Winter 2016
Transcription
Winter 2016
VOLUME 6 | WINTER 2016 Keeping you in touch with your co-op Capital & Governance What is proposed? Since then we’ve done some more thinking. You told us you want us to think out loud and that is what we are doing. Murray King, LIC Board chaiman Creating value and options of significant impact In the last edition of The LINK we told you about work the LIC Board has been doing looking at some of the opportunities and challenges facing your co-op. When we talked to you during our roadshow last year, farmers told us they wanted a range of things: Some wanted investment returns by way of dividends, others wanted growth in share value and most wanted new and innovative products and services. All wanted their cows in calf to quality genetics and information to help manage their herd and farm. As we also said back in January, it was clear to the Board that LIC is essentially two components: i) A herd improvement co-operative supplying core products and services such as our breeding programme, and; ii) a more risk-taking corporate business, investing in new and innovative products both in New Zealand and abroad. So in early June we undertook a second roadshow to talk to you about what we are considering. We have firmed up on some ideas which have the potential to create more than $50 million of value for you, our farmer shareholders, by separating LIC into two parts: 1) LIC – a herd improvement co-op focused on genetic gain at an affordable price, including: • Artificial breeding • The database •FarmWise • Genes on Legs • Genetics Research & Development 2) A beefed up LICA (LIC Automation) – an agritech company focused on developing new software, hardware, and sensing systems for New Zealand and international farmers, including: •Automation •MINDA • Herd Testing •GeneMark • Animal Health •International. shareholders have been raising with us. These include; • Divergence of interest between the current co-operative and investment share classes • Illiquid market created by thin trading in the current shares • Lack of appetite from the current shareholder base for investment • Funding needed to develop and grow the information, automation and sensing businesses • The co-op can ‘stick to its knitting’ and focus on its core business of genetic gain • The LIC Agritech company can focus on developing new products and growth All AB? You've gotta be on your game. What happens next? Now the June roadshows are complete, the Board will be thinking about your feedback and making any necessary changes to our proposal. We plan to update shareholders at our Annual General Meeting in October. We will form the two businesses (still under one Board and management team) in December this year. Any investor proposal for external equity would be considered by shareholders and a vote held, possibly in 2017. The core business would most definitely remain a co-operative. We think this is a truly transformational opportunity for LIC. It will ensure your co-op can continue to deliver the core AB services you need at an affordable price and invest in developing new technologies for you for the future. Aside from the potential opportunity to create more than $50 million of value for shareholders, we’ve been looking for ways to respond to issues Read more on page 14 • The technology world is moving fast and we want to be in control of our destiny otherwise it may be decided for us. This would give the Board options, including the potential to raise capital by bringing in other shareholders into the agritech business if approved by existing shareholders. Why change? It's all about efficiency of output, says Ellis. Read more on page 13 Journey of the Packhorse. Opportunity We look forward to discussing it with you further. Read more on page 10 2 SHAREHOLDER COUNCILLOR PROFILE FRASER MCBETH, WARD 16, TASMAN. Tell us about your farm business. My wife Christine and I have owned our 115 ha dairy farm for 11 years. After sharemilking our way north from Canterbury, we purchased a share in a runoff 2 years ago at the end of the high payout (timing could have been better). Our farm is about one hour’s drive south-west of Nelson. We calve 240 Jersey and KiwiCross™ cows and after having done once-a-day (OAD) milking this season, we plan to continue with OAD into the future. We have 100 R1 and 100 R2 heifers, and 80 R1 and 45 R2 high-BW bulls on our runoff block: As a result, stock sales make up 25 to 35 % of our gross farm income, depending on payout. Bulls are sold or leased as high BW for breeding. Genetics and the Jersey cow are our main passion, and after close to 20 years we have just moved our herd BW into the top-10 in the country. We hope to maintain this ranking while slightly increasing focus on type and conformation traits. Obviously with the lower payouts of the last few seasons we have had to make adjustments to the way we run our business. Until now these have been small tweaks, however now, with sub-$4.50 payouts, we really have slashed expenditure with $100,000 planned to come off total farm expenses this season. This level of cost cutting is only sustainable in our business over the short term. Christine and I have four children. The youngest son, 19, has special needs and is still at home. Our eldest Jason, 24, is contract milking in Murchison. Fraser McBeth Our two daughters, Kelly, 23, and Ashleigh, 22, both live in Nelson. Why are you on LIC’s shareholder council? I was co-opted onto the shareholders council three terms ago. I felt I should contribute to an organisation which has delivered immensly positive results to the dairy industry's profitability (since the advent of AB and herd testing all those years ago). What are the strengths of your area/community – what makes it so special? The Tasman/Marlborough is the greatest region in NZ. Geographically we are the largest LIC ward, extending from Puponga in the west of the top of the South Island, to Maruia near the Lewis Pass in the south, and across to the east including all of the Marlborough district. However, we only have 1.7% of New Zealand’s dairy cows and 2% of New Zealand's herds. We have the highest sunshine hours, and the most national parks (Abel Tasman, Nelson Lakes, and Kahurangi). Blue Lake in the Nelson Lakes National Park has the clearest water in the world. The region also has the most vineyards in the country, and maybe the best beaches! The breeders of the highestBW Jersey bull in the country, Chardonary Frankie, and Friesian bull Sanray FM Beamer, both live in Golden Bay in the heart of our ward. Off-farm, what else are you involved with? What does a co-op mean to you? I don't like to get off the farm much, but do enjoy a bit of fishing and unwinding in the Marlborough Sounds. I do some judging for The Dairy Industry Awards, attend Jersey NZ's annual conference, and get involved in the Nelson/Marlborough and Golden Bay Jersey Club activities. Of course I also enjoy catching up with the kids, and I don't mind watching Game of Thrones! I believe a co-op exists to deliver services to its members at the best possible price, and that pricing is as similar as possible for every shareholder, regardless of scale and location, while continuing to invest for the future. What are your key interests in LIC? Without doubt my key interest in LIC is genetics and herd recording, and the evolving science behind dairy cattle breeding. The animal evaluation model and its evolution are of huge interest to me. LINK Keeping you in touch with your co-operative This newspaper is written and produced by LIC, to take our shareholders behind the scenes, so you have a greater understanding of your co-operative. Published at six-monthly intervals, LINK is mailed to all LIC shareholders and customers. If you would like additional copies for your farm team, let us know. And if you have feedback or suggestions of topics you would like covered in future editions, don’t hesitate to contact us: LIC Marketing & Communications • Phone: 07 856 0700 • Email: [email protected] Disclaimer Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited (“LIC”) has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that the information in this publication is as accurate and up-to-date as possible. The information is provided in good faith with no guarantee as to the accuracy or currency of