Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry
Transcription
Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry
Vol 33 No 1 January 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Table of contents Editorial 1 New concept of depression and its management Ahmed Okasha Original articles 9 Gender differences in personality characteristics and cognitive abilities in adolescents admitted in correctional institutes in Egypt Amany Ahmed Abdou, Dalal Amer and Mohamed Nasreldin Sadek 15 The role of the brain-derived neurotrophic factors in the progression of bipolar disorders Heba Fathy, Shereen Mohamed Abd El-Mawella, Hoda Abdou and Amal Abdou 19 Depression and Alzheimer disease: a risk factor or a prodrome Hoda Salama, Tarek Molokhia, Hazem Maarouf and Hesham Sheshtawy 23 Gender-related phenomenological and neuropsychological differences in elderly patients with depression Fatma Moussa, Mohamed Nasreldi, Hani Hamed and Amany Ahmed Abdou 29 Memory impairment in female schizophrenic patients and its relation with their female sex hormonal profile Samia Abd EL-Rahman Ahmed, Ola Omar Shaheen, Amany Ahmed Abdou and Mohamed Nasr El Din 35 Impact of the first national campaign against the stigma of mental illness Nahed Khairy, Emad Hamdi, Albert Sidrak, Noha Sabry, Mohamed Nasreldin, Aref Khoweiled and Nasser Loza 40 Cognitive functions in euthymic adolescents with juvenile bipolar disorder Lamis El Ray, Aref Khoweiled, Hoda Abdou, Shreen Abd El-Mawella and Mai Abdel Samie 45 Quality of life and burden of women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder Nagda M. El-Masry and Nelly R. Abdelfatah Vol 33 No 1 January 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Editorial Board Editor-in- Chief Momtaz Abdel-Wahab Associate Editors Mostafa Shaheen Tarek Okasha Tarek Asaad Aref Kwaled Co-Editor Ahmed Abdel-Latif Founder & Honorary Editor Ahmed Okasha Emeritus Editors Mahmoud Sami Abdel-Gawad Yehia EL-Rakhawy Editorial Advisory Board National Abdel Azeem, S., Abdel Hakeem, R., Abdel Mohsen, Y. Abdel Rahman, S., Aboul Azayem, A., Aboul Magd, F., Ahmed, S., Arafa, M., Ashour, A., Bishry, Z., El Akabawy, A.S., El Atrouny, M.H., El-Dad A., El Gabry, M., El sheshai. A., Fahmy, E., Fahmy, M., Gad, S., Ghanem. M., Hadhoud, M.E. Ismail, M.K., Khalil, A.H., Khashaba, A., Khater M., Lotaief, F., Loza. N., Mahfouz, R., Medani, A., Moursy, H., Sadek, A., Seif El Dawla, A., Shalaan, M., Youssef, I. Arab World Abdel Rahman, M. (Sudan) Antun, F. (Lebanon) Ansari, E. (Kuwait) Douki, S. (Tunisia) El Assal, A. (Syria) El Hammad. A. (KSA) El kadry, A. (Iraq) El Rowii, A. (Libya) El Serrag, E. (Palestine) El Takritti, A. (Jordan) Erfan, M. (KSA) Ghobash, R. (UAE) Hadad, M. (Bahrain) Kacha, F. (Algeria) Kamel, C. (Bahrain) Karam, E. (Lebanon) Moussaoui, D. (Morocco) Omara, E. (UAE) Paes, M. (Morocco) Sarhan, W. (Jordan) Turky, J. (Tunisia) International Abdel Nasser, M. (UK) Abou Saleh, M. (UK) Akiskal H. (USA) Amin. Y. (UK) Cox, I. (UK) Chaudry, H.R. (Pakistan) Craig. T. (UK) Christodoulou, G. (Greece) Delgado. P. (USA) El Gebali. N. (Canada) Fawzi, F. (USA) Hamdi. E. (UK) Hindmarch, I. (UK) Kasper, S. (Austria) Leonard, B. (UK) Lopez-lbor, I.J. (Spain) Maj, M. (Italy) Mezzich, J. (USA) Ruiz, P. (USA) Sartorius, N. (Switzerland) Vol 33 No 1 January 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Information for Contributors Submission Four copies of each typescript should be submitted to the Editors A covering letter must be included, signed by the corresponding author (i.e. the author to whom correspondence should be addressed), and stating on behalf of all the authors that the work has not been published and is not being considered for publication elsewhere On acceptance of their paper, authors are requested to submit a disk of the final version. Manuscript Style There are several categories of material. Fast-Track Short Papers These should be approximately 2000 words in length with a maximum of four figures or tables Fast-track papers are rapidly reviewed and Published. Regular Research Papers These are of a more usual length (3000-5000) words, and will preferably be oriented towards basic clinical and non-clinical findings. Review Papers These are intended to be well-argued preferably controversial reviews of topical subjects which it is hoped, will generate debate. Letters to the Editors The editors welcome succinct correspondence relating to articles published in the journal, and of an academic and interesting nature. Invited Symposia The journal presents symposia papers by invitation, covering topical subjects Typescripts should be on A4 paper, double-spaced and with ample margins. Title Page - This should contain a concise title of the article, a shortened version (no more Than 50 characters including spaces) for the running head, names of the authors, their affiliations, and the full postal address fax and telephone number of an author lo whom correspondence can be addressed. Abstract - This should be on a separate page, and less than 250 words. It should be followed by up to six key words. Main text - This should start on a separate folio and include: an introduction, methods, results and discussion. The suggested points of insertion of figures and tables, etc. should be indicated. Authors should avoid abbreviations (except for those commonly understood), long sentences, and many juxtaposed numbers in sentences. References - These should be in the Harvard style, i.e. using the names of the authors in alphabetical order (where there are more than two authors, use the first author only followed by et al.), followed by The year of publication Unpublished work should only be cited in the text. Only references genuinely in press should be listed in the reference list. Examples of References: Amin, N., Fathy, A. and Halim, M. (1987). The prevalence of Substance Use Disorders in secondary schools in Rasheed. EJP, 21: 138-44. El-Sayed F. (1993) Human behavior. Zagazig univ. Press (second edition), ch. 32, p. 1172-9. Wageeh Q. (1979) the ‘‘non-caseness" in psychiatry. In: R. Mourad. M. Shoukri (Eds). Classification of psychiatric disorders Academic Press Dameitta, 19-36. Illustrations - These should be referred to in the text as figures using Arabic numbers, e. g., Fig. 1 Fig 2. etc., in order of appearance. Each figure should be marked on the back with its appropriate number, together with the name(s) of the author(s) and the title of the paper. Where there is doubt as to the orientation of an illustration, the top should be marked with an arrow. Photographs and photomicrographs should be uncounted glossy prints and should not be retouched Labeling should be clearly indicated on an overlay or photocopy. Colour illustrations are acceptable when found necessary by the Editors the author will be expected To contribute towards the cost of printing Line drawings should be on separate sheets of white paper in black indelible ink (dot matrix illustrations are not suitable): lettering should be on an overlay or photocopy and should be no less than 4 mm high for a 50% reduction Each figure should have a legend clearly describing it: These legends should be grouped on a separate page a] the end of the manuscript In The full-text on tine edition of the journal, figure legends may be truncated in abbreviated links lo the full screen version. Notice No responsibility is assumed by the editors / publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made. Although all advertising material is expected to conform to ethical (medical) standards, inclusion in this publication does not constitute a guarantee or endorsement of the quality or value of such product or of the claims made of it by its manufacturer. Although great care has been taken in compiling the content of this publication, the editors, publishers, and their servants are not responsible or in any way liable for the currency of the information, for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies, or for any consequences arising there from Inclusion or exclusion for any product or material does not imply its use is either advocated or rejected Use of the Trade names is for product identification only and does not imply endorsement Opinions expressed does not necessarily reflect the views of the editors editorial board, or publishers. Advertising Information Advertising orders and inquiries can be sent to The Editors, the advertising section: Phone: +202- 3024201 / 7961709 Fax: +202 - 3024201 E-mail: [email protected] Vol 33 No 1 January 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Aims and Scope EJP focuses primarily on psychological medicine, integrating it with various allied disciplines as psychology, social, basic and clinical medical sciences. Editorial Policy Today, the amount of new research knowledge doubles every six years the vast number of psychiatric and medical journals available clearly indicates the proliferation of present research activity. However, the practicing psychiatrist and others hardly find the time to read all relevant literature, even when they have access to it. The Egyptian Journal of psychiatry (EJP) in its new form publishes editorials, original research articles, reviews and mini-reviews intended as a way To bridge the gap between basic psychiatric research and clinical relevance, clinical messages including ask the expert, case reports, commentaries, and drug focus, invited symposia and conference reports cowering topical subjects, book reviews and journal search in which the editors have tried to make a representative selection of books and journal summaries grouped in the order they arrive at our office, and every summary is preceded by the title. the names and initials of up to three authors, the abbreviated journal title, year, volume, issue, and page numbers Letters to the editors accepted fix publication comprise comments, view points and preliminary communications, discussion reports and students studies. Material submitted in the EJP also address historical articles on mental hospitals in Egypt as well as tributes to dedicate the contribution of the Egyptian pioneers in the field. Our Mission is to provide the reader with an issue that will enhance and increase their understanding of the Egyptian psychiatric practice. In this respect, pearls from Arabic language were also quoted. The spectrum of EJP extends to cite news, announcements, and scientific highlights on meeting invitations, national and international congress directory, listing of websites and an access to relevant organizations and journals. Material selected for publication includes those papers of merit, not already published or accepted for publication elsewhere, that have been subjected to independent peer review. All subscriptions will be available for electronic access starting from this issue. Noteworthy, EJP is a peerreviewed journal that will publish two issues in 2003 and it is intended as a free service to you. Your suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Editor in chief Anyone reading the EJP in its new form would Not Report the issue with a feeling of déjà vu!!! and is kindly requested to ask: What Changes (if any) it has made in her/his practice? Editorial 1 New concept of depression and its management Ahmed Okasha WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Training in Mental Health, Okasha Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Correspondence to Ahmed Okasha MD, PhD, FRCP, FRC, Psych, FACP (Hon) Director of WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Training in Mental Health Okasha Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University President Egyptian Psychiatric Association Hon. President Arab Federation of Psychiatrists President of WPA (2002-2005) Chairperson of WPA Ethics and Review Committee 3, Shawarby Street, Kasr El Nil Cairo- Egypt Tel: +(202) 29200900,1,2,3,4,5,6 fax: +(202) 29200907,8 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received 1 July 2011 Accepted 22 September 2011 Egypt J Psychiatr 33:1–8 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 Introduction The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the community is high; out of every 100 citizens, 30% suffer from a mental problem that needs attention, 20% will seek traditional healers or general practitioners’ help, 10% will be identified by the general practitioner as psychiatric cases, only 2.3% will be referred to a psychiatrist, and 0.5% will need inpatient treatment (Goldberg and Huxley, 1980). The global burden of depression as measured by disabilityadjusted life years, that is, how many years are lost because of illness and premature mortality was projected to be the third in 2004 (Murray and Lopez, 1996). According to information from WHO, depressive disorders are of high socioeconomic and health-economic importance as these psychiatric disorders most frequently cause psychosocial disability. Despite intensive biologically oriented psychiatric research over the last few decades, the etiology of depressive disorders is not yet fully understood, but a multifactorial genesis is assumed and has been elucidated in increasing detail. Besides psychological and social factors, biological variables apparently play a major role, which lead as a whole to a disturbed central nervous homeostasis (Baghai et al., 2011). Global disparity Depression currently affects B121 million people worldwide. By 2020, depression is projected to become the second highest contributor to the global burden of disease in terms of disability-adjusted life years, whereas by 2030, it will be the first highest contributor. Studies suggest large geographical variations in the burden of depression. Depression is a low priority in most lowincome to middle-income countries and there is apparently a higher incidence of depression in rural than in urban areas (Sartorius et al., 1993; Prince et al., 2007). The prevalence of depressive disorders in various patient populations is estimated as follows: in the general population 5.8%, chronically ill patients 9.4%, hospitalized patients 33.0%, geriatric inpatients 36.0%, cancer outpatients 33.0%, cancer inpatients 42.0%, stroke 1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry patients 47.0%, myocardial infarction (MI) patients 45.0%, and Parkinson’s disease patients 39.0% (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008). Changing conceptualizations of major depressive disorder (MDD) are shown by the differences between the past clusters of situational versus endogenous depression and the recent concept of interplay between biology and environment. Previously, high treatment response rates and full recovery were considered as the rule, nowadays, depression is viewed as a progressive disorder with worse outcomes over time. There was no known cell pathology and a possible ‘chemical imbalance,’ but recently, evidence of cellular pathology has been emerging. In treatment, there was a wait-and-see attitude, with a habit-based prescribing; however, now, aggressive, individualized treatment is followed (Aston-Jones et al., 2000). When does depression become a mental disorder? The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders definition of MDD fails to exclude intense sadness arising from the way human beings naturally respond to major losses. ‘Normal’ sadness may therefore be treated as a depressive disorder, which may undermine normal recovery by disrupting normal coping processes and use of informal support networks. Depression, in contrast to normal sadness, is unrelated to a preceding event in the intensity, duration, and degree of functional impairment it produces (Maj, 2011). The experimental induction of depressed mood has led to a significant increase in reports of recent stressful events. The presence itself of a depressive state may expose a person to adverse life events. Among patients with a diagnosis of MDD, those with a score of less than 20 on the Hamilton Scale for Depression (who made up more than 60% of the sample) did not recover more frequently with imipramine than with placebo plus clinical management (Maj, 2011). The psychosocial impairment associated with the presence of two to four depressive symptoms has been repeatedly reported to be comparable with that associated with the presence of five or more symptoms. The threshold for a depressive state deserving clinical attention may be lower than that fixed by the Diagnostic and Statistical DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000412301.27206.f1 2 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, but the threshold for a depressive state requiring pharmacological treatment is likely to be higher. These thresholds may need to be based on the overall severity of depressive symptoms, rather than, or in addition to, their number (Maj, 2011). In medicine, the term depression has at least three different meanings: (a) a mood, a feeling, an emotion, an affective state; (b) a symptom of a depressive disorder; and (c) the depressive disorder itself. This text presentation focuses primarily on depressive disorders. Essential features of depressive disorders There are numerous types and variations of depressive disorders, and differentiation is important for effective management. Depressive disorders share a number of clinical manifestations: (a) mood and affect (diurnal rhythm): sadness, anxiety, decreased reactivity, tension, decreased motivation, irritability, emptiness, anger, apathy, and a sense of frustration (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008), (b) thought-cognition: decreased concentration, helplessness, indecisiveness, hopelessness, loss of confidence, pessimism, decreased self-esteem, death wishes, inappropriate guilt, and suicidal ideas, (c) psychomotor activity: (i) retardation: decreased body movements, stupor, decreased facial expression, and decreased inhibited interpersonal communication, (ii) agitation: restlessness, fidgeting, and purposeless uncontrollable hyperactivity (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008), (d) somatic manifestations (masked depression) 50–70% of depressed patients: (i) basic functions: insomnia (Early Morning Wakening EMW) (Aka terminal insomnia), hypersomnia, appetite and body weight, sexual drive, (ii) vitality: tiredness, fatigability, energy, and vigor, (iii) bodily sensations: pains and aches, pressure, coldness, heavy limbs, any other vague undifferentiated sensations, (iv) visceral symptoms: gastrointestinal (GI) complaints, Cardio-Vascular (CV) complaints, and vague complaints about a bodily function (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008). Clinically, the main presentations of depression are fatigue, lack of concentration, and painful bodily symptoms rather than depressive symptoms. There are two questions for provisional diagnosis. (a) In the past month, have you felt ‘down,’ depressed, or hopeless? (b) In the past month, have you had little pleasure or interest in doing things? The test can identify 96% of patients with depression. However, its specificity is only 57%; the clinician should obtain additional information to substantiate the diagnosis (Whooley and Simon, 2000). cancel out each other’s effects. Epigenetic modulation explains that life events may influence gene expression. Diathesis toward mood disorders is most likely a product of a complex interaction of a large number of genes, with minor individual effects and environmental factors as shown in Fig. 1 (Maletic and Raison, 2009). The interaction between genetic vulnerability affected by stress or injury and influenced by epigenetic modulation can reinforce or extinguish the gene expression. Multiple roles of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophic factors in mood disorders Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophic factors play a role in neurogenesis, neuroplasticity, and neural resilience. It plays a central role in translating functional into structural change and an important role in neuroendocrine regulation. BDNF and other neurotrophic factors may be altered in depression, anxiety, pain, and mania. Successful treatment of mood disorders may restore appropriate BDNF function (Dunn et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2006; Cunha et al., 2006; Duman and Monteggia, 2006; Schule et al., 2006; Castren et al., 2007; Post, 2007). Stress and 5-HTT polymorphism interaction may precipitate depression This study characterized the risk for major depression and generalized anxiety syndrome as a function of serotonin transporter (5-HTT) genotype, sex, and the occurrence of all stressful life events. Individuals with two short (S) alleles at the 5-HTT locus were more sensitive to the depressogenic effects of all stressful life events than those with one or two long (L) alleles (Kendler et al., 2005). Cumulative effect of risk factors on depression The following factors were investigated for contribution to risk: serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) (locus SLC6A4), BDNF (variant val66met), history of maltreatment, and social support. There was a three-way interaction between the BDNF genotype, 5-HTTLPR, and a history of maltreatment in predicting depression. The vulnerability associated with these two genetic factors was only evident in maltreated children (Kaufman et al., 2006). Figure 1 Epidemiological studies (a) Lifetime prevalence: 16.6 US, 12.8 Europe, 16.0 New Zealand, 7.2 Mexico, 3.3 Nigeria, (b) 12-month prevalence: 6.2 US, 3.9 Europe, 5.7 New Zealand, 3.7 Mexico, 1.0 Nigeria (Kessler et al., 2008). Gene–environment interactions may play a role in the etiology of mood disorders Genetic epistasis means complex interactions between the ‘vulnerability’ genes, whereby they potentiate or Neurobiology of major depressive disorder (Maletic and Raison, 2009). New concept of depression and its management Okasha 3 Impact of comorbid anxiety-depression Greater symptom severity, more illness chronicity, increased risk of suicide, greater function impairment, disability, poorer response to treatment, poorer prognosis, excessive medical utilization, and poor quality of life. Goldberg suggested for International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11) that the emotional disorders (internalizing) may all be similar and should be one cluster instead of splitting them into many disorders, namely: mood disorders: depression (nonpsychotic), dysthymic disorders, neurotic, and stress-related disorders: specific phobias, social phobias, generalized anxiety, panic disorder, obsessional states, posttraumatic stress, somatoform disorders, neurasthenia, anxious, personality disorder, mixed disorder of conduct and emotions, and phobic anxiety disorder of childhood. He proceeds by explaining that, among emotional disorders, the following are especially important and similar: temperamental antecedents, rates of comorbidity, genetic risk factors, symptom similarity, course, treatment response, familiarity, environmental risk factors, the neural substrate, cognitive, emotional processes, and biomarkers (Goldberg et al., 2009) (Fig. 2). The severity of symptoms, diagnostic subtypes, and the presence of specific symptoms, as well as age and comorbidity, play a role in the course of illness and choice of treatment. The treatment that provides the highest likelihood of response and the best tolerability should be preferred in treatment plans and algorithms. Treatment of depressive disorders mostly consists of a combination therapy, determined by the current clinical features, the main constituents of a multimodal antidepressant therapy being pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, psychoeducation, and social support. Whereas pharmacotherapy is not always mandatory for less severe forms of depression, moderate and severe depression usually requires pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in treatment-resistant illness (Baghai et al., 2011). Figure 2 Depression/anxiety disorders comorbidity. [Lifetime prevalence of major depressive disorder among individuals with lifetime diagnoses of each anxiety disorder (Weissman et al., 1994; Wittchen et al., 1994; Kessler et al., 1995; Magee et al., 1996; Roy-Byrne et al., 2000). GAD, generalized anxiety disorder; OCD, obsessive compulsive disorder; PD, personality disorder; PTSD, post traumatic stress disorder; SAD, seasonal affective disorder. A further problem in the pharmacotherapy of depression is the latency of up to several weeks before the symptoms begin to alleviate (Baghai et al., 2006), although a faster onset of response has been reported for newer dual-acting compounds such as mirtazapine (Leinonen et al., 1999; Benkert et al., 2000) and venlafaxine (Benkert et al., 1996; Montgomery, 1999). The fact that total or partial sleep deprivation can produce a rapidly occurring antidepressant effect in up to two-thirds of patients (Wu et al., 1990) shows that it is indeed possible to achieve antidepressant effects within a very short period. However, these effects may not be strong enough and are usually not sustained; thus, it is a clinical standard to strengthen them using maintenance strategies such as multiple repetitions of the sleep deprivation or subsequent phase advance procedures (Wirz-Justice et al., 1999). Intravenous administration of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ketamine has been shown to cause a rapid improvement in mood in depressed patients (Zarate et al., 2006; Paul et al., 2009; Price et al., 2009; Diazgranados et al., 2010a, 2010b; Larkin and Beautrais, 2011), but again, in most cases, this effect is not persistent and may only be used as an acceleration strategy. The only therapeutic intervention that is more potent than sleep deprivation and leads to a more rapid improvement than pharmacotherapy is ECT (Gangadhar et al., 1982; ECT Review Group, 2003). Unfortunately, transcranial magnetic stimulation and other ways of stimulating the brain seem to be less effective than ECT (Hasey, 2001; Eitan and Lerer, 2006; Slotema et al., 2010). In this text, we use the term efficacy to describe the ability of an antidepressant to produce antidepressant effects; by contrast, clinical effectiveness is the capability and success of the treatment in achieving sufficient amelioration of depressive symptoms in wider practice. The definition of efficiency includes effectiveness together with safety and tolerability as an important part of the benefit/risk analysis of a treatment. In psychiatry, the distinction between efficacy (outcome under ideal use of a treatment) and clinical effectiveness (outcome under typical use of a treatment) is often drawn. Whereas efficacy may be shown in randomized double-blind clinical trials, clinical effectiveness has to be demonstrated in the so-called effectiveness studies in wider clinical practice (Baghai et al., 2011). A further problem in the treatment of depression is the nonresponse rate of approximately 30% (Charney et al., 2002): the recent US STAR*D study found lower response and remission rates even after multiple treatment trials (Fava et al., 2006; Rush et al., 2009). High dropout rates occur due to tolerability problems, which limit adherence, complicate the successful treatment of depression, and contribute to the high rate of nonresponse. Adequate treatment comprises the use of a treatment with proven efficacy over at least 4–6 weeks in a sufficient therapeutic dose with reliable patient adherence (Sackeim, 2001; Fava, 2003; Kupfer and Charney, 2003), but following this situation, approximately half of the patients do not respond to a second antidepressant treatment trial. If several 4 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry antidepressant treatment trials have been unhelpful, even lower response rates after switching to other approaches may be expected (Fava et al., 2006). Others consider that it should include combined treatment, for example, using two antidepressants with divergent pharmacodynamic modes of action or the use of two dually acting antidepressants that may provide superior efficacy over antidepressant monotherapy (Bauer et al., 2009). Others argue that augmentation approaches such as lithium augmentation or supplementation with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy are needed in addition, before concluding that the condition is therapy resistant (Thase et al., 1997). Other factors such as measuring treatment adherence using therapeutic drug monitoring, determining plasma concentrations of the prescribed antidepressants, and deciding on the adequate dosage may also be included in the definition of treatment-resistant illness. mood symptoms in bipolar I disorder and over 90% of the time spent with mood symptoms in bipolar II disorder (Jamison, 2000; Judd et al., 2002, 2003). The traditional definition of response to antidepressant therapy is a 50% improvement in symptom severity, whereas remission is defined as the virtual absence of depressive symptoms and a full return to premorbid levels of functioning (Thase, 2003). Besides clearly comprehensible biological factors underlying therapy resistance, such as occult medical conditions, substance abuse interfering with antidepressant treatments, or an abnormal metabolism (Rush et al., 2003), it is also hypothesized that psychiatric comorbidities (Souery et al., 2007) and psychosocial factors may be responsible for many failed treatment trials (Grote and Frank, 2003). (a) Stigma: one out of three patients with a depressive disorder ever seeks medical help. (b) Masked depression: many depressed patients present to physicians with mainly somatic symptoms. In primary care settings, more than half of the patients ultimately found to have a depressive disorder originally presented with somatic complaints: headache, backache, or vague, undifferentiated pain. (c) Comorbid medical illness: fatigue and loss of appetite are common in both. (d) Tacit collusion: physicians’ attitudes can also present obstacles to the recognition of depression. (e) Time constraints. (f) Inadequate medical education: many physicians currently in practice receive only limited psychiatric education during medical school or postgraduate training (Goldberg and Lecrubier, 1995; Regier et al., 1998). Currently available antidepressants are classified according to their chemical structure and their mode of action. Currently, tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) and tetracyclic antidepressant, selective and nonselective inhibitors of monoamine oxidase, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and antidepressants with a dual mode of action such as selective serotonin and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, bupropion (Sartorius et al., 2007), and a melatonergic MT1/MT2 receptor agonist with 5-HT2C receptor antagonistic properties are available for use (Kasper and Hamon, 2009). Current investigational compounds include dopaminergic, serotonergic, and noradrenergic triple reuptake inhibitors (SNDRI) that have reached phase II clinical trials and glutamatergic mechanisms (Kulkarni and Dhir, 2009) (Fig. 3). The evolution of antidepressants is shown in the following diagram (Andrews and Nemeroff, 1994; Slattery et al., 2004) The following figure 4 shows the treatment gap worldwide in psychiatric disorders, with almost 50% of depressed patients untreated. Unipolar versus bipolar Hantouche et al. (1998) found that 28% of a population of depressed patients had bipolar disorders. Benazzi (1997) found that 49% of the outpatients presenting with depression had a bipolar spectrum disorder. Depression represents about three quarters of the time spent with The risks and consequences of misdiagnosis Hirschfeld et al., 2003 noted that 69% of respondents reported that they had initially been misdiagnosed as having Unipolar Disorder (UD). Among the respondents to this survey, 35% reported that they had waited 10 years or longer to receive a correct diagnosis. The issue of misdiagnosis is particularly serious because antidepressants used alone can lead to induction of mania or acceleration of cycling frequency over time, phenomena that have been reported to occur in approximately 25–40% of patients with bipolar disorder (Goldberg and Truman, 2003; Hirschfeld et al., 2003). Obstacles to recognition of depression The natural course of untreated depression shows that after one year, 40% will recover, 20% will show partial recovery (dysthymia), and 40% will remain depressed. With antidepressants, we expect about 70% response and 30% nonresponse (Kupfer et al., 1992; Stahl, 2008). Aim of treatment Response is not sufficient: remission is the goal of treatment. If residual symptoms are present (32%), there is a need for vigorous and aggressive treatment. The functional impact of residual symptoms should be taken into account in the treatment plan. Pharmacotherapies that increase Norepinephrine (NE) and/or Dopamine (DA) neurotransmission may improve residual symptoms. Therapeutic simple clinical approach: (1) Psychotic depression: SGA + AD (SNRI or TCA) + ECT (BST), (2) Melancholic depression: AD (SNRI or TCA + ECT (BST). (3) Nonmelancholic depression: SSRI + CBT (4) Painful depression: TCA or SNRI + CBT (ECTor BST) (Parker and Hyett, 2009). AD indicates antidepressants; BST, brain synchronization therapy; SGA, second-generation antipsychotics. New concept of depression and its management Okasha 5 Figure 3 Antidepressant started with Imipramine in 1957 and went through many stages, the last was Agomelatine and more are in the pipeline. Figure 4 There are three treatment phases, namely, acute (6–12 weeks), continuation (4–9 months), and maintenance (1 or more years). Treatment with antidepressants in the acute phase Treatment gap rates (%) by disorder (Kohn et al., 2004). The adequate treatment should be used long enough to establish whether it is effective. Once treatment with antidepressant medication is initiated, the patient is seen every 1 to 2 weeks, and more often if the patient has severe depression or requires titration of a TCA. Response to therapy (clearly better, not better) is assessed at 6 weeks, although a patient may respond earlier (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008). All antidepressants are efficacious Myocardial infarction After an episode of major depression, the risk of MI increases to fivefold. Subsyndromal forms of depression have a twofold increased risk of MI. Six months after MI, the mortality rate is about 17% in patients with depression, whereas it is only 3% in patients without depression. Twelve months after bypass show those with depression had a higher incidence of subsequent cardiac events, angina, heart failure, MI, repeat surgery. MD is a significant risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease and stroke (Frasure-Smit et al., 1993). Criteria for choosing an antidepressant The selection of antidepressants from more than 42 AD depends on: (a) patient preference, (b) nature of prior response to medication and family history, (c) relative efficacy and effectiveness, (d) safety, (e) tolerability and anticipated side effects, (f) adverse effects (sexual dysfunction – suicidal thoughts – weight, sedation, or anxiety – GI symptoms), (g) potential drug interactions, (h) co-occurring psychiatric or general medical conditions, (i) cognitive functions, (j) type of depression, for example, painful, melancholic, psychotic etcy, (k) half-life, and (l) cost. There is 70–80% efficacy with any marketed antidepressants. SRIs or SNRI or Bupropion are excellent first-line choices. TCAs may be superior for some ‘severe’ depressions. Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) may be preferred for some atypical depressions. See Tables 1–4 for types of antidepressants. Potential for drug interactions Many medications are metabolized through the cytochrome P-450 enzyme pathway: co-administration can lead to drug–drug interactions and can lead to clinically significant effects, increased side effects, and decreased effectiveness, Use Antidepressants (AD) with the least drug–drug interaction, for example, Sertraline, Ecitalopram, Mianserin, that is, no induction or inhibition of liver enzymes (Preskorn et al., 2008) (Table 5). Interaction with cardiac medications SSRIs may increase blood levels of b blockers, and anticoagulants, for example, warfarin, and other cardiac medications through cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme inhibition. Least escitalopram, Mirtazepine, venlafaxine, 6 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Table 1 Mixed serotonin norepinephrine tricyclic antidepressants: (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008) Drugs Amitryptiline Amitriptylinoxide Dibenzepine Dosulepine/ dothiepin Doxepin Imipramine Melitracen Protriptyline Clomipramine 25–75 30–60 120–180 75 150–300 180–300 240–720 75–150 25–75 25–75 20 10 25–50 150–300 150–300 20–30 20–60 100–250 Table 2 Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008) Phenelzine Isocarboxacid Tranylcypromine Moclobemide1 Starting dose (mg/day)* Dose range (mg/day)* 15 20 10 150–300 30–40 20–60 20–40 300–600 *Dosages recommended by the producer. Table 3 Serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008) Drugs Starting dose (mg/day)* Venlafaxine 75 Duloxetine 40/602 Milnacipram 50 Noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor Reboxetine 4 2D6 1A2 2C19 2C9 75–375 60–120 100–200 8–12 Table 4 Modulating antidepressants (The World Psychiatric Association, 2008) Starting dose (mg/day)* Venlafaxine Citalopram Fluoxetine Paroxetine Escitalopram Fluvoxamine Sertraline 0 0 ++ + 0 ++ + 0/ + + +++ +++ + + + 0 + + + 0 +++ + 0 0 ++ + 0 +++ ++ 0 0 ++ + 0 ++ + 0, negligible; + , very weak interaction; + + , moderate interaction; + + + , strong interaction. 3A4: Ca + antagonists, erythromycin, ketoconazole, lidocaine, cancer therapies. 2D6: Antiarrhythmic, b-blockers, haloperidol, neuroleptics. 1A2: caffeine, ciprofloxacin, theophylline, verapamil. 2C19: diazepam, propranolol, moclobemide, imipramine. 2C9: miconazole, phenytoin, S-warfarin, NSAIDs (Greenblatt et al., 1998; Alberts et al., 2000; Von Moltke et al., 2001). General dosing strategy The general dosing strategy involves avoidance of frequent dose increases but making contact with the patient every 1–2 weeks, waiting for 2–4 weeks with a total nonresponse (or a partial response that has plateaued) before increasing the dose. The medication can be changed if there is no response after 4 weeks; however, when clinically necessary, the change may have to be made earlier than 4 weeks and wait 8–12 weeks if a gradual response has not plateaued. Dose range (mg/day)* *Dosages recommended by the producer. Drugs 3A4 Starting dose (mg/day)* Dose range (mg/day)* *Dosages recommended by the producer. Drugs Table 5 Potentials for drug–drug interactions Dose range (mg/day)* Modulating antidepressants Trazodone 50–100 200–600 Nefazodone3 100 300–600 Dopamine and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors Bupropion 100 200–300 Noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants Mianserin 30 60–120 Mirtazapine 15 30–45 Melatonergic antidepressants Agomelatine 25 25–50 *Dosages recommended by the producer. duloxetine. Agomelatin and SSRIs may also reduce platelet aggregation. Patients who receive concomitant aspirin or warfarin may bruise or bleed easily and may require dosage reductions or medication changes. ‘Common’ serotonin reuptake inhibitor adverse effects Common adverse effects of SRI include GI disturbances, headache changes, sleep disturbances, appetite changes, sexual function changes, anxiety level changes, allergic reactions, and rarely bleeding and hyponitremia. Antidepressant treatment trials in patients with chronic medical illness Major depression is responsive to antidepressant treatment in patients with cancer, chronic tinnitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, inpatient rehabilitation needs, ischemic heart disease, Parkinson’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, stroke, and HIV + (Katon and Sullivan, 1990). Formal psychotherapy used in combination with antidepressants Combination treatment may be useful if either treatment alone is only partially effective. The clinical circumstances suggest two different and discrete targets of therapy (e.g. symptom reduction to be addressed with medication and psychological/social/occupational problems to be addressed with formal psychotherapy). Targeted psychotherapy of depression (e.g. cognitive, behavioral, IPT of depression) does not have the physiological side effects associated with medications. It should be kept in mind that psychotherapy is composed of 70% ventilation, 20% exploration, and 10% suggestion, guidance reassurance. Brain synchronization therapy and electroconvulsive therapy ECT provides rapid symptom relief, which is especially useful in severely ill suicidal patients, refractory to other treatments, psychotic, melancholic patients, and when a patient’s medical condition makes drug therapy risky. Treatment of depression in the new millennium Other potential antidepressants such as tachykinin, glucocorticoid, and corticotropin-releasing factor-1 receptor New concept of depression and its management Okasha 7 antagonists have not fulfilled expectations, although newer mechanisms such as L-arginine-nitric oxidecyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway modulators, sigma-1 receptor modulators, neurosteroids, 5-HT6 and 5-HT7 serotonin receptor antagonists, b3-adrenoceptor antagonists, and vasopressin receptor antagonists, as well as some potentially new herbal antidepressants, have not yet been assessed beyond animal experiments (Kulkarni and Dhir, 2009). Further investigation of these potentially new treatment options is of major importance, in order to provide better strategies for the clinical management of depression. (1) Cell surface: drugs designed for specific receptors (NRI, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant, norepinephrime and dopamine disinhibitors), blockade of 5HTC2 (agomelatine). (2) Intracellular: drugs acting on second messenger transduction, transcription. (3) New modalities: drugs to suppress HypothalamicPituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis hyperactivation, glucocorticoid production Corticotropin- releasing factor (CRF), substance P inhibition (neurokinin-antagonist), b 3 receptors [regulate neural activity in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)], drugs acting on Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF). depressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders: a report by the WPA section of pharmacopsychiatry. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 261 (Suppl 3): S207–S245. Bauer M, Pfennig A, Linden M, Smolka MN, Neu P, Adli M (2009). Efficacy of an algorithm-guided treatment compared with treatment as usual: a randomized, controlled study of inpatients with depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol 29:327–333. Benazzi F (1997). Prevalence of bipolar II disorder in outpatient depression: a 203-case study in private practice. J Affect Disord 43:163–166. Benkert O, Grunder G, Wetzel H, Hackett DA (1996). Randomized, double-blind comparison of a rapidly escalating dose of venlafaxine and imipramine in inpatients with major depression and melancholia. J Psychiatr Res 30: 441–451. Benkert O, Szegedi A, Kohnen R (2000). Mirtazapine compared with paroxetine in major depression. J Clin Psychiatry 61:656–663. Castren E, Voikar V, Rantamaki T (2007). Role of neurotropic factors in depression. Curr Opin Pharmacol 7:18–21. Charney DS, Grothe DR, Smith SL, Brady KT, Kaltsounis-Puckett J, Wright CW, et al. (2002). Overview of psychiatric disorders and the role of newer antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry 63:3–9. Chen WL, Cai X, Huang ZL, Huang CW, Zhong JH, Liu Y (2006). Condition of depression and analysis of influence factor among peritoneal dialysis patients. China J Mod Med 16:2976–2978. Cunha ABM, Frey BN, Andreazza AC, Goi JD, Rosa AR, Goncalves CA, et al. (2006). Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor is decreased in bipolar disorder during depressive and manic episodes. Neurosci Lett 398:215–219. Diazgranados N, Ibrahim LA, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Henter ID, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. (2010a). Rapid resolution of suicidal ideation after a single infusion of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in patients with treatment resistant major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 71:1605–1611. Diazgranados N, Ibrahim L, Brutsche NE, Newberg A, Kronstein P, Khalife S, et al. (2010b). A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67: 793–802. Duman RS, Monteggia LM (2006). A neurotrophic model for stress-related mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 59:1116–1127. Conclusion Improving the quality of life of depressed patients requires the proper diagnosis and differentiating them from normal sadness. The selection of one of the 42 available AD requires the psychiatrist to be abreast of knowledge for treating comorbid physical and mental disorders. The first line of treatment, whether medications or psychotherapy, will determine the well-being of the depressed patients. Psychiatrists nowadays are satisfied with the patient being ‘better’ but not ‘well’. The aim of treatment should be remission. Response is not sufficient. Residual depressive syndrome is common in about 32% of patients and may lead to increased relapse rates, continuing functional impairment, increase in suicide rates, and lower quality of life. Dunn AL, Madhukar H, Trivedi MD (2005). Exercise treatment for depression efficacy and dose response. Am J Prev Med 28:1–8. ECT Review Group (2003). Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 361:799–808. Eitan R, Lerer B (2006). Nonpharmacological, somatic treatments of depression: electroconvulsive therapy and novel brain stimulation modalities. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 8:241–258. Fava GA (2003). Can long-term treatment with antidepressant drugs worsen the course of depression? J Clin Psychiatry 64:123–133. Fava M, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Alpert JE, McGrath PJ, et al. (2006). A comparison of mirtazapine and nortriptyline following two consecutive failed medication treatments for depressed outpatients: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 163:1161–1172. Frasure-Smit M, Lespérance F, Talajic M (1993). Depression following myocardial infarction: impact on 6-month survival. JAMA 270:1819–1825. Gangadhar BN, Kapur RL, Kalyanasundaram S (1982). Comparison of electroconvulsive therapy with imipramine in endogenous depression: a double blind study. Br J Psychiatry 141:367–371. Goldberg D, Huxley P (1980). Mental illness in the community. London: Tavistock Publications; 1980. Goldberg DP, Lecrubier Y (1995). Form and frequency of mental disorders across centres. In: Üstün TB, Sartorius N, editors. Mental illness in general health care: an international study. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons on behalf of WHO; 1995. pp. 323–334. Conflicts of interest Goldberg DP, Krueger RF, Andrews G (2009). Emotional disorders: cluster 4 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM–V and ICD-11. Psychol Med 39: 2043–2059. The author received honoraria as a speaker from Janssen-Cilag, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, Lundbeck and Pfizer Pharmaceutical companies. Goldberg JF, Truman CJ (2003). Antidepressant induced mania: an overview of current controversies. Bipolar Disord 5:407–420. Acknowledgements Greenblatt DJ, von Moltke LL, Harmatz JS, Shader RI (1998). Drug interactions with newer antidepressants: role of human cytochromes P450. J Clin Psychiatry 59:27. References Alberts LJ, Reist C, Vu RL, Fujimoto K, Ozdemir V, Helmeste D (2000). Effect of venlafaxine on imipramine metabolism. Psychiatry Res 96:235–243. Andrews JM, Nemeroff CB (1994). Contemporary management of depression. Am J Med 97 (6A): 24S–32S. Aston-Jones G, Rajkowski J, Cohen J (2000). Locus coeruleus and regulation of behavioral flexibility and attention. Prog Brain Res 126:165–182. Baghai TC, Moller H-J, Rupprecht R (2006). Recent progress in pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options of major depression. Curr Pharm Des 12:503–515. Baghai TC, Blier P, Baldwin DS, Bauer M, Goodwin GM, Fountoulakis KN, et al. (2011). General and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of anti- Grote NK, Frank E (2003). Difficult-to-treat depression: the role of contexts and comorbidities. Biol Psychiatry 53:660–670. Hantouche EG, Guelfi JD, Comet D (1998). Alpha-beta l-aspartate magnesium in treatment of chronic benzodiazepine misuse: controlled and double-blind study versus placebo. Encéphale 24:469–479. Hasey G (2001). Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of mood disorder: a review and comparison with electroconvulsive therapy. Can J Psychiatry 46:720–727. Hirschfeld RMA, Baker JD, Wozniak P, Tracy K, Sommerville KW (2003). The safety and early efficacy of oral-loaded divalproex versus standardtitration divalproex, lithium, olanzapine and placebo in the treatment of acute mania associated with bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 64: 841–846. 8 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Jamison KR (2000). Suicide and bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 61 (Suppl 9): 47–51. Prince M, Patel V, Saxena S (2007). No health without mental health. Lancet 370:859–877. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, Endicott J, Maser J, Solomon DA, et al. (2002). The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar I disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:530–537. Regier DA, Rae DS, Narrow WE, Kaelber CT, Schatzberg AF (1998). Prevalence of anxiety disorders and their co-morbidity with mood and addictive disorders. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 34:24–28. Judd LL, Schettler PJ, Akiskal HS (2003). Long-term symptomatic status of bipolar I vs., bipolar II disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 6:127–137. Roy-Byrne PP, Stang P, Wittchen HU (2000). Lifetime panic-depression comorbidity in the National Comorbidity Survey Association with symptoms, impairment, course, and help-seeking. Br J Psychiatry 176:229–235. Rush AJ, Thase ME, Dube S (2003). Research issues in the study of difficult-totreat depression. Biol Psychiatry 53:743–753. Rush AJ, Warden D, Wisniewski SR, Fava M, Trivedi MH, Gaynes BN, Nierenberg AA (2009). STAR*D: revising conventional wisdom. CNS Drugs 23: 627–647. Sackeim HA (2001). The definition and meaning of treatment resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 62 (Suppl 16): 10–17. Sartorius N, Kaelber CT, Cooper JE, Roper MT, Rae DS, Gulbinat W, et al. (1993). Progress toward achieving a common language in psychiatry. Results from the field trial of the clinical guidelines accompanying the WHO classification of mental and behavioral disorders in ICD-10. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50:115–124. Sartorius N, Baghai TC, Baldwin DS, Barrett B, Brand U, Fleischhacker W, et al. (2007). Antidepressant medications and other treatments of depressive disorders: a CINP Task Force report based on a review of evidence. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 10 (Suppl 1): S1–S207. Schule C, Zill P, Baghai TC, Eser D, Zwanzger P, Wenig N, et al. (2006). Brainderived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism and dexamethasone/ CRH test results in depressed patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31:1019–1025. Kasper S, Hamon M (2009). Beyond the monoaminergic hypothesis: agomelatine, a new antidepressant with an innovative mechanism of action. World J Biol Psychiatry 10:117–126. Katon W, Sullivan MD (1990). Depression and chronic medical illness. J Clin Psychiatry 51 (Suppl): 3–11; discussion 12–4. Kaufman J, Yang B-Z, Douglas-Palumberi H, Grasso D, Lipschitz D, Houshyar S (2006). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor – 5-HTTLPR gene interactions and environmental modifiers of depression in children. Biol Psychiatry 59: 673–680. Kendler KS, Kuhn JW, Vittum J, Prescott CA, Riley B (2005). The interaction of stressful life events and a serotonin transporter polymorphism in the prediction of episodes of major depression: a replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:529–535. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Nelson CB (1995). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:1048–1060. Kessler RC, Gruber M, Hettema JM (2008). Comorbid major depression and generalized anxiety disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey follow-up. Psychol Med 38:365–374. Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B (2004). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ 82:858–866. Kulkarni SK, Dhir A (2009). Current investigational drugs for major depression. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18:767–788. Kupfer DJ, Charney DS (2003). Difficult-to-treat depression. Biol Psychiatry 53:633–634. Kupfer DJ, Frank E, Perel JM, Cornes C, Mallinger AG, Thase ME, et al. (1992). Five-year outcome for maintenance therapies in recurrent depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 49:769–773. Larkin GL, Beautrais AL (2011). A preliminary naturalistic study of low-dose ketamine for depression and suicide ideation in the emergency department. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 14:1127–1131. Leinonen E, Skarstein J, Behnke K, Agren H, Helsdingen JT (1999). Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus citalopram: a double-blind, randomized study in patients with major depressive disorder. Nordic Antidepressant Study Group. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 14:329–337. Magee WJ, Eaton WW, Wittchen HU, McGonagle KA, Kessler RC (1996). Agoraphobia, simple phobia, and social phobia in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53:159–168. Maj M (2011). Psychiatric diagnosis: pros and cons of prototypes vs. operational criteria. World Psychiatry J 10:81–82. Maletic V, Raison CL (2009). Neurobiology of depression, fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain. Front Biosci 14:5291–5338. Montgomery SA (1999). New developments in the treatment of depression. J Clin Psychiatry 60 (Suppl 14): 10–15. Murray CJ, Lopez AD (1996). The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health (Global Burden of Disease and Injury Series, vol. I); 1996. Parker GB, Hyett MP (2009). Management of depression by general practitioners: impact of physician gender. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 43:355–359. Paul R, Schaaff N, Padberg F, Moller HJ, Frodl T (2009). Comparison of racemic ketamine and S-ketamine in treatment resistant major depression: report of two cases. World J Biol Psychiatry 10:241–244. Post RM (2007). Kindling and sensitization as models for affective episode recurrence, cyclicity, and tolerance phenomena. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31:858–873. Slattery DA, Hudson AL, Nutt DJ (2004). Invited review: the evolution of antidepressant mechanisms. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 18:1–21. Slotema CW, Blom JD, Hoek HW, Sommer IE (2010). Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 71:873–884. Souery D, Oswald P, Massat I, Bailer U, Bollen J, Demyttenaere K, et al. (2007). Clinical factors associated with treatment resistance in major depressive disorder: results from a European multicenter study. J Clin Psychiatry 68:1062–1070. Stahl SM (2008). Depression and bipolar disorder Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology. 3rd ed. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Thase ME (2003). Evaluating antidepressant therapies: remission as the optimal outcome. J Clin Psychiatry 64 (Suppl 13): 18–25. Thase ME, Greenhouse JB, Frank E, Reynolds CF. III, Pilkonis PA, Hurley K, et al. (1997). Treatment of major depression with psychotherapy or psychotherapypharmacotherapy combinations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:1009–1015. The World Psychiatric Association (2008). , WPA Educational Programme on depressive disorders. The World Psychiatric Association series on depressive disorders 2008, volume one: fundamentals. Von Moltke LL, Greenblatt DJ, Giancarlo GM, Granda BW, Harmatz JS, Shader RI, et al. (2001). Escitalopram (S-Citalopram) and its metabolites in vitro: cytochromes mediating biotransformation, inhibitory effects, and comparison to R-citalopram. Drug Metab Dispos 29:1102–1109. Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino GJ, Greenwald S, Hwu HG, Lee CK, et al. (1994). The cross national epidemiology of obsessive compulsive disorder. The Cross National Collaborative Group. J Clin Psychiatry 55 (Suppl): 5–10. Whooley M, Simon G (2000). Managing depression in medical outpatients. New Eng J Med 242:1942–1950. Wirz-Justice A, Van den Hoofdakker RH (1999). Sleep deprivation in depression: what do we know, where do we go? Biol Psychiatry 46:445–453. Preskorn SH, Nichols AI, Paul J, Patroneva AL, Helzner EC, Guico-Pabia CJ (2008). Effect of desvenlafaxine on the cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme system. J Psychiatr Pract 14:368–378. Wittchen HU, Zhao S, Kessler RC (1994). DSM-II-R Generalized anxiety disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51: 355–364. Wu JC, Bunney WE (1990). The biological basis of an antidepressant response to sleep deprivation and relapse: review and hypothesis. Am J Psychiatry 147:14–21. Price RB, Nock MK, Charney DS, Mathew SJ (2009). Effects of intravenous ketamine on explicit and implicit measures of suicidality in treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 66:522–526. Zarate CA, Jr. Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. (2006). A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:856–864. Original article 9 Gender differences in personality characteristics and cognitive abilities in adolescents admitted in correctional institutes in Egypt Amany Ahmed Abdou, Dalal Amer and Mohamed Nasreldin Sadek Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Correspondence to Amany Ahmed Abdou, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Tel: + 0100 5214720; e-mail: [email protected] Received 1 July 2011 Accepted 22 August 2011 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 33:9–14 Objectives To ascertain differences between male and female adolescents admitted to correctional institutes in Egypt with respect to their personality characteristics and cognitive abilities. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out in two correctional institutes in Cairo. Fifty adolescents admitted after being convicted by court (25 male, 25 female) were randomly selected, assessed, and compared with an age-matched control group (N = 25). Data on personal, sociodemographic, and criminal history were collected. They were subjected to the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, The Hostility Questionnaire, and the Psychiatric Symptomatology Scale for adolescents. Results Of the students, 28% were male and 16% were female; 72% of male and 36% of female adolescents were working as unskilled manual workers. Male adolescents were more violent in their acts compared with female adolescents (48 vs. 8%); 12% of male adolescents were engaged in the use and sale of drugs compared with 8% of female adolescents; 44% of female adolescents were homeless compared with 4% of male adolescents; stress factors were mostly financial in male adolescents (88%), whereas in females sexual abuse was present in 24% in addition. Substance abuse was a dominant feature in both: 80% in male adolescents (nicotine smoking in 24% and polysubstance in 56%) and 64% in female adolescents (nicotine smoking in 44% and polysubstance in 20%). Adolescent girls had significantly higher scores in the adjustment disorder, identity disorder, and depression, bulimia, and sleep disorders on the symptomatology scale. They also had lower IQ in the total, verbal, performance, vocabulary, arithmetic, digit span, digit symbol, and block design scales of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. No significant difference was seen in the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Keywords: adolescents, correctional institutes, personality characteristics and cognitive abilities, sex-related differences Egypt J Psychiatr 33:9–14 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 Introduction Adolescent delinquency is an important public health problem; it varies from outright aggression to other antisocial behaviors such as steeling and vandalism. The National Center for Social and Criminal Studies (2002) showed a marked increase in delinquent behavior among adolescents; for example, school violence rate increased from 4.9% in 1995 to 5.5% in 2000. In addition, police reports for adolescent delinquency showed a significant increase in incidence from 1056 acts in 1991 through 2083 acts in 1997 to 3069 acts in 2001 (The National Center for Social and Criminal Studies, 2002). In a recent report on adolescent crimes in Egypt, drugs constituted 72.5% of the majority of crimes committed in 2001, followed by carrying armed weapon in 14.4% and 1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry crimes related to violence (murder, rape, battery leading to death, armed robbery, kidnapping, arson, etc.) constituting 11.3%. In contrast, 25% of all the children and adolescents arrested in Egypt in 2001 were arrested on the charge of being ‘vulnerable to delinquency’ (Ministry of Interior, Social Protection Sector, General Administration for Juvenile Welfare Investigation, 2002). Male and female juvenile delinquents showed differences in behavioral, psychopathological, and familial risks, psychiatric perspective, and functional impairment. Girls commit fewer and less serious offences and they are younger than detained boys when admitted to correctional institutes. Girls also experience greater incidences of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, physical neglect, and family history of mental illness compared with their DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000411074.34042.8e 10 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry male counterparts. A relatively high percentage of mentally challenged girls were found among those admitted to correctional institutes (McCabe et al., 2002). Female offenders have more acute mental health symptoms and psychological disturbances than do male offenders (Espelage et al., 2003). In addition, multiple sexual contacts from an early age, substance abuse, running away from home, and truancy were found to be behaviors leading to risk of development of juvenile delinquency in girls (Lenssen et al., 2000). (4) The Hostility Questionnaire: It consists of 51 questions, covering different aspects of hostility (overt, selfcriticism, other’s criticism, paranoid aggression, guilt feelings, and the total score) (El Taieb, 1984). (5) The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST): It is a tool for recognizing frontal cortical dysfunction. It consists of 64 cards and four meaningless stimulus cards. These have to be sorted one at a time with these stimulus cards. The first principle is ‘color,’ the second is ‘figure’ or ‘form,’ the third is ‘number’ and so on. Thirteen indices were chosen for assessment (Heaton et al., 1993). Aim of the work NB This work aimed to find out the sex-related differences between adolescents admitted to correctional institutes in Egypt with respect to their personality characteristics and cognitive abilities, which may have implications in the management and choice of rehabilitation programs. For all the previous tools we used the Arabic version, which was standardized and adapted to suit the Egyptian culture; their validity and reliability were proven. We used a control group (N = 25) that was matched with the adolescent delinquent group in age only. The members of the control group were selected from educated volunteers from Kasr El Aini worker relatives. This was not for comparison, as in fact the adolescent delinquent group cannot be compared with any normal adolescent group because their characteristics will never simulate any normal adolescents in any aspect, such as socioeconomic status (SES), familial background, intelligence, education, psychiatric symptoms, hostility, etc. However, this comparison was helpful to compare the results of adolescent delinquents obtained from the different questionnaires with the results of age-matched normal adolescents so as to give us a true idea about the actual results and limitations. Participants and methods This is a cross-sectional study. It was carried out in two correctional institutes in Cairo, one for boys (Ain Shams) and the other for girls (El Agouza), under the supervision of the Ministry of Social affairs after obtaining approval from the legal authority. These adolescents were admitted after being convicted by court following criminal or delinquent acts. Fifty juvenile delinquents (25 boys and 25 girls) were randomly selected, as we included the middle family and the older age group families in both institutes. The children were divided into families according to their ages. They were accused of a heterogenous group of crimes. Their personal, sociodemographic, and criminal histories were collected after interviewing them, the supervisors, and the social worker of each family and also from institution documents. All the adolescents included were willing to participate in the study. The few cases that refused were excluded. They were subjected to the following: (1) The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Revised (WAIS-R) (the subscales and the verbal, performance, and total scores): Analysis of WAIS-R by its detailed subscales was carried out to assess different cognitive domains covered by the scale (Melikah and Ismael, 1967). (2) The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: This questionnaire consists of psychoticism (P), neuroticism (N), extraversion (E), introversion (I), lie (L), and psychopathic deviation (PD) scales, in adult form (Abou Nahia, 1989). (3) The Psychiatric Symptomatology Scale, for adolescents and adults: It is a structured tool prepared according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders third edition-revised criteria and ICD-10 criteria. It consists of 150 questions, screening most of the psychiatric symptoms (27 symptoms) (Hamouda and Emam, 1996). Statistical methods Data were computerized and analyzed using the software package SPSS (version 11 IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Frequency distribution was used to describe the included participants on the basis of their qualitative parameters, whereas mean and SD + was used to describe the quantitative parameters. Differences between boys and girls among both cases and controls were explored using the w2-test (when relevant) for qualitative data and using the Student t-test for quantitative data. Levels of significance in all statistical tests was considered at Po0.05. Results The total number of adolescent delinquents was 50; 25 were male (50%) and 25 were female (50%). The control (C) group consisted of 25 normal adolescents, of whom 15 were male (60%) and 10 were female (40%) (Table 1). Both groups were age matched, with no statistically significant difference between them. There was no significant difference in the