A struggle lies ahead for most of us
Transcription
A struggle lies ahead for most of us
A10 The Plain Dealer Sunday, June 18, 2006 RETIRE AT YOUR OWN RISK A11 RETIRE AT YOUR OWN RISK A struggle lies ahead for most of us Teresa Dixon Murray Plain Dealer Reporter T his is the most difficult story I’ve ever had to write. It’s ugly, and it affects everyone I know and the world as I know it. This nation faces a massive economic crisis — indeed a social catastrophe — that some experts even say will be among the worst the country’s ever seen. Much has been said about how the looming retirement of 76 million baby boomers will stampede Social Security, which is expected to start running out of money in 11 years. We almost joke about senior citizens eating dog food. Maybe that joking is the only way we can keep from crying. But Social Security is just one piece of a cruel puzzle. It’s not until you look at the big picture that you realize how dire the crisis is. The pieces won’t fit together without a lot of pain and anguish for a lot of people. If you think it’s time to stop reading, this is a wake-up call you can’t afford to ignore. By nearly every expert’s forecast, half to three-fourths of the next few generations of retirees will live on the edge financially or in desolate poverty. Today’s children and most of today’s workers almost certainly will pay steeply higher taxes to cover promises to retirees. Taxes will rise while workers are told they need to save more and work into their 70s to avoid the same plight. “The cupboard is bare compared to what we’ve dreamed of,” said Phil DeMuth, a California investment adviser whose firm has $45 million under management. He’s co-written books with commentator Ben Stein. His newest is “Yes, You Can Still Retire Comfortably: The BabyBoom Retirement Crisis and How to Beat It.” But beating the crisis, he says, involves choices such as delaying retirement and tapping home equity. “It’s a terrifying problem,” DeMuth said. “Politicians don’t want you to think about it. Your employer doesn’t want you to worry about it. . . . It’s very depressing, and it’s not going to get any better.” By most estimates, about a fourth of future retirees will be in good financial shape. They have significant savings, insurance, pensions, good health and are married and own their home, said John Rother, director of policy and strategy for the AARP in Washington. Another fourth face an impossible future because of little savings, no home, no insurance and no spouse, he said. The remaining half will be “on the edge,” he said. Best case: Many will struggle. Worst: Most will collapse financially. Study after study shows roughly the same bleak outlook. An analysis this month by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College found that, under the best assumptions, 43 percent of households will have trouble making it in retirement. That assumed people worked until at least 65 and lived partly off the value of their homes. And it didn’t add health-care costs, which researchers said were too unpredictable to even estimate. “Unless Americans change their ways, many will struggle in retirement,” said Alicia Munnell, director of the study. Cleveland certified financial planner Ken Robinson is just as grim. “We need to get ready for parts of America to turn Third World and where you need your extended family to support you financially,” Robinson said. “I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t see us on a course that protects us from that.” Survival for Paula Tinsley, 53, of Maple Heights, will mean delaying retirement until she’s about 80. That’s when she’ll pay off the house she and her 70-year-old husband bought three years ago. Tinsley, a manager of a Shell convenience store in Willoughby, has a small 401(k) and small pension. “If I had it to do all over again, I would have started saving earlier,” she said. She’ll depend heavily on Social Security — which is the most prominent part of this crisis. “It’s a terrifying problem. Politicians don’t want you to think about it. Your employer doesn’t want you to worry about it. . . . It’s very depressing, and it’s not going to get any better.” Phil DeMuth, Systems starting to run dry retirement and investment author Social Security is on course to start paying out more than it takes in by 2017. The money built up before then will be gone in 34 years, just about the time today’s 30-somethings start reaching in their mailboxes for a benefits check. Even now, Social Security pays an average of only about $12,000 a year to a retiree. The Medicare system that retirees rely on for health coverage starts to run out of money this year. It’ll go broke in 12 years. “We may have already committed more physical resources to the Baby Boom generation in its retirement years than our economy has the capacity to deliver,“ Alan Greenspan said last year, when he was chairman of the Federal Reserve. Pension plans, which about 40 percent of today’s