any information, and LIC its employees, agents, and all other persons associated with the compilation, writing, editing, approval or publication of, or any other kind of work in connection with, the information: 1.disclaim any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, lateness or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and 2.without limiting (1) above, fully exclude any and all liability of any kind, on the part of any and all of them, t o any per son or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. The information provided in this publication is only intended to be general information. It is not intended to take the place of other sources of information available to you regarding your business and before acting on any information you should take specific advice from qualified professionals. Reference to any specific commercial product, process, or service whether by trade name, trademark, manufacture, or otherwise does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by LIC. Forward Pack, Premier Sires, Alpha Nominated, KiwiCross, Sire Proving Scheme, DataMATE, MINDA, Protrack, Protrack EZ Heat, KAMAR, GeneMark, and FarmWise are all trademarks belonging to LIC. SGL Dairy, SGL Marker, Premier Sires Fresh Sexed Semen, AB Technician, MINDA Mobile, FarmKeeper, MINDA Land and Feed, MINDA Identification, MINDA Milk, MINDA LIVE, Herd Testing, MINDA Weights, LIC Webshop, MINDA apps, Protrack Vantage, Protrack Vector, Protrack Drafter, PI Hunt, PI Clear and 6 Week Challenge are all products belonging to LIC. 3 Wayne McNee, LIC chief executive 2016: launched at Fieldays Available on the internet, MINDA LIVE – LIC’s eventual replacement for MINDApro – will be demonstrated and at June’s National Agricultural Fieldays at Mystery Creek near Hamilton. MINDA LIVE is an alternative to MINDApro, but comes with improved web-based features that can deliver on-the-spot answers, anytime, anywhere on farm. Transforming LIC so we can be here for you for at least the next 50 years By Wayne McNee, LIC chief executive I’m passionate about New Zealand agriculture and the New Zealand dairy industry. That’s one of the reasons I came to LIC. LIC makes a huge contribution and I want to ensure we are here in 50 years to continue to deliver that value to our farmers. I also love our focus on new product development, especially in agritech, and want to make sure we can get our new products to our farmers faster than ever before. These are tough times for farmers and for agribusinesses. LIC has a responsibility to farmers, and to the dairy industry, to have a long-term sustainable future. We need to prioritise the most important areas for the business. We need to ensure LIC is still here not only next year, but in 50 years. We also want to be in a position to grow and innovate when the time comes. To do this, we need to make the most of our great products and great people. LIC is starting a transformation process and we are bringing in outside experts where we need them. We are reviewing everything we do to ensure we are as efficient as possible, and to identify new sources of revenue. We are working with the best in the world and following a proven process. I believe we will transform the business for a stronger future because we have the drive to succeed and we are passionate about what we do for our farmers. We want to meet our responsibility to ensure LIC is here for the long term for our owners and farmers and for New Zealand. Transforming LIC will deliver better value to dairy farming communities and the dairy sector, enabling them to get through these tough times and be set up when dairy prices go back up. For some time, LIC has offered a select suite of web-based features, such as Land and Feed and MINDA Weights, which are typically used to complement LIC’s traditional herd recording software, MINDApro. However, for the first time MINDA LIVE can be used to submit Events and generate Reports, online and in real time. This new capability offers a range of benefits: One of the foremost is that multiple users on farm can access all, or some, information – depending on settings dictated by management. In other words, farm managers or owners are able to control the level of features accessible to each member of staff. Settings can be aligned to staff responsibilities, experience, and capabilities. One other major benefit is that the need to ‘synchronise’ information will be eliminated. Waiting on a MINDA sync to access up-todate animal information is set to become a thing of the past, because MINDA LIVE offers on-the-spot, latest, information in real time, where and when it’s needed. That means instant updating of calvings, matings, pregnancy diagnoses, and all other important events. Events, however, can still be reviewed in the ‘holding pen’ – catching any mistakes before being submitted to LIC. The holding pen also contains ‘version control’, enabling farmers to review changes that took place during recording of specific events; this allows a full audit trial of changes, including the time at which they were made, and identifying the user who inputted data. The beginning of a new reporting framework will also be offered atFieldays and completed shortly after. New reporting functionality will allow full flexibility, allowing farm management to design reports specific to the farm’s needs. Reports can be saved for later reference, and shared between other devices on farm. MINDA LIVE can be accessed at www.minda.co.nz. LIC encourages visitors to Fieldays to experience MINDA LIVE at the LIC site. Demonstrations and training will be offered, and farmers will be able to reset usernames and passwords (i.e. in case it’s been while since you used LIC’s online tools). LIC's Fieldays site will help farmers discover the benefits of MINDA LIVE We will ensure we are the best at what we do and will continue to deliver quality services and solutions for our farmers. Some of this requires hard decisions. It simply costs us too much to deliver our services to you. We need to find ways of lowering the cost of service delivery. We also need to find ways of improving our service to you while we lower our costs. It won’t be easy. You will see change at LIC over the next 18 months, just as you are making changes in your business. LIC is here for the long haul – we are your cooperative. Discover what MINDA LIVE offers at LIC's Fieldays site LINK : Winter 2016 4 STRAIGHT LINES OR CIRCLES – FINDING HEATS SHOULD BE EZ AS Farmers who milk in herringbones now have an easy-to-use and high tech solution to accurately identify which of their cows are on heat. Developed by LIC, the solution is commercially available to farmers in New Zealand and overseas. The aim of the system is to save farmers staff resource, time, and money during their busy mating season, using exclusive camera technology to automatically identify heat events. Paul Whiston, LIC Automation chief executive, said the technology was developed to meet farmer demand for a herringbone heat detection solution. Protrack’s EZ Heat for rotaries had been available for four years, and a large number of farmers had asked for a herringbone solution. A prototype for herringbones was first released at Fieldays last year. It was then refined in field tests before recently becoming available for commercial release. Protrack’s EZ Heat system (for both rotary and herringbone sheds) integrates with LIC Automation’s Protrack system to draft cows after heat detection. The system also integrates with LIC’s MINDA herd management software to record the heat events – making life even easier for farmers. For the 2016-17 season LIC is offering interestfree terms on a range of products, including Protrack EZ Heat and Protrack™ drafting solutions. Whiston said the heat detection technology was designed to improve efficiency and herd management decisions. “Protrack EZ Heat™ reduces production losses through missed heats, while removing the stress and labour costs associated with manual heat detection.” Identifying cows on heat is critical during the farm’s mating season – and the following year’s production depends on it. Achieving accuracy can be challenging for even the most experienced farmer. “The system is very accurate at detecting activated and missing heat patches,” Whiston said. The herringbone system includes a unique in-race photo booth that cows walk through as they leave the shed after milking. A camera in the booth photographs the cow’s heat patch above its tail, and evaluates the heat patch for signs of activation. By comparison, the rotary system photographs the heat patch while the cow is on the platform. In both systems, cows deemed to have no activity are drafted back to the paddock. If a patch is deemed activated or missing, the cow is automatically drafted by Protrack to a pen ready for the farmer to inspect and put the cow up for artificial insemination. Heats detected by Protrack EZ Heat are automatically recorded in MINDA®, removing the need for manual data entry. 