PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Ganley Pontiac

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Ganley Pontiac
25870 Lorain Road
North Olmsted, Ohio 44070
PREPARED FOR:
Ganley Management Co.
c/o ORG Holdings
3733 Park East Drive
Beachwood, Ohio 44122
PREPARED BY:
RP Consultants, Inc.
8500 Station Street
Mentor, Ohio 44060
(440) 946-5888
RP-1824
October 30, 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE(S)
Executive Summary
Introduction
Scope of Investigation
Walkover Survey
Topography
Soils
Wetlands
Groundwater Pollution Potential
Asbestos Containing Materials
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Underground and Aboveground Storage Tanks
Waste Sites
Stored Chemicals
Lead Paint
City Directories
Water Quality
Radon
Recommendations
Informational Sources
Site Map
Tax Map and Ownership Information
Soil Map
Wetlands Map
Groundwater Pollution Potential Map
Topographic Maps
Aerial Photographs
Photography
Database Research
3-6
6
6-7
7-9
9
9-10
10
10
11
11-13
13-14
15
16
16
16-17
17
17-18
19
20
21
22-27
28
29
30
31-32
33-39
40-65
Appendix I
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RP Consultants, Inc. was retained by Ganley Management Company c/o
ORG Holdings to conduct an environmental assessment of the property
situated at 25870 Lorain Road in North Olmsted, Ohio 44070. The scope
of services provided under this project are described in RP Consultant’s
contract with Ganley Management Company c/o ORG Holdings.
The overall objective of the environmental assessment was to provide an
independent, professional opinion regarding potential environmental
liabilities, if any, associated with the subject property. RP Consultants,
Inc. understands that the results of this project are to be used and relied
upon Ganley Management Company.
The environmental assessment of the site included a site inspection, an
agency database records search, and limited historical research.
This assessment has revealed the following recognized environmental
conditions (RECs) in connection with the subject property:
REC #1: Several aboveground and abandoned in-ground lifts were
observed in the main building on the subject property. The remnants of
six hydraulic in-ground lifts were observed hanging from the basement
ceiling in the main building. The lift equipment was observed to be
stained and oil was leaking from the lifts onto the basement floor. One
abandoned in-ground lift was also observed in the basement of the main
building. Evidence of staining was also observed near this lift. No
evidence of staining or leakage was observed near the aboveground lifts
on the subject property.
Based upon the above information and observations, RP Consultants, Inc.
concludes that there a possibility that the abandoned lifts contain PCBcontaminated hydraulic oil. Accordingly, the lifts should be removed
from the property and the oil within the lifts should be sampled and
analyzed for PCBs. Furthermore, the basement floor should be sampled
to determine if they have been contaminated by the leaking lifts. If PCBs
are found to be above acceptable levels, proper cleanup and/or disposal
3
under Toxic Substances Control Act 40 CFR 761 and Ohio EPA guidelines
should be performed.
REC #2: The subject property was surveyed for evidence of aboveground
storage tanks (ASTs), underground storage tanks (USTs), and petroleum
distribution equipment such as fill caps, vent pipes, pump islands,
pipelines, and depressed or stained soil.
Three 250-gallon new oil, concrete diked ASTs and two solvent ASTs were
observed in the main building on the subject property. One waste oil AST
was also observed outside near the northwest corner of the main building
on the subject property. No evidence of leakage or staining was observed
near the ASTs.
A vent pipe was also observed along the east side of the main building on
the subject property.
Aerial photographs showing the subject property in 1951, 1959, 1977,
1978, 1979, 1988, and 2000 were reviewed. No evidence of ASTs or USTs
was noted on the photographs.
A file review was conducted at the North Olmsted Fire Department and
all pertinent information is as follows: A permit application was filed
in September 1989 for the removal of two 550-gallon and one 1000-gallon
USTs from the subject property. BP Oil Company was listed as the owner
of the USTs. BP Oil Company contacted BUSTR regarding the intent to
remove the USTs in September 1989. United Plumbing and Excavation
removed the USTs from the subject property on October 20, 1989 as
indicated by analytical data in the fire department records. BP Oil
Company notified the North Olmsted Fire Department on January 5, 1990
that the excavation was considered to be “clean”. The letter also indicated
that the soil removed from the excavation was being transported to
Norton Landfill and that the tank cavity was being filled with clean soil.
