Chapter 3 - Agence de l`Eau Seine Normandie

Transcription

Chapter 3 - Agence de l`Eau Seine Normandie
4
!
@
!
!
)
' 1
&
&
' 6
)
%
,
&
&
)
&
&
%
&
%)
&
'
7.39353603482 06-2
67+3-* 06-2
,784.4 ? 48+3:-6.<760 =,-84
8.06-24
<79658 ;6.87
@A67.8+8-.4 >,<-267384
"#
/
"&' %+* )& -.* *)&* "&' $+-"/
&
)
)
' (
)
4; 6
"-*( $%(+*+ $, $(0 "&'1 8"+)&
) &
8 )
&
'
"
"
) *
(
&' + ) & * +. %*&' -*&- &
(
#
*+&#
$ 5* 3
!#' $
"#%
/
%
,
%
&
1
, '
;
'(
%2 I
%
%
%
& &
&
&
8
+
&
)
-*+ ' '
)
(
'I )
%" F
'(
4$
%
)
'
&
A&
G
'
/
%
!$ %
5%#
%
)
-, % )
&
)
)
'(
8-43.1 3-/6>DE+
"#
)" 67 8 *2 # %&9%&, 3
(
$#%/"-)$& '*&+)-1 81 ()5*(8"+)& =$&*
-*$ ' 2 *$ '+ 2 - 3
&
&
"
)
" '
92 )
&
))
&
&
& ' (
) ,
'
4;6
@
%)
)
)
/
#
%
,>
)
'
)
:' (
)
)
%
&
, &)
-" :68 *2
* +. %*& -*&& - # * +).%- ' 3
@
, '1' $ '
9$%
'1
? )
=
)
&
%
&
%)
)
&
&
%
'6
)
$%
'& /
!
#
'
9
&
%
)
!
&
0 &
&
*
)
)
(
:
&
)
)
!
!
'
(
'
&
)
%
)
:%
)
)
'
%
)
&
& '
#"
$ 5* % 1 *2 ' (%- ;' - * 5*)'
(
5
8 %
)
%
8
)
)
8
)
9 F
8 :
%
9 F:%
"
&# ' 3
, ' (%- '
)
)
1
&
! %
' (
,
!$"
# -
!
%
&
9
"
8
, &)
'
%)
0 (
9
:' 6
,
&
+ "
:%
!F'
*
'%&,.1 2*-+'' # *&
(
)
&
&# *2
&
%
& %
)
*#+- %*&
'
'
%
%
%
':
&
'1
%
&
&
'1
&
&
)
%)
'
0
%
&
9
(
!'.
*
% K %
C
:%
9
,
8
&''':'
(
8
& $%
!
4;6
)
9
)
&
&
)
&
&
&
&
6/
<
& !"%$
:
':'
%
%
•
$
9
9
1
•
•
•
/
#*3 &'
#
(
!%
)
'(
#
) & %
B
,-...
" < &'%( %&#+' % ' %&-
& %
& '
. , ' - * *2 - %(% 1
!4%
'
9#5F:
'(
&
&
%
9. F:'
9 F
:'
)"
-*&*$ %- 2 - * ' %&
.*- %*& *2 %&#+' % '
!' (
&
0
; &
' +
&
'1
&
%
&
&
&
&
&
'
' (
%
9
,
&
&
:' 6
9
)
*
/
4' 2
)
:
9
> %
:
)
&
)
'
%
!
,
9
%
1
) ,
:'
%
&
%
*
5.3)3.1 393-2<4.7360 43.84
<50867 965303.384
*739,,2 3-2<4.71
/8+35604
8.600<7*1( 4<79658
.786.+8-.
<*67
6A87
"#
4;6
&
&
$9"-)$& $,-.* 0 ")& )&'%+-()*+ )& -.* 8"+)&
&
%
1
" F
)
'
)
'
& )
&
#D <7-,)87 FGH
3*/ #D
,; ;6.87
5,-4<+A.3,-
-2<4.7360 6)876*8
,; #D
3*/ ;6.87
5,-4<+A.3,,; #D
,; ;6.87
5,-4<+A.3,-
6.87 5,-4<+A.3,- F+ D +3003,- ,98<7,4 ,9 #H
):%(*
! I
$+)-)$&)&: )& )&'%+-()"/ +*9-$(+ )& -*(0 + $,-.*)(/*5*/ $,"''*' 5"/%* "&' 6"-*(
9$&+%0 #-)$& ; >?"''*' 5"/%*@ ?-%(&$5*(<
%
% $ @ ) ,% . B
& K) ,
K
%! A
!5 @
&
(
% 4
K
%"@ '
%!
&% ! @
K
&% !$ ( 0
K
% !.
% !" @ ' &
%
6
%
@
% 4
% .
% #
)
)
=
)
&%
&
I
)
&
4;6
K
*
/0
%5
% !!
&
%
% !4
% !# /
&% ! 6&
%
%
%
% 5/
& '
)
#
& % $
&
$F
F
&%
) ,?'
)
)
%
&%
?
'(
;)
0
%=
%
K
&%
%#
9
'
%
&: )
:
. , (*.+$
*2 * & % ..1 *<%- 3 '
1
&
(
&
?!' (
=&
0
%
9A@:
/
2
%
)
%
)
)
&'
*
'
<79658 .786.+8-.
