Anterior or posterior approach of thoracic disc herniation?

The Spine Journal
-
(2013)
-
Clinical Study
Anterior or posterior approach of thoracic disc herniation? A comparative
cohort of mini-transthoracic versus transpedicular discectomies
Mark P. Arts, MD, PhDa,*, Ronald H.M.A. Bartels, MD, PhDb
b
a
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, PO Box 432, 2501 CK, The Hague, The Netherlands
Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Received 29 March 2013; revised 23 September 2013; accepted 27 September 2013
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The optimal surgical treatment of thoracic disc herniations remains
controversial and depends on the consistency of the herniation and its location related to the spinal cord.
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of patients with symptomatic thoracic disc herniations treated with anterolateral mini-transthoracic approach (TTA) versus posterior transpedicular discectomy.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective comparative cohort study.
PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred consecutive patients with symptomatic thoracic herniated
discs were operated by mini-TTA (56 patients) or transpedicular discectomy (44 patients).
OUTCOME MEASURES: Neurologic assessment by American Spinal Injury Association
(ASIA) Impairment Scale and patients’ self reported perceived recovery and complications.
METHODS: The consistency and location of the herniated disc in relation to the spinal cord was
evaluated by preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were
assessed neurologically before surgery and at regular outpatient controls at 2 months or later.
Long-term follow-up was achieved by questionnaires sent by mail.
RESULTS: In both groups, most patients had symptoms of myelopathy and radicular pain; patients who underwent mini-TTA, more frequently suffered from spasticity. Fifty-eight percent of
the herniated discs were calcified and 77% were larger than one-third of the spinal canal. All patients presented with ASIA Grade C or D (64%) or ASIA Grade E (36%). Postoperatively, 50% of
the patients treated with mini-TTA and 37% of the transpedicular group improved at least one grade
on the ASIA scale (p5.19). The duration of surgery, blood loss, hospital stay, and complication rate
were significantly higher in patients treated with mini-TTA and were mainly related to the magnitude and consistency of the herniated disc. At long-term follow-up, 72% of the mini-TTA patients
reported good outcome versus 76% of the transpedicular discectomy group (p5.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of a symptomatic herniated disc contributed to a clinical improvement in most cases. The approach is dependent on the location, the magnitude, and the consistency of the herniated thoracic disc. Medially located large calcified discs should be operated
through an anterolateral approach, whereas noncalcified or lateral herniated discs can be treated
from a posterior approach as well. For optimal treatment of this rare entity, the treatment should
be performed in selected centers. Ó 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Thoracic disc; Herniation; Mini-TTA; Posterolateral; Calcification; Spine; Surgery
Introduction
The first case of thoracic disc herniation with spinal cord
compression was reported by Key in 1838 [1]. The earliest
record of thoracic disc surgery was carried out by Adson
FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.
Author disclosures: MPA: Grants: Cascade trial (F, Cascade trial sponsored by Amedica Corporation). RHMAB: Grants: NutsOhra Fonds (F,
Paid directly to institution/employer).
The disclosure key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.
TheSpineJournalOnline.com.
1529-9430/$ - see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.053
in 1922, who performed a laminectomy and disc removal
[2]. Thoracic disc herniations are relatively rare, and surgical treatment comprises less than 1% of all intervertebral
disc surgeries [3–5]. Whenever symptomatic, patients may
* Corresponding author. Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center
Haaglanden, PO Box 432, 2501 CK, The Hague, The Netherlands. Tel.:
070-3302054; fax: 070-3809459.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M.P. Arts)
2
M.P. Arts and R.H.A. Bartels / The Spine Journal
present with progressive myelopathy, localized thoracic
pain, and/or radicular pain.
Although the entity of thoracic disc herniation is well
known, the appropriate indications and choice of surgical
strategy are controversial. Formerly, dorsal decompression
with laminectomy was the standard procedure in the treatment of thoracic disc herniations. Because of poor outcome
and neurologic deterioration, laminectomy was abandoned
and alternative approaches were studied [6]. Patterson and
Arbit [7] introduced the posterolateral transpedicular discectomy without laminectomy that has been shown as safe
and effective. This technique has been modified into a
transfacet pedicle-sparing approach [8–10]. However, substantial paravertebral muscle dissection is needed to gain
access to centrally located disc herniations, but even then,
adequate ventral dura decompression can be challenging
[11,12]. Anterior transthoracic discectomy was advocated
to improve direct ventral access and avoid spinal cord manipulation, although pulmonary complications and intercostal neuralgia may occur [6,13,14].
