Derby POCD 2002

Smart Growth For The All-America Valley
D ER BY
Conservation
Development
Infrastructure
2002 Plan Of Conservation & Development
2002 Derby Plan of Conservation & Development
(Effective Date August 15, 2002)
Table of Contents
1
Introduction
5
2
Conditions & Trends
9
3
Conservation Strategies
15
4
Development Strategies
25
5
6
.
Infrastructure Strategies
41
Conclusion
50
Acknowledgments
The Residents of Derby and the
Planning & Zoning Commission
Theodore J. Estwan, Jr. Chairman
David Barboza II
Steven A. Jalowiec
Eric D. Lindgren
Katherine Norwood
David J. Rogers
Glenn H. Stevens
.
Former Planning & Zoning Commission Members
Kenneth Moffat
Vincent Guardiano
John McCormick
Technical and Administrative Assistance
Marc J. Garofalo Mayor of Derby
Rick Dunne Derby Community Development
Linda Sakon Planimetrics, LLP
Glenn Chalder, AICP Planimetrics, LLP
Richard Eigen Valley Regional Planning Agency
August 1, 2002
To All Derby Residents,
On Monday, July 15, 2002 the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Derby held a Public Hearing and formally
adopted the 2002 Plan of Conservation and Development. The attached document is intended to be a strategic plan identifying major issues in the City of Derby. It is anticipated that more detailed studies will be undertaken on various topics in
the Plan as the need arises.
The Plan is the product of many meetings and discussions by the Derby Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission also held two Public Meetings and obtained feedback from the posting of the Plan on Derby’s Web Site to insure the
public had input into the final product.
As we have all worked together to develop them Plan, many recommendations have been included that are designed to :
• Maintain and improve the overall Quality of Life in Derby,
• Enhance the economic vitality, and
• Preserve and promote the historical character of Derby.
It is the Commission’s belief that this strategic Plan of Conservation and Development establishes a guide for the future of
the City of Derby.
Sincerely,
Theodore J. Estwan, Jr., Chairman
Derby Planning and Zoning Commission
2001 Derby Plan of Conservation & Development
Street Map
INTRODUCTION
Introduction To Derby
Derby is located in New Haven County in southwest Connecticut. The City is bounded by Seymour and Ansonia on
the north, Woodbridge on the east, Orange on the south, and
Shelton on the west. Derby is located about 37 miles
southwest of Hartford, the State capital.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Derby had a 2000
population of 12,391 people within its land area of about 4.98
square miles (3,187 acres). This is an increase of 192 people (1.6 percent) from the 1990 Census.
7
1
Statutory Reference
Section 8-23 of the Connecticut General Statutes requires
that the Planning Commission
prepare, adopt, and amend a
Plan of Conservation and
Development for Derby. The
requirements for the Plan are
presented on the following
page.
About Plans Of Conservation And Development
A Plan of Conservation and Development is a tool for guiding the future of a community. The Plan recommendations can
be a continuation of current practices and procedures or, when appropriate, can recommend new directions or initiatives.
It has been over 40 years since Derby prepared a comprehensive land use plan for the community. While the Planning &
Zoning Commission might have preferred to have embarked on a more ambitious planning process at this time, budget constraints dictated that this more abbreviated plan be prepared. Although most topics in the plan are summary in nature, several topics were highlighted as being priority concerns for Derby. These topics were considered priority topics by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and include Transportation, Open Space and Recreational Facilities.
This format was designed as a part of a regional planning process being done for the Greater Valley Region. The Greater
Valley Region, consists of seven towns including Derby, that have united in many past activities. These efforts were recently recognized by the designation of the Valley as the recipient of the “2000 All American Valley Award” by the National Civic League. It is the Planning and Zoning Commission’s hope that the regional and local efforts that have lead to
the preparation of this abbreviated “strategic” plan will provide the impetus to continue planning for the future of Derby on
a more regular basis.
The major strategies in this Plan have been adopted by the Planning & Zoning Commission based on input from Derby
residents through public meetings and on-line surveys. Input was also received from other City commissions, City officials,
our consultants (Planimetrics of Avon), and independent research and investigation. The goals and recommendations of
this Plan reflect the overall consensus of what is best for Derby and its residents in the future. While it is primarily a
statement of recommendations addressing the conservation and development of Derby (the physical layout), this Plan is
also intended to address the social and economic development of the community.
Use of the Plan of Conservation and Development
This Plan of Conservation and Development is an advisory document for use by the Planning and Zoning Commission, all
other City boards and commissions, and Derby residents as well. It is intended to guide local residents and to provide a
framework for consistent decision-making with regard to conservation and development activities in Derby over the next
decade or so.
While the statutory responsibility to adopt the Plan rests with the Planning and Zoning Commission, implementation will
only occur with the diligent efforts of the residents and officials of the City of Derby.
8
9
EXCERPTS FROM SECTION 8-23 OF THE CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUTES
The Commission shall:
•
prepare, adopt and amend a plan of conservation and development ...
•
review the plan of conservation and development at least once every ten years ...
•
adopt such amendments to the plan or parts of the plan ... as the commission deems necessary to update the plan.
The Plan shall:
•
be a statement of policies, goals and standards for the physical and economic development of the municipality, ..
•
show the commission's recommendation for the most desirable use of land within the municipality for residential, recreational, commercial, industrial and other purposes and for the most desirable density of population in the ... parts of the municipality.
•
be designed to promote with the greatest efficiency and economy the coordinated development of the municipality and the general welfare and
prosperity of its people.
•
be made with reasonable consideration for restoration and protection of the ecosystem and habitat of Long Island Sound ...
•
make provision for the development of housing opportunities, including opportunities for multifamily dwellings consistent with soil types, terrain and infrastructure capacity, for all residents of the municipality and the planning region ...
•
promote housing choice and economic diversity in housing, including housing for both low and moderate income households, and encourage the
development of housing which will meet the housing needs ...
•
take into account the state plan of conservation and development ... and note any inconsistencies it may have with said state plan.
•
consider the use of cluster development to the extent consistent with soil types, terrain, and infrastructure capacity.
The Plan may:
•
show the commission's recommendation for a system of principal thoroughfares, parkways, bridges, streets and other public ways; for airports,
parks, playgrounds and other public grounds; for general location, relocation and improvement of public buildings; for the general location and extent of public utilities and terminals, whether publicly or privately owned for water, sewerage, light, power, transit and other purposes; and for
the extent and location of public housing projects.
•
include recommended programs for the implementation of the plan ...
•
(include) such other recommendations ... in the plan as will ... be beneficial to the municipality.
10
Overall Plan Philosophy
During the process of preparing the Plan, the following philosophy emerged as the foundation for this Plan of Conservation
and Development:
Enhance the character, economic vitality and overall quality of
life of Derby residents by:
•
•
•
•
improving community facilities and infrastructure,
promoting open space and recreation areas,
preserving significant natural and historic resources, and
revitalizing the downtown area.
While there may be refinements in the goals and strategies of this Plan over time, it is anticipated that this philosophy will
remain relevant during the anticipated ten-year life of this Plan of Conservation and Development
11
CONDITIONS & TRENDS
History Of Derby
Derby is strategically located at the confluence of the Housatonic
River and the Naugatuck River and this location has had a significant influence on its historic development.
Prior to European settlement of Connecticut, areas along the Housatonic River were inhabited by the Paugussets, a Native American
tribe. In the early 1650s, European settlers from New Haven purchased land from the Paugussets in an area known as the “Great
Neck”, which is present day Derby.
Situated at the head of navigation on the Housatonic River, Derby
soon developed as a commercial hub for much of the Naugatuck
Valley area. During the colonial period, trade and industry (grinding
grain, sawing lumber, and producing cloth) complemented the area’s
predominantly agricultural economy. In the late 1600s, Derby also
developed as a center for shipbuilding. This became a major industry and supported a large workforce. As a result, Derby became an
active port and one of the most important business centers in Connecticut at that time.
12
2
In the 19th century, Connecticut began to evolve from a relatively dispersed, isolated society of farmers to a more complex
differentiated economy. Factories, villages, turnpikes and railroads reshaped both settlement areas and the economy. In
1801, a chartered turnpike company based in Bridgeport constructed the Bridgeport and Newtown Turnpike diverting trade
from the port in Derby. From 1810 on, Derby’s importance as a shipping port declined.
With the industrial revolution in the mid-1800s and the building of the Naugatuck Railroad, Derby and the Valley Region
became famous as an industrial center focused on production of various metal products. Some of the Derby companies
that became world famous include: the Phelps Copper Mill, Ansonia Brass & Copper Company, Farrel Company (producing brass and iron castings), Wallace & Sons (producing brass and copper goods), and the Ansonia Clock Company. In
1889, Ansonia split from the City of Derby and Derby became Connecticut’s smallest city. As industries began to consolidate and leave the northeast, smaller industrial centers like Derby and Ansonia became less prominent, and with little land
available for housing growth, limited growth occurred in Derby after 1920.
Derby Library
“The Brewery”
Main Street
13
Regional Roles & Implications
Compared with most surrounding towns, Derby is a regional sub-center offering goods, services, and employment for the
residents of Derby and the region. As can be seen from the following table, Derby is close to being self-sufficient in terms
of a jobs/housing balance and a jobs/workers balance. However, Derby is also a residential community and a supplier of
workers to businesses in other areas since only 19% of Derby’s residents actually work in Derby.
