navair 2014 - Cyprus Air Traffic Safety Electronics Association
Transcription
navair 2014 - Cyprus Air Traffic Safety Electronics Association
2 Editorial Dear reader, dear colleagues You have on your screen the new edition of Navaire, the offi cial journal of IFATSEA. High costs in mailing and printing has forced us to produce the magazine only in electronic format. The magazine is open to affiliates, associate members and sponsors to publish. As editor, welcome articles from all over the world. Let this journal to continue to be a forum of ideas and news of the interest of the ATSEP community as well as advances in CNS/ATM technology, human resources issues and other related material. Please support this effort by providing your feedback , your articles and your regional news. Theodore Kiritsis IFATSEA Vice President Editor Navaire 2 3 Message from the President Daniel J Boulet President International Federation of Air Traffic Safety Electronics Associations I recently had the pleasure of joining NAV competency verified prior to being given to authority to perform maintenance. For ATSEPs however, a key element required to maintain proficiency is missing: minimum standards for work experience. CANADA’s flight check crew on two flight inspections. Deer Lake and Gander Airports in Newfoundland, Canada are just two of the many locations attended to by NAV CANADA’s ATSEPs and pilots. The inspections involved a variety tests including a re-commissioning of the Deer Lake DME and ILS as well as annual inspections of two ILSs in Gander. As maintenance routines become extended and equipment becomes more reliable, technologists will spend less time face to face with the equipment. So maintaining currency through experience and repetitive action becomes more difficult. It makes no difference whether we are talking about ground based navigational aids in the CNS environment or ATM systems in area control centers – both are becoming increasingly complex. These routine inspections prompt us to consider the importance of periodic maintenance of navigational aids. Although technological improvements may have reduced the frequency or duration of routine maintenance, flight inspections are a reminder that such equipment should never be ignored. And ATSEPs play a vital role in the ongoing maintenance of these systems. Yet while complexity increases opportunities for work experience decreases. These divergent paths are putting ATSEPs in an untenable situation: the requirement to solve more and more complex problems with less and less experience. But routine inspections of ground based navigational aids are not enough to maintain a safe aviation environment. Pilots need to maintain their currency. The “experience matters” culture is well developed in the pilot’s world. Practical exams or “check-outs” are used in the air traffic control profession to verify an ATCO’s qualifications for a particular sector or position. So what about ATSEPs? It stands to reason then that maintaining currency is the new challenge for ATSEPs around the world. It’s also one in which IFATSEA is well positioned to play an important role in the years to come. Of course, ATSEPs will receive extensive equipment specific training. They will also have their 4 SAFETY CRITICALITY OF CNS/ATM SYSTEMS Addressing the risks in the sociotechnical system in CNS/ATM By Theodore Kyritsis IFATSEA Vice President Editor Navaire If someone from the ‘50s would wake up today, he would be amazed with the extent that the technology and especially information technology, has been integrated in our lives. He would also notice that we have become dependent on technology. If the said person was someone from the Air Navigation Services domain, he would also notice the tremendous progress made in ANS technology and procedures, in order to cope with the traffic increase, almost steady, for the last few decades. Now, with the paradigm shift in the concept of operations coming from projects like SESAR, NextGen and CARATS, initially to their area of deployment and finally the whole world, they will all be interconnected through the Aviation internet SWIM (System Wide Information Management), obviously a Decentralized model. That impresses even contemporary aviation experts. The pressure for applying new concepts through new CNS systems is immense and behind it is of course, cost reduction. It is true that while the aircraft systems have evolved, under strict Certification requirements, the ground part still lacks implemented functionalities that would harvest the aircraft capabilities. It is also worth noting that while this paradigm shift is in progress since 2005 to say the least, awaiting the first wave of deployment of mature functionalities at the last moment some newcomers come on board. These are RPAS (Remote Piloted Aviation Systems or UAV) and the issue of Cyber-security!. It is like building a ship and then changing its cargo content and on top of that try to secure it. To complete the confusion coming from this rush for change, IATA , the EU and EUROCONTROL come forward with a concept of Centralized Services* which in my view is contradictory to the SESAR concept of operations. There is another factor that is often overlooked when systems are designed. The reality factor. And reality is hard evidence that is required to be bought in and seriously looked at and taken into consideration. To explain, I mean that the change must be gradual and with secure steps especially now that the demand for Capacity has slowed down. We must not overlook the actual CNS systems and the people making sure that they operate safely and efficiently, the ATSEP. The new SYSTEM is a sociotechnical Complex system on 5 which we have no experience. ATSEP today monitor and control all CNS/ATM systems, sensors like radars and also Navigation and Communication systems under their responsibility in a closed safety critical system. The new system will be a distributed system where the new Business concept wants to see Services through a SoA model (Service oriented Architecture) instead of the robust concept of the ANSP being responsible and a coordinator of these services of today. In other words, to create a new market, through the technological change but in a Safety Critical area. Consequently, address and succeed simultaneously on a monumental change in the concept of operations and multiple operational, technical and business targets at the same time. Or do we? In 2003 a terrible mid-air collision took place in Uberlingen. The accident was deeply investigated and evaluated in many parts of the world and many recommendations were drawn from it and safety lessons disseminated. One of them identifies the issue of complex systems, the necessity to License ATSEP. The evaluation of these recommendations a few years later showed significant progress in all areas apart from the area of ATSEP Licensing. The issue is also being discussed in ICAO and although a decision was made in 2008 to proceed with ATSEP licensing, the issue was brought forward again in 2013, obviously after a long delay, and is now again to be discussed displaying a reluctance to proceed with ATSEP licensing although it is a clear lesson to be implemented by an accident. Please note that the licensing of ATSEP is an element relating to the quality of personnel of the Sociotechnical system definition. The issue of Degraded* modes of operation and the methods of recovery to normal operations is routinely overlooked and thus slips from the attention of the system designers especially when trying to create space for a business concept. It must be understood that the automation degradation has the propagation and a ripple effect throughout the system (Ref. CJ*). The technical Systems Monitoring and Control concept remains antiquated on concepts relating to the 80s although they are expected to address now a huge change of a distributed system and moreover on a SoA. Thus there is very little or no progress in the main tool to identify and address degradations and eliminate risk, safety and performance issues. With the current tools the ATSEP on duty, performing a Safety Critical task*, does not have the necessary tools and information to maintain a system situational/status awareness so as to take the needed actions. This of course can lead to errors with unforeseen impact especially when the various services have been outsourced to different providers (like the datalink service ref EASA study). Take for example a ‘false’ or ‘unidentified’ ADS-B track of a UAV. The ATSEP on duty will have to identify across the various data providers (Sur(ADS-B) , Com, airborne Com, and also decide whether it is a Cybersecurity* issue). What has the experience on changes of the CNS/ATM system taught us? 1.The change to the new ICAO flight plan necessitated a relatively small of a component of the Data Processing part of the CNS infrastructure and created a significant number of problems (ref: ICAO FP2012 implementation study). 2.The same happened with the implementation of the first datalink infrastructure in Europe (ref: EASA DATALINK REPORT) some of which relate to the dispersion of responsibility of ANSPs to external providers. From 2015 and onwards the first proven solutions of SESAR will be deployed in Europe and adjacent ‘third’ countries. There are 4 area functionalities and 2 new innovative concept technical enablers (iSWIM and i4D). As side info this is going to cost about 2.8 billion euro of which 64% will have to be invested by the ANSPs. Doesn’t this sound like an immense technological change? Changing the classic tactical ATC to a 4D Trajectory ATM where the human will play a management role. And of course a net centric system for which the issue of Cybersecurity is only now being investigated? Now even if the problem is quickly identified among the various Service Providers, and I don’t mean ANSPs but companies that will be providing each function, the process will have now to go through the various contractor’s helpdesks, with different cultures, especially safety culture. Eg a Com provider that attends the usual fixed or mobile telephony does not understand the safety 6 criticality nature of the Com service for the pilot and the controller. cality of CNS/ATM systems combined with the ATSEP profession identified in the recent EASA study, by ECORYS, as well as safety lessons from aviation accidents must be integrated in the Implementation of the new systems (SESAR/NextGen/CARATS/GAGAN). Incidentally the study for the implementation of SESII+ and the unbundling of CNS in Europe, uses exactly this example, the mobile telephony, a non-safety critical, non-time critical with uniform type pf equipment throughout its coverage and possibly worldwide. In Europe a study in FABEC for countries in central Europe, identified over 380 different types of CNS equipment! On the example of a Cyber-attack on the forthcoming SESAR or NextGen net-centric systems how will the attack be resolved from a usual technical failure (degradation?). No harmonized modern up to date tools for the Systems Monitoring and Control have been developed so far. This must be done in the most efficient way so as to achieve the flawless operation of legacy systems while at the same time fusing and integrating the netcentric Conops with the eyes firmly focused on the safe and efficient progression in the forthcoming 4D trajectory era! IFATSEA being committed to the safe and efficient provision of ANS through a competent Licensed and highly trained ATSEP professionals is actively involved and contributes its expertise to SESAR JU through the IFATSEA expert team , is involved in the SJU International Validation Team (IVT), while maintaining contacts with the other initiatives like NextGen. The IFATSEA SESAR team has proposed a concept for a modern harmonized SMC element with Health management principles embedded and systems development with built in standardized SMC capabilities. It is evident from the above that the