Virgin America, Inc. - University of Oregon Investment Group
Transcription
Virgin America, Inc. - University of Oregon Investment Group
February 26, 2016 IME Virgin America, Inc. Ticker: VA Recommendation: Outperform Current Price: $31.02 Investment Thesis Key Statistics 52 Week Price Range $30.73-$31.40 1.15 Estimated Beta M arket Capitalization 3-Year Revenue CAGR As an award-winning airline with modern ideas and quality service, Virgin America’s current and future route structure makes it well positioned to penetrate new markets, build customer loyalty, and establish itself as a premier airline for business and leisure travelers. Virgin America’s low cost structure and premium brand offering provides it with the opportunity to be a price setter in the industry when competing with legacy carriers and stimulate demand while maintaining route flexibility. Current and future technological initiatives to increase offering and effectively price ancillary products will grow revenues and improve margins. $30.66 50-Day M oving Average Dividend Yield Price Target: $46.88 $1,738 2.40% Trading Statistics Diluted Shares Outstanding 44.00 mm One-Year Stock Chart Average Volume (3-M onth) 702,670 Institutional Ownership 57.40% Insider Ownership 17.16% $45.00 4000000 $40.00 3500000 $35.00 3000000 $30.00 3.73x EV/EBITDA 2500000 $25.00 2000000 $20.00 Margins and Ratios 1500000 $15.00 Operating M argin 15.60% 1000000 $10.00 EBITDA M argin 15.37% $5.00 Net M argin 13.81% $0.00 Feb-15 Debt to Enterprise Value 500000 0 Apr-15 Jun-15 Volume 0.12 Aug-15 Adjusted Close Oct-15 50-Day Avg Dec-15 200-Day Avg Covering Analysts: Phoebe Hsieh: [email protected] 1 University of Oregon Investment Group University of Oregon Investment Group Business Overview Figure 1: Virgin America Revenue Breakdown Virgin America was founded in Delaware in 2004 and went public on November 13, 2014. Their first flight was offered in 2007 and today Virgin America is a premium-branded, low-cost airline based out of California. As of December 31, 2014, they provide service to 21 airports in the United States and Mexico with a fleet of 53 aircrafts. Virgin America’s founder, also founder of the Virgin brand, Sir Richard Branson, targets guests who value high quality products and services. Meanwhile, Virgin America also strives to maintain a low-cost structure using a point-to-point network and a uniform fleet of aircrafts. In this way, Virgin America aims to compete with legacy carriers on quality and low cost carriers (LCCs) on cost. 10.90% 89.10% Passenger Revenue Other Revenue Source: Virgin America 10-K Figure 2: Virgin America Revenue and Gross Margin $300.00 20.00% $252.49 $239.96 $250.00 15.00% $200.00 10.00% $150.00 $96.42 $100.00 $80.88 5.00% $50.00 0.00% $- 2012 $(50.00) 2013 2014 2015 2016E -$31.74 -5.00% Revenue Operating Margin Source: Virgin America 10-K Aircrafts Virgin America differentiates itself from the rest of its competition through the quality of the aircrafts they operate. There is a distinct appearance onboard every aircraft. There is mood lighting within the cabins to create a calming, lowstress environment as well as custom-designed leather seats to provide comfort. Furthermore, Virgin America’s flights offer wireless Internet access and has built in power outlets in every flight. Each guest also has access to an entertainment system, which allows them to watch free, live television and prerecorded channels, on demand movies and a free music library. This inflight entertainment system also allows guests to track their flight and order and pay or food and beverage items for themselves or guests during the flight. Finally, the Red system features a chat function, which allows guests to communicate with other passengers or send drinks or food during the flight. Unlike other carriers who operate different types of aircrafts with varying amenities on each aircraft, Virgin America offers its customers consistency and guarantees that these services can be expected on every flight. Passenger Revenue Passenger revenue makes up the vast majority of Virgin America’s sales. Virgin America had a key strategy in mind when they launched by operating their flights out of San Francisco and Los Angeles to other major hubs. Throughout their expansion, they have targeted routes that are highly popular and would have the highest chance for success. Today, VA has presence in 23 airports throughout North America and fly to 24 destinations in the United States and Mexico. Ancillary and Other Revenue Ancillary and Other revenue make up 10.8% of Virgin America’s revenues. These revenues do not come from the direct purchase of airfare. Figure 2: Virgin America Revenue and Gross Margin 200.00 150.00 Major ancillary revenue products include checked baggage fees, ticket change fees, and priority boarding and security access. If reservations are made through Virgin America’s reservation call center, there is an additional fee as well. Certain products from their partners such as travel insurance and co-branded credit card program are also included. Finally, meals, snacks, alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages, movies, headphones, and sleep kits also contribute to ancillary and other revenue. 100.00 50.00 0.00 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 Other Revenue Source: Virgin America 10-K UOIG 2 University of Oregon Investment Group Industry Figure 4: 2014 US Airline Market Share There are three main factors on which companies in the airline industry can differ. There are ultra-low-cost carriers (ULCCs), low-cost carriers (LCCs), and legacy carriers, point-to-point or hub-and-spoke, and a choice of aircraft. ULCCs and LCCs are the carriers who charge very low ticket prices but add charges for any additional services. They have higher flight frequencies and are typically shorter flights. Legacy carriers are the larger, well-known carriers who fly longer, more expensive routes with a little more provided by way of inflight amenities. 17% 22% 4% 16% 5% 8% 15% 13% Delta American Alaska Southwest US Airways Other Overview United JetBlue Another differentiating factor is whether an airline flies point-to-point or uses a hub-and-spoke model. The point-to-point model flies direct from one place to another and makes most of its profits by flying very full flights and managing the costs of maintaining their flight crews in different airports. Meanwhile, the hub-and-spoke model creates a central hub that an airplane flies to first before flying larger routes. Legacy carriers typically employ this type of model using a few central hubs from which they fly their routes. The final differentiating factor is the type of aircraft or aircrafts an airline chooses to fly. Carriers can choose between purchasing or leasing aircrafts and decide on the size, age, and type of the aircrafts. The goal is to maximize available seat miles and load factor. Source: Market Realist Industry Operating Metrics Figure 5: Corporate Profit Available Seat Mile (ASM) – One seat flying one mile $2,400.00 Revenue Passenger Mile (RPM): The Basic Measure of Production- A paying passenger flying one mile $2,200.00 Load Factor: Production Compared to Capacity - RPMs divided by ASMs. Passenger revenue per available seat mile (PRASM) – Passenger revenue divided by ASMs, $2,000.00 $1,800.