THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE

Transcription

Council Agenda
1.0
Page 1 of 12
Wednesday March 13, 2013
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Larry Kraemer will call to Order at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday March
13, 2013, the Planning/Corporate Services Meeting of the Council of The
Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine in the Council Chambers at
the Municipal Administration Centre.
2.0
ROLL CALL
Mayor Larry Kraemer
Deputy Mayor Anne Eadie
Councillor Ron Coristine
Councillor Maureen Couture
Councillor Kenneth Craig
Councillor Jacqueline Faubert
Councillor Candy Hewitt
Councillor Mike Leggett
Councillor Randy Roppel
Staff Present
Donna MacDougall, Clerk
Roxana Baumann, Treasurer/Director of Finance
3.0
AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO/FROM THE AGENDA
4.0
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF
Name
5.0
Item of Business
Nature of Interest
PUBLIC MEETINGS (Planning Advisory Committee)
Motion #03/13/13 Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT Council move into Planning Advisory Committee to hold a public meeting
to discuss planning applications.
Council Agenda
6.0
Page 2 of 12
CONSIDERATION OF BY-LAWS/MOTIONS
6.1 Draft Request for Proposal – 719 Queen Street – Annex
Seconded by:
THAT Council approve proceed with the Request for Proposal for the
Annex building (719 Queen Street) as outlined in Report PL 2013-06.
7.0
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
7.1
Move Into Committee of the Whole
Seconded by:
That Council move into Committee of the Whole and upon completion
return to Council.
7.2
Delegations
(A)
7.3
Bob Greason – Lake Huron Fishing Club (attached)
Corporate Services
(A)
TRE 2013-02
Subject: 2013 Insurance RFP
Report Summary: The purpose of this report is to address the upcoming
insurance renewal requirement for the period of April 1, 2013 to April 1,
2014, as the Municipality’s existing contract for insurance services with
Jardine Lloyd Thomson is expiring in the current year.
Request for Proposal (RFP) packages were sent to 5 insurers, and the
Municipality has received 3 bids in response. The lowest bid was received
from BFL Canada, which was quoted at an annual premium of $200,803 +
PST.
Staff is recommending that the quote from BFL Canada be accepted for
the period of April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014, with the option to renew
annually for a maximum of 3 annual renewals.
Council Agenda
Page 3 of 12
Origin: Expiry of current policy
Existing Policy:
GG.2.17 Procurement Policy
Analysis: The Municipality of Kincardine’s insurance policy with Jardine
Lloyd Thomson is expiring on April 1, 2013. As per the Purchasing and
Procurement Policy GG.2.17, for professional services $40,000 and
above, a Request for Proposal (RFP) process must be followed. The RFP
included the ability to extend the contract on an annual basis not
exceeding 3 renewals, dependent on the performance and service
provided. The 2013 operating budget includes $240,000 for insurance
costs.
The Municipality of Kincardine solicited proposals from the following
insurers/brokerage firms:
 Stevenson & Hunt
 Miller Insurance Brokers/Frank Cowan Company
 OMEX
 Jardine Lloyd Thomson (JLT)
 BFL Canada
Staff has reviewed the submissions in detail, and has summarized the key
points in this report. Proposals were submitted by 3 firms, with annual
premiums quoted as follows:
(1) Frank Cowan - $217,016
(2) JLT - $218,746
(3) BFL - $200,803
The criteria used to evaluate the submissions consist of the following:
A.
Completeness of submission and project appreciation:
The Municipality has requested $5 million primary coverage with a $45
million umbrella policy, for total coverage of $50 million. As JLT is our
current insurer, their quoted premium for 2013 reflects this coverage.
BFL’s insurance coverage is also for $50 million, comprised of 2 layers:
1. Primary Policy - $5 million per occurrence/$10 million aggregate
2. Excess Policy - $45 million per occurrence
These 2 policies work together seamlessly so that if a claim was to breach
the primary limit of $5 million, the Excess policy would drop down to
provide coverage up to the Excess policy limit. The Primary policy is the
Council Agenda
Page 4 of 12
“first responder” to all of the Municipality’s liability claims. Only when a
claim breaches the $5 million primary limit or when the $10 million primary
aggregate is exhausted, would the Excess policy be triggered into action.
Cowan’s insurance coverage is also for $50 million, comprised of 3 layers:
1. Primary Policy - $15 million per occurrence/no aggregate
2. Follow Form Excess Policy - $10 million
3. Excess Policy - $25 million/$25 million aggregate
To summarize, all 3 policies provide the Municipality with total liability
coverage of $50 million as requested. The effect of ‘layering’ essentially
allows the insurer to reduce the premium, as the primary layer is the more
expensive coverage and the umbrella/excess policy is less expensive to
purchase. Most claims do not exceed the $5 million primary limit.
Overall insurance coverage across all 3 firms was comparable, however
there were some differences identified:
 Volunteer accident insurance: JLT’s premium did not include this
coverage, and if added this would cost the Municipality an
additional $750
 Voluntary medical payments: Cowan’s premium did not include
voluntary medical payment coverage
 Voluntary payment for property damage: Cowan’s premium did
not include this coverage
 Owned Automobile coverage: BFL’s coverage provides
replacement cost for vehicles, regardless of age. JLT’s coverage
provides replacement cost for vehicles less than 20 years old, and
cash value for vehicles beyond 20 years old. This is increased to 25
years for fire vehicles. Cowan’s coverage is similar to JLT’s which
is replacement cost on vehicles less than 25 years old. Given the
high replacement cost of fire vehicles, the loss exposure is greatly
reduced under BFL’s coverage.
B.


Experience
JLT: The Municipality has been insured with JLT for almost 15
years, since 1998. They are an established company providing
municipal insurance management and risk management services
for many years. They are very familiar with our Municipality and
they have a strong relationship with us. JLT will also continue to
provide aviation liability insurance coverage and volunteer
firefighter insurance coverage, as these have been specifically
excluded from the RFP.
Cowan: This insurer is a leader in providing specialized insurance
programs and risk management services to municipalities across
Council Agenda