8)876*8 3-2<4.71
6A87( 5672>,672
0644 ? 5,-4.7<5.3,- +6.873604
64.8 5,0085.3,- ? A7,58443-*
.880( 9,<-27384( +8.600<7*1
6435 5/8+35604
085.7,-354
<.,+,>308 +6-<965.<73-*
8.60 ;,7E
85/6-3560 ? 8085.73560
8I<3A+8-. 6448+>01
./87 485.,74
/8 A38 5/67.4 678 A7,A,7.3,-60 ., ./8 ;83*/. ,9./8 2345/67*84 3- ./8 *8,*76A/3560
5,++3443,-4 3- 7806.3,- ., ./8 .,.60 9,7 ./8 >643-
"# 4 ():)& $, A-$B ,/$6+ ')+9."(:*+ )&-$ -.* *&5)($&0 *&- 81 )+$/"-*' +)-*+ "&' 81
-.$+* 0 )B*' +)-*+ &$- 9$&&*9-*' )&-$ -.* &*-6$(7!81 +%838"+)& $%(9*?
8"+*' $& '"-" ,($0
0
'
" "
"
(
.,-... #
4 F
F
L &
,:%
+
!#F
0
&
8
9$ F
/
+
% $.F
7
'6 &
& % $F
'
6&
&
•
;
&
)
676+8.87 <482 >1
6-2 ./837 .,J353.1
4;6
& ) &<
6.87 *8-5384 ., 5605<06.8 A,00<.3,- 5/67*84( >6482 ,- ./8 I<6-.3.1 ,9+8.604 2345/67*82
•
&
&
&
)
•
•
&
&
1
)
& *
% 0
& 9
&
%
4;6
%
6&
&
)
+
&
)
%
%
<
&
& ) &%
6A
:<
,
%
&
%
0
%
,'
&
"
=+
(
*2
-*&*$ %- 3 %,
! %
9+
&.
%
8
&
$#
&- 2 $ %&,
&
:%
&
/
!
' 6&
&
4
%)
'(
%
9
>
:
!
*2
!
)
:
<
&
!$F
'
+
%
'
3
B
&
F
)
& '1
!
!
&
B@
%
&
'(
9M. F:' 6
(! /
!"55
)
)
&
%
& '(
)
766
'
>
'
(
% !5F
!$ %
L
6&
• 4 '
*
%
)
#$F
'(
&
8 '
;
'
&
5 ( !
) & ) &%
+
%
& 9!#F
!
#
0
#
, &
&%
)
)
&
+
'
%
#
&%
%
%
,
:
Dried pulses and
protein plants
5%
Industrial beet
5%
Folder maize
5%
Temporary and
artif icial grassland
3%
Wheat
33%
*):.- $,":()9%/-%(* )& -.* 8"+)&
Permanent
grassland
25%
$%(9* ?
C
,7 4.6-2672 62282 )60<8 ,9./8 967+3-* 485.,7 3- ./8 643- 34 K
4;6
;
'
)
Grain maize
3%
):%(*
9
C:'
Sun f low er
1%
Rapeseed
9%
Barley and w inter
barley
11%
/8
@ &
&
'(
&
4#F
; $"F
+
•
9
'
6
&
+
9 B@:% )
•
%
A()5"%B C :(*+-* C
>3003,-
)"
,%*& . ( % %*&' %& , %-+. + . *#+- %*&
6&
&
&
%
&
9
%
)
,
%@
92 )
& ) &
@
,
%
C:%
%
%
&
A
:'
&
&
&
%
&
&
L
<
%
!#F
C
%#
766;
&
5 F
%&
'(
'
>
%&
•
%
8 $
"!F
%
%
) &
&
(
&
;
&
)
%)
)
&
<
:
•
&
&
2 )
•
&
%
'.F
&
!"# %
&)
&
%( N
)
>
&
:<
) %=
& 9@
?
&
0
%
&O
,
'
(
,
& 9 '$
,
%
0
%
766% $F
9. F
& 'A
:%
)
9" F
&
%
:
*
'
Sector
3)84.,5E <-3.4
"8/*
Cattle
2,189,309
Pigs
95,342
5*(5)*6 $, )5*+-$97 &)-+ )&
6 )
9 &
%)
&
Miscellaneous Total
102,854
2,467,353
)& -.* *)&* $(0 "&'1 8"+)&
$%(9*
F
&
&
%
%
Poultry
79,850
6
!$F:'
)
)
%
&
&
&&
&
'
%
4;6
,+3-6-. .1A84 ,9967+3-* ,- ./8 >6434 ,9./8 G
,9967+4 3- 865/ 56-.,8-8760 57,A4( 878604( ,30 48824 ? A<0484
878604( ,30 48824 ? A<0484
878604( ,30 48824 ? A<0484( 76>08 57,A4 ? /87>3),784( /88A ? *,6.4
67E8. *6728-3-* ? /,7.35<0.<78( ./87 5,+>3-6.3,-4( 878604( ,30 48824 ? A<0484
67E8. *6728-3-* ? /,7.35<0.<78
./87 5,+>3-6.3,-4
76>08 57,A4 ? /87>3),784( /88A ? *,6.4( 878604( ,30 48824 ? A<0484
67E8. *6728-3-* ? /,7.35<0.<78
6371 56..08( 6..08 78673-* ? +86.( /88A ? *,6.4
#3-8:*7,;3-*
,<-267384 ,9*7,<-2;6.87 >,2384
"#
-"
1#*+ $,,"(0 )&: )& -.* "+)&
)%,, ' '*+ - *2 #%22+'
1
*..+ %*& )1 . &
$ &
*#+- ' &# &%
&
)
9
&
)
:%
'B
%
)
)
%
A
%
&
:' 6&
&
'(
A
)
&
F
9
+
)
%
,
%
)
& ) &
,
&
)
F
& 'A&
:'
&
'2
% )
766'
!5F
)
%)
677% &
%
# F
&
!! %
'
&
)
&
9 '#F
&
%
,
&
' 1
% )
!% !F
%
)
)
,)
)
'
&
%
)
%
&
%
*
)
,
&
0
&
)
'A
%
)
&
&
*
*
9)
)
)
! %
& '" F
%
9 '&'
*
& 4% 44
%
&
>
)
:' I )
%
)
&
&
:%
&
'
&
4;6
,
1
# 2"
"
(%, %*&> . ''
(
&
)
) 9$"F
& & &
) ,'
(
6
& ?8 *2
) ,
' (
*2
& 3 * 9 @4A7 $ %..%*& + &*(
% $ , %
&
) ,
) ,:
&
9
. &,
&8
)
4%
.
