menifee valley campus facilities master plan

Transcription

August 2015 | Initial Study MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
for Mt. San Jacinto Community College District Prepared for: Mt. San Jacinto Community College District Contact: Becky Elam, Vice President of Business Services 1499 N. State Street Building 700, Facilities San Jacinto, California 92583 (951) 487‐3100 Prepared by: PlaceWorks Contact: Peter Garcia, Associate Principal 2850 E. Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite B Ontario, California 91764 909.989.4449 [email protected] www.placeworks.com MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN INITIAL STUDY
MT. SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Table of Contents
Section
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Page
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................................................... 2 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 11 1.4 EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN ....................................................................... 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST .................................................................................... 13 2.1 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................ 13 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED .......................................... 15 2.3 DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY) ........................ 15 2.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............................................................... 16 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 25 3.1 AESTHETICS .................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES .................................................................. 26 3.3 AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................................................... 27 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES......................................................................................................... 29 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................. 30 3.6 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................ 31 3.7 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES............................................................................................. 31 3.8 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ................................................................................................................ 32 3.9 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ............................................................................................. 35 3.10 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ....................................................................... 35 3.11 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .................................................................................. 38 3.12 LAND USE AND PLANNING..................................................................................................... 40 3.13 MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................ 41 3.14 NOISE.................................................................................................................................................. 41 3.15 POPULATION AND HOUSING ................................................................................................. 42 3.16 PUBLIC SERVICES .......................................................................................................................... 43 3.17 RECREATION .................................................................................................................................. 44 3.18 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC .................................................................................................. 44 3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS....................................................................................... 46 3.20 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................... 48 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 49 4.1 PRINTED REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 49 4.2 PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 49 4.3 WEB SITES ......................................................................................................................................... 49 LIST OF PREPARERS ................................................................................................... 51 LEAD AGENCY .............................................................................................................................................. 51 PLACEWORKS ................................................................................................................................................ 51 APPENDICES
Appendix A August 2015
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Report Page i
MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN INITIAL STUDY
Table of Contents
List of Figures
Figure
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Page
Regional Location ................................................................................................................................. 3 Local Vicinity ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Existing Site Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 7 Full Build-Out Campus Plan ............................................................................................................... 9 List of Tables
Table
Table 3-1 Page ii
Page
Estimated Solid Waste Disposal for the Proposed Project .......................................................... 47 PlaceWorks
Abbreviations and Acronyms
AAQS
ambient air quality standards
AB
Assembly Bill
ACM
asbestos-containing materials
ADT
average daily traffic
amsl
above mean sea level
AQMP
air quality management plan
AST
aboveground storage tank
BAU
business as usual
bgs
below ground surface
BMP
best management practices
CAA
Clean Air Act
CAFE
corporate average fuel economy
CalARP
California Accidental Release Prevention Program
CalEMA
California Emergency Management Agency
Cal/EPA
California Environmental Protection Agency
CAL FIRE
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
CALGreen
California Green Building Standards Code
Cal/OSHA
California Occupational Safety and Health Administration
CalRecycle
California Department of Resources, Recycling, and Recovery
Caltrans
California Department of Transportation
CARB
California Air Resources Board
CBC
California Building Code
CCAA
California Clean Air Act
CCR
California Code of Regulations
CDE
California Department of Education
CDFW
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEQA
California Environmental Quality Act
CERCLA
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
cfs
cubic feet per second
CGS
California Geologic Survey
CMP
congestion management program
CNDDB
California Natural Diversity Database
CNEL
community noise equivalent level
August 2015
Page i
CO
carbon monoxide
CO2e
carbon dioxide equivalent
Corps
US Army Corps of Engineers
CSO
combined sewer overflows
CUPA
Certified Unified Program Agency
CWA
Clean Water Act
dB
decibel
dBA
A-weighted decibel
DPM
diesel particulate matter
DTSC
Department of Toxic Substances Control
EIR
environmental impact report
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPCRA
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
FEMA
Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHWA
Federal Highway Administration
FTA
Federal Transit Administration
GHG
greenhouse gases
GWP
global warming potential
HCM
Highway Capacity Manual
HQTA
high quality transit area
HVAC
heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system
IPCC
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Ldn
day-night noise level
Leq
equivalent continuous noise level
LBP
lead-based paint
LCFS
low-carbon fuel standard
LOS
level of service
LST
localized significance thresholds
MW
moment magnitude
MCL
maximum contaminant level
MEP
maximum extent practicable
mgd
million gallons per day
MMT
million metric tons
Page ii
PlaceWorks
MPO
metropolitan planning organization
MT
metric ton
MWD
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
NAHC
Native American Heritage Commission
NOX
nitrogen oxides
NPDES
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
O3
ozone
OES
California Office of Emergency Services
PM
particulate matter
POTW
publicly owned treatment works
ppm
parts per million
PPV
peak particle velocity
RCRA
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
REC
recognized environmental condition
RMP
risk management plan
RMS
root mean square
RPS
renewable portfolio standard
RWQCB
Regional Water Quality Control Board
SB
Senate Bill
SCAG
Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD
South Coast Air Quality Management District
SIP
state implementation plan
SLM
sound level meter
SoCAB
South Coast Air Basin
SOX
sulfur oxides
SQMP
stormwater quality management plan
SRA
source receptor area [or state responsibility area]
SUSMP
standard urban stormwater mitigation plan
SWP
State Water Project
SWPPP
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB
State Water Resources Control Board
TAC
toxic air contaminants
TNM
transportation noise model
August 2015
Page iii
tpd
tons per day
TRI
toxic release inventory
TTCP
traditional tribal cultural places
USFWS
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS
United States Geological Survey
UST
underground storage tank
UWMP
urban water management plan
V/C
volume-to-capacity ratio
VdB
velocity decibels
VHFHSZ
very high fire hazard severity zone
VMT
vehicle miles traveled
VOC
volatile organic compound
WQMP
water quality management plan
WSA
water supply assessment
Page iv
PlaceWorks
1. Introduction
Mt. San Jacinto Community College District (District) is proposing to implement a Master Plan for campus
improvements at the Mt. San Jacinto Community College, Menifee Valley Campus (Campus). The
improvements would be implemented to meet the demand for learning opportunities in accordance with the
District Educational Master Plan, by providing the means to house instructional programs and related
support services. The main objectives of the Menifee Valley Campus Facilities Master Plan are to:

Incorporate the vision of the District Educational Master Plan when planning future facilities.

Incorporate sustainability.

Create a road map describing how the Campus can sustain a more robust student capacity while imbuing
a sense of place and collegiate atmosphere.

Define open spaces that will expand proportionately with the growth of the Campus.

Replace inadequate temporary modular structures with permanent facilities.

Consider a comprehensive range of issues that may influence design and staging of future projects.
The Menifee Valley Campus Facilities Master Plan sets priorities for project development, and illustrates a
basic level of sequencing required to develop the site while maintaining a working campus.
All projects within the State of California are required to undergo an environmental review to determine the
environmental impacts associated with implementation of the project in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Public Resources Code [PRC], §§ 21000 et seq.). CEQA was enacted in
1970 by the California Legislature to disclose to decision makers and the public the significant environmental
effects of proposed activities and the ways to avoid or reduce the environmental effects by requiring
implementation of feasible alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA applies to all California government
agencies at all levels, including local agencies, regional agencies, and state agencies, boards, commissions, and
special districts. The District is the Lead Agency for an environmental impact report (EIR) to be prepared for
the proposed project described in this Initial Study. As such, the District is required to conduct an
environmental review to analyze the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed project.
1.1
PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed project site is located at 28237 La Piedra Road, in the City of Menifee, County of Riverside,
California, and consists of Riverside County Assessor parcel numbers 364-070-031 and 364-070-032. The
project site is a rectangular parcel of land with a slightly irregular northern border. The project site generally
August 2015
Page 1
1. Introduction
abuts La Piedra Road to the north, Albion Road to the south, Bell Mountain Middle School to the east, and
Antelope Road to the west. The project site is approximately 170 feet east of Interstate 215. Figure 1, Regional
Location, and Figure 2, Local Vicinity, illustrate the project site in its regional and local contexts.
1.2
1.2.1
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Existing Land Use
The project site is partially developed with a community college campus. The southern and southeastern areas
of the project site consist of undeveloped land covered with native vegetation (Figure 3, Existing Site
Conditions). The existing campus includes 15 buildings, 24 portable structures, 5 parking lots, a softball field,
basketball court, and soccer field. The campus is accessed from both La Piedra Road on the north, and
Antelope Road on the west.
The project site topography is relatively level with a change in elevation of roughly 3 feet. The highest point
exists near the intersection of La Piedra and Antelope Roads, and gradually drops to the east. The prevailing
wind direction is easterly. A drainage channel is located on the eastern border of the project site, and
separates the site from Bell Mountain Middle School.
1.2.2
Surrounding Land Use
The project site is generally surrounded by the Enclave Apartments residential development, a Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and Lakepoint residential development to the north, undeveloped property
and Cantabria Apartments residential development to the south, Interstate 215 and Undeveloped property to
the west, and Bell Mountain Middle School to the east. The area in the general vicinity of the project site is
characterized by residential land uses, and undeveloped property.
Page 2
PlaceWorks
Figure 1 - Regional Location
1. Introduction
Site
5
0
Source: ESRI, 2015
Scale (Miles)
PlaceWorks
1. Introduction
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 4
PlaceWorks
Figure 2 - Local Vicinity
1. Introduction
215
Project Boundary
Source: ESRI, 2015
0
2,000
Scale (Feet)
PlaceWorks
1. Introduction
Page 6
PlaceWorks
Figure 3 - Existing Site Conditions
r
line D
La Piedra Rd
Residential
N Port Ln
River Gle
n Ct
Ba
yp
ort
Ln
t Dr
nd Wy
Shore
Lake
Lake Poin
Sand Isla
Spring Deep Terrace
Spring
Inspiration Lake Dr
w Run
Pl
Residential
Meado
Retail
Wy
1. Introduction
Moon Shadow Dr
Antelope Rd
Haun Rd
Bell Mountain Middle School
215
Albion Ln
Residential
Amborella Wy
Holland Rd
0
Source: Google Earth Pro, 2015
Menifee Rd
Palomar Rd
Holland Rd
Hanover Ln
Residential
Midsummer Ln
700
Scale (Feet)
PlaceWorks
1. Introduction
Page 8
PlaceWorks
Figure 4 - Full Build-Out Campus Plan
1. Introduction
FULL MASTER PLAN BUILD-OUT SUMMARY
Residential
La Piedra Rd
Antelope Rd
215
Bell Mountain
Middle School
Albion Ln
Residential
0
PROJECT DATA
Source: LPA Architects, 2015
Full Build-Out Summary
2015 total
Gross
Square Feet
242,238
Parking
spaces
1,529
Net change
Buildings
Existing to Remain
Description
100 - Student Services
Future
GSF
Description
12,590 Fitness Center
GSF
31,000
200
Scale (Feet)
PlaceWorks
1. Introduction
Page 10
PlaceWorks
1. Introduction
1.3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The District is proposing a staged construction program for the Campus improvements. Figure 3, Existing Site
Conditions, illustrates the Campus boundaries, and Figure 4, Full Build-Out Campus Plan, depicts full build-out
of the Campus. It is anticipated that the Campus would accommodate approximately 15,000 to 20,000
students at full build-out. The project would add approximately 4,398 full time equivalent students.
Enrollment is assumed to be balanced at full build-out between daytime and nighttime students (50\50).
Daytime classes typically would be scheduled between 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., and nighttime classes between 5 p.m.
and 10 p.m. The future Campus improvements may also accommodate other nighttime activities such as
sports and musical events. The Campus improvements would include various buildings, a football stadium
and soccer field, and staff, student, and visitor parking facilities. As is typical with other college campuses, the
Campus would have paved pedestrian paths and landscaped areas. The District proposes to construct facility
improvement in two phases. Phase I improvements would occur over a 10-year timeframe, and Phase II
improvements (full campus build-out) would follow pending the availability of future funding. The following
new facilities and improvements are proposed:
Phase I








Fitness Center
Facilities, Maintenance and Operations/Campus Police Building
Football Stadium, Baseball Diamond and Soccer Field
Math and Science Buildings
Student Services Building
Allied Health Building
Landscaping and Pedestrian Paths
New Campus Entry Point
Phase II




Multi-Disciplinary Instructional Building
Student Center Building
Performing Arts Building
Gymnasium
In order to ensure compatibility of the future Campus with surrounding development, the design would
incorporate the following measures:

Design of facilities with a simple unobtrusive architectural appearance with façade treatments, screening
of any rooftop or exterior equipment, and design styles, materials, and exterior colors compatible with
the collegiate character of the campus.
August 2015
Page 11
1. Introduction

Provision of structural setbacks and landscape buffers from adjoining streets and structures on adjacent
properties.

Design of parking areas in a visually unobtrusive manner, and incorporation of sufficient landscaping
and parking areas for visual relief.

