Dosing and Costing Tools for the Evaluation of ERH

Transcription

Dosing and Costing Tools for the Evaluation of ERH
Dosing and Costing
Tools for the
Evaluation of ERH
Treatment of Cr +6
Angus McGrath, PhD (Stantec, Lafayette, California)
David Schroder (Stantec, Sylvania, Ohio)
Daniel Oberle, PE (TRS Group, Sylvania, Ohio)
Presentation Overview
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Properties of Chromium
Problems associated with Cr+6 treatment
Theoretical basis for ERH field observations
Research study hypothesis
Study design
Results
Conclusions and Recommendations
Properties of Chromium
• Commonly found in three oxidation states:
– Hexavalent Chromium (CrO4-2, Cr+6) is an oxidant and
carcinogen
– Trivalent Chromium (Cr+3) is a micronutrient
– Elemental Chromium (Cr0) a metal
• Cr+6 reacts with reducing agents such as ferrous iron,
sulfide, polysulfide, and organic carbon compounds.
• Cr+3 is insoluble at typical ambient pH in
groundwater
Problems with Cr+6 Treatment
• Cr+6 is toxic to most microorganisms above a
concentrations of approximately 30 mg/L
• Certain forms of yeast (30 mg/L), Bacilus (200 to 500
mg/L) and other organism isolated from chromium
waste are more resistant to Cr+6
• Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) have been isolated
from tannery waste in Pakistan that can tolerate
[Cr+6] up to 45 g/L at temperatures of 35 to 37
degrees C (Shakoori et al., 1999)
• SRB are also extreme thermophiles surviving extreme
temperatures
ERH Field Observations
• Implementation of ERH at a site with
chlorinated VOCs and hexavalent chromium
(Cr+6) at 90 µg/L
• During initial heating Cr+6 concentrations
dropped to below detection limits (5 µg/L)
• What caused the reaction to occur given that
Cr+6 had been in aquifer for decades?
Theoretical Reactions
• Soil contains reduced species such as ferrous
iron (Fe+2), sulfides, natural organic matter
• Reductants such as Fe+2 and sulfides either in
solution, adsorbed on mineral surfaces or
generated by microbes readily react with
dissolved species in saturated soil
• Reaction with organic matter must overcome
an activation energy barrier of ~ 90 kJ/mol &
heat can supply this activation energy
Research Hypothesis
• Elevated temperature provides the activation
energy to facilitate the reaction between
natural organic matter and Cr+6
• Heat stimulates microbial activity which either
directly (Bacillus sp. such as Acinetobacter
haemolyticus and Pannonibacter phragmitetus
BB) or indirectly (through production of
reductive species) reduces Cr+6.
• A combination of the two effects.
Experimental Design
• Soil samples from a depth of 10 to 12 ft,
clayey sand with gravels removed
• ~1.1% TOC as measured by Walkley-Black
Method
– Soil Cr+6 reduction capacity = 32,000 mg/kg
• 1 kg of soil, 200 mL water, Dose of 1, 10, 100
and 500 mg/kg Cr+6
Experimental Design
(cont)
• Incubated at 40oC, 60oC, and 80oC
• Samples were sampled after 7 and 14 days
40oC Results
600
Cr+6 Concentration mg/kg
500
40C @ 1 mg/kg
40C @ 10 mg/kg
40C @ 100 mg/kg
400
300
200
100
0
0
5
Days
10
15
60oC Results
Cr+6 Concentration mg/kg
600
500
60C @ 1 mg/kg
60C @ 10 mg/kg
60C @ 100 mg/kg
400
300
200
100
0
Days
80oC Results
Cr+6 Concentration mg/kg
600
500
80C @ 1 mg/kg
80C @ 10 mg/kg
80C @ 100 mg/kg
400
300
200
100
0
0
5
Days
10
15
Bacteriological Results
Test Sample
4oC
Bacteria Populations – colony forming units per milliliter
(cfu/mL)
Sulfate Reducing
Iron Reducing
Total Heterotrophs
Bacteria
Bacteria
200 – 1,200
2,300 – 9,000
50,000 – 500,000
40oC
5,000 – 18,000
2,300 – 9,000
500,000 – 7,000,000
60oC
5,000 – 18,000
2,300 – 9,000
500,000 – 7,000,000
80oC
5,000 – 18,000
2,300 – 9,000
500,000 – 7,000,000
Observations
• After 7 days little or no reaction was observed
at 40oC for 100 and 500 mg/kg samples
• After 14 days, 40oC 100 mg/kg sample
decreased to 60 mg/kg
• At 60oC 100 mg/kg sample decreased to 80
mg/kg after 7 and 6 mg/kg after 14 days
• At 80oC 100 mg/kg sample decreased to 3
mg/kg after 7 and to 0 after 14 days
• 500 mg/kg sample unchanged at all
temperatures
Observations
• Bacterial numbers increased in the 40oC, 60oC,
and 80oC tests in previous tests – bacterial
counts were not conducted in this study
Conclusions
• In Situ heating can readily reduce mobile
carcinogen Cr+6 to the insoluble micronutrient
Cr+3 at concentrations as high as 100 mg/kg
• Above 100 mg/kg Cr+6 appears to be toxic to
the soil microbes
• Iron reducing bacteria or other heterotrophs
may play a significant role in Cr+6 reduction
• Treatment can be achieved at 40oC or less
when concentrations are below 100 mg/kg
Conclusions
• The required heating to achieve 40oC can be
achieved in 2 to 3 weeks at most sites
• ERH operational costs will be less than $100
per cubic yard in clayey soils that are
otherwise difficult to treat
• Effective treatment of CVOCs and other
contaminants that require microbial reduction
depend on removal of Cr+6 first