&
'
#
&
+
)
& &
%
&
& 4.F
:
4
6
' F
+
9
3
&
%
&
&
/
:% )
5 F
! 9
!5'$
:'
7
'
&
9
' #
#
% &
:%
'1
)
'(
#
%)
)
! "
•
•
•
•
•
#'
)
<
&
8
&
,
9J
LA %
)
)
'(
'(
D )(*&D *$'*D
) ,
9 0
%
)
#'
8
(*"7'$6& $,6"-*(6"1 -(",,)9 81 9"-*:$(1 $,0 *(9."&')+*
$%(9*?
&
D %($0 "##)&:
&
%)
;
C
G
*
$%#
% )
:%
%
;
%
&
& %
)
&
#
!
!
0
-A65E82 +875/6-2348 3- /86A4 F5,-4.7<5.3,- +6.873604( 5,60( ,78( 5878604( 8.5 H
4;6
3-87604 ?5,-4.7<5.3,+6.873604
G
8.600<7*1 A7,2
G
9" F:<
):%(* 4
G
8.7,08<+ A7,2 G
)
4%
87.303=874
784 ? ;64.8 9,7
+8.600<7*1 ( G
+
P!4
5/8+35604
G
,60 G
2
<
)
&
&
345 +6-<965.<782 *,,24
G
67+ A7,2
,,2 A7,2 G
G
:<
I
(
'(
>
'
!
&
%
)
)
&
%
G
4
*
&
8
•
•
)
&
'
' *
(
'
&
#
/
#
#'
!
'(
'
6
&)
%
&
&
& & %
6
%A
,% ) ,
'(
'I )
;
%
&
&
&)
)
&
&
P$$ -
)
)
&
&
% ,%
G
&
%@
%
&
&
C6 % )
&
*
,%
&
'
)" * ' .%& > A * ' &#
$ 5* 2%' %&, &# '
& &
&
9
(
)
.. 2%' 2 $ %&,
,%*&
&
&
&%
&%
&
%
'':'
(
!
9B
*
9
&%
%
&:%
:
)
(
92 I
%
&
' 1
!
:%
'
6
9! '$#
:
2 I
9
9
:%
94'4
%
:
&
% $ "%.
%
%
.
-
& ) &' 1
9!5' $ :%
- 0
&
%
'
&
9 '"4
:' 2
%
)
,
%
4.'4$
:
*
& -
!
'
/0
) ,
6
94 F
#' 6
*
2 I
9
)
!""#
8
:
)
)
!: )
&
%
&
%
&
)
%
&
9
%
'
(
6
J
2 (
%
:
9 & %
%
(
%
QNR % I
:' (
*
,9"'! %
& F
&
94'4
% !.F
%
&
%
%
%
%)
&$ F
%
%
%
> %&
:'
0
8
)
@
%
4;6
:
& ) &
)
$
:%
:'
,95'4
9)
:
9 '&' B
9 '&' 4$F 0
&
'
:
%
&
$ F
,9
:' (
!$
F
7000
2500
Commerce
(x 10 thousands tonnes)
*Petroleum products: 64%
* Container traffic: 21%
* Miscellaneous goods: 20%
* Industrial bulk (coal, chemicals...): 9%
* Road traffic: 4%
Passengers
(x 000 passengers)
Fishing
(x10tonnes)
2000
Volume of activity
Cros Channel traffic: 93%
Cruise ships: 7%
Marina
(number of moorings)
* Agrifood bulk(wheat, sugar, flour): 50%
* Industrial bulk (refined oil products, chemicals,
coal…): 50%
NB: cumulative activities of 5 sites: Rouen, Saint-Wandrille
Le Trait, Radicatel, Port-Jérôme, Honfleur
1500
1000
500
):%(*
Granville
Diélette
Barneville-Carterêt
Cherbourg
Barfleur
Saint-Vaast-la-Hougue
Grandcamp
Port-en-Bessin
Courseulles-sur-Mer
Caen-Ouistréham
Dives-sur-Mer
Deauville-Trouville
Honfleur
1#*+ "&' 5$/%0 * $,"9-)5)-1 $,-.* 0 ")& #$(-+ )& $(0 "&'1
!