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Operating Revenue per available seat mile (RASM) – Operating Revenue divided by ASMs. Source: IBISWorld Average Stage Length – The average number of miles flown per flight. Figure 6: Airline Industry Structure Life Cycle Stage Revenue Volatility Capital Intensity Concentration Level Regulation Level Technology Change Barriers to Entry Industry Globalization Competition Level Mature Medium High High High Medium Medium High High Yield – Scheduled service revenue divided by scheduled Macro Factors Corporate Profit Airlines depend on corporate profits to varying degrees depending on whether they are an LCC or a legacy airline. Typically, when corporate profits are higher, demand increases for legacy airlines, which serve business customers in the regions in which they fly. LCCs tend not to fly in the same or as many regions, and therefore do not experience this benefit. Since corporate profits are expected to rise in the next few years, Virgin America is in a strong position to capitalize off of this growth. Source: IBISWorld UOIG 3 University of Oregon Investment Group Security Concerns Due to terrorist attacks or fear of terrorist attacks, citizens have become increasingly cautious and anxious about flying, decreasing the demand for air travel. Security and safety precautions have been tightened, which often delays and belabors the process of going through security. These security measures prompt some customers to seek out alternative modes of transportation during short trips to avoid these inconveniences. Figure 7: Price of Oil $120.00 $90.00 $60.00 $30.00 $0.00 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: Knoema Price of Oil Airlines are heavily dependent on oil to operate. Even small changes in market fuel prices heavily impact an airline’s profitability. The price of oil has fallen more than 70% since June 2014 and as a result, airlines have been able to capitalize on these falling prices. Conversely, if the price of oil were to heavily increase, airlines would be very negatively affected. Fuel prices can be influenced by external factors such as politics, the economy, foreign imports, war zones, supply surplus or shortage, demand, transportation, or tax. It is up to airlines to take precautionary measures to limit the effect that volatile oil prices may have on their profits. In order to protect against this, Virgin America hedges a portion of its fuel on a yearly basis. Disposable Income/ Consumer Sentiment The airline industry is heavily dependent on consumer demand. Consumer demand for travel revolves around the ability to travel and the consumer’s discretionary income. Traveling comes at a high price point and thus disposable income plays a large part in the demand for air travel. When consumer disposable income increases, demand for air travel increases and vice versa. In order to avoid volatility in demand, Virgin America prices itself between LCCs and legacy carriers, hoping to be the quality pick for air travel at a bargain price point. As disposable income is projected to increase steadily over the next few years, there may be an increased demand for leisure travel. Figure 8: Per Capita Disposable Income $50,000.00 $40,000.00 $30,000.00 $20,000.00 2015 2016 2017 2108 2019 2020 2021 Source: IBISWorld Labor Relations Having strong working relationships with staff is vital to maintaining a cohesive and successful work environment. Many airline employees are represented by labor unions. These labor unions often take action against companies in order to improve working conditions for those in the union. This exposes airlines to risk of their wage expenses increasing in relation to these events. Virgin America has 595 pilots, 825 inflight teammates, 632 guest services teammates, 120 maintenance technicians and 568 management and other personnel. Currently, the only employees who are represented by a union are the inflight crew members who voted for representation by the Transport Workers Union in 2014. Virgin America recently saw a wage increase take place after negotiations took place with the labor union. Figure 9: Other Revenue Growth Historical Competition $200.00 40.00% $150.00 30.00% $100.00 20.00% $50.00 10.00% $0.00 0.00% 2010 2011 2012 Other Revenue 2013 2014 % Growth Source: Virgin America 10-K 2015 The airline industry is extremely competitive and with significant consolidation over the past 10 years, even greater competition has emerged among the remaining airlines. Market share is concentrated among a few large players and as a result, airlines must focus on making individual routes as profitable as possible in order to maintain market position. Airlines compete on a variety of factors including routes, pricing, cost structure, frequent flyer programs, customer service, and amenities. Virgin America currently competes with LCCs as well as legacy carriers because they consider themselves to be somewhere in between. They compete on routes, however, primarily with legacy carriers. Legacy carriers typically fly business routes and UOIG 4 University of Oregon Investment Group Figure 10: Revenue and Operating Expenses for 2015 1,563.0 1,177.8 routes that are flown out of concentrated markets where they know the flights will be full. LCCs draw in customers with the opposite strategy. LCCs fly very inexpensive routes from regional places or small cities that are relatively untouched by legacies. Virgin America adapts itself to fit a special mold, pricing closer to that of an LCC and planning routes consistent with legacy carrier strategies. Strategic Positioning 124.0 Revenue Operating Expenses Sales and Marketing 21.6 9.8 3.4 1.4 227.7 D&A Interest Expense Capitalized Interest Taxes Net Income Source: Virgin America 10-K Figure 11: Historical Operating Income and Margin $300.00 20% $200.00 10% $100.00 0% $0.00 2012 2013 2014 Virgin America offers the quality of legacy carriers while maintaining the cost structure of LCC’s. This allows them to compete on price and remain competitive within the industry. Virgin America traditionally enters new markets with very low prices in an effort to try and capture market share. For example, they are launching flights from Los Angeles to Hawaii and starting at pricing at $169 one-way, forcing competitors like Hawaiian Airlines and United Airlines to lower prices in order to match Virgin America. Route Structure Virgin America’s success can largely be attributed to their strategic route placement and market entrance strategies. Unlike LCCs and ULCCs who target small cities in order to dominate small markets and unlike legacies who fly hub and spoke models, Virgin America differentiates itself by identifying the most popular and profitable routes to fly. Understanding that business travelers are reimbursed by their companies, Virgin America positions itself in major business markets where legacies operate but offer a better price. This way, they can maximize their ancillary revenue and ensure high yields and load factors for their flights. 2015 -$100.00 -10% Series1 Pricing Series2 Source: Virgin America 10-K Virgin America also caters to markets with high profitability and targets popular destinations. Realizing that Hawaii is a highly traveled to vacation destination, especially from the Bay Area, Virgin America decided to penetrate that market. In this way, Virgin America does not have a routine way of selecting new routes, rather they evaluate market opportunities frequently and position themselves where they will be able to capitalize on market demand. Cost Structure Figure 12: Domestic Trips by US Residents $800.00 6.00% 5.00% $750.00 4.00% $700.00 3.00% Virgin America’s business model is differs greatly from the rest of the industry. They streamline low production cost models similar to LCCs. They operate a modern, fuel efficient fleet, enabling them to capitalize on lower maintenance costs and common flight crew training. Virgin America also employs high aircraft utilization, averaging 10.8 hours per aircraft day and point-to-point operations. Oursourcing their non-core activities such as ground handling, maintenance, call center, catering, fuel operations, and parts, Virgin America is able to reduce costs and build relationships with their suppliers. $650.00 $600.00 $550.00 2.00% In Flight Experience 1.00% Virgin America prides itself in offering flyers a unique, pleasant, and consistent flying experience every time. By streamlining their fleet of aircrafts, they guarantee that passengers will be experiencing the same in-flight amenities each and every time they board a Virgin America flight. This consistency provides great value to passengers, as they will never have to question whether there will be an outlet or Internet access on their flight. 0.