Provision of a visual transition between the campus and the natural environment through landscaping
techniques, sensitive site planning, and architectural design.

Utilization of grading design that minimizes alteration of the natural landform to the extent feasible.
Construction Stages
Construction would start in May 2018 and would be completed in the following stages;






Fitness Center - May 2017 to September 2018
Facilities, Maintenance and Operations/Campus Police Building – November 2018 to October 2019
Football Stadium, Baseball Diamond and Soccer Field – October 2017 to October 2018
Math and Science Building – October 2019 to July 2021
Student Services Building – September 2021 to April 2023
Allied Health Building – April 2022 to April 2024
Ancillary features such as landscaping and pedestrian paths, and the new campus entry would be constructed
along with the proposed Phase I improvements within the 10-year timeframe. Phase I of the Menifee
Campus improvements would be completed in April 2024, and as described above, Phase II (full build-out)
would be completed pending the availability of future funding.
1.4
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN
The project site is located in a specific plan area of the City of Menifee, known as the Menifee Village
Specific Plan, and is designated for a college. The project site is designated in the City of Menifee Zoning
Map as an SP Zone.
Page 12
PlaceWorks
2. Environmental Checklist
2.1
BACKGROUND
1. Project Title: Menifee Valley Campus Facilities Master Plan
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
Mt. San Jacinto Community College District
1499 North State Street
Building 700, Facilities
San Jacinto, CA 92583
3. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Becky Elam, Vice President of Business Services
(951) 487-3100
4. Project Location: The proposed project site is located at 28237 La Piedra Road, in the City of Menifee,
County of Riverside, California, and consists of Riverside County Assessor parcel numbers 364-070-031
and 364-070-032.
5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:
Mt. San Jacinto Community College District
6. General Plan Designation: The project site is located in a specific plan area of the City of Menifee,
known as the Menifee Village Specific Plan, and is designated for a college.
7. Zoning:
The project site is designated in the City of Menifee Zoning Map as an SP Zone.
8. Description of Project: The District is proposing a staged construction program for Campus
improvements. It is anticipated that the Campus would accommodate approximately 15,000 to 20,000
students at full build-out. The project would add approximately 4,398 full time equivalent students.
Enrollment is assumed to be balanced at full build-out between daytime and nighttime students (50\50).
Daytime classes typically would be scheduled between 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., and nighttime classes between 5
p.m. and 10 p.m. The future Campus improvements may also accommodate other nighttime activities
such as sports and musical events. The Campus improvements would include various buildings, a football
stadium and soccer field, and staff, student, and visitor parking facilities. As is typical with other college
campuses, the Campus would have paved pedestrian paths and landscaped areas. The following
improvements are proposed:
August 2015
Page 13

Fitness Center

Facilities/Maintenance and Operations Building

Football Stadium and Soccer Field

Math and Science Building

Student Services Building



New Parking Structures (2)