Based upon the above information and observations, RP Consultants
concludes that since USTs were removed from the subject property prior
to or during the advent of current State of Ohio Bureau of UST
4
Regulations (BUSTR) protocol, there is a possibility that residual
contamination remains on the subject property.
Furthermore, RP Consultants, Inc. recommends that a BUSTR file review
be conducted for the USTs removed in October 1989. It is unclear as to
whether or not a Closure Report was submitted to BUSTR since the
subject property address is not listed on the Registered Underground
Storage Tank list or the Leaking Underground Storage Tank list. Further
recommendations will be made after it is determined if BUSTR has
documentation regarding the subject property.
REC #3: The property was surveyed for evidence of ground
contamination such as open leaking drums, old batteries, waste ponds,
lagoons, or stressed vegetation that might indicate hazardous waste.
Several oil buckets and two floor drains were observed in the basement of
the main building. Evidence of slight staining was observed near the
buckets and drains. Water and mold damage was observed in the parts
storage area in the basement of the main building. Several oil stains were
also observed in the shop area in the main building.
Aerial photographs showing the subject property in 1951, 1959, 1977,
1978, 1979, 1988, and 2000 were reviewed. No evidence of waste sites was
noted on the photographs.
A file review was conducted at the North Olmsted Fire Department and
all pertinent information is as follows: A fire inspection report indicated
that several issues needed to be addressed in the basement of the main
building on the subject property, including removing old, unlabeled
drums, cleaning up all leakage on the basement floor, and cleaning up the
floor area under and around the waste oil tank. An oil spill was reported
on the subject property in June 1990 in which approximately 200 gallons
of waste crankcase drainings were spilled onto the subject property. The
spill was caused by a truck driver who left his truck unattended while the
pump was engaged and pumping waste material. The spill headed
toward a sewer with approximately 10-15 gallons entering before a wall of
oil dry was formed to contain the spill.
5
It should be noted that the past waste generation practices (e.g. from the
1970s) on the subject property are unknown. Accordingly, there is a
possibility that the past use of the property has led to contamination in
levels that could constitute a release. Subsequently, a phase two is
recommended for waste sites. Specifically, soil (and groundwater, if
encountered) samples should be taken and analyzed for volatile and semivolatile organic compounds, metals, PCBs and total petroleum
hydrocarbons.
Also, a mold survey, conducted by a licensed industrial hygienist should
be conducted to address the water damage and mold in the basement of
the main building. All areas should be sampled and properly remediated
as determined by the industrial hygienist.
A. INTRODUCTION
RP Consultants, Inc. has performed a Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment for Ganley Management Company c/o ORG Holdings, 3733
Park East Drive, Beachwood, Ohio 44122. The purpose of this assessment
is to identify any environmental conditions associated with the property
or any facilities located on the property that may require further
investigation or remediation. This is accomplished by direct observations
of the property and facilities, and by review of historical information
regarding past use of the subject and adjacent properties. Sampling of
soils, building materials, air and water is not within the scope of this
assessment, however, if potential environmental hazards or liabilities are
identified as a result of this assessment, such sampling may be
recommended under the Phase II Recommendations section of this report.
B. SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
RP Consultants, Inc. was hired to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment of the property located at 25870 Lorain Road, North Olmsted,
Ohio 44070. This assessment was performed within the scope and
limitations of the ASTM E-1527-00 Standard Practice for Phase One Site
Assessments and RP Consultants, Inc. guidelines and standard operating
procedure for phase one site assessments. This report represents site
conditions on October 16, 2003. All conclusions and findings are based
6
upon this limited site assessment and historical research conducted by RP
Consultants, Inc. We can provide no assurance that information obtained
from others is accurate or complete. Furthermore, any change in site
condition after the date of the walkover survey is beyond the scope of this
assessment. Accordingly, RP Consultants, Inc. cannot make any
guarantees concerning future conditions. The client should also be aware
that this report is not a guarantee or certification that the site is free of
contamination or hazardous materials, but rather it is an opinion of the
potential for contamination to exist. Moreover, no tests of any materials
or substances have been performed in connection with this assessment.
