Sustainability by using Bioclimatic tools in architecture
Transcription
Sustainability by using Bioclimatic tools in architecture
Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Sustainability by using Bioclimatic tools in architecture Harry Hirsch Dipl.-Ing. Arch. TUD/EPFL HarryHirsch Consult Baden-Baden/Zurich/Vancouver Jakarta, 13.02.2012 Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Harry Hirsch Dipl.-Ing. Architekt TU Darmstadt / EPF Lausanne ≡ DU Diederichs Projektmanagement, Head Sustainability ≡ HarryHirsch Consult, Real Estate- und Portfoliomanagement, Baden-Baden/Vancouver ≡ PricewaterhouseCoopers, Head Real Estate ≡ Prof. Mäckler Architekten, Ffm, Managing Director ≡ Federal Agency for Building and Planning, Personal Assistant to the President ≡ Federal Chamber of Architects, Director for Architecture and Building technology ≡ Co-Founder German Sustainable Building Council (GeSBC), Auditor, Member of Certification Board Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Holistic approach 6 fields of criterias 49 criterias Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Criteria groups Oecological Quality 22,5 % Oeconomical Quality Socio-cultural und Functional Quality 22,5 % 22,5 % Technical Quality 22,5 % Process Quality 10 % Location Quality (only documented) Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Potentialanalyse Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Systembewertung 100 % 95 % 90 % 85% 80 % 1,5 Gold 75 % 70 % 65 % 2,0 Silber 60 % 55 % 50 % 3,0 Bronze DGNB - Stand Version 2009 Bewertung of 49 single criterias with zugehörigen indicators in the above mentioned groups of criterias Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Certification according to DGNB (German Quality Seal for Sustainable Construction) Objectives Making Quality Measurable – Sustainability Certificates for Buildings Improvement of the building quality over the entire lift cycle Quantification of relevant topics with the help of a comprehensive and expandable catalog of criteria Development of a certification system for new and old building 7 Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Requirements Requirements A certificate for buildings will only be successful if its introduction can be financed, it can be updated easily and at low cost, its statements are objective and understandable for end users and the collected data do not only serve for the certificate but also support day-today business 8 Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Strategy of Sustainability Sustainable Construction Economy Ecology long-life, environmentally compatible building materials Saving Energy: disposal relevance of the buildings insulation of the building shell and components of the mechanical distribution commissioning environmentally networks responsible project participants efficient heating and water heating (checking the realization) energy-efficient components, Waste concept, separation of drives and lighting systems secondary material Socially Cultural Environment attractive design (building and outdoor facilities) health and safety high living and additional benefit (balconies) comfortability emission protection optimized development (e. g. lifts) accessability Saving Operating Costs: long-life, low-maintenance, highly efficient mechanical services simplification of the FM services (cleaning and maintenance) 9 passenger car and bike parking lots Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture „The European needs“ Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture „The European needs“ Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture „First Passive House ever“ L1150249.JPG Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture „The Indonesian Way“ Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Bioclamatic tools 1. Passive Strategies of sustainable building design • Orientation • Geometry • Free and controlled ventilation (no AC) • Thermical Trägheit (thermical mass) • Transparence / Opaqueness • Materials und involved energy 14 Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Bioclimatic tools 2. Active Strategies of sustainable building design • Solar Collektor2 (Warmwater, PV) • Regainment of Energy • New Materials (PCM - Phase Change Material, Transparent Insulation, Low-E Glas) 15 Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Bioclimatic tools 3. Differences and conflicts between summer- and winteroptimiziation • Adaptivity as strategy (adaptive U-factor, adaptive ventilation, adaptive layers) • Being opaque or transparent • Building mass (collectivity, Trägheit) • Closed Elevation versus performated outer layer • Exposition versus shadiness 16 Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture „The Indonesian Tradition“ Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Roof Overstand Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Wisma Dharmala Building Jakarta Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Local Shading Solution Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Natural