Landscaping and Pedestrian Paths
Construction would start in May 2018 and would be completed in stages. Full buildout of the Menifee
Campus improvements would be completed in April 2024.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is generally surrounded by the Enclave
Apartments residential development, a Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints, and Lakepoint
residential development to the north, undeveloped property and Cantabria Apartments residential
development to the south, Interstate 215 and Undeveloped property to the west, and Bell Mountain
Middle School to the east. The area in the general vicinity of the project site is characterized by residential
land uses, and undeveloped property.
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required:
City of Menifee
Division of the State Architect
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges
Page 14
PlaceWorks
2.4
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported
by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No
Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact
simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone).
A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors, as well as
general standards (e.g., the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a projectspecific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation,
or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that
an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) “Negative Declaration:
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a
“Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In
this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier
document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be
cited in the discussion.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
Page 16
PlaceWorks
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies
should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental
effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a)
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b)
Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of
the site and its surroundings?
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
c)
d)
X
X
X
X
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing
impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry
and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and
the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted
by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
X
Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
X
Williamson Act contract?
Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest
land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code
X
Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as
defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to
X
non-forest use?
Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due
to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
X
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
August 2015
Page 17
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
III. AIR QUALITY.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
X
quality plan?
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to
X
an existing or projected air quality violation?
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment
under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
X
standard (including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
X
concentrations?
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
X
people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established
native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the
use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
X
X
X
X
X
X
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a)
b)
c)
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in § 15064.5?
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside
of formal cemeteries?
Page 18
X
X
X
PlaceWorks
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a)
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic feature?
X
VII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a)
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code
21074?
X
VIII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i)
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii)
Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii)
Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
iv)
Landslides?
X
X
X
X
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of
the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to
life or property?
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste
water?
X
X
X
X
IX. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
a)
b)
Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted
for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
X
X
X. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a)
b)
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
August 2015
X
X
Page 19
Issues
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working
in the project area?
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
XI. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream
or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream
or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite?
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f)
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g)
Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped
on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which
would impede or redirect flood flows?
h)
Page 20
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PlaceWorks
Issues
i)
j)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
No
Impact
X
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
X
XII. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a)
Physically divide an established community?
b)
Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation
of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
c)
X
X
X
XIII. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a)
b)
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be a value to the region and the residents of the
state?
Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan?
X
X
XIV. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess
of standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
X
X
X
X
X
X
XV. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a)
b)
Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
August 2015
X
X
Page 21
Issues
c)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No
Impact
X
XVI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
a)
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
X
b)
Police protection?
c)
Schools?
d)
Parks?
e)
Other public facilities?
X
X
X
X
XVII. RECREATION.
a)
b)
Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or
be accelerated?
Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
X
X
XVIII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy
establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of
the circulation system, taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel
and relevant components of the circulation system, including
but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
Conflict with an applicable congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of service standards and
travel demand measures, or other standards established by
the county congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways?
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
Result in inadequate emergency access?
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding
public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise
decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
Result in inadequate parking capacity?
Page 22
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PlaceWorks
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or waste
water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project
from existing entitlements and resources or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
Result in a determination by the waste water treatment
provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XX. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a)
b)
c)
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
August 2015
X
X
X
Page 23
Page 24
PlaceWorks
3. Environmental Analysis
Section 2.3 provided a checklist of environmental impacts. This section provides an evaluation of the impact
categories and questions contained in the checklist and identifies mitigation measures, if applicable.
3.1
AESTHETICS
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located on relatively flat terrain and mountain ridgelines
are visible from the project site to the north, south, east and west. However, the project site is not located
within a designated scenic highway corridor nor is it a part of any designated scenic vista. The City of
Menifee Draft General Plan goal (Goal CD-4) is to preserve and enhance scenic corridors that have
exceptional aesthetic value. The project site is not part of Caltrans’ Scenic Highways Plan. Since the Project
Site is not part of any designated scenic resource, impacts related to scenic vistas would be less than
significant. This section will not be discussed in the EIR.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings,
and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. The nearest officially designated state scenic highway is State Route 74 (SR-74), over 19 miles to
the east. Eligible state scenic highway, but not officially designated, Interstate 215/State Route 74 (I-215/SR74) is approximately 5.4 miles to the north. Scenic views from I-215/SR-74 are mountain views to the north
and east. No impact to a state scenic highway would result from project implementation. This issue will not
be addressed in the EIR.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is partially developed and characterized by relatively flat
terrain. The proposed facilities and improvements are consistent with the existing character of the
community college campus. However, the project would add light standards for the proposed athletic
stadium, and proposed buildings may be slightly taller than existing structures. This issue will be addressed in
the EIR
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would include elevated field lighting to allow for the
scheduling of nighttime games and activities. Use of high intensity elevated lighting does have the potential to
result in substantial changes to nighttime light levels at neighboring residences. This issue will be addressed in
the EIR.
August 2015
Page 25
3.2
AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies
may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range
Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology
provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site was used for agricultural land in the past prior to 1978;
however, agricultural uses ceased prior to the Menifee Valley Campus opening in 1990 and is no longer being
used for agricultural purposes. Part of the project site is designated as Farmland of Local Importance by the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (DOC 2015). However, the Menifee Village Specific Plan
designates the project site as college (Riverside County 2005). Department of Conservation does not require
Land Evaluation Site Assessment (LESA) for farmland of local importance and the significance impact for
farmland of local importance is determined by the jurisdictional city or county (DOC 2009). The City of
Menifee’s policies on agricultural resources are to protect existing farms and sensitive uses around them as
agricultural land transitions to more developed land uses (OCS-6.1). Development of the project site is
consistent with the city’s policies and would not conflict with the state’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
No Impact. The project site is zoned as a college and is not zoned for agricultural use. The project site is not
under Williamson Act contract. No impact is anticipated and this issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code
Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code
Section 51104(g))?
No Impact. "Forest land" is land that can support 10-percent native tree cover of any species, including
hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources,
including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits.
"Timberland" means land, other than land owned by the federal government and land designated by the
board as experimental forest land, which is available for, and capable of, growing a crop of trees of a
commercial species used to produce lumber and other forest products, including Christmas trees.
Page 26
PlaceWorks
The project site does not contain timberland or forest land. The project site is zoned as a college and is not
zoned for forest land or timberland. Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the
existing zoning or rezoning of forestland or timberland. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No Impact. As discussed in above Section 3.2(c), the project site is not forest land or timberland. No loss of
forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use would result from the project implementation. No
impact is anticipated and this issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could
result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to nonforest use?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site and surrounding areas are planned for urban development
by the city’s General Plan. The project site is not being used for agricultural or tree resources production and
no changes are proposed to convert farmland to non-agricultural use or forest land to non-forest use. No
significant impact is anticipated and this issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
3.3
AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution
control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Potentially Significant Impact. A consistency determination plays an important role in local agency project
review by linking local planning and individual projects to the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The
proposed project is anticipated to generate short-term construction and long-term operational air emissions.
The EIR will discuss the project’s impact on implementation of the AQMP. This issue will be addressed in
the EIR.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
Potentially Significant Impact. Air pollutant emissions associated with the project would occur over the
short-term for site preparation and construction activities. In addition, long-term emissions associated with
project related vehicle trips would contribute to existing levels and towards an exceedance of criteria
pollutants. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
August 2015
Page 27
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
Potentially Significant Impact. The South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) is designated nonattainment for O3,
PM10, and PM2.5 and lead (Los Angeles County only) under the California and National ambient air quality
standards (AAQS), and nonattainment for NO2 under the California AAQS. The EIR will discuss the
project’s contribution to the area air quality. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Potentially Significant Impact. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would occur
over the short-term as a result of construction related activities and over the long-term from project
generated vehicle trips. During construction, both off-road equipment, such as earthmovers, forklifts and
generators, and vehicular traffic, such as material deliveries and worker trips to and from the site, would emit
exhaust containing air pollutants. This exhaust may impact sensitive receptors that exist along routes used by
vehicles traveling to and from the college and near areas of construction activities. Construction of the
proposed project would also emit dust particles to the atmosphere as soil is exposed and disturbed by
construction vehicles and equipment. Operational impacts may include increases in criteria pollutants from
vehicles as they make their way to and from the site. This includes the potential for CO hotspots as a result
of changes to intersection level of service conditions. Both construction and operation of the proposed
project have some potential to result in significant impacts to sensitive receptors. This issue will be addressed
in the EIR.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not emit objectionable odors that would affect
a substantial number of people. The threshold for odor is if a project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to
SCAQMD Rule 402, Nuisance, which states:
A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other
material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to
the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or
which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of
this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops
or the raising of fowl or animals.
The type of facilities that are considered to have objectionable odors include wastewater treatment plants,
compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating
operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical
manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities. The proposed project would not generate objectionable
odors that would lead to a public nuisance; therefore, operational impacts would be less than significant.
Page 28
PlaceWorks
During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust, application of asphalt and architectural
coatings would temporarily generate odors. Any construction-related odor emissions would be temporary,
intermittent in nature, and would not constitute a public nuisance. Impacts associated with constructiongenerated odors would be less than significant and this issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
3.4
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is partially developed, and the majority of the vacant land
on the project site appears to have undergone vegetation management (possibly disking) for fire control.
Based on the undeveloped nature of portions of the project site, and the drainage feature, potential impacts
associated with candidate, sensitive, or special status species will be evaluated the EIR.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Potentially Significant Impact. An ephemeral channel is located on the eastern side of the project site.
Project development impacts will be evaluated in the EIR.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Potentially Significant Impact. Wetlands are areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground
water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include
swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas (EPA 2015). There is one ephemeral channel along the eastern
boundary of the project site. The channel is generally an engineered ephemeral channel that empties through
a box culvert under La Piedra Road into an unnamed private lake. Implementation of the proposed project
may disturb the channel, and could potentially result in significant impact. This issue will be addressed in the
EIR.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
No Impact. The project site is adjacent to existing developed areas and is located in proximity to the
Interstate 215 freeway and is highly disturbed. There is no evidence that the site would potentially function as
a wildlife movement corridor. This issue will not be discussed further in the EIR.
August 2015
Page 29
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Menifee does not have a tree preservation policy or ordinance
governing trees on private properties. The County of Riverside General Plan Policy OS 9.3 states: “Maintain
and conserve superior examples of native trees, natural vegetation, stands of established trees, and other
features for ecosystem, aesthetic, and water conservation purposes.” Trees on the project site are limited, and
are ornamental in nature. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact. The project site is not located within an area proposed for conservation under a Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The project site is also not within or subject to other approved
local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans. This issue will not be evaluated further in the EIR.
3.5
CULTURAL RESOURCES
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in
§ 15064.5?
Potentially Significant Impact. Section 15064.5 defines historic resources as resources listed or determined
to be eligible for listing by the State Historical Resources Commission, a local register of historical resources,
or the lead agency. Generally a resource is considered “historically significant” if it meets one of the
following criteria:
i)
Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
California’s history and cultural heritage;
ii) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;
iii) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction,
or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values;
iv) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
Due to the fact that the project site is partially developed land, a historical resource analysis will be conducted
and this issue will be addressed in the EIR.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
§ 15064.5?
Potentially Significant Impact. There are no known archaeological resources on the project site. However,
there is a possibility of encountering previously unidentified archaeological resources during grading. This
issue will be addressed in the DEIR.
Page 30
PlaceWorks
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Less Than Significant Impact. There are no known human remains in the project area. In the event
grading activities would uncover previously unknown human remains, the California Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 require that all work in the area of the find to be
stopped and the County Coroner and the Native American Heritage Commission to be notified. Mandatory
compliance with these requirements would ensure that impacts to human remains are less than significant.
This issue will not be addressed in the DEIR.
3.6
PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
Potentially Significant Impact. No unique paleontological or geologic resources are known to exist within
or near the project site. The site is relatively flat and surrounded by developed land; there are no exposed rock
formations or other unique geological features on or near the site. However, there is a possibility of
encountering previously unidentified paleontological resources during grading. This issue will be addressed in
the DEIR.
3.7
TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource as defined in
§ 21074?
Potentially Significant Impact. Section 21074 defines tribal cultural resource as either of the following:
1. Site features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects of cultural value to a California
Native American tribe that are either of the following:
a.
Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical
Resources.
b. Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of section
5020.1.
2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of section 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of section 5024.1, lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American tribe.
Due to the fact that the project site is partially developed land, tribal cultural resources will be analyzed in the
EIR.
August 2015
Page 31
3.8
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving:
i)
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
No Impact. Based on a review of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map website, the City of
Menifee General Plan (2014), and the Geologic Map of the Santa Ana 30’ X 60’ Quadrangle (Morton
2004), the proposed project site is not on a known fault. Therefore, there is no potential at the site for the
rupture of a known earthquake fault. No impact related to an earthquake rupture would occur on the
site. No mitigation measures are required. This section will not be discussed in the EIR.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less Than Significant Impact. A number of faults in the southern California area are considered
active, and the project site is expected to experience strong seismic ground shaking in the future. The
proposed structure would be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes and standards.
The most recent state building standard is the 2013 California Building Code (CBC) (Title 24, Part 2,
California Code of Regulations), with local, more restrictive amendments based on local geographic,
topographic, or climatic conditions. These codes provide minimum standards to protect property and the
public welfare by regulating the design and construction of excavations, foundations, building frames,
retaining walls, and other building elements to mitigate the effects of seismic shaking and adverse soil
conditions. The CBC’s provisions for earthquake safety are based on factors such as occupancy type, the
types of soil and rock onsite, and the probable strength of ground motion at the project site.
Additionally, the CBC requires the preparation of project-specific geotechnical/engineering reports by a
Certified Engineering Geologist and/or Geotechnical Engineer prior to construction of the proposed
structure. The proposed project would be required to comply with the recommendations contained in
these reports. Any structure built for this project would adhere to the most recent version of the CBC.
Impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are
required. This section will not be discussed in the EIR.
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
No Impact. Liquefaction refers to loose, saturated sand or gravel deposits that lose their load supporting
capability when subjected to intense shaking. Any buildings or structures on these sediments may float,
sink, or tilt as if on a body of water during intense shaking. Liquefaction potential varies based on three
main contributing factors: 1) cohesionless, granular soils with relatively low densities (usually of
Holocene age); 2) shallow groundwater (generally less than 50 feet); and 3) moderate to high seismic
ground shaking. Lateral spreading refers to lateral displacement of large, surficial blocks of soil as a result
of pore pressure buildup or liquefaction in a subsurface layer.
Page 32
PlaceWorks
Based on a review of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District/Western Municipal Water
District Cooperative Well Measuring Program database, historical groundwater in the area is deeper than
50 feet below ground surface, and alluvial soils beneath the site are Pleistocene age. Pleistocene soils tend
to be consolidated and less prone to liquefaction. Therefore, liquefaction and lateral spreading are not
expected at the site. No impact related to liquefaction would occur. No mitigation measures are required.
This section will not be discussed in the EIR.
iv) Landslides?
No Impact. Susceptibility of slopes to landslides and other forms of slope failure depend on several
factors, which are usually present in combination—steep slopes, condition of rock and soil materials,
presence of water, formational contacts, geologic shear zones, seismic activity etc.
Based on a review of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute Topographic Series,
Romoland, California Quadrangle Map (USGS 2015), the topography of the project site is nearly level,
with a gentle gradient (slopes less than 0.3 percent) to the north. The lack of significant slopes on or near
the project site indicates that there is not a significant hazard from slope instability, landslides and debris
flows. This conclusion is supported by Morton et al. (2003) and the Menifee General Plan (2014), which
indicated that the project site and vicinity are not susceptible to landslides or debris flows. No impact
related to landslides would occur. No mitigation measures are required. This section will not be discussed
in the EIR.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Less Than Significant Impact. Erosion is a normal and inevitable geologic process whereby earthen
materials are loosened, worn away, decomposed, or dissolved, and removed from one place and transported
to another. Precipitation, water, waves, and wind are all agents of erosion. Ordinarily, erosion proceeds so
slowly as to be imperceptible, but when the natural equilibrium of the environment changes, the rate of
erosion can be greatly accelerated. This can create aesthetic and engineering problems. Accelerated erosion in
an urban area can cause damage by undermining structures; blocking storm sewers; and depositing silt, sand,
or mud in roads and tunnels. Eroded materials may eventually be deposited in local waters, where the carried
silt can remain suspended in the water for some time, constituting a pollutant and altering the normal balance
of plant and animal life.
Although some erosion would result from grading and construction operations, it is not expected that the
project would result in significant soil erosion or loss of topsoil. The project site is relatively level and
contains no unusual geographic features. The proposed project would not expose any soil for prolonged
periods of time. Soils may be exposed during project construction, but that exposure would be temporary
and would not result in substantial soil erosion. Impacts related to soil erosion during construction activities
would be less than significant.
Stormwater from the project would be collected in drains, which would in turn be discharged into the
stormwater drainage facilities on the campus or percolate through landscaped areas. Impacts related to soil
August 2015
Page 33
erosion during operation of the proposed facility would not be significant. No mitigation measures are
required. This section will not be discussed in the EIR.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result
of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is atop late to middle Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits
(Morton 2004). As discussed in Section 5.6a(vi), the proposed project would not result in on- or offsite
landslides. Lateral spreading—the lateral displacement of large, surficial blocks of soil—is not expected at the
site. No mitigation measures are required.
Natural soils may be susceptible to expansion, consolidation, and collapse (including hydrocollapse with the
addition of water). Consolidation occurs when increased load is placed on soils with low relative density,
causing smaller pore spaces and, where saturated, squeezing water out. Hydrocollapse occurs when soil that is
able to withstand increased load in a dry condition collapses upon saturation. Although no site specific
information on hydrocollapse is readily available for the site, the saturation of soils prior to construction and
standard grading practices like excavation and recompaction would reduce the impact of these conditions to a
less than significant level.
Subsidence of the ground surface has been reported in alluvial basins, where significant amounts of
groundwater (often in an overdraft condition; e.g., Lofgren 1971) or petroleum products (oil and natural gas)
are withdrawn over several decades. The primary cause of nontectonic subsidence in alluvial basin areas has
been alluvial compaction due to removal of large quantities of fluid (groundwater or oil). For groundwater
basins, this results in a significant lowering of the groundwater levels and, in oil fields, depletion of the oil
reserves. No oil or gas fields are within a mile of the site, so there is no potential for subsidence due to oil or
gas withdrawal. The proposed project would not remove significant quantities of water or other fluids from
the ground. No impacts related to subsidence would occur. No mitigation measures are required. This section
will not be discussed in the EIR.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks to life or property?
Less Than Significant Impact. Expansive soils swell when they become wet and shrink when they dry out,
which can crack building foundations and, in some cases, distress the structure of the buildings themselves.
Based on the expected lithology and a review of Morton (2004), the project site is likely to be located on
expansive soil. Standard grading technologies and compliance with current grading requirements in
accordance with the seismic requirements of the California Building Code (CBC) would reduce impacts from
expansive soils to a less than significant level. This will not be discussed in the EIR.
Page 34
PlaceWorks
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
No Impact. Development of the proposed project would not require the installation of a septic tank or
alternative wastewater disposal system. The project would utilize the local sewer system. Therefore, no
impacts would result from septic tanks or other onsite wastewater disposal systems. This will not be discussed
in the EIR.
3.9
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in an increase in construction-related
emissions and vehicle trips. The emission levels would be quantified and project’s contribution to the
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be included in the EIR.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in increase in GHG emissions due to
construction and operation of the project, including the proposed stadium. Applicable plans will be identified
and project’s impacts will be addressed in the EIR.
3.10 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or
disposal of hazardous materials?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would involve the expansion of the existing
community college and no significant amount of hazardous materials would be routinely transported, used,
or disposed of in conjunction with the proposed project during operation. Chemicals and hazardous
substances to be used in the laboratory classes would be used in small quantities under proper supervision.
Maintenance of the facility would likely require the use of cleaners, solvents, paints, and other janitorial
products that are potentially hazardous. However, these materials would be utilized in relatively small
quantities and would be stored in compliance with established state and federal requirements. These materials
would be used in accordance with normal operational safety practices, as employed at other school facilities
within the District. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is a partially developed college campus which does not use
any significant quantities of hazardous materials in its operation. Also, construction activities would not
August 2015
Page 35
involve a significant amount of hazardous materials, and their use would be temporary. Project construction
and operational workers would be trained on the proper use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.
Construction projects typically maintain supplies onsite for containing and cleaning small spills of hazardous
materials. No significant impacts would result from project implementation. This issue will not be further
examined in the EIR.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is a school, and the nearest off-site school is Bell Mountain
Middle School, located on adjacent land to the east. The operations at the community college would not
release a substantial amount of hazardous emissions into the environment or require the use of significant
amounts of hazardous materials, substances, or wastes that could impact another school. Long-term
operation of the new facilities at the project site would not involve the transport, storage, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials. The types of hazardous materials generally associated with the operation of a school are
restricted to common substances such as commercial cleansers, paints, aerosol cans, fertilizers, etc., used by
the janitorial and/or maintenance staff. These materials would be used in small quantities and would be
stored in compliance with federal, state, and local health and safety requirements. This issue will not be
addressed in the EIR.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
No Impact. PlaceWorks utilized the electronic database service Environmental Database Resources (EDR)
to complete the environmental records review (Appendix A). The database search was engaged to obtain
information pertaining to documented environmental concerns on, or in close proximity to, the project site.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, state and local databases were searched, including:

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Priority List (NPL) and Proposed
NPL

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS)

CERCLIS-No Further Response Actions Planned List (CERCLIS-NFRAP)

Federal Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Generators list (RCRA Generators)

RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities List

State Sites and State Spill Sites Lists (Cal-Sites Database)
Page 36
PlaceWorks
The agency databases were specifically reviewed to identify known releases that have occurred on, or in the
immediate area of, the project site. No known releases of any hazardous substances are reported to have
occurred on the property. The proposed project site is not included in any of the above lists of hazardous
sites, and no impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. This issue will not be evaluated further
in the EIR.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. The nearest airport is French Valley Airport, near Murrieta, approximately 7.2 miles to the
south. French Valley Airport is a private airport and no safety impact is anticipated from this airport to the
proposed project. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. The nearest private airstrip is Pines Airpark, near Menifee, approximately 3.6 miles to the
southeast. No safety impact is anticipated from this airport to the proposed project. This issue will not be
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Less Than Significant Impact. The County of Riverside is required under the state law to prepare and
maintain a Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) Multi-hazard Functional Plan. The project
site is partially developed and implementation of the proposed project would not interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The proposed project would not conflict with any
adopted emergency response or evacuation plans. The site’s surrounding roadways would continue to provide
emergency access through the project area and to surrounding properties during the project’s construction.
The proposed project would not necessitate any offsite roadway modification. If in the event that a
temporary closure of a street is required, the project’s contractor would be required to provide the city with a
construction schedule and plans for the closure of the street and to ensure that the placement of
construction materials and equipment do not obstruct a detour route. The contractor would be required to
comply with recommendations from the Riverside County Fire Department/CAL FIRE for reducing impacts
to emergency response or evacuation plans. Onsite emergency response would continue to be facilitated
through the use of the site’s driveways, parking lot, and paved areas. Adequate fire lanes from and to the
additional structures would be provided. No significant impacts would occur as a result of project
development, and no mitigation measures are required. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
August 2015
Page 37
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is not located in or adjacent to a high fire hazard area
designated by the Menifee General Plan. The southern side of the project site contains undeveloped plant
communities and is adjacent to open space to the southeast and across I-215 to the west, although some
urbanization has also occurred in the area. No safety impact is anticipated and this issue will not be addressed
in the EIR.
3.11 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is partially undeveloped and development of the project
would convert pervious soils to buildings and other impervious surfaces. Substantial soil disturbance is
anticipated, which may result in discharging of polluted runoff to stormwater system. The proposed site
design, source control, and treatment control BMPs and potential impacts will be evaluated to confirm
conformance with the CEQA Guidelines and the local National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) County-wide Stormwater Permit. The EIR will identify any additional BMPs applicable to the site,
including low impact development features, to minimize impacts and satisfy water quality requirements.
Construction measures would be reviewed for compliance with local erosion and sediment control
requirements and the recently updated General Construction Permit. This issue will be further addressed in
the EIR.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is located within the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin. This
groundwater basin contains several million acre-feet of high-quality groundwater in the San Jacinto aquifer
system. The project site is currently partially developed and implementation of the proposed project would
convert much of the undeveloped portion of the project site to impervious surfaces, potentially interfering
with groundwater recharge within the subject groundwater basin. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site.
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is currently partially developed and is connected to the
stormwater system. Implementation of the proposed project would alter the existing drainage pattern and
increase runoff volume. The EIR will review the existing drainage pattern and discuss how the project-related
runoff flow would be conveyed to existing stormwater system. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
Page 38
PlaceWorks
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is currently partially developed and is connected to the
stormwater system. Implementation of the proposed project would alter the existing drainage pattern and
increase runoff volume. The EIR will review the existing drainage pattern and discuss how the project-related
runoff flow would be conveyed to existing stormwater system. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm
water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase the impervious surface area on the
project site and create additional stormwater runoff compared to the existing conditions. The EIR will
discuss the existing or planned storm drain capacity and evaluate if the proposed development would
generate polluted runoff. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Less Than Significant Impact. No uniquely challenging water quality situation has been identified during
the Initial Study preparation that would not be covered by the previous Sections 3.9(a) through (e). This issue
will not be addressed in the EIR.
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
No Impact. The project site is located in the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel No. 06065C2070H,
Zone X, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (FEMA 2014). Zone X
represents areas determined to be outside the 100-year flood hazard area. In addition, the proposed project
would not involve any housing development. This issue will not be addressed further in the EIR.
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
No Impact. The project site is located in the FIRM Panel No. 06065C2070H, Zone X, published by the
FEMA (FEMA 2014). Zone X represents areas determined to be outside the 100-year flood hazard area. The
proposed project would not place any structures within a 100-year flood hazard area. No 100-year flood
hazard is anticipated and this issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
i)
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
No Impact. The project site is not located within a dam inundation area according to the County of
Riverside General Plan Figure S-10, Dam Failure Inundation Zones. There are no large water bodies near the
project site that would cause a flooding impact, and no impacts due to failure of a levee or dam is anticipated.
August 2015
Page 39
The water feature at the Menifee Lakes development on the north side of the project site is significantly
lower in elevation, and would not pose a threat of flooding. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
j)
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Less Than Significant Impact. Seiche: A seiche is a surface wave created when a body of water is shaken,
usually by earthquake activity. Seiches are of concern relative to water storage facilities because inundation
from a seiche can occur if the wave overflows a containment wall, such as the wall of a reservoir, water
storage tank, dam or other artificial body of water. There is no large open water source that could cause a
severe inundation impact on project site. The water feature at the Menifee Lakes development on the north
side of the project site is significantly lower in elevation, and would not pose a threat of inundation by seiche.
Therefore, no seiche impact is anticipated and this issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
Tsunami: The project site is approximately 31 miles inland from the nearest coastline of the Pacific Ocean,
and no tsunami impact is anticipated. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
Mudflow: Mudflows are rivers of rocks, earth, and other debris saturated with water. The project site is not
identified as having potentially significant landslide potential (Menifee General Plan 2014; Morton et al. 2003).
The required compliance with the CBC standards would ensure that the impact due to mudflow onsite is less
than significant. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
3.12 LAND USE AND PLANNING
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The project site is partially developed and no physical division of an established community
would occur due to project implementation. No impact is anticipated and this issue will not be addressed in
the EIR.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction
over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
No Impact. The City of Menifee recognizes the specific use of the project site for a college. The project site
is located in a specific plan area of the City of Menifee, known as the Menifee Village Specific Plan, and is
designated for a college. The project site is designated in the City of Menifee Zoning Map as SP Zone.
Therefore, the development project does not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation
of an agency with jurisdiction over the project. This issue will not be evaluated further in the EIR.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?
No Impact. The project site is not located within an area proposed for conservation under a Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The project site is also not within or subject to other approved
local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans. This issue will not be evaluated further in the EIR.
Page 40
PlaceWorks
3.13 MINERAL RESOURCES
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region
and the residents of the state?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is classified as Mineral Resources Zone (MRZ) 3 by the
Riverside County Mineral Resources map (Riverside County). MRZ-3 represents areas where the available
geologic information indicates that mineral deposits are likely to exist, however, the significance of the
deposit is undetermined. The project site and surrounding areas have not been used for mineral resources
extraction, and due to the developed nature of the project site and its surroundings, future mineral resources
extraction operations are unlikely. Development of the proposed project would not result in the loss of
availability of any known mineral resources. No significant impact is anticipated and this issue will not be
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Less Than Significant Impact. See Section 3.11 (a). This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
3.14 NOISE
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would involve elevated short-term noise impacts
related to the operation of construction equipment, and long-term impacts related to various events to be
accommodated by the proposed project. The EIR will measure and analyze the existing noise environment
and will provide estimated future noise levels based on these measurements and expected activities. This issue
will be addressed in the EIR.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise
levels?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is generally level and relatively little earthwork would be
required. Minimal groundborne vibrations may be created during project construction, however, no blasting,
pile driving, or hard rock ripping are anticipated to be required for the development. No excessive
groundborne vibrations or noise are anticipated as a result of the proposed project’s operation. Although no
excessive groundbourne vibration is anticipated, considering the proximity to the sensitive uses, further
discussion of this issue will be included in the EIR.
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would involve elevated short-term noise impacts
related to the operation of construction equipment. The proposed development’s operation may also lead to
August 2015
Page 41
a permanent increase in ambient noise levels due to increased traffic and sporting event activities. The EIR
will measure and analyze the existing noise environment and will provide estimated future noise levels based
on these measurements and expected activities. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project could lead to short-term increases in ambient noise
levels resulting from construction activities. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan. The nearest airport, French Valley
Airport, is approximately 7.2 miles south. No impacts related to airport noise would result from the proposed
project. This issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The proposed project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not result in
excessive noise levels related to an airstrip/airport. The nearest private airstrip, Pines Airpark, is
approximately 3.6 miles southeast. No impacts related to airport noise would result from the proposed
project. This issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
3.15 POPULATION AND HOUSING
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
No Impact. The proposed project would not induce population growth either directly or indirectly. The
project would not develop housing or businesses and would not extend roads or other infrastructure. No
impacts would occur and this issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
No Impact. The project site is already partially developed as a college campus and no existing housing would
be displaced as a result of the proposed project. No impact would occur and this issue will not be reviewed
further in the EIR.
Page 42
PlaceWorks
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
No Impact. The project site is an existing college campus and there are no inhabitants onsite. Therefore, the
proposed development would not displace people and would not require the building of replacement
housing. No impacts would occur and this issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
3.16 PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is served by the Riverside County Fire Department/CAL
FIRE. The number of events to be accommodated by the proposed athletic facility and the additional trips
associated with the events would result in additional fire protection services demands. The EIR will address
the need for fire services, including the potential effects upon response times, personnel, equipment, and
facilities.
b) Police protection?
Potentially Significant Impact. Police service needs are related to the size of the population and
geographic area served, the number and types of calls for service and other community characteristics. The
Mt. San Jacinto College Police Department provides police protection services to the project site. The City of
Menifee Police Department, under contract from the Riverside County Sheriff ’s Department, provides police
protection services to the site vicinity. The project would not result in an increase in area population or
additional students attending the Menifee Valley Campus. However, the proposed new athletic facilities would
enable the college to facilitate major athletic events resulting in large groups of spectators visiting the campus
and increasing traffic congestion before and after these events on local streets and in front of the college.
This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
c) Schools?
No Impact. The proposed project would not increase the demand for public schools and would not require
construction of new or expanded school facilities. The proposed project would provide additional facilities at
the existing college campus. No impact would occur and this issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
d) Parks?
No Impact. The proposed project would serve the existing College District population and programs.
Typically, the demand for parks is created by the development of new housing and/or actions that generate
additional population. The proposed project would serve an existing student population within the College
August 2015
Page 43
District boundaries and would not induce growth or influence housing in the area. No impacts to parks
would occur and this issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
e) Other public facilities?
No Impact. Demands for other public facilities such as libraries are determined by the population of the
facilities’ service areas. The proposed project is not a growth inducing project and no additional services
demands would be created. In addition, the college would have its own resources to serve the student
population. This issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
3.17 RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or
be accelerated?
No Impact. Project development is not anticipated to lead to an increase in demand for neighborhood or
regional parks. The demand for parks is more closely related to changes in housing and population. The
construction of college facilities are generally associated with the demand created by changes in housing and
population, and do not create the demand. Additionally, project development would include the construction
of facilities that could be used for community recreational purposes. Since the proposed project would not
have a significant impact on population or housing, and would be equipped with adequate on-site recreational
facilities for students, no significant impacts to parks or other recreational facilities are anticipated.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is already developed as a college and the proposed project
would serve the existing College District population. The proposed project would include the construction of
on-site recreational facilities, including a lighted athletic field complex, creating new parking facilities, and new
classroom buildings. Additional structures will include ticket booths, concession stands, restrooms, storage,
and team rooms. The demand for recreational facilities created by the proposed project would be satisfied by
the existing on-site facilities and would not require the construction, expansion, or use of any off-site
recreational facilities. The impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed
recreational facilities would be related to other topics that will be addressed in the EIR. Therefore, this issue
will be addressed through EIR specific topics identified in this document, such as noise, air quality, traffic,
and others that will be carried forward into the EIR.
3.18 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for
the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation
including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation
Page 44
PlaceWorks
system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian
and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project may result in an increase in traffic and pedestrian
activities on the streets in the vicinity of the site before and after athletic events, or other heavily attended
school functions. A traffic study will be prepared to discuss the existing traffic conditions consistent with the
City of Menifee adopted traffic impact guidelines and evaluate traffic conditions with cumulative projects
with and without project-related traffic. The traffic analysis will focus on major roadways and intersections
adjacent to the proposed boundaries of the project site. The EIR will include the traffic study methodology