safety criti- References: 1.http://www.sesarju.eu/ 2.NEXTGEN : http://www.faa.gov/nextgen/ 3.CARATS Presentation : http://www.atmseminar.org/seminarContent/seminar10/Plenary%20Closing%20Session/AM_930_Fukuda.pdf 4.Centralized Services: http://www.eurocontrol.int/centralised-services 5.SAFETY: a.UBERLINGEN http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~johnson/Eurocontrol/Ueberlingen/Ueberlingen_Final_Report.PDF b.The Interaction between Safety Culture and Degraded Modes: A Survey of national Infrastructures for Air Traffic Management C.W. Johnson , B. Kirwan and A. Licu 6.Degraded modes: Scaring Engineers with Degraded Modes: The Strengths and Weakness of Action Research in Air Traffic Management http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/1459.pdf (Chris W. Johnson and Andrew Kilner) 7.EASA Study, by ECORYS, on safety criticality of professions: http://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/rulemaking-docs-research-EASA-STUDY-2011-FC25--Summary-Note.pdf 8.EASA Datalink report: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/single_european_sky/doc/implementing_rules/2014-04-23-easa-datalink-report.pdf 9.Cybersecurity: a.https://www.eurocontrol.int/news/progress-cyber-security-atm 7 Pete Rosa Appointed ICAO Liaison Officer June 24th, 2014 IFATSEA is pleased to announce the appointment of Pete Rosa as chair of IFATSEA’s ICAO Liaison Committee and liasion officer to ICAO. Pete’s aviation career began in 1997 when he joined the United States Navy working on Air Traffic Electronics Equipment. In 2008 he left the US Navy and moved to Technical Operations in the Federal Aviation Administration. During this time he was part of a workgroup that developed and implemented the FAA’s first successful Aviation Safety Action Program within the technical community. Pete is a member of the Professional Aviation Safety Specialists (PASS) and a graduate of Embry Riddle Aeronautical University with a Bachelors of Science in Technical Management. 8 Author: Patrizio Vanni © [email protected] * reprint from 2012 On March 2011 the European Commission has officially declared the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) available for Safety-of-Life Service in the Aviation domain. This is an important step in Europe for the first pan-European Program that involves all States and different professional profiles. ATSEP is a key figure in the management of EGNOS operations, design, validation and system upgrades. What is EGNOS? EGNOS is the first Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) that improves the accuracy and integrity of GPS signals over the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) area. The system is able to provide a signal in space (SIS) compatible with the Safety of Life requirements defined in the ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) for SBAS. EGNOS SIS meets Integrity and Continuity requirements as defined in the EGNOS Safety of Life Service Definition Document. Another important characteristic of EGNOS is its fully interoperability with other international SBAS systems as the already operational American WAAS, future Japanese MSAS and future Indian GAGAN. Moreover EGNOS satisfies SES 552/2004 regulation concerning interoperability. Main actors involved in the Programs are: •The European Commission (ES) that is the owner of the system. •The European Space Agency (ESA) responsible for system design and related evolutions. •The European Satellite Services Provider (ESSP) that is the Air Navigation Service Provider, certified accordingly to SES regulation 2096/2005, responsible for the management of system operations and maintenance. ESSP shareholders are 7 European Air Navigation Service Providers (AENA, DFS, DGAC/DSNA, ENAV, NATS, NAV Portugal, Skyguide). •Thales Alenia Space France, under a subcontract with ESSP, responsible for the engineering support, maintenance of the EGNOS product deployed in Operations and for the deployment of new system releases. Architecture EGNOS is composed of 4 different segments: The Ground segment, which is constituted of •41 Ranging Integrity Monitoring Stations (RIMS), distributed mainly over the whole of ECAC area and a number of sites spread outside (America and Africa). Each site contains up to three different types of RIMS channels (A, B and C). They all receive GEO/GPS/GLONASS satellite signals and forward them to all MCCs for processing and computation of the EGNOS Navigation Data. The RIMS network is the basis for the collection of GPS/GLONASS signals, but also for the verification of the EGNOS SIS and therefore for the provision of integrity. •4 Mission Control Centres (MCC) located in Italy (Ciampino), Spain (Torrejon), UK (Swanwick) and Germany (Langen). In each MCC station, a 9 device called Central Processing Facility (CPF) computes in real time corrections to the signals received from the RIMS, including ionosphere delays, GPS and GEO ephemeris and clock errors and produce the EGNOS augmentation signal (SIS). The signal is sent to the user via a GEO satellite link in the same L1 band of GPS. •6 uplink stations Navigation Land Earth Stations (NLES) located in Italy (Fucino, Scanzano), Spain (Torrejon), France (Aussagel), Netherlands (Burum). These stations act for the signal uplink. •All stations are interconnected by a dedicated network managed by British Telecom and called EGNOS Wide Area Network (EWAN). The Space segment, which is composed of 3 geo-stationaries satellites (2 Inmarsat PRN 120/126 and Artemis PRN 124). Although the EGNOS Signal in Space (SIS) is broadcasted thorough the global beam area of the GEO satellites, the most requiring service levels will only be provided in the ECAC area. GLONASS and GPS satellites are only monitored and are external to the EGNOS System The User segment, composed of the EGNOS receiver and the aviation community. The Support segment, which is composed of the Performance Assessment Check-out Facility (PACF) located in France (Toulouse) and the mission-oriented Application Specific Qualification Facility (ASQF) located in Spain (Torrejon). EGNOS is used to support RNAV (GNSS) approach operations down to LPV minima. The RNAV operation LPV is an Approach with Vertical guidance (APV). The VNAV capability provides vertical guidance based on EGNOS signals. This operation is also referred to as APV SBAS. APV-I 220 m Today 2 States have published LPV approaches procedures, French (Pau, Le Bourget, ClermontFerrand airports) and Switzerland (Les Eplatures and St. Gallen-Altenrhein airports). Other European Air Navigation Service Providers are starting to sign agreements with the ESSP in order to publish new EGNOS based approach procedures within their territories. EGNOS gives a lot of advantages in RNAV; GNSS trajectories are shorter, more flexible (no need of ground beacons is required) and optimized as per radar trajectories. No installation of nav-aids are required per airport. Runways are more easily reachable when ILS is not possible because of mountains and reliefs. ATSEP role in EGNOS Use of EGNOS in aviation Performance Requirement Horizontal Accuracy (95%) Vertical Accuracy (95%) 20 m Integrity 1-2x10-7/ Approach Continuity 1-8x10-6/ 15 sec Horizontal Alert Limit (HAL) 0.3 nmi Vertical Alert Limit (VAL) 50 m Availability 99% - 99.999% Time To Alert (TTA) 6 sec Today main operations of EGNOS are carried out by: •the team (engineers) operating (office hours) in the ESSP System Operations Unit (SOU) located in Toulouse ; this team is in charge mainly for the second level support, operations planning, system deployments and central logistics management. •the team (operators, maintainers and engineers) operating h24/365d the Mission Control Centre (MCC) with the Master Role (Ciampino, Langen, Swanwick or Torrejon). MCC are hosted and managed by ANSP staff (ENAV for Italy, DFS for Germany, NATS for UK, AENA for Spain). The roles of MCC operators can be summarized as follow: oSystem Supervision: Monitoring and control of EGNOS assets, support to remote maintenance and internal support to MCC. 10 oFault recovery: Ensuring the replacement of any faulty (First Line Maintenance) part of the system, and managing remotely the actions performed by the FLM maintainers from hosting entities. oMaintenance: First Line Maintenance at MCC site (preventive, corrective), Packing Handling Storage and Operations support tasks. oDeployment and Upgrade management, including training and MCC qualification activities. oHosting: Provision of space and environment conditions to EGNOS subsystems. oOperational documentation validation. •the maintainer responsible for the first line maintenance on the 41 RIMS sites and on the 6 uplink NLES stations. Being EGNOS an aeronautical safety of life application is evident the safety relevance of the activities carried out by the actors involved in EGNOS operations, mainly the figures operating in the MCC and in the SOU. Training is delivered to MCC operators by ESSP accordingly to ESARR 5 guidelines. Qualification and training activities are foreseen for MCC operators at each every major System release (ESR). The future EGNOS will have different evolutions in the next years, comprising operability improvements for MCC , new definition of the subsystem architecture and Mission Monitoring Interface, hardware replacement, coverage extensions and GALILEO constellation compliance. On March 2012 a new release (v2.3.1+) will be deployed. This includes new RIMS (La Palma, Athens and Alexandria), some obsolescence performance enhancements, replacement of ARTEMIS with INMARSAT geo satellite. The role of ATSEP operating and deploying the system is fundamental in order to keep the system reliable and safe without any interruption of the service. Conclusions and challenges EGNOS has been a big success for Europe and for the Single European Sky framework. It has demonstrate how different cultures and skills can jointly collaborate to an efficient and safe service. An extensive training programme has been developed for MCC operators, continuous improvement and traceability with ATSEP CCC in the future is requested. Next steps includes a more relevant role of EASA in the certification process that involves different States and a big challenge for the certification of ATSEP itself. EGNOS area coverage extensions are foreseen for African (MEDA program) and East Europe regions. EGNOS can be extended for its use in other domains as road, agriculture, maritime and rail. References • EGNOS Safety of Life Service Definition Document EGN-SDD SoL, v1.0 [EC] • EGNOS a cornerstone of Galileo [ESA] • ESSP website: http://www.esspsas.eu/home • European Space Agency website: http://www.esa.int/esaNA/egnos.html • European GNSS Agency: http://www.gsa.europa.eu/ • EGNOS portal: http://egnosportal.gsa.europa.eu/ 11 FUTURE SYSTEMS I m p a c t o f R PA S * o n AT S E P * R e m o t e l y P i l o t e d A v i a t i o n S y s t e m s ( U AV s ) Carlos Viegas IFATSEA SESAR SJU Liason Our Future with RPAS UAVs, Drones...are words in everyone’s daily life today, at least in most parts of the world. In those parts of the world where other matters have much higher priority, namely; health, food and education, drones will also very soon play a role. This technology is accessible and cheap and can be of wide use for this reason for the good and unfortunately also for the bad. In short RPAS are here to stay and technology and manufacturers are way ahead of regulation authorities, this is of prime concern even though a very significant effort is being done by ICAO and EASA it is still playing catch-up with the huge pressure to put products on the market. In fact many are already here and this first of a series of articles is an attempt to spark debate and show from the smallest to the biggest what they are, what technologies are involved, their uses and the possible security and safety issues stemming from their use. We will start with th e s helicopters, tricopters, quadcopters, and other multiple