5 THE IMPORTANCE OF BCS By Darren Sutton, FarmWise® consultant, Waikato With variation in where the rain falls comes a variation in pasture covers. And so it follows with cow condition. At the beginning of autumn there was a wide range in cow condition, both between farms and within herds. If the situation is not managed well, the herd average BCS may appear okay, but the range of cows can be 3.0 to 6.0 by late autumn. Below, I cover off what you should be thinking about to ensure cow condition is protected through autumn and winter. BCS Targets Low Cow Condition Cow condition and feed planning are two areas requiring careful monitoring to ensure the season’s milk production and reproduction is not dictated by climate. As lactation goes on during the season, it becomes clear who the high producers are within a herd. High performance cows tend to keep milking despite limited levels of feed, and lose weight in the process. Meanwhile, other cows (often lower-PW cows) will begin to partition energy toward BCS gain, getting fat in the process. To optimise opportunity for profit, DairyNZ research reiterates industry targets (at calving) of 5.0 body condition score (BCS) for mixed age (MA) cows, and 5.5 BCS for firstand second-calvers. These are not merely ‘nice targets to achieve’. They should be the aim of every farmer at calving – because condition will directly affect milk production and reproduction potential. DairyNZ’s research shows that the net gain in milk production – through calving cows at 5.0 BCS rather than 4.5 BCS – is 7.5kgs of milksolids. A separate (DairyNZ) study also shows that cows calving at BCS 4.0, compared to BCS 5.0, results in a seven percent lower chance of cycling at planned start of mating (PSM), and will take about nine days longer to begin cycling. Cows that have not cycled at PSM typically have: (i)a 16 percent lower six-week in-calf rate, and; (ii)a six percent higher empty rate. So what is the best way to manage your herd? If you’re not already doing so, start body condition scoring your herd to get a realistic understanding of condition – as opposed to the mind-set that ‘they’re okay apart from the odd light one’. Dairy NZ’s Body Condition Scoring Made Easy booklet helps guide farmers through condition scoring. Aim to do at least 70 cows to get a good cross-section of the herd. The DairyNZ booklet explains how to work out an average from these cows’ scores. There is also the very handy BCS app from Dairy NZ that you download to your smart phone. This provides the mob's average and percentages of differing BCS. You can also ‘flag’ individual cows that need attention. It also has pictures of what the different BCS look like for the different breeds. Alternatively, get an accredited BCS assessor to independently score your herd, which will allow objective and impartial data to work from. To find a local assessor, check out DairyNZ’s website. Once you have worked out what percentage of your herd are in the ‘4.0 BCS or lower’ category, decide what management changes you can make to hit BCS targets by the planned start of calving (PSC). of grass or maize silage, or 125 kgs of PKE above her maintenance needs. So in the middle of June a Friesian cow calving on 1 August, that is 4.5 BCS, is going to need about 9.5 kgs offered of pasture dry matter (DM) for maintenance, and will need about 5 kgs of PKE offered per day to reach the 5.0 BCS target three weeks out from calving. Quantify what supplements are needed for late winter and spring. On crops, the same cow will need to consume 210 kgs of DM of kale, 180 of swedes and 155 of Fodder Beet above maintenance. This explains why after allowing for feed wastage, 14 kgs DM offered of feed can be needed to gain 1 BCS over 60 days on winter crops. Do a feed budget to project if your annual pasture cover (APC) will be at target at the PSC and will track okay through spring to balance date. This highlights the importance of drying cows off in the autumn based on calving date and BCS in a timely way so that you are not chasing BCS when time is short. Build into the feed budget the required amount of feed to lift the BCS to have the entire herd at 5.0 for MA cows and 5.5 for R2s and R3s. To really get accurate you can create a matrix of cows' BCS and their calving date. So what are the best options for managing BCS in the dry period? You cannot expect any BCS gain in the final three weeks of gestation. Also, realistically you cannot expect more than half a BCS gain in 30 days, unless you are using some form of a high quality supplement. The types of feed can have a major influence on whether you can gain more than half a BCS in 30 days. To gain 1 BCS, a Friesian cow of 500 kgs will need to consume either 200 kgs of dry matter of autumn pasture, 160 kgs This is where the MINDA lookup app is so useful. You can draft cows based on whether they are calving in August, September, or October and what BCS they are. A cow calving on 1 October has a lot more time to lift from a 4.0 BCS, than say, a cow calving on 1 August (she can therefore be fed differently). By being proactive (in not letting BCS slip) and by altering management now, you should help provide the farm with options for days in milk at a lower cost structure. LINK : Winter 2016 6 PREMIER SIRES Tony and Ali Van Der Heyden On their Tokoroa dairy farm, Tony and Ali Van Der Heyden calved and reared 111011 Ashdale FM Kelsbells S1F. They had their inaugural year as Premier Sires breeders in 2015. And with Kelsbells’ retaining a lofty place on 2016’s Ranking of Active Sires lists, Tony and Ali look set for their consecutive year as Premier Sires breeders. Here, we gain a unique insight of the Van Der Haydens' breeding philosophy, and their approach toward milking great daughters. “Since I was a five-year-old boy dairy animals have been a passion of mine, and my interest in genetics has developed over time. When you get your first contract cow, that’s a real buzz, and I suppose that thrill continues each time the breeding company is interested. And then of course you want your first bull to make the Premier Sires team. It (bull calf Kelsbells) may have been a bit of luck, the result of Mint Edition on a really good cow family. Mint Edition is the best bull I’ve ever used. So there’s a bit of luck in there because there’s a lot of permutations that go into getting a good bull. Kelsbells’ dam was an ‘03 born, and was the result of one of my own matings rather than a contract mating. I’d done a bit of ET (embryo transfer) work on the granddam, a 1988-born cow who was ET’d at 14 years of age. Kelsbell’s mother was the result of one of the progeny from that ET mating. We got about 16 embryos and eight held, 5 bulls and 3 heifers. Kelsbells’ dam was the best of the heifers, and the mating was to Hugo which was another LIC bull. Because the herd may go up for sale in the next five years or so, I’m becoming more BW oriented. I always want a good conformation sort of a cow, a compact sort of a cow – all the things that I suppose go in to BW, but with good dairy conformation and good udders, and still being able to look after themselves with good production – I suppose that’s where body condition score (BCS) comes in now. Kelsbells has done alright out of the system review in February – the introduction of the BCS breeding value has helped Kelsbells. I nominate. I look for Friesian bulls with 40 protein, and pretty reasonable BW. With crossbred bulls I’ll look for 25-30 protein. I want my nominated packs to have a BW-equivalent to Premier Sires teams, so that I’m not losing out by nominating. I’ll look for an udder overall and dairy conformation of 