Page 5 of 12
Canada. Through this arrangement, the Municipality would deal
with Miller Insurance (located in Kincardine) as our broker.
BFL: This broker is the largest privately-owned commercial
insurance brokerage and consulting services firm in Canada. They
have experience with all tiers of municipalities, and local public
sector clients include: Township of North Huron, Municipality of
Bluewater, and Municipality of Morris Turnberry.
C.
Services Offered
All three firms are able to provide Risk Management and Claims
Management services at no additional cost, which was specifically
requested by the Municipality. This would include contract wording review,
staff training, and claims analysis, and providing guidance and advice on
risks affecting the public sector.
D.
Proponent’s Financial Statements/Stability
All three firms have provided financial statements for their associated
insurance companies. No issues have been identified in this area.
E.
References Submitted
All three firms have provided at least 3 municipal references as requested.
Staff has contacted some of these references to gather more information.
No significant issues have been identified through this process.
F.
Price
Of the 3 quotes provided, BFL Canada has quoted the lowest annual
premium at $200,803 (before PST). This is $17,943 (or 8.2%) less than
JLT’s quotation, and $16,213 (7.5%) less than Cowan’s quotation. BFL’s
premium also included Voluntary Accident, which JLT did not include, as
well as Voluntary Medical Payments, Voluntary Payments for Property
Damage, and Incidental Garage Operations, which Cowan did not include.
G.
Interview
Staff has been in contact with all 3 firms to clarify certain points contained
within the proposals submitted.
Recommendation:
Based on the information submitted by all 3 firms, staff recommends that
the insurance proposal for the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 be
awarded to BFL Canada. Although the Municipality has a long-standing
relationship with JLT, when insurance coverage and risk management
options were compared across the 3 firms, the significantly lower premium
provided by BFL makes this firm the recommended option.
Community Plan and Integrated Community Sustainability Plan
(ICSP) Considerations: N/A
Council Agenda
Page 6 of 12
Financial Considerations: The budgeted amount for 2013 for insurance
costs, excluding aviation liability and volunteer firefighter coverage
amounts to $240,000 plus PST. If the recommendation option is approved,
the Municipality will be under budget by approximately $30,000.
Options:
1. THAT the Municipality of Kincardine Council approve the
acceptance of BFL Canada for insurance services for the
period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 for the premium
amount of $200,803 + PST.
retention of the existing insurer, Jardine Lloyd Thomson,
for the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 for the
premium amount of $218,746 + PST.
acceptance of Frank Cowen for insurance services for
the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 for the premium
amount of $217,016 + PST.
4. Do nothing at this time.
Preferred Option: Option 1
Date to be considered by Council: Matters Arising
CAO’s Comments: I concur
COW RECOMMENDATION
(B)
TRE 2013-03
Subject: Ontario Regulation 284/09
Report Summary: This report is being presented to Council in order to
meet the requirements of Regulation 284/09 under the Municipal Act,
2001. Ontario Regulation 284/09 allows the Municipality to exclude from
their annual budgets amortization, post-employment expenses, solid
waste landfill closure and post-closure expenses; however the regulation
does require that the Municipality report on the impact of these excluded
costs. Municipalities must prepare a report about the excluded expenses
and this report must be adopted by resolution.
Origin: Ontario Regulation 284/09
Existing Policy:
None
Council Agenda
Page 7 of 12
Analysis: Ontario Regulation 284/09 allows a municipality to exclude from
its budget the estimated expenses all or a portion of the following:
1. Amortization expenses
2. Post-employment benefits expenses
3. Solid waste landfill closure and post-closure expenses
If any of these expenses are excluded from the budget, the Municipality
shall (a) prepare a report about the excluded expenses; and (b) adopt the
report by resolution.
The Municipality of Kincardine’s 2013 budget, passed on February 21,
2013, excluded the following:
1. Amortization expenses of $5,328,000. Total amortization expense
for 2012 is $6,075,000, and the 2013 budget includes $747,000.
The annual financial statements include amortization expense on
tangible capital assets as required by PSAB standards. Although
the Municipality’s 2013 budget does not include amortization
expense in its entirety, provisions were made for contributions to
capital and transfer to reserves funds for capital expenses
amounting to $3,893,000. Therefore the overall net impact of
amortization exclusion is $2,182,000.
2. Future post-employment benefits expenses. PSAB standards do
not require liabilities associated with post-employment benefits to
be fully funded by setting aside any portion of the accumulated
surplus as reserves and reserve funds. Employee Future Benefits
include non-pension retirement liabilities for sick leave, extended
health care, dental and life benefits, and WSIB benefits.
Independent actuarial reviews are conducted to estimate the
liability for financial reporting. In 2012, the expense recorded was
$6,900 which would be a reduction to the accumulated surplus had
this been included in the 2013 budget.
3. Solid waste landfill closure and post-closure expenses. PSAB
standards do not require liabilities associated with solid waste
landfill closure and post-closure care activities to be fully funded by
setting aside any portion of the accumulated surplus as reserves
and reserve funds. The 2012 expense recorded for the estimate in
change was $184,000. The impact of solid waste landfill closure
and post-closure expenses is a reduction to the accumulated
surplus and is estimated to be $184,000 in 2013.
Council Agenda
Page 8 of 12
Regulation 284/09 requires this report be approved by Council and
adopted by resolution.
(ICSP) Considerations: N/A
Financial Considerations: As per above analysis.
Options:
1. That Council adopt this report by Resolution as required
under the Municipal Act, 2001, Ontario Regulation
284/09.
2. That Council not adopt this report by Resolution as
required under the Municipal Act, 2001, Ontario
Regulation 284/09.
Date to be considered by Council: Matters Arising
COW RECOMMENDATION
(C)
CAO 2013-08
Subject: Council Remuneration
Report Summary: To align Policy # GG 1.9(a) with the approved budget.
Origin: 2013 budget approved by Council.
Existing Policy:
By-law
GG 1.9(a) and By-Law No. 2013-017 2013 Budget
Analysis: Council elected to freeze their remuneration at the 2010 level
for two years.
The 2013 budget approved by Council included a 3% increase for Council
Remuneration.
Mayor
Deputy Mayor
2012
Remuneration
$28,774
$20,855
2013
Remuneration
$29,638
$21,480
Difference
$864
$625
Council Agenda
Page 9 of 12
Councillor
$16,895
$17,402
$507
To align Policy GG 1.9(a) with the approved budget, the 2013
Remuneration for Council should be updated as noted above.
Please Note: Housekeeping changes are also included in this report as
follows:
Section A 3: Reflects current remuneration for Police Services Board
members.
Section B 7: The wording has been updated due to the elimination of the
master standing committees system.
(ICSP) Considerations:
Community Plan – Corporate Services – Strategic Initiative #1
Ensure our policies are positioned to ensure financial sustainability for our
community.
ICSP – Municipal Operations and Community Leadership – “Committed to
pursue excellence in operations”
Financial Considerations: Funded through the Council operating budget
Options:
1. That Council approve the changes to Policy GG 1.9 (a).
2. That Council approve Policy GG 1.9 (a) with additional
changes.
3. That Council not act at this time.
Preferred Option: Option No. 1
Date to be considered by Council: March 20, 2013
CAO’s Comments:
Author of report.
COW RECOMMENDATION
(D)
CLE 2013-01
Attachments: 2013 Community & Enbridge Community Grants
Recommended Allocation
Subject: 2013 Community & Enbridge Community Grants Allocation
Council Agenda
Page 10 of 12
Report Summary: The 2013 Budget approved by Council on February
21, 2013 through By-law No. 2013 – 017 included funds for Community &
Enbridge Community Grants. The recommended allocation of the grants
is set out in the attached listing.
Also, Enbridge has provided formal notice to the Municipality that, while
they will continue to support and invest in the community, their program, in
association with the Municipality, will come to a close with this 2013
distribution of funds as they intend to assume administration of their
Enbridge grant program.
Origin: 2013 Budget
Existing Policy: GG.3.5 Allocation of Community Grants
Analysis: The Municipality has offered grants to cultural, heritage, arts,
tourism, and community groups for several years. Policy GG.3.5 sets out
that the program is to provide funds to cultural, heritage, arts, and tourism
or community groups, which will have a positive impact on the quality of
life in the community of the Municipality of Kincardine; to provide a fair and
equitable process for the disbursement of community grants; that all
applications are to be evaluated in a comparative context based on the
