TEPCO Tihange
Transcription
TEPCO Tihange
inside WANO T H E M A G A Z I N E O F T H E W O R L D A S S O C I AT I O N O F N U C L E A R O P E R AT O R S Volume 17 TEPCO Corporate peer review Number 2 8 Tihange On the road to excellence 2009 10 inside Inside WANO is published by the World Association of Nuclear Operators for all its members contents EDITOR Tracy Grant-Wilson WANO CC Email: [email protected] Editorial 3 EDITORIAL BOARD Luc Mampaey Managing Director Dave Farr Director AC Mikhail Chudakov Director MC Ignacio Araluce Director PC Takashi Shoji Director TC Laurent Stricker, WANO’s new chairman Feature 4 Improving overall performance From the top 7 The spirit of WANO Peer reviews 8 TEPCO corporate peer review WANO OFFICES Coordinating Centre Cavendish Court 11–15 Wigmore Street, London W1U 1PF United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7478 9200 Fax: +44 (0)20 7495 4502 Plant profile 10 Tihange on the road to excellence TSMs 12 Technical support for Kursk Training 14 Atlanta Centre 700 Galleria Parkway SE Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30339-5943 USA Tel: +1 770 644 8602 Fax: +1 770 644 8505 Moscow Centre Ferganskaya 25 Moscow 109507 Russia Tel: +7 495 376 1587 Fax: +7 495 376 0897 Paris Centre 8 rue Blaise Pascal 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine France Tel: +33 1 46 40 35 55 Fax: +33 1 46 40 35 53 Tokyo Centre 2-11-1 Iwado-kita Komae-shi Tokyo 201-8511 Japan Tel: +81 (0)3 3480 4809 Fax: +81 (0)3 3480 5379 Improving teamwork during requalification Operating Experience Event Reports Search Events Database OE Monthly Summary Reports - Latest Report - Annual Summaries - 2009 - 2008 - 2007 - 2006 - 2005 - 2004 Did you know...? Did you know that WANO creates a summary report of the Operating Experience (OE) reports submitted each month? The OE Monthly Summary Report provides a brief description of the event and is separated into three categories based on event significance. The report is posted on the Operating Experience page of the WANO members’ web site. OE Network Forums COVER Tihange NPP, Belgium 2 INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 Copyright © 2009 World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO). All rights reserved. Not for sale or for commercial use. editorial Laurent Stricker, WANO’s new Chairman outlines the challenges facing an expanding nuclear industry, the paramount importance of safety, and the vital role of WANO. WANO’s new chairman I ‘A nuclear revival is underway but it will only succeed if safety remains at the heart of everything we do. All countries and all operators must unite and work together towards this common goal.’ Laurent Stricker, WANO Chairman t is my great honour to have been elected the Chairman of WANO, particularly at such a pivotal moment in the nuclear industry’s development, as more and more countries turn to nuclear energy as a sustainable source of electricity. For all of us, this presents both great opportunities and responsibilities. A nuclear revival is underway but it will only succeed if safety remains at the heart of everything we do. All countries and all operators must unite and work together towards this common goal. No other industry includes this inherent characteristic; an absolute need for solidarity. This, I believe, is one of WANO’s greatest strengths. It is the reason why WANO exists; to help bring every station up to the same high level of performance. This aim is all the more compelling as the industry prepares itself to support a nuclear renaissance. WANO has made great strides since its formation in 1989. We have seen significant improvements in global safety performance, but there is still much to achieve. In recent years we have seen a flattening of performance in several areas of operation. We continue to see recurring issues from peer reviews and event reports, and recommendations from Significant Operating Experience Reports are not always implemented. These are issues our industry must confront. And as we look to the future, with the expansion of existing fleets, and the emergence of new entrants across the world, we must guard against the risks of isolation and cultural blind spots. We must ensure that WANO plays its full role – and that means each and every one of us. It has taken time to develop our best practices in safety. It is imperative that new operators adopt them from the outset. WANO embodies the principles of sharing best practice and engaging in open and constructive dialogue. Our peer reviews, technical support missions, workshops and seminars, and operating experience programme Laurent Stricker Laurent Stricker’s career at Electricité de France (EDF) and the French Atomic Energy Agency (CEA) spans 35 years. During this time, he has held numerous management positions mainly in nuclear generation. Currently Senior Adviser to the Chairman and CEO of EDF, he was previously Head of Nuclear Operations, a post he held for six years. In this role, he was responsible for the operation of the French nuclear fleet – 58 nuclear units, with a generating capacity of approximately 63,000 MWe. Other career highlights include Director of the Grid and of Thermal and Hydraulic Generation, supervising generation and transmission facilities. Earlier roles included Head of the Radiation Protection and Environment Department in Paris. Laurent Stricker was a member of the Board of WANO Paris Centre from 1999 to 2005. In 2003, he became Chairman of this Board and member of the Main Governing Board. allow operators to help and support each other. We have a tremendous advantage that no other industry has. Effective mechanisms for independent feedback are already in place. We must continue to take full advantage of them in the pursuit of ever higher levels of performance. The future of the nuclear industry will be assured only if we rise to the challenges of safety and transparency. We have to rise to these challenges, individually, in our own companies. And we have to rise to these challenges collectively. This is the mission of WANO; it is our mission. INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 3 feature Improving overall performance I ’The improvements made possible by our training centre have strengthened training programmes and contributed to the plant’s overall performance improvement by reinforcing human performance errorprevention tools, reducing maintenance rework, and helping us begin to reduce dose.’ José Hernández, Technical Area Training Manager, Laguna Verde NPP n 2005, leaders at Laguna Verde Nuclear Power Plant in Mexico started envisioning a training facility filled with an array of equipment mockups that would improve human performance on important plant tasks, bolstering safety and productivity, and marking progress toward dose reduction. They benchmarked other training facilities in the industry, with an emphasis on those with detailed mockups for safety-related equipment and systems. In August 2008, Laguna Verde achieved a milestone in their plan when key elements of the site’s dynamic new training centre were put into action. The training centre incorporates plant equipment and components such as motors, pumps, switches, valves, transformers, models of high-radiation areas and one of the top items on Laguna Verde’s wish list: a flow-loop simulator. The full-scope, flow-loop simulator is integrated with existing equipment mockups, allowing exercises to incorporate more complex and realistic work scenarios for a variety of disciplines and training needs. It also includes more panels and equipment to reflect the exact controls in the plant. ’The improvements made possible by our training centre have strengthened training programmes and contributed to the plant’s overall performance improvement by reinforcing human performance errorprevention tools, reducing maintenance rework, and helping us begin to reduce dose,’ said José Hernández, Technical Area Training Manager. In addition to sharpening errorprevention skills, the realistic mockups prepare employees to deal more effectively with emergent situations and also to mitigate problems that might crop up in the field. Mockups sharpen skills Use of mockups has been especially successful with the addition of the flow-loop simulator for 4 INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 Working on the flow-loop simulator in the training facility employee and supervisory training. Architects of the flow-loop simulator initially focused on its benefit to maintenance, but quickly realised that its use could enhance work performance for operations, engineering, radiation protection and quality control. ’Our QC inspectors routinely observe and evaluate training activities and can get more involved in error-prevention efforts,’ Hernández said. ’Everyone wants to participate now that we have a flow-loop simulator.’ Exercises initially focused on reinforcing adherence to procedures and error-prevention tools and were expanded to incorporate all activities involved in the correct execution of work packages in the field. Prejob planning and postjob briefings are more robust with the new mockups. Workers discuss error-prevention tools, such as three-way communication and peer checking, and review their correct usage during prejob briefings. Through their practice on mockups, employees have collaborated with supervisors to standardise work packages and ensure that instructions, diagrams and schematics are accurate and up-to-date. ’Training is done not only for technicians, but also for supervisors,’ Hernández said. ’They practise using their observation skills and helping the crew prepare more carefully for their work. This really picked up after we installed the flow-loop simulator.’ Laguna Verde’s commitment to training enhances employee and plant performance. This article looks at the multiple benefits of the plant’s dynamic new training centre. Performing a surveillance test in the control room Analysing trends in the chemistry laboratory packing in a variety of valves. Mockups also include sectional valves. Electrical mockups include service transformers that are used to train workers in the operation of test equipment, in addition to a series of electric motors and switches of varying capacities that are used for maintenance and testing. Non-licenced operators use mockups of two hydraulic control units to practise alignments, operation and tag outs; while maintenance personnel practise tasks on accumulators and associated instrumentation. Boosting performance Laguna Verde’s training centre offers a suite of valve and component mockups to familiarise employees with leak detection and troubleshooting, as well as for just-in-time training to brush up on error- and dose-reduction techniques. Four mockups of welding inspection windows give maintenance workers an opportunity to practise window shielding for reactor nozzle removal. When used for justin-time training before refuelling outages, the mockups have reduced stay times in highradiation areas and also reduced dose by 25 per cent on some jobs. On the main steam line leak detection mockup, employees see exactly how valves are arranged and the location of injection points. The arrangement can be pressurised for testing by instrumentation and control technicians. Employees practise assembling and disassembling a model of the reactor recirculation pump seal and installing valve The Laguna Verde full-scope control room simulator has helped boost the performance of veteran operators as well as the department’s latest recruits. Training on the upgraded control room