retirees rely on, are crumbling. While about the same percentage of people are covered by some kind of work-related retirement plan today as in years past, the type of coverage has changed. Only 25 years ago, 80 percent of privatesector workers in retirement plans had pensions. Today, that’s only one in three, with most of the rest instead given the chance to save in an individual investment plan. Even workers who have pen- sions are at risk, given how many plans have run into trouble. Personal savings will be even more important to future retirees, but last year Americans spent more than they brought in — meaning no savings — for the first time since the Great Depression. A third of all workers aren’t saving a dime toward retirement, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Most who are saving don’t have nearly enough. Among workers 55 and older today, 52 percent have less than $50,000 saved for retirement, the institute found. (You need $350,000 to $400,000 at retirement to have an income of $30,000 a year.) Only a fourth of workers 55 and older have $250,000 or more. If that much money sounds good, stomach this: It’s projected that a 65-year-old needs $210,000 in savings just to pay for out-of-pocket medical expenses and supplemental insurance. Maybe dying early doesn’t sound bad about now. But wait: The typical man who makes it to 65 has a 50 percent chance of living until age 85. A 65-year-old woman has the same chance of living until age 88. That’s 20-plus years of a life that’s far from the warm-andfuzzy images of spending our golden years traveling and playing golf. The game plan for many is to work into their 70s or 80s. Those will be the lucky ones. About 40 percent of people retire involuntarily because of illness or layoff. Even working until age 67 was difficult for Robert Newton of Cleveland Heights. He’s in good health, but he still felt as if he was dragging himself to a fulltime job servicing postage meters for Pitney-Bowes. An engineer with a college degree, he was laid off about eight times over a career that spanned TRW, Cleveland Steel Container and Bailey Controls. He had only seven years with Pitney-Bowes, meaning a tiny pension, and he didn’t have enough years at the other employers to qualify for pensions there. He kept working until two years ago, when he could pay off his home and draw a bigger Social Security check. “My body was telling me, ‘It’s time.’ I was pretty worn out at 67,” he said. “A lot of people who plan to keep working are going to find their body isn’t going to accept that.” The widower gets about $23,000 a year from Social Secu- rity, his pension and an annuity combined. “I can live on that. That’s enough.” Social Security is 40 percent of the income of today’s retirees and the only income for one in five retirees today. Five factors brought us here How did we get to this horrifying point? It’s the convergence of five phenomena — all of which were preventable or, at least, foreseeable: R The flood of baby boomers and a slowing birth rate since. Between now and 2030, the number of people over 65 will double. The number of new workers paying into Social Security and Medicare will increase only 20 percent. R Longer life spans. Life expectancy is about 13 years longer for children today than when current retirees were born. R A stock market that lost value for three straight years — also a first since the Great Depression. R Procrastination by political leaders. Washington saw the warning signs in the 1970s and 1980s, but passing the buck has always seemed easier than real solutions. R Procrastination by individuals. Experts have begged us to spend less and save more. But the median retirement account holds $10,000 — barely more than the average household has in credit card debt. Younger workers to pay the price Between 1946 and 1964, the number of U.S. births soared. Instead of two children for every woman on average, there were three or four. Births declined rapidly after 1964, when birth control pills became widely available and women entered the work force in greater numbers. Since then, the birth rate has been about half as much as at the height of the baby boom. That means fewer new workers to support Social Security for the growing number of retirees. Meanwhile, old people are living to be really old. The age for receiving full benefits like Social Security and Medicare had always been 65. That was no big deal at first, because until 1950 the average life expectancy for male babies was less than that. Now life expectancy is 75 years for men and more than 80 for women. Credit medical advances as well as healthier lifestyles. DeMuth, the investment ad- viser, said the decline of smoking is one of the biggest causes of the retirement imbalance. In 1935, nearly two out of three adults smoked. Now, it’s one in five. All this adds up to far more people living in retirement. In 1950, Social Security had 16 workers paying in for every