purpose and objectives of the applicant and the funding available in the
grant program.
As part of the grant program, Enbridge contributes funds for the Enbridge
Community Fund which is administered by the Municipality.
The 2013 Budget, adopted February 21, 2013 by By-law No. 2013 - 017,
included the sum of $130,300 for the purposes of the Community and
Enbridge Community Grants. In the past, Enbridge has provided $50,000
annually, however, for 2013, $60,175 will be contributed. The additional
$10,175 was not included in the budget, and therefore, the total grant
monies available are $140,475.
As noted above, Enbridge intends to assume administration of their grant
program commencing in 2014. The Municipality and Enbridge will work
together to ensure applicants are aware of the change in the process for
next year to ensure a smooth transition.
$25,000 of the Community Grants is provided to minor sports groups
based on a formula that includes facility costs and enrollment numbers of
the particular group.
Council Agenda
Page 11 of 12
Attached is a listing of the applications for both grant programs and the
recommended allocation for 2013. It is a difficult task as each group
represents a component of the community, yet, the amount requested
from the groups is substantially higher than the budgeted amount. In
developing the recommended allocation, factors taken into consideration
included (not in any particular order): purpose and scope of the grant
program as set out in GG.3.5; in-kind support from the Municipality for an
event/group; other financial support already provided to the group by the
Municipality; Enbridge support; minor sports allocation.
(ICSP) Considerations: Preservation and promotion of the Municipality’s
heritage and cultural diversity.
ICSP: Continue to appreciate the role of the arts in economic
development, tourism and community; Preserve the Municipality of
Kincardine’s cultural heritage; Promote the Municipality of Kincardine’s
cultural diversity.
Financial Considerations: The 2013 budget includes $130,300 for the
Community and Enbridge Community Grant programs plus Enbridge
provided an additional $10,175 bringing the total available to $140,475.
Options:
1. Accept the allocation of Community & Enbridge
Community Grants as recommended.
2. Modify the recommended allocation of Community &
Enbridge Community Grants.
3. Take no action at this time.
Date to be considered by Council: March 20, 2013
COW RECOMMENDATION
8.0
MATTERS ARISING FROM PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
/COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
9.0
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
10.0
CLOSED SESSION IF REQUIRED
11.0
MATTERS ARISING FROM CLOSED SESSION
Council Agenda
12.0
Page 12 of 12
SCHEDULING OF MEETINGS
12.1
Notice of Council Meetings
March 20, 2013
April 3, 2013
April 10, 2013
April 17, 2013
May 1, 2013
Regular Council
Regular Council
Planning/Corporate Services
Regular Council
Regular Council
12. 2 Notice of Public and Special Meetings
13.0
ADJOURNMENT
Motion # 03/13/13 Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT this Council adjourn at
p.m.
5:00 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE
Planning Advisory Committee
Page 1 of 3
March 13, 2013
AGENDA
ROLL CALL
Mayor Larry Kraemer
Councillor Randy Roppel
Staff Present
Bruce Stickney, Planner
Murray Clarke, Chief Administrative Officer
Donna MacDougall, Clerk
DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF
Name
1.0
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
1.1
2.0
Item of Business
ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
APPOINTMENT OF ACTING SECRETARY-TRESURER
MOTION #PAC13Moved by:
Seconded by:
Recommendation from Planning Advisory Committee.
Nature of Interest
3.0
Page 2 of 3
March 13, 2013
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
Seconded by:
4.0
ZONING AMENDMENTS
4.1
APPLICANT: Wayne & Dale Chipman
Part of Lot 19, Concession ‘A’
Municipality of Kincardine, geographic Township of Kincardine
(map in blue folder)
Planning Report # Z-8-13.21
The Planner will explain the report and recommendation.
Agency Comments:
Any comments received by the time of writing the report are in the written report.
Public Comments:
Presentations from the Public:
Committee Comments:
Page 3 of 3
Seconded by:
5.0
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #PAC12 Moved by:
Seconded by:
March 13, 2013
Page 1 of 3
January 16, 2013
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
Mayor Larry Kraemer
Councillor Randy Roppel - A
Staff Present
Bruce Stickney, Planner
Murray Clarke, Chief Administrative Officer
Michele Barr, Building and Planning Manager
DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF
Name
1.0
Nature of Interest
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
1.1
2.0
Item of Business
ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
MOTION #PAC13- 01
Moved by: Anne Eadie
Seconded by: Ken Craig
THAT the Minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee meeting of December 12, 2012
be adopted as printed.
Carried
3.0
Page 2 of 3
January 16, 2013
ZONING AMENDMENTS
3.1
APPLICANT: Karl R. Elliott
Lot 28, Concession 6
Municipality of Kincardine, geographic Township of Bruce
(map in blue folder)
Planning Report # Z-58-12-26
The Planner will explain the report and recommendation.
Agency Comments:
Public Comments:
Presentations from the Public:
None
Committee Comments:
None
MOTION #PAC13- 02
Moved by: Larry Kraemer
Seconded by: Anne Eadie
THAT the Planning Advisory Committee recommends to rezone the lands described as,
Lot 28, Concession 6, Municipality of Kincardine (geographic Township of Bruce) to
‘General Agriculture Special’ and ‘Environmental Protection’ to facilitate the severance
of a surplus farm dwelling, AND FURTHER waive the requirement for an Environmental
Impact Study (EIS)
Carried
4.0
Page 3 of 3
January 16, 2013
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #PAC13 - 03
Moved by: Anne Eadie
Seconded by: Ron Coristine
THAT the Planning Advisory Committee meeting now adjourns and moves back into Council.
Carried
________________________
Chairman
______________________
Secretary-Treasurer
Municipality of Kincardine
Planning Report
Application:
File No.:
Date:
Zoning By-law Amendment
Z-08-13.21
March 6, 2013
TO:
Chair and Members of the Municipality of Kincardine Planning Advisory
Committee
FROM:
Bruce Stickney, Planner for the Municipality of Kincardine
County of Bruce Planning & Economic Development Department
SUBJECT:
Application submitted by Wayne and Dale Chipman c/o Paul Wilken to
facilitate the construction of a replacement single detached dwelling and sewage
system.
REASONS FOR AND NATURE OF THE APPLICATION:
The lands are designated ‘Residential’ and ‘Natural Environment’ and are zoned ‘R1-r –
Residential One Special’ and ‘EP – Environmental Protection’. The applicant proposes to
demolish the existing cottage dwelling and accessory building that are partially within the ‘EP’
zone; and, replace them with a single detached dwelling and tertiary sewage disposal system.
The replacement dwelling and sewage disposal system would encroach into the ‘EP’ zone.
The zoning would change from ‘R1-r’ and ‘EP’ to ‘R1-ba’ and ‘EP’ on the lands to permit
development of a replacement dwelling and sewage disposal system on a seasonal road
(requiring a ‘limited services agreement’); and, further to change the maximum Lot Coverage
(Principal Building) from 20% as required in the By-law for partially serviced lots, to 28% to
accommodate the dwelling. Filling and grading of the lot and the design of structures would
allow for an adjustment to the ‘EP’ zone boundary such that the replacement building and
sewage disposal system could be wholly contained within the ‘R1-ba’ zone and would not
encroach into the ‘EP’ zone.
CIRCULATION:
The application was circulated to the mandated commenting agencies as well as to the public.
One letter (see Appendix ‘D’) of concern has been received related to the potential impact to
views from Sandy Crescent.
SUMMARY:
The lands are currently designated for Residential and Natural Environment uses. The
proposed development is to the east of the existing cottage, is an improvement to the long-term
safety of the site and the Conservation Authority will be able to control design measures within
their ‘Permit Area’ to address the hazard associated with the new dwelling.
CONCLUSION:
The application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, complies with the intent of the
Municipality of Kincardine Official Plan and of the County of Bruce Official Plan.
PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION:
Subject to review of objections and submissions arising from the Public Meeting,
I recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment File No. Z-08-13.21
BE APPROVED, in accordance with the draft site-specific By-law attached.
I.
Page 1
CONTEXT:
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
Development
Proposal
Related File(s)
Owner
Applicant
Agent
Legal Description
Municipal Address
Lot
Description:
PART
Frontage
Width
Depth
Area
Uses
Structures
Servicing
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Access
County Official Plan
Proposed Official Plan
Local Official Plan
Proposed Official Plan
Zoning By-law
Proposed Zoning By-law
Surrounding Land Uses
The purpose of the application is to rezone a portion of the subject lands
from ‘R1-r – Residential One Special’ and ‘EP – Environmental Protection’
to ‘R1-ba – Residential One Special’ to facilitate the construction of a
replacement dwelling and private ‘tertiary’ sewage system; permit an