and conclusions from the project-specific traffic study and provide mitigation measures as appropriate This
issue will be addressed in the EIR.
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level
of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
Potentially Significant Impact. See above Section 3.16 (a).
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change
in location that results in substantial safety risks?
No Impact. The nearest airport is the French Valley Airport, approximately 7.2 miles south of the campus.
Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns. No impact is anticipated
and this issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in increased levels of traffic, number of
pedestrians and bicycles, and vehicular turning movements at the school entrances and at the nearby
intersections, therefore increase the potential for traffic conflicts and accidents. This issue will be addressed in
the EIR.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase the number of vehicle trips and
pedestrian activities onsite. Onsite emergency access features will be discussed further in the EIR.
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian
facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would be consistent with policies supporting
alternative transportation because bike racks are provided on the campus and the area is served by public
August 2015
Page 45
transit. The proposed project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
alternative transportation. This issue will not be reviewed further in the EIR.
g) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
Potentially Significant Impact. A parking analysis will be prepared comparing the number of parking
spaces provided and parking demand based on school enrollment and attendance at special events. This issue
will be addressed further in the EIR.
3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
a) Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is in the jurisdiction of Santa Ana Regional Water Quality
Control Board (Region 8). The wastewater treatment and collection for the project site is provided by Eastern
Municipal Water District (EMWD). The EIR will quantify the wastewater demands generated by the
proposed project and discuss the wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB. This issue
will be addressed in the EIR.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or waste water treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
Potentially Significant Impact. EMWD provides both water and wastewater services to the project site.
The proposed project would consume additional water and generate more wastewater than the existing
conditions. The EIR will quantify the additional water and wastewater demands and address the need for
facilities expansion. This issue will be examined further in the EIR.
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is partially developed with the existing campus and
undeveloped areas are characterized by various plant communities. The proposed project would convert some
of the project site to impervious surfaces with buildings, walkways, parking, etc., therefore change the onsite
drainage pattern and runoff volumes. This issue will be addressed in the EIR.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is currently partially developed and the proposed project
would change the amount of water consumed by the project site. The EIR will quantify the amount of water
that would be consumed by the proposed project compared to the existing conditions. As necessary, the EIR
will evaluate and discuss the need for and impacts associated with new or expanded water entitlements. This
issue will be addressed in the EIR.
Page 46
PlaceWorks
e) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
Potentially Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would change the waste water
services demands generated at the project site. EMWD’s existing capacity would be identified and the
proposed increase in sewer demands would be provided, compared to the existing conditions. This issue will
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid
waste disposal needs?
Less Than Significant Impact. Trash hauling and recycling services for residential and commercial
properties within the City of Menifee are provided by private firms operating under contract. The City of
Menifee, including the project site, is served by Waste Management of the Inland Empire (WM). Solid wastes
are taken to El Sobrante Landfill, located in the City of Corona, a state-of-the-art disposal facility with a
capacity to process up to 10,000 tons of waste per day (WM 2014). It processes approximately 43 percent of
Riverside County’s annual waste (WM 2014). The estimated closure date for this landfill is January 2045 and
has maximum permitted throughput of approximately 16,000 tons per day. At full build out, an additional
6,597 part-time or 4,398 full-time equivalent students to be served by an additional 107 faculty and staff. As
shown in Table 3-1, the proposed project would generate approximately 2,306 lb/day or 422 tons per year,
adding approximately 0.012 percent of waste flow to El Sobrante’s daily waste processing amount. Therefore,
there is sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project’s solid waste disposal needs and
impacts would not be significant. This issue will not be addressed in the EIR.
Table 3-1
Estimated Solid Waste Disposal for the Proposed Project
Land Use
Education Facilities
Educational institutions
Total
1
2
Amount
2
4,398 students
163 staff
Estimated Rate1
Pounds per Day (tons)
Tons per Year
0.5 lb/st/day
0.12 ton/emp/yr
2,199 (1.10)
107 (0.05)
2,306 (1.15)
402
20
422
CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates for Institutions. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastechar/WasteGenRates/Institution.htm
15,000 part-time or 10,000 full-time equivalent students
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less Than Significant Impact. The following federal and state laws and regulations govern solid waste
disposal. The EPA administers the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and the Solid Waste
Disposal Act of 1965, which govern solid waste disposal. In the State of California, AB 939 (Integrated Solid
Waste Management Act of 1989; Public Resources Code 40050 et seq.) required every California city and
county to divert 50 percent of its waste from landfills by the year 2000 by such means as recycling, source
reduction, and composting. In addition, AB 939 requires each county to prepare a countywide siting element
specifying areas for transformation or disposal sites to provide capacity for solid waste generated in the
county that cannot be reduced or recycled for a 15-year period. AB 1327, the California Solid Waste Reuse
and Recycling Access Act of 1991, requires local agencies to adopt ordinances mandating the use of
August 2015
Page 47
recyclable materials in development projects. The project would comply with all laws and regulations
governing solid waste, including those listed above.
Participation in various recycling and waste diversion programs would reduce solid waste generated from the
proposed project and assist in compliance with AB 939. The proposed project is required to deposit all solid
waste at a permitted solid waste facility and, therefore, will comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and this issue will not be
examined further in the EIR.
3.20 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
Potentially Significant Impact. The project site contains vacant land, which may contain special status
plant and animal species. Impacts to biological resources will be addressed in the EIR. The project site is not
known to contain any important examples of cultural resources. However, because the project involves
grading and previously unidentified cultural resources could be unearthed during excavation, these issues will
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects.)
Potentially Significant Impact. As discussed in Chapter 3 of this Initial Study, development and operation
of the proposed project could potentially result in significant impacts in the areas of aesthetics, air quality,
biological resources, cultural resources, paleontological resources, tribal cultural resources, greenhouse gas
emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities
and service systems. These impacts could be individually limited or cumulatively considerable. The EIR will
address cumulative impacts related to the proposed project.
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Potentially Significant Impact. As discussed in Chapter 3 of this Initial Study, development and operation
of the proposed project could potentially result in significant impacts in the areas of aesthetics, air quality,
biological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services,
transportation/traffic, and utilities and service systems. These impacts could cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly, or indirectly. The EIR will address potential adverse impacts related to the
proposed project.
Page 48
PlaceWorks
4. References
4.1
PRINTED REFERENCES
County of Riverside, 2005. Specific Plan No. 158, Amendment No. 5, Menifee Village Specific Plan.
Lofgren, B. E., 1971. Estimated subsidence in the Chino-Riverside-Bunker Hill-Yucaipa areas in southern
California for a postulated water level lowering, 1965-2015: United States Geological Survey Water
Resources Division Open-File Report 71C.
Morton, D. M., 2004. Preliminary geologic map of the Santa Ana 10’ X 30’ quadrangle, southern California,
United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-172, scale 1:100,000.
Morton, D. M., R. M. Alvarez and R. H. Campbell, 2003. Plate 5. Soil-Slip Susceptibility Map for the Santa
Ana 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, Southern California in Preliminary Soil-Slip Susceptibility Maps,
Southwestern California, United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-17, scale 1:100,000.
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District/Western Municipal Water District (SBVMWD/WMWD),
2008. Spring 2008 Cooperative Well Measuring Program Covering the Upper Santa Ana River
Watershed, San Jacinto Watershed and Santa Margarita Watershed.
United States Geological Survey, 2015. 7.5-minute Topographic Series, Romoland, California Quadrangle
Map, scale 1:24,000.
4.2
PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
Department of Conservation (DOC). 2009, January 12. Email communication with Patrick Hennessy,
Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program.
4.3
WEB SITES
California Department of Conservation (DOC), 1997. Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model website,
located at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dlrp/Pages/qh_lesa.aspx.
---------------, 2009.
---------------, 2015. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program website, located at
http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/FMMP/Pages/Index.aspx.
City of Menifee, 2014. General Plan, located at http://www.cityofmenifee.us/221/General-Plan.
August 2015
Page 49
4. References
County of Riverside, 2008. Riverside County General Plan 2008, located at
http://planning.rctlma.org/ZoningInformation/GeneralPlan/RiversideCountyGeneralPlan2008.asp
x.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2015. http://water.epa.gov/type/wetlands/.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2015. Flood Map Service Center, located at
http://msc.fema.gov/portal.
Page 50
PlaceWorks
5. List of Preparers
LEAD AGENCY
Mt. San Jacinto Community College
Contact: Becky Elam,
Vice President of Business Services
PLACEWORKS
Dwayne Mears, AICP
Principal, Environmental Services
Peter Garcia
Project Manager
Michael Watson, PG
Associate Geologist
Cary Nakama
Graphic Artist
August 2015
Page 51
5. List of Preparers
Page 52
PlaceWorks
Appendix
Appendix A
August 2015
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
Report
PlaceWorks
Appendix
August 2015
PlaceWorks
Menifee Valley Campus
28237 La Piedra Rd
Menifee, CA 92584
Inquiry Number: 4333215.2s
June 22, 2015
The EDR Radius Map™ Report
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBF-KKT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary
4
Map Findings
8
Orphan Summary
22
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
GeoCheck - Not Requested
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC4333215.2s Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
28237 LA PIEDRA RD
MENIFEE, CA 92584
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
33.6748000 - 33˚ 40’ 29.28’’
117.1668000 - 117˚ 10’ 0.48’’
Zone 11
484537.6
3725918.5
1433 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision:
33117-F2 ROMOLAND, CA
1979
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from:
Source:
20120519
USDA
TC4333215.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
28237 LA PIEDRA RD
MENIFEE, CA 92584
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID
SITE NAME
ADDRESS
DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE
ELEVATION
DIST (ft. & mi.)
DIRECTION
A1
MT SAN JACINTO COMMU
28237 LA PIEDRA
FINDS
TP
A2
28237 LA PIEDRA RD
HAZNET
TP
A3
MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPU
28237 LA PIEDRA ROAD
NPDES
TP
A4
28237 LA PIEDRA
RCRA-CESQG
TP
B5
REPLANET LLC
30125 ANTELOPE RD
SWRCY
Lower
2126, 0.403, North
B6
SHELL SERVICE STATIO
30107 ANTELOPE RD
FINDS, LUST
Lower
2375, 0.450, North
4333215.2s Page 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this
property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:
Site
Database(s)
28237 LA PIEDRA
MENIFEE, CA 92584
FINDS
28237 LA PIEDRA RD
MENIFEE, CA 92584
HAZNET
MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPU
MENIFEE, CA 92584
NPDES
28237 LA PIEDRA
MENIFEE, CA 92584
RCRA-CESQG
EPA ID
N/A
Registry ID:: 110021010216
N/A
GEPAID: CAL000215453
N/A
Facility Status: Active
CAL000215453
EPA ID:: CAL000215453
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL
Proposed NPL
NPL LIENS
National Priority List
Proposed National Priority List Sites
Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL
National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
CERCLIS
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FEDERAL FACILITY
Federal Facility Site Information listing
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List
CERC-NFRAP
CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS
Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF
RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG
RCRA-SQG
RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
US ENG CONTROLS
US INST CONTROL
LUCIS
Engineering Controls Sites List
Sites with Institutional Controls
Land Use Control Information System
Federal ERNS list
ERNS
Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE
State Response Sites
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVIROSTOR
EnviroStor Database
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF
Solid Waste Information System
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
SLIC
INDIAN LUST
Statewide SLIC Cases
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST
AST
INDIAN UST
FEMA UST
Active UST Facilities
Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Underground Storage Tank Listing
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP
Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
VCP
Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
DEBRIS REGION 9
ODI
HAULERS
INDIAN ODI
WMUDS/SWAT
Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
Open Dump Inventory
Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Waste Management Unit Database
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US CDL
HIST Cal-Sites
SCH
Toxic Pits
CDL
US HIST CDL
Clandestine Drug Labs
Historical Calsites Database
School Property Evaluation Program
Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
Clandestine Drug Labs
National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
CA FID UST
HIST UST
SWEEPS UST
Facility Inventory Database
Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database
SWEEPS UST Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
LIENS
DEED
CERCLA Lien Information
Environmental Liens Listing
Deed Restriction Listing
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
CHMIRS
LDS
MCS
SPILLS 90
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
California Hazardous Material Incident Report System
Land Disposal Sites Listing
Military Cleanup Sites Listing
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
DOT OPS
DOD
FUDS
CONSENT
ROD
UMTRA
RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
Incident and Accident Data
Department of Defense Sites
Formerly Used Defense Sites
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Records Of Decision
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US MINES
TRIS
TSCA
FTTS
HIST FTTS
SSTS
ICIS
PADS
MLTS
RADINFO
RAATS
RMP
CA BOND EXP. PLAN
UIC
Cortese
HIST CORTESE
CUPA Listings
Notify 65
DRYCLEANERS
WIP
ENF
EMI
INDIAN RESERV
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
WDS
Financial Assurance
PROC
HWT
HWP
MWMP
LEAD SMELTERS
US AIRS
EPA WATCH LIST
US FIN ASSUR
COAL ASH EPA
PCB TRANSFORMER
COAL ASH DOE
2020 COR ACTION
PRP
Mines Master Index File
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Substances Control Act
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
Section 7 Tracking Systems
Integrated Compliance Information System
PCB Activity Database System
Material Licensing Tracking System
Radiation Information Database
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
Risk Management Plans
Bond Expenditure Plan
UIC Listing
"Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List
Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List
CUPA Resources List
Proposition 65 Records
Cleaner Facilities
Well Investigation Program Case List
Enforcement Action Listing
Emissions Inventory Data
Indian Reservations
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
Waste Discharge System
Financial Assurance Information Listing
Certified Processors Database
Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
Medical Waste Management Program Listing
Lead Smelter Sites
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
EPA WATCH LIST
Financial Assurance Information
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB Transformer Registration Database
Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
2020 Corrective Action Program List
Potentially Responsible Parties
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP
EDR US Hist Auto Stat
EDR US Hist Cleaners
EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LUST
Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RGA LF
Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported
leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking
Underground Storage Tank Information System.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/13/2015 has revealed that there is 1 LUST
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation
____________________
SHELL SERVICE STATIO
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: 200723498
Global Id: T0606519229
Facility Status: 9
Address
________
30107 ANTELOPE RD
Direction
/ Distance
___________________
Map
_____ID
Page
_____
N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.450 mi.)
B6
14
SWRCY: A listing of recycling facilities in California.
A review of the SWRCY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/16/2015 has revealed that there is 1
SWRCY site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation
____________________
REPLANET LLC
Cert Id: RC156255.001
Address
________
30125 ANTELOPE RD
Direction
/ Distance
___________________
Map
_____ID
Page
_____
N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.403 mi.)
B5
14
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
115 kV
EDR Inc.
EDR Inc.
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Distance
(Miles)
Target
Property
>1
Total
Plotted
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
0
0
0
0
0
NR
0
0
