scroope19 cambridge architecture journal
Transcription
scroope19 cambridge architecture journal
cambridge architecturescroope19 journal Editors Stavros Alifragkis Giorgos Artopoulos Julia Sussner, PhD Front Cover, Graphic Design Giorgos Artopoulos ISSN: 0966-1026 © Copyright Scroope 2009. No part of this publication may be reproduced without prior permission from Scroope. Copyright of the articles retained by respective authors. Copyright of the illustrations is referenced in the corresponding legend. Every effort has been made to obtain permission for the reproduction of illustrations. Scroope – Cambridge Architecture Journal 1-5 Scroope Terrace Cambridge CB2 1PX England, UK T : 01223 332950 F : 01223 332960 e-mail: [email protected] website: http://www.arct.cam.ac.uk/powerspaceconference/SCROOPE%2019%20Site/index.html Printed by Piggott Black Bear Printers Ltd, Cambridge All articles were formated according to the Harvard style. With special thanks to: Amelia Gray Philip Prager Donald Saga Lawrence Schear Lily Shirvanee We gratefully acknowledge the following donors for their generous support: Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge 2 scroope nineteen scroope19ContentsJUNE2009 About the Authors 5 Editorial 9 François PENZ Foreword 11 Panayotis TOURNIKIOTIS The Power of the Labyrinth and the Wings of the Architect 14 Daniel M. SUSSNER Future Past: Digital Enlightenment and the Visual Commons 24 Samantha MARTIN-McAULIFFE Architecture as Palimpsest in the Athenian Agora Peter MACAPIA 34 Question: Can we Question the Relation between Space and Power as such? 42 Nimish BILORIA Developing an Interactive Architectural Meta-System for Contemporary Corporate Environments 52 Irina DAVIDOVICI Townhouse on Charlotte Road, Stephen Taylor Architects: Reflections on Type and Place 64 Stephen TAYLOR House on Work London, 2006 68 Evangelia ATHANASSIOU “How the West was Won:” Transformations at the “Western Entrance” to the Thessaloniki 72 cambridge architecture journal 3 Maria HELLSTRöM REIMER Pusher Street in Christiania 82 Yael MUNK When the Ghosts of Colonialism Invade the City of Paris: from Mon Oncle to Caché 94 Sumet JUMSAI Power of the Celluloid and Reflection on History 100 Juliana HODKINSON Instrumentality and the Urban Instrumentarium 106 Lukas FEIREISS Stranger than Fiction: On the Power of Perception in Public Spaces 114 Valerie WALKERDINE Power, Space and Anxiety in the Work of Anthony Gormley 120 Syrago TSIARA Body Politics and Monumental Public Scultpure in Totalitarian Regimes 124 Maria TSANTSANOGLOY Art and Architecture: The “Costakis Collection” at the State Museum of Contemporary Art in Thessaloniki, Greece 134 Stavros ALIFRAGKIS and François PENZ Power of “Reconstruction:” Dziga Vertov’s Cinematic Socialist City of the Future 144 interview with Perry BARD Power Structures and Digital Media: 2008 Man with the Movie Camera The Global Remake 154 The Power of Musical Montage: Michael Nyman’s soundtrack for Vertov’s Man with the Movie Camera 160 interview with Michael NYMAN 4 scroope nineteen Instrumentality and the Urban Instrumentarium Juliana Hodkinson Let us listen to our cities, say philosopher Jean-Francois Augoyard and sociologist Henry Torgue in the introduction to their alphabetical sourcebook of sound effects, Sonic Experience.1 From Walter Ruttmann’s (1887-1941) Berlin sound collage Weekend (1929) up through the 20th century and into the new millennium, representations and conceptual abstractions of the city have been crucial to the development of sound art, just as the ubiquity of sound has come to serve as a paradigm in thinking about the city. The sonic turn in urban studies offers an excellent perspective from which to consider models of how we perceive and use the city. Listening is a sensory navigation in a world of overlapping, porous phenomena – sound spreads, and sonic effects co-exist in complex ways that require aural concentration for their differentiation. Regarding urban auditory territory from the point of sound art, we can see how sound artists bring relationships between listeners and their sonic surroundings into play, using the technologies of recording, amplification, and resonance – both as instruments of representation, and for prompting interaction as a tool of agency. Sound art with an explicitly urban dimension often brings these issues of agency and power into relief. Considering a historical work such as Else Marie Pade’s (b.1924) Copenhagen montage Symphonie Magnétophonique (1958) alongside recent works such as Jacob Kirkegaard’s installation Broadway (2007), and Christina Kubisch’s Electrical Walks (2003-ongoing), tells