Request for PR-22 Public-Private Partnership Qualifications
Transcription
Request for PR-22 Public-Private Partnership Qualifications
Request for PR-22 Public-Private Partnership Qualifications Responses due Tuesday, June 3rd, by 3:00 p.m. Atlantic Standard Time Request for PR-22 Public-Private Partnership Qualifications Long-Term Operation and Maintenance Agreement Responses due Tuesday, June 3, 2008, by 3:00 PM Atlantic Standard Time Issued on Friday, April 25, 2008 http://www.prp3.com/prhta.htm Table of Contents Page Table of Contents List of Tables List of Exhibits 1. Executive Summary 1.1 Executive Summary 2. PRHTA and Toll Road Network Overview 2.1 2.2 PRHTA Overview Toll Road Network Overview 3. PR-22 (José de Diego Highway) 3.1 3.2 3.3 PR-22 Overview Traffic Volumes & Financial Performance Capital Expenditure Profile 4. PR-22 Investment Highlights 4.1 PR-22 Investment Highlights 5. Evaluation Process and Criteria 5.1 Bidder Qualification Requirements and Evaluation Criteria 6. SOQ Submission Requirements 6.1 SOQ Submission Requirements 7. Statement of Qualifications 7.1 Format and Required Information for SOQ Submission 2 3 4 6 11 12 15 17 19 21 24 28 31 Appendices A Supplemental Legal Materials Form A – Transmittal Letter Form B – Eligibility Affidavit 35 39 40 2 List of Tables Table 1 2 Page PR-22 Transactions and Revenues by Toll Plaza (FY2007) PR-22 Financial Performance 16 18 3 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Page Organizational Overview Puerto Rico’s Toll Road Network Map of PR-22 PR-22 Transaction Volume PR-22 Historical Capital Expenditures Illustrative Corporate Investments in Puerto Rico Comparative Ratio: Vehicles Per Capita 11 12 16 17 19 21 22 4 Section 1 Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Executive Summary Introduction The Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“PRHTA” or “Authority”), the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (“GDB”), (as financial advisor and fiscal agent for PRHTA) and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”), are evaluating a long-term Operation and Maintenance Agreement (“OMA”) for PR-22, José de Diego Highway (“the Highway”). PR-22, which spans 52 miles from east to west in northern Puerto Rico, is the Commonwealth’s premier toll road asset and is operated and maintained by PRHTA. The PR-22 OMA contract term currently being contemplated is 50 years. Further details regarding the OMA term and structure will be provided during a later stage of the process. The Commonwealth expects a successful outcome in the OMA process will help it reach several key objectives, including: 1) Create a Financial Position of Strength. Execute an OMA that expands the capacity of the Authority to fund new capital projects and pay down outstanding debt while creating a model for future highway OMA projects in Puerto Rico; 2) Build Towards the Comprehensive Beltway. Create momentum for completing a comprehensive beltway in the Commonwealth that optimizes traffic flows and ensures public safety; 3) Minimize Near Term Toll/Tax Increases. Codify a future toll rate-setting schedule that is consistent with the public interest; and 4) Receive Credit Affirmation. Receive a credit rating affirmation or upgrade on the Authority’s existing toll revenue bond credits. Government Commitment to Expedited Process Private investment is a key element of the Commonwealth’s strategy to develop a world class transportation infrastructure. Consistent with Puerto Rico’s Economic Development and Government Transformation Plan, the Commonwealth is focused on achieving transportation results over the next six to twelve months. For the PR-22 OMA initiative, financial close is targeted for October 2008. Based on a formal review by the Commonwealth’s Secretary of Justice, the the proposed OMA transaction is authorized under Puerto Rico law. Specifically, the office of the Secretary of Justice has provided a formal opinion to the Authority concerning its power to enter into the proposed OMA. This authorizing opinion will be provided to Qualified Bidders in an electronic data room during the due diligence phase of the transaction. 6 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Overview of Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) Executive Summary (cont’d) This Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) provides interested parties (“Bidders” or “Teams”) with the opportunity to formally express their interest in bidding on an OMA for PR-22 and present their qualifications. Section 2 of this RFQ provides an introductory description of the Authority and its toll road network. Sections 3 and 4 provide a detailed description of PR-22 and select highlights of the possible OMA. Section 5 describes the bid evaluation process and criteria. Section 6 establishes submission requirements and procedures for SOQs (“Statements of Qualifications”) and Section 7 identifies the required contents for the SOQs. Finally, Appendix A contains supplemental legal materials, including reserved rights, and a form of the required transmittal letter. Those interested in participating in the OMA process must respond to this RFQ by submitting their SOQs to the PRHTA Junta de Subasta no later than 3:00 PM AST on Tuesday, June 3, 2008. Based on the SOQs, the Authority’s Board of Awards (as defined below) will determine those Teams that are qualified to bid. There will be no restriction as to the number of Bidders that may qualify. Select Definitions For the purposes of this RFQ, the following definitions will apply: • Long-term Operation and Maintenance Agreement (“OMA”) means a contract between the Authority and a private entity (the “Contractor”) in which Contractor will: (i) on the closing date, pay PRHTA the upfront payment amount set forth in its bid (the “Upfront Payment”); and (ii) operate, maintain, restore and rehabilitate PR-22, pursuant to the standards and level of service requirements established in the OMA, and subject to PRHTA primary supervision and control. Under the OMA, PR-22 toll revenues generated during the term of the agreement (the “Toll Revenues”) will be used to: (i) pay the Contractor for operating and maintenance expenses and capital improvements, and (ii) compensate the Contractor for services rendered and capital invested (including principal and interest on debt incurred and a return on equity); • Board of Awards, or “Bid Board” means a 3-member entity of the Authority (plus 2 alternates) that is ultimately responsible for considering, receiving, and evaluating bidder proposals; • PRHTA Evaluation Committee means the committee named by PRHTA (with Morgan Stanley as Advisor) to process and evaluate the RFQ and the SOQ, and to make recommendations to the Bid Board; 7 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Executive Summary (cont’d) • “Team” or “Bidder” means an individual, a company, a joint venture or a consortium of individuals and/or companies formed to undertake the transaction; and • “Team Member” means a member of a Team. Bidder Registration Prospective Bidders that anticipate responding to the RFQ are required to register their intent with the Bid Board as soon as possible by sending an email to: [email protected] Please be sure to include the name and address of your company and a primary point of contact for all future RFQ correspondence. Should you have questions, please contact: 