Ikano Bank - Danske Analyse
Transcription
Ikano Bank - Danske Analyse
Investment Research 30 October 2014 Ikano Bank Issuer profile Facts With its origins in IKEA, Ikano Bank was founded in 1995 and serves mainly as a consumer bank with a strong foothold in the Nordics. The bank is part of the Ikano Group, which is fully owned by the Kamprad family, the main founders of IKEA. Sector: Bank, financing company Much more than a branchless consumer bank Equity ticker: Private Ikano Bank divides its operation in three areas: Corporate, Sales Finance and Consumer. The Corporate business area accounts for 25% of receivables and offers leasing, object financing, invoice purchasing and factoring. Sales Finance offers financing and sales support mainly to retailers. Finally, the Consumer business area offers savings and loans to private individuals. Ikano Bank has no physical branches as it only operates through its website or business partners. Equity book value: SEK2.5bn Strong capitalisation, high coverage ratio but modest RoE Corporate ticker: IKANO Ratings Rating agencies: Not rated Danske Bank Markets: Issuer rating: BBB Senior unsecured: BBB Analysts: Capitalisation is high with a common equity tier-1 (CET1) ratio at 14.7% and total capital ratio at 17.4% end-H1 14 measured by standard method. The leverage ratio is as high as 11.9%. RoE after tax has been lagging peers the past couple of years, mainly due to an average NIM and somewhat higher loan losses. However, the coverage ratio stands out in the peer group, which is the result of more conservative provisioning, in our view. Overall we view capitalisation and credit management as credit positive and profitability as neutral. Lars Holm [email protected] +45 45 12 80 41 We view Ikano Bank as a stable ‘BBB’ bank issuer Key credit issues We assign a ‘BBB’ rating to Ikano Bank with a stable outlook based on our view of its business and financial risk profile. We do not include any support from the owner but do believe the owner would be very constructive in case the bank is in a situation where support is needed. We might consider a notch higher rating if the profitability improves further or a formal support structure from the owner is introduced. Downside risk to our rating includes among others deteriorating asset quality. Strengths Diversified lender cooperating with several corporate brands incl. IKEA. High capitalisation and high coverage ratio of impaired loans. Large and stable deposit base. Challenges Profitability under pressure due to Key metrics SEKm Thomas Hovard [email protected] +45 45 12 85 05 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Pre-Provision Income 608 706 801 762 728 392 Loan Losses and Provisions 416 172 241 242 295 146 Net Income falling income and increasing costs. Dependent on private consumption, 257 145 414 234 190 101 Receivables 13,801 15,329 15,289 15,839 19,830 20,953 which could be hurt by slowing GDP Risk exposure amount (REA) 14,920 15,382 16,346 16,537 20,093 20,487 growth or falling house prices. Equity 1,498 1,420 1,809 1,944 2,370 2,504 Impaired Receiv. % Gross Loans & Guar. 10.3% 4.6% 6.1% 6.4% 5.0% 5.1% 9.6% 9.9% 11.7% 13.5% 14.0% 14.7% 12.2% 13.5% 15.1% 16.5% 16.7% 17.4% Common Equity Tier-1 Ratio (CET1) Total Capital Ratio Note: We have used historical exchange rates in order to change 2009-2011 from EUR to SEK Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Important disclosures and certifications are contained from page 17 of this report. Mainly unsecured lending that is likely to be hit first in an economic downturn. Source: Danske Bank Markets www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Company profile Ikano Bank is one of four business areas in the Ikano Group that is owned by the Swedish Kamprad family through Ikano SA, Luxembourg. Originally the Ikano Group was part of IKEA (founded by Ingvar Kamprad) but it was spun off as an independent group in 1988. Ikano Bank was founded in 1995 and is predominantly known as a consumer bank but it also offers various products to corporate clients. Geographically Ikano Bank is represented in six countries but with the by far largest operation in Sweden (76% of total business volume in 2013) followed by the UK, Denmark and Norway. The bank does not have any physical branches but distributes its products through its website or its business partners. The foreign units operate as branches of the Swedish parent company, which means that they are under supervision of the Swedish Financial Authorities. Ikano Group Note: Ikano is part of the Finance division Source: Company website, Danske Bank Markets The bank can be divided in three business areas: Corporate, Sales Finance and Consumer. The Corporate business area offers leasing, object financing, invoice purchasing (Ikano Bank takes on the credit risk) and factoring (customer still bears the credit risk) and accounts for around 25% of total receivables. Sales Finance offers financing and sales support mainly to retailers. Finally, the Consumer business area offers savings and loans to private individuals in the form of unsecured loans, mortgage loans and Visa credit cards. Mortgage loans are offered in cooperation with SBAB Bank AB (SBAB) under the bank’s ‘Ikano Bolån’ brand (loans are provided and underwritten by SBAB). Deposit products are only offered in Sweden and Denmark (started up in Denmark in 2014) and mortgage loan products are only offered in Sweden. Examples of business partners for Sales Finance Given Ikano Bank’s origins IKEA is the largest business partner within the Sales Finance business area. However, it is important to emphasise that Ikano Bank operates independent of IKEA and competes against other suppliers whenever IKEA looks for a financing partner. Examples of other business partners are Audi, Hemköp, Hemtex, Lindex, Shell and Skoda. See also table to the right. Source: Company website, Danske Bank Markets Total assets were SEK25.7bn end-H1 14 (SEK23.8bn end-2013) with gross receivables accounting for SEK21.7bn (SEK20.6bn end-2013). 