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Series1 Series2 Source: IBISWorld UOIG 5 University of Oregon Investment Group As mentioned in the business overview, Virgin America also employs special mood lighting within their cabins to create a calming, low-stress environment for their guests. They installed custom-designed leather seats in their cabins to provide comfort. Finally, their state of the art Red system allows each guest to customize his or her inflight experience through its entertainment options, chat capability, and menu options. Figure 13: 2015 Route Map Business Growth Strategies Expanding to New Markets Virgin America plans to grow their business by way of route expansion into new markets. Currently, Virgin America operates in 24 cities and with a strong presence in California, Virgin America plans to leverage that strength to expand into additional major business and high-end leisure markets. Source: Virgin America Website Figure 14: Value Offerings Legacy Carriers Low Cost Carriers First Class Service Leading In-Flight Experience Brand Premium Top Destinations Corporate Selling Focus Ancillary Revenue Strategy Loyalty Program Single fleet type Young and fuel efficient fleet Point-to-point network Outsourcing High Labor Productivity Virgin America X X X X X X X X X X Frequent Flyer Program Like most other airlines, Virgin America maintains a guest loyalty program. Loyalty programs are designed to increase revenues by increasing business from current customers, strengthen partnerships, increasing customer loyalty, and bringing in new customers. Elevate frequent flyer program allows guests to earn points for flying with Virgin America and redeem them for travel rewards through Virgin America’s network and network partners. Unlike many other airlines, Virgin America bases their loyalty program points on the value of ticket purchases rather than miles traveled. Frequent flyers can also redeem points for any flight, without any blackout dates. Being an elevate member, flyers can access purchase upgrade options, complimentary upgrades to Main Cabin Select, free checked bags and priority check-in boarding and security access. At this time, Virgin America has 3.5 million flyers enrolled in their Elevate frequent flyer program. Source: Virgin America Investor Presentation Figure 15: 2015 EBIDTA v. Executive Compensation $10.00 Using market research, Virgin America has identified the top SFO and LAX domestic markets and destinations and with that information, they plan on gradually expanding to these new areas as well. Hawaii is one example of an attractive opportunity that Virgin America is leveraging currently. With high-demand leisure routes and a fast growing market, Hawaii is a very attractive market for Virgin America. Not to mention flights to Hawaii have high average fares. $280.00 $8.00 $270.00 $6.00 $4.00 $260.00 $2.00 Management and Employee Relations David Cush, President and CEO David Cush was appointed President and CEO of Virgin America on December 10, 2007. Prior to joining Virgin America, Cush spent 20 years at American Airlines serving as SVP of Global Sale. He also served as VP of American’s St. Louis hub and VP of International Planning and Global Alliances. Since joining Virgin America, Cush has led the company to experience record-setting growth and earn a multitude of industry best-in-class awards. 2014 Compensation: $4.63M $- $250.00 2013 EBITDA 2014 Executive Compensation Source: Virgin America 10-K Peter Hunt, Senior Vice President and CFO Peter Hunt was appointed SVP and CFO of Virgin America in July 2011. Prior to that, he served as VP and CFO of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. form 2004-2011. There, he oversaw the finances of a public airline with over $1B in annual UOIG 6 University of Oregon Investment Group revenue. At Virgin America, Hunt oversees all financial operations including treasury, tax, financial planning and analysis, accounting, external financial reporting, budgets, procurement, and fleet planning. Figure 16: 2015 Executive Compensation 2014 Compensation: $1.25M $5,000,000 $4,500,000 Steve Forte, COO $4,000,000 Steve Forte joined Virgin America in 2013 as the company’s first COO and Director of Operations. Prior to joining Virgin America, Forte worked at United Airlines where he served as a pilot, SVP of Flight Operations and Director of Operations. He has historically held positions in various airline associations and has worked closely with global airlines, manufacturers and regulators to solve various industry issues. $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 2015 Compensation: $1.24M $500,000 $0 Cush Hunt Forte Frances Fiorillo, Senior Vice President | People & In-Flight Services Fiorillo Source: Virgin America 10-K Frances Fiorillo started her career as a flight attendant for Canadian Pacific Airlines and rose through the company to take on various roles until she became VP of Human Resources. With years of human resource and customer service experience under her belt, Fiorillo is an expert at developing a culture that respects and supports the airline’s employees and guests. Figure 17: 2015 GDS Industry Revenue Growth 2014 Compensation: $1.20M 3.90% The airline industry is extremely volatile and for that reason, management only forecasts the near future. Historically, management guidance has been very on par with their performance. Their guidance usually includes the general focus and direction of the company, route expansion opportunities, ASMs, PRASMs, and fuel hedges. 1.60% 0.10% -1.50% Domestic California Management Guidance LAX Basin Bay Area Source: Virgin America Investor Presentation Virgin America gives very little guidance for full year performance and only gives general statements regarding future plans. That being said, they do forecast for the next quarter and their results are usually on par with that guidance. Guidance has been accurate in the past and therefore I have used the available guidance in my projections. Portfolio Strategy Figure 18: Average Fleet Age of Airlines Virgin America is not currently held in any of the three portfolios. Due to the fact that it is a small cap company and part of the Russell 2000, it is a strong candidate for the Alumni Portfolio. Virgin America would also be a good fit for the Tall Firs Portfolio being that Tall Firs is underweight IME. Finally, it would be a good fit for DADCO because it is a strong investment and it is likely to return significant value to shareholders. 23 17 13 13 11 10 9 8 6 ALGT DAL UAL AAL LUV ALK HA JBLU VA 5 SAVE Recent News Competition from Virgin America is driving down CaliforniaHawaii flight fares Source: Virgin America Investor Presentation UOIG 7 University of Oregon Investment Group Pacific Business News-February 4, 2016 Figure 19: Teammates by Work Group Virgin America announced this week that it would be launching flights from Los Angeles to Honolulu. The flights are scheduled to begin in May following its San Francisco-Honolulu launch in November and San Francisco-Maui launch in December. With promotional prices starting at just $169, competitive prices have not gone unnoticed. In reaction to this low price, Hawaiian Airlines has decided to match fares between San Francisco and Honolulu ad San Francisco to Maui at hundreds of dollars less than their typical rates. 