6
•
•
•
•
•
Rouen
Le Havre
Fécamp
Saint-Valéry-en-Caux
Dieppe
Le Tréport
0
! E
&
%
% 5F
#.!
&
2 )
7
$ %
;
) ,&
%$!. 8
&
<
2 )
:
:<
%)
!
<
9#4F
2 )
&
:
7
'
%
8
& 9
6
%
,
95 F
2 )
P! #
:%
"5(*!,)+.)&: '"-"?,)+. 0 "(7*-+ $, $(0 "&'1
+
&
)
$%*&!
&
P!!
9# %
2 !
95%
8
:
'
&
)
' (
$F
&
0
$ F
+
44F
+
9
&
:%
' (
'
,
%
&
)
'S
)
)
&
'
(
@
&
P!4'#
4;6
P.5'.
'
%
)
P$ '"
&
&
%
94!%$
&
!:
&
%)
&
@
@
2
9
:
!%$
@
K!!'
'
!$%
& ) &%
'
P!'!$
%
;
)
9
%
&
&
:%
&
)
,'
,
)
&
'
'
5!F
5"F
8
*
'(
)'
#
*
%
" #
10 direct jobs
MARINE FISH FARMING
€2m
INLAND TROUT
FISHING
210 direct jobs
€20m
35 direct jobs
FISH POND
FARMING
€3m
2,150 direct jobs
SHELL FISH FARMING €107m
):%(*
6*
&
!4'$F
9$&$0 )9 6*):.- $,"F%"9%/-%(* )& *)&*3 $(0 "&'1
&
%
% )
&)
&
'
, &'
%
+
&
' 2
)
)
%
&
&
8
P4
&
% "
5F
'
+
*
&
)
$
+
#
&
%
&%
P % $ %
9
P#!#%
9P !#%
:'
4;6
%
&K
%
&
+1+B%
& %
&'
&
0
6&
)
:
%
&
&
3
4
#
" 6?7 777
(
9
-
-
(
%*& . 2%'
$ %
,
$ &
& -*&*$ %- 3 %,
)
%
)
&
'(
! $%
5
&
966
@6:
66
&
%
*2
*+&# @ 77 $ %..%*&B1
4 %
,
:' (
%
&)
$$%
@6 9
!
)
#%
&
&)
'1
& )
%)
#$%
!$%
&
+
*
&
)
&
, &
9)
&
1
+
0
)
' (
& &% )
&
F
9
P"
'6
&
&
)
:' 1
&
%
,
'
'I )
% *
& , %
%
&
%
& , :%
!!
&
&
'
&
'(
5"
0
K .$% 0
&
&
K 45
K!
)
*
$
8
) $" 8
*
K! 9
&
&
0
&
&
&
)
:
&
)
)
(
:' A
'
)
)
&
)
&
%
)
*
&&
&
%
, &)
)
'
+
8
)
&
)
)
)" )*+ 6 $ %..%*& )
(
' &# 4 $ %..%*&
$$
F
)
,
% $F
*
'(
1
+
(
'A
%
* . #*%&, 3
)
*
%
' * '
)
Water skiing
7%
&
%
%
8
%
*
& , , &%
%
Motorboats
3%
)
&
'
%
&%
, )
)
9&
):%(*
4;6
)
'
Triathlon
18%
Sailing
32%
&
*
& :'
/%8+ ,$("F%"-)9 "9-)5)-)*+ )& -.* 8"+)&
Canoeing Kayak
27%
Rowing
13%
&
!
.
9
&
(
+
%
%
&$
"
&
#F
)
+
-
+
*
'$
'!
&
&
P!
P '$
'(
%
,
'#
'
9
)
:' *
'9
*
0
:'
&
Champagne Burgundy
Centre
4%
Ardenne
2%
6%
Ile de France
3%
!
&:%
'
0
!'$
+
#
:
Champagne
Ardenne
10%
Normandy
82%
):%(* 2 ."(* $,-.* (*:)$&+ )& 8"-.)&:
;#($#$(-)$& $,-$-"/ &%0 8*($,5)+)-+<
+
&
Burgundy
5%
Picardy
3%
4;6
:' (
$5' '
&
P!
&
2
@
:
'
&
9
!
#
) &
'(
9
K4#
1
& ;4 '
)
&
*
:'
)
*
9
Centre
3%
Normandy
27%
Picardy
5%
Ile de France
50%
):%(*
."(* $,-.* (*:)$&+ )& 6"-*(+#$(-+
;#($#$(-)$& $,-$-"/ &%0 8*($,5)+)-+<
)
&%
%
% #
I
)
*
" "
#
)
&
%
&
'1
&
;
&)
%
&
9
:' (
)%
)%
9
& 9&
9
)
&
&
%
&
(
:
)
)
&
)
9 '$ @ :
1 !""$%
. F)
!
!
)
$!
9
&
9! F
%
:' @
@ %)
G
F
)
)
& %
% )
)
)
)
.F
9 @ :%
94 @ :'
)
&
C:' 1 !""$%
# )
)
&
'(
)
,;87 ,9/127,8085.735
4.6.3,-4
4;6
&
)
'
"#
:%
:'
&
$!
