Chapter 6 Quality Management - The WA Franke College of Business
Transcription
Chapter 6 Quality Management - The WA Franke College of Business
Overview Chapter 6 Quality Management Quality & Strategy What is quality? Dimensions of Quality for Goods Malcom Baldridge Quality Award Total quality management (TQM) Facets of TQM Tools of TQM Six Sigma Service Quality Attributes Operation Reliability & durability Conformance Serviceability Appearance Perceived quality Reliability Responsiveness Tangibles Quality Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award Competence Understanding Access Security Courtesy © 1995 Corel Corp. Credibility 2005 Baldrige Awards Communication Manufacturing Sunny Fresh Foods Monticello, MN Service DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company New Orleans, LA Established in 1988 by the U.S. government Designed to promote TQM practices Small Business Park Place Lexus Plano, TX Education Richland College Dallas, TX Jenks Public Schools Jenks, OK Chapter 06 Quality Health Care Bronson Methodist Hospital Kalamazoo, MI 1 TQM – Total Quality Management Deming’s Fourteen Points Create consistency of purpose Lead to promote change Build quality into the products Build long term relationships Continuously improve product, quality, and service Start training Emphasize leadership Encompasses entire organization, from supplier to customer Stresses a commitment by management to have a continuing company-wide drive toward excellence in all aspects of products and services that are important to the customer. Deming’s Points - continued Drive out fear Break down barriers between departments Stop haranguing workers Support, help, improve Remove barriers to pride in work Institute a vigorous program of education and self-improvement Put everybody in the company to work on the transformation Continuous Improvement Represents continual improvement of process & customer satisfaction Involves all operations & work units Other names Kaizen (Japanese) Zero-defects Six sigma Chapter 06 Quality Concepts of TQM Continuous improvement Employee empowerment Benchmarking Just-in-time (JIT) Taguchi concepts Knowledge of tools Employee Empowerment Getting employees involved in product & process improvements 85% of quality problems are due to process & material Techniques Support workers Let workers make decisions Build teams & quality circles 2 Benchmarking Selecting best practices to use as a standard for performance Determine what to benchmark Form a benchmark team Identify benchmarking partners Collect and analyze benchmarking information Take action to match or exceed the benchmark Benchmarking examples Xerox Pioneered benchmarking 1989 Baldrige Award winner Benchmarked competitors. WHY? Benchmarked American Express. WHY? Benchmarked L.L. Bean. WHY? Benchmarking examples Granite Rock 1992 Baldrige Award winner produce aggregate and concrete Benchmarked companies in their industry Benchmarked Dominoes’ Pizza. WHY? Tools for TQM Just-in-Time (JIT) Relationship to quality: JIT cuts cost of quality JIT improves quality Better quality means less inventory and better, easier-to-employ JIT system Perroti’s Pizza Pareto Chart The manager of Perroti’s Pizza collects data concerning customer complaints about delivery. He created a frequency distribution of the problems from a check sheet. Check sheets (read) Scatter diagrams (read) Histograms (read) Problem Flow charts (read) Topping stuck to box 17 Pizza is late 35 Wrong topping 9 Wrong crust 6 Wrong size 4 Partially eaten (?!) 3 Pizza didn’t show 6 Pareto charts Cause-and-effect diagrams Statistical process control (Chapter 6S) Chapter 06 Quality Frequency 3 Perroti’s Pareto Chart Perroti’s Pareto Chart What does the chart show? 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Cumulative Percent Frequency Perroti's Pareto Chart Pizza isTopping Wrong Wrong Pizza Wrong Partially late stuck totopping crust didn’t size eaten box show (?!) Worst problem? What is it? What percent of all problems? If you want to solve 80% of the problems, which problems should you solve? Problem Perrotti’s Pizza Pareto Chart Problem Frequency Pizza is late 35 Topping stuck to box 17 Wrong topping 9 Wrong crust 6 Pizza didn’t show 6 Wrong size 4 Partially eaten (?!) 