Jobs / Housing / Workers Balance (2000)
Town
Shelton
Derby
Seymour
Naugatuck
Ansonia
Oxford
Beacon Falls
Number of
Jobs
21,180
5,080
4,470
9.210
4,430
1,870
960
Number of
Housing Units
14,707
5,568
6,356
12,341
7,937
3,420
2,104
Ratio
144%
91%
70%
75%
56%
55%
46%
Number of
Local Workers
19,810
6,255
7,479
16,840
8,453
4,866
2,834
Ratio
107%
81%
60%
55%
52%
38%
34%
2000 US Census, CT Department Of Labor
Employment Trends
Once a major manufacturing center, Derby has been affected by the loss of manufacturing jobs in Connecticut over the
last several decades. By the late 1990s, less than five percent of the businesses in Derby were manufacturing businesses
and manufacturing employment (500 workers) comprised less than ten percent of Derby’s employment.
However, Derby has been making the transition to a more service oriented economy and, in 1998, about 37% percent of
local businesses were in the service category and another 25 percent were in the retail trade category.
14
PEOPLE OF DERBY
The U.S. Census Bureau reported Derby’s 2000
population to be 12,391 persons. This represents an
increase of 192 persons (1.6%) from the 12,199 persons reported in the 1990 Census. This is one of the
lowest growth rates in the region, but higher than the
2% population decline for the State as a whole.
The adjacent chart shows population growth in Derby
since 1890; the first census that reflects the split of
the City of Ansonia from Derby. Projections through
to the year 2020 were done in 1995 by the CT Office
of Policy and Management. Slightly higher 2001 projections were recently released by the CT Department of Transportation.
Population (1800 - 2020)
20,000
High Projection
Low Projection
15,000
Historic Population
10,000
5,000
0
1890
1910
1930
1950
1970
1990
2010
Dynamics of Population Change
Derby has experienced a variety of population changes over the last fifty years as illustrated in the chart below. Derby
had robust growth in the 1950’s, but this growth began to lessen in the 1960’s. In the 1970’s population declined in Derby
and there was a significant drop in the number of births. This decline is partially attributed to the end of the of the “baby
boom”, but also marks the beginning of a trend of out-migration from the community. In the 1990’s this trend reversed
slightly with an increase in births significant enough to compensate for out-migration. Of more importance than the overall
population change in the 1990’s is the continued change in the racial composition of the community. The percentage of
non-white population increased from 5.2% in 1990 to 9.9% in 2000.
Components of Population Change
Total Change
Change Due To Natural Increase
Births
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
+1,868
+467
-253
-147
+192
+1,211
+1,043
+200
+398
+539
2,323
2,298
1,425
1,666
2,032
15
Deaths
Derby Population
Change Due To Net Migration
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
Population
11,238
10,788
10,287
10,264
12,132
12,599
12,346
12,199
12,391
12,410
12,520
1,255
1,225
1,268
1,493
+657
-581
-453
-545
-347
US Census, Connecticut Health Department reports, 1990s trend is 1990 to 1999 data extrapolated to a ten-year period.
Changes are also occurring due to the changing age distribution of residents. The following detailed census information
and projections done by the Connecticut Office of Policy and Management can help assess the implications of demographic changes on municipal services and housing types.
US Census Data, with projections based on
1995 CT OPM projections in italics.
Growth Comparison
Oxford
Seymour
Shelton
Orange
Beacon Falls
Derby
Ansonia
State of CT.
New Haven
1,112
1990-00
13.1%
8.2%
7.6%
3.1%
2.6%
1.6%
0.8%
-0.2%
-6.5%
16
Children (ages 0-19)
Per Capita Spending
State of CT
Naugatuck
Oxford
Seymour
Ansonia
Beacon Falls
Shelton
Derby
$2,341
$2,163
$2,158
$2,109
$2,092
$1,972
$1,951
$1,927
Per Capita Property Tax
Revenue
State of CT
Oxford
Shelton
Derby
Seymour
Naugatuck
Beacon Falls
Ansonia
$1,527
$1,502
$1,488
$1,196
$1,165
$1,095
$1,018
$ 984
Children (ages 0-19)
4,000
0-4
Available data suggests that young families are not moving to Derby. Local births are stable with a
slight increase shown in the age 5-19 category from 1990 to 2000, after a period of steep decline. As
a result, elementary school enrollments are expected to be stable and to possibly decline. Increases
are expected in the middle school and high school years until the year 2010.
Adults (ages 20-54)
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1970
The number of young adults (ages 20 to 34) is expected to decline during the 1990s, as the “baby
boom” ages. This partially explains stagnant population growth for children under 5. The number of
middle-aged residents (ages 35 to 54) is expected to grow until the year 2010. Since these are the
typical families with older school-age children, this helps explain the increase in school enrollments in
upper grades (middle and high school years) being experienced now in Derby and throughout the
Region.
5-19
1990
2010
Adults (ages 20-54)
4,000
3,000
2,000
Residents Aged 55 and over
20-34
1,000
The number of residents aged 55 and over is expected to increase from the fairly level past figures
as the “baby boom” generation ages and people live longer. In the year 2020, these residents are
expected to represent over 30 percent of Derby’s population.
35-54
0
1970
1990
2010
Tax Base Composition
Older Adults (ages 55+)
Age Composition
Percent
Business
Naugatuck
Shelton
State of CT.
Derby
Ansonia
Beacon Falls
Seymour
Oxford
32%
28%
26%
23%
19%
18%
18%
9%
4,000
Ages
0-4
5-19
20-34
35-54
55-64
65 +
1970
920
3,447
2,385
3,292
1,235
1,320
Actual
1980
1990
668
786
2,550
1,793
3,022
3,446
2,587
2,788
1,774
1,137
1,745
1,782
2000
758
2,130
2,683
3,642
1,119
2,059
Projected
2010
2020
702
770
2,143
1,896
2,100
2,505
3,827
3,076
1,378
1,940
2,211
2,335
55-64
3,000
65+
2,000
1,000
0
1970
US Census, CT Office of Policy & Management
1999-2000 CT Policy & Economic Council
17
1990
2010
Land Use & Development Potential
Derby contains approximately 3,187 acres. While detailed land use information is expected to become available when the
City implements a Geographic Information System, it is estimated that about 85% to 90% percent of the community is occupied for residential, commercial, or institutional use or is dedicated to a specific purpose such as public land or protected
open space.
Of the approximate 10% to 15% of land considered vacant, the largest parcels with development potential are located in
the far eastern and western section of the city. The amount of development potential in these areas is difficult to determine at this time because of the of the physical constraints of the land. Given the level of development in the City of
Derby, the redevelopment of existing parcels, may influence future land use as much as new development.
Fiscal Issues
Expenditures - Derby spends about $19 million in order to provide services to residents and property. Expenditures in
Derby are lower than the state average on a per capita basis and are the lowest in the region. Local expenditures, as in
most Connecticut municipalities, are primarily focused on education. Almost five of every ten dollars spent by the City of
Derby goes to education.
Revenues - While the City generates most of its revenue from local property taxes, Derby is fortunate to receive a larger
than average amount of state aid and other intergovernmental revenue. As a result, the amount of money to be raised
from current taxes is less than the state average, but typical for the Valley Region.
Tax Base - Derby is not considered to have a wealthy tax base since it has less property wealth (measured by Equalized
Net Grand List) than the state average. This makes Derby eligible for more state aid under current state formulas. Derby
has a lower business tax base than some surrounding communities, but a higher percentage than neighboring Ansonia and
Seymour.
18
CONSERVATION ISSUES
Conservation
Goals
Overview
Conservation issues addressed in the Plan of Conservation & Development include:
• Natural Resources
• Open Space
• Historic Resources
• Community Character
Caroline Street
3
Birmingham Green
Protect Natural
Resources . . .
Preserve Open
Space . . .
Sterling Opera House
Protect Historic
Resources . . .
Enhance Community Character. . .
19
Protect Natural Resources
Protection of natural resources is important in terms of preserving environmental functions, protecting community character, and enhancing quality of life. The following table identifies the environmental resources where conservation efforts
should be focused in Derby:
Category
Significant
Conservation Areas
Important
Conservation Areas
Conservation Summary Table
Definition
Proposed Criteria
Very sensitive lands
• Watercourses and waterbodies
worthy of preservation • Poorly drained soils (wetlands)
• Floodplain (100-year, 1.0% probability)
• Any slope in excess of 25%
Sensitive lands worthy •
of conservation
•
•
•
Public water supply watershed areas
Aquifers and recharge areas
Unique or special habitat areas
Floodplain (500-year, 0.2% probability)
Derby is doing a good job protecting it’s most significant conservation areas:
• The Inland Wetlands Commission regulates activities in wetland and watercourse areas and recently revised its
regulations to include 50 foot buffer areas. The Commission does field inspections on every application they review to determine the character of the land and the precise location of wetland soils and watercourses.
• The Planning & Zoning Commission oversees any activity within the 100-year flood plain.
Derby should consider adopting regulations related to development activities on steep slopes and important conservation
areas (public water supply watershed areas, aquifers and recharge areas, unique or special habitat areas, and 500-year
floodplain areas).
20
Water Quality
Water quality protection is the most important natural resource protection priority for Derby to pursue. While most water
pollution was once thought to come from industrial discharges, significant progress has been made in limiting this type of
pollution. At the present time, most water pollution comes from drainage water picking up contaminants as it drains over
roads, parking lots, lawns, agricultural fields, and other areas (called non-point sources since there is no specific discharge
point). Common contaminants can be salt/sand from roads, oil/gas from gas stations and roads, agricultural chemicals from
farmlands, and nutrient and toxic material from lawns. Polluted runoff is largely a result of how land is developed and
used. As more impervious surfaces are built, less water percolates into the soil and more runoff flows into streams and
rivers.
As development increases, it should be a goal of the community to protect water quality in the future by identifying and
analyzing land use that impacts water quality. When projecting future land use and redevelopment, consideration should be
given to the fact that:
• commercial and industrial development can generate 70%-90% impervious surfaces and
• residential areas can range from 15% ( 1-acre zoning) to 65 % (1/8-acre zoning), depending on density allowed.