In recent years, extensive open thoracotomy was modified
into less invasive techniques, such as the mini-transthoracic approach (mini-TTA) and thoracoscopic discectomy [15–18]. A
recent comparative study has shown benefits in favor of miniTTA, especially in patients with paramedially located disc
herniations [19]. To our knowledge, no comparative study
between mini-TTA and posterolateral transpedicular approach
of thoracic disc herniations has been performed. In the present
cohort, we report the results of 100 consecutive patients with
thoracic disc herniations who underwent mini-TTA or transpedicular discectomy.
Materials and methods
Patient population
Between March 2005 and January 2013, 100 consecutive
patients with 106 symptomatic thoracic disc herniations were
treated in two Dutch neurosurgic centers (66 patients in The
Hague and 34 patients in Nijmegen). Preoperative and postoperative neurologic examinations were available of all patients.
Symptoms were assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. Patients were examined
neurologically during the outpatient control 2 months after surgery, or more often when necessary (follow-up moment 1). The
long-term results were investigated by means of a questionnaire sent by mail (follow-up moment 2) that included selfreported recovery, visual analog pain score, and neurologic
complaints related to thoracic disc herniation. Patients’ self
perceived recovery was measured by the seven-point Likert
scale; ‘‘complete recovery,’’ ‘‘almost complete recovery,’’
and ‘‘some recovery’’ were determined as good outcome [20].
Radiographic imaging
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was
performed in all patients to document the localization of
-
(2013)
-
the herniated disc, relation of the herniated disc to the spinal cord, and the size of the herniated disc; less than onethird of the spinal canal diameter, one-third to two-thirds
of the spinal canal diameter, or larger than two-thirds of
the spinal canal diameter (Figs. 1 and 2, A and B). All patients underwent additional computed tomography (CT) for
the documentation of calcified (Fig. 1, C and D) or noncalcified herniated discs (Fig. 2, C and D). Postoperative imaging of the spinal cord was not used routinely, but only on
indication and when additional fusion was performed.
Surgical procedures
Mini-TTA
Under general anesthesia and two-lumen tube ventilation, the patient is placed in lateral decubitus position with
the table tilted. Spinal cord monitoring was not used. In all
cases, a right side approach is performed, except for those
patients with disc herniation at the thoracolumbar junction
where the diaphragm on the right side prevents adequate
exposure. The involved thoracic disc and adjacent vertebral
bodies are drawn on the skin under fluoroscopic control. A
6 to 8 cm long skin incision is made parallel to the orientation of the rib. After splitting the fibres of the latissimus
dorsi and serratus anterior muscles, the underlying rib is
exposed and the mini-TTA spreader (Braun-Aesculap, Melsungen, Germany) is positioned between the ribs. When
necessary, the rib can be removed partially for extensive exposure of the thoracic spine. After deflating the lung, the
visceral pleura is opened and the lung is retracted with an
inflatable lung retractor. The affected disc is verified fluoroscopically. Under microscopic magnification, the rib head,
cranial part of the pedicle, the inferolateral part of the
cranial vertebral body, and the superolateral part of the caudal vertebral body are removed with a high-speed drill.
After opening the longitudinal ligament, the herniated disc
can be mobilized anteriorly away from the spinal cord
(Fig. 3) In case of a large calcified herniated disc, substantial bony removal may be necessary, and additional instrumented fusion is performed in the same procedure when an
estimated 25% or more of the craniocaudal extent of the
vertebral body has been removed. Finally, a chest tube is
placed and the wound is closed in layers [15].
Transpedicular discectomy
The patient is placed in a prone position under general
anesthesia, and no spinal cord monitoring was used. The involved thoracic disc is verified fluoroscopically and a midline skin incision of approximately 10 cm length is made.