increase in maximum Lot Coverage (Principal Building) from 20% to 28%;
and, to revise the ‘EP’ zone.
None
Wayne and Dale Chipman
N/A
Paul Wilken
Part of Lot 19, Concession ‘A’, geographic Township of Kincardine
33 Lower Shore Road
TO BE REZONED ‘R1-ba’
TO REMAIN ZONED ‘EP’
+/- 21.54 m (70.67 ft)
+/- N/A
+/- 20.96 m (68.8 ft)
+/- 20.96 m (68.8 ft)
+/- 20 m (66 ft ) to include proposed +/- 8.5 to 10 m (28 to 33 ft) less
development area;
proposed developed area
+/- 446 sq. m (4800 sq. ft.)
+/-194 sg. m (2089 sq. ft.)
Residential & Natural Environment
Residential & Natural Environment
Residential
Natural Environment
Part of Cottage and Shed
Part of Cottage Dwelling
Single Detached Dwelling
Vacant
Municipal Water and Private Septic
N/A
No Change
No change
Lower Beach Road, a seasonal municipal road
Primary Urban Community
No Change
Residential and Natural Environment
Minor Adjustment to follow Zone Boundary as permitted in OP Section D7.3
‘R1-r – Residential One Special’, and ‘EP – Environmental Protection’
(Municipality of Kincardine By-Law No. 2003-25)
‘R1-ba – Residential One Special’ and ‘EP – Environmental Protection’
Residential and Natural Environment uses surround the subject lands.
Subject Lands
II.
MATTERS ARISING FROM AGENCY CIRCULATION
Municipality of Kincardine:
CBO – no concerns.
Page 2
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
Public Works – Building location should be raised to provide proper drainage.
COMMENT: Some filling is proposed.
Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority (SVCA): A portion of the property is designated Natural
Environment in the Municipality of Kincardine Official Plan. The Natural Environment
designation recognizes flooding, erosion and dynamic beach hazards associated with the
shoreline. The proposal will represent an improvement to the long term safety of the site as the
SVCA will control design measures to address the hazard associated with a new building and
provide greater setback to the dune features. Therefore, given the intent of the NE designation
can be met, provided design details are confirmed ..., the SVCA is of the opinion that the
proposal appears to be consistent with the Municipality of Kincardine’s Official Plan.
The SVCA is not opposed to a proposed rezoning of the subject property in order to facilitate
the proposed development provided the EP zone is revised to avoid the proposed development.
The sewage disposal system will also need to be represented as outside the EP zone. Future
development (including decks or other buildings or structures) to the west, north and south of
the proposed development, in the EP zone, will not be agreeable to the SVCA.
COMMENT: Section D7.5c) outlines the policy for delineation of the Natural Environment Area,
as follows: The exact location of the boundaries of the Natural Environment Area shall be
delineated in the implementing Zoning By-law. The proposed EP zone will follow the west
side of the dwelling and sewage disposal system, such that both will lie wholly within the ‘R1-ba’
zone, as recommended by the SVCA.
Historic Saugeen Metis: HSM has no objection or issues with the proposed zoning by-law
amendment, provided that the development maintains a minimum 30 metre setback from the
Lake Huron Shoreline.
COMMENT: The proposed development will be to the east of the existing developed area and
substantially more than 30 metres from the shoreline.
III.
MATTERS ARISING FROM PUBLIC CIRCULATION
A letter was received from a Sandy Crescent resident. Their concern seemed to be that this
development may interfere with views of Lake Huron they now enjoy from their property. The
‘R1-Residential One’ zone permits a Principal Building Height of 10.5 metres.
Comment: Sandy Crescent lies north-east of the subject property, and north of the MacCaskill
Road allowance (not immediately east); and, Sandy Crescent properties are elevated 10 metres
above the subject lands due to their location on the plateau above the ancient shoreline bluff.
No impact on the view from Sandy Crescent properties are expected, due to the proposed
development.
IV.
MATTERS ARISING FROM PROVINCIAL INTERESTS, POLICY STATEMENTS OR PLANS
Under Section 3(5) of the Planning Act, the Municipality ‘shall be consistent with” matters of
provincial interest as set out in the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Section 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Natural Hazards, provides policy directing development away from “hazard lands adjacent to the
shorelines of the Great Lakes ... which are impacted by flooding hazards, erosion hazards
and/or dynamic beach hazards, and further that no development shall occur within the hazard
areas themselves. However, 3.1.6 goes on to explain that development may be permitted
where the effects and risk to public safety are minor so as to be managed or mitigated, for
example, in accordance with flood-proofing standards, protection works standards, and access
standards, where vehicles and people can safely enter and exit the area, where new hazards
Page 3
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
are not created or existing hazards are not aggravated, and no adverse environmental impacts
will result.
COMMENT: The proposed development is an improvement over existing conditions on the
property and will not aggravate the existing hazards. The setback to dunes will be increased
with the result that the proposed development will have no environmental impacts to natural
features.
An Archaeological Assessment was not requested since the application involved the
redevelopment of an existing lot that was extensively disturbed.
Upon review of the PPS and relevant policies as identified in Appendix ‘A’ to this report, the
proposed Amendment is consistent with the PPS.
V.
MATTERS ARISING FROM COUNTY OFFICIAL PLAN
The subject lands are designated ‘Primary Urban Community’ that permits single detached
residential development.
Section 5.8.3 provides a description of Hazard Land Areas and where they apply as follows:
Hazard Land Areas include those areas that pose a risk if developed, due to the inherent site
conditions, including flood and erosion susceptibility, steep slopes, organic soils or other
physical conditions and are shown on Schedule ‘A’
Although not shown on Schedule ‘A’ for areas within Local Official Plans, these areas shall be
continued within Local Official Plan boundaries, and shall be used in preparation of Official
Plans and Zoning By-laws.
COMMENTS: The Hazard Land Areas are designated as ‘Natural Environment’ in the
Kincardine Official Plan and are accurately delineated as the ‘EP-Environmental Protection
Zone’ in the implementing Comprehensive Zoning By-law.
Upon review of the County of Bruce Official Plan (BCOP) and ‘Primary Urban Communities’
policies as identified in Appendix ‘A’ to this report, the proposed Amendment is consistent with
the BCOP.
VI.
MATTERS ARISING FROM LOCAL PLANNING DOCUMENTS
I Municipality of Kincardine Official Plan
The subject lands are designated ‘Residential’ and ‘Natural Environment’. Section D7.3,
describes the Natural Environment designation as those lands having inherent natural hazards
and are identified by the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority.
The boundaries of the Natural Environment Area are delineated in a conceptual manner and the
exact location of the boundaries of the Natural Environment Area shall be delineated in the
implementing Zoning By-law using a separate and restrictive classification and/or be
appropriately protected through the use of SVCA Regulations.
COMMENT: A single detached dwelling is permitted in the ‘Residential’ designation.
The proposed development will meet the requirements of the Kincardine Official Plan as the
SVCA considers the entire property to be within their Regulation Area and will require written
permission from the SVCA prior to development. The adjustment to the Natural Environment
designation will be delineated and implemented by the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment
using an ‘EP’ zone.
Upon review of the Municipality of Kincardine Official Plan (LOP) and relevant policies as
identified in Appendix ‘A’ to this report, the proposed Amendment is consistent with the LOP.
Page 4
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
II Municipality of Kincardine Zoning By-law 2003-25
The By-law permits a single detached dwelling in an ‘R1’ zone. No person shall erect any
building or structure, in any zone fronted by a Class Two (2) unless the owner has entered into
a ‘Limited Services Agreement’ with the Corporation.
Lots that utilize partial services (i.e. municipal water and private sewage systems) are limited to
a maximum Lot Coverage of 20% for the Principal Building (dwelling). This allows sufficient
space for a typical Class Four Septic System.
COMMENT:
The proponent has proposed the use of a tertiary sewage treatment system that would occupy
less space on the lot, and in turn permit a greater portion to be used for the principle building
(dwelling).
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would allow the maximum Lot Coverage to be
increased to 28%, and require the owner to enter into a ‘Limited Services Agreement’.
The proposed development will comply with all other provisions of the By-law.
VII.
OTHER ISSUES / MATTERS
None
Page 5
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
APPENDIX ‘A’
Planning Policy Checklist
I. Provincial Policy Statement (PPS)
Applicable Section
Policy
Policy
1.0
Building Strong Communities