us not only about the development of sound art, from tape collage through installation to soundwalk, but also about how the urban listener has changed from detached flâneur to immersed individual. In the work of all three artists named, the potential of sound technologies to augment our audition of the city is optimised as a major point of the aesthetic experience. At first glance, the “instrumental” aspect of sound art invoked by talk of agency seems to have nothing in common with instru106 scroope nineteen mental music. But punning on the associations produced by the term “instrument” might, nevertheless, bring a discussion of sound art closer to its physical and material aspects. Pade, Kirkegaard, and Kubisch’s soundworks can be considered partly in terms of their uses of the urban instrumentarium (its sonic effects), but also in terms of the modes of instrumentality by which sound artists and their listeners structure these sounds in a set of orientational relationships. Our perceptions of urban instrumentality and personal agency have changed greatly since the broadly industrialist view of early musique concrète. Augoyard and Torgue appeal to us to reflect on the instrumental dimension of urban space, and the way that sound events are shaped not only by urban context but also by the listener’s auditory competence, psychology, culture, and background: “The city has sometimes been described as a real musical instrument; the material and spatial characteristics of urban morphology can in fact be compared with similar aspects of acoustic instrumentation. The analogy, which calls for measurement and examination, only considers passive acoustic properties, and therefore does not deserve deeper interest. The metaphor really inspires analysis in relation to performance, the ways to play and conduct sounds, the design and use of effects. What instruments are available to technicians and researchers, administrators and users, designers and inhabitants? What is the sonic instrumentarium of urban environments?”2 Augoyard and Torgue are quick to dismiss the urban sound environment as analogous with a musically instrumental palette, in favour of engaging with it as a site of transformation. Their project is at the intersection of physical and applied acoustics, architecture and urbanism, sociology and everyday culture, musical aesthetics, and “textual and media expressions” – a mix that typifies auditory culture studies and shies away from more traditionally “musical” representational descriptions. Nevertheless, their formulation of the sonic instrumentarium of cities has a considerable overlap with the most traditionally musical of the works considered in this article. Scoring City Sounds Even the title of Else Marie Pade’s Symphonie Magnétophonique indicates the composer’s consciousness of a musical tradition. Else Marie Pade is a classically trained Danish composer, revived in recent years as a pioneer of Danish electronic sound art. Symphonie Magnétophonique is a 20-minute sound portrait of the city of Copenhagen based on recordings made around the city, evoking an urban day from early morning, through work and rush-hour, an evening’s entertainment, and back to bed at the end of the day – a temporal narrative that is shared by works such as Walter Ruttmann’s Berlin hörfilm Weekend (1929) and Luc Ferrari’s (1929-2005) more pastoral Prèsque Rien (1970), depicting in sound a day in a fishing village. cambridge architecture journal 107 Pade’s Symphonie Magnétophonique was composed through a handwritten score which at first glance looks like a piece for percussion ensemble. Different sound sources (milk bottles, doors, alarm clocks, trams, cars, bicycle bells, etc.) are each given their stave or part; they are notated motivically, rhythmically, and dynamically as if they were acoustic classical instruments. What are the sound sources, the instruments? Birdsong, a whistling milkman, clockwork, snoring, an alarm clock, clock tower bells, cisterns, machines, machinic voices, a door slamming, dance music, Copenhagen’s characteristic bicycle bells, buses, a typewriter, birds whose cries are slowed down, 24 hours from 6 a.m. to 6 a.m., a Tivoli/fairground, an organ grinder, trains, trams, footsteps, kitchen sounds, a kiss, quotations of Danish music such as “Champagne Gallop,” sirens, a heartbeat; even a falling bomb, followed by police sirens and mumbling crowds. The most archetypically urban of these sounds overlap with Walter Ruttmann’s instrumentarium, but many of the recorded sources are specifically local to Copenhagen. There are lots of people-sounds, but few spoken