Table of Contents
Transcription
Table of Contents
Veterans Memorial High School Brownsville Independent School District Campus Improvement Plan School Year 2012 - 2013 Mission Statement Work collaboratively to prepare students academically, socially and technologically as they become contributing members of our society. Vision Statement Veterans Memorial High School is committed to providing Excellence in Education for all students. The school provides programs and learning experiences that promote academic achievement and career programs of study for the personal and social growth of every student. As a richly diverse community of learners that values all its members, Veterans Memorial High School contributes to the local community by linking parents, local agencies and businesses to the school. Table of Contents I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. Campus Narrative ................................................................................................................................ 4 State of Texas Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................... 7 District Mission Statement .................................................................................................................. 8 District Goals ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Brownsville ISD Core Commitments ................................................................................................ 10 Brownsville ISD Strategic Action Plan ............................................................................................. 11 Brownsville ISD Strategies ............................................................................................................... 12 Site-Based Decision Making (SBDM) Committee Members ........................................................... 13 Planning and Decision-Making Procedures ...................................................................................... 14 Campus Needs Assessment Summary: TAKS/EOC and other related data ..................................... 16 Comprehensive Needs Assessment ................................................................................................... 25 a. Demographics ............................................................................................................................... 25 b. Student Achievement.................................................................................................................... 26 c. School Culture and Climate ......................................................................................................... 27 d. Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention .................................................................................... 28 e. Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment ..................................................................................... 30 f. Family and Community Involvement .......................................................................................... 31 g. School Context and Organization................................................................................................. 32 XII. School-Wide Programs Plan .............................................................................................................. 34 XIII. Instructional Improvement Plans ....................................................................................................... 36 a. Language Arts .............................................................................................................................. 37 b. Mathematics ................................................................................................................................. 48 c. Science .......................................................................................................................................... 55 d. Social Studies ............................................................................................................................... 61 e. Health and Physical Education ..................................................................................................... 67 f. Fine Arts ....................................................................................................................................... 70 2 g. At-Risk.......................................................................................................................................... 74 Table of Contents h. Attendance .................................................................................................................................... 81 i. Discipline Management/Safe and Drug Free Schools ................................................................. 84 j. College Preparation ...................................................................................................................... 91 k. Parents and Community ............................................................................................................... 94 l. Technology ................................................................................................................................... 98 m. Migrant Education ……………………………………………………………………………..102 XIV. Appendix A: AYP Addendum......................................................................................................... 107 XV. Appendix B: Financial Budget and Personnel Worksheets ............................................................ 119 XVI. Veterans Memorial High School Monitoring Instrument ............................................................... 122 a. Language Arts ............................................................................................................................ 123 b. Mathematics ............................................................................................................................... 126 c. Science ........................................................................................................................................ 128 d. Social Studies ............................................................................................................................. 130 e. Health and Physical Education ................................................................................................... 132 f. Fine Arts ..................................................................................................................................... 134 g. At-Risk........................................................................................................................................ 137 h. Attendance .................................................................................................................................. 140 i. Discipline Management/Safe and Drug Free Schools ............................................................... 142 j. College Preparation .................................................................................................................... 144 k. Parents and Community ............................................................................................................. 146 l. Technology ................................................................................................................................. 148 m. Migrant Education ...................................................................................................................... 150 3 Veterans Memorial High School Campus Narrative Veterans Memorial High School is located in Brownsville, Texas. Veterans Memorial High School is one of seven high schools in Brownsville ISD. The campus was constructed in 2010. The 360,000 square-foot school sits on an 80-acre site on Military Highway. The courtyard has a series of pergolas that provide shaded seating areas for students and faculty. Veterans Memorial will be the first BISD high school to have its own football and soccer stadium, a 5,000 seat facility with an all-weather track. It also has 1,000-seat baseball and softball stadiums, as well as practice fields and tennis and basketball courts. It is the district’s magnet school for architecture and construction as well as for government and public administration. All safety standards have been met and all of the building is accessible to students and staff with disabilities. Our school's mission is "work collaboratively to prepare students academically, socially and technologically as they become contributing members of our society". Academic teaming is pivotal in our school's success. Veterans Memorial has highly-qualified teachers that carry out the instructional program. In an effort to meet the diverse talents of our student’s teachers are provided access to high-quality ongoing professional development throughout the school year. Professional development activities are geared to individual teachers’ specialties. The student population at Veterans Memorial High School is approximately 898 and serves students in grades 9th through 10th According to the PEIMS Data Review of our campus profile, 98% of the student population is Hispanic and 92 % are identified as Economically Disadvantaged. Many of our students are first generation Mexican immigrants, 19 % are classified as Limited English Proficient and a majority is English/Spanish bilingual. In addition, several of our students come from homes which participate in state and federal assistance programs such as food stamps, welfare, the Women, Infant, Children (WIC) nutrition program, and subsidized housing and medical assistance. Our school provides effective instruction that will equip students with skills and expertise to be successful in their respective careers whether they enter the workforce or go on to a college or university after graduation from the public school system. Courses are offered in every subject area necessary for college admission, as well as a diverse range of elective and career and technology courses. The instructional programs include academic core subjects at various levels, such as the Gifted and Talented, Pre-Advanced Placement, Advanced Placement, and Dual Enrollment in collaboration with the University of Texas at Brownsville. Veterans Memorial High School also has a “school within a school” magnet program for Architecture & Construction and Government & Public Administration. About 94% of our student population is enrolled in this program. Along with the magnet program, the school also offers a strong foundation for careers in AV Technology and Communications, Business Management and Administration, Finance, Health Science, Information Technology, Law, Public Safety, and Corrections and Security. Students at our school also have access to three graduation plans: the Minimum, 4 Recommended, and Distinguished Achievement Graduation Plan. All students are required to meet the passing standard of the four assessments which comprise the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR). Veterans Memorial High School has an active parent center with a full-time parent liaison that coordinates activities. Activities such as a Parent Orientation Day to inform parents and community members of the daily standard operation procedures to include but not limited to the Student Code of Conduct, Student Parent School Compact, Parental Involvement Policy, Emergency operations procedures and Parent Volunteer Guidelines and Opportunities. Veterans Memorial High School coordinates and integrates federal, state, and local programs and services to maximize the effectiveness of these resources. Several of the strategies being implemented are jointly funded with Special Services and Title I Funds, such as after school tutorial programs. Professional Development activities are also paid for from Title I and Local Funds. Title I Funds are used to purchase supplemental instructional materials, media, and library resources used to improve and enhance the overall instructional program. Veterans Memorial High School is a small very close-knit community. Brownsville residents come from all over the city to attend the school. Businesses, as a rule, support the school by providing merchandise for various incentives and fund raising activities when called upon to do so. The current staff at Veterans Memorial High School is comprised of 82 teachers, 4 campus administrators, 2 counselors, 20 professional support personnel and 8 educational aides. The ethnicity of the Veterans Memorial High School staff is diverse with 97% Hispanic, (2 % Caucasian, and 1% African American. The teaching staff is also 52 % male and 48 % female. Veterans Memorial High School’s most recent campus initiatives include the following: Veterans Memorial High School promotes numerous student clubs and organizations. Students are encouraged to participate in extracurricular activities such as all district co-curricular activities such as Science Fair and History Fair. Students participate in campus level competitions and winners of these competitions compete at the District, State and National level. School Namesake: School Colors: School Mascot: School Song: Veterans Memorial High School Red, White and Blue Chargers Hail to you, Veteran’s High, you’ve become our home… Veteran’s High, hear our song, help us to be strong… As we see all our dreams, guide us to those dreams… 5 School Motto: We shall strive to succeed, with our humble deeds… You’re our home, we’re your own, Hail to Vete-ran’s High. Home of the Brave! Annual Campus Goals The Veterans Memorial High School faculty and staff are committed to the following goals: • • • • • • • • • • • By the end of school year 2012-2013, TAKS/EOC ELA scores will be above 90%. By the end of school year 2012-2013, TAKS/EOC Math scores will be above 80% By the end of school year 2012-2013, TAKS/EOC Science Test scores will be above 80% By the end of school year 2012-2013, TAKS/EOC Social Studies scores will be above 90%. By the end of the school year 2012-2013, all special education test takers will meet ARD expectations in all test subject areas. To sustain and increase yearly student attendance by 97%. The School will maintain a safe and disciplined environment conducive to student learning. The School will increase parental involvement to support an environment conducive to student learning. By the end of the school year 2012-2013, all students, teachers, and support staff will have received the necessary budgetary resources to support classroom and support staff instruction. Students will be encouraged and challenged to meet their full physical educational potential in order to improve health and quality of well-being Increase the graduation rate/decrease dropout rate 6 State of Texas Goals and Objectives Public Education Academic Goals [Texas Education Code, §4.002] To serve as a foundation for a well-balanced and appropriate education: GOAL 1: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in Reading and Writing of the English language. GOAL 2: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of Mathematics. GOAL 3: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of Science. GOAL 4: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of Social Studies. Public Education Objectives [Texas Education Code, §4.001(b)] The objectives of public education are: OBJECTIVE 1: Parents will be full partners with educators in the education of their children. OBJECTIVE 2: Students will be encouraged and challenged to meet their full educational potential. OBJECTIVE 3: Through enhanced dropout prevention efforts, all students will remain in school until they obtain a high school diploma. OBJECTIVE 4: A well-balanced and appropriate curriculum will be provided to all students. OBJECTIVE 5: Qualitative and highly effective personnel will be recruited, developed, and retained. OBJECTIVE 6: The state’s students will demonstrate exemplary performance in comparison to national and international standards. OBJECTIVE 7: School campuses will maintain a safe and disciplined environment conducive to student learning. OBJECTIVE 8: Educators will keep abreast of the development of creative and innovative techniques in instructional and administration using those techniques as appropriate to improve student learning. OBJECTIVE 9: Technology will be implemented and used to increase the effectiveness of student learning, instructional management, staff development, and administration. 7 District Mission Statement Brownsville Independent School District, rich in cultural heritage, will produce well-educated graduates who can pursue higher educational opportunities and who will become responsible citizens in a changing global society by utilizing all resources to provide equitable opportunities for students. BISD does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, or disability in employment or provision of services, programs, or activities. 8 District Goals Curriculum & Instruction Goal: Provide a coherent, horizontally and vertically aligned curriculum that enables students to fulfill local, state, national, and federal academic achievement and graduation requirements and pursue a post-secondary education (Pre-K-16). Personnel Goal: Recruit and retain highly qualified staff in a timely manner to maximize academic excellence for all students. Facilities Goal: Ensure that all district facilities are equitable, well-planned, and maintained so that all students can learn in a safe and healthy environment. Finance Goal: Develop, maintain, and evaluate a district budget that ensures equitable distribution of funds that supports district initiatives. 9 Brownsville ISD Core Commitments 1. All children will be taught, will learn, and will perform at or above their academic levels in all core subject areas and the District will provide a high quality curriculum and instructional program to facilitate children reaching their full potential. 2. The District will eliminate student achievement gaps in the areas of: gender, socioeconomic levels, ethnicity, and program specific populations (i.e. LEP and Special Education) in all core subject areas. 3. The District will provide a safe, clean, and orderly learning environment for every child and staff member as a means of optimizing the teaching and learning process. 4. The District will recruit, hire, value, and retain highly qualified and experienced personnel who will ensure that all students’ educational needs are met and that all children achieve on grade level. 5. The District will implement parent, business, and community involvement partnerships essential to enhancing the overall quality of our students’ education and fomenting every child’s academic success. 10 Brownsville ISD Strategic Action Plan We Believe that: • high expectations are essential in fostering higher achievement; • academic success nurtures lifelong learning; • everyone flourishes in a safe and healthy environment; • all persons in our educational community have inherent value, gifts, and strengths; • the success of each student, teacher, staff member, administrator and family is essential for the success of the entire school district community; • the community and families share responsibility for the development and mentoring of our students; • perseverance and hard work are essential for success; • sensitivity is essential to understanding the needs of others; and • students are the number one resource for our future. Strategic Parameters: • We will not tolerate educational apathy. • We will not compromise the efficient and effective use of any/all resources. • Educational and financial decisions will be based upon what is best for the future success of our students. • We will foster a positive environment that recognizes and celebrates cultural diversity. • We will ensure a safe and healthy learning environment with a commitment to excellence. • We will insist that the ECE-16 instructional program is the priority. Strategic Objectives: • All students will meet and/or exceed state, national, and international standards of achievement. • All students will graduate. • All students will experience ongoing success in their careers. • All students will be productive, responsible, and contributing members of society. 11 Brownsville ISD Strategies We will: 1. Design and implement an effective ECE-16 model that focuses on creativity, communication and lifelong learning. BISD Board Curriculum and Instruction Goal: To continue to provide a curriculum that enhances instruction in the classroom. BISD Board Finance Goal: To continue to evaluate, develop, and maintain a district budget that allows all students the opportunity to receive an excellent education. 2. Ensure a safe, healthy, caring environment for everyone in the district. BISD Board Finance Goal: To continue to evaluate, develop, and maintain a district budget that allows all students the opportunity to receive an excellent education. 3. Provide for the affective, social, emotional and cognitive development of the learning process. BISD Board Special Services Goal: To continue to offer special services to all students to enhance their opportunities in our school district. 4. Strengthen partnerships and communication among parents, community, and schools. 5. Provide appropriate facilities to implement and support our current and future instructional programs. BISD Board Facilities Goal: To ensure that all facilities are well planned and maintained so that students can learn in a safe and clean environment. 6. Recruit, retain, and provide ongoing professional development for all district personnel. BISD Board Personnel Goal: To ensure that all persons have an opportunity to apply and work for one of the best school districts in the state, the Brownsville Independent School District. 