21% Maintenance Technicians 30% Inlfight 4% Management Catalysts 23% Pilots Guest Services 22% Upside Greater expansion into international and national markets will bolster revenues and increase Virgin America’s customer base. New software made to monitor ancillary product sales and demand will continue to boost revenue and create higher margins Source: Virgin America 10-K Maintenance Technicians Management and Other Guest Services Pilots Figure 20: Comparable 1 Year Stock Chart Inflight Declining fuel costs will result in lower operating costs Operating a newer fleet allows Virgin America to consistently provide modern technology onboard, which will increase demand from business travelers Continuing to win travelers awards will increase brand awareness and entice leisure travelers to fly with Virgin America $250.00 $200.00 $150.00 Downside $100.00 Increases in oil prices could have an adverse effect on the company’s operating margin Failing to capture significant market share in new regions could result in Virgin America losing future potential revenue growth and brand equity Negative publicity can spread quickly, diminishing brand equity $50.00 $0.00 VA HA ALK ALGT SAVE JBLU LUV SKYW Source: Yahoo Finance Figure 21: Comparables Revenue Growth 2016 Comparable Analysis Overview 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% VA HA ALK ALGT SAVE JBLU LUV SKYW -5.0% -10.0% Source: UOIG Projections and FactSet Virgin America Inc. is one of thousands of airlines and operates domestically and internationally. While there are a myriad of other airlines, it was difficult to identify airlines that are comparable qualitatively and quantitatively based on business operations, structure and strategy. Therefore, the comparable analyses uses 6 companies that have each have qualities that are comparable on some metric to Virgin America. The primary criteria used to screen for comparable companies were size, growth expectations, margins, and industry. Although maybe more quantitatively similar with respect to route structure and expansion strategy, I did not choose to include legacy carriers due to their enormous sizes and varying growth expectations. UOIG 8 University of Oregon Investment Group For my weightings, I weighted the P/E multiple 80% due to the fact that this is the metric that analysts primarily use when valuing airlines. I had initially thought to include an EV/EBITDAR multiple, however it is very difficult to accurately represent this multiple for a few reasons. Because EBITDAR is a non-GAAP measure, it is impossible to fully understand what analysts are including in the rent expense and therefore, any ratio rendered this way would have a high chance of inaccuracy. Figure 22: HA vs. VA Multiples 10.00x 8.00x 6.00x 4.00x 2.00x .00x EV/Revenue EV/EBIT HA EV/EBITDA P/E Source: FactSet Figure 23: Comparable EBITDA Margins 45% 35% 25% 15% 5% VA HA ALK ALGT SAVE JBLU LUV SKYW -5% Comparables HA: Hawaiian Holdings, Inc.: (25%) VA Weighted Average Source: Company 10-Ks “Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiary, Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., engages in the scheduled air transportation of passengers and cargo. It offers daily services on North America routes between the state of Hawai'i and Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, and San Jose, California; Las Vegas, Nevada; Phoenix, Arizona; Portland, Oregon; and Seattle, Washington. The company also provides daily services on its Neighbor Island routes among the six major islands of the State of Hawai'i; and daily services on its international routes between the state of Hawai'i and Sydney, Australia; and Tokyo and Osaka, Japan. In addition, it offers scheduled services between the state of Hawai'i, and New York City, New York; and scheduled services between the State of Hawai'i and Pago Pago, American Samoa; Papeete, Tahiti; Brisbane, Australia; Auckland, New Zealand; Sapporo, Japan; Seoul, South Korea; and Beijing, China, as well as other ad hoc charter services. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. markets its tickets through various distribution channels, including its Website www.hawaiianairlines.com primarily for North America and Neighbor Island route customers, as well as through travel agencies and wholesale distributors primarily for its international route customers. As of December 31, 2015, the company’s fleet consisted of 18 Boeing 717-200 aircraft for the Neighbor Island routes; 8 Boeing 767-300 aircraft; and 22 Airbus A330-200 aircraft for the North America, international, and charter routes, as well as 3 ATR42 turboprop aircraft. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. was founded in 1929 and is headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii.” – Yahoo Finance Although HA is not very qualitatively similar aside from the fact that VA flies two routes to Hawaii, HA is very quantitatively similar to Virgin America in many ways. It is one of the most similar in size to VA being a small cap company and it has the most similar growth expectations and margins to VA. Though HA’s beta is a bit higher, I still consider HA to be the most qualitatively similar company to VA and for that reason, I gave it a 30% weighting. Figure 24: HA vs. VA Multiples 16.00x 12.00x 8.00x SAVE: Spirit Airlines, Inc.: (10%) 4.00x .00x EV/Revenue EV/EBIT SAVE EV/EBITDA VA Source: FactSet P/E “Spirit Airlines, Inc. provides low-fare airline services. As of June 30, 2015, it operated approximately 360 daily flights to 57 destinations in the United States, Caribbean, and Latin America. As of December 31, 2014, the company had a fleet of 65 Airbus single-aisle aircraft comprising 29 A319s, 34 A320s, and 2 UOIG 9 University of Oregon Investment Group A321s. Spirit Airlines, Inc. was founded in 1964 and is headquartered in Miramar, Florida.” – Yahoo Finance Like Allegiant, Spirit Airlines is qualitatively similar to Allegiant based on the fact that they both operate using low cost structures and point-to-point networks. Spirit Airlines also flies many of the same routes as Virgin America, though Spirit Airlines does fly to more destinations than Virgin America does. Quantitatively, Spirit Airlines is also relatively comparable based on their small market capitalization; however, both Spirit Airlines and Allegiant are still much larger than Virgin America. While it has slightly less debt than Virgin America, I think that SAVE is a company that could provide insight into the growth patterns that we may see with VA and for that reason as well as the other qualitative and quantitative reasons, I gave it a 10% weighting. Figure 25: Comparable Net Margins 20% 15% 10% 5% ALGT: Allegiant Travel Company: (20%) 0% VA HA ALK ALGT Comparables SAVE JBLU LUV SKYW Weighted Average Source: FactSet Figure 26: ALGT vs. VA Multiples 16.00x 12.00x 8.00x 4.00x 0.00x EV/Revenue EV/EBIT ALGT EV/EBITDA P/E “Allegiant Travel Company, a leisure travel company, focuses on the provision of travel services and products to residents of under-served cities in the United States. The company offers scheduled air transportation on limited frequency nonstop flights between under-served cities and leisure destinations. As of February 2, 2015, it operated a fleet of 53 MD-80 aircraft, 4 Airbus A319 aircraft, 9 Airbus 320 aircraft and 6 Boeing 757-200 aircraft provided services on 229 routes to 94 cities. The company also provides air-related services and products in conjunction with air transportation, including use of its call center for purchases, baggage fees, advance seat assignments, travel protection products, change fees, priority boarding, food and beverage purchases on board, and other air-related services. In addition, it offers third party travel products, such as hotel rooms, ground transportation, and attractions; and air transportation services through fixed fee agreements and charter service on a seasonal and ad-hoc basis. The company was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.” – Yahoo Finance VA Source: FactSet Figure 27: 2015 Airline Scoreboard Qualitatively, VA and ALGT are similar in cost structure as they both operate using a low cost, point-to-point network. However, Allegiant caters to a different consumer and region than Virgin America does. Allegiant provides service primarily to under serviced small cities in order to capture most of the market share in one area, while Virgin America’s strategy is to capture high end leisure and business travelers. Quantitatively, VA and ALGT are comparable because they are both small cap airlines with similar growth expectations and operating results. However, being an Ultra-Low-Cost Carrier, Allegiant does manage to have higher margins than Virgin America. Still, based on qualitative and quantitative factors, Allegiant is still quite similar to Virgin America and for those reasons it was weighted 20%. JBLU: JetBlue Airways Corporation: (15%) Source: Wall Street Journal “JetBlue Airways Corporation, a passenger carrier company, provides air transportation services. As of December 31, 2014, the company operated a fleet of 13 Airbus A321 aircrafts, 130 Airbus A320 aircrafts, and 60 EMBRAER 190 aircrafts. It also served 87 destinations in 27 states in the United