The following elements should be included in land use regulations and site review standards to minimize runoff, and protect
watershed lands:
• Limiting clearing and grading of sites so as to minimize the impact on natural drainage patterns.
• Emphasizing the economic and environmental benefits of natural drainage systems (such as grassed swales, vegetative filters, and porous pavement materials) over piped systems.
• Enforcing wetland and riparian buffers to filter pollutants and protect them from direct receipt of runoff.
• Emphasizing preservation of open space and landscaped areas as a tool to filter polluted runoff from adjacent impervious areas.
• Encouraging site design that minimizes imperviousness of streets, parking lots, driveways, and structures.
21
Definition of Open Space
The Plan recommends that
Derby define open space as
land that is permanently preserved for, or dedicated to,
open space uses.
The Plan also recommends
that Derby establish local
criteria regarding the definition of “open space uses”. In
some communities, this definition includes:
•
parks,
•
land trust properties,
•
agriculture or horticulture land,
•
“passive” recreation
land,
•
active recreation land,
•
state forests, and
•
similar uses.
Preserve Open Space
Open space, in adequate quantities and appropriate locations, can help conserve important natural resources, protect community character, provide fiscal and economic benefits, enhance the quality of life, and shape development patterns.
Most people think of “open space” as land that is not built upon (i.e. it is perceived as open space). However, much of
that land is actually privately owned land that is presently vacant and may be developed in the future.
Priorities For Open Space Preservation
While the amount of open space in a community is important, the utility of open space may be more important. Open
space preservation efforts in Derby should be targeted towards protecting important resources and maximizing recreational
benefits to the community. Derby’s open space objectives should be to:
•
Provide for contiguous open space “greenbelts” in order to enhance the overall open space system - If open
space can be interconnected in Derby with a system of greenbelts and trails, the value of open space to the community
will grow exponentially. A system of open spaces interconnected with trails (such as along the Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers connecting Osbornedale State Park, Witek Park, and O’Sullivan’s Island) would make Derby the envy of
surrounding communities and result in increased community character, spirit, and property values. While such a system may take years to complete, there is no reason that this effort could not begin immediately.
•
Protect important natural resources - Important natural resources such as hilltops, streams, forests, water bodies
and significant wetland features such as swamps and bogs can be targeted as important areas to preserve. Although
much of Derby is developed there are areas such as Telescope Mountain that residents want to see preserved.
•
Establish and maintain “pocket greens” to enhance community character - Investment in small public parks can
enhance and revitalize urban areas and become neighborhood focal points. Redevelopment efforts in the City could
focus around such small parks because they can improve land values and enhance the quality of life for residents.
Open Space Plan
The most effective tool a community can have to preserve open space is a well thought out Open Space Plan. In Derby,
such a plan should identify all existing open space and vacant land in the city, and identify desirable locations for open
space and necessary connections.
22
Strategies should also be identified to obtain open space by purchase, donation, and obtaining rights of ways or easements.
Small lots the City may already own should be examined to determine if they are possible locations for “pocket parks”.
Such a plan can also help resolve other issues. For example, there has been a debate in Derby about whether Witek Park
should accommodate recreation fields and facilities. The most promising way to resolve issues like these is to undertake a
master planning process for all open space and recreational facilities in Derby. While some facilities may be entirely
dedicated to active sports, other areas might be dedicated to passive activities, and still other areas might be appropriate for
both. The Derby Open Space Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission should coordinate this effort to ensure
the community has adequate recreation facilities and preserves desired open space. These do not have to be mutually exclusive goals.
There are also regional organizations, led by the State Department of Environmental Protection, working to establish river
greenways, which follow both the Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers. Derby should continue to work with these agencies
to connect any local greenway or parks as part of a regional and even statewide system.
Open Space Preservation Tools
Regulatory Measures - The Subdivision Regulations allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to require land for parks,
recreation, and open space areas in new subdivisions. Since this type of regulation can result in small pieces of open space
that have little utility or benefit to the community, the Regulations should also allow for a fee-in-lieu-of open space. The
Open Space Commission should be asked for a report on each subdivision and whether the land or the fee-in-lieu-of open
space should be required.
Open Space Fund - An open space fund should be established by the City for open space preservation. Funds would
come from a line item in the budget, donations, and fee-in-lieu-of open space payments. The fund will allow Derby to purchase open space where it really wants open space.
Lands Trusts and Open Space Organizations - There are many private organizations which purchase and hold open
space on behalf of the public. Some of the larger trusts and conservation organizations in the state (such as the Nature
Conservancy or the Trust For Public Land) could be approached about working with Derby to achieve open space goals.
State Funding Assistance - The State of Connecticut has grant programs to help communities preserve open space and
preserve agricultural lands. With the completed Open Space Plan, a strong application can be submitted for funding.
23
Open Space Needs
There is no standard of how
much open space a community needs and there are too
many variables to define such
a standard. Each community
is different both in terms of
physical features and resident’s perceptions of what is
appropriate.
Only Derby’s residents can
determine the appropriate
amount of open space the
community should have.
At a public meeting conducted as part of this planning process, Derby residents
identified open space as a top
priority.
The recently formed Open
Space Commission is the first
step in establishing a City
wide focus on open space
preservation. The Commission should:
•
Identify the most important open space areas for
Derby
•
Promote the use of open
space preservation tools
•
Lead the community in
efforts to preserve open
space
Brownfield Sites - The establishment of the Brownfield Remediation Program in the Valley Region may allow for the
clean-up and clearing of contaminated sites, which could be possible open space or recreation sites of the future.
24
National Register Listings
In Derby, the following properties are listed on the National Register of Historic
Places:
1.
Birmingham Green Historic District
2.
Howe House
213 Caroline Street
3.
Kraus Corset Factory
Roosevelt Dr
4.
Osbornedale
500 Hawthorne Ave.
5.
Sterling Opera House
4th and Elizabeth Streets
6.
Harcourt Mem. Library
313 Elizabeth Street
Preserve Historic Resources
Since historic resources significantly contribute to community character and quality of life, historic
preservation efforts should be directed towards three main obje ctives:
• Identification - Historic resource surveys identify important resources and provide recent
information on which to base historic preservation efforts.
• Resources - Local individuals and organizations (such as a local Historical Society, a local
Historic District Commission, and a Municipal Historian) help coordinate historical documentation and preservation efforts.
• Programs - A Cultural Resource Preservation Plan identifies specific actions for preserving
identified historic resources and can include them as part of a larger arts and community
spirit program for a community.
At this time, Derby has six properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places and another
listing on the State Register of Historic Places. The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
recognizes places that have national significance in architecture, archaeology, culture, and American
history. The State Register of Historic Places (SRHP) recognizes places significant to the history of
Connecticut. Properties on the National Register are now automatically listed on the State Register.
The properties included on the National Register are found in the side bar on this page. The other
State Register property is listed with no address, but is defined as a Victorian, brick, commercial and
bank building built in 1880, most likely the Birmingham National Bank building.
It is important for communities to realize that listing on the National Register or State Register is
based only on historic significance and that such designation provides little regulation or protection. On the other hand, local historic districts are established by municipal ordinance to protect designated areas. A Certificate of Appropriateness
must be obtained from a local Historic District Commission prior to commencing a regulated activity (such as exterior
renovations). If historic resources are to be protected, local historic districts are the most effective regulatory tool. There
are no local historic districts in Derby.
There are other historic buildings in Derby and many of these were identified in the 1980 publication “Valley Downtown’s:
A Historical Perspective”, prepared by the Valley Regional Planning Agency. While Downtown redevelopment plans call
for historic buildings on South Main Street to be maintained, as practical, and for the Sterling Opera house to be preserved,
without strong, organized interest in the community however, Derby is at risk of losing historic resources.
25
26
Conservation Map
27
Enhance Community Character & Spirit
Derby residents are concerned about the character of their community. With economic and transportation changes, Derby
has become less of a focal point in the region and investment elsewhere has hurt community character and community
spirit. Community character and community spirit are important elements that must be considered as cities change.
Physical Character
Community Spirit
Downtown
A strong and attractive downtown area is a source of pride for local residents.
Local Community Facilities
City Hall, Recreation Center, and the Library enhance character.
State Facilities
State Parks and other State facilities enhance character.
Natural Resources & Open Space
Natural features and open space contribute to community character.
Ridgelines and Scenic Views
Ridgelines and panoramic views enhance scenic character.
Vegetation/Landscaping
Vegetation is another important aspect of community character.
Scenic Roads
Scenic roads contribute to character. (see CGS 13b-31 and CGS 7-149a).
Architectural Characteristics
Building architecture contributes to overall community character.
Historic Resources
Historical and archeological resources contribute to character.
Local Programs Or Events
Community events (festivals, fireworks, and concerts) add to community spirit.
Local Organizations
Organizations where people assist their community help build community spirit.
Volunteer Contributions
Volunteer contributions have a lot to do with what makes Derby special.
Local Recognition
Community spirit is enhanced by positive publicity of local events and activities.
In Derby, community character and spirit may be enhanced by considering all of the physical attributes included in the
chart above. It is also important that any list of items to be considered concerning community character in Derby include
redevelopment and restoration of areas, where housing or business structures are deteriorated. Maintaining important historic, natural, and scenic resources, while making appropriate change can help promote community character and spirit.
Every change must be viewed in terms of what it says about Derby. Good communities are made, they don’t just happen.
More organized community input is needed to ensure that changes proposed for Derby will enhance community character
and spirit.
