CSIRO AusAID Alliance NTB Sekaroh Scenario Planning Workshop

Climate Futures and Rural
Livelihood Adaptation Strategies in
Nusa Tenggara Barat Province,
Indonesia
Dampak perubahan iklim terhadap mata
penghidupan masyarakat di Provinsi Nusa
Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
Sekaroh Futures and Livelihood
Adaptation Strategies:
Workshop Report
13th November – 14th November 2013
BACKGROUND
The islands of Eastern Indonesia have some of the highest levels of poverty and food insecurity in the country. Livelihoods are primarily rural and dependent on ecosystem goods and services provided by terrestrial and marine habitats, and are highly sensitive to climate change. Currently no method exists to assess the vulnerability of livelihoods in these islands to climate or other drivers of change such as population growth, or to design ‘no regrets’ adaptation strategies which lead to benefits even in the absence of change. This project aims to meet this need by developing an approach in the islands of Lombok and Sumbawa, Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB) Province. A research partnership has been established between the AusAID‐CSIRO Alliance, University of Mataram (UNRAM), BMKG (Indonesian Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysical Board), the Research Institute for Agricultural Technology (BPTP) and the NTB Government’s Climate Change Task Force.
One of the most vulnerable areas obtained from the results of previous workshops is in
typology 1 (fishermen typology) located in Sekaroh Village, District of Jerowaru. This
location also has other subsistence such as forest products, agriculture, farming, embankment,
and tourism potency. However, infrastructures condition which is inadequate and low human
resources, compounded by the uncertain climate conditions, the village is very vulnerable to
climate change and subsistence. Subsistence condition in Sekaroh Village can be seen on
pictures in appendix, complete with maps and other supporting information in all the hamlets
of Sekaroh Village.
Workshop of Sekaroh Village Adaptation Planning was held in Sekaroh Village’s hall,
District of Jerowaru, East Lombok on Wednesday 13 – Thursday 14, November 2013. The
workshop’s participants consisted of PT. ESL, CSIRO, UNRAM, East Lombok Regency
Government, local LSM and Sekaroh communities.
Workshop of Sekaroh Village Adaptation Planning aims to:
1 Identify the future vision of Sekaroh Village
2 Identify the level of vulnerability in every hamlet
3 Identify the adaptation strategies priority and scheme of works proposed to Sekaroh Village
SUMMARY OF WORKSHOP
DAY 1: Wednesday, November 13
8:30
Session 1
Session 2
Session 3
5:00
: Opening and Introduction
: What is supporting factors of subsistence alteration in Sekaroh?
: How does the future of Sekaroh?
: What is the impact caused by future alteration toward subsistence in
Sekaroh?
: Finish
DAY 2: Thursday, November 14
8:30
Session 4
: Flashback of Day 1
: How does the capacity of adaptation in Sekaroh?
Session 5
Session 6
5:00
: What is adaptation strategy priority of subsistence in Sekaroh?
: How does this adaptation strategy compared with development program (scheme of
work)?
: Finish
The workshop was attended by 31 Participants, 11 Collaborative and Management team, 3
Australian team, 1 Observer, Guest and Mass Media representative.