787-721-8787 x 1129 / x1130. Ongoing RFQ Communications The following link will serve as the PR-22 OMA website. Importantly, additional information, including responses to questions and requests for clarification, related to the RFQ will be posted at: http://www.prp3.com/prhta.htm Please note that it is the Bidder’s responsibility to periodically check the website for new information regarding the PR-22 OMA process. Requests for Clarification, Questions and Addenda Bidder’s questions and/or requests for clarification or any other communication with respect to this RFQ, must be submitted in writing, no later than Monday, May 19, 2008 at 3:00 PM AST, solely to the Bid Board, at the following actual or e-mail address: Junta de Subasta Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority Roberto Sánchez Vilella Government Center (Minillas) Eleventh Floor, South Building De Diego Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00940 Via e-mail: [email protected] Please DO NOT contact any PRHTA or GDB officer, related party or advisor. Bidders are responsible for ensuring that any written communication clearly indicates on the first page or in the subject line, as applicable, that the material relates to the PR-22 OMA process. PRHTA Evaluation Committee will provide Bidders with responses to questions and requests for clarifications which it deems to be material and not adequately addressed in previously provided documents. PRHTA reserves the right to revise this RFQ by issuing addenda thereto at any time before the SOQ due date. Bidders who submit SOQs in response to this RFQ will be required to acknowledge in the transmittal letter (Form A) that they have received and reviewed all materials provided in connection with this RFQ, including any addenda. 8 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Overview of Bidding Process Executive Summary (cont’d) Bidders qualified by the Bid Board (“Qualified Bidders”) will be required to sign a Confidentiality Agreement. Upon execution of a Confidentiality Agreement, the Commonwealth will provide the opportunity to conduct due diligence through: 1) 2) 3) 4) Access to a secure, online data room; Investor meetings; Authority management presentations; and A review and discussion of the Authority’s proposed PR-22 Operation and Maintenance Agreement and related documents. During the process, Bidders will be asked to submit preliminary, non-binding indications of interest for evaluation. Bidders also will have an opportunity to comment on the proposed OMA and Operating Standards. Bidders will be provided with more detailed bidding and negotiating procedures and a more detailed timetable at a later stage of the process. Ultimately, Bidders will have the opportunity to submit final, binding bids to the Bid Board. The Bid Board reserves the right to reject any and all SOQs, to waive technical defects, irregularities or any informality in bids, and to accept or reject any part of any bid at its discretion. The Bid Board also reserves the right to postpone the date on which bids are required to be submitted, or to take any other action it may deem in its best interests. 9 Section 2 PRHTA and Toll Road Network Overview 2 PRHTA and Toll Road Network Overview 2.1 PRHTA Overview Organizational Overview The Authority was created in 1965 to assume responsibility for the construction of roads, highways, and related transportation facilities in the Commonwealth. With a 43-year operating history, PRHTA is a separate entity from the Department of Transportation and Public Works (“the Department”) for purposes of financing and constructing Puerto Rico’s transportation system. Since 1971, the Secretary of Transportation and Public Works (the “Secretary”), appointed by the Governor, has overseen the management of the Authority and exercises the powers of the Governing Board of the Authority. The Honorable Carlos González, who is the sixteenth Secretary, is the current Chairman of the Board of the Authority. The Authority is led by Luis Trinidad Garay, PE, Executive Director, who oversees the Authority’s day-to-day operations. Exhibit 1: Organizational Overview Department of Transportation and Public Works Secretary Transportation Advisory Board Undersecretary Highways and Transportation Authority Responsibilities of the Authority Metropolitan Bus Authority Secretary of Administration and Human Resources Secretary of Planning, Programming and Control Ports Authority Transit Security Commission Maritime Transportation Authority Directorate of Public Works Directorate of Driving Services ne Directorate of Urban Planning Directorate of Community Development The Authority has broad powers to carry out its responsibilities in accordance with the Department’s overall transportation policies. These powers include, among other things, the complete control and supervision of any highway and other transportation facilities owned, operated or constructed by it; the ability to set tolls and other charges for the use of the highway and other transportation facilities; and the power to issue bonds, notes and other obligations. The Authority plans and manages the construction of all major projects relating to Puerto Rico’s highway transportation system, undertakes major repairs and maintains the toll highways. The Department maintains Puerto Rico’s highway system, other than the toll highways, and undertakes construction of smaller projects. 11 2 PRHTA and Toll Road Network Overview 2.2 Toll Road Network Overview Overview The Authority operates and maintains a network of six toll roads - PR-22 (José de Diego), PR-5, PR-20 (Martínez Nadal), PR-52 (Luis A. Ferré), PR66, and PR-53. As outlined in the map below, the Commonwealth’s six toll roads are important economic drivers and serve as the Island’s primary interregional transportation routes. Total transaction volume on the six toll roads equaled 345.1 million transactions in FY2007, resulting in total revenues of $217.2 million and Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) of $152.2, a margin of 70.1% Exhibit 2: Puerto Rico’s Toll Road Network Major Corporate Investments Highlighted in Green PR-22 (Extension) PR-22 PR-5 PR-20 PR-66 (Phase I & II) ne Congar Int’l Maunabo Tunnels PR-52 PR-53 Significant Corporate Facility/Investment PR-22 (José de Diego) PR-22 (José de Diego Highway) is a vital component of the Authority’s toll road network and the OMA candidate that is described in this RFQ. As the dominant east-west transportation artery in Puerto Rico, PR-22 provides the most efficient means of traveling between the cities of San Juan and Arecibo, a distance of 52 miles. Notably, PR-22 runs through a prominent pharmaceutical and manufacturing corridor where multinational firms such as Abbott, Eaton, Guidant, Merck, Pfizer, Schering-Plough and others have significant manufacturing operations. PR-22 enjoys strong competitive positioning as the only parallel route (PR-2) is a local road that results in an average travel-time loss of approximately 45 minutes. PR-22 (José de Diego Extension) One of the long-term transportation priorities of PRHTA is the extension of PR-22 from its current terminus in Arecibo to the City of Aguadilla on the west coast. The approximately 27.8 mile extension would complete a significant step towards achieving a comprehensive beltway. A PR-22 extension is expected to save drivers an estimated 30 minutes in travel time versus the current non-tolled parallel road (PR-2). 