rotor craft as well as flapping wing RPAS. The technology for the flight controllers, be it manual or autonomous, GPS and compass reference systems, real time video transmission and telemetry is growing daily at an astonishing rate. A quadcopter with capability for 4kg payload can be easily assembled from of the shelf parts or bought ready to fly from less than 1000$ to over 15000$ depending on the objective of the payload. An air vehicle like this can travel in excess of 100kph in autonomous flight for up to an hour and the range can easily exceed 1,5 km , considering the fully electric model lowest in the range ( the one paparazzi love so much). These numbers are important if the potential in terms of safety and security is to be understood and the multirotor ‘copter in first picture above can easily do this, it includes fully retractable landing gear by the way so that there is nothing in front of the camera lens all 360º on the X axis and 180º on the Z axis, with the RPAS hovering. Now regulation issues come to mind; How close to airports should they be allowed to fly, Up to what altitude, what control frequencies can be used, what telemetry frequencies, what real-time video frequencies can be used, analog or digital ? Although some of these questions have been addressed already many more remain and of those addressed some are not global yet, namely the telemetry and control frequencies. Should telemetry and control data have to be logged and remain available to authorities for a determined time frame in case on an incident ? The heart of such a system , the flight controller, can as easily control a tiny ( 60cm span ) multirotor or a much bigger craft from a ground station comprised solely of a laptop and proprietary or opensorce ( TARANIS ) transmitter, example of the autonomous flight display: More importantly all this is accomplished with open source hardware and software and as such available to all. Impact on CNS and ATSEP roles and responsibilities This question requires going into more detail so 12 that the issue may become clearer; Processing capability for autonomous flight with GPS and magnetic waypoint navigation , loitering and automatic “return home” , altimeter, 3D compass, 3D accelerometer, barometer, 5.8 Ghz and 2,4 Ghz real time diversity video transmission, 433Mhz or 915MHZ telemetry ( EAR99, or not! )….all this fits into the palm of the hand. Now this means that since it is opensource and cheap there is nothing to prevent these flooding the skies in the near future as the price is so appealing for sports and other events video coverage, traffic monitoring, publicity, etc. So we could say that the potential impact on CNS might be spelled “ chaos”, if regulation where not to catch-up since the issue here is not what these RPAS can do but what they may do. Capability to interfere within segregated traffic airspace at airports and aerodromes is there but if we return to the previous question another arises: since they can interfere within segregated airspace should we not integrate them into the controlled air traffic so that they may not exceed their regulated permission to fly? An integrated systems oversight seems the obvious solutions, integrated SMC, but do we have to monitor each and every one of these RPAS? Maybe the question we should ask ourselves is how do we monitor them, integrate them with other air traffic and prevent chaos. It is all new, exciting and potentially very dangerous to existing air traffic systems , to control them or the air space in which they may fly means each and everyone needs to be registered and “login” to a communications network to be allowed to fly and be monitored by systems and its flight data logged? One particular type of RPAS is the flapping wing one, this amongst other uses is targeted at bird control in airports by mimicking peregrine falcons. This raises the obvious question of how do we use them without integrating their flights with the regular airport traffic, be it ground traffic or landings and take-offs of aircraft ? the need for integrated human and systems oversight seems obvious. The Bigger over the line of sight RPAS raise a whole new set of concerns as they have the capabilities which puts them within regular on route airspace, these we will analyze in the next article although the decision and method of integrating them and their systems into regular SMC and air traffic control is unavoidable and as such easier. Quoting Raffaello D’Andrea: “..these machines are incredible powerful if they can communicate together but also incredible dangerous we are creating very powerful stuff here but it should be clear than it can be misused and abused it´s pretty terrifying what one could do with these machines and some advocate suppression…but that is not going to work, you cannot close pandora´s box so to speak. Besides we as a species are not very cautious and we are not going to turn our backs on these tools that offer so much promise so instead we just have to figure out a way to learn how to live with these machines that can do wonderful things but also very terrifying things…we have no choice.” REF: http://copter.ardupilot.com/, http://www.opentx.org/ and http://www.frsky-rc.co.uk/. View and listen with attention to : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4IJXAVXgIo&list=PLCewcH_CAfMXWAfXmk0D-w5ca2qtiIyHM&index=2 13 GAGAN GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation Summary GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation (GAGAN) is a planned implementation of Satellite Based Navigation System being developed by India to deploy and certify an operational Space Based Augmentation System (SBAS) for Indian Flight Information Region (FIR), with expansion capability to neighboring FIRs. GAGAN has been certified for providing RNP 0.1 route navigation service over the Indian FIR meeting International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) requirements. Further work is on to provide APV 1 precision approach service over Indian landmass. INTRODUCTION Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) provide autonomous geo-spatial positioning with global coverage. They allow electronic receivers to determine their location (longitude, latitude, and height) using the signals transmitted by the GNSS satellites. There are four main GNSS systems in different stages of development. The United States NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) is the most popular fully operational GNSS. The Russian GLONASS is in the process of being restored to full operation. The European Union's Galileo positioning system is a next generation GNSS in the initial deployment phase. China is building up a global system called COMPASS. 14 Mr . C.R.Sudhir GPS is very popular and is supporting a large number of general navigation and timing applications. However, the GPS system lacks the accuracy, integrity, and availability to satisfy the more safety critical applications like Air Transport. This has led to the development of techniques to augment the basic GPS service. Augmentation is a method of improving the navigation system's attributes, such as integrity, accuracy, reliability, and availability, through the integration of external information into the calculation process. There are three different types of Augmentation Systems available depending on the way the corrections are computed and sent to the users namely the Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS), the Aircraft Based Augmentation System (ABAS), and the Space Based Augmentation System (SBAS). Currently only 4 SBAS systems are in operation. The SBAS developed by USA is called WAAS which stand for Wide Area Augmentation System. In Europe the similar system is referred to as EGNOS which stands for European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System. The Japanese system is called MSAS which stands for MTSAT Satellite Augmentation System in which MTSAT stands for Multifunctional Transport Satellite System. India is developing GAGAN which stands for GPS Aided Geo Augmented Navigation. SBAS is defined as a wide coverage augmentation system in which the user receives augmentation information from a satellite-based transmitter. This system uses ground reference stations spread across a wide area and provides signals from satellites to support high availability operations from en route through to precision approach over a large geographic area. SBAS Reference Stations are deployed throughout the region of service at pre-surveyed locations to measure pseudo ranges and carrier phases on GNSS Signals from all visible satellites. The reference stations send these measurements to SBAS Master Control Station, which calculate clock and ephemeris corrections for each GPS satellite monitored, ephemeris information for each GEO, and Ionosphere grid points (IGPs). In addition to the corrections, the Master Station calculate error bounds for Ionosphere corrections called grid Ionosphere vertical errors (GIVEs) at each IGP , and also combined error bounds for clock and ephemeris corrections for each visible satellite, called user differential range errors (UDREs). The Master station sends these corrections and error bounds to the users through GEO communication satellites. User avionics apply these corrections to their pseudo ranges obtained from GPS measurements, in order to improve the accuracy of their position estimates. They also use the UDREs and GIVEs and other information to calculate error bounds on position error called the Vertical Protection Level (VPL) and Horizontal Protection Level (HPL). For the integrity of the system, these protection levels must bound the position errors with probability must bound the position errors with probability greater or equal to 0.9999999 in one hour for enroute through Non Precision Approach operations and for Precision Approach in 150 seconds. GAGAN PROJECT GAGAN is a planned implementation of a Satellite Based Navigation System being developed by Airports Authority of India (AAI) and Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) to deploy and certify an operational SBAS for the Indian Flight Information Region (FIR) with expansion capability to neighbouring FIRs. When commissioned for service, GAGAN will provide a civil aeronautical navigation signal consistent with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPS) as established by the Global Navigation Satellite System panel (GNSSP). India is working towards attaining APV1 capability over the entire land mass. As the footprint of the GAGAN space segment covers large portion of the Asia-Pacific region i.e., the whole of Indian region and neighboring countries such as Srilanka, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Nepal and Figure 2: GAGAN FOP Architecture Bangladesh, all can derive benefit of the Indian experience to provide SBAS services by appropriately augmenting ground segments. GAGAN Project was conceived in the year 2001 and planned in two phases: Phase I: Technology Demonstration System (TDS) and Phase II: Final Operation Phase (FOP). GAGAN TDS PHASE Figure 1: GAGAN TDS Architecture The GAGAN TDS was the first phase of GAGAN program to deliver a SBAS over Indian FIR. The GAGAN TDS was leading to an operational Indian SBAS and used to demonstrate SBAS inte- 15 gration, collection of data for system development and modifications necessary for Indian region and establish requirements for the GAGAN-FOP. TDS phase was successfully completed in August 2007. TDS phase required implementation of a minimum configuration system to demonstrate the capability of the SBAS over limited region of the Indian airspace to serve as proof of concept. The performance objective was to meet the limited ICAO SARPs requirements. The TDS consisted of eight Indian Reference Stations (INRES) at Delhi, Kolkata, Guwahati, Port Blair, Ahmadabad, Bangalore, Jammu and Trivandrum, an Indian Master Control Center (INMCC) at Bangalore, Indian Land Uplink