1.1
Managing and Directing Land Use to Achieve Efficient Development and Land Use
Patterns
`
1.1.3
Settlement Areas
1.1.4
Rural Areas in Municipalities
1.1.5
Rural Areas in Territory Without Municipal Organization
1.2
Coordination
1.3
Employment Areas
1.4
Housing
1.5
Public Spaces, Parks and Open Space
1.6
Infrastructure and Public Service Facilities

1.6.4
Sewage and Water
1.6.5
Transportation Systems
1.6.6
Transportation and Infrastructure Corridors
1.6.7
Airports
1.6.8
Waste Management
1.7
Long-Term Economic Prosperity
1.8
Energy and Air Quality
2.0
Wise Use and Management of Resources

2.1
Natural Heritage
2.2
Water
2.3
Agriculture
2.3.3
Permitted Uses
2.3.4
Lot Creation and Lot Adjustments
2.3.5
Removal of Land from Prime Agricultural Areas
2.4
Minerals and Petroleum
2.4.2
Protection of Long-Term Resource Supply
2.4.3
Rehabilitation
2.4.4
Extraction in Prime Agricultural Areas
2.5
Mineral Aggregate Resources
2.5.2
Protection of Long-Term Resource Supply
2.5.3
Rehabilitation
2.5.4
Extraction in Prime Agricultural Areas
2.5.5
Wayside Pits and Quarries, Portable Asphalt Plants and Portable Concrete Plants