28
Conservation Strategies For Discussion
Natural Resources
1. Continue to protect watercourses, waterbodies, wetlands, floodplains, vernal pools, and other important water resources in order to maintain water quality, wildlife habitats, water supply, and ecological balance.
2. Continue to require buffer zones to protect important water resources.
3. Consider regulations to protect slopes in excess of 25%.
4. Continue to acquire land around aquifers and public water supply watersheds to aid in their protection.
5. Seek to reduce the amount of impervious surface in Derby by promoting less density in future development and redevelopment efforts.
6. Require alternatives to paving entire parking lots and driveways and encourage natural drainage systems to decrease
polluted runoff.
7. Identify local animal habitats and protect them at the time of development.
Open Space
1. Seek City funds to prepare an Open Space Plan overseen by the Derby Open Space Commission, with recommendations made to the Derby Board of Aldermen.
2. Interconnect open space and recreational areas in Derby through a system of greenbelt trails.
3. Establish small parks and recreation areas in all redevelopment efforts. Examine all vacant parcels of land owned by
the city, as possible locations for well landscaped “pocket parks”.
4. Require that open space or fees-in-lieu-of open space be a part of every new development or redevelopment effort in
Derby.
5. Establish a Land Acquisition Fund, as authorized by the CT General Statutes, and strive to set aside funds from the
annual municipal budget and other sources for open space acquisition.
6. Pursue state funding, rights of first refusals, rights-of-ways or easements and other methods of obtaining desired open
space.
7. Make preservation of farmland a priority and seek to preserve remaining farms through purchase of development
rights.
29
Main Street Program
Historic Resources
The Main Street Program,
promoted by the National
Trust For Historic Preservation, has been successful
nationwide in building strong
downtown areas.
1. The Derby Historical Society should seek to identify what municipal efforts are needed to protect important historic
resources and ensure historic character is considered in all land use decisions.
2. Update the inventory of important historic resources in Derby.
3. Identify historical resources with signage, plaques, and other designations to enhance community awareness of the
most significant historic resources.
4. Promote awareness of state and local programs that provide tax incentives and credits for the rehabilitation of historic
buildings and provide code relief for the most significant buildings.
The program is based on
recognizing and enhancing a
community’s natural assets:
•
Rich architecture
•
Small businesses
•
Connection with the
past
•
Sense of place
Such a program would help to
build and maintain a strong
downtown in Derby.
Community Character & Spirit
Revitalize Downtown
1. Recognize the importance of the Downtown Area to community character by establishing a “Main Street Program”
with assistance from the Connecticut Main Street Program, administered by Northeast Utilities.
2. Ensure any redevelopment plans for downtown provide visible parking and pedestrian friendly streetscape improvements to encourage residents to use the downtown.
3. Emphasize reuse of existing buildings in downtown where possible and ensure that if new buildings are needed they
are of the scale and style that enhance the historical character of the area.
4. In key retail areas, only allow retail uses on the first floor.
5. Encourage mixed uses where possible by requiring multiple floors with different uses on each floor.
6. Plan community events that bring residents downtown to celebrate the heritage of Derby.
Enhance the appearance of Derby
1. Use codes enforcement, the City’s blight ordinance, and redevelopment plans to improve the appearance of housing in
Derby.
2. Provide well landscaped “greens” and “pocket parks” in Derby to enhance the city visually and lessen the impact of
dense development.
3. Request that the State designate qualifying sections of Route 34 as a scenic highway.
4. Enhance “gateway” entrances to the City by paying close attention to landscaping, signage, viewscape and the condition of properties in these areas.
5. Plan a beautification program that emphasizes landscaping and façade improvements in commercial areas in Derby.
30
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Development
Goals
Overview
Development issues addressed in the Plan of Conservation & Development include:
• Community Structure
• Housing & Residential Areas
• Business & Economic Development
• Community Facilities
Atwater Avenue
4
LifeTouch
Reinforce Community Structure. .
Revitalize housing
Areas. . .
Derby Senior Center
Foster Economic
Development. . .
Improve Community Services. . .
31
Community Structure
Community structure addresses the overall organization of Derby. Structure is an important consideration in the Plan since
it addresses how people, both residents and visitors, perceive and understand the community. Structure is also an important guide for land use regulations and decisions. Regulations can be designed and implemented to reinforce the community structure and enhance community character.
Derby’s community structure consists of:
• Downtown Derby, the major community focal point,
• secondary historic focal points in the historic Birmingham Green and Derby Green areas,
• dense multi family housing north and west of downtown,
• State owned open space and more rural development patterns west of Coon Hollow Road,
• generally suburban development patterns east of CT Route 115, with modern complexes, and
• fairly undeveloped areas to the far east and west sections of the City.
Derby is almost fully developed and the residential character of the community has clearly been established. Derby’s zoning scheme was changed in the last several years to discourage increased density in highly developed areas by limiting conversions of single family residences. In addition, institutional and similar uses are allowed only on a Special Permit basis.
The Zoning Regulations continue to recognize the prevailing development pattern of:
• higher densities and diverse housing types in and near the City Center where water and sewer are available,
• predominantly single-family development in outlying areas, and
• a reduction of density as the distance from the City Center increases.
The most significant land use change in the Zoning Regulations was the industrial-park type (campus) zoning created at the
far western and eastern sections of City, which are currently undeveloped. Access roads, which would enhance the utility
of this property to developers, have yet to be created. Preservation of slope and wetland areas within these industrially
zoned areas will ensure that the planned business parks desired incorporate a sizable amount of undeveloped land and do
not approach the density of commercial development prevalent in other parts of the City.
32
Housing Density
Enhance Housing & Residential Areas
Housing and residential areas are important topics in the plan since most of Derby is zoned for residential purposes. In
addition, identified housing needs must be considered.
Over the past two decades, housing growth has been slower in Derby than surrounding areas due to the limited amount of
available land. In terms of housing density, Derby’s small land area and higher proportion of multi-family units results in it
being one of the most densely populated communities in Connecticut. The tables in the side bar illustrate that Derby’s
housing density is exceeded only by Ansonia when compared to neighboring towns. The percentage of single family units
is also low when compared to neighboring towns and the state average.
Units Per
Acre
2.00
1.74
0.84
0.73
0.67
0.43
0.43
0.33
Ansonia
Derby
Naugatuck
Shelton
Seymour
Connecticut
Orange
Prospect
2000 US Census
While Derby’s housing stock was well suited for local needs when Derby was a manufacturing community, residential
preferences have changed over the past few decades. With economic and transportation improvements, people have
sought more spacious suburban development.
With a lack of land area, especially undeveloped land, Derby has had a hard time competing with current residential market
trends. In Derby, some housing that was built many decades ago is perceived as having inadequate parking and yard area.
As a result, some existing neighborhoods have fallen into disrepair and show evidence of lack of investment and lack of
maintenance.
Caroline Street
East Ninth Street
Fairview Terrace
Housing Types In Derby
Number
%
Total Units
5,420
100
1-Unit
2,600
49
2-Units
1,170
22
3-4 Units
724
14
5+ Units
812
15
DECD 1998 Estimate
Percentage SF Units
Ansonia
47%
Derby
49%
Naugatuck
59%
Connecticut
67%
Seymour
68%
Shelton
78%
Prospect
92%
Orange
96%
1998 DECD Estimate
33
Derby is addressing these issues incrementally. Derby has changed some regulations to curb the development of multifamily units through new construction or through conversion of existing units. In addition, regulatory changes have been
adopted to require larger lot sizes, greater setbacks, and less coverage in order to avoid intensification of existing neighborhoods.
Derby residents and City officials consider the elimination of “blighted” housing a top priority in the City. Derby has had a
Blight Ordinance since 1998 and, as a result of the ordinance, about 80% of the properties cited have complied with required repairs. Other cited properties have been given to the City and foreclosure will be pursued with regard to many of
the properties that do not comply. Some of these properties may provide opportunities for establishment of pocket parks.
With planned redevelopment of some residential neighborhoods in Derby, the new standards will also move Derby more in
the direction of current market preferences. For example, a preferred developer has been selected and has begun the
process to redevelop blocks north of West 4th Street, between Olivia and Cemetery Avenue. This area contains much of
the sub-standard housing in Derby, and lack of parking and density of development makes rehabilitation not a desirable option. Plans call for existing residences to be demolished and replaced with clustered single family units and congregate
housing for the elderly.
Large redevelopment projects of this scale require a significant amount of time and planning to implement, but may be necessary to create a more “livable” urban environment for residents. It is considered “smart growth” to redevelop existing
neighborhoods, with existing public infrastructure and transportation services, rather than to continue the pattern of subdividing outlying vacant land. Derby is embarking on a large scale project that will change the prevailing pattern of providing
new housing in the City from single family subdivisions to well designed clustered housing. The Derby redevelopment plan
will, at the same time, meet identified housing needs for the elderly and enhance community character by improving housing condition.
34
New Single Family Subdivisions
Each new subdivision makes residents feel that the little undeveloped land left in the City is being taken from them. Although a community cannot prohibit development, it can strive to change the pattern of development of new subdivisions to
preserve more open space and preserve it in visible locations.
Conventional subdivision and zoning regulations generally result in preserved open space, or with undeveloped lands at the
end of a street, where it is of minimal value. This “cookie cutter” approach to land use regulations is determined by dimensional standards, rather than by the natural capabilities of the site to be developed. Each zoning district in Derby requires a
minimum lot size and strict adherence to minimum lot dimensions and yard set-back requirements. While these regulations
are designed to ensure building lots are big enough to prevent encroachment on neighboring properties and maintain septic
systems in less developed areas of the City, they also result in a mechanical approach to subdivision design.