retiree. Now, the ratio is three workers for every retiree. By 2030, it will be 2-to-1. Unless benefits are cut sharply, which isn’t expected, workers will lose a bigger chunk of their paycheck to support retirees, said Matt Moore of the National Center for Policy Analysis. “People in their 20s and 30s will be most affected.” Social Security always has collected more each year than it pays out. But the government borrows from that surplus to pay for other things. When Social Security starts paying out more than it collects, it will need money back. The government will have to raise taxes or borrow more. Or it could cut benefits. To fix the problem now through the bluntest methods, we would have to either raise Social Security taxes 16 percent or cut benefits 13 percent, said Bob Rosenblatt, a former journalist who focused on retirement issues and is now with the National Academy of Social Insurance in Virginia, a nonpartisan group of more than 700 experts in government benefit programs. The longer we wait, the more drastic the fix. Most experts believe Social Security will get fixed, no matter how bitter the medicine. If you look really hard, you can find a couple of other rays of hope: R For retirement-age boomers who want to keep working, there should be jobs available. Today, there are more people who want to work than there are jobs. By 2014, it’ll be the other way around, the government says. R Younger workers save more than their parents did at the same age. R More people overall are saving money than a decade ago. Among workers of all ages, the percentage who have something saved for retirement has increased from 57 percent in 1994 to 70 percent in 2006. Even the savers get caught short Fat lot of good that saving did for some people. Just when the first baby boomers were within 10 years of retirement, the stock market tanked. Not only did most investors suffer 30 percent to 50 percent declines (which they haven’t fully recovered since), but economists and financial planners were spurred to rethink projections. For stock investments, they used to forecast annual returns of 10 percent to 12 percent a year. Now, most project 7 percent to 9 percent, said economist LeRoy Brooks of John Carroll University. “That’s a huge difference,” he said. This is bad for pensions and individual investments. Brooks calculates that a 30-year-old could invest $840 a year at 12 percent and have an income of $50,000 a year in retirement. But if the return is only 8 percent, she’d have to invest $2,700 a year to get that same income. The same principles apply to pensions, so many employers are caught without nearly enough money in their pension funds based on lower earnings projections. That includes the government. Standard & Poor’s said federal employee pensions are short about $4.5 trillion. Taxpayers could be forced to pay that bill. John Strangfeld, vice chairman of Prudential Financial Inc. in New Jersey, believes many pension plans will be in trouble in the next 10 to 20 years. The trail already includes IBM, General Motors, Hewlett-Packard, Sears, Delta Airlines, Polaroid and Goodyear. s ee RETIREMENT A11 RE TIRE MEN T, from A10 Mark Iwry, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, said shutdowns or freezes are rare and most pensions are going along OK. What worries him, though, is that the freezes — in which workers no longer accumulate pension benefits, though they may be instead given the chance to save in a 401(k) — have spread from sick companies to healthy ones. And many pension plans could go bankrupt. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., which insures workers whose company plans go bust, could be under a “mega-threat,” Iwry said, because it wasn’t designed to bail out whole industries. Retirement experts are most vocal and exasperated about what Washington hasn’t done. Once it became obvious 20 or 30 years ago that the birth rate was slowing and life expectancies were increasing, researchers waved warning flags. Changes could have come then with minimal pain. “Nobody has wanted to deal with this,” DeMuth said. “Everyone just wants to kick the can down the road. But there is no Santa Claus. The government is functionally bankrupt.” Brooks, the economist from John Carroll, said politicians “have been playing to the populace by giving them what they want. People always say they’re paying too much in taxes and so we cut taxes. They say they want more benefits, so we increase benefits.” Any solutions now will be extremely painful and unpopular, but politicians need to face the crisis, he said. Americans who are angry about the government’s role should look in the mirror. With one out of three people not saving anything toward retirement, and most of the rest not saving enough, we must be waiting for the retirement fairy. Saving for retirement is a fairly new phenomenon. As a society, we’re just not good at it, said Mayfield certified financial planner Kevin Myeroff, author of the 