&
*
1'($*/*9-()9 #$6*(+-"-)$&+ )& -.* 8"+)&
%
5
6
(
) &
%
&
&
#
"
"
) &
9B :%
)
&
%&
0
8
#
)
#
)
&
)
;
0
)
8
&
'(
& 9)
:%
'
Uses
9 )
) &
Users
(thousands)
Jobs
(thousands)
Economic
weight
(€ million)
6&
1
B
:
45% of outlets in the
basin, 28% in the rest of
France, 26% exported
17,500
23 in water and sewerage
(13
&
services
private sector)
Turnover of water and
sewerage services =
2,250
1,600
145
(of which 30 related to water)
Economic dimension (SGM)
8,000
=
6,400 touristic visits
4
(of which 19.5 related to
water)
(of which 3 in commercial
navigation)
Turnover = 332,511
(of which 4,100 related to
water)
Turnover = 370
(of which 130 for
commercial navigation)
3
Turnover = 500
LINKS BETWEEN WATER USES AND WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES IN THE BASIN: RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIFFERENT USES AND
INCONVENIENCES POTENTIALLY SUSTAINED BY THOSE USES FOR EACH ISSUE
Chemical
pollution
Workings of
aquatic
environments
Drought and
flooding
Eutrophication
Microbiological
contamination
4;6
Stormwater runoff
Extra cost of drinking water
Health impact
Degradation of rivers
Impoundments
Stormwater runoff
Degradation of the natural
purification function of
wetlands
Flooding
Stormwater runoff
73% groundwater extraction
61% surface water extraction
Damage to property and the
environment
45% of phosphorus emission
Stormwater runoff
Extra cost of drinking water
and degradation of rivers and
coast
Waster water treatment plant
discharges
Stormwater runoff
Health impacts
70% of phytosanitary product
90% of ‘Metox’ emissions
emissions
Erosion, drainage, pressure on
wetlands
Hydroelectricity:
hydromorphological
damage
Losses of materials being
transported
1 mt chemicals and
fertilizers
Hydromorphological
damage
Disappearance of migratory
fish
18% groundwater
9% groundwater extraction,
Maintenance of navigable
but irrigation is sometimes the abstraction, 38% surface
routes
leading cause of abstraction
water extraction excl.
Modification of flow
locally
EDF ; 61% incl. EDF
23% of phosphorus emissions
80 to 90% of nitrate emissions
Discharges from farms
?
500 extraction sites:
hydromorphological
damage
Modification of flow
Aquaculture
Coastal fishing
Recreational fishing
Bathing
Aquatic leisure
activities
450
10,000 to 60,000
3,000
Uses
Users
(thousands)
Jobs
(thousands)
Economic weight
(€ million)
2.4
3.3
?
?
1
Turnover = 138
Turnover =108.4
Expenditure = 100
Expenditure (coast)
= 370 to 1,000
Club budget
= 30
LINKS BETWEEN USES OF WATER AND WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES IN THE BASIN: RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIFFERENT USES AND
INCONVENIENCES POTENTIALLY SUSTAINED BY THOSE USES FOR EACH ISSUE
Chemical Pollution
Workings of aquatic
environments
Drought and
flooding
Eutrophication
Microbiological
Contamination
Trophic concentration of
Concentration of pollutants by
pollutants by fish: health
filter feeders: health risk
risk
Hydromorphological damage
to coast
Excessive abstraction locally
Dredging
Degradation of
biodiversity
Degradation in quality:
health impact
Obstacles to free circulation
of fish
Lack of water
Trophic imbalance
Health impacts
Degradation of
microbiological quality of
coastal waters
Degradation of biodiversity
and decrease in quantity
Damage due to
development
Damage due to
development
Lack of water
Lack of water
Degradation in aesthetics Degradation in aesthetics
and biological quality
and biological quality
Degradation of
Degradation of
microbiological quality of microbiological quality of the
water
water: health impact
%
4;6
!
!!
7
(
•
•
•
•
)
) &
&
;
&
)
&
&
+
9
(
&
)
!
" '
:
)
'
' !
'
'(
)
'
(
&
#
'+
>
'
&
)
%
%
'
& *
%
)
)
&
)
9
:' (
)
*
! )
!' 1
&
89
*
A :
-
:
&
;
)
#
' (
'
9
%
)
)
)
& 9 I M:
) &
&
)
&
)
'(
&
0 & '1
&
*
!
&
'
)
& ' (
0 &
9
& :' (
0 &
:'
&
0
)
&
9 A %
)
& '
&
'
& %
&
A
'(
'
)
)
*
&
)
6
6
)
8 & ,<:
'
!
)
)
+
)
)
%)
)
'(
)
>
+
)
)
'
'$
)
) ,
,
&
' I
&
'B
,
) ,
& %
)
)
0
'
!
3.739356.3,-L .76-49,7+6.3,- ,9782<582 -3.7,*8- F6++,-3<+( 9,7 3-4.6-58H 3-., -3.76.84 >1 ./8 65.3,- ,9
>65.8736
&
4;6
PUBLIC SEWERAGE
STORMWATER
INDUSTRIES
Estimated gross flow on the
Basis of the housing
Survey in the 1999 census
Annual flow divided
By 365 days
665 KT/yr
UGB
89 KT/yr
Autopurification & cleaning
Of networks
6218 KT/yr
125 KT/yr
1095 KT/yr
Industrial pre-processing
137 KT/yr
758 KT/yr
Single N.