No
Name
Dinas/Instansi/Badan/Lembaga
KEPALA DINAS KEBUDAYAAN DAN PARIWISATA
LOMBOK TIMUR
DINAS PERTANIAN DAN PETERNAKAN LOMBOK
TIMUR
1
GUFRANUDDIN
2
RUSMAN YAMIN
3
URIP SOPYAN, S.IP
4
MIHARJA HARIS, S.AP
5
SABRI
6
MIRZA SOPHIAN
BADAN KETAHANAN PANGAN LOMBOK TIMUR
7
H. M. MANSUR
KADES SEKAROH
8
AMIN ABDULLAH
LSM, LPSDN
9
AHMAD TURMUZI
LSM, AMPEL
10
L. MUKARRAF
YAYASAN GUMI PAER LOMBOK
11
JUMASE
KANTOR CAMAT JERUWARU
12
SUHIRMAN
KANTOR CAMAT JEROWARU
13
MANSUR
BPD DESA SEKAROH
14
SARUJI
KADUS
15
MASDAN
PJS KADUS TELONE
16
LALU AGUS
DINAS KEBUDAYAAN DAN PARIWISATA LOMBOK
TIMUR
17
MASTARIADI
LPMM LOMBOK TIMUR
18
L. AFDALUDDIN SOHRI
KANTOR DESA SEKAROH
CAMAT JEROWARU
BADAN PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DAN
PEMERINTAHAN DESA, LOMBOK TIMUR
DINAS KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN LOMBOK
TIMUR
19
JUFRIANTO
KANTOR DESA SEKAROH
20
NURHAYATI
KADER POSYANDU DESA SEKAROH
21
YULIANA
PAUD-AL HISROH
22
MARDIANAN
PAUD PENGOROS
23
MULAWARMAN
KPH RINJANI TIMUR
24
BQ. HARTINI
KADER POSYANDU SEKAROH
25
MUNAWAR
KADUS PENGOROS
26
KAMARUDDIN
TOKOH PEMUDA DESA SEKAROH
27
SA’AMUDDIN
KADUS ARO INAQ
28
ABDUL KALAM, S.SOS
KANTOR CAMAT JEROWARU
29
L. HAMZANWADI
KANTOR CAMAT JEROWARU
30
MULYAWARMAN
LKMD SEKAROH
31
SAHAR
KADUS UJUNG KETANGGE
32
L. KHAERUDIN
KADUS
33
NURHAYANI
KADER
34
L. PUTRANOM
PEMUDA
35
NURMIN
KADER
36
L. SUPRIADI
PERAWAT PUSTU DESA SEKAROH
37
TAJALLI YAHYA
YAYASAN GUMI PAER LOMBOK
38
KAMARUDDIN
HKM
39
HERMANTO
HKM
40
NASRUN
KANTOR DESA SEKAROH
41
SIRAJUNNASIHIN
YAYASAN GUMI PAER LOMBOK
42
SURIATI
KANTOR DESA SEKAROH
43
SALMAN JAFAR
KANTOR DESA SEKAROH
44
MQ SURIATI
LKMD DESA SEKAROH
45
JUMALIN
KANTOR DESA SEKAROH
46
SYAMSUL BAHRI
BABINSA
Collaborative Team
No
1
Name
PROF.
YUSUF
SUTARYONO, PHD
Dinas/Instansi/Badan/Lembaga
AKHYAR
UNIVERSITAS MATARAM
2
DR. KETUT PUSPADI
BALAI PENGKAJIAN TEKNOLOGI PERTANIAN
NTB / CENTER OF AGRICULTURE TECHNOLOGY
ASSESSMENT
3
DR. ALIS MUKHLIS
UNIVERSITAS MATARAM
4
PROF. KOMANG DAMARJAYA
UNIVERSITAS MATARAM
5
MURSHAL GHAZALI
UNIVERSITAS MATARAM
6
LUKITA CESARIA IBUNDANI
UNIVERSITAS MATARAM
7
MAURIEK PUTRANTA
UNIVERSITAS MATARAM
8
WAYAN EKA SUPARWATA
9
ADI RIPALDI. SP.MAHG
BADAN METEOROLOGI KLIMATOLOGI DAN
GEOFISIKA KEDIRI / Bureau of Meteorology,
Climatology and Geophysics
BADAN METEOROLOGI KLIMATOLOGI DAN
GEOFISIKA KEDIRI / Bureau of Meteorology,
Climatology and Geophysics
CSIRO and Australian Team
No
1
Name
JAMES BUTLER
Dinas/Instansi/Badan/Lembaga
CSIRO
2
MICHAELA
CSIRO
Observer and Facilitator
No
1
Name
ALEXIS ANDERSON
Dinas/Instansi/Badan/Lembaga
PT. ECO SOLUTIONS LOMBOK
2
PUTRAWAN HABIBI
PT. ECO SOLUTIONS LOMBOK
3
NANDA
PT. ECO SOLUTIONS LOMBOK
4
ULFA ANDERSON
PT. ECO SOLUTIONS LOMBOK
DAY 1
Session 1: What is incentive factors of subsistence alteration in Sekaroh Village?