3 Sort frequency distribution from highest frequency to lowest frequency. Perrotti’s Pizza Pareto Chart Problem Frequency Cum Freq Pizza is late 35 35 Topping stuck to box 17 Wrong topping 9 Wrong crust 6 Pizza didn’t show 6 Wrong size 4 Partially eaten (?!) 3 Create the cumulative frequency distribution. Perrotti’s Pizza Pareto Chart Perrotti’s Pizza Pareto Chart Calculate the cumulative percent frequency distribution Problem Frequency Cum Freq Cum Percent Pizza is late 35 35 Topping stuck to box 17 52 Wrong topping 9 61 Wrong crust 6 67 Pizza didn’t show 6 73 Wrong size 4 77 Partially eaten (?!) 3 80 Chapter 06 Quality Problem Frequency Cum Freq Cum Percent Pizza is late 35 35 43.8% Topping stuck to box 17 52 65.0% Wrong topping 9 61 76.3% Wrong crust 6 67 83.8% Pizza didn’t show 6 73 91.3% Wrong size 4 77 96.3% Partially eaten (?!) 3 80 100.0% 4 Perroti’s Pareto Chart Perrotti’s Pizza Pareto Chart 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Cumulative Percent Frequency Perroti's Pareto Chart 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Problem Frequency Cum Freq Cum Percent Pizza is late 35 35 43.8% Topping stuck to box 17 52 65.0% Wrong topping 9 61 76.3% Wrong crust 6 67 83.8% Pizza didn’t show 6 73 91.3% Wrong size 4 77 96.3% Partially eaten (?!) 3 80 100.0% Pizza isTopping Wrong Wrong Pizza Wrong Partially late stuck totopping crust didn’t size eaten box show (?!) Problem Checksheet: Airline Complaints Ticketing error ||||| ||| | ||| Used to find problem sources/solutions Other names 14 0.74 Missed connections 7 0.88 Lost Baggage 4 0.96 2 1 Ticketing error Fish-bone diagram, Ishikawa diagram Identify problem to correct Draw main causes for problem as ‘bones’ Ask ‘What could have caused problems in these areas?’ Repeat for each sub-area. Chapter 06 Quality Complaint 50 Cause-and-Effect Diagrams Machines Personnel Steps Cumulative percent Poor cabin service 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 ice 0.46 | Cause and Effect Diagram 23 se rv ||||| ||||| ||| ||| | Baggage delay Airline Complaints 25 20 15 10 5 0 co nn ec t io ns Lo st Ba gg ag e Tic ke ti n g er ro r ||||| |||| | || | Cumulative Percent ca bin Baggage Delay | Frequency M is se d || Complaint Frequency | ||| Wk 3 Wk 4 Total de la y Lost Baggage Missed connections Poor cabin service Wk 2 Ba gg ag e Wk 1 Po or Type Pareto Chart: Airline Complaints Effect Materials Process 5 Six Sigma Checker Board Airlines Passenger processing at gate Aircraft late to gate Other Personnel Equipment Late cabin cleaners Mechanical failures Unavailable cockpit crew Weather Late cabin crew Air traffic delays Reduce defects to 4 defects per million Reduce cycle time Reduce costs Late baggage to aircraft Poor announcement of departures Delayed flight departures Late fuel Weight/balance sheet late Late food service Contractor not provided updated schedule Materials Quality improvement and business strategy developed at Motorola in the 1980’s Goals Delayed check-in procedure Waiting for late passengers Procedures Utilize an organization infrastructure and statistical tools to implement Source: Adapted from D. Daryl Wyckoff, “New Tools for Achieving Service Quality.” The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, November 1984, pg. 89. © 1984 Cornell H.R.A. Quarterly. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Six Sigma at Motorola Motorola ROI 1987-1994 •Reduced in-process defect levels by a factor of 200. • Reduced manufacturing costs by $1.4 billion. • Increased employee production on a dollar basis by 126%. Six Sigma at GE GE is the current benchmark for Six Sigma success. General Electric ROI 1995-1998 • Company wide savings of over $1 Billion. • Estimated annual savings to be $6.6 Billion by the year 2000 • Increased stockholders share value fourfold. Six Sigma Lessons Implement in BOTH manufacturing and nonmanufacturing areas – Jack Welch, former CEO of GE Chapter 06 Quality 6