2.6
Cultural Heritage and Archaeology
3.0
Protecting Public Health and Safety

3.1
Natural Hazards
3.2
Human-made Hazards
II. Other Provincial Interests
Ministry
Policy / Legislation
MMAH

MCul
Criteria for Evaluating Archaeological Potential – A Checklist for the Non-Specialist
MOE
MTO
MNR
OMAFRA
III. County of Bruce Official Plan
5.8
HAZARD LAND AREA
5.8.1
Introduction
Hazard Land Areas generally identify lands that pose a risk if developed, due to the inherent site conditions,
but these areas may also include important environmental features. Specifically, Hazard Land Areas
include, flood and erosion susceptibility areas, steep slopes, organic soils, or other physical conditions which
are severe enough to cause property damage or potential loss of life if the lands were to be developed.
Municipalities, Conservation Authorities and the appropriate approval authority shall be encouraged to
Page 6
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
undertake floodplain and other mapping to define more precisely hazard lands and other environmental
protection areas.
5.8.3
Areas of Application
.1
Hazard Land Areas include those areas of identified Provincially Significant Wetlands (Class 1 through 3
wetlands) and Environmental Hazard Areas such as flood and erosion susceptibility areas, hazard lands,
steep slopes or other physical conditions which are severe enough to cause property damage or potential
loss of life if the lands were to be developed. These Wetlands, Environmental Hazard Areas and
Floodplains are shown collectively on Schedule A as Hazard Land Areas.
.2
Although not shown on Schedule ‘A’, mapping for Wetlands, Environmental Hazard Areas and Floodplains
shall be continued on within the boundaries of areas also covered by Local Official Plans. Where detailed
shoreline, floodplain, slope or wetland mapping exists this mapping shall be used in the preparation of
County Official Plan Amendments or Local Official Plans, and Zoning By-Laws. Where new development is
proposed and detailed mapping is not available, the proponent shall be required to produce the necessary
mapping.
5.8.5
General Policies
.1
It is the policy of this Plan to prohibit any form of development including new residential, commercial, or
industrial uses in Hazard Land Areas that would detract from the natural environment or be situated where
environmental constraints exist. In addition to Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement concerning
development and site alterations in hazardous lands and sites, the following must be considered....
Existing Uses
.3
Uses existing on the date of approval of this Plan may be recognized in the Zoning By-Law as legally
conforming despite the Environmental Hazard area Zone in the implementing Zoning By-Law. The
expansion or enlargement of non-conforming uses shall be discouraged.
.4
The replacement or rebuilding of an existing building destroyed by natural means beyond the control of the
owner may be permitted providing it does not exceed the size or volume of the original building, is located at
the same site, unless an environmentally more acceptable site is available and acceptable to the owner
which will not aggravate the existing hazardous situation, and is for substantially the same use, subject to
the approval of the local municipality and the appropriate approval authorities.
5.8.6
Great Lakes Shoreline Hazard Areas
5.8.6.1 General Principles
.1
Great Lakes Shoreline Hazard Areas are not a separate designation. These areas have been identified by
the Province of Ontario and Conservation Authorities on mapping which includes shoreline floodplain,
erosion and dynamic beach features....
5.8.7
Implementation
.1
The boundaries of the areas designated as Hazard Land Area on Schedule A are not hard and fast lines, but
are accepted as being flexible to some extent. The limits of the Hazard Land Area on the ground should be
determined through consultation with the appropriate Conservation Authority, the appropriate Provincial
authority, the local municipality, and by a site inspection and evaluation.
.2
Minor adjustments to the Hazard Land Area boundaries may be made without an Amendment to this Plan, in
consultation with the appropriate Conservation Authority or appropriate Provincial authority, providing the
abutting land use designation remains unchanged.
.3
In the absence of more detailed hazard land or environmentally significant area mapping, the boundaries of
the Hazard Land Area as shown on Schedule A to this Plan, will be used as guides for the preparation of
Zoning By-laws, which will implement the policies of this Plan and more accurately define the boundaries.
Detailed hazard land mapping is available for much of the County, through the Conservation Authorities.
.4
Hazard Land Areas will be placed in a Municipal Zoning By-Law which will prohibit all buildings, structures
and uses except those permitted in Section 5.8.4 [Permitted Uses (Hazard Land Area)] of this Plan.
IV.
D7
D7.3
Official Plan of the Municipality of Kincardine
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AREAS
General Principles
Page 7
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
The Natural Environment designation is comprised of those lands having inherent natural hazards
such as flood or erosion susceptibility, steep slopes, poor drainage, areas of organic soils, and
other physical conditions which, if developed upon, could cause loss of life, property damage,
social disruption or result in the degradation of the environment. Council shall, therefore, require
these type of lands to be retained in a natural state....
#77
The Natural Environment designation as shown on Schedule ‘A’ is based upon one or more of the
following features:
c)
The one in 100 year flood level along the Lake Huron Shoreline as indicated on the Saugeen Valley
Conservation Authority Flood Risk Maps for the Municipality of Kincardine plus a:
i)
Flooding and Erosion Hazard Limit - being a 15 metre allowance for wave uprush, erosion and
other water related hazards, measured horizontally landward from the 100 year flood line;
And where appropriate a:
ii)
Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit - being a dynamic beach allowance of up to 30 metres measured
landward from the Flooding and Erosion Hazard limit to recognize areas of inherently changeable
accumulations of shoreline sediments.
Interpretation of the boundaries of the Natural Environment designation should be based upon
evaluation of the above information and any other applicable policies of this Official Plan.
However, for the exact location of the flood line or other hazardous feature on any property, the
owner is advised to review the detailed mapping available at the Saugeen Valley Conservation
Authority, and to obtain their input, interpretation, and recommendation.
Natural heritage features are identified and can only be modified by the Ministry of Natural
Resources. Other provincial ministries shall bo included in consultation when required. Hazard
lands are identified by the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority. Minor adjustments to the
boundaries shall not require an amendment to this Plan.
D7.5
Policies
The following policies apply to the Natural Environment designation:
a)
The erection of buildings and structures or the placing or removal of fill of any kind, whether
originating on the site or elsewhere, within a Natural Environment Area are generally prohibited. Minor
extensions or enlargements of existing buildings and structures shall be discouraged....
c)
The boundaries of the Natural Environment Area are delineated in a conceptual manner
on the attached Schedule ‘A’, 'B' and 'C'. The exact location of the boundaries of the Natural Environment
Area shall be delineated in the implementing Zoning By-law.
d)
Development and site alteration shall not be permitted within the floodway portion of the floodplain,
as defined by the Regional Storm flood.
e)
Replacement of existing buildings or structures damaged by natural causes may be permitted if the
hazard risk does not increase from the original condition....
k)
If more detailed Natural Environment and Natural Heritage mapping becomes available and is
recognized by the Municipality, or should flood control or similar works be undertaken, to the satisfaction of
the Municipality and the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority, which result in major changes in areas
designated Natural Environment, then this Plan may be amended as required.
l)
It shall be the policy of this Plan that in considering an application for the redesignation of lands
designated Natural Environment for other purposes, Council will consider redesignation, if all of the following
can be satisfied:
Page 8
i)
The hazards can be safely addressed and new hazards are not created or existing ones
aggravated. This may include preparation of an engineering study to the satisfaction of Council
and the SVCA;
ii)
No adverse or negative environmental impacts will result, and it has been demonstrated that there
will be no negative impacts on the natural features or the ecological functions for which they have
been identified. The Municipality, in consultation with the SVCA shall require an Environmental
Impact Study to be prepared, at the proponent's expense, in accordance with Section D7.6 of this
Plan;
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
iii)
Vehicles and people have a way of safely entering and exiting at all times;
iv)
The development does not include institutional uses, emergency services (excluding emergency
services specifically for water rescue), or involve hazardous substances, and;
v)
The advice, or approval where required, of the Conservation Authority shall be obtained.
m)
Where development or site alteration is proposed and detailed mapping is not available, the
proponent shall be required to produce the necessary mapping.
n)
It shall be the policy of this Plan that the areas designated Natural Environment shall be zoned in a
separate and restrictive classification in the implementing Zoning By-Law and/or appropriately protected
through the use of SVCA Regulations.
o)
Written permission may be required from the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority pursuant to
Ontario Regulation 169/06 – Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and
Watercourses where development or site grading is proposed within a Regulated Area as shown on
schedules filed with the SVCA where such mapping exists or otherwise generally within or near the Natural
Environment designation. In areas that are subject to the SVCA Regulation No. 169/06 and where the intent
of the Natural Environment designation is being maintained, the Municipality has the option of relying on the
regulatory role of the SVCA through their Regulations to implement the intent of the hazards relating to the
Natural Environment designation along the shoreline areas of Lake Huron.
V.
Municipality of Kincardine Zoning By-law 2003-25
SECTION 5 – DEFINITIONS
‘STREET, CLASS TWO (2)’ shall mean streets under the jurisdiction of the Corporation and shown as reference on
Schedule ‘A’ to this By-law to which the Corporation provides “limited services” including snow clearance or
ploughing.
6.12
FRONTAGE ON A CLASS TWO (2) STREET/PRIVATE STREET
.1
No person shall erect any building or structure, or increase the height, size or volume of existing structures,
in any zone fronted by a Class Two Street or Private Street unless the owner of the lot upon which such building or
structure is to be erected or increased in height, size or volume has entered into a ‘Limited Service Agreement’ with
the Corporation.
.2
Class Two Streets and Private Streets are identified on Schedule ‘A’ for interpretation purposes only.
Section 12 – RESIDENTIAL ONE – R1
12.1
Permitted Uses
In any R1 – Residential One Zone, no person shall use any building, structure or land nor erect any building or
structure except in accordance with the following provisions:
RESIDENTIAL
•
Single detached dwelling
•
Semi-detached dwelling
•
Duplex dwelling
•
Secondary Suite in accordance with Section 6.34
NON-RESIDENTIAL
•
Bed and Breakfast Establishment in accordance with Section 6.17
•
Place of Worship
•
Group Home - Type 1
•
Home Occupation – Household and Domestic Arts in accordance with Section 6.14
•
Home Occupation – Professional Uses in accordance with Section 6.13
•
Day Care Nursery (Licensed)
•
Nursing Home
•
Public Park
12.2
Zone provisions
No person shall within any R1- Residential One Zone use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure
except in accordance with the following provisions:
12.2.1 Zone Provisions for Single Detached Dwellings
Page 9
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
NO MUNICIPAL WATER
OR SEWER
(Replaced by By-Law No.
2005-013 – Housekeeping)
4,000 square metres
EITHER MUNICIPAL
WATER OR SEWER
1800 square metres
30 metres
MUNICIPAL WATER AND
SEWER
30 metres
30 metres
18 metres
Front Yard (Minimum)
6 metres
6 metres
6 metres
Rear Yard (Minimum)
7.5 metres
7.5 metres
7.5 metres
Exterior Side Yard (Minimum)
6 metres
6 metres
6 metres
Interior Side Yard (Minimum)
2.4 metres on one side and 1.2 metres on the opposite side of the same lot plus 0.6
metres on the narrow side for each additional or partial storey above the first storey on
that side. Provided that where a garage or carport is attached to the main principal
building, or the lot is a corner lot, the minimum width of the interior side yard shall be 1.2
meters plus 0.6 metres for each additional or partial storey above the first storey on that
side.
Total Floor Area (Minimum)
75 square metres
75 square metres
75 square metres
10.5 metres
10.5 metres
10.5 metres
15%
20%
40%
PROVISIONS
Lot Area (Minimum)
Lot Frontage (Minimum)
Lot Frontage
(Minimum)
–
Corner
30 metres
Lot
Height - Principal Building
(Maximum)
Lot Coverage (Principal Building)
(Maximum)
464 square metres
15 metres
12.3
Special Provisions
.17
By-law No.:
Not available
Subject Lands: Multiple locations
Special Zone:
‘R1-r’
Exception to Zone Provisions:
(i)
Lands zoned ‘R1-r’ are existing lots of record and have frontage on a ‘Class Two (2) Street’. Prior
to development, alteration, expansion, or additions to existing buildings or structures a limited
service agreement shall be entered into with the Municipality. Class Two (2) Streets are identified
on Schedule ‘A’ for information purposes only.
Page 10
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
SECTION 34 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION – EP
34.1
PERMITTED USES
No person shall within any EP – Environmental Protection Area Zone use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or
structure for any purpose except for one or more of the following uses:
RESIDENTIAL USE
•
Prohibited
NON-RESIDENTIAL USE
•
Agriculture, General
•
Conservation Area
•
Public Park
•
Passive Recreation
34.2
Structures Prohibited
All buildings and structures shall be prohibited in a ‘EP – Environmental Protection’ zone except for the following:
a)
b)
c)
d)
those necessary for flood and/or erosion control purposes;
unenclosed picnic shelters/structures;
washroom facilities associated with a Public Park or Conservation Area;
buildings for essential public utilities.
34.3
Interpretation of ‘EP’ Zone Boundaries
The Environmental Protection Zone boundaries identified on Schedule ‘A’ are intended to generally identify areas of
existing or potential natural hazards, areas of natural or scientific interest and areas of provincial natural significance.
Notwithstanding Section 34.1, ‘EP-Environmental Protection’ zone boundaries are subject to minor changes without a
formal amendment to this By-law when approved in writing by Saugeen Valley Conservation and the Chief Building
Official of the Corporation. Changes to the ‘EP’ boundaries shall be incorporated when required in subsequent Bylaw consolidation.
34.4
PROVINCIALLY SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS – SCHEDULE ‘B’
Some areas zoned as ‘EP-Environmental Protection’ are within a “Provincially Significant Wetland”. The Bruce
County Official Plan and Provincial Policies prohibit development and site alteration in these areas. Provincially
Significant Wetlands are shown on Schedule ‘B’ and forming part of this By-law. For more complete information
reference should be made to the Bruce County Official Plan and the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority.
In cases where lands are identified as Provincially Significant Wetlands in Schedule ‘B’ permitted uses shall be
limited to:
RESIDENTIAL USE
•
Prohibited
NON-RESIDENTIAL USE
•
Forestry/Silviculture
•
Passive recreation, exclusive of buildings and structures
•
No building or structures shall be permitted except those necessary for flood and/or erosion control purposes.
Page 11
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
APPENDIX ‘B’
Existing Development
Existing ‘EP’ Boundary
Page 12
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
APPENDIX ‘C’
Proposed Zone Boundary
R1-ba
EP
Page 13
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
APPENDIX ‘D’
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Page 14
Chipman c/o Wilken
Z-08-13.21
Lake Huron Fishing Club
Dedicated to ensuring
future generations will
have quality fishing
opportunities.
Formed in 1983
350 Members from throughout
Southwestern Ontario
 Meetings every 2nd month at Underwood
Community Center
 Monthly Newsletter
 Fish Fries, Pig Roasts, Christmas Parties
Port Elgin Chinook Hatchery
Built in 1985
Capacity for 250,000 Chinook Salmon
Fingerlings each year
 Currently Produces 120,000 Fingerlings
each year
 Over 4.5 million Salmon stocked into
Lake Huron