The first session is the first step to introduce and brainstorm the participants to the
presentation members about incentive factors of alteration in Sekaroh Village either in
relation to environment alteration, economy or social (subsistence alteration) viewed from
global scale, NTB, District of Jerowaru up to the scale of the village. From this session,
participants will understand the meaning of the incentive factors of the village.
Table 5. The presentations are:
Title
Presenter
Subsistence in Sekaroh
H. Mansyur (Head office of Sekaroh)
Global future, climate change, rising of sea Adi Ripaldi (BMKG NTB)
level in Jerowaru especially in Sekaroh
Village
Demographic trend, economy, culture and Ketut Puspadi (BPTP NTB)
food endurance in the Regency of East
Lombok
The next step is identifying the incentive factors of subsistence alteration in Sekaroh Village
and ranking the supporting factors based on the level of importance. In this activity,
participants are divided into four (4) groups consisted of various stakeholders wherein each
group is facilitated by a collaborative team. From the activity, it is obtained the list of
incentive factors of subsistence alteration which have been ranked based on the level of
importance. Sequentially, the incentive factors are: 1) Infrastructure, 2) Human Resources, 3)
Natural Resource, 4) Climate, 5) Economiy, 6) Politics, and 7) Technology. It can be
completely seen in the table below.
Table: Incentive factors of alteration
No. Category
Incentive factors of alteration
1
Infrastructure
Irrigation and water for agriculture
Rural transportation facility
Health facility/posyandu
arket
electricity
Availability of clean water to all hamlets
Printing of new fields
Reservoir
Roads
Fishing gear
Sport facility and infrastructure
Groundwater bag
Farm business roads
Economic facility (cooperation, KUBE, public Bank)
2.
Human resource
3.
Natural resource
4.
Climate change
Pustu construction
Road construction (Aro inak s/d Tanjung Ringgit)
Public health infrastructure
Flowing of Pandan Dure water to Sekaroh
Construction of boarding school
Center of integrated information service
Center of Sekaroh government service
Communication facility
Independent village of energy
Shopping center
Village landfills
Life skill
Vocation/labor
Education level
Religious education
Youth activity
Public awareness of environmental impact is less
Public health
KB program
Education of SD, SMP, SMK, BLK
Skill education (farmer women)
Marine ecosystem is threatened (mangroves and coral reefs
was damaged)
Terrestrial ecosystem is threatened (burned and cut forests,
excavated chalk)
Quality of sea water
Forest damage
Mangrove forest
Fresh water
Agriculture
Arrangement of environment
Husbandry
Reforestation
Natural potential (beauty of nature)
increasing of plant species
Sawah garam
Environmental conservation of land/sea
Turtle conservation
Fishery
Illegal logging
Illegal grazing
Status of endangered flora and fauna
Destructive fishing (bombs, putas etc.)
Lack of rainfall
Climate information
Disaster Detection
Getting heat
Reduction of Carbon gas usage
5.
Economy
6.
Politic
7
Technology
8.
Culture
Business capital/productive
Cooperation
Investment/foreign investment
Public market
Vocation
Safety (for investment and tourism)
Tourism
TPI/PPI
Investor
Agribusiness center
Seaweed
Dependence on moneylender and barter pattern
Home industry
Comprehension of politics
Good program management system
Government’s concern in program
Attitude and behavior of rural government
Political will
Stakeholder involved
Reproduced cultivation
Salt pond, shrimp, and seaweed
No product processing
Appropriate technology
Agriculture Intensification
Food technology Teknologi pengolahan pangan
Counseling of agriculture, plantation, forestry, fishery,
husbandry and handicraft.
Information technology and mass media
Technology in changing salt water into fresh water
Alternative energy center
Farmers management system
Fishery technology
Agricultural production facility
Coastal cultivation technology
Reducing mating divorce
Addition of art tools
Cultural site preservation
Security
Dependence on certain groups or figures
Lack of gender role
PKK activity
Cooperation among inhabitants
Contest/event
Mutual cooperation
Community organization
Recitation of Imtaq
Society describes incentive The society ranks incentive factors of alteration in Sekaroh
factors of alteration in Sekaroh Village.
