Aquacultura – o novo período Neolítico
Transcription
Aquacultura – o novo período Neolítico
Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente Às quartas, às 17h Aquacultura – o novo período Neolítico http://goodclam.org/apa João Gomes Ferreira Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal Lisboa, 6 de Março 2013 Talk outline • The new Neolithic – food from the sea (4) • Sustainability and carrying capacity (10) • Virtual tools for aquaculture (10) • New ideas, going offshore? (4) • What about Portugal? The FORWARD project (17) • Synthesis (1) http://goodclam.org/apa Trends in fisheries and aquaculture Live weight (106 tonnes per year) 65 60 Capture fisheries for human consumption September 2011 55 50 r² = 0.99, p<0.01 45 40 2003 Data points Extrapolation Aquaculture 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Year Equivalent to the emergence of agriculture 10,000 years ago in the Neolithic period Aquaculture in Europe and the world Volume and value Fast (FAO) facts • 90% of the 68 million tonnes (Mt) of aquaculture products (105 billion USD) originate from Asia (Sorgeloos) • Production of striped catfish Pangasius in the Mekong delta is >1 Mt y-1, highest yields in the world, 350-400 tonnes ha-1 per crop (Sena da Silva) • 30 Mt y-1 of extra aquatic products required to feed the planet by 2050 (Swaminathan) • US predicted expansion from 0.5 to 1.5 Mt y-1 (Olin) • Europe: production is 4.2% by volume, 9.1% by value (Sorgeloos) Growth of both population and aquaculture will take place in developing nations. Aquaculture in Europe Sustainability and legislation Environmental, legal, and social pressures • Aquaculture is the most heavily regulated food production sector in Europe (Varadi) • Competition for space, access to capital, availability of special services, limited authorised veterinary products (Varadi) • Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) – no reference to aquaculture. Benthic biodiversity, fish (in transitional waters); Good Ecological Status in Europe by 2015 • Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2008/56/EC) – Fish and Shellfish Quality Descriptor (QD3). Aquaculture is seen only as a pressure. Good Environmental Status by 2020 • Many other parts of the world don’t come close to the EU regulatory panorama In all likelihood Europe will add value over volume. Imports to Europe If European consumption was at the level of Portugal (57.4 kg y-1 per capita) an extra 27 Mt of fish products would be required annually. Courtesy P. Sorgeloos, 2010, FAO GCA plenary address, Thailand. Sustainability criteria: foundation in classical ecology Current global criteria for site selection Expansion of aquaculture has historically been a bottom-up process Licensing or development • Space availability • Limits to production • Habitat destruction • Coastal eutrophication • Organic enrichment • Loss of biodiversity Environmental basis varies widely Reservoir culture in Mae Tak reservoir, Chiangrai, Thailand Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus Pond culture in Chiangrai, Thailand Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus Annual production (ton) Aquaculture growth in Brazil (1994-2009) 140000 120000 100000 80000 21 % annualized growth 60000 40000 20000 0 • • • 1995 1997 1999 Typical production 250 cages per hectare 200 kg m-3, 6 m3 cages: 2001 2003 2005-1 2007 -1 cycle 300 ton ha 2009 Many reservoirs are used for tilapia cultivation – steel cages keep the piranhas at bay; Typical culture practice: stocking density of up to 300 kg m-3, harvest at 800 g after a 9 month growth period; Carrying capacity is determined as 1/6 of the total allowable phosphorus (30 g L-1), determined using the Dillon & Rigler (1974) model. High growth, high impact, fragile assessment Over carrying capacity farming An extreme case study of cage farming in Sandu Bay (Zhang, 2008) Yellow croaker Zhu, 2010 Rapid overstocking… • Yellow croaker cage farming was started in Sandu Bay in 1995, 1000 fish cages in Qingshan, 1996. • 50,000 fish cages in Qingshan, (260, 000 fish cages in the whole Sandu Bay,) 2005 • Carrying capacity research indicated 40% of the cages should be removed in 2005, but things remain unchanged. Zhu, 2010 Zhu, 2010 Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture (the gospel according to FAO) Three principles • Aquaculture should be developed in the context of ecosystem functions and services (including biodiversity) with no degradation of these beyond their resilience; • Aquaculture should improve human-well being and equity for all relevant stakeholders; • Aquaculture should be developed in the context of other sectors, policies and goals. Soto, 2010 EAA: ecosystem balance, social equity, multiple uses Different types of carrying capacity for aquaculture US, Europe, Canada Types of carrying capacity Production Southeast Asia, China Limiting factor Ecological Governance Limiting factor Social Different parts of the world see carrying capacity in very different ways From technologies to tools Example: Stage 1. Circulation model – connected systems • Larval dispersal; •Diesease; •Xenobiotics. Belfast Lough Strangford Lough Northern Ireland Republic