2| 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Distribution of lending and business volume (2003) - geographic and by product Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Note that Ikano Bank has decided to wind up its operation in the Netherlands as it never reached a sufficient return. Given the small size we see this as immaterial for the company (less than 1% of total assets). Arm’s length principle to the owner Given its historical roots one would assume a tight link between Ikano Bank and IKEA and the other companies controlled by the Kamprad family. However, this is not the case as the subsidiaries even within the Ikano Group generally are run with an arm’s length principle and as such are expected to operate as independent companies. That said, Ikano Bank has got support from its owner when it comes to capital and funding up until now whenever needed and we generally believe this will continue also in a situation with financial distress. As an example, Ikano Bank got SEK242m in new equity in 2013 and has got all its SEK551m in subordinated loans from its owner. Nevertheless, we have not included any support from the owner in our rating of the bank. The reasons are not just the arm’s length principle but also the fact that the financial results from Ikano Group or Ikano SA, Luxembourg are not publicly available. It is thus impossible for us to conclude whether or not the owner has the financial strength to support Ikano Bank in a situation of distress. 3| 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Key credit considerations Nordic and European macro environment With the by far largest exposure to customers in the Nordic region, the macroeconomic development in this region is of particular importance to Ikano Bank. This includes GDP growth but first and foremost the unemployment rate, as it has a large impact on private consumption and not least the level of loan losses. As can be seen from the chart below, the Nordic region generally benefits from a low unemployment rate, which furthermore is expected to decline the coming years on the back of slightly higher GDP growth. In addition, the Nordic region is well known for its relatively generous welfare entitlements for the unemployed, which means that people are able to pay their debt even after they lose their job (at least for 1-2 years). In the largest market, Sweden, the unemployment rate has wavered around 6-8% since 2004. When it comes to GDP growth, the picture is much the same with the Nordic countries faring relatively well after they got hit by the financial crisis in 2009. Finland stands out due to the country’s large reliance on Russia, which Danske Bank Macro Research expects to mean negative GDP growth of 0.4% for 2014 and risk is to the downside for 2015 as well. Against this background we are pleased to note that Ikano Bank’s exposure to Finland is only around 1% of total business volume. Sweden is expected to see the largest growth with 2.2% in 2014E and 2.6% in 2015E. Unemployment rate in Nordic countries (Eurostat harmonised) GDP growth Nordic countries 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 -2.0 -4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 Denmark Finland Source: Macrobond, Danske Bank Markets Sweden Euro area Norway Source: Danske Bank Markets The generally positive economic environment in the Nordic region in combination with, among others, low interest rates has boosted the housing market resulting in all-time-high prices in both Norway and Sweden. The risk of inflated prices is real and a concern to us as it could threaten the economic stability. Near term we do not believe in a material and swift correction but it cannot be ruled out completely. If this occurs the risks to Ikano Bank would be through two different channels: (i) lower house prices would reduce home equity and increase the risk of second-priority lenders (e.g. unsecured consumer credit) and (ii) lower house prices would reduce private consumption and increase unemployment. 