0.60. Because I can’t just have Mint Edition sons, I always look for variation in genetics. I want a low-somatic cell count herd. Fertility I look at as well, just in general. In terms of selection I want some Mint Edition sons and some Solaris sons – just bulls I like, and I try to keep that going. It’s always exciting looking for the progeny of bulls I haven’t used before. I chose Priests Sierra when he was at 215BW. I was just taking a punt because he looked good with 30 protein, 40 for fat. Now he’s at 288BW, and I look forward to seeing progeny from the next generation of bulls – the Beamers and the like. I’ve sort of moved away from Mint Edition and Solaris – so now it’s a few different bulls, and I look forward to them (the daughters) hitting the ground and then milking them two years down the track. I like to have surplus heifer calves so I get choice on which ones to keep. I eyeball the calves as much as I look at the figures – good constitution is a big factor. I’ll walk through the calf pen every day looking at the calves, and I suppose that continues through until they hit the platform; it’s important to monitor whether TOPs (traits-otherthan-production) match up to expectations. For me it’s a culmination of a lifetime of breeding, and getting rewarded with the satisfaction of getting a bull in Premier Sires.” 7 2015: BREEDER Evan & Shirleen Smeath – Hikurangi Northland Luke & Lyna Beehre – Hikurangi Northland Mark & Megan Heslop – Cambridge Waikato Daniel Jefferies – Hamilton Waikato John & Christine McCormick – Huntly Waikato Andrew & Nicola Walford – Matamata Waikato Brent & Cindy Morris – Morrinsville Waikato George & Glenda Howie – Morrinsville Waikato Des Hickey – Ohinewai Waikato Gavin & Rosemary Fleming – Otorohanga Waikato Pat & Kathy Edwards – Otorohanga Waikato Peter & Jill Rabarts – Otorohanga Waikato Stewart & Kathryn Anderson – Otorohanga Waikato Peter, Nola & Gay McDonnell – Putaruru Waikato Graham & Glenys Bell – Te Aroha Waikato Malcolm, Jody, John & Ann Ellis – Te Awamutu Waikato Raeden & Lyn Jackson – Te Aroha Waikato Robert & Anne Siddins – Thames Waikato Roger Crawford – Tokoroa Waikato Rowan Priest – Te Aroha Waikato Shaun Good & Michelle Adam – Te Awamutu Waikato Tony & Ali Van der Heyden – Tokoroa Waikato Goodwright Family – Waiuku Waikato Dennis & Heather Wilks – Katikati Bay of Plenty Charles & Ellen Mitchell – Murupara Bay of Plenty Alan & Anne Looney – Opotiki Bay of Plenty Stephen & Astrid Wells – Eltham Taranaki Kelvin & Sandy Tosland – Hawera Taranaki Kevin & Olwyn Duthie – Hawera Taranaki Merton Family Trust – Hawera Taranaki Murray & Judith Brown – Hawera Taranaki Paul & Kirsten Midgley – Hawera Taranaki Rob & Alison Thwaites – Hawera Taranaki Mike & Christine Gyde – Inglewood Taranaki Robert & Rosemary Cartwright – Inglewood Taranaki Chris & Kerry Mullin – New Plymouth Taranaki Kelston & Diane Dickson – New Plymouth Taranaki John & Jennifer Lawn – Opunake Taranaki And we’ll do the same next year. And the year after that. And the year after that. Lynskey family – Opunake Taranaki Mark Tobeck – Stratford Taranaki You get the picture. Adrian Collins – Waitara Taranaki Jim & Sue Webster – Waitara Taranaki Gavin & Graeme Drysdale – Eketahuna Manawatu-Wairarapa Graham & Julie Moody – Eketahuna Manawatu-Wairarapa Bruce & Bronwyn Jensen – Feilding Manawatu-Wairarapa Bryan & Jo Guy – Feilding Manawatu-Wairarapa Huzziff Farms Ltd – Foxton Manawatu-Wairarapa Craig & Chantelle Rowe – Palmerston North Manawatu-Wairarapa Keith, Gayle & Tania Cresswell – Woodville Manawatu-Wairarapa Brian & Mary-Anne Nesbit – Takaka Nelson-Marlborough Ray & Sandra Hocking – Takaka Nelson-Marlborough Phil & Donna Lowe, Todd & Fleur Anderson – Ashburton/Winton Canterbury Neville & Raewyn Tidey – Christchurch Canterbury Brendan & Jacqui Durcan – Timaru Canterbury Steve & Nina Ireland – Temuka Canterbury Mike & Chris Moffatt – Waimate Canterbury Hans & Margaret Schouten – Invercargill Southland Allison Family – Outram Southland Geoff Wilson – Outram Southland John & Jenne Kennedy – Winton Southland Singh Family – Wyndham Southland Todd & Fleur Anderson – Winton Southland ROLL OF HONOUR. LIC shareholders rely on the industry’s best farmers to nurture world-beating dairy genetics, resulting in bull calves that help secure the continued future of New Zealand’s low-cost pastoral system. So in our top dairy breeders there’s much to be grateful for. For many breeders perhaps the highest honour is producing a bull calf that goes on to become a member of LIC’s Premier Sires® bull team. Premier Sires is the country’s widest distribution network of top dairy genetics – to any New Zealand dairy farmer, anywhere in the country. Sharing in the spoils is what being part of a co-operative is all about. Being part of a co-operative is also about the spirit of celebration. Therefore, as progeny of last year’s Premier Sires begin hitting the ground as newborns this calving season, LIC takes enormous pleasure in listing the breeders behind 2015’s Premier Sires teams. We salute them. LINK : Winter 2016 8 CANTERBURY COUPLE CAPTURE KUDOS LIC chair Murray King with Susie and Michael Woodward Susie and Michael Woodward are the 2016 winners of LIC recording and productivity award, taken out at the recent National Dairy Industry Awards held in Wellington. “When I first came to New Zealand (July 2005), I came to a 3000-cow farm… I took a look at the MINDA records at the time and there was a high number of cows that were mis-recorded – or the calves got allocated an ear tag, were given a random Mum and Dad, and away they went. farmers so they’re able to have the best genetics out there,” Susie said. The couple, aged 33 and 35 respectively, are 50/50 sharemilkers for Purata Farming Ltd at Dunsandel in Canterbury. “I was flabbergasted, because I was used to a system in the States where you knew exactly the cow you were looking at, and you knew exactly what her genetic line was and what her capabilities were.” “We’ve taken the time to do the crossbreeding on those – we’re looking for that half to three-quarter Friesian so she’s all-black with all black feet… we just find it suits us really well where we are in Canterbury. Susie spent a good part of the following few years tidying up the farm’s MINDA records. “When we look at our calves this year compared to last year we’re seeing fewer outliers – so it’s really cool to see them come through and know that we’ve played our part in making that change. Taking out the LIC prize, along with being runners-up at the national awards, has helped them to finish the tough 2015/2016 season on a high. Having won the Canterbury regional award earlier this year – in which they walked away with $17,000 in cash and prizes – they won four category merit awards (including the LIC one) at the awards dinner, picking up a further $33,000 in cash and prizes. “With the right information on the right cow it allows you to make the best decisions you can with your herd. Because we straightened up the records we helped to improve the herd.” Susie, who grew up on a dairy farm in up-state New York, said winning the LIC recording and productivity category was a real highlight. The strategy of improving herd performance through accurate record keeping was part of the reason Michael and Susie became involved in LIC’s Sire Proving Scheme in 2014/2015 (the year they first became 50/50 sharemilkers). “I’ve always taken a lot of pride in the record-keeping I do. “It’s nice to pass on accurate information on to other When Susie and Michael ventured into the 50/50 sharemilking they purchased lines of cows out of both a predominantly-Friesian herd and a predominantlyJersey herd. “Breeding is definitely something we think about long-term. The decisions we’re making now we know will take a long time to come through so we’ve got to be patient with, confident in, and committed to, our plan.” Susie has an interesting ‘side project’ when it comes to breeding. “I particularly like the Brown Swiss breed of cow, which Susie and Michael Woodward I had a lot to do with in the States, and I think there are a few characteristics in that breed that would suit the New Zealand system really well. “It perhaps goes against the BW/PW system, but I do feel the characteristics of that breed might go well here in Canterbury. I had about 25 straws we put