12 2 PRHTA and Toll Road Network Overview 2.2 Toll Road Network Overview (cont’d) The Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) for the PR-22 extension is currently being evaluated by the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board (“EQB”), other governmental agencies and the public. EQB approval of the EIS is anticipated in the 2008 calendar year. Upon receipt of formal approval, extension design and land acquisition processes can commence. PR-5 Inaugurated in February 2006, PR-5 is a 2.5 mile toll road located south of metropolitan San Juan. PR-5 reduces travel time to Bayamón from points south by approximately 10-15 minutes. The PR-5 extension, which is under construction at Naranjito Bridge, will increase traffic volume on this route. PR-20 (Martínez Nadal Expressway) PR-20 (Martínez Nadal Expressway) runs six miles to the south of metropolitan San Juan, providing connectivity between PR-2 and PR-1 near Caguas. PR-20 provides travelers a means of saving 10-15 minutes versus the local PR-1 route. PR-20 and PR-5 effectively serve as congestion relief valves in a high density traffic region. PR-52 (Luis A. Ferré) PR-52 (Luis A. Ferré) is the Commonwealth’s longest toll road, running 67 total miles from metropolitan San Juan to Ponce, Puerto Rico’s second largest city by population. PR-52 has no continuously parallel route due to mountainous terrain, making it an essential artery for vehicle travel in Puerto Rico. The Port of the Americas, which is located in Ponce at the southern terminus of PR-52, is expected to generate additional traffic volume in coming years as the Port benefits from a major ongoing capital program. PR-66 (Eastern Corridor) PR-66, which is the newest of the Commonwealth’s toll roads having opened in April 2006, connects Carolina to Canóvanas in the northeast region of Puerto Rico. PR-66 leads to popular recreation locations, such as Belz Outlets, El Yunque, and other tourist destinations in the northeast. PR-66 also provides a direct route to the Roosevelt Roads Redevelopment Project, an 8,650 acre former U.S. Naval station that will be converted to a mix of residential, commercial, and light industrial uses beginning in 2008. PR-66 (Phase II Extension) PR-66 (Phase II) will be a 3.8 mile extension of the existing PR-66 route, connecting Canóvanas to Rio Grande. Completion of PR-66 Phase II is a high priority capital project for the Authority. Construction on the PR-66 Phase II extension is expected to begin sometime in 2008. PR-53 PR-53 runs 37 total miles and is the primary eastern transportation corridor in Puerto Rico. PR-53 has two completed segments – Fajardo to Yabucoa and Salinas to Guayama. The completion of the unfinished segment of PR-53 between Yabucoa and Guayama is one of the Authority’s long-term strategic goals. The tunnels at Maunabo are one segment of the road currently under construction. When finished, PR-53 will run 53 miles contiguously from Fajardo to Salinas. 13 Section 3 PR-22 (José de Diego Highway) 3 PR-22 (José de Diego Highway) 3.1 PR-22 Overview History PR-22 is the central artery in the Puerto Rico transportation network and is a result of sustained investment by the Commonwealth for over 20 years. As a limited-access, multi-lane toll expressway, the José de Diego Highway was conceptualized by the Authority in the 1960s to facilitate improved traffic flows in the high-density northern region of Puerto Rico. In particular, PR22’s main users were expected to be long-haul commercial vehicles as well as commuters destined for the San Juan metropolitan area. In 1963, public hearings were held for the construction of PR-22. The original alignment, interchanges and tolls for the San Juan to Arecibo route were adopted subsequent to the hearings. With additional feasibility studies completed in 1969, the Authority examined viable engineering and funding alternatives to initiate construction of the expressway. After comprehensive review, the Authority began construction of PR-22 and opened the first section of the road to the traveling public on November 28, 1971. This inaugural route consisted of a 3.5 mile segment that extends west, from San Juan to the Bayamon River. Simultaneously, the Authority began construction on the western portion of PR-22 near Arecibo. In the following decades, Puerto Rico’s northern corridor underwent rapid urbanization and economic development. To complement the expansion and development, two key portions of PR-22 were completed and opened to traffic: (1) San Juan to PR-165 (Toa Baja) which runs approximately 11 miles, and (2) Arecibo Ramp to Arecibo, spanning nearly 13.5 miles. However, the remaining 26.5 miles of the envisioned expressway, running from Toa Baja to Arecibo Ramp, had yet to be constructed. To this end, the Authority conducted PR-22 location studies to determine the optimal route of this remaining portion of the road. The section, which transverses a number of wetlands, rivers, and floodplains, required heightened engineering and technical expertise. As a result of the unique topography, new and innovative bridge construction techniques were utilized in the construction process. Ultimately, PR-22’s final segments were opened in the early 1980s. Today, a complete and fully operational PR-22 is a visible symbol of the Authority’s ongoing commitment to improve transportation efficiency on the Island and, ultimately, complete a comprehensive beltway for its citizens. With the continual reinvestment of capital, the implementation of modern materials and systems, and the potential PR-22 extension from Arecibo to Aguadilla, PR-22’s place as a key component in Puerto Rico’s transportation infrastructure remains certain in the years to come. 15 3 PR-22 (José de Diego Highway) 3.1 Overview PR-22 Overview (cont’d) Currently, PR-22 consists of one continuous route from the City of San Juan (population of 442,447)1 to the City of Arecibo (population of 104,600). The expressway provides safe, high-speed access for both short and long-distance trips along this northern corridor. PR-22 has a total of seven fare collection facilities: Buchanan, Toa Baja, Vega Alta, Manatí, Arecibo, Arecibo Ramp, and Hatillo Ramp. The speed limit across the Highway ranges from 55 to 65 miles per hour. Exhibit 3: Map of PR-22 Northern Puerto Rico One Proposed 27.8 Mile Extension Operation Details Existing 52 mile route (San Juan to Arecibo) In FY2007, PR-22 processed 157.3 million transactions, resulting in nearly $91 million of total revenues. The table below provides summary transaction and revenue data by toll plaza. The adjacent columns highlight the stable and sustained growth trends observed since FY2000. Table 1: PR-22 Transactions and Revenues by Toll Plaza (FY2007) Toll Plaza Transaction Volume (Mn) Transaction Volume CAGR (2000-2007) Revenue ($Mn) Revenue CAGR (2000-2007) Buchanan 54.2 1.4% $27.6 6.1% Toa Baja 32.9 3.0% 17.3 8.1% Vega Alta 23.6 1.4% 12.5 6.1% Manatí 16.8 1.6% 13.2 7.4% Arecibo 17.2 2.2% 13.6 8.1% Arecibo Ramp Hatillo Ramp Total 1.0 0.3% 0.5 5.6% 11.5 2.1% 6.1 6.9% 157.3 1.9% $90.8 7.0% Notes 1. 