The ipsilateral paravertebral muscles are subperiostally dissected and retracted laterally to expose the facet joint and
pedicle. After fluoroscopic verification of the affected disc
level, the medial part of the inferior and superior facets and
the cranial part of the pedicle are drilled off with a highspeed burr. The disc space lateral to the dural sac is incised,
and the disc fragments are removed under microscopic
M.P. Arts and R.H.A. Bartels / The Spine Journal
-
(2013)
-
3
Fig. 1. Example of a calcified herniated disc. (A) Sagittal and (B) transversal T2 magnetic resonance images of a paramedian herniated disc T9–T10, larger
than two-third of the spinal canal diameter. (C and D) The herniated disc is hypointense on T2 imaging. Computed tomography confirms complete calcification of the herniated disc.
magnification (Fig. 4) In case of a calcified herniated disc, a
trough is drilled in the underlying vertebral body to mobilize the herniated disc dorsally. When necessary, partial
costotranversectomy is performed to gain access ventrally
to the dura in case of central disc extrusion. Additional instrumented fusion was not performed. After adequate spinal
cord decompression, the wound is closed in layers over a
suction drain.
Statistical analysis
Student paired two-tailed t tests were used to compare
parametric data; otherwise Pearson chi-square tests, Fisher
exact test, or Mann-Whitney U tests were used. Results are
presented as means6standard deviations. A probability value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software (version 20; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Fifty-six patients underwent mini-TTA and 44 patients
were treated with transpedicular discectomy. Baseline characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. The level
of the herniated disc ranged from T2–T3 to T12–L1, and
the most common affected disc levels were in the lower
thoracic region. Nearly 80% of the herniated discs were
larger than one-third of the spinal canal and almost 60%
of the herniated discs showed calcifications on CT.
Surgical findings and postoperative course
Surgical findings and postoperative course are depicted
in Table 2. The mean duration of a mini-TTA procedure
was 229 minutes versus 98 minutes for transpedicular discectomy (p!.001), with substantially more blood loss during mini-TTA procedure (1,157 mL vs. 213 mL, p!.001).
4
M.P. Arts and R.H.A. Bartels / The Spine Journal
-
(2013)
-
Fig. 2. Example of a noncalcified herniated disc. (A) Sagittal and (B) transversal T2 magnetic resonance images of paramedian noncalcified herniated disc
T8–T9, smaller than one-third of the spinal canal diameter. (C and D) The herniated disc is hypointense on T2 imaging. Computed tomography documents no
calcification.
In the mini-TTA group, 17 patients presented with calcified
herniated disc adherent to dura versus 3 patients treated by
transpedicular approach (p5.005). In nine patients treated
by mini-TTA, more than 25% of the vertebral body was
drilled away to remove the herniated disc safely, and additional instrumented fusion was performed.
The mean hospital stay in patients treated with mini-TTA
procedure was significantly longer (10.1 days vs. 4.9 days;
p5.03). Pulmonary complications, such as pneumonia and
pleural effusions (18%), cerebrospinal fluid leakage requiring external drainage and bed rest for a few days (18%),
were the main complications. Two patients of the transpedicular group were reoperated; one patient developed paraplegia caused by rebleeding and the other patient was
operated on the wrong level. In the mini-TTA group, three
patients were reoperated; one patient developed a cerebrospinal fluid fistula to the pleura that needed transthoracic reintervention and closing the duradefect followed by external
cerebrospinal fluid drainage; one patient had insufficient dura decompression requiring repeated mini-TTA; and one patient underwent a mini-TTA for an assumed herniated disc.
During surgery an epidural abnormality was not found, and
an immediate postoperative MRI showed an intradural mass.
At a second operation through a posterolateral approach
with intradural inspection, a meningioma was identified
and completely removed.