4| 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Growth in Nordic house prices Source: Macrobond, Danske Bank Markets 5| 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Financial profile Profitability and efficiency After some strong years with double-digit returns on equity after tax (RoE) Ikano Bank’s RoE fell to a modest 8.8% for 2013 (8.3% annualised in H1 14, 12.5% in 2012). In the past two years costs have outgrown income, resulting in an increasing cost/income-ratio. This development is of course negative, as it gives Ikano Bank less economic leeway against loan losses in case they increase from the current level. However, we see the increasing costs as a result of the bank’s business expansion the past couple of years, both when it comes to product offering and geographic exposure. The best example of this is the acquisition of fellow subsidiary Ikano Financial Services UK from Ikano Group in May 2013, which added 184 employees to a new total of 719 on average for 2013. We also note that the change of reporting currency from EUR to SEK has had a negative impact on the 2013 earnings. Recurring earnings power, which is profit before loan losses in % of risk exposure amount (REA, formerly known as RWA), has fallen from 5% to 4% from 2011 to 2013 (3.8% in H1 14). 5.0% 0.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% H1 14 10.0% 4.0% 2013 15.0% 5.0% 2012 20.0% 6.0% 2011 25.0% 64% 62% 60% 58% 56% 54% 52% 50% 48% 2010 30.0% Profitability and efficiency 2009 Return on average equity after tax Recurring earnings power, RHS Adjusted cost/income Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Another reason for costs outgrowing income are the stagnating margins, especially the leasing margin (NLM). After peaking at 8.1% in 2011 the NLM dropped to 6.1% end2013 and was testing a new low at 5.5% end of H1 14. The net interest margin (NIM) has been more stable and has in fact increased slightly since 2012 reaching a historical high of 6.8% end-H1 14 (6.7% end-2013). As net interest income accounted for 58% of the total income in 2013 (including depreciation that mainly relates to leasing), the NIM is essential to higher income and as such we favour the bank’s ability to raise the level. A NIM of 6.8% is high compared to more traditional banks. This is clearly a result of the segments in which Ikano Bank operates. Although the segments have several suppliers, and hence some competition, it often comes down to the individual cooperation between the bank and the business partner (retail chains like for example IKEA). Price is normally not the most important parameter for clients. Instead flexibility and speedy access to credit (for ‘impulse’ buying) are very important parameters. Therefore marketing and point-of-sale competition are clear focus areas. 6| 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Margins (NIM and NLM) Distribution of income 2013 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% Leasing 15% Trading 0% Fee & comm. 19% NIM Other 8% Net interest 58% NLM Note: NLM is adjusted for depreciation costs Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Asset quality and credit risks Credit is granted on the basis of credit models with the same principles for probability of default as Basel II advanced models, i.e. advanced calculations of the likelihood that a default event will occur for the customer. The models are supplemented with details from credit information agencies as well as behavioural scoring models. The bank has used the models for many years and is as such quite comfortable with its credit management. In this context it is worth highlighting that the debtor transparency is remarkably high in Sweden as data such as e.g. marital and employment status, age, income, fixed assets, debt, payment record, property ownership etc. are centrally available for the banks for every potential customer. This means that Ikano Bank can get hold of such data quickly and based on that grant a credit in only a few minutes, often automatically or otherwise via the call centre. Add to this that a borrower is personally liable for the loan the entire life, even after a default and foreclosure procedure, and that the enforcement process is quite smooth. All together this makes a very benign operational environment for consumer banking. Specifically for corporate clients the credits are granted on a more individual basis and after a review by the credit department. Ikano Bank focuses on small credit exposures, which means that the average exposure is around SEK100,000. No client accounts for 10% or more of the revenues. Moreover, a large part of the corporate lending is with good collateral such as leasing and object financing. When it comes to the booking of loan losses, Ikano Bank predominantly books the loan losses as collective provisions as the customers and the products are very homogeneous. This requires very strong credit models that can capture changes in the economic situation for the general consumer, which the actual reported figures seem to confirm ref. below analysis. Reported loan losses have stabilised the past four years around 1.5% of gross receivables after they peaked at almost 3% in 2009. We find this to be a satisfactory level seen in light of the margins. Compared to the larger Nordic banks this is a high level but not surprising given the nature of the majority of Ikano Bank’s business with unsecured consumer lending. On the other hand, we note that the gross level (before individual write-downs) of impaired receivables is somewhat higher at 5.1% of gross receivables end-H1 14 (5% at end-2013). See further below for how these ratios compare to the peer group. 