1
2
3
4
Streamwork
Little Sauble River and Penetangore River
 Cattle Fencing - 1,000s of meters
 Tree Planting - hundreds of thousands
 Bank Stablization
 Cattle Crossings
 Spawning Beds

5
6
7
Kincardine Trout Hatchery
Built in 1992
Produces 60,000 Rainbow Trout Yearlings
and 60,000 Brown Trout Yearlings a year
 Brown Trout stocked directly into
Lake Huron
 Rainbow Trout stocked into
Saugeen River
 Over 1.9 million fish stocked


8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Tackleshare
20 libraries participating
 Sign out a fishing rod and tackle box for
the day
 Hundreds of withdrawals yearly
 Run by Lake Huron Fishing Club
 Supported by Ontario Federation of
Anglers and Hunters

School Hatcheries








This year 10 schools participating
Set up mini-hatchery in classroom
Supply 100 Chinook Salmon eggs
Children monitor hatch of fish
Care and feed fish until Spring
Release fish into wild
Expanding program for next year
Waiting list for more sponsors - $1,000.00 per
school hatchery required for set up
17
LAKE HURON
For more information
or to follow our projects:
Please Visit
www.lakehuronfishingclub.com
And its CHANGING ECOLOGY
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Double Crested Cormorant Great Lakes Nests 1979 - 2009
26
Chantry Chinook Classic
Salmon Derby
Chantry Chinook Classic
Largest Fishing Derby on Lake Huron
Running for 30 years
 3 Weigh Stations On Lake Huron
Shoreline
 16 Days In Duration
 Brings over 1,300 anglers to local
communities.


27
2012 Derby Demographics
Prize Structure
Salmon
1st: $14,000.00
2nd: $4,000.00
3rd: $2,000.00
4th – 25th: Sponsor Prize Boards
Trout
1st: $6,000.00
2nd: $1,500.00
3rd: $750.00
4th - 5th: Sponsor Prize Boards
Ticket Outlets

Cambridge
Tall Tales Live Bait & Tackle
310 King St E
Cambridge, Ontario N3H 3M8
Email: [email protected]
519-650-3465