Clinical outcome
Data was available for 96 patients at follow-up moment 1
and 77 patients returned the long-term questionnaires at
follow-up moment 2. The mean (6standard deviation)
follow-ups from surgery to moment 1 and moment 2 were
34631 weeks and 4.162.1 years, respectively. In the
mini-TTA group, 28 patients (50%) improved one or more
grades on the ASIA scale versus 15 patients (37%) in the
M.P. Arts and R.H.A. Bartels / The Spine Journal
-
(2013)
-
5
Fig. 3. Intraoperative microscopic view of right-sided mini-transthoracic approach of a large paramedian calcified herniated disc at T9–T10 (same patient as
in Fig. 1). Parts of the inferolateral cranial and superolateral caudal vertebral bodies are removed with a high-speed drill. (Top Left) A dissector is placed in
the formed cavity. (Top Right) The posterior longitudinal ligament is opened and the calcified herniated disc is mobilized anteriorly away from the spinal
cord. (Bottom) After removal of the calcified herniated disc, the dura is adequately decompressed.
transpedicular group (p5.19) (Table 3). After the mini-TTA
procedure, three patients worsened one or more grades on
the ASIA scale; the calcified thoracic disc appeared to be
ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in two patients and a meningioma in the other patient. In the transpedicular group, one patient worsened neurologically because
of rebleeding.
On follow-up moment 2, 72% of the mini-TTA patients
reported good outcome versus 76% of the transpedicular discectomy group (p5.80). Visual Analog Score (0–100mm)
thoracic back pain in the mini-TTA group and posterolateral
group was 30628 mm versus 36632 mm, respectively
(p5.38). Other long-term symptoms are shown in Table 4.
Discussion
Initial attempts to decompress the dura via laminectomy
were disappointing because of vascular insufficiency and
microcontusions secondary to spinal cord manipulation.
Therefore, variations in surgical techniques were developed
to allow a more direct approach to the intervertebral disc,
Fig. 4. Intraoperative microscopic view of posterior transpedicular discectomy of a right-sided noncalcified mediolateral herniated disc at T10–T11. (Left)
The paravertebral muscles are dissected on the right side and the wound spreader is placed. The facet, pedicle, and adjacent laminae are reduced with a highspeed drill to gain access to lateral and ventral of the dura. (Right) The asterisk marks the disc space after removal of the herniated disc.
6
M.P. Arts and R.H.A. Bartels / The Spine Journal
-
(2013)
-
Table 1
Demographic data of 100 patients with 106 thoracic disc herniations, who underwent mini-TTA or transpedicular discectomy
Baseline characteristics
Mini-TTA (N556)
Transpedicular (N544)
Female gender
Mean age in yrs (range)
Body Mass Index (range)
Comorbidities
Diabetes
Pulmonary disease
Morbid obesitas
Symptoms
Localised thoracic pain
Radicular pain
Sensory deficit
Motor deficit
Spasticity/hyperreflexia
Miction disturbance
Indications for surgery
Radiculopathy
Myelopathy
Mean duration of symptoms (wks) (range)
Level of herniated disc
T2T3
T4T5
T5T6
T6T7
T7T8
T8T9
T9T10
T10T11
T11T12
T12L1
Disc calcification
Axial localization
Paramedian
Mediolateral
Lateral
Size of herniated disc
!1/3 of spinal canal
1/3–2/3 of spinal canal
O2/3 of spinal canal
33 (59)
52.4 (29–82)
27.8 (20–46)
26 (59)
56.9 (28–86)
26.6 (20–34)
3 (5)
1 (2)
3 (5)
16
14
46
32
42
23
(29)
(25)
(82)
(57)
(75)
(41)
13 (23)
43 (77)
93.4 (1–520)
0
0
3
7
7
8
14
10
5
2
47
(5)
(13)
(13)*
(14)*,y
(25)*,y
(18)z
(9)z
(4)
(94)
p Value
.99
.08
.23
.38
2 (5)
2 (5)
0
20
17
35
22
24
17
(45)
(39)
(80)
(50)
(55)
(39)
14 (32)
30 (68)
68.8 (0–312)
1
4
2
2
3
3
6
4
12
7
11
(2)
(9)
(5)
(5)
(7)x
(7)x
(14)
(9)
(27)x
(16)
(25)
35 (63)
19 (34)
2 (4)
10 (23)
22 (50)
12 (27)
10 (18)
29 (52)
17 (30)
13 (30)
29 (66)
2 (5)
.10
.20
.80
.55
.04
.84
.34
.25
.02
!.001
!.001
.04
TTA, transthoracic approach.
Numbers in parentheses are percentages.