12 Veterans Memorial High School Site-Based Decision Making (SBDM) Committee Members The Site-Based Decision Making (SBDM) Committee is dedicated to implementing a well-rounded instructional program that will promote students’ success at Veterans Memorial High School as well as helping them become productive citizens in a democratic society. The members of the SBDM Committee include elected classroom teachers from each department on campus to comprise twothirds of the committee, department chairs, supplemental staff, administration, students, and parents. Each elected representative serves a two year term and election cycles are staggered. All members, especially new, are asked to attend district training in fall of the current school year to learn about shared decision making and how it results in a greater commitment to implementing decisions that will enhance the achievement of students. As a member of the SBDM Committee each participant is responsible for sharing and discussing the SBDM Committee agenda and conveying the information to their department. Thus, attendance and participation are vital and if a member cannot fulfill these requirements, then a new member will be elected to better represent the campus and will attend the SBDM training on September 24, 2012. Name Berta Pena Maria E. Solis Cynthia Castro-Torres Cutberto Rodriguez Alfonzo Gonzalez Ana Solis Perla Gonzalez Monica Zarate Maria E. Lopez Alberto Guerrero Monica Avila Sandra Sanchez Lorena Lozano Position Area Asst. Superintendent Campus Principal Dean of Instruction Mathematics Teacher Mathematics Rep (odd) English Teacher English Rep (even) Special Ed Teacher Special Ed Rep (odd) Social Studies Teacher Social Studies Rep (even) Science Teacher Science Rep (odd) Name Joe Valdez Dr. Juan Chavez Eddie Noriega Rosie Gorena Gina Shafer Neri Villarreal Lourdes Collaso Chris Patterson Adelina Gutierrez Eduardo Chavez Julie Gonzalez Terry Cuellar Position CTE Teacher CTE Rep(eve n) Counselor Librarian Parent Parent Parental Involvement Business Representative Business Representative Student Community Representative Community Representative 13 Planning and Decision-Making Procedures In accordance with the administrative procedures established under Education Code 11.251(b), the Site-Based Decision Making (SBDM) Committee “shall be involved in decisions in the areas of planning, budgeting, curriculum, staffing patterns, staff development, and school organization”. In addition, as per BQB (Legal) each school year, the principal of each campus, with the assistance of the SBDM Committee “shall develop, review, and revise the campus improvement plan for the purpose of improving student performance for all student populations with respect to the academic excellence indicators and any other appropriate performance measures for special needs populations”. As a result, Veterans Memorial High School’s SBDM Committee reviews the campus improvement plan at its meetings throughout the school year to ensure that state and local requirements are met. The members of the SBDM Committee include elected representatives from each department on campus, department chairs, supplemental staff, administration, students, parents, and business representatives. Each SBDM Committee member is responsible for communicating information regarding needed adjustments to the campus improvement plan as well as disseminating information to their departments regarding the plan and campus initiatives. Goal Setting Procedures The SBDM Committee reviews the comprehensive needs assessment, AEIS report, AYP report and other available data to determine annual goals and objectives. In addition, representatives from each department are responsible for reviewing AEIS and AYP indicators and other available data specific for their subject area and collaboratively recommend goals, objectives, and activities as necessary. Budget Decision-Making Procedures Each department reviews their activities in the campus improvement plan and expenditures for department initiatives. The SBDM Committee is then informed of department expenditures and program regulations to determine the monetary allotments for supplies and materials specific to each strategy. In addition, the SBDM Committee is briefed on needed capital outlay, contracted services, and other campus costs to decide on additional allocations. Curriculum Decision-Making Procedures Each SBDM committee member reviews the information and data available with their department and recommends goals, objectivities, and activities as necessary. The SBDM Committee monitors and evaluates the effectiveness of the curriculum in order to ensure campus objectives are met. When appropriate the SBDM Committee jointly identifies new goals based on data and collaboratively designs new activities to be included in the campus improvement plan. 14 Organizational Decision-Making Procedures The SBDM Committee determines the chairperson of the SBDM Committee through an electoral process. One member from each department is elected for a two year on the SBDM Committee. The committee reviews campus specific information and data and evaluates the campus improvement plan’s activities to make decisions about student success. Community members, business representatives, and parents volunteer for committee participation after solicitation from the principal. Staffing Decision-Making Procedures The SBDM Committee reviews information and data presented and recommends activities for continued improvement. Professional Development Decision-Making Procedures The SBDM Committee reviews campus information and data to serve in an advisory capacity. In addition, the SBDM Committee evaluates the plan’s activities in order to make recommendations. Feedback Plan The SBDM Committee includes one elected staff member from each department. This member is responsible for sharing information and gathering input from the campus staff. The committee also includes a student, parent, community member, and business representative. These members bring input to and from campus stakeholders. Two-thirds of the elected professional staff must be classroom teachers and the remaining one-third must be other campus professionals. The campus improvement plan is presented annually at the beginning of the school year to campus personnel. 15 Campus Needs Assessment Summary TEST GRADE LEVEL EOC GRADE 9 TAKS GRADE 10 TAKS GRADE 11 TAKS GRADES 9-11 TAKS/EOC Commended GRADES 9-11 AREA 2009-2010 2010-2011 Reading * 92% Math * 70% Reading/ELA * 95% Math * 79% Science * 85% Social Studies * 97% Reading/ELA * * Math * * Science * * Social Studies * * Reading/ELA * 93% Math * 74% Science * 85% Social Studies * 97% Reading/ELA * 23% Math * 16% Science * 13% Social Studies * 34% 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2013 GAIN/LOSS 16 TAKS/EOC Test Taking Rate PARTICIPATION * * 806 AREA 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Reading/ELA * 92% Math * 80% Science * 67% Social Studies * 91% * .05% * 95% * .01% Beginning TELPAS 9th Grade Intermediate Listening/Speaking/ Advanced Reading/Writing Advanced High Composite * 10.28% 3% * 13.04% 20% * 11.81% 27% * 8.93% 50% Beginning TELPAS th 10 Grade Intermediate Listening/Speaking/ Advanced Reading/Writing Advanced High Composite * 9.48% 3% * 14.22% 33% * 13.96% 33% * 10.78% 30% Beginning * * 5% Intermediate * * 26% TEST GRADE LEVEL TAKS/EOC-M GRADES 9-11 TAKS/EOC-M Test Taking Rate (2%) PARTICIPATION TAKS/EOC-ALT GRADES 9-11 All Tests TAKS/EOC-ALT Test Taking Rate (1%) PARTICIPATION TELPAS 11th Grade 2012-2013 2013-2013 GAIN/LOSS 17 Listening/Speaking/ Advanced Reading/Writing Advanced High Composite TEST GRADE LEVEL AREA Beginning TELPAS 12th Grade Intermediate Listening/Speaking/ Advanced Reading/Writing Advanced High Composite * * 30% * * 40% 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 * * * * * * * * * * * * TELPAS AMAOs 1 Progress 3-12 * 47% TELPAS AMAOs 2 Attainment 3-12 * 13% Reading * 51% Math * 63% * 72% ELA * * Math * * AMAOs 3 AYP TAKS/TELPAS AEIS ELL (9-12) Progress Indicator Texas Success Initiative Higher Education Readiness Component 2012-2013 2013-2013 GAIN/LOSS 18 TEST GRADE LEVEL 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013 Class of 2014 * * * * * * * * * * * Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013 Class of 2014 ELA * * * Math * * * Both Subjects * * * AP English Language Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP English Literature Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP Calculus Percentage 3 or Above AP Statistics Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP Biology Percentage 3 or Above * * * SAT/ACT AREA Percentage Participation At or Above Criterion Average SAT Average ACT College-Ready GAIN/LOSS * AB: * AB: * AB: * AB: AB: AB: BC: * BC: * BC:* BC: BC: BC: 19 AP Chemistry Percentage 3 or Above * * * TEST GRADE LEVEL AREA 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 AP Physics Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP World History Percentage 3 or Above * * 0% AP European History Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP US History Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP Economics Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP Government Percentage 3 or Above * * * * * 34% 3 + High School AP Spanish Language 3+ Middle School AP Spanish Literature Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP French Language Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP French Literature Percentage 3 or Above * * * 2012-2013 2013-2014 GAIN/LOSS 20 AP Art History Percentage 3 or Above * * * TEST GRADE LEVEL AREA 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 AP Art 2D Portfolio Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP Music Theory Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP Music Aural Percentage 3 or Above * * * AP Music NonAural Percentage 3 or Above * * * Student Data Subgroup 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 All Students * * 899 Hispanic * * 875 White * * 21 Asian * * 1 LEP * * 84 At-Risk * * 484 Eco. Disadv. * * 832 Special Ed. * * 95 Migrant * * 15 Attendance Rate 2012-2013 2013-2014 GAIN/LOSS 2012-2013 2013-2014 GAIN/LOSS 21 Student Data Completion Rate I 4 YR / 5 YR Cohort Class Graduation Rate 4 YR / 5 YR Cohort Class Subgroup 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013 Class of 2014 All Students * * * Hispanic * * * White * * * Asian * * * LEP * * * At-Risk * * * Eco. Disadv. * * * Special Ed. * * * Migrant * * * Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013 Class of 2014 All Students * * * Hispanic * * * White * * * Asian * * * LEP * * * At-Risk * * * Eco. Disadv. * * * Special Ed. * * * Migrant * * * GAIN/LOSS 22 Student Data Dropout Rate RHSP/DAP Graduates Subgroup 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Class of 2013 Class of 2014 Class of 2013 Class of 2014 Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 All Students Hispanic * * * White * * * Asian * * * LEP * * * At-Risk * * * Eco. Disadv. * * * Special Ed. * * * Migrant * * * Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 All Students Hispanic * * * * * * White * * * Asian * * * LEP * * * At-Risk * * * Eco. Disadv. * * * Special Ed. * * * Migrant * * * GAIN/LOSS 23 Student Data Campus Demographics Disaggregated by Subgroup (9-12) Students with Disciplinary Placements Staff Data Total Staff Subgroup 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Economically Disadvantaged * * 832 Limited English Proficient (LEP) * * 84 At-Risk * * 484 All Students * * 278 LEP * * 0 Special Ed. * * 62 Area 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Teachers * * 82 Prof. Support * * 20 * * 4 * * 8 * * 21 * * 20 * * 17 * * 22 * * 2 Campus Admin. Educational Aides Beginning Teachers 1-5 Years Experience 6-10 Years Teachers by Years Experience of Experience 11-20 Years Experience Over 20 Years Experience 2012-2013 2013-2014 GAIN/LOSS 2012-2013 2013-2014 GAIN/LOSS 4 24 Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) I. CNA Procedures for Demographics: Veterans Memorial High School views demographics data on a daily basis. Of the many focuses of data we monitor daily our attendance and At-Risk student population. Once attendance is taken on a daily basis, we view our average daily attendance to see if we met our attendance goals. Once we identify that we have not met out attendance goals, we make sure to call the parents of students who are absent and work to make sure absences are excused. If students are consistently absent, we make sure to conference with parents or send the Parent liaison for a home visit. When students are identified as At-Risk, administrators, counselors, and teachers begin consistent progress monitoring to make sure students are academically successful. Allocated State Compensatory funds are allocated to provide additional before or after school tutorials. Procedures for overseeing demographic concerns include verifying daily, attendance, verifying before and after-school and Saturday tutorial attendance, allotting time for teacher and parent conferences, and purchasing additional resources. II. Data Sources Reviewed: The following sources provided valuable data for Demographics in regards to the identification of needs: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Enrollment Report Gradespeed Attendance Report Students by sex, ethnicity, and grade Summary by sex and education Migrant Students by Grade Special Ed Students by grade and disability At Risk Students by Sex ethnicity and grade Staff FTE summary Disaggregation of PEIMS student data School leaver code report ELA Survey Monkey Professional Development ELA Sessions 2012 STAAR Preliminary Average Raw Scores 2011 – 2012 Benchmark Scores 25 III. Findings/Analysis Results: The following strengths/area of improvement were identified after all findings were analyzed by the SBDM Committee. Demographics Strengths • • • • • • Increase in enrollment Academics At Risk Program Fine Arts Dept Athletic Dept CTE Dept Areas of Improvement • • • • • • • Provide effective programs for at risk students Increase and maintain graduation rates to meet district goals Provide credit recovery opportunities to keep students from dropping out. Provide ongoing training for teachers in all areas of curriculum. Grow our Dual Enrollment HS Program by hiring teachers who are qualified. English I Reading Percentage of Level 2 Satisfactory and Level 3 Advanced for LEP and Special Education Students. (STAAR Preliminary) English I Writing Percentage of Level 2 Satisfactory and Level 3 Advanced for LEP and Special Education Students. (STAAR Preliminary) Summary of Needs: After thorough review of multiple data sources, the SBDM Committee assessed program effectiveness and determined that through the collaboration of various campus resources and community entities the following demographics areas of improvement would be addressed: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Programs such as A+ will be provided for at risk students to potentially catch up to their cohort. CIP (7.2, 7.6) Counselors, AT Risk Counselor, Program Specialist will monitor graduation rates during the school year. CIP (7.4, 7.5) Provide Recovery Credit Opportunities during the school year for our students before and/or afterschool to keep them from dropping out. CIP (7.2, 7.6) Offer training for campus personnel including but not limited to CSCOPE, Microsoft, Outlook, Compass Odyssey. CIP (1.10, 1.11, 1.13, 2.3, 2.10, 3.7, 4.9, 10.3) Hire teachers who are eligible to teach UTB Dual Enrollment Course. CIP (10.4) Provide Professional development for all teachers in the area of English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) for Reading/Writing Instruction and STAAR Reporting Categories Provide professional development for all teachers who provide instruction to Special Education students on ELAR/SLAR TEKS, ELPS, CCRS, and STAAR Reporting Categories Provide professional development on ELA/SLA CSCOPE Curriculum and alignment to all state adopted texts. Provide data analysis based on ELAR/SLAR student expectation and reporting Categories from the 2012 STAAR Reading/Writing assessments. 26 To best support campus efforts and meet the identified needs at the District and Campus level; activities, resources, and implementation timelines related to Demographics are set forth in all sections of the 2012-2013 Campus Improvement Plan. I. CNA Procedures for Student Achievement: Critical to the academic success of Veterans Memorial High School is the disaggregation of students’ assessment data. Data is disaggregated consistently to identify the areas needing improvement such as meeting states students’ expectation and TEKS mastery. Data disaggregation is done on a three week basis through the analysis of progress monitoring, student grades, percentages of students on a RTI plan, local and district benchmarks. Administrators and teachers look as student’s scores and break down the test objectives by class period. Once weaknesses are identified, teachers plan instruction accordingly to strengths and weaknesses of each class period and by student. II. Data Sources Reviewed: The following sources provided valuable data for Student Achievement in regards to the identification of needs: • AEIS Report • AYP Report • TAKS/EOC Summary Report-Group Performance • Eduphoria! Aware • TELPAS and AMAO Results III. • • • • • • • Findings/Analysis Results: The following strengths/area of improvement were identified after all findings were analyzed by the SBDM Committee. Student Achievement Strengths Areas of Improvement Eduphoria Aware • Train teachers on the disaggregation of student achievement data using Aware Disaggregation of PEIMS Student Data • Identify students who are making progress in local and district benchmarks to Analyze Enrollment Report Gradespeed Failure Report At Risk programs offered at campus PGP in place at campus • show growth from previous testing scores and provide interventions for their success. Increase 9th grade math scores by 20% to surpass the state standard. Veterans Memorial TAKS/EOC scores were above the district 27 28 IV. Summary of Needs: After thorough review of multiple data sources, the SBDM Committee assessed program effectiveness and determined that through the collaboration of various campus resources and community entities the following Student Achievement areas of improvement would be addressed: 1. Teachers will be trained on the use of Aware to disaggregate data to provide effective instruction on an individual basis. CIP (1.10, 3.5) 2. Provide tutorials before and/or after school to increase student achievement based on their local and district benchmark scores. CIP (2.2, 7.2) 3. Math teachers will meet every two days during the week to align their curriculum across grade levels. CIP (2.1) To best support campus efforts and meet identified needs at the District and Campus level; activities, resources, and implementation timelines related to Student Achievement are set forth in core-area, At-Risk, and Migrant Education sections of the 2012-2013 Campus Improvement Plan. I. CNA Procedures for School Culture and Climate: The campus analyzes the school culture and climate to ensure that students are being provided with a safe and disciplined environment conducive to student learning. Administrators and teachers meet once on a six weeks basis to discuss matters related to providing a positive school culture and climate. The SBDM representatives bring issues and concerns to the monthly meetings. Campus long range plans, policies and procedures, and safety issues are communicated to both parents and community members to assist the campus in providing a positive culture and climate. Parents are strongly encouraged to get involved in volunteering opportunities that will assist their child’s education. Issues are reviewed and discussed through consistent dialogue and both administrators and teachers created a plan to improve issues that affect School Culture and Climate. II. Data Sources Reviewed: The following sources provided valuable data for School Culture and Climate in regards to the identification of needs: • Campus Survey • Academic Teaming • SBDM • Parental Involvement 29 III. Findings/Analysis Results: The following strengths/area of improvement were identified after all findings were analyzed by the SBDM Committee. School Culture and Climate Strengths • • • • IV. Teacher ratio to student ratio Aligned curriculum Parental support Facilities are state of the art Areas of Improvement • • • • Increase the opportunities offered for credit recovery programs. After School Tutorials will be provided for specific objectives. Conduct surveys from parents, teachers and students for campus improvement. Increase our Parental Involvement throughout the year. Summary of Needs: After thorough review of multiple data sources, the SBDM Committee assessed program effectiveness and determined that through the collaboration of various campus resources and community entities the following School Culture and Climate areas of improvement would be addressed: 1. 2. 3. 4. Credit recovery programs such as A+ will be implemented in STAR classes and afterschool. CIP (7.2, 7.6) Afterschool Tutorials will be specific such as core teachers will teach for homework help, End of Course and/or TAKS/EOC. CIP (2.2, 7.2) Surveys need to be conducted at beginning of school year to focus on each campus improvement need based on parents, students, and teacher’s needs (11.5) Parental involvement will increase by 15% to include them in holiday events, parental monthly meetings, athletic events, fine arts events. CIP (11.1, 11.5, 11.6, 11.7, 11.8) To best support campus efforts and meet identified needs at the District and Campus level; activities, resources, and implementation timelines related to School Culture and Climate are set forth in all sections of the 2012-2013 Campus Improvement Plan. I. CNA Procedures for Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention: The campus uses a hiring committee composed of administrators and teachers to make hiring determinations. A record of how applicants interviewed and an evaluation instrument is used to document applicant responses and administrators’ and teachers’ feedback on the applicants. Teacher performance records are kept by the school principal. Novice teachers are provided a gradelevel mentor and an administrative mentor so that they have success in their profession. 30 II. Data Sources Reviewed: The following sources provided valuable data for Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention in regards to the identification of needs: • Teacher Certification Report • Class size report by staff • Paraprofessional and Other Staff Qualification • PEIMS Verification report • AEIS Report • Staff FTE Summary • Teacher Survey • Teacher Student Report • Special Programs Report • Professional Development Report III. Findings/Analysis Results: The following strengths/area of improvement were identified after all findings were analyzed by the SBDM Committee. Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention Strengths • Teacher Highly Qualified • • • • • Professional Development Low teacher-student ratios Course completions Eduphoria Aware allows teachers to create / maintain Data for students PDAS - evaluation provide feedback Areas of Improvement • • • Increase the opportunities of Professional Development in core content areas such as Pre-AP, GT hours, AP, SIOP opportunities. Recruit highly qualified teachers by offering stipends. Develop teacher mentor program for new teacher success in the classroom. 31 IV. Summary of Needs: After thorough review of multiple data sources, the SBDM Committee assessed program effectiveness and determined that through the collaboration of various campus resources and community entities the following Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention areas of improvement would be addressed: 1. 2. 3. Teachers will be given the opportunity to attend Pre-AP, GT, AP and SIOP opportunities thought the year for teacher growth. CIP (1.10, 1.11, 1.13, 2.3, 2.10, 3.7, 4.9, 10.3) Increase the number of teachers who are highly qualified at the time of hire by offering stipends for composite certification and selected trainings. CIP (10.4) New teachers will be assigned a teacher mentor upon their first year or hire for teacher success in the classroom. (1.8) To best support campus efforts and meet identified needs at the District and Campus level; activities, resources, and implementation timelines related to Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention are set forth in all sections of the 2012-2013 Campus Improvement Plan. I. CNA Procedures for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment are one of the most important aspects of the campus. Everyday decisions are made regarding Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment. Veterans Memorial implements district decisions curriculum (CSCOPE) and assessments as required by the state of Texas. Veterans Memorial bases all of its instructions from the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skill (TEKS) and prepares students for state assessments. In doing this process, Veterans Memorial and teachers plan lessons consistently. Administrators provide teachers with instructional resource and professional development opportunities. Veterans Memorial administrators and grade-level lead teachers guide and mentor new teachers. Planning for instruction and intervention is done as a whole through vertical and horizontal alignment. Collaboration is encouraged so that teachers learn from one another. 32 II. Data Sources Reviewed: The following sources provided valuable data for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment in regards to the identification of needs: • EOC • TAKS/EOC • TELPAS • CSCOPE • Project Smart • Online lesson plans • ELA Survey Monkey • Professional Development ELA Sessions III. • • • • • • • • • • Findings/Analysis Results: The following strengths/area of improvement were identified after all findings were analyzed by the SBDM Committee. Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Strengths CSCOPE Curriculum driven Vertical Alignment Collaborating among administrators and teachers Knowledge of STAAR Reading and Writing (M.S. and H.S.) Knowledge of ELAR/SLAR K-12 Knowledge of ELPS K-12 Knowledge of Reading/Expository K-12 Knowledge of Writing Conventions K-12 Implementation of ELAR/SLAR TEKS K-12 Implementation of ELPS K-12 • • • • • • • • • Areas of Improvement Increase mathematics scores by 20% to surpass the state scores. Meet with teachers to create local benchmarks Knowledge of STAAR Reading and Writing (E.S.) Knowledge of Depth of Knowledge (E.S., M.S., H.S.) Knowledge of CSCOPE/Textbook Alignment (M.S. and H.S.) Knowledge of CCRS K-12 Knowledge of Reading Literacy/Poetry K-12 Knowledge of Writing Literacy and Expository Texts K-12 Implementation of CCRS K-12 33 IV. Summary of Needs: After thorough review of multiple data sources, the SBDM Committee assessed program effectiveness and determined that through the collaboration of various campus resources and community entities the following Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment areas of improvement would be addressed: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Increase ongoing Professional Development for the area of mathematics. We will have at least one day every six weeks to plan out the following scope and sequence as a department to have an aligned curriculum across grade levels. CIP (2.1, 2.4, 2.10) Meet with teachers to create local benchmarks for all student populations to include, special education and bilingual to target students strengths and weaknesses. CIP (1.4, 1.5, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1) Provide Professional development for all teachers in the area of English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) for Reading/Writing Instruction and STAAR Reporting Categories Provide professional development for all teachers who provide instruction to Special Education students on ELAR/SLAR TEKS, ELPS, CCRS, and STAAR Reporting Categories Provide professional development on ELA/SLA CSCOPE Curriculum and alignment to all state adopted texts. Provide data analysis based on ELAR/SLAR student expectation and reporting Categories from the 2012 STAAR Reading/Writing assessments. To best support campus efforts and meet identified needs at the District and Campus level; activities, resources, and implementation timelines related to Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment are set forth in all sections of the 2012-2013 Campus Improvement Plan. 34 I. CNA Procedures for Family and Community Involvement: Veterans Memorial is committed to involving parents and community members to be involved in students’ education. The parent liaison compiles data on parental participation attendance and meeting agendas for the SBDM committee. With that information, SBDM determines campus needs. In order to increase parental involvement attendance rates, parent and community member volunteer opportunities are available throughout the school year. II. Data Sources Reviewed: The following sources provided valuable data for Family and Community Involvement in regards to the identification of needs: • Migrant Clerk • Compact contracts • SBDM • Parent Volunteer information • Parent activity evaluations and feedback III. • • IV. Findings/Analysis Results: The following strengths/area of improvement were identified after all findings were analyzed by the SBDM Committee. Family and Community Involvement Strengths Areas of Improvement Parental Meetings Parent Feedback • • Parental Center needs to be developed and involved on an ongoing basis. Low participation in parent meetings Summary of Needs: After thorough review of multiple data sources, the SBDM Committee assessed program effectiveness and determined that through the collaboration of various campus resources and community entities the following Family and Community areas of improvement would be addressed: 1. Include parents in the campus environment to assist within the campus decisions. CIP (11.2) 2. Increase the number of participation in parent meetings. CIP (11.2), (11.5) To best support campus efforts and meet identified needs at the District and Campus level; activities, resources, and implementation timelines related to Family and Community Involvement are set forth in the Parent and Community section of the 2012-2013 Campus Improvement Plan. 35 I. II. III. CNA Procedures for School Context and Organization: The School Context and Organization Committee reviewed the decision making processes, the supervision structures, the schedules for all programs along with the forms of communication, both formal and informal that is in place at our campus. Data Sources Reviewed: The following sources provided valuable data for School Context and Organization in regards to the identification of needs: • SBDM • Master Schedule • ACP/Teacher Builder • Grade Counselors / At Risk Counselors • UIL, Athletics, After school tutorials Findings/Analysis Results: The following strengths/area of improvement were identified after all findings were analyzed by the SBDM Committee. School Context and Organization Strengths • • • • Monthly meetings Assistance in teacher monitoring Equal disbursement of duty responsibilities Each class has one grade level counselor IV. Areas of Improvement • Hire a Communities In School person to assist with student performance. Summary of Needs: After thorough review of multiple data sources, the SBDM Committee assessed program effectiveness and determined that through the collaboration of various campus resources and community entities the following School Context and Organization areas of improvement would be addressed: 1. Campus needs to have more networks with outside agencies to help our At Risk students with a community support to empower them to stay in school. CIP (7.7) To best support campus efforts and meet identified needs at the District and Campus level; activities, resources, and implementation timelines related to School Context and Organization are set forth in all sections of the 2012-2013 Campus Improvement Plan. 36 I. CNA Procedures for Technology: The Technology committee met several times and looked at the STAR Chart, Fixed Assests Report along with the current hardware and software being utilized across grade level at the campus. The technology teacher was able to input as to the level of implementation and acquisition of the Technology TEKS as observed per grade level. II. Data Sources Reviewed: The following sources provided valuable data for School Context and Organization in regards to the identification of needs: a. Star Chart b. Fixed Assets Report c. Technology Plan d. Technology Professional Development opportunities III. Findings/Analysis Results: The following strengths/area of improvement were identified after all findings were analyzed by the SBDM Committee. School Context and Organization Strengths Areas of Improvement • • Upgraded network infrastructure TST • • • Compass / Science Lab • • Use of Gradespeed among administration and parents to view students progress IV. More wireless access points Additional resources are needed for technology integration such as Elmo’s, Projectors, Smartboards Campus need accessibility to instructional technology devices in order to improve student achievement: Desktops, Laptops, Printers, IPADs • Summary of Needs: After thorough review of multiple data sources, the SBDM Committee assessed program effectiveness and determined that through the collaboration of various campus resources and community entities the following School Context and Organization areas of improvement would be addressed: 1. 2. 3. Campus needs improvement in its cable network, wireless infrastructure and instructional work stations as we move closer to a 1 to 1 solution for our students. CIP (12.10) Only 40% of our campus teachers have ELMO’s, projectors, CPS, smart boards to increase the use of technology in the classroom. CIP (1.15, 2.6, 4.5) Campus needs accessibility to instructional technology devices in order to improve student achievement: Desktops, Laptops, Printers, IPADs. CIP (7.17). To best support campus efforts and meet identified needs at the District and Campus level; activities, resources, and implementation timelines related to School Context and Organization are set forth in all sections of the 2012-2013 Campus Improvement Plan. 37 Veterans Memorial High School Schoolwide Program Veterans Memorial High School uses its Title I, State Compensatory and other funds to upgrade the entire instructional program by implementing school-wide programs as authorized under the provisions of Public Law 107-110, Section 1114. The Site-Based Decision-Making (SBDM) Committee conducted a comprehensive needs assessment (CNA) over a period of one year to determine the strengths and needs of students, staff, parental & community involvement, and facilities before deciding how to use available local, state, and federal budget allocations. Based on the CNA, the committee decided to concentrate on improving the passing rate of all students and student groups including Migrant, Bilingual, At-Risk, Dyslexia, GT, Title I, and Special Education on state assessments. The goal is to have 90 percent of all students and all student groups passing all parts of state mandated assessments for the 2012-2013 and to increase the commended performance level in all content areas. In addition, mathematics is an area of concern for our school. To accomplish these objectives, the staff will use the budgeted funds to implement school-wide reform strategies that provide opportunities for all children to meet the State’s proficient and advanced levels of academic performance, use effective methods and instructional strategies that are established on scientifically based research that (1) strengthen the core academic program by offering professional development opportunities in their current content area to include Pre-AP, GT, AP, SIOP, CSCOPE, and End of Course opportunities (CIP 1.10, 1.11, 2.10, 3.3, 3.5, 3.7, 4.6) ; (2) increase the amount and quality of learning time, including the funding of an after-school tutorial/ summer school/ enrichment program, for students who are At-Risk and in need of continuity in their instructional program to be successful in the succeeding school year (CIP 2.2, 7.2) ; (3) include strategies for meeting the educational needs of historically underserved population such as SIOP trainings, ESL trainings; (4) include strategies to address the needs of all children in school, particularly the needs of low-achieving students, At-Risk, or not meeting the State student academic achievement standards such as peer to peer tutoring, cooperative learning, integrating technology strategies; (5) address how the school will determine if such needs have been met; and (6) are consistent with and are designed to implement the State and local improvements plans. Highly-qualified teachers will carry out the instructional program. Only teachers who are certified and who have met state testing requirements to teach the subjects/grade levels to which they are assigned will be hired by the school. In emergency situations, the school will consider teachers who have alternative certification. In addition to appropriate certification, teachers will be sought who are experienced and have been successful in previous assignments. Strategies to attract high-quality teachers to high needs schools will include our school’s participation in the District sponsored annual Teacher Fair, selection of teachers from the District’s and Region I’s efforts to recruit teachers from out of valley and state, recruiting teachers from the district, paying stipends for attainment of a Master’s Degree, and paying stipends for math, English as a second language, science, social studies and career and technology certifications. The school will provide access to high-quality ongoing professional development throughout the school year for all staff including teachers, principals, and paraprofessionals. Professional development activities will be geared to individual teachers’ specialties, along with any other identified needs as determined through the staff, student and parent needs assessment surveys, administration classroom observations and evaluations, and/or district 38 identified needs. Professional development will be conducted both at the school and the education service center as well as district conferences and workshops which will be intensive and sustained (CIP 1.10, 1.11, 2.10, 3.3, 3.5, 3.7, 4.6). We need to continue professional developments in the area of mathematics to increase student performance (CIP 2.10). Title I, Part A Funds will be used to partially finance strategies to increase parental involvement at the school including the parent workroom and to purchase special materials used in the parent volunteer program (CIP 11.11). Parent education will be provided to parents by the campus parent liaison as well as the District’s Parental involvement Center (CIP 11.1, 11.4, 11.5, 11.6, 11.7). Parent training on how to help their students be successful at home, learning English, discipline management and parenting skills will be provided to those parents who want to better meet the rigors of parenting. Teachers will be included in decisions regarding the use and selection of academic assessments to measure student performance. Teachers will use data obtained from state assessments as well as other instruments, including but not limited to the SELP, TELPAS, and benchmark tests, to implement new instructional strategies, modify existing strategies and/or discontinue existing strategies to better address student needs as determined by use of these instruments. Students experiencing difficulty in mastering the TEKS will be provided effective, timely additional assistance. All teachers will closely monitor all students’ performance based on daily exercises and periodic tests. Students not mastering the objectives will be provided additional assistance in the after school tutorial program and/or enrichment courses based on his/her individual needs (CIP 2.2, 7.2). The school will coordinate and integrate federal, state, and local programs and services to maximize the effectiveness of these resources. Several of the strategies being implemented are jointly funded with Special Services and Title I Funds, e.g., after school tutorial programs. Professional Development activities are also paid for from Title I, Parts A and C, and Local Funds (CIP 2.2, 7.2). Title I Funds along with (TI) 199 (LOC) funds are used to purchase supplemental instructional materials, media, and library resources used to improve and enhance the overall instructional program. In addition to those described above, Migrant Funds are used to identify and recruit children of migratory workers for supplemental services designed to reduce the educational disruptions and other problems that result from repeated moves. Our migrant clerk will hold meetings once each semester to foster parental involvement and provide Migrant parents with important information on campus migrant program opportunities and how to better support their children academically. (CIP 13.9) Bilingual Funds are used to provide supplemental services to help ensure that children who are limited English proficient attain English language proficiency and develop high levels of academic attainment. 39 The campus will also continue to provide the state mandated State Compensatory Education Program through campus as well as District funded initiatives. After school tutorials will be offered throughout the spring and fall semesters (CIP 2.2, 7.2). Veterans Memorial follows a 3 tier approach. Our tier 3 approach will have the Assistant Principals meet weekly to discuss discipline consistency and determine proactive changes needed to decrease the number of discipline referrals. Our tier 2 approach will focus on attendance and academics. We will conduct parent conferences for attendance and academics. We will also implement a contract with students who are failing to meet attendance. Our tier 1 approach will use the grade speed and phone master for attendance. Special education funding provides supplemental services to eligible students as per Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) identification requirements. In order to ensure a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) in a least restrictive environment (LRE), children who qualify for special education must receive services in accordance with a properly developed Individualized Education Program (IEP) as per federal and state special education guidelines. In addition, all Admission, Review, and Dismissal (ARD) committees will adhere to the policies and procedures outlined by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) in the ARD Committee Decision-Making Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual and A Guide to the Admission, Review and Dismissal Process. 40 Language Arts State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in reading and writing the English language. A minimum of 90% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC Reading, Writing, and Language Arts tests. A minimum of 40% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate Commended Performance on the TAKS/EOC Reading, Writing and ELA tests. A minimum of 90% of our Veterans Memorial students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC Reading, Writing, and Language Arts test. A minimum of 45% of our Veterans Memorial students will demonstrate Commended Performance on TAKS/EOC, Reading, Writing and Language Arts. Campus Objectives/Summative Evaluation Test Data Grade Level R/ELA Subgroup EOC Grade 9 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 R/W 92% 92% 92% * 46% 82% 91% 82% 100% 90% 93% Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 R/W 25% 25% 26% * 4% 11% 24% 3% 59% 5% 26% Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* 93/*/* Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 R/W (DIP) 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 R/W Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 R/W Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 41 Test Data Grade Level R/ELA TAKS Grade 10 TAKS Grade 11 TAKS-M Grade 9 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2010-2012 R/W 95% 95% 95% * 73% 92% 94% 60% 100% 100% 83% * * * * * * * * * * * 91% * 90% * 100% 91% 86% 91% * 0 Current Commended Mastery 2010-2012 R/W 15% 14% 14% * 0 6% 14% 0 38% 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * 43% * 43% * 50% 45% 91% 43% * 0 Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 R/W 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 Actual Actual Commended Mastery Mastery 2012-2013 2012-2013 R/W R/W Gain/Loss (% Points) 42 Note: Data listed as percentages Test Data Grade Level R/ELA TAKS-M Grade 10 TAKS-M Grade 11 TAKS/EOC-Alt Grade 9 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 R/W 92% * 90% * 100% 92% 92% 92% 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * 100% * 100% * * 100% 100% 100% * * Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 R/W 33% * 27% * 0 33% 33% 33# 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * 0 * 0 * * 0 0 0 * * Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 R/W 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 Actual Actual Commended Mastery Mastery 2012-2013 2012-2013 R/W R/W Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 43 Test Data Grade Level R/ELA TAKS-Alt Grade 10 TAKS-Alt Grade 11 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2010-2012 R/W 80% * 80% * 100% 100% 80% 80% * * * * * * * * * * * * Current Commended Mastery 2010-2012 R/W 0 * 0 * 0 0 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 R/W 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 Actual Actual Commended Mastery Mastery 2012-2013 2012-2013 R/W R/W Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 44 Action Step 1.1 1.2 Programs/Strategies/Activities Provide students opportunities to read for enjoyment in order to gain an appreciation for literature through the use of the following; • Sustained Silent Reading •Open-Ended comprehension question for reading of choice • Incentives •Reader’s Theatre •Read A Thon •Book Talk •Reader’s Café •Read Across America •National Book Week •National Library Week •Library aides will support the English Language teachers with the scheduling of classes, etc. Population 9th – 12th grade students: LEP MI SE GT DYS Pre AP AP AR TI Students will participate in curricular courses as 9th – 12th grade well as extracurricular activities in order to students: develop language usage and improve proficiency. LEP Suggested: MI SE • Debate/Mock Trial GT • Journalism DYS • Advanced Placement Pre AP • Distinguished Achievement Plan AP • Upper Level English Courses AR • Dual Enrollment/Concurrent Enrollment TI • Reading Smart Program for our ELS population. Resources Fund/$ Amount United Streaming Library Facilities Scholastic Software Library Aides (TI) $48,084.00 Person(s) Responsible -Regular Classroom Teacher -Sp. Ed. Teachers -Dyslexia Teachers -Content Area Teachers -Dean of Instruction -Principals -Librarians -TLI Teacher Specialist School Newspaper Advance Placement Institute CSCOPE Dual Enrollment Staff Reading Smart (BIL)$1,500.00 -Regular Classroom Teacher -Sp. Ed. Teachers -Dyslexia Teachers -Content Area Teachers -Principals -Language Arts Specialist -Dean of Instruction -TLI Teacher Specialist -Literacy Coaches -Dual Enrollment Teachers Timeline Formative Evaluation -August 2012 -September 2012 -October 2012 -November 2012 -December 2012 -January 2013 -February 2013 -March 2013 -April 2013 -May 2013 -Benchmarks August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 -Number of Students participating in Recommended and Distinguished Graduation Plans -6 weeks exams -Review number of students taking AP/SAT/ACT exams -Review number of students taking Language Arts AP tests for credit -Benchmark testing schedules & results 45 1.3 Implement intervention through the Response to Intervention (RtI) 3 Tier Model in order to support student academic growth and success. • Universal Screening • All interventions should be scientifically researched based. • Documentation of interventions and progress monitoring • Use data to identify areas of need • Monitor progress of struggling student • Adjust instruction/interventions • Review student outcome data to evaluate instruction • REVIEW360 Tier I – a minimum of 90 minutes devoted to ELA instruction Tier II – 30 minutes per day in small group in addition to the core instruction Tier III – 30 minutes per day in individual or small group instruction in addition to the core instruction 9th – 12th grade students: -SE -DYS -GT -LEP -MI -Recent Immigrants -AR RTI Behavior Program Administrators Dyslexia Aide (TI) $20,600.00 -Classroom Teachers -Special Education Teachers -Dyslexia Teachers -Bilingual Education Department -Special Education Department -Deans of Instruction - Curriculum Specialists -TLI Teacher Specialist August 2012 -Progress Monitoring September 2012 -Benchmark Results October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 46 1.4 1.5 1.6 Implement campus benchmarks to optimize instructional time in order to facilitate data for planning and curriculum purposes. Bilingual, ESL, Local & District Migrant, Sp Ed., Benchmarks GT, Dyslexia, PreAP, AP ELA teachers will meet in August to align the curriculum for every six weeks by grade level to include benchmarks ELA Teachers The ELA Department will meet every six weeks to ESL, Migrant, Sp continue aligning the scope and sequence and Ed., GT, Dyslexia, improve the overall delivery of instruction. Pre-AP, AP 1.7 Dean of Instruction will conduct teacher staff development on instructional strategies as well as provide teacher support. Dean will also develop a teacher mentor system for new teachers to be successful in the classroom. 