7| 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Ikano Bank keeps impaired loans on the balance sheet for a year before it sells them off to a debt collector but normally it is able to collect money before then given the legal possibilities for doing this in Sweden. Loan loss ratio (% of gross receivables) Impaired receivables in % of gross receivables 3.5% 12.0% 3.0% 10.0% 2.5% 8.0% 2.0% 6.0% 1.5% 4.0% 1.0% 2.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets 20092010201120122013 H1 14 Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets The provisioning ratio stood at 71% of impaired receivables end-H1 14 (78% by the end of 2013). We consider this a high level and credit positive. Coverage ratio (provisions to gross impaired receivables) 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Gross receivables development Gross loans Gross leasing assets 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets As stated above we see unemployment as the biggest risk factor for asset quality for unsecured consumer financing. In general the average retail customer in the Nordic countries has experienced a long period of a reasonable benign economic environment even during the financial crisis. We view the stable unemployment rate in the Nordics as the main reason for this. In the graphs below it is illustrated for Norway and the US how close the correlation is between unemployment and losses on consumer loans. As the outlook for unemployment in the Nordic countries is positive, this implies that asset quality transparency is relatively high, in our view. 8| 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Unemployment and losses on consumer lending (US) Unemployment and losses on consumer lending (Norway) 5.0% Loan loss ratio Unemployment 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 02 Source: Macrobond, Danske Bank Markets 04 06 08 10 12 Source: Norwegian FSA, Macrobond Capitalisation Ikano Bank is highly capitalised with a common equity tier-1 (CET1) ratio according to fully loaded Basel III rules of 14.7% end-H1 14 (14% end-2013) and a total capital ratio of 17.4% (16.7% end-2013). The internal target is a total capital ratio of 17%. Furthermore, the company uses the standard method when calculating its risk exposure amount, which applies much higher risk-weights than internal rating based (IRB) models. The minimum requirements in Sweden are 7% CET1 and 10.5% in total capital ratio. This is excluding the Swedish counter-cyclical buffer of 1% and any company-specific pillar 2 requirements. The capital requirements are expected to be fully effective from September 2015. We expect that Ikano Bank is able to meet the requirements with a large margin based on its current capitalisation, although we emphasise that we do not know Ikano Bank’s pillar 2 requirement. That the capitalisation is robust can also be measured by the more simple leverage ratio (tier-1 capital/total assets) that was as high as 11.9% end-H1 14. This could be compared to around 4% for the largest Nordic banks. Overall, we find the capitalisation credit positive. Capitalisation 20% Leverage ratio (tier-1 capital/total assets) Common equity tier-1 (CET1) Total capital ratio 14.0% 12.0% 15% 10.0% 8.0% 10% 6.0% 5% 4.0% 2.0% 0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 0.0% 2009 Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets 9| 30 October 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets www.danskeresearch.com H1 14 Ikano Bank Funding and liquidity Of assets 59% are funded by deposits end-2013, of which 58pp is retail deposits. Deposits are mainly offered in Sweden but since 2014 also in Denmark. All of the deposits are to be considered demand deposits but have nevertheless shown to be a stable funding source. The deposits are covered by the Swedish deposit insurance scheme with a cap of EUR100,000. Ikano Bank’s goal is to have 60% of its asset funding by deposits, which it almost fulfils. As supplement to deposits the bank has issued senior unsecured bonds in recent years, which makes sense considering the relatively high price the bank pays for its deposits. We expect Ikano Bank to continue to do so on a regular basis and as long as the share of deposits is as high as it currently is, we are not concerned. Latest issuances were a SEK300m 3Y in February 2014 and a SEK300m 4Y in May 2014. Examples of deposit offerings Source: Company website September 2014, Danske Bank Markets Disregarding the large deposits Ikano Bank’s bond maturity profile is reasonably spread out over the next five years as shown in the chart below to the right. Funding profile 2013 Maturity profile of liabilities end-2013 Other 13% Corp deposits 1% 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Equity 10% Sub debt 2% Market funds 9% Retail deposits 58% Interbank 7% 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Demand Deposits, (lhs) Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets <3m 3-12m Sub debt Bonds 1-5Y Credit inst Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Comparing the size of the net receivables in Ikano Bank to the total customer deposits we get a receivables/deposits ratio of 144% end-H1 14. It used to be as low as 115% back in 2012 but the 29% loan growth in 2013, due to the acquisition of Ikano Financial Services UK, together with the