Village.
Session 2: How does the future of Sekaroh?
Activities in this session aim to identify the future vision of Sekaroh Villager in 2090 based
on the real situation nowadays. Participants are divided into four groups and write their
statements regarding to the vision of subsistence in the village in 2090. Each group presents
their vision back to plenary and discuss about it. It is then refined to create a vision. Each
group is assisted by a collaborative team in a discussion group.
From the discussions and the presentations from each group, it is obtained a vision of Sekaroh
Village in 2090 as follows:
1) Prosperous society, educated and skilled, physically and mentally healthy with nature
sustainable as well as preserve culture and religious values, safe and orderly
conditions of Sekaroh Village, supported by adequate infrastructure and stable
political conditions.
2) Prosperous society and free of poverty, intelligent, skilled, dignified, safe and
peaceful. Healthy, independent, civilized and cultured society according to the
religion, the village which is free from pollution and disasters supported by the
infrastructure of adequate roads and water
3) Green and sustainable Sekaroh supported by infrastructure of water, electricity,
irrigation, roads, and adequate health, the existence of safe and prosperous Sekaroh for
creating a job from the presence of tourism and investment. Modern Sekaroh village
with the availability of telecommunications technology, information and processing
facilities that can support sustainable tourism. It also entirely is run by customary law.
Sekaroh village society must be resilient in confronting natural disasters, and
4) Sekaroh village community with the proper subsistence, prosperous, independent and
modern metropolitan
The next activity is introducing planning scenario and explaining two most important
incentive factors have been ranked. This activity use diagram axes scenario in the theme of
priority of incentive factors wherein its characteristics are positive and negative. Above the
each label, written some key issues identified as incentive of alteration in session 1 by
participants:
1) Infrastructure and Human Resources: (a) Water, roads and electricity, (b) Schools and
markets, (c) Field work, and (d) population growth.
2) Climate and natural resources; (a) rising in sea level (in meters), (b) climatic
conditions (drought, erosion and storms), (c) reforestation and illegal logging and (d)
natural resource conditions.
Picture: The most important issues of the incentive factors of alteration in the village of
Sekaroh
The next step is explaining the scenario with provided narration and pictures for the year
2100. Participants are divided into four groups work and they then describe the scenario that
has been decided based on axis obtained by each group. The participants then develop the
descriptive narration for each scenario along with the data from session 1 presentation and/
their local insight. In developing scenario narration, the participants are able to characterize
values, condition and incentive from their scenario. This activity is helped by collaborative
team in each group to give participants’ acknowledge about scenario perspective made. Each
scenario is provided a name as follow: 1) green Sekaroh, 2) Colonized Sekaroh, 3) Save
Sekaroh, and 4) Metropolitan Sekaroh, Subscription of Disaster. Each group then present their
scenario to plenary forum
The people and Head Office picture subsistence Representing his group, the head of
scenario of Sekaroh community in the future
tourism dept. explains subsistence
scenario of sekaroh community in the
future
Picture. Scenario 1, prosperous Sekaroh, prosperous peaceful community
Tidak lupa juga telah berdiri juga hotel-hotel yang ramah lingkungan
Scenario 1 is the optimistic scenario of the future in Sekaroh village. This condition is
illustrated by the rapidity of development of infrastructure in Sekaroh that support the
subsistence such as facilities and transportation infrastructure (land, sea and air), electricity
(Sekaroh is not dark anymore) and schools even get to college. Economic facilities such as
market, mall, and banks have been built up to meet the needs of community so that the people
do not need to get exit the village to meet his need in daily life and achieve a sense of
security. There has also been built up hotels that are environmentally friendly surrounded by
green vegetation and the condition of the beaches is still beautiful. Sekaroh Village will be
still green either of agricultural or of forest thus Sekaroh can realize his goal that is green
Sekaroh, peaceful and prosperous society.