Accordingly, RP Consultants, Inc. cannot absolutely guarantee that the
property is free of contamination or hazardous materials or substances.
C. WALKOVER SURVEY
The property surveyed consists of two single-story brick, block and wood
buildings with metal deck roofs and full basements on approximately 5.0
acres of land. The used car building was constructed in the 1950’s or
earlier and the main building was constructed in the 1960’s. A retention
pond is also located along the north side of the subject property.
Improvements to the subject property include an asphalt and concrete
parking lot.
The walkover survey was conducted on October 16 and 17, 2003 by
Patrick Duncan and Erik Ehinger of RP Consultants, Inc. An interview
was conducted during the survey with Mr. Mike Hayes, former General
Manager for Ganley Pontiac.
According to the interviewee, as well as information obtained from
reviews of aerial photographs, city directories, tax maps, and a review of
files at the North Olmsted Fire Department, the history of the subject
property is as follows:
Prior to 1951: The use of the subject property is unknown.
1951 to 1959: The subject property is shown as residential and vacant
land. The current used car building was shown as a residential property
and was listed in city directories as residential from 1962 to 1982.
7
Between 1962 and 1970: The main building was constructed on the subject
property. The used car building was listed as residential from 1962 to
1966.
1970 to 1993: The main building was listed as Paradise Honda and
Pontiac. The used car building was listed as Pocorelli Hair, As You Like It
Photo, and a travel agency from 1986 to 1993.
1998 to 2002: The main building was listed as Ganley Honda and Pontiac.
The used car building was listed as Kenneth Paradise in 2002.
Present: The subject property is used for Ganley Pontiac.
The address of 25876 Lorain Road also appears in City Directories as
Ganley Resale in 2002. This property address was not listed from 1962 to
1998.
Municipal electric, gas, sewer, and water are available on the subject
property.
Adjacent properties include: residential properties to the north; Original
Mattress Factory, City Club Restaurant, Bob Evan Restaurant, and
Ponderosa to the south; AT & T Wireless to the east; and woods and an
apartment building to the west.
None of the adjacent properties appeared to be affecting the subject
property at the time of the walkover survey. Furthermore, none of the
neighboring properties appeared on any of the state or federal
environmental site lists searched as part of this report.
The subject property is listed on Cuyahoga County Tax Map 232, page 34,
as parcels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 90, 100, and 102. The present owners of the subject
property are listed as Michael Paradise, Kay Francis Paradise, and
Kenneth Paradise. Previous owners of the subject property are listed as
P & D Enterprises, Ltd. and individuals.
Information regarding other previous owners was not listed, but could be
8
obtained through a chain of title search, which can be conducted or
reviewed at the request of the client. A copy of the tax map is included in
this report.
It should be noted that the basement in the used auto building was
inaccessible at the time of the walkover survey, and several vehicles were
being stored in the buildings making the buildings difficult to assess.
Accordingly, RP Consultants, Inc. is not responsible for environmental
conditions that could not be observed due to lack of access or visibility.
D. TOPOGRAPHY
The elevation of the subject property is approximately 750 feet above sea
level (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929). The local topography
slopes to the north-northwest.
Major topographical features in the area include Interstate 480
approximately 3/4 miles to the south, Dover Center Road approximately
one mile to the west, and Rocky River Reservation approximately one
mile to the southeast. In general, the surrounding properties are used for
commercial purposes. A copy of the topographic map is included with
this report.
E. SOILS
The predominant soils on the subject property are the Urban landMahoning complex, undulating and Oshtemo-Urban land complex,
undulating.
The Urban land-Mahoning complex, undulating consists of Urban land
(areas covered by concrete and buildings) and a deep, nearly level and
gently sloping, somewhat poorly drained Mahoning soil. This soil occurs
on glacial till plains and on the higher parts of lake plains. Most areas are
irregular in shape, and range from 30 to several hundred acres in size.
Urban land-Mahoning complex, undulating, is considered to be a nonhydric soil with hydric components. Accordingly, there is a potential for
wetlands development on isolated portions of this soil.
9
The Oshtemo-Urban land complex, undulating soil consists of a deep, well
drained Oshtemo soil and Urban land. This soil occurs on beach ridges
and terraces. The soil contains about 45 percent Oshtemo sandy loam and
40 percent Urban land.