2000 Census 16 3 PR-22 (José de Diego Highway) 3.2 Traffic Volumes & Financial Performance Historical Traffic Volume PR-22’s seven toll-collection facilities process traffic flows on the Highway. The chart below depicts PR-22’s 1.9% compound annual traffic volume growth since FY2000, with toll booths being listed in order of proximity to San Juan (Buchanan is the nearest, while Hatillo Ramp is the furthest). From FY2000 to FY2005, compound transaction volume growth was 3.8%. On September 10, 2005, after conducting public hearings, the Authority increased toll rates on PR-22 for the first time in fourteen years. The total roundtrip toll for a two-axle vehicle increased from $4.65 to $6.75, an increase of 45.2%. With this sizable toll increase, PR-22 traffic volumes decreased 5.9% in FY2006. However, in FY2007, traffic volumes rebounded with 0.6% growth, illustrating PR-22’s essential role and strategic route. Exhibit 4: PR-22 Transaction Volume FY2000-07 Millions 175 5.9% decline after 9/2005 toll increase 3.8% compound annual growth FY 2000-FY2005 0.6% growth in FY2007 150 125 100 ne 75 50 25 0 FY00 Buchanan Source: Electronic Toll Collection (AutoExpreso) Toa Baja FY01 FY02 Vega Alta FY03 Manatí FY04 Arecibo FY05 FY06 Arecibo Ramp FY07 Hatillo Ramp Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority, Applied Research, Inc. In March 2004, the Authority began implementing AutoExpreso on its toll roads, including PR-22. AutoExpreso is a high-speed electronic toll collection system that employs radio transmissions from transponderequipped vehicles to plaza-mounted antennas, and video systems for violation enforcement. AutoExpreso has exceeded the Authority’s usage and performance expectations. It has significantly increased vehicle circulation throughout toll plazas and has resulted in reduced travel time and increased convenience for customers. 17 3 PR-22 (José de Diego Highway) 3.2 Traffic Volumes & Financial Performance (cont’d) Direct benefits to the Authority include reduced cost of manual toll collection, enhanced auditing capabilities, additional payment options offering and receipt of toll payments in advance. As of November 2007, AutoExpreso had been implemented on sixteen of the twenty-four existing toll stations in the broader toll road network. On PR-22, AutoExpreso is now operational at six of the seven fare collection facilities. With ongoing initiatives to convert regular AutoExpreso lanes to high-speed AutoExpreso lanes, traffic flows continue to be optimized as toll-violations are minimized. Historical Financial Performance Table 2: PR-22 Financial Performance FY Ending 6/30 ($Mn) 2002 Toll Revenues % Growth Operating Expenses % Growth EBITDA % Margin CapEx (1) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 61.1 63.1 66.1 68.3 85.7 90.8 - 3.4% 4.7% 3.4% 25.4% 6.0% 18.0 18.6 19.5 22.2 25.4 29.6 - 3.3% 4.8% 13.9% 14.4% 16.5% 43.1 44.5 46.6 46.1 60.3 61.2 70.5% 70.5% 70.5% 67.5% 70.3% 67.4% 23.1 23.7 7.1 15.1 12.0 16.0 Source: Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 1. Authority Operating Expenses allocated by transaction volume PR-22’s financial performance is characterized by stable, growing revenue collection and healthy cash flow margins. Since FY2002, PR-22 has achieved an average EBITDA margin of 69.5%. PR-22 revenues have an average growth rate of 8.2% since FY2002, with the most significant increase resulting from the implementation of a system-wide toll increase in FY2006. On the expense side, payroll, toll booth administration and AutoExpreso costs are the main components of PR-22’s operating cost structure. The increase in operating expenses observed in FY2005-FY2007 was largely a result of start-up AutoExpreso costs. Over time, it is anticipated that AutoExpreso will lead to reduced operating expenses as volume increases are achieved through electronic toll collection. 18 3 PR-22 (José de Diego Highway) 3.3 Capital Expenditure Profile As a matter of policy, the Authority continually invests significant capital into the Commonwealth transportation network, including its highways, local roads, mass transit and other essential programs. As part of this continual investment, the Authority maintains a targeted ongoing capital improvement program for its toll roads, including PR-22. The table below displays PR-22’s capital expenditure profile from FY2002 to FY2007. During these years, the Authority invested nearly $100 million in capital improvements for PR-22. Major investments were made in refurbishing toll plazas, repaving surfaces and general road improvements, including select lane widening projects. Exhibit 5: PR-22 Historical Capital Expenditures $Mn 30 25 20 15 One 10 5 0 FY02 FY03 PR-22 Capital Expenditures Source FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority 19 Section 4 PR-22 Investment Highlights 4 PR-22 Investment Highlights 4.1 PR-22 Investment Highlights PRHTA believes that a long-term Operation and Maintenance Agreement for PR-22 represents an attractive and strategically favorable infrastructure investment opportunity. The transaction would be a landmark Operation and Maintenance Agreement in the Commonwealth and provides potential Teams with an opportunity to invest in a vital segment of Puerto Rico’s transportation network. Key investment considerations include: Favorable Investment Climate Vital Component of the Puerto Rico Transportation Network High Vehicle Density Advanced Tolling Systems; and Recent Investments to Improve/Modernize Road Conditions. Favorable Investment Climate As a self-governing territory of the United States with Commonwealth-status, Puerto Rico shares in the benefits and protections of U.S. legal and regulatory regimes. Combining this stable overarching framework with a strong base of multinational companies, a highly educated bi-lingual workforce and the best physical infrastructure in the Caribbean, Puerto Rico is a strong candidate for private investment. As a testament its favorable economics, skilled workers, and an increasingly knowledge-based economy, Puerto Rico produces sixteen of the top twenty U.S. pharmaceutical products. Exhibit 6: Illustrative Corporate Investments in Puerto Rico One Source Vital Component of the Puerto Rico Transportation Network Puerto Rico Industrial Development Corporation PR-22 is essential to the Authority’s toll road network. As the dominant eastwest transportation artery in Puerto Rico, PR-22 provides the most efficient means of traveling between the cities of San Juan and Arecibo, a distance of 52 miles. Notably, PR-22 runs through a dominant pharmaceutical and manufacturing corridor where multinational firms such as Abbott, Eaton, Guidant, Merck, Pfizer, Schering-Plough and others have significant manufacturing operations. PR-22 enjoys strong competitive positioning, with the only parallel route (PR-2) being a local road that results in a total traveltime loss of approximately 45 minutes. 