This plan recommends that that Derby consider modifying local regulations to encourage open space development patterns
in lower density housing areas. A program that encourages open space development patterns includes a definition of buildable land and a density regulation, which together are used to determine the yield (the number of lots allowed on the parcel). A specific amount of open space is then required to be provided as part of the subdivision and the developer is then
asked to design the best plan for subdividing the land taking into account the natural constraints of the parcel and the desire
to provide more open space. This open space can be located on the parcel to conserve natural resources, buffer adjacent
uses, protect scenic views, and contribute to (rather than detract) from the character of the community. The difference in
this concept of subdivision and conventional subdivisions is illustrated by the sketches below:
Conventional Subdivision 32 lots-10% OS
Open Space Subdivision 32 lots-65% OS
35
Source: Conservation Design For subdivisions: A Practical Guide of Creating Open Space Networks, Randell G. Arendt
36
Housing Needs
Housing Affordability
Average Housing Value
Connecticut
$220,858
Shelton
213,107
Orange
213,013
Prospect
161,088
Seymour
135,044
Ansonia
122,999
Derby
114,378
Naugatuck
110,745
Derby’s housing stock would be considered affordable in comparison with the average price of
housing in Connecticut
and in the Valley Region (see side bar). Based on the lower than average cost of single family
housing in Derby, providing affordable housing does not seem to be a priority for the City. HALO
Redevelopment Plans call for mostly market rate housing to be built. Subsidized housing units for
persons age 55+ are the only affordable housing planned in the redevelopment area.
Public Act 108, concerning affordable housing establishes special provisions to promote the construction of affordable housing in communities which do not have 10% of their housing units designated as affordable. Derby in 1999 was considered to have 7% or 386 affordable housing units.
Although Derby does not meet the state’s target of 10%, the definition of affordable housing set by
the State is very limiting and much of Derby’s housing is actually within the “affordable” range. Derby has a fair share of
affordable housing and efforts should be continued to increase market rate housing and meet identified housing needs as
part of redevelopment efforts.
CT DECD 1999
Senior Citizen Housing
The large anticipated growth in the number of persons age 55 and over the next twenty years makes provision of special
housing for the elderly a priority for housing construction. In addition to subsidized rental units, congregate housing, and
accessory apartments are needed to ensure residents are able to remain as part of the community. Redevelopment efforts
recognize this need and emphasize provision of special housing for the elderly.
Cicia Manor
Styger Terrace
Lakeview Apartments
37
Promote Business & Economic Development
This section of the Plan looks at the location and type of retail, office, and industrial development and other activities in
Derby. While there may be many reasons why a community would pursue economic development, the primary reasons
for Derby to invest in an economic development program appear to be:
• growing the tax base to improve community services without significant tax increases,
• creating higher paying jobs in Derby so as to attract more middle income residents back to the city, and
• preparing residents for jobs.
Key Economic Development Program Elements
Through a review of past plans and meetings with municipal officials in Derby the following have emerged as major
themes related to the City’s economic development future:
•
38
Prepare Sites For Business - The primary factor impeding business growth in Derby is a lack of physical space. If
Derby is to continue to grow its tax base and expand employment in the city then locations must be prepared for development. The City has moved in this direction by zoning large amounts of vacant land in the far east and west sides
for industrial campus types of use. This is a step in the right direction, but has had limited impact because of the lack
of development ready sites. If Derby wants to attract higher quality business park type uses than it must consider
spending funds on roads and utilities to make sites competitive with other locations.
•
Foster Adaptive reuse - Effective adaptive reuse of older industrial buildings and mixed use-buildings, along with site
clean-up activities should be targeted for older facilities the City wants to save. Efforts must be made to create a
flexible approach to fire and safety issues with the assistance of state officials, who can help modify codes on a caseby-case basis. The City should provide assistance in locating the many sources of federal and state funding to facilitate adaptive reuse, as well as provide local tax incentives. Continuation of the Brownfield Pilot Program that assists
with the identification and clean-up of environmental contamination at older industrial sites is an important part of facilitating reuse.
39
Education
Downtown Business District
Education is the key to the
“new” economy and essential
in creating better job opportunities and attracting higher
quality businesses to Derby.
The economic health and appearance of downtown continues to be a major concern for Derby residents. Not only is it a
quality of life issue having a negative impact on community character and spirit, it is also related to the city’s competitiveness with other business locations in the state. Prospective companies may feel that the current character of the downtown is an indicator of the future prospects for the community as a whole. The following are important steps that can be
taken to revitalize Downtown Derby:
• Establish a Main Street Program as envisioned by the National Historic Preservation Trust (or least the adoption of
their methods of building a strong public/private partnership) to organize redesign, economic development, and
marketing efforts . This type of program is essential to successful community building.
• Develop a downtown redevelopment plan, that emphasizes the quality of development and design standards to be
followed, to ensure whatever is built enhances the character of Derby.
• Link historic preservation and downtown redesign. Derby has an illustrious history and it should not be lost to redevelopment efforts. Many newer buildings in the downtown to do not appear to enhance the beauty and character of this area.
• Provide visible and well marked parking. This is essential to creating a successful business area in downtown.
• Promote retail uses on first floor space in the downtown. Too many offices and other uses discourages the kind of
pedestrian traffic that is needed to create successful retail shopping.
• Plan redevelopment to the west of Route 34 with strategies to tie this area to the rest of downtown.
The quality of Derby’s
school system can best be
improved through creation of
magnet schools serving the
Greater Valley area.
This would allow for a new
approach to improve basic
education.
Special “academy” schools can be established, with input from the
business community, to provide training in special areas
such as the arts, finance,
technology and health care to
name a few. This would
augment regional economic
development plans calling for
improved linkages between
business and education.
Other Economic Development Elements
•
Improving primary “gateways” into Derby would benefit the community (an example of a gateway is along Route 34
the Route 8 interchange). The nature of the improvement varies by location, but includes such things as visual quality
of buildings, sidewalk condition, signage, traffic congestion, or providing for desired retail or service opportunities. Major access routes provide the first impression of the City for many visitors and the importance of these gateway areas
cannot be overlooked in making Derby a desirable place to do business.
•
Better utilizing waterfront areas is an important goal for Derby to adopt. Riverfront areas continue to be an underutilized resource. Brownfield remediation, improved access, and a change to uses more consistent with a modern
economy and community interests are important considerations in revitalizing these areas.
40
•
Marketing the City as a location for service and trade related businesses is essential. Regional economic development plans indicate that these are growth areas for the Naugatuck Valley Region. Continued regional coordination
with regional organizations such as the GreaterValley Economic Alliance can assist the City in marketing efforts.
Development Map
41
Address Community Facility Needs
Community services and facilities include such governmental functions as education, public works, public safety, and recreational services. Such services contribute significantly to the character of a community and its quality of life. The Plan
of Conservation & Development reviews the physical aspects of such services and facilities to ensure they are appropriately located and sized to meet community needs during the planning period and beyond. The Plan is not intended to address the management, operations, or programs of individual departments or facilities.
There are a number of issues related to community facilities that can be directly related to the growth of the community. It
is reasonable to expect that community growth will increase the need for community facilities and the challenge will be to
prioritize and phase these improvements over time.
City Hall - The Derby City Hall built in the 1960s no longer has room to house all City functions and has no adjacent parking facilities. The building department has been relocated to rented offices in downtown and the City Engineer, Planner
and Corporation Counsel, who are contract employees, have no office space in City Hall. A newer bank building on Elizabeth Street is planned as the future home for a new City Hall.
Staffing - With a move to a new City Hall, a study should be undertaken to determine what professional staffing a community the size of Derby should have. Similar size communities often have full-time Planners, Parks and Recreation Directors, and Engineers. Hiring staff rather than paying on a contractual basis for these services may allow the City to use
professional staff more effectively for more diverse activities, and improve the overall functioning of the City.
Community Center - The lower level of the existing City Hall houses an indoor pool and fitness facility that is now open to
residents of Derby. The recently renovated facility is in the downtown and provides recreation space for the densely developed residential area north of downtown. It’s utility is somewhat hampered by a lack of dedicated parking facilities.
Derby Senior Center - Is located in a restored historic bank building on Main Street and provides a daily luncheon program. Dial- a-ride transportation services are provided regionally by Valley Regional Transit District. Services are adequate currently, but the increase in number of persons age 65+ expected over the next 20 years, necessitates planning for
the future.
Public Safety - The Police Station is located conveniently near the intersection of Routes 8 and 34 on Water Street and is
a modern facility. Four volunteer fire companies (East End Hose Company, Hotchkiss Hose Company #1, Paugasset
42
Hook and Ladder Company #4, and Storm Engine Company #2) provide fire suppression and are also responsible for
emergency medical response. These facilities are expected to be adequate for the planning period
Public Works - The Public Works Department is responsible for maintenance of city roads and storm drainage systems,
maintenance of public works vehicles and some fire equipment, maintenance of city parks and recreation, and solid waste
management. The public works comple x, located on Coon Hollow Road, was built in 1975 and also has a 6,000 square
foot adjoining storage building. Funds are being put aside by the City to build a sand and salt storage facility within the next
two years.
Library - Derby has two public libraries – the Derby Public Library in a restored historic building at the intersection of
Water and Elizabeth Street and the Derby Neck Library on Hawthorne Avenue. The libraries have adequate facilities and
are not expected to need expansion within the pla nning period.
Education Facilities - The Derby Public School System consists of Bradley School (grades K-6) on David Humphrey’s
Road, Irving School (grades K-6) on Garden Place, and Derby High School (grades 7-12) on Nutmeg Avenue. A public
referendum to build a new high school in Derby, and continue use of the existing high school facility as a middle school
only, was recently defeated. The larger number of students in this age category expected over the next decade will make
planning for additional capacity for grades 7-12 essential. Options such as high school renovation and portable classrooms
will have to be explored for the near term. Promoting regional magnet schools should be considered a priority for future
action.