2001 book “Countdown to Retirement.” What we are good at: spending. “We carve out so much of our money for things we didn’t used to need,” said Robinson, the Cleveland planner. “Is it so hard to imagine life without TiVo?” DeMuth, a psychologist by training, said spending is more exciting and more immediately rewarding than saving. For those who don’t have the money, it’s easy to reach for the credit card. Charge-card debt (an average of $9,300 per household) has hit millions of people. Myeroff isn’t sure what it will take for Americans to face reality. “People think this is all just going to work out,” he said. It’s now obvious it won’t, said Brooks. “We’ve known this for decades,” he said. “We’re getting closer and closer to the day of reckoning.” To reach this Plain Dealer reporter: [email protected], 216-999-6315 The dream of retirement is less than 50 years old Fran Henry Plain Dealer Reporter A gingham apron ’round her waist, Mom was in the kitchen, baking cookies for her 3.7 children. And Dad was in his Buick, driving home after a hard day at the office. When they sat down for dinner, they said grace, passed the meatloaf and talked about the day. Then Grandpa and Grandma ambled over from next door with a tall molded orange JellO for dessert. It jiggled when Grandma set it down and the kids laughed. The 1950s: When life was a sitcom, or so they would have us believe. But they never told us about how angry Grandpa was when he faced forced retirement — for that’s what it took to get people out of the work force. Even though the first monthly Social Security check had been issued in 1940, a decade later, up to 60 percent of those reaching 65 still preferred to work. And why not? Even company pensions had been rare until after the Depression. Most retirees in the ’50s had no pension. A third had no retirement savings. Who could blame them for rejecting retirement? It meant you were old, your life was over. Besides, what did you do when you didn’t work? That was the problem, said author Santha Rama Rau at a 1951 conference on leisure and retirement. “Americans have no idea how to enjoy doing nothing,” she said. Those assembled agreed. Beginning at age 50, they said, Americans needed to be educated about leisure. “Perhaps we have to glamorize leisure as we have not,” chairman Lynn White Jr., president of Mills College, reportedly said. It would be the marketing job of the decade, a campaign bankrolled by life insurance companies in the pension business. Advertising would redefine the American Dream to include retirement as a delicious opportunity for a new lease on life. On New Year’s Day 1960, in scorpion-infested, crusty, dusty Arizona desert, a sign appeared that the message had penetrated the nation’s ironclad work ethic: a traffic jam. Cars lined up for two miles on the road to Sun City, Ariz., cars filled with older couples from all over the country, lured by the idea of a retirement community. Over the course of the weekend, 100,000 people pushed their way through six model homes located near a new golf course and recreation center. In three days, 237 homes sold. And so it began. To reach this Plain Dealer reporter: [email protected], 216-999-4806 About this series Every Sunday for the next two months, The Plain Dealer will explain how the American dream of retirement has ended. What we’ll tell you: PENSIONS New workers aren’t covered, and existing plans are at risk of collapse. The company pension is a dinosaur and the comet has already smashed into the system. PBGC The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., a backstop for failed pension plans, was flawed from the start — and even its first leader says so. SOCIAL SECURITY Politicians won’t allow the program to fail. But the cost will be higher taxes and longer waits to collect. SAVINGS It’s too late for the oldest boomers to mend their spendthrift ways. Today’s youngest workers still have time to save — if they can after they pay for the older generation’s mistakes. HEALTH CARE In the future, we’ll live longer and feel better. But we can’t afford to. SOLUTIONS Thirty years after the first warnings of a retirement crisis were raised, Washington has finally acknowledged the problem. But by now, the potential fixes are almost as bad. YOUR FUTURE Should your children have to pay for your retirement dreams? Do the elderly deserve all the health care that money can buy? Heading into a changed world, our most comfortable assumptions will be challenged. TALK TO US To comment on this series: R Use the comment box at cleveland.com/retirement. The page also includes links to a discussion forum, related studies online, a blog from series editor John Kroll and other resources. R E-mail [email protected]. R Write to Retire at Your Own Risk, The Plain Dealer, 1801 Superior Ave., Cleveland, Ohio 44114. CAN YOU AFFORD TO RETIRE? A Plain Dealer BusinessExtra section on Monday, July 24, will offer advice on planning for your own retirement.