21 4 PR-22 Investment Highlights 4.1 High Vehicle Density PR-22 Investment Highlights (cont’d) The Commonwealth’s ratio of vehicles per capita significantly outpaces the continental United States and is one of the highest in the world. In 2007, Puerto Rico registered 0.57 cars per capita versus 0.46 in the mainland U.S. and 0.46 in Western Europe. A high concentration of cars combined with 2.7% annual growth in registered vehicles from FY2000 to FY2006 provides predictable demand. Exhibit 7: Comparative Ratio: Vehicles Per Capita Puerto Rico vs. Mainland U.S. and Western Europe 0.60 0.50 One 0.40 2000 2001 Western Europe Source 2002 2003 United States 2004 2005 2006 2007 Puerto Rico Euromonitor International 2007 Advanced Tolling Systems PR-22 has benefited from the Authority’s modernization initiatives to improve overall highway system operations. AutoExpreso, the Commonwealth’s high-speed electronic toll collection system, is now operational at six of PR-22’s seven fare collection facilities. With ongoing initiatives to convert regular AutoExpreso lanes to high-speed AutoExpreso lanes, traffic flows continue to be optimized as toll-violations are minimized. Recent Investments to Improve/Modernize Road Conditions From FY2002 to FY2007, the Authority invested nearly $100 million into capital improvements for PR-22. Notable and completed capital projects include the construction and rehabilitation of off-ramps as well as the integration of Superpave asphalt into ongoing repaving operations. Importantly, these pavement materials have a relatively long useful life given Puerto Rico’s favorable climate and the fact that a period of severe temperature fluctuation (e.g., ice, snow) does not occur in Commonwealth. 22 Section 5 Evaluation Process and Criteria 5 Evaluation Process and Criteria 5.1 Bidder Qualification Requirements and Evaluation Criteria This RFQ is open to prospective Bidders who desire to be qualified to bid on the OMA. Acceptance to the process will be based on a determination by the Bid Board that Bidders have met the requirements highlighted. Each SOQ will be reviewed by the PRHTA Evaluation Committee for: (a) minor irregularities and apparent clerical mistakes which are unrelated to the substantive content of the SOQ, (b) conformance to the RFQ instructions regarding organization and format, and (c) the responsiveness of the Bidder to the requirements set forth in this RFQ. In addition, the PRHTA Evaluation Committee will review each SOQ to determine whether the Bidder meets the following responsibility requirements: a) That the SOQ contains an original executed Transmittal Letter (Form A) and an original executed Eligibility Affidavit (Form B), both of which are included as part of Appendix A. Please note that if the affidavit is originated in the states, territories or possessions of the United States of America, the legalization of the documents shall be done by an official authorized for such purposes and evidence of the power awarded to such official by the appropriate authority shall be presented. Such evidence shall consist of a certification from the County Clerk or the Department of State; b) That neither the Bidder nor any other Team Member has been disqualified, removed, debarred or suspended from performing or bidding on work for the federal government, the Commonwealth or any state or local government where such disqualification, removal, debarment or suspension would preclude selection and award under applicable law; and c) That the Bidder is either incorporated in or, if a foreign business entity, is qualified to do business in, Puerto Rico, and has met all other legal requirements to do business in Puerto Rico (or expects to do so prior to submission of a Bid). In particular, please note that Bidders, prior to submitting a binding proposal (but not prior to responding to this RFQ), must be registered with the Bidder’s Registry of the General Services Administration, pursuant to the provisions of Law 164 of July 23, 1974, as amended, 3 LPRA 932. It is advised that Bidders allow ample time to complete this process. Any Bidder may be excluded from further consideration if its SOQ does not demonstrate that it has satisfied, or will satisfy, these responsibility requirements. At the end of this review, the PRHTA Evaluation Committee 24 5 Evaluation Process and Criteria 5.1 Bidder Qualification Requirements and Evaluation Criteria (cont’d) will assess each Team’s qualifications in the areas of technical capability and financial capability with respect to the criteria set forth in this RFQ. Those SOQs not responsive to this RFQ may be excluded from further consideration and the affected Bidders will be so advised. Bidders whose SOQ contains a material misrepresentation may also be excluded from consideration. There will be no restriction as to the number of Teams that may qualify to bid. Once qualified, process participants will remain qualified until a Contractor is selected or the OMA process is terminated. Any changes in the composition of a Team are subject to the prior approval of the Bid Board. Technical Capability The evaluation of technical capabilities will address whether the SOQ submission adequately demonstrates the Team’s technical capability necessary to operate and maintain a premier toll road with respect to the following areas of expertise: 1) 2) 3) 4) Financial Capability Highway operation and maintenance; Toll collection and management; Capital improvements; and Safety. The evaluation of financial capabilities will address whether the SOQ submission adequately responds to the financial capability requirements of this RFQ with respect to the following areas: 1) Financial capacity to pay an upfront payment and ability to operate and maintain PR-22 to PRHTA’s standards; and 2) Ability to raise financing. PRHTA Requests for Clarification or Information At various times during the deliberations, the PRHTA Evaluation Committee may issue one or more requests for written clarification to the individual Bidders. The PRHTA Evaluation Committee may also schedule interviews or discussions with one or more Bidders on a one-on-one basis, for the purpose of enhancing the understanding of the SOQs and obtaining clarifications of the terms contained in the SOQs. The PRHTA Evaluation Committee may at any time request additional information or clarification from the Bidder or may request the Bidder to verify or certify certain aspects of its SOQ. If required, interviews or discussions shall be scheduled at a later date. Bidders may be required to submit written confirmation of any new information and clarifications provided during any interview or discussion. Upon receipt of requested clarifications and additional information as described above, if any, the SOQs will be evaluated to factor in the clarifications and additional information. 25 5 Evaluation Process and Criteria 5.1 Bidder Qualification Requirements and Evaluation Criteria (cont’d) Following submittal of the SOQs, the following actions may not be undertaken without PRHTA’s prior written consent: • Deletion or substitution of a Team member identified in the SOQ; • Deletion or substitution of an equity owner of Bidder, a guarantor of Bidder or any other entity that will bear financial responsibility or liability for the performance of the Bidder; and • Other changes in the equity ownership or team membership of a Bidder. PRHTA, in its sole discretion, may allow changes in the composition of a Bidder (e.g. joint venture, contractors, etc.) after the Qualified Bidders have been identified, provided that all qualifications requirements are satisfied for any new Team Member. 