SES between the groups; significant difference was observed in education and occupation. Twenty-eight percent of male adolescents were students versus 16% of female adolescents; 72% of male versus 36% of female adolescents were working as unskilled manual workers (Table 2). Boys were admitted Gender differences in personality characteristics Abdou et al. 11 Table 1 Sex difference in age Table 3 Sex difference in legal data Cases (50) Males (25) Mean SD Control (25) Females (25) Mean SD Males (15) P Females (10) Mean SD Mean Age 17.86 1.79 17.32 2.08 0.32 17.87 0.83 17.3 SD P 1.06 0.15 Type of confinement r3 years 5 years Open Accusation Nonviolent Violent Drug use or selling Homeless Description Planned Impulsive Homeless Description Solitary Group Males (N = 25) Females (N = 25) No. (%) No. (%) P 1 (4) 5 (20) 19 (76) 12 (48) 9 (36) 4 (16) 0.000** 9 12 3 1 10 2 2 11 (36) (48) (12) (4) (40) (8) (8) (44) 0.001* for a longer duration; they were more violent in their acts (48 vs. 8% of girls) (Table 3). Stress factors were mostly financial in boys (88%), whereas in girls sexual abuse was present in 24% (Table 4). Substance abuse was a dominant feature in both: 80% of boys (nicotine smoking in 24% and polysubstance in 56%) and 64% of girls (nicotine smoking in 44% and polysubstance in 20%) (Table 4). There was a statistically significant difference between male and female adolescents in the symptomatology scale; girls showed significantly higher scores in adjustment disorder, depression, identity disorder, bulimia, and sleep disorders. Adjustment disorder was present in 80% of girls versus 48% of boys; depression was present in 80% of girls versus 48% of boys; identity disorder was seen in 84% of girls versus 48% of boys; bulimia was present in 48% of girls versus 4% of boys; and sleep disorders and nightmares were found in 60% of girls versus 24% of boys. There was no statistically significant difference between male and female adolescents in the rest of the subscales of the symptomatology scale. Girls had significantly higher scores in the Hostility Questionnaire covering different aspects of hostility (overt, self-criticism, other’s criticism, paranoid aggression, guilt feelings, and the total score) (Table 5). No significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to personality characteristics as measured by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire in all the subscales: extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism, and psychopathic deviation (Table 5). Girls had lower IQ in the total, verbal, performance, vocabulary, arithmetic, digit span, digit symbol, and block design scales of the WAIS (Table 6). No significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to cognitive abilities such as frontal lobe functions and mental flexibility as measured by WCST. No significant difference was observed between boys and girls in any of the subscales of WCST with regard to their frontal lobe functions and mental flexibility (Table 7). Table 2 Sex difference in sociodemographic data Table 4 Sex difference in clinical characteristics Residence Urban Rural Education Illiterate Primary Preparatory Secondary University Occupation Not working Student Unskilled SES Very poor Below average Average Above average Males (N = 25) Females (N = 25) No. (%) No. (%) P 20 (80) 5 (20) 18 (72) 7 (28) 0.74 5 6 11 3 0 (20) (24) (44) (12) (0) 4 8 9 3 1 (16) (32) (36) (12) (4) 0 (0) 7 (28) 18 (72) 12 (48) 4 (16) 9 (36) 8 10 7 0 15 7 2 1 SES, socioeconomic status. **Highly significant. (32) (40) (28) (0) (60) (28) (8) (4) 0.81 0.000** 0.092 1 (4) 10 (40) 14 (56) 11 (44) 8 (32) 6 (24) 9 (36) 16 (64) 15 (60) 10 (40) 0.003* 0.156 *Significant. **Highly significant. Discussion Sex-related differences among delinquent adolescents have implications on the choice of management plans applied in correctional institutes (Van Wijk et al., 2007; Vincent et al., 2008). In our work (Table 2) male and female juvenile adolescents showed no statistically significant difference with respect to residence, education, and SES. This was expected as poor social and Stress factors Absent Social and financial Positive sexual abuse Family history Negative Positive Self-injury Absent Present Suicide Sexual practices Negative Homosexual Heterosexual Substance abuse Negative Nicotine only Polysubstance *Significant. Males (N = 25) Females (N = 25) No. (%) No. (%) P 3 (12) 22 (88) 0 (0) 3 (12) 16 (64) 6 (24) 0.031* 15 (60) 10 (40) 14 (56) 11 (44) 1.000 19 (76) 3 (12) 3 (12) 18 (72) 1 (4) 6 (24) 0.36 15 (60) 5 (20) 5 (20) 13 (52) 6 (24) 6 (24) 0.85 5 (20) 6 (24) 14 (56) 9 (36) 11 (44) 5 (20) 0.032* 12 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Table 5 Sex difference in personality characteristics (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire) and The Hostility Questionnaire Cases (50) Males (25) EPQ E N P L PD Total hostility Control (25) Females (25) Males (15) Females (10) Mean SD Mean SD P Mean SD Mean SD P 14.08 16.40 7.36 9.84 15.32 22.56 5.28 3.44 2.77 2.54 2.59 6.56 12.96 16.28 8.64 8.48 15.24 26.56 4.95 4.23 2.72 2.77 2.38 7.25 0.44 0.91 0.11 0.08 0.91 0.046* 10.87 12.60 4.67 9.00 7.27 22.2 2.83 3.14 1.54 2.34 1.98 7.25 10.5 13 4 8.7 5.8 16.22 2.72 4.57 1.7 1.25 1.81 7.41 0.75 0.8 0.32 0.70 0.07 0.065 E, extraversion; EPQ, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire; L, lie; N, neuroticism; P, psychoticism; PD, psychopathic deviation. *Significant. Table 6 Sex difference in intelligence Cases (50) Males (25) Total IQ Verbal IQ Performance Performance subscales Digit symbol Object assembly Block design Picture completion Picture arrangement Verbal subscales Vocabulary Similarities Arithmetic Digit span Comprehension Information Control (25) Females (25) Males (15) Females (10) Mean SD Mean SD P Mean SD Mean SD P 80.08 76.80 85.08 6.86 7.04 9.37 71.80 68.56 78.52 11.99 10.57 14.38 0.005* 0.002* 0.063 102.33 101.0 102.32 3.811 5.92 2.58 101.50 96.00 102.50 2.64 3.16 1.58 0.53 0.012* 0.84 9.12 7.36 7.68 8.28 8.12 2.01 2.71 2.34 1.37 2.13 7.56 7.12 5.72 8.36 7.92 2.93 2.89 2.11 2.89 2.72 0.034* 0.763 0.003* 0.901 0.774 11 9.67 9.33 13 11.67 0.85 0.49 0.49 0.85 0.49 11 10.50 9.00 13 10.5 1.05 1.58 0.000 0.000 1.58 1.00 0.14 0.019* 1.000 0.047* 8.04 6.28 6.04 8.44 8.52 4.40 1.57 1.49 2.05 2.24 2.45 1.12 4.76 6.52 3.92 5.56 7.64 4.28 1.81 2.69 2.52 3.12 3.17 1.95 0.000* 0.699 0.002* 0.001* 0.278 0.791 10.67 11.67 9.33 9.67 13 10 0.49 0.98 1.76 1.76 0.85 0.85 9.5 11 8 11.5 11 12 0.53 1.05 0.000 0.53 1.05 0.000 0.000* 0.128 0.011* 0.001* 0.000* 0.000* *Significant. Table 7 Sex difference in The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Cases (50) Males (25) No. of trials administered No. of categories completed Total no. correct Total no. of errors % Errors Perseverative responses % Perseverative responses Perseverative errors % Perseverative errors Nonperseverative errors % Nonperseverative errors Conceptual level response % Conceptual level response Trial to complete the first set Failure to maintain set Control (25) Females (25) Males (15) Females (10) Mean SD Mean SD P Mean SD Mean SD P 12.08 4.12 74 47.5 38.7 33 25.96 25.04 20.04 22.12 18.08 55.84 47.7 18.40 1.00 13.83 1.86 12.6 17.68 12.66 27.11 21.13 17.84 13.62 8.64 6.24 15.13 17.17 12.04 1.53 121.8 3.56 73.48 51.24 40.8 22.6 19.0 26.6 21.16 24.2 19.56 52.88 44.68 16.56 1.12 13.77 1.69 13.19 20.62 14.92 19.04 16.55 15.48 11.78 8.17 5.7 16.34 17.58 9.12 1.33 0.81 0.27 0.89 0.50 0.60 0.12 0.20 0.74 0.76 0.39 0.39 0.51 0.439 0.545 0.769 105 5.13 77.8 38.6 30.8 9.2 7.8 21.93 13.47 16.07 13.13 65.47 61.27 16.4 0.93 21.07 1.06 8.95 16.77 10.19 10.14 8.52 10.55 6.10 8.4 6.09 10.9 14.02 10.66 1.22 93.2 5.80 73.00 15.80 16.50 9.10 10.50 11.30 6.7 6.8 6.7 66.3 77.1 13.9 0.70 25.08 0.63 14.45 8.65 5.86 10.14 13.12 7.10 5.03 5.69 5.03 10.08 8.67 6.44 1.25 0.22 0.09 0.31 0.001* 0.001* 0.98 0.54 0.011* 0.008* 0.006* 0.011* 0.85 0.004* 0.51 0.648 *Significant. economic status affects male and female adolescents equally. Although more boys attend school as families tend to educate boys more than girls, it was not apparent in our work as boys have more tendency for truancy and drop out of school more. This agrees with the results found in the present study that showed that both male and female delinquents were from low SES (Van Wijk et al., 2007; Townsend et al., 2010) with more tendency for Gender differences in personality characteristics Abdou et al. 13 truancy in boys (Handwerk et al., 2006). Regarding occupation, there was a significant difference, as 72% of boys were working as unskilled manual workers versus 36% of girls, as many children who terminate their education because of deviant behavior work as unskilled manual workers, which is the most fitting work for their skills. The reverse is also true, as many children whose low SES force them to work early in their life will be subjected to more stress factors, physical and sexual abuse, and early substance availability and use, making them more vulnerable to delinquency (Faied, 2002). Our culture accepts the phenomenon of early occupation in children because of poverty, which is rejected and forbidden in developed countries. The boys tend to work in workshops, whereas girls work as housemaids (Faied, 2002; Nasr, 2002). A statistically significant difference between male and female adolescents was noted (Table 3) regarding their legal data, as 76% of male adolescents received open admission until they reached 21 years of age, 20% for 5 years, and only 4% for 3 years (i.e. boys were admitted for longer duration). In contrast, only 16% of girls received open admission until they reached 21 years of age, 36% for 5 years, and 48% for 3 years (i.e. girls were admitted for shorter duration). Violent acts (e.g. murder, rape, battery leading to death, armed robbery, kidnapping, arson) were seen in 48% of boys versus 8% of girls, drug use or selling was seen in 12% of boys versus 8% of girls, and homelessness constituted 44% in girls versus 4% in boys. Planned acts were observed in 44% of girls versus 4% of boys, whereas impulsive acts were 40% in boys versus 32% in girls; this agrees with most of the previous studies (Abdou, 2005; Sadeq, 2005; Townsend et al., 2010). There was a statistically significant difference between male and female adolescents (Table 4) with regard to the presence of stress factors. Eighty-eight percent of boys were exposed to social and financial stress compared with 64% of girls; 24% of girls were additionally exposed to sexual abuse. This result agreed with previous studies (Faied, 2002; Nasr, 2002; Van Wijk et al., 2007) that found that girls experienced greater incidence of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse. It was obvious during the interview, as 20% of girls refused to leave the institute and asked for readmission at the end of their stay to escape from their very traumatizing family environment. Substance abuse showed a statistically significant difference between male and female delinquent adolescents; it reached 80% in boys, whereas it was 64% in girls. Nicotine use alone was 24% in boys and 44% in girls, whereas polysubstance abuse was 56% in boys and 20% in girls (cannabis, benzodiazepines, volatile substances, and alcohol were the most commonly used) (Table 4). The comorbidity of substance abuse and delinquency is a worldwide phenomenon. Most of the studies found more incidence of polysubstance abuse in boys than in girls, in agreement with previous Egyptian studies (Abdou, 2005; Sadeq, 2005; Amer, 2007). This is in contrast to the study (McCabe et al., 2002) that found no sex-related differences regarding comorbid substance abuse between boys and girls among adolescent delinquents, which could be explained by the different sample sizes. Delinquent girls had statistically significant higher scores on the symptomatology scale with regard to adjustment disorder, depression, identity disorder, bulimia, and sleep disorders. These results agreed with previous studies that found that girls had higher rates of depression, hopelessness, negative self-evaluation, and suicide ideation scores (McClelland et al., 2004; Ogden and Amlund Hagen, 2009). It is important to mention that depression may not be just a comorbid symptom, or a result of their condition. It may be a cause, as in many cases the disruptive behavior in children and adolescents may be an expression of their depression and anxiety in an atypical form (Abram et al., 2008). This is in contrast to the study by McCabe et al. (2002) that found no sex-related differences in comorbid symptoms between boys and girls among adolescent delinquents. In this study, personality characteristics (Table 5) showed no significant difference between boys and girls in all subscales of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism, and psychopathic deviation), although significant differences between the study group and control group regarding personality characteristics using the EPQ (extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism scales, and psychopathic deviation) were reported in previous studies (Abdou, 2005; Sadeq, 2005; Amer, 2007). This is considered as a disease-specific finding rather than sex specific; that is, it is related to the delinquent behavior itself (impulsiveness, aggression, psychopathic deviation, extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism) and not to the sex of the offender (Table 5). These results also agreed with the studies (McCabe et al., 2002; Espelage et al., 2003) that found no significant difference in the personality profile except for the psychopathic deviation scale, which was more elevated in boys than in girls (Vincent et al., 2008). On the contrary, delinquent girls showed statistically significantly higher scores in the Hostility Questionnaire covering different aspects of hostility, which may be explained by the fact that female delinquents tend to use hostility as a form of defense mechanism to reduce their psychological pain. Girls scored lower than boys (Table 6) with respect to total, verbal, and performance IQ. This may be explained by the fact that girls are less educated in our culture as poor families are less likely to send their girls to school and to continue education. In addition, low IQ is one of the risk factors among girls for early delinquency, running away from school, sexual abuse, and substance abuse (Ministry of Interior, Social Protection Sector, General Administration for Juvenile Welfare Investigation, 2001). Although delinquent girls scored higher than boys along the different subscales of hostility, namely, overt hostility, self-criticism, other’s criticism, paranoid aggression, and guilt feelings, the percentage of boys who received open admission was significantly more than that of girls as they committed more violent and serious crimes requiring higher IQ. On analyzing the subscales of WAIS-R in detail to assess different cognitive domains, it was seen that girls also scored lower than boys in general vocabulary normally available to growing individuals in the society, which might be an indicator of the mental abilities and awareness of the surrounding world, reflecting lower 14 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry verbal abilities stemming from lower IQ and lower cultural and educational level. The arithmetic subscale, in addition of assessing arithmetic abilities, assesses immediate memory, concentration, and conceptual manipulation, reflecting lower conceptual abilities and attention span in girls, which is matched with their lower IQ and lower educational level. With regard to digit span subscale assessing attention and immediate memory, girls scored lower than boys, reflecting their shorter attention span and distractibility. Although no significant difference was noted when comparing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using the symptomatology scale, girls showed higher depression and anxiety symptoms, which might have an impact on performance. Digit symbol assesses visuo-motor coordination. Delinquent girls scored significantly lower than boys. The scores of this scale are affected by the speed and accuracy of performance, which is affected by attention deficit and anxiety levels, both of which were high among girls. The block design subscale assesses visuo-constructive abilities, especially spatial perception and nonverbal concept formation. In this study, performance of delinquent girls was significantly lower than that of boys, reflecting more impairment of visuo-spatial abilities. However, the results of this test could be affected by interests and motivation. The higher depression and anxiety seen in the female delinquent group might have had an impact on the results. No significant difference was observed between boys and girls in any of the subscales of the WCST (Table 7) measuring their frontal lobe functions and mental flexibility. This may be explained by the fact that this pathology in brain functioning is disease specific rather than sex related, as in the previous study (Sadeq, 2005). Examining the cognitive functions in adolescent delinquents using the same tool, it was found that the delinquent adolescent group had higher scores in all items of the WCST as compared with the control group. Conclusion and recommendations Male delinquents were more violent in their acts. Financial stress factors were higher in boys, whereas girls were exposed to sexual abuse as well. Substance abuse was a dominant feature in both (nicotine smoking and polysubstance abuse). Girls had significantly higher scores on the adjustment disorder, identity disorder, depression, bulimia, and sleep disorders. Girls were significantly hostile in all different aspects of hostility (overt, self-criticism, other’s criticism, paranoid aggression, guilt feelings, and the total score). Personality characteristics showed no significant difference in any of the subscales: extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism, and psychopathic deviation. Girls had lower IQ, verbal, and performance scores. Vocabulary, arithmetic, digit span, digit symbol, and block design scales of the WAIS were lower in girls. No significant difference was observed between boys and girls in the WCST in any of the subscales. Management plans and rehabilitation programs for adolescents admitted to correctional institutes should be tailored according to each individual’s circumstances, symptoms, abilities, and personality characteristics, and sex appropriate treatment should be focused upon and not according to general concepts and predetermined ideas. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. References Abdou AA (2005). Psychiatric assessment of juvenile delinquents admitted in correctional institutes in Egypt: correlation between psychiatric morbidity: hostility and emotional intelligence. Kasr EL-Aini Med J 11:311–324. Abou Nahia SE (1989). Eysenck personality questionnaire, Arabic version. Cairo: Dar El Nahda El Massria. Abram KM, Choe JY, Washburn JJ, Teplin LA, King DC, Dulcan MK (2008). Suicidal ideation and behaviors among youths in juvenile detention. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47:291–300. Amer DA (2007). Psychopathological profile of juveniles admitted to correctional institutes in Egypt. Egypt J Psychiatry 26:131–143. El Taieb MA (1984). Hostility Questionnaire and its direction. Cairo: Dar El Maaref. Espelage DL, Cauffman E, Broidy L, Piquero AR, Mazerolle P, Steiner H (2003). A cluster-analytic investigation of MMPI profiles of serious male and female juvenile offenders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:770–777. Faied S (2002). Psychological characteristics of violent offenders, study of a sample of juvenile delinquents. A Paper Presented in the 4th Annual Conference, The National Center for Social and Criminal studies, Cairo, Egypt. Hamouda MA, Emam EA (1996). Psychiatric morbidity scale. Cairo: Dar El Fekr El Arabi. Handwerk ML, Clopton K, Huefner JC, Smith GL, Hoff KE, Lucas CP (2006). Gender differences in adolescents in residential treatment. Am J Orthop 76:312–324. Heaton RK, Talley JL, Chelune GJ, Grant DA, Berg EA (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Psychol Assess Resources. Lenssen SA, Doreleijers TA, Van Dijk ME, Hartman CA (2000). Girls in detention: what are their characteristics? A project to explore and document the character of this target group and the significant ways in which it differs from one consisting of boys. J Adolesc 23:287–303. McCabe KM, Lansing AE, Garland A, Hough R (2002). Gender differences in psychopathology, functional impairment and familial risk factors among adjudicated delinquents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41:860–867. McClelland GM, Elkington KS, Teplin LA, Abram KM (2004). Multiple substance use disorders in juvenile detainees. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 43:1215–1224. Melikah LK, Ismael ME (1967). Wechsler-Bellevue adult intelligence scale. Cairo: Dar El Nahda El Massria. Ministry of Interior, Social Protection Sector, General Administration for Juvenile Welfare Investigation (2001). The administration’s efforts year 2000. Cairo: Ministry of Interior. Ministry of Interior, Social Protection Sector, General Administration for Juvenile Welfare Investigation (2002). The administration’s efforts year 2001. Cairo: Ministry of Interior. Nasr S (2002). Relation between the violence severity and personality characteristics. A Paper Presented in the 4th Annual Conference, The National Center for Social and Criminal studies, Cairo, Egypt. Ogden T, Amlund Hagen K (2009). What works for whom? Gender differences in intake characteristics and treatment outcomes following multisystemic therapy. J Adolesc 32:1425–1435. Sadeq MN (2005). Cognitive dysfunction in juvenile delinquent admitted in correctional institutes in Egypt. Kasr EL-Aini Med J 11:325–343. The National Center for Social and Criminal Studies. The 4th Annual Conference Criminal and Social Dimensions for Violence in the Egyptian Culture. The National Center for Social and Criminal Studies, Cairo. Townsend E, Walker DM, Sargeant S, Vostanis P, Hawton K, Stocker O, et al. (2010). Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions relevant for young offenders with mood disorders, anxiety disorders or self-harm. J Adolesc 33:9–20. Van Wijk AP, Blokland AAJ, Duits N, Vermeiren R, Harkink J (2007). Relating psychiatric disorders, offender and offence characteristics in a sample of adolescent sex offenders and non-sex offenders. Crim Behav Ment Health 17:15–30. Vincent GM, Grisso T, Terry A, Banks S (2008). Sex and race differences in mental health symptoms in juvenile justice: the MAYSI-2 national metaanalysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47:282–290. Original article 15 The role of the brain-derived neurotrophic factors in the progression of bipolar disorders Heba Fathya, Shereen Mohamed Abd El-Mawellaa, Hoda Abdoua and Amal Abdoub Departments of aPsychiatry and b Clinical and Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Correspondence to Heba Fathy, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Tel: + 20 101 404 826; e-mail: [email protected] Received 11 August 2011 Accepted 5 October 2011 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 33:15–18 Introduction Bipolar disorder (BPD) is considered to be the most prevalent psychiatric conditions, and is also among the most severe and debilitating. It was suggested that the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. BDNF appears to be an unspecific biomarker of neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by neurodegenerative changes. Aim The aim of the study was to investigate the association between BDNFs and progression of BPDs. Participants and methods After receiving approval from the ethical committee in kasr El Eini hospital, 80 participants were randomly selected in a comparative cross sectional study. The sample consisted of two groups: a group of patients with BPDs (n = 40), including patients with manic, depressive, mixed episode, or in remission, and a control group (n = 40). The patients were recruited from the psychiatric outpatient clinic. Patients were diagnosed by a lecturer of psychiatry according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition criteria. Psychometric procedure: the Hamilton rating scale of depression and the Young Mania Rating Scale were used: laboratory: Radio-immune assay of BDNFs was carried out. Results Fifty-five percent of the patients in the bipolar group had three or more episodes. There was a statistically significant difference between the cases and the controls in the level of BDNF. There was a negative correlation between the BDNF and the number of episodes (P = 0.000) and there was also a negative correlation between BDNF and disease duration (P = 0.000). There were no correlations between BDNF and the diagnosis of BPD (P = 0.3). Conclusion BDNF was lower than normal in bipolar patients and this was correlated with the number of episodes and duration of disease. Keywords: brain-derived neurotrophic factor, bipolar disorder, number of episodes Egypt J Psychiatr 33:15–18 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 Introduction Mood disorders, such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BPD), are the most prevalent psychiatric conditions, and are also among the most severe and debilitating. However, the precise neurobiology underlying these disorders is currently unknown. One way to combat these disorders is to discover novel biomarkers for them. The development of such biomarkers will aid both in the diagnosis of mood disorders and in the development of effective psychiatric medications to treat them. A number of preclinical studies have suggested that the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders (Hashimoto, 2010). 1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry BD has a poorer longer-term outcome than previously thought, with persistent cognitive impairment and functional decline. The neurobiological underpinnings that might underlie these changes remain unknown. Changes in the levels of BDNF and cytokines may be potentially responsible and BDNF was decreased only in those patients in the late stage of BPD. Moreover, when the levels were compared between patients at early and late stages of illness, there was a significant decrease in BDNF and IL-6 in the later stage of BD compared with the early stage and hence BDNFand continued elevations in cytokines; thus, these may have the potential to serve as markers of illness progression in BD (Kauer-Sant0 Anna et al., 2009). BPD follows a staged trajectory in which persistence of illness is associated with a number of clinical features DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000411123.49083.e0 16 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry such as progressive shortening of the interepisode interval and decreased probability of treatment response. The biochemical foundation of this process appears to incorporate changes in inflammatory cytokines, cortisone, neurotrophins, and oxidative stress. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that these markers may differ between the early and late stages of the disorder. The presence of a series of tangible targets raises the spectra of development of rational neuroprotective strategies, involving judicious use of current therapies and novel agents. Most of the currently used mood stabilizers exert effects on oxidative stress and neurotrophins, while novel potentially neuroprotective agents are being developed. These developments need to be combined with service initiatives to maximize the opportunities for early diagnosis and intervention (Berker et al., 2010). Aim This study was conducted to examine the associations between BDNFs and progression of BPDs. Participants and methods After receiving consent from the ethical committee in Kasr El Eini hospital, and written informed consent, 80 participants were randomly selected in a comparative cross sectional study. The sample consisted of two groups: a group of patients with BPDs (n = 40), including patients with manic, depressive, mixed episode, or in remission, and a control group (n = 40). The patients were recruited from Kasr Al Aini psychiatric hospital (outpatient’s clinic, inpatient department). The control group was recruited from among relatives of patients attending Kasr Al Aini outpatient’s clinic. This was done over 6 months. Patients were diagnosed by a lecturer of psychiatry according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) (APA, 1994) criteria. Both sexes were included and the age limit was 20–50 years. We excluded patients with other psychiatric disorders, mental retardation, organic mental disorders, and substance-induced psychiatric disorders. We compared patients with few episodes with patients with several episodes and compared both with the control group. The diagnosis of BPD in remission was established according to three factors: syndromal (DSM-IV criteria for disorder no longer met), symptomatic (Young Mania Rating Scale score r5 and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score r8), and functional (regaining of premorbid occupational and residential status). These ratings were carried out according to Tohen et al. (2003). Tools Semistructural interview A specially designed semistructural interview derived from the Kasr El Aini psychiatric sheet was used to cover demographic data, personal data, past history, and family history. The structured clinical interview for the DSM Axis of disorders The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders provides broad coverage of Axis I psychiatric diagnosis according to DSM-IV (First et al., 1997). Hamilton Depression Rating Scale This scale was formulated by Hamilton (1960, 1967). The original version consisted of 17 items and was later increased to 24 items by Klerman et al. (1985). The scale is not meant to be a diagnostic instrument (Preskorn and Fast, 1993). Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was found to distinguish between different groups of patients drawn from general practice, day-patient care, and inpatients (Carrol et al., 1973). The concurrent validity is high (Kearns et al., 1982). The interrater reliability of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is also consistently high (Hamilton, 1960). Young Mania Rating Scale The Young Mania Rating Scale was developed in 1978, and the interrater reliability for the scale is high (Young et al., 1978). The choice of items was made on the basis of published descriptions of the core symptoms of the manic phase of BPD and includes abnormalities that exist over the entire range of illness, from mild to severe. Depressive symptoms are not assessed. The severity rating for each of 11 items is based on the patient’s subjective report of his or her condition over the previous 48 h and on the clinician’s behavioral interview, with an emphasis on the clinician’s observations. There are four items that are graded on a 0–8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), whereas the remaining seven items are graded on a 0–4 scale. These four items are given twice the weight of the others to compensate for poor cooperation from severely ill patients. Laboratory The radioimmune assay technique using the Quantikine human BDNF Immunoassay, which is a 3.5 h solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay designed to measure human BDNF in cell culture supernates, serum, and plasma, was used. It contains recombinant human BDNF expressed in Sf 21 cells and antibodies raised against the recombinant factor. This immunoassay has been shown to quantify the recombinant BDNF accurately. These results indicate that the Quantikine kit can be used to determine the relative mass values for natural human BDNF (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The statistical methods Data were statistically described in terms of mean ± SD, frequencies (number of cases), and percentages when appropriate. Comparison of age between the study groups was carried out using the Student t-test for independent samples. For comparing categorical data, the w2-test was performed. An exact test was used when the expected frequency was less than 5. Correlation between various variables was assessed using the Spearman rank correlation equation for nonnormal variables. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were performed using computer programs Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation, New York, USA) and Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) version 15 for Microsoft Windows. Role of the brain-derived neurotrophic factors Fathy et al. 17 Results 52.5% of the sample comprised men and 47.5% were women. Both groups were matched for age. Sixty five percent of the patients showed bipolar manic (Table 1). Fifty five percent of patients had more than three episodes (Table 2). There was a negative correlation between the BDNF and number of episodes (P = 0.000) (correlation coefficient = – 0.636) and there was also a negative correlation between BDNF and disease duration (P = 0.000) (correlation coefficient = – 0.666). There was no correlation between BDNF and the diagnosis of BPD (P = 0.3). Discussion BDNF is the most widely distributed neurotrophin in the central nervous system, where it plays several pivotal roles in synaptic plasticity and neuronal survival. As a consequence, BDNF has become a key target in the pathophysiology of several neurological and psychiatric diseases. Recent studies have consistently reported altered levels of BDNF in the circulation (i.e. serum or plasma) of patients with major depression, BPD, Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. Correlations between serum BDNF levels and affective, cognitive, and motor symptoms have also been described. BDNF appears to be an unspecific biomarker of neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by neurodegenerative changes (Teixeira et al., 2010). The aim of this study is to detect the differences in the levels of BDNF in bipolar patients and healthy controls and to detect the relation between the number of the episodes (disease progression) and the serum level of BDNF in patients with BPD. We found significant differences between patients with BPD and healthy controls as regards the level of serum BDNF as 40% of the patients had a low serum level of BDNF versus 15% only of the healthy controls (Table 3). Also, we found that there was a negative correlation between the level of the BDNF and the number of episodes of BPD. There was also a negative correlation between the serum level of BDNF and the duration of illness. The above result is supported by recent data, which suggest that changes in neuroplasticity, cell resilience, and connectivity are the main neuropathological findings in BD. Data from differential lines of research converge to BDNF as an important contributor to the neuroplasticity changes described among BD patients. BDNF has also been shown to decrease as the disorder progresses. These findings suggest that BDNF plays a central role in the progression of BD (Grande et al., 2010). Grande et al. (2010) also found that BDNF serum levels have been shown to be decreased in depressive and manic episodes, returning to normal levels in euthymia. But in our study we did not obtain this finding, perhaps due to the small sample in our study. In addition, our study is in concordance with the study carried out by Kauer-Sant0 Anna et al. (2009) to examine BDNF levels and their relationship in BD patients in the early and late stages of the disorder. BDNF was decreased only in those patients in the late stage of BPD. Moreover, BDNF levels were negatively correlated with the length of illness. When the levels were compared between patients at early and late stages of illness, there was a significant decrease in BDNF in the later stage of BD compared with the early stage. Also, Machado-Vieira et al. (2007) investigated whether BDNF levels are altered during mania. Sixty participants (14 men and 46 women) were selected and included in the study. Thirty patients meeting the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I criteria for manic episodes were age and sex matched with 30 healthy controls. They found that the mean BDNF levels were significantly decreased in drug-free/naive patients compared with healthy controls. Severity of the manic episode presented a significantly negative correlation to plasma BDNF levels. In contrast to our results (Table 4) are those obtained by Dias et al. (2009), who measured serum BDNF levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method in 65 euthymic type I BD patients and 50 healthy controls and found no significant differences in serum BDNF levels in BD patients and healthy controls. They found significant positive associations between serum BDNF levels and illness duration, and manic and depressive episodes only in female BD patients. This difference can be explained by the fact that the patients were in the euthymic stage, but in our study, there were patients with different diagnosis (manic, depressive, euthymic). As regards the relation between the BDNF and sex differences, 52.5% of the sample comprised men and 47.5% comprised women, both matched for age. The Table 3 Level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor Cases Control Number (%) Number (%) P 24 (60) 16 (40) 34 (85) 6 (15) 0.01 Table 1 Different diagnoses of the bipolar group Bipolar Bipolar Bipolar Bipolar depression manic mixed in remission Number Percentage 1 26 2 11 2.5 65 5 27.5 Within range Low Table 4 Sex differences in the level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor Table 2 Number of episodes o3 Z3 Number Percentage 18 22 45 55 Within range Low Males Females Number (%) Number (%) 13 (61.9) 8 (38.1) 11 (57.9) 8 (42.1) P 0.7 18 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry results show no significant differences between male and female patients. This is also in contrast to the study carried out by Dias et al. (2009). One of the limitations of this study will be the effect of drug taking by the patients. As all patients in our study were taking drugs, the possible question is that whether the drugs affect the level of BDNF. A study was carried out by De Oliveira et al. (2009), who examined the effect of the medication on the level of BDNF in BPD. BDNF serum levels were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum BDNF levels in drug-free and medicated BD patients were decreased when compared with controls. The BDNF levels did not differ between medicated and drug-free BD patients. When analyzing patients according to mood states, serum BDNF levels were lower in BD patients during both manic and depressive episodes as compared with healthy controls. Results suggest that the association of lower serum BDNF and BD mood episodes is maintained even in medicated patients, which strengthens the notion that BDNF serum levels may be considered a biomarker of mood episodes. The change in the level of neurotrophic factors in patients with BPD may be a new challenge in the treatment of mood disorders. Most of the currently used mood stabilizers exert effects on oxidative stress and neurotrophins, while novel potentially neuroprotective agents are being developed. These developments need to be combined with service initiatives to maximize the opportunities for early diagnosis and intervention (Berk et al., 2010). Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. References American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. VA, USA: American Psychiatric Publ; 2000. Berk M, Conus P, Kapczinski F, Andreazza AC, Yücel M, Wood SJ, et al. (2010). From neuroprogression to neuroprotection: implications for clinical care. Med J Aust 193:S36–S40. Carroll BJ, Fielding JM, Blashki TG (1973). Depression rating scales. A critical review. Arch Gen Psychiatry 28:361–366. De Oliveira GS, Ceresér KM, Fernandes BS, Kauer-Sant’Anna M, Fries GR, Stertz L (2009). Decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor in medicated and drug-free bipolar patients. J Psychiatr Res 43:1171–1174. Dias VV, Brissos S, Frey BN, Andreazza AC, Cardoso C, Kapczinski F (2009). Cognitive function and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 11:663–671. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). VA, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 1997. Grande I, Fries GR, Kunz M, Kapczinski F (2010). The role of BDNF as a mediator of neuroplasticity in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Invest 7:243–250. Hamilton M (1960). A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23:56–62. Hamilton M (1967). Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Clin Psychol 6:278–296. Hashimoto K (2010). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a biomarker for mood disorders: an historical overview and future directions. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 64:341–357. Kearns NP, Cruickshank CA, McGuigan KJ (1982). A comparison of depression rating scales. Br J Psychiatry 141:45–49. Kauer-Sant’Anna M, Kapczinski F, Andreazza AC, Bond DJ, Lam RW, Young LT, et al. (2009). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and inflammatory markers in patients with early- vs. late-stage bipolar disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 12:447–458. Klerman GL, Lavori PW, Rice J, Reich T, Endicott J, Andreasen NC, et al. (1985). Birth cohort trends in rates of major depressive disorder among relatives of patients with affective disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:689–693. Machado-Vieira R, Dietrich MO, Leke R, Cereser VH, Zanatto V, Kapczinski F, et al. (2007). Decreased plasma brain derived neurotrophic factor levels in unmedicated bipolar patients during manic episode. Biol Psychiatry 61:142–144. Preskorn SH, Fast GA (1993). Beyond signs and symptoms: the case against a mixed anxiety and depression category. J Clin Psychiatry 54:24S–32S. Teixeira AL, Barbosa IG, Diniz BS, Kummer A (2010). Circulating levels of brainderived neurotrophic factor: correlation with mood, cognition and motor function. Biomarkers Med 4:871–887. Tohen M, Zarate CA. Jr, Hennen J, Khalsa HMK, Strakowski SM, Gebre-Medhin P, et al. (2003). The McLean-Harvard first-episode mania study: prediction of recovery and first recurrence. Am J Psychiatry 160:2099–2107. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA (1978). A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 133:429–435. Original article 19 Depression and Alzheimer disease: a risk factor or a prodrome Hoda Salama, Tarek Molokhia, Hazem Maarouf and Hesham Sheshtawy Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt Correspondence to Tarek Kamal Molokhia, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt Tel: + 01223173572; e-mail: [email protected] Received 21 July 2011 Accepted 15 September 2011 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 33:19–22 Background The number of elderly individuals in the population is steadily increasing. One of the well known problems in the elderly is cognitive impairment. Alzheimer disease is the most common cause of cognitive impairment. Another health problem in this age group that can present with cognitive impairment is depression. Several controversies exist regarding the relationship between depression and Alzheimer disease. Aim This work aims at studying whether depression can be a risk factor for future development of Alzheimer disease. Patients and methods Twenty patients with Alzheimer disease in the outpatient clinic were asked about their history of depression and the presence of depression at the onset of illness. Results One unmarried woman (5%) had a history of depression. Seven patients (35%) had depression at the onset of illness. Conclusion The current study supports the hypothesis that depressed mood is not a risk factor for future development of Alzheimer disease. Further studies are needed to assess the relationship between cognitive symptoms of depression and future development of Alzheimer disease. Keywords: Alzheimer disease risk factor, depression, prodrome Egypt J Psychiatr 33:19–22 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 Introduction The number of elderly people in the population is steadily increasing. In 1900, the percentage of elderly individuals older than 65 years was 5%. In 2003, the percentage increased to 15%, and it is expected to be about 24% in 2030. Elderly individuals suffer from several social and medical problems. One of the most common medical problems suffered by them and faced by physicians dealing with them is cognitive decline (Steffens et al., 2009). One of the most well-known causes of progressive cognitive decline in the elderly is dementia. Dementia has a serious impact on the affected person, his/her caregiver(s), and on the community as a whole. The most common cause for dementia is Alzheimer disease (AD). Five percent of elderly individuals above 65 years suffer from AD. This percentage increases to 30% in those above 85 years. It is expected that 81 million people will suffer from AD in 2040 (Alzheimer’s Association, 2009). Anticholinesterases were introduced as a pharmacological treatment for dementia with an evidenced efficacy in delaying the progress and sometimes improving the course of the disease (Dickerson et al., 2007; Traykov et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2009). Therefore, early detection and treatment of dementia is of considerable importance (Milisen et al., 2006; Belleville et al., 2008). This has led 1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry to the recognition of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (Dierckx et al., 2007). MCI is the intervening zone between normal aging and dementia. MCI is considered by many authors as the prodrome of dementia (Brodaty et al., 2003; Rosenberg and Lyketsos, 2008; Werner and Korczyn, 2008). There are several causes for cognitive decline in the elderly other than dementia. Examples for these causes are systemic illness, previous psychotic illness, intake of medications, and depression (Steffens et al., 2009). Depression is a very common problem among the elderly population. Prevalence of clinically significant depression among them is about 10%, which means that depression is more common than dementia (Potter and Steffens et al., 2007; Hattori, 2008, 2009). Depression and dementia have serious consequences; yet, their treatment and prognosis are totally different. Therefore, differentiation between depression and dementia is of considerable importance (Chertkow et al., 2008; Steffens, 2008; Thomas and O’Brien, 2008). In the real clinical practice, this differentiation is sometimes very difficult. This difficulty is due to the following reasons: (1) Cognitive decline is a common presentation for depression in the elderly (known as pseudodementia). (2) Depressive symptoms are common in actual dementia. (3) Sometimes, depression is the prodrome of dementia. DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000411507.77863.13 20 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Treating depression with antidepressants markedly improves cognitive decline, but the cognition rarely becomes normalized (Wright and Persad, 2007; Gagliardi, 2008; Steffens and Potter, 2008). Only one female patient (5%) reported a history of depression (Fig. 2). Of the 20 patients, seven (35%) reported suffering from depression at the onset of illness (Fig. 3). The question now is can we consider depression as a risk factor for future development of AD? Discussion Aim This work aims at studying whether depression can be a risk factor for future development of AD. Patients This study included 20 patients with AD in the outpatient clinic. They were chosen according to the following inclusion and exclusion criteria: Is depression a risk factor for developing future dementia (including AD) or is depression a prodrome of AD? Figure 1 recent amnesia 20% agitation 20% agitation sleep Inclusion criterion: sleep 15% (1) Age above 60 years. Exclusion criteria: (1) Presence of previous psychotic illness. (2) Mental subnormality. (3) Presence of severe systemic illness (e.g. chronic advanced liver disease, chronic advanced renal disease). (4) Presence of previous neurological disease (e.g. stroke, infection, and epilepsy). agitation & sleep recent amnesia agitation & sleep 45% First symptom for seeking medical advice. Figure 2 positive 5% Methods Written consent was taken from the patients (or their relatives) before participation in the study. positive Clinical assessment was performed with special emphasis on the following: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) negative Age. Sex. Main presenting manifestations. Previous history of depression. Depression at onset of illness. negative 95% History of depression. Results Figure 3 The present study was carried on 20 patients with AD. The number of women was 12 (60%), whereas the number of men was eight (40%). The mean age of the studied group (in years) was 79.65 ± 3.13. Recent amnesia was the first symptom that propelled the caregivers of the patient to seek medical advice in four cases (20%), whereas agitation alone was responsible for another four cases (20%) to start to seek medical advice; sleep problems alone were responsible for three cases. The majority (nine cases; 45%) sought medical advice for both agitation and sleep problems (Fig. 1). positive 35% positive negative negative 65% Depression at onset of disease. Depression and Alzheimer disease Salama et al. 21 Answering this question is important because if depression is a risk factor for AD, effective treatment of depression can, theoretically, decrease the probability of developing AD in the future. The number of women in the studied group was 12 (60%), whereas the number of men was eight (40%). The mean age was 79.65 ± 3.13 years. These findings were consistent with that of Benson et al. (2005). According to the current study on AD patients, only one unmarried woman (5%) reported a history of depression (Fig. 2). Also, in this group, seven patients (35%) reported suffering from depression at the onset of illness (Fig. 3). These findings support the fact that depression is not a risk factor for AD. Also, these findings support the theory of considering depression as a prodrome of AD under some, but not all, conditions. Accordingly, we can see cases of depression alone, cases of depression at the start that culminate in AD, and finally we can see AD that did not start from depression. Thus, we can see depression and dementia from a dimensional perspective. Several cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiological studies have found an association between late-life depressive symptoms and subsequent cognitive decline, including MCI and probable dementia (Barnes, et al., 2006; Geda et al., 2006), but it remains uncertain whether the presence of depressive symptoms is a risk factor or a prodrome or a consequence of a pathological cognitive decline or a part of the pathological process. A meta-analysis (Ownby et al., 2006) has suggested that a history of depression approximately doubles the risk of developing AD, supporting the fact that depression can indicate a risk of future occurrence of AD. However, recent large prospective cohort studies (Panza et al., 2008a, 2008b; Becker et al., 2009) have failed to show that depressed mood is a risk factor for MCI and dementia. In the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging and the Personnes Agée QUID study, the presence of premorbid depressive symptoms increased the risk of later development of dementia, especially AD, but only in men, suggesting a predisposition based on sex (Fuhrer et al., 2003; Dal Forno et al., 2005). This was also reported in the Framingham Heart study (Saczynski et al., 2010). In The Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS) (Goveas et al., 2011), a cohort of postmenopausal women aged 65–79 years at study baseline who met the screening cutoff for depressive disorder, a greater risk of subsequent MCI and incident dementia was found after a mean follow-up of 5.4 years than in those who were not depressed. These findings remained significant after adjusting for multiple potential confounding variables, including demographic characteristics, lifestyle variables, cardiovascular risk factors, presence of cerebrovascular disease, antidepressant use, baseline cognitive function [as measured using the modified mini-mental state examination (3Ms)], and prior use and current prescription of hormone therapy. The participants who were depressed had approximately twice the hazard of developing MCI and probable dementia. Benson et al. (2005) compared the performance of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) total score and item scores in separating four groups of elderly (55–85 years of age) individuals: normal controls, patients with MCI, patients with mild AD, and patients with depression. They concluded that the MMSE effectively separates those with mild AD from the other three groups and MCI from normal aging, but it is relatively ineffective in separating normal elderly individuals from those with depression and individuals with MCI from those with depression. Measures other than the MMSE may need to be implemented to evaluate the mental status to more effectively separate MCI from depression and depression from normal aging. Was the use of 3Ms an effective choice for adjusting the confounding factor of baseline cognitive function in WHIMS? It is a question that needs further research. Accordingly, the findings of the current study were consistent with that of the Italian Longitudinal study on Aging and the study by Becker and colleagues. In contrast, these findings were inconsistent with that of the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, the Personnes Agée QUID study, and WHIMS. This is not a prospective study. Therefore, we cannot ignore the recall bias factor with regard to the history of depression. In contrast, answering ‘yes’ to the question of ‘did you (your parent) have a past history of depression?’ usually denotes the presence of previous depressed mood rather than a full-blown picture of depressive disorder. Accordingly, we can observe that studies that comment on depressed mood [Italian Longitudinal study on Aging, Becker et al. (2009), and the current study] did not find any relation with future development of dementia. In contrast, studies that commented on depressive symptoms (Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, the Personnes Agée QUID study, and WHIMS) found a positive relation with future development of dementia. It seems that the presence of memory symptoms of depressive disorder is a risk for development of future dementia rather than just the presence of depressed mood. In contrast, because the neurodegenerative changes seen in AD precede the clinical diagnosis by several years, these memory symptoms of depressive disorder may be the earliest manifestation of this neurodegenerative disease, suggesting that depressive disorder with memory symptoms was actually a prodrome of AD. This hypothesis needs to be further studied. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. References Alzheimer’s Association (2009). Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Demen 5:234–270. 22 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Barnes DE, Alexopoulos GS, Lopez OL, Williamson JD, Yaffe K (2006). Depressive symptoms, vascular disease and mild cognitive impairment: findings from the cardiovascular health study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63: 273–280. Becker JT, Chang YF, Lopez OL, Dew MA, Sweet RA, Barnes D, et al. (2009). Depressed mood is not a risk factor for incident dementia in a communitybased cohort. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 17:653–663. Belleville S, Sylvain-Roy S, de Boysson C, Ménard MC (2008). Chapter 23 Characterizing the memory changes in persons with mild cognitive impairment. Prog Brain Res 169:365–375. Benson AD, Slavin MJ, Tran TT, Petrella JR, Doraiswamy PM (2005). Screening for early Alzheimer’s disease: is there still a role for the Mini-Mental State Examination? Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 7:62–67. Brodaty H, Luscombe G, Anstey KJ, Cramsie J, Andrews G, Peisah C (2003). Neuropsychological performance and dementia in depressed patients after 25-year follow-up: a controlled study. Psychol Med 33:1263–1275. Hattori H (2009). Elderly depression and depressive state with Alzheimer’s disease. Nippon Rinsho 67:835–844. Milisen K, Braes T, Fick DM, Foreman MD (2006). Cognitive assessment and differentiating the 3 Ds (Dementia, Depression, Delirium). Nurs Clin North Am 41:1–22. Ownby RL, Crocco E, Acevedo A, John V, Loewenstein D (2006). Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease: systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:530–538. Panza F, Capurso C, D’Introno A, Colacicco AM, Zenzola A, Menga R, et al. (2008a). Impact of depressive symptoms on the rate of progression to dementia in patients affected by mild cognitive impairment. The Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23:726–734. Panza F, D’Introno A, Colacicco AM, Capurso C, Del Parigi A, Caselli RJ, et al. (2008b). Depressive symptoms, vascular risk factors and mild cognitive impairment: the Italian longitudinal study on aging. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 25:336–346. Chertkow H, Massoud F, Nasreddine Z, Belleville S, Joanette Y, Bocti C, et al. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 3. Mild cognitive impairment and cognitive impairment without dementia. CMAJ 178:1273–1285. Potter GG, Steffens DC (2007). Contribution of depression to cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults. Neurologist 13:105–117. Dal Forno G, Palermo MT, Donohue JE, Karagiozis H, Zonderman AB, Kawas CH (2005). Depressive symptoms, sex and risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 57:381–387. Dickerson BC, Sperling RA, Hyman BT, Albert MS, Blacker D (2007). Clinical prediction of Alzheimer disease dementia across the spectrum of mild cognitive impairment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:1443–1450. Saczynski JS, Beiser A, Seshadri S, Auerbach S, Wolf PA, Au R (2010). Depressive symptoms and risk of dementia: the Framingham Heart Study. Neurology 75:35–41. Dierckx E, Engelborghs S, De Raedt R, De Deyn PP, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I (2007). Differentiation between mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease and depression by means of cued recall. Psychol Med 37:747–755. Fuhrer R, Dufouil C, Dartigues JF (2003). Exploring sex differences in the relationship between depressive symptoms and dementia incidence: prospective results from the PAQUID study. J Am Geriatr Soc 51: 1055–1063. Gagliardi JP (2008). Differentiating among depression, delirium and dementia in elderly patients. Virtual Mentor 10:383–388. Geda YE, Knopman DS, Mrazek DA, Jicha GA, Smith GE, Negash S, et al. (2006). Depression, apolipoprotein E genotype and the incidence of mild cognitive impairment: a prospective cohort study. Arch Neurol 63:435–440. Goveas JS, Espeland MA, Woods NF, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Kotchen JM (2011). Depressive symptoms and incidence of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia in elderly women: the women’s health initiative memory study. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:57–66. Hattori H (2008). Depression in the elderly. Jpn J Geriatr 45:451–461. Rosenberg PB, Lyketsos CG (2008). Mild cognitive impairment: searching for the prodrome of Alzheimer’s disease. World Psychiatry 7:72–78. Steffens DC (2008). Separating mood disturbance from mild cognitive impairment in geriatric depression. Int Rev Psychiatry 20:374–381. Steffens DC, Potter GG (2008). Geriatric depression and cognitive impairment. Psychol Med 38:163–175. Steffens DC, McQuoid DR, Potter GG (2009). Outcomes of older cognitively impaired individuals with current and past depression in the NCODE study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 22:52–61. Thomas AJ, O’Brien JT (2008). Depression and cognition in older adults. Curr Opin Psychiatry 21:8–13. Traykov L, Rigaud AS, Cesaro P, Boller F (2007). Neuropsychological impairment in the early Alzheimer’s disease. Encephale 33:310–316. Werner P, Korczyn AD (2008). Mild cognitive impairment: conceptual, assessment, ethical and social issues. Clin Intervent Aging 3:413–420. Wright SL, Persad C (2007). Distinguishing between depression and dementia in older persons: neuropsychological and neuropathological correlates. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 20:189–198. Wu XS, Cheng HD, Wang K (2009). Memory monitoring in mild cognitive impairment. Nat Med J China 89:1037–1040. Original article 23 Gender-related phenomenological and neuropsychological differences in elderly patients with depression Fatma Moussaa, Mohamed Nasreldia, Hani Hamedb and Amany Ahmed Abdoua a Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo and bDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suief University, Beni Suief, Egypt Correspondence to Mohamed Nasreldin, MD, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Tel: + 225318885; fax: + 233386951; e-mail: [email protected] Received 19 July 2011 Accepted 10 September 2011 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 33:23–28 Aim The objectives of this work were to detect phenomenological sex-specific differences in elderly patients with depression for better understanding and to illustrate neuropsychological sex-specific differences in elderly patients with depression for better management. Subjects A comparative study with consecutive samples. Two groups were compared in the study comprising 40 elderly patients of both sexes with depression: 20 depressed men and 20 depressed women aged 60 years or above. They were recruited from the psychiatry outpatient clinic of Kasr Al Aini hospital with no obvious cognitive impairment or substance-related psychiatric disorders. Methods Diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, Symptom Checklist-90, mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and State–Trait Anxiety Inventory were used. Results A comparison between the depressed male and female subgroups revealed that the characteristics of the patients were similar in both sexes except for some significant findings; for example, depression in elderly women is more associated with widowhood, more suffering from a sense of worthlessness, lack of attention, and more disturbance in reasoning and constructional abilities. However, elderly men reported more sexual dysfunction and a significant negative correlation between memory impairment (MMSE) and severity of depression (GDS). Conclusion There were no sex-specific differences in elderly depressed patients except that depression in elderly women was more associated with widowhood, a sense of worthlessness, lack of attention, and more disturbance in reasoning and constructional abilities, whereas elderly men reported more sexual dysfunction and a significant negative correlation between memory impairment (MMSE) and severity of depression (GDS). Keywords: depression, elderly, sex, sex-specific differences Egypt J Psychiatr 33:23–28 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 Introduction Worldwide, life expectancy is increasing. Currently, about 10% of the world’s population comprises older adults (aged 65 and above). For mental health, this implies an increase not only in the neurodegeneration conditions, such as Alzheimer’s dementia, but also in depressive disorders (Baldwin, 1997). It has been predicted that there will be a total of two billion people over the age of 60 in 2050; 80% of them will be living in developing countries (Pinto Meza et al., 2006). In Egypt, over the past five decades, life expectancy at birth has increased globally by almost 20 years, from 42.4 in 1950–1955 to 68.3 years in 2000–2005. It is also 1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry projected that by 2025, it will reach 77.8 years [World Health Organization (WHO), 2006]. Epidemiologic studies have found depression to be more common in women, although this sex-specific difference is less pronounced in older adults (Blazer, 2003). The study also found that women have higher incidence rates of major depressive disorder and a more chronic course (Essau et al., 2010). Nearly twice as many women as men suffer from major depressive disorders. This difference continues into extreme old age, but the differential decreases. The higher prevalence of depression among women is due to a higher risk of first onset rather than differential persistence or recurrence. The cause of the sex-specific DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000411115.10146.c9 24 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry difference in rates is not known, but speculation covers cognitive styles, psychosocial and economic stress, an increased rate of abuse during childhood and in the work place, an increase in the incidence of hypothyroidism, and other biological factors related to the effects of endogenous and exogenous gonadal steroids (there is no sexspecific difference in incidence before adolescence). However, these differences pertain only to unipolar depression (Kessler, 2003). criteria of organic mood disorder; all patients who fulfilled the DSM-IV criteria of substance-induced mood disorder or psychotic disorder with predominantly depressive symptoms; agitated and suicidal patients; and individuals who refused to participate in the study. Depressed men have significantly lower disclosure rates of depressive symptoms and treatment and more negative attitudes toward help-seeking for mental health problems than do women (O’Connor et al., 2001; Addis and Mahalik, 2003; Kalache, 2006). The modified Kasr Al Aini Geriatric sheet Men were significantly less likely than women to endorse depressive symptoms such as feeling depressed or low (39% men vs. 47% women) and having lost interest or pleasure in things they usually enjoy (37% men vs. 42% women). Men were also less likely than women to report fatigue (62% men vs. 67% women). Men were significantly more likely to be married, less likely to have two or more previous depression episodes, and reported lower overall depression severity (Hinton et al., 2006). Methods This study is a comparative cross-sectional study; all patients were subjected to the following: The depressed group was classified according to the criteria of the DSM-IV into patients with major depressive disorder and those with nonmajor depressive disorder (adjustment disorder with depressed mood, dysthymic disorder, and minor depressive disorder). Symptom Checklist-90 (El Behery, 1984): Arabic version The Symptom Checklist (SCL)-90 is a self-reporting, clinical symptom rating scale consisting of 90 questions. It is designed for use on psychiatric outpatients. Responses indicate symptoms associated with nine psychiatric constructs (somatization, obsessive compulsive disorder, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism). Geriatric Depression Scale (Baza, 1997): Arabic version Aim The objectives of this work were to detect phenomenological sex-specific differences in elderly patients with depression for better understanding and to illustrate neuropsychological sex-specific differences in elderly patients with depression for better management. Subjects and methods This is a self-rated 30-item scale used to rate depression in the elderly. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) has also been recommended by the Royal College of physicians, British Geriatric society, as a suitable method for screening of depression in the geriatric age group and rating its severity. In our study, the GDS was chosen as it is more specific for the elderly. It was used as a screening method for detection of depressed patients, and it was also used as a measure of the severity of depression in these patients. Subjects This study was designed as an outpatient cross-sectional comparative study after obtaining approval from the ethical research committee that conforms to the provisions of the world medical association’s Declaration of Helsinki. The study consisted of 40 individuals who were selected on consecutive referral basis recruited from the geriatric psychiatry outpatient clinic in Kasr Al Aini university hospitals from July to December 2008 according to the inclusion criteria. They were all elderly outpatients of both sexes (60 years and above). All individuals included in this study fulfilled the general inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients gave consent to participate in the study after a full explanation of procedures was provided. The sample was divided into two groups. Group A (the depressed group) consisted of 40 patients diagnosed to have a clinically recognizable depression and subdivided into two subgroups: depressed men (N = 20) and depressed women (N = 20). All patients fulfilled the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria of a depressive disorder. Exclusion criteria included the following: patients with dementia and other organic mental disorders; all patients who fulfilled the DSM-IV State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (El Behery, 2005): Arabic version It includes two self-rated scales: State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety. Trait Anxiety consists of 20 items that describe the individual feelings generally, whereas State Anxiety consists of 20 items that describe the individual feelings at a particular moment. Mini-mental state examination (Molloy et al., 1991): Arabic version The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) is probably the most widely used measure of cognitive decline. The MMSE has been suggested in early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The MMSE has a maximum score of 30 points, with different domains including orientation, registration, attention, calculation, recall, language, and visual concentration. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Meleka and Ismail, 1996): Arabic version It is a general test of intellegence (IQ) published in 1955 as a revision of the Wechsler Bellevue test 1939. The fullscale IQ test is broken down into 14 subtests, comprising seven verbal subtests (information, comprehension, Gender-related differences in elderly patients Moussa et al. 25 arithmetic, similarities, vocabulary, digit span, and letter and number sequencing) and seven performance subtests (picture completion, digit symbol, block design, matrix reasoning, picture arrangement, symbol search, and object assembly). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) is appropriate through adulthood and for use in individuals over 74 years of age. Statistical analysis All data from both groups were computed and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 15, IBM, Armonk, New York, USA) software for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics was used for illustrating the mean and SD of quantitative data. Statistical tests were used to ascertain the significant differences between the two groups and sex-specific differences in the depressed group. The Student t-test was used for quantitative variables, for example, age and MMSE, WAIS, GDS, and SCL scores. The Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables, for example, sex, education, occupation, marital status, socioeconomic level, depressive symptoms, and severity of depression. A probability level of Po0.05 was considered statistically significant (Levesque, 2007). Results Comparison between men and women in the depressed group Sociodemographic Data There was no significant difference between depressed men and women with respect to age (P = 0.07), education (P = 1), occupation (P = 0.07), socioeconomic level (P = 0.15), or caregiver support (P = 0.55). However, there was significant difference between them with regard to marital status, which means that there were more widows among depressed women than there were widowers among depressed men (P = 0.018). Table 1 Comparison between depressed men and women with regard to depressive symptoms Male (N = 20) Symptoms Worthlessness Anhedonia Hopelessness Helplessness Insomnia Psychomotor retardation Psychomotor agitation Fatigue Poor concentration Suicidal ideation Sexual dysfunction Female (N = 20) Absent Present Absent Present No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) 16 10 13 11 3 18 (80) (50) (65) (55) (15) (90) 15 (75) 3 3 20 14 4 10 7 9 17 2 (20) (50) (35) (45) (85) (10) 5 (25) 10 8 13 8 5 20 (50) (40) (65) (40) (25) (100) 18 (90) 10 12 7 12 15 0 P (50) (60) (35) (60) (75) (0) 0.05 0.53 1 0.34 0.43 0.15 2 (10) 0.21 (15) 17 (85) 3 (15) 17 (85) 1 (15.8) 17 (84.2) 3 (15.8) 17 (84.2) 0.63 (100) 0 (0) 19 (95) 1 (5) 0.31 (70) 6 (20) 20 (100) 0 (0) 0.04 Po0.05 is significant. Table 2 Comparison between depressed men and women with regard to diagnosis of depressive disorders Male (N = 20) Female (N = 20) Diagnosis Major depressive disorder Dythymic disorder Adjustment disorder Minor depressive disorder Medical comorbidity Hypertension Ischemic heart disease Diabetes mellitus Asthma Osteoarthritis Peptic ulcer Anemia Prostatic enlargement Others (UTI, bronchitis and hearing difficulties) No. (%) No. (%) P 2 10 4 4 (10) (50) (20) (20) 3 12 4 1 (15) (60) (20) (5) 0.25 8 4 2 0 0 1 0 1 4 (40) (20) (10) (0) (0) (5) (0) (5) (20) 10 2 3 1 1 0 1 0 2 (50) (10) (15) (5) (5) (0) (5) (0) (10) 0.18 UTI, urinary tract infection. Po0.05 is significant. Clinical Data Depressive symptoms: Tables 1 and 2. Psychometric measurement Tables 3 and 4. State and Trait Anxiety Scale Tables 5–7 Depressed women had a significantly higher sense of worthlessness compared with depressed men. Also, depressed men reported symptoms of decreased libido more often than did depressed women; otherwise, there were no significant differences between depressed men and women regarding other depressive symptoms (P = 0.05 and 0.04, respectively). There were no significant differences between depressed men and women regarding diagnosis of depressive disorders; however, the majority of patients were diagnosed with dysthymic disorder (50% of depressed men and 60% of depressed women). Of the depressed men, 20% had adjustment disorder, 20% had minor depressive disorder, and 10% had major depressive disorder. Of the depressed women, 20% had adjustment disorder, 15% had major depressive disorder, and 5% had minor depressive disorder (P = 0.25). There were no significant differences between depressed men and women regarding medical comorbidity (P = 0.18), nor was there any significant difference between them with regard to SCL subscales. In addition, there was no significant difference between depressed men and women with regard to the total score of the geriatric depressive scale (P = 0.61) or with regard to the severity of depression according to the geriatric depressive scale (P = 0.68). There was a significant difference between depressed men and women regarding the attention subscale, which reveals an effect of lack of attention in depressed women more than in depressed men (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference between depressed men and women regarding verbal IQ, performance IQ, and the full scale of WAIS. There was a significant difference between depressed men and women regarding Similarities and Block design subscales, which means that depressed women have a disturbance in 26 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Table 3 Comparison between depressed men and women with regard to Symptom Checklist, Geriatric Depression scale, and mini-mental state examination Male (N = 20) Mean Symptom Checklist Somatization Obsessions Interpersonal sensitivity Depression Anxiety Hostility Phobic anxiety Paranoid identification Psychosis Geriatric Depressive Scale (GDS) Mini-mental state examination Orientation Registration Attention Recall Naming Repetition Comprehension Reading Writing Construction Total score SD Female (N = 20) Mean 29.35 21.00 13.2 43.85 22.65 8.10 8.35 7.55 10.40 15.85 12.29 10.36 2.32 14.911 11.170 3.946 2.601 2.212 3.775 4.03 8.9 3 4.4 2.6 2 1 3 0.25 0.25 0.0 25.5 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.44 0.44 0.0 1.7 Table 5 Comparison between depressed men and women with regard to the grade of Trait subscale of State–Trait Anxiety Inventory SD Female (N = 20) No. (%) No. (%) P P 27.2 10.8 26.75 9.7 12.8 1.6 36.70 8.75 23.05 10.18 8.25 3.46 8.95 2.56 6.75 2.63 10.50 2.544 16.5 3.98 0.56 0.08 0.59 0.07 0.91 0.9 0.47 0.31 0.92 0.61 9 3 4 2.7 2 1 3 0.25 0.25 0.1 25.5 0.58 – 0.41 0.52 – – – 1 1 0.61 1 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.47 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.44 0.44 0.3 1.7 Male (N = 20) Po0.05 is significant. Table 4 Comparison between depressed men and women with regard to the severity of depression according to the Geriatric Depressive Scale Male (N = 20) Female (N = 20) Geriatric Depression Scale No. (%) No. (%) P Mild Severe 17 (85) 3 (15) 16 (80) 4 (20) 0.68 Po0.05 is significant. reasoning (similarities) and visual perception. There was no significant difference between depressed men and women with regard to the grade of WAIS (P = 0.197) imagination and constructional abilities (Block design) (P = 0.006 and 0.007, respectively). Depressed men and women showed no significant difference in the deterioration index of WAIS (P = 0.376). There was no significant difference between depressed men and women with regard to the grade of State subscale of STAI (P = 0.175). The grade of trait and state subscale of STAI showed no significant difference between depressed men and women (P = 0.301). Discussion Research and clinical evidence revealed that, although both women and men can develop the standard symptoms of depression, they often experience depression differently and may have different ways of coping with the symptoms. Another study reported that elderly women endorsed depressed mood, anhedonia, and State Anxiety Scale None Mild Moderate Severe Trait Anxiety Scale None Mild Moderate 8 9 1 2 (40) (45) (5) (10) 6 9 5 0 14 (70) 4 (20) 2 (10) (30) (45) (25) (0) 0.18 14 (70) 6 (30) 0 (0) 0.3 Po0.05 is significant. Table 6 Comparison between depressed men and women with regard to Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale subscales Male (N = 20) Female (N = 20) WAIS Mean SD Mean SD P Information Comprehension Arithmetic Similarities Digit span Vocabularies Picture arrangement Picture completion Block design Object assembly Digit symbols Verbal IQ Performance IQ Full scale 8.1 7.5 6.5 3.9 7.95 16.2 4.00 6.95 7.5 8.35 13.75 89.6 99.1 91.2 2.88 1.82 1.67 1.17 2.09 5.58 1.56 2.33 3.56 3.28 7.68 6.86 6.23 6.16 9.25 7.85 6.65 2.65 9.20 17.15 3.85 7.20 4.85 7.80 13.45 90 94.75 88.6 3.8 1.98 1.27 1.5 2.19 4.77 1.35 2.67 2.08 3.87 6.31 7.43 8.8 5.68 0.29 0.56 0.75 0.006 0.07 0.17 0.75 0.75 0.007 0.63 0.89 0.86 0.08 0.17 WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Po0.05 is significant. Table 7 Comparison between depressed men and women with regard to the grade of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Grade Average grade Below average grade Deterioration Significant Nonsignificant Male (N = 20) Female (N = 20) No. (%) No. (%) P 10 (50) 10 (50) 6 (30) 14 (70) 0.2 2 (10) 18 (90) 4 (20) 16 (80) 0.38 Po0.05 is significant. irritability more often than did men (Steffens et al., 2000). Women tend to report a greater number of symptoms and a higher degree of distress and may differ from men in their perceived need and willingness to seek treatment (Kornstein et al., 2002). The study results showed that the majority of patients were diagnosed with dysthymic disorder (50% of depressed men and 60% of depressed women). Of depressed women, 15% had major depressive disorder compared with 10% of depressed men. The cause of the sex-specific difference in rates may be related to cognitive styles, psychosocial stress, and economic stress; yet, the large-sized sample Gender-related differences in elderly patients Moussa et al. 27 could illustrate a higher difference. These findings matched with the study that reported that nearly twice as many elderly women as elderly men suffer from major depressive disorder (Kessler, 2003; Essau et al., 2010). Comparison of the depressed female with the depressed male subgroup revealed a significant difference with regard to sense of worthlessness, which suggested that depressed women had lower self-esteem than did depressed men. This may be understood by the cultural agreement that women’s self-esteem is dependent upon their relationships with others; they are less assertive and lack confidence in controlling their lives, which is consistent with the study reporting that men may be more willing to acknowledge fatigue, irritability, loss of interest in work or hobbies, and sleep disturbances rather than feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and excessive guilt (Cochran and Rabinowitz, 2000). Irritability is a more frequent symptom of depression than depressed mood, particularly in Arab women, and it is often mild and takes the form of intolerence and expressions of anger toward the spouse or offspring (Okasha and Maj, 2001). There were no significant sex-specific differences in this study among elderly depressed patients with respect to medical comorbidity that the depressed patients usually suffer from, such as DM, hypertension, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and arthritis. Absence of significant sexspecific differences implies that the physical comorbidity is disease and age related rather than sex related, and this is in agreement with the results of several studies (Benazzi, 2009). There were no statistically significant differences between elderly depressed men and women with regard to somatic complaints on the somatization scale of SCL (SCL-90): for example, headache, dizziness, and gastrointestinal manifestations. These findings agreed with the study that reported that depression in medically ill elderly patients may present covertly, with psychosomatic symptoms or with hypochondriasis, which may make it difficult to distinguish from the coexisting physical illness, and that these somatic complaints are disease specific rather than sex specific (Gallo and Rabins, 1999). Our study showed that there were no statistically significant sex-specific differences among the depressed patients. Although women are two or three times more likely to be affected than men with anxiety disorders and the mean age of presentation is about 25 years (Sadock and Sadock, 2004), these differences could not be detected in our results reflecting different etiological backgrounds. There were no significant differences in the trait anxiety subscale, nor were there any significant sex-specific differences with regard to both subscales. In this study, depressed men reported symptoms of sexual dysfunction in the form of decreased libido more often than did depressed women; depressed men also reported erectile dysfunction (ED). This may be explained culturally as a lower disclosure rate among women about their sexual life. Sexual needs across the lifespan may not differ drastically, although older women voice more concerns about their partner’s sexual difficulties (Nusbaum et al., 2004). Whether the age-dependent decline in androgen levels leads to health problems in men is being debated vigorously. Some investigators argue that age-associated testosterone deficiency, or ‘andropause’, is responsible for many of the typical signs of male aging, such as ED, skin alterations, and osteoporosis, and for neuropsychiatric problems, such as fatigue, loss of libido, depression, irritability, insomnia, and memory impairment (Morales et al., 2000). If women do experience a decline in libido, this tends to start at or around menopause rather than late in life. Subsequent to this, sexual interest is influenced less by age than by health, medication, and availability of a partner (Bretschneider and McCoy, 1988). There were no statistically significant sex-specific differences among depressed patients with regard to hostility, interpersonal sensitivity, paranoid ideation, and psychosis of SCL rating scale. This could be attributed to the small sample size or it could be considered as state specific rather than sex specific (Bretschneider and McCoy, 1988). There were no significant differences between depressed men and women regarding the total score of MMSE and different subscales except attention subscale, as depressed women showed more lack of attention compared with depressed men, as depressed elderly women had lower self-esteem and more sense of worthlessness, which had its impact on attention; the absence of other significant differences could be explained by the fact that MMSE is a rapid clinical screening test for detection of cognitive impairment rather than a sophisticated cognitive battery for detection of notable cognitive impairment (Elderkin Thompson et al., 2006). Depressed women showed more disturbance in reasoning and abstract thinking and in visual perception, imagination, and constructional abilities compared with depressed men. These findings explained by the study reported that the processing speed appears to be the most core cognitive deficit in late-life depression as elderly depressed women showed more psychomotor retardation and their attention was more affected with consecutive effects of the previous cognitive functions (Barch et al., 2001). Otherwise, there were no significant sex-specific differences regarding the global intellectual detrioration, verbal, performance, full scales, and the grade of WAIS. Conclusion (1) Depression in old age is associated with widowhood. Depression in elderly women is significantly associated with widowhood more than in elderly men. (2) There was a significant difference in self-esteem, which suggests that depressed women had a sense of worthlessness more than did depressed men. (3) Depressed men reported symptoms of sexual dysfunction in the form of decreased libido more than depressed women; depressed men also reported ED. (4) Depressed women showed more effects of lack of attention compared with depressed men. (5) Depressed women showed more disturbance in reasoning and abstract thinking and in visual perception, imagination, and constructional abilities compared with depressed men. 28 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Recommendations A large-sized sample may be needed for detection of other differences of old age depression between men and women. Follow-up studies aiming at assessment of the course and prognosis of old-age depression in men and women are required. Comparative studies designed to compare effects of cognitive and executive functions and its relation to depression, especially vascular depression, between elderly depressed men and women are required. Elderkin Thompson V, Mintz J, Haroon E, Lavretsky H, Kumar A (2006). Executive dysfunction and memory in older patients with major and minor depression. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 21:669–676. Essau CA, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Sasagawa S (2010). Gender differences in the developmental course of depression. J Affect Disord 127:185–190. Gallo JJ, Rabins PV (1999). Depression without sadness: alternative presentations of depression in late life. Am Fam Physician 60:820–826. Hinton L, Zweifach M, Oishi S, Tang L, Unutzer J (2006). Gender disparities in the treatment of late-life depression: qualitative and quantitative findings from the IMPACT trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 14:884–892. Kalache A (2006). WHO’s perspective on active aging. In: World Health Organization (WHO), editors. Active aging and promotion of the health of older people. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO). pp. 4–16. Kessler RC (2003). Epidemiology of women and depression. J Affect Disord 74:5–13. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. References Kornstein SG, Sloan DM, Thase ME (2002). Gender-specific differences in depression and treatment response. Psychopharmacol Bull 36 (4 Suppl 3):99–112. Levesque R (2007). SPSS programming and data management: a guide for SPSS and SAS users. SPSS Inc. Chicago. Meleka LK, Ismail ME (1996). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for adults. Cairo, Egypt: El Nahda Egyptian Library. Molloy DW, Alemayehu E, Roberts R (1991). Reliability of a standardized mini-mental state examination compared with the traditional mini-mental state examination. Am J Psychiatry 148:102–105. Addis ME, Mahalik JR (2003). Men, masculinity and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol 58:5–14. Morales A, Heaton JP, Carson CC. III (2000). Andropause: a misnomer for a true clinical entity. J Urol 163:705–712. Baldwin R (1997). Depressive illness. In: Jacoby R, Oppenheimer C, editors. Psychiatry in the elderly. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nusbaum MR, Singh AR, Pyles AA (2004). Sexual healthcare needs of women aged 65 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:117–122. Barch DM, Braver TS, Akbudak E, Conturo T, Ollinger J, Snyder A (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. Cereb Cortex 11:837–848. Baza AA (1997). Geriatric Depression Scale. Cairo, Egypt: El Anglo Egyptian Library. Benazzi F (2009). Classifying mood disorders by age-at-onset instead of polarity. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33:86–93. O’Connor DW, Rosewarne R, Bruce A (2001). Depression in primary care. 1: Elderly patients’ disclosure of depressive symptoms to their doctors. Int Psychogeriatr 13:359–365. Blazer DG (2003). Depression in late life: review and commentary. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:249–265. Bretschneider JG, McCoy NL (1988). Sexual interest and behavior in healthy 80- to 102-year-olds. Arch Sex Behav 17:109–129. Cochran SV, Rabinowitz FE (2000). Men and depression: clinical and empirical perspectives. San Diego: Academic Press. El Behery AA (1984). Symptom checklist. Cairo, Egypt: El Nahda Egyptian Library. El Behery AA (2005). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Cairo, Egypt: El Nahda Egyptian Library. Okasha A, Maj M (2001). Depression in the Arab world. In: Okasha A, Maj M, editors. Images in psychiatry: an Arab perspective. Cairo: World Psychiatric Association (WPA). pp. 89–122. Pinto Meza A, Usall J, Serrano Blanco A, Suarez D, Haro JM (2006). Gender differences in response to antidepressant treatment prescribed in primary care. Does menopause make a difference? J Affect Disord 93:53–60. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (2004). Geriatric psychiatry. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, editors. Synopsis of psychiatry. New York, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. pp. 1318–1337. Steffens DC, Skoog I, Norton MC, Hart AD, Tschanz JT, Plassman BL, et al. (2000). Prevalence of depression and its treatment in an elderly population: The Cache County study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57:601–607. World Health Organization (WHO) (2006). A strategy for active, healthy ageing and old age care in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO). pp. 2006–2015. Original article 29 Memory impairment in female schizophrenic patients and its relation with their female sex hormonal profile Samia Abd EL-Rahman Ahmed, Ola Omar Shaheen, Amany Ahmed Abdou and Mohamed Nasr El Din Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Correspondence to Amany Ahmed Abdou, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Tel: + 20 105 214 720; e-mail: [email protected] Received 20 July 2011 Accepted 9 September 2011 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 33:29–34 Hypothesis Schizophrenic women show deficits in a variety of cognitive domains including executive function, attention, memory, and language. The female sex hormone estrogen acts as a neuroactive hormone that is assumed to have interesting effects on the central nervous system and on the cognitive functions in specific. Aim of the work To determine the memory impairment in a sample of schizophrenic female patients, as well as its relation to the level of their female sex hormone estradiol, to evaluate the usefulness of hormonal therapy as an adjunct therapy to antipsychotic drugs in female schizophrenic patients to improve their cognitive functions. Participants and methods This is a comparative study that included 30 schizophrenic female patients who were admitted for a long time as inpatients of Al Abasseia Psychiatric Hospital, and a control group that matched in age and education. They were subjected to a psychiatric interview, neurological examination, general examination, the scale for the assessment of positive symptoms, and scale for the assessment of negative symptoms, serum estradiol level during 3 consecutive weeks, and the Luria–Nebraska neuropsychological battery, which is a multidimensional battery designed to assess a broad range of neuropsychological functions. (We focused on the items that tested memory functions). Results There were statistically significant differences between both groups in the clinical scales C10 (memory) of the Luria–Nebraska neuropsychological battery, as well the factor scales concerned with memory ME1 (verbal memory) and ME2 (visual and complex memory). The mean estradiol level was inversely correlated with the mean of the memory scales; that is, an increased estradiol level was correlated with better performance of the patient group in memory scales. Conclusion Female schizophrenic patients performed significantly worse in the memory scale (C10), as well as the factor scales concerned with memory ME1 (verbal memory) and ME2 (visual and complex memory); the increased estradiol level was correlated with better performance of the patient group in memory scales, which may be of value in these patients when providing hormonal therapy as an adjunct therapy to antipsychotic drugs. Keywords: female sex hormones, memory impairment, schizophrenia Egypt J Psychiatr 33:29–34 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 Introduction Efforts to identify differential or core cognitive deficits in schizophrenia have been made for several decades, with limited success. Part of the difficulty in establishing a cognitive profile in schizophrenia is the considerable interpatient heterogeneity in the level of cognitive impairment. Thus, it may be useful to examine the presence of relative cognitive weaknesses on an intraperson level (Palmer et al., 2010). Estrogen is a neuroactive hormone that exerts powerful effects on the central nervous system, especially on cognitive functions. The largest concentrations of estro1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry gen receptors-b are in the hypothalamus, the amygdala, and the hippocampus (Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2000). The neurotransmitter that estrogen upregulates the most is acetylcholine (Luine, 1985), although it affects the serotonergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic systems as well (McEwen, 2002). Moreover, the hippocampus itself has been shown to be critical for explicit or declarative memory. Sherwin and McGill (2003) suggested that estrogen may exert the maximum effects on memory, although this does not exclude the possibility that estrogen might influence other cognitive functions as well. Estrogens exert complex and time-dependent effects on spatial and declarative memory in animals DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000411114.33017.6a 30 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry (Voytko, 1996; Fader et al., 1998; Gibbs et al., 1998; Green, 2006). Also, estrogen has been postulated to have a positive effect on short-term and long-term verbal memory in postmenopausal women, as well as increasing the capacity for new learning (Sherwin and McGill, 2003). Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) has an added benefit for cognitive deficits in postmenopausal women with schizophrenia (Kulkarni et al., 1996). Aim of the work The aim of this study is to determine memory impairment in a sample of schizophrenic female patients, its relation to their positive and negative symptoms, and the level of the female sex hormone estradiol, to evaluate the usefulness of hormonal therapy as an adjunct therapy to antipsychotic drugs, to improve their cognitive functions. Participants and methods History of neurological illness, epilepsy, head trauma, mental retardation, acute medical illness, or substance abuse. Uncooperative patients. History of electro convulsive therapy application in the previous 6 weeks before examination. Methods Clinical assessment (1) Psychiatric interview: the semistructured sheet of the psychiatric department of Al Kasr El-Aini Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University was used for the psychiatric interview of the patients. (2) Neurological examination. (3) General examination. Psychiatric symptoms rating The scale for the assessment of positive symptoms (SAPS) and the scale for the assessment of negative symptoms (SANS) were used (Andreasen, 1984a). Participants This Comparative case–control study was carried on a sample of Egyptian women. Patient group This group included 30 patients fulfilling the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, Text Revision diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia that was confirmed by two other psychiatrists. They were admitted to Al Abasseia Psychiatric Hospital with at least 2 years of illness. They did not show acute exacerbation. They were under treatment either by conventional antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, or both. Informed consent was obtained from the general director of the hospital, from the patients, and their relatives. Control group The control group included 15 normal women. They were subjected to a clinical assessment, which included a detailed psychiatric interview and neurological and general examinations, with neuropsychological evaluation using the Luria–Nebraska neuropsychological battery (LNNB). Also, the gynecological history was obtained and hormonal assessment was performed. For every case, two blood samples were obtained: one during menstruation and one on days 10–12 of the cycle. The women selected in both groups fulfilled the following criteria: Inclusion criteria: Women in the child-bearing period. All patients should continue at least 6 years of education. This was a necessity for completion of the psychological evaluation. Hormonal assessment To assess the serum level of estradiol, three blood samples were taken on 3 consecutive weeks (not two samples) to nullify the effect of menstrual irregularities. The hormonal assessment was performed at Kasr El-Aini university hospital, the laboratory of the Obstetric and Gynecology Department. The normal estradiol ranges were as follows: the follicular phase (30–50 pg/ml), periovulatory (150–450 pg/ml), the luteal phase (150– 230 pg/ml), and postmenopausal (0–25 pg/ml). Neuropsychological assessment LNNB (Golden et al., 1995) is a multidimensional battery designed to assess a broad range of neuropsychological functions. Adaptation to the Arabic version was performed accurately with the agreement of professional judgments (one senior psychiatrist and one senior psychologist). The reliability of the LNNB has been examined from a number of perspectives including interrater agreement, split-half, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability, and proven to be reliable. Also, criterion-related, concurrent, and construct validity of the LNNB has been proven. We focused on items that tested memory: Clinical scales: C10-memory; this scale basically tests shortterm and intermediate memory. Factor scales: the factor scales resulted from a series of studies in which each of the major scales of the test Table 1 Age and educational level Exclusion criteria: History of taking any synthetic steroids (including oral contraceptive pills) before and during the examination. Pregnant women and those with ovarian dysfunction or other gynecological problems. Patient group Mean age ± SD P Mean years of education ± SD P Control group 34.6 ± 6.8 34.6 ± 6.7 0.99 12.6 ± 2 12.67 ± 1.98 0.96 Memory impairment in female schizophrenic patients Ahmed et al. 31 Table 2 The scale for assessment of positive symptoms, the scale for assessment of negative symptoms SAPS No. Mean ± SD SANS No. Mean ± SD Delusions Positive formal thought disorder Hallucinations Bizarre behavior Inappropriate affect Total SAPS 30 30 30 30 30 30 33.6 ± 10.1 18.97 ± 8.2 13.9 ± 5.8 12.2 ± 3.2 3.1 ± 0.8 81.7 ± 20.4 Affective flattening or blunting Anhedonia-asociality Avolition-apathy Alogia Attention Total SANS 30 30 30 30 30 30 19.97 ± 4.8 15.8 ± 3.8 11.0 ± 2.03 10.5 ± 4.6 7.87 ± 2.5 64.8 ± 13.7 SANS, scale for assessment of negative symptoms; SAPS, scale for assessment of positive symptoms. Table 3 The three estradiol levels Estradiol levels (E2) Mean ± SD Follicular phase Patients No. = 28 Control No. = 15 Periovulatory phase Patients No. = 30 Control No. = 15 Mean of estradiol levels in both phases Patients No. = 30 Control No. = 15 57.4 ± 41.6 69.1 ± 22.2 151.9 ± 110.1 181.5 ± 131.8 112 ± 89.3 125.3 ± 69.1 Table 4 The results of Luria–Nebraska neuropsychological battery in both patient and control groups Group Number Mean ± SD P 30 15 72.52 ± 10.2 43.80 ± 4.2 0.000* C10 (memory) Patients Control *Significant Po0.05. Table 5 Factor scales Factor scale Group Number Mean ± SD ME1(verbal memory) ME2(visual and complex memory) P Patients Control Patients 30 15 30 76 ± 7.95 0.000* 53.8 ± 5.2 62.6 ± 8.04 0.000* Control 15 44.6 ± 4.7 *Significant Po0.05. Table 8 Correlation of E2 (mean estradiol levels) and scale for assessment of positive symptoms and the scale for assessment of negative symptoms SAPS Hallucinations Delusions Bizarre behavior Positive formal thought disorder Inappropriate affect Total SAPS SANS Affective flattening or blunting Alogia Avolition-apathy Anhedonia-asociality Attention Total SANS No. R P 30 30 30 30 30 30 – 0.098 – 0.113 0.166 – 0.004 0.227 – 0.051 0.61 0.55 0.382 0.98 0.227 0.790 30 30 30 30 30 30 0.014 0.150 0.118 – 0.212 – 0.072 0.009 0.93 0.43 0.54 0.26 0.71 0.96 SANS, scale for assessment of negative symptoms; SAPS, scale for assessment of positive symptoms. battery was investigated in separate factor analyses (Golden et al., 1995). (1) ME1 (verbal memory). These items involve recalling lists of words presented visually and orally. These items require short-term verbal memory skills. (2) ME2 (visual and complex memory). These items involve drawing shapes, copying hand positions, repeating stories, and repeating words associated with pictures, all from memory. They require shortterm memory for visual stimuli, memory for combined verbal and visual information, and integration of visual memory with motor skills. Statistical techniques used Table 6 Correlation of the mean E2 and clinical scales: E2 and C10 (memory) Total number R P 30 15 – 0.380 – 0.106 0.038* 0.707 Patients Control *Significant Po0.05. Percentages, means, and SD were calculated. A t-test and Pearson correlation were also performed using the SPSS (version 11, IBM, Armonk, New York, USA) analysis computer program (Table 1). Results Demographic and clinical data Table 7 Correlation of the mean E2 and factor scales LNNB scales ME1(verbal memory) ME2 (visual and complex memory) Group Total No. Patients Control Patients 30 15 30 – 0.766* 0.027* – 0.547* 0.035* – 0.585* 0.012* Control 15 – 0.877* 0.000* LNNB, Luria–Nebraska neuropsychological battery. *Significant Po0.05. R P There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in terms of the mean age and the mean years of education. Occupation, marital status, family history, and history of menstrual disturbance: there was a higher percentage of working women in the control group in comparison with 80% nonworking schizophrenic patients. Also, most of them were married in contrast to more single and divorced schizophrenic patients. 