Picture. Scenario 2, colonized Sekaroh
This scenario describes the human resource condition that is not ready to accept the changes
and poor infrastructure despite having good and clean natural resources. This condition is
depicted with low human resource condition because of low educational facilities and
infrastructure, so that the vocation is filled by people from outside the village. Schools and
markets were deserted due to the damaged roads that cannot carry the people along with their
agricultural products, then which tourism is not well developed. The result is like what
happen today, in which foreign investors get in (hotel) but his/her education is still low (no
biased foreign language), so that all the vocations is filled by people outside Sekaroh.
Scenario 3. Save Sekaroh
This scenario is a scenario that describes condition of Sekaroh Village which is very extreme,
that is the condition of infrastructure and human resource is still low, coupled with climatic
conditions and natural resources that are vulnerable to damage so what we have to do is "save
Sekaroh
1. If water, roads and electric are not good then are not repaired, then the public protests
and requests for the reparation. But it is not repaired well up to 87 years so they plant
bananas in potholes. Sekaroh become dark and just be luminous if there is no moon
night and houses become not good
2. School and market are less even are not exist: such as current school (i.e. in hamlet of
Aro Inaq) wherein buildings and equipment (benches, tables and blackboards) are not
good and teachers who sometimes do not come causes teaching and learning
conditions become not optimal. The market does not exist, so that the people selling
anywhere and it makes unsafe and untidy.
3. The level of uncontrolled population causes population is very dense yet do not have
jobs and fewer vocation, so much going on unemployment and starvation because no
one can be harvested as well.
4. The rising of sea water up to 1 meter and flooded so many locations in Sekaroh
become submerged, damaging infrastructure and surrounding nature.
5. Drought, erosion and storm: there is no more remaining natural resources. Trees,
wood, are all cut to the sake of tobacco, so that the land becomes barren, no more
cattle left due to lack of food and water due to storms, drought and erosion.
6. Illegal logging is rampant more and more, the land becomes dry and barren, no water
anymore and many people who regret this incident and could be doomsday.
From this condition, we then must choose to save Sekaroh and do not let this
condition occur in 2100 even though we, in this workshop are no longer in 2100.
Picture. Scenario 4 Metropolitan Sekaroh, subscribes to disaster
This scenario describes the conditions of Sekaroh Village which has a very full infrastructure
(metropolitan) such as hotels, bungalows, roads and electricity. In addition, there is conditions
of advanced technology and high human resource leads to Sekaroh village to be very
advanced. Nevertheless, the nature condition is vulnerable to disasters and climate change that
is like a flood, raising of sea level and tsunami results a lot of fallen trees and extinct animals.
Then, there are natural disasters such as earthquake and flood so that the building condition
become damaged and many people undergone squalor and have lost relatives, shelter and
employment. This will happen if the people are not environmentally friendly and no longer
obey the provided rules.
Session 3: what is the impact caused by future alteration toward subsistence in Sekaroh?
Activities in this session are began by presenting the impact which occurs in environmental
products and services in 2030 that were caused by human resources and climatic factors in the
District of Jerowaru (the data obtained from Planning Scenario of Jerowaru District, 21 to 22
December 2011). Furthermore, participants were asked to determine two (2) services and
environmental products which is most affected in 2030 in the entire hamlets in Sekaroh.
Table. Products and ambient Services which is most affected in 2030 in all hamlets in
Sekaroh
No Name of The most important product Impact hamlet and ambient service 1 Aro Inaq 1. Dry land, Corn 1. Land utilizing change (rising of 2. Dry land, Goat population) 2. Land utilizing change (rising of population) 2 Pengoros 1. Dry land, Corn 1. Land utilizing change (rising 2. Beach, tambak garam of population) 2. Rising of sea level 3 Transmigrasi 1. Dry land, Corn
1. Land utilizing change (rising 2. Dry land, Goat of population) 2. Land utilizing change (rising of population) 1. Exploitation (rising of 4 Telona 1. Perairan dalam/off population) shore 2. Exploitation (rising of 2. Perairan dangkal/in population) shore 5. Ujung 1. Dry land, Corn
1. Land utilizing change (rising of ketangge 2. Perairan dangkal, sea population) weed 2. Exploitasi (peningkatan populasi) 6. Ujung Gon 1. Dry land, Corn 1. Land utilizing change (rising 2. Dry land, Goat of population) 2. Land utilizing change (rising of population) 7. Sunut 1. Perairan dalam 3. Exploitation (rising of 2. Perairan dangkal population) 4. Exploitation (rising of population) DAY 2
Session 4:
How does the capacity of adaptation in Sekaroh?