nearly zero deposit growth have increased the ratio. Net receivables/deposits ratio Net receivables Customer deposits 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets The liquidity portfolio amounted to SEK3.2bn end-H1 14 (SEK3.0bn end-2013), which corresponded to 22% of total deposits. The internal policy is that it should at least account 10 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank for 14% of deposits. The portfolio consisted of deposits with banks, short-term lending to credit institutions and investments in liquid interest-bearing securities, which can be sold and converted into cash on short notice. We regard the funding and liquidity profile of Ikano Bank as satisfactory and credit neutral. Indicative pricing of senior bonds, ASW 250 Indicative ASW offer (bps) 225 NORDAX '16 (NR/NR) 200 175 150 125 100 IKANO '18 (NR/NR) IKANO '17 (NR/NR) IKANO '17 (NR/NR) 75 IKANO '16 (NR/NR) IKANO '16 (NR/NR) '17 (NR/NR) IKANO '16 IKANO (NR/NR) SBAB '21 (A/A2) 50 IKANO '15 (NR/NR) SBAB '16 (NR/A2) SBAB '15 (NR/A2) SBAB '14 (A/A2) SBAB '18 (A/A2) SBAB '17 (A/A2) 25 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Source: Danske Bank Markets Peer group analysis In this section we make a short comparison of Ikano Bank’s key ratios versus its closest competitors. As always, such an analysis should be viewed with caution as the different banks differ on several parameters, for instance on geographic exposure and/or business mix, not to forget accounting methods. It nevertheless gives a reasonably fair view on asset quality and credit management, in our view. We start out at the very top with the NIM, which gives some indication of the intrinsic risk in the different banks’ business profiles. However, it is important to note that product mix and interest rate level play an important role as well. As stated above, Ikano Bank’s NIM has been stable to slightly increasing the past couple of years, which places it in the middle of its peer group. Highest level in the peer group is Bank Norwegian at almost 9%. 11 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank NIM 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 2009 Ikano Bank Bank Norwegian Nordax 2010 2011 2012 2013 Eika Kredittbank GE Money Bank Santander Consumer Bank Nordics Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Moving on to the loan loss ratio (LLR), Ikano Bank is at the very top with the reported 1.6% for 2013. At first glance this is negative, but it could be a result of a more conservative provisioning policy and not just worse asset quality. Loan losses in % of avg. receivables (lending and leasing) 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% 2009 Ikano Bank Bank Norwegian Nordax 2010 2011 2012 2013 Eika Kredittbank GE Money Bank Santander Consumer Bank Nordics Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets One factor that speaks in favour of the high loan loss ratio being a result of conservatism is the size of impaired loans in % of total receivables (mainly lending but in the case of e.g. Ikano Bank also leasing). Only 5% of receivables are impaired, which is only second to one other bank in the peer group. GE Money Bank is one of a kind with 32% of its receivables being impaired. Note that Santander bought GE Money Bank AB in June 2014. 12 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Impaired receivables in % of receivables (lending and leasing) 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2009 2010 Ikano Bank Bank Norwegian Nordax 2011 2012 2013 Eika Kredittbank GE Money Bank Santander Consumer Bank Nordics Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets Finally, comparing the coverage ratio (loan loss reserve in % of impaired receivables) against the peer group, Ikano Bank stands out positively with a coverage ratio of 78% for 2013, which is a large margin to the second best, GE Money Bank, at 61%. Coverage ratio (loan loss reserve in % of impaired receivables) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2009 Ikano Bank Bank Norwegian Nordax 2010 2011 2012 2013 Eika Kredittbank GE Money Bank Santander Consumer Bank Nordics Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets In the table below we have summarised our analysis based on average figures for 201013. Ikano Bank is below average when it comes to profitability driven by a lower NIM and a higher LLR, while its capitalisation and funding ratio are better off. Peer group analysis (P/L ratios are based on average for 2010-13*, capital ratios for end-2013) Nordax Santander CBN Average NIM Ikano Bank 6.31% 6.85% 8.50% 8.19% 5.12% 4.50% 6.58% LLR 1.43% 1.08% 1.28% 1.58% 1.71% 0.77% 1.31% RoE after tax 14.2% 6.6% 24.4% 6.8% 25.6% 15.5% 15.5% CET1 14.0% 13.6% 12.8% 42.8% 12.0% - 13.1% Total capital ratio 16.7% 16.1% 17.9% 42.8% 14.5% 13.7% 15.8% Receivables/deposits 141% 108% 97% 2120% 176% 768% 258% NR/NR/NR NR/NR/NR NR/NR/NR NR/NR/NR NR/NR/NR Baa1/NR/NR Rating Moody's/S&P/Fitch Eika Kredittbank Bank Norwegian GE Money Bank * Eika Kreditbank figures only for 2011-13. Average figures are ex. GE Money Bank for capital ratios and liquidity Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets 13 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Our view of Ikano Bank We assign an issuer credit