Oshtemo-Urban land complex, undulating, is not considered to be a
hydric, or a non-hydric soil with hydric components. Accordingly, the
potential for wetlands development is low. A copy of the soil map is
included in this report.
F. WETLANDS
The subject property was surveyed for evidence of wetland systems, such
as saturated or inundated soils and wetland vegetation. A retention pond
was observed along the north side of the subject property; however, no
wetland systems were observed.
The national wetlands inventory map was reviewed for the subject
property. No evidence of wetlands was noted on the map.
Given the developed nature of most of the subject property (buildings,
asphalt), RP Consultants, Inc. concludes that there is no evidence to
suggest that wetlands are an issue. A copy of the wetlands map is
included with the report.
G. GROUNDWATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL
A review of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources Groundwater
Pollution Potential map of Cuyahoga County, Ohio indicated that the
subject property lies within zones containing pollution potential indexes
between 100 and 159. This indicates that the groundwater on the subject
property has a moderate to high vulnerability to contamination.
Accordingly, there is a moderate to high probability that contamination
could migrate off of the subject property to the neighboring properties, or
from the neighboring properties to the subject property.
A copy of the groundwater pollution potential map is included in this
10
report.
H. ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACM)
The subject property was surveyed for evidence of friable ACM, such as
pipe and boiler insulation, and non-friable ACM, such as floor tile and
drywall. Drywall, ceiling tile, floor tile, linoleum, and pipe insulation
were observed in the buildings. All of the materials were in good
condition.
The building appears to contain a mixture of old and new building
materials.
The last date for asbestos in most U.S.-made surfacing materials such as
drywall and floor tile is 1980. It should be noted, however, that surfacing
materials made after 1980 can still contain asbestos, especially if they were
imported (e.g. from Canada or Mexico). Thus, it is possible that ACM
could exist in a building of any age.
Based upon the above information, a phase two is recommended for nonfriable asbestos only if building materials are to be removed (e.g. if the
building is to be demolished or if any areas are to be remodeled). If
asbestos is found, then Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) Guidelines should be followed concerning the abatement plan for
the building.
If building materials are not to be removed, then they must be assumed to
contain asbestos. Accordingly, any damaged areas should be repaired
and encapsulated. If this is done, then an operations and maintenance
plan following OSHA guidelines should be instituted. Essentially, the
plan would involve monitoring the suspect ACM for damage, and making
any appropriate repairs.
I. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs)
The subject property was surveyed for evidence of potential PCBs and
possible PCB-contaminated equipment, including transformers, hydraulic
lifts, leaking fluorescent light ballasts, elevator motors, and compressors.
11
The following were observed:
1. FLUORESCENT LIGHT BALLASTS
Fluorescent light ballasts were observed on the subject property.
According to the interviewee, some of the lights were installed prior to
1979. Since PCBs were commonly used in fluorescent light ballasts until
1979, the older fluorescent lights should be considered a potential risk to
the subject property. Accordingly, in the event of a leak or explosion,
proper cleanup standards as per Toxic Substances Control Act 40 CFR 761
should be followed.
2. POLE AND PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS
Multiple pole mounted transformers and one pad mounted transformer
were observed on the subject property. The transformers are property of
First Energy. No leakage or staining was observed around the
transformers. Information regarding the transformers was unavailable
from First Energy.
While the transformers could be considered a potential risk to the subject
property, as leakage could contaminate the property with PCBs and/or
petroleum hydrocarbons, any such contamination is the responsibility of
First Energy.
If the transformers are ever found to be leaking, or are to be removed from
the property, First Energy should be contacted regarding remediation
and/or removal.
3. COMPRESSOR
One compressor was observed in the main building on the subject
property. According to the interviewee, the compressor was recently
installed as new equipment. Since PCBs have not been used in
compressor motor oil since 1979, the compressor is not considered to be a
risk to the subject property.
12
4. LIFTS
Several aboveground and abandoned in-ground lifts were observed in the
main building on the subject property. The remnants of six hydraulic inground lifts were observed hanging from the basement ceiling in the main
building. The lift equipment was observed to be stained and oil was
leaking from the lifts onto the basement floor. One abandoned in-ground
lift was also observed in the basement of the main building. Evidence of
staining was also observed near this lift. No evidence of staining or
leakage was observed near the aboveground lifts on the subject property.