voices; there’s the milkman’s whistle, sounds of snoring, toothbrushing, kisses, yawns, footsteps, but the only voices are a coloratura soprano, a man and a woman saying “hallo,” a child’s song, the radio news, a newspaper seller, and the insistent, rhythmicised repetition of the word “arbejde” (work). The compositional treatment of voices supports the dominance of instrumental music (and the machinic) over the vocal in post-war composition; as an alternative to vocal, dramatic, and choral musics, instrumental music – like sound art - is considered “abstract.” Departing from a simple cut-and-splice technique, the treatment of the recordings develops through various manipulations (mainly reverse distortion and alterations in playback speed), to become a series of compositional manoeuvres within the musique concrète paradigm, with which Pade was in close contact during this period. These basic electronic manipulations are also very close to the sonic effects that Augoyard and Torgue describe as elementary, compositional, or electro-acoustic. In Pade’s own words, Jacob Kirkegaard’s Broadway. “[...] whereas a hörspiel would have presented the course of a day in a naturalistic sound-collage, in this symphony we tried to make naturalistic (concrete) sound into abstract tone-material. Every sound contains a ‘tone’ and a ‘rhythm,’ and through operations such as change of splicing, crossmodulation, echo, dynamic regulation, and juxtaposition, we tried to order the isolated naturalistic sounds (the parts in the concrete orchestra) according to the table prescribed by the score.”3 Source: Jacob Kirkegaard In terms of the thematisation of “instrumentality” in urban sound art, and the way that different artists “play” the city, one can say that Pade takes recordings of everyday effects and isolates them as instrumental timbres which enter into a layered composition of shuffled sounds that are roughly identifiable, and also undergo a kind of musical tone transformation. In the way that musical 108 scroope nineteen instrumentalists shape tones with vibrato, phrasing, and articulation, so Pade enters into the aesthetic possibilities of these everyday recorded sound-objects and draws out their potential for being abstracted and extracted in the interests of a specific artistic language. Urban Reverberations Installations such as Jacob Kirkegaard’s (b.1975) Broadway (2007) demonstrate a kind of instrumentality that is interesting in virtue of resonance – both in terms of architecturally acoustic concerns and in the composer’s way of bringing a city to resonance at an artistic level. In Broadway, the vibrations of 5 cast iron pillars are recorded and captured through subtle resonance spectra, and played back into the pillars through 12 exciters fastened onto each one.4 The columns run through the gallery space of the commissioning institution (New York’s Swiss Institute), connecting the space – through vibrations – to the rest of the building and, ultimately, to the street and subway below.5 Set up in this way, the five columns act as loudspeakers, while at the same time filtering urban noise. They “play” the sounds of Broadway, each in its individual resonant frequency – but the narrow resonance spectra result in a limited playback frequency, and thus the busyness of the location’s address is muted to an abstract hum. The way that Kirkegaard’s installation offers a means of experiencing reverberations of the urban environment relies on nuances too subtle to be intuitively linked with our everyday conception of this archetypically urban site; the artist’s amplification of urban sonic phenomena results in a smoothing of the city’s irregular roar. Acoustic architect Barry Blesser extends a relatively conventional and well-established topic that is the foundation of practical acoustics – namely, how musical sound reverberates in space – to ask how concert spaces and auditoria are activated through musical sound as “metainstruments.” This discussion can be useful to apply to the case of urban space (as an auditorium) and sound art that is played onto the urban field. Blesser’s book analyses aural architecture devised for musical purposes, but in the case of sound art spreading throughout the city and presupposing sonic ubiquity as its meaningful material, we can also consider the city as a space for reverberation, a kind of metainstrument. “As a simplification, a musical instrument contains two acoustically coupled elements: an active energy source, and one or more passive elements that create a unique timbre. For example, a violin has vibrating strings, an active source of sonic energy