How SGCH are creating positive changes through the Riverwood
Transcription
How SGCH are creating positive changes through the Riverwood
Once upon a time in Riverwood How are we creating positive changes through the Riverwood North regeneration scheme and how will this change be measured? Patrick Ryan Manager Community Renewal, SGCH [email protected] Acknowledgements Payce Communities UNSW City Futures Canterbury City Council Housing NSW (Housing Commission) Riverwood Community Centre Morris Iemma (former Premier and MP) NSW State Library Google maps My Dad! (James Ryan Snr) The Riverwood Community and the traditional owners of the land, their Elders past and present. Disclaimer* Aerial to southwest out to Botany Bay Riverwood social housing estate Redevelopment parcel of land History of Place WW2, military hospital, emergency housing (Herne Bay) Its Personal Social exclusion, poverty, social disconnectedness and lack of housing New public housing development Places – American Places and Presidents Arizona Place Post war 1950-60’s Truman Avenue Roosevelt avenue Kentucky Drive Washington avenue High rise buildings – Lincoln building Community Assets Recreation, health – Canterbury City Council Open space, biodiversity Community Gardens Community infrastructure – social support, aged care, youth Riverwood Redevelopment Project Vision for Washington Park • Integrated community • Mixed tenure (private, social) seniors • Open space • Increased density Riverwood North redevelopment • Demolish 176 existing public housing dwellings (approx 10% estate) • Rehouse residents with neighbouring area (supported by NBESP) • Construct 150 new social housing for seniors and up to 500 private apartments • New library, community centre and cafe onsite • Create open large spaces via land swap between council and state government Contractual Framework Two separate requests for tender/EOI for development contract and social housing management • Developer: Payce Communities (ASX listed developer) awarded contract by NSW Land & Housing Corporation. Link to public disclosure http://www.housing.nsw.gov.au/Changes+to+Social+Housing/Redeve lopment/Riverwood+North+Urban+Renewal+Project/Riverwood+Nort h+Urban+Renewal+Project+Contract.htm • Social housing management: SGCH awarded management rights by Housing NSW (then ‘CHD’) Washington Park- Stage One January 2014 Stage 1 complete: 123 units (1br/2br) Stage 2: 27 units (1br/2br) mixed social, private & library/senior centre (early 2016) Working in Partnership - Developer Despite no contractual requirement or obligation between SGCH and Payce we still managed to: • Community engagement •from day one • Design refinement • Amenity improvement (gardens, streets) • Co-designed community orchard and edible garden • ‘maintain the relationship’ Working in Partnership – Community • Community Garden Club (35 members, 6 residents on committee) • SGCH Tenancy Outreach Office • Shopping Trolleys program • Washington Park Chess Club (XiangQi “shyang-chee” Working in Partnership – Community • Tenant community demographic needs analysis (current and future) • Establish referral and access protocols for aged care support providers • Design and fitout community foyer place as a meeting and learning place for residents Key questions 1. What impact on displaced former tenants of demolished blocks? 2. How effectively have renewal plans been communicated/consulted on? 3. How does the project affect the estate profile? – Housing tenure – Economic activity – Demographic profile 4. How well do new residents integrate socially? 5. What impact on resident satisfaction, community pride and estate external reputation? 6. How far has developer ‘added value’ through stimulating community activity? 7. What (if any) ‘spillover benefits’ accrue to tenants elsewhere on the estate? Evaluation fieldwork/methodology • 3 fieldwork waves • Wave 1 (2014) – – – – Stakeholder interviews Interviews with displaced tenants Tenant focus groups Residents survey – tenants of new social housing • Wave 2 (2015) – Secondary data analysis • Wave 3 (2016/17) – Stakeholder interviews – Residents survey – social renters and private renters/owner occupiers – Resident focus groups Lessons learnt to date • Understand the past and how people are connected to place • Map the ‘community capital’ and plan for the future needs of the community • Being too inclusive can hold you back • Get a ‘seat at the table’ upfront • Mind the ‘devil in the detail’ and plan for contingencies (bins, telephones, fire safety) Challenges & Opportunities for the future • Integrating the private and social residents within Washington Park • Integrating the old and the new (social housing) and privates •Construction program • ‘Bridging’ cultural barriers and differences (and Washington Avenue) • Capturing the story within the research project