* One patient had a herniated disc at three levels.
y
One patient had a herniated disc at two levels.
z
One patient had a herniated disc at two levels.
x
One patient had a herniated disc at three levels.
such as ventral transthoracic and posterolateral transpedicular. The best surgical treatment of thoracic disc herniations
remains controversial. Comparative studies on conventional
transthoracic access versus posterior decompression have
been published previously [10]. However, to our knowledge, our study is the first comparative cohort of patients
with symptomatic thoracic disc herniations treated with
mini-TTA versus transpedicular discectomy.
The clinical outcome of mini-TTA and posterolateral discectomy is favorable in both groups, and more than 70% of
the patients reported good outcome on short and long terms.
This study confirmed that the choice of approach is dependent on the consistency of the herniated disc, its size, and its
location related to the spinal cord. Especially calcified, larger
and medially located herniated discs were approached
through a mini-TTA. However, the complication rate is substantial and many of these are directly related to the TTA.
The complication rate of 38% in the mini-TTA group in
our study is high, but in accordance to other recently reported
papers on thoracic disc surgery [8,10,13,17]. Cerebrospinal
fluid leakage was the most frequently reported complication
in patients treated with mini-TTA that is directly related to
the calcifications of the herniated disc adherent to the dura.
The significantly less frequent complication rate in the posterolateral group can be explained by smaller and less often
calcified disc herniations. Pulmonary related morbidity is
the other main complication of the mini-TTA procedure that
is related to opening the pleura and retraction on the deflated
M.P. Arts and R.H.A. Bartels / The Spine Journal
-
(2013)
-
7
Table 2
Operative characteristics
Surgical characteristics
Mini-TTA (N556)
Transpedicular (N544)
p Value
Duration of surgery (min) (range)
Blood loss (mL) (range)
Instrumented fusion
Disc adherent to dura
Intradural disc extension
Duration of chest tube (d) (range)
Duration of stay ICU (d) (range)
Hospital stay (d) (range)
Total complications
Neurologic deterioration
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage
Pneumonia/pleural effusion
Wrong level surgery
Repeated surgery
Wrong level surgery
Insufficient dura decompression
Rebleeding
Cerebrospinal fluid fistula
229
1,157
9
17
4
2.2
1.0
10.1
21
2
10
10
0
3
0
2
0
1
98
213
0
3
1
NA
NA
4.9
2
1
0
0
1
2
1
0
1
0
!.001
!.001
.004
.005
.38
!.001
!.001
.03
!.001
(90–510)
(100–12,000)
(16)
(30)
(7)
(0–11)
(0–5)
(3–70)
(38)*
(4)
(18)
(18)
(5)
(30–220)
(10–600)
(7)
(2)
(2–30)
(5)
(2)
(2)
(5)
.85
ICU, intensive care unit; TTA, transthoracic approach; NA, not applicable; SD, standard deviation.
Numbers presented are means (with ranges), means6SD, and percentages (parentheses).
* Two patients had multiple complications.
lung. Possibly, this complication could be reduced by an
alternative extrapleural approach of the spinal column in
which the pleura is dissected from the rib and remains intact,
and therefore, no chest tube is required [21]. However, the
use of a chest tube in our most recent cases was abandoned,
as our pulmonary surgeons convinced us that it was not necessary because the lung tissue was not violated. These patients were also directly transferred to the ward with an
intermittent stay at the intensive care unit. The higher complication rate with mini-TTA could explain the longer stay in
the hospital for these patients in addition to the preoperatively more severe symptoms in the group.
The long-term results of patients with surgically treated
disc herniations are favourable. Although most patients presented with spinal cord symptoms, which are often regarded
as permanent disability, more than 70% of the patients in
both groups reported good outcome, ranging from complete
Table 3
Neurologic status measured by the ASIA classification.
Mini-TTA
ASIA grade
A
B
C
D
E
Table 4
Long-term symptoms of 77 patients, reported on the questionnaire sent by
mail.
Outcome
Transpedicular
Preoperative
(%)
Postoperative
(%)
Preoperative
(%)
Postoperative
(%)
0
0
11 (20)
28 (50)
17 (30)
0
2
1
12
41
0
0
11 (25)
14 (32)
19 (43)
0
0
3 (7)
10 (23)
28 (64)
(4)
(2)
(21)
(73)
recovery to some recovery. However, most patients reported
persistent sensory and motor deficits with thoracic back
pain. These long-term results together with potential complications should be discussed in detail with patients while
obtaining consent.
