POISE - I: Evaluation of Instruction by Department and Division Heads
Transcription
POISE - I: Evaluation of Instruction by Department and Division Heads
POISE TM- I: Evaluation of Instruction by Department and Division Heads • • Pre-conference---Poiser and Department Head meet to: o review philosophy and congruency statement o review the “Four Dimensions of Good Teaching (FDGT)” o plan for the first observation; Poiser completes Nos. 1-3 on an “O” worksheet Observation of Classroom Instruction (total of 5) o Department Head observes and completes a “FDGT Observation Worksheet” after the observation. o Department Head gives immediate, brief, positive feedback (either in person, writing or email) after the observation. o Poiser completes No. 4 on the “O” worksheet after the observation. Poiser then completes Nos. 1-3 on another “O” worksheet and sends it to the Department Head to review before the next observation. This process is repeated for each subsequent observation. o After all five observations have taken place, the Department Head reviews the observation data and completes the “Four Dimensions Summary Worksheet.” o The Division CIT completes a “Technology Evaluation Grid, 4.2A,” and forwards a copy to the Poiser and Department Head. o The Division Dean completes an “Advisor Evaluation Grid, 4.2A,” and forwards a copy to the Poiser and the Division Head. o The Department Head writes a summary naming the Poiser’s strengths and stating any recommendations which he/she may have as a result of the complete performance review. • Post-conference-Poiser and Department Head meet to review the “Four Demensions Summary Worksheet” and the Department Head’s summary.