Dosing and Costing Tools for the Evaluation of ERH
Transcription
Dosing and Costing Tools for the Evaluation of ERH
Dosing and Costing Tools for the Evaluation of ERH Treatment of Cr +6 Angus McGrath, PhD (Stantec, Lafayette, California) David Schroder (Stantec, Sylvania, Ohio) Daniel Oberle, PE (TRS Group, Sylvania, Ohio) Presentation Overview • • • • • • • Properties of Chromium Problems associated with Cr+6 treatment Theoretical basis for ERH field observations Research study hypothesis Study design Results Conclusions and Recommendations Properties of Chromium • Commonly found in three oxidation states: – Hexavalent Chromium (CrO4-2, Cr+6) is an oxidant and carcinogen – Trivalent Chromium (Cr+3) is a micronutrient – Elemental Chromium (Cr0) a metal • Cr+6 reacts with reducing agents such as ferrous iron, sulfide, polysulfide, and organic carbon compounds. • Cr+3 is insoluble at typical ambient pH in groundwater Problems with Cr+6 Treatment • Cr+6 is toxic to most microorganisms above a concentrations of approximately 30 mg/L • Certain forms of yeast (30 mg/L), Bacilus (200 to 500 mg/L) and other organism isolated from chromium waste are more resistant to Cr+6 • Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) have been isolated from tannery waste in Pakistan that can tolerate [Cr+6] up to 45 g/L at temperatures of 35 to 37 degrees C (Shakoori et al., 1999) • SRB are also extreme thermophiles surviving extreme temperatures ERH Field Observations • Implementation of ERH at a site with chlorinated VOCs and hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) at 90 µg/L • During initial heating Cr+6 concentrations dropped to below detection limits (5 µg/L) • What caused the reaction to occur given that Cr+6 had been in aquifer for decades? Theoretical Reactions • Soil contains reduced species such as ferrous iron (Fe+2), sulfides, natural organic matter • Reductants such as Fe+2 and sulfides either in solution, adsorbed on mineral surfaces or generated by microbes readily react with dissolved species in saturated soil • Reaction with organic matter must overcome an activation energy barrier of ~ 90 kJ/mol & heat can supply this activation energy Research Hypothesis • Elevated temperature provides the activation energy to facilitate the reaction between natural organic matter and Cr+6 • Heat stimulates microbial activity which either directly (Bacillus sp. such as Acinetobacter haemolyticus and Pannonibacter phragmitetus BB) or indirectly (through production of reductive species) reduces Cr+6. • A combination of the two effects. Experimental Design • Soil samples from a depth of 10 to 12 ft, clayey sand with gravels removed • ~1.1% TOC as measured by Walkley-Black Method – Soil Cr+6 reduction capacity = 32,000 mg/kg • 1 kg of soil, 200 mL water, Dose of 1, 10, 100 and 500 mg/kg Cr+6 Experimental Design (cont) • Incubated at 40oC, 60oC, and 80oC • Samples were sampled after 7 and 14 days 40oC Results 600 Cr+6 Concentration mg/kg 500 40C @ 1 mg/kg 40C @ 10 mg/kg 40C @ 100 mg/kg 400 300 200 100 0 0 5 Days 10 15 60oC Results Cr+6 Concentration mg/kg 600 500 60C @ 1 mg/kg 60C @ 10 mg/kg 60C @ 100 mg/kg 400 300 200 100 0 Days 80oC Results Cr+6 Concentration mg/kg 600 500 80C @ 1 mg/kg 80C @ 10 mg/kg 80C @ 100 mg/kg 400 300 200 100 0 0 5 Days 10 15 Bacteriological Results Test Sample 4oC Bacteria Populations – colony forming units per milliliter (cfu/mL) Sulfate Reducing Iron Reducing Total Heterotrophs Bacteria Bacteria 200 – 1,200 2,300 – 9,000 50,000 – 500,000 40oC 5,000 – 18,000 2,300 – 9,000 500,000 – 7,000,000 60oC 5,000 – 18,000 2,300 – 9,000 500,000 – 7,000,000 80oC 5,000 – 18,000 2,300 – 9,000 500,000 – 7,000,000 Observations • After 7 days little or no reaction was observed at 40oC for 100 and 500 mg/kg samples • After 14 days, 40oC 100 mg/kg sample decreased to 60 mg/kg • At 60oC 100 mg/kg sample decreased to 80 mg/kg after 7 and 6 mg/kg after 14 days • At 80oC 100 mg/kg sample decreased to 3 mg/kg after 7 and to 0 after 14 days • 500 mg/kg sample unchanged at all temperatures Observations • Bacterial numbers increased in the 40oC, 60oC, and 80oC tests in previous tests – bacterial counts were not conducted in this study Conclusions • In Situ heating can readily reduce mobile carcinogen Cr+6 to the insoluble micronutrient Cr+3 at concentrations as high as 100 mg/kg • Above 100 mg/kg Cr+6 appears to be toxic to the soil microbes • Iron reducing bacteria or other heterotrophs may play a significant role in Cr+6 reduction • Treatment can be achieved at 40oC or less when concentrations are below 100 mg/kg Conclusions • The required heating to achieve 40oC can be achieved in 2 to 3 weeks at most sites • ERH operational costs will be less than $100 per cubic yard in clayey soils that are otherwise difficult to treat • Effective treatment of CVOCs and other contaminants that require microbial reduction depend on removal of Cr+6 first