Endoterapia en palmeras. Estudio de la eficacia y persistencia de

Transcription

Endoterapia en palmeras. Estudio de la eficacia y persistencia de
Endotherapy in palms. Study of the efficacy
and persistence of thiametoxam in preventive
treatments against the red palm weevil
Susi Gómez-Vives
Michel Ferry, Alejandro Estévez
Estación Phoenix de Elche
[email protected]
[email protected]
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
The controversy on using endotherapy
• The trees are endowed with mechanisms that allow them to “heal” the
wounds that suffer along their life
• Pruning as endotherapy cause wounds that sometimes “heal” badly
• However, nobody would propose to forbid pruning. Should it be
different for endotherapy?
• In both cases, those techniques must be used with caution and respect
of precise rules to reduce eventual risks
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Endotherapy in palms: differences between trees and palms
The palms are not trees, but, contrary to a classic cliché, the palms also
cure their wounds.
In reason of an anatomy very different from trees, the “healing”
processes in palms are much more simple and they present great
probabilities of success.
The risks of damages due to endotherapy are much lower in palms than
in trees.
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Endotherapy in palms: differences between trees and palms
 Trees have cambium
Palms have not cambium
In Palms no need of reconstruction of secondary meristems
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Endotherapy in palms: differences between trees and palms
 In trees the central part of the trunk is dead wood
 In palms the inner part of the trunk is alive tissue, able to active
healing
In palms we can inject deeply
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Endotherapy in palms: differences between trees and palms
 Phoenix canariensis:
only one trunk (stipe)
a group of leaves around the terminal meristem
 In comparison, trees have many branches
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Endotherapy in palms: differences between trees and palms
 In palms : interconection of vascular bundles
leaves –trunk (in the top of the palm)
Thomlinson 1990
Compared with trees it is easier in palms to reach the
target zones with small number of injections
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
The target zones in P. canariensis
the leaves bases of the central
and medium crown
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
References
Effectiveness of endotherapy in palms
Reference
year
Palm
Wood
1974
Oil palm
Hutauruk
1978
Oil palm
Mariau
1979
Oil palm
Vessey
1981
Oil palm
Genty
1984
Oil palm
Argemiro Reyes
1988
Oil palm
Hean
2000
Oil palm
Nadarajan and Basavana
1981
Coconut
Franqueville et Renard
1989
Coconut
Thevenin
1995
Coconut
Fernando et al
2002
Coconut
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
References
Pest & illness control in palms using endotherapy
Pest/illness
Palm
Localization
Oryctes rhinoceros
Coconut
Asia & Pacific
Brontispa longissima
Ornamentals
Asia & Pacific
Nephantis serinopa
Coconut
India
Letal yellowing
Coconut, Phoenix & others
USA & Caribe
Coelaenomedora
lameensis
Oil palm
West Africa
Sexava sp
Coconut
Asia & Pacific
Metisa plana
Oil palm
Africa
Asterolecanium phoenicis
Date Palm
Sudan
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
References
Red Palm Weevil control using endotherapy
Reference
Year
Palm
Country
Kurian and Mathen
1971
Coconut
India
Lakshmanan
1972
Coconut
India
Muthuraman
1984
Coconut
India
Jose et al
2008
Coconut
India
El-Ezaby
1997
Date Palm
UAE
Abdallah et Al-Khatri
1999
Date Palm
Saudi Arabia
Vidyasagar et al.
2000
Date Palm
Saudi Arabia
Azam
2001
Date Palm
UAE
Hernandez-Marante
2003
Date Palm
Spain
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
 None of these papers mention
biomechanics or sanitary
problems related to wounds
produced by injections
 The question of healing is
scarcely mentioned
 Dissections show healing zones
around perforations, without
consequences for the palms
(Genty, 1983)
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Endoterapia
Vegetal
Risks & advantages of endotherapy. Good practices
 Only when really needed
 Limited number of injections
 Minimal holes sizes
 Pressure under 2-3 Kg/cm2
 Disinfection of tools
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Risks & advantages of endotherapy. Good practice
Advantages :
 Easy to use in urban zones
 Respectful of environment &
health
 High persistency
 Insecticides reach better the
target tissues
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Trials about the effectiveness and persistency
of Thiametoxam injected in adult palms
Objectives
 To reduce risks & costs
 To assess effectiveness,
migration capacity &
persistency of Actara
(thiametoxam 25%)
injected in adult palms,
in the field
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Method
 Consists on bioassays
introducing grubs of
RPW in leaves cut from
treated palms
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Controls
To establish control survival parameters & development,
grubs were introduced in leaves from non treated palms
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Treatment
 Four injections per palm
 One injection: 2.5 g Actara,
diluted in 200 ml of water
 Around 1.5 m from the base
 Latex injector
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Samples
3 leaves x palm
Timing: 15 days and monthly
Infestation of leaves
5 grubs (0.5-1g) / leaf
Maintained at : 26-28ºC
Dissection after 15 days
Parameters observed:
Mortality of grubs
Grub activity (weight, length of
galleries)
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Results: mortality
Effectiveness very high (with mortality of 100% after two months)
High persistency (6 months)
Porcentaje
larvas
PercentageMortalidad
of grub Mortality
Control ST
100
100
100
97,4
Control TF
100
Tiametoxam 25%
89,2
90
85,0
80
70
56,3
60
50
44,4
40
31,4
30
20
10,9
10
4,6
0
Control
13
33
62
91
121
153
180
210
238
DÍAS
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Results: grub activity
Variación
de peso larvas
vivas
Grub
Weight
Variation
%
Control ST
160
Control TF
Tiametoxam 25%
140
120
100
80
60
40
The few survival larvae lose weight
from the first to the sixth month
20
0
-20
-40
Control
15
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
DÍAS
Galleries Length
Longitud media galerías larvas
Longitud (cm)
Control ST
Control TF
25
Tiametoxam 25%
20
15
The larvae don’t make galleries
from the first to the sixth month
10
5
0
Control
15
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
DÍAS
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Conclusions
 We have developed an original technique:
 Very efficient to assess insecticide effectiveness and
persistency, in the field
 At low cost
 With the preservation of the treated palms
 With these results, preventive treatments against the
RPW have been improved strongly, the use of this
technique facilitates greatly the implementation of an
IPM strategy of this pest
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011
Thank’s to
Antonio Urbán from Viveros Urbán
Juan Barbado from Fertinyect SL
Peter Wyss and Rui Delgado from Syngenta Crop Protection
Thank you very much
for your attention
ESA Annual Meeting, Reno 2011