26 Section 6 SOQ Submission Requirements 6 SOQ Submission Requirements 6.1 SOQ Submission Requirements Advisors to PRHTA and GDB The following firms are serving as advisors or consultants to PRHTA and/or GDB and are not available to provide services to any Bidders or to participate as members of any Teams: • Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated; • Popular Securities; • Laurie Mahon; • URS Caribe LLP; • Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP; • Nixon Peabody; and • Fiddler González & Rodríguez, P.S.C. Proprietary/Confidential Information All Bidders should assume that any information submitted as part of the RFQ response process may be made public at the discretion of PRHTA. Bidders are hereby notified that all information submitted as part of, or in support of, both the SOQs and any bids may be subject to public inspection after opening of bids, in compliance with Art. 409 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Puerto Rico, 32 LPRA 1781. It is the responsibility of the Bidders to be thoroughly informed and familiar with the requirements of this statute. Confidential information which a Bidder wishes to be withheld from the public must be clearly exempted under this statute or other applicable law. SOQ Submission Instructions Six hard copies of the SOQ submission along with one copy on two CDs should be delivered to the Bid Board at the addresses shown below no later than 3:00 PM AST on Tuesday, June 3, 2008. Please deliver 6 SOQ hard copies along with one copy on two CDs to: Junta de Subasta Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority Roberto Sánchez Vilella Government Center (Minillas) Eleventh Floor, South Building De Diego Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00940 Additionally, to confirm timely delivery, please send a final electronic copy of the SOQ submission in Portable Document Format (“PDF”) via e-mail to: [email protected] 28 6 SOQ Submission Requirements 6.1 No Liability for Costs SOQ Submission Requirements (cont’d) The Commonwealth, PRHTA, GDB and their advisors are not responsible for costs or damages incurred by Bidders, Teams, Team Members, subcontractors, or other interested parties in connection with the bidding process, including but not limited to costs associated with preparing responses, qualifications, and proposals, and of participating in any conferences, oral presentations, or negotiations, or the exercise of PRHTA of its reserved rights as specified in this RFQ. The requirements of article 8.012A of Law 41 of December 20, 1977, 16 LPRA 3362 are applicable to this process. Bidders should familiarize themselves with its provisions, and the legal consequences of being in violation of such statute. 29 Section 7 Statement of Qualifications 7 Statement of Qualifications 7.1 Format and Required Information for SOQ Submission All SOQ submissions must comply with the format and content requirements set forth below: A) B) C) D) E) Cover Page Transmittal Letter Table of Contents Executive Summary (Optional) Team Information 1) Description of Bidder: Provide a description of the Team, including a complete identification of the Bidder and each Team Member (both equity and non-equity), including the legal name, form and state or jurisdiction where organized, and the anticipated legal relationship (governance and capital structure) among the Team Members (e.g., contractors, shareholders, consultants, etc.) as appropriate. 2) Roles of Team Members and Key Personnel: Briefly outline the roles of the Team Members and key personnel. In doing so, please ensure that all the requirements as detailed in Section 5 are addressed. Describe the Bidder’s management structure, including teaming arrangements. 3) Operator: Specifically identify the entity or entities that will act as private operator of the facilities under the proposed OMA. 4) Major Interest: Identify the individuals or companies who hold a major (>10%) or controlling interest in each Team Member. 5) Required Approvals: Provide a description of any corporate, shareholder, regulatory or other approvals or consents, contingencies and any other material conditions required to close the transaction (including any financing conditions) for each Team Member. 6) Expected Advisors: Identify the companies and individuals who are expected to act as legal, financial, or other advisors for the Team. 7) Relevant Experience: Provide a list of comparable projects in which Team Members have participated. Bidders should specify how these comparable projects relate to the proposed PR-22 OMA. 8) References: Provide a list of Team Member references, including for projects listed in response to paragraph 7 above. These references should be able to describe the relevant qualifications and capabilities of Team Members looking to take a leading role in the operation and maintenance of the Highway. 9) Legal Qualifications: The following information regarding legal issues affecting the Bidder and its Team Members shall be submitted: 31 7 Statement of Qualifications 7.1 Format and Required Information for SOQ Submission (cont’d) a) Identify and explain any significant anticipated legal issues which the Bidder must resolve in order to carry out the OMA; b) Provide a list and a description of all instances during the last five years involving contracts in which the Bidder (or any other organization that is under common ownership with the Bidder) or any Team Member was (i) determined, pursuant to a final determination in a court of law, arbitration proceeding or other dispute resolution proceeding, to be liable for a material breach of contract or (ii) terminated for cause. For each instance, identify the owner’s representative and, if different, the prevailing party’s representative with a current phone and fax number (and e-mail address if available); and c) Provide a list and a description (including the resolution) of each arbitration, litigation, dispute review board and other dispute resolution proceeding occurring during the last five years involving Bidder (or any other organization that is under common ownership with the Bidder) or any Team Member and involving an amount in excess of $25,000,000. Failure to provide this information, conditional or qualified submissions (i.e., “to our knowledge”, “to the extent of available information”, “such information is not readily available”, “such information is not maintained in the manner requested”, etc.) to requests or questions posed, incomplete or inaccurate submissions or non-responsive submissions, or failure to provide information enabling PRHTA or its advisors or other representatives to contact owner or prevailing party representatives may, in the sole discretion of the Bid Board, lead to disqualification from the OMA process. 10) Contact Person: Provide a single contact person for all future communication between the Bid Board (or its advisors) and the Team. Please identify the contact person’s name, title, organization, work address, email address, and work, cell and fax numbers. F) Technical Capability Teams should address the following areas: 1) Operations and Maintenance Expertise: Teams must provide evidence demonstrating their ability to operate and maintain a project of this nature and scope. Specifically, the Team should have: a) Substantial high-volume, toll-facility maintenance and operation experience. At a minimum, Teams must presently maintain and operate 50 miles of toll roads, tunnels, or bridges. To address this qualification, please include current miles under management and 32 7 Statement of Qualifications 7.1 Format and Required Information for SOQ Submission (cont’d) provide corresponding traffic volumes on these road, tunnel and/or bridge facilities; b) Advanced knowledge of highway maintenance, repair, construction, and practical application of equipment and materials in toll-facility operations; c) Demonstrated understanding in highway-aging behavior to assess and determine the applicability of remedial-maintenance action over time; d) All the capabilities necessary to successfully operate and maintain PR-22 including routine facility and equipment maintenance, operations and tolling management and operations, administration and public relations, and emergency operations; and e) The Bidder’s approach to management of operations, including toll collection, safety and security, enforcement, facility maintenance, technology enhancement, public relations, and liaison activities with PRHTA and other governmental agencies or instrumentalities. 