into the herd this year just to see what happens. “Everybody needs their own little thing that gets them out of bed every morning and for me that’s it – being able to tinker around with that sort of stuff. I absolutely love the opportunity to do that, and yes, it’s fair to say I do like to push boundaries and experiment, testing the waters if you like.” Most of the couple’s recording is done via MINDA’s yellow notebook and regularly keyed into the software, and Susie reiterates that she’s absolutely fastidious when it comes to event recording. “For me having no queries on the herd is the natural, default, state. No doubt the people in the LIC call centre, when I was trying to organise and get things right, got to know me quite well.” She and Michael have “tinkered with” MINDA Apps “but what I really like about our paper based system is that I can go back and see where the errors came from.” The also use MINDA LIVE for weights reports and to check on data following Herd Testing. “We use the Culling Guide for voluntary culls and the repro reports are really handy to see how we’re tracking after mating – I love those ones. We also use the livewight ones for the calves, and we’re body condition scoring so we use those reports as well.” 9 SISTERS DOING IT NOT ONLY FOR THEMSELVES, BUT FOR THEIR INDUSTRY LIC’s own Michelle Wilson was a finalist in the recent Dairy Woman of the Year award. Michelle made the shortlist of three, but in the end was edged out by Rebecca Keoghan, who is a Landcorp business manager on the West Coast (Rebecca’s husband Nathan Keoghan is an LIC shareholder councillor). In her day job Michelle services the needs of farmers in the Waihi and Paeroa area as a Farm Solutions Manager. “It was an honour to be named as a Dairy Women’s Network finalist, and I believe it was an acknowledgement of the service and leadership I’ve given over recent years within the industry,” she said. Michelle is a former executive chair of the Dairy Women’s Network, an organisation that fosters leadership and knowledge for women in dairying. During her tenure at the organisation she oversaw phenomenal growth in membership, which today stands at more than 8000. In 2013, she represented the industry at the APEC Women in Leadership Forum in Beijing. When not on the road in her LIC role, Michelle owns and runs a 120-cow Waihi farm with her husband Pete, which they took on two years ago, having moved “back home” from Southland. Beside bringing up their three children (now 19, 23, and 26), the Wilsons spent 12 years in Southland on a 650-cow farm, which they part-owned in an equity partnership with their former sharemilking employers, Mark and Diane Townshend of Ngatea. As an LIC Farm Solutions Manager, Michelle said she gets a privileged insight into farm operations and decision making processes among many couples, and gets an excellent feel for farmer sentiment on a variety of issues. “Every farm varies, but typically the male does a lot of the physical stuff and often has expertise in animal husbandry, and will therefore largely make the onfarm day-to-day decisions. “But women also have a big influence because they’re often the ones who go off-farm for networking events, training sessions, and upskilling when it comes to finance, HR (human resources), or health and safety compliance. “So we, as women, are very often the tactical and strategic decision makers, and we’re able to influence change, and challenge the status quo.” Because of increasing clout on farm, it was apparent that women were feeling empowered to transfer their influence and knowledge beyond the farm gate, Michelle said. It was heartening to see more women making the board table and senior management positions in the rural industry. A good example of that was the LIC board itself. In 2014 Dr Alison Watters was the first woman to be elected to LIC’s board of directors, and the board has since welcomed two further women directors (Abby Foote and Candace Kinser). Note: Barbara Kuriger, now a National Party MP, was the first woman to chair LIC's national shareholder council. It was expected more women would take on leadership roles as the industry recovered from the global dairy downturn, Michelle said. Michelle Wilson “Taking part in awards like this (Dairy Woman of the Year) is about showcasing talent and hopefully inspiring others. When I first attended a Dairy Women’s conference, I never imagined being up on stage talking to an audience as an industry leader, or becoming a board chair. “It’s important to communicate that we, as women, are not merely support people on farm and we shouldn’t limit our thinking to this kind of role – many of us are in fact leaders and decision makers. “It’s about tapping into the incredible potential that exists in most of us – it serves not only ourselves to step up and become better, it serves the industry as a whole.” Michelle is the second LIC employee to become a Dairy Women’s Network finalist. In 2014, Reproduction Solutions Manager Joyce Voogt also made the final three. LINK : Winter 2016 10 Kirk (left) and Richard of Team LIC JOURNEY OF THE PACKHORSE YOU EMERGE FROM YOUR FIRST OPEN-WATER SWIM AT THE BEGINNING OF A 517KM ENDURANCE EVENT. You glance to your right. Richie McCaw is exiting the drink alongside you. You’re in God’s zone. “I didn’t see him after that point,” says Kirk Wotherspoon. Kirk was one of four members of ‘Team LIC’ to compete in New Zealand’s mostbrutal endurance event, held in early April (in his day job, Kirk is LIC’s heifer production manager). Being among the 41 teams to have completed ‘the long course’ was a genuine thrill for Team LIC, and it marked the fulfilment of the team’s goal. “For three of Team LIC, it was the first time we’d done the event,” Kirk says. “Only Richard in our team had done GODZone before." “Unless you’re one of the top teams, the true challenge is to make the long course. That means the entire team hitting the cut-off points (stages) within an allotted time, and getting ranked.” For the record, the LIC team was 39th, finishing in 6 days, 9 hours, 55 minutes; the winning team did the course in three days, 12 hours, 44 minutes; McCaw’s team, Cure Kids, did the course in five days, 56 minutes. “There are teams that have done it up to five times that have never made the cut-off,” Kirk says. Team LIC was made up of four part-time amateur athletes, all with fulltime jobs back at the co-operative’s Newstead headquarters. Outside work hours, the team members each trained for up to 30 hours a week for four months leading into the event. One of the biggest motives of doing GODZone was facing the unknown, Kirk said. “You don’t know what’s happening until the morning of the race. At 6am you get maps, then you need to start planning and organising before the start at midday. “We all had special roles. Thomas and Richard were the navigators, and Christine was the organiser… she had to attend to the logistics of packing a box ahead of time, which is what you pick up at each transition, so you need the right gear, like cycling pants, and food, prepared ahead of time. It’s hard when you’re mentally and physically fatigued. “My role was one of team packhorse. I carried extra weight like tents.” Not that much sleeping in the tent was done. The team planned, and lived up to, three hours’ sleep each day. “It really was a mindset. Because you’re buggered, once you put your head down, that’s it. So for example, one night we were on a side of a mountain, sleeping on sloping rocks which was uncomfortable as hell, but once our minds told us to rest, we were out to it.” Kirk insists there were no moments of despair. “You hear stories of people losing their minds or not functioning due to in-fighting. We didn’t have that. “Fortunately we did the Arc 24hour race in Coromandel about six weeks prior and it was great to do that because we ironed out a few things. We learned from it: I’m like a bull out-of-agate, and other team members were more conservative. I knew I had to scale back and adjust my behaviour to fit in with others. So that was why I carried more weight. “If we hadn’t have done the Arc, I maybe would have pushed harder and that might have had a negative effect on team mates. “When it came down to it, everyone knew their role, everyone had done the training. Everyone was of the same fitness and pretty