rating of ‘BBB’ to Ikano Bank. The rating is based on a review of the rating methodologies from the rating agencies and our assessment of Ikano Bank’s business and financial risk profile. We see the development away from being a sole consumer bank, predominantly granting unsecured lending, to a more diversified bank with several different product offerings, some with good collateral such as leasing and object financing, as credit positive. Profitability with a RoE after tax of 8.8% for 2013 is a bit too low, in our view, whilst we find asset quality and in particular the provisioning level to be high. In our peer group analysis Ikano Bank stands out positively when it comes to coverage ratio, which speaks of a conservative provisioning policy. Capital-wise Ikano Bank is well off with a CET1 ratio of 14.7% and total capital ratio of 17.4% end-H1 14 (14% and 16.7% end-2013, respectively). This is higher than most peers and positive from a credit perspective. Deposits are used as the main funding source, which we find positive, but after having almost complete balance between deposits and net receivables in 2012, the ratio has increased to 144% end-H1 14 following the acquisition in the UK in 2013. We view Ikano Bank’s link to IKEA and not least the fact that the Kamprad family is the sole owner of Ikano Bank as credit positive. However, we have not included any support from the owner in our rating, as the financial results from the owner are not publicly available. Moreover, Ikano Bank is generally run as an independent company. We might consider a notch higher rating if the profitability improves further or a formal support structure from the owner is introduced. Downside risk to our rating includes among others deteriorating asset quality. 14 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Financials and key figures Income statement (SEKm) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Net interest income 699 795 853 927 915 1,081 617 Fee & Commision Income 267 329 295 403 351 356 173 -2 -8 -22 -34 -34 7 1 1,229 1,374 1,500 1,612 1,777 2,039 1,106 Trading & Fair Value Gains Leasing Income Other Income 79 73 124 177 280 142 117 Total Operating Income 2,272 2,562 2,749 3,085 3,290 3,625 2,014 Total Operating Expenses 1,728 1,955 2,043 2,284 2,528 2,897 1,622 Pre-Provision Income 543 608 706 801 762 728 392 Loan Losses and Provisions 245 416 172 241 242 295 146 Appropriations -31 153 -327 -33 -196 -178 -122 Pre-tax Income 267 345 207 527 324 255 124 Net Income 192 257 145 414 234 190 101 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 10,339 10,491 12,009 11,657 11,584 14,887 15,664 419 894 499 643 673 744 794 2,848 3,311 3,320 3,632 4,255 4,943 5,288 Balance sheet (SEKm) Loans Loan Loss Reserve Leasing Loan Loss Reserve Leasing 15 114 77 64 57 57 0 14,609 15,977 17,779 19,206 20,107 23,783 25,226 Risk exposure amount (REA) 8,887 14,920 15,382 16,346 16,537 20,093 20,487 Customer Deposits 6,735 8,953 10,717 12,692 13,831 14,075 14,531 Market Funds 509 2,202 2,387 2,008 1,640 2,622 3,286 Subordinated debt 241 394 554 553 542 551 566 Equity 1,340 1,498 1,420 1,809 1,944 2,370 2,504 Growth % Total Assets 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Receivables, Gross - 8.7% 7.4% 0.6% 3.6% 24.5% 5.4% Total Assets - 9.4% 11.3% 8.0% 4.7% 18.3% 6.1% Risk-weighted Assets - 67.9% 3.1% 6.3% 1.2% 21.5% 2.0% Customer Deposits - 32.9% 19.7% 18.4% 9.0% 1.8% 3.2% Pre-Provision Income - 12% 16% 13% -5% -4% 0% Net Income - 34% -44% 186% -44% -19% 0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Impaired Receivables % Gross Receivables and Guarantees - 10.3% 4.6% 6.1% 6.4% 5.0% 5.1% Impaired Receivables % (Equity + Loss Reserves) - 61% 37% 39% 40% 32% 34% Loss Reserves % Impaired Receivables - 66% 79% 72% 69% 78% 71% Loss Reserves % Gross Receivables & Guarantees - 6.8% 3.6% 4.4% 4.4% 3.9% 3.7% Asset Quality & Market Risk Equities & Non-Trading Assets % Adj. Equity - 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Net Interest Margin (Including Dividends) - 6.38% 6.18% 6.25% 6.13% 6.67% 6.77% PPI % Avg. RWA - 5.11% 4.66% 5.05% 4.63% 3.97% 3.83% PPI excl Trading % Avg. RWA - 5.18% 4.81% 5.27% 4.84% 3.94% 3.82% Net Income % Avg. RWA - 2.16% 0.96% 2.61% 1.42% 1.04% 0.98% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Adjusted Cost % Operating Income 57% 57% 54% 54% 56% 61% 63% Operating Expenses % Avg. Assets 23.7% 12.8% 12.1% 12.4% 12.9% 13.2% 12.9% H1 14 Earnings Efficiency Liquidity 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Avg. Customer Deposits % Avg. Total Funding - 66% 71% 76% 82% 80% 72% Avg. Gross Loans % Avg. Customer Deposits - 141% 121% 106% 93% 100% 112% - 14.4% 12.0% 1.0% -3.9% 5.7% 8.