Move Your CLASS! Kinesthetic Math
Transcription
Move Your CLASS! Kinesthetic Math
Montessori Moves A Step Ahead: A Cultural Perspective of Kinesthetics Koren Clark, M.Ed INTRODUCTION Move Your CLASS! Kinesthetic Math ● In my work, I explore the nuances of cultural responsiveness in a Montessori classroom by studying students’ success in learning mathematics through the use of gross motor skills that are highly valued in African American and Latino cultures. ● Background Research ● Many researchers “gap gaze” losing focus of the needs of the child while focusing on the academic achievement gap in the area of math between African American, Latino students and their Asian and Caucasian peers (Gutierrez, 2008). ● Teachers can bring about academic success for all by viewing each child as an individual with a wealth of cultural knowledge (McIntyre, 2001). ● African American (Favre, 2007) and Latino students (Gutierrez, 2008) seem to have a very strong preference for collaborative, didactic and large gross motor-kinesthetic learning. These preferences fall outside of the traditional approach to teaching (Ladson-Billings, 2001). ● The disparity between the academic achievement of African American and Caucasian children may be explained in part by the lack of institutionalized educational support for the varied approaches associated with difference in cultural learning styles (McIntyre, 2001). ● Student achievement is best when student learning styles and teacher’s instructional methods are aligned (Saracho, 2003). ● The multifaceted intelligences possessed by kinesthetic learners, particularly those of Latino and African American descent, are often overlooked (Favre 2007). ● The theoretical bases of Montessori which require the teacher to look to each child’s individual needs and to build upon the extensive body of knowledge that they already possess are clearly congruent with the theoretical foundations of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (Massey, 2006). Research results I call this Kinesthetic learning, learning that takes place while students are engaged in large muscular physical activity. ● By concentrating on this cultural value, I demonstrate that using culturally responsive teaching methods can enhance student learning. ● As educators stepping into the 21st century, we need to take on new culturally relevant pedagogies to ensure each student’s needs are met with equitable learning opportunities in an increasingly culturally diverse country. Findings ● I believe that when we, as Montessori facilitators, take on the role of saint, scientist and servant, as Maria Montessori implores us to (Montessori, 1917), cultural relevancy can be obtained. ● As saints we remember to look objectively at the child while reflecting on our own personal prejudices and cultural worldviews. ● As a scientist we discover the influence of culture on the learning trends in our classroom. ● All 21 students in the intervention program chose more math tasks during their work period. ● Latino and African American students saw the greatest measure of improvement in their willingness to choose either Montessori or kinesthetically inclined math activities. ● Their newly found willingness to engage in math activities led them to effortlessly spend more time in their day engaging in math activities. ● This increased “time on task” which is a positive indicator of higher learning outcomes lead to the academic success of the Latino and African American students in my classroom. ● The result was a shrinkage in the achievement gap. ● More research can be done on a larger scale to replicate these findings. ● As a servants we are flexible enough to serve the needs of all children with the same equitably high expectation for each child. ● When a culturally relevant pedagogy is obtained, the gap in achievement closes as you move your Montessori Class “A Step Ahead.” Research Question Referencences Can culturally responsive kinesthetic math activities improve students’ levels of engagement and competence?” Intervention Method ● Presented a kinesthetic math program to my classroom of 21 students. ● Gathered data from six sources over three months -- between February 2014 and April 2014. ● Administered pre and post interest questionnaire to determine attitude towards math. ● Evaluated student work plans to measure choice and engagement. ● Measured the student levels of engagement by noting the math work students chose and the word problems they recorded in their math notebooks. ● Assessed students’ rudimentary memorization of math facts in addition and multiplication through pre and post tests. ● Noted student responses to math activities in my instructor’s journal. Figure 1. Label in 20pt Aal. Student responses ● “This is fun.” ● “I taught my family how to play this at home. We are playing it.” ● “Can we please do this at recess?” ● “I know we are not in your class, but can we come in after school and play the math game we saw your students playing? ● “I wish my teacher could teach us those games.” ● “Can we do kinesthetic math instead of sharing? Kinesthetic math is more funner. l. ● Favre, L. (2007). Analysis of the transition of a low socioeconomic status, African-American, New Orleans, elementary facility into a demonstration learning-style school of excellence. Journal of Urban Education 4(1), 79-90 ● Gutiérrez, R. (2008). “A ‘Gap Gazing’ Fetish in Mathematics Education? Problematizing Research on the Achievement Gap.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 39, No. 4. ● Ladson-Billings,G. (1994). The Dreamkeepers: Successful Teachers of African American Children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass ● Massey,Corinne (2006) University of Maryland, College Park MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328. ● McIntyre,E., Rosebery, A.,& González, N. (Eds.). (2001). Classroom Diversity: Connecting Curriculum to Students’ Lives. Portsmouth,NH: Heinemann. Melbourne, Australia: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education ● Saracho, O.N (2003) Matching Teachers’ and Students’ Cognitive Style. Early Childhood Development and Care, 173, (2-3), p. 161-17. ● Montessori, M (1917) The Advanced Montessori Method Publisher: New York, Frederick A. Stokes Company