Housing Authority - The Derby Housing Authority operates three senior citizen housing complexes with a total of 105
units (Cicia Manor, Stygar Terrace, and Guardiano Terrace). There is often a waiting list exceeding 100 seniors, because
there is little turnover in occupancy. The housing authority also operates a Section 8 Voucher Program for the City. There
is a need for expanded assisted housing and for a variety of housing types for the elderly. Current redevelopment plans in
the central part of the city call for the construction of affordable rental units and an assisted living facility for the elderly.
43
Recreation Facilities - Derby residents have identified recreation facility condition and shortages as a priority issue. The
following tables summarize the existing outdoor recreation facilities in Derby by active facilities for organized or team
sports and passive facilities for unorganized or individual activities.
Recreation Facility Inventory
Location
Type
Facilities
Coon Hollow Park, Ryan Field
Active
Baseball, Football, Softball, Soccer, Track, Little League, Tennis, Basketball, Picnic Area
Bradley Complex
Active
Playground, Softball, Babe Ruth Baseball, Soccer
Veterans Community Center
Active
Indoor Swimming, Gym, Exercise Facilities, Stage
Derby Recreation Camp
Active
Swimming, boating
Irving &Bradley Schools
Active
Playground, Gym
Derby High School
Active
Gym
Osbornedale State Park
Passive
Hiking trails, Picnic Area, Kellogg Environmental Center, ice-skating, Cross-country skiing
Witek Park
Passive
Hiking Trails, Fishing
East Derby Green
Passive
Park
Town Green
Passive
Park
Derby Dam
Passive
Fishing
O’Sullivan’s Island
Passive
Potential Open Space
Pink House Cove
Passive
Fishing
A 1999 report prepared for the Parks & Recreation Commission by Milone and MacBroom found several outdoor recreation deficiencies that should be addressed. Overall, the report summarized the state of outdoor recreation in Derby by stating “as the number of participants grows for each athletic program, field shortages, scheduling conflicts, and overuse continue to increase. Derby will have to either create new fields, make improvements on existing facilities, or continue to
creatively schedule all athletic events to occur safely in the currently maximized field system, with the possibility of having
to curtail some.”
The Milone & MacBroom Report summarizes three alternatives all including cost estimates for improving existing recreational facilities, in addition to establishing new facilities at Witek Park. There has also been speculation that the State of
Connecticut may allow recreational fields to be placed at Osbornedale State Park and this is another option that is worth
exploring.
44
As indicated in the following chart, whether in relation to national standards or identified local needs, additional outdoor recreational facilities are needed or desired in the future for a variety of activities. Derby schools have limited recreational
facilities so general City facilities must also serve school program needs.
Active Recreation Facility Needs Assessment
Type of Activity
Baseball
Baseball Fields
Existing
Facilities
Additional Needs Additional Needs
Per
Per
National Stan - Recre ation. Dept
dard
Notes On
Existing Facilities
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
Interferes with track use
4
2
0
2
1
1
0
1
0
Recently resurfaced
1
1
1
0
2
0
0
2
0
Overlaps baseball diamond
2
3
0
Community Center & Beach
n/a
Several locations
Yes
n/a
Recently remodeled
Youth Center
No
n/a
Should be considered
Summer Camp
Yes
n/a
Derby Recreation Camp
0
-1
Not a priority
Softball Fields
Little League Fields
Court Activities
Tennis Courts
Basketball Courts
Volleyball
Field Activities
Football Field
Soccer Fields
Running Track
Water Activities*
Pools, Beaches
Boat/Fishing
Golf course
The National Parks and Recreation Association establishes standards for recreational facilities.
These standards, however,
have to be adjusted in each
community based on the local
popularity of various sports
and activities.
Facilities need repair
This assessment includes
adjustments to meet needs
determined by the Derby
Parks and Recreation Commission.
No irrigation, needs repairs
Not enough gym space
Not proper size, no irrigation
Not suitable for competitions
Miscellaneous
Senior Citizens Center
Recreation Standards
45
Currently there is much debate about placing recreational fields in Witek Park. Witek Park is comprised of excess water
company land purchased several years ago by the City as open space. Witek Park is zoned OS (Open Space) and only
passive recreational uses are allowed in this zone. The referendum that created Witek Park, however, did allow for 25%
of the Park to be used for recreational uses. Based on the comparison of City facilities with national standards there is a
need for more recreational fields in Derby. There are four issues that need to considered relative to recreational facilities:
•
Should sport fields be allowed in open space? This kind of debate can be minimized in the future by planning for both
open space and recreational needs. An open space plan (suggested in the open space section of this plan) would define open space and outline desired open space in all sections of the City including smaller “pocket parks”, which can
help limit the feeling of density. If an Open Space Plan is done, with input from residents, there would be agreement
on the amount and location of desired open space in Derby. In addition, as the population ages after the year 2010,
passive recreation uses will become more important. Plans should be made now for trails and other “passive” recreational uses usually associated with open space areas.
•
If fields are not desired by the public in Witek Park, there will be is a land cost to locating them elsewhere. There are
few alternative sites in Derby, since most of the vacant land in the City is currently zoned for industrial park or residential use. A comparison of the cost of locating fields in other sites in the city and Witek Park should be done. In this
analysis the potential loss of tax revenue created by rezoning and/or change of use of proposed sites should be considered, not just the cost of acquiring land and building fields. The public should be offered alternatives along with the
cost/ benefit of all possible options. If residents do not want to provide funding for additional outdoor recreation sport
fields then the resulting limitation in activities should be made known.
•
A ten-year capital plan should also be done which takes into account the needed renovations to existing facilities and
maintenance, lighting, and watering of existing recreational fields. The need to maintain, and not overuse, exiting facilities is related to the need for new facilities, but tying these issues together may not give necessary attention to the condition of existing facilities. It is important to enhance community character in Derby by providing recreation areas that
are well cared for and give a good impression of the city. Ongoing maintenance, dedication of fields to particular uses,
rotation of fields, and the construction of new fields are all necessary for Derby to have adequate recreation areas.
•
There is not enough gym space for sports and other activities that require this kind of space. Possible alternatives include an addition to the high school, which includes a gym, or resolving parking issues at Veterans Community Center,
allowing more activities to be scheduled where space is available.
46
Development Strategies For Discussion
Community Structure
1. Reinforce the defining elements of Derby’s overall structure with :
• Downtown remaining the major focal point,
• Secondary focal points at historic greens,
• Greenbelt areas that open up the rivers, and
• Continued lower density development in outlying areas.
Housing & Residential Areas
1. Continue zoning efforts in older neighborhoods that limit density and require any redevelopment to meet modern parking and set-back requirements.
2. Develop plans for a variety of housing types to be needed by the increasing number of elderly residents.
3. Ensure any affordable housing built in Derby is lower density and meets identified needs.
4. Continue efforts to improve the appearance of housing in Derby through enforcement of the City’s Blight Ordinance
and implementation of redevelopment plans, where necessary.
5. Require visible open space be a part of any new development or redevelopment plans in the City to lessen the appearance of congestion.
Business & Economic Development
1. Develop guidelines to assist the City in considering whether to fund infrastructure improvements in the Industrial Campus Districts.
2. Seek State aid in determining the development potential for Derby’s section of the Fountain Lake Industrial Area.
3. Continue brownfield mitigation programs to encourage reuse of existing business sites.
4. Assist with building code issues and consider local tax incentives to encourage adaptive reuse of older buildings.
5. Identify primary gateway areas to the city and plan for changes that will enhance the first impression of the city.
6. Continue downtown revitalization efforts with careful attention given to the quality of development and historic character of Derby residents want to maintain.
7. Work with regional economic development agencies to market Derby as a location for service and trade related businesses.
47
Community Facilities
Address Current Needs
1. Consolidate all City Hall activities in a single facility with available parking. Study professional staffing patterns of
other similar size communities in the state to determine the appropriate staffing levels for municipal functions.
2. Work with education officials to develop alternatives to provide additional space needed at the Middle/High School.
3. Develop locations and costs associated with building needed recreational fields.
4. Consider additional need for gym space if school renovations are planned and/or provide for parking solutions to allow
more extensive use of Veterans Community Center Gym.
5. Provide the remainder of funding need to build a salt and sand shed for the Department of Public Works.
6. Provide alternative housing for the elderly, considering assisted living and congregate housing options, as part of redevelopment plans.
Prepare For Future Needs
1. Prepare a ten-year capital plan, which identifies the repair needs of existing City facilities and establishes priorities for
remodeling or new construction needs.
2. During the planning period, investigate the need for additional affordable and/or age-restricted housing for elderly residents.
3. Develop an overall land acquisition strategy based on projections for future facility needs.
4. Identify areas where “passive” recreation activities, such as walking and bike trails, are desirable to meet the needs of
an aging population.
5. Continue to investigate the feasibility of providing a regional cultural facility and/or magnet school at the Sterling Opera
House.
Aim For Efficiency & Economy
1. Address the need to improve education facilities in Derby by working through regional organizations and the State of
Connecticut to explore the establishment of regional magnet schools.
2. Consider how City facilities such as the senior center, libraries and schools, will be effectively used over the planning
period to provide services and activities for an aging population.
3. Consolidate all vehicle repairs and building maintenance activities with the Public Works Department.
4. Consider the consolidation of fire department and emergency medical activities, if lack of volunteer staffing becomes a
problem. Programs such as local tax incentives and pension programs should be explored to encourage continued volunteer participation.
48
49
INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES
Overview
Infrastructure Goals
Infrastructure issues addressed in the Plan of Conservation & Development include:
• Transportation
• Utilities
Improve the State
Highway Network . . .