Based upon the above information and observations, RP Consultants, Inc.
concludes that there a possibility that the abandoned lifts contain PCBcontaminated hydraulic oil. Accordingly, the lifts should be removed
from the property and the oil within the lifts should be sampled and
analyzed for PCBs. Further, the basement floor should be sampled to
determine if they have been contaminated by the leaking lifts. If PCBs are
found to be above acceptable levels, proper cleanup and/or disposal
under Toxic Substances Control Act 40 CFR 761 and Ohio EPA guidelines
should be performed.
Also, RP Consultants, Inc. concludes that PCBs may exist in the older
fluorescent light ballasts and/or transformers on the subject property.
It should be noted, however, that the equipment does not appear to be
leaking at this time, and therefore poses little threat to the subject
property.
J. UNDERGROUND AND ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS
The subject property was surveyed for evidence of aboveground storage
tanks (ASTs), underground storage tanks (USTs), and petroleum
distribution equipment such as fill caps, vent pipes, pump islands,
pipelines, and depressed or stained soil.
Three 250-gallon new oil, concrete diked ASTs and two solvent ASTs were
observed in the main building on the subject property. One waste oil AST
was also observed outside near the northwest corner of the main building
on the subject property. No evidence of leakage or staining was observed
13
near the ASTs.
A vent pipe was also observed along the east side of the main building on
the subject property.
Aerial photographs showing the subject property in 1951, 1959, 1977,
1978, 1979, 1988, and 2000 were reviewed. No evidence of ASTs or USTs
was noted on the photographs.
A file review was conducted at the North Olmsted Fire Department and
all pertinent information is as follows: A permit application was filed
in September 1989 for the removal of two 550-gallon and one 1000-gallon
USTs from the subject property. BP Oil Company was listed as the owner
of the USTs. BP Oil Company contacted BUSTR regarding the intent to
remove the USTs in September 1989. United Plumbing and Excavation
removed the USTs from the subject property on October 20, 1989 as
indicated by analytical data in the fire department records. BP Oil
Company notified the North Olmsted Fire Department on January 5, 1990
that the excavation was considered to be “clean”. The letter also indicated
that the soil removed from the excavation was being transported to
Norton Landfill and that the tank cavity was being filled with clean soil.
Based upon the above information and observations, RP Consultants
concludes that since USTs were removed from the subject property prior
to or during the advent of current State of Ohio Bureau of UST
Regulations (BUSTR) protocol, there is a possibility that residual
contamination remains on the subject property since BUSTR does not
appear to have monitored the UST removal activities.
Further, RP Consultants, Inc. recommends that a BUSTR file review be
conducted for the USTs removed in October 1989. It is unclear as to
whether or not a Closure Report was submitted to BUSTR since the
subject property address is not listed on the Registered Underground
Storage Tank list or the Leaking Underground Storage Tank list. Further
recommendations will be made after it is determined if BUSTR has
documentation regarding the subject property.
14
K. WASTE SITES
The property was surveyed for evidence of ground contamination such as
open leaking drums, old batteries, waste ponds, lagoons, or stressed
vegetation that might indicate hazardous waste.
Several oil buckets and two floor drains were observed in the basement of
the main building. Evidence of slight staining was observed near the
buckets and drains. Water and mold damage was observed in the parts
storage area in the basement of the main building. Several oil stains were
also observed in the shop area in the main building.
Aerial photographs showing the subject property in 1951, 1959, 1977,
1978, 1979, 1988, and 2000 were reviewed. No evidence of waste sites was
noted on the photographs.
A file review was conducted at the North Olmsted Fire Department and
all pertinent information is as follows: A fire inspection report indicated
that several issues needed to be addressed in the basement of the main
building on the subject property, including removing old, unlabeled
drums, cleaning up all leakage on the basement floor, and cleaning up the
floor area under and around the waste oil tank. An oil spill was reported
on the subject property in June 1990 in which approximately 200 gallon of
waste crankcase drainings were spilled onto the subject property. The
spill was caused by a truck driver who left his truck unattended while the
pump was engaged and pumping waste material. The spill headed
toward a sewer with approximately 10-15 gallons entering before a wall of
oil dry was formed to contain the spill.