of Ireland Irish Sea Carlingford Lough Case study – AkvaVis expert system • Applied for mussel and finfish farming • Three modules share the same databases but apply information for different purposes • Siting module identifies potential farm sites, simulates carrying capacity • Management module compiles information needed by the authorities for aquaculture management • Application module promotes efficient application and ensures that all relevant information is provided Norwegian fjords, site selection Ervik A, Døskeland I, Hageberg A.A., Strand, Ø., and Hansen P.K. in prep. Virtual decision support tool (AkvaVis) for integrated planning and management in aquaculture. Puget Sound – NW United States Samish Island Manila clam farm at low tide (it is under 8-10 feet of water at high tide) 3 year crop cycle, annual production ~35-45 mt Simulation of clam live weight with Samish Island environmental drivers Negative scope for growth in winter 30 Live weight (g) 25 20 15 Aquashell model 2009 plant - preharvest June 2010 seed 2011 seed 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Julian Day The AquaShell model shows a good fit to project data for live weight. 1400 Manila clam growth model (AquaShell) Mass balance Simulation of Manila clam growth using Samish Island drivers provides outputs on production and environmental effects. These are then scaled to the culture area. Puget Sound, USA Manila clam harvest at Samish Island Mechanical harvest + year class strips + imagination = profitable business. FARM model Application to Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) Use of the FARM model for shellfish or finfish monoculture, and IMTA. Ferreira et al., 2012. Cultivation of gilthead bream in monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Analysis of production and environmental effects by means of the FARM model. Aquaculture 358-359, p. 23-34. Samish Island Manila clam farm FARM model simulation for nutrient trading At a cultivation density of 70 animals per sq ft. clams provide an annual ecosystem service equivalent to over 1000 people in reducing eutrophication. Marginal analysis TPP (tonnes) 300 APP MPP 50 280 40 260 240 30 Present seeding 220 200 20 180 VMP = MPP.Po VMP = Pi MPP = Pi/Po 160 10 Optimal MPP = 7.84 140 0 Pi = 40 USD Po = 5.1 USD 120 APP and MPP (no units) Harvestable biomass (tonnes live weight) FARM model – application to Samish Island Manila clam farm 9.5 tonnes of seed 100 -10 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Seed (tonnes) Simulated harvest in the FARM model is 48 tonnes per year (declared 35-45 tonnes).. The Samish Island farm appears to be well below carrying capacity, with respect to food supply. However, at the current stocking density, high mortality is already a problem. Crabs and clams from 1 ft2 Clams eaten by crab Interaction of aquaculture with other ocean activities • Competition for space: in the EU and US, shorefront use is a critical limitation; • Social concerns re: visibility, both of culture sites at sea and processing plants on land; • Environmental and genetic pollution, escapes, disease; EU COEXIST project (http://coexistproject.eu/) • European scale - example case studies: Hardangerfjord, southern North Sea, Adriatic Sea, SE Portugal; • Interaction matrices – among uses, interaction types; • Reconciling offshore activities – e.g. mussel farms in wind parks; • Reducing the environmental footprint: Integrated multitrophic aquaculture (IMTA). GIS models, system scale – CoExist project (vTI, Germany) Marine spatial planning for optimization of coastal uses German Shrimp fisheries Dutch mixed flatfish fisheries >300PS, BEAM>80mm >300PS, BEAM>80mm Effort (hours per year) Bird Directive FFH EEZ FFH coastal waters Planned Under construction Approved Running Declined EEZ Marine spatial planning and environment. Water moves, animals move Offshore aquaculture Current speeds: 0.1-1 m s-1, suitable depth range for cages and longlines 123 countries with at least 100 km2 that meet these criteria: 106 - 107 ton y-1 Kapetsky et al., 2010. FAO Workshop, Rome, 2010. http://ecowin.org Combination of offshore windfarms and aquaculture Potential use of wind turbines and enclosed space for cultivating finfish, shellfish, and seaweeds The FORWARD project POLIS Ria Formosa Faça download do livro COEXIST/FORWARD em http://goodclam.org/forwardpt/ Download the COEXIST/FORWARD book at http://goodclam.org/forward/ FORWARD and COEXIST modelling framework Terrestrial boundary conditions Different models for different questions. Scales are from minutes to decades. Overview Catchment: Nutrient Load WWTP (project pop) N exports (kg/ha.yr) Nitrogen: • WWTPs: 590 ton N/yr • Diffuse sources: 560 ton N/yr Phosphorus: • WWTPs: 85 ton P/yr • Diffuse sources: 180 ton P/yr Connectivity: Offshore- Ria Formosa (circulation model) Tidal circulation in the Ria Formosa, Algarve. Water residence time of 1-2 days. EcoWin2000 system-scale model – spatial framework The system is divided into 34 boxes, two vertical layers. Boxes were defined using GIS based on uses, legislation, water quality, and hydrodynamics. EcoWin2000 model – system-scale clam production Declared harvest: 2000 t