Transportation
Expand Transportation Options . . .
Maintain Public UtiliThe transportation system in a community is an important factor in its growth and development. This ties . . .
element of the Plan is concerned with the means by which people and goods are moved from one
place to another. It is designed to encourage, support, and serve the current and desired land use
pattern for Derby.
Transportation was chosen by the Derby Planning and Zoning Commission as the most important issue to be addressed in
this Plan because of the severe impact that traffic problems have on the community.
State Road Network
Expressway Route 8 - In March of 2000, the Connecticut Department of Transportation released a corridor planning
study for the 12-mile stretch of this expressway through Shelton, Derby, Ansonia and Seymour. Average daily traffic volumes are over 60,000 vehicles per day in the vicinity of Route 34 and the Commodore Hulls Bridge and are expected to
increase by 30% by the year 2020. Many interchanges are sub-standard and do not provide safe entrance and exit to the
highway. Improvements recommended for Derby have been amended since the plan was distributed.
50
5
51
The following interchange reconstruction projects will have the most significant impact on Derby:
• Reconstruction of Exit #16 and extension of Pershing Drive.- Pershing Drive terminates at Route 8 with
no connection to Main Street in Derby. Plans call for a new access road paralleling Route 8 to be built between Exit #16 and Main Street (in the vicinity of Route 8, Exit #15). Pershing Drive will be widened in the
vicinity of Exit #16 and will connect to the access road. A northbound exit ramp will be built and the
southbound ramp will be reconstructed.
• Reconstruction of Exit #17 and southbound access - The exit ramp intersection with Seymour Avenue will
be reconstructed and new southbound access provided to Route 8. Hawkins Bridge will be rebuilt and the
northbound interchange will be reconstructed.
• Reconstruction of the northbound lane and ramp at Exit #18 in Ansonia - Access to Westfield Avenue
will be limited and there will be a new southbound ramp built.
Route 34 - Route 34 runs in an east/west direction through the entire City Of Derby. The Main Street section of Route 34
in downtown curves and changes elevation as it approaches Exit #15 of Route 8. High traffic volumes during peak commuter hours cause long delays. The 1997 Regional Transportation Plan highlights Route 34 in Derby, between the Route 8
Interchange and Orange Town line, as being the highest accident location in the Valley Region.
Plans to redevelop the southeast part of downtown Derby should include some traffic solution for this area based on the
change in land use planned by the City. None of the options currently being considered are immediately preferable:
• Demolition of historic buildings and widening the road is an option, but losing some buildings could have a
negative impact on the character of downtown.
• Eliminating parking on one side of Main Street along with some road widening will improve vehicular flow in
Downtown Derby, but it will reduce pedestrian traffic and affect local businesses. This may be a viable solution if redevelopment plans include visible and convenient parking for historic commercial buildings on the
southeast side of Main Street.
• Construction of a one-way bypass road along the riverfront may negatively impact the river and serve to further isolate the rest of downtown from the riverfront.
Route 243/853 - Routes 243/853 (Division Street) has two high accident locations on the Derby/Ansonia line. The 1997
Regional Transportation Plan calls for Division Street to be widened and reconstructed near Clifton Street and Route 8.
52
Local Road Condition
Road Maintenance
The primary function of the Derby Public Works Department is the maintenance of the 40 miles of city roads. A ten million dollar bond issue passed in the late 1990s allowed 75 percent (or 30 miles) of Derby’s roads to be reclaimed. A bond
issue for two to three million dollars is being prepared to reclaim six miles and resurface four miles of the remaining ten
miles.
Derby will find it more cost
effective to spend more on
road maintenance in order to
delay or avoid the additional
expense of reclaiming and
rebuilding roads. The chart
below illustrates that without
proper maintenance most
roads will require almost total
reconstruction after 35 years.
The Department is in the process of setting-up a computerized pavement management system to plan for road maintenance and repair in the future. Implementation of such a system should eliminate the need for expensive bonding projects.
A regular ten year cycle of prescribed inspections and preventive maintenance concentrating on crack sealing and resurfacing, may avoid expensive reclaiming.
The following local road improvements were listed in the Valley Regional Planning Agency 2001 Transportation Update as
priorities for funding in the ten-year plan:
• Realign Sodom Lane between the shopping center and the Orange Line with intersections brought to modern design
standards.
• Replace the Canal Street Bridge over the Derby Canal.
Improvement Costs
(Percent of Total Rebuild)
100%
Local Road Improvements
80%
60%
40%
20%
Trails and Bike Routes
0%
The 1997 Consolidated Regional Plan calls for greater emphasis to be given to walking and bicycling as important modes of
transportation. Transportation Enhancement Grants, distributed by the Connecticut Department of Transportation, address
the value of bicycling and offers mechanisms by which bicycle and pedestrian facilities can be promoted and enhanced.
Regional concept plans call for both a network of interconnected on-street bicycle route and special trails located on a
separate right-of-way.
In Derby on-road bicycle routes include Route 243/Pulaski Highway connecting to Prindle Avenue in Ansonia, with eventual connection to a multi-use river greenway trail along the Naugatuck River. Seymour has already built a section of this
greenway. Plans and funding are already in place to begin construction of a two mile portion of the greenway in Derby.
\
53
0 10 20 30 40 50
Years
Mass Transportation
There are six providers of mass transit in the Derby area:
• The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro North) - commuter rail service to Fairfield County and New
York City along the Waterbury Branch of the New Haven Line.
• Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority (GBTA) – fixed-route bus service from downtown Bridgeport to the
Derby Train Station with stops at such locations as Bridgeport Hospital and the Wal-Mart Shopping Center.
• Connecticut Transit - fixed route bus service from Downtown New Haven to the Derby Train Station.
• Valley Transit District (VTD) - shuttle bus service from the Derby Train Station to work locations on Commerce Drive, Long Hill Crossroad , Platt Road and a number of other locations.
• Valley Transit District (VTD) – demand-responsive “door-to door” paratransit service in the Valley Region.
• The Workplace, Inc– shuttle bus service from Bridgeport to Silvermine Industrial Park in Seymour with stops
at Derby Station.
A July 2000 study by Urbitran Associates analyzed transit service in the Valley Region. The study primarily recommended
more and better marketing of transit service. Publication of Valley Region Transit Maps and Guides were suggested and
seem to be in place now. The use of a Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL), which can locate vehicles on route was suggested to increase the efficiency of the paratransit service. The VTD was also encouraged to take the leadership in arranging for formal transfer agreements and coordinated schedules among the various providers of transit.
The following two enhancement proposals listed in Urbitran’s Report focused on satisfying new travel patterns in the Valley region:
1. Expansion of the employment-based commuter shuttle service was proposed to connect with New Haven CT
Transit service in Derby.
2. Increased service along the New Haven CT Transit Route F6 between East Derby and Downtown Ansonia
was recommended.
54
Utilities
Utility infrastructure includes piped utilities such as public water and public sewer. Also included is wired utilities (ele ctric,
telephone, and cable television), and cellular communications. The location and capacity of infrastructure is important to
the future growth and development of Derby since it can direct growth towards or away from certain areas.
Public Water Service - Derby is expected to have an adequate water supply throughout the planning period. Birmingham
Utilities Inc (BUI), located in Ansonia, supplies water to Derby residents and businesses. A September 2000 water supply
plan done by BUI indicates that “the water supply is more than adequate to meet the need of current customers through
the year 2040”. Population and water consumption in both Derby and Ansonia have decreased since 1970. Existing water
supply sources include the Housatonic and Derby well fields and connections to the Central Connecticut Regional Water
Authority. The total safe yield of all sources is 8.0 MGD (millions gallon per day) and the average 1999 usage was 3.43
MGD. Water quality was consistent with state requirements. Future public water expansion could be expected in the industrial park zoned land in the western section of Derby.
Public Sewer Service - Derby is expected to have an adequate sewage capacity throughout the planning period. The
Derby Water Pollution Control Authority operates public sewers and 95 percent of the city is provided service. The Sewer
Authority has a capacity of 3.5 MGD (million gallon per day) with an average daily usage of 1.5 MGD. There are some
areas in the downtown and east side of Derby where overflows are a problem causing untreated sewage to enter rivers at
times of heavy rains. A Sewer Inflow and Infiltration Study is being done to determine the causes. The system was not
designed to filter some of the modern chemicals now being discharged to the sewage treatment system and this will also be
looked at in the study.
All four pump stations are older and need to overhauled, but especially the Division Street and Roosevelt Drive Stations.
As redevelopment is done, new mains and interceptors should be considered in the downtown and other older areas of the
city. Although there is adequate capacity at the treatment station there is however, a problem with the capacity of sewage
pipes. The Sewer Inflow and Infiltration Study planned will determine where significant infiltration is impacting pipe capacity. Industrial-Park zoned land to the northwest part of Derby is part of the Fountain Lake Industrial Park, in Ansonia.
Public utilities are expected to be provided to this area from Ansonia.
Storm Drainage – The Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of implementing new storm water drainage
requirements (NPDES - Phase 2), which will require the mapping of storm drain systems in Derby and increasingly involve
evaluation and education programs. While Connecticut has not decided exactly how to implement some of these new fed-
55
eral requirements, certain provisions will begin to apply in 2003. This program will certainly require additional attention during the planning period.
56
Other Infrastructure
Yankee Gas provides natural gas service in Derby based on demand for the service for both commercial and residential
use. Equifax Marketing noted that, in 1998, about 40 percent of the households in Derby heated with natural gas.
United Illuminating provides electrical service in Derby. The Connecticut Siting Council has indicated that the electrical
utilities have access to supply resources to meet demand assuming that all the active generators committed to the New
England Power Grid are available for continuing use.