States (the UOIG 10 University of Oregon Investment Group U.S.), the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 17 countries in the Caribbean and Latin America. JetBlue Airways Corporation was founded in 1998 and is based in Long Island City, New York.” – Yahoo Finance JetBlue Airways Corporation (JBLU) and Virgin America have a lot in common in the sense that they cater to the same consumer base. They both appeal to the high-class business and leisure traveler looking for a consistent and modern flight experience. While Virgin America offers this by way of their cabin mood lighting and entertainment system, JetBlue offers this in other forms such as their complimentary, quality snacks and a modern fleet. Qualitatively, JBLU and VA have similar betas. However, JBLU is larger and has a bit different growth rates and a bit higher margins. For those reasons, I decided to weight JBLU 15%. Figure 28: ALK vs. VA Multiples 12.00x 8.00x 4.00x ALK: Alaska Air Group, Inc.: (10%) 0.00x EV/Revenue EV/EBIT ALK EV/EBITDA P/E VA Source: FactSet Figure 29: EV/EBITDA Multiples EV/EBITDA Multiples VA 3.47x HA 4.85x ALK 5.28x ALGT 6.61x SAVE 6.24x JBLU 4.39x LUV 4.90x SKYW 3.19x Source: FactSet “Alaska Air Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides passengers and cargo air transportation services primarily in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Alaska Mainline, Alaska Regional, and Horizon. It serves approximately 100 cities in Alaska, the Lower 48, Hawaii, Canada, Mexico, and Costa Rica. As of December 31, 2015, the company’s fleet consisted of 147 Boeing 737 jet aircraft; and 52 Bombardier Q400 turboprop aircraft. The company was founded in 1932 and is based in Seattle, Washington.” – Yahoo Finance Alaska Air Group (ALK) was chosen because of its similar growth expectations, route structure, and industry. ALK competes with Virgin America on routes but does not necessarily maintain the same priorities when it comes to the services that they offer. However, one priority that both companies have is that they both strive to provide quality, consistent service on routes. Qualitatively, the companies compete on service and satisfaction. Quantitatively, their growth rates and beta are very similar. However, ALK has higher profit margins and is much larger compared to VA. Taking all aspects into consideration, I decided to give ALK a 10% weighting in my comparable analysis. LUV: Southwest Airlines Co.: (5%) “Southwest Airlines Co. operates passenger airlines that provide scheduled air transportation services in the United States and near-international markets. As of December 31, 2015, it operated 704 Boeing 737 aircraft. The company served 97 destinations in 40 states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, as well as 7 near-international countries, including Mexico, Jamaica, The Bahamas, Aruba, the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, and Belize. It also sells frequent flyer points and related services to business partners participating in the Rapid Rewards frequent flyer program, including car rental agencies, hotels, restaurants, and retailers. The company was founded in 1967 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.” – Yahoo Finance Quantitatively, Southwest Airlines and Virgin America are comparable because their growht expectations are pretty similar and they operate the same cost UOIG 11 University of Oregon Investment Group structure. However, Southwest Airlines is tremendously larger than Virgin America and has better margins as well. Quantitatively, Southwest Airlines is comparable because they try to offer quality service and a relatively low price. Virgin America, offers quality service at a relatively cost effective price as well. For all the reasons listed above, I decided to give Southwest Airlines Co. a 5% weighting. Figure 30: Passenger Revenue Growth $3,500.00 $3,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 SKYW: Skywest, Inc.: (0%) $1,000.00 $500.00 $0.00 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Passenger Revenue Source: Virgin America 10-K and UOIG Projections Figure 31: Aircraft Fuel Cost $600.00 8.00% “SkyWest, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates a regional airline in the United States. It provides scheduled passenger and air freight services with approximately 3,500 total daily departures to various destinations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean. The company operates its flights as Delta Connection, United Express, US Airways Express, American Eagle, or Alaska under code-share arrangements. As of March 4, 2015, it operated a fleet of 693 aircraft. It also offers regional jet and turboprop service to airports; and ground handling services for other airlines throughout its system. SkyWest, Inc. was founded in 1972 and is headquartered in St. George, Utah.” – Yahoo Finance $537.50 $507.04 7.00% $499.10 $500.00 6.00% $400.00 5.00% $350.79 $344.95 $300.00 4.00% 3.00% $200.00 2.00% Just about the only qualities that SKYW and VA have in common are the fact that they are both relatively small companies, and the fact that they both operate low cost structures. Aside from those facts, they are vastly different qualitatively and quantitatively speaking. However, because they are in the same industry and I thought it would be useful to evaluate small, low cost airlines, I left it in my model and gave it a 0% weighting. $100.00 1.00% $- Discounted Cash Flow Analysis 0.00% 2012 2013 2014 Fuel Cost 2015 2016 % ASM Source: Virgin America 10-K and UOIG Projections Figure 32: Top SFO Domestic Market PDEWs 2789 2710 1718 1706 1656 1614 1581 1389 1179 LAX JFK LAS BOS ORD EWR SEA SAN DEN 1117 IAD PDEW: Passengers Daily Each Way Virgin America currently not present in this domestic Market Source: Virgin America Investor Relations Revenue Model: Passenger Revenue Passenger Revenue is computed by multiplying yield per passenger mile with revenue per mile (RPM). RPM is calculated by multiplying available seat miles (ASM) with load factor. Available seat miles is arguably the most important measure of all operating statistics when evaluating revenue. The way I went about projecting this was by evaluating how many routes Virgin America had historically launched each year and how many ASMs were added per route. I then had to forecast how many routes I thought Virgin America would be adding each year. Although Virgin America provides data about what markets and cities they want to target, they do not indicate whatsoever the number of routes they plan to launch each year or any rate at which they might launch new routes. Due to the fact that they do not have a route growth pattern similar to that of more mature airlines, I did not feel comfortable applying another airline’s growth structure to Virgin America’s. I projected ASMs based on how many routes Virgin America had launched historically and applied a reasonable assumption for how I thought Virgin America would continue to launch routes. Other Revenue (Ancillary Revenue): Other revenue consists of baggage fees, change fees, seat selection fees, passenger-related service fees and inflight meals and entertainment. Management traditionally gives minimal guidance, however, one thing they were very forthcoming about was Ancillary Revenue. In an earnings call, they UOIG 12 University of Oregon Investment Group emphasized their bullishness about ancillary revenue and expressed their confidence that Virgin America could grow ancillary revenue by 12% into perpetuity based on a new software they have been using, which helps them price and monitor ancillary products. Although I am confident in management’s abilities, I think 12% is extremely high for ancillary revenue and do not think it is realistic that they will be able to achieve this given most airlines have significantly lower growth in ancillary revenue in comparison. However, I am still confident that they will be able to achieve high growth rates in ancillary revenue based on the information provided. I am simply more bearish than VA’s management with respect to other revenue. Figure 33: VA Historical and Future Depreciation $80.00 $60.00 $40.00 Aircraft Fuel: $20.00 $0.