when the violinist pushes a bow across the strings. Musical energy is converted into acoustic energy at the point of contact. Vibrating strings then couple their acoustic energy to the violin body, which acts as a passive resonant enclosure and surface radiator. Drums, organ pipes, cymbals, and even singers can also be modelled as active energy sources coupled to passive resonators. Both the passive and active elements of an instrument may serve cambridge architecture journal 109 Christina Kubisch: Electrical Walks. Source: Courtesy of Christina Kubisch either or both of two separate functions: shaping the spectral timbre, and creating temporal spreading.”6 In the relation between musical instrument (primary resonant enclosure) and concert hall (secondary resonant enclosure), then, the second contributes to the first, governing how the passive and active elements of an instrument shape the way it sounds and create its diffusion in space. “When the violin’s body transmits its sound to the concert hall’s enclosure, the violin becomes a metaviolin; without a secondary resonant enclosure, the violin remains a protoviolin. Performance spaces create a new class of musical instruments: metaviolin, metaclarinet, metaoboe, and so forth.”7 On this model, the pipes in Kirkegaard’s installation are in a way both primary and secondary resonant enclosures. They are both instrument and enclosure, through which Kirkegaard plays the building back onto itself. Jacob Kirkegaard has a specific interest in resonance, often approaching the making of new pieces through acoustic aspects of spaces and listening phenomena – especially those aspects that require amplification in order to be accessible to auditory perception. Using accelerometers, hydrophones, home-built electromagnetic receivers, and other combinations of resonators and microphones, Kirkegaard typically seeks vibrations that can be fruitful for aesthetic listening. The environments where he looks for these sounds – “secret sounds,” as he calls them himself – are not always urban; they can be industrial, volcanic-geological, domestic, or even anatomical (the inner ear). The abstract smoothing of the sound is a characteristic of Kirkegaard’s work, such that resonance and filter are tightly joined in both concept and physical realisation. Electromagnetic Immersion: Immersed in the Electromagnetic Soundfield In their introduction to The Auditory Culture Reader, Michael Bull and Les Back invoke US experimental composer Pauline Oliveros’ 110 scroope nineteen (b.1932) term “deep listening” as a model for rethinking social experience, community, relational experiences regarding spaces and places, and power relationships. The kind of work that goes on in deep listening (as opposed to easy listening) is distinguished by its demand on the listener for an agile mode of listening.8 Agile listening is a particularly fitting description in relation to the issues of agency and instrumentality that arise in connection with Christina Kubisch’s (b.1948) Electrical Walks, in that the agility is very literal. Hearing one of Christina Kubisch’s electrical soundwalks literally requires movement on the part of the listener. Auditory discrimination at any level (from the simply orientational to the abstractly acousmatic) requires intentionality in listening; Kubisch’s electrical walks make this intentionality into a prerequisite for locating anything to be heard at all. Similar to the work of Janet Cardiff (b.1957), whose name is synonymous with audio walks, Christina Kubisch’s Electrical walks increase the listener’s agency through mobile listening; the playback situation is superimposed on a virtual cityscape that overlaps unreliably and mischievously with the sounds heard in the headphones. With Kubisch, the interactive element is increased by being extended to the production of sound, such that the listener’s curiosity is rewarded by seeking out electromagnetic fields and having their existence confirmed through noise of one kind or another. In Electrical Walks, listeners are directed along pre-planned urban soundwalk routes wearing custom-made wireless headphones that detect and amplify electromagnetic fields and convert signals to audible soundwaves, through a set of induction coils. The listener is given the headphones and a map of the area, marked with suggestions of possible routes and areas of interesting electrical fields. The listener’s technical instrumentality in the work is limited to perhaps adjusting the volume on the headset, but the key agency lies in walking with the headset and positioning oneself very precisely in relation to