronger voice to the need for action, by Councillor Darouze at the city table, to effectively and expeditiously improve this section of River Road before someone is killed. Surely, the concerns of rural residents from Manotick and Osgoode can be heard as well as the concerns we hear daily about Light Rail Traffic System. Surely, the LRT focus and costs will not supersede the City of Ottawa’s vigilance and maintenance of River Road where we live rurally. Surely, both Councillor Darouze and Councillor Moffatt can listen to constituents, push away their paper plans and “come and take a look themselves”. I know that our Mayor has tried to experience the skidoo trails perhaps Councillor Darouze can cycle with him or walk down River Road and this experience can be inputted back in Ottawa at the planning tables. Donna Bekkers-Boyd Is there a doctor in the house? I was trying to imagine what it might have been like back in the “olden days” for medical treatment so I read about the limited resources and ingenuity they put to use! For instance, the yarrow plant was used to stop the flow of blood from a wound and so it was called bloodwort or woundwort. As late as the 1860’s surgeons crushed the yarrow plants and applied them to lacerations. The yarrow has graygreen leaves and large clusters of flowers on tall stems. The blooms are usually bright yellow or white; they are often used for dried flower arrangements. Apparently, the yarrow came to America with early settlers from Europe to China. THis week, THIS MONTH by Larry Ellis In the Middle Ages, yarrow was part of an herbal mixture known as Gruit, used in the flavouring of beer prior to the use of hops. The flowers and leaves were used to make liquors and bitters. One recipe called for a mixture of yarrow, brandy and gunpowder. It was prescribed to “ease pain” - I’ll bet it did! Herbal remedies have been and continue to be used to heal today. We’ve come a long way in the medical sciences and are rty i d e h t o d s u t e L work for you! prone to expecting miracles from the advances in modern medical technology. Any MD will tell you that medicine is not an exact science. Luckily, you won’t find a cow patty on your chest to cure a bad cough anymore but nor have we found a miracle pill. In fact, managing pills can be a tricky business with side effects of medication plaguing many a patient. At the end of the day, be thankful for those who heal and the options we have to choose from but most of all, speak up, ask questions and read the information the pharmacist puts in the bag with your prescription: it’s your body, it’s your responsibility. Workmanship Guaranteed, Pool Water Chemistry, Certified Technicians Pool Openings Don’t be disappointed call now to book your opening date!! Before Weekly Service 613-340-3291 [email protected] After Box 1557, Prescott, ON K0E 1T0