Shading Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Zero Energy House Singapore Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Green 4 Facades Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Green Facade Jakarta 1 Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Green Appendix Jakarta Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Green facade Jakarta Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Green layer with pockets Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Shading Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Intelligent Shading- and Reflection System Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Balinese Solution Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Balinese Solution Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Light Collectors Singapore Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Light Reflection and Diffusor Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture your traditional waste reduction Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture maintenance Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Health Requirements A green building provides a healthier working environment. Improved indoor air quality helps to reduce the health and safety risks to occupants from Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) and Legionnaire’s Disease (Shiers, 2000). There are estimates, that improved heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, which limit the spread of contaminants and pathogens, could reduce respiratory illnesses by 9%–20%. Better indoor air quality can also reduce asthma attacks and allergies. Health and comfort are becoming increasingly important with the growing concern about staff welfare. Through sustainability, companies can improve their competitive advantage in the recruitment and retention of talent. 36 Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Centre Jean-Marie Tjibaou at New Caledonia Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Renzo Piano‘s answer to local needs Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Wind grids Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture „The Wind Gap“ Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Ökologische Qualität Kriterien 01-05, 10,11 – Ökobilanzierung ZIEL © S. Lakenbrink Reduktion der negativen Wirkungen von Materialeigenschaften in Bezug auf ihr Treibhauspotenzial, Ozonschichtabbaupotenzial, Ozonbildungspotenzial, Überdüngungspotenzial und Versauerungspotenzial sowie Berücksichtigung des Anteils regenerativer und nicht-erneuerbarer Energie. Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Ökologische Qualität Risiken für die lokale Umwelt ZIEL Reduktion der Verwendung von Stoffen und Produkten, die ein Risikopotenzial für Grundwasser, Oberflächenflächenwasser, Boden und Luft enthalten. © Lakenbrink S. Lakenbrink © S. Berücksichtigte Stoffgruppen: Halogene, Schwermetalle, Organische Lösemittel, Stoffe und Produkte, die gemäß Biozid- oder REACH-Richtlinie umweltschädigend sind. Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Ökologische Qualität Kriterium 08 Nachhaltige Ressourcenverwendung / Holz ZIEL Subtropische und boreale Hölzer dürfen nur dann verwendet werden, wenn durch Vorlage eines Zertifikats „die geregelte, nachhaltige Bewirtschaftung des Herkunftsforstes nachgewiesen wird.“ © S. Lakenbrink Ziel ist ein Ausschluss von Holz und Holzwerkstoffen aus unkontrollierter Gewinnung in gefährdeten tropischen, subtropischen und borealen Waldregionen zur Förderung des nachhaltig gewonnenen Rohstoffes Holz. Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Ökologische Qualität Kriterium 09 Mikroklima ZIEL © S. Lakenbrink Reduzierung des Wärmeinseleffekts durch Auswahl geeigneter Produkte und Lösungen im Fassaden- und Dachbereich durch Schaffung von unversiegelten Bereichen, Begrünung oder Verwendung von Materialien mit geringer solarer Absorption. Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Ökologische Qualität Kriterium 14 – Trinkwasserbedarf und Abwasseraufkommen ZIEL © S. Lakenbrink © Lakenbrink S. Lakenbrink © S. Ziel ist eine Reduzierung des täglichen Trinkwasserbedarfs und Abwasseraufkommens durch Einbau wassersparender Armaturen, Nutzung von Regen- und Brauchwasser sowie die Ableitung von konzentriertem Schmutzwasser. Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Ökologische Qualität Kriterium 15 – Flächeninanspruchnahme ZIEL © S. Lakenbrink © Lakenbrink S. Lakenbrink © S. Ziel ist die Reduzierung des Flächenverbrauchs und folglich die Beendigung der Zersiedelung der Landschaft sowie die Geringhaltung zusätzlicher Bodenversiegelung. Bioclimatic Tools in Architecture Ökonomische Qualität Kriterium 16 – Gebäudebezogene Kosten im Lebenszyklus ZIEL S. Lakenbrink © © Lakenbrink S. Lakenbrink © S. Ziel ist die Minimierung der Lebenszykluskosten von Gebäuden zur Kostenreduktion von Umbau- und Erhaltungsinvestitionen. Folgekosten finden oft nur wenig Beachtung, heutige Einsparungen sollen jedoch nicht auf Kosten zukünftiger Nutzer/Besitzer vorgenommen werden.