This is an English translation of article in
Transcription
This is an English translation of article in
This is an English translation of article in Kuntatekniikka magazine about underground waste handling Original Finnish version can be read at: http://lehti.kuntatekniikka.fi/sites/default/files/KT0412PDF-WWW-LQ.pdf This article has originally been published in Finnish in Kuntatekniikka-Magazine 4/2012, pp. 24-26. The new system will consume less energy and it is easier to install VUORES WASTE TO AN UNDERGROUND PIPE A pipe-based waste collection system will be built in Vuores, Tampere Finland. It represents a new infrastructure implemented with new technology. Simo Isoaho, Development Manager, Tampere Regional Solid Waste Management Ltd. (Pirkanmaan Jätehuolto Oy) The builder of the pipe system is Pirkan Putkikeräys Oy, established in 2010, a subsidiary of Tampere Regional Solid Waste Management Ltd. The supplier of the pipeline and the equipment for the waste station and collection points is MariMatic Oy, a Finnish company. The project is an extensive one and involves several players. It will also necessitate the development of new design and building competence. A collection point being installed on 22 June 2011. THIS IS HOW THE VUORES WASTE SYSTEM WORKS 1. Residents sort out the waste into four feeding points at the collection point: biowaste, paper, cardboard, dry waste. 2. In the feeding point the waste falls into a temporary storage space of about 300 litres. The storage space is emptied when it is full enough. Refuse to a waste station through a feeding pipe The pipe system will consist of collection points, an underground pipeline, and a waste station. The refuse will be sorted at home and taken to a collection point with dedicated feeding pipes for each type of refuse. The pipe hatch will open automatically with the customer’s electronic key. The refuse is placed in a waste inlet, which tips the refuse into the storage space of the feeding pipe when the hatch closes. The waste is emptied from the storage space automatically, based on the fill monitoring information. When the emptying begins, the formator at the bottom end of the storage space moves the waste to a connection pipe, in which the waste station equipment has created a vacuum. The waste will move to the waste station at a high speed. The waste will then be separated from the air current. 24 Waste station pipes mounted on 26 September 2011. After that the waste will fall into a waste press, which moves it to a freight container. The containers will be transported to the recipient of the waste type in question by a truck. An alternative to traditional technique The first pipe system was already built in Sweden over forty years ago. It was considered for the Tampella area in Tampere some twenty years ago. The pipe system, which has been more popular elsewhere in the world, began to become popular here only during the past ten years. However, for a long time there was only one technological model, which was used in Espoo Suurpelto and Jätkäsaari and Kalasatama in Helsinki. The station is ready for final touches in April. Currently, there is both the new and the traditional technology available on the market. The table on page 25 shows that the selection of technology will impact, among other things, both the location options of the pipeline and the implementation of the installation work, including the duration of the work. The pipe system fits Vuores The main goal of the Vuores project is a city sector with modern living, where new technology is used and people live more ecologically. The first background studies showed that a pipe system meets these goals well. Big waste trucks with their emissions and noise can be eliminated from the grounds and, at the same time, the related traffic risk is eliminated. Waste shelters will be removed and the freed up space can be used for some other purpose. Furthermore, collection work with containers as it is now does not seem to be the most sought after profession in the future from occupational safety and workforce availability points of view. 3. The feeding point formator However, there was a player on the market with a different approach: let’s place the refuse in plastic pipe with a smaller diameter. A formator to be placed at the bottom of each feeding pipe had been developed. This technology option provided additional grounds to consider procurement. The required operating energy would 4. The waste travels in the pipe with the help of vacuum and air flow, one waste type at a time. 5. The waste moves through the pipe to a waste station. Waste and air are separated in a cyclone separator. The waste falls into a press, where, for example, the volume of dry waste decreases by about one forth. The air be about one fifth compared to the competing technology. The pipeline installation work would become easier and faster. Opportunities to develop the construction and use of the pipe system were also identified. New prospects to implement the pipe system in old city infrastructure opened up. An opportunity to introduce new technology continues to a filter, where the impurities are removed. Most of the air returns back to the pipeline. 6. The weight press will move each waste type into its own respective container. 7. Trucks pick up the containers to be transported to processing. onto the market, in the challenging area of building infrastructure, was identified. Information was sought to set up fair tendering This was backed by statements on technology, economy, and founding a company. The project had been presented to Differences in two pipe systems available on the market New technology saves energy Cost studies showed that in Vuores, due to the structure of the district and building efficiency, the costs would be close to a breaking point. The studies were first based on traditional technology. Examination variable MariMatic technology Envac technology Pipe, internal diameters/material 210 … 310 mm/plastic 400 … 600 mm/steel Delivery length of the pipe 22 m/bar 6 m/bar Need for curves Only in bigger bends A bend always by beveling or with a curve Pipe welding, estimated eample Electrofusion welding, 50 – 70 m/km (D 310 mm) Metal arc welding, 260 – 300 m/km (D 500 mm) Lifts and haulages Mostly with light machines Heavy work machines Energy need (Vuores area) 25 – 35 kWh/t waste, 3-4 €/t 190 – 210 kWh/t waste, 21-23 €/t the future builders of Vuores. Technical facts were clarified in the meetings with potential pipe system suppliers. Above all, information was sought to set up fair tendering. Possible weaknesses of system suppliers were also identified. An analysis of the consultant market made it clear that the purchaser has to adopt a strong role