simulator has improved the pass rate on licence exams for new reactor operators. A recent group of five operators achieved a 100 per cent pass rate on their first evaluation. The simulator also helps to reinforce and ingrain control room fundamentals that are essential to safe operations, such as conservative decision-making and operations standards. Instructors use the simulator to validate procedures, and tutorials and just-in-time training exercises are frequently used to refresh skills and stay practised on important evolutions that require perfectly coordinated teamwork and communications. ‘In our training centre, we wanted to have training not on just the equipment, but on equipment as it’s integrated in a more realistic plant environment that simulates real plant conditions,’ said Fernando Jaime, Simulator Training Manager. A remote-control tool designed to remove filters from the fuel pool cooling and clean-up system is a Laguna Verde original – and one of the site’s most effective tools to control personnel dose. Filters used in Laguna Verde’s fuel pool cooling and clean-up system are rather unusual in design, and their handling INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 5 feature Engineers in the training facility Discussing plans for an upcoming job is more complicated. Filters must be removed, transported to containers and cut into pieces before disposal. This was a time- and doseintensive process, potentially involving highcost contract support and a projected radiation dose of 75 rem. But Laguna Verde’s maintenance personnel took a creative approach to the issue, designing and fabricating a remote-control filter-removal device that would allow a team to work faster and farther from the radiation source, thereby substantially reducing dose rates. They also built a full-scale mockup of the tool for the training centre, complete with scaffolding to reinforce safe work practices at high elevations. Using the mockup sparked ideas for additional methods to reduce dose, such as the use of lead shielding. By combining ALARA principles with practice on the mockup, dose for the project was reduced substantially. Embracing new technologies Along with updates to the training centre, Laguna Verde instructors are embracing new technologies to increase the effectiveness and convenience of training. With an electronic document library, employees can view and download all task-related training lessons and fundamentals from Laguna Verde’s intranet. Classroom instruction for operations is enhanced with computers that recreate simulator exercises. Operators can practise key evolutions and system testing in individual workstations, which can also be used by maintenance and engineering to increase their understanding of plant operations. Looking ahead, Laguna Verde leaders envision even more enhancements to the training centre. They plan to add mockups for feedwater heater controls and electrical systems instrumentation. They would also like to explore the application of more remotecontrol technologies to improve efficiency and lower radiation dose further still. 6 INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 ’The training centre has really strengthened the use of training to improve performance at Laguna Verde,’ Hernández said. ’We see people getting more involved in their training and helping us identify their training needs. This level of teamwork and communication will help us continue to improve our training programme and have a positive impact on employee and plant performance.’ from the top Anatoly Kirichenko, ‘Energoatom Concern’ OJSC, one of the signatories of the WANO Inauguration Protocol, sums up the spirit of WANO and reflects on 20 years of achievement. The spirit of WANO Anatoly Kirichenko signing the WANO Inauguration Protocol, May 1989 ‘Through the collective efforts of its members, WANO has made great progress in safety and reliability; the high levels of plant performance are visible proof of that.’ Anatoly Kirichenko, ‘Energoatom Concern’ OJSC W hile looking through my old files I came across some pictures and materials dating as far back as the WANO Inauguration Conference. Held in Moscow on 15-16 May 1989, this industry defining event will always remain a personal highlight of my career. I had the great honour of being one of the signatories of the WANO Inauguration Protocol. Although WANO is only 20 years old, it has built a solid reputation for professionalism and its programmes have achieved worldwide respect for their contribution to nuclear safety. Each WANO regional centre has its own history and characteristics. The Moscow Centre includes member organisations located in some 14 countries. And despite the change in political regimes in several East European countries and in the former Soviet Union, with the ensuing economic ups and downs, Moscow Centre has maintained its position and continues to develop in parallel with other WANO centres. Through the collective efforts of its members, WANO has made great progress in safety and reliability; the high levels of plant performance are visible proof of that. But the most important change has been a dramatic transformation in nuclear operator communications; we went from isolation and lack of transparency, stemming from political causes, to direct contact between operators. Over the years, these contacts have developed and evolved into something much bigger – the spirit of WANO. This spirit embodies the principles of sharing best practice and engaging in open and fruitful dialogue. This climate of openness and transparency was created by all those involved in developing and implementing WANO programmes. Lord Walter Marshall, Eric Pozdyshev, Dr Zack Pate, Armen Abagyan, Rémy Carle, Oleg Saraev, and Hajimu Maeda, and many others have