50 KT/an
Estimation SIEE
1502 KT/yr
67 KT/yr
282 KT/yr
76 KT/yr
AGRICULTURE
Basis of calculation
Of pollution tax
Treatment
in centres
Single network : 30 KT/yr
Single network : 20 KT/yr
Industrial waste treatment
Separate network
26 KT/yr
1 % Leakage
603 KT/an
(treatment plant input)
5,1 KT/yr
Separate N.
21 KT/yr
Individual
Sewerage
Public wastewater treatment
Treatment
0
Dispersed discharges
Separate N.
2,6 KT/yr
Discharges into
Environ.l (KT/yr)
21
157
2,6
Public sewerage
15 millions
inhabitants
183
110
9
Individual sewerage
2 millions
62
Pollution ouput flows (g/inhab/day)
DBO
DCO
NR
54
122
12
MES
70
MP
2,5
Industrial discharges: 6d/weeks
):%(*
+
)
•
&
>
)
&
)
)
%
)
*
(
&
9 A %
)
%
>
&
)& -.* 8"+)&
)
)
&
)
)
'
7
*
&' (
)
A
&
,
%)
& '*
A '(
&
&
%
! "
;
@
)
%
'
+
D&
#
%
1
&
4;6
&
)
)
$
& %
!
&
&
&
#
!
'
&
>
& )
'2 )
)
A
:%
%)
*
&
!
%
$
'
*
+
A
;
•
J
/$8"/ ,/$6+ $,
)
'
T
+
(
&
0
#6736.3,- ,9
"#
F+*D0H 5,-58-.76.3,-
0 #"9-+ )&'%9*' 81
')+9."(:*+ ,($0 6"+-* 6"-*(-(*"-0 *&- #/"&-+ "&'
)&'%+-(1!81 ()5*(8"+)& =$&*
"# 2
4;6
"-*(F%"/)-1!$(:"&)9 "&' $B)')+"8/* 0 "--*(
'
" (
6
'+
)
(
)
&
&%
)
9 :
'6
)
)
&
&
&
&
&
'
'
9 &
%
&
%
)
&
C:
)
%
' I&
&
&
)
)
'
--<60 4,30 87,43,- 965.,7
#871 0,;
,;
)876*8
3*/
#871 /3*/
7>6- =,-8
, 26.6
+A785348 236*-,434
"#
)+7 $,*($+)$&
+
' +
*
&
4;6
%
>
)
&
&
%
,
'
Public sewerage
Stormwater
INDUSTRIES
Estimated gross flow on the
Basis of the housing
Survey in the 1999 census
Annual flow divided
By 365 days
383 KT/yr
AGRICULTURE
Basis for calculation
Of pollution tax
2843 KT/yr
51 KT/yr
55 KT/yr
Estimation SIEE
93 KT/yr
416 KT/yr
UGB
4 650 KT/yr
2750 KT/yr
Networks cleaning
Industrial pre-processing
51 KT/yr
388 KT/yr
Single N.
100 KT/yr
Single network : 60 KT/yr
Single network : 40 KT/yr
Industrial
Waste treatment
Separate networks
52 KT/yr
1 % Leakage
394 KT/an
(treatment plant input)
10 KT/yr
Separate N.
42 KT/yr
Individual
Sewerage
Public wastewater treatment
Treatment
Separate N.
4 KT/yr
Dispersed discharges
Discharges into
Environ.l (KT/yr)
42
4
Public sewerage
15 millions
inhabitants
85
53
5,1
46
41
Individual sewerage
2 millions
MES
70
Pollution output flows (g/inhab/day)
DBO
DCO
NR
54
122
12
MP
2,5
Industrial discharges: 6d/weeks
):%(*
(
(
/$8"/ ,/$6 $,
)
)
)
&
)
)
)
" $
)
)
&
- *& '+ 2 - 3
&
)
*
%
%
&
)
%
1
>
9
@
)
, )
%
%
&
&
C
)
9@
)
& % @
!":%
, 9
: )
:%
&
G
&
4;6
'
'
, &
)
&
>
8
%
(
&
)& -.* 8"+)&
1
'
+
&
:' 6
& >
9 '&'
)
%
"#
)" $
E%"/)-1 $,+%(,"9* 6"-*(!+%+#*&'*' +$/)'+
- *& -* ' . &#
&'% %*& . 3
1
'
9 '
&
:'
!'4$
-
%
&
%
%
'
-" $
- *& , *+&#3
*
55
#
)
)
*
"
9
%
0
&
!%
&
' (
&
(
'
)
)
, &)
,
)
,
' +
)
&
& )
'
7
0
- :
*
&
%
)
@
%
)
&
)
%
&
'
One of the key issues in the basin is to limit soil erosion
• suspended solids due to soil erosion, in particular in arable farming areas (Brie)
and winegrowing regions (Champagne and Chablis), silt up riverbeds and carry
with them pesticides and nutrients,
• the turbidity of groundwater in karstic zones (Pays de Caux) causes problems for
drinking water supply.