both in tendering and later in construction and the related planning. Each project area must be seen individually. Procurement as a consult-driven negotiation procedure was rejected due to its apparent high cost and long duration. It had to be realised that the pipe diameter, pipeline alignment and structural materials were not to be set as standard in the request to tender. Standardisation in the request to tender would have led to unjustified limitation of competition. In the request to tender, the location of the waste station, the so called basic service level collection points together with their number of feeding pipes, and street sections where pipelines were forbidden to build were standardised, and requirements regarding, for example, automation and information technology were presented. Purchaser-driven tendering began in autumn 2010 The decision to procure was received in September 2010. Purchaser-driven public tendering was started immediately. In addition to price, the criteria for the overall economic efficiency included references, innovativeness and energy consumption. In November 2010, MariMatic Oy, which represented new technology, was selected as the supplier of the main procurement. A frame agreement has been made with them. Itemised goods and installation purchases will 25 Waste collection points were installed in the housing fair area in early May. Vuores pipe system Description factor Description Collected waste types Mixed waste, biowaste, paper and cardboard Floor square metres of the area Housing appr. 360,000 fm2, work places appr. 85,000 fm2 Population equivalent appr. 13,000 Length of the pipeline appr. 13 km, of which 4.5 km with diameter D 310 and the rest with diameter D210 Pipeline type Three separate ring-line systems Collection points appr. 100 -110 pcs, appr. 280 - 300 feeding pipes Waste station Gross floor area appr. 450 fm2, volume appr. 4,900 fm3 Cost 44 … 48 €/fm2 (2010 price level) be made using procurement contracts. In addition to the main procurement, separate tendering was needed, for example, for the waste station building, pipeline earthwork and for part of the planning tasks. There are over ten contractors and their subcontractors. Almost four kilometres of pipeline is ready The construction of the pipeline began in January 2011 and it will continue for the next 10 years. Currently, almost four kilometres of pipeline is ready. The structures of the collection points and connection pipes are built in the housing fair area, as well as in other properties currently being built. The planning of the waste station was done in spring 2011, and the construction began in May 2011. Equipment installation began in December 2011. The waste station with yard structures was ready in June 2012. The pipe system was ready for use in August. 26 In a project involving new technology, in principle, only the purchaser has an interest in keeping the costs in line, and, in particular, in taking care of development work during the construction. It is important to start the cooperation with the planner as early as possible. Potential routes for the pipes, the connections of the main pipe and connecting pipes and preliminary locations for collection points must be clarified. The planning of the pipe system, and in particular, the collection points and pipeline, requires its own “guidelines” including competence. Planning competence related to water supply or district heating systems cannot be directly applied to planning a waste transfer pipeline. Work instructions benefit other projects, as well Work instructions that are created for Vuores regarding collection point and pipeline construction will certainly benefit future projects. For example, when The waste collection point has its own inlets for bio waste, paper, cardboard and mixed waste. the possibility provided by the pipe material and long pipes to vary the planting depth in the trenches is utilised, it has also been possible to be flexible in the planning of the waste conveying pipeline, in relation to the technically more rigid pipes of water supply service and district heating. The route drawings of the pipelines, together with the excavation pictures are created at the same time as the rest of the infrastructure planning of the construction are. The final location planning is done together with the real estate developer. The Vuores project emphasises that there must be an expert checking the pipeline definitions. The expert must have an opportunity to coordinate and check all the different infrastructure plans. Building a large technical system always has its challenges. The building of the waste conveying pipeline must be included as part of street construction jobs. Through good cooperation we have already produced solutions and operational models, which have been used to create competence required by the implementation of new infrastructure. Regular worksite meetings are in a central position to determine possible “collision courses” in advance. A real positive sign in the Vuores project has been the good spirit which has taken place in the cooperation between the infrastructure team and real estate vendors. The waste conveying pipe system has been warmly welcomed to regional construction as new infrastructure. The support and considerable commitment to the project of city officials and officeholders have significantly speeded up the implementation of the project. Pipe system to a subsidiary Naturally, the deployment of the pipe system will raise many questions. How will you be able to get an old frying pan in the pipe? It does not belong there, and the formator will prevent it from entering the pipeline. When the pipe system was selected, we knew that we were not buying a cell phone off the shelf. We will certainly face challenges that can be called problems. However, we are prepared for them and will also participate in the active development work ourselves. Without courage, significant new solutions cannot be deployed, especially not in infrastructure technology. Now it was time for such a solution. A decision was made at Tampere Regional Solid Waste Management Ltd. to establish a subsidiary, Pirkan Putkikeräys Oy to take care of the investment and operation of the pipe collection. Apart from singlefamily houses, the residential and other property companies of the pipe system area are B shareholders of the subsidiary. They made the funding of the pipe system investment transparent, and the entire operation into a clear entity. The subsidiary owns the technical structure of the whole pipe system, including the equipment situated in the properties. No funding was needed from the city for project preparation. www.pirkanmaan-jatehuolto.fi/Yhtio/ pirkanputkikerays