System (INLUS) at Bangalore, required communication links and necessary software for navigation and communication during the TDS phase. By hiring and integrating the INMARSAT 4F1 navigation transponder (space segment) the user level testing of GAGAN signal in space (SIS) was conducted in May-2007. Results were better than 7.6 meters accuracies in both vertical and horizontal over 95% of the time within the perimeter of the reference stations. Several experiments were conducted with the SIS including the verification of the accuracy with certified airborne SBAS receiver. The successful completion and demonstration of TDS phase paved the way forward to implement GAGAN FOP. GAGAN FINAL OPERATION PHASE The GAGAN Final Operation Phase (FOP) is deployed in a spiral deployment methodology, building incrementally on the TDS phase equipment and architecture, using lessons learned, and data generated from TDS phase to meet the set objective of providing enroute, non-precision approach and precision approach service over the designated service volume. The ground based elements (GBE) of the GAGAN-FOP consist of all subsystems established in TDS phase and additional 7 INRES stations established at Bhubaneshwar, Dibrugarh, Gaya, Goa, Jaisalmer, Nagpur and Porbandar; second INMCC at Bangalore; and two more INLUS stations – one at Bangalore and the other at Delhi. The communication links are planned to have redundancies in terms of 2 OFC links and 2 VSAT links between the GAGAN ground elements, to provide the required availability of 99.999%. The objective of GAGAN FOP is to achieve two milestones: • The first milestone is to achieve an RNP0.1 capability provided over the Indian FIR as specified in the ICAO specification. • The second milestone is to achieve APV1 precision approach service as specified in the ICAO specification over 76% of the Indian land mass on nominal days. The GAGAN service volume, being at lower latitudes, is susceptible to the ionospheric variations that are very predominant and affect the GPS as well GEO signals. The conventional Single shell ionosphere model used in other SBAS systems falls apart when the ionosphere exhibits sudden changes in electron content as in the case over the equatorial region. Hence to meet the set objective of achieving APV1.0 precision approach service over the Indian land mass, for GAGANFOP, an appropriate region specific ionosphere model called ISRO GIVE Model - Multi Layer Data Fusion (IGM-MLDF) has been developed and implemented by ISRO/AAI. Another important feature of this algorithm is that, it does not require any changes in the user message structure, resulting in ease of GAGAN message usage by all the users, including the legacy users. The INRES collect measurement data and broadcast message from all the GPS and GEO satellites in view and forward them to INMCC for further processing. The data collected by each INRES site across the country is transmitted to INMCC in real time every second. The received data are processed for integrity and correction and SBAS messages are generated. The generated SBAS messages are sent to INLUS for further processing. The INLUS receives correction messages from INMCC, format them for GPS compatibility and uplink the SBAS messages to GEO Stationary satellite for broadcast to user community. The SBAS messages contain information that allows SBAS receivers to remove errors in the GPS position solution, allowing for a significant increase in location accuracy and reliability. Along with the corrections, the confidence parameters are also computed and provided to the users as messages. The messages are up linked to Indian GEO satellites through Indian Land Uplink Station (INLUS). The broadcast messages are used by SBAS compatible receivers which compute its position while applying corrections over GPS signals. 3 GEO satellites GSAT-8, GSAT-10 and GSAT15 are earmarked to carry GAGAN payload dur- 16 ing GAGAN FOP. Already GSAT-8 and GSAT-10 have been launched, integrated and broadcasting GAGAN signal. GSAT-15 is an in-orbit spare and expected to be launched during 2015. system India will be on the global radar of every harbor, land strip and airport. The GAGAN system was certified for RNP 0.1 on 30th December 2013 by DGCA. The G series NOTAM 0032/14 was Issued on 07 FEB 13:17 2014 informing the aviation users that since 14th Feb 2014, GAGAN Signal-in-space is available for aviation users for RNP 0.1 Operations in enroute phase of flight over entire Indian FIRs. The Geostationary Satellites GSAT-8 and GSAT10 have a combined coverage extending from Africa to Australia. GAGAN supports 45 ground stations leaving room for 30 new ground stations in neighboring countries within its footprint. GAGAN’s next target is to augment multiple navigation constellations - GLONASS, GALILEO and Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System for which the first two satellites have already been launched in 2014. GAGAN BENEFITS The biggest benefit of the GAGAN system is the ability to transition the GNSS system from a supplemental navigation aid to a primary navigational aid. The change is possible due to the GNSSSBAS’s high level of availability, integrity, accuracy and continuity necessary for a primary navigation aid. The effect is the evolution of navigation from ground-based navigation aids to a GNSSbased system. This evolution allows the shift from existing airways, terminal procedures and approaches that were inefficient due to their reliance on the location and installation of expensive ground-based Very high frequency Omni Range (VOR), thereby allowing for direct routing for both high and low altitude airways and the ability to fly a precision instrument approach using GPS. The GAGAN system will revolutionise navigation in India, be it by land, sea or air. However this is just the beginning, with such a dynamic program remarkable transformations can be brought about in sectors like Land & Resource Management – which will aid in forest measurement, town planning and fleet movement. India being an agricultural country, GAGAN will greatly benefit this sector with precise farming techniques. GAGAN can also be put to good use during search and rescue operations. The scientific community can put this system to good use for surveys, geographical mapping, atmospheric studies, and geodynamic studies. The advantages and benefits of GAGAN are abundant and with the implementation of this LOOKING AHEAD CONCLUSION GAGAN, like other GNSS and SBAS services, is available free of charge to all users. ICAO has endorsed GNSS as Future Air Navigation System (FANS) for civil aviation and this is India’s first step towards modernizing the regional air traffic system. Once fully operational, GAGAN will result in tangible savings and higher revenue both for operators that can now land with lower minima with the APV and for AAI through higher traffic density thanks to improved accuracy, integrity and reliability. 17 Human Factors and performance of ATSEPs. A scientific study needed to ensure safe and secured future ANS systems Subit Kobiraj Regional Director IFATSEA Asia-Pacific ATSEPs’ performance variations due various human factors including stress and fatigue need to be studied scientifically for taking corrective managerial actions to ensure the required level of on the job performance all the times. Immediate initiation of this scientific study is required as the demand in the role of ATSEPs is increasing in the areas of global air traffic safety and capacity. ATSEPs’ tasks are continuously increasing and becoming more complex with the introduction of new technology and new concepts in the ANS all over the world. In addition to ensuring the safety in the air traffic, ATSEPs are playing significant role in increasing the capacity of the traffic handling both in the air and on the ground. Scientific analysis on their job profile and on the human factors causing them to underperform including stress and fatigue would certainly give new findings. Addressing on those findings will assure the safest air traffic services across the globe in future. Since no such studies have been carried out till date, it is necessary to initiate scientific studies at the earliest specifically focused on ATSEPs. Growing complexity and increasing demand in the ATSEPs role In a capacity driven air space management, complex CNS systems are playing a very significant role from GATE to GATE to increase the capacity and efficiency in addition to safety. As ATSEPs are responsible for all the stages of life of these critical CNS systems, their role becomes more demanding and complex. Their areas of expertise are becoming complex as more and more new technologies & concepts are being brought into ANS. In the present scenario ATSEPs’ technological expertise is required in all the following areas (1) Electronic devices (2) Network theory (3) Signals and systems (4) Analog and digital electronics (5) Power electron- ics (6) Communication systems (7) Electromagnetic theory (8) Electronic measurement and instrumentation (9) Antenna and wave propagation (10) Computer HW and S/W (11) Microprocessor and interfacing (12) Microwave and radar engineering (13) Control systems and engineering (14) Data communication (15) Embedded systems (16) Optical communication (17) Digital signal processing (18) Wireless communication (19) Tele communication and (20) Satellite Communication. ATSEPs are professionals those who are expected to act immediately on demand by applying their knowledge from a wide spectrum of fields as mentioned above. Apart from all the 20 fields mentioned above if new technologies are introduced, ATSEPs are expected to learn quickly and initiate procurement action on new technology applications, identify suitable sites, install, customize and adapt the facility to the particular site, identify the suitable maintenance philosophies and carryout the maintenance. In other words all the CNS systems are being taken care by the ATSEPs from the induction stages to till the life expansion programs of the same. For ensuring the required standard of operational life of the CNS systems, ATSEPs are carrying out wide range of tasks which not only require managerial skills but also need technological skills which are of very wide range than that of IT professionals’, telecommunication professionals’, microwave engineers’, power electronics professionals’ and many other well recognized technical professionals. Scientific studies have been carried out on most of the recognized technical professions mentioned above even though their area of expertise is limited. So, similar analyses on ATSEPs are very essential and overdue. ATSEPs’ safety critical contribution in the aviation – Overlooked safety issue 18 In aviation industries, several researches have Pressure, Lack of assertiveness, Stress, Lack of been carried out on pilots, ATCOs and ground awareness and Norms. aircraft maintenance engineers. However the Need for studying the human factors in the ATrole played by ATSEPs for the air safety is overSEPs Job profile. looked and not given any priority. The impact of the above factors in the mainteCNS systems failure could result into huge finannances errors is very significant and we cannot cial loss, significant property damage, damage to overlook the potential safety threats these mainthe environment and even loss of life. System tenance errors can cause. Though we have degradation of safety critical CNS systems are many research findings in the area of mainteunacceptable as global air traffic services are de- nance in general we need to focus to initiate a pending on them. specific study in line with the ATSEPs job profile. New integrated CNS systems which mainly work ATSEPs are exposed to work in high raised towon information technology networks have the poers or even under cable trench. They work in the tential for very high consequences on failure or remote sites exposed in the hot sun and in the degradation. Future air traffic