much the same pace. “The hardest part was the weather. “In the first three days or so it was cold, windy and at times pouring with rain, and you’re on the side of a mountain, trying to navigate and it’s misty and you can’t see 10m ahead of you, and you’re thinking ‘what am I doing here’. “But when that clears and you’re suddenly in beautiful sunshine kayaking through valleys that are surrounded by mountains, you’re like ‘man, this is amazing’.” • Team LIC navigated, trekked, mountain biked, kayaked, canoed, ascended, swam, and ran its way through Nelson Lakes, Kahurangi, and Abel Tasman National Parks. • Team members included Richard Spelman, LIC chief scientist; Christine Couldrey, LIC senior scientist; Thomas Johnson, research programmer, and; Kirk Wotherspoon, LIC heifer production manager. • Except for Richard, the team had all done adventure races, cycling tours, or Iron Man events before, but in nothing on the scale of GODZone. • High calorie low weight food, eaten at eighthour intervals, was arranged in zip-lock bags. Bags comprised energy bars, wraps, lollies, chips, and freeze-dried meals (edible once water was added). • Another LIC staff member, Russell Price of LIC Automation, also took part in GODZone, but was a member of a separate team. 11 BLACK BOXES & COMPOUNDING CASH ‘Understanding your herd’ was the theme of a recent series of workshops fronted by several LIC personnel. We poked our head in on one session, and here is a report on some of the content. Mike Rose fronts a DWN workshop Commonly thought of as something akin to ‘the black box’, a few fundamentals of Breeding Worth (BW) Index are not well understood by many dairy farmers – and in a handful of cases this can lead to misconception, confusion, and, at worst, sub-optimal decision making. But with a basic understanding and application of a few key principles, any pasture-based dairy farmer can profit from the system and add value to their asset. That’s according to LIC territory manager Greg McNeil, who recently spoke at a series of workshops organised by the Dairy Women’s Network. The ‘how to’ workshops, of which LIC were a sponsor, were held in 10 locations throughout the country. Hundreds of farmers attended the sessions, with a large part of the day dedicated to the topic of herd improvement (the remainder of the day involved practical workshops on how to produce various MINDA® reports). Farmers lacking basic understanding of the index principles were in danger of dismissing the index’s credibility, or applying the wrong tools in certain situations, Greg said. Greg said the Breeding Worth model was complex, and involved an intricate series of calculations and breeding value weightings that changed from time-to-time. However, the beauty of the index was in its accurate reflection of the value, and quality, of dairy farm animals. “The key thing is that, for specific decisions, you know what measures to look at. “For example, I’ve had farmers comment that they doubt the index in general, because in their herd they have a case of high-BW cow who’s not a great producer, or vice-versa. “But what they’re more likely to have is a misconception, because BW isn’t about her production as an individual – it’s about how well her daughters are going. More generally, it’s about her wider family. “So Breeding Worth is about reproduction – in other words, what efficiencies her offspring are capable of. It’s not about her milksolid production in any direct sense.” Related measures like Production and Lactation Worth, on the other hand, were about the individual animal. “So production and culling decisions, based on these measures, might be more appropriate.” Feedback from the audience on what ‘herd improvement’ meant to them fell into six categories: 1. INCREASED PRODUCTION 2. BETTER EFFICIENCIES IN CONVERTING FEED TO MILKSOLIDS 3. HEALTHIER UDDERS 4. COWS THAT CONSISTENTLY GOT BACK IN-CALF 5. COWS THAT LASTED LONGER IN THE HERD 6. POOREST PERFORMERS IDENTIFIED AND REPLACED WITH BETTER GENETICS It was no coincidence that many of these herd improvement desirables could be related directly to various breeding values that fed into Breeding Worth, Greg said; these breeding values included fat/protein, liveweight, volume, body condition score, somatic cell count, fertility, and residual survival. Mike Rose, regional solutions manager, presented the module alongside Greg. Mike said the average New Zealand cow lasted 4.8 lactations “and this compares very favourably to the rest of the world.” He explained that the national herd’s 11-point increase in BW, year on year, was not reflective of individual farm performance, so any sense of complacency about how the industry was progressing was risky. “Some farms will go up 14 to 16 points, or more. Chances are you’ll find these are run by managers or farmers that are actively implementing the principles of herd improvement, and they’re probably deliberately leveraging this in their business.” An 11-point annual increase equated to 2.3kg extra milksolids per cow, per lactation. Feedback from the audience suggested 2.3kg did not sound significant. “Add that up across the entire herd,” Mike said. “But the big point is that I’m talking about improvements that are permanent and cumulative. So making BW gains is a lot like compounding interest with cash in the bank. It builds on itself.” Cows were performing a lot better than they were 10 years ago, Mike said, and this had significant implications on inputs such as feed supply and stocking rate decisions, and ultimately, costs of production. Mike detailed the 16 traits other than production (TOP), four of which were farmer assessed and the remaining 12 of which were done by specialist inspectors. “That’s why not all high-BW bulls get marketed by LIC – if a bull doesn’t measure up in terms of TOP, they won’t make a Premier Sires team.” In summary, Greg told the audience to think of their cows in their herd that they and their staff liked to milk. “And think of those cows you don’t like milking. Then make a breeding plan that will produce more of the ones you like milking, and use herd information to make farm decisions around this (culling, rearing, AB/ reproduction, buying/selling stock, dry off, feeding). “Always remember too that it's very hard to achieve herd improvement without good reproductive performance.” LINK : Winter 2016 12 Andrew Scott catches a wave MANAGING TIDAL SHIFTS IN DAIRY SCIENCE ANDREW SCOTT'S TWO GREAT PASSIONS COULDN'T BE MORE DIFFERENT. At work he manages a team of "heavy-hitting scientists" who plunge into the depths of mindboggling mathematics and challenging computations as part of a Primary Growth Partnership (PGP) funded gene sequencing project to improve the national dairy herd. At home he explores different depths altogether. But more on that later. The numbers are big at LIC. So big they require the muscle of the country's most powerful computers. But tiny changes or improvements in desirable traits and genetic variations can be worth many millions of dollars to the industry and national economy. Some of that research has even aided those studying genetic abnormalities in humans. It's a subject that has fascinated Andrew since he was young. budgeting, etc, to give them the room so that they can concentrate on their stuff." "I've always been interested in biology, how things work at the molecular level," he says. "How life is able to replicate itself." That "stuff" involves mining the extraordinary numbers of genetic variations to find those tiny but valuable improvements. It's supported by co-investment through the Transforming the Dairy Value Chain programme, part of the Ministry for Primary Industries' PGP. That led to a Bachelor of Technology degree at the University of Auckland, where he majored in biological technology. After a bit of his own heavyhitting science he considered studying for his PhD before choosing to advance his career "on the commercial side of things". That eventually led him to the LIC, where he manages the work of a dozen scientists. "I do a lot of the leg work; I'm a virtual lab manager, administering their work, "Before PGP this work and the opportunity to be part of a world-class sequencing project based in New Zealand did not exist," Andrew says. "This was the first sequencing project in New Zealand on a scale seen