36.7% of schizophrenic patients had 32 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry menstrual irregularities compared with none in the control group. 53.3% of schizophrenic patients had a family history of psychosis in contrast to 6.7% in the control group. performance of memory function (short-term and intermediate memory) in patients with schizophrenia but not in the control group. Table 2 shows that delusions and positive formal thought disorders were the most common positive symptoms in our patients. Also, affective flattening or blunting and anhedonia-asociality were the most common negative symptoms in the patient group. Table 7 shows that the mean estradiol level is inversely correlated with the mean of scales ME1 (verbal memory) and ME2 (visual and complex memory), and this correlation was statistically significant in both the patient and the control group. Hormonal assessment Results of serum estradiol measurements: for the patient and control groups, the first samples presented a serum level of estradiol in the follicular phase and the second samples presented a serum level in the periovulatory phase. We excluded two patients as the first samples were more than 300 pg/ml. Thus, these samples did not represent the follicular phase in those patients. The serum estradiol levels measured in the third samples for the patient group were only used when assessing the correlation of estradiol level and different scales of LNNB. Table 3 shows that the mean serum estradiol level in all phases was higher in the control group than that in the patient group. The critical level The critical level represents the highest LNNB score, which can be considered normal for the battery and is adjusted for both age and education. Thus, scores above the critical level are considered impaired and scores below this level are considered normal. The critical level represents the cutoff point in other tests; it was 57.76 ± 3.28 in the patient group in contrast to 57.66 ± 3.11 in the control group, and there was no significant difference between the patient and the control group as P-value was greater than 0.05. This is very important for comparison of both. Clinical scales Table 4 also shows that there were statistically significant differences between the patient and control groups in the performance of C10 (memory). The patient group performed above the critical levels in this scale and the control group performed below the critical level ,that is, memory is impaired in the patient group and intact in the control group. Table 5 shows that there were statistically significant differences between the patient and control groups in terms of their performance on factor scales ME1 (verbal memory) and ME2 (visual and complex memory). The patient group performed above the critical levels on these factor scales and the control group performed below the critical level. This means that these functions are impaired in the patient group and intact in the control group. Results of correlations Table 6 shows that the mean estradiol level was inversely correlated with the scores of the C10 (memory) in the patient group and this correlation was significant statistically as P-value was less than 0.05. This means that a high estradiol level is correlated with good Table 8 shows that the mean estradiol levels of the patient group showed no significant correlation between the total SAPS and subscales of SAPS as the P-value was greater than 0.05 in all the correlations. Discussion This study is a case–control comparative study, with no statistically significant difference regarding age and years spent in education that was necessary in order to be able to complete the LNNB. Low rates of marriage in the patient group could be explained by the effect of the psychotic disorder on the patients’ coping mechanisms and the effect of the psychotic disorder on patients’ abilities to maintain normal life to maintain the relationship. Also, the early onset of schizophrenia may explain the low rates of marriage in some patients. Our results agree with those of Halari et al. (2004), who reported low number of married individuals among schizophrenic patients. The scale for the assessment of positive symptoms (SAPS) and scale for the assessment of negative symptoms (SANS). Andreasen (1984b) mean of total SAPS, delusions subscale, positive formal thought disorder, hallucinations subscale and bizarre behavior subscale were within the range of mild-moderate in severity. The means of total SANS, affective flattening or the blunting subscale of SANS, the Anhedonia-asociality subscale, the avolition-apathy subscale of SANS, the alogia subscale, and the attention subscale were within the range of mild-moderate severity. The scores of SAPS were inversely correlated with the scores of SANS. Thus, the means of SAPS and SANS for all the patients were in the mild to moderate range. Another explanation was that we excluded patients with marked to severe positive or negative symptoms, who may not be cooperative during the cognitive assessment. As regards the results of the hormonal assessment, the mean serum estradiol levels in the follicular phase, periovulatory, and both phases for the patient group were lower than those of the control group. We considered patients to have hypoestrogenism when they had a serum estradiol level below 30 pg/ml in the follicular phase and/or below 150 pg/ml in the luteal or periovulatory phase according to the laboratory of Obstetric and Gynecology Department at Kasr El-Aini university hospital. Thus, all the control cases were within normal levels. Five patients had hypoestrogenism in the follicular phase, nine patients had hypoestrogenism in the luteal or periovulatory phase, and four patients showed hypoestrogenism in both follicular and luteal phases. Thus, a total of 18 patients (60%) showed hypoestrogenism. This result agrees with that reported by Bergemann et al. (2005), who found hypoestrogenism Memory impairment in female schizophrenic patients Ahmed et al. 33 in 57.3% of the patients. Also, our result agrees with Ko et al. 2006, who found hypoestrogenism in 62.8% of patients with schizophrenia. There are many explanations for the hypoestrogenism in our study. Most of our patients (96.7%) were on treatment with conventional antipsychotics, which in particular are known to induce hyperprolactinemia, which reduces estrogen levels. The C10 (memory) scale basically tests short-term and intermediate memory. The study found that the patient group had mean scores of the C10 above the critical level. Also, the patient group performed significantly above the control group on scale C10. This means that schizophrenic patients had significant memory impairment. Also, there were statistically significant differences between the patient and control groups on factor scales: ME1 (verbal memory) and ME2 (visual and complex memory). Thus, impairment in schizophrenic patients involved short-term and intermediate memory, verbal memory, visual, and complex memory. This memory impairment may contribute to the development of the psychopathology of schizophrenia. These results agree with those reported in the literature. Valsharkey et al. (2000) reported that impaired memory is a prominent feature of schizophrenia. In general, patients tend to be impaired more on difficult memory tasks that require active processing of materials, whereas procedural learning that involves motor skills may be less impaired. Hoff et al. (2001), reported that with age and education controlled, the first-episode and chronic patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse than the normal participants on neuropsychological summery measures of verbal memory and spatial memory Danion et al. (1999), and Kuperberg and Heckers (2000) reported that memory deficits in schizophrenia are associated with an inability to link the separate aspects of events into a cohesive, memorable, and distinctive whole. Also, working memory deficits are well known in schizophrenia (Quintana et al., 2003; Meda et al., 2009; Palmer et al., 2010) Although most of the previous studies did not use the LNNB, it was highly correlated with tests of memory. For example, Buchanan et al. (2004) found a correlation between the Wechsler Memory Scale (Wechsler, 1987) and the LNNB C10 scale. They also found a 72% agreement between the scales on identification of memory impairment, and there are many correlation studies on the LNNB and other psychological tests, which are beyond the scope of this discussion. This is important so that we can compare the results from the LNNB with the results of other tests. In terms of the results of correlations, the study proved that the mean estradiol levels were inversely correlated with the mean performance of the C10 (memory) measuring short-term and intermediate memory, ME1 (verbal memory), and ME2 (visual and complex memory). All these correlations were statistically significant. This means that a high estradiol level is correlated with good performance of memory function (short-term and intermediate memory, verbal memory, visual and complex memory) in patients with schizophrenia but not in the control group. In our study, the estradiol level was correlated with higher performance on memory. These results agree with those reported by Ko et al. (2006) and Hoff et al. (2001), who reported that serum estradiol levels showed direct significant correlations with the verbal memory, verbal fluency, and executive functions, and also with Sherwin and McGill (2003), who found that estrogen has a positive effect on short-term and long-term verbal memory in postmenopausal women, as well as increasing the capacity for new learning. However, the study disagrees with Halari et al. (2004), who failed to found any correlation of estrogen with any cognitive domains. Other studies failed to find any effect of estrogen on cognitive functions in postmenopausal women for example: Duff and Hampson (2000) and Janowsky et al. (2000). Also, no differences in scores on tests of verbal memory, occurred in women 81 years old treated with either estrogen or progestin compared with those treated with placebo (Binder et al., 2001). Moreover, Barch et al. (2003) reported that estrogen plus progestin did not improve cognitive functions in women aged 65 years when compared with placebo. The study of Seeman and Fitzgerald (2000) summarized the possible roles of ERT itself as a hormonal therapy in female patients with schizophrenia, in that estrogen may be a useful addition to antipsychotic medication in terms of downregulating dopaminergic transmission and by its action on the serotonin system. Estrogen helps to ameliorate cyclical symptomatic fluctuations in women with resistant symptoms. It also preserves bone density and prevents cardiovascular disease, especially in menopausal women; also, estrogen may play a role in ameliorating or preventing symptoms of tardive dyskinesia. In addition, it can be used to counter the unwanted hyperprolactinemia effects that may have accompanied a lifetime of treatment with older antipsychotic medication (Kuperberg and Heckers, 2000). Also, Zec and Trivedi (2002) reported that ERT acts to maintain some aspects of cognition in postmenopausal women, especially verbal memory and learning, as their performance was better in 47% of memory measures in women who received ERT. Moreover, across these studies, there was a significantly higher percentage of significant positive findings for the tests of verbal compared with visual memory performance with ERT. The results of this study should be interpreted in the light of the following limitations: first, we did not include a normal control group with a low estrogen level to compare the results and the specificity of estrogen to memory impairment. Second, our sample was obtained from Alabbasia hospital with a high institutionalization rate with its impact on cognitive functions. Conclusion (1) Schizophrenia is associated with a poor work record and low marriage rates. (2) Female schizophrenic patients had a history of menstrual irregularities more than healthy normal 34 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry controls. Sixty percent of schizophrenic patients had hypoestrogenism at some point in their menstrual cycle. (3) Schizophrenic patients performed significantly worse than the normal healthy controls on the memory scales of the LNNB: clinical scale (C10) and the factor scales: ME1 (verbal memory) and ME2 (visual and complex memory). (4) Increased estrogen level was correlated with better performance of the patient group, as well as in healthy menstruating women in memory (intermediate-memory and short-term memory), verbal memory, and visual complex memory domains. (5) The estrogen level is not correlated with positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Recommendations (1) Further studies should be conducted to examine the effect of estrogen on other cognitive domains, that is, other memory aspects, for example, working memory, language, intellectual abilities, or on the patient’s functioning, quality of life, as we see part of the difficulty in establishing a cognitive profile in schizophrenia is the considerable interpatient heterogeneity in the level of cognitive impairment. Thus, it may be useful to examine the presence of relative cognitive weaknesses at an intraperson level. (2) A larger sample can be used and unhospitalized patients can also be studied. (3) Follow-up studies can be conducted for schizophrenic patients after hormonal replacement therapy when indicated and they can be compared with normal women receiving the same hormonal therapy as regards their cognitive abilities in order to examine the benefits of hormonal replacement therapy. Binder EF, Schechtman KB, Birge SJ, Williams DB, Kohrt WM (2001). Effects of hormone replacement therapy on cognitive performance in elderly women. Maturitas 38:137–146. Buchanan RW, Francis A, Arango C, Miller K, Lefkowitz DM, McMahon RP, et al. (2004). Morphometric assessment of the heteromodal association cortex in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 161:322–331. Danion JM, Rizzo L, Bruant A (1999). Functional mechanisms underlying impaired recognition memory and conscious awareness in patients with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 56:639–648. Duff SJ, Hampson E (2000). A beneficial effect of estrogen on working memory in postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy. Horm Behav 38:262–276. Fader AJ, Hendricson AW, Dohanich GP (1998). Estrogen improves performance of reinforced t-maze alternation and prevents the amnestic effects of scopolamine administered systemically or intrahippocampally. Neurobiol Learn Mem 69:225–240. Gibbs RB, Burke AM, Johnson DA (1998). Estrogen replacement attenuates effects of scopolamine and Lorazepam on memory acquisition and retention. Horm Behav 34:112–125. Golden CJ, Hammeke TA, Purisch AD (1995). The Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Manual. Los Angeles, California: Western Psychological Services. Green MF (2006). Cognitive impairment and functional outcome in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 67 (Suppl 9): 3–8. Halari R, Kumari V, Mehrotra R, Wheeler M, Hines M, Sharma T (2004). The relationship of sex hormones and cortisol with cognitive functioning in schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol 18:366–374. Hoff AL, Kremen WS, Wieneke MH, Lauriello J, Blankfeld HM, Faustman WO, et al. (2001). Association of estrogen levels with neuropsychological performance in women with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158:1134–1139. Janowsky JS, Chavez B, Orwoll E (2000). Sex steroids modify working memory. J Cogn Neurosci 12:407–414. Ko YH, Joe SH, Cho W, Park JH, Lee JJ, Jung IK, et al. (2006). Estrogen, cognitive function and negative symptoms in female schizophrenia. Neuropsychobiology 53:169–175. Kulkarni J, De Castella A, Smith D, Taffe J, Keks N, Copolov D (1996). A clinical trial of the effects of estrogen in acutely psychotic women. Schizophr Res 20:247–252. Kuperberg G, Heckers S (2000). Schizophrenia and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:205–210. Luine VN (1985). Estradiol increases choline acetyltransferase activity in specific basal forebrain nuclei and projection areas of female rats. Exp Neurol 89:484–490. McEwen B (2002). Estrogen actions throughout the brain. Recent Prog Horm Res 57:357–384. Meda SA, Stevens MC, Folley BS, Calhoun VD, Pearlson GD (2009). Evidence for anomalous network connectivity during working memory encoding in Schizophrenia: an ICA based analysis. PLoS ONE 4:11(art. no. e7911). Palmer BW, Savla GN, Fellows IE, Twamley EW, Jeste DV, Lacro JP (2010). Do people with schizophrenia have differential impairment in episodic memory and/or working memory relative to other cognitive abilities? Schizophr Res 116:259–265. Quintana J, Wong T, Ortiz-Portillo E, Kovalik E, Davidson T, Marder SR, et al. (2003). Prefrontal-posterior parietal networks in schizophrenia: primary dysfunctions and secondary compensations. Biol Psychiatry 53:12–24. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. References Andreasen NC (1984a). Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Iowa City: College of Medicine, the University of Iowa. Andreasen NC (1984b). Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Iowa City: College of Medicine, the University of Iowa. Barch DM, Sheline YI, Csernansky JG, Snyder AZ (2003). Working memory and prefrontal cortex dysfunction: specificity to schizophrenia compared with major depression. Biol Psychiatry 53:376–384. Bergemann N, Mundt C, Parzer P, Jannakos I, Nagl I, Salbach B, et al. (2005). Plasma concentrations of estradiol in women suffering from schizophrenia treated with conventional versus atypical antipsychotics. Schizophr Res 73:357–366. Seeman MV, Fitzgerald P (2000). Women and schizophrenia: clinical aspects. In: Castle DJ, McGrath J, Kulkarni J, editors. Women and schizophrenia. Cambridge, UK: University Press. pp. 35–50. Sherwin BB, McGill J (2003). Estrogen and cognitive functioning in women. Endocr Rev 24:133–151. Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I (2000). Estrogen is more than just a ‘sex hormone’: novel sites for estrogen action in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. Front Neuroendocrinol 21:95–101. Valsharkey RM, Allardyce J, McCreadie RG (2000). Cognitive function in a catchment-area-based population of patients with schizophrenia; Nithsdale Schizophrenia Surveys 20. British Journal of Psychiatry 177:348–353. Voytko ML (1996). Cognitive functions of the basal forebrain cholinergic system in monkeys: memory or attention? Behav Brain Res 75:13–25. Wechsler D (1987). Psychological corporation. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Zec RF, Trivedi MA (2002). The effects of estrogen replacement therapy on neuropsychological functioning in postmenopausal women with and without dementia: a critical and theoretical review. Neuropsychol Rev 12:65–109. Original article 35 Impact of the first national campaign against the stigma of mental illness Nahed Khairya, Emad Hamdia, Albert Sidrakb, Noha Sabrya, Mohamed Nasreldina, Aref Khoweileda and Nasser Lozab a Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University and b Mental Health Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Cairo, Egypt Correspondence to Mohamed Nasreldin, MD, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Tel: + 01223267788; fax: + 233386951; e-mail: [email protected] Received 6 April 2011 Accepted 23 September 2011 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 33:35–39 Background Egypt experienced its first nationally televised antistigma campaign in 2007. This independent study aims at a scientific evaluation of the potential benefits of this campaign. Methods Two educational clips lasting 1 or 2 min each were aired daily on prime time television between 1 and 31 October 2007. Five messages were relayed as the clip rolled on. A specially designed questionnaire covering six areas was used; these included demographics, identifying those who have seen the clips, memory and opinion about each message, stigma-related attitudes, and behavior toward the mentally ill persons. Twenty mental health workers with experience in field work ranging in training from 1 to 13 years received two training sessions. The questionnaire was piloted on 82 participants and subsequently modified. A total of 3000 participants who consented to being interviewed were selected to participate. The data of 2274 participants from the Greater Cairo region are reported in this study (75.8%). Results The study sample is more representative of the younger, as only 21% of the sample were above 46 years, educated, as only 18% were illiterate, married, as 55% of the sample were married, and employed sections of the population. A total of 55% reported that daily life stressors were the cause of mental illness. Only 17% of the study sample actually acknowledged seeing the antistigma adverts (campaign exposed, CE) and 83% were campaign unexposed. There were no statistically significant demographic differences between both groups. Among those who saw the campaign adverts, a significant proportion reported a number of positive effects on attitude and behavior. However, when CE and campaign unexposed participants were compared, no statistically significant differences emerged. A total of 50% of the participants remembered that mental illness is curable. The question that psychiatric patients are dangerous to self or others showed a statistically significant difference between participants who were CE and those who were not exposed. Conclusion The public were willing to express their opinions as they showed significant cooperativeness and validity of their answers, especially those exposed to the campaign. The television is the medium of choice that the public prefer is the evidence stated in the paper. The antistigma media campaign leads to changes in the attitude of participants who are exposed to mental illness. Positive messages influenced attitude change more. Keywords: antistigma, mental illness, stigma, television Egypt J Psychiatr 33:35–39 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 The stigma and discrimination experienced by persons with mental illness is a universal phenomenon. It is also linked to patients’ families, psychiatric institutions, and psychotropic medications (Sartorius et al., 1996). mental health services, and in those with limited services (Brundtland, 2001). Stigma is pernicious and unfortunately, there are indications that despite advances in psychiatry and medicine, stigma continues to grow and has more often terrible consequences for patients and families (Brundtland, 2001). Unlike other medical conditions, mental illness is recognized as an important barrier in countries rich and poor, big and small, in countries with well developed Mental health professionals are aware of the harmful effect of stigma against mental illness. It interferes at every stage in the diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation Introduction 1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000411119.59113.6e 36 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry of all types of mental disorders, and even forces people to avoid seeking psychiatric help. Fighting this stigma can improve the outcome of the disease, and allow the patients to make use of the new modalities of treatment that bring new hope to them (Wig, 1997). Stigma has long been viewed as a major barrier to mental health reform and community integration for people with mental disorders. Efforts to remove or reduce stigma are still in their infancy. Therefore, implementing antistigma programs to generate new knowledge and reduce discrimination toward people with mental disorders is necessary [World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 1998]. Aim of the work Stemming from the hypothesis that utilizing media can modify population’s attitude toward mental illness, this work aims at evaluating the utilization of media (through airing two educational clips targeted at raising awareness about the nature of mental illness and its curability) on the sample population. Participants and methods Participants The total number of participants interviewed was 3000; in this study, data from 2773 participants are reported. For the remaining 227 participants, various mistakes in data collection, data recording, and data entry necessitated exclusion (noncompletion rate 7.5%). The data collected are representative of the nationally recognized representative numbers of age groups, literacy groups, and sex (according to the 2007 census). Interviewing of the participants was completed over 5 weeks covering greater Cairo and other dispersed areas. Interviews were individually conducted (one on one). In the case of illiteracy, the questionnaire would be read without explanation in order not to influence choice. The antistigma campaign Two educational clips lasting about 2 min each aired on prime time television (TV) within the breaks of two nationally acclaimed household programs during the period of 1–31 October daily during Ramadan in 2008. Clip 1 shows a conversation between the actors, one posing as a recovered psychiatric patient and the other posing as a salesman who has a dramatic change in attitude when he finds out that he is speaking to a mentally ill person. Clip 2 shows an encounter between two people, one applying for a job and the other a human resource manager. The former is rejected on the basis of his psychiatric history. Five messages were narrated as the clip rolled on. These messages were as follows: (i) daily stressors are among the causes of mental illness; (ii) an invitation to critically appraise the following sentence: ‘This is a psychiatric patient, stay away’; (iii) mental illness is recognizable, diagnosable, and treatable; (iv) mental illness is like any other illness, potentially curable; and (v) an invitation to critically appraise the following sentence: ‘Once mentally ill, always mentally ill’. Assessment instrument: a specially Table 1 Characteristics of the survey participantsa Variable Sex Male Female Age (mean = 34 years) 14 years or less Between 15 and 25 Between 26 and 36 Between 36 and 45 Between 46 and 59 Above 60 Marital status Married Single Divorced Widowed Educational level Illiterate Can read and write Primary Preparatory Secondary Technical degree University degree Employed/unemployed Employmentb Unemployed Housewivesc Students Retired Type of Work Skilled Unskilled Admin/clerical Professional Self-employed Experience with mental illness No EMI Any EMI Self Relative Self and relative Exposure to Campaign Campaign Exposed Campaign Unexposed N = 2701 Population (%) 1400 1373 51% 49% 44 963 693 417 417 167 N = 2768 1510 1062 53 143 N = 2773 504 212 41 290 750 207 679 N = 2737 1909 137 405 284 2 1.6% 34.7% 25% 15% 15% 6% Population (%) 55% 38% 2% 5% Population (%) 18% 7.6% 1.5% 10.5% 27% 7.5% 28% Population (%) 69% 5% 15% 10% 0.1% 518 277 531 179 346 N = 2773 2438 369 101 251 17 N = 2773 459 2284 19% 10% 19% 6.5% 12.5% Population (%) 86.7% 12% 3.6% 9% 0.7% Population (%) 16.6% 82.4% EMI; experience with mental illness. a Total number on which percents are based may vary because of missing data for some participants. b Including both full-timers and part-timers. c Status of housewives in the Egyptian Society discussed within the paper. Table 2 Beliefs about the causes of mental illness and the factor that needs to be addressed/manipulated to alleviate stigma Variable Beliefs about the causes of mental illness Stressors Lack of religion/faith Heredity Upbringing Addiction Message required to get through Psychiatric illness is like any other illness Psychiatric patients get well Reassessment of stereotypes is required Psychiatric illness is not synonymous to dangerousness Some geniuses have had psychiatric illness N = 2773 % 1557 448 325 300 127 56.1% 16.1% 11.7% 10.8% 5.1% 1098 536 493 418 40% 19% 18% 15% 220 8% Impact of the first national campaign Khairy et al. 37 Table 3 Comparison between those who had watched the clip (campaign exposed) and those who had not watched the clip (campaign unexposed) CU (N = 2284) CE (N = 459) Variable N % N % P Sex Male 1181 51.7 199 43.3 Po0.001 w2 = 13.8 1103 34 ± 13.6 48.3 260 33 ± 13.4 56.6 639 28 70 15.2 276 778 595 12.1 34 26.1 54 175 160 11.8 38.1 34.1 655 29.1 162 35.8 Employed Marital status Single 1598 70.9 291 64.2 865 38 185 40.3 Married Divorced/widowed Message remembered Daily stressors may be responsible ‘This is a psychiatric patient: stay away’ Mental illness is diagnosable and treatable Mental illness is like any other illness ‘If a psychiatric patient once, always a psychiatric patient’ Message agreed with Daily stressors may be responsible 1244 170 54.5 7.5 N = 2248 1998 % 87.5 248 26 N = 459 203 216 229 219 178 N = 459 423 54 5.7 % 44 47 50 48 39 % 92 ‘This is a psychiatric patient: stay away’ 1776 78 402 88 Mental illness is diagnosable and treatable 1893 83 414 90 Mental illness is like any other illness 1242 54 315 69 391 17 45 10 517 27 83 18 Psychiatric illness is related to will power 1241 54 284 62 Psychiatric patients are dangerous to self or others 1815 79.5 319 70 384 17 64 15 N = 2284 198 % 9 24 5 Marriage (self or relative) 751 33 219 48 To isolate 701 31 95 21 Hilarity 378 16 45 10 Employ 1223 53.5 296 64.5 678 30 117 25.5 1672 60 351 82 546 58 20 2 96 7 15 3 1752 76.7 381 83 487 40 21.3 1.8 68 8 15 2 256 118 48 20 9 7 56 26 10.5 4.4 2 1.5 1028 778 294 96 60 19 45 34 13 4.2 2.6 0.8 Female Mean age Educational status Illiterate/read and write Primary/preparatory school Secondary school/vocational education University degree Employment status Unemployed ‘If a psychiatric patient once, always a psychiatric patient’ Concepts leading to discrimination of mental patients Psychiatric patients are exaggerating All criminals are psychiatrically ill Attitude towards mental patients Friendship Would stay at home if psychiatric patient Neighbor’s illness Visit Phone Relocate Relative’s illness Seek psychiatric help Faith healer Traditional healer Tool recommended to influence public opinion TV Cable Places of worship Newspapers Posters NGOs CE, campaign exposed; CU, campaign unexposed; NGO, nongovernmental organization; TV, television. t = 0.78 Po0.4 Po0.0001 w2 = 48.8 Po0.004 w2 = 0.28 Po0.48 w2 = 7.4 Po0.008 w2 = 17.2 Po0.0001 w2 = 46.6 Po0.0001 w2 = 32.4 Po0.0001 w2 = 37.7 Po0.000 w2 = 29.6 Po0.13 w2 = 7.1 Po0.298 w2 = 9.5 Po0.0001 w2 = 24.9 Po0.959 w2 = 1.5 Po0.026 w2 = 17.4 Po0.0001 w2 = 45.8 Po0.002 w2 = 20.4 Po0.041 w2 = 18.9 Po0.011 w2 = 19.8 Po0.317 w2 = 9.3 Po0.36 w2 = 8.7 Po0.07 w2 = 11.5 38 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry designed questionnaire