4;6
,
4
"
84 :
stormwater
8 =
':
Public sewerage
INDUSTRIES
Estimated gross flow on
The basis of the housing
Survey in the 1999 census
Annual flow divided
By 365 days
AGRICULTURE
Basis for calculation
Of pollution tax
27 KT/yr
8,8 KT/yr
67,5 KT/yr
Estimation SIEE
6,3 KT/yr
SURPLUS
1,9 KT/yr
UGB
292 KT/yr
Industrial
Pre-processing 0,3 KT/yr
7,3 KT/yr
SOLS
5 kT/yr
Single network : 2,9 KT/an
Single network : 1,8 KT/yr
mechanims:
see specific diagram
of flows in the Seine
basin
Industrial waste treatment
Separate network
2,6 KT/yr
A.N.C.
Public wastewater treatment
Treatment
1%
Leakage
to
:
Aquatic
Environment
Non saturated
zone
70 KT/yr
(treatment plant input)
0,5 KT/yr
Separate N. 2
KT/yr
173 KT/yr
0,6 KT/yr
71,5 KT/yr
Single N.
4,7 KT/yr
UGB
Fertilizer
20 KT/yr
Dispersed
Discharges
220 to 350
- increase in aquifers: 5070 KT/an
- denitrification in soils and
Aquatic environments ( 30% in
Rainy periods, 50% in
Dry periods)
Separate N.
0,4 KT/yr
Discharges into
Envir. (KT/yr)
0,4
2
5,3
36,9
Public sewerage
15 millions
inhabitants
5,7
):%(*
#+- # &% *, & C
/
)
80 à 220
4,5
1,7
Pollution output flows (g/inhab/day)
DBO
DCO
NR
54
122
12
MES
70
MP
2,5
/$8"/ ,/$6+ $,&)-($:*& )& -.* 8"+)&
6
&
&
5,3
5,5
Individual sewerage
2 millions
nitrate (N_NO3)
Azote réduit (N_NK)
Industrial discharges: 6d/week
"
0,9
4 * , &%- "
)
9
! &
&
:
&
)
&
'
1
)
, &
&
&
)
%)
%
>
(
)
&
&
,
)
8
%
9 I:
%
)
0 & %
9A
'
6
(
)
)
$
2
'
= )
& '
;
0
&
& '(
%
&
0
9 A :
)
&
?
8-3.739356.3,- L .76-49,7+6.3,- ,9-3.76.84 3-., -3.7,*8- *64 >1 >65.8736
4;6
8
:'
!
)
%
'
)"
<%#%' # &% *, &> &%
(
&
#
'
)
'
+
'(
&
'
,
)
%
#
'
/
)
)
)
'
&
%
&
(
•
•
+
*
'
A
&
'
)
' (
$
) &
&
# ,-
'
& &
&
;
)
4 F
$$F
%
&
& '
% )
& %
0
)
&
%
)
)
'
3.7,*8- 4<7A0<4 3- E*D/6D17
"#
1
)
&
'(
%
@
)-($:*& +%(#/%+ )& -.* 8"+)&
%
%
&>
@
&
9
:%
1
& )
' (
J
&
)
&
0
)
)
%
,
'
4<7A0<4 F-3.7,*8-:5,-.63-3-* 4<>4.6-584H 34 2893-82 >1 6 43+A039382 8I<6.3,- F3-A<. 3-., 57,A4 M 8JA,7. )36
57,A4 N 3-A<.4 97,+ 6-3+60 ;64.8H
4;6
-" $
(
)
- *& %&. &# '+ 2 - 3
8
&
'
*
0
&
)
$
&'+
!
0
&- :' I )
&
9
,
,
%
)
&
,)
)
&
%
$
)
$
'1
)
)
&- %
!%
G
)
0
$
&
&
&- '
%
064484 <482 9,7 -3.76.84
"#
#"
''+
1
9)
*& -* ' . 3
"-*(F%"/)-1!&)-("-*+
'
)
)
)
&
&
&
A4-
2 )
A4-
4
&
)
&
'(
9#$
)
,
&
)
:'
)
!% .
7
A4A4-
&
&
&
4;6
*
/
'
)
9!
:
, ) %
/
I-
'
(
&
)
,
)
& &
*
&
&
% !!%
)
&
2 I &
&
)
&
&
&
)
'
'(
)
:
20 0 00
117.300
18 0 00
Annual total nitrogen flows (tN/year)
16 0 00
14 0 00
12 0 00
10 0 00
8 0 00
6 0 00
4 0 00
2 0 00
!
!
YERES
BRESLE
SCIE
ARQUES
DUN
SAANE
VALMONT
DURDENT
SEINE Amont Poses
EURE
ANDELLE
RISLE
TOUQUES
DIVES
ORNE
ANCRE
ODON
MUE
SEULLES amont conf_Mue
AURE
VIRE amont conf_Aure
SAIRE
DOUVE
AY
DIVETTE
5"/%"-)$& $,-$-"/ &)-($:*& ,/$6+ )&-$ -.* +*" ;
'"-"<
- *& , *+&#3
(
&
A
SIENNE
SEE
):%(*
" $
THAR
SELUNE
BEUVRON + OIR
COUESNON
0
!
)
, &)
':
&
&
&
!%
'
/
#
': 9
/
!
:'
)
%
&
9
6
) ,
)
&
)
94 !5:
:' 1
'
!""5 9
4
:
9
)
2
!""4
%@
)
&
!% $"
%2
A
)
%G
%
&
&
*
&
)
$ ' !!4:'
, &)
D % A
'6
)
9$
&- :' (
@
9
% 6
% / % 6
0
)
%
@
&
)
0
/
:%
!