internationally." The scale might be big, but the advances in the science do not need to be. "Just a 1 per cent change can mean a massive difference in the New Zealand economy." It's not just the economy that benefits. The environment also gains from those small, incremental improvements achieved by Andrew and his colleagues. "There are lots of gains to be made around feed efficiency and its impact on the environment. "We are studying what's going to maximise the milk production of a cow while minimising the waste that impacts on the environment. It's about sustainability." That's a lot to think about and Andrew is often doing just that during his 45-minute drive to work from the coastal Waikato community of Raglan, where he lives with Irish girlfriend Sarah and their dog Enosh, an interesting genetic mix of Hungarian vizsla and Kiwi heading dog. When Andrew got the role at LIC he moved to Raglan from Sydney to indulge his other great passion, surfing. "I'm always thinking, I never really turn off. When I'm driving to work it's about what I'm going to do that day. But when I'm in the water all I'm thinking about is that next wave," he says. Calculations are limited to reading the weather reports, reviewing the tides and scanning the horizon. No computers needed. It used to be skiing for the former Waiouru lad, but he became hooked on surfing while studying in Auckland and now happily rises at 4.30am to ensure he can get his fix before heading off to work. Whether he's working to maximise the genetic improvement of the national dairy herd or striving to hit that next great wave, Andrew's after liquid gold. This article first appeared in a March issue of NZ Farmer, and has been republished with permission from author Rob Mitchell. Mitchell wrote the article on behalf of the Primary Growth Partnership (a joint venture between the Government and industry). 13 ALL AB? YOU’VE GOTTA BE ON YOUR GAME. From health and safety compliance to costreduction or avoidance of hassle, repairs and maintenance – whatever the reason, come mating time, it seems increasing numbers of farmers are opting for no natural-mate bulls. There’s little doubt ‘bang for buck’ is a common motive, but first it’s vital to go into the season with eyeswide-open. Below we discuss major considerations of the ‘all-AB’ approach. Before settling on a programme of all-artificial breeding (AB) this spring, ensure homework on heat detection performance is done – because if submission rate and non-return rate targets aren’t met, results can be costly! Check out previous years’ heat detection performance through MINDA® reports to make sure all key targets are typically met. Be honest about what you’ve achieved, and ask for professional help if you’re not sure what to look for. The heat detection process should be specific to your farm and staff. Consider the appointed personnel who are doing the detecting – is their experience, diligence, and training up to a high standard? And, given the relatively long-term period that detection will be carried out, are management and staff performance expectations sustainable? Breaks for staff to keep people fresh and focused are imperative – as are appropriate strategies to cover the unforeseen circumstances (staff sickness, for example). With an all-AB programme, the biggest risk centres on heat detection errors, particularly missed heats (i.e. when a bulling cow is not detected). Invented heats, when a cow not-onheat is mated, can also be an issue. Heat detection errors are more likely if fatigue or loss-of-focus set in over time. Fundamentals common among successful ‘all AB’ herds: • Heat detection skills are top-notch • Heat detection fatigue and inattention are avoided through good management strategies • Focus is sustained for a longer period of time Don’t underestimate the importance of maintaining focus. It is a significant challenge to ‘see the wood from the trees’ after consecutive weeks of concentration in spotting heats, and maintaining confidence in the ability to pick cows can be an issue. Using additional resource and sources of information can help, which might include: • secondary heat detection aids; • previous mating history of the animal; • herd paddock checks; • an experienced colleague on farm. The use of secondary heat detection aids is highly recommended (e.g. LIC heat patches), especially in the latter part of mating when tailpaint is likely to be more difficult to maintain and interpret. If you intend using heat detection aids that are new to the farm, practice interpretation in the premating period so staff are upto-speed before mating starts. Remember, the longer the mating period, the harder it gets to pick cows on heat! Bulling activity drops off markedly when most cows fall pregnant, and the sexually active groups get smaller. This point is especially important in the latter rounds of mating; mating an already pregnant cow can cause pregnancy loss. Heat detection training and refresher courses, before mating kicks in, will ‘set the scene’, and may help some team members gain a better appreciation of the difference that good heat detection practices can make. Courses are regularly put on by DairyNZ, and some LIC Farm Solutions Managers organise their own ‘heat detection days’ during September. All AB is an increasingly attractive option for some farmers as it can have both economic and health and safety benefits. Potential benefits can include: • Reduced cost per pregnancy • More mating options available to create the desired end product and to capture added benefits (e.g. SGL Dairy® semen, Compact Calving plus BW, or SGL Hereford). • No bulls eating grass on the dairy platform • No bulls for staff to handle in the milking herd It is useful to ‘have a plan B’ in the wings – in case a change is required as the farm gets into it! LINK : Winter 2016 14 OUT & OUT OUTPUT NOT A PATCH ON EFFICIENCY OF OUTPUT, ELLIS SAYS The past two years have seen a “quantum shift” in farm philosophy and goal-setting among New Zealand dairy farmers. That’s according to Malcolm Ellis, LIC sire acquisition manager. “In November I will have been at LIC five years, and I tell you, I am privileged enough in my job to travel far and wide around New Zealand and I get to see many different farmers on all sorts of terrain and soils, facing all sorts of conditions. “But the correction we’re seeing in the dairy industry and the low payout conditions is forcing a massive change in thinking. “Three years ago, when we were all in the midst of an $8.40 payout, it was all about output. “Now, it’s all about efficiency of output. “There’s been a quantum shift, and it’s pretty important we’ve got two quality parent-breeds to deal with that.” Malcolm was speaking at a series of 10 ‘LIC Jersey Days’, held at venues throughout New Zealand during April and May. “I don’t have any doubt in my mind that the most efficient convertor of pasture to milksolids is the Jersey cow,” he said. Malcolm lamented the diminishing influence of the Jersey breed during the past 30 years, going from 25% of the New Zealand cow population in 1985 (Holstein-Friesian 57% and Crossbred 18%) to just 9% today (Holstein-Friesian 39% and Crossbred 53%). However, over the past three years the downward trend had been halted, and Malcolm said this could be due in-part to the resurgent performance of Jersey-bred bulls on the Ranking of Active Sires (RAS) list. Other factors were at play, Malcolm said, and this included better-quality advice being given to farmers. Coinciding with the low payout climate, there appeared to be “an almost overnight” awareness among professionals about what made a genuine difference on farm. “On this roadshow I visited the farm of Andy and Karen Slater – some people would remember Andy picking up the ball at the back of the scrum for Taranaki in the NPC. “Andy’s your classic, quintessential dairy farmer: 200 Holstein-Friesians and 300 Jerseys – he doesn’t cross, so hasn’t used crossbred bulls before, just parent-breed to parent-breed.” For the last few years Andy had been told by advisors his Jersey cows ‘just weren’t big enough’, and this was reflective of what had typically happened all around the industry, Malcolm said. “So the recommendation was ‘those Jerseys are not big enough, we need to cross them to Friesian, we need a bigger cow. A bigger cow means bigger output, and bigger output means we hit the production target’.” Malcolm believed this kind of advice, though well-intended, was wide of the mark, and it was a relief to see some balance being brought back to the equation. “We talk about the p-word, being profit, not production. I think I've come up with a better line than that: ‘Are you making money out of milk, or milk out of money’?” It was interesting that consultants were now pushing for animal weights at every herd test so calculations could be done on milksolids per day compared to liveweight, and, as the season developed, milksolids per cow (season to date) per kilogram of liveweight. In light of this renewed focus on ‘efficiency of output’, Jerseys were suddenly a more-attractive proposition, Malcolm said. “So things have changed. I couldn’t believe, in the hour I was with Andy, how many times he used the phrase ‘kilograms of milksolids per kilogram of liveweight.’ It was just rolling off his tongue.” The purpose of the Jersey roadshow, therefore, was about spreading the word that there’s a bull team at LIC that is worth using to achieve that measure Malcolm Ellis (kg milksolids per kilogram liveweight), Malcolm said. “It’s about instilling confidence back into the farmers, who have perhaps moved away from Jersey, or LIC Jerseys, that it’s worth thinking again and coming back. “I see farms milking 340kg cows doing 360kg milksolids, 420kg cows doing 450kg milksolids, even 480kg Jerseys doing 600kg solids.” “I’m thinking that ought to be the main measure here. When it’s about profit-notproduction, what we’re really saying is that it’s about margins. Margins is about feed-in and profit out, not necessarily feed-in and milk out. “I think we’ve had a view, as an industry, a false assumption that there’s a straight-line relationship between feed in and milk out.” In reality, the ‘law of diminishing returns’ would at some point kick in. “For the second year in a row, I’m going to use Premier Sires Daughter Proven, and I can’t wait for even the eighth bull to turn up – the team is that good… it offers outstanding value for money. “When you think of Conrad, Dynamo, and Speedway at the tail end of the team, I wouldn’t mind if one-third of my replacements were mated to them.” It was heartening to see the hard work and smart decision making of four years ago now bearing fruit with LIC’s Premier Sires teams. Referring to the RAS List, LIC has eight of the country’s top-10 Jersey sires, 21 of the top-25 Crossbred sires, and 42 of the top-50 Holstein-Friesians. LIC had achieved these figures by sire proving fewer than half the bulls in the artificial breeding industry, Malcolm said. “But make no mistake, these are not LIC bulls – they’re your bulls. You are the shareholders, and they’re your bulls to use.” In the top-30 bulls in the RAS List (across all breeds), there were 11 Jerseys, nine HolsteinFriesians, and 10 Crossbreds, Malcolm said. “So when you represent only 10.4% of the national herd (as Jerseys do) that number for Jersey bulls on the RAS List should equate to three – so in the Jersey space it’s fair to say we’re going alright! It was pleasing to see incredible depth in LIC’s Premier Sires teams. “Maybe what we’re talking about – that this breed is the most-efficient – is true.” LIC had a decent line-up of bulls, as evidenced by the performance of all its Premier Sires® teams on the RAS List, Malcolm said. 15 Craig Purcell A BIG PICTURE VIEW OF YOUR HERD’S HEALTH By Craig Purcell, FarmWise® consultant, Bay of Plenty Despite the New Zealand dairy cow being among the most efficient in the world in converting pasture to milk, a heavy reliance on pasture does come with downsides. Because grass is frequently the main form of intake, there are times when the cow may have to ‘buffer’ intakes and/or nutritive levels: This may leave the cow more susceptible to illness. Every year New Zealand dairy farmers spend more than $400 million on animal health, and this encompasses all costs from antibiotic treatment, through to drenches and minerals. Many of these costs are essential, and as farmers we have a responsibility to ensure stock are in good health and that sound animal husbandry techniques are being followed. In addition to vet and drug expenses, are the costs associated with reduced productivity and increased culling and/or wastage. Farmers tend to be reactionary to individual animal health issues. However, in some cases the adherence to simple policies and procedures is likely to reduce stress levels of both the farmer and the cows. With good awareness, some emerging problems can be detected early, and the treatment of these issues can minimise financial cost and wastage. Applying a big picture view to your herd’s health. Have a plan There are several stages through the year where animal health issues (e.g. calving, bloat, facial eczema) are almost inevitable. Make a plan with your vet (they are the professionals!) for these times, and encourage staff to attend vet days/workshops. Cows store minerals in different ways at different times, so make sure you know the details and requirements. For example, at pre-calving, cows cannot store magnesium too well, so ensure uptake is adequate every day. Through calving, death rates and animal ill health can account for approximately 75% of the farm’s total health issues. Unfortunately this period is when we are most busy on farm – so draw up a plan and use it. Observation Ensure staff show empathy with stock. If staff don’t value the stock they’re working with, results will always be the same – poor. Good animal husbandry skills are a fundamental of good farming practice, and without this, a career in the dairy industry is limited at best. Cows can be a great gauge of potential animal health issues, which is why it is so important to know the stock you’re working with. Knowing all individuals may not be easy in large herd situations, but keeping an eye on any changes in behaviour can help early identification of emerging health issues. • Look for the cow by herself, either in the paddock or on the way to the shed. • Know who the last cows on the raceway or in the shed usually are, an unusually late cow is generally an early sign of something that’s not right. Spend time actually looking at the stock – driving past the herd at 30kmph doesn’t count! You may spend countless hours in the shed milking but how much time do you actually spend observing and noting individual cows in the paddock environment? Also remember that, in many cases of a ‘general outbreak’ (e.g. milk fever or facial eczema) one clinical case is frequently accompanied by six to 10 sub-clinical cases. Train staff Junior staff don’t necessarily need to know all treatments, but it is important for the business and the farming future that they develop capability to visually assess animal health issues. Coach staff to look for simple signs: • Reduction in milk production • How the cow moves/ walks • Attitude in the paddock and cowshed • Obvious ill thrift symptoms – weight loss, appearance Protect your investment Is spending in the right area? After the cost of land, the next largest asset in the balance sheet is stock. Look after them and they will look after you. It costs approximately $1500 to rear an animal from birth to first calving. For an average herd of 400 cows, at 25% replacements, this equates to $150,000. Raising good quality stock commands significant investment in time and money, and any major health issues or deaths increases these costs. Look to trim the fat not the muscle out of your animal health costs, remember you still want to milk the best cows, in the best health, next year. Animals in good health provides them with the opportunity and ability to meet targets. LINK : Winter 2016 We can’t say we have the best bulls. But that doesn’t stop others from saying it. In the latest RAS (Ranking of Active Sires) the top 15 bulls by Breeding Worth all came from LIC. More than that, of the top 30 bulls, 26 came from LIC. And that is across all breeds; Friesian, Jersey and KiwiCross.® So if you’re looking for the best bulls to improve your herd’s productivity, then you know where to look. Not that we can tell you. To find out more about Premier Sires® and our genetics options, talk to your local Farm Solutions Manager or visit lic.co.nz/premiersires