Government Brief
Transcription
Government Brief
Volume 1–January 2012 Government Brief From the Business, Industry & Government Team Proactive Detection of Improper Payments By Tina Kim, Deputy Comptroller for Audit, Office of the New York City Comptroller “Audit reveals city paid $11.8 million in housing subsidies to dead people” blared a recent headline. Auditors, by matching program participant data with the Social Security Death Master File, proactively identified thousands of individuals who had continued to receive housing benefits after their death, resulting in potentially millions of dollars in revenue returned to the general fund. More and more government auditors are incorporating computer-based deductive detection approaches into their audit work to identify improper payments, which, in turn, leads to increased findings and more powerful audits. Deductive detection involves determining which type(s) of improper payments can occur in a particular situation and then using technology and other methods to determine if those type of payments do, in fact, exist. Auditors: 1. Examine internal controls to determine which type(s) of improper payments could occur. 2. Determine what anomalies those payments would generate. 3. Use analytic tools and databases to search for those anomalies. 4. Follow up to determine if payments are actually improper. For example, in the audit of housing benefits, auditors determined that the agency at issue lacked a mechanism to identify instances in which benefits may need to be discontinued because of a change in circumstances, such as a tenant’s death. Agency personnel relied on either the deceased tenant’s landlord or family to notify it of a tenant’s death. Using data matching, auditors looked for payments made on behalf of deceased tenants that were made after the date of death. Specifically, auditors compared tenant data with the Social Security Administration Death Master File (DMF). The DMF is a file of all deaths, beginning around 1936, reported to Social Security Administration (SSA) from sources other than states. Created in 1980 as a result of a Freedom of Information lawsuit, the DMF contains over 87 million records and is available from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), part of the Department of Commerce. The benefit of this approach is that it can be used by the agency in the future to detect these types of improper payments on a periodic basis. Computer-based deductive detection is a proactive approach that can find anomalies early, resulting not only in significant cost savings but also as a strong deterrent when used routinely. It allows auditors to test for specific risks that would be difficult to test aicpa.org/BIG using traditional methods. Unlike traditional methods which involve the use of samples, computer-based deductive detection is more comprehensive—testing the entire population so that 100% of transactions are scrutinized. Testing is done in a fraction of the time required with manual methods even when data volumes are large. However, like other computer-based approaches, such methods are limited by the data captured as well as the quality of the data. Use of data that lacks integrity or that is incomplete can lead to faulty conclusions or inaccurate assumptions. It is important that data reliability testing be performed first to ensure that data is sufficiently complete and error-free so that it used for this purpose. proof that they are dead, as in rare instances, it is possible for the record of a person who is not deceased to be included erroneously in the DMF. Therefore, prior to determining that a payment is inappropriate, the death of an individual must be verified. An understanding of the data and its potential limitations is also a prerequisite for computerbased deductive detection. For example, the DMF contains names and basic information about persons with Social Security numbers whose deaths have been reported to the SSA. However, the absence of a person’s name in this file does not prove that the individual is alive. Further, the inclusion of a person’s name in the file, is not With the increased emphasis on early detection of fraud, waste and abuse, governmental auditors should consider adding to their tool kit proactive computer-based methodologies for the detection of improper payments—including deductive detection approaches. Such tools can be a cost effective method of preventing and detecting not only improper payments but fraud itself. This illustrates a key point regarding deductive detection—identification of an anomaly in the data is only a starting point in the process, representing only a symptom or red flag of a potential problem. Auditors must follow up on results to ensure that they are, in fact, findings and not the result of data errors or other situations that result in similar symptoms. Investigative Related Resources for Auditors: Black Book Online www.blackbookonline.info BRB Publications, Inc. www.brbpub.com Searchsystems.net www.searchsystems.net Federal Government Web Portal www.usa.gov State and Local Government Directory www.statelocalgov.net Sex Offenders Registry www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/cac/states.htm Social Security Death Index Search ssdi.rootsweb.com Federal Prisoner Lookup www.bop.gov For More Information Government Accountability Briefs: “What Government Entities Need to Know About the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009” “Internal Controls: Just the Start of a Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention Program” Whitepaper: Members in Government Guide to Understanding Internal Control and Internal Control Services Online resources: Governmental Audit Quality Center Recovery Act Resource Center DISCLAIMER: This publication has not been approved, disapproved or otherwise acted upon by any senior technical committees of, and does not represent an official position of, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. It is distributed with the understanding that the contributing authors and editors, and the publisher, are not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services in this publication. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. aicpa.org/BIG