2) Toll Collection and Management: Teams must demonstrate their capability to collect tolls and manage toll revenues efficiently. Specifically, the Team should have: a) Substantial high-volume experience with collection of tolls, including both manual and electronic toll collection systems. Please include details regarding the number and type of such systems used as well as details regarding the number of personnel involved in toll collection and management operations; b) Experience in toll enforcement and cooperation with law enforcement; and c) Capabilities with controls and financial management needed to manage the collection of tolls and handling of toll revenues. Please include examples of past projects for which such controls and management practices were implemented. 3) Customer Service: Teams must demonstrate their commitment to achieving the highest standards of customer service and satisfaction. Specifically, the Team must highlight their experience and qualifications in the following areas: a) Substantial high-volume, toll-facility maintenance and operation experience while maintaining productive ongoing relationships with government entities; and b) Providing excellent customer service to the traveling public. 33 7 Statement of Qualifications 7.1 Format and Required Information for SOQ Submission (cont’d) 4) Safety: Teams must demonstrate their ability to address and resolve safety issues. Specifically, the Team should have: a) Knowledge of highway safety strategies and methodologies; b) Experience in emergency response support; and c) Background in relevant traffic engineering standards, specifications, policies, practices, and processes. 5) Capital Improvements: Bidders must describe their ability to undertake capital improvements required to maintain the existing facilities. Please include details regarding knowledge of and experience with key surface transportation industry standards, such as those promulgated by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (“AASHTO”) and contained within Title 23 of the U.S. Code. G) Financial Capability Teams shall address the following areas: 1) Financial Capacity to Pay Upfront Payment and Maintain PR-22: Teams must demonstrate their financial capacity to pay the expected equity portion of the up-front payment and to maintain the Highway for the term of the OMA. To demonstrate sufficient financial capacity, Team Members (including operating partners) must provide copies of audited financial statements for the past two years, together with any other relevant financial information. If audited financial statements cannot be provided, Team Members should provide enough financial information to demonstrate that they have the financial resources and credit quality to successfully execute a project of this nature and scope. Financial factors which will be assessed include: a) Adequacy of equity; b) Profitability; c) Availability of liquid equity; d) Debt/capitalization and interest coverage ratios; and e) Demands from other toll road and infrastructure projects. 2) Ability to Raise Financing: Teams must provide specific evidence demonstrating their ability to raise financing for a project of this nature and scope. Specific factors that will be assessed include: a) Capability of raising debt and equity in the current capital market; b) The number and size of past relevant transactions; and c) Specific experiences on past relevant transactions. 34 Appendix A Supplemental Legal Materials A Supplemental Legal Materials Supplemental Legal Materials Reserved Rights In connection with this proposed OMA, PRHTA reserves to itself all rights (which rights shall be exercisable by PRHTA in its sole discretion) available to it under the Code and applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, with or without cause and with or without notice, the right to: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Modify the OMA process in its sole discretion to address applicable law and/or the best interests of PRHTA, GDB and the Commonwealth. Develop the OMA in any manner that it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary. If PRHTA is unable to negotiate an OMA to its satisfaction with a Bidder, it may negotiate with the next highest ranked Bidder, terminate the OMA process and pursue other alternatives relating to the OMA or exercise such other rights under the Code and other provisions of the Code as it deems appropriate. Cancel the process, as applicable, in whole or in part at any time prior to the execution by PRHTA of an agreement, without incurring any cost obligations or liabilities. Issue a new RFQ after withdrawal of this RFQ. Reject any and all submittals, responses and SOQs received at any time. Modify all dates set or projected in this RFQ. Terminate evaluations of responses received at any time. Exclude any potential Bidder from submitting any response to the RFQ or bid, as the case may be, based on failure to comply with any requirements. Suspend and terminate negotiations at any time, elect not to commence negotiations with any responding Bidder and engage in negotiations with other than the highest ranked Bidder. Issue addenda, supplements and modifications to this RFQ. Appoint evaluation committees to review SOQs, make recommendations to appropriate officials and seek the assistance of outside technical experts and consultants in SOQ evaluation. Require confirmation of information furnished by a Bidder, require additional information from a Bidder concerning its SOQ and require additional evidence of qualifications to perform the work described in this RFQ. Seek or obtain data from any source that has the potential to improve the understanding and evaluation of the responses to this RFQ. Add or delete Bidder responsibilities from the information contained in this RFQ or any subsequent process instruments. Negotiate with a Bidder without being bound by any provision in its Proposal. 