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 H1 14 Market Funds Reliance (Total Assets) Capitalisation Common Equity Tier-1 Ratio (CET1) 11.9% 9.6% 9.9% 11.7% 13.5% 14.0% 14.7% Total Capital Ratio 12.7% 12.2% 13.5% 15.1% 16.5% 16.7% 17.4% Note: We have used historical exchange rates in order to change 2008-2011 from EUR into SEK Source: Company data, Danske Bank Markets 15 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Fixed Income Credit Research Thomas Hovard Head of Credit Research (+45) 45 12 85 05 [email protected] Louis Landeman TMT, Industrials (+46) 8 568 80524 [email protected] Åse Haagensen High Yield, Industrials (+47) 22 86 13 22 [email protected] Mads Rosendal Industrials, Pulp & Paper (+45) 45 14 88 79 [email protected] Jakob Magnussen Utilities, Energy (+45) 45 12 85 03 [email protected] Brian Børsting Industrials (+45) 45 12 85 19 [email protected] Gabriel Bergin Strategy, Industrials (+46) 8 568 80602 [email protected] Niklas Ripa High Yield, Industrials (+45) 45 12 80 47 [email protected] Bjørn Kristian Røed Shipping (+47) 85 40 70 72 [email protected] Ola Heldal TMT (+47) 85408433 [email protected] Wiveca Swarting Real Estate, Construction (+46) 8 568 80617 [email protected] Sondre Dale Stormyr Offshore rigs (+47) 85 40 70 70 [email protected] Henrik René Andresen Credit Portfolios (+45) 45 13 33 27 [email protected] Øyvind Mossige Oil services (+47) 85 40 54 91 [email protected] Knut-Ivar Bakken Fish farming (+47) 85 40 70 74 [email protected] Lars Holm Financials (+45) 45 12 80 41 [email protected] Find the latest Credit Research Danske Bank Markets: http://www.danskebank.com/danskemarketsresearch 16 | 30 October 2014 Bloomberg: DNSK<GO> www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Disclosures This research report has been prepared by Danske Bank Markets, a division of Danske Bank A/S (‘Danske Bank’). The authors of the research report are Lars Holm, Senior Analyst and Thomas Hovard, Chief Analyst. Analyst certification Each research analyst responsible for the content of this research report certifies that the views expressed in the research report accurately reflect the research analyst’s personal view about the financial instruments and issuers covered by the research report. Each responsible research analyst further certifies that no part of the compensation of the research analyst was, is or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations expressed in the research report. Regulation Danske Bank is authorised and subject to regulation by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority and is subject to the rules and regulation of the relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where it conducts business. Danske Bank is subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority (UK). Details on the extent of the regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from Danske Bank on request. The research reports of Danske Bank are prepared in accordance with the Danish Society of Financial Analysts’ rules of ethics and the recommendations of the Danish Securities Dealers Association. Conflicts of interest Danske Bank has established procedures to prevent conflicts of interest and to ensure the provision of highquality research based on research objectivity and independence. These procedures are documented in Danske Bank’s research policies. Employees within Danske Bank’s Research Departments have been instructed that any request that might impair the objectivity and independence of research shall be referred to Research Management and the Compliance Department. Danske Bank’s Research Departments are organised independently from and do not report to other business areas within Danske Bank. Research analysts are remunerated in part based on the overall profitability of Danske Bank, which includes investment banking revenues, but do not receive bonuses or other remuneration linked to specific corporate finance or debt capital transactions. Danske Bank, its affiliates, subsidiaries and staff may perform services for or solicit business from Ikano Bank and may hold long or short positions in, or otherwise be interested in, the financial instruments mentioned in this research report. The Equity and Corporate Bonds analysts of Danske Bank and undertakings with which the Equity and Corporate Bonds analysts have close links are, however, not permitted to invest in financial instruments that are covered by the relevant Equity or Corporate Bonds analyst or the research sector to which the analyst is linked. Danske Bank, its affiliates and subsidiaries are engaged in commercial banking, securities underwriting, dealing, trading, brokerage, investment management, investment banking, custody and other financial services activities, may be a lender to Ikano Bank and have whatever rights are available to a creditor under applicable law and the applicable loan and credit agreements. At any time, Danske Bank, its affiliates and subsidiaries may have credit or other information regarding Ikano Bank that is not available to or may not be used by the personnel responsible for the preparation of this report, which might affect the analysis and opinions expressed in this research report. As an investment bank, Danske Bank, its affiliates and subsidiaries provide a variety of financial services, including investment banking services. It is possible that Danske Bank and/or its affiliates and/or its subsidiaries might seek to become engaged to provide such services to Ikano Bank in the next three months. Danske Bank has made no agreement with Ikano Bank to write this research report. Parts of this research report have been disclosed to Ikano Bank. No recommendations or opinions have been disclosed to Ikano Bank and no amendments have accordingly been made to the same before dissemination of the research report. Financial