The main limitation of the present study is selection bias
and lack of randomization. Based on the presence of disc
calcification and axial localization, patients were selected
for mini-TTA or transpedicular discectomy. Large paramedian calcified discs were nearly always operated through
mini-TTA, and patients with smaller lateral herniated discs
were mostly operated by a posterior approach. Possibly,
two different patient populations were studied. Ideally, future randomized controlled studies seemed to be warranted.
However, in our opinion, a golden standard will be difficult
ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; TTA, transthoracic approach.
In the mini-TTA group, 28 patients (50%) improved one or more grades
on the ASIA scale versus 15 patients (37%) in the transpedicular group
(p5.19).
Mean FU in (mo) (range)
VAS thoracic pain (mm)
(range)
Good outcome
Symptoms
Local thoracic back pain
Radicular pain
Sensory deficit legs
Motor deficit legs
Pulmonary discomfort
Mini-TTA
(N544)
Transpedicular
(N533)
p Value
29.1 (3–64)
29.9 (0–100)
26.6 (4–64)
36.1 (0–92)
.51
.38
32 (72)
25 (76)
.80
9
18
29
19
6
13
9
16
12
(20)
(41)
(66)
(43)
(14)
(39)
(27)
(48)
(36)
0
TTA, transthoracic approach; FU, follow-up; VAS, Visual Analog
Score.
Likert good recovery is defined as ‘‘complete recovery,’’ ‘‘almost complete recovery,’’ and ‘‘some recovery.’’
8
M.P. Arts and R.H.A. Bartels / The Spine Journal
-
(2013)
-
Fig. 5. Postoperative (Left) X-ray, (Middle) computed tomography, and (Right) magnetic resonance image of mini-transthoracic approach removal of a large
calcified herniated disc T9–T10, with supplemental instrumentation (same patient as in Figs. 1 and 3). (Left) Whenever more than 25% of the craniocaudal
extent of the vertebral body had to be removed, additional anterior bicortical screw and rod fixation was performed to prevent iatrogenic scoliosis. (Middle
and Right) The herniated disc was removed completely and the spinal cord was adequately decompressed.
to obtain through randomized controlled trials because the
approach will be defined not only by the surgeon’s preference, but, more importantly, by the consistency of the herniated disc and its relation to the spinal cord. We are
confident that a randomized trial on posterior approach versus anterolateral approach for large calcified and medially
located herniated thoracic discs will not be approved.
The optimal approach for laterally located disc herniation
on the other hand, is still open for discussion. However,
considering the risk of complications and duration of hospital stay, there seems to be a slight preference for a posterolateral approach based on the results of the present
study. This is in agreement with the data of Bransford
et al. [10].
The surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic
thoracic disc herniations can be challenging and may be associated with varying risks. Therefore, these complex spinal
procedures should be concentrated in supraregional experienced spine centers with high-volume patient care.
The treatment algorithm for the optimal surgical approach
should consist of MRI, CT, and conventional radiograph
of the lumbar spine. The latter is mandatory for documentation of possible transition spine, which is one of the pitfalls
of wrong level surgery. Additional CT focusing on axial localization and presence of calcifications is also essential because MRIs of calcified and noncalcified herniated discs can
be similar (Figs. 1 and 2). Based on our experience, patients
with large calcified paramedian herniated discs should be
treated with mini-TTA. All other patients can be treated
by posterolateral approach.
There is no consensus whether routine instrumentation
is needed in patients with thoracic herniated discs
[10,13,17,18]. We have instrumented 9 of 56 patients of
the mini-TTA group and none of the posterior group. Whenever more than 25% of the craniocaudal extent of the adjacent vertebral body was reduced to remove the herniated
disc safely, we performed an additional fusion with placement of bicortical screws and rod fixation (Fig. 5). In this
way, iatrogenic scoliosis will be prevented. In our opinion,
supplemental fusion is not needed in patients with posterior
removal of thoracic disc herniation because the unilateral
pedicle and facet joints are only partially reduced and instability is not likely. Also, bony removal of the adjacent vertebral bodies is limited in case of noncalcified or lateral
herniated discs.