This session begins with an explanation of meaning of adaptation capacity which is
encouraged to know the adaptation capacity of all hamlets in Sekaroh Village by regarding to
or considering the impact of product and ambient services of each hamlets. The next step is
by determining the indicators of adaptation capacities (table), strengths and weaknesses of
adaptation capacity in each hamlet and voting to determine the hamlet with lowest adaptation
capacity (table).
Adaptation Capacity Indicators Table
No. Capital
Indicators
1.
Human
Karang taruna (Youth Club)
Place to learn Quran
Farmers group
Industry Skill Training
Less education
Farmer/Gardener
Handyman
Indonesian/Women Labor (TKI/TKW)
Traditional Processing
Education at least Senior High School
Less Health Facilities
Illegal logging
Belia (young)
Youth
Religious leader
Community leader
School development (PAUD dan SMK)
2.
Nature
Rain fed land
Mangrove forest and maintain it
Beautiful beaches
Beautiful islands
Protected forest area
The limestone
Sawah garam
Little bit wellspring
Making well
Reforestation
No cutting down trees
Changing planting pattern (rice become corn, chili,
banana)
Shrimp farm
Corn
Seeds of sengon buto
Srikaya
Farms
Lading
Sea and rain water
3.
Finance
4.
Physic
5.
Social and Culture
Wealth of sea
Farmers group
Joint business group
Saving and loan cooperation
cooperation
Business capital
Village-owned enterprises (BUMDES)
Moneylender
Gathering
Low income level
Household Industry
Investor
PNPM
Bank Credit
People’s reservoir
Road/bridges
Education facilities/school buildings sekolah
Health facilities (polindes, posyandu, pustu)
Sports facilities
Tourism/hotel facilities
Electricity network
Kantor desa
Forestry post
Water tower/rain water tank
Potency of sea water distillation into fresh water
Normal well
Kiosk/shop
Vehicle/rural transportation infrastructure
Market
Boarding school
Night watch post
Collective cage
Religious facilities
Traditional art
Mutual cooperation
Community organization
Youth organization
6.
Politic
7.
Institution
Pengajian Group
Environmentally conscious community
Group formation
Group empowerment
Yasinan group
Holding pengajian of Imtaq (Iman and Taqwa)
Persatuan banjar
Elderly guidance
Remaja masjid
Nyongkolan
Rowah besiru tradition
Demography
Awiq-awiq
Voting committee (pilkades dll)
Rural government
Publication of sporadic (yang tidak syah)
Publication of SPPT (yang tidak syah)
Son of the soil becomes legislative member
Making the region become the center of tourism
Pilkades
Pilkadus
Enlargement of village
Enlargement of hamlet
Pembentukan kabupaten Lombok Selatan
Headman
BPD
LKMD
PKK
Kadus
RT
Penghulu
Kiai/Ustadz
Farmers group
Joint work group
Working on group
HKm Group
Gapoktan
Pam Swakarsa
Banjar
Civil defense of village
Night watch
LSM (NGO)
Posyandu
Government
Private
Religious leadership
Community leadership
Table: Adaptation Capacity based on voting
No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Name hamlet of Weaknesses of Strengths of adaptation Vote the low adaptation capacity capacity adaptation capacity Aro Inak Brackish well water, The highest corn 22 less/no drinkable water, income, many small no toilets, many married trade businesses, dare under age, less borrowing money to education, low income moneylenders for going 5m/yr, no electricity, to Malaysia, husbandry illegal logging
Pengoros Brackish well water, Gapoktan, workers and 12 less/no drinkable water farmers groups of salt, low education, less there is elementary and nature of mutual junior high school in cooperation, bad roads, one roof, husbandry inadequate markets, no electricity, illegal logging Transmigration Lack of fresh water, low The selection of Kades 21 education, no art are always safe, sports galleries, bad roads, lack facilities, village offices, of business capital, no PAUD, pustu, SMK, electricity, illegal logging HKM, husbandry Telona Fresh water, bad roads There is elementary and 22 (worst), less education, junior high school in low income, low capital, one roof, aquaculture, no transportation and husbandry electricity, illegal logging
Ujung Ketangge Fresh water, worst Seaweed cultivation, 8 roads, education facility Agriculture, PLTS, cattle is only elementary and goats, husbandry school, low income, low capital, no transportation, lack of safety, illegal logging Ujung Gon Bad roads, low PLTS, fresh water wells, 9 education, no school, high corn production, corn, salt, husbandry illegal logging Sunut Heavily damaged roads, PLTS, shrimp 20 no water, no education cultivation, forest facilities, low levels of products, excellent education, no beaches (tourism transportation, high potential), pearl erosion, fishing, cultivation, historical deforestation due to sites, fauna, illegal logging.