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
0.500
0.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
1
0.500
0.500
0.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
NPL
Proposed NPL
NPL LIENS
1.000
1.000
0.001
Delisted NPL
CERCLIS
FEDERAL FACILITY
CERC-NFRAP
0.500
CORRACTS
1.000
RCRA-TSDF
0.500
RCRA-LQG
RCRA-SQG
RCRA-CESQG
0.250
0.250
0.250
1
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
US ENG CONTROLS
US INST CONTROL
LUCIS
Federal ERNS list
ERNS
RESPONSE
1.000
ENVIROSTOR
1.000
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF
0.500
LUST
0.500
TC4333215.2s Page 4
Database
Search
Distance
(Miles)
SLIC
INDIAN LUST
0.500
0.500
Target
Property
>1
Total
Plotted
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
0
0
0
0
1
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.250
0.250
0.250
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0.001
0.001
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
UST
AST
INDIAN UST
FEMA UST
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.250
INDIAN VCP
VCP
0.500
0.500
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
DEBRIS REGION 9
ODI
SWRCY
HAULERS
INDIAN ODI
WMUDS/SWAT
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.001
0.500
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US CDL
HIST Cal-Sites
SCH
Toxic Pits
CDL
US HIST CDL
0.001
1.000
0.250
1.000
0.001
0.001
CA FID UST
HIST UST
SWEEPS UST
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
LIENS
DEED
HMIRS
CHMIRS
LDS
0.001
0.001
0.001
TC4333215.2s Page 5
Database
Search
Distance
(Miles)
MCS
SPILLS 90
0.001
0.001
Target
Property
>1
Total
Plotted
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
0
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RCRA NonGen / NLR
DOT OPS
DOD
FUDS
CONSENT
ROD
UMTRA
US MINES
TRIS
TSCA
FTTS
HIST FTTS
SSTS
ICIS
PADS
MLTS
RADINFO
FINDS
RAATS
RMP
CA BOND EXP. PLAN
NPDES
UIC
Cortese
HIST CORTESE
CUPA Listings
Notify 65
DRYCLEANERS
WIP
ENF
HAZNET
EMI
INDIAN RESERV
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
WDS
Financial Assurance
PROC
HWT
HWP
MWMP
LEAD SMELTERS
US AIRS
EPA WATCH LIST
US FIN ASSUR
COAL ASH EPA
PCB TRANSFORMER
COAL ASH DOE
0.250
0.001
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.500
0.250
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
1.000
0.001
0.001
0.500
0.500
0.250
1.000
0.250
0.250
0.001
0.001
0.001
1.000
0.500
0.001
0.001
0.500
0.250
1.000
0.250
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.500
0.001
0.001
1
1
1
TC4333215.2s Page 6
Database
Search
Distance
(Miles)
2020 COR ACTION
PRP
0.250
0.001
Target
Property
>1
Total
Plotted
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
6
EDR MGP
EDR US Hist Auto Stat
EDR US Hist Cleaners
1.000
0.250
0.250
RGA LUST
RGA LF
- Totals --
0.001
0.001
4
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC4333215.2s Page 7
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
A1
Target
Property
MT SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIST
28237 LA PIEDRA
MENIFEE, CA 92584
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
FINDS
1008231349
N/A
HAZNET
S113109121
N/A
Site 1 of 4 in cluster A
Actual:
1433 ft.
FINDS:
Registry ID:
110021010216
Environmental Interest/Information System
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of
events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,
and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA
program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and
corrective action activities required under RCRA.
HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER
A2
Target
Property
MT SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
28237 LA PIEDRA RD
MENIFEE, CA 92584
Actual:
1433 ft.
HAZNET:
envid:
Year:
GEPAID:
Contact:
Telephone:
Mailing Name:
Mailing Address:
Mailing City,St,Zip:
Gen County:
TSD EPA ID:
TSD County:
Waste Category:
Disposal Method:
Tons:
Facility County:
envid:
Year:
GEPAID:
Contact:
Telephone:
Mailing Name:
Mailing Address:
Gen County:
TSD EPA ID:
TSD County:
Waste Category:
Disposal Method:
Tons:
Facility County:
S113109121
2013
CAL000215453
BRIAN TWITTY
9514873103
Not reported
1499 N STATE ST
SAN JACINTO, CA 925830000
Riverside
CAD008252405
Los Angeles
Not reported
Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another Site
0.055
Not reported
S113109121
2013
CAL000215453
BRIAN TWITTY
9514873103
Not reported
1499 N STATE ST
Riverside
CAT080013352
Los Angeles
Not reported
Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration,
Organics Recovery Ect
1.26
Not reported
TC4333215.2s Page 8
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
MT SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT (Continued)
envid:
Year:
GEPAID:
Contact:
Telephone:
Mailing Name:
Mailing Address:
Gen County:
TSD EPA ID:
TSD County:
Waste Category:
Disposal Method:
Tons:
Facility County:
envid:
Year:
GEPAID:
Contact:
Telephone:
Mailing Name:
Mailing Address:
Gen County:
TSD EPA ID:
TSD County:
Waste Category:
Disposal Method:
Tons:
Facility County:
envid:
Year:
GEPAID:
Contact:
Telephone:
Mailing Name:
Mailing Address:
Gen County:
TSD EPA ID:
TSD County:
Waste Category:
Disposal Method:
Tons:
Facility County:
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
S113109121
S113109121
2012
CAL000215453
BRIAN TWITTY
9514873103
Not reported
1499 N STATE ST
Riverside
CAD982444481
San Bernardino
Not reported
Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/Reovery
(H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
0.2
Riverside
S113109121
2012
CAL000215453
BRIAN TWITTY
9514873103
Not reported
1499 N STATE ST
Riverside
CAD982444481
San Bernardino
Not reported
(H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
0.2
Riverside
S113109121
2012
CAL000215453
BRIAN TWITTY
9514873103
Not reported
1499 N STATE ST
Riverside
CAD982444481
San Bernardino
Not reported
(H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
3.7264
Riverside
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
55 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report.
TC4333215.2s Page 9
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
A3
Target
Property
MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS
MENIFEE, CA 92584
Database(s)
NPDES
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
S108751481
N/A
Actual:
1433 ft.
NPDES:
Npdes Number:
Facility Status:
Agency Id:
Region:
Regulatory Measure Id:
Order No:
Regulatory Measure Type:
Place Id:
WDID:
Program Type:
Adoption Date Of Regulatory Measure:
Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure:
Expiration Date Of Regulatory Measure:
Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure:
Discharge Name:
Discharge Address:
Discharge City:
Discharge State:
Discharge Zip:
RECEIVED DATE:
PROCESSED DATE:
STATUS CODE NAME:
STATUS DATE:
PLACE SIZE:
PLACE SIZE UNIT:
FACILITY CONTACT NAME:
FACILITY CONTACT TITLE:
FACILITY CONTACT PHONE:
FACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT:
FACILITY CONTACT EMAIL:
OPERATOR NAME:
OPERATOR ADDRESS:
OPERATOR CITY:
OPERATOR STATE:
OPERATOR ZIP:
OPERATOR CONTACT NAME:
OPERATOR CONTACT TITLE:
OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE:
OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT:
OPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL:
OPERATOR TYPE:
DEVELOPER NAME:
DEVELOPER ADDRESS:
DEVELOPER CITY:
DEVELOPER STATE:
DEVELOPER ZIP:
DEVELOPER CONTACT NAME:
DEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE:
CONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND:
EMERGENCY PHONE NO:
EMERGENCY PHONE EXT:
CONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND:
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
8
417589
Not reported
Construction
Not reported
8 33C362195
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
10/10/2011
10/14/2011
Active
10/14/2011
1.6
Acres
Larry Dockins
Project Superintendent
951-672-3836
Not reported
[email protected]
Mt San Jacinto Community College District
1499 No State Street
San Jacinto
California
92583
Becky Elam
Vice President Business Serv
951-487-3100
Not reported
[email protected]
Other
Heartland Grading
3146 Tiger Run Court Suite 116
Carlsbad
California
92010
Robert Vlach
President
N
909-322-9313
Not reported
Not reported
TC4333215.2s Page 10
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS (Continued)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
S108751481
CONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND:
CONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND:
CONSTYPE COMM LINE IND:
CONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND:
CONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND:
CONSTYPE GAS LINE IND:
CONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND:
CONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION:
CONSTYPE OTHER IND:
CONSTYPE RECONS IND:
CONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND:
CONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND:
CONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION:
CONSTYPE UTILITY IND:
CONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND:
DIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND:
RECEIVING WATER NAME:
CERTIFIER NAME:
CERTIFIER TITLE:
CERTIFICATION DATE:
PRIMARY SIC:
SECONDARY SIC:
TERTIARY SIC:
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Educational/Institutional (Community College)
Y
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Y
Not reported
Becky Elam
Not reported
10-OCT-11
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Npdes Number:
Facility Status:
Agency Id:
Region:
Regulatory Measure Id:
Order No:
Regulatory Measure Type:
Place Id:
WDID:
Program Type:
Adoption Date Of Regulatory Measure:
Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure:
Expiration Date Of Regulatory Measure:
Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure:
Discharge Name:
Discharge Address:
Discharge City:
Discharge State:
Discharge Zip:
RECEIVED DATE:
PROCESSED DATE:
STATUS CODE NAME:
STATUS DATE:
PLACE SIZE:
PLACE SIZE UNIT:
FACILITY CONTACT NAME:
FACILITY CONTACT TITLE:
FACILITY CONTACT PHONE:
FACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT:
FACILITY CONTACT EMAIL:
OPERATOR NAME:
OPERATOR ADDRESS:
OPERATOR CITY:
CAS000002
Active
0
8
417589
2009-0009-DWQ
Enrollee
Not reported
8 33C362195
Construction
Not reported
10/14/2011
Not reported
Not reported
Mt San Jacinto Community College District
1499 No State Street
San Jacinto
California
92583
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
TC4333215.2s Page 11
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS (Continued)
OPERATOR STATE:
OPERATOR ZIP:
OPERATOR CONTACT NAME:
OPERATOR CONTACT TITLE:
OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE:
OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT:
OPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL:
OPERATOR TYPE:
DEVELOPER NAME:
DEVELOPER ADDRESS:
DEVELOPER CITY:
DEVELOPER STATE:
DEVELOPER ZIP:
DEVELOPER CONTACT NAME:
DEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE:
CONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND:
EMERGENCY PHONE NO:
EMERGENCY PHONE EXT:
CONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND:
CONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND:
CONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND:
CONSTYPE COMM LINE IND:
CONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND:
CONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND:
CONSTYPE GAS LINE IND:
CONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND:
CONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION:
CONSTYPE OTHER IND:
CONSTYPE RECONS IND:
CONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND:
CONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND:
CONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION:
CONSTYPE UTILITY IND:
CONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND:
DIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND:
RECEIVING WATER NAME:
CERTIFIER NAME:
CERTIFIER TITLE:
CERTIFICATION DATE:
PRIMARY SIC:
SECONDARY SIC:
TERTIARY SIC:
A4
Target
Property
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
S108751481
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
28237 LA PIEDRA
MENIFEE, CA 92584
RCRA-CESQG
1008194611
CAL000215453
Actual:
1433 ft.
RCRA-CESQG:
Date form received by agency: 06/08/2004
Facility name:
Facility address:
28237 LA PIEDRA
MENIFEE, CA 92584
EPA ID:
CAL000215453
Mailing address:
1499 N STATE ST
Contact:
BARBARA J OBERG
TC4333215.2s Page 12
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
MT SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIST (Continued)
Contact address:
Contact country:
Contact telephone:
Telephone ext.:
Contact email:
EPA Region:
Classification:
Description:
Owner/Operator Summary:
Owner/operator name:
Owner/operator address:
Owner/operator country:
Owner/operator telephone:
Legal status:
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Op start date:
Owner/Op end date:
Owner/operator name:
Owner/operator address:
Owner/operator country:
Owner/operator telephone:
Legal status:
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Op start date:
Owner/Op end date:
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
1008194611
Not reported
Not reported
US
(909) 487-6752
1201
[email protected]
09
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar
month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;
or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar
month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous
waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or
other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any
land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less
of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting
from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any
time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of
any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from
the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
hazardous waste
1499 N STATE ST
US
Not reported
District
Owner
05/22/1989
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
US
Not reported
District
Operator
01/13/1993
Not reported
Handler Activities Summary:
U.S. importer of hazardous waste:
Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
Recycler of hazardous waste:
Transporter of hazardous waste:
Treater, storer or disposer of HW:
Underground injection activity:
On-site burner exemption:
Furnace exemption:
Used oil fuel burner:
Used oil processor:
User oil refiner:
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
TC4333215.2s Page 13
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
MT SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIST (Continued)
Used oil fuel marketer to burner:
Used oil Specification marketer:
Used oil transfer facility:
Used oil transporter:
B5
North
1/4-1/2
0.403 mi.
2126 ft.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
1427 ft.
B6
North
1/4-1/2
0.450 mi.
2375 ft.
Relative:
Lower
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
1008194611
No
No
No
No
. Waste code:
. Waste name:
D005
BARIUM
. Waste code:
. Waste name:
D008
LEAD
Violation Status:
No violations found
REPLANET LLC
30125 ANTELOPE RD
MENIFEE, CA 92584
SWRCY
S107138079
N/A
FINDS
LUST
1007738672
N/A
Site 1 of 2 in cluster B
SWRCY:
Reg Id:
Cert Id:
Mailing Address:
Mailing City:
Mailing State:
Mailing Zip Code:
Website:
Email:
Phone Number:
Grand Father:
Rural:
Operation Begin Date:
Aluminium:
Glass:
Plastic:
Bimetal:
Agency:
Monday Hours Of Operation:
Tuesday Hours Of Operation:
Wednesday Hours Of Operation:
Thursday Hours Of Operation:
Friday Hours Of Operation:
Saturday Hours Of Operation:
Sunday Hours Of Operation:
Organization ID:
Organization Name:
156255
RC156255.001
800 N Haven Ave Suite 120
Ontario
CA
91764
http://www.replanetusa.com
[email protected]
(951) 520-1700
N
Y
05/01/2012
Y
Y
Y
Y
N/A
9:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm
9:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm
9:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm
9:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm
9:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm
9:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm
9:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm
151891
rePLANET LLC
SHELL SERVICE STATION
30107 ANTELOPE RD
MENIFEE, CA 92584
Site 2 of 2 in cluster B
FINDS:
Registry ID:
110018987480
Actual:
1427 ft.
TC4333215.2s Page 14
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
1007738672
Environmental Interest/Information System
California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART)
provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for
generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities.
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of
events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,
and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA
program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and
corrective action activities required under RCRA.
LUST:
Region:
Global Id:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Case Type:
Status:
Status Date:
Lead Agency:
Case Worker:
Local Agency:
RB Case Number:
LOC Case Number:
File Location:
Potential Media Affect:
Potential Contaminants of Concern:
Site History:
STATE
T0606519229
33.6844964976068
-117.167730331421
LUST Cleanup Site
Completed - Case Closed
02/17/2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOP
SCB
Not reported
200723498
Local Agency Warehouse
Aquifer used for drinking water supply, Soil
Gasoline
Release discovery: April 2007 - A Phase II Divestment Assessment was
conducted. Seven soil borings (B01 through B07) were drilled to 50
feet below grade. Concentrations up to 8.3 ppm TBA (B03@35) and 0.43
ppm MTBE (B01@50) were detected. The site was entered into LOP. A
passing ELD UST test was conducted 1/28/06 and subsequent UST testing
passed - UST system was considered tight. Assessment: July 2007 Four soil borings (B-8 through B-11) and one soil vapor extraction
(VE-1) well were completed. Groundwater (GW) was encountered at 90 ft
below grade. A GW grab sample from boring B11 detected 0.55 ppb
toluene and 1.9 ppb MTBE. Soil samples detected up to 440 ppb TPHg
(VE-1-15ft), 180,000 ppb TPHd (B-9-80ft), 440 ppb MTBE (B-10-50ft),
and 2,900 ppb TBA (VE-1-30ft). All other constituents were below the
detection limits. November 2007 - Three GW monitoring wells (MW-1
through MW-3) were installed. GW stabilized at a depth of 87-88 ft
below grade with a flow direction to the northeast at 0.02 ft/ft.
Contaminants were not detected in the GW, however, none of the wells
were positioned downgradient of the source area. Soil samples
detected up to 89,000 ppb TPHd (MW-3-95ft), 240 ppb MTBE (MW-2-55ft),
and 410 ppb TBA (MW-2-30ft). April 2008 - Two additional GW
monitoring wells (MW-4 & MW-5) and two additional SVE wells (VE-2 &
VE-3) were installed. Contaminants were not detected in the GW. Soil
samples detected concentrations up to 5,300,000 ppb TPHd (MW-5-10ft),
8,600 ppb TPHg (MW-5-10ft), 7,800 ppb X (MW-5-10ft), 450 ppb MTBE
(MW-5-10ft), and 130 ppb TBA (MW-5-10ft). The 5-ft and 15- to 105-ft
samples in this same boring (MW-5) were all ND. SVE Testing: May 2008
- A 22.5-hour SVE test was conducted using VE-2 for extraction.
Maximum vapor concentrations were: 7.3 ppmV TPHg, ND<15 ppbV BTXE,
TC4333215.2s Page 15
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
1007738672
1400 ppbV MTBE (at end of test), and 8.7 ppbV TBA. Approximately 21.7
lb hydrocarbon vapor and 0.05 lb MTBE were removed during the 22.5-hr
test. October 2008 - A second 24-hour SVE test was conducted using
VE-1 (8 hours), VE-2 (6 hours), VE-3s (6 hours), and VE-3d (6 hours).
Maximum vapor concentrations detected during the test: ND<5ppmV TPHg,
1.3 ppbV benzene, 2.7 ppbV toluene, 0.52 ppbV ethylbenzene, 0.51 ppbV
xylenes, and other VOCs were less than 35 ppbV (individual
concentrations). MTBE in well VE-1 was 4000 ppbV at the start of the
test and dropped to 140 ppb after 6 hours. MTBE in well VE-3d was
3000 ppbV at the start of the test and dropped to 2200 ppbV after 6
hours. The cumulative (all wells) TPHg mass removal rate for this
test was 3.97 lb/day (4.22 lbs TPHg removed) and the MTBE removal