1.8 An enrichment teacher will support students who failed the TAKS /EOC in the area of English Language Arts on their state assessment. ELA Teachers, At- (SCE) $67,254.00 Risk AT Risk Students (TI) $125,174.00 Classroom Teacher Sp Ed Teachers Dyslexia Teacher Technology Principals Dean Principal Dean ELA Department October 2012 January 2013 Classroom Observations August 2012 for 3 days • ESL/ELA Dept Chairs Principals Dean TLI Teacher Specialist October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Dean of Instruction October 2012 TLI Teacher Specialist November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 English Dept Principal Dean of Instruction • August 2012 May 2013 Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) Walk through observations • • Sign in logs Six weeks grades • • Sign in sheets Classroom Observations • • Lesson Plans Success on state assessments 47 1.9 Provide Language Arts Professional Development for new and existing secondary reading, English, ESL, Special Educ., and dyslexia teachers in order to implement comprehensive ELAR/SLAR instructional program. • CSCOPE Curriculum-TLI Grant • ELAR/SLAR (English/Spanish/Language Arts & Readings)TEKS-TLI Grant • Response to Intervention (RTI) • New State Adopted Texts • CCRS (College and Career Readiness Standards) • Curriculum Alignment Document Training • STAAR EOC – English I, II, and III • Aware Disaggregation of data • Pre-AP / GT • Writing Across the Curriculum • Effective research-based teaching practices 9th – 12th grade students: -LEP -ESL -Migrant -Special Ed. -GT -Dyslexia Students -At Risk -Pre-AP -TI TPTR $500.00 RTI 360 Effective Writing Instruction TOP Rubric for Writing CSCOPE District Professional Development (TI) $500.00 -9th – 12th grade teachers -Special Ed. Teachers -Dyslexia Teachers -Principals -Dean of Instruction -TLI Specialist -Lead Teachers/ Department Heads -Language Arts Specialists -Region 1 May 2012 June 2012 August 2012 September 2012 August 13 – October 31, 2012 • • • • • • Classroom observations for implementation Progress reports Walkthroughs Reduction of Dyslexia referrals to Dyslexia and Special Education Professional Development Evaluations Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) 48 1.10 Provide Professional Development which utilizes intensive, multisensory, phonetic methods, as well as writing and spelling components, for Dyslexia Teachers in order to implement a complete comprehensive Dyslexia Program. • All new Dyslexia teachers will complete a two year training in Basic Language Skills Dyslexia Reading Program • Program training for all Dyslexia teachers of students in grades 6 – 12 in Multisensory Reading and Spelling • Continue training for all Dyslexia teachers in areas that support and expand their current knowledge base in Orton-Gillingham approaches and current trends • Continue to provide professional development for general education campus teachers in areas of Dyslexia characteristics, Dyslexia student identification and implementation of accommodations • Dyslexia teachers will be committed to achieving the level of expertise in completing the Dyslexia Practitioner Preparation Program • Dyslexia teachers will be committed to revising or updating the newly developed District Teacher and Dyslexia Program Operating Guidelines on a yearly basis • Texas Assessment Conference Identified Dyslexia students in Grades 9th – 12th Ongoing Professional Development from District. Dyslexia Teacher (TI) $2750.00 -Principal -Dean of Instruction -TLI Specialist -Assistant principal -Dyslexia Teachers -Section 504 Dyslexia Administrator -Dyslexia Lead Teacher August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 -Professional Development Evaluations -Teacher Transcripts -Benchmarks 49 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 Co-Planning Periods with ESL and English Department will be established to facilitate collaboration of curriculum between teachers. (Addresses AYP) Teams of English teachers will attend ESL Training for Teachers. Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol will be utilized for ELA teachers working with students who are ELL. (Addresses AYP) Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, ESL and Language Sp Ed., GT, Dyslexia, Pre- Arts Teachers AP, AP ELA/ESL Teachers (LOC) B.I.S.D. ESL Coordinator ESL State Assessments (TELPAS) for enrichment Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, will be provided to all ESL students at different Sp Ed., levels accordingly. N/A Implement the use of technology into classroom instruction through the use of computers, smart boards, projectors, and ELMOS. Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp Ed., (LOC) Classroom Teacher Sp Ed Teachers Dyslexia Teacher Technology Principals Librarians Dean of Instruction Classroom Teacher Sp Ed Teachers Dyslexia Teacher Technology Dean New students will be identified as possible LEP through home language survey during registration. Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp Ed., Home Language Survey Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp Ed., LPAC committee August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • • • Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) Walk through observations Sign in sheets Classroom Observations • Classroom Observations • Progress Monitoring • Bilingual Audits 50 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 ESL Teachers will follow the Bilingual state adopted materials to serve all LEP students. Veterans Memorial will serve all identified LEP students with Parental Approval through the recommended district ESL program. The LPAC committee will meet on a regular basis to review pertinent information on LEP students. Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp Ed., LPAC committee ESL Teachers Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, ESL Clerk Sp Ed., GT, Dyslexia, Pre- LPAC Chair AP, AP ESL Teacher (BIL) $3000.00 LPAC committee ESL Teachers Bilingual, ESL ELA Dept Principal Dean of Instruction Bilingual, ESL ESL budget will be monitored by Dean of Instruction to ensure proper distribution of funds to meet students’ needs. ESL Classroom Teachers Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Home Language Sp Ed., GT, Dyslexia, Pre- Survey AP, AP ESL teachers will be ESL certified to meet the needs of ESL students. 1.20 The Edge The Access ESL Teachers Reading Smart Teacher Certificate Principal Dean of Instruction October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • Classroom Observation • • LPAC Review Bilingual Audits • Sign in logs • Professional Development Evaluations Teacher transcripts Benchmarks • • • Purchase Order Documentation 51 1.21 Librarian will order supplies throughout the school year to ensure that they have the necessary databases, books, periodicals in order to maintain TEA standards of 12 to 1. 1.22 ESL/ELA department will order supplies throughout the school year to ensure that they have the necessary tools to complete their curriculum. Items such as paper, pencils, pens, printing, etc. 1.23 The English I Reading Percentage of Level 2 Satisfactory and Level 3 Advanced for LEP and Special Education Students will increase to meet passing standards on state assessments through monthly meetings and continuous collaboration between the CBLT, the TLI specialist, department chairs, administrators, and faculty. Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, (TI)$17,000.00 Sp. Ed. GT, Dyslexia, Pre-AP, AP, At-Risk Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, (TI) $18,164.00 Sp. Ed. GT, Dyslexia, (BIL) $2300.00 Pre-AP, AP, At-Risk (TIII) $4028.00 Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp. Ed. GT, Dyslexia, Pre-AP, AP, At-Risk 1.24 The English I Writing Percentage of Level Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp. Ed. GT, Dyslexia, 2 Satisfactory and Level 3 Advanced for LEP and Special Education Students will Pre-AP, AP, At-Risk increase to meet passing standards on state assessments through monthly meetings and continuous collaboration between the CBLT, the TLI specialist, department chairs, administrators, and faculty. Librarian Dean of Instruction October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 -ESL Teacher October 2012 -Dean of Instruction November 2012 -TLI Teacher Specialist January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 -ESL Teachers October 2012 -ELA Teachers November 2012 -Dean of Instruction January 2013 -Campus March 2013 Administrators April 2013 -TLI Teacher Specialist • Inventory Logs • Lesson Plans • • Sign In Logs Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) Walk through observations Progress Monitoring Sign In Logs Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) Walk through observations Progress Monitoring • • -ESL Teachers -ELA Teachers -Dean of Instruction -Campus Administrators -TLI Teacher Specialist October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • • • 52 9th-12th grade students: 1.25 Provide Language Arts Professional Development for and Secondary ELA • Bilingual teachers in order to implement a • Migrant comprehensive instructional program for • ESL English Language Learners. • LEP • TELPAS • Sp. Ed. • ELPS • GT • CSCOPE Curriculum • Dyslexia • Sheltered Instruction • At Risk • STAAR End of Course –English I, • Pre-AP II, and III • AP • Writing Across the Curriculum • Title I • Effective research-based teaching practices Classroom management –(REVIEW 360) 1.26 • Provide Professional Development for new and existing Secondary teachers on all modules of Texas State Literacy Plan in order to establish a working plan. 9th – 12th grade students: LEP ESL MI SE GT DYS AR Pre AP TI -9-12th grade teachers -Lead Teachers -Department heads -ESL Teachers -ELA Teachers -Dean of Instruction -TLI Teacher Specialist -Campus Administrators -Language Arts Specialists August 2012 • September 2012 • October 2012 • January 2013 • February 2013 • • TLI Grant -9th – 12th grade teachers -TLI Teacher Specialist -Special Ed. Teachers -Dyslexia Teachers -Principals -Dean of Instruction -Lead Teachers/ Department Heads -Language Arts Specialists Benchmark Testing Walk through observations Progress Monitoring Professional Development Evaluations Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) Teacher Transcripts -Professional Development Evaluations -Teacher Transcripts 53 1.27 Receive Professional Development in the area of Reading through attendance of selected teachers and administrators at TX TLI Summer Institutes in order to target areas for improvement. TI MI LEP SE AR GT DYS TLI Grant -Principal -Dean of Instruction -TLI Teacher Specialist -Teacher-Language Arts July 2012 -Professional Development Evaluations -Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) -Benchmarks 1.28 Provide Professional Development in the area of Reading through turn-around training by selected teachers, Teacher Specialists, and administrators, who attended TX TLI Summer Institute, in order to guide planning for student improvement. TI MI LEP SE AR GT DYS Develop oral language skills and increase listening/speaking and reading/writing proficiency through the use of ELPS and ELAR strategies in the classroom in order for students to systematically transition to English literacy. 9th – 12th students: LEP MI SE GT DYS AR Pre AP AP TI TLI Grant -Principal -TLI Teacher Specialist -Dean of Instruction -Teacher-Language Arts August 2012 -Bilingual/ESL Teachers -9th-12th grade Teachers -Special Education Teachers -Dyslexia Teachers -Principals -Dean of Instruction -TLI Teacher Specialist -ESL Reading Smart August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 -Professional Development Evaluations -Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) -Benchmarks 1.29 -Benchmark testing -Teacher Observations -Progress Reports 54 1.30 Implement a coordinated systematic assessment plan at the district, campus, and classroom level to optimize instructional time in order to facilitate data for planning and curriculum purposes. 9th – 12th grade students: LEP MI SE GT DYS Pre AP AP -Regular Classroom Teacher -Sp. Ed. Teachers -Dyslexia Teachers -Content Area Teachers -Title I Reading Teacher -Principals -Language Arts Specialist -Bilingual/ESL Specialists -TLI Teacher Specialist -Dean of Instruction -Literacy Coaches -B.E.S.T. Committee -Diagnosticians -September 2012 -January 2013 -April 2013 -Classroom Observations State/District/Campus Assessment Schedules 55 1.31 Provide Professional Development for new and existing teachers on designated grade level assessments data analysis in order to monitor/adjust instruction and report student achievement in literacy. • EOC 9th – 12th grades • TELPAS 9th – 12th grade students: -LEP -MI -SE -GT -DYS -AR -Pre AP -AP -TI -9th – 12th grade teachers -Special Ed. Teachers -Dyslexia Teachers -Principals -Dean of Instruction -TLI Teacher Specialist -Lead Teachers/Department Heads -Language Arts Specialists May 7 – August 3, 2013 -Benchmark testing -Teacher Observations -Progress Reports -Professional Development Evaluations -Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) -TELPAS -Teacher Transcripts ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 56 Mathematics State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of mathematics. A minimum of 90% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate minimum passing standards with 30% of these students obtaining a commended performance level on the TAKS/EOC Mathematics Exam. A minimum of 90% of our Veterans Memorial students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC Mathematics test and 40% will obtain a commended performance level. Campus Objectives/Summative Evaluation Test Data Grade Level Math Subgroup EOC Grade 9 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 70% * 70% * 44% 44% 70% 35% 97% 79% 72% 19% * 19% * 7% 3% 18% 3% 54% 16% 20% Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* 92/*/* Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) (DIP) 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 Note: Data listed as percentages 57 Test Data Grade Level Math TAKS Grade 10 TAKS Grade 11 TAKS/EOC-M Grade 9 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 79% * 78% * 75% 68% 79% 71% 96% 100% 79% * * * * * * * * * * * 78% 79% 77% * 67% 78% 78% 82% * 76% 12% * 11% * 0 3% 11% 0 32% 0 11% * * * * * * * * * * * 0 * 0 * 0 0 0 0 * 0 Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 75/90/25 Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 90/30 58 Note: Data listed as percentages Test Data Grade Level Math TAKS-M Grade 10 TAKS-M Grade 11 TAKS/EOC-Alt Grade 9 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 80% * 78% * 100% 80% 80% 80% * * * * * * * * * * * * 100% * 100% * * 100% 100% 100% * * 10% * 11% * 0 10% 10% 10% * * * * * * * * * * * * 17% * 17% * * 0 0 17% * * Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 Note: Data listed as percentages 59 Test Data Grade Level Math TAKS-Alt Grade 10 TAKS-Alt Grade 11 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 100% * 100% * 100% 100% 100% 100% * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 * 0 * 0 0 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 80/90/25 Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 90/40 Note: Data listed as percentages 60 Action Step 2.1 Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Math Teachers Resources Fund/$ Amount (LOC) Math teachers will meet in August to align the curriculum for every six weeks by grade level to include benchmarks and will meet twice a week to align curriculum across the grade levels. 2.2 Support research-based response to intervention strategies, including tutorials and remediation for students diagnosed as performing below campus established proficiency levels so that struggling students gain a year or more in math progress. 2.3 The Math Department will meet every six weeks to continue improving specifications, format, item analysis and objectives of TAKS/EOC so that they can provide focused instruction to improve student performance on TAKS/EOC and disaggregate data on EOC and or TAKS Profile monitoring instrument. Timeline August 2012 for 3 days Formative Evaluation • • ESL Migrant Sped. Educ. GT Dyslexia Pre-AP AP At-Risk All Math Teachers Measuring UP TAKS Coach Compass Odyssey Test Smart Professor’s Tutor Holt CSCOPE Math Teachers Special Education Dean of Instruction (TPTR) Math Teachers, Special November 2012 Education, Dean of January 2013 Instruction TPTR Grant funds will be used for teachers to attend professional training, (such as CPS, TINSPIRE, Pre AP Institutes) to increase teacher knowledge of system. 2.4 Person(s) Responsible Principal, Dean of Instruction, Math Department October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • • • • • Math Teachers, (LOC) – Special Education, Bilingual/ESL/PreAP/AP/GT math teachers Math Dept Chair Dean of Instruction October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • • • Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) Walk through observations Curriculum from prior six weeks Classroom assessments Pre and post benchmark and tests. Agendas Classroom observation Implementation in lesson plans Student assessments Classroom Observations Walkthroughs Lesson Plans 61 Action Step 2.5 2.6 2.7 Programs/Strategies/Activities Population ESL Math teachers will use TI-NSPIRE calculators, Migrant student presentation link adapters and TI presenters Spec. Educ. to prepare students for the EOC. GT Dyslexia Pre-AP AP At-Risk Teachers will use CPS program (classroom ESL, performance system) to engage student participation Migrant in the classroom. CPS will be used to administer Spec. Educ. exams and quizzes compatible with the Exam View GT program that is currently implemented. Dyslexia Pre-AP AP At-Risk Math Teachers All math teachers will attend in-services in order to Special Educ. increase the content and pedagogical level of Bilingual/ESL/Preteacher to include the development on the AP/AP/GT specifications, format, item analysis and categories of the STAAR so that teachers can provide focused instruction to improve students’‟ performance on STAAR. 2.8 Implement the use of technology into classroom instruction to promote critical thinking skills. ESL, Migrant, Sp. Ed., GT, Dyslexia, Pre-AP, AP, At Risk Resources Fund/$ Amount (LOC)Math Teachers TI Presenters Person(s) Responsible Math Teachers Special Education Principals Dean Exam View Program TAKS/EOC Material EOC Material Math Department Teachers Special Educ. Admin District Professional Development (TI) $500.00 (TI) $2750.00 Math Teachers Principal Deans of Instruction Special Education Teachers Timeline October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 1st – 6th six weeks Formative Evaluation • • Walkthroughs Lesson Plans • Student Participation Classroom Observations Walkthroughs Lesson Plans • • • • • • • Computers, Laptops, Printers, Federal Funds/Technology Funds Administration Math Dept. Special Education October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • • Student Assessments Classroom observation, Walkthroughs Lesson Plans Student participation Walk-throughs Lesson Plans 62 2.9 Teachers will implement on line resources/materials such as Study Island and Odyssey Compass to improve student performance in the classroom and on state assessments. ESL, Migrant, Sp. ((TI)) Ed., GT, Dyslexia, Technology Funds Pre-AP, AP, AtRisk Administration Math Dept. August 2012 May 2013 Professional development opportunities will be offered for math teachers for growth in the areas of Pre AP/ GT/ AP/ SIOP. Teachers will also receive stipends for selected trainings. Math department will order supplies and printing services throughout the school year to ensure that they have the necessary tools to complete their curriculum. Items will be distributed among their department. A Math Enrichment teacher will support students who failed the TAKS /EOC in the area of mathematics on their state assessment. Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp. Ed., GT, Dyslexia, PreAP, AP, At-Risk Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp. Ed. GT, Dyslexia, PreAP, AP, At-Risk Math Teachers (TPTR) Math Dept. Principals, Dean August 2012 May 2013 (TI) $18,164.00 Math Teacher Math Dept Principals, Dean October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 May 2013 • • • 2.10 2.11 2.12 AT Risk Students (SCE) 68,160.00 Math Dept Principal Dean of Instruction • All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education Teacher sign in and ERO Credit • • Lesson Plans Inventory Logs • • Lesson Plans Success on state assessments ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia Student participation Classroom observation Lesson Plans Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 63 Science State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of science. A minimum of 90% of students taking the TAKS/EOC science exam will demonstrate mastery. A minimum of 25% of students taking the TAKS/EOC science exam will achieve commended performance. A minimum of 90% of our Veterans Memorial students taking TAKS/EOC science exam will demonstrate mastery. A minimum of 30% of students taking TAKS/EOC science exams will achieve commended performance. Campus Objectives/Summative Evaluation Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 Test Data Grade Level Science Subgroup EOC Grade 9 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE TAKS Grade 10 All Students 85% 14% Hispanic White Asian LEP * 85% * 50% * 13% * 0 Accountability Standard State Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 * (DIP) 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 * * * * * * * * * * * Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) (DIP) 90/25 * * * * 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 64 At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE 77* 84% 40% 100% 50% 85% 3% 13% 0 50% 0 13% * * * * * * 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 Note: Data listed as percentages Test Data Grade Level Science TAKS Grade 11 TAKS-M Grade 10 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 Accountability Standard State Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 * * * * * * * * * * * 67% * 64% * 100% 67% 67% 67% * * * * * * * * * * * 17% * 9% * 0 17% 17% 17% 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) 65 TAKS-M Grade 11 Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 Note: Data listed as percentages Test Data Grade Level Science TAKS-Alt Grade 10 TAKS-Alt Grade 11 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 Accountability Standard State Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 67% * 63% * 100% 67% 67% 67% * * * * * * * * 67% 67% * * 17% * 9% * 0 17% 17% 17% * * * * * * * * 17% 17% * * 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 90/25 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 66 Action Step 3.1 Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Science Teachers Resources Fund/$ Amount (LOC) Science teachers will meet in August to align the curriculum for every six weeks by grade level to include benchmarks. Person(s) Responsible Principal, Dean, Science Dept. Timeline August 2012 for 3 days Formative Evaluation • • Science Teachers, (LOC) The Science Department will meet every six weeks Special Education, to continue improving specifications, format, item Bilingual/ESL analysis and objectives of TAKS and EOC categories so that they can provide focused instruction to improve student performance on TAKS and EOC and disaggregate data on EOC and or TAKS Profile monitoring instrument. Science Dept. Chair Dean of Instruction 3.3 Utilize data from district and campus benchmarks and state assessments to target instruction for subgroups and individual to plan future professional development to improve the delivery of science instruction and increase student achievement. GT, SPED, Science Teachers Bilingual, and At- Benchmarks Risk Science Teachers Science Teachers Special Education Teachers Dean October 2012 January 2013 • • 3.4 Students will conduct field and laboratory investigations the state required 40% of their instructional time to ensure ample opportunity for descriptive, comparative, and experimental investigations outlined in the new TEKS. GT, SPED, Bilingual and AtRisk Science Teachers CSCOPE Curriculum, FOSS materials, Lab-Aids Kits Science Teachers, Principals, Dean August 2012 – May 2013 • • Walkthroughs Lesson plans 3.5 Provide Professional Development for teachers to Science Teachers improve the delivery of science instruction, analyze and disaggregate data AWARE to increase student achievement in the classroom and testing. Campus Needs Assessment Survey (TI) $500.00 Science Teachers, Principals, Dean August 2012 – May 2013 • Session Evaluations Classroom observations Lesson plans 3.2 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence Walk through observations • • • • • • Student assessments Classroom Observations Walkthroughs Lesson Plans Lesson Plans Benchmarks 67 68 Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Step Students are required to complete an original 3.6 research based inquiry project and Pre-AP/GT will be required to participate in the Science Fair competition. *Note – Project to be done at home 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 Provide professional development to support ESL strategies for science instruction, Pre AP/ GT/ AP trainings to improve student achievement for these students. The Science Department will meet every six weeks to continue improving specifications, format, item analysis and objectives of TAKS/EOC so that they can provide focused instruction to improve student performance on TAKS/EOC. Purchase a site license for Compass Learning software to address students’ weaknesses in Science. Population Resources Fund/$ Amount Science Teachers Posters Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp. Ed., GT Pre-AP, AP, AtRisk Bilingual/LEP/ESL (TPTR) Students Science Teachers, Science teachers Special Education, Bilingual/ESL/PreAP/AP/GT Science Teachers Bilingual, ESL, (LOC) Migrant Sp. Ed. GT Pre-AP, AP At-Risk Science teachers will participate in on going Bilingual, ESL, Science Teachers education by participating in CAST, RGVSA Migrant, Sp. Ed. (TI) $2750.00 Conferences, Texas Assessment Conference, district GT, Dyslexia, Preand Region all in-services to improve science AP, AP, At-Risk curriculum awareness Bilingual, ESL, (TI) $18,164.00 Science department will order supplies and Migrant, Sp. Ed. Science Teacher printing services throughout the school year to GT, Dyslexia, Preensure that they have the necessary tools to AP, AP, At-Risk complete their curriculum. Items will be distributed among their department. Person(s) Responsible Science Teachers, Principals, Dean Timeline Formative Evaluation October 2012 January 2013 • Student Participation Science Specialist, Principals, Dean August 2012May 2013 • Science Dept. Chair, Dean of Instruction October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Session Evaluations Classroom observations Lesson plans Student assessments Classroom Observations Walkthroughs Lesson Plans • • • • • • Dean of Instruction Science Department Chair August 2012May 2013 • Lesson plans • Tutorial • lesson plans Science Dept. Principals, Deans October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • • Science Dept Principals, Dean • • Lesson plans Tutorial Lesson plans Lesson Plans Inventory Logs ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. 