systems will be far same day come back to main data processing more automated and far more dependent on equipment room where the temperature is different. safety‐critical computers than today’s systems. The result is that serious consequences of failure ATSEPs are expected to work in a remote sites with very few or no people around and at the arise for entirely new application domains and same time they need to work in a major ACC new failure modes are evolving such as where lot many human denial‐of‐service atinteractions are retacks against netquired. worked information Good quality maintenance work leads to ATSEPs are expected systems. good results or elimination of unexpected to a wide variety of Maintenance tasks or failures, lower costs, and better safety to tasks like a very simple jobs are in direct rethe passengers. daily reading recording sponse to the air trafto specialized site adapfic services’ safely. tations. Most of the Good quality mainteworks ATSEPs are carrying are not well defined nance work leads to good results or elimination and supported with state authority documents. of unexpected failures, lower costs, and better These contrast nature of job profile cannot be igsafety to the passengers. In other words ATSEP nored further, we cannot address the human facrole is inevitable and they must perform well to tor issues by referring general management meet the required level of performance under techniques. In particular stress, pressure and faany circumstances. Unless otherwise this intigue factors need to be studied in detail. evitable role is played properly safety in the air A case study can be immediately started with traffic services cannot be taken for granted. identified samples like, busy airport to remote enSafety is of paramount importance, thus it must route site, human intensive places to remote site be ensured at all the levels and components of where one or two ATSEPs are posted and CNS/ATM. So it is essential that comprehensive approaches younger to old generations. Conclusion: to the total CNS/ATM systems and the professionals behind these systems are needed so that Need for scientific study on ATSEPs human factors and their effects in the performance are very critical role of ATSEPs and human factors assojustified. We need to take the first small step tociated with them are not over looked. wards this study. In the era of information, the Human factors- that lead to degrade the ATSEPs collection of research data won’t be difficult. We ability to perform may initiate a case study to begin with. After reTransport Canada identified twelve human facviewing and reworking on the type of data we tors that degrade people’s ability to perform efneed to collect for addressing the objective we fectively and safely, which could lead to maintenance errors. These twelve factors, known can move forward for wide scale of collection of research data. These study will not only will bring as the “dirty dozen,” can be viewed from the ATus wonderful findings but also will make us well SEPs point of view. define our role to match with the growing techThe twelve factors are - Lack of Communication, nology intensive ANS. Complacency, Lack of knowledge, Distraction, Lack of team work, Fatigue, Lack of resources, 19 42 VIEWPOINT VIEWPOINT TEAMING UP FOR SAFETY T Loïc Michel, ECA Technical Policy Advisor o achieve its mission, EUROCONTROL works closely with Member States, air navigation service providers (ANSPs), civil and military airspace users, airports, the aerospace industry, intergovernmental organisations, the European institutions, and last but not least with professional organisations. All these stakeholders come together to create a Single European Sky which meets the safety, capacity and performance challenges of European aviation in the 21st century. Partnership is the single word that best describes the Agency’s way of operating. As front-end users and safety professionals, European pilots are a key pillar of this partnership and have enthusiastically embarked on this ambitious project to improve and develop new, more efficient and safer air traffic management (ATM) concepts and procedures. The European voice of pilots is the ECA – the European Cockpit Association, which was created in 1991 and today represents 38,000 pilots from national Pilot Associations in 37 European States. In 2006, ECA signed an agreement with the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations (IFALPA) to take on the role of IFALPA’s “regional body in Europe” – to carry out IFALPA’s responsibilities in Europe when representing airline pilots at institutions, agencies and any other branches of the European Union. This agreement also empowers ECA to fully represent cockpit crews at intergovernmental organisations, including EUROCONTROL and the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC). Today ECA is involved at every level of the corporate governance structure of the Agency. Not only is it an observer organisation to the Provisional Council – the key governing and supervising body of the Agency – but it also brings a great Skyway Summer 2014 www.eurocontrol.int 20 deal of operational expertise and experience on many issues ranging from technical topics such as traffic collision avoidance systems (TCAS) or continuous descent operations (CDO) to more transverse subjects like ways of creating a stronger ‘Just Culture’ environment for aviation professionals. ECA experts very actively participate in the work of the Network Operations team, the Airport Operation team and the activities of many other working groups or ad-hoc task forces. The pilots’ presence and active involvement helps to foster ideas about how to improve aviation safety and to implement efficient ATM procedures. Even more importantly, it provides a ‘reality check’ by channeling valuable and sound inputs from people being confronted – in their daily work – by the new developments and functionalities attached to a given operational scenario. The ECA community also con- VIEWPOINT “The pilots’ presence and active involvement helps to foster ideas about how to improve aviation safety and to implement efficient ATM procedures.” tributes to the Safety Improvement Sub-Group (SISG), which aims to help front-end operators involved in ATM-related safety events to share experiences with each other. In this way, the aviation safety professionals have an opportunity to broaden their experience of the problems that may be encountered, to be aware of available solutions and therefore be better prepared should they meet similar occurrences themselves. Two very concrete and tangible recent initiatives demonstrate how fruitful such a partnership between EUROCONTROL and the pilot community can be. A significant achievement for pilots was the release of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (EAPPRE) in early 2013. With at least two runway excursions per week worldwide, there was an urgent need to scale up action against this kind of safety event. All along the elaboration process of the action plan, ECA experts very closely and actively cooperated with EUROCONTROL and many other aviation stakeholders and organisations to come up with an ambitious action plan, consistent with the operational reality. The action plan provides a comprehensive set of stakeholder specific guidelines and recommendations on how to reduce the number of runway excursions. It recognises that the Local Runway Safety Teams (LRST), which aim at monitoring closely the local aerodrome, identifying potential runway safety issues and working on means to mitigate runway safety deficiencies at local level, are a crucial tool to successfully implement the plan and produce safety benefits. It is the expertise and day-to-day experience of pilots from local pilot associations that will be instrumental in making the best possible use of LRST. Another major project in which ECA’s members are playing a central role is the Prosecutor Expert Course set up by IFATCA and EUROCONTROL. The need for proper administration of justice and – at the same time – continued availability of aviation safety information brought this course to life. The fear of prosecution or reprisals at company level after reporting an occurrence is still very much present today. The resulting lack of incident reporting breaks the experience feed-back loop and reduces the ability to achieve safety improvements by learning pro-actively from the past. This initiative tries to smooth the path for independent aviation experts to provide highquality information and expertise to judicial authorities and to increase mutual understanding. Available upon request, these experts will support – with specialist knowledge – the work of prosecutors especially before, but also during, a (criminal) investigation related to an incident and/or accident, and where appropriate, support the Court. The aim is not only to provide expertise but also to create confidence and trust which are two key ingredients to any robust and mature safetymanagement system. Expanding on this positive experience of cooperation, the pilot community is committed to continue its active involvement to support the Agency’s future work and initiatives. A number of activities are already on ECA’s radar screen, such as the upcoming Airborne Conflict Safety Forum SOURCE: Skyway magazine 21 jointly organised with the Flight Safety Foundation. More than ever, it remains essential to take human factors and operational first-hand experience into account in dealing with upcoming challenges. In particular, it needs to be clear that the future ATM system will only work if wholeheartedly endorsed by those responsible for operating it. A very good test case in that respect is the shared objective of safely integrating the Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) into non-segregated airspace. In the near future, RPAS will significantly change the look of Europe’s skies. Indeed, the smaller RPAS offer such clear business opportunities that there will soon be greater willingness to progressively accommodate them. It is therefore EUROCONTROL’s intention to help establish clear, harmonised and appropriate rules to operate RPAS. These provisions are required so RPAS can evolve into a recognised and legitimate category of airspace user that, from an ATM perspective, is able to operate transparently with other aircraft. This raises a wide range of challenging, safetycritical issues, such as the management of RPAS collision avoidance and separation or the design of human systems interface, which cannot be successfully addressed without controllers and pilots’ operational input. Close cooperation and mutual understanding with professional staff organisations, therefore, remains at the core of EUROCONTROL’s work. ECA has played its part in the past and will continue to do so in the future – in building a more-efficient and safer European ATM system. Álvaro Gammicchia, ECA Board Director for Technical Affairs 4 4 3 r d I FAT S E A G e n e r a l A s s e m b l y Report I. The 43rd IFATSEA General Assembly was held at Istanbul, Turkey at the Grand Cevahir Hotel, from 2nd to 6th September 2013. II. The Assembly was inaugurated with Greetings and Messages from Mr A Eren Bellikli, President, TATSETPA Mr. Daniel Boulet, President, IFATSEA Mr. Bilal Ekşi, General Manager of DGCA Mr. Orhan BİRDAL, Chairman of Board of Directors and General Manager of State Airports Authority and ANSP III. Due to change in programme the Minister of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications Mr Binali YILDIRAM could not be present for the Inaugural function. However, he had sent his message. In his message he said that “The Air Traffic Safety Electronics Staff have a great contribution in this achievement through providing safety of life and property for hundred of aircraft and millions of people. They are the invisible characters for the safe and comfortable flights that make all our citizens access their