set very high standards for WANO. And 20 years later – an entire generation from a human point of view – with many of the industry leaders who established WANO approaching retirement, it is vital to keep the spirit of WANO alive, and maintain the continuity of generations. With this in mind, Moscow Centre organised the 20th Anniversary Conference in St. Petersburg, which brought together WANO founders and veterans, current NPP site directors and new WANO members. My hope is that this meeting will help the new generation of leaders to embrace the goals, objectives and the spirit of WANO. In the face of the current global crisis, with many industries adversely affected and world leaders rethinking their economic options, WANO has shown itself to be a truly dynamic organisation; one that is continuously developing and improving. With the prospect of many large projects being either cancelled or delayed, and organisations looking to cut back their budgets, we must ensure that we never compromise on nuclear safety; it must remain our top priority. And therefore, it is essential for WANO to maintain its effectiveness and efficiency both at its regional centres and at NPP sites around the world. The spirit of WANO requires us to set the priorities, evaluate the available resources and use them correctly. INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 7 peer reviews TEPCO corporate peer review T ‘With the support and strong leadership of the corporate office, I am committed to ensuring that TEPCO makes every possible effort to put the action plan into practice and attains excellence at its three power stations.’ Ichiro Takekuro, Chief Nuclear Officer, TEPCO and Chairman of WANO Tokyo Centre Regional Governing Board he safety performance of a nuclear power station not only depends on what happens at the station; it is very much influenced by the interactions at the corporate level. Corporate sets the vision, goals and objectives; it supports the station with resources and exercises nuclear oversight. For a company with multiple units, corporate plays the vital role of providing clear direction on nuclear safety to the entire fleet; it must ensure that a strong and unambiguous message of nuclear safety is communicated and reinforced throughout the entire organisation. WANO is well known for its peer reviews of individual power plants. In 1998, it extended this to the corporate level. The areas covered in a corporate peer review include: leadership and management; overseeing and monitoring of plant performance; support for power plants; human resources; and communications. To assist members, WANO provides Performance Objectives and Criteria for corporate reviews, which serve as the foundation of the review. Since their introduction, WANO corporate reviews have been carried out at British Energy, Electricité de France, Ontario Power Generation in Canada, Electronuclear in Brazil, and E.ON in Germany. In the US, corporate reviews are performed by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). Over the past 25 years INPO has performed more than 140 corporate reviews at US utilities. Quest for improvement In September 2008, WANO Tokyo Centre conducted a corporate peer review for the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). The peer review team included officers and senior managers from Atlanta, Paris, Moscow, and Tokyo Centres. Laurent Stricker, who became the Chairman of WANO in January, joined the team as an adviser. Kimitoshi Yahagi, TEPCO’s host peer, said: ‘After the data falsification issue which was 8 INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station Review meeting revealed in August 2002, TEPCO initiated a wide range of performance improvement initiatives to regain the public’s trust. These included thorough information disclosure, peer activities, and monthly performance reviews using performance indicators. The question we asked ourselves was, “Has TEPCO Corporate and its three nuclear power stations – with 17 reactor units – become a unified organisation that could continue to improve safety and reliability against world standards?” To gain an independent assessment, we requested a corporate peer review.’ Commenting on the careful preparations made for the corporate review, Yahagi said: ‘To make the review effective and useful, it was essential for the team members to understand In recent years, TEPCO has launched a number of performance improvement initiatives. To assess how effective these have been, the company invited WANO Tokyo Centre to perform a corporate peer review. that TEPCO’s way of working reflects the unique culture of Japan.’ He continued: ‘We put a tremendous amount of work into compiling a comprehensive information package. Corporate has a wide range of tasks, and this was very difficult to describe in detail.’ Indeed, the final information package was 400 pages long. In addition, Tokyo Centre provided team members with reports on the previous peer reviews carried out at TEPCO power stations. This advance information proved very useful during the review. On July 16 2007, an earthquake struck TEPCO’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station. All of its seven reactors were shut down safely. Although equipment vital to safety was not affected, outdoor equipment and structures such as transformers, fire protection piping, and port quays were heavily damaged. To allow sufficient time for restoration work to be completed, the corporate peer review initially planned for October 2007 was postponed. ‘Our tasks went well beyond assessing the extent of damage and planning the restoration work,’ Yahagi explained. ‘There were other important tasks, such as providing local residents with accurate information, and sharing the valuable lessons learned from this unprecedented earthquake with our peers worldwide. TEPCO was in a flurry of activity and the corporate review had to be postponed.’ Taking action When restorations were finally on track, the review was rescheduled for September 2008, almost a year later. Yahagi said: ‘We felt the corporate peer review was absolutely necessary to accelerate our performance improvement, and I was particularly pleased that all the initial team members still wanted to be involved.’ The review was carried out over a two week period. During the first week, the team was divided into three groups assigned to obtain information from the three power stations. After two days of preparations, the teams went to the stations to interview plant executives, first line managers, staff, and contractor employees. The second week was spent interviewing corporate officers and managers, and preparing reports. ‘As soon as the corporate review was over, we performed a thorough analysis of each of the areas for improvement (AFIs) to establish the action plan. To begin with, we needed time to understand the issues identified by the review team. The causes of the AFIs were then subjected to very detailed scrutiny,’ explained Yahagi, who also acted as the coordinator for producing the action plan. ‘A high-level management team headed by the Chief Nuclear Officer was formed within the corporate office. This team spent a further four months in extensive discussions to confirm the issues to be improved or corrected before the final action plan was produced.’ After the corporate peer review, Ichiro Takekuro, TEPCO’s Chief Nuclear Officer and Chairman of WANO Tokyo Centre Regional Governing Board, said: ‘The team review results were eye-opening and very helpful. I am truly grateful that our peers gathered from different parts of the world and spared us precious time from their heavy business schedules to conduct this review.’ He added: ‘With the support and strong leadership of the corporate office, I am committed to ensuring that TEPCO makes every possible effort to put the action plan into practice and attains excellence at its three power stations. We feel now, more than ever, that WANO members are united as one through WANO.’ INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 9 plant profile Tihange on the road to excellence T ’A safety culture is not something that can be decreed; it has to be cultivated from day to day. It takes time and requires a lot of effort. It is a permanent challenge which involves everyone.’ Wim De Clercq, Station Director, Tihange NPP 10 INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 he Tihange Nuclear Power Plant, operated by Electrabel (GDF SUEZ), consists of three units: Tihange 1 (962 MWe), Tihange 2 (1008 MWe) and Tihange 3 (1055 MWe). They were commissioned in 1975, 1983 and 1985 respectively. Each year, the three reactors generate around 23 billion kWh, which represents a third of electricity production in Belgium. Employing 930 people, it is an urban power station located near the town of Huy between Liège and Namur. Continuous improvement ‘For several years now, we have been conducting ongoing audits and engaging in an intense process of continuous improvement,’ Wim De Clercq, Station Director of Tihange NPP told Inside WANO. ‘In addition to an OSART, an OSART Follow Up and the WANO peer reviews, our environmental and industrial safety certifications, together with assessments by our insurers, are based on regular audits. These are seen as opportunities for making progress. So far this year, we have already had a successful OSART Follow Up and we will be taking part, among other things, in a WANO peer review in October.’ In 2005, Electrabel introduced a specific ’change management’ oriented organisation operating at all levels of the group. This new structure made it possible to deal with the whole of the OSART mission with the full support of the entire staff. At Tihange, the management team includes a Change Manager, at present Sébastien Houart, whose current task is to develop all the action plans in preparation for the WANO peer review later in the year. He will be responsible for coordinating a team composed of the 10 heads of functional areas and their deputies, as well as the heads of cross-functional areas. The ultimate aim is to ensure the involvement of the whole workforce of the company and its service providers. Commenting on the challenges of his role, Sébastien Houart said: ’It is idealistic to believe that you can be everywhere all of the time. The vital thing is to avoid becoming lax. It is important that everyone should take part.’ The organisation is working on developing plans spread over several years, such as ‘Energy 2010’, as well as the achievement of annual goals. A process of continuous performance improvement must be supported by indicators of quality. The WANO indicators are benchmarks that allow everyone to position themselves in relation to their peers. ’At Tihange, we have set up three multidisciplinary work groups to draw up an action plan, for mid-2009, geared at improving our safety equipment availability indicators,’ said Houart. ‘As a result of some unavailability recorded in recent years, Tihange is not in the best quartile. We aim to get there in the medium term.’ The actions to achieve this have been clearly identified and integrated into the ’Energy 2010’ action plan. This commitment is further reflected through internal indicators which extend to the teams themselves. The recently launched ‘Feedback from Experience’ initiative has been given pride of place in the continuous improvement process; backed by a Company Policy Statement it applies to all employees. This clear and formal commitment, at the Business Unit level, gives the initiative greater legitimacy and visibility. The idea behind it is, ’Let us not give an incident a chance to repeat itself! Let us learn from experience!’ To support these initiatives, specific communication programmes have been developed directed at different internal target audiences. The objective is, on the one hand, to raise their general safety awareness and, on the other, to make them adhere to the different action plans developed by the theme leaders. Communication is based on clear and ambitious messages, such as ’Doing better what we are doing already’ and ’Champions of excellence’. These messages and actions Sébastien Houart, Change Manager at Tihange, talks about the vigorous process for continuous improvement at the plant. Practical training on loop simulator staff to familiarise themselves with the requirements of working both in the nuclear part and in the secondary part of the plant. The loop simulator is also used for the training of service providers operating at Tihange. Benchmarking Tihange NPP are further reinforced by constant external communication motivated by a desire for unfailing transparency. Training Developing a safety culture must also be based on appropriate training programmes. In 2008, 100,000 hours of training were given to personnel, 10 per cent of it devoted to behavioural aspects. Each member of staff participated in a day of awareness-raising and training in the use of tools designed to reduce human error. These tools were grouped into four categories; adhesion to procedures, pre- and post-job briefing, a questioning attitude and secure communication. These correspond exactly with the trends that have emerged from periodic exercises in the analysis of internal events. Since 2007, the plant has benefited from the installation of a loop simulator which allows To improve nuclear safety, it is important to observe good practices carried out on-site by other nuclear operators. ‘This approach allows us to adopt other ways of thinking and, above all, to look critically at our own practices,’ said De Clercq. For several years now, the plant’s management has been ensuring that all managerial staff take part in OSART missions, WANO peer reviews, and technical support missions. In a spirit of openness, managerial staff are required to document their experiences so that the lessons learned can be shared and to present the conclusions of their mission either to the management team or to the entire management. ‘The results of the OSART, carried out at Tihange by the IAEA, clearly demonstrate that nuclear safety is the absolute priority of Electrabel and of the Tihange NPP’, said De Clercq. ‘In order to progress continuously, it is of paramount importance not only to act through a multitude of coordinated actions, but above all to mobilise by making each player accountable and proud of their contribution to safety and transparency.’ INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 11 TSMs Technical support for Kursk K ‘Managers who attended the seminar will be able to put their newly-acquired knowledge into practice in their daily activities. The WANO technical support mission provided the answers to many questions raised by managers from different levels at our plant.’ Igor Bondarev, Kursk Training Manager ursk Nuclear Power Plant, a part of Russia’s Energoatom utility, is located near the town of Kurchatov, 40 kilometres west of the city of Kursk. The plant currently operates four 1000 MWe RBMK reactors: Kursk Unit 1 went on line in 1976, and Unit 4 in 1985. To support its ongoing improvement process, Kursk has hosted nine WANO technical support missions (TSMs) since 2004. In the past, these tended to focus on operations and maintenance, but more recently the focus has shifted to personnel management and contractor control. ‘These missions offer very practical and focused assistance to the plant. All technical support mission team members are closely involved in the nuclear industry; they have indepth experience and expertise, which they are always ready to share with plant staff in Russia and other countries,’ said Sergey Kezin, Moscow Centre Adviser. ‘It is a kind of alliance of nuclear professionals who firmly believe in the continued development of the nuclear industry worldwide and who do their best to make this a reality. Whenever the plant faces an urgent or challenging issue, WANO experts are always there to give peers a helping hand.’ Last December, Moscow Centre staff carried out a TSM on condition-based maintenance and contractor management. Mission experts included highly-experienced specialists from Balakovo, Kalinin, Smolensk and Volgodonsk nuclear power plants. They provided Kursk personnel with helpful materials and shared their experience of dealing with similar issues. And the benefits are already in evidence. The knowledge acquired as a result of the mission has been successfully applied during the upgrading of Unit 4 and also during planned maintenance outages. Learning from others In early April 2009, Kursk hosted a TSM using experts from the Moscow and Paris regions; its 12 INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 Seminar participants in the main control room simulator purpose – to gain expertise in implementing advanced techniques in personnel management – was the first time that such a mission had been held at a Russian nuclear power plant. ‘For the purpose of this mission we have generalised the experience of other European nuclear countries,’ explained Alain Huchet, Programme Manager, Paris Centre. ‘Seminar materials can be used in everyday work practices at the Kursk plant. This is the first plant in Russia to host such a mission. If the mission turns out to be a success we will conduct similar missions at other Russian plants.’ The mission took the form of a seminar where participants learned: ■ the major principles and techniques of task observations in the workplace ■ to write and analyse observation reports ■ to identify root causes of existing problems and additional areas for improvement The seminar opened with a theoretical explanation of the basic principles of task observations, coaching during the work process and methods of feedback. Participants were then split into small groups allowing instructors to give one-on-one training to demonstrate how to put the theory into practice. This part of the programme began with video-exercises and role playing. Observations were then Hands-on training in the main control room simulator Over the years, Kursk has taken part in several WANO technical support missions, most recently in the area of personnel management. Sergey Kezin, Moscow Centre Adviser, explains the process and the benefits. Putting theory into practice Kursk NPP analysed in line with the WANO Performance Objectives and Criteria; the report writing technique was demonstrated and participants then practised writing reports based on observed facts. The reports were analysed to identify areas for improvement using the multiple classification technique; a technique designed to identify fundamental problems. The root causes of the problems and proposals for improving plant performance were then discussed. Seminar attendees included first line managers drawn from a wide range of areas. These included Kursk reactor hall shift supervisors, and nuclear safety and reliability operations supervisors. In addition, plant managers attended from several functional areas, including the turbine hall, electrical, radiological protection, instrumentation and control, and the underground thermal utility system. ‘By applying international standards to its personnel management process, Kursk will significantly improve management and worker relations,’ explained Sergey Kezin. ‘I believe that Kursk now has a valuable management tool that can be readily used by managers at different levels. It will help them to more effectively manage their own personnel while at the same time enhance their interactions with other managers.’ Igor Bondarev, Kursk Training Manager, agrees with this view: ‘Knowledge obtained during the seminar has led to improved relations among plant staff, which in turn has increased effectiveness in the workplace. Managers who attended the seminar will be able to put their newly-acquired knowledge into practice in their daily activities. The WANO technical support mission provided the answers to many questions raised by managers from different levels at our plant. ‘Upon completion of the seminar, participants are capable of identifying and reinforcing plant requirements, conducting effective observations with personnel, and post-job debriefings, in particular on the use of human error-prevention tools. In addition, they will be able to identify areas for improvement related to the problems identified in observation reports. In other words, leading international experience in this field will help prevent the potential consequences of human performance errors in plant operation.’ INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 13 training Improving teamwork during requalification A ‘The crew relationship-building that results from our approach leads to improved trust. It also translates into higher levels of individual and team accountability, which in turn deliver improved performance results.’ Tim O’Connor, Monticello Site Vice President lthough the use of control room simulators continues to improve licenced operator training, there is an ongoing need to transfer knowledge to nonlicenced operators and help bridge the experience gap. The operations training department at the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, in the US state of Minnesota, has developed an innovative approach to meet that need. During licenced operator requalification, nonlicenced operators out in the plant simulate tasks required by the performance monitoring scenarios. During other training scenarios, nonlicenced operators observe licenced operators performing their duties in the control room simulator. ‘The crew relationship-building that results from our approach leads to improved trust,’ says Tim O’Connor, Monticello Site Vice President. ‘It also translates into higher levels of individual and team accountability, which in turn deliver improved performance results.’ Efforts to improve requalification training at Monticello began a couple of years ago when three significant needs became clear. The plant needed better realism in its control room simulator training. Nonlicenced operators needed and wanted to know more about how to respond to certain failure scenarios. And the younger generation of operators – many of whom have never seen a scram – needed to build their expertise and gain some of the knowledge of experienced operators. Building confidence The first phase of the combined training, in late 2006, brought nonlicenced operators into the control room simulator. ‘Having the nonlicenced operators gain an understanding of what’s going on helps them to better time their communications and coordinate better with the control room and its needs,’ says Gerald Allex, General Supervisor of Operations Training at the site. In 2007, the next phase of the combined 14 INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 Checking the standby liquid control pump and motor Checking the status of the recirculation system motor generator training had nonlicenced operators out in the plant simulating the actions required by the requalification scenarios. ‘Their role-playing provides a more realistic experience for us,’ says Peter Komarek, reactor operator. ‘When we work together during training scenarios, we’re communicating back and forth,’ explains Todd Dean, nonlicenced operator. ‘The licenced operators are giving us instructions on verifying plant equipment positions or manipulating plant equipment, and we’re feeding actions and results back to the control room. It gives us a lot of confidence as a crew. It builds camaraderie.’ To accomplish this interaction, the training staff had to create the nonlicenced operator tasks and incorporate them into the scenario Monticello’s combined requalification training programme has facilitated knowledge sharing between licenced and nonlicenced operators. guides. The combined training was breaking new ground, as there were no nonlicenced operator tasks in the existing scenario guides. ‘We followed the systematic approach to training,’ explains Shawn Halbert, Monticello Training Manager. ‘We made sure that there were training objectives and goals and a known, understood outcome. We then evaluated the nonlicenced operators’ performance to ensure that we were achieving the expected outcome.’ An operations crew usually has eight members. Five are in the control room simulator – a shift manager/shift technical adviser who is a licenced senior reactor operator, a control room supervisor who is a senior reactor operator, and three licenced reactor operators. Three are nonlicenced operators who are out in the plant. Monitoring the performance of the operations crew and the quality of training is an evaluation team that includes instructors and an operations management representative. After completing a scenario, the operations crew and evaluators return to the training centre for a debriefing and feedback session. The resulting document is used to generate areas for improvement for the operations crew for the rest of the training programme, as well as for when the operations crew goes back to regular duty in the plant. The feedback sessions can also drive revisions in procedures. The licenced operators and nonlicenced operators at Monticello have used their combined training to perform well during actual plant operation. On January 10 2007, the plant scrammed at 90 per cent power after welds on supports for the turbine control actuator box failed. The box dropped 6 inches, pulling four turbine control valves wide open, and causing a decrease in main steam line pressure that initiated an automatic reactor shutdown. ‘Our site management brought in an assessment team, including the outside peer reviewer, to review the event and the plant’s response,’ says Scott Sharp, Operations Manager. ‘The assessment team looked at the performance of the nonlicenced operators and the licenced operators and found that the operations crew performed very solidly for that scram. And it wasn’t a straight-forward scram.’ Bridging the gap With the next generation of workers entering the nuclear industry, the combined training at Monticello provides the opportunity to get new nonlicenced operators interacting with more experienced colleagues who share their tips, tactics, and knowledge. To take further advantage of that opportunity, a couple of upgrades are being considered for the requalification programme. One upgrade would add nonlicenced operators to the evaluation scenarios, which then could be used as an instructional tool to evaluate performance against the procedures. This would provide a more realistic job performance measure of the nonlicenced operators. Currently, the nonlicenced operators are evaluated during periodic stand-alone activities. The second upgrade would add more instructors to oversee the nonlicenced operators in the plant. The current practice of having one instructor oversee three or four nonlicenced operators limits the number of procedures that can be done because the instructor and nonlicenced operators must stay together. Adding an instructor would create two teams that could be staged separately in the turbine and reactor buildings. At Monticello, bridging the experience gap has accomplished a paradigm shift. The combined requalification training has facilitated knowledge sharing and transfer between licenced operators and nonlicenced operators. Based on an article that originally appeared in The Nuclear Professional, the journal of the US National Academy for Nuclear Training, by kind permission. Note: In the US, licenced operators work in the control room. Nonlicenced operators handle in-plant activities. INSIDE WANO: V17–NO2–2009 15 Recognising excellence During each Biennial General Meeting, WANO Nuclear Excellence Awards are presented to individuals in recognition of their contribution to successful operation of nuclear power plants operated by WANO members. An independent selection committee with representatives from all the regional centres, meets to select the award recipients based on a list of people who have been nominated. Now is the time to make those nominations. Operational excellence becomes a reality only when a nuclear organisation has developed – at every level – a passion and unwavering commitment to focus on daily operations. Any individual whose work contributes to or supports the successful operation of nuclear power plants operated by any WANO member is eligible for the award. This could include contributions to any part of the infrastructure that supports the nuclear power enterprise. It could also include contributions made through WANO. The intent is that individuals at any level in an organisation be considered for the award. The deadline for nominations is 1 September 2009. Full details of the procedure are available on the WANO members’ web site or by contacting Gary Welsh at the WANO Coordinating Centre ([email protected]). These nominations will be reviewed by the selection committee and the awards will be presented at the 2010 WANO Biennial General Meeting.