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Source: Virgin America 10-K and UOIG Projections Figure 34: VA Capital Expenditures 2024 Aircraft fuel is one of the main operating expenses in the airline industry. Fuel prices are extremely volatile, which is why most airlines hedge their fuel in order to avoid the negative effects that can be associated with wild fluctuations in pricing. Virgin America is no exception and hedges their fuel on a rolling basis throughout the year. In order to project fuel costs, I gathered data on the historical price of fuel and used it to estimate Virgin America’s hedge rates during each given year. Based on those rates, I projected very conservatively fuel costs going forward under the assumption that they hedge their fuel on an annual basis. Aircraft Maintenance: Because Virgin America operates a relatively young fleet, their maintenance costs up to this point have not been excessive. They pride themselves in fleet modernization and their single fleet structure. However, as their fleet does begin to age as it approaches the terminal year, aircraft maintenance costs will increase as a percentage of ground and other equipment. Depreciation and Amortization: Source: Virgin America 10-K and UOIG Projections Because Virgin America amortizes maintenance over the remaining lease term rather than the next estimted maintence event, there will be higher depreciation and amortization expense in the last few years of the leases in comparison to the earlier periods. As mentioned above, Virgin America has a relatively young fleet and just as aircraft maintenance costs will increase as Virgin America’s fleet ages, depreciation and amortization will as well. Capital Expenditures Figure 35: VA Betas Capital expenditures are expected to increase by $500 M in the next 2 years related to the delivery of 10 new aircrafts to be added to Virgin America’s fleet. Management has announced that 30 new aircrafts will be delivered by 2022 so I included those in my projections and then trended down their Capital Expenditures as their company matures in the future. Beta: Source: UOIG Projections Beta was calculated by running regressions against the S&P 500. The estimated beta for Virgin America is 1.15. All of the betas were weighted, however, the airline industry beta was given the heaviest weighting of 55%. While the other betas are important to evaluate, given Virgin America’s recent IPO, it was difficult to come up with enough data points to estimate the most accurate beta for Virgin America with just the Vasicek and Hamada. UOIG 13 University of Oregon Investment Group Recommendation Figure 36: Virgin America Final Implied Price Method Implied Price Weight Discounted Cash Flow 39.42 60% Forward Comparables 58.06 40% Implied Price 46.88 Current Price 30.33 Undervalued 54.57% Source: UOIG Projections As a relatively young airline that has had a strong start in the industry, Virgin America is well positioned for great success even in a highly competitive environment. Virgin America’s unique business model allows it to be a price setter competing with legacy airlines while maintaining a low cost structure consistent with LCCs. Giving a 60% weighting on the discounted cash flow analysis and a 40% weighting on the comparable analysis, a final price target of $46.88 is reached. Given an undervaluation of 54.57%, I am recommending a BUY for all three portfolios. UOIG 14 University of Oregon Investment Group February 26, 2016 Appendix 1 – Relative Valuation Comparables Analysis VA Virgin America Airlines ($ in millions) Stock Characteristics Current Price Beta Max $158.36 1.29 Min $15.78 0.25 Size Short-Term Debt Long-Term Debt Cash and Cash Equivalent Non-Controlling Interest Preferred Stock Diluted Basic Shares Market Capitalization Enterprise Value 265.00 2,434.00 1,282.00 0.00 0.00 691.55 27,115.79 28,525.79 10.43 96.26 89.61 0.00 0.00 18.62 810.75 1,089.14 156.35 2,003.28 500.72 0.00 0.00 221.44 10,279.81 10,496.00 Growth Expectations % Revenue Growth 2016E % Revenue Growth 2017E % EBITDA Growth 2016E % EBITDA Growth 2017E % EPS Growth 2016E % EPS Growth 2017E 15.36% 18.10% 130.70% 14.09% 565.42% 11.90% -4.80% -0.40% -2.60% -1.90% -2.30% -39.07% 0.00% 29.39% 37.35% 17.34% Profitability Margins Gross Margin EBIT Margin EBITDA Margin Net Margin Credit Metrics Interest Expense Debt/EV Leverage Ratio Interest Coverage Ratio Operating Results Revenue EBIT EBITDA Net Income Capital Expenditures Multiples EV/Revenue EV/EBIT EV/EBITDA EV/(EBITDA-Capex) Market Cap/Net Income = P/E Median Weight Avg. $43.09 $65.74 0.96 0.74 HA Hawaiian Holdings Inc. SAVE Spirit Airlines, Inc. ALGT JBLU Allegiant Travel JetBlue Airways Company Corporation ALK Alaska Air Group, Inc. LUV Southwest Airlines Co. SKYW SkyWest Inc. $30.78 1.15 25.00% $39.77 1.29 25.00% $46.87 0.90 20.00% $158.36 0.92 15.00% $21.36 1.20 10.00% $72.34 1.06 5.00% $39.31 1.01 0.00% $15.78 0.25 116.81 850.63 368.09 0.00 0.00 139.03 5,582.36 6,181.72 33.80 96.26 394.64 0.00 0.00 44.08 1,353.72 1,089.14 156.35 893.29 264.09 0.00 0.00 53.59 2,131.31 2,916.86 10.43 135.82 632.78 0.00 0.00 103.61 4,599.51 4,112.97 53.82 539.28 89.61 0.00 0.00 18.62 2,886.49 3,389.98 265.00 1,968.00 341.00 0.00 0.00 321.51 6,761.09 8,653.09 117.00 686.00 107.00 0.00 0.00 132.03 9,524.07 10,220.07 258.00 2,434.00 1,282.00 0.00 0.00 691.55 27,115.79 28,525.79 211.82 1,533.99 132.28 0.00 0.00 51.96 810.75 2,424.28 5.20% 6.40% 14.70% 4.00% 18.10% 3.70% 6.19% 10.75% 14.34% 4.24% 22.07% 2.69% 15.36% 16.33% 130.70% 14.09% 565.42% -39.07% 3.50% 5.20% 19.60% -1.90% 50.60% -0.10% 8.40% 18.10% 6.50% 12.60% -2.30% 6.30% 6.50% 13.40% 6.80% 4.00% 9.50% 2.50% 8.10% 8.90% 28.10% 1.80% 34.60% -0.70% 4.40% 6.40% 14.70% 2.60% 18.10% 3.70% 5.20% 5.40% 15.40% 4.60% 21.90% 7.50% -4.80% -0.40% -2.60% 7.20% 9.50% 11.90% 0.00% 8.72% 16.54% 3.73% 0.00% 22.30% 27.51% 13.14% 0.00% 23.30% 28.93% 13.60% 0.00% 15.37% 16.54% 13.81% 0.00% 19.02% 23.44% 10.38% 0.00% 21.92% 26.66% 13.09% 0.00% 29.39% 37.35% 17.34% 0.00% 23.06% 28.82% 13.14% 0.00% 26.14% 32.38% 16.28% 0.00% 22.30% 27.51% 13.26% 0.00% 8.72% 25.56% 3.73% $114.00 0.72 2.32 85.28 $8.83 0.04 0.24 10.86 $42.00 0.17 1.12 45.07 $47.44 0.19 1.00 33.68 $9.98 0.12 0.45 29.26 $51.73 0.36 1.87 10.86 $8.83 0.04 0.24 70.10 $26.51 0.17 1.18 18.94 $114.00 0.26 1.12 17.54 $42.00 0.08 0.42 45.07 $114.00 0.09 0.47 50.33 $8.83 0.72 2.32 85.28 $20,860.00 $4,652.00 $5,738.00 $2,767.00 $2,020.00 $1,344.00 $257.00 $291.91 $110.00 $155.00 $2,946.00 $509.00 $753.00 $304.00 $622.00 $4,117.25 $945.65 $1,171.85 $555.20 $547.95 $1,764.49 $271.26 $291.91 $243.73 $250.00 $2,398.00 $456.00 $562.00 $249.00 $197.00 $2,322.00 $509.00 $619.00 $304.00 $622.00 $1,344.00 $395.00 $502.00 $233.00 $222.00 $6,939.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 $912.00 $854.00 $5,846.00 $1,528.00 $1,893.00 $952.00 $697.00 $20,860.00 $4,652.00 $5,738.00 $2,767.00 $2,020.00 $2,946.00 $257.00 $753.00 $110.00 $155.00 2.52x 9.43x 6.75x 25.99x 15.13x 0.62x 4.02x 3.22x NM 5.55x 1.37x 6.69x 5.19x 7.67x 9.80x 1.68x 7.12x 5.75x NM 11.00x 0.62x 4.02x 3.73x 25.99x 5.55x 1.22x 6.40x 5.19x 7.99x 8.56x 1.77x 8.08x 6.64x NM 15.13x 2.52x 8.58x 6.75x 12.11x 12.39x 1.25x 5.41x 4.33x 7.55x 7.41x 1.75x 6.69x 5.40x 8.55x 10.00x 1.37x 6.13x 4.97x 7.67x 9.80x 0.82x 9.43x 3.22x 4.05x 7.37x Multiple EV/Revenue EV/EBIT EV/EBITDA EV/(EBITDA-Capex) Market Cap/Net Income = P/E Price Target Current Price Undervalued Implied Price Weight 73.32 0.00% 49.84 10.00% 44.06 10.00% NM 0.00% 60.84 80.00% $58.06 30.78 88.64% UOIG 15 University of Oregon Investment Group February 26, 2016 Appendix 2 – Discounted Cash Flows Valuation Discounted Cash Flow Analysis ($ in millions) Total Revenue % YoY Growth Operating Expense Aircraft fuel % ASM % of Revenue Aircraft Rent % Revenue Salaries, wages and benefits % Revenue Landing fees and other rents % Revenue Sales and Marketing % Revenue Aircraft Maintenance % Flight, Ground and Other Equipemnt % Revenue Other Operating expenses % Revenue Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation per Aircraft Number of Aircrafts Growth in Depreciation Per Aircraft Operating Income Operating Margin Interest Expense % Revenue Capitalized interest % Revenue Net Interest (Income) % Revenue Earnings Before Taxes % Revenue Less Taxes (Benefits) Tax Rate Net Income Net Margin Add Back: Depreciation and Amortization Add Back: Interest Expense*(1-Tax Rate) Operating Cash Flow % Revenue Current Assets % Revenue Current Liabilities % Revenue Net Working Capital % Revenue Change in Working Capital Capital Expenditures % Revenue Unlevered Free Cash Flow Discounted Free Cash Flow EBITDA EBITDA Margin EBITDA Growth 2012A 1,332.83 28.51% 2017E $2,052.61 16.33% 2018E $2,423.62 18.07% 2019E $2,818.87 16.31% 2020E $3,144.92 11.57% 2021E $3,449.86 9.70% 2022E $3,686.50 6.86% 537.50 507.04 499.10 323.85 387.57 460.98 7.02% 5.15% 3.99% 2.55% 2.68% 2.77% 40.33% 35.59% 33.50% 21.17% 21.97% 22.46% 236.80 202.07 184.36 183.62 206.01 253.60 17.77% 14.18% 12.37% 12.00% 12.19% 12.36% 176.22 196.48 257.37 289.64 332.05 384.17 13.22% 13.79% 17.27% 18.94% 18.82% 18.72% 110.17 122.62 133.13 143.84 162.90 186.34 26.43% 8.61% 8.93% 9.40% 9.23% 9.08% 107.14 106.60 113.20 124.77 140.27 160.74 8.04% 7.48% 7.60% 8.16% 7.95% 7.83% 58.93 61.85 60.07 57.31 72.01 92.75 69.85% 48.29% 40.70% 35.71% 38.05% 40.80% 4.42% 4.34% 4.03% 3.75% 4.08% 4.52% 126.56 133.18 131.84 150.71 171.77 198.52 9.50% 9.35% 8.85% 9.85% 9.73% 9.67% 11.26 13.96 14.49 17.20 20.64 24.77 0.22 0.26 0.27 0.32 0.28 0.31 52.00 53.00 53.00 63.00 73.00 79.00 21.67% 3.75% 18.76% 20.00% 20.00% ($31.74) $80.88 $96.42 $238.64 $271.26 $290.73 (2.38%) 5.68% 6.47% 15.60% 15.37% 14.16% 116.11 71.29 37.52 9.98 20.00 22.92 8.71% 5.00% 2.52% 0.65% 1.13% 1.12% (2.18) (0.53) (2.67) 3.41 0.00 0.00 -0.16% -0.04% -0.18% 0.22% 0.00% 0.00% (0.29) (0.34) 0.28 (2.33) 0.00 0.00 -0.02% -0.02% 0.02% -0.15% 0.00 0.00% (145.38) 10.46 61.29 227.59 251.26 267.81 -10.91% 0.73% 4.11% 14.88% 14.24% 13.05% 0.02 0.32 1.18 (172.39) 7.54 20.28 -0.01% 3.03% 1.92% -75.74% 3.00% 7.57% ($145.39) $10.14 $60.11 $399.98 $243.73 $247.53 (10.91%) .71% 4.03% 26.15% 13.81% 12.06% 11.26 13.96 14.49 17.20 20.64 24.77 116.12 69.13 36.80 17.53 19.40 21.19 ($18.01) $93.24 $111.39 $434.71 $283.77 $293.49 (1.35%) 6.54% 7.48% 28.42% 16.08% 14.30% 123.21 127.04 44.29 69.95 76.85 92.01 9.24% 8.92% 2.97% 4.57% 4.36% 4.48% 262.73 256.64 304.02 297.85 320.79 366.09 19.71% 18.01% 20.40% 19.47% 18.18% 17.84% ($139.53) ($129.60) ($259.74) ($227.90) ($243.95) ($274.08) (10.47%) (9.10%) (17.43%) (14.90%) (13.83%) (13.35%) $ (139.53) $ 9.92 $ (130.14) $ 31.84 $ (16.05) $ (30.13) 27.18 42.00 55.16 250.00 250.00 250.00 2.04% 2.95% 3.70% 16.34% 14.17% 12.18% $ 94.33 $ 41.32 $ 186.37 $ 152.88 $ 49.81 $ 73.62 $ 61.32 552.45 2.86% 22.79% 303.41 12.52% 451.13 18.61% 216.29 8.92% 186.92 7.71% 116.76 43.54% 4.82% 232.87 9.61% 29.73 0.35 85.00 20.00% $334.06 13.78% 26.66 1.10% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 307.40 12.68% 37.33 12.14% $270.07 11.14% 29.73 23.42 $323.22 13.34% 109.53 4.52% 422.68 17.44% ($313.15) (12.92%) $ (39.07) 250.00 10.32% $ 112.29 $ 85.35 649.99 2.95% 23.06% 357.50 12.68% 521.82 18.51% 247.22 8.77% 214.05 7.59% 144.22 46.28% 5.12% 269.07 9.55% 35.67 0.39 91.00 20.00% $379.33 13.46% 30.54 1.08% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 348.79 12.37% 58.30 16.71% $290.49 10.31% 35.67 25.44 $351.60 12.47% 128.43 4.56% 480.47 17.04% ($352.04) (12.49%) $ (38.89) 250.00 8.87% $ 140.49 $ 97.46 737.20 3.05% 23.44% 403.99 12.85% 578.96 18.41% 270.97 8.62% 235.08 7.47% 170.27 49.03% 5.41% 298.21 9.48% 42.81 0.44 97.00 20.00% $407.44 12.96% 33.55 1.07% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 373.89 11.89% 79.58 21.29% $294.30 9.36% 42.81 26.41 $363.52 11.56% 144.44 4.59% 523.61 16.65% ($379.17) (12.06%) $ (27.13) 250.00 7.95% $ 140.65 $ 89.04 820.16 3.14% 23.77% 448.80 13.01% 631.57 18.31% 291.93 8.46% 253.78 7.36% 197.04 51.77% 5.71% 324.95 9.42% 51.37 0.50 103.00 20.00% $430.26 12.47% 36.23 1.05% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 394.04 11.42% 101.89 25.86% $292.15 8.47% 51.37 26.86 $370.38 10.74% 159.71 4.63% 560.75 16.25% ($401.04) (11.62%) $ (21.86) 250.00 7.25% $ 142.24 $ 82.18 886.36 3.23% 24.04% 485.62 13.17% 671.12 18.20% 306.28 8.31% 266.81 7.24% 221.50 54.51% 6.01% 344.92 9.36% 59.07 0.55 107.00 15.00% $444.84 12.07% 38.10 1.03% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 406.75 11.03% 142.36 35.00% $264.38 7.17% 59.07 24.76 $348.22 9.45% 172.02 4.67% 584.64 15.86% ($412.62) (11.19%) $ (11.58) 214.96 5.83% $ 144.84 $ 76.37 -$20.48 (1.54%) 2013A 1,424.68 37.37% $94.84 6.66% (563.20%) 2014A 1,489.97 11.79% $110.90 2015A $1,529.58 2.66% $255.85 16.73% 130.70% 2016E $1,764.49 15.36% $291.91 16.54% 14.09% $315.50 15.37% 8.08% $363.79 15.01% 15.30% $415.00 14.72% 14.08% $450.24 14.32% 8.49% $481.63 13.96% 6.97% $503.91 13.67% 4.63% 2023E $3,783.59 6.86% 2024E $3,934.90 4.00% 938.89 1,020.50 3.42% 3.50% 24.81% 25.93% 504.60 531.21 13.34% 13.50% 684.92 708.28 18.10% 18.00% 308.51 314.79 8.15% 8.00% 269.34 275.44 7.12% 7.00% 232.64 259.70 57.26% 60.00% 6.15% 6.60% 351.61 363.19 9.29% 9.23% 64.98 71.48 0.59 0.64 110.00 112.00 10.00% 10.00% $428.09 $390.30 11.31% 9.92% 38.47 39.35 1.02% 1.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 389.62 350.95 10.30% 8.92% 136.37 122.83 35.00% 35.00% $253.25 $228.12 6.69% 5.80% 64.98 71.48 25.00 25.58 $343.24 $325.17 9.07% 8.26% 177.94 186.50 4.70% 4.74% 585.08 592.93 15.46% 15.07% ($407.14) ($406.43) (10.76%) (10.33%) $ 5.48 $ 0.72 167.07 118.05 4.42% 3.00% $ 170.69 $ 206.41 $ 82.14 $ 90.64 $493.07 13.03% 2.38% $461.77 11.74% (8.36%) UOIG 16 University of Oregon Investment Group February 26, 2016 Appendix 3 – Revenue Model Revenue Model ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015A 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E Passenger 655.45 950.93 1,215.18 1,289.27 1,329.21 1,362.87 1,587.59 1,864.92 2,224.51 2,607.67 2,920.94 3,212.34 3,434.67 3,531.79 % Growth 33.57% 45.08% 27.79% 6.10% 3.10% 2.53% 16.49% 17.47% 19.28% 17.22% 12.01% 9.98% 6.92% 9.94% 6.79% % of Total Revenue 90.53% 91.69% 91.17% 90.50% 89.21% 89.10% 89.97% 90.86% 91.78% 92.51% 92.88% 93.12% 93.17% 93.34% 93.22% ASM (in millions) 7,652.00 9,853.00 12,514.00 12,243.00 12,756.00 12,691.00 14,467.74 16,637.90 19,299.97 22,001.96 24,202.16 26,138.33 27,445.25 28,268.60 29,116.66 %Growth 16.90% 28.76% 27.01% (2.17%) 4.19% (.51%) 14.00% 15.00% 16.00% 14.00% 10.00% 8.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% 81.50% 81.50% 79.20% 80.20% 82.60% 82.24% 82.09% 81.95% 81.82% 81.68% 81.54% 81.41% 81.27% 81.14% 81.00% LoadFactor 2024E 3,667.96 %Growth (1.57%) 0.00% (2.82%) 1.26% 2.99% (.43%) .15% (.17%) (.17%) (.17%) (.17%) (.17%) (.17%) (.33%) (.33%) RPM (in millions) 6,236.00 8,034.00 9,912.00 9,814.00 10,550.68 10,437.53 11,955.65 13,635.11 15,790.47 17,971.21 19,735.42 21,278.70 22,305.31 22,936.02 23,584.50 %Growth 15.08% 28.83% 23.38% 22.16% 6.44% (1.07%) 14.54% 14.05% 15.81% 13.81% 9.82% 7.82% 4.82% 2.83% 2.83% 10.50 11.82 12.26 13.14 13.27 13.05 13.28 13.68 14.09 14.51 14.80 15.10 15.40 15.40 15.55 16.15% 12.57% 3.72% 7.18% .99% (1.68%) 1.77% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 1.00% Yield per passenger mile %Growth Other 68.60 86.18 117.66 135.41 160.76 166.71 176.90 187.69 199.11 211.19 223.98 237.52 251.84 251.80 266.95 20.66% 25.62% 36.53% 15.09% 18.72% 3.70% 6.11% 6.10% 6.08% 6.07% 6.06% 6.04% 6.03% 6.01% 6.00% 9.47% 8.31% 8.83% 9.50% 10.79% 10.90% 10.03% 9.14% 8.22% 7.49% 7.12% 6.88% 6.83% 6.66% 6.78% Total Revenue $724.05 $1,037.11 $1,332.83 $1,424.68 $1,489.97 $1,529.58 $1,764.49 $2,052.61 $2,423.62 $2,818.87 $3,144.92 $3,449.86 $3,686.50 $3,783.59 $3,934.90 % Growth 32.21% 43.24% 28.51% 37.37% 11.79% 2.66% 15.36% 16.33% 18.07% 16.31% 11.57% 9.70% 6.86% 2.63% 4.00% % Growth % of Total Revenue Passenger Revenue 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015A 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E ASM 7,652.00 9,853.00 12,514.00 12,243.00 12,756.00 12,691.00 14,467.74 16,637.90 19,299.97 22,001.96 24,202.16 26,138.33 27,445.25 28,268.60 29,116.66 RPM 6,236.00 8,034.00 9,912.00 9,814.00 10,550.68 10,437.53 11,955.65 13,635.11 15,790.47 17,971.21 19,735.42 21,278.70 22,305.31 22,936.02 23,584.50 Loadfactor 81.50% 81.50% 79.20% 80.20% 82.60% 82.24% 82.09% 