It should be noted that the past waste generation practices on the subject
property are unknown. Accordingly, there is a possibility that the past
use of the property has led to contamination in levels that could constitute
a release. Subsequently, a phase two is recommended for waste sites.
Specifically, soil (and groundwater, if encountered) samples should be
taken and analyzed for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds,
metals, PCBs and total petroleum hydrocarbons.
Also, a mold survey, conducted by a licensed industrial hygienist, should
15
be conducted to address the water damage and mold in the basement of
the main building. All areas should be sampled and properly remediated
as determined by the industrial hygienist.
L. STORED CHEMICALS
The property was surveyed for evidence of stored chemicals such as
labeled drums. Several types of automotive fluids as well as one 55-gallon
drum of window wash fluid were observed in the main building on the
subject property. All chemicals appeared to be properly stored and
labeled.
Based upon the above information and observations, RP Consultants, Inc.
concludes that there is no evidence to suggest that chemicals are
improperly stored on the subject property.
M. LEAD PAINT
The property was inspected for potential sources of lead such as peeling
paint on old debris. No such evidence was observed.
Based upon the age of the buildings, it is possible that lead paint exists in
the buildings. A lead paint survey can be conducted at the request of the
client.
N. CITY DIRECTORIES/SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS
City directories were reviewed at the Cleveland Public Library. Sanborn
maps were not available at the Cleveland Public Library. A complete
history of the subject property is given in section “C” of this report.
SOUTH NEIGHBOR (Original Mattress Factory)
Not listed from 1962 to 1974, listed as Swing Set Hair in 1982, Hair
Systems in 1986, The Hair Shop from 1990 to 1998, and Mattress Factory in
2002.
16
SOUTH NEIGHBOR (City Club Restaurant)
Not listed in 1962, listed as Redwood Tavern from 1966 to 1982, and listed
as City Club Restaurant from 1990 to 2002.
SOUTH NEIGHBOR (Bob Evans Restaurant)
Listed as Red Fox Inn from 1962 to 1970, not listed from 1974 to 1978, and
listed as Bob Evans from 1982 to 2002 (All State Sales in 1993 only).
SOUTH NEIGHBOR (Ponderosa)
Listed as residential from 1962 to 1966, not listed in 1970, and listed as
Ponderosa from 1974 to 2002.
EAST NEIGHBOR (AT&T Wireless)
Not listed from 1962 to 1970, listed as Alder Rube Sporting and Lawson’s
from 1974 to 1982, and Eyeglass Factory from 1990 to 2002.
WEST NEIGHBOR (apartment building)
Listed as apartments from 1962 to 1986, not listed in 1990, and listed as
residential from 1993 to 2002.
O. WATER QUALITY
Since water is supplied to the subject property by a municipal source, a
study of water quality is not applicable here.
P. RADON
A radon gas survey was not conducted as part of this study. According to
Ohio Geological Survey Report 144, Geological Controls on Indoor Radon
in Ohio, the median indoor radon concentration in North Olmsted, Ohio
(zip code 44070) is 2.3 picocuries of radiation per liter of air (pCi/l). This
level is below the 4.0 pCi/l "action threshold" recommended by the U.S.
EPA for house remediation.
17
It should be noted that the above data does not necessarily indicate that
low radon levels exist on the subject property, they only represent a
typical concentration for North Olmsted, Ohio 44070. Accordingly, the
only definitive method to determine radon concentrations on the subject
property is through a radon test, which can be conducted at the request of
the client.