rate was 2.11 lb/day (2.47 lbs MTBE removed from all wells).
Individual MTBE removal rates were: 1.71 lb from VE-3d (6.84 lb/day),
0.02 lb from VE-3s, 0.38 lb from VE-1, 0.31 lb from VE-2. The
cumulative (total) mass removed during both SVE events was 8.22 lb
TPHg, 5.36 lb MTBE, and 0.00.016 lb TBA. The SVE radius of influence
was calculated to be 43 to 53 ft. Well VE-1 is located 30 ft from
boring B03 where the highest TBA was detected at 35 ft bgs. May 2010
A third 24-hour SVE test was conducted using well VE-3D. Maximum
vapor concentrations detected during the test: 2.8 ppmV TPHg, 0.92
ppbV benzene, 21 ppbV toluene, 13 ppbV ethylbenzene, 77 ppbV xylenes,
400 ppb MTBE, 33 ppb TBA, and other VOCs were less than 50 ppbV
(individual concentrations). The mass removed during this SVE event
was 3.26 lb TPHg, 0.0029 lb MTBE, and 0.00017 lb TBA. The cumulative
(total) mass removed during all three SVE events was 11.48 lb TPHg,
6.43 lb MTBE, and 0.085 lb TBA. GW data: GW has been monitored for
nine quarters. All wells have been below the detection limits for all
constituents tested except 1.2 ppb benzene and 2.5 ppb xylenes in
MW-5 during the 3rd quarter 2008 GW monitoring event and 150 ppb TPHd
in MW-2 and 82 ppb TPHd in MW-3 during the most recent GW monitoring
event (January 2010).GW flow direction has varied northeasterly to
southeasterly. Depth to GW has fluctuated from 88 to 82 feet below
grade and is currently 82 feet below grade. Most recent GW sampling
showed that all wells were below the detection limits for all
constituents tested except TPHd (maximum 150 ppb). Subsurface Soil
types: predominantly sands w/ varying amounts of silt and clay, fineto coarse-grained sand, sandy silt, clayey silt, and gravelly sand to
~106 ft below grade. Remediation: Three 24-hr SVE tests conducted.
Sensitive Receptors: Surface water body 800 ft away, no water wells
within 1 mile of site. Other information: UST system currently
installed and operating at the site. County Env Health and RWQCB
concur with closure as of 11/1/2010. Waiting on well destruction,
landowner notification, and waste disposal. Wells destroyed 12/2010
02/17/2011 CASE CLOSED
Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility:
Contact:
Global Id:
Contact Type:
Contact Name:
Organization Name:
Address:
City:
Email:
Phone Number:
T0606519229
Local Agency Caseworker
SHARON BOLTINGHOUSE
3880 LEMON ST SUITE 200
RIVERSIDE
[email protected]
9519558980
TC4333215.2s Page 16
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
Global Id:
Contact Type:
Contact Name:
Organization Name:
Address:
City:
Email:
Phone Number:
1007738672
T0606519229
Regional Board Caseworker
CARL BERNHARDT
SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)
3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500
RIVERSIDE
[email protected]
9517824495
Status History:
Global Id:
Status:
Status Date:
T0606519229
Open - Site Assessment
04/13/2007
Global Id:
Status:
Status Date:
T0606519229
05/02/2007
Global Id:
Status:
Status Date:
T0606519229
07/23/2007
Global Id:
Status:
Status Date:
T0606519229
Completed - Case Closed
02/17/2011
Global Id:
Status:
Status Date:
T0606519229
Open - Verification Monitoring
04/07/2010
Global Id:
Status:
Status Date:
T0606519229
Open - Case Begin Date
01/26/2006
Regulatory Activities:
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
04/07/2010
Staff Letter - #RCDEH040710
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
Other
05/02/2007
Leak Discovery
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
01/20/2011
Well Destruction Report
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
REMEDIATION
05/01/2008
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)
Global Id:
T0606519229
TC4333215.2s Page 17
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
1007738672
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
ENFORCEMENT
10/15/2007
Staff Letter - #101507
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
02/17/2011
Closure/No Further Action Letter - #RCDEH Closure
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
03/13/2008
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
08/28/2007
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
12/20/2007
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
07/15/2010
Staff Letter - #RCDEH 071510
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
Other
01/26/2006
Leak Stopped
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
08/09/2007
Notification - Fee Title Owners Notice - #080807
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
06/11/2007
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
Other
05/02/2007
Leak Reported
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
02/20/2008
Other Workplan
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
06/02/2007
TC4333215.2s Page 18
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
1007738672
Action:
Preliminary Site Assessment Report
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
12/15/2007
Well Installation Report
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
06/13/2008
Other Report / Document
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
08/11/2007
Preliminary Site Assessment Report
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
10/19/2007
File review
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
05/02/2007
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
11/14/2008
File review
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
09/18/2008
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
09/11/2008
File review
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
12/22/2008
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
11/03/2010
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
07/15/2009
Request for Closure
TC4333215.2s Page 19
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
1007738672
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
10/13/2007
Other Workplan
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
04/15/2008
Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
10/15/2008
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
04/03/2009
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
04/20/2009
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
08/25/2009
LOP Case Closure Summary to RB
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
07/15/2009
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
01/15/2010
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
04/15/2010
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
10/15/2009
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
01/15/2009
Global Id:
Action Type:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
TC4333215.2s Page 20
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
Database(s)
1007738672
Date:
Action:
11/14/2008
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
01/15/2010
Other Workplan
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
05/27/2010
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
07/15/2008
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
08/06/2009
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
ENFORCEMENT
12/16/2009
Verbal Enforcement
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
02/13/2009
Request for Closure
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
04/15/2009
Global Id:
Action Type:
Date:
Action:
T0606519229
RESPONSE
08/31/2010
Request for Closure
RIVERSIDE CO. LUST:
Region:
Facility ID:
Employee:
Site Closed:
Case Type:
Facility Status:
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
RIVERSIDE
200723498
Boltinghous-LOP
Yes
Soil only
closed/action completed
TC4333215.2s Page 21
Count: 0 records.
City
ORPHAN SUMMARY
EDR ID
Site Name
Site Address
Zip
NO SITES FOUND
TC4333215.2s Page 22
Database(s)
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015
Number of Days to Update: 32
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: 202-564-7333
EPA Region 1
Telephone 617-918-1143
EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-655-6659
EPA Region 3
EPA Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7247
EPA Region 4
EPA Region 8
Telephone: 303-312-6774
EPA Region 5
EPA Region 9
Telephone: 415-947-4246
EPA Region 10
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4267
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-1
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,
private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities
List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-412-9810
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-8704
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status
indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined
no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates
this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.
This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that,
based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-412-9810
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-2
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators
(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-3
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Telephone: 703-603-0695
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Telephone: 703-603-0695
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: 843-820-7326
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: 202-267-2180
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RESPONSE: State Response Sites
Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity.
These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk.
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-4
ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database
The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s)
EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate
further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL));
State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor
provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information,
including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for
reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses,
and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment
at contaminated sites.
Telephone: 916-323-3400
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System
Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section
4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites.
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: 916-341-6320
LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation
Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information,
please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1)
Telephone: 707-570-3769
LUST: Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground
storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. For
more information on a particular leaking underground storage tank sites, please contact the appropriate regulatory
agency.
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: see region list
LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6)
Telephone: 760-241-7365
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-5
LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7)
Telephone: 760-776-8943
LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa
Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2)
Telephone: 510-622-2433
LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3)
Telephone: 805-542-4786
LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El
Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas,
Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5)
Telephone: 916-464-4834
LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List
Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control
Board’s LUST database.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4)
Telephone: 213-576-6710
LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report
Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources
Control Board’s LUST database.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9)
Telephone: 858-637-5595
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-6
LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer
to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8)
Telephone: 909-782-4496
LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing
For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6)
Telephone: 530-542-5572
SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Telephone: 866-480-1028
SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1)
Telephone: 707-576-2220
SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2)
Telephone: 510-286-0457
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3)
Telephone: 805-549-3147
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-7
Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4)
Telephone: 213-576-6600
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5)
Telephone: 916-464-3291
SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch
Telephone: 619-241-6583
SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region
Telephone: 530-542-5574
SLIC REG 7: SLIC List
Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region
Telephone: 760-346-7491
Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8)
Telephone: 951-782-3298
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-8
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9)
Telephone: 858-467-2980
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: 312-886-7439
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1313
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Telephone: 404-562-8677
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Telephone: 415-972-3372
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Telephone: 206-553-2857
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Telephone: 214-665-6597
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-9
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Telephone: 303-312-6271
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Telephone: 913-551-7003
UST: Active UST Facilities
Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies
Source: SWRCB
Telephone: 916-341-5851
AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations.
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-327-5092
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Telephone: 617-918-1313
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Telephone: 404-562-9424
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-10
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Telephone: 312-886-6136
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Telephone: 214-665-7591
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Telephone: 913-551-7003
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Telephone: 303-312-6137
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Telephone: 415-972-3368
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Telephone: 206-553-2857
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-11
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: 202-646-5797
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Telephone: 913-551-7365
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Telephone: 617-918-1102
VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents
have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for
DTSC’s costs.
Telephone: 916-323-3400
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Telephone: 202-566-2777
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-12
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Telephone: 415-947-4219
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
SWRCY: Recycler Database
A listing of recycling facilities in California.
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-3836
HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
A listing of registered waste tire haulers.
Source: Integrated Waste Management Board
Telephone: 916-341-6422
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Telephone: 703-308-8245
WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database
Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the
Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed
of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information,
SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter
15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure
Information, and Interested Parties Information.
Telephone: 916-227-4448
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-13
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: 202-307-1000
HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database
The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California
EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the
state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR.
Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
SCH: School Property Evaluation Program
This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous
materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the
level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose.
Telephone: 916-323-3400
TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup
has not yet been completed.
Telephone: 916-227-4364
CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug
lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either
requires or does not require additional cleanup work.
Telephone: 916-255-6504
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-14
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: 202-307-1000
CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database
The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage
tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data.
Telephone: 916-341-5851
UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database
A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County.
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 707-463-4466
HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database
The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county
source for current data.
Telephone: 916-341-5851
SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing
Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and
maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained.
The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list.
Telephone: N/A
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-15
Telephone: 202-564-6023
LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing
A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder.
Telephone: 916-323-3400
DEED: Deed Restriction Listing
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management
Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program
(SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current
or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed
restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management
Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land
use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by
the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or
part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed
restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners.
Source: DTSC and SWRCB
Telephone: 916-323-3400
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: 202-366-4555
CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System
California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material
incidents (accidental releases or spills).
Source: Office of Emergency Services
Telephone: 916-845-8400
LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing
The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management
units.
Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-16
MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing
The State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards partner with the Department
of Defense (DoD) through the Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA) to oversee the investigation
and remediation of water quality issues at military facilities.
Telephone: 866-480-1028
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: 202-366-4595