The people decides
capacity in Sekaroh
lighthouses, husbandry. adaptation Voting is to decide the lowest adaptation capacity in
all hamlets in Sekaroh Village
Session 5: What is adaptation strategy priority of subsistence in Sekaroh?
This session begins with a presentation of CSIRO-UNRAM researchers and ESL about new
subsistence innovations and adaptation strategies followed by a discussion between
participants and presenters as an arena to learn about societies in this workshop. This
presentation aims to give participants a consideration in determining adaptation strategies in
each hamlet with different subsistence typologies and can be applied in adaptation strategies
planning that are made.
Table: New innovation and subsistence adaptation strategies
Activity
Title
Presenter
Presentation
and discussion
Adaptation strategy – mixed cropping
Prof
(UNRAM)
Presentation
and discussion
Adaptation
production
Presentation
and discussion
Presentation
and discussion
Adaptation strategy – silvofisheries
Pak Alis (UNRAM)
Adaptation strategy -Eco-tourism
Putrawan
(ESL)
strategy
–
sea
Komang
weed Ibu Alluh (UNRAM)
Habibi
Session 6
: How does this adaptation strategy compared with development program
(scheme of work)?
The next step is explaining the robust adaptation strategies concept (No. regret adaptation
strategy) in order for the strategies built by the community can achieve the vision of Sekaroh
community in 2090 which has been determined on day 1 session 2 and avoided from the
worst scenario (Business as usual) although environmental products and services in Sekaroh
is affected by climate change, exploitation and land-use change in 2030.
Participants are divided into seven groups according to the number of hamlets in Sekaroh to
determine adaptation strategies for each of the hamlet. Each working group is assisted by a
collaborative team in discussions to determining the adaptation strategies. In the process of
adaptation strategies is also used for adaptation capacity and assessment of environmental
impacts of products and services towards subsistence in Sekaroh.
Deciding adaptation strategy priority in People explaining adaptation strategy priority in each hamlet in Sekaroh, assisted by each hamlet in Sekaroh collaborative team Each working group presents the adaptation strategy that has been made to the plenary, and
discuss with other participants and other stakeholders to convince people that the strategy
made is a firm strategy that is by observing the risks that will occur in each subsistence
scenario that has been made in the Session 2 Day 1.
I order to find out how this strategy when compared to the rural development program, thus it
uses the last column in the table to be coloured with markers with a system of 'traffic light',
where red means never been done, green means has been done and blue means still in the
planning phase.
CONTACTS:
FURTHER INFORMATION:
Professor Yusuf Sutaryono
University of Mataram
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: (+62) 0818369007
http://www.ausaid.gov.au/hottopics/topic.cfm?I
D=2707_8209_4232_9569_1218
Dr. James Butler
CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: (+61) 0437030120
http://www.csiro.au/multimedia/Indonesia-AndClimate-Change
http://www.csiro.au/news/Improvedclimatechange-projections-SE-Asia
http://www.rfdalliance.com.au/site