y-1 Actual harvest: >5000 t y-1 E2K model: 2300-6700 t y-1 Revenue: 20-50 million € y-1 Direct jobs: 4000-5000 System-scale carrying capacity is spatially variable, depends on ocean connections. Goods and services from bivalves Water fluxes 12 11 24 10 9 22 23 36 8 35 48 7 20 21 34 6 33 46 47 60 5 18 19 32 59 45 4 31 3 16 17 30 43 44 57 58 2 29 1 14 15 28 41 42 55 56 54 13 26 27 40 53 39 25 38 52 Water fluxes 37 50 51 49 • Removal of organic waste from finfish aquaculture • Detrital organic material enhances shellfish growth • Bivalves may act as a firewall to prevent disease spread Up to 70% finfish At least 30% bivalves Several large areas in the Algarve are currently designated for offshore aquaculture Mass balance for gilthead cultivation Weight: 350 g, AquaFish model Energy assimilated 385 kcal Anabolism: 1471 kcal BMR: 277 kcal SDA: 809 kcal Swimming: 0.2 kcal Food ingestion 449 g DW Feed supplied 463 g DW Cultivation:414 days Current: 10 cm s-1 Biomass: 350 g FW Length: 29 cm FCR: 1.3 ADC (N): 82% Respiration 0.78 kg O2 Feed loss 14 g DW Digestion in the gut Organic pollution 140 g DW Faeces 126 g DW Urine 7.4 g NH4 Inorganic pollution 7.4 g NH4 FARM model for culture of finfish AquaFish model – gilthead bream (Sparus aurata) Mass balance for gilthead pond culture – models are important for optimization Ferreira et al, 2012. Aquaculture 358–359 (2012) 23–34. POM (percentile 90 mg l-1) Positive externalities of shellfish culture Only mussels No aquaculture 3,61 3,58 3,55 3,52 3,49 3,46 3,61 3,58 3,55 3,52 3,49 3,46 5 4 3 2 POM (percentile 90 mg l-1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 5 3.58-3.61 3.55-3.58 3.52-3.55 3.49-3.52 3.46-3.49 IMTA: mussels + fish 4 3 2 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 9 10 Only fish 3,61 3,58 3,55 3,52 3,49 3,46 3,61 3,58 3,55 3,52 3,49 3,46 5 4 3 2 11 12 3 5 7 9 11 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 EcoWin2000 - Simulated change in clam harvest due to offshore aquaculture of mussels An annual loss of 120 t of clams (1.2 million €) is offset by 13,000 t of mussels The FORWARD and COEXIST projects - Carrying capacity Social aspects and governance - The other 50%… • Even if you solve 50% of the problem, you still need to resolve the other half • Social aspects and governance cannot be modelled, but are very important • Examples: moving animals among regions can spread disease; small leases can conflict with each other; governance issues over the use of machines; obstacles to certification • Lots of plans, no practical results – respecting multiple uses (third principle of EAA): the Paper Park syndrome • Good governance is a major element of success Mathematical models can address part of the issues, but that still leaves the rest... Virus Particle tracking: Parallel (m) Ratio between concentrations at XYZ and emission concentration APPAA Disease source 5 km Meridian (m) • Disease source: APPAA • Virus concentration: Up to 2x106 ml-1 • Forcing functions wind and tide • No decay • 6 day model run • Release in midwater layer Background virus release the first 2 days, high release on days 3,4 and 5, then a reduction by a factor of a hundred on the last day. Virus exposure 90 Exposure (h) Parallel (m) APPAA Disease source 20 km 0 Meridian (m) Number of hours of exposure to 0.5% of the shedding concentration as a measure of potential infection. The revenge of the killer mussels… Huge mussel fouling in the summer of 2012. Spat from offshore culture? The revenge of the killer mussels – part II February 19th 2013: mussel fouling on untreated fish culture nets. The nets sank under the weight of mussels. The four orders of coastal governance outcomes National Regional Local Intermediate outcomes Final outcomes First order: Enabling conditions Second order: Changes in behaviour Third order: The harvest Fourth order: Sustainable coastal development Formalized mandate with implementing authority Changes in behaviour of institutions and stakeholder groups Management plans adopted Changes in behaviours directly affecting resources of concern Some social and/or environmental qualities maintained, restored, or improved A desirable and dynamic balance between social and environmental conditions is achieved Funding secured Constituencies present at local and national levels Investments in infrastructure Time Avoiding the ‘paper park’ syndrome (from Olsen, 2003) Conclusões • • • • • http://goodclam.org/apa Portugal precisa de mais aquacultura, mas uma boa parte terá que ser desenvolvida nos grandes estuários, e.g. Tejo e Sado; A nossa costa ocidental é muito agitada – o cultivo vai ser caro e dificil em termos logísticos. A costa sul é melhor mas há mais conflitos de usos; Temos que decidir quais as espécies, quais as zonas, e qual o mercado, senão temos a fábula do bacalhau e da panga; Para competir no mercado de peixe, temos que fazer o ‘branding’, a certificação, e definir classes intermédias de produto. E aproveitar a boa imagem do pescado nacional; Estamos longe da realidade: é preciso fazer mar, e não só falar mar―não foi assim que chegámos à India. Leia o livro! http://goodclam.org/forwardpt/ Read the book! http://goodclam.org/forward/ Resilience…