beloved ones. Thus, it is of vital importance for our staff to be trained accordingly to the international standards in order to provide air navigation services accordingly. In this context. IFATSEA is a significant organization for our air navigation services staff to pursue the current and international standards..” IV. Mr Bilal EKSI, Director General of Civil Aviation wrote.. “Civil aviation is getting developed very fast on global scale; and thus the importance of Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel is increasing day by day in order for ensuring that aviation activities and operations can go further with regards to flight safety and aviation security. Such personnel’s being aware of all structural and technologi- 22 cal developments and progress taking place at the aviation industry and preparing themselves for such developments and progress are of vital importance with regards to performance of civil aviation safety, rapid and orderly. During a process, where cooperation, partnership and coordination efforts are necessary with regards to our countries, the endeavors carried out by IFATSEA for building up the awareness to comply with the international civil aviation standards, and framework of the collective responsibility, are undoubtedly of great value.” V. Ms. Nancy Graham, Director, ANB, ICAO in her video message spoke about – ATSEPs Competency Program, global training, she recognized the key role ATSEP is playing in providing safe air passages to the passengers and wished that ATSEPs continue to do so. She also mentioned about the Global Aviation Programme and looked for the support from ATSEPs. VI. Mr. Frank Brenner, Director General, EUROCONTROL in his presentation on “Centralized Services” said, the representatives of the EUROCONTROL Member States see the need for change, to overcome some issues, to become more competitive and to re-establish an ATM environment that is as good as any in the world. We have currently an excellent record on safety and that’s important – we must never neglect safety. But we’re falling a long way short on other measures, particularly cost. Airspace users in Europe are paying nearly twice as much per controlled flight hour as they are in the US; we’re still trying to reach out to Asian countries to establish the needed agreements to do a detailed comparison to that region. But from the figures that are available today it is very likely that the Asians are also 23 significantly cheaper than we are, and most probably cheaper than the US. That leaves us in third place when compared to the other major regions of the world. Now being third in a field of three is not a very comfortable situation. We need to be listened to around the world; we need to be listened to in ICAO. We need to work collectively to get our act together in Europe, to retain our influence, to ensure that we have the most modern high tech solutions. In the beginning of his presentation he mentioned, I come from an operational background having been responsible for the ATM technology in DFS for quite some years so I am very much aware of just how important ATSEPs and IFATSEA are to ATM. IFATSEA’s contribution in the working groups of EUROCONTROL has in the past always been exceptionally high and dedicated and I very much hope that it remains in such a way in the future. VII. Mr. Patrick Mana, SESAR JU Programme Manager in his presentation on “SESAR Programme Results” mentioned about the Multi-Stakeholders approach at the heart of working of SESAR JU programme which include staff associations. He also mentioned about the ATSEP participation expected in the Internal Validation Team and also about IFATSEA involved in many SESAR activities : • Technical Projects : i4D, CWP, Remote TWR, SWIM, supervision • Transversal Projects : Human Factor • Task Forces : e.g. supervision • Long Term R&D: e.g. Alias (liability impact& issues of automated systems), HALA! (automation) VIII. Mr. Paul Lavigne, Director Technical Operations, Safety and Quality, NAV CANADA gave presentation on the “Just Culture” system in practice at NAV CANADA. He said in his presentation - • Why is safety important to ATSEPs • What role they play in the safety equation • How to build on a strong safety culture • Where does Just Culture fit in What is a Just Culture? As per James Reason An atmosphere of trust in which people are encouraged to provide essential safety-related information, but in which they are also clear about where the line must be drawn between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Why introduce a Just Culture? In order for workers to come forward and report errors or mistakes, an organizational climate conductive to such reporting must exist. Just Culture Benefits: • Clear understanding of “Human Error” • Clear expectations on individual treatment • Strong “Reporting Culture” IX. Other important presentations from eminent speakers were from – Mr Charles Laponite, Vice President, Technical and Operations NAV CANADA on Technical Operations New Equipment Competency & Training Mr Kenalulkar, International Transport Federation - expressed the need of working of Professional bodies with workers for the betterment of the civil aviation industry. He also expressed his concern for the worldwide trend of retrenchment in manpower due to modernization. Mr Orhan Birdal, General Manager DHMI (Turkey State Airports Authority and ANP) Mr Theodore Kyritsis, VP, IFATSEA on “A strategic view and impact of new concepts of operations on ATSEPs future job elements” Mr. Carlos Viegas, IFATSEA SESAR JU, Liaison Officer on IFATSEA SJU Executive Report Mr. Michel Gaulin, IFATSEA ICAO Liaison Officer gave an update on ICAO NGAP Mr Anders Halskov-Jensen and Ms Anne_mette Petri, Entry Point North ATS Academy, Sweden on Training and Competence assessment, Competence Assessment possibilities – legal requirements, help and guide the individual and Develop Unit, best practice etc. X. Presentations from DHMI (General Dırectorate of State Aırports Authorıty, Turkey) on - Air Traffic Services, ATSEP & CNS Services, Aeronautical Information Services. XI. There were other presnations and/or exhibition stalls from manufacturers and suppliers/ sponsors – SELEX ES, TUBITAK BILGEM, , INDRA SYSTEMS INC, GUNTERMANN & DRUNK, SITTI, BARCO, SAAB, THALES, JOTRON, NAV CANADA XII. The 43rd IFATSEA Assembly was attended by 38 countries. 1. IFATSEA Business: i. Resolution on Constitutional Changes from the present Executive Board consisting of the President, Executive Secretary, Treasurer and three Vice-President to President, VicePresident, Executive Secretary, Treasurer, and four Directors. The new IFATSEA Executive Board – President: Mr Daniel Boulet Vice-President: Mr. Theodore Kiritsis 24 Executive Secretary: Mr. Dany Van der Biest Treasurer: Mr. Andy Mooney Director - Asia Pacific: Mr Subit Kobiraj Director - America: Mr Chuck Siragusa Director - Africa: Mr. Frank Kofi Apeagyei Director - Europe: Mr Thorsten Wehe ii. The Professional and Technical Committees had joint meeting, Agenda points – • ICAO NGAP/ Definition of ATSEP • ATSEP Promotion on global level • ATSEP Competency and Liability • Impact of CNS and new concept of operations for ATSEPs There were presentations and discussions on each Agenda points. The Committee recommended for two Working Groups to study on (i) ATSEP Competency and Liability (i) ATSEP Safety Criticality. The Committee also recommended the Motion proposed by Indian affiliate – “It is proposed that IFATSEA should present a working Paper at ICAO in connection with Safety criticality of ATSEPs profession” iii. The Administrative Committee after its meeting recommended the following – • Publication of IFATSEA Navaire magazine. Option – A Full electronic version, Option – B Electronic version on website, also produced in printed form according to the identi- fied needs of a dissemination/ distribution plan from the Executive Board. • Public Relations: A Public relation plan for participation in International Organizations, Forums and Exhibitions • Possibility of establishing a working relationship with IFALPA by attending main events • IFATSEA website further improvement ideas iv. Combined Asia Pacific and Americas caucus meeting • The proposed change in Constitution and the Resolutions were discussed, reviewed and recommended with certain clarifications from the Executive Board. • Recommendation for Corporate mem- 25 bership • Brief Overview of safety initiative in the United States was given. A voluntary, non-punitive program to solve safety issues that have previously not been discovered, it is called Technical Safety Action Plan (TSAP) and is specifically intended to report on safety issues for ATSEPs • Treasurer’s Report / Budget was placed in the Assembly • IFATSEA new Affiliates: Serbia, UAE and Mongolia. Two more applications are awaiting approval Pakistan and Montenegro • Motions : 7 Motions have been proposed (3 not related to constitutional changes and 4 related to constitutional changes). 4 were carried, 3 withdrawn. Detailed overview see annex to the Executive Board Meeting Report “List of Motions”. • Two Internal Auditors- have been appointed Mr. Costas Christophrou from Cyprus and Mr. Zelko Valentic from Croatia • WG to review DOC 7192 Part E-2 ATSEPs Training will be established. • Sub-committee to work on ATSEPs Licensing will be established. • WG to work on IFATSEA’s Working Paper on Safety Criticality of ATSEPs profession will be established. 2. The 44th IFATSEA Assembly in 2014 to be held at Italy, Rome. ********* 5 26 Company News These orders bring the total number of the SCANTER 5000 Solid State family sold well over 100 units. EC adopts Pilot Common Project regulation: one step closer to deployment of SESAR R& I Solutions Dubai Int. Airport to Operate a Total of Five Terma Surface Movement Radars Terma has been contracted to deliver and install two new SCANTER 5502 Surface Movement Radar (SMR) and to upgrade three existing SCANTER 2001 to SCANTER 5502 standard for Dubai International Airport (DXB) in United Arab Emirates bringing the total up to 5 redundant SMR systems. Lystrup, Denmark, September 12, 2014 - The purpose of the Surface Movement Radar is to maximize safety in airports by allowing Air Traffic Controllers to monitor, advice, and instruct aircraft, vehicles, personnel etc. moving on the ground in an airport. A radar is very suitable for this purpose as it covers a large area and operates independently of light conditions (day/night), visibility conditions e.g. fog, and possible precipitation e.g. rain and snow. The SCANTER 5502 Solid State Surface Movement Radars will be integrated into the airport’s NOVA 9000 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) as the primary non-corporative surveillance sensor. With a record of 66.5 million passengers in 2013 – an increase by 15.3 per cent compared with 2012 – Dubai International Airport rank 2nd on the list of the world’s busiest airports. An extensive program aims to increase the airport’s capacity until 2020. At this time, the airport will handle 90 million passengers per year and will have grown to become the world’s largest airport. Dubai International added 28 new passenger destinations during 2013, bringing the total number of destinations served to upwards of 260 cities worldwide operated by more than 130 different airline companies. Aircraft movements in 2013 were 369,953, a 7.5 per cent increase compared to 2012. Recently, Terma was also contracted for delivery of SCANTER 5502 to Bahrain’s Manama Airport, on top of systems already operational at the Dubai World Central and Abu Dhabi International Airport. 