69 Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 70 Social Studies State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the area of social studies. A minimum of 90% of BISD students tested will demonstrate minimum passing Standards with 45% of the students tested will obtain Commended Performance on the Social Studies TAKS/EOC Assessment. Veterans Memorial students will demonstrate a minimum of passing standards by 50% or higher on obtaining Commended Performance on the Social Studies TAKS/EOC assessment. Campus Objectives/Summative Evaluation Test Data Grade Level Social Studies Subgroup EOC Grade 9 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 Accountability Standard State Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 * (DIP) 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 * * * * * * * * * * Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) 71 TAKS Grade 10 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE 97% * 97% * 81% 95% 97% 80% 100% 100% 96% 37% * 36% * 0 18% 34% 0% 78% 50% 35% * * * * * * * * * * * (DIP) 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 Note: Data listed as percentages Test Data Grade Level Social Studies TAKS Grade 11 TAKS-M Grade 10 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. GT Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 Accountability Standard State Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 * * * * * * * * * * * 91% * 90% * 100% 91% 91% 91% * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 * 0 * 0 0 0 0 * * 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) 72 TAKS-M Grade 11 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 Note: Data listed as percentages Test Data Grade Level Social Studies TAKS-Alt Grade 10 TAKS-Alt Grade 11 Subgroup All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Current Mastery 2011-2012 Current Commended Mastery 2011-2012 Accountability Standard State Projected Mastery/ Commended 2012-2013 100% * 100% * 100% 100% 100% 100% * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 * 0 * 0 0 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 90/45 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Actual Commended Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 73 Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Step Social Studies teachers will meet in August to align Social Studies 4.1 the curriculum for every six weeks by grade level to Teachers include benchmarks. Resources Fund/$ Amount (LOC)- Person(s) Timeline Responsible Principal, Dean, Social August 2012 for Studies Department 3 days Formative Evaluation • • 4.2 4.3 4.4 Social Studies students will participate in Constitution Week and Kids Voting to develop appreciation of the origins of our freedoms and responsibilities, as well as learn about the election process at the local, state, and federal levels. Social Studies students will participate in National History Day, a nation-wide academic competition where students choose historical topics, conduct research, and create projects to present in competition against other students. Students will have the opportunity to advance through several levels of competition- campus to national level. Teachers may employ a grading system as students progress through the development of their project. Veterans Day and Memorial Day will be commemorated by honoring veterans who have served and/or died for their country. Social Studies teachers will create student awareness about the contributions and sacrifices of citizens of the United States who have served in the military. Migrant Bilingual/ESL Sp. Ed. At-Risk GT Pre-AP AP Dyslexia Government documents, district computer ballots, Social Studies teachers Migrant Bilingual/ESL Sp. Ed. At-Risk GT Pre-AP AP Dyslexia Curriculum and Instruction History Fair All teachers Migrant Bilingual/ESL Sp. Ed. At-Risk GT Pre-AP AP Dyslexia Campus Materials Social Studies Teachers November 2012 • • • All Social Studies Teachers Dean Principals All Social Studies Teachers 1st – 3rd Six wks Campus Event December, 2012 District Event Jan., 2013 Regional Event Feb., 2013 State Event May 2013 November 2012 May 2012 • • • • • • Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) Walk through observations Curriculum (lesson plans, framework, scope and sequence) Walk through observations Student Participation Project Evaluations Rubric Campus History Day Evaluations Classroom activities Staff recognition in auditorium Classroom activities 74 Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Step Teachers will be trained in the area of PowerPoint, 4.5 smart board, CPS, and web links that will assist, create, and develop an ambience for interactive learning and increase participation for students in order to focus on appropriate instruction and strategies pertaining to the Reporting Categories to ensure students success. Resources Fund/$ Amount All Social Studies Computer Tech Teachers Related Tech Person(s) Responsible Social Studies Teachers TST Dean Principals Utilize data from district and campus benchmarks and state assessments to target instruction for subgroups and individual to plan future professional development to improve the delivery of Social Studies instruction and disaggregate data on EOC and or TAKS/EOC Profile monitoring instrument. and increase student achievement. Teachers will utilize ABC-Clio History, Ignite Program, and United Streaming to assist, create, and develop an ambience for interactive learning and increased participation for students. GT SPED Bilingual At-Risk Social Studies Teachers Social Studies Teachers Sp. Ed. Department Teachers Dean October 2012 January 2013 Dean All History Teachers August 2010 May 2012 4.8 Teachers will participate in staff development that implements interdisciplinary studies with other subjects. Bilingual, ESL, Migrant Sp. Ed., GT Pre AP, AP, At Risk Social Studies Teachers, Dean, Principals 4.9 Social Studies teachers will enhance their curriculum by participating in regular inservices at the campus, district, Region 1, and/or conference level to include SIOP/Pre AP/GT and AP trainings. Bilingual, ESL, Migrant, Sp. Ed. GT, Dyslexia, Pre-AP, AP, AtRisk (255)- 1248.00 October 2010 November 2010 January 2012 March 2012 April 2012 4.6 4.7 Population Bilingual Migrant Sp. Ed. GT Pre-Ap/AP At-Risk Social Studies Teachers Benchmarks Dean Resource companies Internet Service CSCOPE, SIOP, Dictionaries for Secondary Students, ESL Students, (TI) $500.00 (TI) 2750.00 Curriculum and Instruction Campus Funding Social Studies Teachers Dean Principal Timeline Early Fall Semester – 2012 Early Spring – 2013 August 2012May 2013 Formative Evaluation • • • • Tests Benchmark Tests Walkthroughs Lesson plans • • Lesson Plans Benchmarks • • • Lesson Plans Benchmarks Walkthroughs • • • • Tests Benchmark tests Walkthroughs Classroom observation • • • Lesson plans Tutorial Lesson plans 75 4.10 Social Studies department will order supplies and printing services throughout the school year to ensure that they have the necessary tools to complete their curriculum. Items will be distributed among their department. Bilingual, ESL, (TI) $18,164.00 Social Studies Dept Migrant, Sp. Ed. Social Studies Teacher Principals, Dean GT, Dyslexia, PreAP, AP, At-Risk October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • Lesson Plans Inventory Logs ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 76 Health and Physical Education State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Action Step 5.1 5.2 5.3 Programs/Strategies/Activities Attend CPR, First Aid and CPI Training to ensure student safety on campus. The students in the public education system will be provided with educational opportunities that address safety, health, nutrition, substance abuse, and violence prevention. Improve in the overall wellness of the students, staff as well as community members by promoting awareness of healthy lifestyles. Veterans Memorial will improve in the overall wellness of the students, staff as well as community members by promoting healthy lifestyles and awareness. Population PE / Health Teachers Resources Fund/$ Amount Athletic Department Funds $3000.00 Person(s) Responsible PE / Health Teachers P.E. Teachers Meet once a week to discuss PE/Health issues and address ways we can improve the overall learning and behavior issues of our athletic students. PE / Health Teachers P.E. Teachers Teach Character Education in our Health classes to support school wide expected behavior. LEP, At Risk, Econ, Dis, Special Ed., GT, Pre-AP, Regular Health Teachers Health Teachers Timeline Evaluation August 2012 Formative: Teacher – December evaluation 2012 Summative: Certification October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Formative: # of office referrals decrease Summative: Overall # of students in ITS, ISS, per semester Formative: # of office referrals decrease Summative: Overall # of students in ITS, ISS, per semester 77 Action Step 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 Resources Fund/$ Amount Cost-Local funding for supplies Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Assess student fitness annually in grades 9-12 to improve the health and well being of all students and be in compliance with the requirements of Senate Bill 530 effective 09/01/2007. LEP, At Risk, Econ, Dis, Special Ed., GT, Pre-AP, Regular Teachers are required to have a minimum of 8 daily grades and 4 test grades each six weeks. Bilingual, ESL, Migrant Sp. Ed., GT Dyslexia, Pre AP, AP, At Risk PE/ Health Teachers Monitor and emphasize the integrated math, reading, and writing academic concepts inherent in the Health and Physical Education curriculum programs in order to enhance students’ skills and prepare them for testing. Bil, GT, Pre-AP, AP, Special Education, Migrant, At Risk Resource Guides TAKS/EOC Objectives TEKS Objectives Content area Scope & Sequence Monitor and emphasize the integrated math, reading, and writing academic concepts inherent in the Health and Physical Education curriculum programs in order to enhance students’ skills and prepare them for testing. Bil, GT, Pre-AP, AP, Special Education, Migrant, At Risk Resource Guides TAKS/EOC Objectives TEKS Objectives Content area Scope & Sequence Person(s) Responsible P.E. Teachers Physical Education Department, Principals, Dean Timeline October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Physical Ed. Teachers, Health Ed. Teachers Physical Ed. Teachers Math, Reading & Writing Department August 2012thru June 2013 Physical Ed. Teachers, Health Ed. Teachers Physical Ed. Teachers Math, Reading & Writing Department August 2012thru June 2013 Evaluation Formative: Classroom Observation Summative: TEA required report for Fitness Assessment Results & Student Follow-up Formative: Six Weeks Grades, Classroom Observation, Grade Book Summative: Decrease in failure rate of course Formative: Curriculum Frameworks, Staff Development Agendas, Lesson Plans Summative: Formal class room observations Formative: Curriculum Frameworks, Staff Development Agendas, Lesson Plans Summative: Formal class room observations 78 5.8 5.9 Provide information on the Wellness/Nutrition Policy & Guidelines to parents, teachers & students through parent meetings, teacher staff development, CATCH Teams, and classroom instruction to ensure compliance with respective policies and guidelines and comply with the Texas Public School Nutrition Policy and revisions effective 08/01/2004 08/01/2007. Implement informational sessions to faculty, staff, and parents on specific guidelines on reporting child abuse. ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Bil, GT, Pre-AP, AP, Special Education, Migrant, At Risk, Administrators, Parents Teachers, Counselor Campus, Administrators, Dean Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Wellness Policy Reference Manual Square Meals.org (Texas Dept. of Agriculture) Food & Nutrition Services Administrator, CATCH Team August 2012 thru June 2013 Counselors August 2012- Formative: thru June 2013 Presentations Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education Formative: Observations, Agendas, Parent Meetings Summative: Follow Policy Summative: Set procedure for teachers Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 79 Fine Arts State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Action Step 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Programs/Strategies/Activities The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in instrumental music, choral music, visual arts, theatre arts, and dance. A minimum of 90% of our fine arts students will meet performance standards in all fine arts areas with 92% meeting commended performance. A minimum of 90% of our fine arts students will meet performance standards in all fine arts areas with 95% meeting commended performance. Population VMHS band will perform at all football games to prepare for UIL competitions and promote community awareness and support of the Fine Arts programs. Band Students VMHS band will compete in UIL Region, Area and State Marching Competition to access their proficiency and ensure commended performances Band Students Resources Fund/$ Amount Transportation and meals Local funds Person(s) Responsible High school band directors Meals, entry fees, materials, transportation Local funds High school band directors Timeline August – November 2012 October – November 2012 VMHS band will compete in Pre/Post UIL Marching competition to prepare and improve their performance skills. Band Students Meals, entry fees, transportation Local funds High school band directors October – November 2012 VMHS band will compete in TMEA All-Region, Area and State Band Competition so that individual students can develop confidence and performance skills and ensure commended performances Band Students Meals, Entry fees, transportation, lodging Local funds High school band directors November 2012 February 2013 Evaluation Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Audience reaction, Student reaction Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Rating Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Rating Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Rating 80 Action Step 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 6.11 6.12 Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Resources Fund/$ Amount Transportation Local funds Person(s) Responsible High school band directors Timeline Evaluation December 2012 Formative: Lesson Plans Will perform in the Brownsville Christmas Parade to promote community awareness and support of the program. Band Students VMHS Estudiantina will compete in the Estudiantina Championship/Evaluation to provide Estudiantina students with a reason for academic success and to improve their skills. Estudiantina Students Adjudicators, awards Local funds VMHS students will perform in Charro Days parades to promote community awareness of the programs. Band Students/Colo r guard/Dance Transportation Local funds Estudiantina and Colorguards will perform for Fiesta Folklorica to promote community awareness of the programs. Estudiantina & colorguard groups Transportation Local funds High school estudiantina & band directors February 2013 Estudiantina groups will perform for the Charro Days parades to promote community awareness of the programs. High school Estudiantina groups Transportation Local funds High school Estudiantina directors February 2013 Students will compete in Solo and Ensemble Band Competition so that individual students can develop confidence and performance skills. Color guard will compete in Color Guard competitions to develop the performance skills of the groups and promote community awareness. VMHS students will perform in various pre/post UIL concert/contest to prepare and improve their performance skills and ensure commended performances Band students High school bands Band Students Entry fees, transportation Local funds Transportation, meals Local funds Meals, entry fees, transportation Local funds Supervisor of Instrumental Music & high school estudiantina instructors High school band directors December 2012 February 2013 High school band directors February – May 2013 High school band directors February – May 2013 Band Directors Summative: Audience reaction, Student reaction Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Rating Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Audience reaction, Student reaction Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Audience reaction, Student reaction Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Audience reaction, Student reaction Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Ratings Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Ratings March – May Formative: Lesson Plans 2013 Summative: Performance Ratings 81 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 6.19 6.20 6.21 Students compete in UIL Concert and Sight Reading Competition to access and improve their performance skills and ensure commended performances Students will participate in the All-City Choir Clinic & Concert in order to experience a level of literature that is specifically composed for large groups to be accompanied by orchestra Students will attend summer choir camps to build a foundation for the choir program Middle and high school bands Art students will compete in community and/or valley art competitions to promote professional growth Art students who qualified will compete in state VASE competition to promote success in visual arts programs at the state level and ensure commended performances Students will participate in BISD district art competition/ exhibition to promote professional growth Theatre arts students will participate in “An Evening of Theatre” to promote the importance of theatre arts in the schools Meals, entry fees Local funds Band Directors April 2013 Choir students Clinicians Local funds Supervisor of Choral Music April 2013 Art Students Transportation Local funds Choir Director Art Students Cost - None Art Teacher Art Students Art Students Theatre Arts students Theatre arts students will participate in One Act Play (OAP) high school clinics to ensure success at their OAP competition Theatre Arts students Theatre arts students will participate in One Act Play (OAP) zone, district, area, and state competitions to promote professional growth Theatre Arts students Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Ratings Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Ratings August 2012 Formative: Lesson Plans & Summative: Audience June 2013 reaction, Student reaction Formative: Lesson Plans September 2012 May Summative: 2013 Performance Ratings Formative: Lesson Plans April 2013 Entry fees, meals, transportation, lodging Local funds Supplies Local funds Supervisor of Visual Arts & high school visual arts instructors Transportation, meals Local funds Theatre Arts Teacher October 2012 Transportation Local funds Theatre Arts Teacher Feb. 2013 Summative: Performance Ratings Formative: Lesson Plans Transportation Cost - $1,000 Local funds Theatre Arts Teacher March 2013 Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Ratings Formative: Lesson Plans Art Teacher Summative: Performance Ratings Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performance Ratings Summative: 82 6.22 6.23 6.24 6.25 and ensure commended performances Supplies needed for Theater Arts students to participate in a minimum of 2 fall shows and 1 spring show to promote community awareness of the Dramatic Arts in performance and technical aspects. Dance students and high school theatre and choir students will perform in “Santa and Friends” for all elementary campuses to promote community awareness and cultural experiences for all BISD students Dance students will perform for the district Employee Awards Banquet to provide community awareness of fine arts programs Teachers are required to have a minimum of 8 daily grades and 4 test grades each six weeks. ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Theater Arts students Fine Arts dance, theatre, choir, band, and art students High school dance students Bilingual, ESL, Migrant Sp. Ed., GT Dyslexia, Pre AP, AP, At Risk Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Local Funds$5000.00 Theater Arts Teacher August 2012May 2013 Supplies & meals Local funds Dance Teacher December 2012 Local funds Dance Teacher May 2013 Fine Arts Teachers Fine Arts Department, Principals, Dean Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education Performance Ratings Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Performances/audience reactions Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Audience Reaction, Student reaction Formative: Lesson Plans Summative: Audience Reaction, Student reaction October 2012 Formative: Six Weeks November Grades, Classroom 2012 Observation, Grade January 2013 Book Summative: Decrease in March 2013 April 2013 failure rate of course Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 83 At-Risk State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Through enhanced dropout efforts, all students will remain in school until they obtain a high school diploma and/or pursue a post-secondary education. All campuses will develop prevention and intervention strategies that will support reducing the dropout rate to less than 1% in Middle School, increase the High School Completion Rate to 95%, and increase the Graduation Rate to 75%. Our campus will have a dropout rate of 1.0% or less. Campus Objectives/Summative Evaluation Test Data Grade Level EOC Grade 9 TAKS Grade 10 TAKS Grade 11 Subject Area Subgroup Reading Math Science Social Studies Reading/ELA Math Science Social Studies Reading/ELA Math Science Social Studies All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk All Students/At-Risk Current Mastery 2011-2012 92/49 68/49 82/62 79/62 82/62 96/62 * * * * Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 93/*/* 92/*/* * * 80/90/25 75/90/25 90 90 80/90/25 75/90/25 90 90 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 84 Test Data Grade Level Attendance Rate Dropout Rate Completion Rate Cohort Class 4 YR 5 YR Graduation Rate Cohort Class 4 YR 5 YR Subject Area 9-12 Grades 9-12 Grades Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Subgroup All Students At-Risk All Students At-Risk All Students At-Risk All Students At-Risk All Students At-Risk All Students At-Risk Current Mastery 2011-2012 * * * * * * * * * * * * Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) 95.0 Not Applicable 95.0 95.0 90.0 90.0 Note: Data listed as percentages 85 Action Step 7.1 7.2 Programs/Strategies/Activities Population CTE pathway course sequencing will be aligned with the Achieve Texas standards to provide for school to work related coursework that allows students to complete graduation with a career pathway focus. Bil, GT, Pre-AP, AP, Special Education, Migrant, At Risk, CTE students All at risk students Before and after school tutorials will be offered daily to decrease the # of students not meeting AYP criteria, and/or graduation criteria. Courses will be offered by teachers and the use of the A+, software to decrease student dropout rates. Additional custodial supplies will be purchased for before and after school tutorials. Resources Fund/$ Amount Course Listing Guide Person(s) Responsible Principal/ CPO,CATE Lead Teacher, Dean of Instruction (SCE) $46,920.00 including fringe benefits (TI) – $2500.00 Computers, software. (TI) – $1500.00 AT Risk counselor, Program Specialist, PEIMS Supervisor, Dean Timeline October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Formative Evaluation • • • • • • • 7.3 Saturday Academies will be provided for students who did not meet expectations on previous TAKS/EOC in the areas of ELA, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies. All at risk students (SCE) $7680.00 including fringe benefits Principal, Dean of Instruction Teachers November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • • • • Master schedule Survey # of students enrolled in CATE Pathway School dropout rate decreases Six weeks dropout report Module completion report Curriculum from prior six weeks Classroom assessments Pre and post benchmark tests. School dropout rate decreases Six weeks dropout report Module completion report Curriculum from prior six weeks Classroom assessments Pre and post benchmark tests. 86 Program Specialist will make presentations to faculty, staff, parents and students about programs that help students stay in school and complete in 4 years and monitor dropout intervention programs for students classified as At-Risk. All Students, Faculty, Staff and Parents One At-Risk counselor will service students who are at risk of dropping out by providing guidance and information about available programs and resources designed to assist them. At-Risk Students (SCE) $81.548.00 7.6 STAR lab teachers will assist students to regain credit who are at risk of dropping out through A+ Plus and / or Compass Odyssey programs. At-Risk Students (SCE) $136,320.00 Principal, PEIMS Supervisor 7.7 A Community In Schools (CIS) Case worker will work with At-Risk students by providing guidance and available information about programs and resources to decrease student dropout rate. At Risk Students Additional FTE PEIMS Supervisor 7.8 A Probation Officer will collaborate with Administration, faculty and staff in providing support services to students currently on probation to improve behavior and to maximize classroom performance. Students on probation Dropout Grant Counselors, AtRisk Counselors, Assistant Principals, BISD Police, Principal 7.4 7.5 (SCE)- 51,976 Program Specialist, Dean of Instruction PEIMS Supervisor, Principal, At Risk Counselor October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 • • October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 - 2013 • • October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 – May 2013 • • • Master schedule School dropout rate Number of graduates under the Recommended Program Six weeks dropout report Counselor Logs School Dropout rate Six weeks drop out report • Completion of modules • Six weeks drop out report • Decrease in student drop out • CIS Logs • School Dropout rate • Six weeks drop out report • Monthly Contact Logs 87 7.9 Create a Mentoring program in which successful graduates become mentors for AtRisk students in order to decrease the dropout rate. At Risk Students Teacher monitoring forms At-Risk Counselors, Counselors, PEIMS Supervisor, Dean 7.10 We will create an At-Risk Committee that will meet monthly to review At-Risk student progress and possible interventions. AT Risk Students Sign in sheets of meetings At-Risk Counselor, Counselors, Dean, Assistant Principals, Principal 7.11 High School principals will ensure that campus counselors provide guidance services for parent students that include schedule modifications, Graduation plans, career counseling, job readiness training, parenting education. Principals will ensure that campus nurses provide prenatal screening and medical support to pregnant students. 7.12 7.13 7.14 A social worker will ensure that parent students at the high schools are provided with specialized services that include, case management, obtaining assistance from government services agencies, childcare information, service coordinator. Principals will ensure that Compensatory Education Home Instruction (CEHI) academic services are provided to the student at home or in the hospital when pregnancy prevents the student from attending school during the All pregnant students All pregnant students All pregnant students All pregnant students Flyers, brochures Pregnancy Related Services Nurses (TI) 58,735.00 Flyers, brochures, pregnancy related services Pregnancy Related Services At- Risk Counselors, Counselors, Principals and Assistant Principals School Nurses, Principal and Assistant Principals Social worker, Principal and Assistant Principals CEHI Teacher, Principal and Assistant Principals, Campus teachers, October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Aug 2012 – May 2013 1 time a month • • Sign In Sheets Contracts • Student Reports Logs • • PRS Contact Log Nurses Log Aug 2012 – May 2013 1 time a month Aug 2012 – May 2013 1 time a month • • PRS Contact Log Nurses Log • PRS Contact Log including dates and times Aug 2012 – May 2013 4 hrs weekly (1-6 weeks) (6-10) • CEHI Contact log including date and time. Homebound/CEHI attendance logs • 88 prenatal or postpartum period. 7.15 7.16 7.17 7.18 7.19 7.20 7.21 Students will participate in a book club. Titles will deal with issues related with At Risk youth “Charged UP” Meet with students to discuss and evaluate progress The campus will insure accessibility to instructional technology devices in order to improve student achievement: Desktops, Laptops, Printers, IPADs. . The campus will insure accessibility to instructional technology in order to improve student achievement by having the operating site license for the computer. Implement LUCHA program with a teacher to target literary development and math success through the use of native language support and sheltered instruction strategies. Conduct transcript analysis and implement online modules. Conduct parent/student information sessions on graduation requirements and career pathway options. Increase coordination between campus ESL clerk, migrant clerk, special education clerk and home visitors to determine the whereabouts of non-returning students and to ensure appropriate documentation is in place to recover and document non-returning students. Parent liaisons will conduct home visits and monitor withdrawal leaver codes to ensure At Risk Students At Risk Students Flyers, brochures Sign in log All teachers with a focus on LEP, Mig. AT Risk, students (TI)$25,000.00 (TI) 53,060.00 All teachers (TI)$1275.00 Recent Immigrant and LEP students (TIII) – 52,436.00 LUCHA transcript PEIMS administer, ARD coordinator weeks with Dr. Verification Weekly At Risk Team Monthly All Teachers Administration December 2012- May 2013 Dropout Specialist All Teachers Administration ESL Teacher, Dean, Counselor December 2012 – May 2013 August 2012 – May 2013 • Sign In Sheets • • Sign In sheets Agenda Formative: • Lesson Plans • Walk Through • Lesson Plans • Survey Results Summative: Performance Ratings • Use of computers • • At-Risk Students At Risk Students Campus Monitoring Form PEIMS Supervisor, Campus Staff, High School Registrars, Record Clerks (TI) – $50,549.00 (TI) - $1500.00 Administration, Parent Liaison August 2012 –September 2012 • • October 2012 November • • Program effectiveness based on assessment results and parent and student surveys Transcript analysis ESchoolsPLUS Student Roster with ESL, Migrant indicators ESchoolsPLUS Home Visit Log 89 accuracy and will deliberate a focused effort to recover non-returning students. 7.22 7.23 Classify AT-Risk students by criteria in order to provide appropriate intervention strategies The Homeless Department will ensure support services for students identified as homeless. Teachers, parent liaison will coordinate with counselors to help students in need. High School At Risk Students Homeless High School Students. Key Codes for Special Populations (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (AR) At-Risk (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Cognos Report, PEIMS Report Homeless documentation Computer Services Counselor Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Aug 22, 2012 – October 28, 2012 August 2012 – June 2013 • Dropout monitor form • F. ESchoolsPLUS A+ Learners. • • Monthly ESchoolsPLUS At Risk reports will be generated and Homeless Dept will work with the AtRisj Campus contact to ensure support services provided to students classified as homeless. Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. 90 91 Attendance State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Veterans Memorial HS Campus Goal: The students will be encouraged and challenged to meet their full educational potential. Increase the student attendance rates for all district schools 98.5% for elementary schools, 96% for middle schools, and 95% for high schools. Increase our attendance rate to 97%. Campus Objectives/Summative Evaluation Student Data Subgroup 2009-2010 Accountability Standard State Projected Mastery Attendance Rate All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE * * * * * * * * * * 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 2010-2012 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 92 Action Step 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 Person(s) Responsible Classroom teacher, PEIMS Supervisor Daily • Weekly Review of campus attendance rates Bil, GT, Pre-AP, Gradespeed, PEIMS AP, Special Administrator Education, Migrant, At Risk, Bil, GT, Pre-AP, Prizes, pizza, AP, Special Ice cream, fruit Education, drinks, certificates, Migrant, At Risk, trophies Grade Level Principals August 2012 –May 2013 • Grade level attendance report Assistant Principal, Art teacher, English Teachers, Counselors At Risk Home visitor October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 –May 2013 Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Teachers will take attendance each period as prescribed by district policy. All Teachers Student attendance will be monitored on a daily basis and made known to appropriate grade level principal to increase student attendance rates and improve student instructional levels. Schedule various activities and awards to honor and reward perfect attendance, student essays and poster contests to promote and motivate student attendance and increase educational potential of students. Initiate a process where counselors work closely At Risk with attendance monitor and home visitor to contact parents in order to identify and recover potential dropouts. Refer parents whose children are truant to the truancy court and follow-up each case. Facilitate the parent’s ability to monitor attendance via Phone Master availability by consistently checking phone master data and phone master e-mail by campus personnel and grade speed. ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Budget, allocation for Attendance clerk, counseling personnel home visitor, counselors Bil, GT, Pre-AP, AP, Special Education, Migrant, At Risk, Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education Resources Fund/$ Amount Gradespeed Budget for home visitor Phone Master Grade Speed Attendance Clerks, PEIMS Supervisor Data Entry Clerk Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community Timeline August 2012 –May 2013 Formative Evaluation • Scheduled activities • Meeting Agendas • Absentee Reports • Absentee Reports Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special 93 (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. (TIC) (TII) (TIII) (TIV) (IEP) (CSR) (BIL) (TIX) (CTE) (HOM) Title I-C: Migrant Title II Title III: Federal Bilingual Title IV Innovative Education Class Size Reduction State Bilingual Title IX Career and Technical Education McKinney Homeless Education Education CAP Strategies in the activities 94 Discipline Management/Safe and Drug Free Schools State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Veterans Memorial HS Campus Goal: School campuses will maintain a safe and disciplined environment conducive to student learning. Discipline referrals (office referrals, removals and expulsions, to Brownsville Academic Center TAP/PTP and JJAEP) will decrease by 5%. Our campus will maintain a safe and disciplined environment conducive to student learning and decrease student referral to BAC by 3%. Campus Objectives/Summative Evaluation Student Data Grade Level Subgroup 2010-2012 # of students Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 9 ISS All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE Projected Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 95 Student Data Grade Level Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 10 ISS Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 11 ISS Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 12 ISS Subgroup 2010-2012 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Projected Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 96 Student Data Grade Level Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 9 OSS Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 10 OSS Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 11 OSS Subgroup 2010-2012 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE * * * * * * * * * * Projected Mastery 2010-2012 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 97 Student Data Grade Level Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 12 OSS Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 9 DAEP/JJAEP Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 10 DAEP/JJAEP Subgroup 2010-2012 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE * * * * * * * * * * Projected Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 98 Student Data Grade Level Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 11 DAEP/JJAEP Students with Disciplinary Placements Grade 12 DAEP/JJAEP Subgroup 2010-2012 All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE All Students Hispanic White Asian LEP At-Risk Eco. Disadv. Special Ed. Migrant CTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Projected Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 99 Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Step 9.1 Assistant principals will meet regularly weekly to discuss discipline consistency and to determine proactive changes needed to effectively decrease the number of discipline referrals and maintain an effective school wide Discipline Management Plan. 9.2 Distribute Student Code of Conduct to students, parents, staff to ensure all students are afforded due process and their rights. 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 Resources Fund/$ Amount Meeting logs Person(s) Responsible Administration Bil, GT, Pre-AP, District handbook AP, Special Education, Migrant, At Risk, CTE students In-service students on the contents of the student Bil, GT, Pre-AP, Student handbook handbook through school-wide teacher AP, Special presentations and grade level assemblies. Education, Migrant, At Risk, CTE students Provide teacher training on conflict resolution All teachers Presenter, time, and violence prevention and classroom facilities management techniques. In-service students on bully prevention, violence, Bil, GT, Pre-AP, Counselors conflict resolution, and recent drug use trends, AP, Special and dating violence to recognize and address the Education, issue, as a preventive measure. Migrant, At Risk, CTE students Administration, Registrar’s Clerk, Teachers Ensure that our Emergency Operations Plan covers lock down drills, shelter in place, reverse evacuation, drop and cover in order to prevent, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of incidents 3times a year. Population Bil, GT, Pre-AP, AP, Special Education, Migrant, At Risk, CTE students Administrators, Staff and Faculty, Counselors, All students and parents Campus Administration, faculty and staff, counselors, BISD Timeline Formative Evaluation October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012 • • Student Code of Conduct Principal, Assistant Principals, Teachers August 2012 • Written Procedures Presentation Counselors August 2012 • Counselors, Administration October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 August 2012June 2013 • • Campus Administration, faculty and staff, counselors, BISD • • • • School wide discipline Discipline referrals Training Session Agendas Discipline Reports Counselor Referrals After action reviews Sign In sheets 100 Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Step 9.7 Promote student participation in extra-curricular Bil, GT, Pre-AP, activities such as UIL, athletics. Fine arts to AP, Special increase student involvement. Education, Migrant, At Risk, CTE students 9.8 Security Officers are placed and assigned to Administrators, prevent the number of criminal offenses on Campus school grounds and to prevent victimization of Staff & Faculty, students and staff. Counselors Students and Parents 9.9 9.10 Resources Fund/$ Amount Announcements Person(s) Timeline Responsible Sponsors, As scheduled Administration, Counselors, Teachers Administrators, August 2012Principals, Assistant June 2013 Principals, Counselors, Parental Involvement, BISD Police and Security Services. Guidance and counseling will participate in Red Bil, GT, Pre-AP, Administrators, Administrators, October 2012 Ribbon Week activities to promote an awareness AP, Special Principals, Assistant Principals, Assistant of anti – alcohol, tobacco, and drug awareness Education, Principals, Principals, and violence prevention. Migrant, At Risk, Counselors, Teachers Counselors, Teachers CTE students The district will provide training for All Students Webinar Principals, Assistant August 2012administrators and new teachers: Principals, June 2013 (a) to effectively utilize RtI modules (Review Counselors 360) to handle classroom discipline so that out of school suspensions and discretionary removals are used as a last resort; (b) assure students' rights and due process are afforded in order to have a safe and disciplined environment conducive to student learning. Formative Evaluation • Announcements • • Referrals Expulsions • Student participation Student competition Administrators, Principals, Assistant Principals, BISD Police and Security Services. • • • Agenda Sign-in sheets ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 101 (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. (TIII) (TIV) (IEP) (CSR) (BIL) (TIX) (CTE) (HOM) Title III: Federal Bilingual Title IV Innovative Education Class Size Reduction State Bilingual Title IX Career and Technical Education McKinney Homeless Education College Preparation State/BISD Goal: Students will be encouraged and challenged to meet their full educational potential. BISD Annual Performance Objective: The percent of students taking the SAT/ACT will increase by 10% and the percent of students at or above the criterion will increase by 10%. Veterans Memorial HS Campus Goal : Veterans MHS students will take the SAT/ACT will increase by 10% and the percent of students at or above the criterion will increase by 10%. Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Step All students 10.1 PSAT/SAT/THEA/ACT District/campus prep courses will be offered throughout the school year to prepare students for these tests such as the PSAT. Resources Fund/$ Amount PSAT materials SAT materials Person(s) Responsible Principal, Dean, Testing Coordinator Timeline 1st – 5th Six weeks, 2012 2013 Evaluation Formative: Student participation in prep classes Summative: National Merit Finalists from campus 102 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 Integrate aligned curriculum for Pre-AP/AP All high school courses in the core areas of English, math, students science, social studies, and Spanish Language and Literature to improve students passing rates on AP exams. Pre-AP/AP materials, released exams from the College Board, Teachers, Principal, Dean, Testing Coordinator Campus teachers, GT Funds, AP/IB state funds, PreAP/AP local funds, federal funds. Teachers teacher Pre- July 2012 – AP classes June 2013 All Pre-AP/AP secondary teachers will receive Pre-AP/AP Institute training and will maintain on-going training in GT, Pre-AP, AP to enhance teaching skills and better prepare students to pass AP exams. Secondary GT/Pre-AP/AP teachers Hire teachers that are qualified to teach upper level courses. All AP teachers will have their courses approved by the College Board via the College Board Audit process. Dual enrollment teachers will provide opportunities for our high school students to receive college credit. AP teachers Dual Enrollment Students enrolled in a Pre-AP/AP course must be in place for students to remain in the course, so teachers can teach the aligned curriculum and student passing rates will increase on AP exams. All high school Pre-AP/AP teachers, Pre-AP Teachers Pre-AP students Pre-AP/AP enrolled in a Pre- curriculum, campus Pre-AP/AP AP funds Dual Enrollment Registration will be held for all interested students. Campus AP teachers Dual Enrollment teachers Qualified N/A students all grade levels AP Teachers Dual Enrollment Counselors Aug. 2012 – July 2013 Aug. 2012 – March 2013 August 2012December 2012 August 2012 – June 2013 Formative: Curriculum documents Summative: Student Scores Formative: Sign In sheets Summative: Certificate of completion Formative: Syllabus acceptance letter for the College Board Acceptance letter from college Summative: Student AP scores Student final grade Formative: Time sheets for teachers, AP contracts Summative: Student AP Scores Formative: Registration forms Summative: Compass Test 103 10.7 10.8 Guidance and counseling will provide a “University Day” where BISD students will meet representatives from different universities throughout the state and country to make informative decisions about what college to attend. All students Guidance and counseling will have a “College All students Parent Night” where students can learn about any topic related to attending college, so students can make informed decisions regarding college attendance. Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Step 10.9 Guidance and counseling will sponsor a All District high “Scholarship Night at BISD” to inform students of school students available national, state, and local scholarship opportunities. 10.10 Guidance and counseling will sponsor a College and Financial Aid Night to provide student information on admissions, financial aid and scholarship information to increase the number of students qualifying for financial aid. Juniors and Seniors Guidance and Counseling funds Counselors Guidance and Counseling funds Counselors Resources Fund/$ Amount N/A Person(s) Responsible Counselors Guidance and Counseling funds University Financial Aid Officers Counselors September, 2012 September 2012 Timeline November 2012 January 2013 Formative: Sign In Sheets Summative: BISD Guidance and Counseling Program Evaluation form Formative: Sign In Sheets Summative: BISD Guidance and Counseling Program Evaluation form Evaluation Formative: Sign In Sheets Summative: BISD Guidance and Counseling Program Evaluation form Formative: Sign In Sheets Summative: BISD Guidance and Counseling Program Evaluation form 104 ** Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities Parents and Community State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Veterans Memorial HS Campus Goal: Action Step 11.1 Programs/Strategies/Activities The Board of Trustees, in collaboration with District Staff, Administration, Parents, and Community will provide required support and resources for the attainment of educational excellence and equity. Parents will be full partners with educators in the education of their children. There will be a 10% increase of parents involved in campus/district parental involvement activities during each school year. Parents and community will be full partners in education at Veterans Memorial High School. Population Host a “Parent Orientation Day” to informed Parents parents and community members of the daily And Community Resources Fund/$ Amount Title I, Part A funds Person(s) Responsible Parental Involvement Timeline August 2012 October 2012 Evaluation Formative: • Fliers 105 11.2 standard operation procedures: • Student Code of Conduct • Student-Parent-School Compact • Parental Involvement Policy • Emergency Operation Procedures • Parent Volunteer Guidelines and Opportunities • State testing results Coordinator, Parent Trainer, Principals, and Parent Liaisons Complete and disseminate a Parental Parents Involvement Policy to delineate how parents and Community will actively be involved at the district/campus level and to increase participation. Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Step 11.3 Complete and disseminate the Code of Conduct Handbook and School-Parent-Student Compact to ensure student achievement. Population School, Parents, and Students Title I, Part A funds Resources Fund/$ Amount Code of Conduct Handbook, School – Parent – Student Compact March 2013 • • Agendas Sign-In Sheets Summative: Evaluations Parental Involvement Sept. 2012-Dec. Formative: Campus Coordinator, Parent 2012 Parental Involvement Trainer, Principals, Policy and Parent Liaisons Summative: Composite of End of the Year Survey Person(s) Timeline Evaluation Responsible Parental Involvement Sept. 2012- Oct. Formative: • Code of Conduct Coordinator, Parent 2012 Handbooks Trainer, Principals • School-Parent-Student and Parent Liaisons Compact Summative: • Composite of End of the Year Survey 11.4 Conduct an annual Title I Meeting to inform parents and community members of its purpose and how funds are distributed. Parents, Community, Staff, and Faculty Parent Meeting Logs Fliers Agendas Parental Involvement August 2012Coordinator, Parent Oct. 2012 Trainer, Principals, and Parent Liaisons Formative: • Fliers • Agendas • Sign-In Sheets • Handouts 106 11.5 Action Step 11.6 11.7 The Parental Involvement program provides Parents different activities for parents to foster better And communication skills and healthy relationships Community between their children, school and the environment they live in so that in turn it assists students achieve a higher academic success. Types of Parental Involvement are: • Bi-weekly parent meeting and Trainings • Guest Speakers • BISD Events • Health Education through CATCH and FIT • School Programs • BISD resources • Parent surveys • Family Literacy Enrichment Activities Programs/Strategies/Activities Population To increase the participation of Parental School and Involvement, the program requires that Fliers, Parents Invitations, Calendar of Activities be sent to parents and community members to informed them of all upcoming campus and district events. Ensure representation of community and parent involvement in the decision-making process. Parents will participate in the review and/or revision of the following to ensure program requirements are met: • Parental Involvement Policy • School-Parent-Student Compact Parents, Teachers, Students, and Community Members Parent Meeting Logs Agendas Surveys Parental Involvement Coordinator, Parent Trainer, Principals, and Parent Liaisons August 2012May 2013 Resources Person(s) Timeline Fund/$ Amount Responsible Fliers, Marque, Emails Parental August 2012Involvement May 2013 Coordinator, Parent Trainer, Principals, and Parent Liaisons SBDM Committee Members Parental August 2012Involvement May 2013 Coordinator, Parent Trainer, Principals, and Parent Liaisons Summative: Composite of meeting minutes Formative: • Fliers • Calendar of Activities • Agendas • Sign-in sheets • Handouts Summative: Evaluations Evaluation Formative: • Fliers • Invitations • Calendar of Activities Summative: Composite of End of Year Survey Formative: • Fliers • Calendar of Activities • Agendas • Sign-in-Sheets • Handouts 107 11.8 11.9 • SBDM • SHAC • LPAC • DPAC F.I.T./CATCH Program Conduct an annual Title I Survey of Campus Administration and Staff to evaluate the support services provided by the Parental Involvement Department. Recognize parent volunteers with an appreciation certificate for supporting a variety of district/campus activities in order to increase parent participation. Summative: Composite of meeting minutes BISD Employees Parents and Community Surveys and scantrons (LOC) Action Resources Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Step Fund/$ Amount (LOC) 11.10 Every year the Parental Involvement Parent Parent Liaisons Trainers and Parent Liaisons attend the out of district NCLB Conference where we acquire the necessary updated information and training to better conduct all required parent meetings. 11.11 Parent Liaison will order supplies throughout the Parent Liaison (TI) 1900.00 Volunteer Parents school year to ensure that they have the necessary equipment to have a successful parent center. Parental April 2013 Involvement Coordinator and Parent Trainer, Principals and Parent Liaisons Parental August 2012Involvement May 2013 Coordinator, Parent Trainer, Principals, and Parent Liaisons Person(s) Timeline Responsible Parental Involvement August 2012Coordinator, Parent May 2013 Trainer, Principals, Parent Liaisons Parent Trainer, Principals, Parent Liaisons Formative: Survey Results Summative: Composite of Survey Results Formative: • Contact Log • Sign-in Sheet • Volunteer Listing Summative: • End of Year Survey Results Certificate of Appreciation Evaluation Formative: Handouts Summative: Evaluation October 2012 Formative: Handouts November 2012 January 2013 Summative: Evaluation March 2013 April 2013 **Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education Funding codes must include 108 (MI) (LEP) (SE) (AR) (GT) (DYS) Title I-C Migrant Limited English Proficient Special Education At-Risk Gifted and Talented Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. (LOC) (TI) (TIA) (TIC) (TII) (TIII) (TIV) (IEP) (CSR) (BIL) (TIX) (CTE) (HOM) Local Title I Title I: Parents and Community Title I-C: Migrant Title II Title III: Federal Bilingual Title IV Innovative Education Class Size Reduction State Bilingual Title IX Career and Technical Education McKinney Homeless Education actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 109 Technology State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Veterans Memorial HS Campus Goal: Action Step 12.1 12.2 12.3 Programs/Strategies/Activities Funds will be allocated in order to provide materials and equipment for CTE course offerings. Add career specific courses to curriculum to meet the demand of student needs. Increase the number of students enrolled in CTE courses and CTSO’s by 15% each year. Our vision for technology is to have all district stakeholders involved in the teaching and learning process seamlessly integrate technology to make informed decisions and advance student achievement and technology literacy to encourage and support creative, innovative, lifelong learning. All schools will be at Advanced Tech level in all four key areas of the Star Chart. All Career and Technical Education (CTE) students will have the opportunity to take courses that will provide a variety of career choices. Population CTE Students CTE Students CTE Students Resources Fund/$ Amount CTE Funds CTE Funds CTE Funds Person(s) Responsible CTE Administrator, CTE Lead Teacher CTE Administrator, CTE Lead Teacher CPO, Counselors Dean of Instruction, Principal CTE Teachers, CTE Lead Teacher CPO, Counselors Timeline October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 Evaluation Formative: • CTE Teacher Input • Teacher Observation • Student Success Summative: • CTE Budget Report • Bi-Tech PRs Formative: • Student Tallies • Class Rosters Summative: • Student Schedules • Master Schedule Formative: • Student Tallies • CTSO Membership Rosters Summative: • Master Schedule • CTSD Membership Rosters 110 Action Step 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 Programs/Strategies/Activities Fund the replacement of all computers in the CTE computer labs to increase student participation. Population CTE Students Administer interest inventory survey to CTE CTE Students students. Provide all students with age appropriate CTE information and guidance for a better understanding of career choices. Resources Fund/$ Amount CTE Funds CTE Funds Bilingual, ESL, CTE Funds Mig, Sp. Ed., GT Dyslexia, Pre AP, AP, At Risk Middle school and high school classroom Bilingual, ESL, CTE Funds demonstrations/presentations of common career Mig, choices. Sp. Ed., GT Dyslexia, Pre AP, AP, At Risk Person(s) Responsible CTE Administrator, CTE Lead Teacher Career Placement Officer CTE Advisory Committees, CTE Teachers, CTE Lead Teacher, CPO, Counselors, CTE Teachers CPO Timeline August 2012 – May 2013 September 2012 – May 2013 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2012 August 2012 – June 2013 Evaluation Formative: Three-year Rotation Schedule Summative: • CTE Budget Report • Bi-Tech PRs Formative: • Kuder Navigator • Completion of Surveys • CTE Teacher Input • Student Input Summative: Kuder Navigator Report Formative: • Flyers • Brochures • Sign-In Sheets Summative: Post Grad career choices Formative: • PowerPoint Presentations • Schedule of Presentations • Sign-In Sheets Summative: • 100% of students have a career choice • Declaration of Intent 111 Action Resources Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Step Fund/$ Amount 12.8 Ensure the learning needs of students in CTE Bilingual, ESL, CTE Funds programs are met, including CTE students with Mig, disabilities, students with limited English Sp. Ed., GT proficiency (LEP), and other students who are at Dyslexia, Pre AP, risk of failing or dropping out of school AP, At Risk Person(s) Responsible CTE Administrator, CTE Lead Teacher CPO, CTE Teachers Integration of core subjects (i.e., reading, writing, Bilingual, ESL, CTE Funds mathematics, social studies, and science) into Mig, CTE courses Sp. Ed., GT Dyslexia, Pre AP, AP, At Risk Principal, Dean , Assistant Principals, CTE Lead Teacher CTE Teachers Improvement in the cable network, wireless infrastructure and instructional work stations as we move closer to a 1 to 1 solution for our students. Principal, Dean , Assistant Principals, 12.9 12.10 Bilingual, ESL, Mig, Sp. Ed., GT Dyslexia, Pre AP, AP, At Risk Local funds **Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV Timeline October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2012 Evaluation Formative: • ARD • CTE Teacher Input • CTE Program Evaluations Summative: Ongoing Formative: • Walk-Throughs • CTE Lead Teacher Observations • Lesson Plans Summative: • Walk-Through Forms • PDAS • CTE Program Evaluation Formative: • Observations Summative: Cable installation Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 112 All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. (IEP) (CSR) (BIL) (TIX) (CTE) (HOM) Innovative Education Class Size Reduction State Bilingual Title IX Career and Technical Education McKinney Homeless Education 113 Migrant Education State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Veterans Memorial HS Campus Goal: Migrant students will be challenged and encouraged to meet state content standards and assessments that are necessary to graduate on time and enroll in post secondary education while receiving additional supplemental support in order to overcome the obstacles encountered due to their migrant lifestyle. 90% of BISD migrant students will participate in the supplemental instructional activitie support services as required by the Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program (MEP). 100% of our migrant students will participate in the supplemental activities and support. Campus Objectives/Summative Evaluation Test Data Grade Level EOC Grade 9 TAKS Grade 10 TAKS Grade 11 Subject Area Subgroup Reading Math Reading/ELA Math Science Social Studies Reading/ELA Math Science Social Studies All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant All Students/Migrant Current Mastery 2010-2012 88% 78% 100% 100% 67% 74% * * * * Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended 80/90/25 75/90/25 80/90/25 75/90/25 90 90 80/90/25 75/90/25 90 90 Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) Note: Data listed as percentages 114 Test Data Grade Level Attendance Rate Dropout Rate Completion Rate Cohort Class 4 YR 5 YR Graduation Rate Cohort Class 4 YR 5 YR Subject Area 9-12 Grades 9-12 Grades Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Subgroup All Students Migrant All Students Migrant All Students Migrant All Students Migrant All Students Migrant All Students Migrant Current Mastery 2010-2012 * * * * * * * * * * * * Accountability Standard AYP/State/ Commended Actual Mastery 2012-2013 Gain/Loss (% Points) 95.0 Not Applicable 95.0 95.0 90.0 90.0 Note: Data listed as percentages 115 Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Step 13.1 Migrant clerks will attend the annual intensive Identification and Recruitment (ID & R) training in order to secure the most current information needed to appropriately assist with the campus identification and requirement initiative. 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 Population Migrant Campus Clerk Resources Person(s) Fund/$ Amount Responsible Region One ESC Migrant Campus Migrant Staff Clerk Region One State Migrant Service Trained ID & R Coordinator (MSC) Specialist Migrant Campus clerk will attend the required New Generation System (NGS) state required training in order to secure the needed skills to accurately and appropriately in put the data for migrant students into the state data base. Migrant Campus Region One ESC NGS Clerk State Trainer Migrant Campus Clerk Migrant Service Coordinator (MSC) Migrant Campus clerk will assist with the ID & R Residency Verification initiative in order to ensure that all migrant students at our campus are picked up in a timely manner. Migrant Students Migrant Campus Clerk Migrant Clerk will distribute migrant information Teachers, and currently enrolled listing to all teachers and Administrators administrators in order to facilitate pertinent information in a timely manner. PFS student will be provided with calculators, on PFS Migrant a need basis in order to ensure that students Students have the necessary tools to complete their assignments. NGS Currently Enrolled Report NGS Currently Enrolled Report (TIC) 20,425.00 NGS PFS Report Local Funds Title I, Part C Funds Campus Migrant Clerk Campus Migrant Clerk Timeline August 2012 September 2012 Evaluation Formative: ID & R Training Summative: • Texas Education Agency (TEA) • ID & R Certificates Formative: NGS Annual Training Summative: • Texas Education Agency (TEA) • NGS Certificates September 1, Formative: 2012 Thru • NGS Residency • Verification Reports November 1, • NGS Mass Enrollment 2012 Report Summative: Student Names on NGS Currently Enrolled Report September 23 – Formative: Last day of June 3 each month September 2012 – February 2013 Summative: Migrant Clerk Evaluation. Formative: Migrant Student Needs Summative: • Documentation Log • NGS Number and Signature • Student Report Cards 116 Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Population Step 13.6 PFS students will be provided with clothing All PFS Migrant (sweaters, jeans, and socks, shoes) as needed in Students order to assist them with the necessities that will ensure their school attendance. 13.7 13.8 13.9 All PFS students will be monitored closely in regards to grades, attendance and behavior to ensure academic success and have timely attention and appropriate interventions. All PFS Migrant Students Migrant students will be provided with the basic All Migrant school supplies throughout the school year to Students ensure that they have the necessary tools to complete their school assignments. Items will be distributed to migrant students on an as needed basis. Campus Migrant Clerk will hold meeting once Migrant each semester to foster parental involvement and provide Migrant parents with important information on campus migrant program opportunities and how to better support their children academically. Resources Fund/$ Amount Local Funds Title I, Part C Funds Person(s) Responsible Campus Migrant Clerk PFS Report, Progress Campus Migrant Report, Grade Speed, Clerk, Teacher Attendance Referrals Counselor Timeline Evaluation Formative: Migrant September Student Needs Survey 2012 – Results February 2013 Summative: • Documentation Log • NGS Number and Signature Student Report Cards February 19, 2013 Formative: • Parent Permission Form • Appropriate School form Summative: • Leadership Conference • Evaluation Form Formative: Migrant Student Needs NGS Enrollments Listing, Local Funds, (TIC) $2420.00 Campus Migrant Clerk August 23 – June 4 NGS Report, Administration, Parent Liaison, Computer, Printer, Phone, Misc, Office supplies (TIC) $100.00 Campus Migrant Clerk October 14, 2012 and February 17, 2013 Summative: • Documentation log • NGS Number and Signature Formative: • Fliers • Parent reminder calls • Distribution log Summative: • Meeting Evaluation • Sign in Form 117 Action Programs/Strategies/Activities Step 13.10 Migrant students will be provided with a backpack on an as needed basis in order to ensure that students carry all required student assignments and materials. Population All Migrant Students Resources Fund/$ Amount NGS Currently Enrolled Report Person(s) Responsible Campus Migrant Clerk **Add or delete Action Steps as needed. Key Codes for Special Populations (TI) Economically Disadvantaged (MI) Title I-C Migrant (LEP) Limited English Proficient (SE) Special Education (AR) At-Risk (GT) Gifted and Talented (DYS) Dyslexia All Students includes Regular, LEP, Special Ed., At-Risk, etc. Key Codes for Funding (SCE) State Compensatory Education (LOC) Local (TI) Title I (TIA) Title I: Parents and Community (TIC) Title I-C: Migrant (TII) Title II (TIII) Title III: Federal Bilingual (TIV) Title IV (IEP) Innovative Education (CSR) Class Size Reduction (BIL) State Bilingual (TIX) Title IX (CTE) Career and Technical Education (HOM) McKinney Homeless Education Timeline Evaluation September 23 – Formative: Last day of June 3 each month Summative: Migrant Clerk Evaluation. Funding codes must include actual dollar amounts Include Professional Development and or Special Education CAP Strategies in the activities 118 Appendix A: AYP Addendum Committee Members Maria T. Zavala, Parent Maria I. Villarreal, BLA Cindy Ortiz, Faulk MS Josie C. Villarreal, Putegnat Elementary Dane Babcock, Rivera HS Elizabeth C. Rojas, Paredes, Elementary Denise Hinojosa, Porter HS Rosie S. Gorena, Lopez HS Facilitators Raul Vasquez, Administrator for Assessment, Research and Evaluation Ben Estrada, AYP Compliance Coordinator Meeting Date November 3, 2009 (Proposed and Approved November 16, 2009) Revision and Inclusion Activities Special Services Department (Proposed and Approved September 20, 2010) 119 Basic Skills Area: Language Arts The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in Reading and Writing the English Language. A minimum of 90% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS Reading, Writing, and Language Arts tests. State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 1 Activity All Special Education students in BISD will increase oral language skills to develop listening/speaking, reading/writing proficiency • Presentations • Retelling • Personal oral discussion • Speaking opportunities to use new vocabulary in context Population PK-12 Special Education Students • • • • • • • • • • • Resources/ Source SIOP TEKS Reading First Modified Reading materials Modified Writing materials Accelerated Reader Study Island TAKS/EOC released tests State adopted textbook resources Eduphoria Martha Morales Reading Program Person(s) Responsible • Administrator for Curriculum & Instruction • C& I Reading Specialists • Librarians • Special Services • • • • Department Principals Facilitators/Deans Special Education Teachers PK-12 teachers Timeline August 1, 2012 May 31, 2013 Evaluation • Benchmark • • • • • testing Reading Fluency Monitoring Teacher observations Progress grades Accelerated Reader tests *AYP Stage 1 Requirement 120 Basic Skills Area: Language Arts The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in Reading and Writing the English Language. A minimum of 90% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC Reading, Writing, and Language Arts tests. State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 2 Activity Special Education students in BISD will participate in TEKSappropriate modified/ accommodated tutorials to improve overall Reading and Writing skills. Population PK-12 Special Education Students • • • • • • • Resources/ Source SIOP TEKS Reading First TEKSappropriate modified/ accommodated Reading materials TEKSappropriate modified/ accommodated Writing materials Accelerated Reader Martha Morales Reading Program • • • • • • • • • Person(s) Responsible Administrator for Curriculum & Instruction C & I Reading Specialists Reading First Coaches Special Services Department Principals Facilitators/Deans Special Education Teachers PK-12 teachers Librarian Timeline August 1, 2012 May 31, 2013 Evaluation • Benchmark testing • Reading • Fluency Monitoring • Teacher observations • Progress grades • Accelerated Reader tests *AYP Stage 1 Requirement 121 Basic Skills Area: Math The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of mathematics. BISD Annual Performance Objective: A minimum of 90% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC mathematics exam. State/BISD Goal: Action Steps Activities Activity 3 Implement an integrated challenging, standards-based, inquiry-centered math curriculum with necessary TEKSappropriate modified / accommodated for Special Education students as demonstrated through: • CSCOPE (K-12) Population Resources/ Person(s) Responsible Timeline Evaluation Source • Unique Learning Systems (Life Skills) PK-12 Special Education Students • Categorical • Administrator for Curriculum & funds Instruction • TEKS • C & I Math • Framework Specialists • TEKS- appropriate • Special Services modified / • • • • accommodated materials State adopted textbook resources Graphing calculators