36 A Supplemental Legal Materials Supplemental Legal Materials (cont’d) • • • • • • • Waive deficiencies in a SOQ, accept and review a non-conforming SOQ or permit clarifications or supplements to a SOQ. Disqualify any Bidder that changes its submittal without the Bid Board’s approval. Disqualify any Bidder under this RFQ, or at any time during the process for violating any rules or requirements of the OMA process set forth in this RFQ or in any other communication from or to the Bid Board. Award one or more contracts for the entire PR-22 OMA, for any segments, or portions thereof, in the Bid Board’s sole discretion. Add or eliminate facility expansion to or from the Project. Not issue a notice to proceed after execution of any contract; and Exercise any other right reserved or afforded to PRHTA under this RFQ. This RFQ does not commit PRHTA to enter into a contract or proceed with the OMA as described herein. Except as expressly set forth herein, PRHTA, the GDB, and the Commonwealth assume no obligations, responsibilities, and liabilities, fiscal or otherwise, to reimburse all or part of the costs incurred or alleged to have been incurred by parties considering a response to and/or responding to this RFQ, or in considering or making any submission or Bid. All of such costs shall be borne solely by each Bidder. In no event shall PRHTA be bound by, or liable for, any obligations with respect to the OMA until such time (if at all) as a contract, in form and substance satisfactory to PRHTA, has been executed and authorized by PRHTA and, then, only to the extent set forth therein. Confidentiality The requirements of Art. 409 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Puerto Rico, 32 LPRA. 1781, are applicable to this process. Bidders should familiarize themselves with its provisions. A Bidder which reasonably believes that certain information submitted in its SOQ is not subject to disclosure under the statute or other applicable laws or regulations should specifically and conspicuously designate that information as such by placing “CONFIDENTIAL” in the header or footer of each such page affected. Nothing contained in this provision, however, shall modify or amend requirements and obligations imposed on PRHTA or its designee by the statute or other applicable law or regulation. In no event shall PRHTA or its designee, or any of their agents, representatives, consultants, directors, officers or employees be liable to a Bidder or Bidder team member for the disclosure of all or a portion of a SOQ submitted under this RFQ. All written correspondence, exhibits, reports, printed material, photographs, tapes, electronic disks, and other graphic and visual aids submitted to the Bid 37 A Supplemental Legal Materials Supplemental Legal Materials (cont’d) Board during this process, including as part of the response to this RFQ, become the property of PRHTA upon receipt and will not be returned to the submitting parties. Organizational Conflicts of Interest The Bidders must familiarize themselves and be aware of the provisions of Act. Num. 84 of June 18, 202, as amended (3 LPRA §1755-1761) regulating conflict of interest. Under this Act, Bidders will have to certify that they don’t have any conflicts of interest with any branch of the Commonwealth. Any such conflict may be sufficient grounds to disqualify any Bidder. It is the Bidders sole responsibility to be aware of the terms and conditions under which any such conflict may or could arise under the previously-mentioned statute. 38 A Supplemental Legal Materials Form A – Transmittal Letter BIDDER: [Insert Name] SOQ Date: [Insert Date] Junta de Subasta Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority Roberto Sánchez Vilella Government Center (Minillas) Eleventh Floor, South Building De Diego Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00940 Dear [Insert Name]: The undersigned (“Bidder”) submits this statement of qualifications (this “SOQ”) in response to that certain Request for Qualifications dated as of April 25, 2008 (as amended, the “RFQ”), issued by the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) to provide for the monetization of tolls and the long-term operation and maintenance of PR-22 (referred to herein as the “PR-22 OMA” or the “OMA”). Initially capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the RFQ. Bidder acknowledges receipt, understanding and full consideration of the RFQ, all addenda, and all other necessary information available from PRHTA as of the date of this letter, and the following addenda and sets of questions and answers to the RFQ: [Bidder to list each addendum to this RFQ and each set of questions and answers, by date and number prior to executing this Form A] Bidder represents and warrants that it has read the RFQ and agrees to abide by the contents and terms of the RFQ and the SOQ. Bidder understands that PRHTA is not bound to accept any Bidder as qualified and may reject any SOQ received. Bidder further understands that all costs and expenses incurred by it in preparing this SOQ and participating in the process will be borne solely by the Bidder. Bidder agrees that PRHTA will not be responsible for any errors, omissions, inaccuracies or incomplete statements in this SOQ. This SOQ shall be governed by and construed in all respects according to the laws of the Commonwealth and the terms of the RFQ. Bidder's business address: ________________________________________________________________________ (No.) (Street) (Floor or Suite) ________________________________________________________________________ (City) (State or Territory) (ZIP or Postal Code) (Country) State or Country of Incorporation/Formation/Organization: ______________ Insert appropriate signature block for signature by a person duly authorized to bind the Bidder 39 A Supplemental Legal Materials Form B – Eligibility Affidavit I , of legal age and resident of (President or authorized official of bidder) certify under penalty or perjury, that except as noted below or any person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, (Company Name) partner, director, officer, principal, project director, manager, auditor or any position involving administration of Commonwealth federal funds • is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any federal agency; • has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded or determined ineligible by any federal agency within the past three (3) years; • does not have a proposed debarment pending; and • has not been convicted or plead guilty in federal or Commonwealth forum, in any other jurisdiction of the United States, or in any other country, for the commission of: aggravated misappropriation, in all its modalities; extortion; construction fraud; fraud in the execution of construction works; fraud in the delivery of goods; undue intervention in the processes of awarding bids or in government operations; bribery, in all its modalities; aggravated bribery; offer to bribe; undue influence; crimes against public funds; preparation of forged documents; presentation of forged documents; forgery of documents; or, possession and transfer of forged documents. For the purposes of the federal jurisdiction, that of the states and territories of the United States, or of any other country, the prohibition set forth in this provision shall apply in cases of convictions for crimes whose constitute elements are equivalent to those of the above stated crimes. Exceptions to the above are as follows: (Note here all exceptions indicating for each to whom it applies, the initiation agency, and dates of action). Contractor By: (Corporate Seal) (Name and Title) Affidavit # 40 A Supplemental Legal Materials Form B – Eligibility Affidavit Sworn to and subscribed before me by of legal age, contractor and resident of personally known to me, or identify by in day of , , 20 , Puerto Rico on this . Notary Public Note: Exceptions will not necessarily result in denial of award but will be considered in determining bidder responsibility. Providing false information may result in criminal prosecution or administrative sanctions. 41