30/06/2014 The European Commission has adopted a Regulation for the implementation of the Pilot Common Project, the first set of Air Traffic Management (ATM) functionalities that have been identified for wide scale coordinated deployment. Published on 27 June in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Regulation aims to ensure that the ATM functionalities developed within the SESAR Research and Innovation (R&I) are deployed in a timely, coordinated and synchronised way. Deployment in such a way is expected to bring important performance and cost benefits for Europe’s aviation and air transport sectors. The Pilot Common Projects is derived from the SESAR R&I Solutions and comprises the following ATM functionalities: • Extended Arrival Management and Performance Based Navigation in the High Density Terminal Manoeuvring Areas; • Airport Integration and Throughput; • Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route; • Network Collaborative Management; • Initial System Wide Information Management; • Initial Trajectory Information Sharing. In addition to the PCP, the European Commission intends to establish a Deployment Manager, whose job will be to implement the PCP and ultimately manage SESAR deployment activities. A review process by the European Commission will check progress towards deployment and the achievement of performance targets, as a result of the PCP - See more at: http://www.sesarju.eu/newsroom/all-news/ec-adopts-pilot-common-projectregulation#sthash.VFxGEupk.dpuf 27 EC adopts Pilot Common Project regulation: one step closer to deployment of SESAR R& I Solutions 30/06/2014 The European Commission has adopted a Regulation for the implementation of the Pilot Common Project, the first set of Air Traffic Management (ATM) functionalities that have been identified for wide scale coordinated deployment. Published on 27 June in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Regulation aims to ensure that the ATM functionalities developed within the SESAR Research and Innovation (R&I) are deployed in a timely, coordinated and synchronised way. Deployment in such a way is expected to bring important performance and cost benefits for Europe’s aviation and air transport sectors. The Pilot Common Projects is derived from the SESAR R&I Solutions and comprises the following ATM functionalities: • Extended Arrival Management and Performance Based Navigation in the High Density Terminal Manoeuvring Areas; • Airport Integration and Throughput; • Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route; • Network Collaborative Management; • Initial System Wide Information Management; • Initial Trajectory Information Sharing. In addition to the PCP, the European Commission intends to establish a Deployment Manager, whose job will be to implement the PCP and ultimately manage SESAR deployment activities. A review process by the European Commission will check progress towards deployment and the achievement of performance targets, as a result of the PCP - See more at: http://www.sesarju.eu/newsroom/all-news/ec-adopts-pilot-common-projectregulation#sthash.VFxGEupk.dpuf _____________________________ Airservices Australia Commissions Integrated Tower Automation Suite from Saab and NAV CANADA at Melbourne Airport PRNewswire/ -Defense and security company Saab announced that Airservices Australia, the Air Navigation Service Provider for Australia, has commissioned into service the Integrated Tower Automation Suite (INTAS) at Melbourne Airport. Melbourne, Australia's second busiest airport, is the fourth air traffic control (ATC) tower to receive the modern INTAS platform provided by Saab and NAV CANADA for the safe, efficient management of air traffic. INTAS is part of Airservices Australia's National Towers Program (NTP) initiative to modernize or replace the core ATC technology in its towers with a universal, flexible solution that meets current and future controller needs for safe, efficient operations. INTAS is also operational at Adelaide, Broome and Rockhampton airports. Saab, along with partners NAV CANADA and Harris, developed INTAS on NAVCANatm technology that was modified to meet the specific needs of the NTP initiative. INTAS is a fully harmonized suite of ATC tools that provides Airservices controllers with a common, modern set of key ATC systems and capabilities in a single customizable platform. NAV CANADA provided a modified version of its NAVCANsuite of ATC tools, while Harris supplied the voice communications system, and Saab provided overall project management and system integration as well as integration of surface automation tools. "INTAS has successfully met Airservices' requirements for a modern, flexible air traffic control solution that can seamlessly scale to any size airport or any controller working position," said Ken Kaminski, general manager of Saab ATM. "Providing controllers with a common set of tools helps ensure safety of operations, increases efficiency and streamlines training and maintenance." 28 "The successful implementation of INTAS in Melbourne demonstrates its flexibility and capability to integrate flight data, advanced air field lighting control, and fused air and ground surveillance with safety logic in a large complex tower," said Sid Koslow, Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at NAV CANADA. "As an air traffic service provider and ATM systems developer, NAV CANADA is continuing to advance the INTAS Integrated Tower platform to meet current and Next Gen requirements in all types of single or multiple networked tower operations." INTAS is comprised of a Controller Working Position with up to four touchscreen monitors to display data and common input devices. The system integrates: • Electronic Flight Strips • Operational Data Management (monitoring and control of airfield ground lighting, navigational aids, weather and other related systems) • Digital – Automatic Terminal Information Services (enabling controllers to construct the terminal information services messages) • Voice Communication Control System • Electronic Surveillance System (integrated terminal and surface surveillance on a common display) The INTAS architecture supports any tower position (local, ground, clearance or supervisor) and is fully scalable to any size tower (from small regional airports such as Broome and Rockhampton to Australia's major international hubs like Melbourne). NAVCANsuite integrated tower automation products combine flight and operational data, surveillance and voice communications into a single customizable air traffic management system. NAVCANsuite products are in operation at more than 70 Canadian sites, and have been adopted internationally by the United Kingdom, Denmark, Australia, the United Arab Emirates, and the Dutch Caribbean. Additional projects are currently underway in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Source : Reuters GAMMA IN A NUTSHELL GAMMA is a four year project (Grant agreement no: 312382) co-financed by the Research Executive Agency of the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) and coordinated by Selex ES. The project stems from the growing need to address new air traffic management threats and vulnerabilities due, for instance, to the increased reliance on distributed enterprise computing and the automated flow of information across a ground and airborne network. The goal of the GAMMA project is to design and implement technical and organizational solutions to address the emerging air traffic management vulnerabilities. In pursuing its objectives, the project will take into consideration the new scenarios created by the Single European Sky programme. To reach the project goals, GAMMA will be concerned with both the operational and technological aspects of the ATM. More specifically, GAMMA will perform a comprehensive assessment of the full set of security threats and vulnerabilities affecting the existing ATM system, to be considered as a ‘system of systems’. This analysis will provide the basis for GAMMA to develop a security management framework, intended as a concrete proposal for the day-to-day operation of air traffic management security. It will also define the requirements and architecture of a security solution which will include the ability to manage incidents and crises spreading throughout the system. The proposed solution will be tested in validation exercises using a validation platform that will include prototypes and demonstrators developed within the project. PLANNING AND STRUCTURE GAMMA adopts a clear activity flow starting from the threat assessment, and proceeding with the architecture definition, prototypes design and validation exercises. The figure beside illustrates the matrix approach combining the linear flow methodology with an organisation based on vertical areas (CNS, Cybersecurity, Critical Ground Infrastructures and 29 User Group membership is voluntary and users can evaluate their participation during the four year life of the project, by presenting an unbinding candidature which can be sent by e-mail to the project coordinator. Crisis Management). CONSORTIUM The GAMMA consortium is composed by the following organizations: Selex ES · Airbus ProSky · Thales Alenia Space España · Boeing Research and Technology Europe · Enav · Lancaster University · Cassidian · Cassidian CyberSecurity · Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) · RNC Avionics · Thales Research and Technology · SEA · 42 Solutions · Ingenieria de Sistemas para la Defensa de España · Romatsa · Ustav Infomatiky, Slovenska Akademia Vied · Thales Avionics · Eads Innovation · Ciaotech Srl USER GROUP SCOPE AND MISSIONS The GAMMA User Group will foster a stronger co-operation among the main stakeholders of ATM security with the aim of ensuring that the outcomes of the project will be relevant for the overall ATM security with respect to emerging threats and European ATM related crisis management. In particular, the User Group, will contribute to: setting out the shared operational expectations and requirements of all actors within the context of GAMMA ensuring that the technological solutions developed within GAMMA respond to the operational requirements identified by the Users disseminate the GAMMA results within the user community Although relevant end-users MEMBERSHIP (ANSPs and airport operators) are already participating in the GAMMA project, additional expertise is welcome to enrich the user perspective and broaden the range of feedback relating to the operational environment. The User Group (UG) is expected to include a community of professionals with an interest in supporting the definition of the GAMMA solutions for ATM security. It is expected that the UG will attract membership from experts representing organizations with a role in ATM (ANSPs, Airports, Civil Aviation Authorities, Airlines, etc) and in the security domain (Military, Police Forces, etc). The following main benefits are offered to UG members: Be updated on the latest GAMMA research on ATM security management Possibility to provide feedback to influence the research within GAMMA Networking opportunity in the two workshops that will be held during the course of the project Access to a document sharing portal to facilitate dialogue between users and the GAMMA consortium, and to download/share specific material of/for the project Furthermore, specific budget is available to support travel expenses for UG members. WORKING METHODS AND STRUCTURE The GAMMA User Group structure is based on an open and simple organization and an activity plan will be shared so as to drive and facilitate member’s collaboration when required. To join the group it is sufficient to send an email to the project coordinator (Selex ES) who will manage the UG activities. The User Group members will be actively involved in the project operational activities from the threat assessment to the validation of concepts. The user contribution will mainly be gathered through specific questionnaires and input tables which will be sent out at specified time intervals according to the schedule of the project. Visits and workshops may also be organized for a closer interaction. 