AEIS-IT Manipulatives and Instructional Materials • • • • Department Principals Facilitators/Deans Special Education Teachers PK-12 teachers August 1, 2012 May 31, 2013 • Benchmark testing • Teacher observations • Progress grades • Analysis of student work • 5 “E” model Assessment *AYP Stage 1 Requirement 122 Basic Skills Area: Math The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of mathematics. BISD Annual Performance Objective: A minimum of 90% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC mathematics exam. State/BISD Goal: Action Steps Activity 4 Activity Special Education students in BISD will participate in TEKSappropriate modified / accommodated tutorials to improve overall mathematics skills. Population PK-12 Special Education Students • • • • • • • • Resources/ Source Categorical funds TEKS Frameworks TEKSappropriate modified / accommodated materials State adopted textbook resources Graphing calculators Eduphoria Manipulatives and Instructional Materials • • • • • • • Person(s) Responsible Administrator for Curriculum & Instruction C & I Math Specialists Special Services Department Principals Facilitators/Deans Special Education Teachers PK-12 teachers Timeline August 1, 2012 May 31, 2013 Evaluation • Benchmark testing • Teacher observations • Progress grades • Analysis of student work • 5 “E” model Assessment *AYP Stage 1 Requirement 123 Basic Skills Areas: Language Arts and Math State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 5 Activity Population BISD Personnel (Principals, ARD Chairperson, Diagnosticians, Supervisors, Assessment Dept.) will participate in staff development that focuses on dissecting Assessment data to determine the percentage of students tested on TAKS/EOC, TAKS-A, TAKS/EOCM, and TAKS/EOCALT. Principals, ARD Chairpersons, Diagnosticians, Supervisors, Assessment Dept. The students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA. 100% of BISD students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA in the ARDC DecisionMaking Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual. Resources/ Source • District TAKS/EOC data • State TAKS/EOC data • AYP data • AEIS-IT • • • • Person(s) Responsible Assessment Department Special Services Department Principals ARD Chairpersons Timeline August 1, 2012 May 31, 2013 Evaluation • Analysis of Student Data 124 Basic Skills Areas: Language Arts and Math State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 6 Activity BISD Personnel (Principals, ARD Chairperson, Diagnosticians, Supervisors, Assessment Dept.) will participate in the workshop entitled “ARD DecisionMaking Process Including Accommodations and Grade Placement to Support Students” provided by Region One via TETN at CAB. Population Principals, ARD Chairpersons, Diagnosticians, Supervisors, Assessment Dept. The students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA. 100% of BISD students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA in the ARDC DecisionMaking Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual. Resources/ Source • Region One • ARD Committee Decision-Making Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual • • • • • Person(s) Responsible Assessment Department Special Services Department Principals ARD Chairpersons Region One Timeline October 5, 2012 And October 13, Evaluation • 100% of campuses in attendance monitored by sign in sheets 2012 125 Basic Skills Areas: Language Arts and Math State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 7 Activity Population BISD Personnel (Assessment Department in conjunction with Special Services) will monitor the percentage of students that are projected to take TAKS/EOC, TAKS-A, TAKS/EOC-M, and TAKS/EOC-Alt per campus. Assessment and Special Education departments. The students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA. 100% of BISD students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA in the ARDC DecisionMaking Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual. Resources/ Source • Reports from IEPplus • ARD documentation • ARDC DecisionMaking Manual Person(s) Responsible • Assessment Department • Special Services Department Timeline August 23, 2012 – June 02, 2013 Evaluation • Reports 126 Basic Skills Areas: Language Arts and Math State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 8 Activity BISD Personnel (Assessment Department in conjunction with Special Services) will meet with campus personnel with disproportionate percentage of students that are projected to take TAKS/EOC, TAKS-A, TAKS/EOCM, and TAKS/EOCAlt. The students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA. 100% of BISD students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA in the ARDC DecisionMaking Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual. Population Resources/ Source Assessment and • Reports from Special IEPplus Education • ARD departments, documentation Principals, • ARDC DecisionARD Making Manual Chairpersons, Diagnosticians, Supervisors • • • • Person(s) Responsible Assessment Department Special Services Department Campus Principal ARD Chairperson Timeline August 23, 2012 – June 02, 2013 Evaluation • Reports 127 Basic Skills Areas: Language Arts and Math State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 9 Activity Special Education Supervisor, ARD Chair, and Special Education Teacher, Facilitator/Dean of Instruction will review and analyze student specific data to analyze TAKS/EOC objectives and expectations to optimize instructional planning. Population Special Education Supervisor, Special Education Teacher, and Facilitator/ Dean The students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA. 100% of BISD students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA in the ARDC DecisionMaking Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual. Resources/ Source • Confidential Student Reports • Eduphoria Person(s) Responsible • Special Education Supervisors • Special Education Teachers • Facilitators/Dean Timeline Evaluation August 23, 2012 – June 02, 2013 • Campus Special Education Department meetings sign in sheets 128 Basic Skills Areas: Language Arts and Math The students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA. 100% of BISD students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA in the ARDC DecisionMaking Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual. State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 10 Activity Special Education Supervisors in conjunction with Curriculum Specialists will maximize contact with Special Education teachers to support the implementation of research-based teaching strategies. Population Special Education Supervisors and Curriculum Specialists • • • • • • • Resources/ Source CSCOPE TEKS Frameworks TEKSappropriate Modified/ accommodated materials State adopted textbook resources Eduphoria Manipulatives and Instructional Materials • • • • Person(s) Responsible Assessment Department Special Services Department Campus Principal ARD Chairperson Timeline August 23, 2012 – June 02, 2013 Evaluation • Reports 129 Basic Skills Areas: Language Arts and Math The students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA. 100% of BISD students in Special Education will be assessed by the appropriate state assessment using the policies and procedures outlined by TEA in the ARDC DecisionMaking Process for the Texas Assessment Program Manual. State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Action Steps Activity 11 Activity Special Education Supervisor, Curriculum Specialists, Facilitator/Dean of Instruction will provide professional development and support in the following areas: • CSCOPE Population Special Education Teachers • • • • • Resources/ Source Confidential Student Reports Eduphoria Professional Development Dept. Region One ESC TEKS • • • • Person(s) Responsible Special Education Supervisors Curriculum Specialists Special Education Teachers Facilitators/Dean Timeline Evaluation August 23, 2012 – June 02, 2013 • Campus Special Education Department meetings sign in sheets • Evidence of Implementation of CSCOPE • English Language Arts and Reading Standards (ELARS) • Mathematics Standards • District Writing Plan • Technology Resources 130 Appendix B: Financial Budget and Personnel Worksheets Fund Function 11 Instruction Function 12 Library Function 13 Prof Dev Function 23 Admin Function 31 Guidance Function 33 Health Function 36 Co-Curr Function 51 Maintenance Function 61 Parental Inv Total 199 Local 3,164,78 59,377 19,000 942,550 41,050 32,206 133,616 372,601 0 4,765,187 162 State Comp 36,430 0 59,145 44,732 72,630 0 0 0 0 212,937 163 State Bil 23,520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23,520 164 State Voc 535,711 0 57,661 0 57,336 0 43,800 0 0 694,508 165 Athletics 0 0 0 0 0 0 383,706 0 0 383,706 166 State Sp Ed 399,836 0 0 63,292 0 0 0 0 0 463,128 (TI) ESEA Title I 139,243 27,023 2,500 0 0 21,471 0 2,000 37,881 230,118 3,135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,597 17,732 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 224 Idea B 31,028 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,028 244 Voc Ed Basic 196,552 0 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 198,552 212 ESEA Title I Part C 216 School Imp Program 131 Appendix B: Financial Budget and Personnel Worksheets Fund Function 11 Instruction Function 12 Library Function 13 Staff Dev Function 23 Admin Function 31 Guidance Function 33 Health Function 36 Co-Curr Function 51 Maintenance Function 61 Parental Inv Total 255 TPTR 0 0 4,992 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,992 262 EETT 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 71,051 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71,051 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 411 Tech 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 428 HS Allot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 4,901,293 86,400 145,298 1,050,574 171,016 53,677 561,122 374,601 52,478 7,096,459 263 ESEA Title III 286 TTIPS Grant % of Total Budget Total Capital Outlay Total Cert. FTE’s Total Class. FTE’s 132 2012-2013 Special Programs Personnel for Veterans Memorial High School Position Reading Teacher Parent Liaison Library Aide Dyslexia Aide Migrant Clerk Career Technology Teacher Career Technology Teacher Hall Monitor Career and Technology Special Education Local Dean of Instruction Counselor At-Risk Dropout Prevention Specialist Program (TI)A (TI)A (TI)A (TI)A (TI)A 164 (80%), 199 (20%) 164 (50%), 199 (50%) 199 (60%), (TI) (40%) 164 166 199 162 162 162 FTE 1.000 2.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 2.0 3.0 13.00 9.0 78.00 1.000 1.000 1.000 133 Veterans Memorial High School Monitoring Instrument As part of the school improvement process, instruction is modified as needed to address the targeted objectives of each subject area. Campus administration encourages all teachers to develop their lesson plans to reflect the posted daily objectives and to follow a systematic schedule developed by teacher teams and the district adopted CSCOPE curriculum. District and campus benchmarks, state mandated assessment scores, TELPAS scores and other data is disaggregated to ensure that instruction is tailored to meet student strengths and weaknesses. Re-teaching is approached by presenting the content using alternative instructional methods and strategies. In addition, all teachers are expected to incorporate the 5 E Model and Sheltered Instructional strategies in their daily lessons in order to emphasize language and content objectives. Furthermore, an educational intervention program for newly arrived immigrants provides language development and support activities prior to entering traditional courses. Instructional timelines that demonstrate expected mastery pace have been established, and the campus plan activities are periodically reviewed and updated by department members, using the attached form. Planning and training activities are continuously monitored by the Principal, Dean of Instruction, and Primary Appraisers to ensure teacher collaboration and implementation of campus initiatives. A classroom observation (Walk Through) schedule has been developed to monitor instruction and ensure implementation of curriculum requirements and effectiveness. 134 Language Arts State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Action Step Implementation The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in reading and writing the English language. A minimum of 90% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC Reading, Writing, and Language Arts tests. A minimum of 40% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate Commended Performance on the TAKS/EOC Reading, Writing and ELA tests. A minimum of 90% of our Veterans Memorial students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC Reading, Writing, and Language Arts test. A minimum of 45% of our Veterans Memorial students will demonstrate Commended Performance on TAKS/EOC, Reading, Writing and Language Arts. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) 135 Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet Activity Action Step 1.6 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: P Did not meet 1.7 1.8 1.9 IP P P Did not meet 1.10 1.11 IP C Met 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 IP IP IP IP 136 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 137 Mathematics State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 2.1 Action Step Implementation The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of mathematics. A minimum of 90% of our BISD students tested will demonstrate minimum passing standards with 30% of these students obtaining a commended performance level on the TAKS/EOC Mathematics Exam. A minimum of 90% of our Veterans Memorial students tested will demonstrate mastery on the TAKS/EOC Mathematics test and 40% will obtain a commended performance level. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: C Did not meet 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) 138 Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet Activity Action Step 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: P IP IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 139 Science State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 3.1 Action Step Implementation The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of science. A minimum of 90% of students taking the TAKS/EOC science exam will demonstrate mastery. A minimum of 25% of students taking the TAKS/EOC science exam will achieve commended performance. A minimum of 90% of our Veterans Memorial students taking TAKS/EOC science exam will demonstrate mastery. A minimum of 30% of students taking TAKS/EOC science exams will achieve commended performance. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: C Did not meet 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 IP P P IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. 140 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet Activity Action Step 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 141 Social Studies State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 4.1 Action Step Implementation The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the area of social studies. A minimum of 90% of BISD students tested will demonstrate minimum passing Standards with 45% of the students tested will obtain Commended Performance on the Social Studies TAKS/EOC Assessment. Veterans Memorial students will demonstrate a minimum of passing standards by 50% or higher on obtaining Commended Performance on the Social Studies TAKS/EOC assessment. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: C Did not meet 4.2 C Meet 4.3 4.4 4.5 IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) 142 Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet Activity Action Step 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP P IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 143 Health and Physical Education State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Action Step Implementation The students in the public education system will be provided with educational opportunities that address safety, health, nutrition, substance abuse, and violence prevention. Improve in the overall wellness of the students, staff as well as community members by promoting awareness of healthy lifestyles. Veterans Memorial will improve in the overall wellness of the students, staff as well as community members by promoting healthy lifestyles and awareness. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP C Did not meet Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. 144 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet Activity Action Step 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 145 Fine Arts State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 6.1 Action Step Implementation The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in instrumental music, choral music, visual arts, theatre arts, and dance. A minimum of 90% of our fine arts students will meet performance standards in all fine arts areas with 92% meeting commended performance. A minimum of 90% of our fine arts students will meet performance standards in all fine arts areas with 95% meeting commended performance. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: C Meet 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 146 Activity Action Step 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP P IP P P P P P C Meet 6.15 P 147 6.16 6.17 6.18 6.19 6.20 6.21 6.22 6.23 6.24 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd 4th 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: P P P IP P P P IP C Did not meet 6.25 P Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 148 At-Risk State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 Action Step Implementation Through enhanced dropout efforts, all students will remain in school until they obtain a high school diploma and/or pursue a post-secondary education. All campuses will develop prevention and intervention strategies that will support reducing the dropout rate to less than 1% in Middle School, increase the High School Completion Rate to 95%, and increase the Graduation Rate to 75%. Our campus will have a dropout rate of 1.0% or less. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP C Did not meet Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 149 Activity Action Step 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.16 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP 150 7.17 7.18 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP 7.19 C 7.20 IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 151 Attendance State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 Action Step Implementation The students will be encouraged and challenged to meet their full educational potential. Increase the student attendance rates for all district schools 98.5% for elementary schools, 96% for middle schools, and 95% for high schools. Increase our attendance rate to 97%. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 152 Activity Action Step Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure 2nd: 8.6 Spring 2013 4th: IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 153 Discipline Management/Safe and Drug Free Schools State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 9.1 9.2 Action Step Implementation School campuses will maintain a safe and disciplined environment conducive to student learning. Discipline referrals (office referrals, removals and expulsions, to Brownsville Academic Center TAP/PTP and JJAEP) will decrease by 5%. Our campus will maintain a safe and disciplined environment conducive to student learning and decrease student referral to BAC by 3%. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP C Met 9.3 C Met 9.4 C Met 9.5 IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 154 Activity Action Step 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP C Met Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 155 College Preparation State/BISD Goal: Students will be encouraged and challenged to meet their full educational potential. BISD Annual Performance Objective: The percent of students taking the SAT/ACT will increase by 10% and the percent of students at or above the criterion will increase by 10%. Campus Performance Objective: Veterans MHS students will take the SAT/ACT will increase by 10% and the percent of students at or above the criterion will increase by 10%. Activity Action Step 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 156 Activity Action Step 10.6 10.7 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP C Met 10.8 10.9 10.10 P P P Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 157 Parents and Community State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 11.1 11.2 11.3 Action Step Implementation The Board of Trustees, in collaboration with District Staff, Administration, Parents, and Community will provide required support and resources for the attainment of educational excellence and equity. Parents will be full partners with educators in the education of their children. There will be a 10% increase of parents involved in campus/district parental involvement activities during each school year. Parents and community will be full partners in education at Veterans Memorial High School. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP C Met 11.4 11.5 P P Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. 158 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet Activity Action Step 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.10 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 159 Technology State/BISD Goal: Our vision for technology is to have all district stakeholders involved in the teaching and learning process seamlessly integrate technology to make informed decisions and advance student achievement and technology literacy to encourage and support creative, innovative, lifelong learning. BISD Annual Performance Objective: All schools will be at Advanced Tech level in all four key areas of the Star Chart. Campus Performance Objective: All Career and Technical Education (CTE) students will have the opportunity to take courses that will provide a variety of career choices. Activity Action Step 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 160 Activity Action Step 12.6 12.7 12.8 12.9 12.10 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 161 Migrant Education State/BISD Goal: BISD Annual Performance Objective: Campus Performance Objective: Activity Action Step 13.1 Action Step Implementation Migrant students will be challenged and encouraged to meet state content standards and assessments that are necessary to graduate on time and enroll in post secondary education while receiving additional supplemental support in order to overcome the obstacles encountered due to their migrant lifestyle. 90% of BISD migrant students will participate in the supplemental instructional activitie support services as required by the Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program (MEP). 100% of our migrant students will participate in the supplemental activities and support. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative and Summative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: C Did not meet 13.2 C Did not meet 13.3 13.4 13.5 IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. 162 Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet Activity Action Step 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.9 13.10 Action Step Implementation Formative Progress Evaluation Measure Fall 2012 Formative and Summative Progress Evaluation Measure Spring 2013 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: 2nd: 4th: IP IP IP IP IP Identify Action Step Implementation: Pending (P); In Progress (IP); Completed (C) Note: In April 2013, indicate the anticipated date of completion for the action step by inserting completion date. Formative Progress Evaluation Measure: Met or Did Not Meet 163