81.95% 81.82% 81.68% 81.54% 81.41% 81.27% 81.14% 81.00% 655.45 950.93 1,215.18 1,289.27 1,329.21 1,362.87 1,587.59 1,864.92 2,224.51 2,607.67 2,920.94 3,212.34 3,434.67 3,531.79 3,667.96 %Growth 33.57% 45.08% 27.79% 6.10% 3.10% 2.53% 16.49% 17.47% 19.28% 17.22% 12.01% 9.98% 6.92% 9.94% 6.79% %of Total Revenue 90.53% 91.69% 91.17% 90.50% 89.21% 89.10% 89.97% 90.86% 91.78% 92.51% 92.88% 93.12% 93.17% 93.34% 93.22% Passenger Revenue UOIG 17 University of Oregon Investment Group February 26, 2016 Appendix 4 – Working Capital Model Working Capital Model ($ in millions) Total Revenue Current Assets Credit card holdbacks and receivables Days Sales Outstanding A/R % of Revenue Prepaid Expenses % of Revenue Total Current Assets % of Revenue Long Term Assets Flight Equipment % Revenue Ground and Other Equipment %Revenue Capital Expenditures % Revenue Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation per Aircraft Number of Aircrafts Growth in Depreciation Per Aircraft Net PP&E Ending Total Current Assets & Net PP&E % of Revenue Current Liabilities Accounts Payable Days Payable Outstanding % of Revenue Air Traffic Liability Days Charges Outstanding % of Revenue Other Current Liability Days Charges Outstanding % of Revenue Total Current Liabilities % of Revenue 2015A 2016E 2017E 2018E $1,332.83 2012A $1,424.68 2013A $1,489.97 2014A $1,529.58 $1,764.49 $2,052.61 $2,423.62 $2,818.87 2019E $3,144.92 2020E $3,449.86 2021E $3,686.50 2022E $3,783.59 2023E $3,934.90 2024E 95.19 26.07 7.14% 28.02 103.67 26.56 7.28% 23.37 23.41 5.74 1.57% 20.87 42.55 10.13 2.78% 27.40 46.74 9.67 2.65% 30.10 56.24 10.00 2.74% 35.77 66.40 10.00 2.74% 43.13 77.23 10.00 2.74% 51.20 86.16 10.00 2.74% 58.28 94.52 10.00 2.74% 65.19 101.00 10.00 2.74% 71.02 103.66 10.00 2.74% 74.28 107.81 10.00 2.74% 78.70 2.10% $123.21 9.24% 1.64% $127.04 8.92% 1.40% $44.29 2.97% 1.79% $69.95 4.57% 1.71% $76.85 4.36% 1.74% $92.01 4.48% 1.78% $109.53 4.52% 1.82% $128.43 4.56% 1.85% $144.44 4.59% 1.89% $159.71 4.63% 1.93% $172.02 4.67% 1.96% $177.94 4.70% 2.00% $186.50 4.74% 84.37 6.33% 0.00 0.00% 27.18 2.04% 11.26 65.56 4.60% 62.53 4.39% 42.00 2.95% 13.96 76.82 5.16% 70.75 4.75% 55.16 3.70% 14.49 93.95 6.14% 66.55 4.35% 250.00 16.34% 17.20 111.81 6.34% 77.41 4.75% 250.00 14.17% 20.64 126.64 6.17% 100.71 4.91% 250.00 12.18% 24.77 145.48 6.00% 122.70 5.06% 250.00 10.32% 29.73 164.50 5.84% 147.11 5.22% 250.00 8.87% 35.67 178.27 5.67% 169.04 5.38% 250.00 7.95% 42.81 189.79 5.50% 190.82 5.53% 250.00 7.25% 51.37 196.65 5.33% 209.67 5.69% 214.96 5.83% 59.07 195.50 5.17% 221.10 5.84% 167.07 4.42% 64.98 196.75 5.00% 236.09 6.00% 118.05 3.00% 71.48 0.22 52.00 - 0.26 53.00 21.67% 0.27 53.00 3.75% 0.32 63.00 18.76% 0.28 73.00 20.00% 0.31 79.00 20.00% 0.35 85.00 20.00% 0.39 91.00 20.00% 0.44 97.00 20.00% 0.50 103.00 20.00% 0.55 107.00 15.00% 0.59 110.00 10.00% 0.64 112.00 10.00% 68.45 $191.65 14.38% 100.06 $227.10 15.94% 106.90 $151.19 10.15% (72.29) -$2.34 (.15%) (40.13) $36.71 2.08% 2.12 $94.13 4.59% 47.90 $157.43 6.50% 97.28 $225.71 8.01% 140.11 $284.55 9.05% 181.98 $341.69 9.90% 250.42 $422.45 11.46% 314.52 $492.46 13.02% 386.27 $572.77 14.56% 82.87 22.69 6.22% 116.52 31.91 8.74% 63.35 17.35 4.75% $262.73 19.71% 44.00 11.27 3.09% 138.89 35.58 9.75% 73.75 18.90 5.18% $256.64 18.01% 52.82 12.94 3.55% 150.48 36.86 10.10% 100.72 24.67 5.18% $304.02 20.40% 51.06 12.15 3.34% 148.93 35.44 9.74% 97.87 23.29 6.40% $297.85 19.47% 56.09 11.64 3.18% 168.28 34.91 9.54% 96.42 20.00 5.46% $320.79 18.18% 63.58 11.31 3.10% 192.85 34.29 9.40% 109.66 19.50 5.34% $366.09 17.84% 72.88 10.98 3.01% 223.63 33.68 9.23% 126.16 19.00 5.21% $422.68 17.44% 82.23 10.65 2.92% 255.37 33.07 9.06% 142.87 18.50 5.07% $480.47 17.04% 88.90 10.32 2.83% 279.62 32.45 8.89% 155.09 18.00 4.93% $523.61 16.65% 94.41 9.99 2.74% 300.94 31.84 8.72% 165.40 17.50 4.79% $560.75 16.25% 97.55 9.66 2.65% 315.39 31.23 8.56% 171.70 17.00 4.66% $584.64 15.86% 96.71 9.33 2.56% 317.34 30.61 8.39% 171.04 16.50 4.52% $585.08 15.46% 97.03 9.00 2.47% 323.42 30.00 8.22% 172.49 16.00 4.38% $592.93 15.07% UOIG 18 University of Oregon Investment Group February 26, 2016 Appendix 5 – Discounted Cash Flows Valuation Assumptions Discounted Free Cash Flow Assumptions Tax Rate Risk Free Rate Beta Market Risk Premium % Equity 35.00% Terminal Growth Rate 1.80% Terminal Value 1.15 PV of Terminal Value 6.45% Sum of PV Free Cash Flows Considerations 1.95% 2,731 912 956 Method Implied Price Weight 91.23% Firm Value 1,868 % Debt 8.77% Total Debt 130 Cost of Debt 4.87% Cash & Cash Equivalents 395 Implied Price 46.88 Small Cap Risk Premium 1.00% Non-Controlling Interest 0 Current Price 30.33 1,738 Undervalued 54.57% CAPM 10.19% Market Capitalization WACC 9.57% Fully Diluted Shares Terminal Risk Free Rate 2.75% Implied Price Discounted Cash Flow 39.42 60% Forward Comparables 58.06 40% 44 39.42 Terminal CAPM 11.14% Current Price 30.33 Terminal WACC 10.44% Undervalued 29.98% UOIG 19 University of Oregon Investment Group February 26, 2016 Appendix 6 –Sensitivity Analysis Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate 39 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0.98 41.25 42.74 44.41 46.31 48.48 0.98 36.00% 40.90% 46.43% 52.69% 59.84% 1.08 37.88 39.11 40.49 42.05 43.81 1.08 24.88% 28.96% 33.51% 38.63% 44.43% 1.18 34.92 35.96 37.11 38.39 39.83 1.18 15.13% 18.55% 22.34% 26.57% 31.32% 1.28 32.31 33.19 34.15 35.22 36.41 1.28 6.53% 9.42% 12.60% 16.13% 20.06% 1.38 29.99 30.74 31.55 32.45 33.45 1.38 (1.11%) 1.34% 4.04% 7.00% 10.29% Adjusted Beta Adjusted Beta Terminal Growth Rate Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate 39 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 9.76% 35.30 36.38 37.58 38.92 40.43 9.76% 16.39% 19.95% 23.90% 28.32% 33.30% 8.76% 38.60 39.80 41.14 42.64 44.32 8.76% 27.27% 31.24% 35.65% 40.58% 46.14% 7.76% 42.27 43.62 45.11 46.78 48.66 7.76% 39.37% 43.80% 48.73% 54.24% 60.45% 6.76% 46.36 47.86 49.53 51.40 53.51 6.76% 52.85% 57.81% 63.32% 69.48% 76.42% 5.76% 50.92 52.60 54.48 56.57 58.92 5.76% 67.89% 73.44% 79.61% 86.51% 94.28% WACC WACC Terminal Growth Rate Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate 39 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 213.97 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 213.97 18.32% 21.95% 25.99% 30.50% 35.58% 163.97 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 163.97 18.32% 21.95% 25.99% 30.50% 35.58% 113.97 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 113.97 18.32% 21.95% 25.99% 30.50% 35.58% 63.97 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 63.97 18.32% 21.95% 25.99% 30.50% 35.58% 13.97 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 13.97 18.32% 21.95% 25.99% 30.50% 35.58% Terminal Year Capex and Acquisitions Terminal Year Capex and Acquisitions Terminal Growth Rate Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate 39 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 45.00% 36.10 37.21 38.45 39.84 41.40 45.00% 19.0% 22.7% 26.8% 31.4% 36.5% 40.00% 35.99 37.10 38.33 39.71 41.26 40.00% 18.7% 22.3% 26.4% 30.9% 36.0% 35.00% 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 35.00% 18.3% 22.0% 26.0% 30.5% 35.6% 30.00% 35.78 36.88 38.09 39.45 40.98 30.00% 18.0% 21.6% 25.6% 30.1% 35.1% 25.00% 35.68 36.77 37.97 39.32 40.84 25.00% 17.6% 21.2% 25.2% 29.6% 34.7% Tax Rate Tax Rate Terminal Growth Rate Implied Price Additional Senstivity Tables Terminal Growth Rate 39 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 423.85 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 423.85 18.3% 22.0% 26.0% 30.5% 35.6% 373.85 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 373.85 18.3% 22.0% 26.0% 30.5% 35.6% 323.85 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 323.85 18.3% 22.0% 26.0% 30.5% 35.6% 273.85 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 273.85 18.3% 22.0% 26.0% 30.5% 35.6% 223.85 35.89 36.99 38.21 39.58 41.12 223.85 18.3% 22.0% 26.0% 30.5% 35.6% Fuel Cost Fuel Cost Terminal Growth Rate UOIG 20 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 8 – Sources Company 10-K’s Factset IBIS World Mergent Online ONEsearch S&P Net Advantage SEC Filings Virgin America Investor Relations page Virgin America presentations Wall Street Journal