30 Regional Focus Speaking at the launch, Chief Director, Ministry of Transport Mr. T-A Selby, congratulated the team AFRICAN REGION for their research works. He added that through research, teamwork and innovation, ICAO came up GHATSEA WEEK with another concept of Aviation System Block Upgrade (ASBU) which describes a way to apply the The Ghana Air Traffic Safety Electronics Associa- concepts defined in the ICAO global Air navigation tion (GhATSEA) launched its week celebration plan with the goal of implementing regional per- which begun from 5th- 8th June, 2014 at the Best formance improvement. Western Premier Hotel in Accra. The Theme for “Safety must be achieved at reasonable cost with the celebration was “Team work, Research and In- commensurate benefits. It requires teamwork and novation into Electronics systems; the backbone I urge you and other associations to unite with one to Air Transport Safety”. aim to support your management to sustain The main essence of the event was to remind Ghana’s enviable safety records in the air trans- themselves and partners of the aviation commu- port industry” Mr. Selby added. nity the need to ensure air transport safety. “The international body, IFATSEA, has worked in 31 concert with ICAO to develop training standards tions of the Aeronautical Navigation System (ANS) for ATSEP. However, in order for the local regulator future system. He added that ATSEPs are commit- to be enhanced to properly regulate ATSEPs. I ted to delivering and managing safe, secure and have tasked the engineering Director to develop efficient ANS technical infrastructure for the benefit standards to address ATSEP training, competency of the aviation community and travellers. and licensing in line with LI 2002 passed by the The program also witnessed presentations from parliament of Ghana to license all ATSEPs” Direc- manufacturers of CNS systems like Jotron, ERA, tor-General, Air Cdre Kwame Mamphey added in BARAN Group International, CS-Soft and Indra his address. systemas who were the main sponsors of the event. The President of the Association, Ing Frank Kofi The Director General also reiterated his support Apeagyei in his address stated that GhATSEA for the Association program including the hosting plays a critical role in ensuring the accuracy, in- of the Africa Regional Meeting in 2015 in Accra. tegrity and reliability of the air navigational system His statement was welcomed by the Ghana AT- infrastructure in Ghana. SEPs who already has started preparations for the He further highlighted that GhATSEA already con- event in April 2015. stitutes a trained and tested workforce and will continue to promote, and maintai technical opera- 32 • ing) REPORT – Asia Pacific Region Subit Kobiraj Regional Director Asia-Pacific Region, IFATSEA 1.CNS Officers’ Guild (CNSOG), India Review of Proficiency Scheme (Rat- A Seminar on “CNS Is Safety Critical – A Challenging Issue World Wide” and Extended Central Executive Council (CEC) meeting was organized on 1-2 September 2014. Such conference are organized to build a bridge between the Ministry, DGCA, AAI management, ATCOs, Airlines, Private Airport Operators, Industry people and us. Around 230 persons attended the first day’s programme, including dignitaries, invitees and delegates form 21 airports. There were three Technical sessions. Discussions and interactions on ICAO Working Paper from Indonesia regarding inclusion for ATSEP in Annex 1- Personal Licensing were actively done for support in ICAO Assembly. India voted in favour. Technical Session – I Topic: Safety, Security and Human Factors i. Cyber Security Eighteenth meeting of the CNS Subgroup of APANPIRG a Working Paper on “SAFETY CONCERN DUE TO STRESS AND FATIGUE ON ATSEPs” submitted by India ii. Safety Monitoring iii. Human Factors Presentations on: Technical Session – II Topic: Future Air Navigation Services Presentations on: i. Air Traffic Management (ATFM) Flow ii. Modernization of Air Traffic Services at Kolkata Airport iii. Upper Harmonization Airspace iv. Futuristic Telecommunication Infrastructure (FTI) Organized all India Extended Central Executive Council (CEC) meeting on 10th November 2013. 61 participants from 23 major airports attended the important meeting. The following major issues were discussed followed with a closing Dinner. • Manpower augmentation • CNSOG organization matters • ICAO Doc 7192 • ATSEP Licensing 33 Technical Session – III Topic: Maintenance perspective. Presentations on: i. Trends of Video Management & Airport Surveillance ii. Flight Calibration of NavAids iii. Maintenance Philosophy–CNS-ATM system perspective Large scale modernization is being carried. Indigenous SBAS – GAGAN has been into operation. Upper-space harmonization, more Radars, ADS-B, Navaids, GBAS, Futuristic Telecommunication Infrastructure (FTI), inhouse Test Equipment calibration, more in-country repair facilities etc. are in the pipeline. 2. ROCATSEA Consultancy on ATSEP training and certificate Since ANWS, the air navigation service provider of Taipei FIR, is going to improve the existing certificate approaches for ATSEP to adapt the implementation of PBN roadmap, ROCATSEA as the Taiwan ATSEP association has the responsibilities to make sure those changes won’t harm the rights of our members. However, in order not to be the barrier of air navigation services in Taipei FIR, ROCATSEA is now involved in the training and certificate studies with ANWS to achieve win-win consequences. Being a sponsor and technical supporter for ILS troubleshooting contest In order to highlight the importance and contribution of ATSEP in Taiwan, ROCATSEA has been the sponsor and technical supporter for ILS troubleshooting contest for years. The contest is held at Taichung ATSEP Training Center in summers. In the contest the contestants are evaluated by their troubleshooting skills and knowledge about ILS principles. nars Visiting transport relative industries With a view to expanding the members’ vision, every summer ROCATSEA holds visits to transport industries in Taiwan, including airlines, airport companies, traditional railways, sea port companies and Taiwan High Speed Rail. The latest event in the second half of 2013 was to visit the operation of Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation (TRTC). 3.Emirates ATSEP Association (EATSEPA), UAE There has been a lot of activity in the UAE surrounding ATSEP since the ICAO General Assembly last year. As you will remember, Indonesia proposed an inclusion for ATSEP in Annex1-Personell Licensing. A position paper for the UAE representative on the ICAO Technical Committee was prepared to brief on the situation here and to persuade our vote to support the motion. This was very successful and although ICAO didn’t agree (at this junction) to adopt the motion, our Director General of the GCAA has decided to support the licensing of ATSEP in the UAE. Subsequently EATSEPA has assisted the GCAA in formulating a workgroup (myself as Chairman) to harmonise Training and Competency (T&C) assessment of UAE ATSEP and to support their regulation with guidance material. We have also been providing them with information from the activities of the ICAO-NGAP T&C CANSO Task-Force formulating a framework for ATSEP T&C and the inclusion into ICAO Doc9868 Pans-Trg. Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zahid Centre recently dispatched 50% of their ATSEP to Entry Point North for Eurocontrol ATSEP Common Core Content and System Monitoring and Control training and shortly the remaining 50% will attend. Regionally… Oman has adopted ATSEP and has commission UK’s NATS to be their ATSEP training provider. Holding CNS/ATM technology semi- ROCATSEA as an ATSEP organization has held at least two internal CNS/ATM seminars in the second half of 2013. The seminar subjects included DME/DME coverage analysis, flight check technique and the implementation of GNSS in Taipei FIR. According to the plan of 2014, the next seminar will be held in this August. 4. Mongolian Air Traffic Safety Electronic Personal Association (MATSEA) Generally, we organize the sport events for our members. Also we did organize 34 health care event for our members. We plan and organize seminar and other events during the International communication day 17 May, 2014. Our suggestion to Exec Board is to organize or encourage the training program among the membership countries in order to improve their skills, exchange experience, appeal cooperation between neighbouring countries and make friendship. 5.Workers Union Of Transport Government (KOKKOROSO), Japan Council, visited Japan. On September 10th, Dr. Aliu visited JAL’s Operation Control Center, ATC facility at Haneda (Tower and the radar control room) and Tokyo System Operation and Management Center, where ATSEPs are at work. When he visited Tokyo System Operation and Management Center, his only question was whether Japan has licensing system for ATSEPs or not. Mr. Shuji Takahashi, former IFATSEA vice President, in the hosting team on JCAB side explained to him about the Japanese ATSEP licensing system. Dr. Aliu listened to the explanation very ardently, showing his particular interest on the issue. 6.Nepal Air Traffic Safety Electronics Association (NATSEA), Nepal We hold "Aviation Division Committee Meetings" (similar to General Assembly) four times a year with aviation workers from all over Japan. We have consultations with CAB management twice a year to exchange opinions and to realize our claim regarding aviation safety and working conditions improvement issues. ICAO Council President’s visit to Japan: From 5th to 11th of September 2014, Dr. Olumuyiwa Benard Aliu, the President of ICAO 35 ATSEP worldwide. The new Executive committee of Nepal, Nepal Air Traffic Safety Electronics Association (NATSEA) is currently trying to implement rules regulations and its amendment performed by Nepal Government on behalf of ATSEP. i.e. Implementation of PLR, Hardship/Stress Allowance etc, compulsion of License/Rating for working on surveillance, navigational aids etc. State of Innovation of New Technology: new terminal MSSR and en-route MSSR is going to replace existing ASR/SSR and it will be completed on 2015 March. New centralized VCCS has fully replaced the existing VHF airground communication system. AMHS was installed and operated successfully from 2012 November. The council of management of the Air Traffic Engineering Officers‟ Association (Sri Lanka) wishes to organize seminar on introduction of “Training Manual for ATSEP” to aware members in our division aiming the implementation training in accordance to the guideline stipulated. In such an event the Association wishes to invite Director General of Civil Aviation in Sri Lanka and Relevant Authorities of the AASL. ATSEP training (License/Rating) Activities and Standard: In house trainings are conducted by Civil Aviation Academy. CNS training manual developed by CAA in line with ICAO Doc. 7192 part E-2. Status of Human Factors: CAAN agreed for stress allowance and implemented to regulate but final implementation is still in discussion. All ATSEPs are under the Technical Support Division, under which Security and Facilitation Division also falls. Thus it is a problem for us to manage license/rating for ATSEPs working under this division, as it is not been mentioned under ICAO’s rating policy 7.Air Traffic Engineering Officers Association (ATEOA), Sri Lanka Proposed designation for the existing “Technical officer‟ category is ATSEEO (Air Traffic Safety Electronics Engineering Officer) which is based on ICAO acronym ATSEP. The purpose and reason for the said designation name change in our division (Electronics & Air Navigation Engineering) is solely to be unique among other technical categories of various divisions (Civil, Mechanical & Electrical department) in our organization. Presently we have been convincing the management of AASL the needfulness of afore said change with respect to the duties entrusted to technical staff of our division and also educate them to recognize ATSEP in our organization in contrast to the 36 RPAS Remotely Piloted Aviation Systems ...changing the aviation scene 37