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Source: USGS
Telephone: 888-275-8747
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-17
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: 202-528-4285
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-416-0223
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 505-845-0011
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: 303-231-5959
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-0250
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-18
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-260-5521
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: 202-566-1667
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-1667
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Telephone: 202-564-2501
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Telephone: 202-564-2501
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-19
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4203
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Telephone: 202-564-5088
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-0500
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: 301-415-7169
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Telephone: 202-343-9775
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Source: EPA
Telephone: (415) 947-8000
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-20
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4104
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Telephone: 202-564-8600
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan
Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of
Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated.
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 916-255-2118
NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing
A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater.
Telephone: 916-445-9379
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-21
UIC: UIC Listing
A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database.
Source: Deaprtment of Conservation
Telephone: 916-445-2408
CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List
The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste
Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites).
Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information
Telephone: 916-323-3400
HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List
The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board
[SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the
state agency.
Telephone: 916-323-3400
NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records
Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the
Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency.
Telephone: 916-445-3846
DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities
A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes:
power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries
and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and
garment services.
Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control
Telephone: 916-327-4498
WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List
Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area.
Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board
Telephone: 213-576-6726
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-22
ENF: Enforcement Action Listing
A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of
Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter.
Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-9379
HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data
Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year
by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately
350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain
some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This
database begins with calendar year 1993.
Telephone: 916-255-1136
EMI: Emissions Inventory Data
Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies.
Source: California Air Resources Board
Telephone: 916-322-2990
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Source: USGS
Telephone: 202-208-3710
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Telephone: 615-532-8599
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-23
Telephone: 703-308-4044
MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing
The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting
and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the
state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters.
Telephone: 916-558-1784
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Telephone: N/A
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
WDS: Waste Discharge System
Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements.
Telephone: 916-341-5227
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-24
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-6023
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: 703-305-6451
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Telephone: 703-603-8787
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Telephone: 617-520-3000
PROC: Certified Processors Database
A listing of certified processors.
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-3836
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Financial Assurance information
Telephone: 916-255-3628
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-25
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: 888-275-8747
Data Release Frequency: N/A
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure
that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the
owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board
Telephone: 916-341-6066
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Telephone: 202-566-0517
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Telephone: 202-566-1917
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 202-586-8719
HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any
person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous
waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number.
Telephone: 916-440-7145
HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-26
Telephone: 916-323-3400
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-27
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California.
Telephone: N/A
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California.
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: N/A
COUNTY RECORDS
ALAMEDA COUNTY:
Contaminated Sites
A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from
chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination
from leaking petroleum USTs).
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Underground Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county.
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
AMADOR COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List
Source: Amador County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-223-6439
BUTTE COUNTY:
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-28
CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facility list.
Source: Public Health Department
Telephone: 530-538-7149
CALVERAS COUNTY:
Cupa Facility Listing
Source: Calveras County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-754-6399
COLUSA COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.
Source: Health & Human Services
Telephone: 530-458-0396
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY:
Site List
List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs.
Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department
Telephone: 925-646-2286
DEL NORTE COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 707-465-0426
EL DORADO COUNTY:
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-29
CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.
Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department
Telephone: 530-621-6623
FRESNO COUNTY:
CUPA Resources List
Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous
waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials,
operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks.
Source: Dept. of Community Health
Telephone: 559-445-3271
HUMBOLDT COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.
Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
IMPERIAL COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.
Source: San Diego Border Field Office
Telephone: 760-339-2777
INYO COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.
Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 760-878-0238
KERN COUNTY:
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-30
Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing
Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing.
Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department
Telephone: 661-862-8700
KINGS COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary
for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program
as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration,
permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.
Source: Kings County Department of Public Health
Telephone: 559-584-1411
LAKE COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Source: Lake County Environmental Health
Telephone: 707-263-1164
LOS ANGELES COUNTY:
San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern
San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office.
Telephone: 415-972-3178
HMS: Street Number List
Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites.
Source: Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-3517
List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-31
Source: La County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 818-458-5185
City of Los Angeles Landfills
Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles.
Source: Engineering & Construction Division
Telephone: 213-473-7869
Site Mitigation List
Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint.
Source: Community Health Services
Telephone: 323-890-7806
City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank
Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city.
Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department
Telephone: 310-524-2236
City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank
Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach.
Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department
Telephone: 562-570-2563
City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank
Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance.
Source: City of Torrance Fire Department
Telephone: 310-618-2973
MADERA COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary
for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program
as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration,
permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-32
Source: Madera County Environmental Health
Telephone: 559-675-7823
MARIN COUNTY:
Underground Storage Tank Sites
Currently permitted USTs in Marin County.
Source: Public Works Department Waste Management
Telephone: 415-499-6647
MERCED COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.
Source: Merced County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-381-1094
MONO COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
CUPA Facility List
Source: Mono County Health Department
Telephone: 760-932-5580
MONTEREY COUNTY:
CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division.
Source: Monterey County Health Department
Telephone: 831-796-1297
NAPA COUNTY:
Sites With Reported Contamination
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-33
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 707-253-4269
Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites
Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 707-253-4269
NEVADA COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.
Source: Community Development Agency
Telephone: 530-265-1467
ORANGE COUNTY:
List of Industrial Site Cleanups
Petroleum and non-petroleum spills.
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups
Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST).
Telephone: 714-834-3446
List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities
Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST).
Telephone: 714-834-3446
PLACER COUNTY:
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-34
Master List of Facilities
List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites.
Source: Placer County Health and Human Services
Telephone: 530-745-2363
RIVERSIDE COUNTY:
Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites
Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Underground Storage Tank Tank List
Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county.
Telephone: 951-358-5055
SACRAMENTO COUNTY:
Toxic Site Clean-Up List
List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred.
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Master Hazardous Materials Facility List
Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks,
waste generators.
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY:
Hazardous Material Permits
This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers,
hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-35
Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division
Telephone: 909-387-3041
SAN DIEGO COUNTY:
Hazardous Materials Management Division Database
The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment
’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information
provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous
waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information
on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases
in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination
are included.)
Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division
Telephone: 619-338-2268
Solid Waste Facilities
San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities.
Telephone: 619-338-2209
Environmental Case Listing
The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with
hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program.
Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 619-338-2371
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY:
Local Oversite Facilities
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.
Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County
Telephone: 415-252-3920
Underground Storage Tank Information
Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.
Telephone: 415-252-3920
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY:
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-36
San Joaquin Co. UST
A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county.
Source: Environmental Health Department
Telephone: N/A
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.
Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department
Telephone: 805-781-5596
SAN MATEO COUNTY:
Business Inventory
List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks.
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division
Telephone: 650-363-1921
Fuel Leak List
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county.
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division
Telephone: 650-363-1921
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY:
CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division.
Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department
Telephone: 805-686-8167
SANTA CLARA COUNTY:
Cupa Facility List
Cupa facility list
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-37
Telephone: 408-918-1973
HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report
A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county.
Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health.
Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District
Telephone: 408-265-2600
LOP Listing
A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county.
Telephone: 408-918-3417
Hazardous Material Facilities
Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites.
Source: City of San Jose Fire Department
Telephone: 408-535-7694
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing.
Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health
Telephone: 831-464-2761
SHASTA COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.
Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management
Telephone: 530-225-5789
SOLANO COUNTY:
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-38
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 707-784-6770
Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 707-784-6770
SONOMA COUNTY:
Cupa Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department
Telephone: 707-565-1174
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county.
Telephone: 707-565-6565
SUTTER COUNTY:
Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county.
Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture
Telephone: 530-822-7500
TUOLUMNE COUNTY:
CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Source: Divison of Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-533-5633
VENTURA COUNTY:
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-39
Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks
The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste
Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information.
Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites
Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites.
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites
Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Medical Waste Program List
To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the
Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and
disposal of medical waste throughout the County.
Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Underground Tank Closed Sites List
Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List.
Telephone: 805-654-2813
YOLO COUNTY:
Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report
Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county.
Source: Yolo County Department of Health
Telephone: 530-666-8646
YUBA COUNTY:
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-40
CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing for Yuba County.
Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department
Telephone: 530-749-7523
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: 860-424-3375
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: 518-402-8651
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-783-8990
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 401-222-2797
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-41
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: PennWell Corporation
Telephone: 281-546-1505
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant
its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
Telephone: 800-823-6277
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: 312-280-5991
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: 410-786-3000
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: 301-594-6248
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities
Source: Department of Social Services
Telephone: 916-657-4041
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-42
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images
are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image
is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC4333215.2s
Page GR-43

menifee valley campus facilities master plan

Transcription

Similar documents

So what exactly does the UHN system do for researchers?

Kentucky CHAPTER G - Chapter G Homepage

Extraction and Organization of Abstract Concepts that

Historical Topo Report - CPV Valley Energy Center

ADD 1 13-40 Phase I ESA Report

Our visit to Grizzly Bear Lodge, Minstrel Island 2nd

Final PDF Phase I ESA

The underground city of Derinkuyu

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

(MSDS) Organic Coconut Oil

Sharon Sadler Top 5 Issues