18
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
N = NO EVIDENCE OF RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS OR ISSUES
O&M = OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN RECOMMENDED
P = POTENTIAL RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
D = WETLANDS DELINEATION RECOMMENDED
HAZARD
Friable Asbestos Containing Materials
Non-Friable Asbestos Containing Materials
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Aboveground Storage Tanks
Underground Storage Tanks
Waste Sites
Stored Chemicals
Lead Based Paint
Radon
Water Quality
Wetlands
Sincerely,
Patrick W. Duncan
Principal
Geologist
19
O&M
O&M
P
N
P
P
N
Not Available
Not Available
Not Applicable
N
INFORMATIONAL RESOURCES CONSULTED
Federal NPL site list
Federal CERCLIS list
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
Federal ERNS list
OEPA-equivalent NPL
OEPA-equivalent CERCLIS
OEPA landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
BUSTR Leaking UST list
BUSTR Registered UST list
Topographic Map (North Olmsted, Ohio)
Wetlands Map (North Olmsted, Ohio)
ODNR Groundwater Pollution Potential Map (Cuyahoga County)
Information Request (North Olmsted Fire Department)
Aerial Photographs (Euclid Blueprint, Cuyahoga County Soil
Conservation Service, and US Geological Survey)
Cuyahoga County Tax Maps
Soil Conservation Service (Cuyahoga County)
City Directories Review (Cleveland Public Library)
Sanborn Fire Insurance Map Review (Cleveland Public Library)
Geological Controls on Indoor Radon Report (ODNR)
20
SITE MAP SHOWING SUBJECT PROPERTY
21
TAX MAP SHOWING SUBJECT PROPERTY
22
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REGARDING SUBJECT PROPERTY
23
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REGARDING SUBJECT PROPERTY
24
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REGARDING SUBJECT PROPERTY
25
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REGARDING SUBJECT PROPERTY
26
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REGARDING SUBJECT PROPERTY
27
SOIL MAP SHOWING SUBJECT PROPERTY
28
WETLANDS MAP SHOWING SUBJECT PROPERTY
29
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL MAP
SHOWING SUBJECT PROPERTY
30
2-D TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHOWING SUBJECT PROPERTY
31
3-D TOPGRAPHIC MAP SHOWING SUBJECT PROPERTY
32
AIR PHOTO DATED 1951
33
AIR PHOTO DATED 1959
34
AIR PHOTO DATED 1977
35
AIR PHOTO DATED 1978
36
AIR PHOTO DATED 1979
37
AIR PHOTO DATED 1988
38
AIR PHOTO DATED 2000
39
SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SEEN FROM LORAIN ROAD
40
VIEW SHOWING NORTH AND EAST SIDES
OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
41
VIEW SHOWING NORTH AND WEST SIDES
OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
42
VIEW SHOWING SOUTH SIDE OF USED CAR BUILDING
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
43
RETENTION POND ON NORTH SIDE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
44
EAST SIDE OF MAIN BUILDING ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
SHOWING VENT PIPES
45
NORTHWEST CORNER OF MAIN BUILDING
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWING WASTE OIL AST
46
VIEW SHOWING PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
47
AUTO SHOWROOM IN MAIN BUILDING ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
48
VIEW SHOWING SHOP AREA IN BASEMENT IN MAIN BUILDING
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
49
VIEW SHOWING SHOP AREA IN BASEMENT IN MAIN BUILDING
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
50
SUSPECT ACM ON PIPING IN BASEMENT OF
MAIN BUILDING ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
51
DEBRIS AND STAINING IN SHOP AREA IN MAIN BUILDING
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
52
CLEANING AND WASH AREA IN SHOP IN MAIN BUILDING
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
53
NEW OIL ASTS IN SHOP AREA IN MAIN BUILDING
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
54
WATER DAMAGE AND MOLD IN PARTS STORAGE AREA IN
BASEMENT OF MAIN BUILDING ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
55
ABANDONED IN-GROUND HYDRAULIC LIFT IN BASEMENT OF
MAIN BUILDING ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
56
ABANDONED IN-GROUND LIFT SYSTEM IN BASEMENT OF MAIN
BUILDING ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
57
ABANDONED IN-GROUND LIFTS HANGING DOWN INTO
BASEMENT FROM FIRST FLOOR IN MAIN BUILDING
ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
58
OIL STAINING FROM ABANDONED LIFTS IN BASEMENT OF
MAIN BUILDING ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
59
NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TO THE EAST
(AT & T WIRELESS)
60
NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES TO THE WEST
(WOODS AND APARTMENT BUILDING)
61
NEIGHBORING PROEPRTY TO THE WEST
(APARTMENT BUILDING)
62
NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH
(ORIGINAL MATTRESS FACTORY AND CITY CLUB RESTAURANT)
63
NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH
(BOB EVANS RESTAURANT)
64
NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH
(PONDEROSA)
65