In conclusion, the long-term surgical outcome of thoracic disc herniation was favourable in most cases treated
with mini-TTA and posterolateral discectomy. The complication rate of transthoracic procedures was higher and
mainly related to pulmonary morbidity, and the neurologic
complications were not different between both approaches.
Patients with calcified herniated discs should be informed
about the additional risk of cerebrospinal fluid leakage.
Based on this experience, it is our opinion that large calcified paramedian herniated discs are best treated by an anterior approach, whereas noncalcified or lateral herniated
discs can be treated from posterior as well. Because the entity is rare, its treatment should be concentrated in experienced centers to optimize the surgical strategy for each
specific thoracic herniated disc.
M.P. Arts and R.H.A. Bartels / The Spine Journal
References
[1] Patwardhan RV, Hadley MN. History of surgery for ruptured disk.
Neurosurg Clin N Am 2001;12:173–9.
[2] Love JG, Schorn VG. Thoracic disk protrusions. Rheumatism
1967;23:2–10.
[3] Dietze DD Jr, Fessler RG. Thoracic disc herniations. Neurosurg Clin
N Am 1993;4:75–90.
[4] McInerney J, Ball PA. The pathophysiology of thoracic disc disease.
Neurosurg Focus 2000;9:e1.
[5] Stillerman CB, Chen TC, Couldwell WT, et al. Experience in the surgical management of 82 symptomatic herniated thoracic discs and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1998;88:623–33.
[6] McCormick WE, Will SF, Benzel EC. Surgery for thoracic disc disease. Complication avoidance: overview and management. Neurosurg
Focus 2000;9:e13.
[7] Patterson RH Jr, Arbit E. A surgical approach through the pedicle to
protruded thoracic discs. J Neurosurg 1978;48:768–72.
[8] Bransford R, Zhang F, Bellabarba C, et al. Early experience treating
thoracic disc herniations using a modified transfacet pedicle-sparing
decompression and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:221–31.
[9] Stillerman CB, Chen TC, Day JD, et al. The transfacet pedicle-sparing
approach for thoracic disc removal: cadaveric morphometric analysis
and preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 1995;83:971–6.
[10] Bransford RJ, Zhang F, Bellabarba C, Lee MJ. Treating thoracic-disc
herniations: do we always have to go anteriorly? Evid Based Spine
Care J 2010;1:21–8.
[11] Bilsky MH. Transpedicular approach for thoracic disc herniations.
Neurosurg Focus 2000;9:e3.
-
(2013)
-
9
[12] Le Roux PD, Haglund MM, Harris AB. Thoracic disc disease: experience with the transpedicular approach in twenty consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 1993;33:58–66.
[13] Ayhan S, Nelson C, Gok B, et al. Transthoracic surgical treatment for
centrally located thoracic disc herniations presenting with myelopathy: a 5-year institutional experience. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23:
79–88.
[14] Vollmer DG, Simmons NE. Transthoracic approaches to thoracic disc
herniations. Neurosurg Focus 2000;9:e8.
[15] Mayer HM. Microsurgical anterior approach to T5-T10 (Mini-TTA).
Minimally invasive spine surgery. Springer, 2006:129–37.
[16] Quint U, Bordon G, Preissl I, et al. Thoracoscopic treatment for single
level symptomatic thoracic disc herniation: a prospective followed cohort study in a group of 167 consecutive cases. Eur Spine J 2012;21:
637–45.
[17] Russo A, Balamurali G, Nowicki R, Boszczyk BM. Anterior thoracic
foraminotomy through mini-thoracotomy for the treatment of giant
thoracic disc herniations. Eur Spine J 2012;21:S212–20.
[18] Uribe JS, Smith WD, Pimenta L, et al. Minimally invasive lateral approach for symptomatic thoracic disc herniation: initial multicenter
clinical experience. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;16:264–79.
[19] Bartels RH, Peul WC. Mini-thoracotomy or thoracoscopic treatment
for medially located thoracic herniated disc? Spine 2007;32:E581–4.
[20] Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment
of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine
2000;25:3100–3.
[21] Moran C, Ali Z, McEvoy L, Bolger C. Mini-open retropleural transthoracic approach for the treatment of giant thoracic disc herniation.
Spine 2012;37:E1079–84.