was prepared by E.H. and N.K. in colloquial Arabic. The questionnaire consists of six sections that include the following: demographics (age, marital status, educational level, employment if any, and type of job), identifying people who have seen the clips or posters, inquiring whether each message is remembered and gathering opinion about it, attitude toward the mentally ill persons, and behavior toward the mentally ill persons. It was handed out by social workers and a psychologist who attended two training sessions. Data entry and statistical analysis A predesigned SPSS (Version 15, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) datasheet was distributed to all participants, and training on data entry and coding was conducted in collective setting, where all administrators and data enterers were present. Four of the administrators were supervised by one of the researchers. Data analysis was carried out using the SPSS version 16. Simple descriptive statistics were used as frequencies and percentages for descriptive purposes. Inferential statistics for categorical data in the form of the w2-test were used to compare the results of the different study groups. The P-value was considered significant at less than 0.05. Results Regarding the characteristics of the survey participants, the study results showed that 51% of the study sample were men and the mean age was 34 years, 55% of the sample were married, only 28% were university degree educated, 86.7% had no experience with mental illness, and 82% were campaign unexposed (Table 1). Regarding the beliefs on the causes of mental illness and the factor that needs to be addressed/manipulated to alleviate stigma stressors as a cause of mental illness, 56.1 and 40% of the study sample Table 4 Comparison between participants who are psychiatrically naive and those who are psychiatrically exposed (whether for self, for a relative, or both) Variable Message agreed with Psychiatric patients get well Psychiatric illness is like any other illness Reassessment of stereotypes is required Psychiatric illness is not synonymous to dangerousness Some geniuses have had psychiatric illness PN PE N (%) N (%) 456 903 375 193 (20) 73 (16) (39.6) 186 (40.6) (16.4) 110 (24) (8.5) 25 (5.4) 350 (15.3) 64 (14) PE, psychiatrically exposed; PN, psychiatrically naive. reported that psychiatric illnesses are like any illness (Table 2). On comparing participants who had watched the clip (campaign exposed) with those who had not watched the clip (campaign unexposed), statistically significant differences were observed between them regarding the sex of the participants, educational level, opinion on the messages, and attitudes toward mental illness (Table 3). Comparison between participants who are psychiatrically naive (PN) and those who are psychiatrically exposed (PE; whether for self, for a relative, or both) showed that 20% of those who were PN and only 16% of those who were PE reported that psychiatric patients get well. In addition, 40.6% of the population who were PE reported that psychiatric illness is like any other illness (Table 4). Comparison between participants who are campaign exposed and those who are campaign unexposed regarding uncooperativeness and the validity of their answers showed a statistically significant difference (Table 5). Discussion Stigma has long been viewed as a major barrier to mental health reform and community integration for people with mental disorders. Knowledge on how to remove or reduce stigma is still in its infancy (Sartorius, 2000). Regarding the beliefs that influence stereotype formation, our results showed that stressors were a cause of mental illness, followed by lack of religion/faith, followed by heredity and upbringing, respectively. This highlights the importance of a future antistigma program to generate new knowledge about causal mechanisms underlying mental illness as it is consistent with the result that 40% of the sample reported that the message required to get across was that psychiatric illness is like any other illness (Lauber et al., 2004). In addition, these reflect the need for an effective antistigma program to reduce discrimination of people with mental disorders to build confidence in mentally ill persons, family members, program funders, and policy makers. TV and cable are the tools recommended to deliver future messages and influence public opinion as they target a very large number of people freely and are considered as important tools to inform and educate the public about mental illness and promote the acceptance of mental illness as the majority of our community received limited education or were illiterate and only 35% of the sample were university or secondary degree educated (Arboleda Florez, 2003; Al Gohary, 2005). The broadcast messages reached only 20% of the study sample (campaign exposed), with a higher number of women, which did not match the Table 5 Comparison between participants who are campaign exposed and those who are campaign unexposed regarding uncooperativeness and validity of their answers CE CU Total t-test Cooperativeness of interviewed participants 8.77 ± 1.24 8.46 ± 1.27 8.51 ± 1.28 Validity of interviewed participants 8.51 ± 1.34 8.21 ± 1.33 8.25 ± 1.35 T = 4.72 Po0.0001 T = 4.38 Po0.0001 CE, campaign exposed; CU, campaign unexposed. Impact of the first national campaign Khairy et al. 39 Austrian (9) initiative to use mass media as an antistigma tool as the broadcast message reached 46% of the total television viewing audience. This could be attributed to the time of broadcasting the clip, which was during Ramadan after breakfast at the time of prayer and on national TV, which has a limited audience compared with cable. A higher number of women watched the clip as they are at home for a longer period of time than men (Al Gohary, 2005). There are a statistically difference between the two groups those who watched the clip and those who has not along the different messages agreed upon it. In addition, the clips were supposed to convey their messages focusing on one of the three outcomes: an improvement in knowledge, attitude, or behavior (Okasha and Stefanis, 2005). These messages were that daily stressors may be responsible for reflecting knowledge about mental illness; ‘This is a psychiatric patient: stay away,’ reflecting a behavior toward mental illness and measuring social distance (Okasha and Stefanis, 2005); mental illness is diagnosable and treatable, reflecting knowledge about mental illness (Okasha and Stefanis, 2005); mental illness is like any other illness, reflecting knowledge and a tolerant attitude toward mental illness; and ‘If a psychiatric patient once, always a psychiatric patient’, reflecting knowledge about mental illness (Okasha and Stefanis, 2005). All these messages highlighted the fact that the most relevant objectives for mentally ill persons and family members relate to the way people behave toward people with a mental illness and the societal structures that create and perpetuate social disadvantages (Amer et al., 2007; Hamdi et al., 2007). This means that the messages were clear, relevant, understandable, and considered to be measurable outcome results of the antistigma clips, and it coincided with the WPA’s mission to improve the lives of mental patients and to reduce the discriminatory behavior that has the most direct and damaging effect (Brundtland, 2001). Early successes of any program related to short-term outcomes create agreement, morale community support and can be used to marshal the additional resources needed to bring about long-term changes (Posavac and Carey, 1992). However, one of the pitfalls of this program is the absence of pretesting to compare the results (preprogramming and postprogramming), to measure existing levels of knowledge, attitudes, or socially distancing behavior in the population, to identify problems in logistics and familiarity or difficulty of the words to increase the usability of the results. However, good antistigma outcomes also need to be strategic. In this context, strategic means directing efforts to specific subpopulations, and our program was directed toward the general population. Regarding the potential impact of psychiatric exposure (PE) on the response to the campaign, the comparison between participants who are PE (whether for self, for a relative, or both) and those who are PN showed a statistical significance. Conclusion The public are willing to express their opinions as they showed significant cooperativeness and validity of their answers, especially those exposed to the campaign. The TV is the medium of choice that the public prefers is the evidence stated in the paper. The antistigma media campaign led to changes in the attitude of participants who were exposed to mental illness and its results could be generalized had the outcomes been clearly identified, preexposure and postexposure assessment; the postexposure assessment should be carried out shortly after the exposure, the given questions should be standardized and simple, and finally proper time for broadcasting should be chosen. Positive messages influenced attitude change more. Acknowledgements A Christian Orthodox NGO by the name of ‘‘The Best Life’’ provided the volunteers, who were trained to conduct the questionnaire and enter data. This organization provides services for combating drug addiction and the stigma of AIDS. The Finnish mental health program for Egypt funded the research. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. References Al Gohary M (2005). Record mental illness representation in Egyptian folklore. In: Othman S, Sa’dalla N, editors. Health and sickness: a socioanthropological perspective. Alexandria: Dar L Aa’refa al Gami’’eya. Amer D, Abdou A, Nasreldin M (2007). Cultural beliefs and help seeking behavior in Egyptian psychiatric patients and their families. J Ment Illn 40:150–165. Arboleda Florez J (2003). Considerations on the stigma of mental illness. Can J Psychiatry 48:645–650. Brundtland GH (2001). From the World Health Organization. Mental health: new understanding, new hope. JAMA 286:2391. Hamdi E, Rakhawy M, Sabry N, Ramy H, Hamed H, Rakhawy M, et al (2007). The attitude and use of faith healing by people with mental disorders: a community survey. Arab Journal of Psychiatry 21:24–49. Lauber C, Nordt C, Falcato L, Rössler W (2004). Factors influencing social distance toward people with mental illness. Community Ment Health J 40: 265–274. Okasha A, Stefanis CN (2005). Perspectives on the stigma of mental illness. Geneva: World Psychiatric Association (WPA). Posavac EI, Carey RG (1992). Program evaluation: methods and case studies. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Sartorius N (2000). Breaking the vicious cycle. Ment Health Learn Dsiabil Care 4:80. Sartorius N, Gulbinat W, Harrison G, Laska E, Siegel C (1996). Long-term followup of schizophrenia in 16 countries. A description of the International Study of Schizophrenia conducted by the World Health Organization. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 31:249–258. Wig NN (1997). Stigma against mental illness. Indian J Psychiatry 39:187–189. World Psychiatric Association (WPA) (1998). Global program against stigma and discrimination because of schizophrenia. Bourg - Switzerland: World Psychiatric Association (WPA). 40 Original article Cognitive functions in euthymic adolescents with juvenile bipolar disorder Lamis El Ray, Aref Khoweiled, Hoda Abdou, Shreen Abd El-Mawella and Mai Abdel Samie Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Correspondence to Lamis Ali El Ray, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Tel/fax: + 02 23651929; e-mail: lamis [email protected] Received 22 December 2010 Accepted 24 March 2011 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 33:40–44 Introduction Bipolar disorder in adolescents is often referred to as juvenile bipolar disorder. A peak in the prevalence of bipolar disorder has been documented between the ages of 15 and 19 years. Wide-ranging neuropsychological deficits have been found in many studies of juvenile bipolar disorder. Persistent neuropsychological deficits present in the euthymic state suggest that such deficits could be vulnerability trait markers of the illness. Aim To identify and assess cognitive functioning in euthymic adolescents diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Participants and methods A case–control cross sectional study, in which 30 euthymic bipolar adolescents were recruited from the psychiatric adolescent clinic of Kasr al Ainy and compared with 30 healthy controls. Psychometric procedure The Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression, the Young Mania Rating Scale, the letter cancellation test, the digit span and digit symbol/coding tests, the Bender gestalt test and the Wisconsin card sorting test were used. Results Cases had significantly higher mean scores than controls in the letter cancellation test and its omission errors as well as in the perseverative errors of the Wisconsin card sorting test, and lower mean scores in the digit span, digit symbol coding and the Bender gestalt tests. There was a significant positive correlation between the number of omission errors on the letter cancellation test and both of the number of manic episodes and the age of onset of the illness. Conclusion There are neuropsychological deficits in the areas of sustained attention, set shifting, processing speed and visual and auditory short-term memory in euthymic bipolar adolescent patients, type I. There is a significant correlation between the number of manic episodes as well as age of illness onset and sustained attention. Keywords: euthymia, juvenile bipolar disorder, neuropsychological deficits Egypt J Psychiatr 33:40–44 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 Introduction Bipolar disorder in adolescents is often referred to as juvenile bipolar disorder (Cahill et al., 2009). It is a disabling condition characterized by extreme affective and behavioural dysregulation, aggression, severe irritability and a chronic course (Biederman, 2003). In clinical trials, euthymia in bipolar disorder is conventionally defined as scores below a certain threshold, but not zero, on the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) (Pizzagalli et al., 2008). During euthymia, bipolar patients exhibit minimal symptoms by definition, although a persistent vulnerability for mood dysregulation is always present. This persistent vulnerability has been hypothesized to result from over-reactive emotional (i.e. anterior limbic) brain networks (Phillips et al., 2003). If correct, this hypothesis suggests that, even 1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry during euthymia, dysfunction within the anterior limbic network persists, leaving patients at risk for mood and cognitive disturbances (Strakowski et al., 2004). Wideranging deficits have been found in many studies of juvenile bipolar disorder (Olvera et al., 2005; Bearden et al., 2007). Persistent neuropsychological deficits present in the euthymic state of bipolar affective disorder, particularly impairment in sustained attention, suggest that such deficits could be vulnerability trait markers of the illness (Thompson et al., 2005). Aim The aim of this work is to identify and assess the cognitive impairment of euthymic adolescents diagnosed with bipolar disorder on neuropsychological measures of DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000411121.54126.e5 Cognitive functions in euthymic adolescents El Ray et al. 41 sustained attention, short-term memory, processing speed and set shifting after exclusion of other comorbid psychiatric disorders. Participants and methods A total of 30 adolescents diagnosed with bipolar disorder type I participated in this research. All the patients were selected from the Kasr Al Aini adolescent outpatient psychiatric clinic. Both male and female patients were included. They were between the ages of 13 and 19 years, met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria for bipolar disorder type I and were euthymic during application of the psychometric tools, which was defined in our study as scores of 7 or below on both the 17-item HRSD and the Young Mania Rating Scale. All patients with comorbid psychiatric disorder, a history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder before the onset of the disorder, intelligence quotient less than 90, any neurological deficit or chronic illness, a history of significant head trauma, electroconvulsive therapy in the past 6 months or those who were illiterate were excluded. The control group was selected to match the patients’ group for age, sex and educational level. All control participants had no past history of psychiatric or neurological disorders or family history of psychiatric disorders. The diagnosis of bipolar disorder type I as well as the exclusion of psychiatric co morbidities and history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder starting before the onset of the bipolar disorder was established by interviewing the patients and at least one of their parents using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia in school-aged children (KSADS-PL) (Kaufman et al., 1997). A written informed consent was obtained from parents for their minor adolescents and from the participants themselves if they were aged 18 years or older. Tools Semistructural interview A specially designed semistructural interview derived from the Kasr Al Aini psychiatric sheet was used to cover demographic data, personal data, past history and family history. The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia in school-aged children (Kaufman et al., 1997) The K-SADS-PL is a semistructured diagnostic interview designed to assess current and past episodes of psychopathology in children and adolescents according to DSMIII-R and DSM-IV criteria. Probes and objective criteria are provided to rate individual symptoms. The K-SADSPL is administered by interviewing the parent(s), the child and finally achieving summary ratings that include all sources of information (parent, child, school). When administering the instrument to preadolescents, the parent interview should be conducted first. In working with adolescents, the interview should be conducted first with them, followed by the parent, which was followed in our research. The majority of the items in K-SADS-PL are scored using a 0–3-point rating scale. Score of 0 indicate that no information is available; a score of 1 suggests that the symptom is not present; a score of 2 indicates subthreshold levels of symptomatology; and a score of 3 represents threshold criterion. The remaining items are rated on a 0–2-point rating scale, in which 0 implies no information; 1 implies that the symptom is not present; and 2 implies that the symptom is present. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (Hamilton, 1960) The HRSD is the most widely used clinician-administered depression assessment scale. We have used the 17-item version, where a score of 0–7 is accepted to be within the normal range or in clinical remission. It has been used to ensure the euthymic state of cases after interviewing them using the K-SADS-PL. Young Mania Rating Scale (Young et al., 1978) It is a clinician-rated scale used to rate the severity of manic symptoms. The items rated are elevated mood, increased motor activity, sexual interest, sleep, irritability, speech and language, content of thought, disruptive or aggressive behaviour, appearance and insight. Scoring of each item is between 0 and 4 points. The cases had to score 7 or less to be considered euthymic and thus to be included in the study. Letter cancellation test (Diller et al., 1974) It is a measure of sustained attention (Ronald et al., 2000). It has been applied in its Arabic version, where participants were asked to cancel two fixed Arabic letters whenever they found them amidst 19 rows of Arabic letters, as fast as they could. The time in seconds taken by each participant to complete this task was calculated. Whenever any of the letters to be cancelled was missed, this was considered an omission error. We used the Arabic version by El Kholi (1985). Digit span (Meleka and Ismail, 1996, 1999) It is one of the subtests of both the adult and the child Wechsler Intelligence Scale used to measure auditory short-term memory. The candidate was asked to repeat a dictated series of digits forward and another backward, with two trials each time. The final score was calculated by adding the score of the forward series to that of the backward series. Digit symbol coding (Meleka and Ismail, 1996, 1999) It is one of the subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale used to measure processing speed (Doyle et al., 2005). In the Arabic version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children that was applied with participants below 16 years, the participants had to transcribe a digit symbol code as quickly as possible for a duration of 2 min, whereas in the adult version, used when participants were 16 years or above, participants had to transcribe the digit symbol code as quickly as possible for a duration of 90 s. The number of correct transcriptions completed by the participant in the given time was counted to yield the final score. Bender gestalt test (Bender, 1938) It is a measure of visual short-term memory and visual motor maturity (McCarthy et al., 2002). It was formulated 42 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry by Lauretta Bender, a child neuropsychiatrist. The version used in our study comprises six figures on six separate cards. The cards were shown one after the other to each participant, who was instructed to draw each figure carefully, bearing in mind that he would be asked to recall the six figures after about 2 min. Scoring was carried out according to a standardized scoring system, where each recalled figure would receive a score between 0 and 5 points according to the accuracy of the details recalled. Table 2 Pattern of intake of psychotropic medication Type of medication Typical antipsychotic Atypical antipsychotic Antiepileptic drug Lithium SSRIs intake (fluoxetine) Anticholinergic drug % of negative intake % of positive intake 23.3 56.7 10.0 93.3 93.3 43.3 76.7 43.3 90.0 6.7 6.7 56.7 Table 3 Neuropsychological test scores in both groups Wisconsin card sorting test Neuropsychological tests The purpose of this test is to assess the ability to form abstract concepts, to shift and maintain set and to utilize feedback. The test is considered a measure of executive function (Heaton et al., 1993) in that it requires strategic planning, organized searching, the ability to use environmental feedback to shift cognitive set, goal-oriented behaviour and the ability to modulate impulsive responding. The test can be used with individuals aged 5 to 89 years. The time required is about 15–30 min (Strauss et al., 2006). The statistical methods Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package of Social Science, version 16 (SPSS-V16, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analysis was performed using frequency tests, pie and bar charts. The student’s unpaired ttest was used to compare quantitative data between two groups and the analysis of variance and the post-hoc tests were used to compare quantitative data between more than two groups. The correlation between different quantitative data was assessed using the Pearson correlation test. Finally, the w2-test with Yates correction was used for the analysis of categorical data. The level of significance was set at P less than 0.05. Results 53.3% of the cases were women and 46.7% were men. The mean age of the cases was 18.03. The case and control groups were matched in terms of age, sex and educational level (P = 1, 1, 0.6, respectively) (Tables 1–4). There were no statistically significant differences between cases with positive and negative intake of any of the classes of psychotropic drugs used by the cases at the time of assessment as regards the mean scores of the neuropsychological tests. Table 1 Clinical data of cases Clinical data HRSD YMRS Age of onset Manic episodes Depressive episodes Hospitalization Duration of illness Mean SD N 0.4000 1.3667 14.9667 1.6667 0.7333 0.2667 3.0667 1.19193 1.67091 1.06620 0.88409 0.86834 0.44978 1.14269 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 HRSD, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; YMRS, Young Mania Rating Scale. Mean Letter cancellation Controls 30 75.5667 Cases 30 116.07 Omission errors in letter cancellation Controls 30 0.0000 Cases 30 2.4667 Digit span Controls 30 10.0000 Cases 30 8.3667 Digit symbol coding Controls 30 51.1667 Cases 30 29.6333 Bender gestalt Controls 30 19.9333 Cases 30 15.2667 Perseverative errors in WCST Controls 30 3.5667 Cases 30 39.5333 SD P 10.45741 25.44220 0.000 0.00000 3.54024 0.000 1.64002 1.44993 0.000 5.63293 9.33840 0.000 2.66437 3.05053 0.000 2.45909 13.23979 0.000 WCST, Wisconsin card sorting test. Discussion Our study aimed at assessing the performance of euthymic adolescent patients with bipolar disorder on neuropsychological measures of sustained attention, shortterm memory, processing speed and set shifting. The comparison between the neuropsychological test scores of our cases and controls revealed that the euthymic patients showed poorer performance than controls in the letter cancellation test, which is a measure of sustained attention, with a highly significant statistical difference between the mean scores of both groups on this test. This is consistent with findings in the study conducted by Kolur et al. (2006) and where euthymic bipolar patients showed poorer performance than healthy controls on tests of sustained attention. However, this finding is not concordant with the study by DelBello et al. (2004), where no statistically significant difference was found between the performance of euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls in tests of sustained attention, but this may be due to the small sample size in their study (10 cases and a matched control group). The euthymic patients in our study also showed poorer performance than controls on the digit span test, which is a measure of auditory short-term memory, with a highly significant difference between the mean scores of both groups in this test. This finding is consistent with the findings by Gruber et al. (2007), where euthymic bipolar patients showed an impaired auditory short-term memory in comparison with healthy controls. However, this finding was in contrast to a recent study by Langenecker et al. (2010), where euthymic patients showed no impairment Cognitive functions in euthymic adolescents El Ray et al. 43 Table 4 Correlation between clinical data and neuropsychological test scores Age of onset Pearson’s correlation P-value Manic episodes Pearson’s correlation P-value Depressive episodes Pearson’s correlation P-value Hospitalization Pearson’s correlation P-value Duration ff illness Pearson’s correlation P-value Letter cancellation Omission errors Digit span – 0.086 0.650 0.443* 0.014 0.075 0.693 – 0.207 0.271 0.602** 0.000 – 0.254 0.176 Digit symbol BG Perseverative errors 0.078 0.681 – 0.061 0.750 – 0.304 0.102 0.152 0.421 0.043 0.821 – 0.196 0.299 – 0.011 0.955 0.199 0.292 – 0.194 0.305 – 0.289 0.122 – 0.076 0.688 0.289 0.122 0.258 0.169 – 0.146 0.442 – 0.049 0.796 0.008 0.968 – 0.305 0.101 – 0.146 0.440 – 0.027 0.886 0.077 0.685 0.089 0.641 – 0.253 0.178 0.084 0.660 0.098 0.607 BG, bender gestalt test. *Statistically significant. **High statistical significance. in auditory memory ability, although the sample size in the latter was larger. Moreover, the patients in our study showed poorer performance than controls in the Bender gestalt test, which is a measure of visual short-term memory, also with a statistically significant difference between both groups. This is concordant with the study by Langenecker et al. (2010) but is inconsistent with the study by Pavuluri et al. (2006), where there was no difference between euthymic patients and controls as regards visual short-term memory. In addition, the cases and controls in our study showed a statistically significant difference between their mean scores on the digit symbol coding test, where cases showed a poorer performance, revealing impairment in mental processing speed. This finding is consistent with the findings obtained in a study conducted by Langenecker et al. (2010). Regarding the performance on the Wisconsin card sorting test, the patients in our study committed more perseverative errors than controls, with a statistically significant difference, which revealed a deficit in set shifting ability in cases. This finding is in agreement with the findings in the study by Trivedi et al. (2007), where euthymic patients committed more perseverative errors than healthy controls on the Wisconsin card sorting test, also with a statistically significant difference between both groups. As for the correlation between the clinical variables and the mean neuropsychological scores of the patients in our study, the number of manic episodes was positively correlated to the mean number of omission errors in the letter cancellation test, which is statistically significant (i.e. the number of manic episodes was negatively correlated to the sustained attention function of the euthymic patients in our study).This is consistent with the findings in the study by Clark et al. (2002), where sustained attention performance suffered with increasing burden of manic episodes. In our study, the age of illness onset, like the number of manic episodes, was positively correlated to the mean number of omission errors on the letter cancellation test, which is consistent with the finding obtained by Martinez Aran et al. (2004b), where the age of onset of illness was also positively correlated to a score on a measure of sustained attention (i.e. those with a later onset of illness performed more poorly on measures of sustained attention). In our study, no statistically significant correlation was found between the duration of illness and any of the neuropsychological test scores, which was concordant with a study assessing the same neuropsychological functions in euthymic bipolar patients (Kolur et al., 2006). As regards the number of depressive episodes, no significant correlation was found between the number of depressive episodes and any of the neuropsychological scores in our study, which is in agreement with the findings obtained in the study conducted by Martinez Aran et al. (2004b), where no significant correlation was found between the number of depressive episodes and scores on measures of verbal memory and sustained attention. Moreover, no significant correlation was found between the number of hospitalizations and any of the neuropsychological scores in our study, which is similar to the findings obtained by Cavanagh et al. (2002), where no significant relationship was found between the total number of hospitalizations and executive function, psychomotor speed and visual recognition. It is also concordant with the finding obtained by Clark et al. (2002), where no significant relationship was found between the total number of hospital admissions and measures of sustained attention, set shifting, verbal memory and speed of information processing. Moreover, this similarity was present despite the fact that these two studies included patients of an older age group than those in our study, with more number of hospitalizations. As for the intake of psychotropic medication, no statistically significant difference was found between cases with positive and negative intake of typical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, antiepileptics, anticholinergic drugs and antidepressants as regards neuropsychological 44 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry test scores, which are consistent with the finding in the study by Kolur et al. (2006). Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between cases with positive and negative intake of lithium as regards neuropsychological test scores, which is similar to the finding in the study conducted by Martinez Aran et al. (2004a) and also by Kolur et al. (2006). Limitations Our study was cross sectional, whereas longitudinal studies can track the decline in neuropsychological function with illness progression better and can also track the impact of medication on cognition more accurately. Our study was not drug free; although no significant relationship was found between psychotropic drug intake and neuropsychological test scores in our study and similar others, yet, the effect of psychotropic drugs on cognition cannot be excluded. However, for euthymia to be established, being drug free is quite a remote possibility; moreover, it gives rise to ethical issues. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. References Bearden CE, Glahn DC, Caetano S, Olvera RL, Fonseca M, Najt P, et al. (2007). Evidence for disruption in prefrontal cortical functions in juvenile bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 9 (Suppl 1): 145–159. Bender L (1938). Visual motor gestalt and its clinical use. New York: American Orthopsychiatry Association. Biederman J (2003). Pediatric bipolar disorder coming of age. Biol Psychiatry 53:931–934. Cahill CM, Walter G, Malhi GS (2009). Neurocognition in bipolar disorder and juvenile bipolar disorder. J Can Acad Child and Adolesc Psychiatry 18:221–230. Cavanagh JT, Van Beck M, Muir W, Blackwood DH (2002). Case-control study of neurocognitive function in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder: an association with mania. Br J Psychiatry 180:320–326. Clark L, Iversen SD, Goodwin GM (2002). Sustained attention deficit in bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry 180:313–319. DelBello MP, Zimmerman ME, Mills NP, Getz GE, Strakowski SM (2004). Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of amygdala and other subcortical brain regions in adolescents with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 6:43–52. Diller L, Ben Yishay Y, Gerstman LJ, Goodkin R, Gordon W, Weinberg J (1974). Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia. New York: New York University Medical Center Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. Doyle AE, Wilens TE, Kwon A, Seidman LJ, Faraone SV, Fried R, et al. (2005). Neuropsychological functioning in youth with bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 58:540–548. El Kholi SW (1985). Attention in psychiatric patients. A psychometric study. MA Thesis, Faculty of Arts. Gruber S, Rathgeber K, Bräunig P, Gauggel S (2007). Stability and course of neuropsychological deficits in manic and depressed bipolar patients compared to patients with major depression. J Affect Disord 104: 61–71. Hamilton M (1960). A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23:56–62. Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtiss G (1993). Wisconsin card sort test manual: revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, et al. (1997). Schedule for affective disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age ChildrenPresent and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:980–988. Kolur US, Reddy YCJ, John JP, Kandavel T, Jain S (2006). Sustained attention and executive functions in euthymic young people with bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry 189:453–458. Langenecker SA, Saunders EFH, Kade AM, Ransom MT, McInnis MG (2010). Intermediate: cognitive phenotypes in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disorders 122:285–293. Martinez Aran A, Vieta E, Colom F, Torrent C, Sanchez Moreno J, Reinares M, et al. (2004a). Cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar patients: implications for clinical and functional outcome. Bipolar Disord 6:224–232. Martinez Aran A, Vieta E, Reinares M, Colom F, Torrent C, Sanchez Moreno J, et al. (2004b). Cognitive function across manic or hypomanic, depressed and euthymic states in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 161:262–270. McCarthy J, Rabinowitz D, Habib M, Goldman H, Miley D, Stefanyshyn HY, et al. (2002). Bender Gestalt Recall as a measure of short-term visual memory in children and adolescents with psychotic and other severe disorders. Percept Mot Skills 95 (3 Pt 2): 1233–1238. Meleka LK, Ismail ME (1996). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children. Cairo: El Nahda Egyptian Bookshop. Meleka LK, Ismail ME (1999). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children. Cairo: El Nahda Egyptian Bookshop. Olvera RL, Semrud Clikeman M, Pliszka SR, O’Donnell L (2005). Neuropsychological deficits in adolescents with conduct disorder and comorbid bipolar disorder: a pilot study. Bipolar Disord 7:57–67. Pavuluri MN, Schenkel LS, Aryal S, Harral EM, Hill SK, Herbener ES, et al. (2006). Neurocognitive function in unmedicated manic and medicated euthymic pediatric bipolar patients. Am J Psychiatry 163:286–293. Phillips ML, Drevets WC, Rauch SL, Lane R (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception II: Implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry 54:515–528. Pizzagalli DA, Goetz E, Ostacher M, Iosifescu DV, Perlis RH (2008). Euthymic patients with bipolar disorder show decreased reward learning in a probabilistic reward task. Biol Psychiatry 64:162–168. Ronald TB, Patricia CD, Richard L (2000). Neurocognitive functioning and magnetic resonance imaging in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatric Psychol 25:503–513. Strakowski SM, Adler CM, Holland SK, Mills N, DelBello MP (2004). A preliminary fMRI study of sustained attention in euthymic, unmedicated bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1734–1740. Strauss E, Sherman E, Spreen O (2006). The compendium of neuropsychological tests. Administration, Norms and Commentary. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. Thompson JM, Gallagher P, Hughes JH, Watson S, Gray JM, Ferrier IN, et al. (2005). Neurocognitive impairment in euthymic patients with bipolar affective disorder. Br J Psychiatry 186:32–40. Trivedi JK, Goel D, Sharma S, Singh AP, Sinha PK, Tandon R (2007). Cognitive functions in stable schizophrenia and euthymic state of bipolar disorder. Indian J Med Res 126:433–439. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA (1978). A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 133:429–435. Original article 45 Quality of life and burden of women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder Nagda M. El-Masry and Nelly R. Abdelfatah Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt Correspondence to Nagda El-Masry, Lecturer of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt Tel: + 012 234 8839; fax: + 055 230 7830; e-mail: [email protected] Received 3 January 2011 Accepted 14 May 2011 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 33:45–50 Background Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual physical and psychological discomfort. The disorder is common and has a negative impact on mental health and quality of life of women suffering from PMDD. Aim This study was carried out to evaluate the quality of life of women with PMDD. Participants and methods In a comparative case–control study, 34 patients with PMDD and 34 healthy controls (matched for age, educational level, and social class) were included. All were within the reproductive period. Tools Both groups were subjected to the following psychometric tools: a semistructured interview, a structured clinical interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fourth edition, the World Health Organization Quality Of Life instrument, the symptom checklist instrument, the psychological adjustment scale, and the Sheehan disability scale. Results Patients and control groups were matched for age (P = 0.46), marital status (P = 0.35), educational level (P = 0.87), and socioeconomic status (P = 0.84). The mean scores of psychological and social relationships domains on the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF were lower for patients compared with the healthy control participants. Differences were statistically significant for emotional, family, and social adjustment (Po0.001). There were statistically significant differences for somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depressive, and anxiety symptoms (Po0.001). The burden of PMDD was higher for the patient group compared with the healthy control participants (Po0.001). The family responsibilities domain was the most affected on the Sheehan disability scale. Conclusion Patients with PMDD have lower quality of life than healthy participants. They have maladjusted emotions, family relations, and social functioning. They experience higher somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depressive, and anxiety symptoms than normal participants. The burden of illness is high. Appropriate recognition of the disorder and its impact should lead to the treatment of women with PMDD. Effective treatments are available. They should reduce individual suffering and impact on families, society, and economy. Keywords: burden, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, quality of life Egypt J Psychiatr 33:45–50 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 1110-1105 Introduction Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual physical and psychological discomfort occurring 1 to 2 weeks before menstruation (Dante and Facchinetti, 2011). The symptoms usually disappear shortly after the onset of menses (Futterman and Rapkin, 2006; Campagne and Campagne, 2007). The prevalence of PMDD, where premenstrual symptoms reach a level of severity that interferes with personal, social, and professional functioning, is about 1110-1105 & 2012 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 3–8% (Cohen et al., 2002; Halbreich et al., 2003; Steiner et al., 2003; Di Giulio and Reissing, 2006). PMDD most likely has multiple determinants in the biological, physiological, and sociocultural domains (Stanton et al., 2002). Although the etiology of PMDD is unknown, the symptoms of dysphoria, including depression and anxiety, have been associated with serotonergic dysregulation (Ivezić et al., 2010). DOI: 10.7123/01.EJP.0000411124.67583.a3 46 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Some potential risk factors for PMDD are the quality of interpersonal relationships and cooperation, self-esteem, expectation, and perception of premenstrual symptoms, stress, socioeconomic factors, biological factors, and lifestyle factors (Deuster et al., 1999). Matsumoto et al. (2007) suggested that altered functioning of the autonomic nervous system in the late luteal phase could be associated with diverse psychosomatic and behavioral symptoms appearing premenstrually. Landen et al. (2004) have reported that PMDD may be associated with reduced vagal tone compared with controls and that this difference is most apparent in the nonsymptomatic follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. PMDD, first called the late luteal phase dysphoric disorder, was included as a provisional diagnostic category in the appendices of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-III-R (American Psychiatric Association, 1987). It remained as an appendix in DSM-IV, after being renamed PMDD (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). The most prevalent symptoms include irritability, mood lability, depression, anxiety, impulsivity, feeling of ‘loss of control,’ fatigue, decreased concentration, abdominal bloating fluid retention, breast swelling, and general aches (Kessel, 2000). According to the American psychiatric association (DSMIV), PMDD criteria require five or more of the following symptoms to be present premenstrually: depressed mood or dysphoria, anxiety or tension, affective lability, irritability, decreased interest in usual activities, concentration difficulties, marked lack of energy, marked changes in appetite, overeating or food cravings, hypersomnia or insomnia, feeling overwhelmed, and other physical symptoms, for example, breast tenderness, bloating. At least one of these symptoms must be a mood symptom, that is: depressed mood or dysphoria, anxiety or tension, affective lability, or irritability. In addition, certain phenomenal characteristics are required (present premenstrually, absent postmenstrually, causing premenstrual interference other than an exacerbation of another disorders). PMDD was confirmed if, throughout the entire week before menstruation, at least one of the four core symptoms (depressed mood, anxiety or tension, affective liability, anger, or irritability) was reported as severe, and at least four additional symptoms (for a total of five) as moderate to severe, and if they were absent in the week after menses (Halbreich et al., 2007). PMDD can lead to disruption in interpersonal relationships and role functioning. Recent studies of the burden of illness of PMDD have identified a high economic indirect cost, mostly from reduced productivity and effectiveness at work, in addition to disturbed parenting and marital relationships (Pearlstein and Steiner, 2008). The impairment and lowered quality of life is similar to that of dysthymic disorder and is not much lower than major depressive disorder. Appropriate recognition of the disorder and its impact should lead to the treatment of more women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and PMDD (Halbreich et al., 2003). PMDD is commonly associated with other mood-related disorders such as major depression and causes significant life impairment (Sassoon et al., 2011). Aim This study was carried out to evaluate quality of life of women with PMDD. Participants and methods This comparative case–control study was conducted at the psychiatry outpatient clinic of Zagazig University hospitals from April 2010 till September 2010. It included 34 female patients compared with 34 healthy women, recruited from among employees and visitors of the hospital. All patients were diagnosed as having PMDD according to DSM-IV TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Inclusion criteria Good general health, euomenorrhea, lack of major uterine dysfunction, reproductive age (18–45), informed consent. Exclusion criteria General medical illness (diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, anemia, seizure disorders, past or present history of other psychiatric disorder, use of oral contraceptives). Both patients and controls were subjected to the application of case history of the psychiatry department of Zagazig university hospitals to obtain sociodemographic and relevant clinical data. A structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis-I disorders was used for all cases to confirm the diagnosis and also to screen the control participants for PMDD (First et al., 1995). The following psychometric tools were applied to both patients and controls: (1) World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF (The WHOQOL group, 1996): is a standardized comprehensive instrument for assessment of quality of life comprising of 26 items and was developed by WHO. The scale provides a measure of an individual’s perception of quality of life for four domains: (a) physical health (seven items), (b) psychological health (six items), (c) social relationships (three items), and (4) environmental health (eight items). In addition, it also includes two questions of overall quality of life and general health factors. The domain scores are scaled in a positive direction (i.e. higher scores denote higher quality of life). The range of scores is 4–20 for each domain. The international consistency of WHOQOL-BREF ranged from 0.66 to 0.87 (Chronbach’s a coefficient). The scale had been found to have good discriminant validity. It has good test–retest reliability and is The burden of premenstrual dysphoric disorder El-Masry and Abdelfatah 47 recommended for use in health surveys and to assess the efficacy of any intervention at suitable intervals according to the need of the study. The first transformation method converts scores to range between 4 and 20; the second transformation method converts domain scores to a 0–100 scale. (2) Symptoms checklist-90-revised (SCL-90R) (Derogatis, 1983): this 90-item self-report instrument measures nine dimensions of psychological symptoms and yields three global indexes of distress. The measured dimensions are somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility phobia, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. Participants were instructed to indicate how much distress each item on the SCL-90R had caused on a five-point scale ranging from (0 = not at all to 4 = extremely). In this study, we used the Arabic form (Al-Behairy, 1984). In this study, we used the somatization, obsessivecompulsive, depression, and anxiety subscales to assess these symptoms among the studied women. (3) Psychological Adjustment scale (Shokeer, 2003): it consists of 80 items that measure four dimensions of adjustment: (a) emotional adjustment, (b) health adjustment, (c) family adjustment, and (4) social adjustment. Participants were tested on a three-point scale ranging from (0 = not at all to 2 = extremely). (4) Sheehan disability scale (Sheehan et al., 1996): was developed by Sheehan to assess functional impairment in three interrelated domains: work/school, social life and home life, or family responsibilities are impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analogy scale. The numerical ratings of 0–10 can be translated into a percentage. The three items can also be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Statistical analysis Data were collected, revised, and analyzed statistically using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science, version 15, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Data were described by frequency and percentage for qualitative data, and mean and SD for quantitative data. The w2-test was used to determine the relationship between two qualitative variables. Student’s t-test was used for comparing quantitative variables. Probability level (Po0.05) was considered statistically significant. Results Table 1 illustrates the characteristics of both patients with PMDD and the control participants. The study included 34 patients with PMDD and 34 control participants. Both groups had similar demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. The majority of the studied patients and control participants were married (61.8 and 64.7%, respectively), lived in an urban area (52.9 and 58.8%, respectively), and had received secondary school education (58.8 and 61.8%, respectively). Table 1 Characteristics of patients with premenstrual dysphoric disorder and the control participants Variables Age 18–30 31–45 Marital status Single Married Divorced Residence Urban Rural Educational level Primary Secondary University Employment status Employed Unemployed Student Type of work Manual White collar Socioeconomic status Low Moderate High History of pregnancy Menarche (years) Duration of menstrual cycle (days) Duration of menstruation (days) PMDD (N = 34) Control (N = 34) Test of significance No (%) No (%) w2 P-value 16 (47.1) 18 (52.9) 19 (55.9) 15 (44.1) 0.53 0.46 11 (32.4) 21 (61.8) 2 (05.8) 12 (35.3) 22 (64.7) 0 (0.0) 2.07 0.35 18 (52.9) 16 (47.1) 20 (58.8) 14 (41.2) 0.24 0.62 2 (5.9) 20 (58.8) 12 (35.3) 3 (08.8) 21 (61.8) 10 (29.4) 0.41 0.81 16 (47.0) 10 (29.4) 6 (17.6) 23 (67.6) 3 (8.8) 8 (23.6) 5.26 0.07 26 (76.5) 8 (23.5) 25 (73.5) 9 (26.5) 0.08 0.77 2 (5.9) 24 (70.6) 8 (23.5) 20 (58.8) Mean ± SD 13.6 ± 3.2 26.1 ± 6.1 3 (8.8) 22 (64.7) 9 (26.5) 21 (61.7) Mean ± SD 12.9 ± 2.4 29.2 ± 5.3 0.35 0.84 0.06 t 1.0 1.5 0.8 P-value 0.31 0.11 6.9 ± 2.1 5.1 ± 1.6 3.97 o0.001* PMDD, premenstrual dysphoric disorder. *Po0.05 is statistically significant. 47.0% of the patients and 67.6% of the control participants were employed. Majority of both groups were employed: 47.0% of the patients and 67.6% of the control participants. 58.8% of the patients and 61.7% of the control participants had a history of pregnancy. 70.6% of patients and 64.7% of control subjects were of moderate socioeconomic status. They were matched as regards age (w2 = 0.53, P = 0.46), marital status (w2 = 2.07, P = 0.35), residence (w2 = 0.24, P = 0.62), educational level (w2 = 0.41, P = 0.81), employment status (w2 = 5.26, P = 0.07), and type of work (w2 = 0.08, P = 0.77). Socioeconomic status (w2 = 0.35, P = 0.84) and history of pregnancy (w2 = 0.06, P = 0.8). No statistically significant difference was found between the PMDD group and the control group regarding menarche (P = 0.31) and the duration of the menstrual cycle (P = 0.11), whereas there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the duration of menstruation (days) (P = 0.001). Table 2 illustrates the mean and SD of WHOQOL-BREF applied to the studied groups. There was no statistically significant difference between PMDD and control groups as regards the physical domain of WHOQOL-BREF (t = 0.73, 48 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry Table 2 World Health Organization Quality Of Life-BREF: comparison between premenstrual dysphoric disorder and control groups Domain Physical domaina Psychological domaina Social relationshipsa Environmenta PMDD group (No = 34) Mean ± SD Control group (No = 34) Mean ± SD t P-value 53.4 ± 8.1 55.2 ± 9.8 0.73 0.6 44.6 ± 9.3 71.5 ± 13.2 9.5 o0.001* 55.8 ± 8.7 67.2 ± 12.1 4.46 o0.001* 52.8 ± 8.1 51.7 ± 9.3 0.52 0.5 PMDD, premenstrual dysphoric disorder. a Score range from 0 to 100. *Po0.05 is statistically significant. P = 0.6). There was a statistically significant difference between the PMDD group and the control group regarding the psychological domain (t = 9.5, Po0.001). Also, there was a highly statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding social relationship (t = 4.46, Po0.001), whereas no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the environmental domain. The social relationships domain was the most affected domain between the four domains of WHOQOL-BREF. Table 3 shows the mean and SD of the psychological adjustment scale applied to the PMDD and the control groups. There was a highly statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding emotional adjustment (t = 19.23, Po0.001), whereas no statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups regarding the health adjustment domain (t = 1.38, P40.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding family adjustment (t = 10.31, Po0.001) and social adjustment (t = 10.92, Po0.001). Table 4 shows the mean and SD of the SCL-90R scale applied to the PMDD group and the control group. We used somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depression, and anxiety domains to assess the symptoms of these groups among the studied women. We found highly statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding somatization (t = 24.91, Po0.001), the obsessive-compulsive domain (t = 8.69, Po0.001), the depression domain (t = 18.25, Po0.001), and the anxiety domain (t = 22.6, Po0.001). The depression domain was the most affected domain. Table 5 shows the mean and SD of the Sheehan disability scale applied to the PMDD and the control groups. Highly statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding work (t = 7.44, Po0.001), social/ leisure activities (t = 3.18, Po0.001), and family responsibilities (t = 12.09, Po0.001). The most affected area of functioning was family responsibilities. Discussion Five percent of menstruating women meet the criteria for PMDD and about 20% of them have ‘subthreshold PMDD’ or severe PMS. Thus, in each menstrual cycle, Table 3 Psychological adjustment scale: comparison between premenstrual dysphoric disorder and control groups Domain Emotional adjustmenta Health adjustmenta Family adjustmenta Social adjustmenta PMDD group Control group (No = 34) (No = 34) Mean ± SD Mean ± SD t P-value 15.3 ± 4.1 38.2 ± 5.6 19.23 o0.001* 14.4 ± 5.4 11.7 ± 6.8 12.1 ± 4.3 16.4 ± 6.4 30.4 ± 8.1 31.3 ± 9.3 1.38 40.05 10.31 o0.001* 10.93 o0.001* PMDD, premenstrual dysphoric disorder. a score range from 0 to 40. *Po0.05 is statistically significant. Table 4 Symptoms checklist-90R scale: comparison between premenstrual dysphoric disorder and control groups Domain Somatizationa Obssesivecompulsiveb Depressionc Anxietyd PMDD group (No = 34) Mean ± SD Control group (No = 34) Mean ± SD 28.7 ± 3.1 18.4 ± 5.3 12.2 ± 2.3 9.9 ± 2.1 24.91 o0.001* 8.69 o0.001* 31.2 ± 6.4 21.6 ± 3.4 8.8 ± 3.2 6.1 ± 2.1 18.25 o0.001* 22.6 o0.001* t P-value PMDD, premenstrual dysphoric disorder. a Score range from 0 to 48. b Score range from 0 to 40. c Score range from 0 to 52 d Score range from 0 to 40. *Po0.05 is statistically significant. Table 5 Sheehan disability scale: comparison between premenstrual dysphoric disorder and control groups Domain Work Social/leisure activities Family responsibilities Total score PMDD group (No = 34) Mean ± SD Control group (No = 34) Mean ± SD 7.31 ± 2.3 6.34 ± 2.4 3.5 ± 1.9 4.6 ± 1.2 7.44 o0.001* 3.18 o0.001* 9.12 ± 3.1 22.77 ± 5.1 2.3 ± 1.1 10.4 ± 3.1 12.09 o0.001* 12.11 o0.001* t P-value The total score ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). PMDD, premenstrual dysphoric disorder. *Po0.05 is statistically significant. 1 in 4 women has emotional, behavioral, and physical premenstrual symptoms that can lead to disruption in interpersonal relationships and role functioning (Pearlstein and Steiner, 2008). Our study revealed that the quality of life of women with PMDD was severely affected as there were statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding domains of psychological and social relationships. This finding is in agreement with other studies. Women with confirmed PMS and PMDD reported significantly lower quality of life, increased absenteeism from work, decreased work productivity, impaired relationships with others, and increased visits to health providers (Borenstein et al., 2003; Steiner et al., 2003; Dean and Borenstein, 2004; Kornstein et al., 2005). The impairment The burden of premenstrual dysphoric disorder El-Masry and Abdelfatah 49 and lowered quality of life for PMDD is similar to that of dysthymic disorder and is not much lower than major depressive disorder (Halbreich et al., 2003). The length of menstruation was reported to be associated with PMDD in studies by Adewuya et al. (2008) and Kaur et al. (2004). This result is in agreement with our results as there was a statistically significant difference between the PMDD group and the control group (t = 3.97, Po0.001). This factor may lead to impairment of quality of life. Emotional, family, and social adjustment were assessed using the psychological adjustment scale. We found a highly statistically significant difference between the two groups (Po0.001). This maladjustment is in agreement with many studies. Anxiety, irritability, and mood lability are associated with functional impairment (Bloch et al., 1997; Angst et al., 2001; Pearlstein and Steiner 2008; Ivezić et al., 2010). PMDD patients have lower quality of life than healthy controls. They have maladjusted emotions, family relations, and social functioning. Also, they have higher scores of somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depressive, and anxiety symptoms than healthy controls. The burden of illness was high mostly as a result of reduced productivity and effectiveness at work and disturbed parenting and marital relationships. Thus, appropriate recognition of the disorder and its impact should lead to treatment of more women with PMDD. Efficacious treatments are available. They should reduce individual suffering and impact on families, society, and economy. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. PMDD causes marked social impairment during the last half of the menstrual cycle (Kaur et al., 2004). We found a highly statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding somatization symptoms of the SCL-90R scale (t = 24.91, Po0.001). This result is in agreement with those of Halbreich et al. (2007), who reported that some cultures emphasize somatic rather than emotional premenstrual symptoms. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms were found to be higher in patients with PMDD compared with control participants (Po0.001). Sasson and his colleagues found that obsessive-compulsive personality disorder was the most common character pathology in the PMS (18%). We also found that depressive symptoms were present with a statistically significant difference in women with PMDD compared with control participants (t = 18.25, Po0.001). This result is in agreement with studies by Kessel (2000) and Halbreich et al. (2007). Major depressive disorder is one of the most common axis I psychiatric disorders that may be concurrent and exacerbated premenstrually (Wittchen et al., 2002). The current study found that anxiety symptoms were more prevalent in patients than in control participants (t = 22.6, Po0.001). Generalized anxiety disorder is one of the most common axis I psychiatric disorders that exacerbate premenstrually (Hsiao et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2004). The Sheehan disability scale was used to assess the burden of PMDD among the studied patients. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding work, social/leisure activities, and family responsibilities (Po0.001). The burden of illness of PMDD results from the severity of symptoms, the chronicity of the disorder, and impairments in work, relationships, and activities (Freeman, 2005; Di Giulio and Reissing, 2006). References Adewuya AO, Loto OM, Adewumi TA (2008). Premenstrual dysphoric disorder amongst Nigerian University students: prevalence, comorbid conditions and correlates. Arch Women Ment Health 11:13–18. Al-Behairy AA (1984). Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90R) Arabic form. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Nahda Al-Messria Library; 1984. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV). 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Publication; 2000. Angst J, Sellaro R, Merikangas KR, Endicott J (2001). The epidemiology of perimenstrual psychological symptoms. Acta Psychiatr Scand 104: 110–116. Bloch M, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DR (1997). Premenstrual syndrome: evidence for symptom stability across cycles. Am J Psychiatry 154:1741–1746. Borenstein JE, Dean BB, Endicott J, Wong J, Brown C, Dickerson V, et al (2003). Health and economic impact of the premenstrual syndrome. J Reprod Med 48:515–524. Campagne DM, Campagne G (2007). The premenstrual syndrome revisited. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:4–17. Cohen LS, Soares CN, Otto MW, Sweeney BH, Liberman RF, Harlow BL (2002). Prevalence and predictors of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) in older premenopausal women. The Harvard Study of Moods and Cycles. J Affect Disord 70:125–132. Dante G, Facchinetti F (2011). Herbal treatments for alleviating premenstrual symptoms: a systematic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 32:51. Dean BB, Borenstein JE (2004). A prospective assessment investigating the relationship between work productivity and impairment with premenstrual syndrome. J Occup Environ Med 46:649–656. Derogatis LR (1983). SCL-90-R administration, scoring, procedures manual-II. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1983. Deuster PA, Adera T, South Paul J (1999). Biological, social and behavioral factors associated with premenstrual syndrome. Arch Fam Med 8:122–128. Di Giulio G, Reissing ED (2006). Premenstrual dysphoric disorder: prevalence, diagnostic considerations and controversies. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 27:201–210. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1995). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I). New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York Psychiatric Institute; 1995. Freeman EW (2005). Effects of antidepressants on quality of life in women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Pharmacoeconomics 23:433–444. Futterman LA, Rapkin AJ (2006). Diagnosis of premenstrual disorders. J Reprod Med 51 (4 Suppl): 349–358. Conclusion and recommendation PMDD is common and has an adverse impact on mental health and quality of life of women suffering from this disorder. In conclusion, the present study indicates that Halbreich U, Borenstein J, Pearlstein T, Kahn LS (2003). The prevalence, impairment, impact and burden of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMS/ PMDD). Psychoneuroendocrinology 28 (Suppl 3): 1–23. Halbreich U, Backstrom T, Eriksson E, O’brien S, Calil H, Ceskova E, et al (2007). Clinical diagnostic criteria for premenstrual syndrome and 50 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry guidelines for their quantification for research studies. Gynecol Endocrinol 23:123–130. Kornstein SG, Harvey AT, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Trivedi MH, Svikis DS, et al (2005). Self-reported premenstrual exacerbation of depressive symptoms in patients seeking treatment for major depression. Psychol Med 35: 683–692. Matsumoto T, Ushiroyama T, Kimura T, Hayashi T, Moritani T (2007). Altered autonomic nervous system activity as a potential etiological factor of premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Biopsychosocial Med 1, art. no. 24. Pearlstein T, Steiner M (2008). Premenstrual dysphoric disorder: burden of illness and treatment update. J Psychiatry Neurosci 33:291–301. Sassoon SA, Colrain IM, Baker FC (2011). Personality disorders in women with severe premenstrual syndrome. Arch Women’s Ment Health 14:257–64. Sheehan DV, Harnett Sheehan K, Raj BA (1996). The measurement of disability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 11 (Suppl 3): 89–95. Shokeer MZ (2003). Psychological adjustment scale. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Nahda AlMessria; 2003. Stanton AL, Lobel M, Sears S, DeLuca RS (2002). Psychosocial aspects of selected issues in women’s reproductive health: current status and future directions. J Consult Clin Psychol 70:751–770. Steiner M, Macdougall M, Brown E (2003). The Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool (PSST) for clinicians. Arch Women’s Ment Health 6:203–209. The WHOQOL Group (1996). WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment-field trial version. Geneva: WHO; 1996. Landen M, Wennerblom B, Tygesen H, Modigh K, Sorvik K, Ysander C, et al (2004). Heart rate variability in premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29:733–740. Wittchen HU, Becker E, Lieb R, Krause P (2002). Prevalence, incidence and stability of premenstrual dysphoric disorder in the community. Psychol Med 32:119–132. Hsiao MC, Hsiao CC, Liu CY (2004). Premenstrual symptoms and premenstrual exacerbation in patients with psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 58:186–190. Ivezić SS, Jukić MK, Tikvica A, Baldani DP (2010). Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Acta Medica Croatica 64:183–190. Kaur G, Gonsalves L, Thacker HL (2004). Premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a review for the treating practitioner. Cleveland Clin J Med 71:303–305. Kessel B (2000). Premenstrual syndrome. Advances in diagnosis and treatment. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 27:625–639. Kim DR, Gyulai L, Freeman EW, Morrison MF, Baldassano C, Dube B (2004). Premenstrual dysphoric disorder and psychiatric co-morbidity. Arch Womens’ Ment Health 7:37–47.