%
,
)
9
:'
%
4;6
"#
E%"/)-1 $,:($%&'6"-*(!&)-("-*+
nb of abstraction points abandoned
50
données : DDASS/DRASS
NO3 : + 70 non dated values
Pesticides : +1 non dated value
45
40
Nitrates
pesticides
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1993
):%(* 4
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
year
1999
2000
2001
2002
Data lacking from some départements
8+-("9-)$&+ "8"&'$&*' ,$(*B9*++ /*5*/+ $,&)-("-*+ "&' #*+-)9)'*+ ;
#($5)+)$&"/<
4!
One of the key issues for the basin: control diffuse pollution
• nitrates of agricultural origin contribute to eutrophication of the coastline and excessive
growth of algae, some of which are toxic for bathers and consumers of shellfish;
• nitrates and pesticides compromise the production of drinking water, on an occasional
basis from surface water and on a long-term basis from groundwater.
&
4;6
*
(
7 ,
"
& %
#
)
%
!
)
'
&
'
1
*
&
,
&
' (
&
'
5%
.
)
-
%)
, )
&
&
! F
>
'
&
,
!
' ;
)
)
(
'
&
&
% )
'(
A
%
7
>
O6
Stormwater
Public Sewerage
INDUSTRIES
Annual flow divided
Estimated gross flow
On the basis of the
Housing survey in the
1999 census
Basis for calculation
Of pollution tax
By 365 days
2 )
'
AGRICULTURE
Data : Etude Cyril HOSATTE
5,9 KT/yr
13,7 KT/yr
UGB
5 KT/yr
2,1 KT/yr
1,28 KT/yr
3,8 KT/yr
UGB
161 KT/yr
39 KT/yr
SOILS
Industrial pre-processing
15,5 KT/yr
Inputs
Fertilizer
1,6 KT/yr
Single N. :
0,84 KT/yr
Single network 0,5 KT/an
Single network : 0,4 KT/an
Industrial
Waste treatment
Separate networks
0,44 KT/yr
mechanims:
see specific diagram
of flows in the Seine
basin
1%
Leakage
13,1 KT/yr
(treatment plant input)
0,07 KT/yr
Separate N.
0,37 KT/yr
Treatment
Public wastewater treatment
erosion (2%)
Individual
Sewerage
Dispersed discharges
Discharges into
Envir. (KT/yr)
0,37
Separate N.
0,07 kT/yr
7,7
0,07
Public sewerage
15 millions
inhabitants
1,1
0,2
Individual sewerage
2 millions
):%(*
@
3,2
)
&
'(
)
&
4;6
MP
2,5
/$8"/ ,/$6 $,#.$+#.$(%+ )& -.* 8"+)&
)
2 )
0,4
Pollution outputs flows (g/inhab/day)
DBO
DCO
NR
54
122
12
MES
70
4
8
)
2-6
8
;
A
&
& )
%@
&
%/
%
&
'(
&
>
'
)
(
)
&
&
%
'
'
*
1
>
)
)
)
!F
)
'
%
%)
)
)
)
)
%
) ,
!
)
)
'
&
)
,
%)
)
)
)
)
' 1
9!""
!""":' (
&
)
&
&
,
)
&
)
)
%
'(
*
%
'
'
)
)
96 D :
!'
4A853935 0,62 FE*D261DE+ H
"# 4
*
#
'
.$+#.$(%+ #$//%-)$& #(*++%(* ;6"+-* 6"-*(-(*"-0 *&- #/"&-+ "&' )&'%+-(1< 81 6"-*(
8$'1
+
!
'
#
'6
)
4;6
!
!
%
)
'
) ,
tonnes/year
14 000
1 400
12 000
1 200
10 000
1 000
8 000
800
6 000
600
4 000
400
2 000
200
0
0
2000*2001*2002*
1 9901 9911 9921 9931 9941 9951 9961 9971 9981
999
Flow of phosphorus through Poses
):%(*
Phosphorus flow other rivers
Average instantaneous flow
Provisional data
.$+#.$(%+ ,/$6+ $%- $,-.* 8"+)&
,
& 0
%
'1
&
&
& )
'1
9A
6
:'
!"".%
)
)
m3/s
)
& 9
&
:
)'
Estimation of total quantities of phosphorus discharged per population
equivalent & perd ay : period 1999-2001. ‘data sources: SIAAP, raw
effluent Seine Downstream station
Daily quantity of total phosphorus
discharged per population equivalent
(g total P/PE day)
3,20
3,00
EH (g Pt/ EH.J)
2,80
2,60
2,40
2,20
2,00
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
années
):%(*
+-)0 "-)$& $,#.$+#.$(%+ *0 )--*' #*(#$#%/"-)$& *F%)5"/*&-
*
+
+
&
%
%
& ) ;
6
%
92 %
)
%
9
% 6
C:' 1
'
4;6
% 2 &
&
1
1
C:
*
/,4A/,7<4:5,-.63-3-* 4<>4.6-584
"#
"-*(F%"/)-1!#.$+#.$(%+39$&-")&)&: +%8+-"&9*+
One of the key issues for the basin: limit eutrophication
• phosphorus is the main factor in the eutrophication of water courses;
• nitrates are the major factor in eutrophication of the coast.
4;6