specific sources. Walk maps include suggestions as to what kinds of sites demonstrate interesting sonic fields, Christina Kubisch: Electrical Walk, Birmingham, 2007. Source: Christina Kubisch cambridge architecture journal 111 e.g. “Go up to level 5 and stand outside Hugo Boss to listen to their security system,” or “listen to the variety of sounds emitted by security gates and the revolving billboards.” (In this respect, Kubisch’s electrical walks even go part way in providing the “sound history of surveillance” that Bull and Back demand.) ATMs, Wi-Fi areas, ticket machines, and mobile phones all become virtual instruments waiting to be played by listeners, through head movements akin to the hovering of a musician’s hands around a Theremin. As David Michael Perez comments in the liner notes to a CD of compositions by Kubisch derived from the Electrical Walks: “the agency and power given to the spectator may be the work’s ultimate achievement,” indicating as they do the extent to which there are “unseen forces at play in our beguiling world.”9 One of the tracks on the CD consists solely of sounds derived from security gate emissions in six different cities. If Pade’s listener is a musical flâneur, listening to the city in terms of motifs and timbres, Kubisch’s listener is an immersed individual with a high degree of mobility and agency. According to Oliver Grau, in an immersive relationship: “[...] the relations are multifaceted, closely intertwined, dialectical, in part contradictory, and certainly highly dependent on the disposition of the observer. Immersion can be an intellectually stimulating process; however, in the present as in the past, in most cases immersion is [...] characterised by diminishing critical distance to what is shown and increasing emotional involvement in what is happening.”10 Compared to representational strategies in acousmatics, immersion offers an opportunity for the constitution of presence that – in urban sound art – fits well with highlighting the everyday, the vernacular, the local, the site-specific/related – “The quality of apparently being present in the image [...] achieved thorough maximisation of realism and increased through illusionism in the service of an immersive effect.” In Janet Cardiff’s classic audio walks, the fictional element of simulated stereophonic sound goes hand-in-hand with this reference to illusionism, whereas in Kubisch’s electrical walks there is no attempt to produce a fictional illusion; the strangeness of the exercise itself, the sounds that it produces, the immediacy and excitement of the interactive element [...] all these replace illusion, yet still in the service of the immersive effect – giving the listener the strongest impression possible of being at the location where the sound is whilst immersed in an aspect of reality that is so strange it seems virtual or “magic,” ethereal, and likely to disappear as soon as the headphones are taken off. Kubisch’s interest in electromagnetic fields resonates with Augoyard and Torgue’s commentary on urban drones, as sonic continua linked to physical elements in urban and industrial mechanised civilisations (car traffic, fluorescent lighting, muzak).11 Kubisch, Kirkegaard and Pade demonstrate just a handful of ways to listen to our cities, and to play and conduct sounds through urban aesthetic experiences. 112 scroope nineteen Endnotes Route map for Electrical Walk, South Kensington, London, 2005. Source: Courtesy of Christina Kubisch 1. Augoyard, J.F. and Torgue, H. (2006) Sonic Experience: A Guide to Everyday Sounds. Queen’s University Press, McGill, p.4. 2. Augoyard and Torgue, op. cit., p.4. 3. Bruland, I. (2006) Else Marie Pade og Symphonie Magnétophonique. Forlag, Museum Tusculanums, p.49. 4. Exciters are electro-acoustic vibrators, which can transform any substance into a loudspeaker. 5. The installation is described in detail in Kølbæk Iversen, M. (2007): The Sound of the White Columns at http://secretsounds.dk/mk_broadway.pdf, originally published in Danish as Lyden af Smedejernssøjler på Broadway in Dansk Musik Tidsskrift, no. 5, pp.160-5. 6. Blesser, B. and Salter, L.R. (2007) Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? Experiencing Aural Architecture. MIT Press, Cambridge, p.135. 7. Blesser, op. cit., p.136 8. Bull, M. and Back, L. (2003) The Auditory Culture Reader. Berg, p.3. 9. Kubisch, Ch. (2007) Invisible/Inaudible: Five Electrical Walks. Important Records. 10.Grau, O. (2003) Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. MIT Press, Cambridge, p.13. 11. Augoyard and Torgue, op. cit., pp.40-6. cambridge architecture journal 113