Guelph
First Choice Fishing Tackle
28
Sponsorship Opportunities
The Chantry Chinook Classic Salmon Derby has sponsorship opportunities available to
highlight your firm’s support of our fisheries and the environment. The Derby
Committee again requests your assistance through donations of products or funds for
prizes to be awarded to the Top 25 Salmon, Top 5 Trout, daily prizes and special
events for Kids, Ladies and Seniors Days. The Derby features the largest prize
package on Lake Huron.
There are prize categories for the entire family as well as the seriously competitive
angler.
Derby proceeds go to the Lake Huron Fishing Club conservation account for their
ongoing programs. LHFC depends on a successful Derby to continue their annual
stocking of salmon and brown and rainbow trout from their hatcheries in Port Elgin and
Kincardine along with their rehabilitation of local tributaries to improve fish habitat. Our
efforts ensure Lake Huron remains a premiere Great Lakes fishing and tourism
destination for our many annual participants and all anglers throughout the entire year.
Support for this Derby helps ensure a sport fishery for our sons, daughters and
grandkids.
Chantry boundaries cover over 100 miles of shoreline on Lake Huron and Georgian
Bay making it the largest on the lake Chantry anglers enjoy live streaming updates as
29
30
2012 Salmon & Trout Winners
Brought To You In Part By
Dwinnell’s Computer Services And
Dwindle’s Dream Fishing Charters
Lake Huron Kincardine Ontario
31
2013 Enbridge 2013 Enbridge Grant Organization Name Grant Request Recommendation Project Description
$3,000
$0
Sponsorship of event 1 ArtFul Hands
Downtown 2
Kincardine BIA
$3,500
$0
Downtown Ambassadors
Big Brothers & Big 3
Sisters
$2,375
$2,375
Child safety program
#
4 Bluewater Summer Playhouse
Breast Cancer 5
Society of Canada
Bruce County 6 Museum & Cultural Centre
Bruce County 7 Plowmen's Association
8 Chantry Chinook Classic Salmon Derby
9 Community Living Kincardine & District
10 Elgin Market Home & School Association
11 Glammis Historical Researchers
12
Grey Bruce Woodturners Guild
$2,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$1,000
20th Anniversary Brochures
2013 Community Grant Request
$2,000
2013 Community Grant Recommendation Project Description
Sponsorship of event $1,500
$4,300
$1,000
Enhance agency's annual activities
$2,000
$2,000
20th Anniversary Brochures
$950
$500
Sponsor mothers day walk
$500
$400
Host Bruce County annual Plowing Match
$5,000
$1,500
Sponsorship of annual derby
Construction of new residence (Delegation to Council requested $50,000)
Kids Korner at Museum
Sponsorship of annual derby
$10,000
Construction of new residence
$10,000
$25,000
$5,000
$5,000
Purchase of Smart boards for the school
$1,000
$0
$750
$0
Historic book of Glammis
$1,000
$700
Historic book of Glammis
$0
Sponsor two seminars/demonstrations
$400
Sponsor two seminars/demonstrations
$10,000
$800
$500
Bike Rodeo 2013 Enbridge 2013 Enbridge Grant Organization Name Grant Request Recommendation Project Description
Develop heritage plaque program/walking tour 13
Heritage Kincardine
brochures $1,000
$0
#
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Kincardine Agricultural Society
Kincardine & Community Health Care Foundation
Kincardine Canada Day
Kincardine & District Chamber of Commerce
$2,500
$1,000
$1,500
$1,500
$1,500
$1,000
$1,000
$1,000
$540
$0
Erect roof structure over existing rings/improve fall fair venue and Farmers Market
$2,500
$1,100
$540
$540
Purchase of medical equipment for Kincardine Hospital
Sponsorship for children's entertainment
Sponsorship of the Fish Kincardine Derby
Sponsorship of 2013 Community Achievement Awards
Kincardine Guiding
$500
$200
$500
$350
21
Kincardine Saturday Farmers Market
Kincardine Scottish 22 Festival & Highland Games
$2,000
$5,000
$5,000
Improve fall fair venue and Farmers Market
Sponsorship of Scottish Festival
$0
Sponsorship of annual award
Sponsorship of 2013 Santa Claus Parade
Sponsorship of Kincardine Guiding
Farmers Market permanent signage (temporary signs added to wayfinding system)
2013 Enbridge 2013 Enbridge Grant 2013 Community Grant Request
Organization Name Grant Request Recommendation Project Description
Sponsorship of Gathering of the Bands to support 23 Kincardine Scottish Pipe Band
security/policing costs
$1,200
$1,000
Program Enhancement (stroking, jump & dance 24 Kincardine Skating Club
programs)
$1,000
$0
$2,000
#
25 Kincardine Summer Music Festival
Kincardine Trails 26
Association
$0
Sponsorship of the Kincardine Summer Music Festival
Huron Ridge‐ Kin‐Huron Trail Link
Collect funds in support of local charities, bursaries, volunteering
$6,000
$4,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$2,500
28 Lake Huron Fishing Club
Royal Canadian 29
Legion Branch 183
Lighthouse Blues 30
Festival
Lovat Cemetery 31
Board
32 Ontario Shuffleboard Association
Paddy Walker 33
Heritage Society
$5,000
$0
Davidson Centre rental rates for Home & Garden Show $1,500
Sponsorship of the Kincardine Summer Music Festival
$5,000
$0
Collect funds in support of local charities, bursaries, volunteering
Kincardine Hatchery/encourage youth/ensure future fishing
$1,000
$500
Mini hatcheries for schools
$0
Repairs to walk‐in fridge
$5,000
$2,000
Repairs to walk‐in fridge
$2,500
Sponsorship of Festival
$5,000
$2,500
Sponsorship of Festival
$2,250
$2,250
Maintenance of the cemetery
27
Knights of Columbus
$5,000
$400
$400
$2,000
$0
OSA tournament insurance costs Kitchen Improvements
$410
$250
Davidson Centre rental fees for OSA tournament
$2,000
$800
New display cases
#
34 Paisley Agricultural Society
Parkinson Society 35 Southwestern Ontario
Penetangore 36
Watershed Group
37 PRANCE
38 Tiverton Agricultural Society
$300
Sponsorship of rural fair
$1,000
$1,000
$500
$300
Plant trees, native plants and shrubs
Appreciation celebration
$3,000
$1,100
$500
$300
$500
$1,500
$1,500
Sponsorship of Parkinson's Superwalk
New plantings in ravines/increase tree cover
$1,000
$1,000
Sponsorship of the annual Tiverton Fall Fair
$1,000
$1,000
39
Township of Bruce Historical Society
Victoria Park Gallery 40 Artists' Co‐operative
$5,000
$0
Victoria Park Gallery & Scougall Gallery and variety of activities
41
VON Grey Bruce
$1,830
$1,400
$10,000
$4,000
World Peace Day
$1,000
$700
Sports Grants
$25,000
$25,000
42 Women's House Serving Bruce & Grey
43
44
$5,000
$5,000
Sponsorship of the annual Tiverton Fall Fair
Give seedlings to annual meeting attendees/landscaping at existing plaques
Shelter services and client necessities
Community programs in Tiverton (received $1,220 pre‐
budget approval)
Delivery of services
Sponsorship of World Peace day event
Annual Contribution to Minor Sports
#
45
46
Misc
MultiCultural Day
$542
47
Bruce County Rugby
Saugeen Valley 48 Children's Safety Village
49 Firefighters' Association
TOTAL
Enbridge
Community Grant
Total
$650
$3,400
$102,965
$60,175
$80,300
$140,475
$3,400
$60,175
For items after budget is passed
$118
Rental fees at Davidson Centre
$542
Towards cost of renting gymnasium at Davidson $550
Sponsorship of the Children's Safety Village
$500
$106,472
$500
$80,300
Ice rental rate at Davidson Centre for charity hockey game

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE

Transcription

Similar documents

For Dog`s Sake - theMarketplacemag.com

August-September 2014 - Municipalité d`Ormstown

2007 Newsletter - Kincardine and Community Health Care Foundation

On behalf of everyone involved with the BBBSKD

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE

Overview_EU FIN

February 2012

2 MB 16.10.2015 Summer 2015 bulletin

Summer 2015 - Grey

2young2fail 2014 – 2016 Municipality of `s

info terrasse - Municipalité Terrasse

Economic and Community Profile - Strathroy

cl assified 17 ntabankulu ntabankulu

Kincardine Area 2015 Tourist Guide

kincardine, ontario, canada

Escape to Kincardine

2016 Escape to Kincardine Visitors Guide

the Municipality of Kincardine!