Telemedia of Western Connecticut services Derby with cable television service from their Seymour office. Telemedia is
currently installing fiber-optic cable lines in Derby that allow for high-speed computer access to the Internet.
Southern New England Telephone Service provides regular phone service in Derby. SNET is believed to have adequate
capacity for local needs during the planning period.
Wireless communication is available from a number of different providers in the Valley. Currently there are cell tower
locations along Route 8 providing service along this major transportation corridor. The greatest concerns to municipalities
have been the aesthetic impact of towers, which have been typically regulated by zoning regulations. Recent approval by
the Zoning Commission of the placement of antennas on an older industrial tower in Derby will ensure improved service by
multiple providers and yet minimize the visual impact on the City.
S ewage Treatment
Water Service
Cellular Service
57
Infrastructure Plan
58
Infrastructure Strategies For Discussion
Transportation
1. Continue to work with Valley Regional Planning Agency and CT DOT officials to ensure that improvements to Route
8 interchanges in Derby and throughout the region are made.
2. Examine alternative solutions to decreasing traffic congestion on Route 34, in Downtown Derby, in relationship to
planned land use changes prescribed by downtown redevelopment plans.
3. Seek funding as outlined in the Regional Transportation Plan to assist the City in planning the following road improvements:
• Widening of Division Street near Route 8 and Clifton Streets.
• Realigning and improving Sodom Lane in the vicinity of the Orange Town Line.
• Replacing the bridge over the Derby Canal.
4. Complete work on the 10 miles of Derby’s local roads, not included as part of the initial road improvement bonding
project.
5. Complete installation of a computerized pavement management system to track local road condition.
6. Provide annual funding to maintain all roads in average or above condition rating, based on pavement management
classification.
7. Promote the installation of bicycle lanes on Derby roadways highlighted by the Regional Transportation Plan.
8. Implement plans to begin a multi-use river greenway in Derby to be linked with greenways in adjacent communities in
the future.
9. Explore available funding to maintain and create less formal trails in open pace and recreation areas.
10. Plan for expanded use of paratransit services by the elderly and handicapped as demand increases.
11. Ensure all rail and bus service in Derby is coordinated and well advertised.
12. Promote expansion of employment shuttle services by the Valley Transit District and expansion of the New Haven
Line fixed bus route in Derby.
59
Utilities
1. Upgrade water pipes, that may still be owned by the City of Derby, to standards that would allow them to be transferred to Birmingham Utilities.
2. Fund improvements to the sewer system, to address capacity and overflow problems to be outlined by the planned Inflow and Infiltration Study.
3. Plan for improvements to sewage pumping station in Derby, but especially the stations on Division Street and Roosevelt Drive.
4. Continue to encourage provision of natural gas service, especially to new commercial development.
5. Promote energy conservation methods wherever possible to reduce energy needs and maintain capacity.
6. Encourage all replacement and new wired utilities to be placed underground.
7. Work with utility companies to establish a reasonable tree-trimming schedule that balances reliability and community
character.
8. Encourage efforts by local utilities to make high speed internet access available to all businesses and residents in
Derby.
9. Maintain and enhance local regulations relating to the siting of communication towers, especially in regard to colocation on recently approved facilities.
60
6
CONCLUSION
61
Responsibility
While the Planning & Zoning
Commission has the primary
responsibility of implementing the Plan's recommendations, other local boards and
commissions such as the
Board of Aldermen, Board of
Finance, and similar agencies,
are also involved.
If the Plan is to be successfully realized, it must serve as
a guide to all residents, applicants, agencies, and individuals interested in the orderly
growth of Derby.
“The Plan shall show the
commission's recommendation for the most desirable
use of land within the municipality for residential ...
purposes and for the most
desirable density of population in the ... parts of the
municipality.”
Overview
As part of a Plan of Conservation & Development, the recommendations of each of the preceding chapters are generally
reviewed to produce an overall Future Land Use Plan.
However, since Derby is in the process of establishing a GIS System, the Final land Use Plan is best prepared when that
project is concluded. In the meantime the schematic maps used in this strategic plan are adequate for planning purposes.
This plan is a reflection of the stated goals, objectives, and recommendations of Derby Commissions, Staff and the general
public. It presents a vision for Derby based on historic character, current land use patterns, and desired economic growth
and community facilities. It outlines the general policies the City should pursue in the future.
Plan Consistency
This Plan was compared with the Locational Guide Map in the 1998-2003 State Plan of Conservation & Development and
found to be generally consistent with that Plan. In addition, this Plan was compared with the 1996 revised Regional Plan of
Development for the Valley Regional Planning Agency and found to be generally consistent with that Plan.
Any inconsistencies can be generally attributed to:
• differences in definitions of desirable uses or development densities,
• local (as opposed to State or regional) desires about how Derby should grow and change in the coming years.
62
Implementation Priorities
Implementation of the Plan is a gradual and continual process. While some recommendations can be carried out in a relatively short period of time, others may only be realized towards the end of the planning period, and some may be even more
long-term in nature. Further, since some recommendations may involve additional study or a commitment of fiscal resources, their implementation may take place over several years or occur in stages.
Implementation Tools
Tools available to implement the Plan of Conservation and Development include:
•
Annual Work Program - The strategies in this plan can used by the Planning & Zoning Commission to develop an
annual work program, both for itself and other boards and commissions.
•
Plan of Conservation & Development - Using the Plan of Conservation & Development as a basis for land use decisions by the Planning & Zoning Commission will help accomplish the goals and objectives of the Plan. All land use
proposals should be measured and evaluated in terms of the Plan and its various elements.
•
Zoning and Subdivision Regulations - The Zoning and the Subdivision Regulations provide specific criteria for land
development at the time of applications. As a result, these regulations are important tools to implement the recommendations of the Plan. However, this is only true if the regulations reflect the recommendations of the Plan.
•
Capital Budget - The Capital Budget (or Capital Improvement Program) is a tool for planning major capital expenditures of a municipality so that local needs can be identified and prioritized within local fiscal constraints that may exist.
A five-year capital budget should be prepared for Derby.
•
Referral of Municipal Improvements - Section 8-24 of the Connecticut General Statutes requires that municipal improvements (defined in the statute) be referred to the Planning & Zoning Commission for a report before any local action is taken. A proposal disapproved by the Commission can only be implemented after a two-thirds vote by the
Board Of Aldermen.
63
Summary
The Plan of Conservation & Development has been prepared to be an overview of the challenges that will confront the
City of Derby in the future. After years of slow or negative growth, Derby is looking to redevelopment and other methods
to enhance the quality of life for residents, while maintaining the historic character of the community.
The first step in the planning process was to find out what the important issues in Derby residents are. Information was
collected, presented, reviewed, and discussed with the Derby Planning and Zoning Commissions as part of the process of
assembling this Plan. The second step was to determine where Derby is heading. The Commission assessed issues in
Derby and discussed priority topics for preparation of this plan. The priority topics selected for the plan, Transportation,
Open Space end Recreational Facilities were given special emphasis in the plan. The third step is for Derby to lay out specific actions that will help the City direct change. While the task of implementation rests with all Derby residents, the realization of the Plan is orchestrated by the Zoning and Planning Commission and other City agencies and officials.
The Plan is intended as a guide to be followed in order to enhance the quality of life, economic vitality, and the community
character of Derby. It is intended to be flexible in order to allow adjustments in the manner that specific goals and obje ctives are achieved while maintaining stability in the long-term goals of the community.
During the next few years, some of the strategies will hopefully be achieved, some circumstances will undoubtedly change,
and some conditions will certainly arise that will suggest that it is time to reconsider the Plan or some of its elements. Such
situations are to be welcomed since it will mean that the Plan is being used as a map of the general direction Derby is
heading. Programs that help achieve community consensus, establish community goals, and promote community welfare
will all turn out to be positive steps in the history of Derby.
By preparing this Plan of Conservation & Development, that process has already begun.
64
2002 Derby Plan of Conservation & Development
References
While many documents were reviewed in the preparation of this Plan of Conservation & Development, the following documents, which can be found at Derby Public Library, Valley Regional planning Agency or Derby City Hall, are considered
the most significant and should be consulted for additional information:
Derby Plan of Development & Rezoning, 1958
HALO Redevelopment Plan, August-2001
Zoning Regulations, adopted January 18-2000
Linking Land Use to Water Quality, UConn Extension Center.
City of Derby Subdivision Regulations
The Changing Valley, 1988 Regional Plan, Valley Regional Planning
Agency, updated 1996
Inland Wetland & Watercourses Regulations
2000 U. S. Census
Code of the City of Derby, 1999
CT Department of Education, CT Mastery Test Results
Naugatuck Valley Corridor Economic Development Strategy,
June 1998
CT Department of Economic & Community Development, Affordable Housing in Connecticut
Greater Valley Business.com, Valley Chamber of Commerce, 1998
Valley Downtown: A Historical Perspective, Valley Regional Planning Agency, 1980
Recreational Facilities Report, Milone & Mac Broom Eng., Feb.-99
Historic Preservation in CT, Volume IV, Western Uplands, 1996
Route 8 Corridor Planning Study, CT DOT, March 2000
CT Department of Historic Preservation, 2001 National and Sate
Historic Register properties
Consolidated Regional Transportation Study, Greater Bridgeport &
Valley Regional Planning Agencies, 1997
Derby Water Supply Plan, Birmingham Utilities, September-2000
Valley Regional Transportation Update, Valley Regional Planning
Agency - 2001
Yankee Gas Forecast of Natural Gas Supply and Demand 19992008.
CT DOT Statewide Bus System Study, Valley Transit District,
July 2000
CT Siting Council Review of Connecticut Electric Utilities, 1999
Twenty year Forecasts