models and/or methodology used in this research report Calculations and presentations in this research report are based on standard econometric tools and methodology as well as publicly available statistics for each individual security, issuer and/or country. Documentation can be obtained from the authors on request. Risk warning Major risks connected with recommendations or opinions in this research report, including a sensitivity analysis of relevant assumptions, are stated throughout the text. 17 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Expected updates Credit Update: This research report will be updated on a quarterly basis following the quarterly results statements from Ikano Bank. Scandi Handbook: This research report will be updated bi-annually, usually in April and October. See the front page of this research report for the date of first publication. Recommendation structure Investment recommendations are based on the expected development in the credit profile as well as relative value compared with the sector and peers. As at 30 September 2014 Danske Bank Markets had investment recommendations on 49 corporate bond issuers. The distribution of recommendations is represented in the distribution of recommendations column below. The proportion of issuers corresponding to each of the recommendation categories above to which Danske Bank provided investment banking services in the previous 12 months ending 30 September 2014 is shown below. Time horizon Distribution of recommendations Investment banking relationships Outperformance relative to peer group 3 months 33% 50% Hold Performance in line with peer group 3 months 53% 42% Sell Underperformance relative to peer group 3 months 14% 14% Rating Anticipated performance Buy Changes in recommendation within past 12 months: Date New recommendation Old recommendation 30 October 2014 Not Rated N/A General disclaimer This research has been prepared by Danske Bank Markets (a division of Danske Bank A/S). It is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part of, and shall under no circumstances be considered as, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any relevant financial instruments (i.e. financial instruments mentioned herein or other financial instruments of any issuer mentioned herein and/or options, warrants, rights or other interests with respect to any such financial instruments) (‘Relevant Financial Instruments’). The research report has been prepared independently and solely on the basis of publicly available information that Danske Bank considers to be reliable. While reasonable care has been taken to ensure that its contents are not untrue or misleading, no representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness and Danske Bank, its affiliates and subsidiaries accept no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss, including without limitation any loss of profits, arising from reliance on this research report. The opinions expressed herein are the opinions of the research analysts responsible for the research report and reflect their judgement as of the date hereof. These opinions are subject to change, and Danske Bank does not undertake to notify any recipient of this research report of any such change nor of any other changes related to the information provided in this research report. This research report is not intended for retail customers in the United Kingdom or the United States. This research report is protected by copyright and is intended solely for the designated addressee. It may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, by any recipient for any purpose without Danske Bank’s prior written consent. Disclaimer related to distribution in the United States This research report is distributed in the United States by Danske Markets Inc., a U.S. registered broker-dealer and subsidiary of Danske Bank, pursuant to SEC Rule 15a-6 and related interpretations issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The research report is intended for distribution in the United States solely to ‘U.S. institutional investors’ as defined in SEC Rule 15a-6. Danske Markets Inc. accepts responsibility for this research report in connection with distribution in the United States solely to ‘U.S. institutional investors’. 18 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com Ikano Bank Danske Bank is not subject to U.S. rules with regard to the preparation of research reports and the independence of research analysts. In addition, the research analysts of Danske Bank who have prepared this research report are not registered or qualified as research analysts with the NYSE or FINRA but satisfy the applicable requirements of a non-U.S. jurisdiction. Any U.S. investor recipient of this research report who wishes to purchase or sell any Relevant Financial Instrument may do so only by contacting Danske Markets Inc. directly and should be aware that investing in nonU.S. financial instruments may entail certain risks. Financial instruments of non-U.S. issuers may not be registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and may not be subject to the reporting and auditing standards of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 19 | 30 October 2014 www.danskeresearch.com